HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/07/1998AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 1998 6:30 P. M. CITY CENTER
HERITAGE ROOM II
8080 MITCHELL ROAD
CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Y ounghans, Ronald Case, Ross
Thorfinson Jr., Nancy Tyra-Lukens
CITY STAFF: City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger,
Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Bob Lambert,
Manager of Recreation Services Laurie Helling, Council Recorder Jan
Nelson
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
II. DISCUSSION OF FUNDING OPTIONS FOR PARK SYSTEM NEEDS
III. REVIEW OF PROPOSAL FROM LARRY FRANSEN
IV. SET DATE FOR JOINT PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
V. ADJOURNMENT
Memorandum
To: Mayor and City Council
---"'r
From: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ~
Date: April 2, 1998
Subject: Funding Options for Park System
REVIEW NEEDS:
Attached to this memorandum is a February 26 memorandum that lists a number of projects that need
to be considered for funding in the relatively near future. The following is a summary of those
projects plus several additional projects that should also be considered when discussing priority needs
for this community.
Land Acquisition Projects -$2,490,000
1. Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area
a. Option Parcel No.2 -estimated costs $636,000
b. Richard Vogel property -approximately 7 acres -estimated cost $154,000
2. Larry Fransen Property -approximately 12.9 acres -estimated cost $200,000
3. Neighborhood Park Site -approximately 25 acres -Estimated cost $1,500,000
Youth Athletic Facilities -$1,700,000
1. Flying Cloud Ballfield Improvements -estimated cost $500,000-$700,000
2. Miller Park Concession/Restroom/Storage Buildings -cost 1 million dollars
Park Development -$1,900,000
1. Picnic Shelters (Miller Park and Riley Lake Park) -estimated cost $600,000
2. Replace Neighborhood Park Shelters (Prairie View, Forest Hills, Edenvale, Preserve) -
estimated cost 1 million dollars
3. Replacement of playground and storage building at Round Lake Park -estimated cost
$300,000
1
Trail Projects -$440,000 (plus matching funds for Indian Road Trail)
1. County Road 4 east -estimated cost $250,000
2. Bryant Lake Drive -estimated cost $50,000
3. County Road 4 west -estimated cost $40,000
4. Homeward Hills Road (widen from 6' to 8' trail) -estimated cost $100,000
5. Indian Road Trail -no estimated cost at this time
Community Center Improvements -1-8.5 million Dollars
1. Entry, Lockers, Multi Purpose Room -estimated cost 1 million dollars
2. Gymnasium -estimated cost 1.5 million dollars to 2 million dollars
3. Third Ice Rink -estimated cost 2 million dollars to 2.5 million dollars
4. Outdoor Swimming Pool-estimated cost 2-3 million dollars
Golf Course
1. 18 Hole Course -1.5 -3.5 million dollars
2. 9 Hole Course and extensive driving range and chip and putting course -estimated cost 1.5
million dollars
This breaks down to approximately 6.5 million in projects that affect parks and trails, anywhere from
1 to 8.5 million for improvements to the Community Center and from 1.5 to 3.5 million for a golf
facility depending on the amount of land that might be available from MAC adjacent to the airport.
OPTIONS TO CONSIDER:
Timing
There are a number of these projects that will require a decision by the City Council within the next
12-18 months, and other projects that could be delayed beyond this time; however, the longer the
City waits the more pressure there will be to provide those facilities. For example, Mr. Fransen wants
to know, now, whether or not the City is interested in acquiring his property. Ifthe City is not, he
will put it on the market and sell it at this time. The City has an option on the Darril Peterson
property until February of the year 2000. The City has applied for a matching grant this year and if
the City is successful would have to come up approximately $440,000 before February 1999 in order
to acquire that property at $21,000/acre. The Council will most likely see a development proposal
that includes the Vogel property later this year. If the Council wants to preserve that site, a decision
must be made at that time. The sooner the City makes a decision on the improvements to Flying
Cloud Ballfields, the less likely we are to experience an accident at that facility. Obviously, with the
proposed improvements there is still no guarantee that an accident could not occur; however, chances
would be significantly reduced.
The Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan has proposed that the City replace the park shelter and
make some other modifications at Preserve Park in 1999. The park shelter at Prairie View Park was
burned down several years ago and the City is using a temporary Mobil home for that facility as an
2
interim use. The Metropolitan Airports Commission will be making a decision on expansion ofthe
airport and how much land will be required for buffer purposes. Their final decision on how much
property is acquired for buffer purposes will determine whether or not an 18 hole golf course is
feasible on airport property. If it is not feasible, the City may wish to consider a shorter course that
would provide an extensive driving range, as well as a chipping and putting course on Metropolitan
Airport Commission property, provided the Metropolitan Airports Commission would lease the
property for that purpose.
Several of the Athletic Associations have been putting away funds in order to provide some matching
funds to encourage the City to construct restrooms, concessions and storage buildings within Miller
Park. The City Council can expect requests from several of those associations within the next year
or two.
FUNDING ALTERNATIVES:
There are a number of funding sources that might provide resources for a number of these facilities.
All of those funding alternatives should be evaluated prior to developing a funding plan to
accommodate these needs.
General Fund
If at all possible, the City should attempt to set aside a minimum of $200,000 per year from the
general fund for capital improvements to the park system. With the size and age of the existing
system, it will take at least that amount of money simply to make major repairs and replacement of
facilities as they age.
Cash Park Fees
Although cash park fees have been generating approximately a half million dollars per year for the
last few years, the City will not be able to rely on that source of funding as a significant income
beyond another ten years. The formula that was developed to establish park fees from developers
is based on1y on providing basic facilities that new development will require. The City cannot count
on cash park fees as a source of income to provide for land acquisition of conservation areas,
expansion ofthe Community Center, or development offacilities such as swimming pools or a golf
course. The cash park fees are a source of revenue to complete development of the neighborhood
parks and to replace the old temporary neighborhood park shelters, and can be used for matching
funds for grants for some limited park improvements.
The Capital Improvement Plan has typically attempted to limit spending of cash park fees on an
annual basis to the estimated amount of revenue that would be generated during that year in order
to try to maintain a balance in that fund for around one million dollars. Obviously, using cash park
fees for anyone of the major projects would deplete that fund.
There are two existing neighborhood parks left to develop. Rice Marsh Lake Park will be developed
this year using cash park fees, and Crestwood Park will be developed in 1999 and 2000 using cash
park fees. The last neighborhood park to be acquired and developed must serve the Cedar Forest
3
area to the Spring Road area south of County Road 1 and west of the airport. That park will require
a minimum of20 usable acres to provide the active space needed which will include two soccer fields,
a baseball field, a tennis court and basketball court, a hockey rink, skating rink and warming
house/park shelter.
Grants
There are a number of grants provided by the State at this time. Every other year the legislative
session changes the rules on the amount of those grants and there is no guarantee that those grants
will be available even two years from now. The grant programs that are currently available to local
units of government are as follows:
1. Natural and Scenic Area Grant Program -maximum amount $200,000
2. Outdoor Recreation Grant Program -maximum amount $50,000
3. Cooperative Trail Grant Program -maximum amount $50,000
4. National Recreational Trail Fund Program -maximum amount $50,000
5. Regional Trail Initiative Grant Program -maximum amount $250,000 (only applies to
designated regional trails)
6. Fishing Pier Grant Program -maximum amount $20,000
7. Public Boat Access Program -maximum amount (variable)
The majority of these grants are for matching funds where the City must match a minimum of 50%
of the project cost. The City is not eligible for any State grant if it has already been approved for a
grant during that year, or if it has any approved grant that has not been completed. With those
maximum grant amounts and with the fact that only a small percentage of the applicants for grants
ever receive a grant, it is not feasible to rely on grants for developing any significant portion of a park
system.
ISTEA Grants are currently available for trails that are significant transportation links to the regional
trail system These grants are more likely to be approved if there is a partnership involved in the grant
application. City staffwill be recommending discussing a grant application for an ISTEA Grant for
the Indian Road Trail with the Minnesota Historical Society, the Lower Minnesota Valley Watershed
District, the CORP of Engineers, the Department of Natural Resources, the Fish and Wildlife Service,
and Murphy's Landing. Depending on the number of agencies that would agree to participate in the
grant application, the City'S portion ofthe project may be relatively small compared to the cost of
the project. That project may also have some significant problems accommodating the property
owner that farms land on both sides ofIndian Road. He currently opposes allowing the public to use
Indian Road due to its remote location and the problems he has with trespassers, illegal hunting, etc.
The City, the DNR or the Fish and Wildlife Service would have to commit to regular patrolling of
that trail to satisfy the property owners in the floodplain.
Partnerships
The City staff have been involved in discussions with both current and possible future partnerships
with the Metropolitan Airports Commission, General Growth, owners of the Eden Prairie Shopping
Center, The US Fish and Wildlife Service, the Department of Natural Resources, the School District,
Southwest Metro, several athletic associations, as well as some City/private business partnerships.
4
These partnerships often provide the greatest opportunity for providing facilities at the least cost.
Revenue Bonds
Revenue bonds are only feasible when the facility being provided has the ability to provide a sufficient
amount of revenue to cover the cost of construction or development and, hopefully, a significant
portion of the operating costs. The second sheet of ice at the Community Center is an example of
a facility that was developed with revenue bonds. A third rink mayor may not be feasible depending
on the cost ofthe rink, and a golf course might also be feasible depending on land costs.
Bond Referendum
Bond referendums are generally successful for facilities that the public believes are necessary;
therefore, facilities serving a relatively small portion of the public rarely have a chance to succeed.
The past community survey that asked what percentage of the Eden Prairie residents utilized Flying
Cloud Ballfields, Round Lake Park, Community Center, trails and picnic facilities indicated that the
majority of Eden Prairie's residents do utilize these facilities at some time or another; therefore, these
types of facilities do offer an opportunity for bond referendum funding. It is important to keep in
mind that even though some special use facilities, like an indoor rink or a golf course, may not be
used by the majority of the residents, a balanced system is important to the quality of life of the
greater community.
PRIORITIZING:
If the City Council initiates a public discussion process for selecting funding priorities for
development of the park system, there will be additional projects proposed for discussion by various
special interest groups. Prior to making a decision on what projects should be funded at this time,
the February 26 memorandum lists five questions that should be answered relating to each proposed
project.
1. What will be the long term cost to maintain any additional facilities?
2. Are there any alternative methods for acquiring additional facilities.
3. What will be the process for determining what projects are included in a referendum?
4. How do these projects address the stated community valu~s (focus areas) and the policy
directives?
5. How do we communicate these needs and long term costs to the community residents to
ensure they will make an informed decision when and if there is a referendum?
PROCESS:
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission has requested a workshop with the City
Council to detennine if the Council wants the Commission to initiate public discussion evaluating the
park system needs or not, and if they do, how they want to proceed with this process.
BL:mdd
fundoptIBob98
5
Memorandum
To: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
From: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ~
Date: April 2, 1998
Subject: Process for Evaluating Community NeedsIPriorities
Assessment and understanding of current and anticipated recreational needs of the Community, as
well as anticipated changes in user demographics, must be the driving force behind the development
of the park system plan.
In order to initiate discussions of options for a process that involves citizens of Eden Prairie in
evaluating community needs, and determining priorities for development of the park system, the
following outline is submitted for discussion purposes only:
1. PROPOSED PROCESS
A. Needs Assessment Survey
1. Determine Specific Problem Areas
2. Detennine understanding of residents interests/attitudes as they relate to parks
and recreation within Eden Prairie
3. Survey should determine:
a. awareness of recreation facilities
b. satisfaction with recreation facilities
c. participation in leisure activities, programs and facilities
d. community issues, opinions on community needs in the area of park
and recreation
4. Consider a written survey to all households, plus a telephone survey to a
percentage of randomly selected households
B. Access Cost of Needs as Determined by Survey
1. Contract for services to obtain more accurate cost estimates of proposed
facilities.
•
2. Determine annual operating costs of proposed facilities.
3. Evaluate budget impact of proposed facilities.
4. Evaluate tax impact of proposed facilities.
C. Public Hearing
1. The hearing would be to provide an opportunity for the public to review and
discuss results of the survey or surveys and the budget and tax implications.
2. Hearing would provide an opportunity to claritY issues and discuss options to
address the needs.
3. The hearing would provide input to the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission and City Council regarding priorities for development
of the park system and the preferred method of funding the various projects.
II. CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE
A Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission to form an ad hoc committee
to evaluate community needs and recommend priorities and funding sources.
Process.memo/Bob98
1. Committee to be made up of at least one Council member and at least three
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission members and up to ten
citizens at large. (No more than one member of any special interest group
should be represented on the committee.)
2. Committee responsibilities include:
a. The committee would assist a consultant in developing a City survey
to determine the parks and recreation needs and priorities.
b. The committee would hold a series of public meetings to review the
results of the surveys and to provide input to the Council.
c. The committee would make reconnnendations to the Commission and
the Council on priorities for the park system and on funding sources
for the various projects.
d. If the Council approved a referendum, the committee would assist the
Council and Commission in obtaining volunteers to get the word out
to the public regarding the information that the committee learned
about the needs and priorities of the community and the reasons for
a referendum.
Robert A. Lambert
Eden Prairie Park and Recreation
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Bob,
March 11, 1998
Thank you for the courtesies you extended to me on my visit to your office a few weeks
ago. Over the years you have always been both friendly and professional in the matters
regarding my land that we have dealt with.
Having lived and raised our family in Eden Prairie over the past twenty years we consider
ourselves longtime residents. We have enjoyed our stay and love the very special piece
of property we have been privileged to call home. With our family grown, we are
making some changes in our lives. One of the changes we are undertaking is the
disposition of our property, to allow us move to smaller accommodations. When we sub-
divided our property a few years ago, we had this time in mind. We plan to sell our
residence with the ten acres it sits on and deal with the rest of the property in various
ways.
As a part of our plans, my wife LuAnn and I offer to gift to the city of Eden Prairie, Lot 1
of Riversedge Addition a 10.92 acre parcel on the northwest comer of our property. The
gift would be made subject to the City assuming an existing mortgage with a balance of
$200,000.00 and the real estate taxes due and payable in 1998 and future years. An
appraisal of the property would be made, at our expense, to determine the value of the
gift. Any legal expenses we incur on our behalf would also be ours. Any and all other
costs incurred by the City would be at their expense.
We are very pleased to make this offer ofa very special piece of property, especially
given its location on the Bluff and Purgatory Creek. Giving this property as a lasting
memorial from our family to the future Eden Prairie would please us very much.
From our conversation, it is my understanding that some meeting is to occur on April 7,
1998 at which time this issue will be addressed. We would like to know the outcome of
that meeting, regarding this offer, as soon as possible thereafter. Until that time we will
make no other moves regarding that property, but want to move forward in another
direction if this is not to be. We understand what you may have to do publicly, but would
appreciate your honoring our low profile preference, allowing this event to be as private
as possible.
We look forward to hearing from you.
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Memorandum
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ~
March 10, 1998
Consideration of Offer by Larry Fransen to Sell 12.92 Acres of Land on
Minnesota River Bluffs to the City of Eden Prairie for Approximately
$200,000
In early February 1998, I met with Lally Fransen, 9901 Riverview Road, who requested meeting with
me to discuss the possible sale of property to the City of Eden Prairie. He wished to ask if the City
was interested in acquiring 12.9 acres of property adjacent to Purgatory Creek on the Minnesota
River bluffs. This is Lot 1 of the Fransen Addition that was approved in 1996 or earlier by the City
of Eden Prairie. Mr. Fransen indicated that the balance ofthe mortgage is currently $200,818 and
will be reduced to something less than $200,000 after the March payment. The mortgage is not
assumable and the entire mortgage is due within a year.
Mr. Fransen has only bad discussions with the Fish and Wildlife Service regarding Outlot A which
contains 20.87 acres. They intend to purchase that property from Mr. Fransen in June or July of this
year.
The only access to this lot is through the access road across Purgatory Creek that has been approved
by the Watershed District and the City. Lot 1 does have an easement for emergency purposes only
across Lot 2; however, that easement comes within 25 feet of the front door and would be fairly
expensive to acquire.
Mr. Fransen would like a decision on whether or not the City is interested in pursuing this opportunity
in the very near future, as now is the prime time to put this parcel on the market if the City does not
wish to acquire it. Mr. Fransen is not interested in a lot of public discussion regrading this proposal
unless the City is interested in pursuing this matter.
CONSIDERATIONS:
This parcel of property is a key parcel for providing a public trail access to the Minnesota River
Valley Trail and to the Minnesota Wildlife Refuge and Recreation Area from the trail adjacent to
Purgatory Creek. The lot would certainly sell for more than the $200,000 that Mr. Fransen is
offering to the City, and if the lot is developed it would require significant filling in the floodplain, and
grading on the top of the wooded bluff, in order to accommodate the size and scale of homes that
are built in these locations. On the other hand, it may take quite a while to find a prospective buyer
willing to take on the construction and maintenance of a road across that creek.
My reconnnendation would be to ask the City Council for authorization to negotiate the best deal the
City can get in terms of acquisition of this parcel and then if the City wants to sell the lot in the future
with some restrictions regarding grading and public access across the lot at least the City would have
control of how the site is developed and would guarantee public access across this parcel to the
Minnesota Wildlife Refuge and Recreation Area. This could also be another parcel of property put
on a park bond referendum for protection of the bluffs and the creek valley.
BL:mdd
Offer.Lamber98h
.,
N~'" ~?:
","'N _N'"
. N
-------~
I ~-
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 1998
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
7:30 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry
Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case,
Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy
Tyra-Lukens
City Manager Carl J. Jullie,
Assistant City Manager Chris
Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Bob Lambert,
Director of Public Works Eugene
Dietz, City Attorney Ric Rosow, and
Council Recorder Jan Nelson
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. OPEN PODIUM
III. MINUTES
A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. MARCH 17. 1998
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
B. APPROVE REQUEST FOR GOOSE RELOCATION FROM MTS
SYSTEMS
C. AWARD BID FOR SAFETY SURFACING FOR STARING LAKE
PLAY AREA
D. RECEIVE LETTER OF WITHDRAWAL FOR THE RESTAURANT
PROPOSAL ON LOT 2 BORDERS PLAZA
E. ADOPT PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING MAY 17-23.1998 AS
WETLANDS WEEK
---------------------
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, April 7,1998
Page Two
F. RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR STREET STRIPING.
I.C. 98-5452
G. RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINAL PLAT OF THE BIG WOODS
3RD ADDITION
H. RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR PIONEER TRAIL
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER. I.C. 98-5458
I. RELEASE OF LAND OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
FOR THE RIDGE 2ND ADDITION -SSA# 88-19
J. ADOPT PROCLAMATION FOR ARBOR DAY
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. REGAL CINEMA by Ryan Companies of Minnesota. Request for
Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 17.88 acres,
Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.88 acres, Zoning
District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service Zoning
District on 17.88 acres, Site Plan Review on 17.88 acres and
Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into 3 lots. Location: East of Prairie
Center Drive between Rolling Hills Road and Prairie Lakes Drive.
(Resolution for PUD Amendment Review, Ordinance for PUD
District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution
for Preliminary Plat) Continued by March 17, 1998
B. WELTER'S BROOKHAVEN FARM by Ray Welter, Jr. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 23.45 acres, PUD
District Review on 23.45 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to
RM-6.5 on 21.77 acres, Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.38 acres and from
Rural to R1-9.5 on 0.3 acres, Preliminary Plat of 23.45 acres into 43
lots and 2 outlots. Location: Northeast corner of Homeward Hills
Road and Pioneer Trail. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review,
Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Changes,
and Resolution for Preliminary Plat)
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, April 7, 1998
Page Three
C. GERRING CAR WASH -REZONING by Gerring Properties.
Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment of 3.76
acres, Planned Unit Development District Review of 3.76 acres,
Rezoning from Rural to Community Commercial on 2.5 acres, Site
Plan Review of 3.7'6 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.76 acres into
one lot. Location: Hwy 212 and Aztec Drive. (Resolution for PUD
Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and
Rezoning and Resolution for Preliminary Plat)
D. OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT by Oppidan Inc. Request
for PUD District Review on 2.76 acres, Zoning District Amendment
within the Office Zoning District on 2.76 acres, Site Plan Review on
2.76 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.76 acres into 1 lot. Location:
Southwest corner of Valley View and Office Ridge Circle.
(Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District
Amendment and Resolution for Preliminary Plat)
E. DOUGLAS CORPORATION by Douglas Corporation. Request for
Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Industrial on 10.24 acres,
Site Plan Review on 10.24 acres and Preliminary Plat of 10.24 acres
into one lot. Location: Southwest quadrant of Valley View Road and
Golden Triangle Drive. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change
and Resolution for Preliminary Plat)
F. VACATION 98-01: VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PART OF
WEST 70TH (Resolution)
G. VACATION 98-02: VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT IN LEE
DATA PLAT (Resolution)
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION (Councilmember
Nancy Tyra-Lukens)
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, April 7, 1998
Page Four
B. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION (Chair Jane Hession)
1. Recommendation to adopt the Roles and Responsibilities
prepared for the City and the Eden Prairie Historical
Society. and direct Staff to prepare a Cooperative
Agreement
2. Camp Edenwood
a) Status of Friendship Ventures Dining Hall
Construction
b) Direct the preparation of a nomination for National
Register of Historic Places
c) Authorize $5.000 for planning/grant administration
3. Recommendation by Heritage Preservation Commission
to Change the name of Franlo Park to Samuel Anderson
Park
X. APPOINTMENTS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL & WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION -
Appointment of 1 Member to the Environmental & Waste
Management Commission to fill an unexpired term through
3/31/1999
B. PLANNING COMMISSION -Appointment of 1 Member to the·
Planning Commission for a three-year term through March 31,
2001
XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL
RESOURCES
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, April 7, 1998
Page Five
D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
--------------------
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 1998
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLLCALL
Councilmember Tyra-Lukens was absent.
7:30 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-
Y ounghans, Ronald Case, Ross
Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-
Lukens
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
City Manager Chris Enger, Director of
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Ric Rosow,
and Council Recorder Jan Nelson
PRESENTATION OF COMMENDATION TO MARK POTTER
Mayor Harris read a Commendation for Mark S. Potter commending his actions alerting a
family that their home was on fire. Councilmember Case presented a plaque to Mr. Potter.
BOND SALE OF $7,950,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER AND SEWER
REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1998A (RESOLUTION 98-39)
Dave McGilvray, presenting Springstad Financial, presented the results of this afternoon's bid
opening. He said these are capital appreciation bonds that will be used to fund the water
treatment plant. He said Dain Rausch Corp. presented the best bid.
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to adopt Resolution 98-39 Prescribing the
Form and Details and Providing for the Payment of $7,950,000 General Obligation Water and
Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1998A. Motion carried 4-0.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Case added items XI.A.1. and A.2. Butcher-Younghans added item XI.A.3. Harris
added item XI.A.4. Phase Two of the Succession Manaa=ement Process.
MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the
Agenda as published, Motion carried 4-0.
---~-------------------
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 2
II. OPEN PODIUM
Mr. & Mrs. Olson, 9480 Dell Road, asked for help dealing with an excavating business
next door to them. The business has trucks and cars going from 6:00 a.m. to late at
night and this is a residential area. They have had potential buyers for their lots who
backed out because of the excavating business. Harris asked Jullie to meet with the
Olsons to follow up on this issue and to provide feedback to the Council. Jullie noted
there has already been some transaction with the Olsons. The adjacent property owner
is in the process of pursuing this through the appeal process.
Case said he would like to have a report given back to the Council because he is
interested in knowing what the permissible usages are for such 5-10 acre properties.
III. MINUTES
A. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY
17, 1998
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve as
published the Minutes of the City Council/Staff Workshop held Tuesday,
February 17, 1998. Motion carried 4-0.
B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1998
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve
as published the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February
17, 1998. Motion carried 4-0.
C. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY
24, 1998
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve as
published the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 24,
1998. Motion carried 4-0.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
B. BEST BUY CAMPUS CONCEPT PLAN -1997 by Best Buy. Approve 2nd
Reading of Ordinance 5-98-PUD-3-98 for PUD District Review on 3.5 acres
and Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 3.5 acres; Adopt Resolution
98-40 for Site Plan Review on 3.5 acres. Location: 7075 Flying Cloud Drive
(Ordinance 5-98-PUD-3-98 for PUD District Review and Zoning District
Change and Resolution 98-40 for Site Plan Review)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 3
C. RIVER KNOLL OFFICE BUILDING by River Knoll, L.L.C. Approve 2nd
Reading of Ordinance 9-98-PUD-7-98 for PUD District Review on 2.49 acres
and Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 2.49 acres;
Adopt Resolution 98-41 for Site Plan Review on 2.49 acres and Approval of a
Developer's Agreement for River Knoll, LLC. Location: Rowland Road and
Shady Oak Road. (Ordinance 9-98-PUD-7-98 for PUD District Review and
Zoning District Amendment and Resolution 98-41 for Site Plan Review)
D. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-42 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
BEARPATH TOWNHOMES 6TH ADDITION
E. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-43 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
BEARPATH TOWNHOMES 7TH ADDITION
F. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-44 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BEST BUY
ADDITION
G. APPROVE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT TO ASSIST IN
THE PROCUREMENT OF A COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH (CAD)
AND RECORD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS) FOR PUBLIC SAFETY
OPERATIONS
H. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-45 FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF
MUL TIF AMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS <LAKE
PLACE APARTMENTS PROJECT) SERIES 1998
I. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-46 APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL
SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT
VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND TH 169 RAMP INTERSECTION. I.C. 95-
5384
J. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-47 APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR TRAFFIC
SIGNAL AT VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND WASIDNGTON AVENUE. I.C.
95-5384
K. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.2 FOR THE CSAH 41 EDENWOOD
DRIVE/IDGH SCHOOL ENTRANCE PROJECT. I.C. 96-5404
L. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-48 APPROVING MNDOT PLANS FOR
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ON TH 212 AT SPRING ROAD AND
EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD, I.C. 96-5420
M. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-49 AUTHORIZING FEASIBILITY STUDY
FOR DORNKEMPER AREA UTILITIES I.C 98-5458 & 98-5459
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 4
N. APPROVE CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR 1998 LIME RESIDUAL
REMOVAL
O. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-50 AWARDING STREET SWEEPING
CONTRACT. I.C. 98-5451
P. APPROVE RELEASE OF LAND FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
CITY WEST
Q. APPROVE RELEASE OF BEARPATH FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
AGREEMENTS. I.C. 93-06
R. APPROVE RELEASE OF BEARPATH FROM SACIW AC SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
S. ADOPT FEE RESOLUTION 98-51 AMENDMENT FOR WATER
CONSERVATION SURCHARGE (Resolution 98-51)
T. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-52 REQUESTING ADVANCE
ENCUMBRANCE OF STATE AID mGHWAY FUNDS
U. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-53 AMENDING SUBURBAN TRANSIT
ASSOCIATION JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
V. AWARD BID FOR EDEN PRAIRIE POLICE CANINE CARE FACILITY
W. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-54 RELATING TO JOINT AND
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL DATA
PROCESSING
X. AWARD BID FOR PLAYGROUND STRUCTURES AT mDDEN PONDS
PARK AND RICE MARSH LAKE PARK
Y. APPROVE NINE-MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PLANS TO
PROCEED WITH PHASE I OF SMETANA LAKE OUTLET PROJECT
Z. APPROVE CITY'S ACQIDSITION OF TAX FORFEITED LANDS
AA. CANCEL COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP FOR TUESDAY.
MARCH 24. 1998 REGARDING TRANSITION ISSUES.
BB. SET COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP FOR TUESDAY. APRIL 7. 1998 AT
6:30 PM REGARDING A POSSIBLE PARK REFERENDUM
Case said he has concerns about Item B because he voted against the expansion
concept plan. While this item is clearly Phase 2, Best Buy is beginning the
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 5
process to look at Phase 3. He wanted to go on record that Best Buy should
look at alternatives for the parking expansion as he is steadfastly opposed to use
of wetlands to build a parking lot. He would like to see them come in and work
with Staff to pursue other avenues for the expansion.
Regarding item Z, Case said he talked to neighbors who believed as he did that
this land was owned by the City, not by the developer. He wondered if it would
be better to have it owned by private owners and get some tax dollars from it.
Dietz replied that Staff discussed the possibilities for this property. The choices
given by Hennepin County were to have the City take it or sell it to an adjacent
property owner. He didn't think they were willing to divide it among separate
property owners. There is an easement over the whole thing so the value is for
storm water management. At some point we probably could break it into
separate parcels and sell to the individual property owners. Case said he talked
to some of the property owners and they would like to gain control.
MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve
items A-BB on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0.
v. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. REGAL CINEMA by Ryan Companies of Minnesota. Request for Planned
Unit Development Amendment Review on 17.88 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review on 17.88 acres, Zoning District Amendment in
the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 17.88 acres, Site Plan
Review on 17.88 acres and Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into 3 lots.
Location: East of Prairie Center Drive between Rolling Hills Road and Prairie
Lakes Drive. (Resolution for PUD Amendment Review, Ordinance for PUD
District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for
Preliminary Plat)
Jullie said proponent requests continuance to the April 7, 1998 City Council
meeting.
MOTION: Thorfmnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans to continue the
Public Hearing to the April 7, 1998 City Council meeting. Motion carried 4-0.
