The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 06/01/1999EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 1999 CITY COUNCIL: CITY STAFF: OTHER: 5:00 -6:55 PM, CITY CENTER HERITAGE ROOM II Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens City Manager Chris Enger, Public Safety Services Director Jim Clark, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Engineer AI Gray, BRA Manager David Lindahl, and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen Lisa Raduenz, Consultant for 494 Corridor Coalition I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER -MAYOR JEAN HARRIS II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. PRESENTATION OF PROPOSED TRAFFIC DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) (David Lindahl and Gene Dietz) IV. COUNCIL / STAFF DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. COUNCIL FORUM -6:30 -6:55 PM VI. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 1999 CITY COUNCIL: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road Acting Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Sherry Butcher-Y ounghans, Ronald Case, and Ross Thorfinnson, Jr. City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety Director Jim Clark, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney, Roger Pauly and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS A. SWEARING IN OF NEW OFFICERS IV. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, MAY 18, 1999 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 18, 1999 V. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. EDEN ORCHARD by Orrin Thompson Homes. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers on 158.4 acres and Rezoning from Rural to Rl-9.5 on 42.08 acres, and Rezoning from Rural to Rl-13.5 on 77.07 acres, and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 39.26 acres, and Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 39.26 acres, and Adopt the Resolution for EA W Review. Location: at Pioneer Trail and Dell Road. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning and Resolution for Site Plan Review and Resolution for EA W Review) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 1, 1999 Page 2 C. CHESTNUT APARTMENTS by BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 9.16 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the RM-2.5 District on 9.16 acres and Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 9.16 acres. Location: Chestnut Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Site Plan Review) D. FARRELLILAPIC ADDITION by Mike Farrell and Tom Lapic. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 1.54 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. Location: 12563 Sunnybrook Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change) E. ADOPT RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 98-213, REGULATING FEES AND CHARGES FOR BUSINESS LICENSES, PERMITS AND MUNICIPAL SERVICES F. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIGNAL AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT MITCHELL ROAD AND ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD (I.e. 96- 5397) (Resolution) G. APPROVE RESOLUTION CALLING FORA PUBLIC HEARING JULY 20,1999, TO CONSIDER ESTABLISHING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) DISTRICT VI. PUBLIC HEARINGSIMEETINGS A. EAGLE PEAK by Luxus Corporation. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 1.92 acres, Preliminary Plat of 1.92 acres into one lot and Site Plan Review on 1.92 acres. Location: SW Comer of Plaza Drive and Valley View Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) B. OAKVIEW OFFICE by Mount Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 3.76 acres of the overall Technology Park PUD, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 3.76 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 3.76 acres, and Site Plan Review on 3.76 acres. Location: 7765 Golden Triangle Drive (Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment) e. LINCOLN P ARC by Hartford Financial Services. Request for Guide Plan Change from Regional Commercial to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.83 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.83 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres, Preliminary Plat on 4.83 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 1, 1999 Page 3 acres into 1 lot and Site Plan Review on 4.83 acres. Location: Eden Road and Singletree Lane. (Resolution for Guide Plan Change, Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VIII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IX. PETITIONS, REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS X. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION (Councilmember Nancy Tyra-Lukens) XI. APPOINTMENTS XII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. City Manaeer Performance Manaeement Proeram B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIII. OTHER BUSINESS A. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION XIV. ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS 06/01199 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Public Safety Services Swearing In of New Officers III.A. Police Lieutenant Rob Reynolds Requested Action The Police Department of the Public Safety Services Area requests that the ceremonial swearing in of Officer Christopher Gary Wood and Officer Todd Allen Groves take place prior to the Council's business meeting. Synopsis For the ceremonial swearing in of the Police Department's two newest officers, the Mayor should ask each officer to repeat the following oath: I, (full name ofo(!icer) , do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States and of the State of Minnesota, and faithfully discharge the duties of the office oj Police Officer of the City of Eden Prairie in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, to the best of my judgment and ability. So help me God. Background Information The Mayor or his/her designee has traditionally done the ceremonial swearing in of police officers at Council meetings. In the late 1980s during the City's peak development years, we stopped this practice out of respect to packed Council agendas. In October of 1998, the practice of swearing in officers at Council meetings was resumed with the swearing in of the police department's 50th officer. The addition of these two officers increases the police force to 52 sworn officers. Officer Chris Wood grew up in Hastings, Minnesota, and after earning a degree in Zoology from North Dakota State University, began working for the Department of Natural Resources where he became interested in law enforcement. Officer Wood joined the department as a Park Ranger in May 1998 and was hired as an officer in January 1999. Officer Todd Groves grew up in Eden Prairie, graduated from Eden Prairie High School, and received his criminal justice degree at Mankato State. Officer Groves served as a volunteer Reserve Officer with the police department for over three years (since September 1995) prior to being hired as an officer in January 1999. Officer Groves and his wife Rebekah currently reside in Eden Prairie. 1 UNAPPROVED MINUTES iA. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP TUESDAY, MAY 18, 1999 CITY COUNCIL: CITY STAFF: 5:00 -6:55 PM, CITY CENTER HERITAGE ROOM II Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens City Manager Chris Enger, Public Safety Services Director Jim Clark, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney Roger Pauly and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER -MAYOR JEAN HARRIS Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to approve the agenda. Mayor Harris stated Judy Smith was not able to be present for the Council Forum; however the subject of brackish water on ponds would be added to the agenda for the workshop. Motion approved 5-0. III. TOPIC: 2000-2001 BUDGET PREPARATION A. General Overview Enger said the purpose ofthe workshop is to go over the year 2000 budget objectives, to propose biannual budgeting, review the city's 1998 financial performance, point out highlights of the 1999 budget, review the budget adoption schedule and receive direction from the Council. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP MINUTES May 18, 1999 Page 2 B. Year 2000 Budeet Objectives Enger reviewed the year 2000 budget objectives. First is to begin a biannual budget cycle. Staffwould coordinate the two-year budget cycle with the Strategic Plan. The State Legislature extended 6 percent levy limits for one year, and the City's budget will comply. Enger said Staff doesn't know the long-term effects of these levy limits. To minimize tax impacts, Staffwill develop a balanced budget model. Another objective ofthe budget is to reserve surplus building permit fees as funding for future operations. The majority of the surplus has been coming from commercial and industrial construction permits. Other objectives are to fund necessary services and staffing, fund capital improvements, and reduce the rate of increase in operational expenditures. Enger explained that Staff is prioritizing the capital improvements, and is hoping to continue to increase the levels of capital improvement funds. Reducing the rate of increase in operational expenditures is a big challenge; it is still running above 6 percent. C. 2-Year Budeetine Process In the first year of the two-year process, Staff will fully develop, and the Council formally adopt, the year 2000 budget. Staff will start preliminary development of the 2001 budget, identifying specific revenues and expenditures they know of, and other general increases or decreases. During the second year, a budget for 2001 will be completed and formally adopted, and Staffwill fully develop a budget for 2002. The advantages of a biannual budget are that Strategic Planning would occur in alternate years, Staff and Council would develop a longer-term perspective, there would be improved financial planning, budget preparation becomes much simpler, and it allows time to focus on other areas. The limitations of a biannual budget are that taxes, levy limits and other legislation can impact revenues and expenditures, budget decisions could become outdated and economic conditions could change. D. 1998 Financial Performance Dram described the City's positive 1998 budget performance, with revenues of $23,569,353 and expenditures of$21,114,063, leaving a surplus of $2,455,290. The reasons for this are conservative budgeting, including 5 percent tax abatement totaling $775,000; building permit and development fee collections of $580,000; and delayed expenditures of $737,290, which were encumbered from the 1998 budget. Of this amount, $1,200,000 has been transferred to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and $518,000 is reserved in the Undesignated Funds for future operating expenses. A liquor enterprise transfer was used to reduce the Den Road store debt servIce. J- CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP MINUTES May 18, 1999 Page 3 E. 1999 Budget Highlights • Budgeted transfer of$500,000 to CIP for1999 projects • Completed preliminary CIP, which will be reviewed in October. • Centralized purchasing, including computers and software, wireless communications, and furniture F. Budget Adoption Schedule May 18 May June/Aug Aug 17 Sept 7 Sept 15 OctINov Dec Dec 21 Dec 30 Budget workshop W orkpaper distribution Preliminary budget preparation Preliminary budget workshop Certify Preliminary levy Preliminary levy certified to County Final budget preparation Truth in Taxation hearing Certify levy and adopt budget Final levy certified to County G. Council DirectionlDiscussion General discussion followed regarding levy limits and use of surplus funds. Uram pointed out that the fire station would be paid for through an annual appropriation in the general fund. A mortgage for $2.8 million will be obtained in the near future. IV. OTHER BUSINESS A. Guthrie Theater Relocation Tyra-Lukens noted that the Board of Directors of the Guthrie Theater is discussing relocating the theater, possibly to a suburban community. She said an Eden Prairie resident is on the Board of Directors. Mayor Harris offered to contact her. B. Reorganization of Boards and Commissions Tyra-Lukens inquired about progress being made by the group looking at reorganization of the City's boards and commissions. Thorfinnson responded that the group has met several times with department heads and others in the organization, and made a list of proposed changes resulting from those discussions. The next step is to take this infonnation to the chairpersons and staff liaisons of the various boards and commissions to get their feedback. The group 3 CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP MINUTES May 18, 1999 'Page 4 ' adopted a list of objectives. One was to retain as many boards as possible; no commission or board would cease to exist, but their roles will be more clearly defined. The effective date of commission appointments is October 1, and the group is expected to finish its work before then. Mayor Harris asked Enger to put this subject on the agenda for a future workshop. C. Condition of Stormwater Ponds Mayor Harris said Judy Smith, who lives on Ticonderoga Trail, called about the condition of the pond in her backyard, which has turned green from algae for the first time in the 17 years she has lived there. Harris told her the City does not treat ponds. Dietz said the City is looking at ways to reduce the services it supplies and has never treated ponds with chemicals to remove algae. Last year conditions were drier than normal, but now pond levels are up and algae grow faster. Lambert said the City has 200-400 ponds, including NURP ponds and can't afford to start treating ponds. Individuals have to get a permit from the DNR to treat a pond. A fountain in a pond helps aerate the pond and reduce algae. There was discussion about the effects of fertilizer use on ponds. Mayor Harris suggested putting a request on the City's web site and in the newsletter to refrain from using fertilizer with phosphorous. This should include information on lawn maintenance, where to get information on treating ponds, etc. Residents need to take responsibility. Dietz pointed out even if everybody stopped using phosphates on their lawns, it runs off impervious surfaces such as streets, parking lots, etc. into the ponds. This has been found to be the case on Round Lake, which is surrounded by a walking path. V. COUNCIL FORUM 6:30 -6:55 PM VI. ADJOURNMENT Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to adjourn the meeting. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m. L/ / TUESDAY, MAY 18, 1999 CITY COUNCIL: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road I:' J ,I i<. 1',/';,.)' Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher- Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety Director Jim Clark, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Planner Michael Franzen, City Attorney Roger Pauly and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Enger added three temporary liquor licenses to V.A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST. Enger also added V.J. INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL PHASE 3, CLASSROOMS, and V.K. SET JULY 6, 1999, TO REVIEW MAY 13, 1999, PERKINS VARIANCE REQUEST #99-08, to the Consent Calendar. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried 5-0. IV. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, MAY 4,1999 MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, Case seconded, to approve as published the minutes of the City Council/Staff Workshop held Tuesday, May 4, 1999. Case, Thorfinnson, Tyra-Lukens and Harris voted "aye", Butcher-Younghans abstained. Motion carried 4-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18, 1999 Page 2 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 4,1999 Case said on page 7, paragraph 3, there should be quotes around the word ''road'', and Butcher-Y ounghans said on page 13, paragraph 6, it should read "Case" rather than "Chase." MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, Tyra-Lukens seconded, to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, May 4, 1999, as published and amended. Motion carried 5-0. V. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. BEARPATH 10TH ADDITION by Bearpath Limited Partnership. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 3.3 acres and Rezoning from RM- 6.5 to Rl-13.5 on 3.3 acres. Location: BearpathTraii. (Ordinance No. 5-99- PUD-4-99 District Review and Rezoning) C. IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH by Immanuel Lutheran Church. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 6.7 acres with waivers and Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 6.7 acres and Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 6.7 acres. Location: 16515 Luther Way (Ordinance No. 6-99-PUD-5-99 District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution No. 99-64 for Site Plan Review) D. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 99-65 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BEARPATH TENTH ADDITION E. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 99-66 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SEALCOATING TO PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. (I.C. 99-5479) F. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 99-67 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BITUMINOUS OVERLAYS TO VALLEY PAVING, INC. (I.C. 99-5489) G. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 99-68 APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR TH 212 STAGE III PROJECT FROM TH 5 NEAR WALLACE ROAD TO CSAH 4 (I.C. 99-5303) H. APPROVE CONTRACT WITH STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR ICWC PROJECT I. GRANT UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS OUTLOT A, TECHNOLOGY PARK 4TH ADDITION CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18,1999 Page 3 J. INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL PHASE 3. CLASSROOMS. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Public Zoning District on 56 acres, adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 56 acres and approve the Developer's Agreement for International School of Minnesota. (Ordinance No. 7-99 for Zoning District Amendment and Resolution No. 99-75 for Site Plan Review) K. SET JULY 6. 1999. TO REVIEW MAY 13. 1999. PERKINS VARIANCE REQUEST #99-08. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Y ounghans, to approve items A-K on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. HALLETT ADDITION by Centex Homes. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 18.84 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 18.84 acres with waivers and Preliminary Plat of21.09 acres into 32 lots, 3 outlots and road right-of- way. Location: South of Pioneer Trail at Braxton Drive, north of Cedar crest Drive. (Resolution No. 99-69 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution No. 99-70 for Preliminary Plat) Enger said official notice of this Public Hearing was published on April 22, 1999, in the Eden Prairie News and sent to 92 property owners. He asked the proponent to proceed with the presentation. Dan Blake of Cent ex Homes explained the Hallett Addition has 21 acres, bounded on the north by Pioneer Trail. Riley Ridge subdivision is east of the property and to the west is the Cedar Forest development. They are proposing to plat 32 single- family lots. Sewer and water will be connected to the lots. Staffhas requested that Outlots A and B be eliminated, and that the developer sign a special assessment agreement for the future lift station. Blake asked Staff to put a time line on this agreement. Blake understands Staff will be doing a feasibility study of the system, but once the waiver is signed it becomes difficult for them to limit their exposure for an increase in the assessments. Case asked what the developer would do with the outlots if they are removed from the plan. Blake said they would be blended into the other lots. Franzen said the Planning Commission reviewed this project at its April 12 meeting and voted to recommend approval to the City Council. Lambert said the Parks and Recreation Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project. He has since had discussions among Staff and they CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18,1999 Page 4 recommend putting sidewalks in. This is consistent with what the City does in any subdivision. It will be a Council decision, however. Dietz asked Blake if the drainage and utility easement issues have been resolved in the past two weeks. Blake responded the storm sewer issue has been resolved and he believes the sanitary sewer issue will be resolved. Al Gray, City Engineer, addressed the special assessment agreement for the lift station. This developer would be able to use the same temporary lift station that will be used for the Hustad subdivision on Riley Creek Ridge, which allows them to proceed with that project. Gray assumed Centex would enter into an assessment agreement with the City to share the cost of the new lift station when it is built. A feasibility study has been authorized by the City to consider a lift station and sanitary sewer west and southwest of the airport. A draft report is expected to be ready for review with the area's property owners by mid-to late-summer, and preliminary costs should be available then. All property owners would be expected to share the costs of this lift station when it is built. Dietz said this will be taken into account, and Staff will try to come up with some firm figures for these projects to establish an upper-level cap so developers know what they are getting into. Mayor Harris asked what is the future of Outlot C. Blake responded the sewer that exists there today is not big enough to serve Outlot C, so it is being removed from the project. It was left in Rural District zoning and may be subdivided in the future. MOTION: Moved by Butcher-Younghans, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to close the Public Hearing; and adopt Resolution No. 99-69 for PUD Concept Review on 18.84 acres; and approve I st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review on 18.84 acres and Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.S on 18.84 acres with waivers; and adopt Resolution No. 99-70 for Preliminary Plat of 21.09 acres into 32 lots, I outlot and road right-of-way; and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission, Staff and Council conditions. Council conditions are to eliminate Outlots A and B, to add sidewalks, and for Staff work with Proponent on a cap for special assessments in a timely fashion. Motion carried 5-0. B. ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS by ADC Telecommunications. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 91.03 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 91.03 acres, Rezoning from Rural to 1-5 Industrial on 91.03 acres, Preliminary Plat on 91.03 acres and Site Plan Review on 91.03 acres and AUAR Review on 91.03 acres. Location: South of Technology Drive and east of Mitchell Road (Resolution No. 99-71 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning, Resolution No. 99-72 for Preliminary Plat, and Resolution No. 99-76 for AUAR Review) I c: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18, 1999 Page 5 Enger said official notice ofthe Public Hearing was published on May 6, 1999, in the Eden Prairie News and sent to 145 property owners. Wayne Stewart, Corporate Vice President of Operations for ADC Communications, explained the reason for the company's proposal to develop a world corporate headquarters and technology campus in Eden Prairie. It is a Minnesota-based company currently using a number of locations in Minnetonka. The company has been growing at the rate of over 20 percent a year, with $1.7 billion in sales worldwide. They operate in 17 different countries and also in major sites across the United States. The plan has three phases. Phase one is 430,000 square feet in three buildings and a parking garage. Phase two is 150,000 square feet. Phase three is 600,000 square feet. The company has been working with City Staff and residents of the community and incorporating their concerns, such as screening from neighbors. The TDM plan has not been finalized. Bob Riesselman, ADC Project Manager, said the company started design planning ofthis project in 1988. Phase one will accommodate about 1200 employees. Phase two will be completed in two or three years and will accommodate about 400 employees. Phase three is not completely defined. The company would like to begin construction on phase one as soon as possible. Monos Ginis, the Architect for the project, said the design is very unique and maintains the present environment as much as possible. The design for phase one is basically glass, brick, steel and aluminum. All buildings in the complex will be interconnected with skyways. Franzen said this project was reviewed by the Planning Commission in January. At that meeting a concept plan was presented and issues regarding land use, waivers, traffic, wetlands, buffers, and environmental review were discussed. The Commission directed Staff and the developer to proceed with the development and review of detailed plans and to work with interested residents about the project. ADC held neighborhood meetings before returning to the Planning Commission on April 26. The Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council approve the plans with waivers for building setback to Technology Drive, increase in allowable office use, building height, and parking space dimensions in the parking deck. Lambert said the Parks and Recreation Committee reviewed the project at its May 3 meeting and recommended approval on a 6-0 vote. The Commission had no problem with the 6-foot trails, but on the south side along Technology Drive there should be 8-foot trails, which will be maintained by the City. Butcher-Younghans said she did not see a response letter to MnlDOT's concerns about underestimation of trips generated and overestimation of TDM strategies. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18,1999 Page 6 Franzen responded by saying the City hired a consultant to prepare the alternative urban area review and hired BRW to analyze the traffic impacts and tell Staffifthe information it had from ADC was accurate. Staff communicated this information back to MnlDOT, and BRW prepared the response on traffic numbers and responded to MnlDOT directly so they would be confident the numbers were accurate. Thorfinnson said the 1-494 Corridor Commission consultant has had an opportunity to review the TDM plan. There'are some details lacking and he would like ADC to accomplish that before the second reading. The Commission is leaning more toward a Traffic Management Association (TMA) of businesses. Thorfinnson would like to see ADC commit to becoming a charter member ofthe TMA that would eventually be established as a private association of businesses working together. Tyra-Lukens referenced the widening of Technology Drive. The Staff report says there is no need to widen it for phase one, but subsequently may need to widen it. She inquired if it might be necessary to widen it prior to moving into phases two and three, Enger stated the City is now expecting that expansion of Technology Drive will occur at the same time as the construction of phase one. ADC is working with staff to accomplish this. MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the Public Hearing; and adopt Resolution No. 99-71 for PUD Concept Review on 91.03 acres; and approve 18t Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers and Rezoning from Rural to 1-5 Industrial on 91.03 acres; and adopt Resolution No. 99-72 for Preliminary Plat on 91.03 acres into one lot; and adopt Resolution No. 99-76 for Alternative Urban Area-wide Review on 91.03 acres; and direct Staffto prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations, reference letter to ADC dated May 11, 1999; and the Council conditions relating to a TDM Plan and the TMA before the 2nd Reading. Tyra-Lukens inquired if the issue of Cash Park Fees had been resolved. Enger replied it has, and there will not be park fees on this project. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Harris pointed out that ADC has requested permission to receive an early grading permit. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to grant an early grading permit to ADC Telecommunications to proceed with construction at their own risk, subject to receipt of an Indirect Source Permit. Motion carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18,1999 Page 7 C. PILLSBURY ADDITION by Pillsbury. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 8.25 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 8.25 acres with waivers, Zoning District Amendment in the 1-2 Zoning District on 8.25 acres, Preliminary Plat of 8.25 acres into 1 lot and road right-of-way and Site Plan Review on 8.25 acres. Location: Northwest comer of Highway 5 and Mitchell Road. (Resolution No. 99-73 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution No. 99-74 for Preliminary Plat) Enger said official notice of this Public Hearing was published on May 6, 1999, in the Eden Prairie News and sent to 22 property owners. He asked the proponent to present the proposal. Gary Gandrud, Faegre & Benson, 90 South 7th Street, Minneapolis, spoke on behalf of the Pillsbury Company. He said this project is to relocate parking affected by the construction of T.H. 212 and for a 23,000-square-foot expansion to the existing building. The construction of T.H. 212 caused the loss of 68 parking stalls. Construction of temporary off-site parking and truck staging area is currently taking place. Wayne Jeske reported that the project would be done in two phases. The first phase will be construction of a temporary parking lot on the west side of the building and a truck staging area on the northwest side of the building, to get semi-trailers off Martin Drive. There will also be major landscaping, using trees to screen the loading dock and parking lot. Phase two will involve redoing the parking lot and creating new parking areas, as well as additional landscaping to screen parking from T.H. 5. The company is asking Council for conceptual approval of the site plan at this time. Franzen said the Planning Commission recommended approval of the project by a vote of 6-0 at their April 26 meeting. Mayor Harris asked if anyone in the audience wished to address the CounciL Richard Kresch, owner of property with a health care facility on Martin Drive, expressed concern that there would be an increase in noise levels or disruptions for the health care facility. Mike Nordstrom, Vice President of Operations for the Pillsbury Company, responded that all the changes taking place started about two years ago. The use ofthe property will not change. With the new staging area, semis that arrive prior to their appointed time can move off Martin Drive and onto the property. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to close the Public Hearing; and adopt Resolution No. 99-73 for PUD Concept Review on 8.25 acres; and approve 1 st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers on 8.25 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the 1-2 Zoning District on 8.25 acres; and adopt CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18,1999 Page 8 Resolution No. 99-74 for Preliminary Plat of 8.25 acres into one lot and road right- of-way; and direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried 5-0. VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Butcher- Younghans, Case, Thorfinnson, Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting "aye." VIII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IX. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS X. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION XI. APPOINTMENTS XII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Y2K Report Uram gave the background of the Y2K problem and how it relates to Eden Prairie in provision of essential and other City services, public education, and Y2K preparedness. 1. Essential and other City Services. The City has direct control over public safety, utilities, transportation systems, and external vendors and suppliers to the City. (A) Public Safety • 911 switch and dispatch radio consoles are compliant. • Hand-held and portable radios are compliant. • Emergency response vehicles are compliant. • Ongoing testing with HCMC is taking place. (\ CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18,1999 Page 9 (B) Utilities • Honeywell audit of Water Treatment Plant is completed. • Nearly all date-sensitive equipment is compliant. • Staff is prepared to operate water system manually. (C) Transportation Systems • Traffic signals operate on 100-year clock. Worst-case scenario: lights would go into "conflict mode" and flash red- red or red-yellow. • Advanced Traffic Management is currently being tested for compliance (ramp meters and cameras). • Vehicles area compliant -snowplowing and street maintenance vehicles. (D) External Vendors and Suppliers • AT&T -systems testing completed • U. S . West is still testing • Minnegasco -systems testing completed • NSP will be 100% completed by 6/30/99 due to Nuclear Regulatory Commission guidelines 2. Non-Critical Systems (A) PCs and software are compliant. (B) LOGIS business applications are compliant. (C) City Center systems are compliant. • elevator compliance needs to be confirmed. (D) Most Community Center systems are compliant. • swimming pool chemical controller needs new chip (scheduled) • pool air-handling unit (new unit -need confirmation) (E) Liquor Enterprise systems are compliant. 3. Next Steps (A) Y2K Managers meeting (B) "Year 2000 Preparedness" Plan • Communication -Web Site updates -Community News -work with local media -Y2K information presence at all community events -neighborhood watch groups will hand out flyers -employee communication CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18, 1999 Page 10 (C) Implementation • Internal assessment • External assessment • Contingency planning Clark explained the Incident Management System under the following headings. 4. Incident Management System (A) Utilize Public Safety Incident Command System (B) Emergency Operations Plan (C) Identify command structure, areas of responsibility and accountability Clark said the problems the City will address are most likely problems outside of the control of the City, as Staff is quite confident the City's systems will work. The City will also have plans in place to deal with the problems of fear and perceptions. Essential staff will be working on site December 31 to deal with any problems. After letting the community know the City has checked all its systems and upgraded as needed, the next step is to ask the community to be prepared, to check their burglar alarms, fire alarms, etc. In addition, business will have to be sure their heating systems are going to work accurately, etc. They need to find out from the vendors of those systems if they are Y2K compliant. Case attended a conference on Y2K when the issue of computers having been set to run a test on 9/9/99 was discussed. He inquired ifthe City expects any problems on September 9, 1999. Uram replied he understands this is a situation programmed into the software and may cause something else within the system to delete records or some other function. Staff has talked about how to address the issue if anything comes up, although no problems are expected. Enger said the League of Minnesota Cities' Web site is under the "Minnesota Y2K" site, and has good information on all the dates that may cause problems. E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIII. OTHER BUSINESS I,n , /,' CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18,1999 Page 11 A. VACATION TIME AND WORKSHOP SCHEDULE Enger asked Councilmembers to send him a memo indicating vacations they have planned this summer. Workshop Schedule: July 6 -Flying Cloud Noise Mitigation Report -RileylPurgatory Creek Watershed District Report July 20-Update on Board and Commission Restructure B. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION Mayor Harris said the Council Forum will be held the fIrst and third Tuesdays of the month from 6:30-6:55 p.m. in Heritage Room II. This will be scheduled time following City Council Workshops and immediately preceding regular City Council meetings. It is important if you wish to visit with the City Council and Service Area Directors at this time that you notify the City Manager's offIce by noon of the meeting date with your request. XIV. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Case moved, ThorfInnson seconded, adjournment of the meeting. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. I " ,I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 1, 1999 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREAlDIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Clerk's License Application List V.A. & Financial Services/ Gretchen Laven These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. NEW LIQUOR LICENSE ON-SALE LIQUOR & SUNDAY LIQUOR Outback/Midwest -II, Limited Partnership Dba: Outback Steakhouse See attached memo NEW LIQUOR LICENSES DUE TO CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP ON-SALE LIQUOR & SUNDAY LIQUOR Chevy's Cuatro, LLC (Formerly Innovative Restaurant Concepts Inc) Dba: Rio Bravo Cantina See attached memo Don Pablo's Operating Corporation - (Formerly DF & R Operating Co, Inc.) Dba: Don Pablo's See attached memo AMENDMENT TO LIQUOR LICENSE Gemelli, LLC, dba: Woody's Shady Oak Grille, to serve liquor on existing patio June 1, 1999 - 1 - CONTRACTOR Aust Construction Inc Carlson-Lavine Inc Controlled Air Donahue Mechanical Inc General Plumbing & Heating Inc H & H Plumbing Leonard Nagengast Minnesota Roofing & Remodeling Northco Corporation Peak Mechanical Inc Shelley-Daniel Co Superior Roofing Construction Inc Symington Plumbing GAMBLING Eden Prairie Lions Club, Inc. -Bingo (Schooner Days -June 4, 5, & 6, 1999) LAWN FERTILIZER APPLICATOR Fertilawn Inc. MEMORANDUM TO: Chief Clark THROUGH: Sgt. Paulson FROM: Cpl. Conley DATE: May 24, 1999 SUBJECT: Liquor License Investigation/Outback Steakhouse #99002466 The owners of Outback Steakhouse are opening a restaurant at 12910 Plaza Drive, and have applied for an on-sale liquor license. Construction has started and tentative plans for completion is the end of August. Outback Steakhouse of Florida Inc. own 81 % of the business and the remaining shares are owned by Gary Norman Chanen and Geoffrey Stuart Alston. I have completed a background investigation on both Chanen and Alston. All the federal, state and local checks were made and came back clear. • Chanen lives in New Hope and will be the manager. • Alston lives in Eden Prairie and is part owner. I did criminal histories on the five partners in Florida and sent their fingerprint cards to the BCA. I have not received the fingerprint cards back, but their criminal history came back clear with no record. Based on the results of this investigation, and pending the results of BCA, there appears to be no reason to recommend denial of this liquor application. MEMORANDUM TO: Chief Clark THROUGH: Sgt. Paulson FROM: Cpl. Conley DATE: May 24,1999 SUBJECT: Liquor License Investigation/Rio Bravo Cantina #99008657 Innovative Restaurant Concepts, Inc. has undergone a change of ownership. They now are Chevy's Cuatro LLC, dba: Rio Bravo Cantina. The manager for Rio Bravo is still Bruce Goode. Two new officers were added, Greg Ben Komen and Joseph Albert Schmidt. Checks were done on the both Komen and Schmidt. • Federal, state and local checks were made. All checks came back clear. • Komen is the president and resides in Bellevue, Washington. • Schmidt is the new secretary and resides in Mpls, Minnesota. The background on both Komen and Schmidt are completed and I see no reason to deny their applications. MEMORANDUM TO: Chief Clark THROUGH: Sgt. Paulson FROM: Cpl. Conley DATE: May 25, 1999 SUBJECT: Liquor License Investigation/Don Pablo's Operating Corporation dba: Don Pablo's Don Pablo's had a corporate reorganization and changed their corporate name. In December of 1998, I completed backgrounds on the following individuals from Don Pablo's and they were not re-done. • General manager, Aaron Suntken • CEO, Robert Andreottola • CFO, Richard Andrew Two new officers to the company are: • President-Prentiss Jay Hall • Sr.VP-Louis James Profumo I completed a background investigation on the new officers for Don Pablo's. Federal, state and local checks were conducted and both individuals came back clear. A fingerprint card was sent to the BCA for Prentiss Hall and I have not received the information back from BCA. Louis Profumo' s fingerprint card was sent back to him for a signature, and I am awaiting to receive it so it can be sent to BCA. Pending the results from BCA, there doesn't appear to be any reason to deny their liquor license. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 1, 1999 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. V.B. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Donald R. Uram Eden Orchard Michael D. Franzen Requested Action: Move to: • Approve 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 158.4 acres and Rezoning from Rural to RI-9.5 on 42.08 acres, and Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 on 77.07 acres and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 39.26 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 39.26 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for EA W Review; and • Approve the Developer's Agreement for Orrin Thompson Homes. Synopsis: This is a 433 unit project with 259 single family homes, 116 townhomes, and 58 twinhomes. Background: The developer has incorporated all of the following items required by the City Council (February 16, 1999) in to revised plans. 1. Dedicate a 40-foot wide outlot to accommodate the City trail and utilities connection to Crestwood Drive. 2. Construct an eight foot wide asphalt trail within that 40 foot wide outlot prior to the construction of any homes on either side of the outlot. 3. Replat a conservation easement line along the back of the twin homes surrounding a 3.5 acre conservation area. 4. Straighten the rear lot lines on the back of the single-family homes adjacent to Riley Creek. 5. Place a 20-foot wide conservation easement on the back of the seven eastern most lots 1 along the northern boundary of the Riley Creek Woods Conservation Area. 6. Construct a four-foot high, black vinyl clad chain link fence along the northern boundary of the Riley Creek Wood Conservation Area from the parking lot easterly to the cul-de-sac in the southeast corner of the development. The fence will be located on City property and will be maintained by the City. 7. Relocate the sidewalks to the north or east side of all streets with the exception of Street K and Street E where the sidewalks will be on the west side of the street. 8. The sidewalk on Street M will be on the east side of Street M, then the south side as that street loops around to the west with a sidewalk connection to the park on the west side of the parking lot. 9. To improve the visual relationship to Pioneer Trail and adjoining land uses the staff recommends additional trees according to the attachment. The official comment period For the EAW began on November 16, 1998 and ended on December 16, 1998. Notice of the availability of the EAW was published in the Eden Prairie News on November 12, 1999. Written comments on the EA W received during the comment period are attached. The [mdings of facts are attached, representing City responses to written comments received. Public hearings were also held at the Planning Commission on December 14, 1998, and January 11, 1999. The City Council held a public hearing on February 2, 1999. Both the Planning Commission and City Council received copies of the Eaw. The final Eaw is attached. Supporting Reports: 1. Letter from Roger A. Pauly of Lang, Pauly,Gregerson & Rosow, Ltd. dated May 28, 1999 2. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning 3. Resolution for Site Plan Review 4. Resolution for EA W 5. Developer's Agreement 2 6128290713 LAt--lG PAUL'r' GREGERSOt--l F-444 T-060 P-002 LANG, P.t\.ULY, GREGERSON & ROSOW, LTD. IIDBfiU 1.l.AMC) .oaDJ..JWJLT DAw:lJl.~ ~F.~ ~ .. ~ lOS1!PIllo..lGLAJf'" lODOA.&II:MUIL lDMl'IlK._ ~w. (IIll..AIIl.AN .~~"'~ -tOodId ....... 1OMIIIIIr ." ............... /IIr"....... Mr. Chris Enger CityMaDager City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie~ MN 55344 ATTORNEYS AT LAW U.s. BANKPLACE 1600 l"AllJ( 'BTJJLDING 650 1HlRD AVENUE SOOTH MINNBAPOUS. MINNESOTA55402-4337 ~(61l)3l~~S FAX: (612) 349.6718 May 28. 1999 • Re: Edeo Orchard EAW Dear Mr . .Enger: t1AY 28 '99 1l- mPI~Of;ACJ. IUI11Il"II PI~~DII.IYt I!DBH ftAJRlE.MK 55IoM ~cmJ~ FI\X;(II~II2S.I1IJ Ul'\..T1O ~ CIIIIfaI It has come to my attention the Council may be requested to open the EA W process with regard to the Eden Orchard dcvdopmcnt to receive fUtthet public comment, perhaps including an additional public meeting. Minnescn. Rules part 441 0.1600 provides that O11ft or more publicmeetings may be held to gather comments QI1 an EAW if the ROO ("Responsible Govcmmemal Unit~") detami.oes that a meeting is necessuy or usefUl. That Rule further provides that the review and comm= period on an EA W u limited to 30 days. The Rules CQJ:1t.ain DO authority to extend that time period. It is my understanding the comment period on the Eden Orchard EAWbegan November 16~ 1998, and ended Dcc;cmbcr 16, 1998. The RAW Wft$ also available for consideration and comment at the Council meeting held on February 2. 1999, during which the proposed POO, tezoning and platting were beard. nu" the 'time for public comment is well past the 30 day period. Notwithstmdin& it i5 my ~ from discussions with Staff~ no public eomment on the adequacy oftbe EAW has been received by Staffafterthe eud of the comment period-nowmore than four mgnth5 past. Furthermore; all of the comments received concerning tbtI EAW are addressed in the proposed record and findings. 6128290713 CbrisEnger May 28, 1999 Page 2 LAt--lG PAULY GREGERSOt--l F-444 T-060 P-003 t'1AY 28 '99 11 Separate and apart from the Rules .-elating to the EAW conuncut period, Minnesota Rules pan 4410.1100 relating to the decision on the need for an EIS provides in pan that iftha RGU determines that information 1lCCeS5aIY to a reasoned decision about the potential for or significance of a possible environmental impact is lacking b1.1t oould be reasonably obtained, the ROO may postpone the dccisintl 011 the need for an BIS for not more than 30 days in order to obtain the lacking iDfbnnation. The II.IIlC Rule provides, however, that the deci,ion on the need for an BlS is to be made between three and 30 days after the close of the EAW revieW period. The time limits relating to the comment period and subsequent action on the need for an BIS are imposed to prevent undue de1aya in the process to the detriment of the Project Proposer. Because the Rule requirel prompt action on an EIS (within three to ]0 days after the end of tbeBA W comment period). the generous opportuDity already afforded to the public to comment. and the lack, as of this writing, of comments received after the end of the EA W comment Period. I believe it would be inappropriate to postpono the decision on the need for an EIS. Very truly yours, __ y, G.R.EGER.SON &. ROSOW, LID. RAP/Jd CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2-99-PUD-2-99 EDEN ORCHARD AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE WNING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereo£ Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural Zoning District and be place in the Planned Unit Development RI-13.5, RI-9.5 and RM-6.5 Zoning Districts 2-99-PUD-2-99 (hereinafter "PUD-2-99-Rl-13.5, Rl-9.5 and RM-6.