Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council - 09/07/1999
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 7, 1999 5:00- 6:55 PM,CITY CENTER TRAINING ROOM LOWER LEVEL CITY COUNCIL: Acting Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher-Younghans,Ronald Case, and Ross Thorfinnson,Jr. CITY STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger,Financial Services Director Don Uram, Public Safety Services Director Jim Clark,Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert,Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz,Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Engineer Al Gray,Assistant City Engineer Rod Rue, and Recording Secretary Peggy Rasmussen I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER—ACTING MAYOR NANCY TYRA-LUKENS II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY IV. SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL FORUM—6:30—6:55 PM TRAINING ROOM,LOWER LEVEL, ADJACENT TO THE GARDEN ROOM A. RUTH CHARCHIAN ON PRESERVE PARK RENOVATION. AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1999 7:00 PM,CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Acting Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Sherry Butcher-Younghans,Ronald Case, and Ross Thorfinnson, Jr. CITY COUNCIL STAFF: CityManager Chris Enger, Parks &Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety g g Director Jim Clark,Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram,Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney Ric Rosow and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS IV. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL FORUM HELD TUESDAY,AUGUST 17, 1999 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,AUGUST 17, 1999 C. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,AUGUST 24, 1999 V. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER Request by Opus Northwest L.L.C. 2nd Reading of Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.2 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 9.2 acres,Zoning District Change from Rural and C-Reg-Ser to Office on 9.2 acres, Site Plan Review on 9.2 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 11.2 acres into 2 lots. Location: North of Flagship Athletic Club,west side of Prairie Center Drive, south of Technology Drive. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution for Site Plan Review) C. EDEN SHORES SENIOR CAMPUS by SilverCrest Properties, LLC. 2nd Reading of Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial/High Density Residential on 11.5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA September 7, 1999 Page 2 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.5 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 11.5 acres, Site Plan Review on 11.5 acres and Preliminary Plat of 11.5 acres into one lot. Location: East of Highway 212 at Fountain Place. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution for Site Plan Review) D. SPRING HILL SUITES by GSH Lodging, L.L.C. 2nd Reading of Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 4.12 acres to the overall Town Place PUD, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.12 acres,Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 4.12 acres, Site Plan Review on 4.12 acres and Preliminary Plat on 4.12 acres into 2 lots. Location: Den Road and Leona Road. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Site Plan Review) E. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR SPRINGHILL SUITES ADDITION F. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR NORTH BLUFF 1ST ADDITION G. APPROVE SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9 RELATING TO USE OF PARKLAND H. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT AT MITCHELL ROAD AND ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD,I.C. 96-5397 I. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AT MITCHELL ROAD AND ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD, I.C. 96- 5397 J. ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF BELL OAKS LOTS FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT K. ADOPT RESOLUTION DIRECTING FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO CEDAR FOREST ROAD,CEDARCREST DRIVE AND VALLEY ROAD IN SECTION 20 AND 29,I.C. 99-5491 L. ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO CRESTWOOD TERRACE AND DELL DRIVE,I.C. 98-5474 M. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT FOR WELL PUMP HOUSE NO. 13,I.C. 98-5475 N. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR INDIAN CHIEF ROAD WATERMAIN EXTENSION, I.C. 99-5492 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA September 7, 1999 Page 3 O. APPROVE QUIT CLAIM DEEDS FOR CSAH 1 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT,I.C. 94-5369 P. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN THE LIVABLE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. EDEN PRAIRIE MALL—VON MAUR by General Growth Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 80 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 10 acres,Zoning District Amendment within the Regional Commercial Service District on 10 acres, and Site Plan Review on 10 acres. Location: Eden Prairie Mall—East Side. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review and Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning Amendment) B. LARIAT OFFICE BUILDING by Lariat Companies, Inc. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 2.28 acres and Site Plan Review on 2.28 acres. Location: 8205 Commonwealth Drive. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment) C. PHILLIPS & TEMRO INDUSTRIES,INC.by Phillips and Temro Industries, Inc. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 7.44 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.44 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.44 acres into one lot. Location: 9700 West 74th Street. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) D. CITY HILL FELLOWSHIP by City Hill Fellowship. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 7.9 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.9 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 7.9 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.9 acres and Preliminary Plat on 7.9 acres into one lot. Location: 12901 Roberts Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning Amendment, and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) E. OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE SOUTH by Cluts, O'Brien, Strother,Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 8.87 acres to the overall 31 acre Bryant LakeCenter/Lakeridge Office Park PUD,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.87 acres, Zoning District Change from Commercial Regional Service to Office on 1.67 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Office District on 7.2 acres, Site Plan Review on 8.87 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.85 acres into 1 lot, and 1 outlot. Location: Between Market Place Drive & Office Ridge Circle. (Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning Change, and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA September 7, 1999 Page 4 VIII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. ADOPT RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY'S PROPOSED 2000 LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICES TAX LEVY AND SETTING THE DATE(S) FOR THE "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION"HEARINGS B. ADOPT RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY'S PROPOSED 2000 PROPERTY TAX LEVIES, SETTING THE DATE(S) FOR THE "TRUTH- IN-TAXATION"HEARINGS,AND ACCEPTING A PROPOSED BUDGET FOR GENERAL OPERATIONS AND TAX-SUPPORTED OBLIGATIONS FOR 2000 IX. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. SET SEPTEMBER 21, 1999,TO HEAR APPEAL OF BOA ACTION FOR MATT'S AUTO,VARIANCE 99-14 X. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS XI. APPOINTMENTS XII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIII. OTHER BUSINESS A. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION XIV. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE COUNCIL FORUM TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 6:30 P.M., CITY CENTER Training Room 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Acting-Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Sherry Butcher-Younghans,Ronald Case and Ross Thorfinnson, Jr. CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert and Council Recorder Carol Pelzel A. ALAN HANSON ADDRESSING THE WILD GOOSE SITUATION Alan Hanson expressed his concern about the number of geese at Round Lake. He indicated that the highest goose count seems to be in the beach and swimming area. Hanson said he feels the only way to solve the problem is to eliminate a majority of the geese. In order to make the elimination of the geese successful it must be done within a ten-mile radius around Eden Prairie. Hanson said it is his hope that some type of plan will be put in place next year. Case asked Lambert if there are any plans in place to address this problem and if there are alternatives in the works. Lambert responded that they have been working with the DNR, the Watershed District and MPCA regarding what they are going to do with the goose population at Round Lake. Currently there are 80 to 150 geese daily at Round Lake. There are two concerns at this site,water quality and the goose population. The goose problem must be addressed before spending money on the treatment of the water. Case asked that a chart be prepared showing the projected geese population. He also asked that the Council be provided with plans for addressing the goose issue. Meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr.,Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney Roger Pauly, City Planner Mike Franzen and Council Recorder Carol Pelzel I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Acting Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Jean Harris was absent. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Enger asked that Item V. F. under Consent Calendar be amended to read "Approve Amendment to the City Code Regarding Use of Parkland"rather than Set Public Hearing Date for Proposed Amendment. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, Case seconded, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried 4-0. A. PRESENTATION OF APPRECIATION PLAQUE TO THE BROWN FAMILY FOR LAND DONATION Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens presented a plaque to Bob and Jim Brown, representatives of the Brown family, for their generous donation of 43 acres of land along the Minnesota River to the City of Eden Prairie. On behalf of the City, Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens expressed her appreciation to the Brown family for the beautiful piece of land that will add to the City's open space. Bob Brown gave a brief history of his family and how they obtained various pieces of land in the City. They have donated over 100 acres to the City of Eden Prairie. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 2 IV. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,AUGUST 3, 1999 MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, Thorfinnson seconded, to approve the minutes of the August 3, 1999, City Council/Staff workshop as published. Motion carried 3-0-1 with Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens abstaining because of absence from that meeting. • B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,AUGUST 3, 1999 MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, Thorfinnson seconded,to approve the minutes of the August 3, 1999, City Council meeting as published. Motion carried 3-0-1 with Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens abstaining because of absence from that meeting. V. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. NORTH BLUFFS by Laukka-Jarvis. 2°a Reading of Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 60.69 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 60.69 acres with waivers, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 60.69 acres and Preliminary Plat of 60.69 acres into 108 lots. Location: West of Homeward Hills Road and north of Silverwood. (Ordinance No. 18-99-PUD-13-99 for PUD District Review and Rezoning) C. DELL ROAD/HIGHWAY 5 OFFICE by Tandem Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 2.72 acres of the Jamestown PUD, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 2.72 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 2.72 acres, and a Site Plan Review on 2.72 acres. Location: Dell Road and Cascade Drive. (Ordinance No. 20-99-PUD-15-99 for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution No. 99-134 for Site Plan) D. LAKE PLACE TOWNHOMES by S & H Realty Management Co., LLP. 2°a Reading of Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 2.26 acres to the overall Preserve PUD, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 2.26 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural and RM-2.5 to RM-6.5 on 2.26 acres and Site Plan Review on 2.26 acres. Location: Southwest corner of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Center Way. (Ordinance No. 21-99-PUD-16-99 for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution No. 99- 135 for Site Plan) E. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 99-136 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR BRYANT LAKE HEIGHTS oa CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 3 F. APPROVE AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CODE REGARDING USE OF PARKLAND G. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 99-137 APPROVING SPECIAL LEGISLATION AUTHORIZING FIVE ADDITIONAL LIQUOR LICENSES H. APPROVE TEMPORARY REMOVAL OF PERSONAL LEAVE ACCRUAL MAXIMUM FOR THE CITY MANAGER I. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 99-138 DECLARING UNCLAIMED COMPUTER EQUIPMENT `ABANDONED PROPERTY' J. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 99-139 AUTHORIZING ROADSIDE LANDSCAPING PARTNERSHIP WITH MNDOT MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, approval of Items A-J. Case asked the motion be amended to eliminate Item F. He would like to discuss this item further. Enger suggested this item be moved to Section XII.C.3., under Report of Parks and Recreation Services Director. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve Items A-J, with the exception of Item F on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. MATT'S AUTO SERVICES by Matt Strodel. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the I-General District on 0.96 acres, Site Plan Review on 0.96 acres in the I—General Zoning District with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Location: Industrial Boulevard south of Highway 62. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment) Enger reported this item had been continued from the last Council meeting and official notice of this hearing was published on July 22, 1999, in the Eden Prairie News with notices sent to 22 property owners. In the interim,this item went to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals and they recommended approval of the requested variances subject to a five-year time period. Case asked the proponent how comfortable he was with the five-year limitation. Matt Strodel, the proponent, said he was of the understanding that there is no limitation as long as he continues the business as a towing business. Don Uram, Community Development and Financial Services Director, pointed out that one of the conditions of approval for the variances is that the variance approval for the outside storage of impounded vehicles be for a five-year period unless it continues as a City related impound lot or until redevelopment of the area occurs. Enger 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 4 said that under this condition a City impound lot would be different than a private impound lot. If the City operates it as an impound lot or until redevelopment occurs the towing business may remain. Thorfinnson said he reads it to mean City related and that would mean if the City has a contract with the towing business. Enger said at some point in the future there may be redevelopment occurring in this area. There is a need for an impound lot for City tagged vehicles. Whether or not this is the highest or best use of this property for a five-year period is a difficult question. Case asked if this would give the Council the opportunity to review this use year- by-year and allow the City to remove the variances if the land is sold. Case said his main concern is that the variances not be grandfathered in. City Attorney Roger Pauly said in reading the conditions he finds it very unclear that it is limited necessarily to a five-year period unless it continues as a City related impound lot or redevelopment occurs. Strodel explained he has discussed with the City his intention to keep the lot as is. The building will enhance their Services to the City and make a more pleasing site. Strodel said he feels it is unfair to place a five-year limit on the business. He is open to redevelopment when that occurs and does not feel it is fair to ask him to go through this whole process again in five years. Pauly explained the Council does have the option of reviewing the Board's condition or they can affirm the condition or deny it. The Council does have review authority. Thorfinnson suggested reviewing the way the condition was written. Pauly explained the proponent understands the condition to mean that he can continue this business until some redevelopment occurs. If that is not what is intended by this Council this condition needs to be rectified. Thorfinnson said he has a real problem restricting this use to five years after the proponent has spent $300,000 to make the improvements. Butcher-Younghans said her main issue is the continued soil testing on this site even if there are limits on its use for five or ten years. Her concern is with Nine- Mile Creek. Strodel stated they did agree to a five-year testing program. Butcher- Younghans said it should be a stated condition. Strodel explained this is a very expensive program and they just had some soil borings done which came in within EPA limits. Butcher-Younghans said she understands that, however, there are other factors that can change those conditions. Butcher-Younghans said they need to defer to staff the issue of testing and what should be included. She is not comfortable with going forward with this project because of the closeness of the parking to the Creek without some conditions in terms of testing. Case pointed out if this project is redeveloped prior to the five-year limit, the proponent will get money from this redevelopment and if the redevelopment doesn't occur, there is no loss and the Council would be able to review this business year-by-year. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 5 Thorfinnson questioned why they were putting a five-year limit on this item. If they are concerned someone else will come in and operate the business as it exists they could restrict the use of this property. Enger said he reads the condition as one that allows Matt's Auto Services to operate until the area is redeveloped or until it is not used as a towing service. The condition is not tied to the ownership of the property but to the use. Pauly explained the variance would pass along with the title of the property to a new owner and that owner would continue to enjoy the variance that is granted. Thorfinnson asked if the proponent should build his building and someone else wants to purchase it what options would the City have. Pauly responded if the Council is not satisfied with the variance as it is written, they have the option to review the Board of Appeals decision and then take action at the time of that review. This would require a future hearing, which could be the next Council meeting. If the Council is satisfied with the Board of Appeals decision, they could approve the request as presented. Butcher-Younghans asked staff look closer into the issue of requiring annual soil testing for this site. Dietz said he was not sure what would be a good time schedule. They may be able to do a small well sampling annually and inexpensively and this is something they will check into. Strodel stated he has been located at this site for 28 years and they have only come up with a small sample of contamination. Thorfinnson suggested the applicant be required to submit test results to the City environmental staff and EPA every five years but also ask staff to look at interim testing. He recommended City staff continue to work with the proponent for an agreeable yearly testing method. Butcher- Younghans said staff should determine what is reasonable and appropriate. Case said this towing service is an incredible service supplied to the City. He is concerned to the proximity of this lot to the Creek. However, after viewing the site and seeing that the Creek was a dried bed he was not so concerned this use would be a great threat to the Creek. Michael O'Leary, a member of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, appeared before the Council, stating he too was concerned about the contamination of the Creek but after viewing the site and hearing the results of the soil testing, it is not such a concern any longer. O'Leary explained he is comfortable with the five- year restriction. The Board wanted to grant the variances and if the business did change, they were looking to maintain it as a service for Eden Prairie versus it becoming something else. It would be maintained as a service for the City as storage for towed vehicles. Butcher-Younghans said she feels no one here has had a problem with the business itself, it is an essential service and she does feel more comfortable about the possibility of water contamination. However, she would still like to see staff work out a testing schedule between this reading and the second reading. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the public hearing, approve first reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the I- General District on .96 acres and direct staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement 5- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 6 incorporating Commission and Staff Recommendations and Council conditions. Council conditions include: Staff to work with the proponent to develop a testing schedule before the next reading. Motion carried 4-0. B. BLUFF COUNTRY VILLAGE EAST- COMMERCIAL by Hustad Land. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.5 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.5 acres, Rezoning from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 7.5 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.5 acres and Preliminary Plat on 7.5 acres into two lots and one outlot. Location Pioneer Trail and Highway 169. (Resolution No. 99-140 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning and Resolution No. 99-141 for Preliminary Plat) Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens explained items VI. B, C and D will be considered as one item, however, the Council would vote on each item separately. Enger reported the notice of public hearing for each item had been officially published in the Eden Prairie News on August 5 and notices were sent to 127 property w proponentCitystaff would owners. Enger explained after the presentation by the taf present their staff report and reports from the Planning Commission, Parks, Recreation and the Natural Resources Commission. Wally Hustad, owner of the property, Hustad Land Company, explained he is the sponsor of the three different projects and they have developed three separate plans. They felt the first plan was appropriate for the area because of their interest to create as many Services for the neighborhood as possible. Many of the elements included in this plan have been asked for over the years. The project became rather intense for development purposes. Hustad said they were proposing 114,000 square feet of retail space with 144 housing units without any public Services area. Retail will be located in the northern section of the eastern commercial area. The proposed Walgreens drug store will be an individual, separate building. Hustad explained the second project was developed because of the concern for the intensity of the development. It was designed to reduce the square footage of the commercial area, which was a primary criticism of the neighborhood. This project was reduced to 55,000 square feet and included senior housing as did the original project but was moved because of concerns about visibility of the commercial area. There also was a request from Southwest Metro Transit for a public Services area. They did reduce the amount of retail-commercial space and incorporated the Park and Ride facility. They reduced the commercial area to 32,000 square feet making this project a convenience center rather than a neighborhood center. The gas station was also moved to the corner. The owner of the gas station did agree to the new gas station site. Hustad explained this proposal was once again modified and this modification did receive Planning Commission approval. The major criticism of the single-family neighborhood to the north and west was that they wanted an expanded buffer. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 7 Hustad stated the third proposal includes a single-loaded townhouse concept and the setback has been expanded. The number of units in the townhouse development was reduced to 98 from the original 155 units and will include 15 live-work units. These units are a new concept in the marketplace to accommodate changing life styles in the community for people that are in their waning years or changing their work habits. The live-work units will allow people to have an office or a shop of some kind as well as a place to live. Hustad described the live-work units as including 700 square feet of office/work area on the first floor along with a garage (all over the commercial) and the apartment/living unit on top. The retail included in the approved plan was reduced to just under 50,000 square feet with 113 live-work and townhouse units. The density for this project is below seven units per acre. The public Services area will have a small retail area, which will include a coffee shop and bagel store that would work well with both the Park and Ride development and the neighborhood. Hustad said they did agree to a proposed cul-de-sac for turn- around and snow storage. There were three suggested modifications to the proposed plan to the Planning Commission. One of which was to modify the architecture for the Walgreens Drug Store. Paul Tusse from Opiton Investment Company is present representing Walgreens and could better address this issue. The other two were a revised staff recommended site plan for office or senior housing and to construct a channeled opening which would prevent the exiting left turns on the Hennepin Town Road. Paul Tusse, Opiton, representing Walgreens, explained one of the things discussed through this process has been the look of the building and how they would handle compatible materials and color in this center. The proposed Walgreens' building is an attractive building with a brownish tan brick as the primary material with accent paints. This is the prototype for Walgreens. The material of the brick will be matched with the center, which will allow the two to look like they are individual. They are proposing signage as you see it. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens asked what modifications the Planning Commission was asking Walgreens to make to their building. Tusse responded the modification was to pick up some of the elements of the gabled roof line and mansard type roof. The proposed Walgreens as originally presented is their corporate image. Hustad explained the key issue for Walgreens is their corporate image. He agrees with Walgreen's argument that this building is separate and has a separate identity even though they are close in proximity. Hustad said the second issue is the alteration of the access into and out of the west area as well as in and out of the gas station area. He said they are questioning whether the traffic will increase in the future to a point where a change will be necessary. One of the issues is whether or not there will be an overpass on 169 that some day will help to route the traffic in that area. Hustad said they feel if the traffic increases that would be the appropriate time to correct the intersection,which could occur 15 years from now. They are trying to solve a problem that may or may not happen. Hustad explained they are very willing to incorporate that possible change into their development agreement and would be willing to do a 3/4 access in the future. However, if necessary, they would be CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 8 willing to put in a 3/4 access now but this would create some other problems. Hustad stated the 3/4 access would require installation of a bypass around the outside to the eastern side that will channel out-going traffic from the west through the northern area. This 3/4 access will also have some impact on the use of the northern site because of the increased traffic through there and will also have an impact on the tree loss. Hustad pointed out the overall tree loss for this project is less than 40%. Hustad explained the third concern is the ultimate use of the northern site on the eastern portion of the commercial project. As originally proposed, the small retail facility and business Services area would be an appropriate use for this northern site. He further explained the senior housing has been brought back into the proposal. This is something they feel is important for this area. They are not comfortable with how the design interrelates with the Park and Ride site. Hustad said they are suggesting this segment of the project be continued until they receive feedback from the Council as well as do some further design work themselves so that they too are comfortable with it as well. Hustad responded to a question from Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens regarding the existing setback. He indicated that it is 70 feet for the actual building. Mike Franzen, City Planner, reported at their July 12 meeting the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend to the City Council approval of the plan, as proposed, subject to incorporating the same canopy, color and architectural style as proposed with the strip center east of Hennepin Town Line Road. There were three items that did warrant discussion. Franzen explained the neighborhood has asked that the site plan for the gas station be done differently. They would like to see the gas station turned 90 degrees. Staff is comfortable with this alternate plan. The second item involves access. Both the neighbors and the developer would like to adopt a wait and see approach. If it becomes a problem the improvement would be made at that time. If the Council should decide this is appropriate, it is very important that it be clearly defined in the developer agreement. Franzen stated after reviewing traffic analysis and being consistent with how other projects are done, staff feels the improvement should be constructed now rather than waiting. Franzen said there also was the question of what to do with the Park and Ride. The Planning Commission and staff feel the Park and Ride's location is fine, however, the neighbors are concerned with the change in the topography that will occur on this site. The alternate plan does include a senior building with 30 units and a Park and Ride or an office building with retail and a smaller 30-car Park and Ride lot. After the neighbors viewed the plan they approached staff to do something with regards to noise and visual impact along the highway. With the senior housing being located on the east side and with the open space, berm and plantings for the neighborhood, the Park and Ride would be located on the west side of Hennepin Town Road and will result in 75 parking spots and will be shared with the commercial area. Franzen said the second alternate is for a reduced sized office building, which will result in less needed parking and allow more room for the Park and Ride. This alternate would consist of a 10,000 square foot office building and 100 parking spots for the Park and Ride. The downside to this plan is that the hearing process will have g CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 9 to be done all over again. However, the proposed housing is still consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Lambert explained the Parks Commission did review this proposal and recommended approval as per the July 29 staff report. The Commission did want to insure that a five-foot concrete sidewalk connection be made in the northwestern corner between two of the units so that pedestrian/bike traffic from the residential area has access to the existing five-foot sidewalk along the north side of Shadow Pond Drive. The Commission felt it is necessary to provide residents with a sidewalk to parking and to the private sidewalk. It may be necessary to have a public easement on this because of the public walking on this sidewalk. Also, Lambert further explained the Commission wanted to be sure an eight-foot wide bituminous trail along the northerly side of Pioneer Trail would be completed with the upgrading of County Road 1 by the County in the future. With regard to the access, Public Works Services Director Dietz indicated staff still advocates the 3/4 access within that roadway be installed initially with the project. Case questioned if staff has run traffic projections to determine if the project changes,would there be significant affects on this intersection that would possibly make the needed change not necessary. Dietz responded this access is a safety issue for existing traffic from the east side of the property and movement would be restricted with this restricted median. The main reason for the 3/4 access is because of safety. Kevin Benjamin, 9949 Lee Drive, explained he is representing the neighbors in the southern neighborhood. He expressed his appreciation for the efforts of the Council who have visited the site and he feels the solutions are almost there to provide a win/win situation. There are four major issues that affect the southern neighborhood. The first concern is the impact the gas station will have on the area both visually and noise. The current orientation facing east will be in the view of one-third of the homes and the lights from the canopy will also affect those homes along with headlights from the vehicles entering the gas station. Benjamin said they would like to see the gas station turned 90 degrees facing toward the development. They feel this will address their visual concerns. In addition, this will lower plantings needed to the back side and will help for the screening of the property. The developer may be concerned his business will not be exposed to the traffic, however, given the neighborhood type development, local traffic will not need the identification. Benjamin indicated the neighborhood is also opposed to the size of the gas station. They feel it is in excess of the definition of neighborhood commercial. They would like to see a decrease in size from eight pumps to six pumps. The second major issue is the noise form Highway 169. They feel the senior housing unit is a benefit to the area, however, they do not feel it effectively buffers the noise for the neighborhood. The Department of Transportation's guideline states that a buffer should be eight to ten feet above the road grade and close to the road. The proposed senior building will not meet this guideline because of the distance from Highway 169 and opening on the north and south sides. Benjamin said the neighbors would like to see the extension of the current wall or have effective 9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 10 berming installed. They would like to see 10-foot to 12-foot berms between the Park and Ride and Highway 169 and plantings. They prefer to see the berm with a larger setback on the property to accomplish noise protection and to provide a more visually appealing site. Benjamin explained their third issue of concern is the traffic pattern and the 3/4 access issue. They are uncomfortable with the 3/4 access that they feel will cause confusion and will be inconvenient at creation. This will also necessitate a ring route that resulting in a significant loss of trees which provides noise and visual protection. They prefer to use the wait and see approach. Benjamin said their fourth issue is tree preservation in Outlot A on the southwest corner of the project. They are concerned this outlot will be developed and they would ask that Outlot A be put into a conservation easement to prevent future development. Benjamin reiterated that their main concern is that the gas station be turned 90 degrees and that the double row of plantings be maintained and a berm and plantings be placed along Highway 169 and that a conservation easement be granted on Outlot A to protect the trees. The neighbors feel a normal traffic interchange will eliminate the need for the ring route resulting in less tree removal. Jeanette Gunderson, 9922 Balmoral Lane, explained she is representing the neighborhood north of the proposed project. They are in agreement with the comments made by Benjamin. She indicated she has a list of eight concerns relating to noise, traffic, safety, green space and tree preservation. The neighborhood is concerned about the Park and Ride eliminating a significant berm and trees along Highway 169. This will result in the elimination of the sound barrier. Noise from this road will severely impact the neighborhood. Neighbors would support the alternate plan for three-story senior housing on the northeast corner of the site with the Park and Ride across the street. They would like to keep the attractive green space and trees for the project and senior residents. The neighbors would like this to be senior housing. She questioned how they could be guaranteed that this would remain senior housing. The sound wall along Highway 169 does stop at one point and leaves an open space. There is no protection from the end of the sound wall to the beginning of the berm. Gunderson asked something be done for noise reduction. The neighbors do like the berm proposed behind the senior housing and would like to see this extended to where the south wall ends. Gunderson said they do agree with the developer regarding the intersection. There may be ways to reduce traffic in the future. She said they too would like to see the gas station downsized, the senior housing built and the Park and Ride shifted to the location across the street. This would help to reduce traffic. The reduction in the size of the gas station would also reduce future traffic problems. Gunderson said they would also like to see the car wash have restricted hours from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. This is a commercial- neighborhood development and they do not feel the neighborhood needs more commercial space than what is in the current plan. Bruce Webster, 9953 Balmoral Lane, explained he is also representing the neighbors living north of the proposed development. The neighbors feel in order for this development to gain full acceptance of the neighborhood, several items need to be addressed. Webster pointed out the number of parking spaces in the /D CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 11 Walgreens' proposal calls for 92 parking spaces. Webster explained that it is reasonable to assume Walgreens' shoppers will be using this space. If this is the case, the parking will accommodate over 180 customers at one time. Webster said they feel the parking appears to be excessive. The neighborhood is also concerned about the preservation of the green space and they do not feel the site should be paved over for excessive parking. They ask the developer consider postponing development of the parking row on the east side of the Walgreens store which would eliminate 18 spaces on the back side of the building. Webster suggested they use proof of parking and if there is not sufficient space in the future the developer be required to provide additional parking at that time. Webster said another concern of the neighborhood is the overall townhouse layout. There are a couple of units that appear disjointed on the east side. They suggest removal of the two-unit building and reduce the six-unit building to four- units. This would increase the amount of green space and would allow maintaining existing vegetation and enhance the appearance of the development. Webster further explained the neighborhood is concerned with the amount of tree removal occurring along the northern border. Numerous trees were lost as part of the Highway 169 construction and were replaced with small trees throughout the site. The proposed development would eliminate many of these trees and leave the site with far fewer trees than intended. The neighbors would like the City's assurance that many of the planted trees destroyed due to this project be replaced. Arthur Schunk, 8432 W. 100th St., appeared before the Council stating he is representing the Countryside West Townhome Association located in Bloomington across Highway 169. He explained when Highway 169 was constructed, it was located more on the Bloomington side for the purpose of preserving the small wetland area on the northwest corner. In addition to the wetland area, the State and County spent considerable money in planting over 200 trees. Schunk said it appears as though this project will be taking down a good number of those trees. He stated they are concerned with the visual impact of this project and with the noise. Schunk indicated they are also concerned about the lighting for this project and the visual impact of those lights. Schunk said they would like to see this project scaled back and they would like to see as many trees as possible be preserved. Schunk questioned the viability of the retail for this project. The existing Preserve Shopping Center is having problems filling up their space. The drug store is no longer there and Schunk thought this would be a good location for the Walgreens store. Gary Johnson, 10106 Juniper Lane, said he is happy with the changes to the housing portion of the project that have occurred along the west side. He did question the elevation of these townhomes. Johnson asked if those buildings will be set higher than the existing homes or will they be graded down to a level approximately in line with the houses there now. Hustad responded that initially the elevation was lower. Because of the tree loss issue, the elevation was raised and the townhomes will be higher than the existing homes. II CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 12 Kate Garwood,representing Southwest Metro Transit, said she has been listening to the neighbor's concerns for this project but she has also been listening to some of the users of the transit system. From the transit point of view, they did approach Hustad and asked for a Park and Ride because of the need. Ridership is important and they would like to maintain a Park and Ride in this area. The current Park and Ride in the Preserve has 30 spaces and there is an active ridership in this area. With the addition of senior housing or additional housing they expect it to continue. Garwood pointed out right now of the seven Park and Rides in the southwest metro area six are attached to some form of retail. Studies show that for every dollar invested in transit, retail will benefit to the tune of$3 to $3.50. The neighbor's concerned with traffic congestion because of the Park and Ride must realize that the vehicles arrive in the morning with no further movement again until the evening. For this area, cars will be parked by 7:09 a.m. with buses returning at 5:30 p.m., 5:50 p.m. and 6:35 p.m. Garwood explained the Metro Transit does have control over this by scheduling bus arrivals and are willing to work with that if need be. Either location will work for them. They anticipate more need for transit in this area in the future. Case asked if they could split the Park and Ride by having 30 spaces on the east end and then 70 spaces 100 feet away. Garwood responded 75 to 90 spaces is a very nice number to work with. Thirty spaces would be a maintenance nightmare. Case asked if they could work with 70 spaces on the west side and 30 on the east side. Garwood said her immediate reaction to this would be a concern for safety and the issue of having to make two pickups. Steve Moer, 9812 Lea Drive,pointed out there are 30 spaces for Park and Ride at the Preserve Center which is just down the road and he questioned the necessity for having another Park and Ride location so close. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens explained no lease exists for the Preserve site and it will be closing soon. Cliff Gonye, 9624 Hampshire Lane, asked what the impact of traffic would be on Hennepin Town Road as a result of this project. Hustad said they have done a traffic study but does not have that information with him. Basically, the traffic will be focused on the southern end of this project. Maureen Degnas, 9946 Balmoral, asked that as many trees as possible be preserved. She feels that large tree loss should be negotiated. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 4-0. A short recess was called at 8:50 p.m. after which the meeting was reconvened at 9:00 p.m. Butcher-Younghans asked what the operating hours are of surrounding car washes. Franzen said he did not know and they have not had any car washes where they have required restricted hours of operation. Acting Mayor Tyra- Lukens pointed out they did discuss restricting the hours for a car wash located / 1L CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 13 by the Menards store. Case indicated the developer of that car wash agreed to close the car wash at 10:00 p.m. Butcher-Younghans asked what kind of signage would be used if the gas station were to be rotated 90 degrees and how would it impact the business of the gas station. Franzen explained City Code allows signs on all four sides of the building and four canopy signs that are limited in size to 15% of the wall area. There will be a pylon sign located on the Walgreens site advertising the Walgreens store and the gas station. Butcher-Younghans pointed out that there are 90 parking spaces outlined on the Walgreens' site. She assumed this met Code but questioned what alterations could be made if proof of parking were used. Butcher-Younghans asked if they would be able to reduce any parking spaces from this site. Franzen responded that usually the developer complains the parking requirements are too high. They could ask Walgreens if the amount of parking required by ordinance is in excess of the demand. The Walgreens site on CSAH 4 doesn't have much parking and Franzen believes a variance may have been granted for that site. The architect for the Walgreens store explained that right now the ordinance requires 80 spaces. He indicated they can go with the ordinance amount but they do not want to go much lower than that. They are making a commitment of over 60 years on this site. Butcher-Younghans explained proof of parking would allow them the option of expanding their parking at a future time if needed. The architect pointed out since they are leasing the building there would be some legal issues as to who will do the work for the increased parking should that need arise at a later date. Enger explained some very strong arguments for proof of parking were made when the County Road 4 Walgreens was constructed. At that time they were very convincing that Walgreens did not create that much parking. Even with the limited parking at the County Road 4 store one-third of the lot is never used. Enger said they are suggesting they utilize the proof of parking so the parking required by Walgreens is realistic and this could be included in their lease. The architect indicated they are pushing to get 90 parking stalls at all of their stores throughout the country. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens suggested they look at eliminating the 18 spaces on the east side. Butcher-Younghans asked who owned the land between the sound wall and the proposed senior housing. Franzen said they could not tell the exact ownership but are assuming Hustad owns the land up to the noise wall. Butcher-Younghans asked staff what their opinion is of using berm and plantings as a sound reducer and the possibility of filling in that space with a berm. She asked if that would be effective and how tall would it have to be. Dietz responded trees are really not a noise barrier. It is necessary to have a significant mass of trees in the order of 50 feet to be an effective sound barrier. A berm certainly can be as effective as a noise wall, however, it needs to be of the same height. The noise wall was stopped because when that wall was installed it was to protect existing properties and not in anticipation of what would occur in the future. Butcher-Younghans asked how many trees would the developer be replacing on the three parcels. Hustad said he wasn't sure of the exact amount but anticipates planting between 400 and 500 trees. / 3 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 14 Case expressed his appreciation to the residents for their well-prepared presentation. He explained after having been on the site he would like to see if it is possible for staff to come up with some type of buffer or retaining wall. Case said he would like to see senior housing in this project and he likes the idea of moving the Park and Ride spaces to the west commercial area. This allows the building to be positioned on the westerly side, which cuts out the access to the north. Case said he is in favor of proof of parking for Walgreens. This would result in 23 less parking spots, which will help to save the topography and should be able to be worked out in the lease agreement. With regards to access Case stated it would be tempting to wait and see, however, he indicated he is not the expert and he must go along with the City Engineer's recommendation especially if safety is the concern. Case also said he definitely favors turning the gas station 90 degrees and is not opposed to the station having eight pumps. He would prefer to eliminate the two townhomes on the northeast corner. Case said he also favors a public easement on the private sidewalk and he definitely wants to see an eight-foot trail on the County Road 1 side. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens asked the City Attorney to address the issue of an easement on a private sidewalk. Pauly explained the Parks Commission questioned whether there would need to be a dedication of a public use trail or easement given for public use in order to assure that the trail would be available continuously for the public. He said during the break he did talk to Lambert as to what would actually be needed to assure reasonable access. One of the questions is who is going to maintain and provide the private trail. Pauly said they assume it would be the Association and it would be part of the covenants and restrictions and included in the easements to the Association. The Association could terminate that trail at any time unless a public easement is granted. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens said she would be more comfortable going with the proof of parking for the Walgreens parking lot and would like to retain as much open space as possible. She feels another senior housing project is a great idea. However, she is concerned about the impact on retail. Acting Mayor Tyra- Lukens said she feels the whole proposal has much more berming and landscaping potential on the east side. She likes the idea of the road at Walgreens going north and limiting car wash hours. She is also in favor of rotating the gas station. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens said she is in agreement that the channelization intersection is something that should be done now because of the safety issue. They need to address the issue of Outlot A being placed into a conservation easement and she is very adamant about preserving the Park and Ride site. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens said she doesn't feel strongly about eliminating the two-townhouse units, however, she is concerned about the architecture of the Walgreens store. She would like to see the store have a pitched roof, something more residential in feel and to tie in with the retail center and the neighborhood. Thorfinnson said he agrees with much of what has been said this evening. He too is in favor of turning the gas station and he would prefer to see eight pumps / CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 15 rather than six. Thorfinnson said he does have mixed feelings about the road going to the north to Walgreens and he said he is okay with proof of parking for the Walgreens' lot. However, he did question what they are trying to accomplish by eliminating the parking spaces. Are they asking the developer to preserve something that is there or will they be mowing things down and planting grass. In asking for the proof of parking they need to clarify whether they want that site left in the state it is in now or have a piece of grass there that could be paved. Thorfinnson said he is also concerned about the availability of the Park and Ride. Case agreed with Thorfinnson that in looking at the topography they may not be able to preserve what is existing on the Walgreens site. However, they may be able to preserve some open space if the Walgreens store can get by with 20 less parking spaces. With respect to the Park and Ride, Hustad explained one of the reasons the Park and Ride did not work at the Preserve Shopping Center was because of the conflict between the retail and the Park and Ride. He said he is concerned about moving the Park and Ride to the west side. Case pointed out the Metro Transit representative indicated that the riders do benefit the retailers. Case said that if five years down the road this doesn't seem to work, there are other alternatives in that area and there is some flexibility. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens asked that Outlot A be placed in a conservation District. Enger responded this has already been included in the staff report. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, with regards to Bluff Country Village East-Commercial, to adopt Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 7.5 acres; approve first reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 7.5 acres and adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 7.5 acres into two lots and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and Council conditions. Council conditions include: consideration of eliminating the northern road; building significant berm for sound barrier on the eastern side with sensitivity to the low area connected into the sound barrier wall; staff to work with the developer with the proof of parking issue for the Walgreens store thereby reducing the number of paved spots; and to consider architectural improvements by Walgreens with the road access out of the Walgreens lot being a 3/4 intersection. Motion carried 4-0. C. BLUFF COUNTRY VILLAGE WEST — COMMERCIAL by Hustad Land. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 3.9 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 3.9 acres, Rezoning from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 3.9 acres, Site Plan Review on 3.9 acres and Preliminary Plat of 3.9 acres into two lots. Location Pioneer Trail and Highway 169. (Resolution No. 99-142 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning and Resolution No. 99-143 for Preliminary Plat) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 16 (See Item VI. B for discussion.) MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, with regards to Bluff Country Village West-Commercial, to adopt Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 3.9 acres; approve first reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 3.9 acres; adopt Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 3.9 acres into two lots and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and Council conditions. Council conditions include: request the Developer to use the rotation plan of the gas station, rotating it 90 degrees; ask staff to address the issue of limiting the hours of operation of the car wash; if the 8 foot association trail is not part of the Pioneer Trail upgrades it shall be a condition of approval and architectural improvements to the Walgreens store be addressed prior to the second reading of the Ordinance. Motion carried, 4-0. D. BLUFF COUNTRY VILLAGE WEST — RESIDENTIAL by Hustad Land. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 17.97 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.97 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM- 6.5 on 14.97 acres, Site Plan Review on 14.97 acres and Preliminary Plat of 17.97 acres into 21 lots and 3 outlots. Location Pioneer Trail and Highway 169. (Resolution No. 99-144 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning and Resolution No. 99-147 for Preliminary Plat) (See Item VI. B for discussion.) MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, with regards to Bluff Country Village West-Residential, to adopt Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 17.97 acres; approve first reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 14.97 acres; adopt Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 17.97 acres into 21 lots and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating commission and Staff recommendations and Council conditions. Council conditions include: refer to staff preservation of the tree mass on the northern border; direct staff to address the issue of the bituminous walkway and easements prior to the second reading. Motion carried 4-0. E. SHADY OAK ESTATES by Bruce Nelson. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 14.64 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 14.64 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 14.64 acres and Preliminary Plat of 14.64 acres into 9 lots and 2 outlots. Location: North of Old Shady Oak Road. (Resolution No. 99-146 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning and Resolution No. 99-147 for Preliminary Plat) Enger reported official notice of this hearing was published in the August 5, 1999, Eden Prairie News and notices were sent to 95 property owners. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 17 Bruce Nelson, the property owner, stated he has been living on this property for the past six and a half years and he intends to continue living there once the development is completed. They have considered several different projects for this property and with the proposed concept they are attempting to develop a low- density type project with minimum impact on the wetlands and the trees. The project will encompass nine lots and are intended to be suited for upper bracket type houses. Nelson mentioned the Engineer for the project is present and available to answer any questions. Don Uram, Community Development and Financial Services Director, reported the Planning Commission did recommend approval of this project on a 6-0 vote. Bob Lambert, Parks & Recreation Services Director, reported the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended approval at their August 2, 1999, meeting. However, the developer had not completed a landscape plan and the Commission requested that deciduous trees native to that area also be included in the homeowner's covenants language that would require protection of the wetlands. MOTION: Case moved, Butcher-Younghans seconded, to close the public hearing; adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 14.64 acres; approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 14.64 acres; and adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 14.64 acres into nine lots and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and Council conditions. Case asked if the City has any regulations regarding maintaining a 15-foot buffer from where the grass stops to the wetlands. Enger said he believes there is some language in the City's Wetlands Management Plan which requires 20 feet of buffer from delineated wetlands. Public Works Services Director Dietz explained staff does require a 25-foot buffer between the wetland and the grass area. Ken Adolf, Schoell & Madson, Inc., consulting engineers for Nelson, pointed out this has not been a requirement of previous approvals. However, they have discussed the wetland setback issues. The City indicated they were in the process of developing an ordinance to address those issues, therefore, there would be no requirement for this project. Case asked if staff has any idea what this ordinance would encompass. Dietz responded he believes it would require a 25-foot buffer. However, he was under the impression that there is a protection requirement they are implementing. Enger indicated this is something that would have to be done before the first and second reading. Case feels it makes sense to have the buffer and it would be okay for staff to work with the proponent to come up with a buffer concept. Adolf indicated they would be happy to work with staff to identify a buffer area. It would be difficult to have a uniform 25-foot buffer on this development because of the topography of the lots. Case said he would like to see some type of 1 ? CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 18 identification such as a silk fence for future landowners to determine where the sod ends and the wetlands begin. Following discussion, vote was called on the motion. The motion carried 4-0. VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call, with Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens, Butcher-Younghans, Case and Thorfinnson voting"aye". VIII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IX. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS X. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS XI. APPOINTMENTS XII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Boards and Commissions Restructure Thorfinnson reported the new structure for Boards and Commissions has been presented to the staff liaisons of the current Boards and Commissions as well as the Chairs of those Boards and Commissions or their representative. Thorfinnson explained they are now beginning the process of moving forward by notifying the Boards and Commissions members of the changes and how it impacts their positions. They will be working on a deadline as a group to see this process through completion. Thorfinnson said by the time they get everyone appointed and in place they are probably looking at the end of March,2000. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER B. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Proposed Community Center and Round Lake Parking Permits Lyndell Frey, Community Center Manager, explained this request for parking permits for daytime use of the Community Center and Round Lake parking lots was generated because of safety issues. They have worked with the Police Department, School District and Southwest Metro to develop this plan and feel this is a good option to encourage high school students to use parking available to them at the school. � c9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 19 Case asked where the students would park if they don't want to pay the parking permit fees for the Community Center or High School. Frey responded they will probably park in the neighborhoods. They have discussed this issue and do have most of the neighborhoods within walking distance posted for no parking and they may be required to do additional posting. Case said he is totally in support of this proposal, however, he wants to be sure all of the "what ifs" have been addressed. Frey explained there would be some follow-up required. Thorfinnson said he too supports this but is wondering how they will enforce this. Frey responded the Police will monitor the parking lot as they did last year. They do have 90-minute parking buffers. There are 350 spaces available and all of those spots will not be sold. Thorfinnson asked if this fee is the same as what the High School charges. Frey stated staff is recommending a$100 fee while the High School charges $80. The higher fee is to encourage the students to park at the High School. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve the request for parking permits for daytime use of the Community center and Round Lake parking lots effective from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday from the first day of school until the final school year and to tie this fee to the highest tier of the High School's fee schedule. Motion carried 4-0. 2. Renovation of Nesbitt Preserve Park Lambert reported they are well within the estimate projected and the amount budgeted in the five-year Capital Improvement Program. This project will be funded through the Cash Park Fee Fund. In addition, all of the bidders included a bid price for a new Round Lake boathouse building. Staff is not recommending awarding the contract for this building at the current time due to the need to assess the situation with the Round Lake beach and the Canada goose population. Butcher-Younghans asked if the improvements to the hockey rink facility will relieve any of the pressures from the Community Center for ice. Lambert responded it will probably be the same as in the past. MOTION: Case moved, Butcher-Younghans seconded, to award the Nesbitt Preserve Renovation Contract to Ingram Excavating in the amount of $364,908. This is accepting their base bid amount of $421,908 and exercising Alternative No. 8, which reduces the bid amount of$57,000. In addition, all the bids for construction of the Round Lake boat house should be rejected. Motion carried 4-0. 3. APPROVE AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CODE REGARDING USE OF PARKLAND 9 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE COUNCIL WORKSHOP TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1999 5:00 P.M. CITY CENTER Training Room, 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris; Councilmembers Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case,Ross Thorfinnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger,Financial Services Director Don Uram,Public Safety Services Director Jim Clark, Parks &Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, Director of Inspections Kevin Schmieg,Director of Assessing Steve Sinell, Finance Operations Manager Sue Kotchevar, and Council Recorder Carol Pelzel I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER—MAYOR JEAN HARRIS Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Case moved, Thorfinnson seconded, to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried 5-0. III. HIGHWAY 101 COMUNICATION AND CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROCESS City Manager Enger explained this group has previously discussed the process for design review approval of Road Projects and ways to improve this process. Enger indicated Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz is present to review this Workplan and to discuss what will be involved in the process for Highway 101 improvements. Dietz briefly reviewed the Strategic Workplan and the Strategy Assessment establishing the process for approving road projects in the Community. Staff will be using Highway 101 as a working model. Dietz reviewed the changes made to the Workplan. The plan does include a formal presentation that will include a question and answer session. Dietz explained the biggest change to this Workplan is that the Mayor will be the moderator for the public meetings and informal neighborhood meetings will be held. Dietz further explained a newsletter was prepared by the County for the Highway 101 reconstruction and mailed in July to property owners within 800 feet of each side of the roadway. Dietz reviewed the approval process for Highway 101 explaining they do have more lead time with this project. They are anticipating construction in the fall of 2001 or spring of 2002. An open house will be held which will include a formal presentation with a time for questions and answers. Dietz stated they will present alternates but will focus on I CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES August 24, 1999 Page 2 realistic options. Staff will structure a partnership with the potential for a final design task force. Dietz reviewed the communication strategy that will include team involvement, newsletters, Web site and the Eden Prairie News. Staff will also keep a chronicle of the process as this is a long process and will include different people at different times. They will need to remind the people of what has already taken place over the three-year period. Dietz explained that a meeting of the staff design team would be held on September 2 to finalize the agenda for the public open house scheduled for September 28. It will also be necessary to review the process with the Mayors of Chanhassen and Eden Prairie to determine what their role will be at the public meeting. The formal presentation will involve a panel discussion for the question and answer part. Tyra-Lukens pointed out that one of the challenging issues of this project is the involvement of two different cities and the County. She asked what happens if one city is in favor of a particular plan and the other city is not. Dietz responded that it would probably take time to solve the conflict. It is staff's hope everyone will recognize there are both fiscal and public transportation responsibilities to complete this project. In response to Butcher-Younghans questions regarding funding for this project,Dietz explained they would be using the turn-back process with the State. The road will have to be built to State Aid standards at the expense of MNDOT. Trails on both sides of the road will have to be done at the expense of the City along with any street lighting. Most of the financing for this project will come from MNDOT. The project cost estimate is $8 million to $9 million with 80% of the funds coming from the State through the turn-back process. Thorfinnson pointed out one of the lessons they learned from the Pioneer Trail project is that you cannot have engineers describing the proposed plans to the citizens. Thorfinnson asked if this has been addressed in this new process. Dietz responded at one point they did discuss this but have not built anything into this plan. They have discussed the role of the moderator being somewhat influential and they are considering having the Mayors be the moderators at the public meetings. Mayor Harris asked at what point would the Council be involved in this process and in what capacity. Enger explained that this process for the Highway 101 improvement gets them to the first meeting with the neighborhoods most affected by this construction. One of the reasons this item is being brought to the Council this evening is because ultimately the entire Council will be involved. They have discussed the dynamics of these meetings and how they will deal with the residents' answers and concerns. This road construction is part of an overall transportation system and they need to interact and communicate with the citizens on all road projects. All of the road projects ultimately require Council approval. Enger said this project may go on for three or four years and this will require keeping up to speed as to what is happening with this project and what has happened. Enger asked how the Council would like staff to provide information to them and what type of involvement they would like. Enger pointed out that they do have the framework for this process and would appreciate the Council's comments. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES August 24, 1999 Page 3 Thorfinnson pointed out he does not want to lose site of the fact that the engineers have difficulty in communicating with the residents. Enger said he believes they have to first deal with the concerns, fears and uncertainties of the people before they will be ready to process the facts. Thorfinnson said he feels they can resolve some of the concerns with open meetings and questions and answers. However,they need to formalize these meetings and have minutes prepared so the information can be delivered to the Council. This would help address any concerns there may be about the Council receiving the information. Dietz responded that the preparation of minutes is included in the strategy. Dietz reported while considering County Road 1 the staff and County did not put the facts on the table at the beginning and were in a responding mode dealing with misinformation. It is necessary they have a strong meeting at the beginning and get the facts out in the open. Dietz said he is not sure how they can resolve the communication problem between the engineers and residents. Tyra-Lukens suggested they ask the residents what their concerns are before they present them the plans for the road improvement and once staff is aware of their concerns they can evaluate the plans on the basis of those concerns. Dietz explained they do have several alternative plans and they will present a matrix that will show the pros and cons of each alternative. Case pointed out at previous meetings, it appears the residents feel it is already a done deal. It is their responsibility to work with and educate the residents. Part of this project is a done deal in that they have decided that this roadwork is necessary. However, other areas are still workable and the residents' input is required. The elected officials have decided that this work is critical and it is important that the elected officials attend different meetings to present the historical information that is necessary. Following discussion, Mayor Harris asked that staff review this entire process and at a future meeting discuss what the role of the Council will be over the next few years. Dietz pointed out that the Mayor would be in attendance at each of the meetings serving as the moderator. He suggested they consider appointing another Councilmember as a member of a task force and report back to the full Council the progress of this project. Mayor Harris asked that staff bring back several options at a future meeting for Council consideration. IV. YEARS 2000-2001 BUDGET WORKSHOP II A. Presentation of Budget Information and Assumptions City Manager Enger presented introductory comments regarding the budget process. Staff's goal is to balance the budget but also keep taxes low. Enger explained this is the first year Service Area Directors have developed a balanced budget the first time through. Enger explained this is the first year they will be initiating the multi-year budget process. With regard to the multi-year budget, Enger explained in 1999 the Council would adopt the 2000 budget and develop the 2001 budget. In 2000 the Council will 3 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES August 24, 1999 Page 4 adopt the 2001 budget and then in 2001 they will adopt the 2002 budget and develop the 2003 budget. This process allows staff to carry-over spending and revenues into the next year. Also,much of the activity involved does not follow the fiscal year. Therefore, it made sense to look at a couple of years for budgeting purposes. The advantages of a two-year budget is additional time can be spent on strategic planning in alternate years; there will be improved financial planning; and a streamlined budget process which allows staff time to focus on other areas. Enger reviewed the General Fund Budget objectives explaining that they will begin the multi-year budget cycle, comply with levy limits, coordinate the budget with the Strategic Plan,minimize tax impacts and ensure a balanced budget model. They will also fund necessary services, continue funding capital improvements and reduce the rate of increase in operational expenditures. B. Discussion of Budget Scenarios Financial Services Director Don Uram briefly reviewed the changes between the 2000 budget and 2001 budget on the revenue side. He explained that the total revenues will increase by 5%in the year 2001. The budget will increase by 6% from 1999 to 2000. Uram explained that licenses and permits increase 2.7% from 1999 to 2000 with the primary component of this revenue being building permits. Uram explained that expenditures will increase 4% from 1999 to 2000. Staff continues to try to increase the fund balance to reduce the levy at a future date. In response to a question regarding the 2000 payroll adjustments, Uram explained that staff has not yet allocated these funds. Wages are adjusted at the beginning of each year and are allocated throughout the year. Mayor Harris questioned the reduction of$35,000 under new employees from 2000 to 2001. Swaggert explained that that amount is expenses. In 2000 they are projecting additional payroll for a certain number of new employees. That amount will be incorporated into the 2001 budget. If positions are not added,the payroll number becomes much smaller. Swaggert explained in the year 2000 they are anticipating increasing staff at the front end and are seeing more activity in 2000 than 2001. There are new positions being proposed in the 2000 budget. This is a result of a number of emerging issues. These positions will be needed because of new technology and because of the continued growth in population. Butcher-Younghans asked how Eden Prairie's wages compare with other cities in the area. Swaggert responded that it is very difficult to do a comparison from one city to another because of the different service levels. Eden Prairie has a liquor enterprise and a different approach to the delivery of water and sewer. Swaggert explained that the wage base will be different depending on the services offered. However, economic adjustments and pay equity do balance out from city to city. The same economic factors are used and each year an informal wage survey is completed. Swaggert indicated for the year 2000 they are proposing a 4% economic adjustment with 2%pay equity and a 3% step increase. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES August 24, 1999 Page 5 Uram reviewed the various capital requests. He explained that median residential property will see a 2.3%increase in taxes for the year 2000. The median home in 2000 is valued at$186,000 with the median home valued at$195,000 in 2001. Uram further explained staff is projecting close to a$500,000 transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Program to fund capital improvements. Staff is attempting to increase fund balance levels to increase the City's bond rating. The City's bond rating is currently AA3 and they are looking for an AA2 rating. One of the things that is looked at when reviewing a city's bond rating is the city's fund balance. Eden Prairie's fund balance has increased$500,000 from last year and they have approximately$4.6 million on reserve. Uram stated that a study from the City's financial advisor indicated Eden Prairie has the lowest unreserved fund balance. A majority of the cities have a fund balance of at least 50%while Eden Prairie is at 25%. The City does not issue a lot of debt, therefore, the bond rating does not have such a large impact. However, Eden Prairie should be rated the same as similar communities that have a bond rating of AA2. Uram reviewed the budget model and indicated things look relatively good for the City five years out. Economic growth continues with market values increasing 10%. This may change at any time and that is why staff has taken a conservative approach. The model is based on information they have today and does not take into consideration the issuance of debt for a new fire station. This cost will have to be covered. Dietz reviewed the Utility Fund Budget and explained their goal is to maintain the $1 million fund balance. The actual fund balance at year-end in 1998 was $1,588,000. Staff is not anticipating any rate increases in the year 2000 and will look at those rates again in 2001. Thorfinnson asked that this be looked at very seriously. He does not want to get into the situation of where they have to raise rates 5% every year. Dietz said they would review the rates on an annual basis. Dietz reported the operating revenues for the Utility Fund Budget will increase 4% from 2000 to 2001 and operating expenditures will increase 1%. Dietz explained they have not been spending much for capital expenditures in the Utility Fund. They have recently completed the Wetlands Plan and will be developing a Water Management Plan. Once these reports are completed, they will better know what funds will be expended. Uram presented the Liquor Fund Budget objectives explaining that they have hired an inventory control clerk. The City does have an inventory of$5 million and they need to keep better control of this inventory. Uram indicated they would be spending additional funds to improve store security. Any remaining monies in this Fund will be transferred to the General Fund or to the Capital Improvement Program. Last year excess funds were placed in the Debt Service Fund. Case asked if there are any plans to have a liquor store located at the Hustad Development on Highway 169 and Pioneer Trail. Uram responded that staff has discussed this and feel it is an excellent site. However,they question whether or not this commercial operation is big enough to support a liquor store. Staff will continue to monitor this site. c CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES August 24, 1999 Page 6 Tyra-Lukens asked if there was any estimate as to the amount of losses because of theft. Uram said based on the retail method, the losses are very small. Tyra- Lukens asked if it is worthwhile to put in the security systems. Uram explained that the cost would be approximately$30,000 throughout the operation and it is being installed not only to prevent theft but also for employee safety. C. Final Direction for Preparing 2000/2001 Budget Uram explained the Council will need to certify a preliminary levy by September 15 and set a date for the Truth-in-Taxation hearing. Staff is proposing December 6 for the initial hearing and December 21 as the date for the continuation hearing should that be necessary. Tyra-Lukens asked what staff positions are being added. Tyra-Lukens also questioned why there was no revenue under the COPS Program. Public Safety Services Director Jim Clark explained the grant for the COPS Program has expired and it is unlikely they will receive funds for this program again next year. Tyra-Lukens questioned why engineering charges increased 81% from 1999 to 2000. Finance Operations Manager Sue Kotchevar responded these charges are for overhead fees on projects that the City administers. It is projected the City will be participating in more projects in 2000. With regard to staffing, Swaggert explained in the past staff has presented the Council with a listing of position requests. The reason for not doing that this year was to allow management to review the list to see if it is possible to shift resources around. Swaggert said they do anticipate adding five additional people. These positions would be added in the safety area because of the population growth. The City also needs better support in Information Systems and in other communication areas. The City is expecting continued expansion in those areas. Swaggert explained they are seeing higher turnover because of today's market. With this turnover comes an opportunity to rethink jobs and it is staffs plan to bring back a more solid position list to the Council in October. Case asked what services to the typical Eden Prairie resident would be lost if the budget were not increased the proposed 6%but was increased 0%. Enger pointed out they need to focus on what impact the levy increase will have on the median priced home which is a 2.3% increase. Uram explained the 6%increase includes vehicles, equipment and debt service. Thorfinnson said they must remember that as the population increases additional services are required which drives up the cost. Enger pointed out that the City's population has grown about 3%. Mayor Harris explained that the preliminary budget would be presented to the Council at the September 7 meeting for approval. V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 7:10 p.m. 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar September 7, 1999 SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Clerk's License Application List V.A. &Financial Services/ Gretchen Laven These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. CONTRACTOR A-abc Appliance &Heating Inc Air Mechanical Inc Boiler Services Inc Jobco Plumbing Kalmes Mechanical Inc Knott Mechanical Building Services Metro Sheet Metal Inc Schadegg Mechanical Inc Schreiber Mullaney Construction Co Inc September 7, 1999 - 1 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 09/07/99 SECTION: Consent Agenda SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald Uram Flagship Corporate Center V. 13. Scott A. Kipp Requested Action Move to: • Approve 2"Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers and Zoning District Change from Rural and C-Reg-Ser to Office on 9.2 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 9.2 acres; and • Approve the Developers Agreement for Flagship Corporate Center Synopsis This is for a 150,300 square foot, four-story office building located north of the Flagship Athletic Club, west of Prairie Center Drive, and south of Technology Drive. Attachments 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 21 MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to approve a Resolution awarding a contract for traffic signals at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road and Super Valu Entrance/Market Place Drive to Killmer Electric Company. Motion carried,4-0. 2. Award Contract for Lincoln Lane Street and Storm Sewer Improvements, I.C. 52-196 (Resolution No. 99-149) Dietz reported one bid was received on August 12, 1999, for these improvements in the amount of$109,879. This bid is approximately 36% above the engineer's estimate. Staff recommended this bid be rejected and they proceed with re-bidding the project at a later date for construction next year. MOTION: Case moved, Butcher-Younghans seconded, to approve a Resolution rejecting the bid for Lincoln Lane street and storm sewer improvements. Motion carried,4-0. E. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIII. OTHER BUSINESS A. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION B. COMMISSION APPRECIATION BANQUET MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to set Thursday, September 30, as the date for the Commission Appreciation banquet to be held in the City Garden Room. Motion carried,4-0. XIV. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to adjourn the meeting. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens adjourned the meeting at 10:20 p.m. cI CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 17, 1999 Page 20 Case explained he has talked to the President of the State Metal Detectors who said other cities grant permits for digging in parks. Case said he would like to review this matter to see if there are alternatives. Lambert explained they did look at a number of other cities' ordinances. This Code amendment does not mean they can't walk in the parks with a metal detector, it just means they can't start digging in the parks. Not only can a person with a shovel or a hand trowel cause damage to turf areas, there is also a possibility of hitting either an irrigation line or buried electrical lines that are present throughout the park system and are not marked. MOTION: Case moved, Thorfinnson seconded, to approve the first reading of an Ordinance amending City Code Section 9.04 entitled "Rules and Regulations Governing Parks." Motion carried 4-0. C. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Extension of Closing Date for Lincoln Parc Apartments Uram reported that per the terms of a purchase agreement dated January 19, 1999, the City is in the process of selling Lot 4, Block 1, Eden Prairie Marketcenter Addition to Hartford Financial Services, the developer of the recently approved Lincoln Park project. The developer is requesting to have a closing date for the sale of this parcel extended from July 22, 1999 to September 22, 1999. The purpose of the extension is to allow the developer more time to obtain approvals for the use of Housing Revenue Bonds to help finance the project. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to approve the first amendment to the purchase agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and Hartford Financial Services for the sale of Lot 4, Block 1, Eden Prairie Marketcenter Addition. Motion carried,4-0. D. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Award Contract for Traffic Signals at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Super Valu Entrance/Market Place Drive, I.C. 99-5480 (Resolution No. 99-148) Dietz reported bids were received on August 17, 1999, for these improvements. A summary of bids and recommendation letter from Westwood Professional Services, Inc. was distributed to the Council. This project is anticipated to be completed this year. The project is being funded by the Tax Increment Fund and Super Valu, Inc. The low bid was received from Killmer Electric Company in the amount of $192,732.50, which is approximately 2%below the engineer's estimate. c2 FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 1-99-PUD-1-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be changed from the Rural District and C-Reg-Ser District and be placed in the Office District 1-99-PUD-1-99 (hereinafter "PUD-1 -99 -Office") Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 7, 1999, entered into between Opus Northwest, LLC and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-1-99-Office, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-1-99-Office is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-1-99-Office designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-1-99-Office are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-1-99-Office is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed z from the Rural District and C-Reg-Ser District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-1-99-Office and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of February, 1999 and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on . 3 Exhibit A Flagship Corporate Center Legal Descriptions: PUD, Rezoning, Site Plan Review (Property description per Certificate of Title No. 854100.) Outlot A, Flagship Addition, except that part thereof which lies Northwesterly of a line described as beginning at a point on the North line of said Outlot A distant 190. 