B. EDEN PRAIRIE mGH SCHOOL PHASE 3 EXPANSION by Independent
School District 272. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on
67 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 67 acres,
Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 67 acres and Site
Plan Review on 67 acres. Location: 17185 Valley View Road. (Resolution 98-55
for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning
District Amendment)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 6
Jullie said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on March 5,
1998 in the Eden Prairie News and notices were mailed to 206 property owners.
The project involves construction of a 86,818 square foot Activity Center and a
78,540 square foot Athletic Bubble at the Eden Prairie High School site. Both of
these projects were approved for funding in the 1997 School District Referendum.
Michael Darian, representing Independent School District 272, and Jay Pomeroy,
landscape architect, reviewed the building plans and the landscaping.
Butcher-Younghans asked how the bubble is inflated. Darian said it is inflated by
mechanical equipment that will be located along the east side of the building.
Butcher-Younghans asked if there is a back-up system. Darian said there is.
Butcher-Y ounghans asked where the material will be stored when the structure is
not inflated. Darian said if it is stored it will be put in a fenced-in enclosure.
Harris asked if the equipment is screened and if the screening is sufficient to meet
the City's noise ordinance standards. Darian said they submitted a noise study that
was done at two other athletic bubble locations.
Harris asked if there are drawings that would give a sense of what the sight lines
are from adjoining properties. Darian presented a photo montage showing the sight
lines from the north and west. Enger asked about the size of the trees in the photo
montage. Darian said they are 18-foot trees that would represent a ten-year
growth. He said the montage was done before they started working with the City,
and they plan to have considerably more plantings than are indicated in the
montage. Enger then asked if the montage was done very close to the trees.
Darian said they got as close to the property line as he could to take the photos.
Enger noted the further back you get from the property line, the less impact the
trees would have on the property.
Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed the project and determined waivers
would be necessary for the building height of both the activity center and the
athletic bubble, the percentage of exterior building material for the bubble, and the
shoreland impervious surface maximum. He said the Commission and Staff
approached the review with the understanding there is a clear partnership between
the City and the School District. They placed great reliance on the School
District's public process, and the passage of the bond issue by the citizens gave
validation to the project. The Commission recommended approval on a 7-0 vote,
per the recommendations of the Staff Report of February 20.
Lambert said the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed
the project at the March 2, 1998 meeting. There was a lengthy discussion
regarding a number of concerns including the impervious surface, the height of the
bubble, the impact of the bubble on the neighborhood at night, the noise level and
the screening. The Parks Commission recommended approval of the construction
with the stipulation that proponent work with neighbors to produce the best
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 7
screening and buffering plan possible. One of the Commission members asked
Lambert to bring up the question of whether there would be a commitment from
the School District regarding how late the bubble lights would be on at night.
Lambert noted the City has made a commitment to shut off the lights in City
facilities at 10:00 p.m.
Shelly Beard, 16691 North Hillcrest Court, said she lives to the east of the property
and she is concerned there isn't any room to plant trees on their side of the
development. She asked if they could move the equipment to the other side or put
up screening. Trees on top of a ten-foot high berm won't hide a 65-foot dome.
She would like to see the dome taken down during the summer time just as other
schools do. She noted that none of the photos were taken from their direction.
John Pollock, 16460 North Hillcrest Court, asked if there is a commitment that the
lights will be off after 10:00 p.m. Harris said we have made a note of the request
and it will be part of the Council's discussion.
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to close the
Public Hearing; to approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review
on 67 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on
67 acres; to adopt Resolution 98-55 for PUD Concept Review on 67 acres; and to
direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and
Staff recommendations and Council conditions.
Butcher-Y ounghans said she acknowledges the democratic process that was
followed in developing this project. She visited the bubble facility at the Holy
Angels Academy and discovered it is a very large structure. We have heard tonight
that the appearance is something of concern, particularly the illumination later in
the evening. She would like to see some restriction on the hours of use at night and
in the morning. She would also like to see some restriction on the inflation time.
She was also concerned about the noise and thought we need to explore screening
of the inflating apparatus and perhaps moving the equipment to a different location.
She thought there is a potential for echoing because of the bubble's structure. The
staff at Richfield recommended that netting be placed around the edge of the dome
to mitigate the noise of balls hitting the bubble walls.
Harris asked proponent about the time period the bubble will be inflated. Bill
Gaslin, Superintendent of Schools, said the district will work with the community
to make the facility a community amenity. They will work on the screening, the
hours of operation and the times of inflation; however the project was put here in
response to the community coming forward and asking for the facility to be built.
Case asked Mr. Gaslin to respond to the request to limit the hours of use to 10:00
p.m. and possibly restrict morning use. Gaslin said this was set up as a partial
revenue generator and the only time revenue can be generated is evenings and
weekends. He would not want to make a firm commitment tonight because they
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 8
don't know the exact scheduling. He doesn't see them using it much differently
than other facilities but we don't know what the demand will be for use of the
facility.
Case asked if the City has any regulations we abide by concerning the City's
lighted fields and other private facilities. Enger said the City has an ordinance
pertaining to glare from lighting off a site to an adjacent site. We expect the light
shed to end at the property boundary. Lambert said the City has had a policy since
we lighted the first ball field that we would shut down all lights on activities at
10:00 p.m.
Harris thought there was a reference in the materials that the lights would be out
at 10:30 p.m. Darian said that was part of the description of the use of the
facilities.
Thorfmnson was concerned that views were taken from the west and northwest but
not from the east. He thought we need to maximize the screening of the
mechanical equipment and the bubble for the benefit of the neighborhood. He did
not think the screening planned will significantly cover up the bubble. He also
would like to have some kind of agreement that the bubble will be taken down
during the summer months. He would be in favor of limiting its use to 10:00 p.m.
He thought we need to get some commitments on these items.
Case thought we are trying to serve two masters at this point. We need to help the
neighborhoods to the north maintain the understanding they had when they moved
in by mitigating the effect of the project as much as possible. His discussions with
staff at the Holy Angels facility indicate it should work to limit the time of use
from October 1 to June 1, and he thought we also need to give the neighbors some
clear times during the summer that it will be down. While the School District has
a need to realize revenue he thought there is also a need for a time limit. He
thought we could leave it up to Staff to work with them on the time limit. He was
concerned about landscaping. While it may be okay in thirty years, he did not
think it is that expansive at this point. He thought there should be screening walls
for the mechanical equipment. He thought we could also leave that issue up to
Staff and the School District.
Thorfinnson said he would be comfortable with Staff working something out;
however, he was not necessarily satisfied with the answers given by Dr. Gaslin.
He was confident they will work hard with the neighbors. He would lean towards
a 10:00 p.m. time limit for consistency.
Harris reviewed the list of Council conditions to the motion: screening of the
buildings and the mechanical equipment; the defined period for inflation of the
bubble; and minimizing the hours the bubble is lighted. Butcher-Y ounghans said
she would like to add a condition regarding netting, noting that staff at Holy Angels
said it would add to the lifetime of the bubble as well as help with the noise
problem.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 9
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried 5-0.
C. MAPLE IDLL ADDITION by MSS Holdings. Request for Preliminary Plat of
3.64 acres into 6 lots within the existing Rl-22 Zoning District. Location: 9060
Staring Lane West. (Resolution 98-56 for Preliminary Plat)
Jullie said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on March 5,
1998 in the Eden Prairie News and notices mailed to 52 property owners. The
original request was for a rezoning of the property to Rl-13.5 and preliminary
platting of eight single family lots. The neighborhood and Planning Commission
were not supportive of the rezoning because the lot sizes were incomparable with
surrounding Rl-22 zoned property. The plans have now been revised to show a
six lot subdivision meeting the existing Rl-22 zoning district requirements.
Accordingly, the rezoning request has been withdrawn.
Steve Kroiss, representing MSS Holdings, reviewed the project. He said there are
no variances or zoning changes needed.
Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed the project at the February 23, 1998
meeting and recommended approval on a 6-0 vote, subject to the recommendations
of the Staff report of February 6.
Lambert said the Parks Commission reviewed the project at the March 2, 1998
meeting and recommended approval on a 7-0 vote, subject to the recommendations
of the Staff Reports of February 20 and February 25.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to close the
Public Hearing; to adopt Resolution 98-56 for Preliminary Plat Approval of 3.64
acres into 6 lots; and to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement
incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations.
Case asked for clarification as he understood that cash would be given in lieu of a
NURP pond. Dietz said he believes the pond is something that will be built in the
future, but there is a cash park fee due in lieu of the pond at this point. Case asked
where the existing pond for the property drains. Kroiss said it goes into the system
and ends up in McCoy Lake. Case was concerned about what will happen to
McCoy Lake if there is more drainage into it because it is very shallow. He
thought it could be a long time before the adjacent property is developed and the
NURP pond is built. Dietz said he believes discussions were held with the
property owner and this seemed to be the best solution.
Case noted there is a tremendous amount of plant growth on the property and
wondered what will happen to it. Kroiss said they will keep as many trees as
possible and will custom foot the lots among the trees.
q
-----------------------
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 10
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried 4-0.
D. 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING
PROPOSALS (CDBG) Approve CDBG funding for the list of activities as
reviewed and recommended by the Housing, Transportation, and Human Services
Board (HTHSB) at their February 5 meeting. (Resolution 98-57)
Jullie said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on March 4,
1998 in the Eden Prairie News. Council is being asked to approve the Community
Development Block Grant Funding for the list of activities as reviewed and
recommended by the Housing, Transportation and Human Services Board at their
February 5th meeting. The total amount of funding involved is $182, 404.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Case, to close the Public
Hearing; and to approve the 1998 CDBG Block Grant Funding Proposal, per the
Staff Agenda Report of March 17,1998. Motion carried 4-0.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfmnson, to approve the Payment of Claims as
submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Butcher-Younghans, Case,
Thorfinnson, and Harris voting "aye."
VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VIII. PETITIONS, REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
X. APPOINTMENTS
A. HERITAGE PRESERV ATION COMMISSION -Appointment of 1 Member
to the Heritage Preservation Commission to fill an unexpired term through
3/31100 commencing upon appointment
Jullie said due to Ginger Venable declining the appointment to the Heritage
Preservation Commission, a vacancy remains on the Commission. The
appointment would be to fill an unexpired term through 3/31100.
Case nominated John Murray II. Butcher-Younghans nominated Deborah Barkley.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to close the
nominations. Motion carried 4-0.
10
----------------------
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 11
Jullie tabulated the results of the written ballot. He said Deborah Barkley received
three votes and John Murray II received one vote.
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to cast a
unanimous vote for Deborah Barkley for an unexpired term through 3/31100 on the
Heritage Preservation Commission. Motion carried 4-0.
XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS
1. Street Name in Mitchell Villas
Case said for a while we were automatically running street names by the
Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) but it did not happen in this case.
Also, the Chair of the HPC was not aware that they should be involved.
He was concerned about the process. Enger said it would not be the
Commission Chair's responsibility to monitor the process, it would be his
Staff's responsibility. He heard the Council's concerns about consulting
with the HPC and will check on why it did not occur in this case. Case said
he was particularly concerned that the Chair had not heard that they would
be contacted on a regular basis. Enger said he will reinforce with Staff that
the Commission is to be consulted and will expect that the Chair of the
Commission will report to the Council under the Reports of Advisory
Boards & Commissions.
2. City Use of the Oak Point Pool
Case said he has been around the pool at Oak Point lately and noticed there
is no evidence that the City has any programs going on there. Since we
have half ownership there, he thought we were going to expand our
presence. Lambert said Staff will check into it.
3. National League of Cities Conl:ressional Meetinl:
Butcher-Younghans reported on the National League of Cities
Congressional meeting in Washington D. C. She thought it was significant
that 113 of the President's cabinet addressed the group. Attendees at the
meeting also met with U.S. Senators and Congressmen to discuss bills and
offer their perspectives. She reviewed three pieces of legislation she
believes are particularly important: the ISTEA2 re-authorization that
passed the Senate last week; the Internet taxation freedom act that would
provide for no sales tax on Internet transactions; and pre-emption of local
land use that provides for federal litigation for local decision making.
Harris noted this shows the importance of staying apprised of happenings
on the national level.
1/
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 12
4. Phase Two of the Succession Management Process
Harris said Part 1 of the process began with the promotion of Chris Enger
to Assistant City Manager. With Carl JUllie' s plans to retire in July, the
City has pursued the defmition of leadership qualities required for a City
Manager. They used responses from a leadership survey to develop the
defmed qualities. She was pleased that Chris Enger's qualities parallel the
qualities identified in the leadership profile.
Harris appointed an Appointment Committee comprised of one Council
member (Thorfinnson), a member of the Review Committee (Case), the
Personnel Committee, the City Attorney and other Staff as needed. The
Committee will develop and recommend a City Manager's Salary and
Benefit package, develop and recommend an employment agreement for the
City Manager position, and report their findings and recommendations at
the May 5, 1998 City Council meeting. At that meeting the Council may
take action to appoint the new City Manager.
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL
RESOURCES
1. Request to Obtain Proposals for Development of a Conservation Area
Management Plan and Concept Site Plans for the Eight Remaining
Conservation Areas
After reviewing the process used to work with a Citizen's Committee to
develop a Management Plan for the Prairie Bluff Conservation Area,
Lambert believes we can go through a similar process to develop an overall
management plan for all of the conservation areas as well as specific site
concept plans for the eight remaining conservation areas. He thought we
could have a naturalist and a landscape architect work as a team with the
Citizens Committee to plan how the sites would be developed. The
committee would be concerned about all the areas in making decisions
regarding trails, parking areas, park shelters and natural areas. There
would still have to be a site plan developed and a public hearing held for
each area, but the difficult questions would have already been addressed.
Thorfinnson asked how much of the $20,000 has already been spent or is
earmarked for other uses. Lambert said we have spent less than $1,000
thus far. We generally have a large planning process each year that we
designate it for. Staff has applied for a $15,000 grant for this project. He
noted the other project this year is the renovation of Preserve Park.
12
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 13
Lambert suggested the proposals be reviewed in phases so that we would
do the management plans and inventory and map the areas with the concept
plans done in a later phase.
Thorfinnson asked where we stand if the grant does not come through.
Lambert said we would have to split the cost over two or three years.
Thorfinnson noted that would affect park planning for several years.
Butcher-Y ounghans asked if we could reapply. Lambert said we could
reapply if it is available next year.
MOTION: Thorfmnsonmoved, seconded by Case, to direct Staff to obtain
proposals for development of conservation area management and concept
site plans as per the Staff Agenda Report of March 17, 1998.
Harris agreed this is something we need to do despite the considerations
about funding.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried 4-0.
2. Request from Murphy's LandinI:
Lambert said Ms. Shirley Olson, Executive Director of Murphy's Landing,
came before the Council to ask for a commitment of $25,000 for portions
of the Murphy's Landing project. He said the DNR bike trail and the
landing were approved in this phase of funding; however the restoration of
Murphy's Inn and the ferry project were not approved. The $25,000 was
included in the project to study the feasibility of a ferry. Ms Olson is
requesting that the City keep their commitment for the $25,000. Lambert
said City Attorney Pauly's question was whether any part of the project
constructed facilities in Eden Prairie because that would be the rationale for
putting our money into the project.
Lambert recommended that Mr. Rosow review what criteria must be met
before the City can commit to this and then get answers from Ms Olson to
those questions.
Rosow said it is a question of to whom we are giving the funds and who
will have ownership of the funds. If they are to go to the Department of
Transportation or to the DNR we can do that; however they cannot be given
to another private organization.
Harris asked if it is a case that we can't act upon this tonight because we
don't have sufficient information. Rosow said we could act upon it with the
contingency that if the funds are being directed to another governmental
agency it will be approved. Butcher-Y ounghans asked if it would be
acceptable if Ms Olson changed the physical agent to another government
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17,1998
Page 14
agency. Rosow said it could be the City of Shakopee but merely naming
them as the physical agent does not mean they have control of the funds.
He thought we need to take a closer look at this and determine how this is
going to work.
Thorfmnson asked if we could reaffirm our commitment to the project but
not necessarily the dollar amount until the second phase of the project. We
could hold back the $25,000 until the second phase. Butcher-Younghans
thought that makes sense. Harris thought we could reaffIrm our
commitment and then clarify who is the administrator of the funds.
MOTION: ThorfInnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to
reaffirm the City's philosophical commitment to the Murphy's Landing
project and to withhold commitment of the $25,000 until the second phase
of the project. Motion carried 4-0.
D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
A. CITY MANAGER EVALUATION (closed session)
Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting to a Closed Session at 9:25 p.m. to hear the
report of the City Manager's 1997 performance review and evaluation.
Mayor Harris reopened the session at 9:55 p.m.
Case reported the fmdings of the performance review. He said after reviewing the
positive performance evaluation of the City Manager and researching comparable
positions in the area, they decided to recommend a 3 % cost-of-living adjustment
and a 3 % merit increase. The $6150 adjustment will result in a total salary of
$102,230 per year.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve the salary
adjustment as recommended. Motion carried 4-0.
Mr. Jullie said he appreciated the review and the salary adjustment. He thanked
Staff members who have made his tenure possible and Councilmembers who have
been a delight to work with.
It{
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 17, 1998
Page 15
Harris noted the evaluation was reviewed by City Staff and selected community
leaders as well and the ratings were uniformly high.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Thorfmnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to adjourn the meeting.
Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.m.
/1)
ec:Jen praIrIe
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Consent Calendar
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
DATE:
April 7, 1998
ITEM NO.
Finance -Gretchen Laven Clerk's License Application List IV.A.
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity.
CONTRACTORS
ADV ANTAGE AIR INC
AIR CONDITIONING ASSOCIATES INC
ALPINE HEATING
BENDZICK BUILDERS
BENT CREEK GOLF COURSE
COTY CONSTRUCTION
EGAN MECHANICAL CONT INC
GALLAGHER HEATING & AIR
CONDITIONING
JAMES STEELE CONSTRUCTION CO
KALMES MECHANICAL INC
MIKKELSON-WULFF CONSTRUCTION INC
NORTHERNSTATESPOwtRCOMPANY
RA YCO CONSTRUCTION INC
RESIDENTIAL HEATING & AIR INC
RIVER CITY SHEET METAL INC
RJ RYAN CONSTRUCTION
RUTLEDGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
SYMINGTON PLUMBING
TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES
April 7, 1998
I
COMMERCIAL LAWN FERTILIZER
APPLICATOR
Bob's Lawn & Landscaping, Inc.
Chapman Custom Lawn Care, Inc
Fairway Green Lawncare, Inc.
Fertilawn, Inc.
Green Stuff, Inc.
Guaranteed Spray, Inc.
Hawes Lawn Service, Inc.
Nature's Way Lawn Service
Quality Green
Showcase Landscape Maint., Inc.
TruGreen Chemlawn
Southwest Lawn Maint., Inc.
Talberg Lawn & Landscape
Ticen's Pro-Care, Inc.
Renewal Liquor License
D'Amico & Sons, Inc.
(Name change from D'Amico Catering, Inc.)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: April 6/98
Section: Consent Calendar
Department: PRNR . ~ Subject: Request for Goose Relocation from MTS Item No.:
Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Systems Corporation -r.V:B. Parks& Natural Resources
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission developed a Wildlife Management Plan
several y~ars ago. Under the guidelines of that program, whenever a request or petition is made these
are brought forward to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission prior to submission
to the City Council.
APPLICATION FOR GOOSE RELOCATION:
Staffhas received a letter from Don Fournier, Facilities Manager for MTS Systems. Mr. Fournier
is requesting that the City, under its Wildlife Management Plan, allow MTS to contract with the
University of Minnesota to relocate Canadian Geese from their facility at 14000 Technology Drive.
The City has received requests in the past; however, these were withdrawn prior to the actual
roundup being conducted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Because of the large number of geese that have been observed by the staff, as well as the continuing
nature of this goose population, the staff would recommend approval of the petition by MTS
Systems. Under the terms of the permit, MTS would contract with Dr. James Cooper at the
University of Minnesota in conjunction with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
personnel. All costs associated with this roundup and relocation would be paid for by MTS Systems.
Geese2lStuart98
I
MTS
®
MTS Systems Corporation
14000 Technology Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2290
Telephone 612-937-4000
Fax 612-937-4515
March 25, 1998
Eden Prairie City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230
Subject: Goose Roundup
To Eden Prairie Council Members:
MTS isrequesting permission from the City of Eden Prairie to contract with Dr. James A. Cooper
at the University of Minnesota, in conjunction with the DNR, to round up and relocate the
extensive goose population currently on our site. This will be done by the team from the U of M
during the birds' flightless time in the summer.
This year the population has grown so large that we can no longer keep our sidewalks clean nor
protect our employees. The geese are beginning to congregate at the entrance and are becoming
very aggressive. Over 50% of our business comes from outside of the United States and many of
OUF customers, being small of stature, are deathly afraid to leave their vehicles or walk outside.
We at MTS feel that by relocating them to another more open area is one of the most humane
ways to handle the problem.
Thank you in advance for your consideration and approval of this request. Please call me at 937-
4186 if you have any questions.
Don Fournier
Facilities Manager
DF/jd
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: April 7, 1998
Section: Consent Calendar
Department: PRNR~ Subject: Award Bid for Safety Surfacing for Staring Item No.:
Stuart A. Fox, Manager of
Parks & Natural Resources
Lake Play Area 7JJe.
BACKGROUND:
The final phase of the reconstruction of the Staring Lake play area is to apply a rubberized safety
surface under the playstructure. Staff has advertised for the installation of 5200 square feet of
rubberized protective surfacing to be applied over the asphalt base.
SUMMARY OF BIDS:
The City received four bids for installation of the appropriate safety surfacing to meet playground
safety standards. The summary ofthe bids is as follows:
1. Flanagan Sales -Installation of "Safe Top" Surface
2. Miracle Equipment ofMN -Installation of "Spectra Turf'
3. No Fault Industries -Installation of "Safedeck"
4. Earl F. Anderson -Installation of "Playbound"
$49,740
60,675
40,060
49,750
Each of the quotes meets the five-year warranty requirement for the bids. Staff would recommend
that the bid be awarded to No Fault Industries for $40,060. Installation is expected to take place in
May and payment for the safety surfacing will be made from a combination of cash park fees and
ADA improvement funding.
SAF:mdd
suraw2lStuart98
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
DEPARTMENT:
ADMINISTRATION
Requested Action:
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Withdrawal for Restaurant Proposal on
Lot 2 Borders Plaza
DATE:
ABRLL 7, 1998
ITEM NO.
rV.D.
Receive letter of withdrawal for the Restaurant Proposal on Lot 2 Borders Plaza
Background Information:
Fonn clhrlcounci11agn.fonn.wpd
Rev 12/4/95 I
BRIDGEWOOD CORPORA TION
February 26, 1998
Mayor Dr. Jean Ranis & City Council
City of Eden Prairie
c/o Carl Jullie, City Manager
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, Mn 55344
RE~ WITHDRAW RESTAURANl' PROPOSAL
LOT 2 BORDERS PLAZA
Dear Honorable Mayor Harris and City Council Members:
At the Council meeting on February 17, 1998, the City CounCil granted their approval of the
Borders Bookstore on Lot 1 of the Border's Plaza subdivision located at Prairie Center Drive and
Rolling Hills Road. At the same time, the proposal for a quality restaurant was denied for Lot 2.
The CitY Council further requested staff to prepare a statement of fact to deny the restaurant and
. bring the statement of denial back to the City Council for approval.
Bridgewood Corporation, a co-applicant of Border's Plaza and developer of Lot 2, respectively
withdraw our request for a restaurant on Lot 2. It is our understanding with this withdrawal that
it. will remove. the. requirement for a negative finding of fact letter specifying the grounds for
denial of the restaurant on Lot 2 Border's Plaza in the Hartford Plaza Place PUD.
resubmitting a revised site plan for Lot 2 at Border's Plaza
cc: .. Bill Hoa~ The Daly Group . ... .
Michael Franzen. City of Eden Prairie Community Development
John Dietrich, RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
(612)469:'5900
20141 Icenic Trail, Suite B, Lakeville, MN 55044
2' Fax: (612)469-5906-
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date:
Section: April 7, 1998
Department: Item Description: Item No.:
Public Works Wetlands Week Proclamation 1JI.E.
Leslie Stovring
Requested Action
Declare the week of May 17th through the 23 rd as Wetlands Week
Background
The League of Women Voters has declared May 17th through the 23rd as Wetlands Week. May has also
been declared as American Wetlands Month by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The
League seeks to elevate awareness of and appreciation for the role and value of wetlands. Their project
is being funded in part by the National League of Women Voters and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
There are four elements of the League's project with which the League has requested assistance from
the Cities of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka and Hopkins. They include:
• Poster Contest -Third graders from each of the school districts will be asked by the League to
submit posters illustrating what wetlands are and how they are important. Winners will receive
a gift certificate for the City's Parks and Recreation programs. Their entries will also be
di!:!played at City Hall during Wetlands Week.
• Brochure -The League will produce an informational brochure on wetlands for distribution at
the City.
• Video -The League will produce an informational video for broadcast on Paragon cable. The
City will advise the League on sites and issues for discussion on the video.
• Wetland Tour - A tour of wetlands will be provided by the League. At least one wetland site
will be within the City. The City will assist with tour publicity.
Attachments
Proclamation for Wetlands Week.
PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING MAY 17th-23rd, 1998 AS WETLANDS WEEK
WHEREAS the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has designated Mayas American
Wetlands Month to elevate awareness and appreciation of wetlands, and
WHEREAS the City of Eden Prairie is cooperating with the League of Women Voters to
promote wetlands awareness through a 3rd grade 'poster contest, brochure, video and tour, and
WHEREAS wetlands cleanse the water we drink by absorbing and filtering pollutants that
otherwise can end up in lakes, streams and groundwater, and
WHEREAS wetlands help reduce the risk of dangerous flooding, and
WHEREAS some wetlands buffer creeks, rivers and lakes from the eroding effects of currents
and waves, and
WHEREAS wetlands provide precious open space, and
WHEREAS wetlands serve as essential habitat for the breeding, rearing and feeding of treasured
birds and other wild life, and
WHEREAS wetlands can be home to as many, and as diverse a spectrum of, plant and animal
species as an equal-sized area of rain forest, and
WHEREAS wetlands provide opportunities for recreation, education and contemplation, and
WHEREAS Eden Prairie is home to numerous wetlands, including each of the eight wetland
types identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Department; and
WHEREAS Eden Prairie has a demonstrated commitment to the preservation and enhancement
of wetland areas;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jean L. Harris, Mayor of the City of Eden Prairie do hereby proclaim
the week of May 17th through May 23rd as Wetlands Week in the City of Eden Prairie, and I urge
all citizens to support efforts to protect our wetlands, and
FURTHER, I urge all citizens to examine materials made available by the League of Women
Voters or other organizations, to visit a wetland in Eden Prairie, and to take steps in their own
neighborhoods to preserve wetlands, .
ADOPTED, this 7th day of April 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
DATE: 04/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Consent Calendar
ITEM NO: IV. F
SECTION:
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.e. 98-5452
Engineering Division Award Contract for Street Striping
Mary Krause
Recommended Action:
Award of I.C. 98-5452 for 1998 Street Striping to Precision Pavement Marking in the amount
of $43,617.25 as the lowest qualified bidder.
Overview:
Two bids were received as shown in the bid summary:
Precision Pavement Marking
AAA Striping
Fmancial Issues:
$43,617.25
$51,601.00
The 1998 budget amount for striping is $45,000.00 under Budget No. 50-585-4440.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement:
I.C. 98-5452 -Street Striping
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on
the attached Summary of Bids; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to
PRECISION PAVEMENT MARKING
as the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract
with Precision Pavement Marking in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount
of $43,617.25 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the
Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
2
DATE: 04/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM NO: LV. G ,
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of The Big Woods 3rd Addition
Randy Slick
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of The Big
Woods 3rd Addition subject to the following conditions:
• Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $378.00
• Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,712.00
• Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $693.75
• Satisfaction of bonding requirements for the installation of public improvements
• Execution of Special Assessment Agreement for trunk utility improvements
• The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement
• Revision of Plat to include drainage and utility easements over the scenic and
conservation areas
• Receipt of scenic and conservation easement descriptions
Background:
This proposal is a subdivision of Outlot A of The Big Woods 2nd Addition. The part consists
of nine (9) single family lots, right-of-way dedication for street purposes, and one outlot.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council July 19, 1994. Second Reading of the
Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on August
16, 1994.
RS:ssa
cc: Jim Ostenson, Tandem Properties
Gary Germond, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
THE BIG WOODS 3RD ADDmON
WHEREAS, the plat of The Big Woods 3rd Addition has been submitted in a manner required
for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the
Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for The Big Woods 3rd Addition is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat
dated March 24, 1998.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this
Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate
of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing
provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
AITEST: SEAL
Donald R. Uram, Clerk
2
-,
4_
()
~= C)
() I c( ,
I
~ a: t:
~t
~
F'=
c(
O.
~
LIS
CD
THE BIG WOODS
rAtF~FIELD
.------,,-
I
1 I;
1
,-I,r-Inc..
---------;" DRAIIAGIE
«
WOODS
SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
3RD ADDITION
----.---
-.,
~::
7J -,,
r', r-
CJ
:~
\
[11
(,') 1"1 -~
t~
~-
CJ
»
0
CJ :3
()
:;~
II
C.R. DOC. NO.