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of June 1, 1999, entered into between Orrin Thompson Homes and the City of Eden Prairie, (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions ofPUD-2-99-RI-13.5, Rl-9.5 and RM-6.5, and are hereby made a part hereo£ Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-2-99-RI-13.5, RI-9.5 and RM-6.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan ofthe City. B. PUD-2-99-Rl-13.5, Rl-9.5 and RM-6.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-2-99-Rl-13.5, Rl-9.5 and RM-6.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-2-99-Rl-13.5, Rl-9.5 and RM-6.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-2-99-Rl-13.5, RI-9.5 and RM-6.5 and the legal descriptions ofland in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. and publication. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of February, 1999, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 1st day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on ____________ _ EXHlBIT A Planned Unit Development Legal Description for Eden Orchard All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, the Northwest Quarter of Section 29 and the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, all in Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Ivfinnesota described as follows: Beginning at the southwest comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 33 minutes 52 seconds West, along the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 112.24 feet; thence North 89 degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 503.55 feet; thence South 70 degrees 34 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of264.30 feet; thence South 51 degrees 33 minutes 04 seconds East, a distance of 403 .14 feet; thence South 21 degrees 43 minutes 17 seconds East, a distance of 118.44 feet; thence South 13 degrees 10 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 115.61 feet; thence South 10 degrees 52 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 116.69 feet; thence South 26 degrees 48 minutes 43 seconds West, a distance of 132.55 feet; thence South 18 degrees 25 minutes 14 seconds East, a distance of25.33 feet; thenc~ NorJl 71 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of232.53 feet; thence easterly, a distance of76.58 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a central angle of 25 degrees 04 minutes 27 seconds and a radius of 175.00 feet; thence continuing easterly, a distance of 167.16 feet, along a reverse curve, concave to the north, having a central angle of 06 degrees 29 minutes 36 seconds and a radius of 1475.00 feet; thence South 89 degre-cs 50 minutes 23 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 114.48 feet; thenc~ South. 00 degrees 09 minutes 37 seconds West, a distance of229.67 feet; thence southwesterly, a distance of697.35 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle of 88 degrees 47 minutes 20 seconds and a radius of 450.00 feet; thence South 88 degrees 56 minutes 57 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 742.80 feet; thence southwesterly, a distance of 3 90.81 feet, along a tangential curve, cQncave to the southeast, having a central angle of 49 degrees 45 minutes 35 seconds and a radius of 450.00 feet; thence North 50 degrees 48 minutes 37 seconds West, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 46. 72 feet; thence northwesterly, a distance of 164.10 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 50 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds and a radius of 186.76 feet; thence North 00 degrees 27 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 1315.55 feet, to the point of beginning. Total area = 42.0757 acres EXHIBIT A Planned Unit Development Legal Description for Eden Orchard All that part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29 and the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, all in Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying westerly of the centedine of Riley Creek and southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest comer of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 27 minutes 57 seconds East, along the west line of said East Half, a distance of 1315.55 feet, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southeasterly, a distance of 164.10 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 50 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds and a radius of 186:75 feet; thence South 50 degrees 48 minutes 37 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 46.72 feet; thence northeasterly, a distance of390.81 feet, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the southeast, having a central angle of 49 degrees 45 minutes 35 seconds, a radius of 450.00 feet and a chord be:mng of North 64 degrees 04 iTIinutes 10 seconds E::.st; :hence North 88 degrees 56 minutes 57 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of742.80 feet; thence northeasterly, a distance of 287.85 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle of36 degrees 39 minutes 01 seconds and a radius of 450.00 feet; thence South 37 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds East, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 56.48 feet; thence southeasterly, a distance of 54.98 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 51 degrees 44 minutes 40 seconds and a radius of60.87 feet; thence South 89 degrees 26 minutes 44 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 234.81 feet; thence southeasterly, a distance of 384.35 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a central. angle of82 degrees 10 minutes 15 seconds and a radius of268.00 feet; thence southerly, a distance of 327.70 feet, along a compound curve, concave to the west, having a central angle of 09 degrees 16 minutes 41 seconds and a radius of2023.67 feet; thence North 89 degrees 50 minutes 24 seconds East, not ·tangent to said curve, a distance of 199.02 feet; thence North 00 degrees 33 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 1.94 feet; thence easterly, a distance of207.55 feet, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the north, having a central angle of 04 degrees 24 minutes 40 seconds, a radius of2695.96 feet and a chord bearing of North 89 degrees 41 minutes 28 seconds East; thence northeasterly, a distance of238.13 feet, along a compound curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle of70 degrees 03 minutes 17 seconds and a radius of 194.76 feet; thence North 17 degrees 25 minutes 51 seconds East, a distance of 84.37 feet; thence northeasterly, a distance of254.82 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast, having a central angle of 19 degrees 35 minutes 56 seconds and a radius of744.95 feet; thence North 37 degrees 01 minutes 47 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 194.47 feet; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 09 seconds East, a distance of 500 feet and there terminating. Total area = 77.0681 acres / EXHIBIT A Planned Unit Development Legal Description for Eden Orchard All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, the Southwest Quarter of Section 20, the Northwest Quarter of Section 29 and the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, all in Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, .Minnesota descnoed as follows: . Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 33 minutes 52 seconds West, along the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 112.24 feet, to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 503.55 feet; thence South 70 degrees 34 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 264.30 feet; thence South 51 degrees 33 minutes 04 seconds East, a distance of 403 .14 feet; thence South 21 degrees 43 minutes 17 seconds East, a distance of 118.44 feet; thence South 13 degrees 10 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 115.61 feet; thence South 10 degrees 52 rcinutes S6 seconds \Vest, a dist;mce of 116.'59 feet; thence South 26 degrees 48 minutes 43 seconds West, a distance of 132.55 feet; thence South 18 degrees 25 minutes 14 seconds East, a distance of25.33 feet; thence North 71 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of232.53 feet; thence easterly, a distance of 76.58 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a central angle of25 degrees 04 minutes 27 seconds and a radius of 175.00 feet; thence continuing easterly, a distance of 167.16 feet, along a reverse curve, concave to the north, having a central angle of 06 degrees 29 minutes 36 seconds and a radius of 1475.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 50 minutes 23 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 114.48 feet; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes'37 seconds West, a distance of229.67 feet; thence southwesterly, a distance of 409.50 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle of 52 degrees 08 minutes 19 seconds and a radius of 450.00 feet; thence South 37 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds East, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 56.48 feet; thence southeasterly, a distance of 54.98' feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a central angle of 51 degrees 44 minutes 40 seconds and a radius of 60.87 feet; thence South 89 degrees 26 minutes 44 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of234.81 feet; thence southeasterly, a distance of384.35 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a central angle of82 degrees 10 minutes 15 seconds and a radius of268.00 feet; thence southerly, a distance of 327.70 feet, along a compound curve, concave to the west, having a central angle of 09 degrees 16 minutes 41 seconds and a radius of2023.67 feet; thence North 89 degrees 50 miputes 24 seconds East, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 199.02 feet; thence North 00 degrees 33 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 1.94 feet; thence easterly, a distance of207.55 feet, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the north, having a central angle of 04 degrees 24 minutes 40 seconds, a radius of2695.96 feet and a chord bearing of North 89 degrees 41 minutes 28 seconds East; thence northeasterly, a distance of238.13 feet, along a compound curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle of 70 degrees 03 minutes 17 seconds and a radius of 194.76 feet; thence North 17 degrees 25 minutes 51 seconds East, a distance of 84.37 feet; thence northeasterly, a distance of254.82 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast, having a central angle of 19 degrees 35 minutes 56 seconds and a radius of744.95 feet; thence North 37 degrees 01 minutes 47 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 194.47 feet; thence , , EXHIBIT A Planned Unit Development Legal Description for Eden Orchard South 89 degrees 54 minutes 09 seconds West, a distance of 998.60 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of290.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 09 seconds East, a distance of752.ob feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 09 seconds West, a distance of350.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 431.29 feet; thence South 89 degrees 15 minutes 00 se~onds West, a distance of 576.17 feet; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 506.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of378.01 feet; thence North 00 degrees 04 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of710.01 feet; thence southwesterly, a distance of26.69 feet, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle of 00 degrees 38 minutes 38 seconds, a radius of2374.32 feet and a chord bearing of South 55 degrees 35 minutes 39 seconds West; thence South 00 degrees 04 minutes 45 seconds West, not tangent to said curve, a distance of354.18 feet; thence South 89 degrees 13 minutes 58 seconds West, a distance of325.04 feet; thence North 00 degrees 04 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 174.00 feet; thence south'?lesterly, a distance of 3 82.41 feet, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle of 09 degrees 13 minutes 34 seconds, a radius of2374.82 feet and a chord bearing of South 69 degrees 33 minutes 39 seconds West; thence South 74 degrees 10 minutes 26 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 552.48 feet; thence southwesterly, a distance of 115.96 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle of 03 degrees 52 minutes 39 seconds and a radius of 1713.52 feet; thence South 00 degrees 33 minutes 52 seconds East, a distance of 104.29 feet, to the point of beginning. Total area = 39.2673 acres EDEN ORCHARD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2-99-PUD-2-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOT~, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE WNING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Pioneer Trail and Dell Road from Rural to RI-13.5, Rl-9.5 and RM-6.5 on acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: ATTEST: /s/ Kathleen A. Porta City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. /s/ Jean L. Harris Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __________ __ (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL EDEN ORCHARD BY ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES WHEREAS, Orrin Thompson Homes has applied for Site Plan approval of Eden Orchard on 158.4 acres for construction of a 433 unit residential subdivision with 259 single family homes, 56 twinhomes and 118 town homes; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at .its January 11, 1999, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its February 16, 1999, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Orrin Thompson Homes for the construction of a 433 unit residential subdivision with 259 single family homes, 56 twinhomes and 118 town homes, based on plans dated January 29, 1999, between Orrin Thompson Homes, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on June 1, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. EDEN ORCHARD A RESOLUTION FINDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR EDEN ORCHARD, A PRIVATE ACTION, DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie did hold a hearing on February 16, 1999, to consider Orrin Thompson Homes proposal of Eden Orchard; and WHEREAS, said development is located on 158.4 acres ofland located at Pioneer Trail and Dell: and, WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on the Eden Orchard, and did recommend approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet finding the project of no significant impact; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie reviewed the Record of Decision for the Eden Orchard on February 16, 1999; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for the Eden Orchard proposal, because the project is not a major action, does not have significant environmental effects, and is not of more than local significance. ADOPTED by the City Council ofthe City of Eden Prairie thislst day of June, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk EDEN ORCHARD HOUSING EAW CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FINDINGS REGARDING THE RULES OF THE MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Orrin Thompson Homes is proposing the development of 158 acres for a mixed use residential development containing 259 single family homes, 116 townhomes, and 58 twin homes located south of County Road One and east of Dell Road. 2. REASON FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to Minnesota Rule 4410.4300. Subpart 19. D. And Environmental Assessment Worksheet is mandatory for this project. The rule designates the City is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for preparation and review of the environmental document. 3. ENVIRONMENT AL REVIEW PROCESS The EAW was prepared and sent to the EQB on November 4, 1998 and a public notice appeared in the EQB Monitor on November 16, 1998. Copies ofthe EAW were mailed to all of the agencies and organizations on the EQB Distribution List. The EA W was a available for public review at the Eden Prairie City Hall. The thirty day comment period ended on December 16, 1998. The rezoning public hearings published in the official newspaper and mailed to residents indicated that the EA W would be reviewed at the Planning Commission of December 14, 1998 and the City Council on February 2, 1999. 4. COMMENTS ON THE EA W During the public comment period, letters of comment were received from the following agencies. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Metropolitan Council 1 \ /1/ The comment letters are attached. Following is a summary ofthe comments received and responses to the comments. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Comment The City should examine ways to improve the Dell Road and HWY 212 intersection. The City should review the State Aid designation in this area. Response As part of the feasibility study for Dell road, the intersection at 212 will be examined for potential improvements. The City will review the State Aid designation in this area as part ofthis study. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment What will happen to the two existing residences-fannsteads in the area? Response The City will require by a Developer Agreement that the existing homes be demolished, wells will be capped, and septic tanks and drain fields be abandoned in accordance with state law. Plumbing Plan Review Response This is a City requirement. Water Service Lines Response This is a-City requirement. Sewer main stubs Response NI A. All wells will be capped and abandoned. Inventory of existing sewage disposal systems. Response This will be required before it is abandoned. Field well inventory. 2 Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Comment Response This will be required before it is capped and abandoned. Construction near a well. Response NI A. The wells will be abandoned. Stonnwater Conduits Response This is a City requirement. Well setbacks from sewers. Response NI A. The drain fields will be abandoned. Petroleum Pipeline Easement Response NI A. The wells will be abandoned. All homes served with municipal water. Well inventory for new pipeline alignment. Response This will be required of the developer. Asbestos Response This will be required of the developer. Comment Lead Response This will be required of the developer. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Comment The EA W does not recognize the locally significant nature and value of the forest. Response The City recognized the significance of the forest several years ago by identifying the area as one of top three sites that should be preserved as part of a citywide natural resource study. As a result, the site was purchased with money from a bond referendum. 3 f< .:./ Comment Comment As part of the public hearing process the plan was changed in as a recognition of the resource by removing 20 units from the project, removing 3 lots next to the forest, eliminating a cuI de sac in the woodland area, increasing the rear yard depths adjacent to the forest, requiring a fence and conservation easement adjacent to the forest, dedication of 10 acres of woodland, a 3.5 acre conservation easement in the twin home area, a forest edge planting plan on pen lots next to the forest, and tree replacement. The EA W does not recognize how the project avoids impacting the forest. Response As part of the public hearing process the plan was changed in as a recognition of the resource by removing 20 units from the project, removing 3 lots next to the forest, eliminating a cuI de sac in the woodland area, increasing the rear yard depths adjacent to the forest, requiring a fence and conservation easement adjacent to the forest, dedication of 10 acres of woodland, a 3.5 acre conservation easement in the twin home area, a forest edge planting plan on pen lots next to the forest, and tree replacement. Evaluate the feasibility of developing the site without developing the forest. If this is not possible development should happen only under the direction of a professional forester or arborist. Response The City and the developer looked at ways to develop the site without developing in the forest, but would have resulted in higher densities next to existing lower density neighborhoods which would be incompatible, and product types the developer did not build. Approximately 20 of the total 35 wooded areas will be protected by conservation easements and land dedication. In the remaining areas, the City forester has already examined tree impacts and 65% ofthe significant trees in the woods will be preserved. The City code evaluates tree loss on the basis of disturbance to the root zone and considers a tree lost due to construction practices even if the tree is not physically cut down. These trees are also subject to tree replacement. 4 I "'; METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Comment Comment Pennits Response Section 8 will be revised to indicate the required wetland pennits. The Met Council recommends that the entire forest be left intact in the southeast comer. Response The land in the southeast comer is defined as a woods by the DNR. The forest is owned by the City. The City and the developer looked at ways to develop the site without developing in the forest, but would have resulted in higher densities next to existing lower density neighborhoods which would be incompatible, and product types the developer did not build. Approximately 20 of the total 35 wooded areas will be protected by conservation easements and land dedication. In the remaining areas, the City forester has already examined tree impacts and 65% of the significant trees in the woods will be preserved. The City code evaluates tree loss on the basis of disturbance to the root zone and considers a tree lost due to construction practices even if the tree is not physically cut down. These trees are also subject to tree replacement. As part of the public hearing process the plan was changed in as a recognition of the resource by removing 20 units from the project, removing 3 lots next to the forest, eliminating a cuI de sac in the woodland area, increasing the rear yard depths adjacent to the forest, requiring a fence and conservation easement adjacent to the forest, dedication of 10 acres of woodland, a 3.5 acre conservation easement in the twin home area, a forest edge planting plan on pen lots next to the forest, and tree replacement. 