16 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Outlot A; thence in a Southwesterly direction to a point on the West line of said Outlot A distant 267.84 feet South from said Northwest corner of Outlot A and said line there terminating. And (Property description per Warranty Deed Doc. No. 5512135.) That part of the West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies Southwesterly of the Southwesterly right—of—way line of Prairie Center Drive and Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 87 degrees 59 minutes 07 second East, along the South line of said West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 407.67 feet to the Southwesterly right—of—way line of Prairie Center Drive; thence North 55 degrees 52 minutes 37 seconds West, along said right—of—way line. o distance of 175.71 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 34 degrees 07 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 128.31 feet, more or less, to the South line of said West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and said line there terminating. Also that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of Section 15; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 51 minutes 48 seconds East. along the Cost line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of 267.84 feet to the point of beginning of the Iund to be described; continuing South 0 degrees 51 minutes 48 seconds East a distance of 170.83 feet: thence North 55 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 97.95 feet; thence North 34 degrees 07 minutes 23 seconds East o distance of 140. 1 I feet. more or less, to the point of beginning. AND That part of Lot 2, Block 1, FLAGSHIP ADDITION, according to the plat thereof. Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies northwesterly of a line described as commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 2; thence North 87 degrees 59 minutes 07 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the south line of said Lot 2, a distance of 96.70 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 47 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds East a distance of 476.68 feet to the northeasterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. y Exhibit A Flagship Corporate Center Legal Descriptions (continued): Preliminary Plat (Property description per Certificate of Title No. 854100.) Outlot A, Flagship Addition, except that part thereof which lies Northwesterly of a line described as beginning at a point on the North line of said Outlot A distant 190.16 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Outlot A; thence in a Southwesterly direction to a point .on the West line of said Outlot A distant 267.84 feet South from said Northwest corner of Outlot A and said line there terminating. And (Property description per Warranty Deed Doc. No. 5512135.) That part of the West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies Southwesterly of the Southwesterly right—of—way line of Prairie Center Drive and Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 87 degrees 59 minutes 07 second East, along the South line of said West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 407.67 feet to the Southwesterly right—of—way line of Prairie Center Drive; thence North 55 degrees 52 minutes 37 seconds West, along said right—of—way line, a distance of 175.71 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 34 degrees 07 minutes 23 seconds West, o distance of 128.31 feet, more or less, to the South line of said West half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and said line there terminating. Also that port of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing of the Northeost corner of said Southeast Quarter of Section 15; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 51 minutes 48 seconds East, along the East line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of 267.84 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; continuing South 0 degrees 51 minutes 48 seconds East a distance of 170.83 feet; thence North 55 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 97.95 feet; thence North 34 degrees 07 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 140.11 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. AND (As Provided) Lot 2, Block 1, flagship Addition, according to the plot thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. 5- FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 1-99-PUD-1-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located on the west side of Prairie Center Drive, south of Technology Drive from Rural and C-Reg-Ser to the Office Zoning District. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) 6 FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER BY OPUS NORTHWEST,LLC. WHEREAS, Opus Northwest, LLC has applied for Site Plan approval of the Flagship Corporate Center on 9.2 acres for construction of a 150,300 square foot office building located on Prairie Center Drive, west of Technology Drive, within the Office Zoning District on 9.2 acres by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on September 7, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its January 25, 1999, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its February 16, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Opus Northwest, LLC for the construction of a 150,300 square foot office building, based on plans dated September 7, 1999, between Opus Northwest, LLC and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 7, 1999. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of September 7, 1999, by Opus Northwest, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.2 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural and C-Reg-Ser to Office on 9.2 acres with height and setback waivers, Site Plan Review on 9.2 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 11.2 acres into two lots for construction of a 150,300 square foot office building, legally described on Exhibit A(the "Property"); NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. 99-28 for Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural and C-Reg-Ser to Office, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. 99-29 for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees, subject to the conditions, terms, and agreements set forth herein, to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated September 7, 1999, reviewed and approved by the City Council on March 16, 1999, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. This Agreement imposes no affirmative obligation upon the Developer to proceed with the development of the Property,but is intended to impose the conditions upon which development of the Property may proceed. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. MEDIAN OPENING IN PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE, ACCESS DRIVE TO TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, AND POND CONSTRUCTION: Developer shall enter into an Assessment Agreement for the total cost to design and construct a median opening in Prairie Center Drive opposite the driveway opening in the center of the Property, and the driveway across City property to Technology Drive as shown on Exhibit B, and costs for construction/use of the regional pond on adjacent property to accommodate storm water from the Property. The assessable cost shall, in addition to design and construction costs, include a 9% administrative fee. The assessment period shall be fifteen years at an interest rate of 8%. 4. FUTURE ENTRANCE SIGNAL: The Developer or owner may request signalization of the main entrance on Prairie Center Drive. The Developer agrees that signalization shall only be allowed at such time as the signal warrants achieve minimum priority standards in accordance with Hennepin County Public Works policy for signalization and the owner enters into an assessment agreement for the full cost of signal design and construction in accordance with City assessment policy. 5. GRADING,DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include items required by the application for and release of a land alteration permit. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures: All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan. Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the existing and/or proposed sedimentation pond during construction. Developer shall provide preconstruction and post construction surveys for evaluation by City. 6. NURP POND: Developer acknowledges City's requirement that a NURP facility for the treatment of storm water be created and maintained on the Property. Developer has represented to City that construction of such a pond on the Property is not feasible. The Developer agrees to participate in the costs(which costs shall be assessed)for implementation of a regional pond facility which will serve the Property for the treatment of storm water. As a result, Developer will consent to assessment of an amount equal to the amount of 2%of the Assessor's January 2, 1999 estimated market value of the Property($2,500,000),plus $1,000 per acre of impervious surface area on the Property, which Developer and City agree is an 9 amount sufficient to substantially offset the costs of implementing the Property's share of the regional pond facility. Developer waives any and all rights to object to the nature or amount of this assessment and agrees to defend and indemnify City for any claims made by any party that the nature or amount of the assessment is invalid for any reason. Developer acknowledges that this payment is in lieu of an on-site NURP facility only. Developer and the Property may still be assessed or charged other amounts for construction and maintenance of other storm water facilities, other than ponds, including but not limited to amounts for the storm water utility fund and special assessments relating to the Property, subject to applicable law. 7. PARK DEDICATION: Developer agrees that, prior to release of the final plat for the Property, Outlot A, as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto, shall be dedicated to the City for park purposes (and shall be subject to a restriction that it may only be used for park purposes) in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 8. CROSS ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Property, the Developer shall enter into cross access and maintenance agreements with respect to the driveway easements with the City and Flagship Athletic Club. These agreements shall be acceptable to the City and shall address joint vehicle access and maintenance of driveways. All of these facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the Developer or Owner. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that the cross access and maintenance agreement has been recorded in the Hennepin County Recorder's Office/Registrar of Titles' Office. 9. IRRIGATION PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, subject to delays caused by weather. 10. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity,type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, subject to weather delays, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. /0 11. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN: Developer shall implement the Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM) attached as Exhibit E at the site to help reduce traffic congestion on Prairie Center Drive and Technology Drive. Prior to issuance of a building permit on the Property, Developer will provide to the City a Letter of Credit in the amount equal to the estimated cost of implementing the first two years of the TDM Plan. The Letter of Credit will be released to the Developer on a"draw-down"basis during the later of the first two years of building occupancy or first two years of TDM Plan implementation, in the following manner: a) The Developer shall periodically submit to the City receipts of expenses associated with executing the TDM Plan. The City shall have 15 business days to review the receipts. If within this 15 day period the City does not provide the Developer with written notice that it objects to all or any portion of the expenses which the Developer has submitted as TDM implementation expenses then in such event Developer may also exchange for the then existing Letter of Credit, a new or amended Letter of Credit in an amount equal to the previous total, less the total receipts submitted. 12. TRAIL EASEMENT AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Park and Recreation Services and obtain the Director's written approval of detailed plans for a trail to be constructed on Outlot A. The trail shall be constructed in the following location: a) An eight-foot wide bituminous trail to be located on the west side of the building between the building and wetland, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. For any portion of the trail that is located outside of Outlot A, as depicted in Exhibit B, Developer shall provide to the City, a trail easement of sufficient width to maintain a 10- foot right of way on either side of the trail centerline. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved plans in accordance with the terms of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, subject to weather delays. 13. EDEN PRAIRIE MARKETCENTER DESIGN FRAMEWORK: Prior to building permit issuance for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and obtain the City Planner's written approval of detailed plans for implementing the Eden Prairie Marketcenter Design Framework for the Property consistent with the materials attached as Exhibit F. This includes the following: a) Decorative street lighting along Prairie Center Drive. b) Decorative pedestrian lighting along Prairie Center Drive. c) Decorative pedestrian lighting leading to the building from Prairie Center Drive. d) Specialized concrete sidewalk along Prairie Center Drive. e) Landscaping planters at site entrances. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved plans for the Marketcenter Design Framework in accordance with the terms of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, subject to weather delays. 14. SCREENING WALL AND EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for the design of a face brick wall or landscaping and berming, at the sole discretion of the City Planner, for screening the loading area from the Purgatory Creek flood plain, and exterior materials and colors to be used on the building on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, subject to weather delays, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved face brick wall, or landscaping and berming plan and exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 15. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, subject to weather delays. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner, in his or her sole discretion,that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures. 16. TRASH: Developer agrees that all trash,trash receptacles and recycling bins shall at all times be located inside of the building enclosures depicted on Exhibit B. 17. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: The city hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD-1-99-Office: � z a) Building height of 60 feet. City Code maximum is 30 feet in the Office Zoning District. b) Front yard setback to parking of 0 feet for the 10 parking spaces in the northwest corner of the Property. City Code requires a minimum of 35 feet in the Office Zoning District. 18. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions to the extent arising from any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. i3 EXHIBIT E FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared By: BRW, Inc. Prepared For: Opus Northwest, L.L.C. May 3, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GOAL OF TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 2. INTRODUCTION 2 Project Description 2 Access to Transit 2 Amenities Adjacent to the Development 2 3. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN 3 Proposed Developer/Property Owner and Property Manager Actions 3 • Employee Transportation Coordinator 3 • Carpool/Vanpool 3 • Transit 4 • Participation/Coordination 4 • Communications and Education 5 • Flex-Time and Telecommuting 6 • Intelligent Transportation System Technologies 6 Metro Commuter Services Support 7 Proposed Tenant Actions 7 Table 1: Proposed Travel Demand Management Plan Budget 8 4. EVALUATION PROGRAM 9 • Survey 9 • Evaluation of TDM 9 5. COOPERATING AGENCIES 10 Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest,L.L.C. i May 3, 1999 1. GOAL OF TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN The goal of this Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan is to reduce the number of trips during the peak hour to the maximum extent possible. The TDM Plan for the Flagship Corporate Center identifies actions to be taken by the property manager and tenants, in conjunction with support from Metro Commuter Services. It includes strategies to manage travel demand and minimize peak period site-generated traffic. Goal: Have 5% of Flagship Corporate Center employees using a transportation mode other than the single occupant vehicle within two years of occupancy of the building. The development of this TDM Plan has been done in coordination with Metro Commuter Services (MCS), Southwest Metro Transit, the I-494 Corridor Commission and the City of Eden Prairie. Description of these cooperating agencies is at the end of the document. Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 1 May 3, 1999 l6 2. INTRODUCTION Project Description The proposed Flagship Corporate Center is the construction of a 138,000 rentable square foot office building located along the west side of Prairie Center Drive between Technology Drive and Singletree Lane in the City of Eden Prairie. A total of 597 parking spaces will be provided for the approximately 600 employees at this four story, 60-foot tall building being proposed by Opus Northwest, L.L.C. (Opus). There is a drop-off lane in the front of the building that can be used for car pool drop-off and taxi cab pick-up/drop-off. (Coordination with Southwest Metro Transit indicated that it would not be appropriate to have a bus stop on site since there is already a bus stop located in front of the Flagship Athletic Club adjacent to the new Flagship Corporate Center.) Access to Transit As is typical of many Opus projects, the Flagship Corporate Center is located adjacent to a transit hub, the new Southwest Station operated by Southwest Metro Transit. The Southwest Station is located at 13500 Technology Drive, approximately 1,400 feet northwest of the building and will give employees of the Flagship Corporate Center a unique opportunity to utilize transit service for a suburban office complex. In addition, a bus stop is located on Prairie Center Drive in front of the Flagship Athletic Club adjacent to the new facility. Southwest Metro Transit provides the most feasible service within its available resources, continually evaluating its service and maintaining flexibility. Of significance is that service is provided westbound and eastbound from about 5:00 AM to 9:00 PM. There are 15 routes operated by Southwest Metro Transit that connect the Cities of Chanhassen, Chaska and Eden Prairie to each other and to Southdale, the Southwest Triangle and downtown Minneapolis. Regular weekday peak hour express service is provided by Route 681 between downtown Minneapolis and the Southwest Station and continues to/from the Southwest Station along Prairie Center Drive in front of the Flagship Corporate Center. The bus stop is located in front of the Flagship Athletic Club adjacent to the new facility. There is 45 minute service on the AM peak hour express bus from downtown Minneapolis to Eden Prairie that operates from 5:00 to 9:00 AM. The 45 minute evening express service operates from 3:15 to 6:30 PM from Southwest Station to downtown Minneapolis. Local hourly service throughout the day is provided as well as dial-a-ride service. In addition, service at 90 minute intervals is available at the Southwest Station to the Mall of America and the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport. Amenities Adjacent to the Development A Day Care/Pre-School program is offered in the immediate vicinity at St. Andrews Church located north of Technology Drive and west of Prairie Center Drive. The Flagship Athletic Club, located immediately to the south of the site, can be accessed by walking and could be used by those employees who wish to exercise during the lunch hour or after work without getting into Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 2 May 3, 1999 /7 their vehicle. For those who choose to exercise after work, this will act like staggered work hours thereby reducing the number of employees leaving in the peak hour. 3. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN This section describes the proposed Flagship Corporate Center TDM Plan and the Opus programs to support their tenants' employees in the use of alternative modes of transportation to driving alone. Proposed Developer/Property Owner/Property Manager Actions: 1. Designate an Employee Transportation Coordinator: • The Property Manager for the Flagship Corporate Center building will be designated as the Employee Transportation Coordinator. • The Property Manager will maintain and monitor TDM activities and serve as the continuing liaison to the I-494 Corridor Commission, Metro Commuter Services and a local Travel Management Organization (TMO), if established. 2. Carpool/Vanpool: • Designate 12 preferential parking spaces initially for car pools, which is approximately 4% of the parking spaces. Designate 2 preferential van pool spaces. Allocation of additional car/van pool spaces will be based on the growth in demand and added when needed. • Subsidize up to four unused van pool seats for up to one year for up to two vans. Implementation of the van pool program will be coordinated through Southwest Metro Transit. • Evaluate use of car/van pool spaces after 12 months and adjust number of spaces accordingly. • The Property Manager will monitor the use of the designated carpool/vanpool spaces and assure proper utilization. • Evaluate use of van pools after 12 months and adjust subsidies for unused spaces. • Promote ridesharing by: -Distributing rideshare matching applications and information for carpools/vanpools. -Distributing information on the Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) program sponsored by MCS. • Promote car pools through the use of incentives, such as gas coupons, free lunch, etc. Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 3 May 3, 1999 • Ride Share Matching -Employees in the Flagship Corporate Center interested in car pooling can contact Metro Commuter Services (MCS) for ride share matching services. MCS, sponsored by the Metropolitan Council, is the regional clearing house for ride share matching in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. To contact MCS, employees can: -Call MCS at 651/349-RIDE (7433) -Return the form at the back of the Commute Planner brochure -Access the MCS web page at: www.metrocommuterservices.org -E-Mail the information to MCS at: commuter.services@metc.state.mn.us -Participate in a sub-area ride share matching service when available. 3. Promote Transit • Promote transit to all new tenants by providing the opportunity to try transit to each new employee through a one-time only reduced rate monthly transit pass. Upon being granted a certificate of occupancy for the building, provide a one-time subsidy of$9,120 to fund up to one-half the cost of an average monthly transit pass ($76) for two months for all full-time employees. • Promote transit by providing materials to educate tenant employees on the location of and schedule for transit service available at the Southwest Station, other connecting transit service, and the location of transit stops closest to their homes, this includes information on transit routes, schedules, park-and-ride lots and various transit passes. • Alert the building employees to the Route 681 express service bus stop at the Flagship Athletic Club adjacent to the Flagship Corporate Center. 4. Participation in a Transportation Management Organization and Coordination • The Property Manager will work to help establish and participate in a Transportation Management Organization (TMO) for the southwest metro area. • The Property Manager will meet in coordination with the City of Eden Prairie, Southwest Metro Transit, the I-494 Corridor Commission, Mn/DOT, Metropolitan Council, and other large office and commercial property owners in the area to discuss alternatives to improve and expand transit service and utilize existing transit service. A key option to consider at these coordination meetings would be a transit circulator service among the Southwest Station and commercial and office buildings during the AM and PM peak periods as well as the lunch hour. Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 4 May 3, 1999 1I 5. Communications and Education: The Property Manager will: • Make available to the decision makers and Human Resources department of each tenant/employer the information on the Metropass and T-Bill programs, transit financial incentive programs for employers and employees, as supplied by MCS. • Set up and maintain a display of commuter information at the entrance to the building. This information, which will be supplied by Southwest Metro Transit and Metro Commuter Services, will include transit schedules, rideshare applications, bike information, Guaranteed Ride Home program, etc. To maintain an awareness of alternative modes of transportation, information can be distributed through e-mail, flyers, posters in frequented locations, etc. • Distribute to all tenants rideshare information and applications supplied by MCS. Ridematching assistance is provided by MCS, the metropolitan area clearing house for ridematching. Employees return the rideshare applications to MCS for rideshare matching. • Promote alternative modes of transportation during a designated month each year. This could include a week-long display in the building of educational materials concerning alternative modes of transportation. • Sponsor a Commuter Fair for tenant employers and employees in conjunction with MCS as an opportunity to: ►Inform and assist tenants to find and use the most efficient and cost effective alternative transportation modes. Set up zip code meetings of personnel commuting from the same area. • Provide information and application forms on the Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) Program to all Flagship Corporate Center tenants upon occupancy for their employees. The GRH program is sponsored by MCS and is available to all employees who ride the bus, car pool, vanpool,bike or walk to work at least three days per week. Eligible employees who complete a GRH registration form receive two coupons good for up to 12 months for a bus or taxi cab ride home on a regular work day in the event of an emergency or a schedule conflict. Registration is renewable each year with new coupons issued at that time. • Develop and distribute a Flagship Corporate Center newsletter for employees to include rideshare matching services, the GRH program, commuter news, information on discounted bus passes, the Metropass program and special commuter option events. • Inform and encourage tenants to participate in special events such as B-BOP Day. Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest, LL.C. 5 May 3, 1999 • For commuters to make better travel choices, make tenants aware of how to access -the real-time traveler information program, sidewalk.com, on the internet, and -the new Mn/DOT SmarTraveler, the Twin Cities new state-of-the-art transportation information network. 6. Flex-Time and Telecommuting • Work with tenants to consider offering flex-time schedules for employees, where practical. • Work with tenants to consider the practice of telecommuting, where practical. 7. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Technologies: The developer will investigate the feasibility of providing real-time traffic information to its tenants at the proposed project for employees to make better travel choices. Mn/DOT already collects real-time information at its Traffic Management Center and this information is available on the Internet at no extra charge. The program, called sidewalk.com, gives up to the minute travel conditions on the regional roadway system. A commuter can focus on specific areas to determine the length of the ramp queues and congestion on a particular route. This information can be used to determine when to leave the office. Rather than waiting at ramp meters, a commuter could accomplish additional work in the office and then leave when congestion on the system is less. In addition, Mn/DOT has been working on SmarTraveler, the Traveler Information Center (TIC) created as part of the Orion project which will be run by Smart Route Systems, a national provider of travel information services. This service began in December 1998. The TIC provides real-time traffic information available through the Traffic Management Center,Mn/DOT's current source of traveler information. Better travel choices through technology help to spread out trips on the system reducing congestion and the queue lengths on the ramps. Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest,L.L.C. 6 May 3, 1999 0 Metro Commuter Services Support • Conduct a commuter survey of tenants' employees to better understand their commuting habits and needs. • MCS would take the lead in rideshare matching for the formation of car pools by employees. The Property Manager will coordinate with MCS for timely rideshare matching. • Provide information to the Property Manager on the Metropass program, the T-Bill Program, the GRH program, the rideshare matching program,discounted bus pass program, etc. • Provide new hire information packets to the Property Manager concerning transportation choices for distribution to tenants. • MCS would co-administer the car/van pool preferential parking and provide access to signage (up to five car/van pool signs and hang tags). Proposed Tenant Actions Opus will support their tenants in implementing the following programs, but they are the responsibility of the tenants. • Provide new employees with rideshare and transit information. • Solicit management support for policies that support alternative commuting programs. • Investigate and consider staggered work hours or flextime for employees. • Investigate and consider telecommuting for employees. Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 7 May 3, 1999 Table 1 Proposed Travel Demand Management Plan Budget One-Time TDM Plan Item Estimated Cost Only Cost 2001 2002 Transportation Assume 20% FTE in Year 1 and $15,000 $11,700 Coordinator 15% FTE in Year 2 @ $75,000/yr (including benefits) Designated Car/Van 14 spaces @ $100/space $1,400 Pool Parking Subsidize Van Pool 8 seats @ $100/month/seat for one year $4,800 $4,800 Seats Transit Subsidy 600 employees with 20% participation $9,120 %z x $76 x two months Promote Transit Marketing materials, postage, copying, $2,000 $2,000 etc. @ $2,000/year Car Pool Incentives Encourage people to car pool $3,000 $3,000 Commuter Fairs Two @ $1,500 each $1,500 $1,500 Develop/distribute Copying $1,000 $1,000 newsletter Total $10,520 $27,300 $24,000 Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 8 May 3, 1999 e723 4. EVALUATION PROGRAM Survey Employees The Property Manager will work with Metro Commuter Services to conduct a survey of the Flagship Corporate Center employees' commuting habits and needs after 70% lease up. • The Commuter Survey will be developed by MCS in coordination with the Property Manager. • The Property Manager will promote the implementation of the survey and a timely response by building employees. • The Property Manager will coordinate the distribution and collection of the survey and return completed surveys to MCS for tabulation. • A report will be issued documenting the findings of the commuter survey one month after survey is completed. • The Property Manager will use the findings as a base line to compare the effectiveness of the TDM Plan. Evaluate the Effectiveness of the TDM Plan • Conduct a follow-up survey two years after the first survey to determine if commuting habits have changed. • Appropriately modify the TDM Plan to focus on the most effective measures. Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 9 May 3, 1999 5. COOPERATING AGENCIES The cooperating agencies in the TDM are Southwest Metro Transit, I-494 Corridor Commission and Metro Commuter Services. Southwest Metro Transit Transit service in Eden Prairie is provided by Southwest Metro Transit, which operates under a Joint Powers Agreement by and between the Cities of Chanhassen, Chaska and Eden Prairie. I-494 Corridor Commission The I-494 Corridor Commission is a Joint Powers Organization (JPO) of seven cities who are working together to reduce congestion along the I-494 corridor by working with affected businesses and public agencies to reduce travel demand. Their mission is to promote the improvement of I-494 from the Minnesota River in Bloomington to I-94 in Maple Grove, in order to increase the people moving capacity of 1-494, and to improve the productivity and convenience of businesses and residents throughout the region. Members include the Cities of Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Plymouth and Richfield. Partners include the Metropolitan Council, Mn/DOT, Metro Transit Southwest Metro Transit, Maple Grove Transit, Plymouth Metrolink and Hennepin County. Metro Commuter Services Metro Commuter Services (MCS) is the Twin Cities area regional commuter transportation agency. As part of the Metropolitan Council, MCS promotes the planning, development and implementation of commuter options which decrease traffic congestion by improving both the effectiveness and efficiency of existing transportation infrastructure. MCS offers direct assistance to employers who seek to promote commuter options. One of the services MCS provides is to work with employers to assess the current transportation situation and commuting needs of employees through the MCS Commuter Survey. Other services offered by MCS are ride matching services, subsidies for start-up vans of five or more passengers, the Guaranteed Ride Home program and transit information. For the transit commuter, MCS can identify all the routes and park and ride lots available to employees for their commute. In addition, MCS can investigate the option of reverse commuting from inner city to suburb and suburb to suburb thereby broadening the available employee pool. Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan Opus Northwest, L.L.C. 10 May 3, 1999 idA, Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future Metro Commuter Services February 15, 1999 Ms. Biz Colburn BRW Thresher Square 700 Third Street South Minneapolis, MN 55415 Dear Ms. Colburn: Metro Commuter Services (MCS) has reviewed the Flagship Corporate Center Travel Demand Management Plan. . Our organization has been consulted throughout the course of writing this plan and agrees to help support its implementation when called upon, within the limitation of MCS products and services being offered at the particular time of implementation. We acknowledge the efforts of the Flagship Corporate Center to manage site-generated traffic and help minimize peak period trip generation. Metro Commuter Services looks forward to working with the Flagship Corporate Center. Yours Truly, j),JAI /ohn Mulcahy TDM Consultant cc: Trish Moga, Manager/Metro Commuter Services Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street Saint Paul,Minnesota 55 10 1-1 626 (651)602-1602 FAX 602-1200 TTY 602-1253 COMMUTER e-mail:commuter.servicesgmete.state.mn.us 1SER\/)CESI An Equal Opportunity Employer I JCfIV IIILJ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 09/07/99 SECTION: Consent Agenda SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald Uram Eden Shores Senior Campus Scott A. Kipp 4' Requested Action Move to: • Approve 2°d Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers and Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 11.5 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 11.5 acres; and • Approve the Developers Agreement for Eden Shores Senior Campus Synopsis This is a 321 unit senior campus offering a "continuum of care" approach to residency in conjunction with health care. The project is located east of Highway 212 at Fountain Place. The project will involve Tax Increment Financing to lower rents on 20% of the units, and write- down land acquisition costs. Attachments 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement EDEN SHORES SENIOR CAMPUS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 22-99-PUD-17-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural Zoning District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development RM-2.5 Zoning District 22-99-PUD-17-99 (hereinafter "PUD-17-99-RM-2.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 7, 1999, entered into between SilverCrest Properties, LLC and the City of Eden Prairie, (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-17-99-RM-2.5, and is hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-17-99-RM-2.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-17-99-RM-2.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-17-99-RM-2.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-17-99-RM-2.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. 02 Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural Zoning District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-17-99-RM-2.5 and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of July, 1999, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 3 Exhibit A Eden Shores Senior Campus Legal Description: Petrels 1: That pert of the Southwest Quc ter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Tournehip 115, Range 22 dseersbsd as fellows: CCfrifTlendnq 210.5 feet North fran the Southeast corner of the Southwest 0uarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14 Township 116, Range 22; thence North 174.5 feet thence Northwesterly inciting on on is to the left of 39 degrees 10 minutes a ditches of 327 feet to a point In the Seutheesteriy line of State Highway 169-212 a distance of 258.4 feet Southweeteriy along acid Highway from the East lire of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence Southwesterly along acid Highway 110.2 feet: thence at right angles Southeasterly 482.3 feet to the point of beginning. Parted 2: Pcrcai k That port of the Soutripezt 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14., Township 118, Range Z2. described as faker= C.s.renerrictng at a point on the Ezet lin* of said Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 distance 385 feet tierth to the Soatheest corner of said Southwest 1/4. cf Southwest 1/4: thanes North terry to a point cn the Southeasterly line of State Highway 169. which point is distant 258.4 feet Southwestern tern the intersection of held Southeasterly highway line with the Eat the of acid Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4; thence . Nerthec eteriy along the Southeasterly I'm of sold highway a distance of 81 feet: thence at right angles Southeasterly to East bounder,' line of said Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4: thence South along East line of sold Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 to the point of beginning. Portal e: That part of the Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 116, Rance 22 described as follower Ccrnmencing at a point on the Southeasterly line of State Highway Number 169. which point la dr/store 1 LS.4 feet Southwesterly front the intersection of acid Southeasterly highway line with the Esat line of said Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4: thence Southeasterly at right aXXise to said Sorttaaete iy line of sod State Highway 169 to East bo scary line of acid Southwest 1/4 of Scuthwatt 1/4; thence North along the East line of acid Southwest 1/4 of Scuthweit 1/4 to the Southeasterly line of sold State Highway Number 169: thence Southwseterty along the sold Southeasterly line of sold State Highway Number 169 to the point of beginning. Parcel 3: That pert of the Southeast Qucrtor of the tcuthwest Wexler of Section 14, Township 116. Rag, 27_ deacrtded a fellows: Cornertenc5nq at the intersection of tile Wiest tine of tad text and the Scutheeetety one of said Highway 189 on 212; thence South clang said West line 410.58 feet; thence Nertheiersterly perdei with the Southeasterly Iine of said highway 115 feet: themes North pere:lei with the Meet line of said Southeast Curter of the Southwest Quarter 4438.58 fret to the Southeasterly line of said highway: thence Southwesterly along the Scutheaaterry line of sold highway a distance of 115 feet to the point of beginning. 1 Eden Shores Senior Campus Legal Description, continued: Parcae 4: Tract C. Regf terted Lcnd Survey No. 210. Parcel Parcae A: That port of Section 14, Toenshtp 118, Range: 2.2 deavtbed cs Ic oars: Carrxnsneetq at the Southeast earner of the Southeast Cuarter of the Southeast Warty: of said section, thence North donq the East line thereof. 17.4 feet thence Northeasterly 810.5 feet more or less to a paint it the Southeasterly Tine of Stets Hk)rteay No. 5 'inch point Fs distant 498.8 feet Southwerteny da, told Scuthoasterty rood Ire from Its Intersection with the Cost line of told Southwest Cucrter of the Southwest Cuortr.: thence Sautheesteriy of nq acid Southeasterly rood line to eta intersection with the South line of said Section 14: thence East clang 3oid South line of said Section to the point of begimmnq. EXCV'T That pert thereof ernbrocad in Registered Lard Survey No. 210. Res of Registrar of Title. County of Hennepin. Pa-ta e: Tro;,t A. Registered Lcnd Survey got 210, riles of Reerstrcr of TTtieo, County of Hennepin. Pate! 6: Tract A. Registered Land Surrey No. 275. Pvrcet 7: Tract 8, Registered Land Survey No. 275. Rtresi Trott C, Registered Land Surrey No. 275. P rreel 9: The North 1829 feet of the Northeast Custer of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23. Tcwr►eh;o 118 North. Ronge 22 West. lying Easterly of U.S. H1gt way Now 189 end 212 and west of a Ire crawl at riot angles to the North line of said Northwest Quarter of fiert?'W t Ouorter, and distant 574.42 feet East of the Northwest corner of sold Section 23. Pere tC' That Dort of Southwest Qucrtor of Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 118, Rangy 22 deserted ce follows C.ntrnenctrtq at point on the Ecet Ilee of sc4 Southwest Cuortsr of Soot vreet Custer, 17.4 feet North of. the Southeast carrier thereof, thence North clang said Ecst line 193.1 Fear: thanes Northeeeterly '-823 feet to a point h the Southeasterly line of Stole 4gr1rar rnl'ch is 375.5 feet SouthcastartY aenq said highway line tram the East line of sc'd Southwest Ouorter of Southwest Cue:marr thence Southwesterly along sold highway Iiner 122 feet: thence Scutheasterty 810.5 feet to pent of begInntnq. 5. EDEN SHORES SENIOR CAMPUS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 22-99-PUD-17-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located east of Highway 212 at Fountain Place from Rural to RM-2.5 Zoning District. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) EDEN SHORES SENIOR CAMPUS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR EDEN SHORES SENIOR CAMPUS BY SILVERCREST PROPERTIES, LLC WHEREAS,the SilverCrest Properties,LLC. has applied for Site Plan approval of the Eden Shores Senior Campus on 11.5 acres for construction of 321 senior housing units,to be zoned RM-2.5 Zoning District on 11.5 acres by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on September 7, 1999; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 14, 1999, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 20, 1999,meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to SilverCrest Properties, LLC for the construction of 321 senior housing units at Eden Shores Senior Campus, based on plans dated June 25, 1999 between SilverCrest Properties, LLC and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 7, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT EDENSHORES SENIOR CAMPUS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of September 7, 1999, by Silvercrest Properties, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential/Neighborhood Commercial on 11.5 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.5 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.5 acres,Zoning District Change from Rural to RM- 2.5 on 11.5 acres, Site Plan Review on 11.5 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 11.5 acres into 1 lot and road right-of-way, legally described on Exhibit A(the "Property"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. 99-114 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change,Resolution No. 99-115 for Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. 99-116 for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated June 25, 1999, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 20, 1999, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms,covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of streets and utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for public sanitary sewer and water. Plans shall include construction of all signal modifications at the entrance of T.H. 212 and Fountain Place including loop detectors, signal heads, signing and striping as required by MnDOT and the City. Plans for public infrastructures shall be of a plan view and profile on 24 x 36 plan sheets consistent with City standards. A permit fee of five percent of construction value shall be paid to City by Developer. The design engineer shall provide daily inspection, certify completion in conformance to approved plans and specifications and provide record drawings. 