1l£ eASIs F'OR 1HE BEARING 5Y51'E:N IS ASS./MED.
.. 30
H 120
SCAlf IN ruT
o DENOTD IftON WQiUWEHT
II
.L.l l.--'I-L ___ ~l ___ j l ___ ~l __ _
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
DATE: 04/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM NO: 151. H.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Receive Feasibility Report and Set Public Hearing
Engineering Division for I.C. 98-5458: Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1) Sanitary Sewer and
Alan D. Gray Watermain Improvements in Section 30
Recommended Action:
Adopt resolution receiving feasibility report and setting public hearing for I.C. 98-5458, Pioneer
Trail (CSAH 1) Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements in Section 30.
Overview:
Council ordered the feasibility study for the project March 17, 1998. The proposed project will
extend sanitary sewer and water service to the Settlers Ridge subdivision and other properties
in Section 30.
Primary Issues:
The project will result in assessments to Settlers Ridge and other properties.
Financial Issues:
All costs should be assessable. Some properties may request deferments until time of
development.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASmILITY REPORT
AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer, recommending the following
improvements to wit:
I.C. 98-5458: Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1) Sanitary Sewer and Watermain
Improvements in Section 30
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the
report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all
or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011
to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on May 5, 1998
at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall, 8080 Mitchell Road. The City Clerk
shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as
required by law.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
Donald R. Uram, Clerk
2-
DATE: 04/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM NO: -rv.1.
SECTION: Consent Calendar
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: S.A.A. #88-19
Engineering Division Release of Land from Special Assessment Agreement for The Ridge 2nd
Jim Richardson Addition
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Release of Land from Special Assessment
Agreement No. 88-19 for Lots 1 through 18, Block 1, Lots 1 through 27, Block 2 and Lots 1
through 24, Block 3, The Ridge 2nd Addition, and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to
sign the release.
Background:
In July of 1988, the City entered into a special assessment agreement with United Mortgage
Corporation for their share of the construction and costs associated with Improvement Contract
No. 52-126. The I.C. 52-126 project is Dell Road from Twilight Trail to Highway 5. The
agreement was recorded at. Hennepin County and appears on the title of each of the lots. Staff
has been requested that the City release this agreement. The assessments have been levied,
therefore, it is appropriate and timely to release this agreement.
RELEASE OF LAND
This Release of Land is executed by the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal
corporation ("City"), and is dated as of April 7, 1998.
FACTS
1. A certain Agreement Regarding Special Assessments (" Agreement") dated July
19, 1988, was executed by and between the City and United Mortgage Corporation, which
Agreement was filed as Document No. 5439135 with the Hennepin County Recorder on August
4, 1988.
2. The special assessments contemplated by the Agreement have been levied and the
time for appeal has expired.
3. To evidence the fact that the special assessments have been levied and the time
for appeal has expired, the City is executing this Release of Land.
THEREFORE, the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereby
releases the Property from all obligations and conditions set forth in the Agreement Regarding
Special Assessments dated July 19, 1988 filed with the Registrar of Titles as Document No.
5439135 on August 4, 1988. This Release of Land shall not release or discharge the Property
from the lien of any special assessments levied by the City pursuant to the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Eden Prairie has executed the foregoing
instrument.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
A Municipal Corporation
BY: -------------------------------Jean L. Harris
Its Mayor
BY: ____________________ _
Carl J. J ullie
Its City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
HENNEPIN COUNTY )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ----:
1998, by Jean L. Harris and Carl J. Jullie, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Eden
Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of said
corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
#7 --Release. C
RFR/01-14-88
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 417/97
SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. 13I,J,
DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Arbor Day Proclamation
Recreation and ~
Stuart A. Fox
v
For the past 17 years Eden Prairie has conducted Arbor Day activities as part of the City's comprehensive
forestry program. Attached is a proclamation proclaiming May 2, 1998 as Arbor Day in Eden Prairie. The
11th Annual Arbor Day Walk will be held at Staring Lake Park Saturday, May 2, 1998, from 9:30-11:30
a.m., to promote tree planting in our community.
SAF:mdd
1
PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING MAY 2, 1998 AS ARBOR DAY
WHEREAS, in 1872 J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that
a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and
WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was fIrst observed with the planting of more
than a million trees, and
WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world, and
WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut
heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce oxygen and provide
habitat for wildlife, and
WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for hour homes, fuel for
our fIres and countless other wood products, and
WHEREAS, trees in our city increase property values, enhance economic vitality of business
areas, and beautify our community, and
WHEREAS, trees, whenever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal, and
WHEREAS, Eden Prairie has been recognized as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor
Day Foundation and desires to continue its tree planting ways,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jean L. Harris, Mayor of the City of Eden Prairie do hereby
proclaim May 2, 1998 as ARBOR DAY in the City of Eden Prairie, and I urge all citizens to support
efforts to protect our trees and woodlands and to support our city's urban forestry program, and
FURTHER, I urge all citizens to plant trees to gladden the hearts and promote the well-being
of present and future generations.
ADOPTED, this 7th day of April 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Don Uram, City Clerk SEAL
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date:
Section: Consent Calendar April 7, 1998
Department: Item Description: Item No.:
Inspections Award Bid for cleanup of9539 Hartford
Circle.
Background
The Eden Prairie City Council has ordered that the unsanitary conditions existing at 9539
Hartford Circle be abate,d. All costs associated with the cleanup of the unit will be assessed to
the property.
The inspections department received four bids from contractors to eliminate the unsanitary
conditions.
The bids are as follows:
Du-All Services
Laver Maint & const
Homecare Inc
Excel Construction
Requested Action
$13,890.64
$16,146.00
$18,006.00
$20,739.00
Staff recommends awarding bid to the low bidder Du-All Services in the amount of
$13,890.64.
---~~~------------------------------------------------------
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-7-98
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. \lA.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger REGAL CINEMA
Michael D. Franzen
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
1. Close the Public Hearing;
2. Adopt the Resolution for PUD Amendment Review on 17.88 acres;
3. Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 17.88 acres and Zoning District
Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 17.88 acres;
4. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into 3 lots; and
5. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations (and Council conditions).
Background:
This project is a 20 screen theater and two free standing restaurants. The theater requires a waiver from the
city code parking requirement of 1 per 3 seats to 1 per 4 seats.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission first reviewed this proj ect on January 19, 1998. The commission voted to continue
the project and directed the proponent to provide more information on parking.
The Planning Commission voted 5-1 to approve the project at the February 23, 1998 meeting.
Parks Commission Recommendation
The Parks Commission did not review this project.
Historic Preservation Recommendation
The HPC did not review this project.
J
Supporting Reports:
1. Resolutions
2. Staff Report dated January 23, 1998 and February 20, 1998
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated January 26, 1998 and February 23, 1998
4. Correspondence
?
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
REGAL CINEMA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF REGAL CINEMA FOR RYAN COMPANIES OF MINNESOTA
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Regal Cinema for Ryan Companies of Minnesota dated March 31, 1998,
consisting of 17.88 acres into 3 lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in
conformance with the provisions ofthe Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of April, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
3
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
REGAL CINEMA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AMENDMENT OF REGAL CINEMA
FOR RYAN COMPANIES OF MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned
Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on Regal Cinema
PUD Amendment by Ryan Companies of Minnesota and considered their request for approval for
development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 7, 1998;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,
as follows:
1. Regal Cinema, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in
Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans
dated March 31, 1998.
3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission
dated February 23, 1998.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of April, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
Exhibit A
Legal Description:
Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 2, Prairie Lakes Business Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, and
situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
5
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
February 23, 1998
Page 3
B. REGAL CINEMA by Ryan Companies of Minnesota. Request for Planned Unit
Development Amendment Review on 17.88 acres, Planned Unit Development District
Review on 17.88 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional
Service Zoning District on 17.88 acres, Site Plan Review on 17.88 acres, and
Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into 3 lots. Location: East of Prairie Center Drive
between Rolling Hills Road and Prairie Lakes Drive (Continued Public Hearing).
Corey Birkeland, Centers Group, discussed the project and the traffic and parking
information. He noted they hired the firm of Parsons Brinkerhoff which is a large
traffic consultant in Minneapolis. They have looked at the market for large cinematic
complexes and feel there are several options available to the Planning Commission.
One option is to approve the request as presented. Another option would be to
approve the project with a shared parking arrangement that could be implemented if
needed. He was opposed to downsizing the project and requested. the Planning
Commission approve the project as proposed.
Paul Bilotta, 10 Second Street NE, Minneapolis, representing Parksons Brinkerhoff
Parking Consultants, reviewed the parking analysis that was submitted for the project.
He discussed the market and how it would be changing in the next few months as
more of these complexes are constructed. They researched both local and national
resources to obtain the data which was included in the study. Most places in the
country require a parking ratio of 1 :5. They used cinema data from other providers
to find out what was required in other areas. He showed graphs which illustrated
comparisons of parking requirements from various agencies and municipalities. They
researched other sites which have a large amount of parking to get some comparisons.
Regal parking data comes out at a ratio of about 1:4.55.
Sandstad commented the chart showed local parking ratios at 1:3, but he did not see
any national ratios like that. Bilotta responded that most of them were higher. The
local ordinances which have parking requirements of 1:3 are ones that do not have
these issues, but those communities that have these theaters have parking ratios that
are higher. Clinton inquired if Bilotta was familiar with the parking requirements of
the City of Hopkins as they just built a new theatre. Bilotta responded he did not
have any information on the requirements for Hopkins.
Foote asked about seating capacities versus parking requirements in Coon Rapids.
Bilotta responded they do not use those figures because they were so new and it
would need to be supplemented by data from national sources. The figures change
so much as the business stabilizes and things settle down, that any long-term
projections are difficult to make.
Franzen reviewed the staff report and noted staff recommended approval of
Alternative #1 in the Staff Report.
The Public Hearing was re-opened.
PLANNING COMMISSlvN MINUTES
February 23, 1998
Page 4
No one present wished to speak.
Sandstad commented he was ready to support Alternative #1 with two restaurants as
he was comfortable with the data provided by the traffic consultant. Habicht
concurred with Sandstad. Foote commented he was concerned about safety issues
ifpeople should have to cross the streets, and he would prefer to see the number of
theaters reduced. He would prefer to see 12-15 theaters instead of the 20 proposed,
but he did not want to eliminate the two restaurants.
Wissner stated she wanted to be sure they have adequate parking for this facility. She
supported the 20 theaters and the two restaurants proposed. Ismail did not want to
have parking across the street, and he would prefer to hear a better argument put
forth to support the need for twenty theaters. Clinton stated he was comfortable with
the twenty theaters after reading the reports and the traffic studies. He was not
convinced the parking lot would ever be full given the staging of the movies. They
have had proposals for the Eden Prairie Center presented that never came to fruition
and he was reluctant to refuse a developer because of something that "may" happen
at that location in the future.
Sandstad commented that Alternative # 1 did not include any off-site parking and thus
no safety issues were involved. Off-site parking was also not part of the staff
recommendation.
MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Wissner, to close the Public Hearing.
Motion carried 6-0.
MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Wissner to recommend to the City Council
approval of Alternative #1 for Ryan Companies of Minnesota for Planned Unit
Development Amendment review on 17.88 acres, Planned Unit Development District
Review on 17.88 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional
Service Zoning District on 17.88 acres, Site Plan Review on 17.88 acres, and
Preliminary Plat oft 7 .88 acres into 3 lots based on plans dated February l3, 1998 and
subject to the recommendations ofthe Staff Report dated February 20, 1998. Motion
carried 5-1. Foote voted "no".
Planning Commission Minutes
January 26, 1998
B. REGAL CINEMA by Ryan Companies of Minnesota. Request for Planned
Unit Development Amendment Review on 17.88 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review on 17.88 acres, Zoning District Amendment in
the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 17.88 acres, Site Plan
Review on 17.88 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into 3 lots.
Location east of Prairie Center Drive between Rolling Hills Road and Prairie
Lakes Drive.
Ron Krank, representing Centres Group, reviewed the site plan and indicated
the request is for approval of a 20 screen Cinema and two restaurants. It's a
self contained site across from the Eden Prairie shopping center. He reviewed
the modifications made to minimize the impacts. They have single security
lights and there is no need to light the back of the building. The theater does
not need much service so they have the service area fully enclosed including
trash pick up. There are 1281 parking stalls on site providing one car per four
seats for the Cinema and appropriate parking for the restaurant.
He reviewed the architecture of the theater noting the building will be fairly
quiet and has similar colors and materials as next door. The entrance is also
fairly subdued and quiet. The marquee will indicate what movie is playing and
will be very small. There will be a band of neon lights on the marquee which
provides nice soft lights.
Sandstad was concerned that the shape of the neon sign will be visible for
many of the homes on the south side and suggested making it more of a north
facing triangle which could avoid any problems. Krank said it's only five feet
above the roof but they will take a look at it.
Ismail was concerned about security because young kids corne to the movies
and the neighbors are so close. Krank said they tried to provide security by
the design of the exterior by not having any areas where people can
congregate outside. This cinema has a very unique design. There will be a
coffee bar where people can sit down and gather before going into a movie.
This is a concept that works very well.
Ismail commented if they are only selling 80 percent of their parking spaces,
he suggested removing theater seats so they would not need a parking waiver.
He was also concerned about the lighting being too intense. Krank said they
will meet and not exceed the ordinance.
Clinton asked how people will find the theater. Krank said they will have two
9
Planning Commission Minutes
January 26, 1998
20 foot monument pylon signs at the front and he also noted that the building
is 30 to 32 feet high.
Franzen reviewed the staff report and noted the six potential reasons why staff
believes the plan minimizes the impacts to the residential and the reasons why
Regal Cinemas believes they need a parking waiver. Staff does not have a
good working example of a movie theater in Eden Prairie on a free standing
site. Staff can not tell whether the City ordinance is adequate for parking
because there are 4000 spots in the mall. The developer seems to be
comfortable with eithe: requirement, 1:3 or 1:4 parking. Staff experience at
Centennial Lakes and Willow Creek during peak periods shows that on site
parking is adequate and that overflow parking was not being used because it
was too far away from the entrance. Staff supported the 1:4 parking.
The public hearing was opened.
Raymond Mohler, 10825 Leaping Deer Lane, noted he was a board member
on the association of Westin Woods located just to the north of the planned
development. His concern with the development is the size of the
development and the amount of traffic to be drawn to this particular area,
specifically to the times of operation of the business. A 20 theater movie
house with about 800 parking spaces that are being proposed, and the amount
of traffic going to be attracted to Prairie Center Drive to his particular
development of W estin Woods, is the only exit and entrance to their homes.
This proj ect is going to cause undue stress on the neighborhood. It will be
difficult to get to their homes when coming home after work.
He was also concerned about the additional announcement of the 20 screens
to be developed at Eden Prairie Center mall and was concerned about 40
movie screens in such close proximity. He believes this will draw people from
Chaska, Chanhassen, and Minnetonka, and that is going to significantly
increase traffic around his particular area, and the possibility that one or both
of them will fail is quite a possibility. He commented he went to see Titanic
on Christmas Day at Centennial Lakes and he assured everyone that all the
parking was used.
Terry Pearson, 10827 Leaping Deer Lane, indicated the road behind her home
is Prairie Lakes Drive and was concerned about the increase of traffic on that
road. They will have traffic patterns that will affect not only getting to their
home and leaving, but it will also be affecting them trying to stay home and
relax since their patios are behind Prairie Lakes Drive. If there's a line of cars
going into this establishment, people will find very creative ways of getting
10
Planning Commission Minutes
January 26, 1998
around the traffic and this will happen when they are at home trying to relax.
She was concerned that the berm on the comer of Prairie Lakes Drive and
Rolling Hills Road needs to be increased. She was also concerned whether
this site is zoned appropriately or not. There may be something that is a
better transition, something that would be more blendable with their
community.
Penny Hanson, 11043 Lexington Drive, was concerned about the additional
traffic generated from this project. When she leaves to go to work in the
morning she has to make a left at the intersection of Rolling Hills Road and
it's a very dangerous location to make a left turn. The roads are very slippery
when it snows and the additional traffic will only make it worse. She also said
she will see the lights from the marquee.
Krank said there was a traffic report done that indicated the traffic generation
is substantially less than what was previously approved. They will do their
best to create a very high berm and it will probably be 10 feet high with tall
conifer trees.
Mona Armel, Hartford Place, commented the developer keeps saying in 1994
this and that happened, but they are in 1998 and what was proposed for traffic
then was fine, but this is 1998 and it's not okay. She was concerned she will
be looking right at the theater and the lights will be on constantly. She was
very concerned about the increased traffic.
VK Bormann, 10917 Lexington Drive, said the developer has made some
attempts to address the issues but it's not enough. They were just so greatful
that it was not going to be a Home Depot, and the kinds of things they would
be facing since it's to be a theater didn't really sink in at the first neighborhood
meeting. She was concerned about the amount of traffic this proj ect is going
to bring to her area, and that they are only going to have one stop light at
Prairie Center Drive and nothing at the other end which is Rolling Hills Road.
Corey Berglund, Centres Group, explained the changes they made to the road
system per direction from staff to make this project work. They gave up 250
parking spaces because they felt it was more important for the roads to be
evacuated quickly. One of the benefits of a 20 screen movie theater is the
staggering of times for the movies to be easy flowing. He noted they would
not be opposed to help finance the stop light at the comer where the left tum
is difficult to make. He noted they are looking for a restaurant with a liquor
11
10
Planning Commission Minutes
January 26, 1998
license and will bring that in for approval. They are platting the property in
three different parcels and are looking at various layouts for the restaurant.
Paul Hanson, 11043 Lexington Drive, was concerned about an increase in
police security due to the private road. He said the stop lights are a great idea
but it's not going to solve the traffic problem.
Alexander asked if it was possible to eliminate the exit from the theater and
restaurant on to Rolling Hills Road so it's not to create more problems there,
and just have the exit on to Prairie Center Drive and Prairie Lakes Drive.
Brooklyn said they can, but they did it mainly because they have limited food
delivery service to this site. They would be happy to meet with staff to
discuss this.
Habicht was concerned that the restaurant to the west can only be accessed
through Prairie Lakes Drive and it's got to come all the way through the site.
Brooklyn said they would look at the restrictions. If all parties concerned
were in favor, they would eliminate that exit way.
Beverly Sorenson, 10924 Leaping Deer Lane, said her main concern is the
City of Eden Prairie has no concept of what the traffic problem is like on
Prairie Center Drive. The critical area is off Prairie Lakes Drive and the
cinema is going to cause bottlenecking. They are trapped in their homes
because they have one exit.
Habicht asked what the long term plan is for Prairie Center Drive and Rolling
Hills Road. Franzen said the City takes a traffic count on all the roads and
intersections. The signals have to meet the defined criteria established by the
State of Minnesota. If Eden Prairie keeps growing in this manner, at some
point in time the intersection around Prairie Center Drive would be expected
to have a signal. At this point, based upon what people have said tonight,
they could have the developer do a signal warrant analysis for the Rolling Hills
intersection and find out at what point the signal would need to go in.
Sandstad was not comfortable with the parking waiver.
Foote was also concerned about the parking waiver from a safety standpoint.
He was concerned that people would be running across the street in the
evening because the parking lot was full. He said traffic is a problem. He was
concerned about traffic in the area, but it was no worse than any other areas
in the City.
12
IJ
Planning Commission Minutes
January 26, 1998
Wissner agreed with Foote about the parking waiver and suggested posting
no parking signs so people will not park along Prairie Lakes Road and Rolling
Hills Road.
Ismail was concerned about the parking not being adequate and suggested
more analysis by the developer as to whether or not they need more parking
or not.
Wissner suggested scaling back the project to possibly 10, 12, or 15 theaters
to see if it works. Krank said that would be difficult to do structurally. He
said they may be able to provide off site parking adjacent to the site at the
office building for possibly one to three years as a test to see ifit's necessary.
Foote said it may address the parking issue but it does not address the safety
Issue.
Sandstad commented the developer's change could have been part of the
package deal for staff and for the commissioners to evaluate in advance with
written consent from the property owner, but that wasn't something he wanted
to consider so late in the game here. He said he was prepared to continue
because of the parking and allow the developer to study the parking issue a
little more carefully. The traffic is okay but as soon as they get the signal in
it will be a lot more comfortable.
Habicht said he was reluctantly comfortable with the plan because it provides
less traffic than the previously approved plan.
Foote agreed with Habicht because they will have less traffic, according to the
traffic study, than with the previously approved plan.
Wissner was concerned about the parking but noted the one good thing is that
it would be evening traffic.
Sandstad asked if the developer was interested in making any changes if a
continuance is granted to address the parking shortage on site. Berglund said
he would bring some additional data to either staff or the Commission
regarding this type of multiplex development and the parking issue. He would
also bring the agreement he has with the owner of the office building across
the street which gives them an additional 750 parking spaces.
MOTION 1: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote, to continue the public
hearing for 30 days for the developer to submit additional substantiation for
a parking waiver or reduce the building size. Motion carried 7-0.
13
I~
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
February 20, 1998
Regal Cinema and Restaurants
Centres Group
Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota
East of Prairie Center Drive between Rolling Hills Road and Prairie Lakes
Drive.
1. Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 17.88 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.88 acres.
3. Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service
Zoning District on 17.88 acres.
4. Site Plan Review on 17.88 acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into 3 lots.
13
· . ~ ...
I
~
\ -I
I
z..\
Staff Report
Regal Cinema
February 20,1998
BACKGROUND:
This is a continued item from the January 20, 1998 meeting. The Planning Commission asked the
developer to provide more infonnation to substantiate a parking waiver or reduce the size of the
building.
PARKING INFORMATION;
The parking infonnation includes a study of theater parking in the twin cities and nationally which
indicates that a ratio of 1 space for every 4 seats is adequate.
The developer has provided a copy of a signed parking agreement for 378 parking spaces on the
mus office building site across the street to meet the 1 per 3 seat parking requirement of the
City.
Offsite parking is a waiver from the City Code. A 10 foot wide concrete crosswalk is needed,
with signs and additional lighting to make a safer pedestrian crossing.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Alternative One (Waiver for total number of parking spaces)
If the Planning Commission believes that Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment is
acceptable, that impacts on the surrounding area are low and mitigated, and there are compelling
reasons for granting the parking waiver for total parking spaces, then one option would be to
recommend approval of the PUD Concept Amendment on 17.88 acres, PUD District Review on
17.88 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on
17.88 acres, Site Plan Review on 17.88 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into three lots
based on plans dated January 23, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated January 23, 1998 and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed stonn water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the City Engineer.
2. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall:
2
Staff Report
Regal Cinema
February 20, 1998
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements.
C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review.
D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review.
3. PUD approval for the parking waiver from the City code requirement of 1 per three seats
to one per four seats, and zero lot line setback to parking.
Alternative Two ( Waiver for off site parking)
If the Planning Commission believes that Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment is
acceptable, that impacts on the surrounding area are low and mitigated, and there are compelling
reasons for granting the parking waiver for offsite parking, then one option would be to
recommend approval of the PUD Concept Amendment on 17.88 acres, PUD District Review on
17.88 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on
17.88 acres, Site Plan Review on 17.88 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into three lots
based on plans dated January 23, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated January 23, 1998 and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the City Engineer.
2. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements.
C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review.
D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review.
3
1&
Staff Report
Regal Cinema
February 20, 1998
3. PUD approval for the parking waiver from the City code requirement of 1 per three seats
to one per four seats, offsite parking for 378 spaces, and zero lot line setback to parking.
Alternative Three
If the Planning Commission believes that Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment is
acceptable if the required parking can be provided on site, then one option would be to
recommend approval of either a 15 screen theater and two restaurants or A 20 screen theater.
Alternative Four
If the Planning Commission believes that Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment is not
acceptable, that impacts on the surrounding area are high and are not mitigated, and there are no
compelling reasons for granting the parking waiver, then one option would be to recommend
denial.
Staff recommends Alternative One.
4
11
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
January 23, 1998
Regal Cinema and Restaurants
Centres Group
Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota
East of Prairie Center Drive between Rolling Hills Road and Prairie Lakes
Drive.
1. Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 17.88 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.88 acres.
3. Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service
Zoning District on 17.88 acres.
4. Site Plan Review on 17.88 acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into 3 lots.
LU!40S
CE.NTER
;'DD
ROAD
w > a:
UJ
<J) w a:
(l.
~l:1 .:., ....
ORIV
r
I
Staff Report
Regal Cinema
January 23, 1998
BACKGROUND:
This site was first approved and rezoned office and commercial as part of the 1978 Hartford
Planned Unit Development (See Exhibit A). In 1994 the City approved the Hartford Place
Planned Unit Development Amendment which changed a portion of this site from office to
commercial (See Exhibit B). The attached approved plan shows 165,000 square feet of retail use
for entertainment, pet, electrical, office supply, strip retail and restaurant. The proposed plan is a
theater and two restaurants totaling 98,440 square feet.
LAND USE AND ZONING
The site is guided regional commercial. The zoning of the property is commercial regional service
which allows retail sales and services which require relatively large sites, and attract little or no
pedestrian traffic and are not typically found in shopping center structures such as the Eden
Prairie Center. Examples of pennitted uses are restaurants, hotels, gas stations, auto dealerships
and strip retail shopping. A movie theater is a pennitted use.
All pennitted land uses are required by City Code to minimize the adverse impacts on nearby
dwellings. The City must detennine if the proposed land uses are compatible with the approved
plan and the surrounding area.
The City code also requires a transition where there are differences in land use, building mass,
height, densities and site intensity. Transitions may be accomplished by increased setbacks,
benning, plantings, lower site densities, lower floor area ratios, and smaller buildings.
To minimize impacts the plan does the following:
1. The theater setback to Rolling Hills Road is a minimum of 50 feet as compared to
the code minimum of 35 feet.
2. The theater is set into a benn to reduce the height of the building along Rolling
Hills Road.
3. There is no driveway access opposite the residential areas. The approved plan had
access to a loading area along Rolling Hills Road.
4. There is no loading area along Rolling Hills Road.
5. Benning and heavy plantings are proposed closest to the residential areas to screen
views of the parking.
2
Staff Report
Regal Cinema
January 23,1998
6. Total building square footage is 66,560 square feet smaller than the approved plan.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS:
The project requires a parking waiver from the requirement of one stall per three seats to one stall
per 4 seats. The information provided by the Centres group shows varying parking requirements
in the metro area. Approximately 50% of the cities have parking at one stall per three seats and
50% have parking at one stall per four seats. Regal Cinemas parking requirement is I per 4 seats.
Regal Cinemas believes this requirement is adequate for the following reasons.
1. Off peak usage is 95% after 5 P.M. and on weekends.
2. Staggered ending and starting times for all showings.
3. Large drop off contingent.
4. Regal never sells more than 80% in any auditorium.
5. Regals peak parking demand is 812-848 cars.
The existing movie theaters at the Eden Prairie Mall meet City code requirements. The Eden
Prairie Mall has over 5,000 parking spaces. For most of the year the parking lot is never full. For
these reasons the staff is unable to determine if the theater at the mall needs more or less parking
than the City's parking requirement of one stall per three seats.
Communities with theater parking at one per four seats have indicated that parking is adequate
but the majority of the theaters are located adjacent to office and retail where overflow parking is
available. Staff experience at Centennial Lakes and Willow Creek during peak periods show that
on site parking is adequate and that overflow parking was not being used because it was too far
away from the entrance.
The project also requires waivers for internal zero lot line setback to parking. This is typical for all
retail areas and the waivers have been granted in all cases.
SITE PLAN:
The site plan shows the construction of an 85,240 square foot theater on 14.89 acres at a .13 base
area. The base area ratio for the restaurants are .10. City code permits up to a .20 base area ratio.
The theater and the restaurants meets the structure setback requirements of the commercial
3
~I
Staff Report
Regal Cinema
January 23, 1998
regional service zoning district.
The theater and the restaurants meets the parking setback requirements of the commercial
regional service zoning district.
GRADING AND TREE LOSS:
The tree loss calculated for the entire PUD is 35%. Tree replacement for this site is 176 caliper
inches.
ARCHITECTURE:
The buildings meet the exterior material requirements of the commercial regional service zoning
district for face brick and glass. The architecture is consistent with the approved PUD
architecture. Mechanical equipment will be screened by parapet wall.
The theater averages 32 feet tall which is similar to the building height of the approved plan. The
restaurants are 17 feet tall. The zoning disrtict allows a maximum height of 40 feet.
LANDSCAPING:
The amount of landscaping required is based on caliper inches according to building size, tree
replacement, screening of parking, and screening of loading. The landscape plan meets City code.
UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE;
Sewer and water is available in Rolling Hills Road and Prairie Lakes Drive. Stormwater drains to
NURP ponds on other sites in the PUD.
SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS;
A sidewalk will be constructed along Rolling Hills Road and Prairie Lakes Drive.
SIGNS:
The signs meet City Code and are consistent with the approved PUD signs.
LIGHTING;
Proposed lighting with 1000 watt lights is too intense. Lighting closest to the residential areas
4
Staff Report
Regal Cinema
January 23, 1998
shall be limited to 20 feet in height. Light intensity shall not exceed 250-400 watts. Lighting
adjacent to Prairie Center Drive can be 30 feet tall and 250-400 watt fixtures.