5 Comment Comment Comment Comment Erosion Control Response The developer is dedicating a 300 foot wide, 10 acre parcel of wooded slopes adjacent to Riley Creek. Active erosion areas will be fixed by the developer as required by the City. All stormwater is directed to Nurp ponds and there is no direct discharge on to the slopes adjacent to Riley Creek. Water Quality and Water Runoff Response Traffic Response The EA W has been amended to include before and after discharge rates including phosphorus and suspended sediment. These forecasts are from the City's Transportaion Plan approved by the Met Council in 1997. Compatibility with the airport. Response A small portion of the east side of the project is in existing noise zone D. The home construction will be built to comply with required interior noise levels. k:\commdec\planning\reports\edeneaw 6 ( c>'-I' Minnesota Department olTransportation ! s -------------------------------------------------- ~ OF ~,~l Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road 82 Roseville, MN 55113 December 21, 1998 Michael Franzen City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Michael Franzen: SUBJECT: Qrrin Thompson Homes MnlDOT Environmental Review EA W98-042 Northeast Quadrant of Trunk Highway (TH) and Dell Road Eden Prairie, Hennepin County C.S.2744 The Metro Division ofthe Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnlDOT) has reviewed the Orrin Thompson Homes Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) for impacts to the state highway system. We apologize for our delay in responding to this submittal. We find it acceptable with consideration of the following comments. • Due to the recent and future development in this area, the city should be examining ways- in which to improve the TH 212IDell Road intersection. MnlDOT has expressed it's concerns over this location to the Eden Prairie City Engineer. For further information regarding this matter, please contact Lars Impola of our Traffic Engineering Section at 797-3126. • Dell Road is MSA Route 113. The city should review it's State Aid system designations in this area. Questions regarding this matter may be directed to Tom Leibli of our State Aid Section at 582-1372. • We request the opportunity to review site plans and grading/drainage plans for any proposed developments next to TH 212, when plans have been prepared. MnlDOT review of plans allows potential issues to be identified and considered at a comparatively early phase of the development process. Two copies of the plans may be sent to Sherry Narusiewicz, Local Government Liaison Supervisor, at the above address. Please allow thirty days for a formal response. An equal opportunity employer Michael Franzen December 21, 1998 page two This letter represents the transportation concerns of the Metro Division of MnlDOT. Other environmental concerns raised by a wider MnlDOT review may be forwarded to you under separate letter. Please contact me at 582-1383 with any questions regarding this review. Sincerely, ~d~~~ Lisa Christianson Transportation PlannerlLocal Government Liaison c: Gerald Larson, MnlDOT Environmental Coordinator _.1 \ Protecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of All Minnesotans December 16, 1998 Mr. Mike Franzen City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Franzen: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) staff has reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the untitled residential development project at Dell Road and County Road 1 in Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota. We understand that this project proposes to develop 416 residential units on 158 acres, including 254 single-family detached homes, 28 duplexes, and 134 units of townhomes. Concomitant development includes grading and construction of public roads; storm water treatment pond construction, and storm sewer pipe installation for stormwater systems; erosion control measures; wetland mitigation; and public utilities to include city water and city sewer services. There are two existing residences/farmsteads in the project area. Also, there may be one or more other existing buildings on the land now; however no information is provided about future intentions to retain, remove, or demolish these structures. We offer the following comments for your consideration: 1. Plumbing Plan Review. Plumbing plan approval will be necessary for any housing units which are part of a building consisting of five or more housing units. Please call the state plumbing regulation program at (612)215-0836. 2. Water Service Lines. The Minnesota Plumbing Code specifies that a buried sewer or drain be located at least 10 feet from a buried water service line, or if this distance cannot be maintained, the installation and materials must comply with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4715.1710, subp. 2 (Minnesota Plumbing Code). Questions should be directed to the local plumbing administrative authority or to the state plumbing regulation program at (651)215-0836. 3. Sewer Main Stubs. We recommend careful planning to consider where to locate stubs for any future sewer service lines or other connections, in order to maintain the isolation distance from wells and/or buried water service lines. 4. Inventory of Existing Sewage Disposal Systems. We recommend an investigation be made of the type(s) and location(s) of any existing component(s) of sewage disposal system(s) in the area of any existing building(s), including the two residences/farmsteads, or where there were any buildings in the past on any ofthis property. If any sewage disposal system component(s) remain, their locations should be staked and the types of the sewage disposal systems should be recorded, in order to maintain required setback distances. 5. Abandonment of Septic Systems. We recommend that all existing septic system component(s) be properly abandoned according to Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080, with proper disposal of remaining waste. Improperly abandoned septic systems can threaten existing wells in the area. 121 East Seventh Place· St. Paul, MN 55101 • http://www.health.state.mn.us An equal opportunity employer Mr. Mike Franzen December 16, 1998 Page 2 6. Field Well Inventory. We acknowledge the infonnation in Item 13.a. of the EA W, which states that there is one irrigation well on the property and two wells are located at the on-site residences/fannsteads, which will be sealed according to MDH regulations. However, it is unclear by which method these wells were located, and whether any other unused, unsealed wells may still exist on this property. We frequently caution project proposers that records and databases are not all-encompassing, and that old wells from previous land uses or installed by previous landowners frequently remain, especially in rural areas. Therefore, we recommend a field well inventory be perfonned, if one has not been done, across the entire property, and especially along the proposed routes of all streets and sanitary sewer lines, along any proposed new pipeline alignment, as well as in the vicinity of any large-diameter stonnwater pipes, to detennine the locations of any existing water supply wells (active or unused, unsealed). Please be aware that water supply wells also include irrigation wells, drive-point wells, etc. Such a well inventory will be useful to detennine where all wells to be sealed are located, and also to ensure that isolation distances will be taken into account (if any wells will remain). Particular attention should be made in the areas shown on air photos, old maps, etc. where any fannsteads or homes have been located on this property, as well as along property boundaries where wells on adjacent properties may still exist. We recommend that the work be completed for all wells to be sealed before beginning other types of construction, because the isolation distances apply in all cases until a well is sealed. Once a well is sealed by a licensed well contractor in accordance with requirements of the rules, the isolation distance is no longer an issue. In case a decision is made in the future to retain any well on this property, or to begin any construction prior to well sealing, we offer the following infonnation: 7. Construction Near a Well. The Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725 specify that construction activities must not bury any well. 8. Stormwater Conduits. The Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725 specify that the setback distance between water supply wells and stonnwater pipes or conduits must be 20 feet if the pipe is 12 inches in diameter or greater; there is no setback distance requirement if the pipe is less than 12 inches in diameter. If the pipe carries sewage or sewage can back up in the pipe, the piping is considered a sewer, not a stonnwater drain. 9. Well Setbacks from Sewers. Minnesota Statutes, section 1031.205 prohibits the placement of regulated sources of contamination any closer to an existing water supply well (active or unused, unsealed) than the distances prescribed by the Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725. The rules specifies the following setback distances between water supply wells and buried sanitary sewers or individual sewer lines, including building drains connected to the building sewer line: a. 50 feet. A minimum setback distance of at least 50 feet must be maintained between a well and a buried sewer if the sewer: i. is a collector or municipal sewer; 11. is pressurized and serves more than a single-family residence; 111. is open-jointed; or IV. is constructed of materials that do not meet the material, installation and testing requirements in the Minnesota Plumbing Code. b. 20 feet: The 50-foot separation distance may be reduced to 20 feet if the sewer meets the material, installation and testing requirements in the Minnesota Plumbing Code, AND it is: i. a buried, gravity sewer that serves a single-family residence or a single facility such as a business, church, school, or single commercial property. (This does not include collectors or municipal sewers); or 11. a buried, pressurized sewer that serves a single-family residence. Mr. Mike Franzen December 16, 1998 Page 3 There is a 12-inch gasoline easement which runs approximately east-west through the property, shown and labeled on Figures 1 and 4. Figure 3 appears to show the easement; however, it is not labeled and the alignment appears to be changed to run nearly north-south near the east property boundary. It is not clear whether the proposer intends to request that the pipeline be moved. In case that request is made, we provide the following for your information: 10. Petroleum Pipeline Easement. Please be aware that Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725 specifies that the setback distance between a water supply well and a buried petroleum pipeline must be 150 feet. 11. Well Inventory for Any New Pipeline Alignment. We recommend that a separate field well inventory be performed along any proposed new pipeline alignment, across all affected properties, to determine the locations of any existing water supply wells (active or unused, unsealed), in order to accommodate the required isolation distance. In the case that any structure(s) will be remodeled, demolished, or otherwise disturbed during the project, we offer the following additional comments: 12. Asbestos. MDH regulates removal or disturbance of asbestos-containing material from commercial or residential buildings for the protection of public health. These regulations mandate licensure of contractors and individuals conducting asbestos-related work and the safe work practices associated with this type of work. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulates proper handling and disposal of asbestos-containing material, and the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry regulates protection of asbestos workers. For additional information, please contact the MDH asbestos program at (651 )215-0900. 13. Lead. MDH also regulates lead abatement in and around homes by mandating licensure of contractors and individuals conducting lead abatement. These regulations also specify the safe work practices for lead abatement. Please call (651 )215-0890 for a copy of the regulations governing lead abatement and for information about how to protect children and adults from the harmful effects of lead. Thank you for the opportunity to review this EAW. If you have questions or need further information, please contact Betty Wheeler at (651 )215-0807. DWW:BJW cc: Betty Wheeler Docket #: 98228 ,/ Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road SI. Paul, Minnesota 55155-40_ 10 December 16, 1998 Mike Franzen, City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Untitled Residential Development in the Vicinity of Dell Road Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) Dear Mr. Franzen: The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the EAW for the above-noted project. We offer the following comments for your consideration. The site exhibits a mixture of cover types according to Item 10. Of particular interest to the DNR is the southeastern portion of the site containing approximately 35 acres of "woodland/forest" vegetation. According to Item lIb, "development is proposed in approximately 59% of the on-site portion of the forested area," which represents a 41 % loss of forested area. We are concerned that the EA W does not recognize the locally significant nature and value of this forest, especially in terms of the larger, contiguous forest complex of which it is a part. We are also concerned that the EA W does not identify how the project avoids impacting this important resource. The discussion that follows explains our concern. The forested riparian corridor along Riley Creek, including the project site, contains remnants of the once extensive maple-basswood "Big Woods" natural community. The Big Woods forest type is dominated primarily by red oak, sugar maple, and basswood trees. The Big Woods once spanned from St. Cloud to Mankato and included the western one-half of Hennepin County. Less than one percent (1 %) of the County's original Big Woods forest remains today due to 140 years of clearing for agricultural and human settlement purposes. The remaining Big Woods forest covers approximately 1,100 acres that are best characterized as being individual, isolated patches or fragments of forest. These forests are shady and moist with tall, straight trees dominating a rich and diverse understory whose ecological value depends upon minimal intrusion and disturbance. As just noted, the forest area on the site is also maple-basswood, but is not high quality. However, higher quality maple-basswood forest is located just south of the project site and is protected in the Riley Creek Woods Conservation Area. In general, remnant stands of the Big Woods forest have long been considered to be one of the most threatened natural community types in the state and are given a high priority for protection. When funding is available at the state and federal level, site purchase can occur to protect these (and other) natural communities to the benefit of local residents, citizens of the state, and the nation. Unfortunately, insufficient funding is available at the state level to protect all of the high quality natural community priority sites. Therefore, efforts to preserve what is left of Minnesota's natural heritage, including the remaining Big Woods stands, will in most instances require the direct action of local citizens and governments. Eden Prairie has taken such a step, one that DNR DNR Information: 612-296-6157, 1-800-76a-6000 • TTY: 612-296-5484, 1-800-657-3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity ft Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a '-.» Minimum of 10% Post-Consumer Waste Mike Franzen, City Planner December 16, 1998 commends, by protecting the high quality maple-basswood forest remnant in the conservation area adjacent to the project site. The Riley Creek Woods Conservation Area serves several important natural resource functions, some of which are also tied to the forest area located at the project site. The riparian forest surrounding Riley Creek provides locally significant wildlife habitat, open space, and amenity value to the Eden Prairie community. Importantly, because the forest complex is growing on the slopes above Riley Creek, it provides an extremely valuable riparian buffer that reduces soil erosion, provides water infiltration, and keeps the stream water temperature lower. Essentially the forest protects Riley Creek from the potentially adverse effects from upland use and development. The 35 acres of forest found on the site contributes substantially to the habitat, water quality, amenity values of the entire forest complex located along Riley Creek. The EA W does not recognize that proposing to develop the forest on the site results in some loss of value, especially in terms of habitat, for the entire forested area. In our offering of these comments, please recognize that the term "forest" cannot be applied to all sites with trees, especially in an urban and suburban setting. The term "forest" must be distinguished from "woodland," where forest is ecologically distinct and superior to the functions and values produced just by woodland. In this instance, the forest complex exhibits a mixture of trees of different sizes, various shrubs, herbaceous plants, and the associated leaf litter that are correctly characterized as a true, 'actual forest. Woodland exhibits less diversity along all these dimensions, thus its habitat and biodiversity values are accordingly lessened. In this case, the forest label is correctly applied to vegetation listed as "Woodland" on Figure 4. The proposed elimination of 18 acres of forest identified in the EA W affects more than just the trees that are cut. The remaining 17 acres will essentially be converted to residential woodland, thus the loss of true forest will occur on the entire 35 acres on the site. Offsite impacts will also result because the site's forest loss and conversion to woodland further diminishes the total area of forest, thus contributing to the ongoing fragmentation of the total forested area, including the Riley Creek Woods Conservation Area. Forest fragmentation is an issue of concern statewide, but particularly in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The development as proposed fragments the forest by creating more open areas and forest fringe, thus changing the existing "unopened" condition to a more sunny and windy condition. Such a change favors those species, especially birds, adapted for the boundary zone between forest and open space while adversely affecting forest bird species adapted to inhabiting only the interior portion of mature forest stands. The main consequence is to change the predation and competition profile of the forest. In particular, interior-adapted forest bird species are subject to increased predation from crows, jays, and mammals that tend to hunt forest edges .. Development, for example through installation of roads, building sites, farming, harvest activity, and golf courses, is resulting in an increase in forest edge conditions over forest interior conditions. We believe that interior species populations are gradually declining from the cumulative effects of such activities. In general, whatever interior habitat that remains in the Twin Cities is being converted to . edge habitat as development proceeds. This project contributes to this trend by eliminating most of the ecological functionality on the site proper, and by diminishing the general ecological functionality of the larger forest block. 2 Mike Franzen, City Planner December 16, 1998 The EA W indicates in Item lla that "[ d]uring development of the project site, some trees will be removed. Removal and replacement will be in accordance with all applicable City ordinances." Item llb further offers, "[a]ccording to current project plans, development is proposed in approximately 59 % of the on-site portion of the forested area. Mitigation will include tree replacement in accordance with the City ordinance, as well as efforts to avoid damage to remaining trees." Unfortunately, the lost ecological functions on the site cannot be mitigated by simply planting replacement trees. Furthermore, the dimunition of ecological function and value offsite will not be mitigated by tree replacement either. In this respect, the EA W fails to acknowledge this impact and is therefore deficient. From a natural resources perspective, development should avoid the forested portion of the site because it is a valuable, locally significant resource. The two eastern cul-de-sacs have the most impact and represent a small percentage of the development. We strongly encourage the City of Eden Prairie and the proposer to evaluate'the feasibility of meeting project objectives without encroaching into the forested portion of the site. The area could be redesigned with some low impact trails, thus providing substantial amenity to the development as a whole. In this respect, we note in Item 28, Compatibility with Plans, that the project as proposed is currently "inconsistent" with City's Guide Plan and City's Zoning Map in terms of permissible dwelling unit densities. Opportunities may be present to apply a more clustered approach to the site similar to that employed with planned unit developments, where higher unit densities are tolerated at some parts of a site in return for open space dedication. Any economic burden this may place on the proposer could be offset by compensation with City open space monies, or donation or tax credit options that are available. Such an outcome could prove mutually beneficial for both the proposer and Eden Prairie community as well as the future residents of the development. As we have indicated, it is preferred that no development occur at all in the forested part of the site. If development does proceed in that part of the site, it should happen only under the supervision of a professional forester or arborist. A Tree Protection Plan should be developed that identifies how tree losses are minimized, especially potential post-project losses. Post-project tree losses are important because tree mortality can continue long-term after construction ceases if trees are wounded, or if their roots are damaged, during construction. In addition, the plan should ensure that all trees removed be utilized for the commercial products they contain. These products include sawlogs, veneer, pulpwood, and firewood. Non-merchantable material should be chipped into mulch. If any material remains that is unusable, it may be permissible to burn it. Piling and burning is to be considered a last resort and burning permits are not automatically issued for disposal of this much material. Regarding storm water runoff management issues discussed in Item 18, we strongly endorse the EAW's recognition of the value of handling runoff "by infiltration and discharge to adjacent vegetated areas." Although we cannot ascertain fully whether this project meets this objective at this time based upon the level of detail available, we support this concept and recommend close scrutiny of this project feature as greater definition becomes available. Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. The project as proposed results in the loss of locally important forest areas, which is a loss that can be avoided. In addition, the project will also diminish the value of the Riley Creek Woods Conservation Area. We recommend evaluation of whether project objectives can be achieved without encroaching into the forested area of the site. We are willing to meet with the City as well as the proposer to discuss our concerns. 3 Mike Franzen, City Planner December 16, 1998 We look forward to receiving your record of decision and responses to comments. Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, subparts 4 & 5, require you to send us your Record of Decision within five days of deciding this action. Please contact Bill Johnson of my staff at (651) 296-9229 to discuss our comments or if you have questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor Environmental Review and Assistance Unit Office of Management and Budget Services c: Kathleen Wallace Con Christianson Bret Anderson Jon Nelson Lynn M. Lewis, USFWS Jon Larsen, EQB Lee Johnson, Orrin Thompson Homes #990158-01/UNTITLED. WP7 4 ~ Metropol .. £a.