8 Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved street and utility plans concurrent with building construction and prior to occupancy permit issuance. 4. GRADING,DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land alteration permit. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan. Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures: All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan. 5. GRADING IN THE WOODED AREAS ON SITE: Prior to grading within any of the wooded areas on the Property, delineated on Exhibit B, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a plan depicting construction grading limits on the Property. Prior to the issuance of any land alteration permit, Developer shall place a construction fence on the approved construction grading limits. Developer shall notify the City and watershed district 48 hours in advance of grading so that the construction limit fence may be field inspected and approved by the City Engineer and City Forester. Developer shall maintain the construction limit fence until written approval is granted by the City to remove the fence. 6. NURP POND: Developer acknowledges City's requirement that a NURP facility for the treatment of storm water be created and maintained on the Property. Developer acknowledges that capacity to an existing downstream storm water pond will be restored in place of an on-site pond. The City shall implement said improvements. As a result, Developer has volunteered to make a payment to City prior to release of a final plat on any portion of the Property, in the amount of 2% of the land acquisition costs (less the Tax Increment Financing portion), plus $1,000 per acre of impervious surface area on the Property, which Developer and City agree is an amount sufficient to substantially offset the additional impact on the City's storm water facilities caused by the absence of a NURP pond on the Property. Developer waives any and all rights to object to the nature or amount of this voluntary payment and agrees to defend and indemnify City for any claims made by any party that the nature or amount of the payment is invalid for any reason. Developer acknowledges that this payment is in lieu of a NURP facility only and that Developer and the Property may still be assessed or charged other amounts for construction and maintenance of storm water facilities, including but not limited to amounts for the storm water utility fund and special assessments relating to the Property. 7. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. These plans shall include details with respect to the height,type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer agrees that the materials to be used shall be modular masonry. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 8. REMOVAL/SEALING OF EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or building on the Property, Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and to obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of plans for demolition and removal of existing septic systems and wells on the Property, and restoration of the Property. Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a deposit in the amount of$ 1,000.00 to guarantee that Developer completes implementation of the approved plan. The city agrees to return to Developer the$ 1,000.00 deposit at such time as the Chief Building Official has verified in writing that the Developer has completed implementation of the approved plan. 9. TREE LOSS- TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 1,022 diameter inches of significant trees on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 825 diameter inches. Tree replacement required is 886 caliper inches. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 886 caliper inches. / 0 This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3-inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a 7-foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to occupancy permit issuance. The City Manager may grant an extension of time to complete the tree replacement plan provided, at the sole discretion of the City Manager, the delay is attributed to factors beyond the Developer's control. 10. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. The City Manager may grant an extension of time to complete the landscaping plan provided, at the sole discretion of the City Manager, the delay is attributed to factors beyond the Developer's control. 11. IRRIGATION PLAN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees that the irrigation system shall be designed such that water is not directed on or over public sidewalks or trails. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. The City Manager may grant an extension of time to complete the irrigation plan provided, at the sole discretion of the City Manager,the delay is attributed to factors beyond the Developer's control. 12. SIDEWALK AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for streets or utility construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Parks and Recreational Services Director and obtain the Director's written approval of detailed plans for sidewalks and trails to be constructed on the Property. Developer shall convey access easements for such sidewalks and trails in such locations as determined by the Parks and Recreation Services Director. Sidewalks and trails shall be constructed in the following locations: A. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk to be located along the south side of the entrance with T.H. 212. 1/ B. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail leading from the north end of the parking lot, as depicted in Exhibit B, north to Medcom Boulevard. Developer shall convey to the City a 10-foot wide trail easement parallel with T.H. 212 right- of-way from the north side of the entrance with T.H. 212, north to Medcom Boulevard. Developer may request the City's assistance in obtaining the off-site portion of the trail easement along T.H. 212. Developer would agree to reimburse the City for all costs, including attorney's fees, related to obtaining such off-site easement. 13. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 14. TRASH: Developer agrees that all trash,trash receptacles and recycling bins shall at all times be located inside of the building enclosures depicted on Exhibit B. 15. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 20 feet in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 16. ACCESS PERMIT: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall obtain, from MnDOT, a permit for access to T.H. 212, and provide a copy of said permits to the City Engineer. Developer agrees to close all existing driveways off of T.H. 212 in accordance with MnDOT requirements. 17. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT: Prior to release of a final plat for any portion of the Property, Developer agrees to sign an assessment agreement with the City for trunk sewer and water assessments for an assessable area of 11.95 acres at the per acre rate then in effect. 18. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: The city hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the RM-2.5 Zoning District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD A. Density at 27.9 units per acre. Code allows up to 17.4 units per acre. B. Site Area per Dwelling Unit of 1,561 sq. ft. Code requires 2,500 sq. ft. C. Building height to 50 feet. Code maximum is 45 feet. D. Parking at .7 spaces per dwelling unit and .3 enclosed. Code requires 2 spaces per dwelling unit, of which 1 is enclosed. E. Side yard structure setback at 15 feet. Code requires 25 feet. 19. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorneys' fees),damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. 20. ASSIGNMENT: Developer shall have the right to assign this Developer's Agreement to an affiliated entity provided that entity agrees in writing to all of the terms, conditions and obligations of"Developer" in the Developer's Agreement. i3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 09/07/99 SECTION: Consent Agenda SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald Uram Spring Hill Suites V . Michael Franzen Requested Action Move to: • Approve tad Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers on 4.12 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 4.12 acres; and • Approve the Developers Agreement for Spring Hill Suites Synopsis This project is a 71,200 sq. ft., 4 story hotel and a 6,895 sq. ft. restaurant. Attachments 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement SPRING HILL SUITES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 23-99-PUD-18-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter,the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the Commercial Regional Zoning District 23-99-PUD-18-99(hereinafter "PUD-18-99- Commercial-Regional"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 7, 1999, entered into between GSH Lodging, L.L.C., and the City of Eden Prairie, (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-18-99-Commercial-Regional, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-18-99-Commercial-Regional is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-18-99-Commercial-Regional is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-18-99-Commercial-Regional are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-18-99-Commercial-Regional is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the Commercial-Regional District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 18-99-Commercial-Regional, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of July, 1999, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 3 nele UC-1 MU? U1 :Ub ru UULifj-i: I I , 1 ,1.L I , IjnyeriJitIe (64 /6 Insurance erporation ( /Pay. /ccs) NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHM0HO, YIRGINIA SCHEDULE A CONTINUED • 'ARCEL 1: :,ot 7, Block 1, Leona Addition, except that part thereof lying Westerly of a line 3escribed as beginning at a point on the North line of said Lot .7, said point being North 90 degrees, 00 minutes, 00 seconds East, assumed bearing, 60.00 feet from the Northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence South 00 degrees, 00 minutes, 00 seconds East 220.19 feet to a point on the South line of said Lot 7 and said line there terminating; and that part of the Northerly half of vacated Leona Road, as dedicated in the plat of Leona Addition lying between the Southerly extension of the East line of Lot 7, Block 1, in said plat and a line drawn Southerly passing at right angles through a point on the North line of said Lot 7 distant 60 feet Easterly from the Northwest corner of said Lot 7. NOTE: Said property being registered as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 854162. NOTE: The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title is in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL 2: Lot 8, Block 1, Leona Addition and that part of the Northerly half of vacated Leona Road, as dedicated in the plat of Leona Addition lying between the southerly extensions of the East and West lines of Lot 8, Block 1, in eaid plat. • NOTE: Said property being registered as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. S47726. NOTE: The Owner' s Duplicate Certificate of Title is in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL 3: Lot 9, Block 1, Leona Addition and that part of the Northerly half of vacated Leona Road, as dedicated in the plat of Leona Addition lying between the Southerly extensions of the East and West lines of Lot 9, Block 1, in said plat. NOTE: Said property being registered as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 776652. NOTE: The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title is in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCHEDULE A-PAGE 2 COMMITMENT NO. 44633 ere Mc t_Ili 1 iir 11W Mg' 1.UC Mr I.1u Me tile: Mlle I li I_Iti I.11, I tIC tilt. t_71'. Me Cite UP. IJp_ tilt' Lire 1.11$ tale' MC Iiti ,ih_ Form 100 036-0-100.0011 • 08/02/99 ' MON 14:10 [TX/RX NO 6432] nuv uc jCyy 1"1Ut' U l .u l f 1 i uun;.nri t 1 1 1 I l C 11111 ,w. edit t lti tier Lila-1X11- m Ita' ;.1ir ijir 1_tN ute ,a rvc eau: km LW-LW tltr' :111 gilt: /11t i)K IJK talc' Lilt•ITIh' t-q.--I.tli.EIn ,_ - _ - Juyers] tIe ca,c Zw c) Insurance @rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RlCHMotro,VIAGINIA SCHEDULE A • Legal Description Continued • PARCEL 4: • Lot 10, Block 1, Leona Addition and that part of the Northerly half of vacated Leona Road as dedicated in the plat of Leona Addition lying between the Southerly extensions of the East and West lines of Lot 1e, Block 1, in said plat. NOTE: Said property being registered as is evidenced. by Certificate of Title No. 776653. NOTE: The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title is in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. • • • • • • • Case Number 44633 lit': flit' Inc- tile' I.fia LAIC Ills ixle' 1111 LN,- llli t_IN mt. 131.- lrlr lilc Isla 131i Ell.: 1-11.: 111i Ul•: I-ill• tTlr t:11a' 1.11. r11' t31r 1_111 f Form 100 Li- 0350.100-0011 08/02/99 MON 14:10 [TX/RX NO 6432] fUlr'UG-1.7.77 Itutt U1 •vt (It uu,uuut, t , + t.� a.3uyers it e ( 7e 2 c7i= Insurance @potation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND,VIRa1NIA SCHEDULE A Legal Description Continued. PARCEL 5: • All that part of the following described tract: . Lot 8, Block 1, Leona 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County. which lies Southwesterly of the following described line: From a point on the North line of Section 14, Township 116, North, Range 22 West, distant 1277.4 feet East of the North Quarter corner thereof, run Northwesterly at an angle of 30 degrees 27 minutes 19 seconds with said North section line for 412.6 feet; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 120 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds for 529,68 feet; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 84 degrees 32 minutes 25 seconds for 290.62 feet; thence deflect to the right on a 2 degree 15 minute curve (delta angle 20 degrees 19 minutes) for 902.96 feet; thence deflect to the right at an angle 90 degrees for 100 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence run Southeasterly to a poir. distant 184 feet Southwesterly (measure at right angles) from the point of termination of Line .A described below and there terminating; • Line A: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Section 14 distant 1277.4 feet East of the North Quarter corner thereof; thence run Southeasterly at an angle of 30 degrees 27 minutes 19 seconds with said North Section line for 1272.25 feet and there terminating. That part of the Northerly half of vacated Leona Road, as dedicated in the plat of Leona 2nd Addition lying between the Southerly extensions of the East and West lines of Lot 8, Block 1, in said plat. NOTE: Said property being registered as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. • 776654. NOTE: The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title is in the office of the Registrar of Titles, }tennepin County, Minnesota. • Case lumber 44633 111f ITIt: ITIt: kilt LW Litt Me 1314.- cur Me l U. :tie: t.11i 'an: LTIt. Litt: 1.Tir t_TII CIIr: ITH: *TIC 1.111 tilt' Lilt 11W Z UC 1-111' UK- Form 100 lit 035.0-100-CO11 08/02/99 MON 14:10 (TX/RX NO 6432] rtta tih tpr 1.10. 1.711 Enr 1_jl I.1Ir 1,nc.t.fp: lilt. t,tl.'-1_IN .1_TIC 171C Faf1 !MC IJIC lilt'lJIl LW- t(..Irl .+rl...+..L, kwyerslitle ese diPc) Insurance @rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RIGriMOND, VIRGINIa SCHEDULE A Legal Description Continued • PARCEL 6; All that part of the following described Tract: Lot 9, Block 1, Leona 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of record the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County, which lies southwesterly of the following described line: From a point on the North line of Section 14, Township 116, North, Range 22 West, distant 1,277.4 feet East of the North Quarter corner thereof, run Northwesterly at an angle of : degrees 27 minutes 19 seconds with said North section line for 412.6 feet; thence deflec to the left at an angles of 120 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds for 529.68 feet; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 84 degree, 32 minutes 25 seconds for 290.62 feet; thence deflect to the right on a 2 degree 15 minute curve (delta angle 20 degrees 19 minutes)for 902.96 feet, thence deflect to the right at an angle 90 degrees for 100 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described ; thence run Southeasterly to a point distant 184 feet Southwesterly (measured at right angles) from the point of termination of Line A described below and there terminating: Line A: Beginning at a point on the North line of Said Section 14 distant 1,277.4 feet East of the North Quarter corner thereof; thence run Southeasterly at an angle of 30 degrees 27 minutes 19 seconds with said North Section line for 1,272.25 feet and there terminating. That part of the Northerly half of vacated Leona Road, as dedicated in the plat of Leon 2nd Addition lying between the Southerly extensions of the East and West lines of Lot 9 Block 1, in said plat. • NOTE: Said property being registered as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 776655. NOTE: The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title is in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Case Number 44633 ttl: 1]i• llic taw I Ilr LFN" tFie 1.71. Liar F.tlr 'DC Lip' tali I tic We up, 1..11.: ltIC tsp.: I_rk• taw isle 1_rlt t_rll' i_tn I fir Lill LIP 1.111 1 ' Form 1OQ LI 035-0-100-0011 ti 08/02/99 MON 14:10 (TX/RX NO 6432] .� R71r t,tlt, Y.17a ii,,- 'ilr t.t/C cue' Lit. Up' '.TIC'Tla MC ijtr (MC-LUC.Mr MC (SIC IItC 1 C , - e - Iit nir eS14-11 : ietllli W+1,;it awyers itle (Par S. Of'5) Insurance Cap oration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMONo,VIRGINIA SCHEDULE A Legal Description Continued PARCEL 7: That part of Lot 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 335, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of U.S. Interstate Highway No. 494 (per Document No. 3677302) and lying easterly of a line described as: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Lot 1, said point being North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, assumed bearing, 300.36 feet from the southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence North 43 degrees 42 minutes 37 seconds East 193 .50 feet to a point on the south line of said Interstate Highway No. 494 and said line there terminating, and also lying easterly of a line described ass Commencing at a point on the south line of said Lot 1, said point being North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds east assumed bearing 300.36 feet from the southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence North 43 degrees 42 minutes 37 seconds East 62.10 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described: thence South 46 degrees 17 minutes 23 seconds East 57.73 feet; • thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 5.00 feet to a point on the mouth line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating. (Abstract Property) NOTE: Guaranty Title, Inc. , prepared this commitment from an examination or the public records and is not in possession of an Abstract of title for the property 'in question. Together with an appurtenant easement for ingress, egress, right-of-way and underground utility purposes over the following described parcel as contained in Access and Utility Easement Agreement dated March 31, 1999, filed April 12, 1999 as Document No. 7094441 (CF and filed April 12, 1999 as Document No. 3143804 (RT) . • • Case Number 44633 taw LIII' LW.l u I:ti. Line Lft. Inc e.lte•111C Luir Lup' %NIC tatC use We the Lne tali ITte ljlr.l_lt: tile' talc Vic MI" LHe' I,ilt IOW UV Form 100 Litho 03S-0-100-0011 08/02/99 MON 14:10 (TX/RX NO 6432] SPRING HILL SUITES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 23-99-PUD-18-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amending of the legal description of land located at Den Road and Leona Road within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) 9 SPRING HILL SUITES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR SPRING HILL SUITES BY GSH LODGING, L.L.C. WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has applied for Site Plan approval of the Spring Hill Suites for construction of a 122-room hotel and a 7,409 s.f restaurant,to be zoned C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 4.12 acres by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on September 7, 1999; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 14, 1999, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 20, 1999, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to the City of Eden Prairie for the construction of a 122-room hotel and a 7,409 s.f restaurant at Spring Hill Suites, based on plans dated June 11, 1999 between GSH Lodging, L.L.C. and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 7, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor DEVELOPER AGREEMENT SPRING HILL SUITES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of September 7, 1999,by GSH Lodging, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company,hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 4.12 acres to the overall Town Place PUD, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.12 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 4.12 acres Site Plan Review on 4.12 acres and Preliminary Plat on 4.12 acres into 2 lots, legally described on Exhibit A(the "Property"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. 99-123 for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. 99-124 for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated July 13, 1999, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 20, 1999, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXLHBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of streets and utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for public sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer outfall from the pond. Plans for public infrastructures shall be of a plan view and profile on 24 x 36 plan sheets consistent with City standards. A permit fee of five percent of construction value shall be paid to City by Developer. The design engineer shall provide daily inspection, certify completion in conformance to approved plans and specifications and provide record drawings. 4. CROSS PARKING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to release of the final plat for any portion of the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and receive the City Engineer's written approval of a cross parking and maintenance agreement for the Property. The agreement shall address joint access, and maintenance of parking facilities and storm water facilities. 1 / Prior to the issuance of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that the cross parking and maintenance agreement has been recorded in the Hennepin County Recorder's Office/Registrar of Titles' Office. 5. DEDICATION OF OUTLOT A: Prior to release of the final plat for the Property, Developer agrees to dedicate to Outlot A for drainage purposes in accordance with the terms of Exhibit C. 6. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. GRADING,DRAINAGE,AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land alteration permit. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures: All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan. Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the existing and/or proposed sedimentation pond during construction. Developer shall provide preconstruction and post construction surveys for evaluation by City. 8. IRRIGATION PLAN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees that the irrigation system shall be designed such that water is not directed on or over public sidewalks or trails. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 9. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 10. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air- conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner, in his or her sole discretion,that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures. 11. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: The city hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the C-Regional Service_District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD / 3 • Hotel floor area ratio from.40 to. 75. • Hotel height from 40 feet to 61 feet: • Hotel side yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. • Hotel parking setback from 35 to 17.5 feet. • Side yard setback to parking from 5 feet to 0 feet. 12. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. These plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 13. SIGNS: Developer agrees that for each sign which requires a permit by Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.70, Developer shall file with the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of an application for a sign permit. The application shall include a complete description of the sign and a sketch showing the size, location, the manner of construction, and other such information as necessary to inform the City of the kind, size, material construction, and location of any such sign, consistent with the sign plan shown on Exhibit B and in accordance with the requirements of City Code, Section 11.70, Subdivision 5a. 14. TREE REPLACEMENT: Prior to the issuance of any grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 553 caliper inches. This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3-inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a 7-foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to occupancy permit issuance. 15. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT: Prior to the release of any final plat for any portion of the property, Developer agrees sign an assessment agreement with the City for trunk sewer and water assessments for an assessable area of 0.76 acres at the per acre rate then in effect. /L/ 16. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents for the Property. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. / 5- DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar \(, SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Works Final Plat Approval of Springhill Suites Addition Engineering Randy Slick Requested Action Move to: Adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Springhill Suites Addition Synopsis This proposal is a replat of Lots 4-10, Block 1, Leona Addition and Lots 8 and 9, Block 1, Leona 2nd Addition, located north of Leona Road and east of Den Road, the plat consists of 4.12 acres to be divided into three lots and one outlot for the construction a four-story hotel and restaurant. Background Information The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council July 20, 1999. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement will be completed on September 7, 1999. Approval of the final plat is subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$436.72 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $371.70 • Execution of Special Assessment Agreement for trunk utility improvements • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement • Provide a list of areas (to the nearest square foot) of all lots, outlots, and road right-of-ways certified by surveyor • Prior to release of final plat, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and receive City Engineer's approval of a cross parking and maintenance agreement which addresses joint access, and maintenance of parking facilities and storm sewer facilities. • Prior to release of final plat, Developer agrees to dedicate Outlot A to the City. • Revision of plat to include an additional drainage and utility easement over the north 15 feet of the south 25 feet of Lots 2 and 3. • Completion of vacation of underlying drainage and utility easements Attachment Drawing of final plat RS:ssa CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF SPRINGHILL SUITES ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Springhill Suites Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Springhill Suites Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated September 7, 1999. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, Clerk 2 DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar V 1. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Works Final Plat Approval of North Bluff 1st Addition Engineering, Randy Slick Requested Action Move to: Adopt the resolution approving the final plat of North Bluff 1st Addition. Synopsis This proposal is located west of Homeward Hills road and north of Silverwood Drive. The plat consists of 60.7 acres to be divided into 56 single family lots, one outlot and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Background Information The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council July 6, 1999. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on August 17, 1999. Approval of the final plat is subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$2,408.00 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$8,549.10 • Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of$921.50 • Satisfaction of bonding requirements for the installation of public improvements • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement • Provide a list of areas (to the nearest square foot) of all lots, outlots, and road right-of-ways certified by surveyor • Prior to release of final plat, Developer shall submit evidence to the Parks and Recreation Service Director, that the approved conservation FAcement has been filed with Hennepin County • Prior to release of final plat, Developer agrees to sign an assessment agreement with the City for improvements to the storm sewer system discharging from property through Homeward Hills Park and under Homeward Hills Road to Purgatory Creek • Revision of plat to include the standard five-foot drainage and utility easement between Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 Attachment Drawing of final plat RS:ssa / CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF NORTH BLUFF 1ST ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of North Bluff 1st Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for North Bluff 1st Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated September 7, 1999. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, Clerk 2 NORTH BLUFF 1ST ADDITION I RT.DOC.NO. C.R DOC.NO. P� 'C4 /^` oq,r, ,, // \/ �� , N' k s4 t1<'� 8 ,,,/^\ d0 0a, \ , / . 4. �� • $mot'k. '/i Alf) . \) 1-11 °� 1 1 `v `h. ° )/ . s9?s �,.y' C ISM w4, �'°\ 9c, ;L. ///:4 1 ,/ , U,olr u 1 1'I a `'i.. �•U `• / / 1 6 / SEMI N FEET ¢ 4T 1 1.� L,� v / si .�. 'l 0 So IZD ISO L txm J 1 2 ,///. °'•.O3 47. j% d5+\°55 /,. 2 N7J7S• gon S.8 r ....roc - 1 / / �a3 s� \ Jury.� ,Cr `\j�. ,"- rs9.si•N. _: I gl l p� ',... i 4 /i `OIt9, 1 11 1 I , / sr'. / / / Me S ``_-7 SE? i,^.•'J. /,/? 3 / / °v.° 8 d' E S/y`/ C _1 n `/�^.$z,„,), 1 a1 1:71 9 , ' ,//A, \�0( //g 3 / / '4444( raah / / / ti .:; :: z4 /1 \ ` iff Via; / A tN.:- y' < ' ,, / R. 6 ,R/ / ly w s.p 8 1 /• 9 / ^. \A` •o`L. dn 1/i y \ // ./44. ,sse 5/At t' ♦ 8Ai Tl �' .No / ./ , 4w �. bs.� e`ICI e / /,/ "Aye //// 7 /'/ 'k i° ..x}i Pe -`` _ :y z., ,s / 20 4/ � •\ �t' o A' Vet, // s/ \ �►4 H �`�3Jia53`�. �,��I`- `\` �� >v \\4' �� //•P a P\\v/ //: ` — ottcPl'P DRAINAGE AND USUTY EASEMENTS 3TSr�.7.. •h ,1^. a`y7•. / / / /\ I, .�'1.. •ro , /'t• d / /'� / v.Do�1 �, 4 .•ale•4/ ..Yn 1. ``1 ` i•a\/ '^\ •,�;�, '`�1°AKIe .' a / .AAi t.... oi••_/ if 21 / '•j,/ / ,,• ., yis. N.y.4�/// �g�?,`. ,'tii. t / .47Oi°. I q "� . ).. / yd1 `_`1 !FI« r-�_ ✓ xaAN 41, .` , Al. M'll .r"� 1-. 14 �I" x57e<>j 1 1 it is 'l e7r.rrt �.�'bi\\///4P ..aa�„•�• ! •+ 8 `. .•.,•a.•,.• Is A.` :L, SI I "'Wi�tr \ 17•°506'S.•/,'\ t.vu• • :YS / �.,, BEING s FEET IN WON.UNLESS 1' ,, e / •Y.�•,y q . , / 8,, OTHERWISE INDICATED.ADJOINING /„`��� and it I i 22 I C; f/ a ` ,1,'' b� 1 LOT ONES.AND 0 BEING 10 FEET N I S p \ a• �.n. all fEa .4 / '� �— s \ 1 "3 �. .� 141 M�3aN'\ 1Qq•—., OOS ` •'64 \\,,'/." 1 `\�� `` UNES.AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. Y _ INDICATED.ADJOINING RIGHT OF WA 1 �'IT 179.47 ,b /' 5.9611500 L`� I 1 S.aI.41 , TTTmA - T,_ ,w, I , / 6SpO.'.' r ` / t 4,e•er• , J -, / I 15 , BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH lWE OF ♦ / 1„ I i 1 r INE Sw 1/4 OF SECTION 26,.NICH I5 ASSUMED mE I s ' TO NAME A BEARING OF N 59.32'.3•E • S7,T20?a J! gi ^. 23 j ' 24 ri r 25 ry 1 ::Y•` v— .0�t. NOTE: NO NOMIYENT SYMBOL SHOWN AT ANY STATUTE ii. YI ( REOl1NED LOCATION INDICATES A PLAT MONUMENT 'U E r 1 I 1 I I 1 1 nl .M1'` I /1• -- 0a A6O THAT TOLL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR FROM THE V RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT. SAID MONUMENTS ---4.7•n•-4_J L h 601V1'r7• -' 1 e•xe n--...u PIPESP BE 1/2 BY�R.L.S.NO.INCH 124.GALVANIZED RCN /, a1.A moo 1 Ilwa ...� °.Rems- . �' R�B•oz 130.1i7 131.85 —N,57 ,i d.r5?JS.Z}• , 689.321.E 1 d•05'07'SB' r 6.20.41831" .3.0.' 6 •DENOTES I/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND JAMES R. HI1L7 INC. 07/20/1999 14:36:21 8767P1-3 ""•"* h-1.d19L9 05:90:SL 6661/OZ/10 R.T.DOC.NO. NORTH BLUFF 1ST ADDITION C.R.DOC.NO. .6.06.43-E 30.00 1560'15.00 P. I 1 6 / - ^`\ — S- 2n326 E a.• I^S i . ,161S ' • Wq 8' -- g' a/ / � fg i ///R.27o.00 7 /A 6'53'23' N89.32'43-E 6.06'07'60• R.435.77 _ / `/ 78.02 136.37 13L85 6.20'41'31•157.35 a N69.32'43'E --��--1,zJJ e!8 L,1'., Se.ee iSILVERWOOD a i "xiaM DRIVE8 ,y�oy__ 1szTJ___ 453.67 3vut__ aea__ ?IAA-a -w3J;e ,'--- a/ 'a°s�'�` iR +1 vo-,e� N8111. n O' ,- r___ _, r__ 1 ,__ l?I a-- -� 1 R 4q}r ° n \\` \11 \1\1 \\\ -7 p` S A\ '°i J__M.a4- e,.M 1u• 226.6,2i 502• \\`\ \1 1 \I\1 \\\\ i ' +A (--s \\\`J4. I7\I yU°, 11\\ `"A .q 4.i°Ru'T3�--1 \\ 1 1 11 sa\. 8 / 9 A\ A-or 11•o• I\ 4`c'31'p. \1 6'400 I 1 4" CIO o• I 4� \- 11 it 1 .1 1� 11, . / \1 1 1 \ \ °.o1F.aA S1\ 000 I u'O,t a *\`\ A 11 a\1\ •4. \\\\ %j�' .6'6,,,. ,...°, 1\ 1 1 s\ IB 22 \ 12 \ \ I I M14 1\ 6P 44! \\ 4 21 c \ KA \11 • \\en ro fin\ P � 1 1 1 . .'P .ei3 '3a a-x \1 . 1 1 - n /'1 1 y4 =0 ;1\ \.• nN _Ps1 ,4. 11// A.63.31'4\' J'°�°7,•" ,t [�• ; \111 II\ 20 t\1 1 fi,.^"p �C'5d8,.4V�1."..} .--es..e 1� gTEN i .-I' 11 t'\ 111 \'1 .014 L----r43.n--- / +' w6•,�e r. 't :».n nER non 1\ 11 1 1 \ \ „b'+'�/ 4 F--- `- z1 1 19 \ 1 1 1 t"/ N1 z$8o76R---� %p y 1 1 R L' p e:i°e.e. \ 1 1 Igo-1 Fr e•` \' \g \\\\ \1 .p.r g: VVt.4,,o. F bayg,-4:'1\-:•w•.o,• \\1\`°M°2'o• 1\I- 18 11Y \\I j11-a / i/r4"i'rw: \\� 4 y J•A i t\ 1'\_ 17 �1� \111 „'-,,6.1 i,/ b';v 1\1I 6,° _\\\\z 16 tl\ \\\II ;\I ,--0°s-, 13 d 14 \I 11 11' '1`------»j 66 41 514‘16 3\-_— ':" N // --- DRAINAGE AND UTTUTT EASEMENTS BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH UNE OF ARE SNOW THUS 1HE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26,1414CH IS ASSUMED 146.79 1 I TO HAW A BEARING OF N 89'32'43'E ser0S'46N 1 1 4 L^S NOTE:NO MONUMENT SYMBOL SHOWN AT ANY STATUTE 1 REWIRED LOCATION INDICATES A PLAT MONUMENT THAT%LL BE SET MTMN ONE YEAR FROM THE 0 1 1 o1 RECORDING DATE CF MS PLAT. SAO MONUMENTS ___�____J L____l___ PIPES MARKED SHALL BE 1/2 B R.L.S.NOA 14 .1 GALVANIZED IRON 2IRON i 1 SCALE N FEET 0 BEING 5 FEET IN MOTH.UNLESS I 60 120 ifp niiiMai OTHERWISE INDICATED,ADJOINING •DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MCNUMENT FOUND LOT LINES,AND BEING 10 FEET IN MOTH,UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY UNES,AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. JAMES R. HILL. INC. SHEET 4 OP 4 SETS NORTH BLUFF 1ST ADDITION ! IC.A'OC:NO. • • TR,-,- � I HILLSBOROUGII SECOND A.^010071 i N61.38.0 0'E I THEA� i �� •� a gio r 1 �pl s' I ..i% , \-OOF s or ai•a sr 1/• tsrx••n WA , e p/'r MR" s UPC OF N sn OF NE 1/1-� 6F OF SW 1/1 OF=A4. / 1 N ��F.�. t� /r ma ' ' IlD 1 '3 �^1. I 9, n SENE IN FEET J O / IA 0 200 400 600 :� A A A '�j BIURl1[SI OT 6 O o �1 i�4 1/ i tj mo AMMON jJ g 8 *.r4 : 4.. c C1' ES h I 5' ' t �L Jc M1e 1. C] ( R 1\ a #fit r \ 1 h, ' b i; '� 1,7-, Milt'.- • A ~dy r" 6-. 6 r 4.4 r.3 '°.. 21 •Q6 —i11 — I eT • FM MEET A SEE PAGE 3 OF 4 MEETS �7 0 ✓J.�171 .•3q^ 8� + .Fp•1.�/•41 ‘� t) ICI E, Pe 1 - 1FYS% L- a; { { i 1.) .s/4 Caaal�TKM sN ATaYs. 1 i H»,l�s•,w/I' Aqi�. 4P14 �6•>e•09,M (T n IIa sr1•a_— ' A.a. sa•41 4''sn• . II/ I /1°,4' , X (^ 8G M 1.114.R. N.' / N 532'4YE \ as 1>e.,T / \ / 9327.77 a 1xE OF a�1/•01 SEC......'• A.?26 �gS•9)0.�� E4 MSO N LATE OF IIII I" ^'p7ep?.02• `\ •ysti ;{y4,11. Tw+ v i.. v i O � \� t y�C a ,iqt NEST 6 NE PAGE 4 OF 4 aims ,11,E �' %to,\� sEZWO .....05.11 I.T 1 •nnrr \, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH UNE OF ST4 A I THE SW 1/4 OF SECPON 26,MUCH IS ASSUMED •unE r we 1/4____ 71 ai ` 5\ 70 HAVE A BEARING OF N 139'32'43.E or •146.71 11 1 Y _- 1 J_ 1� 'P \ NOTE:NO MONUMENT SYMBOL SHOWN AT ANY STATUTE µTIFF' ;��• ,6 .Y \ \ REQUIRED LOCATION INDICATES A PLAT MONUMENT �I f \ \\\ 1 THAT MILL BESET NTNIS ONE YEAR FROM THE I RECORONG DAIS OF THIS PUT. SAD MONUMENTS �4141 ✓ I \ PIPES MARRED BY .I.S.NNO.p1122 4vAN2ED IRON i •DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND 1 CI DENOTES ALUMINUM MONUMENT FOUND • JAMES R. HILL INC. 37/20/1999 12:20:15 8767P1-2 SHIM "I4II�F• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Second Reading of ITEM NO: Parks and Recreation Proposed Amendment to the City Code Regarding Robert A. Lambert Director Use of Parkland V- G. Requested Action Move to: Approve the second reading of an ordinance amending to the City Code under Section 9.04, entitled"Rules and Regulations Governing Parks"to add a paragraph making it illegal to dig or excavate soil. Background The first reading for this amendment to the Park Use Code was approved by the City Council on August 17, 1999. This will make it illegal for anyone to dig or excavate soil in a park without a permit. Attachment Copy of ordinance as proposed by the City Attorney. BL:mdd H:\Lambert\Second Reading Park Use Ordinance • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9 SECTION 9.04,ENTITLED RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING PUBLIC PARKS, SUBD 4 BY ADDING PARAGRAPH AK AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 9.99 WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 9.04, Subd. 4 is amended by adding paragraph AK as follows: "AK. Dig or excavate soil." Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 9.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor"are hereby adopted in their entirety,by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1999, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1999. City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1999. E P\Parks\DigOrdinance CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 25-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9 SECTION 9.04, ENTITLED RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING PUBLIC PARKS, SUBD 4 BY ADDING PARAGRAPH AK AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 9.99 WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance amendment to City Code Section 9.04, Subd. 4 will make it illegal for anyone to dig or excavate soil in a park without a permit. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on September 16, 1999. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) 3 DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar y, H. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5397 Public Works Approve Traffic Control Signal Agreement with MnDOT for the Traffic Engineering Signal at Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road Rodney W. Rue Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution approving Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 79334R with MnDOT for MnDOT-supplied equipment for the traffic signal at Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road. Synopsis This agreement allows MnDOT to supply the City with the necessary signal equipment for this intersection at an estimated cost of $20,000. In addition, this agreement allows MnDOT to operate this signal and include it in the future interconnect system (from Mitchell Road/Martin Drive to Mitchell Road/Technology Drive) along Mitchell Road. This interconnect system will be installed with the TH 212 Stage II project. Background Information This signal at Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road will be owned by the City. However, in order for this signal to be part of the future interconnect along Mitchell Road it needs to be operated by MnDOT and they require that the signal and its components be designed and constructed to their standards. Therefore, we have designed and are proposing to construct this signal to MnDOT standards with MnDOT supplying the signal cabinet and controller. The estimated cost for this MnDOT-supplied equipment is $20,000, which is proposed to be financed with TIP funds. In addition to this agreement, MnDOT requires a maintenance agreement which defines the maintenance responsibilities for this signal and interconnect. This maintenance agreement is also on this council agenda. We hereby recommend approval of Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 79334R with MnDOT for the estimated amount of$20,000. Attachments (Copy of this agreement is available in the Engineering Service office) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR SIGNALS AT THE INTERSECTION OF MITCHELL ROAD AND ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD I.C. 96-5397 WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and approved construction plans for intersection and signal improvements at the intersection of Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires to have this signal interconnected with the interconnect system along Mitchell Road, which is part of the TH 212 Stage II construction project; and WHEREAS, MnDOT has prepared a traffic control signal agreement that identifies the operational and financial obligations for the City-owned traffic signal at the Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 79334R for City Project No. 96-5397 is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk 2 DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar v , SERVICE AREA: rrEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5397 Public Works Approve Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement with MnDOT for Engineering Maintenance of Traffic Signal at Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Rodney W. Rue Parkway/Scenic Heights Road Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution approving Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 79335-R with MnDOT for maintenance responsibilities for the traffic signal at Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road. Synopsis This agreement identifies the maintenance responsibilities for the proposed signal at the intersection of Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road. This signal is proposed to be maintained by MnDOT as part of the interconnect system along Mitchell Road, which will be installed with the TH 212 Stage II project. MnDOT will be providing the operational and major maintenance responsibilities for this signal on a reimbursable basis with the City. We hereby recommend approval of Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 79335-R for maintenance responsibilities for the traffic signal at Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road. Attachments (Copy of this agreement is available in the Engineering Services office) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR SIGNALS AT MITCHELL ROAD AND ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD I.C. 96-5397 WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and approved construction plans for intersection and signal improvements at the intersection of Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires to have this signal interconnected with the interconnect system along Mitchell Road, which is part of the TH 212 Stage II construction project; and WHEREAS, MnDOT has prepared a traffic control signal maintenance agreement that identifies the operational and maintenance obligations for the City-owned traffic signal at the Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 79335-R for City Project No. 96-5397 which provides for operation and maintenance of the traffic control signal at the Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road intersection by State forces on a reimbursable basis, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1999. ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar V. 1; SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Works Resolution Authorizing Release of Bell Oaks Lots from Special Assessment Engineering Agreement Alan D. Gray Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to provide a release of the assessment agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and Bell Oaks Company dated May 30, 1989 and filed as Document No. 5552564 upon the receipt of the sum of $3,800 as the lots contribution to future Riverview Road improvements in lieu of a future assessment. Synopsis The assessment agreement recorded against Bell Oaks lots for Riverview Road improvements has been of record for 10 years. There will not, however, be a pending amount until the improvement project is scheduled for construction and ordered by the City Council. The tentative schedule for Riverview Road improvements is 2001. Recently two residents have experienced significant problems in closing real estate sales in dealing with the assessment agreement without an estimated assessment amount. Staff has estimated that if Riverview Road improvements were constructed today, the assessment for each lot in Bell Oaks subject to the assessment agreement, would be approximately $3,800. The payment of $3,800 will provide the City with a reasonable contribution to the future improvement of Riverview Road. Release of the assessment agreement will simplify real estate sales and avoid large escrow accounts to cover future assessments for which the amount is unknown. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie and the Bell Oaks Company entered into an Agreement Regarding Special Assessments (the Agreement) dated the 30th Day of May, 1989 and filed as Document No. 5552564 granting the City the right to levy assessments for Riverview Road improvements to certain property in Bell Oaks First Addition and Bell Oaks Second Addition; WHEREAS, the improvements to Riverview Road adjacent the Bell Oak Additions remain a pending project tentatively scheduled for the year 2001; and WHEREAS, property owners in the Bell Oaks Additions have recently experienced problems with real estate closings related to the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to provide a release of the Agreement for any Bell Oaks lot upon receipt of the sum of$3,800.00 for each lot requesting a release. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar V. k SERVICE AREA: TTEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 99-5491 Public Works Approve Resoluton Directing Feasibility Study for Public Improvements to Engineering Cedar Forest Road, Cedarcrest Drive and Valley Road in Section 20 and 29 Alan D. Gray Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution authorizing a feasibility study for public improvements to Cedar Forest Road, Cedarcrest Drive and Valley Road in Sections 20 and 29. Synopsis The Cedar Forest neighborhood consists of 44 single family homes lying southerly of Pioneer Trail and east of the recently approved Apple Orchard residential development. This neighborhood is currently served by on-site wells and septic systems. 30 property owners have petitioned for a study to consider public utilities for this neighborhood. Development of the Apple Orchard will extend sanitary sewer and water to the westerly side of this existing neighborhood making consideration of public improvements feasible. Several existing homeowners have experienced problems with their on-site septic systems. The extension of public utilities could mitigate the continued investment in maintenance of on-site systems. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements: I.C. 99-5491 Public Improvements to Cedar Forest road, Cedarcrest Drive and Valley Road in Sections 20 and 29 and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of SEH/RCM and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk 2. DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM No: SECTION: Consent Calendar V. L SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 98-5474 Public Works Resolution Directing Feasibility Study for Public Improvements to Crestwood Engineering Terrace and Dell Drive Alan D. Gray Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution authorizing feasibility study for public improvements to Crestwood Terrace and Dell Drive. Synopsis The Crestwood/Maplewood Park neighborhood consists of 47 single family homes located westerly of Dell Road and northerly of Riley Creek in Section 30. The existing homes are currently served by wells and on-site septic systems. The development of the Apple Orchard will extend sanitary sewer and water southerly along Dell Road to a point making it feasible for extensions into this existing neighborhood. 27 property owners have petitioned for utility improvements. Some homes in this neighborhood have experienced operational problems with their original septic systems. It may be desirable to consider these improvements to minimize the additional investment in on-site utilities prior to conversion of the neighborhood to public utility service. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements: I.C. 98-5474 Public Improvements to Crestwood Terrace and Dell Drive and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of SEH/RCM and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar Y, M. SERVICE AREA: rrEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 98-5475 Public Works Change Order No. 1 Eugene A. Dietz Well Pump House No. 13 Requested Action Move to: Approve Change Order No. 1 to the contract with GHT Construction, Inc. for Well Pump House No. 13 (LC. 98-5475) in the amount of a decrease of$1,300. Synopsis GHT Construction, Inc. was awarded the contract for Well Pump House No. 13 in January, 1999 and the work was substantially completed in June. Change Order No. 1 decreases the final project cost from 199,000 (as bid) to $197,700. Background Information Except for some minor punch list items, Well No. 13 is complete and in service. The only difficulty encountered during construction was the contractor's ability to meet the completion date as specified in the contract of May 14, 1999. The contractor was not able to put the well in service for approximately 30 days beyond completion date. However, seasonal rainfall was well above average and the remaining well field was easily able to handle demand. Due to the critical nature of providing water to our customers, the contract did provide a $500 per day liquidated damage clause. Potentially, the contractor had an exposure of approximately $15,000 in liquidated damages, but certainly the exact number of days that the contractor could be penalized was a very subjected discussion since there were weather implications, some delays due to NSP work in the area as well as additional work requested by the City. As a final negotiated solution, the contractor performed approximately $5,000 worth of additional work at the site -- driveway modifications and site work -- and accepted a $1,300 liquidated damages amount that equaled the amount to the City for additional engineering services from our consultant as a direct result of additional time spent on the project due to an extended completion date. The net result is that the project cost for Well No. 13 is exactly the bid amount less the extra out-of-pocket expense for our consultant and additional site work was performed that improved the project. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 to the contract with GHT Construction, Inc. Attachments Change Order No. 1 CHANGE ORDER TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Engineers-Architects-Planners Saint Paul, MN August 4, 19 99 Comm. No. 11652 Change Order No. 1 To G H T Construction Inc. for Construction of Well Pumphouse No. 13, Improvement Contract No. 98-5475 for City Of Eden Prairie, Minnesota You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated January 5, 1999. The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. This Change Order will decrease the contract sum by One Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($ 1,300.00) . This Change Order is for the resolution of all extra claims to date and the liquidated damages provision of the contract for a negotiated amount of DEDUCT $ (1,300.00) . TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 (1,300.00) Amount of Original Contract $ 199,000.00 Additions approved to date (Nos. ) $ 0.00 Deductions approved to date (Nos. ) $ 0.00 Contract amount to date $ 199,000.00 Amount of this Change Order Deduct $ (1,300.00) Revised Contract Amount $ 197,700.00 Approved City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota TOLT G, DUVALL, ANDERSON Owner AND ASSOCI TES, INCORPORATED By _ p By By David L. Moore P. E. Approved G H T Construction Inc. White - Owner Contractor Pink - Contractor Blue - TKDA By /tf Ivy z DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar V, N. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 99-5492 Public Works Approve Change Order No. 1 for Indian Chief Road Watermain Extension Engineering Mary Krause Requested Action Move to: Approve Change Order No. 1 for the Indian Chief Road watermain extension in the amount of$4,369.65. Synopsis The change order is a result of two items as follows: . • The watermain in Indian Chief Road needed to be re-routed to avoid old concrete bridge abutments. • Adjacent to the Camp Edenwood dining hall an existing sanitary sewer line was removed and replaced to maintain proper clearance according to permit requirements. Background Information This change order results in a total amount of$4,369.65. The project is funded by two different methods: • The section of watermain installed within Indian Chief Road will be paid for by the City through the utility fund, therefore the portion of the change order within Indian Chief Road in the amount of $2,185.37 will be the responsibility of the City. • The watermain construction within Camp Edenwood will be paid for by Friendship Ventures through a lease agreement with the City and will be responsible for $2,184.28. We hereby recommend approval of Change Order No. 1 in the total amount of$4,369.65. Attachments Copy of change order I CHANGE ORDER#1 Date: 8/9/99 To: City of Eden Prairie City Improvement Contract#: 99-5491 Project Name: Indian Chief Road Watermain Extension Contractor: Kober Excavating, Inc. Engineer: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc. Nature of Changes: 1. Reroute watermain due to old bridge abutments buried in the road. 2. Remove and replace existing sanitary sewer line so they could maintain proper clearance. Adjustments to Contract Price: 1. Add labor and material costs, lump sum: $2,185.37 2. Add labor and material costs, lump sum: $2.184.28 $4,369.65 Summary of Contract Changes: Contact Amount prior to Change Order#1 $80,978.65 Net Increase resulting from Change Order#1 $4,369.65 Current Contract Amount including Change Order#1: $85,348.30 THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED: Hansen Thorp PellinenOlson Inc. City of Eden Prairie By ircf 4 By Date �',9,97 Date THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED: Kober Excavating. Inc. By di X Date g///l DATE: Sept. 7, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar \, d. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5369 Public Works Approve Quit Claim Deeds to Hennepin County for Easements Associated Engineering with the CSAH 1 Construction Project Requested Action Move to: Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute Quit Claim Deeds to Hennepin County for permanent and temporary easements associated with the CSAH 1 construction project. Synopsis These Quit Claim Deeds and Construction Permits provide Hennepin County with the necessary easements on City property to construct the CSAH 1 project. There is no financial compensation for these easements as per Hennepin County policy, with the exception of the Pleasant Hills Cemetery parcel. Hennepin County will pay the City $4,800.00 for 50% of the value of the cemetery plots lost due to construction of the CSAH 1 project. Attachments 5 - Sketches of Easement Areas 5 - Quit Claim Deeds 5 - Construction Permits 1 - Receipt and Agreement NC 5220 HF' 'NEPIN COUNTY HIGHWAY DEP 2TMENT 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins. Minnesota LAND AND BUILDING ACQUISITION DATA Pro' No. _ _ '332°___ _ i 3 4. iLt Parcel Road No. ___1.________ __ P/0 zC -//6 -Z. Z.-ZZ--. 4i17 a Owners __eida_5(Arrt Hifi Cerite.+eri 455i). Address ...lin I . - ZOO F. Show North Arrow Topographic inforfhltion required: () l'Ill ' )r, ' I,) 1r,,f, or ill ' . ,Hi 14s and 1-prDve, ,-•- 1_)7. I 111'.2!.b aild (11111,•fls,on . Scent or lli;l1wly frontage lr, s r IrrirlJe.•erirs o. ,u I lir ..,5 ard equipment • Proposed R W line and access taking. rearr3112,e0 ent is necessary due to R A taking. SKETCH . • • . • . . . _ Iv" . 9? Wkw 7.W (5" 5 R 4 .,•) • 1 -- - ilr 111.51 '''. (53) " (52) 4.......1.1 :::4E Se 4•43,__. • : -- (38) „ 126.16 , 212N• ...., :4 .7 2/410 ADDif 21 q:81.%ssi li --4.).43)e,l 1•co'.Z-A...), 5 ..I.r. • (93) • (60)...f4) 13 Z . •: 2 . 4it (61)..' S .` .• ? 4 f_A 4.43. *3 . 1 1) . .• (36) ..... ,41; . . '55 •73 its '3.• 13 44 : 6 • 9 . IA \6‘.3. $ .i. 10 • (22) 2,.t. \'5 t (35) ... (4.2) .,i• • -• . 4.4 i•ia • 7 41 41 • ., '' .".. • 22 . lb' .e., (34) . 9 ci.r 74., 4 -Ls ,. At• ' (57) .. •••.,...„ ..4. v . It•.6, '''' 16 1..' ''.7* .3' N•- Ji, •1' 41.. . j. (29) -'0. V`P.: tory-cry .45 0 0\ `lt.1,i• , a si s 15 411•:./.• •-• nu .,,, :.7.(26) 17 • '14,, 1.1. •:- (1) 10 %Yr' 62 , 1 • '-' • its CO ta 1 N•OS• 8 4 - • IMP . ./3 • s• . • (31) t' 's'‘' 4VA411114,. ' ,,-,k e . 16i.4* • (_4..._.-)._,..-,---_••.-.... ,..-..Z• ,1'2.„m .- .- 3•t-"--..:-.:.-.-..-,i,-1r.1t 8--r,1-1-1-.1!•,-'___'1•:•,.f•,-:./.-i..• ,, -•-f-Jg_19r___l-)s-".-7_-'-"-'-,---4 57.•!64,2-.1/4.•7..7.4 ( 7 • JO I- _ ,i. _ -- ., . 1 , - 2°" / 1 - 3 - ,t41§ 0 4-1-4) (51CO -----LI---------: '3--44 1 `,L • • iip 2e)-- it-' : (53 _- (25) . •• _----- 3' .. 1 k -- ' , 1,, 12) ... 171.27 •••\ 14.?? 4. lyGe __{1.0 to (214 i Zr•-• - -- ill.32 PI 27 a iI 4' ..• 2 , 2 V. .xl a 467 s. (49) g 4I i ) 4 (44) . •-74 (13) 7••-. (52) 1, •„13:r - (26) . 33 l • 37) 8 08) ij _ ieo.23 - 4". < "321 - 133 1 12T - • 230 ca ' 133.56 73 _ 26 s• > 3 31 73. '- (48) 5 .. •.:( 0 so 1790 -. C5 .: (14) it:.'7 (53) . g iv 13(27) *"*.,-. 7- el . :24. 1 Mgr h ra.cri rn,i 25 - (47) S ar s- fo • ,65,S,39)§ V1.56 . .. 4 • 2 cc, i •1.5. CI 1 -- (54) - - - s 05.45 -,,,, -. -. (1_, - . (28) 1•: -- *M .... IT -4' •. 24 , . .. . 53 . . . • . . • • • • 2. • . . . A I I Qs' e. I .- I PARCEL NO. 14 PARCEL NO 1111. FEE DINER PLEASANT HILL CEMETERY ASSN. FEE OWNER II } PIO NO. 26-116-22-21-0002 Pt0 NO. I HIGHWAY ESNT. • 1340 SO. FT. / 124.470 nQ HIGHWAY E - TEMPORARY ESlT. • 1065 S0. FT. / 99.924 nQ TEMPORART / i DATE ACOUIRED DATE ACOUI I PARCEL NO. 16 PARCEL NO. . , 1 I FEE OWNER CHURCH or PAX-CHRISTI DF E.P. FEE OWNER 1 IPIO NO. 26-116-22-21-0003 PIO NO. 26-1 I HIGHWAY CWT. •20.746 SO. FT. / 1927.591 me NO TAKINGS N r DRAINAGE ES►T. •549 SO. FT. / 50.972 nQ DATE ACOUIRED < I UTILITY ESHT. •24 SO. FT. / 2.249 1R I TEMPORARY ESlT. •21.256 SO. FT. / 1974.799 •Q PARCEL NO. -- I DATE ACQUIRED FEE OWNER 41) PID N0. 26-1 - 1 _- TEMPORARY ES 11 ' i_-. I. I DATE ACOUIRED tt ' ( r i CONSTRUCTION LIMIT PARCEL FEE PID NO. ^A i 00 TEIPDR ` 1/ � 1 - m 14 s � 1 DATE AC v ~�sc _ --:. .fit y 1 — x\x ?- ---- I - ...1-..- --- ..... _ ?---___— 2+1 ------ r. 2+000 I — __— t_. �t :-`?9 _ il'—� — I 2+too— — — _--- I ' F�® 1111 _______ I T *oft 1 0 20 m _ ... --rTi en e i 7 (Corporation to Corporation) 1-9320-13&14 Quit Claim Deed STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Exempt DATE: , 19 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, grantor(s), do(es)hereby grant, bargain, quitclaim, and convey to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee,together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, the real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: (Legal description on reverse side) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L.Harris,its Mayor Chris M.Enger,its City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 by Jean L. Harris, the Mayor and Chris M. Enger, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation, grantor(s). (Notary stamp or seal.) Notary Public Accepted: Assistant/County Administrator / Date T CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Road No.CSAH 1 Parcel No. 13& 14 Project No.SP 27-601-27 Job No.9320 OWNER: City of Eden Prairie Grantor, of Hennepin County, for valuable consideration hereby grants to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN for a period of time terminating November 30, 2001, a Temporary Construction Permit, as part of the general plan of improvement and protection of CSAH 1 on the following described property in the County of Hennepin, in the State of Minnesota: (As indicated on attached Exhibit A.) It is mutually understood and agreed that the aforesaid consideration includes payment of damages for and permits removal or destruction of grass or other herbage and other appurtenances on the above described premises. The County will sod the disturbed area and otherwise restore it to its present condition. That the Grantor is the owner and in possession of the above described premises and has lawful right and authority to convey and grant the permit herein granted. That Grantor, for himself, his heirs, executors and assigns, hereby releases the County of Hennepin, its officers and agents, from any claims therefore concerning said premises and Grantor's adjoining premises, that may result therefrom by virtue of the construction and all work in connection therewith. Dated this day of ,19 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L.Harris,its Mayor Chris M.Enger,its City Manager Slopease.doc Owners:/1/41 jorit. +Georr 14, J4reseri Sr. Address: / - �' �/ - __ - -<J.7 Scale 1" = ZOQ ft. Topographic information required: Show North Arrow Street or highway frontage. Lot lines and dimensions. Outline and location of all buildings and improvements. Proposed R/W line and access taking. Interior arrangements of buildings and equipment if rearrangment is necessary due to R/W taking. SKETCH - _ . - -•.._- ��.,'..'� 1'7. ..- .. -=7- +----- -.. ._ - • 7•- • ' M11T.31 1.1? J rt k`. I PP-t IE,E--. r_il 1 •• 4-? -; _ I ^- / ®_ • ry 'fit„2 I2) a .isi . 63 y` �,� <b.* I / (37) Pi: (38) ari :- (1)-salisS • k(36) . \2..33 s •>$ (43) • • ( ) 7 N + ' •I a 1 i r36,4s in a - �. �' I, •I i� (35) II�J • 6 ;1$(42) ' • = • (15) ' •._t....... i •., 4.I , ` `.• 1•f3.TS b ....!s•.L..._.. . At -� , 4 a 11c4�) g t , ,I g •�� �•� ' , (41) _ s (16) [Sa 23 El I ,r —RI x (62) L 3' /[-* • r (5) :.. :33.61.115.96.31. 33) -r6 21245:H _ i R - i 17 ! 6s 21.• (48) • �� (18) /' / ........ O 3 ? / co 316 !� . 14 (47) , $ (19) ai ( 1g (31) % ( - _ Ed ?>36,163.73 levir I" P in.32 Ili � IS e� < Ki 00 V (48) ' (20) k*O q(30) 4' _. to • , - al e v (49) (20i � ) 29) .(� 2 Q6•4a# i ,zo*os9 k.�I, 39e< (57) 32.bd 153.91 k,I („ (28) L (56) 69.31 17 ris2.es �) . J 155411 'ie (7) - rlaa3 16z.ae n 8 :�•= (23) 1 e. 1. _ a (st) Vitt 1 (� Ia1:zI ., (SI) i 'ei a ro J f aaa( 4,, ,„., �� R6 10 teo:6�i ......., 4s, Cad (17) - 14 a`......... i.1' ._�eL.7o ... .\ `% ... . .Leo.Te.... .... _� (22) S a (i8) to i 9 - J - g (6� �....�,l3 u p........ _ t4at N 170.43 -IR' • �� 130.71! 13 4943...._. e.33 22 — (21) a_ II II -' i r 3 � * 3•�. �: Iz -- ► --' ,,•. , j n 193-63 . - ( ) v\\ ',� ca ! (14)`:T�' e,:e'�tl N }•e • ---• (5) $i \ fir. E 13� ; Sr s�. a tt1.s \. _ I + (12) ep- s r1e- .. 14(6) i e tO ,, 0 3 (l0) 742, V OUTlOT A • . ;3 Fp (7) (23) (9) !\.4"L._ <s ' s A NT 8) • C„ 4 I. ( ....•.__ . ._...__ 361.a3 ' T. •aa• 4 >4 NO "' e4 (Corporation to Corporation) 1-9320-108 Quit Claim Deed STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Exempt DATE: , 19 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, grantor(s), do(es) hereby grant, bargain, quitclaim, and convey to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee,together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, the real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: (Legal description on reverse side) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L. Harris, its Mayor Chris M. Enger, its City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 by Jean L. Harris, the Mayor and Chris M. Enger, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation, grantor(s). (Notary stamp or seal.) Notary Public Accepted: Assistant/County Administrator / Date 7 it CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Road No. CSAH 1 Parcel No. 108 Project No. SP 27-601-27 Job No. 9320 OWNER: City of Eden Prairie Grantor, of Hennepin County, for valuable consideration hereby grants to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN for a period of time terminating November 30, 2001, a Temporary Construction Permit, as part of the general plan of improvement and protection of CSAH 1 on the following described property in the County of Hennepin, in the State of Minnesota: (As indicated on attached Exhibit A.) It is mutually understood and agreed that the aforesaid consideration includes payment of damages for and permits removal or destruction of grass or other herbage and other appurtenances on the above described premises. The County will sod the disturbed area and otherwise restore it to its present condition. That the Grantor is the owner and in possession of the above described premises and has lawful right and authority to convey and grant the permit herein granted. That Grantor, for himself, his heirs, executors and assigns, hereby releases the County of Hennepin, its officers and agents, from any claims therefore concerning said premises and Grantor's adjoining premises, that may result therefrom by virtue of the construction and all work in connection therewith. Dated this day of 1 g CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L. Harris,Its Mayor Chris M. Enger, Its City Manager Slopease.doc 8 [IC 5220 HF"NEPIN COUNTY HIGHWAY DEP . 1TMENT 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota # - LAND AND BUILDING ACQUISITION DATA Road No. ...____1 ProA. No. _ 9320 Parcel 15 ___ 0,,„ers: _. _Plect5arrk Bills Cemeter7 __/tocia-hoo Address: __ I2390 .P__IoneRr___77-. __ Snow Norm Arrow r wogratanic information required: Ow:1111, 111d 10‘::-V.IOn t),' .11! L:+f hoe; .-uli (11,:e1151011S. In t,..!r1,); Irr,11)2e,,C,ItS or ;;11111U14'; and equipmer: :, s..r.iee.;. or H gh 0,.3 y frontage Proposed R W hoe and access taking. rearrangement is necessary due to R W taking. SKETCH . - • . . . . . 223ek (5-1) __Nepssilrit_ '161 --_, k 4 43....L. Dif 12 •••• , T(60) •'• # cis 417-111 IOS") . cc_ .7-1:I- !•41.6. 14 .... ... (62) •• 14101 7. 133 • (3) 1 1 a .. trj_jmi •. 2 111E4 • I I ig,1 ° 0 leir27•47•9 t in 13 no W / (I) ./ . tal 133 . 0 (1?) / ;___ 6!---t T-- .-.! ...-...._....--- -65L-- ---- -it,,f7or ----—.jrlir 0, \\,, P'sPh % * 111—......- 1,6510r---410ary--,P,---- . 47,4 , 71 alp 4 - "P - .1-------_------ - ._AstetiEekt..........,.4,R.FL:.S-. .....--.......-....... ...._fa. =IP" It•11744.9.4 I ter:s. ...........4.14:4.1 — 1 113.61—.. -'"alWarir-----griir"-- 96 A 9-25,5:62/7 . allot 1004-04 -211912 -we-.•Er • . IT. .." ze3-------- ... • -0 no.ol . 113. -••••.,„„....4.0... . • agattik.— 0 .1 •; 10 11 1 itiVio lit 9 ' , ,... . 4:1 - Z s• • ii) I- ,2efffp -....--4,-eciP,3 -4.0 4) YIZIF-4,1 •?-la • I 1 0 g ( q lo '5' a...: $r . .. 12) (51 t .• k 33 1:-.k.= (26). - 15 -Wa7 ),- - „As.1.,,„„ ' )). ,... •I 3.. 33 i .,... 93 si Tv -..1.11 ' 111.8z 127,27 442 4., 1 11,- CUR DR — ( I') ,..-. (52) • */ ,, (49) it 80 : 60 • 75, 12.T., ->Z3-06 7 / ) 190.Z3 19.99 ‹. st •-"...11 7 (26) d\ so 4. 9 • 33 7 3 — A io'r' gi (8) 1 : 3 a&96 331 IN 8 iv 6. 6 F. (16) f(20) -aro. (22) i• I 1 ( 14) ?' :',' 31 -.• > •-• (48) Sr >... i( 18)- 293 1:9.67 E .(53) 8 113 Illt 95 . 2 adt.tkn '3 8 6 8 2(27) 0 - ..-0 CI,'t OM 0-0 ao . •_103 (7) 1 ! 4 Vis 755.91 b-u-ey. 23 oc 295 (47) $ iv -c 5 p;AIM 3 . 2 1 c_.) 3(17) -•v 4 .111(15) .6(14) 14 13)/4 5 g 1 t ( 15) - :'•-• (54) ." -. • 133 5 2 (6) ........›.4, ( 18) .... • 153.97 ,7.• •••• 24 gi8(266) .47:I - i . . . . 3 ' 38 4 16(46) -.< iv.3i $3 \„4 45 ao ao ao 15 5 • •. 4 0 . ( 16) .• (55)/,,7/1 g ......21•sat 7 1.... -•.......••• osa NI% ... .in • • • . . . • • \ 43. - `7 I I s I ! PARCEL NO. 14 PARCEL NO. 40 \ 111111 :0 FEE OWNER PLEASANT HILL CEMETERY ASSN. FEE OWNER : -+ I PID NO. 26-116-22-21-0002 PID N0. • - HIGHWAY ESWT. . 1340 S0. FT. / 124.470 n HIGHWAY E• TEl- II TEAPORARY Ewa. . 1065 SO. FT; / 99.924 rn2 I GATE ACQUIRED DATE ACOUI ‘ ` I PARCEL NO. 16 PARCEL NO. I FEE OWNER CHURCH OF PAX-CHRISTI Cr E.P. FEE OWNER 110 I P10 1.0. 26-116-22-21-0003 RID NO. 26-I N UHT.WT. .20.748 S0. FT. / 1927.591 RV Pill DRAINAGE ESWT. .549 SO. FT. / 50.972 ,2 DATE ACQUIRED I UTILITY ESWT. .24 SO. FT. / 2.249 WQ I iEIiPORARY ESWT. •21.256 SO. FT. / 1974.789 .Q NO TAKINGS PARCEL NO. ----ID __ 1 DATE ACQUIRED FEE OWNER _ PIO M0. 26-till I TEMPORARY ES /I I —'�\ r 'I DATE ACQUIRED 11 ' --� — _se---,--se — r • \\� 1 / CONSTRUCTION LIMIT PARCEL I tom—---�'�� 1 14 r \ \ I ® 0 R I O N gyp I ` --- 13 _ I ' DATE AC 2 0 -?- --___ 2+1 - --- - - I ( :) '4ct o all 111 0 20 m arrill �' �_ ' r4r1 e e 1 iiiiii (Individual to Corporation) 1-9320-15 Quit Claim Deed STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Exempt DATE: , 19 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, grantor(s), do(es) hereby grant, bargain, quitclaim, and convey to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee,together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, the real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: (Legal description on reverse side) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L.Harris, its Mayor Chris M.Enger, its City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 by Jean L. Harris, the Mayor and Chris M. Enger, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation, grantor(s). (Notary stamp or seal.) Notary Public Accepted: Assistant/County Administrator / Date CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Road No.CSAH 1 Parcel No. 15 Project No. SP 27-601-27 Job No.9320 OWNER: City of Eden Prairie Grantor, of Hennepin County, for valuable consideration hereby grants to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN for a period of time terminating November 30, 2001, a Temporary Construction Permit, as part of the general plan of improvement and protection of CSAH 1 on the following described property in the County of Hennepin, in the State of Minnesota: (As indicated on attached Exhibit A.) It is mutually understood and agreed that the aforesaid consideration includes payment of damages for and permits removal or destruction of grass or other herbage and other appurtenances on the above described premises. The County will sod the disturbed area and otherwise restore it to its present condition. That the Grantor is the owner and in possession of the above described premises and has lawful right and authority to convey and grant the permit herein granted. That Grantor, for himself, his heirs, executors and assigns, hereby releases the County of Hennepin, its officers and agents, from any claims therefore concerning said premises and Grantor's adjoining premises, that may result therefrom by virtue of the construction and all work in connection therewith. Dated this day of ,19 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L.Harris, its Mayor Chris M.Enger, its City Manager Slopease.doc IL RECEIPT AND AGREEMENT I hereby acknowledge receipt of a Highway Easement and Construction Permit executed by City of Eden Prairie, Grantor, and dated , 19 Such document conveys to the County of Hennepin the property located at 12390 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie, MN, and indicated in orange and green, as shown on the attached Exhibit A, and legally described as follows: A permanent easement for highway purposes over all that part of the following described tract: All that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 50.0 feet East from the southwest corner thereof; thence North parallel with the west line thereof a distance of 137.59 feet; thence West parallel with the south line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 50.0 feet more or less to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North along said west line a distance of 186.98 feet; thence East at right angles with said west line a distance of 110.0 feet; thence South parallel with said west line a distance of 324.27 feet more or less to the south line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence West along said south line a distance of 60.0 feet more or less to the point of beginning, which lies southerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 31.17 feet (9.500 meters) northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26; thence run northerly along the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 23 minutes 40 seconds West for 17.30 feet (5.274 meters) to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence North 87 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds East for 131.23 feet (40.000 meters) and said line there terminating. Also a temporary easement for construction purposes over all that part of the above described tract which lies southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 26; thence run northerly along the west line thereof for 48.23 feet (14.701 meters) to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence North 82 degrees 10 minutes 32 seconds East for 60.88 feet (18.555 meters); thence North 69 degrees 58 minutes 41 seconds East for 55.77 feet (17.000 meters) and said line there terminating. i3 Said temporary easement to begin July 1, 1999 and expire on November 30, 2001. Upon acceptance of the above deed by County Administration, a Hennepin County check in the sum of$ 4,800.00 payable to the above Grantor will be issued in full payment for the above real estate. It is agreed and understood that the Grantor shall have possession of the premises until the day of payment at which time Hennepin County will take possession. HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: Date: f/ir9 p BY: ildK d� Mike Kleinschrodt Right of Way Agent, Hennepin County GRANTOR(S): CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L. Harris, Its Mayor Chris M. Enger, Its City Manager /T EEC 522.0 K. NEPIN COUNTY HIGHWAY DER ITMENT 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota I LAND AND BUILDING ACQUISITION DATA p Road No. Proj. No. 1320 Parcel o6 �, j` �.. / jJ P10 Owners: e.try 0i �2N 1 ('Gable _. Address: _----- ZG -4 -Z Z-N/-0,0a1/ Scale I,. : 200 ft. Show North Arrow Topographic information required: Outline and location of all buildings and improvements Lot lines and dimensions. • Street or highway frontage Interior arrangements of buildings and equipment if Proposed R.'W line and access taking, rearrangement is necessary due to R 'W taking. SKETCH '.1 Syr i, • R 1� s C `'W • ' N g� • s 16 16 N = ......... sj N I1.:, ea r'-R1"'tee '-te'"ite'37`1 - _ . ' CCyppTT` =.2.i`• T :: 'iVa• . h!b'sr•�.f Nde % `�7.j �c'.01��� 3 (9) — aSJ� `•sal . 12 S; ‘N ai• / ' �r �'t� :s*-- _ •� r�:y .(it :4j 16'E 32�547 �_y= E •:• Allili2JId+ �A, t1• �• A (lt) r �1 1 b(l \;J�)) (Q �- r� o ` I fY f� • 1• �s �/ n 7D yJ �1 'g� I 2 g 3 =' I ,V 6 1& 7 �eF • -� 1— .a• ''e. �t , . 17)�I (18)E1l (19) N (20) N (2i)g ''� a /JGII�1�(22) a (r�)o ,� z 1' b St y A ,0-,o4 i.,'21'14 PURGATORY6 1 7t '3!•26`E .cL _ �r 2. . ` �� 4-•,.. . ryi' 641.1 t I �!�. 1 5 W 103 106 106 106 106itt 14.1 0: �3.1 ._.......__.. 71 2631.1 'ORES._ ,,;. r(44 f�5) PA1a (44CRE$48) Pi Tik�P9) ,' 1 \ -_-:I .... ,o t 1 ,27 - • (9) - 11741 106 too toe me 4 ` • - 012.40 1 46 137E 90 90 >ao w �, s >r .......� S � \erg' oril .. 2 ;o • 2 (20) 't (10) �`8 a 6 R �.' 16 g - 10 o �3eVj g5! - ��s2°iee...oe. ......:, s : (14) (15) ft ( 6) n (17) (18) Z N 86 s • moss ( ) " Z 6 O I tl • .� _ ,�S •, Z,kOUTLOT A ^ ,.9- 3 N( 12) •74.6 '' 90 g0 g0 105 b. (34) a CO 266.66 ti;3 . .sol, (11) 162__ �..40 _ y ' I R ' 7 lip _• •0,� 1 ' el 1' Sep'37•M•E Q 1 _c •• ~ (771 �.'�• z _ ''*(351 IIAVIV1 1111E i (42) ? — I "�• . PARCEL NO. 93 FEE OWNER OLIVIA 0. VARDNER PARCEL NO. 82 PARCEL NO. 81 PID NO. 26-116=22-14-0016 FEE OWNER TERRANCE HOLM A KIMBERLY WAGNER FEE OWNER DANIEL F. A USA BECKER TEMPORARY ESMT. - 1780 SO. FT. / 165.407 m2 DID NO. 26-116-22-14-0019 PID NO. 26-116-22--J4-0020 HIGHWAY ESMT. - 190 SO. FT. / 17.610 m2 HIGHWAY (SwT. - 325 50. FT. / 30.216 m2 1 DATE ACQUIREDS TEwPORARY ESMT. . 1466 S0. FT. / 136.161 m2 TEMPORARY ESMT. � 21l5 50. FT. / 202.997 .� DATE AC OUIREO DATE ACOUIREO c$1..._-.-z-....... .sc N \, - 36C � 36D 37 \� , 38 `' ' � 39 _ _� C. S, q, H, N0. 4 4 f �'--- 3+100 --- - 150 ___ - ._ , - 1 151 53 __ 3+200 - _-- - - ............. ..........., •!. 0 S t To SC sr / I x ID al 80 I 201( 0 81 ESTIMATED RIGHT OF NAY COORDINATES ESTIMATED RIGHT OF ■AY COORDINATES INTNT a-_-_1 TYPE NORTH IY) EAST IX) POINT a TYPE NORTH IV) EAST (X) 37 PT 34529.8370 149300.8858 SO PC 34489.2593 149615.4893 511.1280 149417.6380 135 POO 34458.0070 149597.8760 0 20 m I 149417.4065 136 PC 34456.6278 149612.1648 Cirri S 149593.4433 51 CC 34187.3706 149586.1683 149474.3119 141 P08 34450.0280 149589.2230 t_- ----.,c__- 142 PC _ ._..34474.8821_149432.6915 AI en e I MIkil-- . (Corporation to Corporation) 1-9320-86 Quit Claim Deed STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Exempt DATE: , 19 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, grantor(s), do(es)hereby grant, bargain, quitclaim, and convey to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee,together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, the real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: (Legal description on reverse side) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L.Harris,its Maayor Chris M.Enger,its City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 by Jean L. Harris, the Mayor and Chris M. Enger, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation, grantor(s). (Notary stamp or seal.) Notary Public Accepted: Assistant/County Administrator / Date R CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Road No.CSAH 1 Parcel No.86 Project No. SP 27-601-27 Job No.9320 OWNER: City of Eden Prairie Grantor, of Hennepin County, for valuable consideration hereby grants to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN for a period of time terminating November 30, 2001, a Temporary Construction Permit, as part of the general plan of improvement and protection of CSAH 1 on the following described property in the County of Hennepin, in the State of Minnesota: (As indicated on attached Exhibit A.) It is mutually understood and agreed that the aforesaid consideration includes payment of damages for and permits removal or destruction of grass or other herbage and other appurtenances on the above described premises. The County will sod the disturbed area and otherwise restore it to its present condition. That the Grantor is the owner and in possession of the above described premises and has lawful right and authority to convey and grant the permit herein granted. That Grantor, for himself, his heirs, executors and assigns, hereby releases the County of Hennepin, its officers and agents, from any claims therefore concerning said premises and Grantor's adjoining premises, that may result therefrom by virtue of the construction and all work in connection therewith. Dated this day of ,19 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L.Harris,Its Mayor Chris M.Enger,Its City Manager E(C 5"..20 HI, ,N1EPIN COUNTY HIGHWAY DEP ;TMENT 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota A.AND AND BUILDING ACQUISITION DATA Road No. I u I' ! .. ,, (' ✓i',,,t_?Prof. No. 9J20 Parcel 77 Owners: �IennepiY1 hocfe;lLed Lava Address: _P/D- ZS— /lam/— Z. Z.-Z- 3 66,"?, Scale I " - 2-i7a ft. Show North Arrow Topographic information required: Outline and location of all buildings and improvements Lot lines and dimensions. Street or highway frontage Interior arrangements of buildings and equipment if Proposed R.'W line and access taking. rearrangement is necessary due to R 'W taking. SKETCH - (24) - 124 i i 14 (25) 1:-3 i N 1-- 125 1 E - (26) .. 110.6 (27) , I _ • 4'3.12 2P C' 1 , 33 . •• R i _ c� "���• �' i 11 •. 1. •� ' _ ,. �'� \�\�> p� _ter ,� = �tiq�, olive VFz ...�--- _ r Ry .t wE E'-43'2'€_33.�_2 3r.rem �F.{ r R��l'+1-Q�4, p` `ZtvoI?6 !T • 17)4 (18)0. (19) N (20) R (21) 6 74 7 gs i tte %• 6, , s ( /1�Il�lE(2z) a (z3)• 7 a • �\ ,� ,10--oy(123.11 P OR'6 1 71 •31•26•E :<< i ti i • . • 6 731 ~i. / W 183 106 I06 106 10611.I ry a+ A3.3 8) 7. 1 - : ' �: :..2b. A 1 ? _2 Ai S1 ` e C#1 iy •1111 , 13.31, ` "`• (32) b ;^(44 5) (4 48) r'4 9; 49) ►` Is . (e6)1 3�60 "✓ _'— -- I (9) " 106 106 106 106 V'4- WTI z�233.70.964.3( >31.32 IA a1= OUTLOT B,t 117,31 'O 1 t caa .% 12.69<: 143.16 13r 90 90 90 lo5.43 ;,! 1J ) �: `��i is Q K so ( ) _" • "12 _ J trf � v161.T1 23 , Q_ (10) 1o� ^+ A `� 1 ' 21,N(55)W 2 ' 117• •11 \ 1�._ 5 12 ~' - _: �5" lee.% ........, 3 (14) 1 r a 9 t0 . 3 I ,. ,_�. S(81) (83) 6,,;,,., loi.as (13) • ( 15) n (16) n ( 17) n (18) i W (77) :p �bs.9z w,` 122 T2.i •::�148.26g w Cr)', 13 A 11C/i '6 .4 ' ,�� ..1-i tddd z . (82) • cc,3 "' , 46. 20.41 s — • - 1'- t(12) . 74.6 , rf..;' 3i— �2 a3o� v. .� • '• NAVA .2 • (56 1 a i DR r,� - 122.71. . ...41..144840.8 al.3z _ 'T 67, 228•� . 8053 85 '83 131.14 i1 p 1 . ! . 1 p`:v 1 w 589.37•11•E g 1 $;� 0 1 Ol C 1 •... 1•� ' , 90 !`.`V,(35) A DAy/D MOLAND(42) 1 — (57) _ _(84)(75j: ; ter17'24'E EL . r�79 �Z` '. 7e 1 0 2 3 3 131.51 � u•2 -1 1 S? 220.94 11' 4 3 't' (38) (39) (40)oo(44 fl S 'J__i Tier �3• 311•t ,l���asesrerze Esc s��r.eo 2e•I3• (2 )) (28)''. g .N 8 f ill sa-113-(/. ..... .. iLy Whv/ / • • • • • • \` / Z Ampotr / Il a r . 14: /a / 1/ ♦mod ``� $ J / o , // - t t ? I): / i v.P. kV44.•2... /:\N/ / AC <;) Tip. v./ i i • 4 it 1 / 1 II I e // 1 \ f I 0 ( y - Ni aft ,,,i.-7. zz- - - i , -noo ►` r- e -- .� ... N°� •a 8 39did -- - — — — — pop; ' — - -- _ 11_NN39i - 1 tt6+8t 01 Iw I Q f(11r—co II11 0I I IfiI1 0 eo1 N10 : !! ! u ao (Corporarion to Corporation) 1-9320-77 Quit Claim Deed STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Exempt DA l'E: , 19 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, grantor(s), do(es) hereby grant, bargain, quitclaim, and convey to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, the real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: (Legal description on reverse side) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L.Harris,its Mayor Chris M. Enger,its City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 by Jean L. Harris, the Mayor and Chris M. Enger, the City Manager of City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation, grantor(s). (Notary stamp or seal.) Notary Public Accepted: Assistant/County Administrator / Date t CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Road No. CSAH 1 Parcel No.77 Project No. SP 27-601-27 Job No. 9320 OWNER: City of Eden Prairie Grantor, of Hennepin County, for valuable consideration hereby grants to the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN for a period of time terminating November 30, 2001, a Temporary Construction Permit, as part of the general plan of improvement and protection of CSAH 1 on the following described property in the County of Hennepin, in the State of Minnesota: (As indicated on attached Exhibit A.) It is mutually understood and agreed that the aforesaid consideration includes payment of damages for and permits removal or destruction of grass or other herbage and other appurtenances on the above described premises. The County will sod the disturbed area and otherwise restore it to its present condition. That the Grantor is the owner and in possession of the above described premises and has lawful right and authority to convey and grant the permit herein granted. That Grantor, for himself, his heirs, executors and assigns, hereby releases the County of Hennepin, its officers and agents, from any claims therefore concerning said premises and Grantor's adjoining premises, that may result therefrom by virtue of the construction and all work in connection therewith. Dated this day of ,19 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L.Harris,Its Mayor Chris M.Enger, Its City Manager 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: September 7, SECTION: Consent Calendar 1999 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Community Development Resolution to Continue Participation &Financial Services: in the Livable Communities \ . P Don Uram V David Lindahl Requested Action: Move to: Approve the attached resolution to continue participation in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program through the Livable Communities Act. Synopsis: To continue participation in Livable Communities cities must each year submit a resolution electing to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account (LHIA) program. Participating cities must also contribute a certain level of funding toward meeting their affordable housing goals. The local contribution is called the Affordable and Life Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount(ALHOA). The ALHOA amounts are established by the Metro Council through a formula prescribed by law using tax base and market values. The proposed ALHOA amount for Eden Prairie in 1998 is $282,302. Sources of local contributions can be CDBG funding, Tax Increment Financing (TIF), local levies, etc. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: Resolution CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 2000 WHEREAS,the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act(Minnesota Statues Section 473.25 to 473.254)establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121; and WHEREAS,the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund,comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account,the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes section 473.254; and WHEREAS,the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life-cycle housing goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide;and WHEREAS,the Metropolitan Council adopted,by resolution after a public hearing,negotiated affordable and life- cycle housing goals for each participating municipality; and WHEREAS,a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; and WHEREAS, for calendar year 2000, a metropolitan area municipality that participated in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 1999, can continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 if: (a)the municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1999;and(b)the Metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the municipality: NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THAT City Council of the City of Eden Prairie elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 2000. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 7th day of September 1999. Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: Katherine Porta, City Clerk 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9/07/99 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald R. Uram Eden Prairie Center—Von Maur Mike Franzen ' Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 80 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD Zoning District Amendment within the Regional Commercial Service Zoning District on 10 acres; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). • Direct Staff to issue a land alteration permit and footing and foundation permit to General Growth Properties, Inc. to proceed with construction at their own risk. Synopsis General Growth is proposing a 160,582 square foot department store. The building expansion meets setback and parking requirements. A parking dimension waiver is requested for bay width from 63 feet to 60 feet for deck parking. This is consistent with the waiver granted for ADC Telecommunications. Background Information The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council at the August 23, 1999 meeting. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated August 23, 1999 3. Staff Report dated August 20, 1999 1 EDEN PRAIRIE MALL—VON MAUR CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT REVIEW OF EDEN PRAIRIE—VON MAUR FOR GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on Eden Prairie— Von Maur PUD Concept Review by General Growth Properties and considered their request for approval for development and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on September 7, 1999. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Eden Prairie Mall — Von Maur, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Review approval as outlined in the plans dated July 16, 1999. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 23, 1999. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 23, 1999 PAGE 4 B. EDEN PRAIRIE MALL—VON MAUR by General Growth Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 80 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on ten acres, zoning District Amendment within the Regional Commercial District on ten acres and Site Plan Review on ten acres. Location: Eden Prairie Mall—East Side Bill Moston, representative of General Growth Properties, explained that they are requesting approval to add the Von Maur Department Store to Phase II of the Eden Prairie Mall redevelopment. The proposed store would be located on the east side of the center between Kohls and Mervyns and will be a two-level department store. Moston further explained that in order to meet the parking requirements of the City, they would be adding a parking deck. Moston presented the elevations of the proposed project and presented the material samples for the building that they are proposing to use. The material selections will be compatible with the materials chosen for the rest of the redevelopment. Moston gave a brief overview of the building explaining that the exterior materials will be compliant with the City's code; 75%brick and glass. The City staff has requested additional landscaping and the proponent indicated that that would not be a problem. Foote asked what the time frame would be for completion of this store. Moston responded that they are looking to begin construction of the building as soon as possible and would like to open the store for business by March 1, 2001. They anticipate the opening of the theaters in November of next year. Kipp reported that the project does meet City Code as well as the parking ratios. Staff does recommend approval, however, prior to City Council review, they ask that the proponent revise the landscape plan to include an additional 51 caliper inches of trees to meet City Code. Sandstad said he was surprised that the work has been started on the project prior to any approvals. He questioned how the proponent received approval to start the project before coming to the Planing Commission and City Council. Moston explained that they are operating under the utility relocation permit. They had received previous zoning approval for the theater and a big box development. Since that time, they have moved the theater to the other side and staff did indicate they could go ahead and move the private utilities under that pervious approval at their own risk. Foote opened the public hearing. Laurel Bluml, 10540 West Riverview Drive, spoke in favor of both the department store and parking ramp. She asked if the parking spaces would be reduced in size. Moston explained that they did have approval to reduce the size under the previous zoning, however, under this new plan they do not anticipate reducing them. There 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 23, 1999 PAGE 5 will be enough room with the parking deck so that they do not have to restrict the parking slots. Bluml said one issue she does have is that of pedestrian safety and she asked that the developer consider doing something to make this area safer for pedestrians. Moston said one of their big focuses is the addition of a pedestrian friendly streetscape and to increase space for customer drop-off areas adjacent to the entrances. It is challenging for them to determine where the sidewalks should go but they would be very happy to work with City staff to add sidewalks and to address the pedestrian issue. Alexander said she agrees with Bluml and feels that the issue of pedestrian safety needs to be addressed. Sandstad said he supports the project and likes Bluml's suggestion that the proponent look into the placement of sidewalks throughout the project. Sandstad said he would encourage staff to consider two or three locations where sidewalks can be placed perpendicular to the Mall. Clinton said he too agrees with the project and also the concept of additional sidewalks. MOTION: Lewis moved, seconded by Clinton, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION: Lewis moved, seconded by Clinton, to move to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of General Growth Properties for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 80 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on ten acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Regional Commercial District on ten acres and Site Plan Review on ten acres based on plans dated July 16, 1999, and subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated august 20, 1999. Motion carried 6-0. / STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: August 20, 1999 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Mall-Von Maur APPLICANT: General Growth Properties, Inc. FEE OWNER: General Growth Properties. Inc. LOCATION: East Side of Eden Prairie Mall REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 80 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 10 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment in the Regional Commercial Zoning District on 10 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 10 acres. 1 5" --, - ,.-..p •-•:.--.. .‘• .:•••-- . ., ....1 - , , , , , , •• , .,..---I -„,,,1 ,•,,, . ill, ;111 .'" ...r..4.:-.A3.-.1 ; 3 T:--, -(3) E 44. V • •#.. xi ...7.7' 1 ••• RO H'44,,%%";!;•-...X./',,--:.,;: -.".r ^":,„73,,:.,-- AA.' - .... t ....flit ,',;.. •• ....... .../_.2. or.._tAaa- ..•;i.33,3. I.ECNA_ _out-L--.!!--,Mr7.--•----tcor a a. t":5-r•-..,';to-1•44.2''f..;.1( it•et•;.'i;i5,..,„ - .4 ., .,, t.7.,,....-....sr- • , '';'•• .•!: 1.** . , ..." ..1 • mot x .•-t L..c too.sn ./ * --' t i !.;141 ON• ....: .r., .. .,...r. .., •Aar i fa..; .'. I ,Lit 2 t ' ra!,at 5= •••14 i , . 'a 1 : • - t: ,t • 1- v; 1 •.:.,,a,;t1 s tr• 1 . •= , 'LI,,,, (n), .... 13.4 (161 •••• '/'•" Z t...',..: ,.._. ,31: , nil C2,131,_ ii 03 SI' 1 •t• i x•tx. t >a." ' ot•- /:,(4c>‘..' ER ODY t,L Zro apor(ie vt- - C NI, ....-..-. 1....... -• . ....---....-.-...-...-. -.- /...7.--......": „:D. -.1.::.‘. -. :1..t E I...- .0' . (25) ";-.1 S.JED , ItaSS a i• ,,.• _ larx.,74 2 In., " -V. ____..,..„----. -:.....- .N. 2•" iV 1 .ii.- _ i: , I!.: /NM IPS 3 ,.0, aa:• r., •...7 V x 42,61, 1.. i: . :La 20) - 1 ' ' IRV AEI'• ntrx 4* ( , cal 7 • ' - -tr. . t 1_,"OW •• ...: Er. n- ‘ ' .....7 e:p - , t . , ... • - I ,,,,:_,....;;; .,,,,,, , g ::'i :.:...' • f COM. ' 4eP ,. . . , ....a tit I .. • V. 3,n--- . ...go 3.rn•r`i ''''''"" .A•.'"":- l'A LI- i• xe. r • ,"• (4., 1 -0, ___5 ------7- -,.-,--,t• ,.•3. le*. _,... I . (42) I / ,'• ..,* •....P _!........7.7•814k--- 'I!. '•.4'4. 1..I . • 2-..' • k ... I.: i c .-.1 40.„ v ar.. : Nr,4. a is•••••........ ..._..1.1.---i 11 • L. . (,...6).1”Carl.09 ci.. ,•• . 1.c- .4". .•- - ..,- .2i jr 1 1 f3.9 ADDif -t:'* • .4. 0 .N• .., . W , '04 ':. ''/e//4- 4 • (19•10$ rA ....*_. ..- . 4,..,e --.-;.:7.,-tv ,7:'7n-z.i.,910z' .%`!".;0' ..,...,. v'/, / .. ......... !...:. _nit: s'svettre t..:er 4 • .•' /:,.••' .4 ..i. * • 4/•'''' inn 1 x hi ... Si: 999.• . 9•••• ..4". S.iF•• ..••• .4. ..,.. 4#, ......_. ., 041..:'411 -f..: .....x..ft•Lit..\#.1 : CISII.; ,•• ••'•'_ • ,f. ..•!-- ,'` • 7' •-.1 ......,.....,,, .:... '. ' . ......, ',., ... •.• .'IS"- • • I • %V •1,.of Wirral t, lh. . • • 4'9,9 ‘„ ft. 4..s... r 1.. , :'1.7.'- •7-':,-.....,...i. . ,,..r.t.tt i ... ....... !,51......9, 1 Pal • :Z•t7h• r..,C4.'.. : _ ,, 5,-• .,k1A, 0:Z,.5.7/ :,. , ,7 --='' - tig.. EDEN PRAIRIE $.:.- 1 , (I, 4 f 4. 2......... a lc/ ,,e •,•9. ....., . 9.I... •• 12-7 . • -•1 r x •./ 'a 4.•,... ..,.. • • • •••-• 0 ,, It t. Al ...!: .•7 I ..I - / ac4f) ! V3( ,A13S. .7 ''''•,47" ,'' I • (.0, ',rte.., . 4.13.4.. . 4.•--.... .44' -N '''• .. 1 ,.„3 ' ,.is.si ..• . 0/4 Cf°1. 1% 0 . ,... i•:.• t.'" ; 1 1:.: ti .. ...col% I t:I/......_•:__ 7. #'7,0 • . , 10 :••43.1': ..:. - r,. Mt ii . C - N'TER ADDH , A, .,.. .,,•-,- ;,, APO .34 ins Pk _Lit, ......... . .04.4 1. 1 ••92;,,.. I, I i 91 ././. 4114 9•. ....awl 1...-1, 1 . • 4 i , .r. ..:1 -7: V' i ' .. '... . ......... . ..7-7..•.4 ..'"7.:4 corir Iry •:-.4* 7. _,..1,,' • ____...a.t.... 1 . . " (;)I -•,.....3. 3 ca - .... ..^Itis-i :..I. • .r.rio • t'l ..- ' • • • ,,• / / • „ .... 1.1 : ra°' • 1 s). '.). C i• # $;14f It• °t11 1 -,..>•71/S; 73 • .11 . 9 • •.- ' I , '.••,/I/ .•/.4: IdliiiM)1 !%% It ........ • .., ..a..,-cr• ••••• ..S.i., EDEN PRAIRIE EN Lif 0'TN g APB// f; .., . '''7,...., •,.. '.. • e . . I . !PRA? •• Jo 4 ,:i's,::...,:si vr4 • .., -• ...*-. ,';'", ; / ' • .• . -4,,r- . . -... 7.")i cil it, il i :' °N...N. .‘•ei t't-r- • ee.,, ..9 ce.„,q* u . 1.,..r NV t1/4NV , 4 I 4') ir 1 . 4.• .../111* •,, 1 , e,,N. •:S.:.., ,,,,,›....4.4t. . % 1 11 : <0‘v\‘'`z- \ ... -:,. , , cLF2e3 7 • .,,.. ..,, .4.4.,,_,,,_ 0.a,. ..... • I • % 2'.••al" I .11 • •• .;;;ic,...i .. •{" 04. .e •• .,..•7` .C')S . 2 -• .4..- .; ••' *..,.•:•( ••• ,.... s , 4. • k g s 4t.' .`- .ii. I 4'• . : : ... . 1 - 4. . 41...2.(3=411-L.-.-.- . ----•. .. ..-. .-.. 4 . • :5) ..r...„ .L..3_7:_.... _____.. 4.10S 404 . .. . 440 • - 1 : , , ... ,3,.,•• .',. a-L!; 4 ' fi "1:1•1:et.o? .... . -.-- Nr •-•.'-‘ -,.,.•. . • r. ..-: .. Cf:C.2.„„ •• ' ti..:‘ --, ;,••• # • .,,,/ WW1", ..„...,.,...0 in 1 ' . - ,r).). .93•24r1.. . , (11299 f 0‘ -^7^/•45 r .:.._,'-zr-kz... •. . •• 7-- -- .. ...• .. .1,. . ....... .93.,1.1_1•:„..... 1 ••(' 4N,l......-, • a'1 --7-4 -1- * L_ , --7,•-,sr---- • r . ..._ 0,‘‘0( St • . • la cLat• .".- 05 E.r."!z- .4'...1 ''N,,,,--. .-- -." e,or- • f Cr."' 1,....air • 1 • wrircal+Attig.... ..3,..71 1 ... 3, It•4- . .. ir.......).., .....s. , . ..,. . ...,..... E, r, 6 ..4 •• (law tr.%-••••‘'.1). •••• •r--' MUMS 1.10i1=1 *. L , 1.0.091 ..., ._ ......,,' ualiti, , (mg.410 1((.91 XPrg ; ADM t.g CS'.08 \,,./44. '. '477M,,:-_t_A , -1:0,,..•;„.„., ri x t- ;Orli i i• g ;„C. i.0 . (13) „-) " 1,154- • s(.3.10 ;•''l • .1'• si20.. , :I I 341 (.4. 1 ell .......... • --1-`44' x .* ••••-• ....,.L I -.-x-Yr• --;;7 •i± Z.,;..A;fitri.sTF.7,./i 1., Al.1 dr 91:0.11 ,nit ..,: ,zit.,r.•,,,,A•• / '... : 01.24 i (4,.24-asi .4. . d ..... ... •,,,..„. 06:...L. ....t.,...i...... „.A*C...........•.0 ,..;jel. ...\....E",,,1 0. "I. .. 1 14' •(1)4 ON ..4...... . 'Zi iv r1:; \171.q.. " (!A ii•V4C04 *v ..3. "in,' 1//31 3, ii, 1. .., • • 7(20) -..7,,,. ...., .. h. • ,y1.!,),Il4I 'j. '''''..` ,___, 11 ,.. i 1' ,......44.....• ;4;iiind 1 \........_c) ... • • •••II . .,,,.,,, , ... ,........,?....;... ).„.....„:31),,,N ; (,:8) . i: (;) ..,,,,...‘ 1 ' CR) : tr-,r4.2-4.,...,=•..g,..-..-. ..- •, .•••:..1., ,i t.- c?„ .'"I(.11:itt ,,_ , L2 G.;,..- st• . . 2:k t,,,,....,,,,,,...... „ .WM. _,P,_ 1 "...1.--‘. ,,.a.•,2,..... _th.....' '',7,-,: N.:,..fy . .-,,,,,, • . ..,,,,.....4.„,,,, \•.4'..;,.. :,'"fi ,,,siii;,..T..; IIMIE• s'••40' , 0;5, 4,•,---- ,,,,, v\ J••••- r.-7., ,.,,,.:,.. E i,„...,. .. I gor,r'r i....••Irzr• ' i 4 4_0.- :irr12,,' WIZ i ta al: 1.)12,1; 02.1.1t Vii, p- ‘., -..•. •-\ 206), _..1 3E1 E. ........,: .,. .. ,...../.4.•... .1•11 )4NS- . Ve, TS L.-.... ‘--. )" , 7(.1l)L-A , •*.- • S a- s. 1 7 =En = ,it • ton •,:t ..1",-t„.." 114-3) i-(24) 7 'I ....„, . .v., .s.„..... ...„.....,, . 6 1 .10 SID ANN p • . ' "5"-.-.00-, riorg„,.., (5,.sc., ?..... ,,,,,,,, ...:. 3s-. - .47. ,:•..1.5.'.. --. *°.,g,.... .2-;..-- •(.1) ..'-k"..;::-,•:-, '7.1;7- ' -:;",-----az...,.....,,.. • -,.., -,,,-,..-- • ., F.-.,-•••••_,%.,41.3 - ••••••• 3. • t-- . ! •,... \?-•• ,,,:g 17-Ct ili.! 1,22 Kil A `‘ r x. 1 (i),I g 1;71 a t71 (4.1, 'ri'1:4 =tt; I . .--. ....., ..,.,...,....ze.:7,.. .,„, c-"U .. . •""*":-.77.. 1 °la. _ ..."7*-- 2..t•I', .._.,7:'. .t. . -A (9' i; 37"-Ivotrmtilm 711.'?-17,4 1"),11(2) / Staff Report Eden Prairie Von Maur August 20, 1999 BACKGROUND In 1998 the City approved an 18-screen theater on the east side of the mall. In 1999, the City approved a relocation of the theaters to the west side of the mall. SITE PLAN General Growth is proposing a 160,582 square foot department store. The building expansion meets setback requirements. The plan meets parking requirements. Total parking provided for the mall and the department stores is at a ratio of 4.96 spaces per 1,000 sf. The mall and department stores were approved in 1996 for a parking ratio of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 sf. A parking dimension waiver is requested for bay width from 63 feet to 60 feet for deck parking. This is consistent with the waiver granted for ADC Telecommunications. ARCHITECTURE The building addition is 75% brick and glass as required by the City code. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is 501 inches. The landscape plan shows 440 inches. Prior to City Council review the developer shall revise the landscape plan to include 51 additional caliper inches. UTILITIES Sewer and water service is available on site. Neil Lake is the treatment pond for the mall. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Staff recommends approval of the PUD Concept Amendment on 80 acres, PUD District Review with waivers on 10 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Regional Commercial District on 10 acres, and Site Plan Review on 10 acres, based on plans dated July 16, 1999 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 20, 1999 and subject to the following conditions: 2 Staff Report Eden Prairie Von Maur August 20, 1999 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall revise the landscape plan to include an additional 51 caliper inches of trees to meet City Code. 2. Prior to building permit issuance the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. C Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. D. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. E. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 3 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9/07/99 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald R. Uram Lariat Office Building Scott A. Kipp . Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Approve 1St Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment within the C- Reg-Ser Zoning District on 2.28 acres; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions); and • Direct Staff to issue a land alteration permit to Lariat Companies to proceed with construction at their own risk. Synopsis This is a 17,250 square foot office building located at 8205 Commonwealth Drive. Background Information The project meets the City Code. A TDM plan will be prepared for the project prior to building permit. The developer is requesting issuance of an early grading permit so a majority of the project can be completed prior to the winter season. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council at the August 9, 1999 meeting. Attachments 1. Planning Commission Minutes dated August 9, 1999 2. Staff Report dated August 6, 1999 3. Correspondence 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 9, 1999 PAGE 2 A. LARIAT OFFICE BUILDING by Lariat Companies, Inc. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 2.28 acres and Site Plan Review on 2.28 acres. Location: 8205 Commonwealth Drive. Keith Nichols and Mike Shields of Walsh Bishop&Associates were present and stated they were in agreement with the staff report and would be happy to answer any questions the Commission might have. Kipp stated staff recommended approval. The Public Hearing was opened. No one present wished to speak. MOTION: Lewis moved, seconded by Sandstad to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Lewis moved, seconded by Sandstad to recommend to the City Council approval of the request by Lariat Companies, Inc. for Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 2.28 acres and Site Plan Review on 2.28 acres based on plans dated July 23, 1999,and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 6, 1999. Motion carried 5-0. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: August 6, 1999 SUBJECT: Lariat Office Building APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Lariat Companies LOCATION: 8205 Commonwealth Drive REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service District on 2.28 acres. 2. Site Plan Review on 2.28 acres. 3 I ; ....1 . 1 3..- 111 43 • ../.31.4••••• ' ii • .4,111;:c..-. .6'4 C.14 . .• I ..e. •••• • . : • •14 . •41•57,1e. ' •• ,0.92R1 1 •••• 01.3 " • . *8 ""Pl. 2RODY : to. - ""- s...,:tr• 4, . I • . -7 ''• --...-....-...-•-. - 3 .... ... ... .v----.4-f.............. , ix_ •.)30-•,•• "r mew 2AU • "1 (22) LI E .• 1 1. 3?A .- 2 , ..... :-••31.13 • , .0/ 4.- 10E11 Pil'ALUE kil 11111- ,,,,,,,, IC , -..r. , , 1 i (2.) <19\"-: (,2) 1 - (21) • . (42) / • t).' (/3) . i. 2k19 AIM ' MI X El ;4 2 .. § MARKET ENTER ADD il .7 , . , ..... : (7) \A.T., • , -tr• 0111.0• 1 • • scra•Trt FIREEKL,k. ' , a (13) • : ;:t ,sItIGL- r, .ritsVis,,..; s•s'‘... .. IRINTGOXIIT ki, .i.: 2.I 2; r e . .• xis ;It .- ADON ' I ' .17-15.4s 4.2...' Ili- t'n•v-. ‘..•.- 0.,0‘:e ' (38) !, ,- .. zoi\2; • .. . . i .0 ys . . . . N‘. 1• (7I) '_\._1I.4 ,• f-.I.l.;'k;.e'." ."•... I.NtiAk0 Ii'fL ART(2,5) 2q gc...., 1 P3ir:i.3 149D11 • • • ,...sn!:•.•-•1,_ ,1-3.•. (u:Ic5cxosa) g2b3^'ti3s!••• ;...r•. •b 4 4RtV4Lt.% N 43l0a_i.l/.s0' 04'i..4 4..9 = . k (1 ). LS C..'1'.2•.3:/4 1•$;.s'o.•4'4.S m-s: - . (X .., (24) f 519 v . : .. r rm a! . 4;.rr 9(3....,4261..1••5 1', .,. /./.,•,';( A ,...0• - • c:••• .. co) a'1"' ‘,. • • ,-...-.•'• t•. 2 .: r/st x•'. .. ._._ .. ..rf::r.r 4•k-.--a-"SNYlt_iii lt-1 i•..l ka*i.*l ON A:L CE.Ni Ts5tE L21s-6a,,•,•.4..' 33.1 •a/'. .,- 1.4.,. •./. .- , s 1 - e ., r\„ e, 2 , . 0 '(40) . (4I) ... .. .... 3.0 .3..,.__ . 411.• I TSI Pitt USTI t--• II AL 'i WW1.: I 4-0.3.3 • -4 ' • .....r '" ••e(U ,' 7.4, sr I,/ 7 09 .• .! "SITE 3. ;_ • ' - / . 41/I 17;9') ..3'4 -' - /.1 . • . . - % • / je/ ..• .estrer 51• • - 1 pax NO 539 1 - . * *I same -; ' -. , 4, • '..-- sr..`".., . • : FRARIE . (32.35) ••••• :wile.....• •t 0 ' • • ••••"'" 4 ••••/ ,, r k ......nin • EusiNESS ii, (V), • / ,...,,' il' ..33 ED4 I PARK CVADOXiNil.0 .• ..„..Z. X ,, ' 4 , "100 . ••••• • , t ESE . 1 (36) 0 33... . ,' efs,•• , :!,,,p - ,e, ocK. • •• , 7 4 „.-•••.s.64 AMA .... */ ..' 1714*.: /4,' ./ F.'s ,l'•• es / Y, , Ve. V . 4# I ..z:,- ,7 . *0 / // 4 lip ..." • V 4 oi. 4 tr.e• ...... r.t, div _ .b.t,14 / • (15) 4 2 ''''• . e. i. k ' 4 . •:..., . It • . 'iY • • j /*:. lP : • - z:•" 111 A iti•‘1 ... . .4. 0/ •_•. i . . cr v"!" NO • .:t.• .5. .2,.,..., ,(30) .: $4,t.l. / _. R.. : 4 V• ... • • Vilfir 5 4, c•••,`.. , ,. pg. • 4k4 F. ,.. .....zot°' Q.,- .... y, z ' .... 4',2.. i' , ..•',I3.0 ' 4 I ..A. 01. 440 • •• • if '. • 0 . 2:I . (46) s I .......... ,,0,54;,....:.......:....................(3,i) 1,, .5.,, . ,.., .,/ • . ,, ..) . 'et W4 D 4,..,k•% • .47. - 1.• • , et(,/ .... ALM/111W ,,.. . .e. . ,,.. .4,... . %4, OR1G(5-173) - ctra-zeo) .0.4 •• A,• , _ ..5. (4,5) / ., .‘"INII.ISTI• 4 t, , .... . -„, , ,, .,... s \krif,,,,.. ,..,.. „ 3 0 7) (.P4:134\"A (10) • • ••!/../ r / 'i. •" RI ; // (.•4 ••' / EIJNE'TT ,4. .0.. 0"?' . • ° < 11,. 3 4„210 1 -del • ' ...' 2 " 010.4.•let ... . (19) '' • i( ''/ N 4' • sr- '.. ... 313•33'Irt (5) ;134 '•30C • • .. ...1 • / s 414.4?..' , .•. Ir31•71'Or I , 14. . . 40.' • •.'i 0 43, •' /1 iel),ON.- ,.. . • , ,„ .0 .0. . 3 _i •. `-',.:• •Yig Iv “ers•Irv. in /. •- .5s•ro•* ,_. ... • P- . 4- (a) -- w,32 , -r-3P '• ..er" . pit . cAsTLEyooR ,... ,R -- .02.r2.147, 314•10.0 00.0 .• * 4 ...,.. ,,,, •,.. i • i .L vgi. ft A , s i*:.•s, a c ,v, .../ - 441, (2.9)' is•-•.. , .ineli.,:k ' .1 i. . . . . /:....0 (16) f.,'; (PO) //,` , ,• 21,.. 1._40 1 4 el . : " "...z.ic h •50 3 4040, Ot •/0 . . 1'4.'1/4-.4'4102' .• ..•..0' 15 •li 4.. . e - '<Is' I''''' aermrwv. t.t A A • 0Al• //dr. 1.4,••• 10 000 .3% p •• . re,VT 03 II L. • .,• • ,r......,f....." (2) -,(6)• 0 /.,- : no.Artsurngs. oc., - "' 'eft • • • '',..' i . .. (7) (5) . ;,:/.... / ,•:,, / CIIMICIE A, . , •a r•11 I t 1 .".2°4L...&•11:lar........ ....... ....... .4 I .34 Pitt°C. ;/7.. .0 114,° Spur",. ANERTY C (A) A 1.2114 •••.t: - w/ ,,j,•<\\ • (19) .,‘ 0 I •... . I St- .I...r.•:-Tizr,-.....-------viAter°4 Staff Report—Lariat Office Building August 6, 1999 BACKGROUND This site is part of the Preserve Commercial Park North Planned Unit Development approved in 1977, and conceptually approved for a 20,000 sq. ft. building. The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the site as Regional Commercial land use and is currently zoned C-Reg-Ser. Office use is permitted in this zoning district. Surrounding land uses are C-Reg-Ser to the north, east, and south, and Office to the west. SITE PLAN The request is for a 17,500 sq. ft. single-story office building. The Base Area Ratio and Floor Area Ratio are .17. City Code permits up to .20 BAR and .40 FAR. The building and parking meet setback requirements. A total of 86 parking spaces is required for this building. The plan shows a total of 92 parking spaces, meeting City Code. GRADING/DRAINAGE This site was graded at the time of the PUD approval in 1977. Since then, 168 diameter inches of significant trees have grown on-site. A total of 123 diameter inches of significant trees will be lost as a result of development. This site is located in a major commercial area of the City where the lots are small, and any other reasonable development would result in similar tree loss. Tree replacement is 119 caliper inches and is included in the landscaping plan, A NURP pond is proposed in the southwest corner of the site. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water is available to this site from Commonwealth Drive. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT Since 1998, the City Council has required new office and industrial projects to adopt Travel Demand Management (TDM)plans to reduce peak hour traffic. Other developments such as Best Buy, Crosstown Circle Center, Flagship Corporate Center and Oakview Office have developed TDM plans. Some ways in which TDM can have the greatest impact on reducing peak hour capacity problems include the following: • Staggered work hours, or flextime. • Car pools and Van pools, including working with other corporations. • Telecommuting • Establishing a TDM coordinator • Park and Ride lots • Transit services Staff Report—Lariat Office Building August 6, 1999 The proponent will need to work with City, I-494 Corridor Commission, and Southwest Metro Transit Commission to implement TDM program as part of the project approval. ARCHITECTURE Building materials are consistent with City Code for 75%face brick and glass. The building is 19 feet tall. City Code permits buildings up to 40 feet in the C-Reg-Ser district. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening is proposed with parapet wall from the south and west, and metal panel from the north and east. If, after building construction, the rooftop mechanical equipment is visible, additional metal panel screening will be required to meet City Code. Site lighting consists of 25-foot downcast shoebox fixtures. An exterior face brick trash enclosure is proposed. LANDSCAPING The caliper inch requirement based on building size is 54 inches. Together with the tree replacement, a total of 173 caliper inches are required. The plan meets this requirement. Irrigation of the landscaping is proposed. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommends approval of • Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser District on 2.28 acres; • Site Plan Review on 2.28 acres. Approval is based upon plans dated July 23, 1999, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report August 6, 1999, and the following conditions: 1. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Stake the grading limits with erosion control fence and notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Provide a landscape surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping improvements and mechanical equipment screening. Staff Report—Lariat Office Building August 6, 1999 B. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for their review and approval. C. Submit exterior building material samples and colors for review. D. Submit a detailed sign plan for review. E. Submit a TDM plan for review and approval. eJ � IS - ESOP A S S O C I A T E 5, I N C. Architecture • Interior Design • Planning 20 August 1999 Eden Prairie City Council 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Re: Proposed Lariat Office Building 8215 Commonwealth Drive Eden Prairie, MN Application for Early Land Alteration Permit Dear Mayor Harris and City Council Members: Walsh Bishop Associates, acting on behalf of Lariat Companies, Inc., is asking that the City of Eden Prairie issue a permit for site clearing and excavation for the above referenced project prior to the City Council's second reading of approval. Appropriate civil engineering drawings (grading, drainage and utility) will be submitted to both the City engineering department and the watershed district prior to the permit application. Early site clearing and excavation will significantly reduce pending winter construction costs. Lariat Companies, Inc., the project's owner is aware that the early approval of a site excavation (grading) permit does not indicate approval of the building or a building permit. The owner is also aware that any financial investment in site excavation is at his own risk. Sincerely, WALSH BISHOP ASSOCI TES Aiee LEADERSHIP THROUGH Keith Nichols CREATIVE Project Architect SOLUTIONS xc: Ed Flaherty 920 Second Avenue South • Suite 210 ■ Minneapolis, MN 55402 TEL: 612 338-8799 • FAX: 612 337-57859 • EMAIL: wba©walsh-bishop.com CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9/07/99 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald R. Uram Phillips& Temro Industries, Inc. Krista Flemming Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Approve Pt Reading of the Ordinance for PUD Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 7.44 acres. • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Synopsis This is an addition of 9,083 sq. ft. to the front of the building for offices and 29,336 sq. ft. of warehouse to the rear. The project is located at 9700 West 74th Street. Background Information The current structure is built over an existing lot line; therefore, a preliminary plat is required to eliminate this lot line. Due to the proximity of this project within the Golden Triangle area, the City is requiring TDM plan. The project meets all Code requirements. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council at the August 9, 1999 meeting. Attachments 1. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated August 9, 1999 3. Staff Report dated August 6, 1999 4. Correspondence 1 PHILLIPS & TEMRO INDUSTRIES, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 99- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PHILLIPS & TEMRO INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR PHILLIPS AND TEMRO INDUSTRIES, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Phillips&Temro Industries, Inc., dated August 23, 1999, consisting of 7.44 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 9, 1999 PAGE 3 B. PHILLIPS & TEMRO INDUSTRIES,INC.by Swedenborg Shaw Construction, Inc. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the 1-2 Zoning District on 7.44 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.44 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.44 acres into 1 lot. Location: 9700 West 74`h Street. Vic Pearlbac, Architect of Record for the proponent,reviewed the proposal, and requested the Planning Commission for approval. He discussed the replat and described the site plan, including the existing and proposed expansion areas. He discussed the drainage plan and the travel management plan proposed to alleviate traffic congestion. He described the landscape plan. Flemming reviewed the staff report and noted staff recommended approval of the project subject to the stipulations listed in the staff report with the exception of revising the plan to include an addition of 14 proof of parking spaces. Sandstad asked about the number of employee shifts and Bill Rosen,President of Phillips and Temro Industries explained they will have 165 employees in the Eden Prairie plant, and expect to see a growth rate of approximately 65%. The proposed 210 parking spaces on the site will be more than adequate to accommodate their employees. They will have two shifts with the first beginning at 7:00 a.m. and the second ending at 5:00 p.m. with each shift overlapping two hours.Flemming noted that the proponents were providing 270 spaces on the site which met the City Code requirements and staff felt the parking provisions were more than adequate. Foote noted the staff report requested the Proponent to work with the I-494 Task Force and he inquired if they were willing to do that. Pearlbac responded they were willing to do that. The Public Hearing was opened. No one present wished to speak. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Lewis,to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Lewis,to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Swedenborg Shaw Construction for a Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 7.44 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.44 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.44 acres into one lot,based on plans dated July 23, 1999,and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 6, 1999. Motion carried 5-0. 3 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Krista R.Flemming, Planner I DATE: August 6, 1999 SUBJECT: Phillips & Temro Addition APPLICANT: Phillips & Temro, Inc. FEE OWNER: Phillips & Temro, Inc. LOCATION: 9700 West 74t Street 12-116-22-14-0020 REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 7.44 acres. 2. Site Plan Review on 7.44 acres. 3. Preliminary Plat on 7.44 acres into one lot. • L . ri ;.: I 414.1..-rr• .10 DI VI 11 • °'. 76.7 • 337.33*C71 3 , . 70 . .•;•1 t....__---.321\---.... 3, ... V• . (2) 3 , CP 1 I - . : 1 -< ••: .. (I )t ' . t...i i . 1 ra0 2. ' # ..... 1 7* i i i lqi. i • / •- \ i. 1 ...A , ( 3) . I • 1 ...* 1 z 1 -..., .....„..L.....?:04/r... 1 i / ... ',.s„33.0;,.c...„..........,...:"..-;# I\ '3 ., 't.. •, - INDUSTIL41 ... : - I on :4) , , ... ., (i.4) • 3 :.•-•,i I . )Pado, .... ..• r . .., 3 P'• 1 3•'--- , i ": :•0 -.--\•k r...li,. • , - • # .. . 1 •, Ni.0 •so. /5 . , - . .,, .0\''' ..9.•331....., • - - 3C.1 22) - I : ,,•r. \ . .1 ad ... •*a'1)...'". a - Se‘.: a; • - 43 5.31t••irai-to •sta 2 A... r•A •.4, ., ..,,, •761-11'arra a 3a a/ r. rt. il ••`* ...'•' ..5.-."... t,• ttrir•1*9, Q..•0 w ; t-. ...:. 1.A.. tli r.r... .. •4, , Ai* \ , , ....... .7 ,.• .3• (17; Su-- S .- ,,,,,,3' . : •. - - .-:,,,•?•f- .. , kg sic ., •.- ,..) i A • •"1 ir 4) rA Og . • - 3.1 , g STAIIII . 4.0.'7 1- X .Cit .". 7 ; • 1:3 \ 4 i • , I ''•:, .... 7 21) 4:4 *:..... . .(4) , ..-•• ,,, . _. j 1 r .,..i 1 _ ' -,../. ct LI — ..,,,,T-, •''„q\ 4 l• 17 CP4 ,1 1.4 Ite CZ 7 t1... ' le? . 44C) •- 1 -ic gg__ --------7-- 4'...;;. . ' t -* co = I ...._.i- -- ---:;,-- _,a., .., .,....• • . A ..•.>•_,',.P!,;' t ;.. 4,, 4:), 1 ' - 1.1° v• 1 ...4..a.: I S ..`• Ca I • ! (5) - : 161 4•,? -la el : K-•,133 'a...S.74.1 .• 1 ..i. 0.4 , ../ • \ 'n 12 ; \ kr' 01 \ A ., , ••.- , 4.. -. •ai.:1-• ar 3/-,•0' • ' i.L._...;,.:4,..,../.•.3'‘• •••• 4.•.• . .. 1 1,t,,,,,,,Ps. (,7) , ze j.„, vi ..., Mg - .' 14:.• I i , •f•5' :?* At -,,,c .11 r . :-. .. 1 • 0. -• • -..k L - ,.. ------,101 , ‘604 gal. ifaraSai ':.• 4r 11XYS ' 1 z .4.0 :5- . a••••..., oI 1TZIAL s e " .-: (7) FL& 171 •% IAN .2 •. NSt- • -2-2.4.1.. 3001/'r• 1 4.41 SI (T) \ •:• (.0)I. . •5 ..1 _1 . 3t .3) •X • ... ''' ..t.4P.-ww ......w www. w..... '3''" :*• \ .1.1.;... .3.:, e 74TH ST W ;I ) .. . ,_ 0 .. 1.-. •nc v..03717"C - :,..c•C w•C9C1 .=,..../3 ... I .01•11.my./ A 1 I ...• I . a • letgetla-..-/ I INUSTRIAL ---... 2746.zz n 3 Pal NM AXd 4 . I 5" ; 4--..,c•atx: MINTY. IANNESOTA Staff Report—Phillips & Temro Addition August 6, 1999 BACKGROUND The site is currently guided industrial and zoned I-2. The existing structure is 63,258 sq. ft. used mostly for warehouse and manufacturing with a small portion of office. PRELIMINARY PLAT The current structure is built over an existing lot line. The plat will eliminate this lot line. SITE PLAN Phillips and Temro,Inc., is proposing to increase the size of its warehousing and office space. The Phase I addition for 9,083 sq. ft.will be for office space located on the front of the building. Phase II will consist of 29,336 sq. ft. added to the rear of the building for warehousing purposes. The BAR is at 30% and FAR at 31% to meet code. The buildings meet structure and parking setbacks. The building is 23' tall,meeting City code. Based on the building square footage and its percentage of uses,270 parking spaces are required. The plan provides 210 spaces and a proof of parking for 46 additional spaces. The plan needs to show proof of parking for 14 additional spaces. These spaces can be placed along the west side of the drive isle to the loading docks. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is 120 caliper inches; this plan provides 122 caliper inches, which meets code. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Sewer and water services currently exist. A NURP pond will be constructed on-site. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT Since 1998,the City Council has required new office and industrial projects to adopt Travel Demand Management (TDM) plans to reduce peak hour traffic. Other developments such as Best Buy, Crosstown Circle Centre, Flagship Corporate Center and Flying Cloud Corporate Campus have developed TDM plans. Some ways in which TDM can have the greatest impact on reducing peak hour capacity problems include the following: 2 Staff Report—Phillips & Temro Addition August 6, 1999 • Staggered work hours, or flextime. • Car pools and Van pools, including working with other corporations. • Telecommuting • Establishing a TDM coordinator • Park and Ride lots • Transit services The proponent should work with the City,I-494 Corridor Commission,and Southwest Metro Transit Commission to implement a TDM program as part of the project approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Staff recommends approval of the following actions: • Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 7.44 acres • Site Plan Review on 7.44 acres • Preliminary Plat on 7.44 acres into one lot This is based on plans dated July 23, 1999, and subject to the following recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 6, 1999: 1. Prior to City Council review,the proponent shall: A. Show additional proof of parking for 14 spaces along the loading dock drive isle. 2. Prior to building permit issuance the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility, and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District and City Engineer. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. D. Submit a TDM plan for review and approval. 3 7 SWEDENBORG SHAW CONS T R U C T ION August 20, 1999 City of Eden Prairie Attn: Krista Flemming Community & Economic Development 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Phillips & Temro Industries, Inc. Building Addition 9700 W. 74th Street Dear Ms.Flemming: Please consider this letter as our request for an early grading and foundation permit for the above referenced project. We are asking that consideration for this request be presented at the September 7, 1999 City Council meeting. At that time,we are also requesting approval for our Site Plan Application and Preliminary Plat. If our construction documents and contract administration can be completed in a timely manner,we may be in a position to start construction prior to the approval of the final plat and developers agreement at the October 5th City Council meeting. I understand that our request to start grading and foundation work is contingent upon review and approval of plans by the building, engineering and other City departments. Thank you for considering this request. Regards, c�>s, \MAPJ-.-s:Lc....\ Al Musech Sr.Project Manager mla Design Phase Services& Construction Management 7685 Corporate Way Eden Prairie,MN 55344-2021 (612)937-8214 (612)934-9433 FAX CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9/07/99 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald R. Uram City Hill Fellowship IL' Mike Franzen Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 7.9 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 7.9 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 7.9 acres into one lot; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Synopsis This is an addition to the existing church structure of 15,164 square feet for offices, daycare, and reception space. The project is located at 12901 Roberts Drive. Background Information The church is built across an existing lot line; therefore, a preliminary plat is required to eliminate the lot line. The church addition will be to the north and southeast ends of the building. The request is a concept amendment to an underlying Planned Unit Development and meets all codes. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council at the July 26, 1999 meeting. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated July 26, 1999 4. Staff Report dated July 23, 1999. 1 I CITY HILL FELLOWSHIP CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF CITY HILL FELLOWSHIP FOR CITY HILL FELLOWSHIP WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the City Hill Fellowship PUD Concept by City Hill Fellowship and considered their request for approval for development and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on September 7, 1999; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. City Hill Fellowship, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated August 6, 1999. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated July 26, 1999. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor Exhibit A City Hill Fellowship Legal Description: That part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 10 and of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, all in Township 116, Range 22 described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 10; thence West along the South line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 10, a distance of 290.5 feet; thence North parallel with the East line of said Section 10 to the Southerly line of County Road No. 66 as now laid out and traveled; thence in a general Southerly direction along the Southerly line of said County Road No. 66 to the intersection of the East line of the West 110 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence South along last mentioned line to the South line of said Southwest 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 11; thence West along the South line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 11 to the point of beginning; and That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10 in Township 116, Range 22 described as follows: Beginning at a point in the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter 290.5 feet West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence West along the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 10 a distance of 210 feet; thence North parallel with the East line of said Section 10 to the Southerly line of County Road No. 66 as now laid out and travelled; thence in a general Southerly direction along the Southerly line of said County Road No. 66 to its intersection with a line drawn from the point of beginning parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence South to the point of beginning. 3 CITY HILL FELLOWSHIP CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 99- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CITY HILL FELLOWSHIP FOR CITY HILL FELLOWSHIP BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of City Hill Fellowship, dated August 6, 1999, consisting of 7.9 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED bythe Eden Prairie CityCouncil on the 7th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Eden Prairie July 26, 1999 Page 2 B. CITY HILL FELLOWSHIP by City Hill Fellowship. Senior Pastor Richard Kao of City Hill Fellowship introduced an engineer from Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson, Inc., who presented the plans for the proposed addition and remodeling to the church. He indicated that the existing parking spaces will exceed the number required and the exterior of the addition will match the existing building. Mary Bird, 7359 Scott Terrace, stated concern about the view she will have from her home. The proponent assured her there would not be significant changes to the landscaping on her side of the building and that the addition wouldn't be placed closer to the lot line. Ms. Bird also stated concern about the previous day care that was located in the church and the disturbance that was caused by the children being led through her yard to a nearby park. She also stated that she would appreciate the builder abiding by the city requirements for start and stop construction times since there has been considerable problems during the construction of the Home Depot. Mary Ellen Anderson, 12966 Roberts Drive, asked if the grassy area near Roberts Drive will remain unchanged and was told it will remain. MOTION: Habicht moved, seconded by Clinton to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Habicht moved, seconded by Clinton to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of City Hill Fellowship for a Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 7.9 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.9 acres, Zoning Amendment within the Public zoning district on 7.9 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.9 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.9 acres into one lot, based on plans dated June 18, 1999, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 23, 1999. Motion carried 5-0. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Krista R. Flemming, Planner I DATE: July 23, 1999 SUBJECT: City Hill Fellowship APPLICANT: City Hill Fellowship OWNER: City Hill Fellowship LOCATION: 12901 Roberts Drive REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.9 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.9 acres 3. Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 7.9 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 7.9 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat on 7.9 acres into one lot. 6 • e • ',. .... ti........... ___ 2A6.45 RES , it k,p•.r1 t' J• %A,o ... Ps (l6m•a1-. (29)® E rra•srt teats y,�a sr�ea •9sy1 +.� ssl ee•a••• m '::• oaas—''''• 'u.of u.n •"a c St% I (3 (sI) (ir) _1 � 5) E�IST .; ,ti - (ao) i:1 _ (�:)3) t(19),r- ] (40) (03) 1s ri3 U2) 1 f (r2) .�F (20) . ri. •rx. ] •.A. `I (37) OONLEA (sn) h.N r� (22) '".1-Z (31) _ (32): 70 V(2) 31 (2r3) a (•s) 3 s 1 1570 . ; GFR R 1 • sits•: . ,.: Ap:.,.b.r (,) (24) ti,, (46) sue. S ... r] pR i 7,. .... • • 1'-- .• (39) (33) '(10) ( 1) .e • ib M..1 (Q) w 12 a 3, • can Y (3a) 1� 1� a,(3f) ,1 • (13) t .t -0.� I�P.t7OY. ,.f .y•Tr,.r. _ (Sr) •. �7.,■I .iq.... Q ••.. ..(17) _ r, (.8) - f1.9 • .. - D•" - ] I 2 (9) CI-.' nl.b - I(2 ) - 3 1, 1 t (36) - (35)• .(22)1 no �'� v 1 ,1 (20� _ x (A) //I':. w 23) g r.a't .A� 70.. ; - - f (14) H I. /� 3 , - (r9) Q •• kq i•4(C• •- . •. $ (8) .e. t fn t 19) 'ro, .. / ,P' i - ,, 4•3.9 se . C) N' Se t.P t • ne9•y..•. ' rr ] . g 3 td t (7) 8- 1�(IS) , • i 17 'g .f i i rn �i.^ ..• 6 R • 3 (18) (32) •`s f. 3?... _(S2)o R'` .i• (I) : (24)t (25) S (27) (26) ct W ,o `� 14 , ' b g •_ • i 7.01 �. .j y 1..... _-.. y ..-. ^ g1,r l:D_--!_.tr 0' �`° (119) 's (It) 13 �O ^ ..Yr..�-ram"" -b,-,r`.b 4 (,1,) ./ ,. . (e.l , (83) , J` . ' ,7;.'\` a (112) ' (531 ('� ,p])1 q.A.. :d,S ` ""�•i.` o (33) eaY• / i7 I '� ! 'r IP r r =ls13 s) _! n .c (,rQ)^ 4`;`.1�t °!� ..'• (65) ~� (32)` ..3 b•^ (3) (f) a IP1 Y „IOW 7+.. - -_ -' `�'•`(1,�.• "`• (St) (31) �" :' J'Ial 1341 n4t9 lit�lg (171) •1' A/ •t,, :i.;'3 �A 1Ytr,ll: ',7n 9,"(183) .I. 11 r11_ r1 (leo)'- n t1 ,9 4at (167, - -d......74t--7---- z (165)-, (- '-•-*...+e P �... f:flit tA) tl 9 - 7-- f�zcl-(17f) (16a) Al . ,� , 'e t2r) = ITS1 - (16b) eY w3 gas �0 03 - (9r) G�y� ' f o u t ( . 1 (177) 95): r g .. + A ' l.A.. .%41 - (178)- I 13(i6) i trail E �, • ° as ° • ig „4s. ¢ c03 'tM111f as I '03 s S C : �7 T ;33 tm "Y' f (a"-14•R,i(l43J , (131)�OM .Ito �(2)� �i :� a ._- f C (9910s C \ Y 7• p Iiin 41(W6)1st' (152) I•,l?A) —l_-�Sp 8 (t31 - y "" 1t'l- Tali L .?: .' U .� wf t,. O Mtn1 ; tlty I'f tn3: M �(l54) a(lrI) f .f) ��LT t:Yt -(,t01 lgfl e: f: t (Itj!_0( (r9)C ~ (1) Irf1 _ .,1r . » r.).73� IItf •03 .N '73 . (��S) _o] T9 a 1 / (b) 1. 1tr1a Ft— S-3 � ' +a•t :b.11•,fi :�/ . .p197, . LINO'S-- 3. F_. ., L..-T.,.=f- •,_.; _ :...q!..:.; -= - -- .1..„ ,.., 4.i .••e it 43f•33•.cr. . :32.It I (4) Staff Report—City Hill Fellowship July 23, 1999 BACKGROUND The site is currently guided Church and zoned Public. This project was part of a 1974 PUD for the New Testament Church. SITE PLAN The site plan shows a 15,164 square foot addition to the existing church structure. The total building size is 31,882 sq. ft. Parking meets City Code requirements. The setbacks for the building addition and parking meet City Code. The existing farmhouse is a legal non-conforming use in the Public Zoning District. The farmhouse is currently occupied by the church's groundkeeper. PRELIMINARY PLAT The church is built across an existing lot line. A preliminary plat is required to eliminate the lot line. TREE LOSS AND GRADING There is a 12 inch cottonwood tree that will be lost due to construction. The required tree replacement is 16 caliper inches. LANDSCAPE PLAN The landscaping requirement is caliper inches based on building size and tree replacement. The caliper inch requirement for the building addition is 47 inches. A total of 63 caliper inches are required between landscaping and tree replacement. The plan provides 60.5 caliper inches. One additional 2.5 caliper inch tree will be required. DRAINAGE Two NURP ponds are shown on the drainage plan. UTILITIES Utilities are available onsite. 2 Staff —Report CityHill Fellowship P July 23, 1999 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approvalof: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.9 acres of the PUD • Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.9 acres • Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 7.9 acres • Site Plan Review on 7.9 acres • Preliminary Plat on 7.9 acres into one lot This is based on plans dated June 18, 1999,this Staff Report dated July 23, 1999,and the following: 1. Prior to City Council review,the proponent shall place one additional 2.5 caliper inch tree on the landscape plan. 2. Prior to final plat approval,the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. 3. Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Review the building plans with the Fire Marshal. B. Submit a landscaping bond in accordance with City Code. C. Provide building material samples and colors for review by the City Planner. 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9/07/99 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald R. Uram Office Ridge Circle South Scott A. Kipp ' Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 8.87 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from Commercial Regional Service to Office on 1.67 and Zoning District Amendment within the Office District on 7.2 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 3.85 acres into one lot and one outlot; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Synopsis This is a 28,650 square foot,three-story office building located between Market Place Drive and Office Ridge Circle. The first floor is enclosed parking. Background Information The project also includes elimination of a future 5,500 sq. ft. building previously approved within the Lake Ridge Office Park, and substituting additional parking. The following waivers are requested as part of the PUD: 1. Front yard structure setback of 20 feet along I-494. City Code requires 35 feet. 2. Zero lot line setback to parking. City Code requires 10 feet. 3. Building height of 32 feet. City Code maximum is 30 feet. These waivers may have merit since three-story buildings are typically greater than 30 feet tall, it is setback the same as the neighboring Extended Stay America hotel, and the zero lot line setback is consistent with the underlying PUD. City Council Agenda- Office Ridge Circle South September 7, 1999 An alternate grading plan is provided if MnDOT does not permit grading within its right of way. Either option is acceptable. A TDM plan will be prepared for the project prior to building permit. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council at the July 26, 1999 meeting. The plans have been revised according to the Staff Report. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated July 26, 1999 4. Staff Report dated July 23, 1999 5. Letter from MnDOT dated August 18, 1999 2 2 OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE SOUTH CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT FOR OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE SOUTH FOR CLUTS, O'BRIEN, STROTHER WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Office Ridge Circle South PUD Concept Amendment by Cluts, O'Brien, Strother, considered their request for approval for development and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on September 7, 1999; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Office Ridge Circle South, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval as outlined in the plans dated August 20, 1999. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated July 26, 1999. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor 3 EXHIBIT A Office Ridge Circle South Legal Descriptions: PUD Concept Amendment, PUD District Review, and Site Plan Review Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 17, 18 Block 1, Bryant Lake Center and that part of Lot 15, said Block 1, lying southerly of Lots 12 and 13, said Block 1, and lying easterly of a line (and of the southerly extension of said line) described as commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 13; thence running South 15 degrees 35 minutes West to the Southerly line of said Lot 15 and there terminating. The southerly line of Lot 15 has an assumed bearing on North 74 degrees 25 minutes West. Also Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Bryant Lake Center 2nd Addition Also Outlot B, Extended Stay America Zoning District Change from C-Reg-Ser to Office Outlot B, Extended stay America Zoning District Amendment within the Office District Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 17, 18 Block 1, Bryant Lake Center and that part of Lot 15, said Block 1, lying southerly of Lots 12 and 13, said Block 1, and lying easterly of a line (and of the southerly extension of said line) described as commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 13; thence running South 15 degrees 35 minutes West to the southerly line of said Lot 15 and there terminating. The southerly line of Lot 15 has an assumed bearing of North 74 degrees 25 minutes West. Also Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Bryant Lake Center 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat Outlot B. Extended Stay America Lot 10, Block 1, Bryant Lake Center, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; That part of Lot 15, Block 1, Bryant Lake Center, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and Hennepin County,Minnesota, lying southerly of Lots 12 and 13, said Block 1, and lying easterly of a line (and of the southerly extension of said line) described as commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 13; thence running South 15 degrees 35 minutes West to the southerly line of said Lot 15 and there terminating. Lot 3, Block 1, Bryant Lake Center 2"d Addition. 9 OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE SOUTH CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 99- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE SOUTH FOR CLUTS, O'BRIEN, STROTHER BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Office Ridge Circle South, dated August 20, 1999, consisting of 3.85 acres into one lot and one outlot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of September, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting Mayor J PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Eden Prairie July 26, 1999 Page 3 C. OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE SOUTH by Cluts, O'Brien, Strother. Brian Cluts, of Cluts, O'Brien, Strother appeared before the Planning Commission to answer questions. Some questions of the Commissioners related to concern about additional traffic to which Kipp responded that it should not be a problem;the height of the retaining wall responded by Kipp to be 6-8 feet; and whether there were tenants for the new building to which the proponent responded no at this time. Kipp explained that a performance bond for implementing the Travel Demand Management plan must be posted for the first two years of a new office building. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Lewis to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Lewis to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Cluts, O'Brien, Strother for a Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 8.87 acres to the overall 31 acre Bryant Lake Center/Lakeridge Office park PUD, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.87 acres, Zoning District Change from Commercial Regional Service to Office on 1.67 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Office District on 7.2 acres, Site Plan Review on 8.87 acres and Preliminary Plat of 3.85 acres into 1 lot, and 1 outlot, based on plans dated July 14, 1999 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 23, 1999. Motion carried 5-0. 6 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: July 23, 1999 SUBJECT: Office Ridge Circle South APPLICANT: Cluts O'Brien Stother Architects FEE OWNER: Eden Prairie Land Corporation LOCATION: Between Office Ridge Circle and Market Place Drive REQUEST: 1. PUD Concept Amendment on 8.87 acres to the overall Bryant Lake Center/Lakeridge Office Park PUD. 2. PUD District Review with waivers on 8.87 acres. 3. Zoning District Change from Commercial Regional Service to Office on 1.67 acres. 4. Zoning District Amendment within the Office District on 7.2 acres. 5. Site Plan Review on 8.87 acres. 6. Preliminary Plat of 3.85 acres into 1 lot, and 1 outlot. 77y T. 116:3 UU . 22 E®EN PRAIRI- r 42 41 4 • . . GOVT LOT 4 x.. � ....__ 2677.S4 RES ...- (2) • 75 ♦ _ 1.1192,01 (42) E - .. .M: _III r ,) 1 - Ir ' 4 P .•'I.. _ (S) = . : 7..v. :7/44,2) .../ (IS) (I •. 8/A (.S/) ' . y%�♦``S�A-0QPN[y�y gg��((��pp�� a}S! • 8:'' 1 '•' -.Jr, ;• b• y EXTENDED "Pe 1 (7) ..�ror ..rz��. ;•.'. y 40.41 �. 4 -a cx a_ r1A)r SF' 4 • 0 it P. t,tQ ,' �$ 7t� = , . 4--44' ',. (35) : c � ir114-,, .4, , r e:' 'to>. -12,4) .0 .......,..,:_. STAY ,!. • A :� . (/3) ♦ ., .01 Is -44: e_.q..�•p•._ ♦ , 4...;. a � z 1' I . �I�7 CA •• SY .7.y:.. n _ 10.y (/6) 3Ln, ._11.. 1 ,.4 \ :II y I/ S. 'A coo) c .�ti T :; ti d 3 . ♦.R• v - (7) • _ _—'-yam ---_, -- __r_ ... IEO•Y•71'[ 1= • ... . _. _ lz;74i- 4J S o —. - ------•:- ..-'-° '--------r----")>----.1.-'---''' . l'.11:'----.., • .. ramp• `j *lb' r• '0�y' ,fit .. )." b• p : *: tT o1'�♦ 8st ♦ >'. .........1.6, r: - s+9,.6se ,,.1. (120) Atit \ .... :714 i (3) :i :.;4:0,:'..,i3..'4, "4 .r. ••••.. , ?.i.\ s; 1p ? . \: ♦r �' +tea 8 "5 i :9j9 y� (21) --` AA,♦ — y ,. VEST 7. Staff Report—Office Ridge Circle South July 23, 1999 BACKGROUND This site was conceptually approved for a 28,000 sq. ft. office building as part of the 31 acre Bryant Lake Center Planned Unit Development in 1980. The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the site as Regional Commercial land use and is currently zoned C-Reg-Ser. Office use is permitted in a Regional Commercial land use area. Surrounding land uses are Office to the north, I-2 to the east, and the Extended Stay America hotel to the west, zoned C-Reg-Ser. The property abuts I-494. SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT The request is for a 28,650 sq. ft. three-story office building, and a preliminary plat of 3.85 acres into one lot, and one outlot. The first floor is enclosed parking. The Base Area Ratio is 17%, with a Floor Area Ratio of 39%. City Code permits up to a 30% BAR and a 50% FAR in the Office district. The request also includes elimination of a future 5,500 sq. ft. building previously approved within the Lake Ridge Office Park, and substituting additional parking. A front yard setback waiver to the building is proposed from the I-494 frontage. This waiver may have merit since the building is more than 275 feet from the highway and the setback is the same as the neighboring Extended Stay America hotel. Based on the size of all buildings for this site and the Lake Ridge Office Park a total of 427 parking spaces are required. The plan shows a total of 495 parking spaces, including 66 proof- of-parking, meeting City Code. The parking setbacks for the perimeter of the site meet City Code. A parking setback waiver from 10 feet to zero feet for the shared lot line with the Lake Ridge Office Park is proposed. The waiver may have merit since this is consistent with the underlying PUD and a cross parking easement will be recorded. GRADING/DRAINAGE Grading is proposed within the MnDOT right-of-way to provide additional visibility to the building. This will require MnDOT approval. An alternate grading plan is provided if it is not approved. Either option is acceptable. An existing NURP pond on the west side of the Extended Stay America hotel was designed to accommodate this project. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water is available to this site with connection to existing lines in Market Place Drive. A utility easement will need to be provided over an existing sanitary sewer line that crosses the site near Market Place Drive. 9 Staff Report—Office Ridge Circle South July 23, 1999 TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT Since 1998,the City Council has required new office projects to adopt Travel Demand Management (TDM)plans to reduce peak hour traffic. Other developments such as Best Buy, Crosstown Circle Center,Flagship Corporate Center and Oakview Office have developed TDM plans. Some ways in which TDM can have the greatest impact on reducing peak hour capacity problems include the following: • Staggered work hours, or flextime. • Car pools and Van pools, including working with other corporations. • Telecommuting • Establishing a TDM coordinator • Park and Ride lots • Transit services The proponent will need to work with City, I-494 Corridor Commission, and Southwest Metro Transit Commission to implement TDM program as part of the project approval. ARCHITECTURE Building materials are consistent with City Code for 75%face brick and glass. The building height according to City Code is 32 feet. City Code permits buildings up to 30 feet in the Office district. A waiver through the PUD will be required. Three-story office buildings are typically greater than 30 feet and have been granted this waiver similar to the office building recently completed at the corner of Office Ridge Circle. All rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened with metal panel according to City Code. Proposed site lighting consists of 20-foot downcast shoebox fixtures. An exterior face brick trash enclosure is proposed. LANDSCAPING The caliper inch requirement for this project is 122 inches. The plan meets this requirement. Irrigation of the landscaping is proposed. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommends approval of • Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 8.87 acres; • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.87 acres; /0 Staff Report—Office Ridge Circle South July 23, 1999 • Zoning District Change from Commercial Regional Service to Office on 1.67 acres; • Zoning District Amendment within the Office District on 7.2 acres; • Site Plan Review on 8.87 acres; • Preliminary Plat of 3.85 acres into one lot and one outlot. Approval is based upon plans dated July 14, 1999, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report July 23, 1999, and the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall provide a utility easement over the sanitary sewer line that crosses the property near Market Place Drive. 2. Prior to final plat review, the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Obtain written permission from MnDOT for grading within its right-of-way, or proceed with the alternate grading plan. B. Stake the grading limits with erosion control fence and notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. 4. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Provide a landscape surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping improvements and mechanical equipment screening. B. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for their review and approval. C. Submit exterior building material samples and colors for review. D. Submit a TDM plan for review and approval. 5. The following waivers are granted as part of the PUD: • Front yard structure setback of 20 feet along I-494. City Code requires 35 feet. • Zero lot line setback to parking. City Code requires 10 feet. • Building height of 32 feet. City Code maximum is 30 feet. Do :o Minnesota Departn• of Transportation D C cs, Metropolitan Division ' oF Tao,,' Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 August 18, 1999 Mr. Michael Franzen City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Dear Mr. Franzen: SUBJECT: Office Ridge South Plat Review P99-057 Northwest Quadrant I-494 and TH 212 Eden Prairie, Hennepin County C.S. 2745 The Minnesota Department of Transportation(Mn/DOT)has reviewed the Office Ridge South plat. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments. • The site should maintain the existing drainage patterns and rates of runoff. For complete details concerning the drainage permit process and requirements, contact Keith Van Wagner of our Permits Unit at (651) 582-1443. Any questions regarding drainage concerns may be directed to Don Berre of our Water Resources Engineering Section at(612) 797-3090. • Please identify Mn/DOT right of way and access control on the final plat. • At issue is the extent of the grading contours within Mn/DOT right of way. Any use or work within Mn/DOT right of way will require a permit. The type of permit necessary depends on the nature of the proposed work. Please be advised that there must be benefit to the highway right of way or the general public to justify grading on Mn/DOT right of way. A final, detailed grading and drainage plan, and drainage computations should be submitted with the permit application. Mn/DOT is to be monetarily compensated for any material removed from our right of way. Therefore,please submit computations showing how many cubic yards of material will be removed. Please plan on submitting these plans to Jim Reierson of Central Office Engineering Services for his review. His mailing address is Mail Stop 686, 395 John Ireland Blvd., St. Paul, MN, 55155. Keith Van Wagner of our Permits Unit may be contacted at(651) 582-1443 for further information and the appropriate permit forms. An equal opportunity employer /92— • • Mr. Michael Franzen August 18, 1999 Page two Please feel free to contact me at 651-582-1403 with questions regarding this review. Sincerely, (111CIAL V Alicia Vap Intermediate Planner 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS September 7, 1999 SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Resolution Authorizing A Proposed Multifamily Community Development Housing Program And Issuance Of Multifamily VI. F Director Don Uram Housing Revenue Bonds (Lincoln Parc Apartments Project) Requested Action Move to: Adopt Resolution Authorizing A Proposed Multifamily Housing Program And Issuance Of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Lincoln Parc Apartments Project) Synopsis This Council has received a proposal that the City finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed multifamily housing development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended(the"Act"), on behalf of Community Housing Corporation of America, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, or a nonprofit affiliate(the"Borrower"), consisting of the acquisition, construction and equipping of a 186-unit multifamily rental housing development to be owned by the Borrower and located at 8030 Eden Road in the City(Lincoln Parc Apartments). Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2 of the Act requires that prior to undertaking the financing of the Project,the City must prepare and adopt a housing program after notice and hearing and review given and held as provided therein. The City has prepared a multifamily housing program for the Project, designated as the"Program for Multifamily Housing Development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, Lincoln Parc Apaitinents Project" (the"Housing Program"). The Housing Program authorizes the Project and the issuance of revenue bonds by the City in the approximate principal amount of$36,000,000 to finance the costs thereof. Attachments Housing Finance Program-Lincoln Parc Apartments Project Letter from Guy Peterson, Metropolitan Council Senior Planner to Katherine Hadley, Commissioner of MN Housing Finance Agency CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.99-167 RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C,ON BEHALF OF COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION OF AMERICA;ADOPTING A HOUSING PROGRAM THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota(the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals and Findings 1.1. This Council has received a proposal that the City finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed multifamily housing development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended(the"Act"), on behalf of Community Housing Corporation of America, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, or a nonprofit affiliate (the "Borrower"),consisting of the acquisition, construction and equipping of a 186-unit multifamily rental housing development to be owned by the Borrower and located at 8030 Eden Road in the City(the"Project"). 1.2. Pursuant to the Act,the City is authorized to develop and administer programs of multifamily housing developments under the circumstances and within the limitations set forth in the Act. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.07 provides that such programs for multifamily housing developments may be financed with revenue bonds issued by the City, following adoption of a housing program, after a public hearing, and other proceedings conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Act. 1.3. Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2 of the Act requires that prior to undertaking the financing of the Project, the City must prepare and adopt a housing program after notice and hearing and review given and held as provided therein. The City has prepared a multifamily housing program for the Project, designated as the "Program for Multifamily Housing Development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C,Lincoln Parc Apartments Project" (the "Housing Program"). The Housing Program authorizes the Project and the issuance of revenue bonds by the City in the approximate principal amount of$36,000,000 to finance the costs thereof. 1.4. On September 7, 1999,this Council held a public hearing on the adoption of the Housing Program after publication of the notice of hearing not less than 15 days prior to the date thereof in a newspaper circulating generally in the City. A copy of the draft Housing Program has been forwarded to the Metropolitan Council (the"Metropolitan Council") for review. The public hearing was duly noticed and held in accordance with the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. All parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to adopt the Program and to undertake and finance the Project and interested persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments to the City Administrator before the time of the hearing. Representatives of the Metropolitan Council did [not] submit comments on the Program at or prior to the public hearing. Section 2. Adoption of Housing Program. 2.1. Based on the public hearing, such written comments (if any)and such other facts and circumstances as this Council deems relevant, it is hereby found, determined and declared: (a) the Project would assist the preservation of needed housing units in the City; (b) the Housing Program is hereby approved and adopted in the form presently on file with the City; and (c) the issuance by the City of its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act and the Program to finance the Project in the maximum aggregate face amount of $36,000,000 (the "Bonds")is hereby preliminarily approved. 2.2. A. The Borrower has agreed to pay directly or through the City any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion; and whether or not the Bonds or operative instruments are executed. B. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Borrower. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to in Section 1 hereof, should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds in an amount less than referred to in Section 1 hereof, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreements as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. C. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that the City and the Borrower shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement,the Bonds, and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and that the closing of the issuance and sale of the Bonds shall have occurred by no later than December 31, 1999. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are not sold within such time,this resolution shall expire and be of no further effect. D. The Bonds,if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, except the revenues specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and each Bond,when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the Bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues and property specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. Passed this 7th day of September, 1999. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Acting, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C LINCOLN PARC APARTMENTS PROJECT This housing finance program is undertaken by the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota(the"City") for a multifamily rental housing development located at 8030 Eden Road in the City. The Development (as hereinafter described)will be financed by revenue bonds issued by the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C. The Development will be undertaken to further the policies and goals stated in the City's Housing Plan. The Development, called Lincoln Parc Apartments, will consist of the acquisition,construction and equipping of a multifamily rental housing development of approximately 186 units, a portion of which are designed for persons of low and moderate income. The Development will be undertaken by a Minnesota nonprofit corporation. The expected base monthly rental fees for a one-bedroom unit will be between $546 and$855; a two-bedroom unit will be between$654 and$1390; and a three-bedroom unit will be between$749 and $1515. The Development will be available for rental to the general public, and will be operated only as a multifamily rental housing facility for the term of the revenue bonds. The City will issue revenue bonds to finance the Development in the principal amount not to exceed $36,000,000. The owner of the Development will be required, pursuant to a revenue agreement, to make payments sufficient to pay when due the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on all such revenue bonds. The revenue bonds may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available or necessary and are permitted by law to enhance the security for and marketability of the revenue bonds. Substantially all of the net proceeds of the revenue bonds(the initial principal amount thereof, less amounts deposited in a reasonably required reserve or paid out as costs of issuance of the revenue bonds)will be used to pay the costs of the Development, including any functionally related and subordinate facilities. The Development will be operated as a multifamily rental housing development within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C. Acquisition of the Development will be carried out in accordance with applicable land use and development restrictions, and construction of the Development is subject to applicable state and local building codes. The Development is consistent with the City's Housing Plan under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C. The owner of the Development will be required to operate the project in accordance with state and local anti-discrimination laws and ordinances. The City has adequate existing capacity to administer,monitor and supervise the Development, although the City has reserved the right to contract with other public agencies or private parties for these purposes. The costs of the Development and the program of financing the Development, including specifically the costs of the City generally will be paid or reimbursed by the owner of the Development or from the application fee paid to the City by the owner. 3L1 en , 11•F71 rrcul'l. 1 u•To1C7`t7o. , rmaC•tic Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future September 7, 1999 Ms.Katherine Hadley,Commissioner Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55101 Re. City of Eden Prairie Multifamily Housing Development Program-Lincoln Parc Apartments Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 18053-1 Dear Commissioner Hadley: The City of Eden Prairie has submitted for our review pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 462C, a proposed housing bond program for the Lincoln Parc apartment project. The program proposes to finance costs involving the development of a 186 unit rental property at 8030 Eden Road in Eden Prairie through issuance of up to $36 million in revenue bonds. The apartment units will make up the upper three stories of a four-story office and residential development. The development of this mixed market rate and low and moderate income affordable rental housing is consistent with both local and regional plans. The apartment project will have 20 percent of the units affordable to households at 50 percent of median income and another 55 percent of the units affordable to households at 80 percent of median income. The citys'Livable Communities Housing Action Plan calls upon the city to provide a balanced housing stock in order to provide various housing types that serve housing needs at all stages of the life-cycle. It also says the city will explore various sources of financial resources to promote this diversification of housing opportunities. The issuance of revenue bonds by the city for rental housing development is a financial tool identified in the city's Action Plan to assist the development of affordable and life-cycle housing_ The Regional Blueprint also supports this type of mixed-use development and housing diversification to serve affordable and life-cycle housing needs and, in particular, to do so within close proximity to transit and significant employment and commercial services such as will be the case with the Lincoln Parc development. The significant development density of 37 units per acre is also consistent with local LCA housing goals and will further Regional Growth Strategy objectives for more compact and efficient use of.land in developing suburbs. If you have any •uestio,s about these comments,please call me at 651/602-1418. Sin s ply, tA - Guy D. P• erson Senior Planner C: David Lindahl,City of Eden Prairie Lenore Aaseng,Dorsey&Whitney 130 t*auit Fifth Street St. Paul.Minnesota 55101•1826 16511 602-1000 Fax 602-1550 TDD/1TY 291-0404 Metro infc,Line 602-1888 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Payment of Claims September 7 , 1999 SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development and Payment of Claims Financial Services/Don Uram —TT Requested Action Move to: Approve the Payment of Claims as submitted(roll call vote) Synopsis Checks 78457 to 79109 Wire Transfers 263 to 271 Background Information Attachments COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY O1-SEP-1999 (14:47) DIVISION TOTAL N/A $4,402.24 LEGISLATIVE $325.45 LEGAL COUNSEL $41,367.22 CUSTOMER SERVICE $27,763.83 BENEFITS $19,927.50 TECHNOLOGY $15,013.21 CITY MANAGER $2,224.82 FINANCE $278.65 HUMAN RESOURCES $1,841.36 COMMUNICATIONS $107.50 CITY CLERK $600.00 HUMAN SERV $20,792.75 RISK MANAGEMENT $49,377.92 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION $7,024.17 ENGINEERING $813.02 INSPECTIONS $3,238.44 FACILITIES $5,255.70 ASSESSING $138.01 CIVIL DEFENSE $12.56 POLICE $36,395.72 FIRE $177,411.06 ANIMAL CONTROL $915.00 STREETS/TRAFFIC $14,379.59 PARK MAINTENANCE $19,889.37 STREET LIGHTING $314.00 FLEET SERVICES $19,516.23 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $3,203.34 COMMUNITY DEV $362.50 COMMUNITY CENTER $18,356.41 BEACHES $545.45 HISTORICAL $1,810.30 YOUTH RECREATION $6,353.94 SPECIAL EVENTS $1,682.39 ADULT RECREATION $4,805.99 RECREATION ADMIN $50.32 ADAPTIVE REC $2,052.69 OAK POINT POOL $1,050.30 ARTS $2,031.75 PARK FACILITIES $1,477.85 PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ $106,758.26 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS $417,052.33 CITY CENTER $525.08 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $5,500.25 PRAIRIE VILLAGE $91,250.14 PRAIRIEVIEW $79,080.47 CUB FOODS $192,685.85 TRUST FUNDS $31,500.00 WATER DEPT $93,631.28 SEWER DEPT $171,953.78 STORM DRAINAGE $10,165.46 AGENCY FUNDS $269,756.10 ADA $389.85 $1,983,357.40* Z COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78457 $20.00 BJORKSTRAND, TERRI OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ACTIVITY CAMP 78458 $160.00 DAIRY QUEEN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL DAY CAMP 78459 $100.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 78460 $5,227.79 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 78461 $41.39 KROC, REBECCA MILEAGE AND PARKING TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78462 $55.80 LANENBERG, CYNTHIA MILEAGE AND PARKING FIRE 78463 $50.00 MCDONALDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ACTIVITY CAMP 78464 $111,501.95 MEDICA CHOICE COBRA COSTS/REV BENEFITS 78465 $1,168.96 MINN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 78466 $40.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 78467 $80.00 MINNESOTA TWINS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 78468 $513.79 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP ELECTRIC STORMWATER LIFTSTATION 78469 $12,932.04 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 78470 $152.77 PETTY CASH OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TEEN PROGRAMS 78472 $52,382.75 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 78473 $50.78 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 78474 $500.00 RUDOLPH, MICHAEL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ADAPTIVE INTEGRATED 78475 $2,694.29 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 78477 $50.68 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78478 $967.00 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78479 $2,993.65 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78480 $1,890.38 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78481 $6,812.43 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78482 $347.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78483 $9,078.68 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78484 $6,153.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78485 $1,300.82 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78486 $4,216.77 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78487 $259.65 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78488 $186.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78489 $168.45 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78490 $1,200.94 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78491 $1,330.22 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78492 $5,477.25 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78494 $8,575.97 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78495 $1,091.29 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78496 $82.84 AFFILIATED EMERGENCY VETERINAR CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 78497 $315.00 CARLTON CTY SHERIFFS DEPT DEPOSITS ESCROW 78498 $500.00 COLLINS PRODUCTIONS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 78499 $100.14 DAVANNI'S OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78500 $300.00 EVERGREEN COMMUNITY CHURCH OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 78501 $15,875.00 GHT CONSTRUCTION INC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS DESIGN WELL 13 & WELL COLLECTO 78502 $909.70 GREATER MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPT TRAINING SUPPLIES POOL LESSONS 78503 $250.00 HALE, WILLIAM OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ADAPTIVE INTEGRATED 78504 $75.00 INT'L CONFERENCE OF POLICE CHA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 78505 $235.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78506 $136.00 KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 78507 $40.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF COMMERCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 78508 $229.19 MUELLER, CYNTHIA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ROUND LAKE MARINA 78509 $117.57 PELTIER, TIMOTHY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 78510 $80.92 PETSMART CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 78511 $20.00 U.S.FILTER WATERPRO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUMMER SAFETY CAMP 78512 $226.98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78513 $5.40 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE POLICE 78514 $150.00 ZHANG, YING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 3 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78515 $900.00 DJ BEHR CO D/B/A/21ST CENTURY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ADAPTIVE INTEGRATED 78516 $30.50 MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 78517 $182.80 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78518 $48.90 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78519 $2,987.54 BELLBOY CORPORATION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78521 $115.27 BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE* CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78522 $1,509.46 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78523 $4,406.74 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78524 $4,098.64 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78525 $1,677.06 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78527 $20.00 M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78528 $1,411.60 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78529 $158.80 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78530 $70.29 NEON IMAGES CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78531 $519.61 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78532 $75.75 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78533 $3,951.83 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78536 $180.00 PROTECTION ONE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78537 $1,298.99 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78538 $84.93 RESPOND SYSTEMS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78539 $669.40 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- ADVERTISING PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78540 $32.12 STAR TRIBUNE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78541 $88.33 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG CO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78542 $3,173.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78543 $88.30 WINE MERCHANTS INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78544 $27,583.50 ALPHA WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTERS POLICE 78545 $1,700.93 ARCH PAGING COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 78546 $275.59 CORDES, JEFFREY MILEAGE AND PARKING TREE DISEASE 78547 $398.99 FIBRCOM COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 78548 $486.42 LAMETTRYS COLLISION INSURANCE SAFETY 78549 $13,103.69 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE LEGAL COUSEL 78550 $32.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH LICENSES & TAXES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78551 $75.00 MINNESOTA MULTI HOUSING ASSOC LICENSES & TAXES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78552 $91.00 MN STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY SPECIAL EVENTS FEES TASTE ON PRAIRIE 78553 $67.90 NRPA SAFETY SUPPLIES AQUATICS & FITNESS SUPERV 78554 $120.00 PORTH, ANN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78555 $40.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 78556 $1,545.00 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE WATER ACCOUNTING 78557 $429.73 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL 78558 $100.00 WERTS, SANDY DEPOSITS ESCROW 78559 $260.93 FUN SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TASTE ON PRAIRIE 78560 $450.00 BAKER, JIM CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78561 $42.92 BILL CLARK OIL CO INC LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78562 $725.00 BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF KENNEL SERVICE ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT. 78563 $93.75 CALLANDER, JULIA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78564 $6.56 CHRISTIANSON, JENNA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78565 $19,432.35 DON RIHN TRANSPORT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78566 $29.70 DONABAUER, LUKE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78567 $2,042.30 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 78568 $48.60 GAYTHER, JAMES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78569 $38.44 GHOSE, MILA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78570 $40.63 HAYS, ELYSA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78571 $45.00 HEATON, CHELSEA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78572 $231.82 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S ACCO BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 78573 $95.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78574 $160.02 HUEBL, LISA MILEAGE AND PARKING TREE DISEASE 78575 $53.75 KISTNER, MATT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78576 $41.25 KURZEKA, MEGAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78577 $13,507.96 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE LEGAL COUSEL 78578 $48.13 LEBOW, ALLISON OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78579 $72.87 MINNCOMM PAGING COMMUNICATIONS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78580 $1,398.00 MINNESOTA ASPHALT CORP OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES 1998 REHAB PROGRAM 78581 $162.12 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT POSTAGE GENERAL 78582 $192.40 STANDARD REGISTER CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FINANCE DEPT 78583 $17.50 STUCKEL, BARBARA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78584 $15.63 SWANSON, EMILY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78585 $1,209.75 WOOD FLOOR INSTALLATIONS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES 1998 REHAB PROGRAM 78586 $10.65 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78587 $205.00 GRAND PERE WINES INC WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78588 $3,396.82 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78589 $28.38 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78590 $4,585.51 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78592 $684.50 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78593 $185.20 AT&T TELEPHONE GENERAL 78594 $52.50 BOE, HOLLY LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 78595 $33.00 BURGER, LISA LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 78596 $45.00 CABLE, LINDSEY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78597 $449.82 ECONOMICS PRESS INC, THE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CITY MANAGER 78598 $97.20 ELFSTROM, JOJO OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78599 $100.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 78600 $11.50 GOVE, MOLLY LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 78601 $26.00 HASKELL, JANIE LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 78602 $40.20 HENRIKSEN, JANET LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 78603 $5,227.79 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 78604 $47.50 JEFFERSON, AIMEE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78605 $56.25 JOHNSON, MICHAEL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78606 $22.37 JUNSO, MARY JO LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 78607 $30.00 KOKESH, ELIZABETH OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78608 $14,855.57 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE LEGAL COUSEL 78609 $90.00 LANGSDORF, TARA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78610 $13.70 MARK'S HWY 5 AMOCO MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78611 $6,552.29 MINNEGASCO GAS FIRE STATION #5 78614 $40.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 78615 $52.50 MURPHY, JOHN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 78616 $127.50 NGUYEN, QUOC ADULT RESIDENT MEMBERSHIP COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 78617 $32.66 O'CONNEL, TERRY LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 78618 $12,782.04 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 78619 $10.00 PLOSZAY, ANDREA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78620 $50,802.44 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 78621 $50.78 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 78622 $55.00 RECYCLING ASSOC OF MN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS RECYCLE REBATE 78623 $52.50 ROSENWINKEL, WILL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78624 $113.75 SEVERSON, NIK OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78625 $67.50 SHEA, LIZ OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78626 $16.88 SHERMAN, AMY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78627 $100.58 STRICHARCHUK, NICK OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78628 $1,600.00 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CITY MANAGER 78629 $97.20 SWANK, ANNA-LISA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78630 $4,802.15 E F JOHNSON CO RADIOS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 78631 $29.00 WARHIME, KRISTIN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 5 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78632 $12.50 WIKLAND, KELLY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 78633 $400.00 IHRIM CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 78634 $53.24 OFFICE MAX OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 78635 $134.61 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78636 $292.50 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78637 $2,098.30 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78638 $1,785.31 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78639 $15,826.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78640 $161.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78641 $11,045.32 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78643 $5,974.47 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78645 $1,605.78 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78646 $5,959.70 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78647 $270.00 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78648 $55.95 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78649 $814.72 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78650 $257.81 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78651 $2,201.60 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78652 $2,797.44 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78653 $15,403.74 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78654 $5.00 ATKINS, SANDRA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 78655 $287.92 BOSEK, LYLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BENEFITS 78656 $30.00 CONRAD, ANN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 78657 $70.00 COOK, BRAD ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78658 $35.00 COOPER, NATALIE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78659 $30.00 DELEBO, MARY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 78660 $35.00 DRAPP, KENNETH ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78661 $25.00 DUFFY, SANDY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 78662 $30.00 FARELLO, MARILYN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 78663 $186.77 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES FITNESS CENTER 78664 $35.80 GOOD TIME ATTRACTIONS EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 78665 $823.56 HILLCREST CAFE & CATERING EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 78666 $35.00 JOHNSON, CLAIRE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78667 $35.00 KELLEY, KENT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78668 $35.00 LUECKE, TONA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78669 $50.00 MCDONALDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ACTIVITY CAMP 78670 $30.00 MCNEE, AL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 78671 $10.00 NOREEN, GLENN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 78672 $1,601.61 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC PUBLIC WORKS/PARKS 78673 $30.00 OLSON, WILLIAM ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 78674 $70.00 QUIRK, HEIDI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78675 $35.00 SCHULZ, MICHAEL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78676 $43.00 SLAVICS, KATHY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG PRESCHOOL EVENTS 78677 $86.25 STANDARD REGISTER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FINANCE DEPT 78678 $35.00 STYRLUND, SONI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78679 $75.00 SULLIVAN, JO ANN ROUND LAKE PAVILION PARK FACILITIES 78680 $35.00 TERRANCE, JILL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78681 $84.00 VINUP, CAROLYN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ACTIVITY CAMP 78682 $35.00 VUOLO, SUZANNE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 78683 $3,134.69 BELLBOY CORPORATION WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78685 $59.