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS:
A traffic signal at Prairie Lakes Drive will be installed concurrent with building construction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Alternative One
If the Planning Commission believes that Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment is
acceptable, that impacts on the surrounding area are low and mitigated, and there are compelling
reasons for granting the parking waiver, then one option would be to recommend approval of the
PUD Concept Amendment on 17.88 acres, PUD District Review on 17.88 acres, Zoning District
Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 17.88 acres, Site Plan Review
on 17.88 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 17.88 acres into three lots based on plans dated January
23, 1998 and subject to the recommendations ofthe Staff Report dated January 23, 1998 and
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the City Engineer.
2. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements.
C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review.
D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review.
3. PUD approval for the parking waiver from the City code requirement of 1 per three seats
to one per four seats and zero lot line setback to parking.
5
Staff Report
Regal Cinema
January 23, 1998
Alternative Two
If the Planning Commission believes that Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment is not
acceptable, that impacts on the surrounding area are high and are not mitigated, and there are no
compelling reasons for granting the parking waiver, then one option would be to recommend
denial.
Staff recommends Alternative One.
6
-:--------....,...--------------------------::::::.=::.:..=::.:.. .. :.c __ ._ ..•• _._ •... -.
Figure 17
l'178 ArrRouED
1
,
I
-
"
/
--
1
---
.n ........... .-...." ...... ",OJ
,I'UIJI-"" , .. ·,tU)."·II"
-
I ..... ~ ....... ,.._ ............. .,..,.'" _ .... t ........... I ...... ..... ... .... " ... ".-
;
I
\
\
1,,1 I'·.··
"11·'
1'1 ':11, ,,';:'1 \1
\.
, "\ , \
'" ,'I ,
'\ \;
"
\
~-'" RYAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
... OF MINN1!80TA, INC. __ AW_--..
:'r '-_-__ -___ -__ -_______ --J
"I'I.ANI Mllt,VIII.t .... ha
."" "".
_LANDSCAPI REqUIREwENTS _______ _
At:llJo1C. so 'OO'1ICl 'Ofl 'HIS SI't IS II'!t.OOO
I... (UC'I'tcAl BUIlDING 1\ eM. to' .. H( .ctt'
...-:" "(SUl'~ IN A OO"I", ... C or 'HI: SQuARl
IOOI.t.G( 01' 4'.000 '011 lNIOSCAl'( c: .... r.uu..1QN PU'If'OS(S .
• C"4.IPU: -.cH(S ~o • ",,"0
•• IHI: A8(r)If L\HO'5tN'( '"'0''''''' .... '''15 DO NO' _liM '~"'lN
INCH totAlS rOfl ~"1 ... 'flUS AND ~ YA~~.
/)
'/
lEE LAtID'CAPE
DU AIL 'HEU FOil
PLANTING DETAIL'
ANO NOTEI.
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
~~.~
"AIITFOIIO PLACE RUII. __
[
LANDICAPt! PLAN J (;.....) '--------'~ _MP __
I'lQ+ HMTfO~D
t~I&'T~) --
£
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
" I
Ii
I
11-
II
I
II.
I.
I
·1.
I
I
Zoning: Office
Lot
Number Acres
42.38
_"of . "
2 14.51
3 9.54
4 7.77
5 13.95
6 14.59
7 13.06
8 10.00
Sub Total 125.80
Zoning: Regional Commercial Service
9 4.41
10 3.82
11 4.19
12 4.00
13 4.58
14 4.33
Sub Total 25.33
Road Right-of-Way
Spine Road 4.84
Loop Road 2.98
Sub Total 7.82
Summary
Total 158.95
Table 1
BASE SITE DATA
-I'
Building Area Number Parking Area
in Sq. Ft. of Cars in Sq. Ft.
N/A N/A N/A
200,000 800 256,000
160,000 640 204,800
140,000 560 179,200
200,000 800 256,000
170,000 680 217,600
170,000 680 217,600
160,000 640 204,800
1,200,000 4800 1,536,000
N/A N/A N/A
42,000 330 105,600
36,000 280 89,600
40,000 320 102,400
38,000 300 96,000
44,000 350 112,000
200,000 1580 505,600
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
1,400,000 6,380 2,041,600
30
Honorablc City Council Members
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
City Center
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
RE: Regal Cinemas
Honorable Members;
March 17th , 1995
Please note my concern with regards to the development being planned by Ryan Companies of Minnesota,
located near by East Prairie Center Drive. My understanding of this situation is that a pJanned cinema
would be buHt directly across from the Mall, on the opposite side of Prairie Center Drive. J have been
asked by numerOUS people to sign letters to support the position that this project with Ryan Construction is
not only outside oran original plan for a strip mall. but may actually create additional traffic problems.
Additionally, this project would compete with a new project at the Mall for additional screens. I would like
it known thTough this letter; I am opposed to this plan.
My opposition is that a new cinema would not be necessary in our area, with the recently planned additions
to the mall theatre. But more so that any theatre or projects tor that matter, heavy traffic afrer 9:00pm in
this area would devastate the property values of the homes in this area. If I had been told that the planned
use of this property would be for any thing other than a strip mall, 1 would have never purchased the
property. J am currently ok with d)e Borders, Inc. planned addition. However, I do not wish my Council
Members to vote an approval to, any after 9:00pm traffic generator, to this plat of £den Prairie. If this plan
were to be approved, 1 would be forccd to organi7.e those in opposition to file suit for loss of property
value.
Since, 1 now have your attention. J would also like to voice my desire to put a no right turn on red
design arion on the Preserve Blvd., Prairie Center Drive intersectioIl. I have found that iII order to avoid the
lights on HWY 212, NON-Eden Prairie residents cut through town, making Eden Prairie residence wait at
their tums to Prairie Center Drive for very cxtended periods of time. Now, 1 realize that th1s a big city and
that traffic is always going to be a problem for every citizen, but this small designation would prevent this
long wait situation for an those who use Prairie Center Drive.
in summary, my COIlcern for the Ryan Companies planned cinema js the traffic and property values east of
the l?:den Prairie Center. Traffic would be created that would in turn reduce property values. Also, I have
noted that need for traffic control at the intersection of Preserve Blvd, and Prairie Center Drive be
addressed with a no right on red designation. Please note that J feel the Eden Prairie City Council has done
a superior job with these issues in the past. J hope that logic and k"owledge will prevail, and that this plat
of land will remain available until a suitab1e development can be planned.
Respectfully yours,
~J;t·s~orn·~~~
11240 Pr deJ1ce Lane
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
612-996-9696
cc: Eden Prairie News
~002
January 10, 1998
Penny Hedqusit HanBvil
11043 Lexington Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
903-0045 • peDIlY.ha.nson@mci2000.com
Eden Prairie City Planner
Mr. Mike Franzen
Community and Economic Development
-8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: Hartford Place Development
Dear Mr. Franzen:
I have attended both meeting for the Hartford Place Development on November
20 and November 21, 1997. I am a concerned Eden Prairie homeowner who is
at the most vulnerable area of the proposed development. My home is location
next to the bunn which abuts the proposed "Borders Bookstore Development"
and my from door faces Rolling Hills Road, closest to the proposed entrance on
Rolling Hills Road for the "Regal Cinema." I have made my request to RLK in
person on November 20th and 21 st and now I am submitting my request to the
Planning Commission and the Eden Prairie City Council.
-._ Upon the purchase of my home in September of 1996, I knew there would be a
-forthcoming development in the area. My greatest concern for the Hartford
.-----. Place Development is protecting my homes value upon resale, and prohibiting
needless traffic.
Listed below are my requests for the Hartford Place Development:
Borders Bookstore and Restaurant/Bar Pad
1. The "Bar" pad is not my first choice for the complement building. 1 have
strong objections to the Restaurant/Bar pad. "Bar" this is what I object
to so close to a residential area. (Just as a side note. I do smell the odors
from the Asian Grill more than a block away, even though this is not
considered to be air pollution.)
2. In order to screen the parking facilities from our townhouses, I am
. requesting the following.
A. The bunn between the Hartford Place community and Lot 9 be elevated
on the North end to a height of no less than 8 feet above our first floor
elevation.
1.
2.
3.
.....• ' .. 4.
. , ... ,.
•••• + •• -. ~, •• ~ •• ~.
2.
Penny Hedqusit Hanson
11043 Lexington Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
903-0045 • penny..lla.n:3on@mci2000.com
Borders Bookstore and Restaurant/Bar Pad -continued
B. In order to eliminate the foot traffic between Lot 9 and the Hartford Place
community. A 5 foot height chain link fence (with green plastic coating)
running form the storm water pond to the Southeast comer of the "Borders
Bookstore" and from the Northeast comer of the "Borders Bookstore" to an
area approximately 10 feet from the Northeast corner of the "Borders
Bookstore" lot. This fence should be as close as practical to the "Borders
Bookstore" parking lot.
"Regal Cinema" Lot 1 Proposed Development with
Restaurants on Lot 2 and Lot 3
An earth burm retaining wall should be built along Rolling Hills Road to
maintain the same elevation along the South side of the property. This
retaining wall should only be lowered at the intersection of Rolling Hills
Road and Prairie Center Drive. Thereby removing the driveway from Lot
1 and Lot 2 on to Rolling Hills Road.
Install a cyclone fence from the Southwest comer of the theater to within
50 feet of the intersection of Prairie Center Drive. The 5-foot height chain
link fence (with green plastic coating) should eliminate foot traffic. Place
this fence as close a practicable to the parking lot within at least 5 feet of
the curb.
Move the South Restaurant as close as possible to the restaurant on the
Northwest Corner. Move the driveway going out onto Prairie Center Drive
to the South side of the South restaurant. The proposed driveway on to
Rolling Hills Road must be eliminated.
The traffic onto Rolling Hills Road must be eliminated. The traffic here
will tremendously impact the residence in the Hartford Place
Community. The following modification by the Planning Commission
and City Council will have the theater parking making a right turn onto
Prairie Center Drive eliminating the unnecessary traffic on Rolling Hills
Road.
Would you please inform me of when the hearing will be on the Hartford
. Development so I can attend. Thank you for you time.
Sincerely,
re1w(~
Penny Hedqusit Hanson
CC: Franzen, Harris, Thorfmnson, Butcher-Younghans, Case, Tyra-Lukens,
and Hartford Community.
2
30
City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie MN 55344-2230
March 17,1998
Subject: Regal Cinema
I don't know if my February 15, 1998 letter to the Planning Commission on the Regal Cinema
proposal was forwarded to the City Council for their consideration. Although I was initially
pleased to have a "stadium seating" type of theater within walking distance of my townhome, I
became concerned about the effect of traffic on nearby streets. I did not have any sense of
feeling on the 1:4 versus 1:3 parking per seat ratios.
The night before writing that letter I went to the Muller Multiplex Theater in Lakeville, which had
just been expanded from 10 to 18 screens. I took the Highway 70 exit from 1-35 at about 7:15
P.M. for a 7:30 movie. There is a long service road into the theater with no other buildings or
businesses in the vicinity. There were 50-75 exiting cars in stop-and-go traffic on the service
road, with cars parked on both sides of the road, and parked cars trying to join the exiting traffic
lane. The parking lot was essentially filled. There were 100-150 people in four lines waiting to
buy tickets. I'll admit that it was Valentines Day and that there were two Academy Award
nominated movies playing, but this could happen with other popular movies and nights.
With a 20-screen theater at the Hartford location, I can't imagine what this type of attendance
would do to Prairie Lakes Drive, Rolling Hills Road and Prairie Center Drive. The Lakeville
Theater is in the middle of a prairie at the present time. There was either an editorial or a letter
to the editor in the Eden Prairie News which suggested that a multiplex theater would be better
placed in the Eden Prairie Center complex. That complex has lots of parking and multiple points
of entrance and exit. I agree wholeheartedly with that editorial viewpoint.
I would suggest that the City Council members park in the Lakeville Muller parking lot for a
period of time between 7:00 and 7:30 some Friday or Saturday evening to comprehend the
effects on our already crowded streets and neighborhood before rendering a final decision on
the Regal Cinema proposal.
~~
11256 Providence Lane
Eden Priairie MN 55344-4917
(612)942-6370
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-7-98
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. V, B·
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger WEL TER'S BROOKHAVEN FARM
Scott Kipp
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
1. Close the Public Hearing;
2. Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 23.45 acres;
3. Approve 1st Reading ofthe Ordinance for PUD District Review on 23.45 acres and Zoning District
Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 21.77 acres, Rural to Rl-13.5 on 1.38 acres and from Rural to Rl-
9.5 on 0.3 acres;
4. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 23.45 acres into 43 lots and 2 outlots; and
5. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations (and Council conditions).
Background:
The project consists of 40 twinhome units and 3 single-family lots at a overall density of 1.83 units per acre,
consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan for Low Density Residential.
Purgatory Creek floodplain and the wooded steep slopes of the property are proposed within an Outlot for
protection. Tree replacement is 56 caliper inches.
PUD waivers are necessary for cul-de-sac length and shoreland abutting lot size. City Code permits a cul-de-
sac length of500 feet. The proposed cul-de-sac is 1,120 feet. Minimum lot size for shoreland abutting lots
requires 10,000 sq. ft. Some lots vary between 7,736 sq. ft. to 9,884 sq. ft.
Outlot B shown along Pioneer Trail is to accommodate the County's road upgrading plans.
The development is subject to the Cash Park Fee.
I
The Staff Report recommended approval of the project based on the following:
• Revise the frontage for Lot 21, Block 2 from 64.24 feet to a minimum of 70 feet to meet City Code
for the RI-9.5 zoning district.
• Revise the preliminary plat to show the southerly 27 feet of Outlot B as Hennepin County right of
way.
• Provide a tree replacement plan for 64 caliper inches.
• If Outlot A is to remain under private ownership, a conservation easement should be provided over
Outlot A.
• Shift the easterly end of Brookhaven Terrace to the north as shown in the attachment. This shift will
provide additional distance and appropriate grade between the twinhome units and the upgraded road.
• If Outlot A is to remain under private ownership, the plans should be revised to show a 20 foot wide
public trail easement along the creek.
• Grant PUD waivers for cul-de-sac length and shoreland abutting lot size less than 10,000 sq. ft.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
At its February 9, 1998 meeting the Commission voted 4-0 for denial of the project because the plans were
inconsistent with the shoreland code and the proponent did not agree with the recommendations of the Staff
Report.
Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission:
Because ofa lack of quorum, the Commission did not hold a meeting on March 2, 1998. The project will
be reviewed at the April 6, 1998 meeting. The Commissions recommendations will need to be presented at
the Council meeting.
Changes to the plans since the Planning Commission:
The following plan revisions have taken place:
• Shoreland Code minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet for the abutting lots has been met. An
alternate plan is also provided which maintains the smaller abutting lot size and larger Outlot A as
originally proposed.
• Frontage for lot 21, Blk 2 has been revised to meet code.
• Required tree replacement has been incorporated into the landscaping plan.
2
• East end of Brookview Terrace has been shifted 10 feet to the north providing additional distance
from Pioneer Trail.
• A viable access for a future trail connection has been shown from Homeward Hills Road to the
Purgatory Creek corridor.
Agreement reached with the proponent, to be shown in revised plans prior to 2nd Reading:
• The southerly 17 feet of Outlot B will be revised as road right of way, with the remaining portion left
in a separate outlot for purchase by Hennepin County.
• In addition to the required Cash Park Fee, a conservation and trail easement will be placed over
Outlot A. Some private paths near the top of the bluff, and no more than 3 gazebos will be placed
within the conservation easement area at the top of the bluff, after consultation with City Staff.
• The preliminary plat will include a small portion of additional right of way for the existing trail along
Homeward Hills Road.
• The location shown for the trail connection from Homeward Hills Road to the Purgatory Creek
corridor will be rough graded.
• A vinyl clad chain link fence will be placed between the NURP pond and the trail along Homeward
Hills Road for safety purposes.
• The portion of the property located on the east side of Purgatory Creek (26-116-22-12-0011) will
be combined with the parcel lying to the east (26-116-22-14-0014) prior to final plat approval.
• Staff supports the PUD waivers for cul-de-sac length, and shoreland abutting lot size (alternate plan).
In addition, Staff supports PUD shoreland and lot line setback waivers for the placement of no more
than 3 gazebos at the top of the bluff within the 150 foot structure setback to Purgatory Creek.
Supporting Reports:
1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review
2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat
3. Staff Report dated February 6, 1998
4. Planning Commission Minutes dated February 9, 1998
5. Correspondence.
WEL TER'S BROOKHAVEN FARM
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT REVIEW OF WEL TER'S BROOKHAVEN FARM
FOR RAY WELTER, JR.
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned
Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Welter's
Brookhaven Farm PUD Concept Amendment by Ray Welter, Jr. and considered their request for
approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City
Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 7, 1998;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,
as follows:
1. Welter's Brookhaven Farm, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described
as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans
dated March 16, 1998.
3. That the PUD Concept did not meet the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated February 9, 1998.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of April, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
Welter's Brookhayen Fann
Exhibit A
Legal Description:
Property Identification Number: 26-116-22-12-0011 (part of)
That part of Tract A, described as follows: Beginning at
a point on the survey line of Hennepin County Highway Plat
6 a distance of 886 feet East from the West line of the
Northeast 1/4, as measured along said survey line; thence
Northeasterly at right angles distant 412 feet; thence
Southeasterly at right cngles to the centerline of Purgatory
Creek; thence Northerly, Northeasterly and Northwesterly
along said centerline to the Westerly line of Tract A;
thence South along the West line and its Southerly extension
to said survey line; thence Southeasterly along said survey
line to beginning, except road, Registered Land Survey
No. 1032,. and
Propertv Identification Number: 26-116-22-12-0012
That part of Tract B, lying Southwesterly of Welters
Purgatory Acres 1st Addition, except that part of the West
40 feet thereof lying South of the North 250 feet thereof
and except road, Registered Land Survey No. 1032.'
WELTER'S BROOKHAVEN FARM
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF WELTER'S BROOKHAVEN FARM FOR RAY WELTER, JR.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Welter's Brookhaven Fann for Ray Welter, Jr. dated March 16, 1998,
consisting of 23.45 acres into 43 lots and 2 outlots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is
found to be in confonnance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances,
and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of April, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
Planning Commission Minutes
February 9, 1998
B. WELTER'S BROOKHAVEN FARM by Ray Welter, Jr. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 23.45 acres, PUD District
Review on 23.45 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on
21.77 acres, Rural to RI-13.5 on 1.38 acres and from Rural to RI-9.5 on 0.3
acres, and Preliminary Plat of 23.45 acres into 43 lots and 2 outlots.
Location: Northeast comer of Homeward Hills Road & Pioneer Trail.
Frank Cardarelle, surveyor representing Ray Welter Jr., said they have been
working with staff for a couple of months trying to work out all the problems.
He explained the technical problems which they can solve and explained their
concerns about the two outlots and the moving of the road.
Ray Welter Jr., developer, was concerned that the City is requesting cash park
fees, requesting he do a trail, and requesting that he give land to the County.
He was also concerned that widening the road will result in great tree loss of
beautiful oaks on 169. He said he will have about a 30 foot front yard at his
own house because of that road and will not be able to get out of his cul-de-
sac. The City is asking for a conservation easement and he said he can give
them a partial conservation easement.
He commented his family has taken care of this land since 1948 and has lived
there for 33 years. He knows most ofthe trees personally. When Pax Christi
was built, he donated part of the land for the parking and part of that
agreement was they"had to curb the road to save all the trees at the bottom.
He said he would be willing to give the path or the cash park fees but doesn't
feel it's fair that he give both when he's already given sewer and water
easement to the Metropolitan Waste Commission.
Kipp reviewed the staff report and noted they have worked for quite a while
with Mr. Welter. The density of the project is 1.83 units per acre and it's well
within the limits of the guide plan. It's a 40 unit twinhome development with
three single family units. The project is a transitional type use between the
County Road and the apartment proj ect to the south at 9.3 units per acre and
the Purgatory Acres which was approved at 1.7 units per acre. Staff believes
a twinhome proposal is a good transitional use between those existing uses.
There is minimal tree loss with the development and the development is taking
place on the upper portion of the property. None of the units encroach into
the slopes and wooded areas on Purgatory Creek.
5
1
Planning Commission Minutes
February 9, 1998
Based on the plans submitted, it appears three significant trees will be effected
by this development that would mainly fall in the location of the NURP pond
in the northwest comer. The plan does depend on shoreland waivers for lot
size ofless than 10,000 square feet and they range between 7,500 and 9,500.
Staffis supportive of those waivers since it will maintain a maximum buffer
between the development and the creek. Staff also wants to maintain all the
conservancy areas identified as part of the Purgatory Creek study. Staff did
recommend that the proponent look at other options, either dedicating Outlot
A or providing staff with a standard conservation easement for the outlot
together with a 20 foot trail. This is consistent with all the development along
Purgatory Creek and consistent with the Purgatory Creek study.
Pioneer Trail is proposed to be upgraded sometime in the next year. Staffhas
looked at the proposal and recommended the shift depicted in the staff report.
The proponent did revise the plans to shift the road approximately half the
distance based on some preliminary grading from the County. Staff believes
it necessary to shift that road additional distance according to the graphics
provided. This will provide for a more adequate grading between the
structures and the road. .
The landscaping plan has been submitted and does meet City Code. Staff
recommended approval of the plan based on revisions prior to the City
Council as stated in the staff report.
Foote asked the developer which of the conditions, A-F, listed in the staff
report does he or does he not agree with. Welter said he doesn't agree with
B. He wants to leave Outlot B as an outlot so he can negotiate a price with
the County with it because it creates major cost for him. He didn't agree with
D but said he would agree if they would allow him to put a gazebo in there.
He also didn't agree with E because it would get too close to the trees and all
the creek lots would be right up to the edge and ruin the salability of them.
Foote asked if it was possible to widen the road with a retaining wall as
recommended by Mr. Welter. Gray respondf£ he didn't think it was possible
to widen the road with a retaining wall without taking away some of the right
away.
Sandstad asked if there was any other way to deal with the NURP pond other
than taking out the trees. Gray said they have other concerns besides that,
such as using retaining walls along Homeward Hills Road for safety reasons.
6
Planning Commission Minutes
February 9, 1998
The public hearing was opened.
Bill Hoag, 11995 Sunnybrook Road, pointed out where he lives on the map
and said the Welters have been great neighbors. He said the 25 acres are very
precious to him because of the all the wildlife and would like to see some type
of conservation easement over it to protect the wildlife. He supported
everything he heard but was concerned about the 20 foot wide public
easement the City is requiring because he does live on the creek. Kipp
explained the 20 foot wide trail easement is part of the Parks Open Space
System plans of identifying future trails and would be like a wood chip trail
along Purgatory Creek.
Hoag said he opposed to that trail now or in the future. He was also
concerned about the NURP pond since he will be looking at it for the next 50
years.
Kipp addressed some of the comments made by Mr. Welter regarding Outlot
B and access to his homestead. Staff believes there are some areas they can
work on and some of the things they feel strongly need to take place.
Sandstad said he would like to see Mr. Welter, his consultant, and the City do
a little more fine tuning and see if they can reach agreements on most of the
issues. He commended Mr. Welter for taking great care of the trees. He
recommended continuing this for another month to see if they can reach some
agreement.
Welter said he would rather go right to the City Council because he gave
enough and is not giving any more. He doesn't feel he should have to give the
trail and cash park fees. He should get some credit for what he has done
already. He's willing to give one or the other but not both.
Foote agreed with Sandstad and also commended Mr. Welter for the great
care he has given to the trees. However, they have to allow enough right of
way for some of those things. He supported the staff report regarding the
recommendations.
Alexander said there should be a limit to what Mr. Welter should have to give
but on the other hand there are the City and County laws and she doesn't
know how to get around them. She agreed with the staff report but in all
fairness it doesn't seem right that he should have to continue to give more than
7
q
Planning Commission Minutes
February 9, 1998
he already has done.
Clinton supported the staff report recommendations and recommended the
developer work with staff in trying to work out some minor details before it
goes to the City Council. The Commission likes to present to the City
Council a good plan that has basically worked through the details so they
don't have to deal with it.
MOTION 1: Sandstad moved. seconded by Foote. to close the public
hearing. Motion carried 4-0.
MOTION 2: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote. to recommend denial of
the project because it does not comply with the Shoreland Ordinance or the
recommendations in the staff report that are a compromised package based
upon working with the developer. and that the Commission has recommended
a continuance and further cooperation between the developer and the City to
improve areas in which they disagree. but it is the developer's choice to move
forward without a continuance. Motion carried 4-0.
Foote commented it bothered him to deny this for the simple fact he thinks it
would be a very nice project. He hopes they can work something out before
going to the City Council. Alexander agreed with Foote.
8
10
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
February 6, 1998
Welter's Brookhaven Fann
Welter Development Company
Ray N. Welter Sr. Family Partnership
Northeast comer of Pioneer Trail and Homeward Hills Road
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 23.45 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 23.45 acres.
3. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 21.77 acres, and
from Rural to Rl-9.5 on 0.3 acres, and from Rural to Rl-13.5 on 1.38
acres.
4. Preliminary Plat of23.45 acres into 43 lots, 2 outlots and road right
of way.
1/
· ~": ;:.: ~ :':~ -;. ~
:~" ;~; :_: ; "r ~ ".:: :'.:
Welter's Brookhaven Farm
Staff Report
February 6, 1998
BACKGROUND
The Guide Plan shows this site as Low Density Residential land use for up to 2.5 units per acre. The
property is currently zoned Rural. Surrounding land uses consist of Welter's Purgatory Acres to the
north, zoned Rl-13.5(1.7 units per acre), the Welter homestead and additional Low Density
Residential land to the east, zoned Rural, the Olympic Ridge Apartments to the south, zoned RM-
2.5(9.36 units per acre), and the Pax Christi Catholic Community to the west, zoned Public. The
property is bounded by Purgatory Creek to the north and east, Pioneer Trail to the south and
Homeward Hills Road to the west.
SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT
The request is to develop the property into 40 twinhome units and 3 single-family units. The density
of the project is 1.83 units per acre. City code would pennit up to 2.5 units per acre under the Low
Density Residential designation.
The twinhomes will be zoned RM-6.5, with the most southeasterly single-family unit zoned Rl-9.5,
and the two most northwesterly single-family units zoned Rl-l3. 5.
Lot 21, Block 2 has a frontage of 64.24 feet. City Code requires a minimum of70 feet offrontage
in the Rl-9.5 zoning district and should be revised.
A total of2 parking spaces are required for each twinhome unit, one of which must be enclosed. The
plan meets this requirement, and provides for additional on street parking for guests.
Lots 3-6, Block 2 will share a private driveway.
The preliminary plat shows the subdivision of the property into 43 lots, 2 outlots and road right of
way. The preliminary plat does not show any additional right of way dedication to accommodate the
needs of the County Road. The plat should be revised to show the southerly 27 feet of Outlot Bas
road right of way. This would be consistent with the Riley Creek Ridge development farther to the
west along Pioneer Trail.
GRADINGIDRAJNAGE
The portion of the property to be developed is generally open and higher in elevation than the
surrounding area. Outlot A contains the bluff and shore impact zones, the creek and the majority of
vegetation on site, including a large number of significant oak trees which will not be impacted by the
proposal A NURP pond is proposed within Outlot A. It is shown outside of the delineated wetland
area and any bluff or shore impact zones of Purgatory Creek. The proponent indicates that some
boxelder and secondary growth trees will be lost with the construction of the pond, together with
three significant trees (20" oak, 8" oak, and 36" basswood), or 64 caliper inches. A tree inventory
was requested by staff for the significant trees to be saved within the O~t1ot. This has not been
15
Welter's Brookhaven Fa .. m
Staff Report
February 6, 1998
completed. Without this information, the percentage of tree replacement will need to be considered
100%. Therefore, a tree replacement plan for 64 caliper inches will be required.
The majority of all site drainage will be collected by storm sewer, including rear yard drainage, and
directed to the NURP pond.
NATURAL RESOURCES
In 1976, the City Council adopted the Purgatory Creek Study which recommended an area of
protection along the entire Purgatory Creek corridor known as the Conservancy area. This area
generally follows the extent of flood plain, steep slopes, and other significant natural features
associated with the creek corridor. The study shows the Conservancy area closely matching the area
within Outlot A of the proposal
As part of the development of properties along Purgatory Creek, the City has obtained through
dedication, gifting, or conservation easements, protection of the corridor. In keeping with the study
and consistent with these previous approvals, the proponent should dedicate or gift the property, or
provide a conservation easement over Outlot A.
SHORELAND ORDINANCE
The shoreland area for this site is the land within 300 feet of the bank of the channel of Purgatory
Creek. Lots are considered abutting if they are within 150 feet of the creek. Lots 1,2, 8-16, Block
1 are abutting lots which need to meet the following criteria:
• Minimum size of 10,000 square feet (multi-family), 13,500 square feet (single-family).
• Minimum width at building line of 100 feet (multi-family), 120 feet (single-family).
• Minimum structure setback from Ordinary High Water Level of 150 feet (multi-family), 100
feet (single-family).
• Structures shall not comprise more than 50% of the length ofthe shoreland (multi-family).
The abutting criteria is met for all lots, except lots 11-16 which do not meet the minimum lot size of
10,000 square feet. The following options are available to address this issue:
1. Extend the lots closer to Purgatory Creek to increase the lot size. This would decrease the
amount of Conservancy area adjacent to the creek. However, this does not increase tree loss.
2. Shift the lots outside of the 150 foot abutting area. This would require a shift in the roadway
and a loss of 2 to 4 units. This option would further reduce a low density proposal already
consistent with creek lot development.
3. Obtain a waiver through the PUD. The outlot provides a large buffer zone to the creek, and
stays clear of the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Area established as part of the 1976
I~
Welter's Brookhaven Farm
Staff Report
February 6,1998
Purgatory Creek Study. Mitigation for the waiver can be based on the following:
a. Density ofthe project is less than the 2.5 unit per acre guiding for the property.
b. A greater Conservancy area consistent with the Purgatory Creek Study.
Staff recommends option 3.
ACCESS
A 1,120 foot public cul-de-sac from Homeward Hills Road will serve all but two lots of the proposal.
Single-family lots 1 and 2, Block 1 are shown to take direct access to Homeward Hills Road. City
Code limits the length of a cul-de-sac to 500 feet. A waiver through the PUD will be required. The
waiver may have merit since the use of a cul-de sac is the only reasonable option available to develop
the property which eliminates the need for any direct access to the County Road. It also provides for
a future private connection for the Welter homestead to the east should this be necessary as part of
the upgrading of Pioneer Trail.
UPGRADING OF PIONEER TRAIL
Hennepin County is designing plans for the upgrading of Pioneer Trail between Highway's 212 and
169. The upgrade generally includes a widening of the road to 4 lane, addition of medians and
various turn lanes, and a trail system. The proposal has been designed to work with the future right
of way location. However, it does not provide for adequate distance and rear yard grade between
the housing units and the new road.
To provide an appropriate distance between the housing units and roadway, Staff recommends that
the easterly end of Brookhaven Terrace be shifted slightly to the north (see attachment). This shift
will provide additional distance and allow for an appropriate grade between the twinhome units and
the upgraded road without the lots encroaching closer to the creek.
The Historic Sites Inventory conducted by the Heritage Preservation Commission identifies the
remaining foundation of the old Wolf School (HE-EPC-A28) at the northeast comer of Pioneer Trail
and Homeward Hills Road. The upgrading of the County Road will require the removal of this
foundation. The proponent has shown the placement of an historical kiosk near the site to explain
the history of the school. The proponent will need to discuss recordation of the site with the Heritage
Preservation Commission prior to any grading or construction activity.
UTILITIES
Sanitary sewer will connect to the existing MWCC sewer line which crosses the property. Water will
connect to lines along Homeward Hills Road and Pioneer Trail.
Ii)
Welter's Brookhaven "arm
Staff Report
February 6, 1998
ARCHITECTURE
The proponent indicates that there will be three or four builders for the project to ensure that all the
units will not look the same. He has provided two architectural designs that give an idea of the type
of buildings to be constructed. Since no specific architecture or builders are proposed at this time,
the architectural designs provided will become the framework for the specific design of each unit in
the development. Included in the framework will be the requirement for consistency in roofing
material, and the use of earth tone colors.
A Homeowner's Association will need to be created to control architectural continuity, maintenance
of yard areas, private drives, etc. Homeowner's Association documents will need to be submitted
for review prior to release of the final plat for the property.
LANDSCAPING
Landscaping is required based on the gross square footage of the buildings. This project requires a
total of 396 caliper inches. The landscaping plan provides 406 caliper inches, meeting the
requirements of City Code. Much of the landscaping will be used to buffer the development from
Pioneer Trail and Homeward Hills Road.
PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM
An existing bituminous path will be maintained along Homeward Hills Road.
As part of the County's upgrading plans Pioneer Trail, a new bituminous path will be constructed
along the north side of the road.
A City trail is shown on the City's Comprehensive Park and Open Space Plan from Homeward Hills
Road to Pioneer Trail along Purgatory Creek. The exact location has not been detennined. The trail
may have to use both sides of the creek and include bridge crossings to provide the best trail location.
This project is along the designated trail corridor, and should provide measures to maintain the
corridor for future trail development. If Outlot A is to remain under private ownership, it will be
necessary for the proponent to provide to the City a 20 foot wide public trail easement along the
creek.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would reconunend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 23.45 acres,
Planned Unit Development District Review on 23.45 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to
RM-6.5 on 21.77 acres, and from Rural to RI-9.5 on 0.3 acres, and from Rural to Rl-13.5 on 1.38
acres, and Preliminary Plat of23.45 acres into 43 lots, 2 outlots and road right of way, based on plans
dated February 6, 1998, the Staff Report dated February 6, 1998, and the following:
I/o
Welter's Brookhaven Farm
Staff Report
February 6,1998
1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall:
A. Revise the frontage for Lot 21, Block 2 from 64.24 feet to a minimum of 70 feet to
meet City Code for the RI-9.5 zoning district.
B. Revise the preliminary plat to show the southerly 27 feet of Outlot B as Hennepin
County right of way.
C. Provide a tree replacement plan for 64 caliper inches.
D. If Outlot A is to remain under private ownership, a conservation easement should be
provided over Outlot A.
E. Shift the easterly end of Brookhaven Terrace to the north as shown in the attachment.
This shift will provide additional distance and appropriate grade between the
twinhome units and the upgraded road.
F. If Outlot A is to remain under private ownership, the plans should be revised to show
a 20 foot wide public trail easement along the creek.
2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and
approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District.
B. Submit for review Homeowner's Association documents that address architectural
continuity, maintenance of yard areas, private drives, etc., to be recorded with the
final plat.
3. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading.
B. Install erosion control on the property, as well as tree protection fencing at the drip
line of all trees to be preserved as part of the development. Said fencing shall be field
inspected by the City Forester prior to any grading.
C. Submit a Conservation Easement for Outlot A to the City Forester for review and
approval. Said easement shall be recorded with the final plat for the property.
D. Submit a 20 foot wide public trail easement along Purgatory Creek to the City
Forester for review and approval Said easement shall be recorded with the final plat
for the property.
11
Welter's Brookhaven Farm
Staff Report
February 6, 1998
E. Work with the Heritage Preservation Commission for recordation of the old Wolf
School site.
4. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Provide a landscape surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping
improvements indicated on the approved plan.
B. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for
their review and approval.
C. Pay the Cash Park Fee.
5. The following waivers have been granted through the PUD District Review for the property:
A. Lot size less than 10,000 square feet for Lots 11-16, Block 1. City Code requires
shoreland lots to be a minimum of 10,000 square feet.
B. Cul-de-sac length of 1,120 feet. City Code limits cul-de-sac length to 500 feet.
1
rz
Arn-oXIMATE' '2. ~I SLOPE
r.~ tA4J~ ltol4) IIPteIlAl)e
CHERn & R8N WHITE
Phone 944-1140
City Council Members
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN. 55344-2230
Dear Council Members:
11787 Welters Way
Eclat Prairie, MN 55347
March 18, 1998
This letter is in regard to the Welter's Brookhaven Farm project. We are submitting this because
of our concern for several matters related to the development of this property. We are not
opposed to the project, but believe the following issues need careful consideration as this project
is being evaluated for approval.
• The conservation easement and the ISO-foot shoreline setback should remain enforced.
Variances were not approved for the homes on the opposite side of Purgatory Creek when the
original Welter's farm area was being developed (now known as Olympic Hills). More
importantly, we believe it is important to retain as much of the natural habitat as possible in
conjunction with community growth.
• We are definitely opposed to the approval of gazebos in this development. They should not
be allowed within the conservation easement or within the ISO-foot shoreline setback. These
structures run cross-purposes to the concept of not disturbing the natural habitat. If these
gazebos are allowed, who will be responsible for noise and trash control?
• The exterior colors of the homes should be complementary with a shoreland area along the
creek. The covenant in the Olympic Hills area has supported earthtone colors that blend with
the natural habitat. Since this Brookhaven Farm project is part of the original Welter farm, it
would seem logical that the exterior colors are consistent with the existing homes in the
immediate area.
We appreciate your consideration of these concerns. We are confident that your interest in
conserving the beauty of this area is as great as ours.
Sincerely,
{jilAJ t r2tm mAde
Cheryl and Ronald White
cc: Eden Prairie Planning Commission
Community Development
Parks Department
, .'
------------------------------------------------
Hennepin County
An Equal Opportunity Employer
July 22, 1997
Michael Franzen
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: Proposed Plat -Walter's Brookhaven Farm
CSAH 1
Section 26, Township 116, Range 22
Hennepin County Plat No. 2422
Review and Recommendations
Dear Mr. Franzen:
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require county review
of proposed plats abutting county roads. We reviewed the above plat and make
the following comments:
• The developer should dedicate additional right of way for Hennepin County
Project 9320, as shown on the attached graphic. The dedication begins
approximately 60' from current centerline of CSAH 1 at Homeward Hills Road,
through a 4.50 curve to approximately 70' from centerline at the plat's
east boundary. For detail questions please contact Craig Twinem, Design
Engineer, at 930-2536. All access must be via city streets, as shown. No
direct access to CSAH 1 can be permitted.
• All proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved
Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but
is not limited to access drainage and utility construction, trail
development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for
the appropriate permit forms.
• The developer must restore all areas, within the county right of way,
disturbed during construction.
Please direct any response to Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548.
As a matter of procedure, we request that the City Clerk inform us of the City
Council's action on the right of way and access provisions.
Sincerely,
d~-j(J~_-.-
Thomas D Aohnson, P. E.
Transportation Planning Engineer
TDJ/DKZ:mvr
Department of Public Works
320 Washington Avenue South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8496
(612)930-2500 FAX:(612)930-2513 TDD:(612)930-2696
Recycled Paper
, ,
I I I I , o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...... ...
To:
Through:
From:
Date:
SUbject:
BACKGROUND:
Memorandum
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural resources
Stuart A. FO~ager of Parks and Natural Resources
March 31, 1998
Supplemental Staff Report to the February 6, 1998 Community Development
Staff Report for Welter's Brookhaven Farm
This project is located on the northeast comer of Homeward Hills Road and Pioneer Trail. The
property is 23.45 acres in size and the proponent is requesting the property be developed into 40 twin
home units and three single family units.
The requested zoning would be RM-6.5 for the twin homes and RI-9.5 for one single family home
and Rl-13.5 for the two most northerly single family units.
NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES:
Tree Loss/Landscaping Plan
The majority of the trees on this site are located in Outlot A. The developer has not submitted a tree
inventory or a forest mensuration calculation, which would indicate how much total diameter inches
of significant trees are on this site.
Staffhas calculated that two significant trees as defined by City Code will be lost due to grading and
development work. One tree is a 20-inch oak. The other is a 36-inch basswood. This results in 56
diameter inches of trees lost. Since a complete tree inventory has not been submitted, the staffis
recommending that the developer replace 100% of the trees lost, which would result in 56 caliper
inches of landscaping material to mitigate the tree loss.
Based on the multifamily development, the landscaping/screening requirements would be 396 caliper
inches of landscape material. The developer has submitted a landscaping plan, which indicates a
number of coniferous and deciduous trees would be planted on this site. The trees include red pine,
Scotch pine, Austrian pine, Northern red oak, American linden, amur maple, and quaking aspen.
Most of these trees are eannarked for planting along the perimeter of the project adjacent to Pioneer
Trail and Homeward Hills Road.
NURPPond
The project has a NURP pond located in the northwesterly comer of the site. This project would
collect water from both the street and the rear yard storm sewer collection pipes. The water would
be pre-treated prior to release into Purgatory Creek. City engineering staff has been discussing
options with the developer related to the NURP pond, whether it should be a single pond or a two-
stage pond. The single stage pond has retaining walls that could present a significant safety issue for
walkers and bike riders on the trail along Homeward Hills Road. In addition, the City's
Comprehensive Trail Plan indicates a trail along Purgatory Creek from Homeward Hills Road to
Pioneer Trail. If a single stage pond is built, staff would recommend utilization of five foot chain link
fencing along the existing trail and developer grade a trail pad meeting City standards to
accommodate future trail access along Purgatory Creek.
The staffhas not reviewed the potential for a two-tier NURP pond, but would recommend the same
safety considerations be used, if that type of ponding were utilized.
Storm water calculations, as well as NURP pond holding capacities will have to be approved by the
City Engineering Department and Watershed District prior to construction of the NURP ponds for
this project.
Shoreland Ordinance
The Planning Staff Report, dated February 6, 1998, covers the details of the lot setbacks, as well as
the zoning criteria for structure setback from Purgatory Creek. The staff has recommended that
option three be applied to this project.
Option Three
Obtain a waiver through the PUD. The outlot provides a large buffer zone to the creek, and stays
clear of the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Area established as part of the 19976 Purgatory Creek
Study. Mitigation for the waiver can be based on the following:
1. Density of the project is less than the 2.5 unit per acre guiding for the property.
2. A greater conservancy area consistent with the Purgatory Creek Study.
Shoreland Recommendation
The alignment of the creek depicting the setback distances submitted by the developer does not
appear to be consistent with the aerial photo of the actual creek alignment. City staff recommends
a verification of the setback from the normal ordinary high water of the creek measured from points
on the creek closest to the proposed units be required ..
Scenic and Conservation Easement
Staff has recommended that a scenic conservation easement be applied over Outlot A. This is
consistent with the Purgatory Creek Study that was conducted in 1976. As other properties have
developed along Purgatory Creek, the City has obtained property through dedication, gifting, or
protection by conservation easements.
/}J/
The developer has requested that since this property will be controlled by a Homeowner's
Association that specific exceptions to the scenic and conservation easement be granted. These
requests include:
• The placement of gazebo structures in a couple of prominent locations.
• That trails connecting the structures to the common street be allowed within the scenic and
conservation easement area.
Staff do not believe the gazebos will be a positive amenity for the residents of this subdivision;
however, staff doesn't believe there will be a significant intrusion on the visual impact of the creek
valley from the trail. Staff does support private trails connecting to the future public trail provided
that the City would approve the location of the trails and method of construction on the slopes.
Trails/Sidewalks
There is an existing 8 foot wide bituminous path that should be maintained along Homeward Hills
Road.
As part ofthe proposed upgrade of Pioneer Trail by Hennepin County, a trail would be constructed
as part of the upgrade along the south side of the project.
Staff is recommending that a trail easement be given to the City through Outlot A. This easement
would be for future construction of a hiking trail to be built from Homeward Hills Road to Pioneer
Trail. Because of the meandering nature of Purgatory Creek and some of the steep slopes on this
project, it may be necessary to cross the creek in one or more location. Because of this, the staffhas
been unable to specuy a trail corridor. If the developer does not want to place a trail easement over
the outlot, it will be necessary to field locate a corridor and have it surveyed. Typically, the City
requires a-20-40 foot wide trail easement, depending on the terrain and the type of vegetation present
in the trail corridor area.
RECOMMENDATION:
This project was reviewed at the February 9, 1998 Planning Commission meeting and was
recommended for denial on a 4-0 vote because the project did not meet the Shoreland Ordinance or
recommendations contained within the February 6, 1998-staffreport by the Senior Planner.
The developer has requested review of the project by the City Council on April 7, 1998.
Comments/recommendations ofthe Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will be
forwarded to the City Council.
Staff recommends approval of the proposal contingent upong the commitmetns of the developer to
file a conservation easement and trail easement over Outlot A, to grade a ten foot pad for a trail
connection from the trail on Homeward Hills Road to the proposal trail along the creek, and to
dedicate the road right-of-way along Country Road 1 as requested.
Brook.memo/Stuart98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-7-98
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. V. e-
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger GERRING CAR WASH -REZONING
Michael D. Franzen
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
1. Close the Public Hearing;
2. Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 3.76 acres;
3. Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review of3.76 acres and Rezoning from
Rural to Community Commercial on 2.5 acres;
4. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 3.76 acres into 1 lot; and
5. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations (and Council conditions).
Background:
This is a car wash. The plan is consistent with the plan submitted with the guide plan change in January.
There are elevations which show a residential character, however the building looks better without pitched
roof.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the project at the March 9, 1998 meeting.
Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation:
The Parks and Recreation Commission did not review this project.
Heritage Preservation Commission Recommendation:
The Heritage Preservation Commission did not review this project.
Supporting Reports:
1. Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment
2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat
3. Staff Report dated March 6, 1998
4. Planning Commission Minutes dated March 9, 1998
5. Correspondence.
2.
GERRING CAR WASH -REZONING
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT AMENDMENT OF GERRING CAR WASH -REZONING
FOR GERRING PROPERTIES
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned
Unit Development (PUD) Concept Amendment of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Gerring Car
Wash -Rezoning PUD Concept Amendment by Gerring Properties and considered their request for
approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City
Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 7, 1998;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,
as follows:
1. Gerring Car Wash -Rezoning, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally
described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans
dated March 31, 1998.
3. That the PUD Concept did meet the recommendations of the Planning Commission
dated March 9, 1998.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of April, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
3
Gerring Car Wash -Rezoning
Exhibit A
Legal Description:
Lot I, Block I, Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 4th Addition
Lf
GERRING CAR WASH -REZONING
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF GERRING CAR WASH -REZONING FOR GERRING PROPERTIES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Gerring Car Wash -Rezoning for Gerring Properties dated March 16,
1998, consisting of3.76 acres into 1 lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in
confonnance with the provisions ofthe Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of April, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Vram, City Clerk
PIA""": ... .,j ~ -...... ~~ic.r. M i "' ....... "\c....<;.
~,t.'" q I 'CfGl 'b
~~ z..
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. GERRJNG CAR WASH -REZONING by Gerring Properties. Request for
Planned Unit Development concept Amendment of 3.76 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review of 3.76 acres, Rezoning from Rural to Community
Commercial on 2.5 acres, Site Plan Review of3. 76 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.76
acres into one lot. Location: Highway 212 and Aztec Drive.
David Gerring stated he was present to answer any questions. Wissner asked if there
were changes in the plans from the last time they were reviewed. Kipp responded that
the last time the Planning Commission reviewed the plans was to decide on the Guide
Plan land use. The current action is a request to rezone the property and construct
the facility.
Kipp reviewed the staffreport and noted staff recommended approval subject to the
conditions listed in the staff report.
Charles Radloff, Architect, showed elevation renderings of the proposed building and
noted that he did not include all the landscaping so the building would be easier to
see. He noted they have tried to design the building to be more in keeping with the
surrounding neighborhood. He reviewed the landscape plan which will include
evergreens as well as deciduous trees to provide interest.
Alexander felt it was attractive and well laid out and would blend well with the
neighborhood.
The Public Hearing was opened.
No one present wished to speak.
Wissner asked if the building met the City's noise standards and Gerring responded
they will have some special elements included to eliminate the noise from the car
wash. Sandstad commented he felt it was a good project with an above average
design.
MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Alexander, to close the Public Hearing.
Motion carried 5-0.
MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Alexander, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Gerring Properties for Planned Unit Development
Concept Amendment of 3.76 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review of
3.76 acres, Rezoning from Rural to Community Commercial on 2.5 acres, Site Plan
Review of 3.76 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.76 acres into one lot based on plans
dated March 6, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
March 6, 1998. Motion carried 5-0.
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
March 6, 1998
Gerring Car Wash
Gerring Properties
169 Anderson Lakes Corporation
Aztec Drive and Anderson Lakes Parkway.
1. Planned Unit Concept Amendment on on 2.5 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.5 acres .
. 3. Rezoning from Rural to Community Commercial on 2.5 acres.
4. Site Plan Review on 2.5 acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of3.6 acres into one lot.
1
\
\
\
\
\
::
u
-a
u
-
'"
I--~J
I ,
Staff Report
Gerring Car Wash -Rezoning
March 9, 1998
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the guide plan change from Neighborhood Commercial to Community
Commercial on January 16, 1998 subject to the following conditions.
• The architecture should be residential in character.
• Heavy landscaping will be needed to soften the view of building and parking.
• Lighting standards shall not exceed 20 feet in height. The intensity of lighting shall not
exceed a 2 footcandle average.
• All trash shall be stored in side of the building.
• Gas pumps shall not be petmitted.
• The use of the site must meet noise standards of the City code.
SITE PLAN:
The site plan shows the construction of a 18,225 square foot building on 3.76 acres at a .10 base area
ratio area ratio. The City code pennits up to a.20 base area ratio. The floor area ratio is. II. The
City code pennits up to a .40 floor area ratio.
The building meets the setback requirements of the community commercial zoning district.
The plan meets parking requirements.
The proof of parking plan shows how the property can be used for general retail use.
GRADING AND TREE LOSS:
There are no significant trees on the property.
ARCWTECTURE:
The buildings meet the exterior material requirements of the community commercial zoning district
for face brick and glass. Mechanical equipment will be screened by parapet wall.
2
q
Staff Report
Gerring Car Wash -Rezoning
March 9, 1998
The guide plan was approved based on a condition that the architecture be residential in character.
Examples of residential character would be the Kindercare on the north side of Anderson Lakes
Parkway and on Cascade Drive, and Oasis Mart on Anderson Lakes and Chestnut. In those situations
housing is closer and there is no berm in between.
The reason for a residential character is to blend in with the surrounding residential area and to create
a building with interest and detail at a pedestrian scale. The building architecture is different from the
typical rectangular box car wash (E.P. Car Wash) and contains angles, curves, jogs, brick detailing
and awnings. A pitched roof could be added to the building, but would increase the height, making
it visible from the homes to the east behind the berm.
The plans show examples of how the building would look with a pitched roof.
LANDSCAPING:
The landscaping plan meets City requirements.
UTIliTIES AND DRAINAGE:
Sewer and water is available in Aztec Drive. A NURP pond is shown on the plan.
LIGHTING:
Lighting shall be 20 foot tall downcast luminars with wattage not to exceed 400.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned
Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Change from Rural to Community Commercial,
Site Plan Review, and Preliminary Plat, based on plans dated March 6, 1998 and subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 6, 1998, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall:
2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the
Watershed District.
3
10
Staff Report
Gerring Car Wash -Rezoning
March 9, 1998
B. Submit detailed stonn water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the
City Engineer.
3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements.
C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review.
D. ,Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review.
4
1/
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Metro Waters -1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106-6793
Telephone: (612) 772-7910 Fax: (612) 772-7977
February 23, 1998
Mr. Scott Kipp
Community Development Department
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchel! Rc~
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: GERRING CAR WASH, NW 114 OF SECTION 23, Tll6N-R22W, CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY
Dear Mr. Kipp:
We have reviewed the site plans dated January 26, 1998 (received January 28, 1998) for the above-
referenced proposal (NW 1/4, Section 23, TII6N-R22W) and have the following comments to offer:
1. The proposed project does not impact DNR protected waters.
I
2. There may be wetlands on the site that are not under DNR jurisdiction. The U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers should be consulted regarding pertinent federal regulations for activities
in wetlands. In addition, impacts to these wetlands should be evaluated by the city in
accordance with the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991.
3. The following comments are general and apply to all proposed developments:
a. Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period.
The Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook
(Board of Water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan and Soil and
Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed.
b. Ifconstruction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million
gallons per year, a DNR appropriations permit is needed; You are advised that it
typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application.
:' ..
c. Construction activities which disturb five acres of land or more, are required to apply
for a stormwater pennit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Dan Sullivan
·@6121296-7219).
DNR Information: 612-296-6157, 1-800-766-6000 • TTY: 612-296-5484, 1-800-657-3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Who Values Diversity
I'A
ft.. Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a
'-_ Minimum of 10% Post-Consumer Waste
Mr. Scott Kipp
City of Eden Prairie
February 23, 1998
Page (2)
d. The comments in this letter address DNR -Division of Waters jurisdictional matters
and concerns. These comments should not be construed as DNR support or lack
thereof for a particular project.
Please contact me at 772-7914 should you have questions.
Sincerely,
cJ)~
Ceil Strauss
Area Hydrologist
CCS:PLPIkl
c: Riley-Purgatory-BluffCreek Watershed District, Bob Obermeyer
u.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Joe Vanta
13
0'-1' Minnesota De~_,1ment 01 Transportation ~ S ----------~----------~----------------------------------~; 'iol Metropolitan Division
OF Tl'I' Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
February 17, 1998
Lynda Voge
Metropolitan Council
230 East 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Lynda Voge:
SUBJECT: Gerring Car Wash Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Metropolitan Council Referral File 16492-6
East of Trunk Highway (TH) 212 and South of Anderson Lakes Parkway
Eden Prairie, Hennepin County
C.S.2744
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnlDOT) has reviewed the Gerring Car Wash
comprehensive plan amendment. We have no major concerns regarding the proposed land use
change.
We would like to remind the city of the following stipulations regarding development of property
adjacent to MnlDOT right of way.
• Ifproperty adjacent to MnlDOT right of way is to be platted, the preliminary plat must be
submitted to us for review, along with a site plan and grading and drainage plans ifprepared.
This must occur before we will issue any permits.
• We require a MnlDOT access permit for access to or across state highways or right of way,
including MnlDOT owned frontage roads. A change in the intensity or type of use of an
existing entrance also requires a permit.
• We require a MnlDOT stormwater drainage permit for any change in rate of runoff to trunk
highway right of way, or any alteration of trunk highway storm water drainage systems.
-~ .
• Any other use of or work within MnlDOT right of way, including but not limited to grading,
utility work, and landscaping, also requires a permit. The permit necessary depends on the
nature of the proposed work.
An equal opportunity employer
ILl
Lynda Voge
February 17,1998
page two
Copies of proposed plats and site plans may be sent to Sherry Narusiewicz, Local Government
Liaison Supervisor, at the above address. Questions regarding permit applications may be
directed to Bill Warden of our Permits Section at 582-1443.
Please contact me at 582-1654 with any questions regarding this review.
Scott Peters
Senior Transportation PlannerlLocal Government Liaison
c: Mike Franzen, City of Eden Prairie
It;
------------------------
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-7-98
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. YO.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT
Scott Kipp
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
1. Close the Public Hearing;
2. Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 2.76 acres and Zoning District
Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 2.76 acres;
3. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 2.76 acres into 1 lot; and
4. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations
(and Council conditions).
Background:
This site was approved for a 60,000 sq. ft. three-story office building in 1980 as part of the 31 acre Bryant Lake
Center Planned Unit Development, and amended in 1984 for a 46,000 sq. ft. three-story office building. The
request is for a 38,600 sq. ft. three-story office building.
The proposal meets City Code except for building height of 42 feet. City Code pennits buildings up to 30 feet in
the Office district. A waiver through the PUD will be required. This would be consistent with the previous office
building approvals.
The plans have been revised according to the Staff Report for an alternate rooftop mechanical equipment screening
plan should the parapet wall not work. In addition, landscaping and berming have been added along Office Ridge
Circle.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Commission voted 5-0 for approval at its February 9, 1998 meeting.
Supporting Reports:
1. Resolution for Preliminary Plat
2. Planning Commission Minutes dated March 9, 1998
3. Staff Report dated March 6, 1998
I
OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT FOR OPPIDAN, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Office Ridge Circle Development for Oppidan, Inc. dated March 25,
1998, consisting of 2. 76 acres into 1 lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in
conformance with the provisions ofthe Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of April, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
2
PLANNING COMMISSIUN MINUTES
March 9, 1998
Page 3
B. OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT by Oppidan, Inc. Request PUD District
Review on 2.76 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 2.76
acres, Site Plan Review on 2.76 acres, and Preliminary Plat of2. 76 acres into one lot. Location:
Valley View and Office Ridge Circle.
Laurie Johnson, Hanson, Thorpe & Pellinen, representing Oppidan, Inc. Stated she was present
to answer questions.
Kipp gave the staff report and noted staff recommended approval of the project, with an
alternate rooftop screening plan. Prior to City Council review, according to the Staff Report,
additional landscaping should also be added along Office Ridge Circle.
The Public Hearing was opened.
Neil Lipson, Director of Facilities for Super Valu on Valley View Road, stated they were very
concerned about the traffic which presently is very heavy on Valley View Road in front of their
facility. They are endeavoring to have a traffic signal placed at the intersection to enable their
employees better access to Valley View road.
Kipp noted there have been discussions regarding signalization of valley View Road, but
because it is a County road, it will require coordination with the County on this issue. Lipson
wanted to be sure that people were aware of the traffic problems on Valley View Road.
Foote noted that this project has less traffic associated with it than the existing approved plan.
Lipson asked if this plan would jeopardize their Planned Unit Development. Kipp responded
that the surrounding traffic generation should have been part of the Super Valu PUD, so with
less traffic proposed with this site, there should not be a negative effect to their existing PUD
approval. Sandstad inquired if Hennepin County has detennined if there are enough warrants
to require signalization at this time and Lipson responded that the traffic levels did not meet
warrants at this time. However, it was very dangerous now, and traffic was moving so fast
(about 50 mph) that it was very dangerous considering there was very little sight distance
available at this intersection. Wissner commented she felt part of the traffic problem was that
people drove too fast on the roadway. Lipson stated there will be signals placed at both the on-
ramp and off-ramp from 1-494 onto Valley View this spring.
Wissner commented she had found the proponent had met the requirements and she had not
found any reason not to approve the project.
MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Habicht, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried
5-0.
MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Habicht, to recommend to the City Council approval
of Office Ridge circle Development by Oppidan, Inc. for PUD District Review on 2.76 acres,
Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 2.76 acres, Site Plan Review
on 2.76 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.76 acres into one lot based on plans dated March 2,
1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 6, 1998. Motion
carried 5-0.
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner
March 6, 1998
Office Ridge Circle Office Building
Oppidan, Inc.
Hu~tad Development Company
Southwest comer of Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle
1. Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.76 acres.
2. Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 2.76
acres.