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78686 $622.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78687 $2,679.20 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78688 $416.35 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78689 $2,233.30 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 6/ COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78690 $1,818.50 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78691 $323.50 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78692 $36.50 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78693 $30.00 AD/PRO, INC. TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 78694 $300.00 ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING OFFICE SCHOOLS POLICE 78695 $3.00 COLEMAN, FLORENCE SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT PROGRAM 78696 $3.00 FURE, GRETA SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT PROGRAM 78697 $325.45 HARRIS, JEAN MILEAGE AND PARKING COUNCIL 78698 $6.00 KORWES, CARLA DOG REGISTRATION FD 10 ORG 78699 $40.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF COMMERCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 78700 $294.41 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE 78701 $129.51 PETTY CASH OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION 78702 $2,309.63 US POSTMASTER POSTAGE COMMUNITY BROCHURE 78703 $3,689.73 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE SEWER LIFTSTATION 78704 $40.00 WASHTOCK, TIMOTHY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 78705 $605.00 MULHAUSER, WENDY INSTRUCTOR SERVICE PRESCHOOL EVENTS 78706 $112.00 PIZZA HUT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ACTIVITY CAMP 78707 $67.42 BELLBOY CORPORATION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78708 $2,750.05 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78709 $2,598.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78710 $1,504.73 GRIGGS COOPER & CO WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78712 $58.00 MARK VII MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78713 $494.34 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78714 $4,617.90 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78715 $1,438.05 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE TELEPHONE FIRE 78717 $24.20 AMOCO OIL COMPANY MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78718 $175.00 ARMA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CITY MANAGER 78719 $250.00 CO-SOURCE EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE BENEFITS 78720 $419.00 CWH RESEARCH INC PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM FIRE 78721 $540.00 DAHLGREN GOLF SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 78722 $66.00 DNR FISHERIES LICENSES & TAXES PARK MAINTENANCE 78723 $146.79 ELFSTROM, BRIANA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ACTIVITY CAMP 78724 $7.65 FOUNTAINE, TOM REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 78725 $44.23 GLENROSE FLORAL AND GIFT SHOPS EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 78726 $389.85 HARRIS COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE EQUIPMENT ADA PROGRAMS 78727 $150.00 HEBERT, JANENE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 78728 $46.00 HELLING, LAURIE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ARTS INITIATIVE 78729 $377.00 IPMA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 78730 $55.34 KLUTE, JOEL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CONCESSIONS 78731 $2,500.00 MARAVELAS, PAUL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1998 CLG GRANT 78732 $24.99 OLSON, COURTNEY SPECIAL EVENTS FEES DAY CAMP 78733 $559.92 RIA GROUP OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL HUMAN RESOURCES 78734 $65.68 SCHERBRING, GARI OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL YOUTH TENNIS 78735 $45.19 SHOLD, KARA TELEPHONE GENERAL 78736 $6.58 STRAND, KAREN REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 78737 $121.05 TARGET REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES VOLLEYBALL 78738 $3,000.00 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE GENERAL 78739 $90.12 WILEY, KERI REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 78740 $683.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78741 $4,733.63 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78742 $232.05 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78743 $73.80 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78744 $2,053.22 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78745 $3,331.59 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78747 $13,779.18 TIE COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE GENERAL 17 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78748 $72.00 DAKOTA PLUMBING CASH OVER/SHORT FD 10 ORG 78749 $704.47 GE CAPITAL RENTALS GENERAL 78750 $4,834.20 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOM UNEMPLOYMENT COMP BENEFITS 78751 $99.25 WILBUR GJERSVIK BUILDING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 78752 $1,200.15 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78753 $13,409.95 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78754 $3,841.21 GRIGGS COOPER & CO BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78755 $11,043.96 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78756 $88.20 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78757 $3,580.91 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78758 $7,357.63 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78760 $152.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 78761 $183.75 AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ACTIVITY CAMP 78762 $3.70 AT&T TELEPHONE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78763 $7.76 CARLSON, JODY TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 78764 $200.00 GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL PARK FACILITIES 78765 $200.00 GOWER, GLORIA STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL PARK FACILITIES 78766 $8.51 LANDKAMER, MANDY TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 78767 $184.34 MCGLYNN BAKERIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 78768 $150.00 OLOFSDOTTER, MARIE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ARTS CAMP 78769 $359.70 SAILER, PEGGY LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 78770 $4,250.00 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 78771 $135.72 SWENSON, DON OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 78772 $7,861.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78773 $5,010.05 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78774 $13,090.39 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78775 $2,625.21 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78776 $6,948.40 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78777 $129.60 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78778 $796.40 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78779 $102.30 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78780 $4,725.21 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78781 $134.39 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78782 $9,141.91 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78783 $138.70 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78784 $1,416.79 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78785 $47.93 BIG CITY BAGELS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION 78786 $160.00 FUDDRUCKERS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 78787 $747.80 HUMAN SERVICES - EMSOCS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 78788 $80.00 MINNESOTA MULTI HOUSING ASSOC LICENSES & TAXES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78789 $229.15 POSTMASTER POSTAGE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 78790 $26.23 VANDENBERGHE, MARK MILEAGE AND PARKING FIRE 78791 $48.90 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78792 $1,021.35 BELLBOY CORPORATION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78793 $949.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78794 $4,517.02 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78796 $335.25 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78797 $1,585.01 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78798 $672.29 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78799 $26.50 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78800 $1,432.71 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78801 $200.00 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC FACILITIES RENTAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 78802 $90.00 DNR ENFORCEMENT, FIREARMS SAFE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 78803 $167,500.00 EDEN PRAIRIE VOLUNTEER FIRE RE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES FIRE 78804 $1,810.30 HUTCHISON WESTERN CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS HERITAGE PRESERVATION S COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER O1-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78805 $200.00 INFORMATION SPECIALISTS MILLER PARK SHELTER PARK FACILITIES 78806 $200.00 INTRANET SOLUTIONS ROUND LAKE PAVILION PARK FACILITIES 78807 $60.00 JASC SOFTWARE FACILITIES RENTAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 78808 $4,235.27 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78810 $200.00 LSC, INC. HOMEWARD HILLS BLDG RENTAL PARK FACILITIES 78811 $50.00 MCDONALDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL DAY CAMP 78812 $540.00 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT SCHOOLS FIRE 78813 $57.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC BIKE REGISTRATIONS FD 10 ORG 78814 $2,043.67 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO PRINCIPAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 78815 $281.75 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78816 $180.00 PROTECTION ONE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78817 $3,631.05 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78818 $2,760.30 FAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78819 $1,851.98 GRIGGS COOPER & CO WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78820 $2,144.30 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78821 $452.70 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78822 $66.15 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78823 $2,709.95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78824 $95.32 BEST BUY - MINNETONKA REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 78825 $145.40 CORNELL UNIVERSITY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL DEER CONSULTANT 78826 $10,790.00 DIVERSIFIED CONSTRUCTION DUE TO OTHER GOVNT UNITS SAC AGENCY FUND 78827 $663.00 EARTHWATER STENCILS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 78828 $1,420.00 EDEN PRAIRIE VOLUNTEER FIRE RE DUES PAYABLE FD 10 ORG 78829 $142.35 FAIRMONT CONVENTION & VISITORS CANINE SUPPLIES IN SERVICE TRAINING 78830 $262.50 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 78831 $62.90 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78832 $16.00 HARRIS FIRE PROTECTION CASH OVER/SHORT FD 10 ORG 78833 $235.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78834 $51,518.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS INSURANCE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78835 $200.00 MIAMA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 78836 $400.00 MINNESOTA GFOA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 78837 $120.00 MINNESOTA MAYORS ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 78838 $270.00 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 78839 $270.00 SCOTT, DEBORAH SCHOOLS IN SERVICE TRAINING 78840 $41.00 NORBLOM PLUMBING CO. CASH OVER/SHORT FD 10 ORG 78841 $13.37 PARAGON CABLE CABLE TV COMMUNITY SERVICES 78842 $496.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78843 $5,670.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78845 $58.08 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78846 $220.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78847 $3,259.37 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78848 $46.75 WINE COMPANY, THE BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78849 $6,624.65 CEMSTONE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 78850 $9.83 ECKERSEN, JON F. OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ART & MUSIC 78851 $246.18 ELWELL, JEFF TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 78852 $243.00 ERICKSEN ELLISON AND ASSOCIATE BUILDING FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION 78853 $378.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY CENTRAL SERVIC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 78854 $366.56 HENNEPIN COUNTY I/T DEPT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM 78855 $246.18 KLUTE, JOEL TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 78856 $29,106.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DUE TO OTHER GOVNT UNITS SAC AGENCY FUND 78857 $1,169.09 MINN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 78859 $4,311.75 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER BLDG SURCHARGES BUILDING SURCHARGE 78860 $49,440.85 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE INC BUILDING FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION 78861 $12,848.17 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78862 $3,748.00 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO DEPOSITS ESCROW 9 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78863 $62.84 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING COMMUNITY SERVICES 78864 $14.90 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CASH OVER/SHORT FD 10 ORG 78865 $5,165.97 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL 78866 $265,593.10 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPOSITS ESCROW 78867 $84.56 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78868 $682.33 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78869 $8,239.03 FART SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78870 $1,581.76 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78871 $423.26 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78872 $103.50 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78873 $216.55 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78875 $2,883.23 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78876 $447.19 WINE MERCHANTS INC WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78877 $100.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 78878 $5,477.79 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 78879 $1,504.65 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI UNION DUES WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 78880 $94,013.45 MEDICA CHOICE COBRA COSTS/REV BENEFITS 78881 $170,929.66 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME WASTE DISPOSAL SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 78882 $40.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 78883 $435.00 MN FALL MAINTENANCE EXPO CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 78884 $249.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LIFE INSURANCE W/H FD 10 ORG 78885 $12,770.04 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 78886 $4,518.72 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP LIFE EMPLOYERS SHARE BENEFITS 78887 $51,256.04 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 78888 $283.28 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 78889 $2,503.04 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY DISABILITY IN EMPLOYERS FD 10 ORG 78890 $36.19 SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 78891 $48.18 STAR TRIBUNE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 78892 $2,554.85 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78893 $542.88 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78894 $295.20 GETTMAN COMPANY MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78895 $10,224.71 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 78896 $2,947.42 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78897 $58.05 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78898 $18.54 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 1 78899 $1,708.87 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 I 1 78900 $5,273.50 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 78901 $1,570.00 EDEN PRAIRIE, CITY OF DUE TO OTHER GOVNT UNITS SAC AGENCY FUND 78902 $3,195.00 20TH CENTURY PLASTICS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL INSPECTION-ADMIN 78903 $35.20 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER RENTALS POLICE 78904 $191.70 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 78905 $319.50 ACT ELECTRONICS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 78906 $4,045.00 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 78907 $1,691.62 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 78908 $529.47 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 78909 $1,986.51 APRES EQUIPMENT RENTAL STARING LAKE CONCERT 78910 $60.00 AQUA LOGIC INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES POOL MAINTENANCE 78911 $12,800.00 ARTEKA LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL PIONEER TRAIL SANITARY SEWER 78912 $2,375.05 BATTCHER AND AERO ELECTRICAL C CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR MARKETCENTER RESERVOIR 78913 $201.90 BAUDVILLE OFFICE SUPPLIES REC SUPERVISOR 78914 $1,115.47 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78915 $1,241.79 BENIEK LAWN SERVICE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FIRE STATION #2 78916 $1,467.17 BERGIN AUTO BODY INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78917 $910.00 BETH AND MORLEY BURNETT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 78918 $6,582.42 BIFFS INC WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE /6 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78921 $285.00 BRANDT, LEE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 78922 $236.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78923 $65.85 BROADWAY AWARDS EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 78924 $377.00 BUCK, NATHAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 78925 $100.00 CARLSON, CHARLES REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 78926 $540.74 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78927 $1,841.18 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78930 $290.00 CLARKLIFT OF MINNESOTA INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78931 $438.93 CLUTCH AND U JOINT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78932 $275.00 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC SMALL TOOLS STREET MAINTENANCE 78933 $111.60 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78934 $395.85 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING TRAFFIC SIGNAL-MITCHELL RD 78935 $102.24 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 78936 $454.86 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 78937 $130.42 CROWN MARKING INC OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 78938 $1,220.81 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 1 78939 $330.98 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 78940 $85.89 CUSTOM HEADSETS INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 78941 $13,018.47 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78942 $226.96 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 78943 $2,440.61 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE 78944 $270.00 DPC INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78945 $542.16 DRISKILLS NEW MARKET OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 78947 $371.19 DYNA SYSTEMS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78948 $3,472.59 EARL F ANDERSEN INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ROUND LAKE 78949 $3,470.00 ECKLUND'S TREE RECYCLING WASTE DISPOSAL TREE REMOVAL 78950 $266.50 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N BLDG RENTAL ART & MUSIC 78951 $425.00 EDINA, CITY OF CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE 78952 $600.00 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT ELECTION 78953 $257.16 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC SMALL TOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE 78954 $2,004.00 FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 78955 $1,500.00 FAMILY HOPE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 78956 $140.40 FEDEX POSTAGE GENERAL 78957 $100.00 FLESCH, KRISTINE REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 78958 $12.50 FLEX COMPENSATION INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 78959 $96.69 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 78960 $2,437.80 FOREMOST FIRE PROMOTIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES FIRE 78961 $39.38 G & K SERVICES DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING & UNIFORMS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 78962 $228.75 GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES CONTRACTED COMM MAINT INFORMATION SYSTEM 78963 $3,504.47 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 78964 $3,022.44 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 78969 $100.00 GOEDTEL, DAVID REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 78970 $1,602.45 GOLD COUNTRY INC SIGNATURE CON CLOTHING & UNIFORMS SUMMER SAFETY CAMP 78971 $2,352.00 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND DEV RICHARD T ANDERSON CONSERV 78972 $400.00 HANSEN, TAMI REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 78973 $100.00 HANSON, CINDY REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 78974 $100.00 HARRISON, JAMES REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 78975 $94.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS RECORDING DOCUMENT FEE ENGINEERING DEPT 78976 $289.77 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S ACCO BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 78977 $262.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 78978 $262.74 HERC U LIFT EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78979 $575.00 HONKERS AWAY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ROUND LAKE 78980 $1,441.48 ICI DULUX PAINT CTRS BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78981 $769.20 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS* OFFICE EQUIP MAINT WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 78982 $332.61 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT II COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14: CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 78983 $979.75 INGRAHAM & ASSOC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RILEY LAKE PARK SHELTER (GRANT 78984 $100.00 INMAN, DAWN REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 78985 $36.42 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78986 $199.16 IOS CAPITAL RENTALS FIRE 78987 $232.99 JANEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 78988 $3.20 KINKOS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 78989 $1,417.83 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 78992 $100.00 KUBAL, HAROLD REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 78993 $104.83 LAGERQUIST CORP CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 78994 $733.50 LAMETTRYS COLLISION CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78995 $60.00 LOES OIL COMPANY WASTE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78996 $12,988.20 LOGIS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT INFORMATION SYSTEM 78997 $17.90 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78998 $437.33 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 78999 $1,429.70 MASYS CORPORATION CONTRACTED COMM MAINT INFORMATION SYSTEM 79000 $1,406.88 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTING POLICE 79001 $184.34 MCGLYNN BAKERIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POOL LESSONS 79002 $566.25 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 79003 $46.00 MEDTOX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFETY 79004 $2,625.83 MENARDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RILEY LAKE-BEACH 79008 $122.79 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 79010 $1,044.04 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* RENTALS FIRE 79011 $594.09 METROPOLITAN FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79013 $10,555.09 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 79015 $20,103.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 79016 $83.34 MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOD SERVICE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 79017 $100.00 MOELLER, SHERYL REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 79018 $101.68 MOREHOUSE, KEITH MILEAGE AND PARKING EPCC MAINTENANCE 79019 $632.42 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79020 $62.62 MUNICILITE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79021 $294.89 NEWLINE PUBLISHING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 79022 $69.00 NORSEMAN OIL COMPANY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79023 $1,516.66 NORTH COUNTRY BUSINESS PRODUCT BUILDING CC CAPITAL OUTLAY 79024 $295.31 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79025 $50.00 OBERLE, KAREN TOLLISON OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 79026 $139.71 OHLIN SALES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79027 $1,466.32 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 79028 $1,387.70 OUTT)OOR ENVIRONMENTS INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 79029 $102.18 P & H WAREHOUSE SALES INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 79030 $19.46 PAPER WAREHOUSE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 1 79031 $280.84 PARTNERS FOUR INC TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 79032 $1,116.50 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 79033 $519.25 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 79034 $1,140.63 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 79035 $1,990.90 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY NEW CAR EQUIPMENT FIRE 79036 $174.87 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79037 $505.88 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 79038 $160.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 79039 $30.70 RAINBOW FOODS - CHARGES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 79040 $594.00 RAY, LEE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 79041 $216.83 RC IDENTIFICATIONS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 79042 $342.52 RICHARDS ASPHALT COMPANY SIGNS STREET MAINTENANCE 79043 $230.00 RIDGEVIEW BUSINESS HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFETY 79044 $619.94 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79045 $630.00 RMR SERVICES INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER METER REPAIR Z COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14: CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 79046 $204.60 ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79047 $50.00 SBSI INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 79048 $190.00 SCHLUTER, TAMARA REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 79049 $300.00 SCHNEIDER, DAVE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 79050 $551.00 SCHWARTZ, DONALD OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 79051 $100.00 SCHWARTZ, LEROY REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 79052 $878.63 SHERWIN WILLIAMS OTHER EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 79053 $1,150.20 SIGN SOURCE INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE STATION #1 79054 $426.60 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 79055 $100.00 SMITH, DIANE REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 79056 $100.00 SMITH, PATRICIA REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 79057 $4,913.75 SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIONAL PLANNI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 79058 $6,250.00 SOUTHDALE YMCA YOUTH DEVELOPME PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 79059 $22.10 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ROUND LAKE 79060 $750.00 SPECTRUM LABS INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ROUND LAKE 79061 $313.93 SPORTS WORLD USA INC CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 79062 $34.50 SPS COMPANIES BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 79063 $176.12 STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO, THE CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 79064 $1,875.00 STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 79065 $1,642.55 STREICHERS CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 79066 $277.27 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 79067 $254.53 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79068 $70.26 SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79069 $930.38 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO SERVICE I TIRES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79070 $125.00 SWEDLUNDS WASTE DISPOSAL OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 79071 $79.08 THERMOGAS COMPANY MOTOR FUELS ICE ARENA 79072 $337.50 THUNDER COMMUNICATIONS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SENIOR WEB SITE 79073 $89.24 TIERNEY BROS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 79074 $799.00 TIMM, KEVIN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 79075 $4,421.92 TKDA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 79076 $363.91 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN MTKA GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FIRE STATION #3 79077 $100.00 TWAIT, KRISTIN REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 79078 $99.20 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79079 $207.68 TWIN CITY SEED CO LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL WESTGATE PARK 79080 $99.91 TWIN CITY TIRE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79081 $382.02 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING &UNIFORMS ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 79082 $550.00 UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE BENEFITS 79083 $228.34 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79084 $16.95 US CAVALRY CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 79085 $394.57 US OFFICE PRODUCTS TRAVEL WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 79086 $429.73 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL 79087 $616.63 USA BLUEBOOK REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 79088 $97.29 VAUGHN COMMUNICATIONS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUMMER SAFETY CAMP 79089 $1,010.69 VERNCO MAINTENANCE INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 79090 $475.00 VIDEOTRONIX INC PHOTO SUPPLIES POLICE 79091 $127.97 VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 79092 $1,033.26 W W GRAINGER INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 79093 $100.00 WAGNER, DIANE REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 79094 $485.62 WAHLS ENTERPRISES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 79095 $178.28 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAINE WASTE DISPOSAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 79096 $401.81 WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 79097 $1,736.71 WATSON CO INC, THE MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 79098 $165.00 WEATHER WATCH INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SNOW & ICE CONTROL 79099 $424.02 WEST WELD EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79100 $12.67 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC - PLYMOUT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 1 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-SEP-1999 (14: CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 79101 $361.01 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79102 $13,634.97 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL PARK MAINTENANCE 79104 $621.79 PROEX PHOTO SYSTEMS PHOTO SUPPLIES POLICE 79107 $305.00 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 79108 $199.26 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79109 $426.55 ZIEGLER INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $1,983,357.40* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 01-SEP-1999 (14:49) DIVISION TOTAL CUSTOMER SERVICE $8.19 HUMAN RESOURCES $3.25 COMMUNICATIONS $1.76 RISK MANAGEMENT $1.79 INSPECTIONS $62.30 FACILITIES $2.96 ASSESSING $13.11 POLICE $118.30 FIRE -$31.23 PARK MAINTENANCE $29.07 FLEET SERVICES $1,021.09 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $10.47 COMMUNITY CENTER $4,487.07 BEACHES $102.69 YOUTH RECREATION $215.42 SPECIAL EVENTS $6.84 ADULT RECREATION -$405.86 ADAPTIVE REC -$22.75 OAK POINT POOL $801.06 ARTS $9.12 PARK FACILITIES $574.33 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $828,018.83 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS $291,101.78 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $52.00 PRAIRIE VILLAGE $14,645.37 PRAIRIEVIEW $13,995.12 CUB FOODS $35,896.40 WATER DEPT $8,538.05 SEWER DEPT $2.20 $1,199,258.73* I COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER O1-SEP-1999 (14 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 263 $116,619.62 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A FEDERAL TAXES W/H FD 10 ORG 264 $64,730.07 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A FEDERAL TAXES W/H FD 10 ORG 265 $64,730.07 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A EMPLOYERS SS & MEDICARE FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG 266 $45,021.34 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAXES WITHHELD EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 267 $524.80 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE MOTOR FUELS 268 $79,614.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENU SALES TAX PAYABLE FD 10 ORG 269 $296,418.83 FIRST TRUST NATL ASSOC INTEREST B & I PAYMENTS 9.8 270 $130,680.00 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY INTEREST B & I PAYMENTS 271 $400,920.00 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. INTEREST B & I PAYMENTS $1,199,258.73* CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 09/07/99 SECTION: Ordinances and Resolutions SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development and Resolution certifying proposed 2000 Local Transit ITEM NO.: Financial Services Services tax levy and setting date(s) for Truth-in- ;" A Donald Uram Taxation hearing(s) Requested Action Move to adopt a resolution that: 1. Certifies the proposed 2000 Local Transit Services tax levy to be $2,420,528; and 2. Sets the "Truth-in-Taxation" public hearing for Monday, December 6, 1999 and, if necessary, to reconvene the public hearing on Tuesday,December 21, 1999. Background Information On June 15, 1999, the City Council declared their intent to exercise the Local Transit Services tax levy option for taxes payable in 2000. Certifying the amount to be levied is the next step in this process. In conjunction with the City, this amount must be certified to the county auditor by September 15. The final levy adoption is required by December 21. Attachments Resolution I F:\CITYWIDE\Finance\URAM\DON\CC cover sheet-Transit tax resolution.doc CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.99- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY'S PROPOSED 2000 LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICES TAX LEVY AND SETTING THE DATE(S)FOR THE"TRUTH-IN-TAXATION"HEARINGS WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie has declared their intent to exercise the local transit tax levy option for taxes payable in 2000 in the maximum amount permitted by the Local Levy Option Act. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council: 1. Establishes the following proposed taxes on real and personal property within the City of Eden Prairie for Local Transit Service in 2000: NET LEVY $2,420,528* * The NET LEVY excludes $454,788 in Homestead and Agriculture Credit Aid (HACA), and $94,706 in distribution from the Metropolitan Tax-Base Sharing Pool(Fiscal Disparities). The proposed total net levy may not be exceeded when the City Council sets the fmal tax levy for 2000. 2. Sets the following dates for the"Truth-in-Taxation"public hearings on the proposed 2000 tax levy and budget: Public Hearing: Monday,December 6, 1999 7:00 PM,Council Chambers Eden Prairie City Center 8080 Mitchell Road Reconvened Public Hearing: Tuesday,December 21, 1999 6:30 PM,Council Chambers Eden Prairie City Center 8080 Mitchell Road If the public hearing is completed and closed on December 6,the Council will consider action on the 2000 tax levy and budget at its regularly-scheduled meeting December 21, 1999. 3. Accepts the 2000 proposed net levy of$2,420,528 at this time. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 7, 1999. Jean L.Harris,Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta,City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 09/07/99 SECTION: Ordinances and Resolutions SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development and Resolution certifying proposed 2000 property tax ITEM NO.: Financial Services levy, accepting the proposed 2000 budget, and Donald Uram setting date(s) for Truth-in-Taxation hearing(s) e . Requested Action Move to adopt a resolution that: 1. Certifies the proposed 2000 net property tax levy to be$19,733,603; 2. Sets the "Truth-in-Taxation" public hearing for Monday, December 6, 1999 and, if necessary, to reconvene the public hearing on Tuesday,December 21, 1999; and 3. Accepts the proposed 2000 budget of $27,062,627 as reviewed by the Council on August 24, 1999. Background Information Minnesota Law and administration rules prescribe a detailed process for public notification and participation in setting taxes and budgets of local governments. Cities must adopt a proposed net property tax levy by September 15 and certify it to the county auditor. In 1997, the Legislature passed a levy limit law for the 1998 and 1999 budget years limited Eden Prairie's total levy (not including debt) to growth plus inflation (about 6%). Legislation was passed in 1999 that extended levy limits for the 2000 budget year. At the same time, the City Council must accept a proposed budget for the coming year. The City must also set a date for the "Truth-in-Taxation" hearing and a date to reconvene it (if necessary). These dates may not conflict with the initial hearing dates set by Hennepin County, school districts, or the metropolitan taxing districts. Because they get to set their dates before we do, there are a very limited number of dates available. The dates of December 6 and December 21 are the most workable ones for us to be within the schedule established by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. The Council must adopt the final tax levy and budget by December 21. Attachments Resolution F:\CITYWIDE\Finance\URAM\DON\CC cover sheet-tax resolution.doc CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 99- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY'S PROPOSED 2000 PROPERTY TAX LEVIES,SETTING THE DATE(S)FOR THE"TRUTH-IN-TAXATION"HEARINGS,AND ACCEPTING A PROPOSED BUDGET FOR GENERAL OPERATIONS AND TAX-SUPPORTED OBLIGATIONS FOR 2000 WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie has reviewed the City Manager's recommended 2000 budget and tax levies;and WHEREAS,the City Council has decided to accept these recommendations at this time. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council: 1. Establishes the following proposed taxes on real and personal property within the City of Eden Prairie for the 2000 budget. Net Levy on Tax Capacity(City) $19,114,603 Levy on Market Value 619,000 Total NET LEVY $19,733,603* * The NET LEVY excludes $690,126 in Homestead and Agriculture Credit Aid (HACA), and $817,871 in distribution from the Metropolitan Tax-Base Sharing Pool(Fiscal Disparities). The proposed total Net Levy may not be exceeded when the City Council sets the fmal tax levy for 2000. 2. Sets the following dates for the"Truth-in-Taxation"public hearings on the proposed 2000 tax levy and budget: Public Hearing: Monday,December 6, 1999 7:00 PM,Council Chambers Eden Prairie City Center 8080 Mitchell Road Reconvened Public Hearing: Tuesday,December 21, 1999 6:30 PM,Council Chambers Eden Prairie City Center 8080 Mitchell Road If the public hearing is completed and closed on December 6,the Council will consider action on the 2000 tax levy and budget at its regularly-scheduled meeting December 21, 1999. 3. Accepts the 2000 proposed net levy of$19,733,603 and proposed budget totaling$27,062,627 at this time. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 7, 1999. Jean L.Harris,Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta,City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 09/07/99 SECTION: Reports of Advisory Boards and Commissions SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Police Jim Clark Appeal on a condition related to BOA action on lz A. Jean Johnson Variance 99-14 Requested Action Move to: Set September 21, 1999, to hear the appeal of Matt Strodel, Matt's Auto, regarding a condition imposed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Synopsis The Board, in keeping with other actions on non-conforming use variances, conditioned the approval of the impound lot for a five year time frame unless it continues as a City related impound lot or until redevelopment of the area occurs. This condition would not affect the new building and the site's use for office/industrial purposes if it were no longer used as a City impound lot. See the attached final order for all conditions. Background Information The Board recognized the need for an impound lot to be close and accessible to residents, however, this site is small and numerous variances are being requested, including shoreland variances. The entire industrial park is in need of upgrades so to facilitate a time limit and accommodate future possible rehab, the Board did condition the variance. Attachments • August 24, 1999 letter from Matt Strodel • August 12, 1999 minutes and final order from Board of Adjustments and Appeals • 99-14 Staff Report l4aktt'3. 4uko1� 2E (viI CE, Jnc n 6 28 2 J0.ui.L'LLat c 1.)RL(TE e /En 'cai'iE, c4kJ1155346 August 24, 1999 City of Eden Prairie Board of Adjustment and Appeals 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-4485 Re: Variance Request No 99- 14 Petition of Matthew (Matt) Strodel 6282 Industrial Drive • Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dear Board Members, On August 12,1999, the Board of Adjustments and Appeals granted my variance request related to the construction of a new building on my property at 6282 Industrial Drive. The Board's Final Order includes six conditions. Condition 4 (f) states: That variance approval for the outside storage of impounded vehicles be for a 5 year period unless it continues as a City related impound lot or until redevelopment of the area occurs. Condition 4 (f) does not reflect the fact that for many years this site has been used for outside storage of vehicles and that this use has been "grandfathered" under the City's Zoning and Platting Code. My variance request did not seek any expansion in storage capacity. In my view, granting the variance should not limit the outside storage of vehicles to a 5 year period or any other time period. And, as long as I continue to use the site in the current manner, that of outside storage of vehicles, it should be granted independent of the City contract. I understand and agree that should the property be sold or redevelopment takes place, review of the variances, at that time would be appropriate. I would like Condition 4 (f) to read: That variance approval for the outside storage of vehicles continue as is until the property is sold or redevelopment of the area occurs. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Matt Strodel Matt's Auto Service, Inc. z