3. Site Plan Review on 2.76 acres.
4. Preliminary Plat of2.76 acres into 1 lot.
.~.
178 TH 5T.
, ....... t: 1.-.. •. ·
Staff Report
Office Ridge Circle Office Building
March 6, 1998
BACKGROUND
This site was approved for a 60,000 sq. ft. office building as part ofthe 31 acre Bryant Lake Center
Planned Unit Development in 1980. The PUD was amended in 1984 for a 46,000 sq. ft. three-story
office building (see attachment). The Comprehensive Guide Plan identifies this site for Regional
Commercial land use and is currently zoned Office. Office uses are permitted in a Regional
Commercial guided land use area. Surrounding land uses are the Lakeridge Office Park to the east
zoned Office, Extended Stay America Hotel to the south, zoned C-Reg-Ser, Land Rover to the west,
zoned C-Reg-Ser, and the SuperValu headquarters to the north, zoned Office.
SITE PLANIPBELIMINARY PLAT
The request is for a 38,600 sq. ft. three-story office building, and to plat the 2.76 acre property into
1 lot. The Base Area Ratio is 11 %, with a Floor Area Ratio of 32%. City Code permits up to a 30%
BAR and a 50% FAR in the Office district. The building meets all setback requirements.
City Code requires parking based on 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of building for a total of 193 parking
spaces. The plan provides 163 spaces and 31 spaces in proof of parking meeting the code
requirement. Parking setbacks meet City Code.
Access is from Office Ridge Circle. No access to Valley View Road will take place. There are a
number of existing curb cuts to this site along Office Ridge Circle that the proponent will need to
remove as part of the site construction.
GRADINGIDRAINAGE
The site has been previously graded and contains no significant vegetation.
A four foot retaining wall is proposed along the south property line. The retaining wall should be
constructed of modular masonry material.
The existing NURP pond located to the southwest of this site and constructed as part of the Extended
Stay America Hotel was designed to accommodate this project.
UTILITIES
Sanitary sewer and water is available to this site with connection to existing lines in Office Ridge
Circle.
(,
Staff Report
Office Ridge Circle Office Building
March 6, 1998
ARCHITECTURE
Building materials are consistent with City Code for 75% face brick and glass.
The building height is proposed at 42 feet. City Code permits buildings up to 30 feet in the Office
district. A waiver through the PUD will be required. Since the site is within the Major Center Area,
and the height is consistent with the previous approvals, and scales well with the three-story Extended
Stay America Hotel, the waiver may have merit.
All rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed to be screened with a two-foot parapet wall. It is
difficult to verifY whether the use of this parapet wall will achieve the required screening since
mechanical unit size and placement is unknown, and only one sight line has been shown. An alternate
screening plan should be prepared prior to City Council review which shows screening with metal
panel enclosures should the parapet wall not provide the required screening.
Proposed site lighting consists of downcast shoebox fixtures.
An exterior trash enclosure is proposed. The enclosure will need to be constructed of face brick to
match the building.
LANDSCAPING
The landscaping plan meets the caliper inch requirement based on the building square footage, and
provides the necessary screening from Valley View Road. Additional plant material should be added
along Office Ridge Circle, as shown in the attachment, to provide screening of the parking area.
Irrigation of the landscaping is proposed.
BECOMMENDA TIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.76 acres,
Zoning District Amendment within the Office zoning district on 2.76 acres, Site Plan Review on 2.76
acres, and Preliminary Plat of2.76 acres into 1 lot, based on plans dated March 2, 1998, the Staff
Report dated March 6, 1998, and the following:
1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall:
A. Provide an alternate rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan using metal panel
enclosures should the proposed parapet not provide the screening required by City
Code.
7
Staff Report
Office Ridge Circle Office Building
March 6,1998
B. Revise the landscaping plan according to the attachment for screening of parking
along Office Ridge Circle.
2. Prior to final plat approva~ the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and
erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District.
3. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Stake the grading limits with erosion control fence.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading.
C. Submit detailed plans for the construction of the retaining wall to the Inspections
Department. Said retaining wall shall be constructed with modular masonry materials.
4. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Provide a landscape surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping
improvements and mechanical equipment screening.
B. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for
their review and approval.
C. Submit exterior building material samples and colors for review.
5. The following waiver is granted as part ofthe PUD:
A. Building height of 42 feet in the Office zoning district. City Code maximum is 30
feet.
~-----------, ~--' . . ' .
• I :-
.>
-
~"
-----.. ~ . .
\J
l1.l
~ .........
Q(
-----
I
. (-lJ
\)
f
). .
\ .
~1
-
-'-
"
2.30 Ef~6,.'
-."'";:,;,:":.' ! I.:,
.. ~ ... ;~ ,."
, ,
·;
o -
': -:;:'
,~
!-•. ",
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-7-98
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. \/. E
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger DOUGLAS CORPORATION
Michael D. Franzen
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
1. Close the Public Hearing;
2. Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Industrial on 10.24 acres;
3. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 10.24 acres into 1 lot; and
4. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations (and Council conditions).
Background:
This is an industrial building which meets City requirements.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the project at the March 9, 1998 meeting.
Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation:
The Parks and Recreation Commission will review this project on April 6, 1998.
Heritage Preservation Commission Recommendation:
The Heritage Preservation Commission Recommendation did not review this project,
Supporting Reports:
1. Resolution for Preliminary Plat
2. Planning Commission Minutes dated March 9, 1998
3. Staff Report dated March 6, 1998
4. Correspondence.
I
DOUGLAS CORPORATION
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF DOUGLAS CORPORATION FOR DOUGLAS CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Douglas Corporation for Douglas Corporation dated March 6, 1998,
consisting of 10.24 acres into 1 lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in
confonnance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of April, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
. March 9, 1998
Page 4
C. DOUGLAS CORPORA nON by Douglas Corporation. Request for Zoning District Change
from Rural to 1-2 Industrial on 10.24 acres, Site Plan Review on 10.24 acres and Preliminary
Plat of 10.24 acres into one lot. Location: Southwest quadrant of V alley View Road & Golden
Triangle Drive.
Gary Vogel, Architect, representing Douglas Corporation introduced Mr. Doug Skansky, owner,
and David Walden, builder who were also present. Vogel reviewed the plans for the industrial
building and discussed the surrounding area including the land uses. He discussed the parking
requirements and noted that the building will be primarily used for warehouse and
manufacturing with a small office component. He discussed the landscaping plan which is fairly
extensive, and showed renderings of the building. He described the architectural features and
materials which will be used in the construction of the building. Sandstad asked if the
landscaping was irrigated all around the building and Vogel responded it would be. Sandstad
asked about handicapped parking spaces and Vogel indicated them on the plans.
Alexander asked about the amount of tree loss which would occur, as it appeared the site would
be graded clean and then replanted with trees after the building was constructed. Vogel
responded that it was doubtful if the trees on the site would survive transplantation and they
decided to replant the site according to the City guidelines once construction was completed.
Kipp gave the staff report and noted that staff recommended approval of the project. All lost
trees will be replaced, and the site will be nicely landscaped once construction is completed.
The Public Hearing was opened.
No one present wished to speak.
Wissner commented it was very nice to see four entrances and exits onto the site, which would
provide adequate traffic circulation. She felt the location of the building on the site was very
attractive. Habicht concurred, and commented that while the tree loss was significant, it was
being replaced and the proponent does not have the flexibility to work around the trees based
on their central location on an industrially guided property. Foote commented he thought the
building was very attractive. Wissner commented this was a business already located in Eden
Prairie and was staying in Eden Prairie, which was very gratifying!
MOTION: Alexander moved, seconded by Wissner, to close the Public Hearing. Motion
carried 5-0.
MOTION: Alexander moved, seconded by Wissner, to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Douglas Corporation for Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2
Industrial on 10.24 acres, Site Plan Review on 10.24 acres and Preliminary Plat of 10.24 acres
into one lot based on plans dated March 6, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the
Staff Report dated March 6, 1998. Motion carried 5-0.
3
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
March 6, 1998
Douglas Corporation on Golden Triangle
Douglas Corporation
Douglas Corporation
Valley View Road and Golden Triangle Drive
1. Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Industrial on 10.24 acres.
2. Site Plan Review on 10.24 acres
3. Preliminary plat of 10.24 acres into one lot.
1.9 ...,
i. ..
PK.
W. 70 TH ST.
:d-lAi)' •
\ \
\ \
,si
:
'\ 11\
\\
\.
W 75 TH "T i
TR:.f'.;·:·~; ... !: ~
F;:;:.,:~:~.: .. :)' I:
, r.;'
Staff Report
Douglas Corporation
March 9, 1998
BACKGROUND:
The site is currently guided Industrial. Surrounding land is guided Industrial. The site is currently
zoned Rural. Surrounding land is zoned Industrial.
SITE PLAN:
The site plan shows the construction of a 143,720 square foot building on 10.24 acres at a .30 base
area ratio floor area ratio. The City code pennits up to a base area ratio. The floor area ratio is.33.
The City code pennits up to a .50 floor area ratio.
The building meets the setback requirements of the Industrial zoning district.
The amount of parking required is 287 spaces. The plan meets this requirement.
GRADING AND TREE LOSS:
There are 232 inches of significant trees on the property. The majority of the trees are oak. Tree
loss is calculated at 232 inches. The required tree replacement is 310 caliper inches.
ARCHITECTURE:
The buildings meet the exterior material requirements of the industrial zoning district. Mechanical
equipment will be screened by parapet wall or individual metal screens.
LANDSCAPING:
The amount of landscaping required is based on caliper inches according to building size, tree
replacement, screening of parking, and screening of loading. The amount of caliper inches required
is 824 inches. The plan meets this requirement. The amount of tree replacement required is 310
inches. The plan meets this requirement.
UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE:
Sewer and water is available in Golden Triangle Drive. A NURP pond is shown on the plan.
2
Staff Report
Douglas Corporation
March 9, 1998
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff would recommend approval of the Zoning District Change from Rural to Industrial, Site
Plan Review, and Preliminary Plat, based on plans dated March 6, 1998 and subject to the
recommendations of the staffreport dated March 6, 1998, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the
Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the
City Engineer.
2. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements.
C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review.
D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review.
3
1
March 16, 1998
ScottKipp
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Metro Waters -1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106-6793
Telephone: (612) 772-7910 Fax: (612) 772-7977
Community Development Department
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: DOUGLAS CORPORATION -GOLDEN TRIANGLE AND BEST BUY -PHASE 3, NINE MILE
CREEK, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY
Dear Mr. Kipp:
We have reviewed the site plans both dated February 13, 1998 (received February 18, 1998) for the above-
referenced proposals (SW1I4, NE 1/4 and NW 114, SE 114 of Section 12, TI16N-R22W; NW 114 of Section
12, TI16N-R22W) and have the following comments to offer:
1. Both the Douglas Corporation -Golden Triangle and the Best Buy Company -Phase 3 plans are located
near Nine Mile Creek. The proposed Douglas Corporation site plans indicate the location of the
Nine Mile Creek 100 -year floodplain; there does not appear to be any proposed development within
the floodplain. However, the City should verify whether the 100-year floodplain for Nine Mile Creek
extends to within the boundaries of the proposed Best Buy -Phase 3 project site and, if so, should ensure
that the project is able to meet the criteria of both the Eden Prairie Shoreland and Floodplain Ordinances.
2. There may be wetlands on the site that are not under DNRjurisdiction. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers should be consulted regarding pertinent federal regulations for activities in wetlands. In
addition, impacts to these wetlands should be evaluated by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District in
accordance with the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991.
3. The following comments are general and apply to all proposed developments:
a. Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period. The
Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of
Water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan and Soil and Water Conservation
Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed.
b. If construction involves dewatering, or the proposed irrigation system would be in excess of
10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, a DNR appropriations permit is needed.
You are advised that it typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application.
DNR Information: 612-296-6157,1-800-766-6000 • TTY: 612-296-5484,1-800-657-3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Who Values Diversity
ft Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a "'.I Minimum of 10<;< Post-Consumer Waste
Mr. Kipp
March 16, 1998
Page 2
c. Construction activities which disturb five acres of land, or more, are required to apply for a
stormwater permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Dan Sullivan @ 6121296-
7219).
d. The comments in this letter address DNR -Division of Waters jurisdictional matters and
concerns. These comments should not be construed as DNR support or lack thereof for a
particular project.
Please contact me at 772-7920 or Area Hydrologist Ceil Strauss at 772-7914 should you have questions.
Sincerely,
1:a~f2t-
Hydrologist
c: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, Bob Obermeyer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Joe Yanta
To:
Through:
From:
Date:
Subject:
BACKGROUND:
Memorandum
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Stuart A. FO~nager of Parks and Natural Resources
March 10, 1998
Supplemental StaifReport to the March 6, 1998 City Planner StaifReport for
Douglas Corporation
The proponent is requesting rezoning of 10.24 acres of land, site review, and preliminary plat. This
site currently is zoned rural. The surrounding land is zoned industrial and this site is guided
Industrial.
NATURAL RESOURCES ISSUES:
Tree Loss/Landscaping Plan
There are 11 trees on this site that are defined as significant by City Code. The tree cover is
predominately oak with a few cottonwood trees. There is a total of232 diameter inches of significant
trees. Tree loss is calculated at 232 diameter inches. The required tree replacement is 310 caliper
inches of landscape material.
The landscape plan for the project indicates that a variety of deciduous and coniferous material will
be planted on the site. There is a total of293 trees for a total of 831 caliper inches oflandscape trees
required. This is based on the square foot area and the height of this building. Staff would
recommend that some ofthe trees along Valley View Road on the northerly side be changed from
a honey locust to oaks. This is the area where most of the oak trees are being removed by the
proposed construction. For each of the trees lost due to construction, there are approximately 35
trees being planted.
NURPPond
A NURP pond is planned for this project in the northwest comer of the site. Drainage from the
parking lot area, as well as roof drainage will be channeled into this NURP pond for sedimentation
prior to discharge into the Nine-Mile Creek floodplain west of the site. The developer will be
/()
required to submit final storm water calculations to the City Engineer and Watershed District to
confirm the storm water calculations.
Sidewalks/Trails
Currently, there is an 8' bituminous trail along Valley View Road and Golden Triangle Drive. Based
on the plans that were submitted, it appears that a portion of this trail is outside of the right-of-way
and on private property. Staff would recommend that a trail easement be given to the City to allow
the trail to remain in its current location. In addition, staff is recommending that the appropriate curb
cuts be made at the driveway entrances to allow proper crossing of these entrances by pedestrian and
bicycle traffic.
RECOMMENDATION:
This project was reviewed at the March 9, 1998 Planning Commission and was approved on a 5-0
vote. Staff would recommend approval of the project based on the information included in the
Planning Staff Report and the recommendations within this supplemental staff report.
Douglas/Staurt98
1/
DATE: 04/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Public Hearing
ITEM NO: V,f
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Vacation 98-01
Engineering Division Vacation of Right-of-Way for part of West 70th Street
David Olson Published 03/19/98
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:
1. Close the public hearing
2. Adopt the resolution vacating the right-of-way for part of West 70th Street.
Overview:
The owner of originating property has requested the vacation of a 16.5-foot wide section of West 70th
Street adjacent to the plat of Lee Data (presently owned by Best Buy). This strip of property previously
provided access from TH 169/212 to property now platted as MN TX Business Campus and was
dedicated to the City at the time of platting in anticipation of the continuance of West 70th Street to
Flying Cloud Drive. Responding to a request in 1994 from Best Buy to vacate a parallel strip dedicated
in the Lee Data Plat, the City determined that West 70th Street would not be extended to Flying Cloud
Drive. The originating property owner requests this vacation to allow transfer of ownership to Best Buy.
Best Buy will then include this vacated strip in a new plat.
Supporting InCormation:
• Vacation drawings
• Legal description in the Resolution for Vacation 98-01.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
VACATION OF
PART OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
FOR WEST 70TH STREET
(VAC 98-01)
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain right-of-way described as follows:
All that part of the right-of-way for West 70th Street as dedicated in the recorded plat of MN TX
Business Campus, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies Westerly of the northerly extension of
the east line of the recorded plat of LEE DATA, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said right-of-way
is located in the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Towns~ip 116, Range 22.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 7, 1998 after due notice was given to affected property
owners and published in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851;
WHEREAS, is has been determined that the said right-of-way is not necessary and has no interest to the
public, therefore should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
L Said right-of-way as above described is hereby vacated.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with
M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1998.
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
SEAL
-,.
.~ ...
.. r
O
4. :r.:
!.Ii
.. ;
!l..
c:r
'3
•
J.L
Q .
\0-
~
q
m 'r-
<:(
V
$
lu
rtJ
VI V)
V1
~
bJ
."")
"Z
D-
.H 1
VI <t z
L..
-::> en \j
~:r.
:--<r
r'''' -!
DATE: 04/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Public Hearing
ITEM NO: V. G.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Vacation 98-02
Engineering Division Vacation of Utility Easement in Lee Data
David Olson Published 03/19/98
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:
1. Close the public hearing
2. Adopt the resolution vacating the utility easement located in Lee Data.
Overview:
The property owner has requested this vacation':clear an encumbrance on the property. A watermain
previously located within the easement has been abandoned and a part of the building (expanded in 1994)
now extends over the easement.
Supporting Information: .
• Vacation drawings
• Legal description in the Resolution for Vacation 98-02
I
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT
IN LEE DATA
(VAC 98-02)
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie a certain utility easement described as follows:
That part of a 15.00 foot utility easement, originally dedicated in the recorded plat of Lee Data,
HeniJ.epin County, Minnesota, which lies 7.50 feet to the left and 7.50 feet to the right of the
following described centerline:
Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, in said plat; thence on an assumed
bearing of North 86 degrees 55 minutes 33 seconds West along the north line of said Lot 1,
a distance of 120.42 feet; thence South 1 degree 30 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of
197.18 feet; thence south 88 degrees 47 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 5.21 feet;
thence South 0 degrees 44 minutes 22 seconds West a distance of 7.50 feet to the point of
beginning of the centerline to be described; thence continuing South 0 degrees 44 minutes 22
seconds West a distance of 47.68 feet; thence North 86 degrees 11 minutes 28 seconds East
a distance of 82.45 feet; thence South 0 degrees 54 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of
100.00 feet and said centerline there terminating.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 7, 1998 after due notice was given to affected property
owners and published in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851;
WHEREAS, is has been determined that the said utility easement is not necessary and has no interest to
the public, therefore should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. Said utility easement as above described is hereby vacated.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with
M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on December 16, 1997.
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
SEAL
0· .. · ... <.J::.
" ~ " ." . •• ,:\:i. ").:'~ ~~v f ;' .. : .... , .. -'("
SHADY
z
:"
.', I' . 1'\ 'v' ~. II-\,~ I
PI<. It .. ·· . '( it·.
.~ rd .... ... ;nd 0
1-~
W. 70 TH ST,
", '..J '" .',. I '::';-00\1,' .
", t'I\' . ' .. , .... .
I",: I'~ , : -· \...--,.---.
I." ,.. , .
:.)
!ND,
rIA'" ' .. r ..
W. 69 TH.· ST,'
'I"f'~'" :,1 'H,t'.
,S t
I
VAC '18-02.
LEE DATA
N. [ cor. of the
N. W ~ of Sec/2
(}{enn. Co Mon) _ ,
\
\
\
,:: L.,
1 .. '/ ,
~-/6500-
I
I
......... ,'-,
! .. ',
I h.. I
I
I " ,'\/ r~! ,: .~.: .,'-j I I I I , ,-I ~. '~I J ,
I : ~
: ~~~
~I ~~Q..
t!;1 ~ <:s
.... : I ~
I
l
I
I
/
/
/
I I
....... "220/
I ' .......
. ~~ ~}l.t I ~ / . "../..... /
I ~ I
I
I
CUTLeT ,.
( 16)
PRt:vrouSlY 'VAC-AiIED
72:r6t I~ "( -0 f=' -WA Y
(NOR1HGA 1E PKWY,L) _----/ ----------~~~
(6)
!
I
1
i
/
'" ~..-. .
'" ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ 1 ft:,'\ ~
~~'-~
iii ...,
:;.t :"':"';]7
'";~ I '.;.:~
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
I
I
I VAG
..
g 70TH
371. 66
~''31''35"W
" N .
%
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Calendar 04/07/98
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.
Finance Payment of Claims VI.
Checks 61323 to 61790
Action/Direction:
Approve Payment of Claims
I
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 23-MAR-1998 (16:18)
DIVISION TOTAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N/A
CONTINGENCY
LEGISLATIVE
LEGAL COUNSEL
GENERAL SERVICES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
DATA PROCESSING
FINANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
INFORMATION
ENGINEERING
INSPECTIONS
FACILITIES
ASSESSING
CIVIL DEFENSE
POLICE
FIRE
PARK ADMIN
STREETS/TRAFFIC
PARK MAINTENANCE
PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY
STREET LIGHTING
FLEET SERVICES
ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
COMMUNITY DEV
COMMUNITY CENTER
YOUTH RECREATION
SPECIAL EVENTS
ADULT RECREATION
RECREATION ADMIN
ADAPTIVE REC
OAK POINT POOL
ARTS
PARK FACILITIES
PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
CITY CENTER
SW METRO TRANSIT
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE
PRAIRIEVIEW
CUB FOODS
DEN ROAD BUIDLING
WATER DEPT
SEWER DEPT
STORM DRAINAGE
AGENCY FUNDS
EQUIPMENT
$50.50
$4,735.68
$1,645.26
$6,550.20
$16,379.68
$2,585.41
$1,068.84
$365.80
$2,054.22
$3,652.13
$487.93
$331.16
$5,676.95
$6,073.48
$18.84
$28,839.71
$3,109.88
$750.00
$8,626.79
$2,532.70
$47.00
$48,636.25
$22,164.22
$4,368.00
$137.50
$11,678.92
$4,057.21
$226.77
$10,410.71
$177.55
$447.36
$229.31
$4,449.48
$120.00
$288,545.20
$74,671.79
$17,484.29
$26.71
$2,787.50
$56,492.01
$57,777.81
$118,363.84
$325.00
$2,208.92
$199,394.07
$46.24
$5,470.67
$76,743.20
$1,103,022.69*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
61323
61324
61325
61326
61327
61328
61329
61330
61331
61332
61333
61334
61335
61336
61337
61338
61339
61340
61341
61342
61343
61344
61345
61346
61352
61353
61354
61355
61356
61357
61358
61362
61363
61375
61379
61388
61392
61401
61402
61404
61405
61406
61407
61408
61409
61410
61411
61412
61413
61414
61416
61417
61418
61419
61420
$45.00
$160.00
$28.00
$6.25
$6.25
$62.55
$1,682.64
$70.00
$47.00
$177.81
$303.35
$405.00
$20.33
$30.00
$235.95
$30.00
$24.00
$21. 00
$44.36
$49.00
$352.32
$770.00
$615.91
$49,431.73
$39.50
$53.00
$387.50
$32.76
$5,727.68
$811.90
$8,238.32
$219.50
$61,509.63
$4,456.77
$44,479.89
$9,641. 04
$17,563.38
$790.62
$2,166.07
$1,687.91
$50.00
$1,450.60
$26.00
$180.13
$209.97
$315.00
$210.87
$113.31
$276.52
$788.59
$50.00
$140.00
$50.00
$25.00
$79.20
VENDOR
GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES
AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING
ADAMS, MARY
ANDERSON, BOB
BATCHELDER, LARRY
CHASKA COMMUNITY CENTER
CIRCUIT CITY
CIRCUS PIZZA
CONKLIN, JOAN
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
DRISKILLS NEW MARKET
HENNEPIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL
HOWARD, CECILIA
LABORE, JEAN
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE
MINNESOTA GFOA
ROGERS, LISA
RUSINKO, MARY
SUBWAY
UNDERWATER WORLD MALL OF AMERI
CAMAS-SHIELY DIVISION
CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRE
GE CAPITAL
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
ICMA
S & B MFG CO INC
STATE FARM INSURANCE
STENCILS & MARKING PROD INC
US POSTMASTER
BELLBOY CORPORATION
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO
VINIFERA MINNESOTA
WINE COMPANY, THE
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
BECKER, DAVE
CORPORATE EXPRESS
CRAANE, CARL
FERRELLGAS
FRANZEN, JAMES
GFOA
GRAND VIEW LODGE
HOEFT, JULIE
KELLY INN
MENARDS
MILES, BRADLEY
MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAFCI
MORROW, JAMES
MSANI S/A J B PREECE
NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT
23-MAR-1998 (16:18)
DESCRIPTION
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
OTHER EQUIPMENT
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
TRAINING SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
LICENSES & TAXES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
BLDG REPAIR & MAINT
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
GRAVEL
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
RENTALS
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
TRAINING SUPPLIES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
HOPE LOAN RECEIVABLE
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
POSTAGE
WINE DOMESTIC
WINE IMPORTED
WINE DOMESTIC
WINE DOMESTIC
BEER CASES
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
WINE DOMESTIC
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
WINE IMPORTED
WINE DOMESTIC
WINE DOMESTIC
SCHOOLS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BUILDING PERMIT
MOTOR FUELS
DEPOSITS
CONFERENCE
SCHOOLS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
SCHOOLS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT
PROGRAM
INFORMATION SYSTEM
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
WINTER SKILL DEVELOP
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
POLICE
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
KIDS KORNER
HUMAN RESOURCES
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
POOL OPERATIONS
WINTER SKILL DEVELOP
ADULT PROGRAM
PARK MAINTENANCE
IN SERVICE TRAINING
SKI TRIPS/WINTER CAMP
SKI TRIPS/WINTER CAMP
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
STREET MAINTENANCE
ADULT PROGRAM
GENERAL
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
FINANCE DEPT
ICE ARENA
hope auto repair
TRAFFIC SIGNS
ASSESSING-ADMIN
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
POLICE
GENERAL
FD 10 ORG
ICE ARENA
ESCROW
IN SERVICE TRAINING
POLICE
OAK POINT OPERATIONS
POLICE
EPCC MAINTENANCE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
FD 10 ORG
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR
61421
61422
61423
61424
61425
61426
61427
61428
61429
61430
61431
61432
61433
61434
61435
61436
61437
61438
61439
61440
61441
61442
61444
61445
61446
61501
61502
61503
61505
61506
61507
61508
61509
61510
61511
61512
61513
61514
61515
61516
61517
61518
61519
61520
61521
61522
61523
61524
61525
61526
61527
61528
61529
61530
61531
$758.34 POTTER, GRETCHEN
$120.00 SAMUEL FRENCH INC
$75.00 STARK, EMMETT
$800.00 SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS
$52.92 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC
$50.00 VOSBEEK, PETER
$124.91
$37.50
$37.50
$120.00
$64.03
$50.00
$100.00
$1,172.08
$600.00
$37.50
$169.00
$15.00
$866.25
$90.00
$35.00
$58,186.77
$600.00
$450.00
$57.00
$21. 25
$91.49
$1,362.17
$2.00
$15.00
$15.00
$543.36
$15.00
$7.75
$392.00
$4,469.55
$2.00
$6,577.00
$200.00
$14.00
$72.00
$7,436.85
$15.00
$5,840.16
$36.00
$1,393.00
$29.00
$58.00
$4,699.45
$7.75
$156.80
$3,597.50
$1,000.00
$40.00
$121.50
WERTS, SANDY
BARTUSEK, RON
CASSADY, KEVIN
CITY ENGINEERS ASSOC OF MINNES
CORDES, JEFFREY
IFMA
IPMA
J A PRICE AGENCY INC
JACKSON, RICHARD
JOHNSON, BRUCE
LAMBERT, BOB
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
MANLEY BROS CONSTRUCTION
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PR
NORTH AMERICAN LAKE MANAGEMENT
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
POTTER, GRETCHEN
PRIMA
PRODOEHL, JERRY
MS, TERRY
ABBOTT OFFICE SYSTEMS
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
BERGELAND, KAY
BOLAND, BEVERLY
BRAG EN , MARK
CAMAS-SHIELY DIVISION
CAMPBELL, CAROL
CHRISTOPHER, CHERYL
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
DAY DISTRIBUTING
DIERAUER, NANCY
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS
FLYNN, SHARON
GEKAS, JAMES
GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY
HOWARD, CECILIA
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457
ILANGARATNE, CHRIS
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI
JONES, JENNIFER
KIST, ELISE
MARK VII
MEYER, SUZANNE
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE
MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS
MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI
PEPSI COLA COMPANY
23-MAR-1998 (16:18)
DESCRIPTION
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
SMALL TOOLS
SCHOOLS
TRAVEL
LICENSES & TAXES
LICENSES & TAXES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
MILEAGE AND PARKING
TRAINING SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
INSURANCE
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
LICENSES & TAXES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
CONFERENCE
BUILDING PERMIT
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ELECTRIC
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
CONFERENCE
CONFERENCE
LESSONS/CLASSES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
LESSONS/CLASSES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
LESSONS/CLASSES
GRAVEL
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
BEER 6/12
BEER 6/12
LESSONS/CLASSES
BEER 6/12
BOND DEDUCTION
LESSONS/CLASSES
YOUTH RESIDENT MEMBERSHIP
DEFERRED COMP
LESSONS/CLASSES
DEFERRED COMP
LESSONS/CLASSES
UNION DUES WITHHELD
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
BEER 6/12
LESSONS/CLASSES
MISC TAXABLE
DEFERRED COMP
DEFERRED COMP
CREDIT UNION
MISC TAXABLE
ARTS
ARTS
ARTS
PROGRAM
WATER WELL #2
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE
IN SERVICE TRAINING
SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL
SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL
IN SERVICE TRAINING
TREE DISEASE
IN SERVICE TRAINING
IN SERVICE TRAINING
GENERAL
ARTS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
IN SERVICE TRAINING
IN SERVICE TRAINING
FD 10 ORG
IN SERVICE TRAINING
IN SERVICE TRAINING
STORMWATER LIFTSTATION
ARTS
IN SERVICE TRAINING
IN SERVICE TRAINING
OAK POINT LESSONS
GENERAL
SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL
POOL LESSONS
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
POOL LESSONS
STREET MAINTENANCE
ICE ARENA
POOL LESSONS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
POOL LESSONS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
FD 10 ORG
ICE ARENA
COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN
FD 10 ORG
POOL LESSONS
FD 10 ORG
POOL LESSONS
FD 10 ORG
OAK POINT LESSONS
POOL LESSONS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
OAK POINT LESSONS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
FD 10 ORG
FD 10 ORG
FD 10 ORG
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
61532
61533
61534
61535
61536
61537
61538
61539
61540
61541
61542
61543
61544
61545
61546
61547
61548
61549
61550
61551
61552
61553
61554
61555
61556
61557
61558
61559
61560
61569
61570
61571
61572
61573
61574
61575
61576
61577
61578
61579
61580
61581
61582
61583
61584
61585
61586
61587
61588
61589
61590
61591
61592
61593
61594
$50,878.56
$21.25
$7.75
$6,430.30
$34.95
$187.70
$330.79
$358.00
$116.64
$21. 00
$66.00
$66.00
$70.00
$365.04
$28.00
$75.00
$15,842.00
$310.94
$141. 05
$10.00
$261. 51
$41.16
$118.29
$1,014.68
$96.04
$25.50
$42.71
$2,955.00
$19.55
$36.00
$30.00
$30.00
$389.07
$105.00
$22.50
$37.50
$13.00
$100.00
$100.00
$20,927.00
$81.47
$47.88
$15,101.00
$13.00
$19,831.00
$7.67
$7.75
$182.00
$2,101. 80
$62.40
$1,075.00
$90.50
$3,063.90
$90.00
$32.00
VENDOR
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
RENIER, JOAN
SWING, PAMELA
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
TWIN CITY TIRE
UNITED WAY
UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC
VERSATILE VEHICLES INC
BANDEMER, LISA
BRAND, DONNA
CAMPBELL, LOIS
HENDRICKSON, KAY
MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM
POTTER, GRETCHEN
RHOADES, MARTHA
ASE/ACT
BROOKDALE DODGE INC
CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE
HELLING, LAURIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEF ASS
MCGLYNN BAKERIES
MEYER, NICOLE
SEARS
US POSTMASTER -HOPKINS
WM MUELLER AND SONS INC
DUONG, SOM
FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL
MRPA
RYANS RUBBER STAMPS
ANDERSON, ANN
ANDERSON, IRENE
ANDERSON, LIZ
AT&T
BOLD, PAULINE
CALDERON, WENDY
CARSON, JAN
CHAFFEE, JEAN
CIRCUS PIZZA
CIRCUS PIZZA
COON RAPIDS CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH
COUSIN SUBS
DISCOVERY ZONE
ERICKSON CHEVROLET PONTIAC INC
GRIEG, JANICE
GROSSMAN CHEVROLET COMPANY INC
HOWARD, CECILIA
LINDGREN, JULIE
MENARDS
MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFET
MINNESOTA ZOO
MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL
PEACHTREE BUSINESS PRODUCTS IN
RICHFIELD, CITY OF
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA
SEIFERT, LEE
23 -MAR-1998 (16: 18)
DESCRIPTION
PERA WITHHELD
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
BEER 6/12
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
UNITED WAY WITHHELD
EQUIPMENT PARTS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
LICENSES & TAXES
AUTOS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
MILEAGE AND PARKING
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
EQUIPMENT PARTS
POSTAGE
GRAVEL
SWIMMING-NAM
CANINE SUPPLIES
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
LICENSES & TAXES
LESSONS/CLASSES
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
TELEPHONE
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
AUTOS
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
AUTOS
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
AUTOS
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
LESSONS/CLASSES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
AUTOS
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
AUTOS
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
s
PROGRAM
FD 10 ORG
POOL LESSONS
OAK POINT LESSONS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FD 10 ORG
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ARTS
ARTS
SKI TRIPS/WINTER CAMP
ADULT PROGRAM
ADULT PROGRAM
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
ARTS
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
piS REVOLVING FD
FIRE
RECREATION ADMIN
FIRE
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
WATER ACCOUNTING
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
POOL LESSONS
POLICE
SOFTBALL
HUMAN RESOURCES
POOL LESSONS
ADULT PROGRAM
ADULT PROGRAM
GENERAL
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
ICE ARENA
OAK POINT LESSONS
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
pis REVOLVING FD
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
pis REVOLVING FD
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
P/R REVOLVING FD
WINTER SKILL DEVELOP
OAK POINT LESSONS
PARK MAINTENANCE
pis REVOLVING FD
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
SUMMER THEATRE
EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS
P/R REVOLVING FD
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
ADULT PROGRAM
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
61595
61596
61597
61598
61599
61600
61601
61602
61603
61604
61605
61606
61607
61608
61609
61610
61611
61612
61613
61614
61615
61616
61617
61618
61619
61620
61621
61622
61623
61624
61626
61627
61628
61629
61630
61631
61632
61633
61634
61635
61636
61637
61638
61639
61640
61641
61642
61643
61644
61645
61646
61647
61648
61649
61650
$39.30
$113.15
$2,721.36
$303.75
$1,670.83
$51. 00
$214.12
$375.14
$1,058.26
$1,104.55
$233.90
$36.09
$232.90
$53.10
$23.33
$28.00
$260.62
$3,184.20
$243.79
$1,375.95
$547.60
$41. 33
$44.00
$256.50
$7,256.04
$157.62
$1,149.39
$120.00
$293.62
$998.41
$22,676.08
$889.83
$4,250.50
$51. 52
$450.00
$230.17
$212.99
$129.35
$20.49
$70.00
$74.15
$60.97
$280.04
$152.13
$559.13
$2,275.00
$734.00
$185.34
$695.55
$112.28
$910.04
$3,500.00
$425.73
$378.29
$48.00
VENDOR
SUBWAY
UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
WILDER, LOIS
WM MUELLER AND SONS INC
WORKS, THE
CARLTON CO HUMAN SERVICES CTR
CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT AND
WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT
DELANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS
GAS SUPPLY COMPANY
MINNCOMM PAGING
PETTY CASH
VATLAND, SUE
YOUNG, DEBBIE
ALBINSON INC
AMERICAN PAGING OF MN
AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY
ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY
ANDERSON PUBLISHING COMPANY
APCO INTERNATIONAL
APT, JOE
B & F DISTRIBUTING
BARTLEY SALES COMPANY INC
BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY
BCA/TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT
BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC
BELLBOY CORPORATION
BLACK & VEATCH
BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE*
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
BROADWAY AWARDS
BUCK, NATHAN
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS
CENTRAIRE INC
CHANHASSEN LAWN AND SPORTS
CLAREYS INC
CO 2 SERVICES
COMMERCIAL SAW COMPANY
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC
COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOC
CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC
CSM CORPORATION
DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL IN
DALCO
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO
DATA FIBER PRODUCTS INC
DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC
DECISION RESOURCES LTD
DECORATIVE DESIGNS INC
DELEGARD TOOL CO
DEM CON LANDFILL INC
23-MAR-1998 (16:18)
DESCRIPTION
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
TELEPHONE
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
SAND
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
GARNISHMENT WITHHELD
GARNISHMENT WITHHELD
GARNISHMENT WITHHELD
CREDIT UNION
BUILDING
EQUIPMENT PARTS
COMMUNICATIONS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PRINTING
TRAINING SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
MOTOR FUELS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
EQUIPMENT PARTS
SCHOOLS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
DESIGN & CONST
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
CONTRACTED BLDG MAINT
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
EQUIPMENT PARTS
CHEMICALS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
TRAINING SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
PRINTING
NEW CAR EQUIPMENT
DEPOSITS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
NEW CAR EQUIPMENT
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
RENTALS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
WASTE DISPOSAL
PROGRAM
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
TRAFFIC SIGNS
WATER UTILITY-GENERAL
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SNOW & ICE CONTROL
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
FD 10 ORG
FD 10 ORG
FD 10 ORG
FD 10 ORG
COMMUNITY CTR KOO
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
INSPECTION-ADMIN
FINANCE DEPT
WINTER SKILL DEVELOP
WINTER SKILL DEVELOP
ENGINEERING DEPT
GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
GENERAL
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
POLICE
POLICE
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE
ICE ARENA
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION
EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS
PAVEMENT MGMT PROGRAM
SR CTR OPERATIONS
VOLLEYBALL
POLICE
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
TREE REMOVAL
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POOL MAINTENANCE
PARK MAINTENANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
STREET MAINTENANCE
COMMUNITY SERVICES
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ESCROW
EPCC MAINTENANCE
EPCC MAINTENANCE
FIRE
POLICE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
COMMUNITY SERVICES
EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
STREET MAINTENANCE
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
61651
61652
61653
61654
61655
61656
61657
61658
61659
61660
61661
61662
61663
61664
61665
61666
61667
61668
61669
61670
6167l
61672
61673
61674
61675
61676
61677
61678
61679
61680
61681
61682
61683
61684
61685
61686
61687
61688
61689
61690
61691
61692
61693
61694
61695
61696
61697
61698
61699
61700
61701
61702
61703
61704
61705
$350.00
$119.00
$120.27
$1,274.04
$188.00
$10.65
$1,090.92
$1,116.00
$165.00
$126.63
$62.28
$109.22
$103.84
$35.83
$51.02
$1,354.59
$109.00
$43.23
$215.77
$256.45
$335.91
$576.37
$1,315.29
$182.00
$40.00
$103.50
$517.56
$167.50
$247,269.00
$5,011.50
$364.00
$263.63
$310.00
$16.24
$234.00
$26.55
$351.34
$188.12
$278.46
$400.33
$147.70
$904.30
$157.55
$1,864.51
$283.18
$905.48
$25,622.31
$30.00
$7,818.28
$1,068.00
$219.53
$577.50
$57.52
$500.00
$1,968.54
VENDOR
DEPARDE, HILLARY
DIAMOND LABORATORIES INC
DON E WILLIAMS CO
EARL F ANDERSEN INC
EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMER
EDEN PRAIRIE CLEANERS-REGAL CL
EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N
EDINA S W PLUMBING
ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD
FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL
FORCE AMERICA
FRANKLIN COVEY
FRESCO INC
G & K SERVICES DIRECT PURCHASE
G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL
GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN
GILLUND ENTERPRISES
GLENROSE FLORAL AND GIFT SHOPS
GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
GTE DIRECTORIES
GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC
HANCE COMPANIES
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON
HENDERSON, JOSH
HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF OF POLIC
HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S ACCO
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER R&B
HENNEPIN TECHICAL COLLEGE
HERC U LIFT
HIGLEY, STEVE
HIRSHFIELDS DECORATING CENTERS
HOLMES, TOM
ICE SKATING INSTITUTE OF AMERI
INLAND TRUCK PARTS COMPANY
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC
ITS A KEEPER
J H LARSON ELECTRICAL COMPANY
J W PEPPER OF MINNEAPOLIS*
JANEX INC
JUSTUS LUMBER COMPANY
LAKE REGION VENDING
LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES
LAMETTRYS COLLISION
LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW
LAW ENFORCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
LINCOLN STUDIOS MIDWEST
LINE X
LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT
LUNDEEN, BOB
MARKS CERTICARE AMOCO
MARTIN-MCALLISTER
MCSB INC
23-MAR-1998 (16:18)
DESCRIPTION
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
NEW CAR EQUIPMENT
MISC FIRE EQUIPMENT
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
ADVERTISING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TRANSPORTATION
CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
CANINE SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT PARTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES
EMPLOYEE AWARD
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
ADVERTISING
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
EQUIPMENT PARTS
DESIGN & CONST
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
RECORDING DOCUMENT FEE
BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
RIGHT OF WAY & EASEMENTS
BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
EQUIPMENT PARTS
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
BLDG REPAIR & MAINT
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
EQUIPMENT PARTS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
EMPLOYEE AWARD
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
CLEANING SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
TOBACCO PRODUCTS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
LEGAL SERVICE
MISCELLANEOUS
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
NEW CAR EQUIPMENT
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
MOTOR FUELS
PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM
SOFTWARE
1
PROGRAM
WINTER SKILL DEVELOP
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE
TRAFFIC SIGNS
JULY 4TH CELEBRATION
POLICE
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS
IN SERVICE TRAINING
POLICE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
TREE REMOVAL
PARK MAINTENANCE
STREET MAINTENANCE
ICE ARENA
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
FITNESS CENTER
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
STREET LIGHTING
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
RIVERVIEW RD
ADULT OPEN GYM
POLICE
ENGINEERING DEPT
POLICE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CSAH4 COUNTY PROJECT 9016
POLICE
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VOLLEYBALL
EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS
VOLLEYBALL
ICE ARENA
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS
ART & MUSIC
EPCC MAINTENANCE
STREET MAINTENANCE
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
LEGAL COUSEL
POLICE
10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PARK MAINTENANCE
ICE ARENA
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
CC CAPITAL OUTLAY
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
61706
61707
61708
61709
61710
61711
61712
61713
61714
61715
61716
61717
61718
61719
61720
61721
61722
61723
61724
61725
61726
61727
61728
61729
61730
61731
61732
61733
61734
61735
61736
61737
61738
61739
61740
61741
61742
61743
61744
61745
61746
61747
61748
61749
61750
61751
61752
61753
61754
61755
61756
61757
61758
61759
61760
$403.00
$92.00
$1,230.54
$1,351.08
$198,894.91
$4,735.68
$128.20
$120.81
$259.20
$7,646.65
$444.56
$1,308.98
$215.52
$455.76
$250.00
$130.95
$19.15
$2,400.00
$327.25
$131. 63
$41. 50
$523.75
$207.01
$206.08
$170.39
$88.33
$61. 25
$652.68
$28.50
$443.09
$89.90
$491.18
$3,158.58
$2,762.43
$44.70
$15.92
$103.40
$651.31
$986.43
$504.92
$119.43
$120.45
$35.50
$5,826.20
$51. 21
$34.06
$1,309.00
$61. 35
$461.39
$356.27
$964.85
$142.00
$306.40
$130.80
$699.62
VENDOR
MEDICINE LAKE TOURS
MEDTOX
METRO SYSTEMS
METROMAIL
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME
METROQUIP INC
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION
MINN BLUE DIGITAL
MINNESOTA CONWAY
MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOD SERVICE
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
MUNICILITE
MUSICLAND GROUP
NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE
NORSTAN COMMUNICATIONS INC
NORTH STAR ICE
NORTHERN
NUNNALLY, PATRICK
NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO
OHLIN SALES
PARK NICOLLET CLINIC HEALTHSYS
PEPSI COLA COMPANY
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO
PITNEY BOWES INC
PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN
PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING
QUALITY SALES & SERVICE INC
QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC
QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER
R E FRITZ INC
RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING CO INC
RESPOND SYSTEMS
RICOH CORPORATION
RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATE
RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
RITZ CAMERA
ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC
ROBERTS COMPANY INC
ROLLINS OIL CO*
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO
SAFETY-KLEEN
SALLY DISTRIBUTORS
SAMUEL FRENCH INC
SHAKOPEE VALLEY PRINTING
SHARPS AWAY
SIGN SOLUTIONS
SIT, ERIC
SIWEK LUMBER & MILLWORK INC
SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS
SNAP-ON TOOLS
SNELL MECHANICAL INC
SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING-
SPECIALTY SCREENING
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
23-MAR-1998 (16:18)
DESCRIPTION
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
RENTALS
WASTE DISPOSAL
OTHER EQUIPMENT
WASTE DISPOSAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
MISCELLANEOUS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
NEW CAR EQUIPMENT
POSTAGE
EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
MISC TAXABLE
EQUIPMENT PARTS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PRINTING
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
EQUIPMENT PARTS
RENTALS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
PRINTING
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
WASTE DISPOSAL
POSTAGE
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
CANINE SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
DESIGN & CONST
EQUIPMENT PARTS
PHOTO SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES
LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES
EQUIPMENT PARTS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
PRINTING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
BUILDING MATERIALS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
SMALL TOOLS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR
EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
DESIGN & CONST
PROGRAM
ADULT PROGRAM
HUMAN RESOURCES
REC SUPERVISOR
POLICE
SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL
RESERVE
RILEY LAKE
ENGINEERING DEPT
PARK MAINTENANCE
EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
GENERAL
HUMAN RESOURCES
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1997 CLG GRANT 27-97-12026.009
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
FIRE
HUMAN RESOURCES
CONCESSIONS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
GENERAL
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ARTS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EPCC MAINTENANCE
GENERAL
FIRE
POLICE
GENERAL
GENERAL
10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
STREET MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PARK MAINTENANCE
SOCIAL
ARTS
COMMUNITY BROCHURE
HUMAN RESOURCES
EPCC MAINTENANCE
WINTER SKILL DEVELOP
STREET MAINTENANCE
TRAFFIC SIGNS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EPCC MAINTENANCE
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
FIRE
Scenic Heights Road
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
61761
61762
61763
61764
61765
61766
61767
61768
61769
61770
61771
61772
61773
61774
61775
61776
61777
61778
61779
61780
61781
61782
61783
61784
61785
61786
61787
61788
61789
61790
$2,061. 50
$104.00
$374.06
$820.69
$12.59
$1,600.00
$893.98
$375.00
$2,232.00
$216.00
$90.50
$631.09
$1,700.00
$67.73
$33.90
$285.67
$191.70
$759.00
$10,046.94
$150.00
$1,386.00
$604.86
$549.32
$182.00
$694.59
$50.00
$150.00
$170.61
$750.00
$105.00
$1,103,022.69*
23-MAR-1998 (16:18)
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
STAR TRIBUNE TRAINING SUPPLIES
STREICHERS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO EQUIPMENT PARTS
SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO SERVICE I TIRES
SWEDLUNDS WASTE DISPOSAL
TAMIS CORPORATION FURNITURE & FIXTURES
THOMSEN, LORI SUE
TIE COMMUNICATIONS INC
TIERNEY BROS INC
TOTAL REGISTER
TOWN AND COUNTRY DODGE
TRIARCO
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC
UNITED PROPERTIES CONSTRUCTION
US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
US WEST DEX
W W GRAINGER INC
WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC
WATER TECHNOLOGY INC.
WATSON CO INC, THE
WBCS
WEATHER WATCH INC
WHEELER LUMBER OPERATIONS
WILLIAM K CAMPBELL & ASSOCIATE
WINE SPECTATOR
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
TELEPHONE
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
EQUIPMENT PARTS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
EQUIPMENT PARTS
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE
BUILDING
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADVERTISING
SMALL TOOLS
CHEMICALS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
PRINTING
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
BUILDING MATERIALS
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
PROGRAM
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
COUNCIL
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE
CC CAPITAL OUTLAY
VOLLEYBALL
GENERAL
TRAFFIC SIGNS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
AFTERNOON ADVENTURE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE
BENEFITS
CITY CENTER OPERATING COSTS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POOL MAINTENANCE
COMMUNITY CENTER FILTRATION
CONCESSIONS
PROGRAM SUPERVISOR
SNOW & ICE CONTROL
STREET MAINTENANCE
PARK/REC ADMIN
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-7-98
SECTION: REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS AND
COMMISSIONS
ITEM NO. 1X 8 ,
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
City of Eden Prairie and Eden Prairie Historical Society Chris Enger
John Gertz Roles and Responsibilities
Requested Council Action:
• Adopt the Roles and Responsibilities prepared for the City and Eden Prairie Historical Society.
• Direct staff to prepare a Cooperative Agreement between the City and Eden Prairie Historical
Society.
Background:
• Efforts to complete a Cooperative Agreement began in 1989.
• The City has increased its activity in historic preservation and historic buildings.
• A need to collaborate with the Historical Society has increased and makes a Cooperative Agreement
essential.
• The City shares resources, i.e., City Center space, historic houses without any agreement on use.
• The collaboration and shared use of resources will continue to increase.
Supporting Reports:
• Memorandum from the HPC dated March 24,1998.
• Copy of Resolution No. 977
• Draft of a Cooperative Agreement.
Memorandum
To: Mayor and City Council
Through: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development
From: Heritage Preservation Commission
Date: March 24, 1998
Subject: Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Eden Prairie and Eden Prairie
Historical Society and Roles and Responsibilities
RECOMMENDATION
The Heritage Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Roles and
Responsibilities as summarized in this memorandum.
The Commission also recommends the City Council complete a Cooperative Agreement with the
Eden Prairie Historical Society. This recommendation is based on a recent and growing history of
collaboration between the City and Society, done in the past without clear understanding of each
others individual or mutual roles and responsibilities.
The purpose of the Cooperative Agreement is stated in the draft document (attached) and restated
here as follows:
1. Define the individual roles of the Society and City.
2. Recognize the assets which belong to each party.
3. Recognize the importance of maintaining the public's trust in caring for those assets
by establishing a process whereby either party can request assistance from the other
to protect those assets.
I
4. Recognize the joint commitment of the parties to the operation of historic sites and
establish a process for this joint operation.
5. Establish subcommittees to facilitate those activities on which the two parties wish to
collaborate.
HISTORY
The Eden Prairie Historical Society was organized in June, 1969, and since that time has worked to
collect, store, and disseminate information about Eden Prairie's past. In April, 1975, the City Council
designated the Eden Prairie Historical Society as the depository of historical information for the City
of Eden Prairie (See attached Resolution No. 977). This was the beginning of a relationship between
the City and Historical Society that has changed much in the last twenty years.
Most significant of the changes that occurred were the establishment of City "history" commissions
and committees i.e., Historical and Cultural Commission, Restoration Committee, Heritage
Preservation Committee, Historic Sites Committee (successor to Restoration Committee), and
Heritage Preservation Commission (successor to Heritage Preservation Committee and later the
Historical and Cultural Commission). To these changes can be added the City's purchase of three
historic properties; the Cummins-Grill Homestead, Smith-Douglas-More House, and Riley-Jacques
Farm.
In May, 1982, the City Council established the Restoration Committee for the purpose of restoring
historic homes owned by the City. This marked the beginning of a City role which paralleled in some
respects the Historical Society's role in preserving local history. The need to define respective roles
and responsibilities emerged.
Initial attempts at a joint agreement began in 1989. The discussion at that time focused on collections
and storage facilities. Possible restructuring of the Historical and Cultural Commission was also
discussed due to a redundancy that existed with a standing Historical Society, Historical and Cultural
Commission, and Restoration Committee. This last issue was eventually resolved with the split of
the Historical and Cultural Commission into separate arts and history commissions, respectively.
Assuming the historic preservation responsibilities of the defunct Historical and Cultural Commission
was the Heritage Preservation Commission. Also in place at the time was the Restoration Committee
which became affiliated with the Heritage Preservation Commission.
A Memorandum of Understanding was developed (presumably) by the Eden Prairie Historical Society
in October, 1989, adopted by their Board of Directors October 22, 1989, and forwarded to the
Historical and Cultural Commission and Restoration Committee for review. By January 17, 1990 a
revised Memorandum of Understanding emerged, but apparently was never adopted by either the
Historical Society or City. No further action was taken on this matter until March, 1994.
2
In 1994 and 1995 City staff initiated agreements with the Historical Society, and assisted them in
developing museum Collection Guidelines, and accession procedures. The Historical Society rej ected
the agreements and until the present time no other agreements have been proposed.
The need to clarify roles and responsibilities continued and necessitated several meetings that included
City staff and representatives ofthe Heritage Preservation Commission and Eden Prairie Historical
Society. The meetings resulted in a draft outline of roles and responsibilities for the City and Eden
Prairie Historical Society, and a proposal to organize and direct volunteers to take up those
responsibilities and tasks associated with historic sites.
Following is a summary of roles and responsibilities developed from the meetings. A draft
Cooperative Agreement between the City and Historical Society is attached.
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
City of Eden Prairie
• Preserve and protect sites and structures of historic significance for the community.
• Promote the preservation and continued use of historic sites and structures for the education
and betterment of the community.
• Through a Heritage Preservation Commission:
• Conduct historic resource surveys
• Recommend preservation of historic sites, places and objects
• Prepare Heritage Site designations
• Review Heritage Site alteration permits
• Provide preservation planning
• Prepare site specific guidelines for the treatment, use, and maintenance of historic
sites, structures, objects, and places
• Offer historical events/programs for the enjoyment of the community
• Maintain a historic preservation budget
Eden Prairie Historical Society
• Embody in a permanent form, the leading incidents in the history of Eden Prairie from its
earliest beginnings to the present.
• To preserve and interpret the heritage and history of Eden Prairie.
• Act as the official depository of artifacts for the city of Eden Prairie.
3
• Official depository of historical information for genealogy studies.
• Furnish the City-owned historic houses. This means with items presently owned by the
Society; not items that must be bought.
• Provides services of operating the Eden Prairie History Museum for the benefit of the
Community.
• Sponsor of historical programs and events.
Volunteers
• Provide a pool of interested and committed "hands-on" volunteers who could assist with a
wide array oftasks essential for the well-being and future ofthese historic properties.
• Bring together citizens of Eden Prairie who value the history of Eden Prairie and who have
not found their niche on either the Historical Society or the Heritage Preservation
Commission. By opening such a group up to the general public we are saying that history and
preservation matters to Eden Prairie and anyone who is interested can help.
• Have the potential to raise funds for special projects.
CONCLUSION
Identifying and agreeing on individual and mutual roles should continue. The Heritage Preservation
Commission believes that continued work to define the roles and relationship of the Society and City
will lead to better collaboration between the two, and subsequent better service to the public.
barb\john\memos\coop.agr
4
5
CITY OF EDl."'N,PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. '111:..,'.'
'A RESOLUTIO~ DESIGNATING THE EDEN 'PRAIRIE HISTORICAL
SOCIETY AS THE DEPOSITORY OF HISTORICAL INFORMATION'
'FOR TIlE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRII;:.~.,
;"':"::~:~' Wu~R~As,. the Eden' Prairie 1Iis tor ical. Soci~ty was organized
. : ~.-:,
.4 .~._.:~:.;;;>~. ::.~(~:~~~._:_
in Jim~of ~:'~'
':./:. >: .. ~:·':3:~:;~~~-~~~; '.-~
~",' . 1969nnd','is'~affi1iafed' tl7ith'~lie Minnesot~ Historical socrety, t"he.~enncp:'n
~.:.., ~. .
"County H~st~~ical Society~ an(ffh~,¥Sociation of Hennepin County Historians;
~ ... ~.
-.. .
organized
catalogue,
and properly display the same; and
WHEREAS, thes8.id historical society will be a benefit for all of the
citizens of 1:he City.
NO\'J, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL\'ED by the City Council of the City of E_:Qr~
Prairie that the Eden Prairie Histor:c21 Socic~:
as the official depository for the gathering and collection of historical infor-
~'.'~~4~'~':'::
mation and artifacts relating to tllC' history and development of the City of . ! -,
DRAFT
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into this day of , by and
between CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation ("City") and CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC., a Minnesota non-profit corporation
("Society").
PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT
The purpose of this Agreement is to:
1. Define the individual and independent roles of the Society and the City.
2. Recognize the assets which belong to each party.
3. Recognize the importance of maintaining the public's trust in caring for those assets by
establishing a process whereby either party can request assistance from the other to
protect those assets.
4. Recognize the joint commitment of the parties to the operation of historic sites and
establish a process for this joint operation.
5. Establish subcommittees to facilitate those activities on which the two parties wish to
collaborate.
STATEMENT OF JOINT PURPOSE
The City and the Society are committed to the preservation of all aspects of Eden Prairie's
history for future generations. These parties recognize that meeting their goal requires ongoing
programs and the commitment of funds and labor. These parties also believe that their individual
contributions may be enhanced through collaborative efforts which may ultimately maximize
resources and result in a higher quality program.
RECOGNITION OF STEWARDSHIP AND RECITATION OF RESOURCES
The City and the Society recognize that Eden Prairie's Historical resources benefit the
community's history and that these parties serve as stewards of these resources. As such, these
parties have an inherent responsibility for the preservation of these resources.
Many of the tangible items of historical significance have come into the ownership of the
Society through donations and acquisitions. These items primarily include documents,
photographs, maps, textiles, furnishings and other artifacts.
Likewise, the City owns the properties known as the Cummins-Grill Homestead located at
13600 Pioneer Trail, Smith-Douglas-More House located at 8107 Eden Prairie Road, and Riley-
Jacques Farm located at 9110 Riley Lake Road. The Cummins-Grill Homestead is listed on the
National Register of Historic Places. All three properties are listed as local Heritage Preservation
Sites. The City and the Society support the continued use ofthese sites for a house museum and
interpretive center for the history of Eden Prairie.
Many of the tangible resources are of a frail or sensitive nature and require specialized
handling to prevent deterioration. Both parties agree that the resources under their control and
1
1
JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
stewardship are being held in a public trust. However, each party retains the right to make final
decisions concerning the items which are within their respective ownership.
There are also intangible resources which link Eden Prairie to its past. Primary of these
resources are the individuals who have knowledge of the various aspects of the City's history;
knowledge which can best be preserved through oral histories.
ACCESS AND DISSEMINATION
Both parties agree that the ultimate goal of preserving Eden Prairie's history is to provide
access for the community and others with an interest. This access can best be achieved through
the use of interpretive tours, exhibits, printed material, and educational programs.
OTHER PARTIES
Although the legal entities to this agreement include only the City and the Society, these
parties wish to acknowledge the role ofthe Eden Prairie Heritage Preservation Commission
("HPC") in achieving their joint goals. The HPC is an advisory board to the Eden Prairie City
Council comprised of volunteer members of the community with demonstrated interest andlor
expertise in history. By ordinance, the HPC includes a representative from the County Historical
Society. It is the City's intention that the HPC perform a key role in achieving the goals ofthis
agreement by collaborating with the Society, as well as other City boards and commissions and
volunteers. The City Council will be the ultimate decision-making body in matters related to the
City's involvement.
The Eden Prairie City Council has authorized the HPC to create ad-hoc committees to
deal with the various aspects of an on-going historical preservation program. These committees
may include members of other organizations, boards and commissions, the Eden Prairie Historical
Society or community volunteers.
MUTUAL SUPPORT
Each of these parties recognizes the importance of the other's separate contributions.
They agree to commit appropriate financial support, staffing, and volunteer resources to these
joint efforts.
In return for the Society's contribution to City historic sites, including provision of
furnishings and artifacts for displays, the City agrees to provide the Society with a space
designated for their use. The specific location for this use and the terms ofthe use, shall be
addressed in a separate agreement based upon the mutual agreement of the Society and the City.
The City's failure to provide mutually acceptable space to the Society will void this Cooperative
Agreement.
2
JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE TO PRESERVE ASSETS
If either party is unable to maintain the tangible items of historical significance within their
ownership, they may request assistance from the other to ensure that the public's trust is not
jeopardized. Either party may give written notice to the other when there is any threat to these
resources. The written notice shall describe the situation and the proposed remedial actions
required. If the party in ownership does not or cannot remedy the situation, the other party may
offer to do so, by giving written notice to the other party of their intent. However, each party
shall retain final authority over items in their respective ownership.
JOINT PLAN OF ACTION
A Joint Planning Committee will be formed which will include but not exceed, the Chair ofthe
HPC and the President of the Society and two other members designated by each of the two
organizations each year. This committee will be responsible for annually administering this
agreement, appointing its subcommittee members and directing and coordinating the
subcommittees' activities. These subcommittees shall be created to address specific ongoing
programs and needs. Their structure and responsibilities may change depending on actual needs,
but at this time are anticipated to include the following:
1. Historic Sites. This subcommittee will include representation from the Society and
Heritage preservation Commission. This subcommittee will work with the restoration
plans for historic sites and address issues related to usage of the sites.
2. Records & Artifacts. This subcommittee will include representation from the Society and
Heritage Preservation Commission. It will develop ongoing programs for the care and
preservation of, and public access to the records and artifacts.
3. Education/ProtiUams. This subcommittee will include representation from the Society and
Heritage Preservation Commission. Parks, Recreation and Facilities staffmay also
participate as needed. This subcommittee's primary role will be the coordination of
special events, educational programs, tours, exhibits, and interpretive materials.
In addition to the specific representations noted for each subcommittee, membership on
the subcommittees may be solicited from the City Council, members of other City boards and
commissions, the Eden Prairie Historical Society, volunteers, and youths.
In October each year the subcommittees shall each prepare an annual plan of action which
outlines the joint activities ofthe City and the Society for the following calendar year. In
November, the City will distribute the plan for review by the HPC and the Society. The HPC will
submit the final plan to the City Council for approval in December.
3
q
JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Both parties retain their individual right to operate independently. The Joint Plan of
Action pertains only to their collaborative efforts.
NOTICE
A notice under this Agreement will be sufficiently given if it is delivered personally or sent
by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the other party at the
addresses listed below:
Society: President
Eden Prairie Historical Society
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
City: City Manager
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
or any other address which may be provided in writing by one party to the other.
TERM
This agreement shall continue until it is amended or canceled upon mutual consent of the
other party. It may be terminated by either party upon 60 days written notice to the other party.
If either party gives notice of their intent to terminate this agreement, the Joint Planning
Committee will convene to negotiate the terms ofthe agreement termination.
4
10
JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Dated: ________ _ By _______________________ _
Its Mayor
Dated: ________ _ By ____________ ___
Its City Manager
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
Dated: ________ _ By ____________ ___
Its President
barb~ohn\agrmnts\coop.agr
5
II
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-7-98
SECTION: REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS AND
COMMISSIONS -ITEM NO. JXB2,
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger Glen Lake Children's Camp Designation
John Gertz
Requested Council Action:
• Direct the Heritage Preservation Commission to proceed with designation of the Glen Lake
Children's Camp (Camp Edenwood) as a Heritage Preservation Site, and prepare a National Register
of Historic Places nomination for the Glen Lake Children's Camp.
• Authorize up to $5,000.00 previously earmarked for the Dining Hall Documentation to be utilized
for planning/grant administration.
Background:
• Evaluation to determine historical significance ofthe camp began in 1996.
• Camp lessee plans to construct new building and remove the existing building (dining hall) approved
by Council November 5,1996.
• Lessee fails to secure funds necessary to complete project as approved. Project delayed.
• Historical evaluation resumed and concluded with State Historic Preservation Office Determination
of Eligibility, completed August 4, 1997.
• Lessee currently working to revise plans and include for consideration the reuse of existing buildings.
Supporting Reports:
• Memorandum from the HPC dated February 26, 1998.
• Letter from the State Historic Preservation Office dated August 4, 1997.
I
Memorandum
To: Mayor and City Council
Through: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development
From: Heritage Preservation Commission
Date: February 26, 1998
Subject: Glen Lake Children's Camp (Eden Wood Center)
This memorandum provides a summary of events concerning Glen Lake Children's Camp, current
planning, and request.
Recommendation
The Heritage preservation Commission recommends the City Council approve that the HPC proceed
with preparing a Heritage Preservation Site designation for the Glen Lake Children's Camp.
The Commission also recommends that the City Council authorize the HPC to proceed with
preparing a National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Glen Lake Children's Camp.
History
City Staff were informed in August, 1996, that Rolf Anderson, historical consultant, was engaged in
historical evaluation of the Glen Lake Children's Camp. Mr. Anderson was completing this survey
and evaluation for the Minnesota Historical Society's State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
Staff informed Mr. Anderson that the camp's lessee, Friendship Ventures, had recently submitted
plans for development ofthe camp that included demolition of one ofthe old camp structures -the
dining/recreation building. He recommended that the City allow him and the SHPO time to complete
the evaluation to determine the properties National Register eligibility.
1
2.
Memo
Mayor & City Council
Glen Lake Children's Camp
February 25, 1998
Staff informed the Development Review Committee of the pending historical evaluation on August
28, 1996. Also informed of the historical assessment was Ed Stracke, Executive Director of
Friendship Ventures. Mr. Stracke then attended the September 16 meeting of the Heritage
Preservation Commission (HPC) to discuss his plans for the camp. The HPC concluded it would
need to wait the historical evaluation before making a recommendation to the City Council.
On September 30, Staff met with Rolf Anderson at the camp to discuss the property and the ongoing
evaluation. He stated his work was nearly complete, and he would be recommending to SHPO that
the camp is eligible for the National Register. On October 1, staff reported to Chris Enger, Director
of Community Development that the camp would be recommended eligible for the National Register
and the HPC should review the matter at its October 21 meeting.
The City Council determined at its October 1 meeting to continue the Public Hearing to November
and have the HPC review the plan at its October 21 meeting. The HPC reviewed the matter and
submitted its findings in a memorandum to the Council dated October 29, 1996. The
recommendation from the HPC was for preservation of the camp.
November 5, the Council considered the recommendations from the HPC along with those presented
by Friendship Ventures. The Council approved plans submitted by Friendship Ventures to construct
a new facility building. Also approved was the demolition of the Glen Lake Children's Camp
dining/recreation building and three nearby buildings to make room for the new building.
Based on the Council's decision, the HPC began planning for recordation ofthe old camp to ensure
documentation before demolition. This process included seeking possible grant funds from the
Minnesota Historical Society which might be applied toward this use. It was decided that recordation
would be done by Staff with the assistance ofHPC members.
Throughout July, 1997, City staff and HPC members were engaged in recordation of the Glen Lake
Children's Camp in anticipation of demolition of the dining/recreation building. Friendship Ventures
had plans to replace the building with a new 14,000 square foot multi-use building. However, total
funds needed to construct the new building were not forthcoming by September 1, 1997, the tentative
date for demolition of the camp building. According to Mike Maley of Friendship Ventures, they had
secured approximately $200,000 ofthe $800,000, or 25% of the funds necessary. He added that they
would probably not proceed with anything until next year (1998).
With demolition aside, staff requested completion of the National Register of Historic Places
evaluation. This was done in August by SHPO who notified the City that the Glen Lake Children's
2
Memo
Mayor & City Council
Glen Lake Children's Camp
February 25, 1998
Camp was eligible for inclusion in the National Register under National Register Criteria A in the area
of health and medicine as a significant and rare example of a facility constructed for the treatment of
children infected with tuberculosis.
This finding was important and allowed the City with concurrence from Friendship Ventures to apply
for State Bond Funded grants, which could be applied as rehabilitation work on the dining/recreation
building. City staff met with Friendship Ventures representatives September 4 to discuss possible
reuse options and City assistance in applying for grant funds to facilitate rehabilitation and use of the
existing buildings.
September 10, staff and Friendship Ventures board member and architect Elizabeth Thompson met
with SHPO and City staff to discuss design and site options for a building which could be joined to
the existing dining/recreation building. Since State Bond Funded grant money could only be used on
a National Register property much of the discussion centered on how and where the new building
could be connected without compromising National Register eligibility. Solutions to this important
question were resolved to everyone's satisfaction. It was agreed that a new building could be joined
in a seamless fashion without significant impact to the historic building's integrity.
September 12, City staff submitted to the SHPO a State Bond-funded Grant application seeking funds
to rehabilitate the dining/recreation building. The Minnesota Historical Society's Grant Review
Committee considered the City's application October 16, and unfortunately, it was not approved.
Requests (from all applicants) totaled nearly $l.2 million; available funds were only $431,926.
Awards were made to properties already listed on the National Register (the Children's Camp is not,
but eligible), properties in public ownership (the camp was considered quasi-public), and
demonstrating maintenance agreements for the historic property (lacking in specificity in the City's
lease agreement).
Despite lack of approval for grant funding, the Grants Review Committee expressed their interest in
the properties unique type and support its preservation. The City was encouraged to reapply in the
future.
Staff informed Ed Stracke of Friendship Ventures of the status of the grant request. He indicated
that Friendship Ventures would likely return to its original plan, albeit somewhat modified.
December 2, 1997, staff discussed camp planning with Elizabeth Thompson. Ms. Thompson had
received pennission from the Friendship Ventures Board of Directors to seek support for preservation
from the Bush Foundation, their principal funding source. No support for preservation of the Glen
3
Memo
Mayor & City Council
Glen Lake Children's Camp
February 25, 1998
Lake Children's Camp was forthcoming. Friendship Ventures then proceeded with designing a
smaller camp building that would be located on the site of the existing dining/recreation building.
Tentative plans called for elimination of the walkout found on the earlier building design, new grading
plan, and a change in building materials from masonry to wood siding. Staff informed Ms. Thompson
that these changes would require Friendship Ventures to resubmit its plans to the City for review,
essentially starting the process over.
February 10, City staff and representatives from the Heritage Preservation Commission, Friendship
Ventures and the City Council met to discuss current plans for the camp. Reuse of the existing
buildings was discussed. City staff asked that Friendship Ventures include the existing buildings in
new plans to be reviewed by the City. Friendship Ventures complied with this request and is currently
working on a plan that will site a new building near, or connected to the existing dining/recreation
building.
Conclusion
The Heritage Preservation Commission continues to support preservation and reuse of the camp. The
commission also believes that the addition of a new building, either located nearby or attached to the
existing building is possible. This was also confirmed in talks with SHPO staff.
The commission further recommends the camp be designated a Heritage Preservation Site. This is
important for two reasons. One, it provides the City with a framework to review and consider
subsequent changes to the historic property, and two, it assembles together information on the
property useful in preparing a National Register of Historic Places nomination.
The National Register nomination is important primarily because it will allow the City to apply for
matching grants. Grant funds could be used, for example, to replace a roof, insulate a building, repair
foundation problems, etc. Though the Glen Lake Children's Camp has been determined eligible for
the National Register which allows the City to apply for grants, chances of receiving funds are
significantly improved if the property is listed on the National Register.
Some future considerations regarding the camp include planning for the eventual rehabilitation of the
dormitory building, which together with other historic features need to be planned for within their
historic context.
Consideration should also go into a possible public use of the camp. Perhaps public tours of the camp
could be scheduled that wouldn't conflict with normal camp functions. This is an important element;
providing public access. An exhibit could be on display at the camp also, which interprets the history
4
s
Memo
Mayor & City Council
Glen Lake Children's Camp
February 25, 1998
ofthe camp, tuberculosis care in the early part ofthis century, and the Glen Lake Sanitorium.
Just as important is long term maintenance. The City will need to provide specific guidelines on
caring for the historic buildings. The Heritage Preservation Commission can assist in developing
these guidelines which are not necessarily different or unusual, just specific to the historic property.
This maintenance agreement should be long term, i.e., consistent with the lease agreement, and signed
by representatives of the City and current lessee.
barb\jobn\memos\edenwd2.cc
5
ID
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
August 4, 1997
Mr. John Gertz
Eden Prairie Center
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Gertz:
RE: Glen Lake Children's Camp Site Inspection, July 24, 1997
Charles Nelson and I thank you for making the arrangements for our inspection of the above
property. Our inspection reveals that the site contains three buildings (Dining HalllRecreation
Building, Dormitory, and garage) and one stone monument which date to the historic period.
Five modem buildings are also located on the camp site.
The two principal historic buildings retain good historic physical integrity, both on the interior
and exterior, although it was apparent that the current occupants of the camp are in the process of
replacing some of the historic doors with off-the-shelf doors. We also noticed that were previous
attempts to modify a couple windows (one each in the dorm and dining hall). This replacement
activity which is happening incrementally does have a cumulative effect and eventually will
seriously affect the historic physical appearance of these buildings. Since these two buildings
were intended for summer use, they are inherently fragile and the removal of even minor
elements will alter the physical qualities that identify them as a summer camp facility.
The landscape integrity of the site is fair to good, but its setting and feeling has been
compromised by the construction of the four modem buildings. It is not known if the paths
leading down to the lake are from the historic or modem era. The grounds behind the buildings
retain a sense of openness and the mature vegetation helps to convey a camp-like setting. We
were not able to discern if any landscape features from the historic era remain such as trails,
paths, or designed recreational or play areas, and it is not known at this time if historic landscape
plans exist.
After our inspection, a review of the historical documentation followed. It is the opinion of the
State Historic Preservation Office that the Glen Lake Children's Camp appears eligible for
nomination to the National Register of Historic Places under National Register Criterion A in the
area of health and medicine as a significant and rare example of a facility constructed for the
treatment of children infected with tuberculosis.
However, we must reiterate that the camp by virtue of its being a seasonal facility is inherently
fragile. The buildings were constructed not only to let the weather in, but to allow recuperating
children to enjoy the benefits of spending the summer at the lake. While the camp site has been
compromised by the construction of new buildings and the historic buildings affected by the
installation of new doors, neither alteration, at present, is sufficient to disqualify the camp for
1 :. ~l~LJ~H,:, ~~~>! L'-:'~\\:~:) \\·l-;:.~T'/ ,,_\i ;)\'L-~ .. \l~>."":'>'d:~'~'\ --,-,ll":: :_1)1' "· .. :·~)~H)'.}·. ~-"':''':~;i'-;'':'1)
consideration for nomination to the National Registt(r. However, if the buildings continue to be
altered, if either of the historic buildings are removed, or if new construction is sited in such a
way that the relationship of the two buildings to each other, to the lake shore, or to the open
playground area is obscured or compromised, the camp will no longer retain the qualities which
this office had determined renders it eligible for the National Register.
Our site inspection did reveal that it appears possible to modify the buildings on the interior for
year-round use, and the inspection revealed that it may be possible to construct a new building
on the perimeter of the camp, perhaps to the side and behind the Dining Hall. The proposal to
construct a new road on a fomler railroad bed would not introduce another modem element
directly into the camp site.
This office would be happy to work with you on the rehabilitation of the camp buildings, and
discuss how the Glen Lake Children's Camp can continue to serve persons with special needs.
Sincerely,
J /"/' _--~-rof1--
Susan Roth
National Register Historian
State Historic Preservation Office
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS AND
COMMISSIONS
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development
Chris Enger
John Gertz
Requested Council Action:
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Franlo Park Name Change
DATE: 4-7-98
ITEM NO. 1J 6 ~
• Direct the Heritage Preservation Commission to work with the Park and Recreation Commission
to develop a recommendation for renaming Franlo Park.
Background:
• Leslie B. Anderson, descendant of Samuel Anderson, made this request, asking the HPC to support
it.
• HPC approved the request at their January 26, 1998 meeting. Motion to approve carried 5-0.
• Mr. Anderson provided additional background on the family history of the land, which includes the
parkland, and his rationale for the renaming of this park.
Supporting Reports:
• Letter from Leslie B. Anderson, dated February 16, 1998, to the Mayor and City Council.
• Memorandum from the HPC dated March 31, 1998.
I
------~-------------------------'
Memorandum
To: Mayor and City Council
Through: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development
From: Heritage Preservation Commission
Date: March 31, 1998
Subject: Franlo Park Name Change
Recommendation
The Heritage Preservation Commission recommends the City Council approve the request by
Leslie B. Anderson to change the name ofFranlo Park to Samuel Anderson Park.
History
In January, 1998, Leslie Anderson asked that the Heritage Preservation Commission consider his
request to rename Franlo Park. This request was presented at the Commission's January 26
meeting and a motion to approve was made. In addition to the Commission's approval, they
asked that Mr. Anderson provide a letter to the Mayor and City Council which documented his
request and rationale for the proposed renaming ofFranlo Park. Mr. Anderson provided a letter
(attached) and included a copy of a historic photo of the Samuel Anderson house, which still
stands nearby the park on Pioneer Trail.
The Heritage Preservation Commission supports the name Samuel Anderson Park based on that
family's significant contribution to Eden Prairie, which has spanned many generations since
starting here in 1854.
Also, the Commission believes that the proposed name offers a more local, historic link to the
parkland than the name Franlo.
February 16, 1998
Dr. Jean Harris, Mayor
City Council of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Rd.
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344
Dear Mayor Harris and Council Members:
The Samuel Anderson farm located now at Pioneer Trail and Hwy. 169 was
homesteaded by him probably in the mid to later 1850's. He was a son of Elizabeth
Anderson who came from Ireland and settled in Eden Prairie in the 1850's.
I am a grandson of Samuel Anderson and one of three children of James R.
Anderson. My father, James was born in 1873 and lived on this farm all of his active life.
My brother Roger, and my sister Ethel, and myself were all born in this farm house. It is
exciting for me to think back to my childhood days on this farm and to see the changes
that have been made in this section of Eden Prairie in recent years.
The farm consisted of eighty acres. It was rectangular in shape. The eastern half
of the farm contained the buildings and pasture land for the dairy cattle. There was no
road on the eastern edge of the farm. One only had to step over the fence and be in
Bloomington. County Road 18 and Hwy. 169 were not in the planning stage. This
section is now built up with beautiful homes and townhouses surrounding the original
home and silo which are still there. The western half of the farm was cultivated and
planted in small grains, corn and some hay. These crops were rotated every year to keep
the soil in top shape. Of course all the farm work was done with horses. Three horses
were often used for plowing, harrowing, planting and harvesting. Attached is a copy of a
receipt made out to Samuel Anderson for threshing in 1889. To see this section of the
farm developed into a park and recreation area has been a great thrill for me.
It would be a great honor and show respect to my pioneer grandfather if the name
of this park could be changed from Franlo Park to the Samuel Anderson Park with the
Heritage Site Plaque design on the sign.
I trust that you will consider and pass this name change.
Sincerely,
, .. ', /7 ,/-7
L'~C:~
Leslie B. Anderson
12015 James Rd.
Minnetonka, Mn. 55343
~'i •
Ii
.,
'1'1.'
.4 ,.~, ,,"-_ ...... "-.. ~_ .•..... ~_ .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.Pl()'···· .,truIIJ'IMPROVEMENTS
'(8ecfitlb'30)t . .
~:~y
c~~i~\lU1(lwatermain
, .... :.:.:.:>:<: ..... : ...... :::".: ':'<:'::'.~ ... ~ .".:: ~:"::'::.~".: .. >' >".": . .... .... ·.··P'J~~.bft·i,i.<·i ..... ' .......... .
~~~?i •..
·.····Eden··~··.~ .• ·.~····
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
CER.TIFICA TION ..............«««.......................... 1
REPORT CONTENT
I. INTRODUCTIO.N. . . « • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • « . . . .. 2
n. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ...•......•....•.•••• 2
III. W A TERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS. • • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . • .• 2
IV. PROJECT COST SUMMARY « •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3
V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDA nONS .....«.......... 3
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL .......•...........•........•. 4
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ...............................«.... 5
PROJECT SCHEDULE •........................•.............. 6
PR01ECT MAP -SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I
am a du1y registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
q~.NO.llm
April 6. 1998
Date
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a preliminary engineering study of sanitary sewer and
waterrnain improvements for that portion of Eden Prairie lying west of Riley Lake Road and
adjacent Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1). Twelve land parcels shown on the Preliminary Assessment
Roll will derive access to sanitary sewer and/or water service. Approximately 80 percent of the
developable property area is currently proposed for a residential development known as Settlers
Ridge.
II SANITARY SEWER
The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are shown on the project map included in this report.
They consist of a sewage pumping station located north of Pioneer Trail adjacent to Highview
Drive, a segment of gravity sanitary sewer extending from the pumping station to the south side
of Pioneer Trail and a forcemain connecting between the pumping station and sanitary sewer at
Pioneer Trail and Dell Road. Nine land parcels, seven of which are included in the proposed
Settlers Ridge development will benefit from the proposed sanitary sewer improvements.
The total project cost for the sanitary sewer improvements as shown in Table 1 is estimated as
$663,300. Each of the benefitted properties are unique in their size and topographic features.
All benefitted properties are anticipated to develop residential in accordance with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. It is proposed that each property's benefit is proportional to its net
developable area. Net developable area is defined as the gross area minus wetland and steep
slope unable to support development.
The estimated net developable acreage for each of the nine land parcels benefitted by sanitary
sewer construction is shown on the Preliminary Assessment Roll. Based on the project cost and
total net acres, the proposed assessment rate for sanitary sewer improvements is $6,347/net acre.
The estimated net acreage and assessment amount for each benefitted parcel is shown on the
Preliminary Assessment Roll. The net acreage for Parcel 5 will be further reviewed after
completion of the preliminary plat for Settlers Ridge. The exact area utilized for residential lot
development may result in a revision of the net acres currently estimated.
ill WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed watermain improvements are shown on the Project Map. They consist of a 12-
inch watermain along Pioneer Trail from Dell Road to Dorenkemper Boulevard and an 8-inch
watermain along Pioneer Trail from Dorenkemper Boulevard to the sanitary sewer pumping
station on Highview Drive. While this is not a designated trunk watermain, a 12-inch size is
required to serve the area as a dead-end system until further development of the southwest area
results in adequate looping.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The estimated total project cost for watermain improvements as shown on Table 1 is $507,600.
Twelve properties with development potential will benefit from the proposed watermain
improvements. As with sanitary sewer it is proposed to apportion the cost based on the net
developable area of each parcel. Based on the estimated net developable areas as shown on the
Preliminary Assessment Roll and a total project cost of $507,630, the estimated assessment rate
is $4,324 per net acre. The estimated assessment for each parcel is shown on the Preliminary
Assessment Roll. As discussed in the previous section on sanitary sewer, the net area of Parcel
5 may be adjusted to reflect the fmal area included in residential lots.
IV PROJECT COST SUMMARY
The total-estimated cost for this project is $1,170,900 including construction, engineering,
interest and a 9% administrative fee. Cost estimates are based on anticipated 1998 construction
costs. No easement costs are included in the estimate project costs. If incurred, easement costs
are proposed to be added to total project costs to determine total assessments. Final assessments
will be based on actual construction, engineering, interest and easement costs together with a
9 % administrative fee.
Each of the properties proposed to be assessed for these improvements have potential for
development as residential subdivisions. In addition to these proposed assessments, each parcel
would be subject to trunk utility assessments at time of development.
v. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on this study, Improvement Contract No. 98-5458 is f~ible and cost effective. The
resulting benefit to each parcel listed on the Preliminary Assessment Roll will equal or exceed
the proposed assessments. It is therefore recommended that the Eden Prairie City Council
proceed with the project on a schedule similar to the one suggested in this report.
3
-------------------PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PIONEER TRAIL SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
(SECTION 30)
I.C. 98-5458
PARCEL P.I.D. NO. OWNER NET SANITARY (1) WATERMAIN (2) TOTAL (3)
NO. ACRES SEWER
lA 30-116-22-31-0001 Darril Peterson 38.5 244,370 166,475 410,845.00
IB 30-116-22-34-0001 Darril Peterson 3.0 19,040 12,970 32,010.00
lC 30-116-22-42-0024 Darril Peterson 8.5 53,960 36,754 90,714.00
2A 30-116-22-24-0010 Alex Dorenkemper 6.1 38,720 26,375 65,095.00
2B 30-116-22-24-0011 Alex Dorenkemper 9.8 62,200 42,375 104,575.00
3 30-116-22-23-0007 Alex Dc rent ll~l 11.5 73,000 49,725 122,725.00
4 30-116-22-32-0001 Richard rogel 16.0 101,550 69,183 170,733.00
5 30-116-22-23-0006 Thomas Zwiers 6.7 42,530 28,970 71,500.00
6 30-116-22-23-0001 Carol & Richard Ingram 4.4 27,930 19,025 46,955.00
......
7 30-116-22-21-0007 Teresa Miller 4.8 20,755 20,755.00
8 30-116-22-21-0010 Roxanne Biedermann 3.7 16,000 16,000.00 ........
':
":'!i:I::I:, 9 19-116-22-34-0008 Luverne & Joann Hosek 4.4 '" ': 19,025 19,025.00
':. .::.
663,300.00 507,600.00 1,170,900.00
TOTAL
1. Based on an acreage assessment rate of $6,347/acre for subtrunk sanitary sewer improvements
2. Based on an acreage assessment rate of $4,324/acre for subtrunk watermain improvements
3. Properties are subject to trunk sanitary sewer and watermain assessments at time of development
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED
PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
I.C. 98-5458
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Eden Prairie City Council will meet at the
Administration Building, 8080 Mitchell Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 5, 1998 to
consider the making of the following described improvements:
I.C. 98-5458 -Construction of sanitary sewer and watermain improvements along
Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1) west of Dell Road. The areas proposed to be assessed lie in
Sections 19 and 30, Township 116, Range 22.
The total estimated project cost is $1,170,900.
Pursuant to Minnesota State Laws, Section 429.011 to 429.111, the area proposed to be assessed
for such improvements is all that property within or abutting on the above described limits.
Written or oral comments relating to the proposed improvements will be received at this
meeting.
By Order of the City Council
Sharon Sullivan-Alvord, Deputy City Clerk
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
Publish:
Eden Prairie Community News
April 23 and April 30, 1998
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
April 7, 1998
April 14, 1998
April 14, 1998
May 5, 1998
July 7, 1998
July 30, 1998
August 4, 1998
Nov. 15, 1998
July, 1999
September, 1999
Spring 2000
PROJECT SCHEDULE
(I.C. 98-5458)
Present Feasibility Report to City Council
Deliver Notice of Public Hearing to Eden Prairie Community News.
Publish April 23 and April 30, 1998
Mail Notice of Public Hearing to Public
Hold Public Hearing, Order Improvements and, Preparation of Plans and
Specifications
Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement of Bids
Advertise for Bids in Eden Prairie Community News and Construction
Bulletin July 9 and July 16, 1998
Open Bids
Award Contract
Substantial Completion
Final Completion
Special Assessment Hearing
Assessments First Appear on Tax Statements
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED COST
PIONEER TRAIL SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT
(Section 30)
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 98-5458
/
SANITARY WATERMAIN TOTAL
SEWER
Construction $ 470,000 $ 360,000 $ 830,000
Engineering 105,000 80,000 185,000
Administrative (9%) 42,300 32,400 74,700
Capitalized Interest (8%) 46,000 35,200 81,200
TOTAL COSTS $ 663,300 $ 507,600 $ 1,170,900
7
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parcel 5
Parcel 4
FORCEMAIN
WATERMAIN SU8-TRUNK
GRAVITY SAN. SEWER
RILEY JAKE
Parcel 6
Parcel 3
Parcel 1
Parcel 9
~~~~~~~~~~------~:::-=-~-----=='~rr ----------~:;;::::;~ ------\~ .. ~ ---=::;--..,-=-______ --.-....:L-_---1 ,----' ~