&l Council ~ Working for the Region, Planning for the.Future December 9, 1998 Mike Franzen, City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: EAW --Orrin Thompson Residential Development at Pioneer Trail and Dell Road_ Metropolitan Council District 4 Referral File No. 16913-1 Dear Mr. Franzen: Council staff has conducted a review of this environmental assessment worksheet (EA W) to determine , its adequacy and accuracy in addressing regional concerns. The staff review has concluded that the EA W is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes. However, staff provides the following comments for your consideration: The proposed project involves the construction of254 single-family detached and 162 attached (two- family and townhouse) residences on 158 acres located in the SE quadrant of Pioneer Trail and Dell Road. Riley Creek forms the eastern boundary in the SE portion of the project area. Item 8 -Permits and Approvals Required The EA W mentions that several jurisdictional wetlands will be filled during this project, Council staff recommends that all permits pertaining to wetland fill/mitigation be included in this section of the document. Item llb. Fish, Wildlife and Ecologically Sensitive Resources. The EA W states that the maple-basswood forest on the slopes of Riley Creek will be impacted by the project; approximately 59% of the on-site forest will be developed. Council staff concurs with Karen Cieminski, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ecologist, whose letter is included in the appendices of the EAW. In her letter, Ms. Cieminski states that ... because less than 1 % of the maple-basswood forest natural community type remains, I believe that the portion of the forest that lies on the southeast segment of the project area should be preserved as open space. This would also further protect the health of Riley Creek". From the information included with the EA W, it appears that the forested area of the proposed development is steeply sloped, with high potential for erosion. Due to rarity of the maple-basswood forest, its vicinity to Riley Creek, and the potential for erosion, Council staff recommends that the rl '\ j AREA CODE CHANGES TO 651 IN JULY, 1998 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 (612) 602-1000 Fax 602-1550 An Equal Opportunity Employer TDD/TrY 291-0904 Metro Info Line 602-1888 Mike Franzen, City Planner December 9, 1998 Page 2 entire forested area on the southeast corner of the proposed development be left intact to serve as a buffer to Riley Creek, consistent with the Council's action steps 4A and 4D of the Regional Blueprint. Item 17-Erosion and Sedimentation The EAW states that portions of the site have slopes greater than 12 percent and that some parts of the site are already eroded, yet only two erosion control measures (siltation fences and revegetation) are mentioned in the EA W. Council staff does not believe that these measures will be sufficient for prevention and/or mitigation of erosion of the steeply sloped, highly erodable soils in this project area. We recommend that construction on slopes of more than 12 percent should be prohibited, if possible. Additionally, the City and developer should negotiate a more realistic set of corrective and preventative measures so that erosion of the steep slopes and the likely sedimentation in Riley Creek can be avoided. This should include, but not be limited to, requiring that the entire forested area on the southeast corner of the proposed development be left intact to serve as a buffer to Riley Creek Item 18a and b-Water Quality-Surface Water Runoff The EA W form requires that a comparison be made of the quality and quantity of site runoff before and after the project. This information is not included in the EA W. Council staff recommends that estimates of water quality/quantity discharging to Riley Creek under existing and proposed conditions be completed and included with the EA W. This is important information for the City and permitting agencies to know before project approvals are given. In part b, the EA W states that since storm water runoff will be treated to NURP standards, water quality impacts to Riley Creek are not expected. Council staff would like to point out that NURP standards specify design criteria to achieve a certain removal efficiency, not a specific effluent concentration. Since no water quality simulation estimates were included in the EA W, it is not possible to assess whether or not the stormwater runoff will impact Riley Creek. As stated previously, Council staff recommends that estimates of water quality discharging to the creek under existing and proposed conditions be completed and included with the EA W. In addition, phosphorus and suspended sediment concentrations as determined by the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District should be included in the EA W. From the results of the water quality/quantity simulations and from the monitoring data, a more realistic assessment of the impacts on Riley Creek can be made. Item 22 -Traffic Forecasts for TH212 appear low compared to Hennepin County's TSP 2000 forecast of30,000-32,000 ADT. At these numbers, it will be at or over the capacity ofTH212; they should be examined closely. Item 28 -Compatibility with Plans The EA W does not include any discussion on relationships/impacts between the proposed project and the Flying Cloud airport plan. The Metropolitan Council approved the 2010 airport Long-Term Mike Franzen, City Planner December 9, 1998 Page 3 Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) in 1996 and the City MUSA expansion in 1997. The following text discusses the plans and outlines areas of concern. The proposed 158-acre Orrin Thompson subdivision is about one and a half miles due west of the Flying Cloud Airport. The subdivision will include 416 residential units consisting of detached single- family homes, twin homes and townhomes. At this location the likely airport impacts to be considered are potential airspace obstructions and aircraft noise. Airspace Obstructions: Most of the subdivision appears to be close to the same elevation as the airfield (i.e. @900'AMSL). The most stringent runway safety zone surface is an imaginary surface starting at the end of the runway primary zone, extending upward and outward at a 50: I ratio for precision instrument runways. At a distance of 1.5 miles from the runway end the floor of the runway approach zone would be at about 150' AGL or, 1,050' AMSL. The residential uses in this proposed subdivision are usually controlled by cities through a height ordinance limiting buildings generally to 35 or 40 foot maximum height. Some areas will be at @ 950 feet AMSL, and with residential structures could be at @ 970 to 980 feet AMSL at the southeastern part of the subdivision. It appears that there should be no height restrictions needed in the subdivision; however, the City should have a height limit ordinance in-place and enforced. If better information is available and the data indicates the height assumptions above appear inaccurate, a detailed assessment should be conducted and coordinated with the MAC. Aircraft Noise: The 2010 LTCP noise contours are depicted in Figure 19 of the 1996 Aviation Guide Chapter. These are the contours that apply for review of this EA W. Several acres of the proposed subdivision are within the 20 I 0 LTCP noise contour (D) as depicted in attachments 1 and 2. The proposed subdivision is essentially undeveloped property without urban services and is considered as "New Development" under land use compatibility guidelines for aircraft noise. Under noise zone D, single family, twin home and townhome development is a "conditionaf' use. This means residential use can be considered as a compatible and permitted use if: (a) it meets the interior sound structure performance standards for residential development of 45 d.b.a. (see also footnote 1 1n table 9 of the Aviation Guide), and (b) it can adequately address the conditional land use review factors as identified in the Aviation Guide (applies to all system airports). It appears that about eight blocks of the proposed townhomes in the northeast portion of the subdivision would need to meet the exterior-to-interior noise reduction performance standards. The City should refer to the Council's Builders Guide concerning state building code and model noise ordinance. Be advised that the Builders Guide is under revision, and readers should contact Chauncey Case, Office of Transportation and Transit Development at 651-602-1724 for information about specific changes that may impact this proposed subdivision. The remainder of the subdivision is considered a compatible use at the present time and requires no special noise control considerations. Conditional Land Use Review Factors to be addressed as part of a PUD comprehensive plan amendment are listed below: ~ 1 l Mike Franzen, City Planner December 9, 1998 Page 4 1. What is the specific nature of the proposed use, including extent of associated outdoor activities? For example, are the activities voluntary or required? Does the activity occur on a daily or seasonal basis? 2. What is the relationship of the proposed use to other planning considerations, including adjacent land use activities, consistency with overall comprehensive planning and relation to other metropolitan systems? For example, how does this project fit into the overall comprehensive plan, its use designation and development phasing? Do adjacent uses increase or decrease the ambient noise? 3. What is the frequency of exposure of the proposed uses to aircraft overflight? For example, how many times does the overflight occur -day/night, daily/seasonal? Is it expected to increase/decrease? 4. What is the location of the proposed use relative to aircraft flight tracks, and aircraft on- ground operating and maintenance areas? For example, is the proposed use located directly under a heavily used flight track, a seldom-used flight track, to the side of a flight track? How close is the project to taxiways and hangars? 5. What are the location, site design and construction restrictions to be imposed on the proposed use by the community with respect to reduction of exterior-to-interior noise transmissions, and shielding of outdoor activities? If the project is close to the airport, are there opportunities to limit noise intrusion by taking advantage of terrain, or through the orientation of structures? Can building structure be used to block common areas such as outdoor swimming pool or recreation areas in apartment complexes? If the project is further from the airport, but still in the noise impact area, is it a candidate for clustering or other site positioning to lessen noise impacts? 6. What method the community will use to inform future occupants of proposed potential noise from aircraft operations? For example, will there be a notice in the property deed, a truth in housing type disclosure, an informational bulletin provided to buyers, permit notice? 7. The extent to which the community restricts the building from having facilities for outdoor activities associated with the use? For example, are outdoor recreation areas and facilities allowed for projects in high noise impact areas? Are numbers, types of doors and windows or other openings (e.g. vents, skylights) included in building design to attenuate high noise impacts? do building designs restrict balconies? 8. The distance of the proposed use from the existing or proposed runways, parallel taxiways, or engine run-up areas. For example, how far is the project away from the noise source now? What will it be in the future? The distance/direction the project has in relation to the above airport areas will determine the type of noise impacts that will be experienced; it also relates directly to the type of potential mitigation effort. Mike Franzen, City Planner December 9, 1998 Page 5 This will conclude the Council's review of the EAW. The Council will take no formal action on the EA W. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Jim Uttley, AICP, principal reviewer, at 651-602-1361. Sincerely, Id:±;.r,~ Environmental Services Division Attachments - 2 C: Jules Smith, Metropolitan Council District 4 Lee Johnson, Orrin Thompson Homes Lisa R. Fay, Environmental Scientist, Northern Environmental Karen L. Cieminski, Data Manager/Ecologist, Minnesota DNR Keith Buttleman, Director, Environmental Planning and Evaluation Department Thomas C. McElveen, Director, Housing and Local Assistance Lynda Voge, Referrals Coordinator Chauncey Case, Office of Transportation and Transit Development Karen Jensen, Environmental Planning and Evaluation Department Tom Caswell, Sector Representative, Office of Local Assistance Jim Uttley, AICP, Community Development Division V:/iibrary/commundv/referralliettersIEP169131.doc DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT EDEN ORCHARD THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of June 1, 1999, by U.S. Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 39.26 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 158.4 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 158.4 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RI-9.5 on 42.08 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 on 77.07 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 39.26 acres, Site Plan Review on 39.26 acres, EAW Review and Preliminary Plat on 158.4 acres into 433 housing units, acres legally described on Exhibit A (the "Property"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. 99-24 for Guide Plan Change, Resolution No. 99-25 for Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to Rl-9.5, Rl-13.5, RM-6.5, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. 99-26 for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop and plat the Property in phases in conformance with the materials revised and dated February 16, 1999, reviewed and approved by the City Council on February 16, 1999, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXlllBIT C: Developer agrees to the tenus, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Developer agrees that the utility plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of streets and utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of final plans for streets, public sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer. Plans for public infrastructures shall be of a plan view and profile on 24 x 36 plan sheets consistent with City standards. A permit fee of five percent of construction value shall be paid to City by Developer. The design engineer shall provide daily inspection, certifY completion in conformance to approved plans and specifications and provide record drawings. Developer agrees to complete implementation ofthe approved street and utility plans prior to building permit issuance. Streets The Developer shall be responsible to provide to the City all permanent right-of-way required to construct proposed Dell Road south of CSAH # 1 outside of the Property as indicated on Exhibit B at no cost to the City prior to issuance of a permit by the City for construction. Proposed Dell Road from CSAH # 1 to the south boundary as shown on ExhIbit B shall be constructed by the Developer. Design shall include an 18' median approximately 400 feet south ofCSAH #1. The Developer shall also be responsible for the construction of temporary intersection improvements at CSAH #1 and proposed Dell Road as approved and permitted by Hennepin County and the City. Improvements shall include widening of CSAH #1 to provide dedicated left turn lanes and right turn lanes for east and west bound traffic. In the instance that Hennepin County will not permit the immediate placement of temporary signals. the Developer shall provide to the City the cost of a temporary signal system which shall be established in an escrow account for future use by the City for the placement of signals at such time a signal system is permitted by Hennepin County. Easements for construction of the improvements specified shall be conveyed to the City prior to release of the final plat. Construction of Dell Road north of Street A shall be completed in Phase 1. The Developer agrees to enter into an assessment agreement prior to release of a final plat of the property for the property's share of the costs for the reconstruction of existing Dell Road from CSAH # 1 to Street G as detennined in a feasibility study which shall be conducted by the City. The Property's proportional share of the existing Dell Road improvements shall be based on 93 units. Developer shall provide a storm drainage outlet and treatment for existing Dell Road improvements within the proposed development. Utility Plans Plans for sanitary sewer shall include the following: A forcemain of a size to be approved by the City Engineer shall be constructed from the proposed lift station to the sanitary sewer manhole located in Street A directly adjacent to Outlot J. Construction of the forcemain and sanitary sewer downstream of the forcemain shall be complete by September 1,2000. The Developer shall enter into an assessment agreement for the construction of a sanitary sewer lift station that will serve Lots 31-42 and Lots 7 -26 of Block 4 and other properties prior to release of the final plat. Sanitary sewer and an 8" watennain shall be extended along the west Property line within Street G to the common lot line between Lots 7 and 8 of Block 7 at which an 8" stub shall be extended to the west right of way line at an invert elevation of877.5. Construction of this shall be complete by September I, 2000. Watermain Plans for watennain shall include the following: 12" watennain shall be constructed from CSAH #1 southerly within Street G to Street F, then west within Street F through the common lot lines of Lots 15 and 16 of Block 12 to Street A, west to existing Dell Road, then north to tie into the existing watennain. An 8" water stub should be extended from the private street adjacent to Lots 31 -42 of Block 4 following the sanitary sewer alignment to the proposed lift station location. Drainage The Developer shall provide an adequate storm sewer outlet from the pond located within Outlot H. To utilize the outlet shown on ExhIbit B the developer shall provide the following: 1. An Engineering study demonstrating the ability of the system downstream of the proposed connection to manage the discharge from the property without negative impacts to private property. 2. Provide new stormsewer from Outlot A to exist pond north of CSAH 1 together with easement. Trail Easement Prior to release of the final plat, Developer shall provide to the City a 10' wide trail easement along the northerly property line adjacent to CSAH #1. Special Assessment Agreement for Trunk Sewer and Water Prior to release of a final plat for any portion of the property, Developer agrees to sign an assessment agreement with the City for trunk sanitary sewer and water assessments for an asssessable area of 158.4 acres at the per acre rate then in effect. Construction Traffic Developer agrees that no construction traffic will use existing Dell Road south of the Property. Developer agrees to include this provision in all construction contracts. 4. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exlnbit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration pennit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, stonn water detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land alteration permit. All design calculations for stonn water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures: All site grading operations shall confonn to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation ofthe approved plan. Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the existing and/or proposed sedimentation pond during construction. Developer shall provide preconstruction and post construction surveys for evaluation by City. 6. CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY: Prior to release of the plat, Developer shall submit a Conservation Easement for review and written approval by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Service Director, for the area delineated on Exlnbit B. Prior to the release of the first building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit evidence to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Service Director, that the approved Conservation Easement has been filed in the Hennepin County Recorder'slRegistrar of Titles' Office. 7. DEDICATION OF PARK LAND: Prior to release of the final plat for the Property, Developer agrees to dedicate to City Outlot Band E for park purposes in accordance with the terms of Exhibit C. The area to be dedicated to the City shall also include the land area necessary for the wetland trail shown on Exhibit B. 8. FENCE TO PROTECT WILDLIFE HABITAT: Prior to the release of the final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's written approval of a plan for a five-foot high chain link fence to be constructed along the entire length of the Property adjoining the Riley Creek Woods Conservation Area and tied back into the berms as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto. The purpose ofthe fence shall be to protect the wildlife habitat in the following area: Riley'Creek Woods Conservation Area from encroachment by adjacent property owners from Lot 1, Block 4 to Lot 15, Block 4. Prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete the approved fence and landscaping, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 9. GRADING IN THE WOODED AREAS ON SITE: Prior to grading within any of the wooded areas on the Property, delineated on Exhibit B, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a plan depicting construction grading limits on the Property. Prior to the issuance of any land alteration pennit, Developer shall place a construction fence on the approved construction grading limits. Developer shall notifY the City and watershed district 48 hours in advance of grading so that the construction limit fence may be field inspected and approved by the City Engineer and City Forester. Developer shall maintain the construction limit fence until written approval is granted by the City to remove the fence. 10. IRRIGATION PLAN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the RM 6.5 Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. II. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building pennit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Ex1nbit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 12. REMOV AL/SEALING OF EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS: Prior to issuance by City of any pennit for grading or building on the Property, Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and to obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of plans for demolition and removal of existing septic systems and wells on the Property, and restoration of the Property. Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a deposit in the amount of $ to guarantee that Developer completes implementation of the approved plan. The city agrees to return to Developer the $ deposit at such time as the Chief Building Official has verified in writing that the Developer has completed implementation of the approved plan. 13. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building OfficiaL and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. These plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 14. SIDEWALK AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Service Director and obtain the Director's written approval of detailed plans for sidewalks and trails to be constructed on the Property. Developer shall convey access easements for such sidewalks and trails in such locations as determined by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Service Director. Sidewalks and trails shall be constructed in the following locations: A. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk to be located as shown on plans dated 2-11-99 and revisions dated 4-18-99 as depicted in Exhibit B, and the north side of Street F, attached hereto. B. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail to be located along west and north sides of street G and through Outlot J, and along Dell Road where new Dell Road ties into existing Dell Road as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved plans in accordance with the terms of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. Bonding in accordance with City Code shall be required for sidewalk construction on each phase of the project. 14. SIGNS: Developer agrees that for each sign which requires a permit by Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.70, Developer shall file with the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of an application for a sign permit. The application shall include a complete description of the sign and a sketch showing the size, location, the manner of construction, and other such information as necessary to inform the City of the kind, size, material construction, and location of any such sign, consistent with the sign plan shown on Ex.hJ.bit B and in accordance with the requirements of City Code, Section 11.70, Subdivision Sa. 15. TREE LOSS -TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 14;282 diameter inches of significant trees on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 4,525 diameter inches. Tree replacement required are 1,107 caliper inches. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 1,107 caliper inches. This approved plan shall include replacement trees ofa 3-inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a 7-foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to building permit issuance. 16. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, defend and indemnifY City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indetnnjfy because of any inspection, review or approval by City. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 1, 1999 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. V.c. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Donald R. Uram Chestnut Apartments Michael D. Franzen Requested Action: Move to: • Approve 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.16 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the RM-2.5 Zoning District on 9.16 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 9.16 acres; and • Approve the Developer's Agreement for BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement I CHESTNUT APARTMENTS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 4-99-PUD-3-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A WNING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the RM-2.5 Zoning District 4-99-PUD-3-99 (hereinafter "PUD-3-99-RM-2.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the tenns and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of June 1, i999, entered into between BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership and the City of Eden Prairie, (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions ofPUD-3-99-RM-2.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-3-99-RM-2.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-3-99-RM-2.5 is designed in such a manner to fonn a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-3-99-RM-2.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-3-99-RM-2.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the RM-2.5 Zoning District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 3-99-RM-2.5, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 1l.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. and publication. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage FIRST READ at a regular meeting ofthe City Council ofthe City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of April, 1999, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 1 st day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on ____________ _ Chestnut Apartments Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Th.at part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and ·of the North 1/2 of the Northeost 1/+ of the Southwest 1/+ of Section 15, Township 116, Nonn Range 22. West of the 5th Principal Meridian, desc:ibed os\ follows: Commencing at the Southwest comer of the Nor..hwest 1/+ of the Southwest 1/+ of said Sec!!cn 15, thenc~ North 89 degrees 40 minutes 33 seconds East, assumed b~aring, along the South line of seid Northwest 1/+ of the Southwest 1/4 a distcnce of 734.00 feet to the o c!:.! al peint of beginning; :hence North CO degrees 13 minutes 27 sec:::nds 'Nest a dlstcnce of 44.CO feet: thenc~ ~cr.:-: J....i decrees ~ 7 minutes 13 sec:::nds East a oistcnc~ of 23A..9.3 feet: thenc~ Nor-Jl 00 degrees 42 minutes +7 sec:::nds West a dIstance of 84.45 feet; thenc~ Nonh +5 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of 311.00 f~t;thenc~ NcrJl 13 degrees 20 . minutes 00 seconds West 0 distance of 233.79 feet:· thence North 45 de<;lrees East 0 distance of 56.79 feet; thence South 45 degrees East a distance of 291 feet; thence along a tcngential co..:rve ccncove to the Southwest and having a radius of 316.50 feet a distance of 102 feet; thence, North +5 degrees Ecst, not tangent to last desc:-ibed co.Jrve a distcnce of 260 feet; thence North a d(stanc~ of 142.50 feet: thenc~ East a distanc~ of 270.76 feet to a point on a c:Jrve having a radius of 660.20 feet. the c~nter of cIrcle of seid c:.:r/e beers South 69 degrees 14 minutes 33 secends West from said point; thence Southerly along soid c:Jrve a distance of 169.53 feet, more or less, to the South line of the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/+ of t."e Southwest 1 /4 of said Section 15; thence Westerly along the South line of said North 1/2 to the Southwe~t c::mer of said North 1/2: thence Southerly along the Ecst line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 15 to the Southeast comer of soid Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence Westerly along the South line of sold Northwest 1/4 of the '. Southwest 1/4 to the actual point of beginning •. Together with appurtenant Eosernent for sign, planter and sidewalk. flied of record as Doco.Jment No. 6661737. 1...1 CHESTNUT APARTMENTS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE WNING OF CERTAIN LAND WITHIN ONE DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amendment of the zoning of land located at Chestnut Road and Anderson Lake's Parkway within the RM-2.5 Zoning District. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: ATTEST: /s/ Kathleen A. Porta City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. /s/ Jean L. Harris Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ___________ ' (A full copy of the text ofthis Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) CHESTNUT APARTMENTS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR CHESTNUT APARTMENTS BY BBY CHESTNUT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership has applied for Site Plan approval of Chestnut Apartments on 9.16 acres for construction of a 39 unit apartment building located at Chestnut Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway, to be zoned in the RM-2.5 Zoning District on 9.l6 acres by an Ordinance approved by the City Council on April 20, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its March 22, 1999, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 20, 1999, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership for the construction ofa 39 unit apartment building, based on plans dated April 13, 1999, between BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on June 1, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT CHESTNUT APARTMENTS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of June 1, 1999, by BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership, a Minnesota Limited Partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 9.16 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.16 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the RM-2.5 Zoning District on 9.16 acres, and Site Plan Review on 9.16 acres for construction of 39 apartment units, all on 9.16 acres legally described on Exhibit A (the "Property"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No._ for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Amendment in the RM-2.5 District, and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated April 20, 1999, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 20, 1999 and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land alteration permit. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to release of the grading rl bond, Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance with the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures: All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Prior to release ofthe grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan. Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the existing and/or proposed sedimentation pond during construction. Developer shall provide preconstruction and post construction surveys for evaluation by City. 4. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 5. IRRIGATION PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C and prior to the release of the landscape security. 6. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape security equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. 7. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 8. TREE LOSS -TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 96 caliper inches of significant trees on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 96 caliper inches. Tree replacement required are 128 caliper inches. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 128 caliper inches. This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3-inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a 7-foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C and prior to the release of the landscape security. 9. SITE AND BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS: Developer agrees to complete site and building improvements identified in Exhibit B, attached hereto concurrent with the construction of the 39 apartment units and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 10. WETLAND EASEMENTS: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall dedicate to the City, drainage and utility easements over the wetland and wetland buffer areas as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto. 11. TRAIL EASEMENT: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall dedicate to the City, a trail easement over the existing bituminous trail as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto. 12. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. i l~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 1, 1999 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. V.D. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Donald R. Uram FarrelVLapic Addition Scott A. Kipp Requested Action: Move to: • Approve 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 1.54 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; and • Approve the Developer's Agreement for Mike Farrell and Tom Lapic. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for Zoning District Change 2. Developer's Agreement FARRELLILAPIC ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE WNING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the RI-13.5 District. Section 3. The the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the RI-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1 , Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of June 1, 1999, entered into between Mike Farrell and Tom Lapic, and the City of Eden Prairie, and which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. publication. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of May, 1999, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 1 st day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on ____________ _ Exhibit A Farrell/Lapic Addition Legal Description: < ;~~. -, : ~:.. :., .•.• i :: '~-'" ",' :';.: ' ... ;.".: ',. THAT PART OF THE EAST 759.44 FEET OF TRACT I, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY. NO. \:751, ~,<;: . HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE· BEGINNlNG··A r A POINT. ·ON.·:;:- THE soum LINE OF TRACT I, 205 FEET EAST OF THE WEST L1N£OF .THE EAST 759.44· .. "f: .. FEET; THENCE NORTHERL Y AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF TRACT I,' A 'DISTANCE--;' OF 400.00 FEET; THENCE DEFLECTING 47 DEGREES 30 )JINUTES LEFT A ,DISTANCE OF.: 95:0 -'- FEET; THENCE DEFLECTING 23 DEGREES RIGHT A DISTANCE OF 157.43 FEET· TO' TI-J£ .. ":~ '.' NORTHERLY LINE OF TRACT I AND Tf-IERE lFRMINA TlNG: :'. :-A· .... , . EXCEPT THE SOUTH 190.0 FEET THEREOF .... FARRELLILAPIC ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 12563 Sunnybrook Road from Rural to R1-13.5 Zoning District. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description ofthis property. Effective Date: ATTEST: /s/ Kathleen A. Porta City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. /s/ Jean L. Harris Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __________ _ (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FARRELLILAPIC ADDITION TIDS AGREEMENT is entered into as of June 1, 1999, by Michael Farrell, an Individua~ and Thomas H. Lapic and Trudy E. Lapic, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural to RI- 13.5 on 1.54 acres and Preliminary Plat of 1.54 acres into 3 single family lots and road right-of-way legally descnbed on Exhibit A (the "Property"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5, and Resolution No. 99-62 for Preliminary Plat, Devel~per agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in confonnance with the materials revised and dated Apri127, 1999, reviewed and approved by the City Council on May 4, 1999, and attached hereto as ExhIbit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXIllBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for public sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer. Plans for public infrastructures shall be of a plan view and profile on 24 x 36 plan sheets consistent with City standards. A permit fee of five percent of construction value shall be paid to City by Developer. The design engineer shall provide daily inspection, certify completion in conformance to approved plans and specifications and provide record drawings. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved utility plans prior to any occupancy permit issuance for the Property. 4. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land alteration penni!. All design calculations for stonn water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan. Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for confonnance to the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures: All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation ofthe approved plan. Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the existing and/or proposed sedimentation pond during construction. Developer shall provide preconstruction and post construction surveys for evaluation by City. 5. TREE LOSS -TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 139 diameter inches of significant trees on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 24 caliper inches. Tree replacement required is 6 caliper inches. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 6 caliper inches. This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3-inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a 7-foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to occupancy permit issuance. 6. CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXISTING WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY: Prior to release of the final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit a Conservation Easement for review and written approval by the Parks and Recreation Services Director, for the area delineated on Exhibit B. Prior to the release of the final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit evidence to the Parks and Recreation Services Director, that the approved Conservation Easement has been filed in the Hennepin County Recorder'slRegistrar of Titles' Office. The Conservation Easement shall be delineated by posts and signs along the side lot lines. 7. PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND UTILITIES: Prior to the release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit proofto the City Planner that a reciproca~ joint access and maintenance agreement for the shared driveway and private utilities has been filed against the Property with the Hennepin County Recorder'slRegistrar of Titles' Office in a form approved in writing by the City Planner. 8. FINAL ORDER NO. 99-09: Developer has obtained approval from the Board of Adjustments and Appeals for variances from City Code requirements within the Rl-13.5 District for the Property as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 1) Front yard structure setback of 16 feet for Lot 1, Block 1. City Code requires 30 feet. 2) Lot frontage on a cul-de-sac of 19 feet for Lot 2, Block 1, and 21 feet for Lot 3, Block 1. City Code requires 55 feet. 3) Zero foot setback for shared driveway between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. City Code requires 3 feet. This approval has been granted through Final Order No. 99-09, attached hereto as Exlubit F. Developer agrees to comply with all requirements of said Final Order No. 99-09. Prior to any building permit issuance for the Property, Developer agrees to provide proof to the City Planner that Final Order No. 99-09 of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals was filed against the Property at the Hennepin County Recorder'slRegistrar of Titles' Office. 9. CONVERSION OF EXISTING STRUCTURE TO SINGLE-FAMILY USE: There exists on that portion of the Property shown as Lot 1, Block 1, on Exhibit B a duplex (2 family) dwelling. Developer has and by this agreement agrees that the duplex will be converted into a single-family dwelling in accordance with the following: A. Conversion of the duplex will be completed upon the earlier of (i) 120 days of occupancy ofa single-family dwelling on the Property, or (ii) one year from the date of approval by the City Council of including the Property within the Rl-13.5 zoning district. B. Prior to issuance of any building permit for the conversion of the structure, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of plans for demolition and removal of existing septic systems and wells on the Property, and restoration of the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the structure, Developer shall complete the demolition and removal of existing septic systems and wells on the Property, and restoration of the Property. C. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the structure, Developer agrees to connect a public sanitary sewer and water main to the structure. D. The duplex may not be rented after the earlier of (i) occupancy permit issuance for any single-family dwelling on the Property, or (ii) one year from the date of approval by the City Council of including the Property within the RI-13.5 zoning district. This will not prohlbit rental of the structure as a single-family dwelling. E. Developer acknowledges and agrees that any right of nonconforming use of any part of the Property for a duplex use or purpose (multi-family dwelling) has been and is abandoned. 10. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AND CONNECTION FEES: Prior to release of a final plat for any portion of the Property, Developer agrees to sign an assessment agreement with the City for trunk sewer and water assessments for an assessable area of 1.04 acres at the per acre rate then in effect. Developer agrees to pay two water connection fees for water at current rates prior to release of a final plat for the Property. II. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR SERVICE AREAJDIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development and Financial Services Don Dram, Director Requested Action A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 98-213, Regulating Fees and Charges for Business Licenses, Permits and Municipal Services DATE: JUNE 1, 1999 ITEM NO. Move to: Adopt the amendment to Resolution No 98-213, Regulating Fees and Charges for Business Licenses, Permits and Municipal Services. Synopsis Subsequent to the fee resolution revision for 1999, Engineering Staff developed a revised schedule for sign installations for new development. This resolution will increase the fees for signs to reflect actual costs incurred by the City. Attachments Memorandum from Don Dram and Kathleen Schwankl regarding changes to the Fee Resolution. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Christopher M. Enger, City Manager FROM: Donald R. Uram, Director of Community Development & Financial Services Kathleen Schwankl, Senior Accounting Clerk DATE: May 25. 1999 SUBJECT: An amendment to the 1999 Resolution Regulating Fees and Charges for Business Licenses, Permits and Municipal Services All purposed changes in our Fee Resolution are summarized as follows: 3.13 STREET SIGNS: Stop Sign (incl. brackets, install, no post) 30"x30"-fee was $67.00 ; raised to $110.00. Stop Sign (incl. brackets, install, with post)30"x30"-added fee-$130.00. No Outlet (incl. post & install)24"x24" -fee was $72.00 ; raised to $100.00. 9 Button Delineator-Red (incl. post & install) -fee was $67.00 ; raised to $90.00. 9 Button Delineator-Red (incl. breakaway post, install) -added fee $100.00. Keep Right Symbol (incl. 9 button delin.-Yellow, install, no post) -fee was $88.00 ; raised to $110.00. Keep Right Symbol (incl. 9 button delin.-Yellow,install,post) -fee was $93.00 ; raised to $130.00. Keep Right Symbol (incl. 9 button delin.-Yellow,install,breakaway post) -added fee $150.00. Future Road Extension Advisory, 36"x 30" -fee was $129.00 ; raised to $210.00. Other: added fee $130.00. ~I a CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 98-213, REGULATING FEES AND CHARGES FOR BUSINESS LICENSES, PERMITS AND MUNICIPAL SERVICES BE IT RESOLVED, that changes to Section 3.3 STREET SIGNS, be added to read as follows: Street Name Sign (incl. install w1l2' post) 6"x6" Street Name Sign (incl. install w1l2' post) 6"x9" Street Name Sign (incl. install w1l2' post) 9"x9" Temporary Signs: 15% surcharge for maintenance of temporary signs Stop Sign (incl.brackets,install,no post) 30"x30" Stop Sign )inc!.brackets, install, with post) 30"x30" No Outlet (incl. post & install) 24"x24" 9 Button Delineator-Red (inc!. post & install) 9 Button Delinator-Red (inc!. preakaway post & install) Keep Right Symbol (inc!. 9 button delin.-Yellow, install, no post) Keep Right Symbol (incl. 9 button delin.-Yellow, install, post) Keep Right Symbol (incl. 9 button delin.-Yellow, install, breakaway post) Future Road Extension Advisory (incl. 2 posts & install) 36"x30" No Parking -Use for Turn-Around (inc!. post '& install) Other: $180.00 $201.00 $216.00 $134.00 $110.00 $130.00 $100.00 $ 90.00 $110.00 $110.00 $130.00 $150.00 $210.00 $113.00 $130.00 ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on this 1st day of June, 1999. Dr. Jean Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk DATE: June 1, 1999 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO: V.F. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5397 Public Works Approve Plans and Specifications for Signal and Intersection Improvements at Engineering Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road Rodney W. Rue Requested Action Move to: Synopsis Approve resolution approving construction plans and specifications for traffic signal and intersection improvements at Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway /Scenic Heights Road and authorize bids to be received. The construction plans include installation of a new traffic signal and roadway widening on Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway to improve traffic flow and capacity of the intersection. It is anticipated that construction will be completed by this fall. We have not received a final cost estimate for the project yet, but we anticipate the project costs will be approximately $550,000. Background Information The project is proposed to be funded with TIF funds, subject to a public hearing to revise the project list to include this improvement. One outstanding issue prior to advertising for bids will be securing easements and/or right-of-way from ADC necessary for the project along Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer (through SRF Consulting Group) has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 96-5397 Signal and Intersection Improvements at Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway/Scenic Heights Road and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received and publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and City Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Eden Prairie City Council. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5 % (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 1, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ArrEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 1, 1999 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Calling for a Public Hearing July 20, 1999 to & Financial Services: V.G. Don Uram consider establishing a Tax Increment Financing David Lindahl (TIF) District for housing Requested Action: Move to: Approve Resolution calling for a public hearing July 20, 1999 to consider establishing a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District. Synopsis: The purpose for establishing the proposed TIF District is to help finance the construction of about 36 moderate-cost rental units within the 180 unit Lincoln Parc apartment proposal on the City's site near the water tower on Eden Road. State law requires that before a public hearing is held to establish a TIF District a resolution must first be passed by the City Council for the hearing. Background: A 180 unit market rate rental project is being planned on the site formerly known as the "Ternan site" along Eden Road by Hartford Financial (Jack Brandt). The developer is requesting TIF financing to integrate about 36 units (20%) affordable to persons with incomes below 50% ofthe area median. Details of the TIF plan will be presented to the City Council/HRA on July 20, 1999. Attachments: Resolution Proj ect Area Maps I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON APPROVAL AN AMENDED PROJECT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO.5 IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (QUALIFIED HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 16 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: 1. Proposed Project Plan and Financing Plan. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "HRA") has prepared, and will present to the City for approval, a amended redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Project Plan (the "Project Plan") for Redevelopment Project Area No.5 (the "Project Area"), and a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statues, Section 469.002, subdivision 14 (the "Redevelopment Project"). In order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred in connection with the Project Plan and the Redevelopment Project, the HRA has prepared, and will present, to the City for approval, a tax increment financing plan (the "Financing Plan"), which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defmed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, designated as Tax Increment Financing (Qualified Housing) District No. 16 within the Project Area. It has been proposed that the Board of Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council approve the Project Plan and Financing Plan, and that this Council hold a public hearing on the Project Plan and Financing Plan as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.028 and 469. 175, subdivision 3. 2. Public Hearing. A public hearing is hereby scheduled to be held on the Amended Project Plan and Financing Plan at 7:00 p.m. on July 20, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Eden Prairie City Center, 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing in substantially the form of Exhibit A hereto to be published in the official newspaper of the City not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing, and to provide the information required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 2 to the appropriate governmental bodies. ADOPTED by the City Council on June 1, 1999. ATTEST: Jean L. Harris, Mayor Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk EXHmITA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED PROJECT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO.5 IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND ON APPROVAL OF A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (QUALIFIED HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 16 OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie will hold a public hearing on approval of the an Amended Project Plan (the Project Plan) for Redevelopment Project Area No.5 (the Project Area) and approval ofa Tax Increment Financing Plan (the Financing Plan) for Tax Increment Financing (Qualified Housing) District No. 16 (the Financing District) of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Eden Prairie (the HRA) at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 20, 1999, in the City Council Chambers, 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The Project Plan and Financing Plan provide for the financing with tax increment revenue generated by the Financing District established by the Financing Plan of certain public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA or the City in connection with carrying out the Project Plan for the Project Area. Accompanying this notice is a map of a portion of the City. The map shows the area encompassed by the Project Area and the Financing District from which tax increment may be collected pursuant to the Financing Plan and the area in which such tax increment may be expended. All who wish to be heard as to the Project Plan and Financing Plan will be given an opportunity to express their views at the time of the public hearing or may file written comments with the Finance Director/Clerk prior to the public hearing. Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk EDEN PRAIRIE MARKETCENTER P P-ofCJ~ el> Ii~ l) ~~7J<'( e:..-r 1~;\:';~;EJl'v' 13 ' ""''''1:1'''1 ... _.'100111 Utl( c.-mE ~ru", III or nlE NW I/t rf SEC. U ~ \J.)II~ .')" I "'-.. CI:~ nEil / -~ ,0 ~ I I 5 a71jU'21' W '"'08.4' -., ~~ , ~_ f __ ..•.••. ·T -• -......... -T' ...... --. c -•. 1 U" - ,( ••• e. ""'" T'"OO .--•• ---~....... Il.1I." I "-.. I I I I I I I I ""/ -+ J, ,>" ..... ¥'/'I rwCJ ... J.· ... ~ "400~AAK .:;IJltD'"1 fUJl.4ff.ll • ·~r6 .• ~ 1\-~Jf, ... ,. $J~ .>" ,. "'-.. "~f' .1',' " ~. , " C> '()",i', ~ ..... I .r. '''0 ')/ I " -1/,p/~~~ -' '-<;_.--,(,A '" ~ 'A""" ~/_" .,'. " , l> •• U....." "-":f" O~ .... ~ 0"'"'''' , " .,c.~.> C1 II U""""'''' ''4 "-'" <')_ ~ ~~~~""( '--. (~ ~ "'<o'Aifc)-' "~1. ... 0'" " '\~. , -.,:.~. 'V ~l'1,.~~/'b " .. ~" "'\-·O~ "., .... q. 1:'~tr,,"'4,4~ " r:.~!.;~;f HP ,.. ,...."'TI" .. . n"I".I ....... . "'o',}' ""'(""'''' ,..J{MON.. \ LNIO'-'AfUC ... _ j\ -- C"" IItCl'i -... -~.~~ -\ ... ,-------·v .-;< ,~ E fJ -C ! I) ~~ on"'IIIAr:( "'!O UntlN ["'n.U[Nrs "'n( SHO"" nfUS: JIL. I I '--' r , I __ JJLJ __ 1(ltlll 0 ftU 1'( 'MOnl, Ut't.(5' QIII(f"'fW'IU INOICAl(O. ,l'm ,.OJQlUUIO ln1 LI'n:S, ,.tlD 10 Jut .tt 'WiD'" ",ttl'-5S Orll(n'MS( ItIOICAlfO "tiD ADJOIIilNO RIO.n_Of_WAY LlNES. AS 5.'0",,",( Of' nl( Pl-At o 0["01[5 1'lOtI "'0"'U ... ,1I1 " ..... StS Of' P,,,"IUOS I, "S~U""(O \ \ \ \ I I : I \ B\ L I I I I I I : I g 1 8 cJ ~ . ~ • I I I o c K ... :" ("51 --,,;- U.OO ~, ~:i J :: 'I = ~ I: I ~ ~ I I I I I ____ ~ I 1 ___ --6"'11.,,',,' g I I ____ \. ... )U.\) I ." ;1"-----: . I ,,10"'_:i I _ ...-...-,,0 t.(. \ t. ".,~y' :!!----"" J>.-" \G\.t' ~ " ~·IO.' S" 1 ?_-~"';';'---I __ -- --\........ -7 ,., al~;s9:,: "I D.~.~&. \ -.... -L -1,~~l' \u • ~\ 0. ~ ---•••.• _. , l(),A& 1\ _ 111l.M '., ~J.. ". \' \ \ ~ I Scol, ~ tnt c:::=::)OOO" ..... .c~ ,S Q •• " ... .." "SOUl'ltnl'( fIlDII-O"-WI-l or SlItr.t(nl(( LNlt r[A DOC. No. 'u5tl1l a> ., ,_-'I'" ':-rJ -I' I ,,,,. I ..,., ...... ,-.1 I t _,,, 4. 2 R'e. "b "('1 Vlil ." ':.,.. A' 12QH __ ("'111.., S a'I~.·U· If J .... , ~. ......... I,";" ..... ..,~(!l(~(' ". " )'00. . , ... ' / '0' ' •. 1-1.11 _",--,' ~"~t'J C- R .. ,., •. ,I 6 -0'0"1' o 100 200 lOO OETNI. " "'0' 10 St",-( . , ,- r\ t',::--tt) ~: (rJ:-t' .... I, '\:. . I! (" I::' ::.: '"' I ~~ •. : C.J(""; 70 I ~~lfl<~ ~\lI ~[(j~ /' ~~. ,OUPI Utl[ « nl( Ii lIZ or nit / r::- tf.,.. 1/4 or «c. u 1 ". ft ~ 705.50 I f / r~ . /./ i .f~~ .. -- / ~ . :: 1· .. " r.: ~, ~( 1 I." 1,,/ ~b.r1-"·I:·:1 ~ ~ , . ..1 ~ 2 u. ../' ...HI X"~ .~I~I I lA. )i if m r.2 I tljl 4 I 'frl I 1'f,5' ., ... ·u· w l~-",.r, '1 • _____ _ ,,_.1 0., ..-o.u -_ 'U.O) 4.. t.J.I.s - . ''In,. ~ SII'GlElAEE ~ I lAtlE .......... . ~ ..... d.:lIlJ. : d :...:.::( -S 17"'·11'" tI ::It ,..__ 100.0) Dt:T,..,L 0 ItOl '0 $C.AU 'J G X ~ ~I~I :1--- %1 11,,10, •• 1.,..."1 'I 1,,1\1, .. I \J\llvl )J '1"\1 "TI ro,. I"IJI/I II\JI~ L- II H:;:::;U·:11U:.E fi.LS. ~:G. 3r,; 11-', 1I0n •• n lho'!, ~ I) Pellinen oison Inc. , CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 1, 1999 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: Community Development ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Donald R. Uram VI.A. Michael D.Franzen Eagle Peak Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Approve 1 st Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 1.92 acres; and • Adopt Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 1.92 acres into one lot; and • Direct Staffto prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Synopsis The project is for a convenience gas station including fast food and a car wash located at the southwest comer of Valley View Road and Plaza Drive. Background Information A formal letter of request for an early grading permit is included with this packet. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the project at its May 10, 1999, meeting. The Parks and Recreation voted did not review the project. Attachments 1. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 2. Staff Report dated May 7, 1999 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 10, 1999 4. Correspondence CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EAGLE PEAK FOR LUXUX CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: EAGLE PEAK That the preliminary plat of Eagle Peak dated May 25, 1999, consisting of 1.92 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in confonnance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of June, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT/ OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Krista R. Flemming, Planner I May 7,1999 Eagle Peak Luxus Corporation SW Comer of Valley View Road and Plaza Drive 11-116-22-32-0013 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 1.92 acres. 2. Site Plan Review on 1.92 acres. 3. Preliminary Plat of 1.92 acres into one lot. -;. •• 110 ~.oe --··· .. 37·000' \- \ I) 1 ( II) -- I (5) I (: (11) r-'~-i if ~--.r--~l~ ~ · • i 1 l~ ~ &R · t: ; . · + ~ .. , --- · Staff Report -Eagle Peak May 7,1999 BACKGROUND The site is currently vacant with no existing trees or wetland areas. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The land is presently zoned Rural, but needs to be rezoned to C-Reg-Ser to be consistent with the zoning ordinance and corresponding guide plan land use. SITE PLAN The proposed plan is for a 8,602 sq. ft. gas convenience/fast food building and a 2,400 sq. ft. car wash. The base area ratio is .15 and the floor area ratio is .13 which meets zoning regulations for the C-Reg-Ser district. There are 69 parking spaces provided which exceeds the parking requirement. All building and parking setbacks comply with the code. A sidewalk along Plaza Drive will connect to the existing trail along Valley View Road. ARCHITECTURE The building meets the 75% brick, glass, or natural stone requirement. ACCESS/CIRCULATION/TRAFFIC At this time, Hennepin County indicated that access off Valley View Road into the site will be through a "right in only" entrance. Luxus Corporation is continuing to seek a "right in-right out" access from the County. The staff reviewed both options and will support either access according to Hennepin County's final decision. A "right in-right out" access is located off Plaza Drive through an existing, shared access with the strip center south of the proposed project. A stoplight currently exists at the comer of Valley View Road and Plaza Drive. Internal stacking lanes are provided for the fast food and car wash driveways. The fast food drive isle will accommodate up to 22 cars while the car wash drive isle accommodates up to 16 cars. Both stacking distances are consistent with industry standards and City requirements. LANDSCAPING There are no significant trees on the property. The project provides 49 caliper inches oflandscaping which exceeds the code requirement. 2 Staff Report -Eagle Peak May 7,1999 LIGHTING Single-head, downcast, shoebox type lighting is proposed. The maximum height for light structures at this site is 30 feet. Canopy lighting will be recessed. SIGNAGE All signage details are specified in the plans and meet City Code requirements. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Sanitary sewer and water is available from Valley View Road. Drainage will be directed to an on- site NURP pond sized to accommodate this development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recomends approval of the Zoning District change from Rural to C-Reg-Ser on 1.92 acres; Site Plan Review on 1.92 acres; and Preliminary Plat of 1.92 acres into 1 lot based on plans dated April 16, 1999, subject to the staff report dated May 7, 1999, and by incorporating the following conditions: 1. Prior to release of the final plat, the proponent shall: A. Acquire necessary permits with Hennepin County for the access off Valley View Road. 2. Prior to grading or any construction on the property, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Engineer prior to grading. 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the cash park fee. B. Submit a landscaping bond for review. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Eden Prairie May 10, 1999 PageS C. EAGLE PEAK by Luxus Corporation Flemming introduced the plan to the Commission Tom Vol ?, Luxus Corporation, representing Eagle Peak, presented the plan to the Commission. He stated they were in agreement with the staff recommendation and stipulations. Sandstad stated concern about noise from the car wash especially in the evening hours. He asked if the developer would be agreeable to having the doors closed during washes in the summer, evening hours. The developer responded that if they do not meet the city noise ordinance they would be in agreement. Richard Berry, 7359 , is in favor ofthis project and told the Commission not to worry about the noise. He asked what gas station and was informed Mobil; and what fast food and was told they had not made a decision. He stated concern if there was no right tum allowed. He also told the Commission to "lighten up" on the brick requirements indicating there's too much brick now and they should allow the developers to be creative. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Habicht to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Habicht to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Luxus Corporation for Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 1.92 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.92 acres and Preliminary Plat of 1.92 acres into one lot, based on plans dated April 16, 1999 and subject to recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 7, 1999. Motion carried 5-0. /1 APR-06-1999 12:24 FROM Henne Mr_ Alan Gray, P_R, City Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-4485 Dear Mr _ Gray: RE: TO April 6, 1999 Eagle Peak: site plan review CSAH-39 (Valley View Road) I Plaza Drive FoJlow-up on CSAH-39 access discussion I am responding for Tom lolmson concerning your letter to him on March 16111 requesting consideration of a right-in / right-out entrance to CSAH-39 for the proposed Eagle Peak gas station I convenience store I fast food j car wash development. Hennepin County administers an entrance permitting process consistent with the authority granted by State Starutes a.nd the policies adopted by the County Board of Commissioners. This process requires tha.t any proposed driveway to a county highway must have an approved county entrance permit issued prior to commencing construction_ Our original response letter to City Planner Mike Franzen on February 26th mentioned that the proposed entrance to CSAH-39 would not meet our county access spacing guidelines. These guidelines recommend providing a minimum 1/8 mile (660 foot) spacing for a non-public, high volume (> 1,000 ADT) right-in J right- out entrance to a divided minor arterial roadway_ This proposed entrance is located approximately 375 feet west of the Plaza Drive intersection. The proposed entrance is problematical for a number of reasons: • Our county acddent statistics and recent statewide studies have found that accident rates increase markedly when the average access spacing is less than about 500 feet_ National studies have found that 10-15 percent of arterial roadway accidents can be attributed to driveway conflicting movements alone. • The proposed entrance is located near the beginning tapers of both of the eastbound right tum and left turn lanes at Plaza Drive. Vehicles entering CSAH-39 from the site will potentially conflict with through, right and left turning vehicles proceeding eastbound on CSAH-39. • The introduction of an entrance in or near a right turn lane introduces a short hazardous weaving maneuver between CSAH-39 traffic desiring to turn right at Plaza Drive with entering vehicles from the site destined to the east on CSAH -39_ • The proximity of the entrance to the intersection will encourage other hazardous weaving maneuvers as some vehicles from the site try to weave across CSAH-39 in order to turn left or U-turn at Plaza Drive_ • Roadway capacity can be profoundly affected by· added entrance traffic. Nationa.l studies have found that the capacity of an arterial decreases significantly as more entrances are allowed fOT driveway entering traffic Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Driw MedUla, Minrlc:sotil 55340-5421 (, (612) 745-7000 FAX: (612) g52-67~7 IDO: (612) 852-6760 Our above concerns related to vehicle conflicts are heightened in this case because this development has the potential to generate a significant number of trips due. to the gas station I convenience / fast food I car wash combination of uses. We understand the Fire Marshall's concern for vehicle egress in an emergency situation. However, as an alternative, the site can be designed with surmountable boulevards. berms, or open areas to allow vehicles to exit the site quickly to the street under emergency conditions. Based on these considerations, we recommend agamst providing a right-in I right-out access to the site on CSAH-39. A single entrance onto Plaza Drive should be able to adequately serve the site. To respond to the developer's needs for improved accessibility, our original response letter suggested the possibility of a right-in only driveway off CSAH-39. This right-in access would require an extension of the existing right tum lane so that it begins west of the proposed entrance. With this design, the right-in would be much less of a safety problem than a right-in / right-out since most of the conflicting movements on CSAH-39 are eliminated. Also, this design would allow for easier tanker truck deliveries of gasoline to the site. Please contact Tom Johnson (745-7630) or myself (745-7633) if you have any additional comments or questions regarding this proposed development. Robert H. Byers, P.E. Seriior Transportation Planner c: Jim Grube -Director Transportation Department Tom Johnson -Transportation Planning Engineer Dave Zetterstrom -Entrance Permit Coordinator Mike Franzen -Eden Prairie City Planner . 1 Mike Franzen City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd. Henne Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Eagle Peak site plan review CSAH 39, SW quadrant Plaza Drive Review and Recommendations Dear Mr. Franzen: .illppoCounty February 26, 1999 We have reviewed the above site plan and make the following comments: • Enough right of way or easement should be provided to accommodate the current or future pathway along CSAH 39, approximately 20' behind the existing curb line. • The proposed right in/right out driveway does not meet Hennepin County's proposed spacing guidelines of 660'. A right tum ingress can be permitted with a right tum lane and appropriate signage and geometries on-site to preclude egress onto CSAH 39. • All proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to access drainage and utility construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 745-7600 for the appropriate permit forms. • The developer must restore all areas within the county right of way disturbed during the construction. Please direct any response to me at 745-7643. Sincerely, David K. Zetterstrom Entrance Permit Coordinator DKZ:jrh Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340-5421 (612) 745-7500 FAX: (612) 478-4000 TDD: (612) 852-6760 Recycled Paper CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 1, 1999 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREAJDIVISION: Community Development ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Donald R. Uram VI. B. ScottKipp Oak:view Office Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 3.76 acres of the overall Technology Park PUD; and • Approve 1 st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers on 3.76 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 3.76 acres; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). • Direct Staff to issue a land alteration permit for the Mount Properties to proceed with grading at their own risk and subject to receipt of necessary permits from the Watershed District and u.S. Army Corp. of Engineers. Synopsis This project is to construct a 32,000 square foot one-story walkout office building located at 7765 Golden Triangle Drive. Background Information There have been four previous projects approved for this site ranging between a 27,800 sq. ft. three-story office building to a 58,000 sq. ft. five-story office building. These projects proposed stormwater ponding in an existing wetland, and required Shoreland Code waivers. The 1998 approval for a 50,000 sq. ft. office building had received all the necessary permits for wetland alteration from the Watershed District and U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers. The current 32,000 sq. ft. office building has less impact on the site than the previous approvals. A similar amount of wetland alteration is proposed as in the 1998 approval with on-site wetland mitigation. The plans have been revised based on the Staff Report recommendations. A Travel Demand Management plan will be prepared for the development prior to building permit issuance. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the project. The Parks and Recreation Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment 2. Staff Report dated May 7, 1999 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 10, 1999 4. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes dated May 17, 1999 5. Letter from Mount Properties dated May 25, 1999 1 I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. OAKVIEW OFFICE A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT OF OAKVIEW OFFICE FOR MOUNT PROPERTIES WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Amendment of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on Oakview Office PUD Concept Amendment by Mount Properties and considered their request for approval for development and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on June 1, 1999; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Oakview Office, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally descnbed as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval as outlined in the plans dated May 25, 1999. 3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated May 10, 1999. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 1st day of June, 1999. JeanL. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Exhibit A Oakview Office Builing Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, Technology Park 4th Addition, Hennepin County, MN. STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: . DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner Krista R. Flemming, Planner I May 7, 1999 Oakview Office Mount Properties 7765 Golden Triangle Drive 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 3.76 acres of the overall Technology Park PUD. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 3.76 acres, with waIvers. 3. Zoning District Amendment within the Office District on 3.76 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 3.76 acres. f l-.' e ... - 11:1 l ~ ~ ~ .... __ ... _d_. ___ .L.._ •• l ~ ~ -------1 ( 11) ~l""'.ll.u. ,m 113 JM;I 74TH ST Vi . ... , 1 1 Y~~M~OlOCV I ~A~~ ( 16) )' ... ----.", . :i! • \)1 "<If. 24' ~;'I ®fli I t (6) 1 pal ~D ADO;« •••. ~ ••• :.~ •• Z:O .•••• ~ •• ::.:: ( I) Staff Report -Oakview Office May 7, 1999 BACKGROUND This 3.76 acre site is guided and zoned office and is part of the overall Technology Park PUD approved for office, office/service, and office/warehouse uses. Surrounding land uses are industrial. There have been four projects approved on the property since the original PUD approval, consisting of office or industrial development ranging between 27,800 square feet and 58,000 square feet. All these projects required variances from the Shoreland Code in one fonn or another for building and parking setback, building height, impervious surface, grading, and lot size. In all approvals, grading was shown within the wooded knoll and creek corridor. In addition, stonn water ponding was proposed within a wetland. The last approval was in 1998 for a 50,000 square foot, three-story office building and parking deck for Ancor Communications. Variances were granted for an impervious surface, setback for the building and parking deck from the creek, building height, and the alteration within the shoreland impact zone. SITE PLAN The site plan shows development ofa 32,000 square foot, two-story office building. No parking deck is necessary with this proposal. The Base Area Ratio is 10% and Floor Area Ratio is 20%. City Code pennits up to a 30% BAR and a 50% FAR in the office zoning district. The building and parking meets all setbacks from lot lines. A total of 160 parking spaces is required for this proposal and is shown on the site plan. SHORELAND CODE Nine Mile Creek abuts the site, and is classified as a General Development water according to the Shore1and Code. The proposal will require shoreland waivers through the PUD as follows: • Structure Setback Minimum. setback requirement for structures to the Ordinary High Water Level of the creek is 150 feet. The proposed building is setback 75 feet. The 1985 Nonnark project was approved with a 70 foot setback. • Impervious Surface Staff Report -Oakview Office May 7,1999 Maximum impervious surface is 30%. The proposal shows a 45% impervious surface. This is less than the 49% approved for the Ancor proposal and the 52% approved for Normark. All hard surface runoff from the site will be treated to NURP standards. • Alteration of the 75 foot Shore Impact Zone The plan shows grading within this area. Allowing the graded slopes within this area together with the reforestation plan will maximize screening to the parking. All previous approvals showed similar alterations. During review of the original PUD, the desire by the City to preserve the wooded knoll was a primary consideration in the layout of the lots and site plan approvals. Development planning for the Technology Park PUD could have met the requirements of the Shoreland Code, but would have resulted in major alteration of the knoll or its total elimination. The waivers are reasonable for the following reasons: • There are fewer waivers with less impact than the previous variances for the site. • The wooded knoll and creek corridor was dedicated as part of the original PUD approval. • All previous approvals showed grading close to the creek prior to creation of the shore impact zone. • Tree replacement, landscaping, and reforestation of the graded slopes in the shore impact zone screens parking and creates a more forested look than what exists today. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The original PUD was approved prior to the Tree Preservation Code. The other approvals were based on the analysis of significant trees on Outlot A (wooded knoll) and the proposed site. The updated tree inventory indicates a total of 1,096 diameter inches of significant trees on the two parcels. The plan shows tree loss of 479 diameter inches or 44%. This is slightly higher than the average 40% tree loss for office and industrial development, but less than the 50% approved for the Normark development, which involved grading and tree loss up to an elevation of9l0 feet. Tree replacement required is 280 caliper inches and is included with the landscaping plan. The property rises from an elevation of 833 feet along Nine Mile Creek to 885 feet near the north central portion ofthe site. Development ofthe property will involve a retaining wall along the north property line, as did all previous approvals. A retaining wall will also be located along the south side of the easterly parking lot. Drainage from this site and from the industrial site north of the wooded knoll will be treated to NURP standards. The NURP pond and a small portion of the development will alter 0.67 acres of existing wetland Staff Report -Oakview Office May 7,1999 located along Nine Mile Creek. Similar alteration was approved for the Ancor project. Total wetland filling is 0.17 acres, with 0.50 acres of excavation for the pond. Mitigation for the alteration includes creation of additional wetland type diversity, creation of upland buffer areas through landscaping, and the treatment of proposed and existing storm water runoff to NURP standards. New on-site wetland will be created totaling 0.22 acres. The combination provides mitigation in excess of the required 2: I ratio with 50% new wetland and 50%upland buffer. Permits were issued from the Corp of Engineers and the Watershed District of a similar alteration for the Ancor project. This proposal is a reasonable use for the property. All efforts have been made to avoid the wetland encroachment. UTILITIES City sewer and water can be provided to the site with connection to existing lines located in Outlot A to the north, adjacent to Golden Triangle Drive. ARCHITECTURE The two-story building meets City Code for 75% face brick and glass. The building is 27 feet tall based on the height definition and meets City Code. Rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed to be screened by a five-foot parapet wall. If the parapet wall does not physically screen the rooftop mechanical units, metal panel screening will be required. Lighting for the property should consist of downcast cut off fixtures. The free-standing sign for this site complies with the code. LANDSCAPING Based on total building size and the required tree replacement, a total of 380 caliper inches of landscaping is required. The landscaping plan meets this requirement. To provide a better wetland landscaping transition and additional screening of the retaining wall along the east parking area staff recommends that additional wetland type shrub massing be included along the south side of the project as shown on the attachment. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT While the traffic for this project will be less than the previous approval, there is a growing concern by the City Council about the amount of traffic being added to an already crowded system, Staff Report -Oakview Office May 7,1999 especially in the Golden Triangle area. Other developments such as Best Buy, Crosstown Circle Center, Flagship Corporate Center and Flying Cloud Corporate Campus have developed TDM plans. Traffic Demand Management (TDM) is a tool that can have a positive result in reducing the impacts associated with peak hour capacity problems. Some ways in which TDM can have the greatest impact on reducing peak hour capacity problems include the following: • Staggered work hours, or flextime. • Car pools and Van pools, including working with other corporations. • Telecommuting • Establishing a TDM coordinator • Park and Ride lots • Transit services The proponent should work with City, 1-494 Corridor Commission, and Southwest Metro Transit Commission to implement TDM program as part of the project approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 3.76 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 3.76 acres; Zoning District Amendment within the Office District on 3.76 acres; and Site Plan Review on 3.76 acres based on plans dated April 15, 1999, this Staff Report, and the following: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall revise the landscaping plan to include additional shrub massing as depicted in the attachment. 2. Prior to final plat approva~ the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Provide a permit from the Watershed District and the Corp. of Engineers for the alteration of the wetland. B. Install erosion control and tree protection fencing at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by the City Engfueer and City Forester. Staff Report -Oakview Office May 7,1999 4. Prior to building pennit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Review the building plans with the Fire Marshal. B. Submit a landscaping bond in accordance with City Code. C. Provide building material samples and colors for review by the City Planner. D. Develop a TDM program in coordination with the City, 1-494 Corridor Commission and Southwest Metro Transit to address the reduction in traffic in the Golden Triangle area. E. Pay the cash park fee. 5. The following waivers to the Shore land Management section of the City Code are granted as part of the PUD: 1. Building setback of75 feet from Nine Mile Creek. Code requires 150 feet. 2. Impervious surface of 45%. City Code pennits a maximum of 30%. 3. Alteration in the 75 foot Shore Impact Zone. City Code restricts alteration in the Shore Impact Zone. J{) 0 ... ,r """ o ,,," ONe o 10' 12'" 'T ... o SOD TO DIS TURBED AREAS A trI\OfMEN"- ,,. """ o 01t"0Ne. '·· ... 0·'·.""" O· ""-"""0 .""'. 11-11" . Ul'" 13" ". 'T""" o '2"o.uc:~tff*o.uc: 06~""" cf OAK o c:{)""'-OAI< . -,r"'", O''-OAK ,T""" '. Q' . 'u" (.).!II( ,. OAK d~"Q.\I( . 10" IT 0 ....... ''-OAK dO""""""" O . "r 'd' ,,"t1" . )~. 0''-'''''\ 'OIl~ U"ewe: o 'j ! { ~ PRESERVED NATURAL AREA ~ SEED AREA "'111 UNDOT MIX 200 (UPLAND BUffER UIX) TOP OF wAJ+. To,...P!~BED UUITS " EROSION CONTROl UAT R~aUIREDUU I LU I A.. "- AT SlOPES CREATER THAN J: 1 . ~ .. 0'" I I \ \ o .,.~ '.-0»< 0 .~~ o 0'1)" ~_13" !!} lROPILQAY. .~':'T 3 ~O .. PCA SEED AREA WITH MNDOT MIX 200 (UPLAND BUFFER UIX) EROSION CONTROl UA T REQUIRED AT SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 t~·nt .-: ',::: ~. OUTLOT B ,/ -......... '~', d __ , " ~t / '---\ --,--, j ~ ---_\ < ._-~~ -----.--, --~ , ---~-;nm",,'" _ _ '-~n.;:g ~= . I -", -.... '!'!'.«--e,:... I ------\ ."., I --I 8 "'L ~ ~.-jj~f~ 1~;;:7~·~:.:: i~.;· .... W~:.i'" ,. A"'TI'ttI"'-SH kCl 8 MASSES """ ::::~.~' / ( \ 30' I l,L I PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Eden Prairie May 10, 1999 Page 4 B. OAKVIEW OFFICE by Mount Properties Franzen explained this was office building five ofthe Technology Park PUD. This proposal is smaller than the originally approved plan. ___________ " 105008 Bluff Road introduced the development team. He presented the new plan indicating they are in agreement with the staff recommendation and stipulations. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Lewis to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Lewis to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Mount Properties for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 3.76 acres of the overall Technology Park PUD, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers and Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 3.76 acres, and Site Plan Review on 3.76 acres, based on plans dated April 15, 1999 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 7, 1999. Motion carried 5-0. I~ Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission May 17,1999 Page 2 Stolar wanted to correct his statement on page three, in the second paragraph of the second motion to read: "Stolar said that if the City is waiving the fees, and the commission doesn't know about it, he is concerned". Koenig wanted to correct the sentence in the discussion section of the second paragraph under the fIrst motion to read: "Koenig brought up the possibility of an amendment being added to the motion stating that the appropriate cash park fees be paid by the developer, and discussion ensued." Koenig asked to amend the last sentence in the second paragraph on page two to change the word "meadow' to "sedge meadow". MOTION: Stolar moved to approve the minutes as amended. Wilson seconded. Approved 5-0. Hilgeman abstained. IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. None V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Oakview Office The proposed development site is on 3.76 acres located along Golden Triangle Dr near Nine Mile Creek. Steve Michaels presented the proposal in behalf of the developer, which includes a 32,000 square foot building. The commission approved a similar landscape plan in August 1998. Tree loss is 34%, or 31 trees, with mitigation of 280 inches of landscaping material consisting primarily deciduous trees. The tree loss calculations include Outlot A, which has been dedicated to the city. The Planning Commission has reviewed and approved waivers to the shore land setback code in regard to Nine Mile Creek. Discussion: Stolar asked if the setback variance is the same as granted for the previously proposed Normark project. Fox said that the Normark project was approved with a 70 foot setback, while this proposal has a 75 foot setback from the creek. Koenig asked where the willows would be located. Michaels said they would be by the NURP pond. Koenig asked where the building would set in relation to the hill and what would be done on Outlot A. Fox said the slope of the hill is 70 feet, and there will be no grading or disturbance of Outlot A. Jacobson questioned the percentage of tree loss calculated in the staff report, as the fIgures do not appear accurate. The report states tree loss at 34%, but said his calculation is 42%. Koenig said she read somewhere in the report that tree loss was 44%. Fox said the 34% may a typing error, and that when the Andcor development was proposed, the tree loss was 44%. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission May 17, 1999 Page 3 MOTION: Wilson moved to accept the Oakview Office proposal as recommended in the May 11, 1999 Staff Report. Corneille seconded. The motion was approved 6-0. B. Lincoln Park The proposed development is on 4.83 acres located at Eden Road and Singletree Lane. The land is owned by the city and is a part of the Market Center Planned Unit Development. Jack Brandt of Hartford Financial presented the plan, which includes 186 apartment homes, and 20,000 square feet of commercial, office, and small retail space. The building will be four stories with 2 levels of underground parking. Buildings will be stucco and brick in a traditional style. He said the neighboring retailers support the plan to bring housing to the downtown marketplace. Fox said the land is being zoned from rural to commercial. There will be a significant tree loss of 502 inches, with 400 inches of required mitigation. Mitigation that will not fit on the site will go on the adjacent city- owned sites. Storm water discharge will drain into the existing NURP pond and into Purgatory Creek. Staff is recommending a sidewalk along Eden Road. Discussion: Koenig is concerned about the landscaping plan, and the amount of tree loss. Hilegman said there is "a lot of building for the lot size". She questioned the amount of 40% impervious surface in a Shoreland area. Koenig questioned building so close to Lake Idlewild. Fox said the Shoreland district is within 1,000 feet from the body of water. Stolar noted that the building would be 475 from the lake. Fox said the shoreline setback is 200 feet from the lake, so no variance is needed. Drainage will not go toward the lake, it will go through the NURP pond near Bachman's. Koenig expressed concern about the tree loss and the 290-inch mitigation. Fox said staff is working with the developer to come up with a plan. Hilgeman said that from a natural resources perspective, she doesn't believe this is the best use for this site. She asked "if this is the best we can do on this 4.38 acres". She is concerned about the amount of concrete, the loss of trees, and the proximity to the lake. Fox said the .site is guided for Regional Commercial use, and this proposal does meet the guide plan. Koeing asked Brandt about the affordabi1ity and the rental range of the apartments. Brandt said the rental range is about $915 to $1,600 per month, and an affordability component can be added. Jacobson said that the development waivers requested are "way above code". He asked if this was normal, and stated that he thinks these waivers are ''way out of bounds". Stolar asked if the tree mitigation plan was the best that could be done. CornieHe pointed out that the mitigation will be met by planting on city property. MOTION: Corneille moved to approve the Lincoln Park development proposal with the staff recommendations outlined in the May 11, 1999 Staff Report. Wilson seconded. May 25, 1999 Scott Kipp Senior Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Scott: MOUNT PROPERTIES At the June 1, 1999 City Council meeting, Mount Properties will be requesting the approval of our Oakview Office Building. In addition, we are requesting an early grading permit to allow us to prepare the site prior to the City Council's second reading. Mount Properties, Inc. understands this to be at its risk, however, it is necessary in light of the approval delays and required delivery of Oakview Office Building by December 1,1999. We look forward to the Council meeting as well as the approval of these requests. Robert J. Solfelt President Mount Properties, Inc. 612-941-1383 fax 612-941-1560 7808 Creekridge Circle, Suite 305 Bloomington, Minnesota 55439 MOUNT PROPERTIES Development Review Committee City of Eden Prairie Community Development Department 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 April 16, 1999 RE: Land Development Application for Oakview Office. Building 7777 Golden Triangle Drive -Revised Dear Committee Members: Mount Properties, Inc. is submitting application materials in support of a request for the approvals necessary for development of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Technology Park 4th Addition in the Eden Prairie Technology Park. This lot is located on the east side of Golden Triangle Drive, north of Nine Mile Creek. The Project being proposed with this application is a two-story office building containing 32,000 square feet. There have been several past proposals for development of this site which have been approved. The City of Eden Prairie approved a 50,000 square feet three-level office building with a one-level parking ramp in the summer of 1998 for Ancor Corporation. That approval was for Hoyt Properties on Resolution No. 98-106. The application by Mount Properties will maintain the same zoning, wetland and grading schemes along Nine Mile Creek as the approved Ancor application. The intent of this application is to reduce the size of the development in the following areas: 1 . Building size is reduced from 50,000 s.f. to 32,000 s.f. 2. Building height is reduced from three stories to two. 3. Parking capacity is reduced from 245 to 160 parking stalls. 4. There will be no parking deck. 5. The amount of retaining walls and grading will be reduced. 612-941-1383 fax 612-941-1560 7808 Creekridge Circle, Suite 305 Bloomington, Minnesota 55439 Page 2 Oakview The following professionals have created the submission plans for your review and comment: Planning, Civil Engineering, Environmental: Mr. Miles Lindberg BRW, Inc. Thresher Square 700 Third Street South Minneapolis, MN 55415 Phone: 612-373-6341 Fax: 612-370-1378 Architects: Nicholas Sperides & David Thorsen Weiman, Sperides, Thorsen Architects 7808 Creekridge Circle Bloomington, MN 55438 Phone: 612-996-9662 Fax: 612-996-9663 Existing Conditions When Golden Triangle Drive was extended across the creek to connect the Technology Park and Southwest Crossing developments, the culvert crossing location dictated the relocation of the Creek channel on the east side of the street from its location at the time of platting. This northerly shift of the creek, which averages approximately 25 feet, further reduces the site area available for building placement based on Shoreland zoning structure setbacks. Nine Mile Creek is deSignated as General Development Waters, with a shoreland zone extending, by definition, 300 feet from the bank of the channel. The Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) for the Creek in this area was established by the DNR at elevation 832.14 at the top of the bank on the northerly side of the creek. The OHWM is identified on the EXisting Conditions survey based on the typical creek channel width, which is approximately 12 feet. The shoreland zone related to Nine Mile Creek encompasses the entire Lot 2 site. The DNR area hydrologist, Ms. Ceil Strauss, provided a letter to the City in January of 1992 confirming that the DNR's jurisdiction ended at the bank of the creek. The remaining wetland area, as field-delineated and mapped by BRW, Inc., falls under Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction. The wetland edge as delineated, and the edge of the 1 OO-year floodplain at elevation 935 are roughly coincident. The wetland delineation was reviewed and approved by the Watershed District and Leslie If} Page 3 Oakview Stovring at the time the Ancor proposal was approved. Permits were issued at that time; copies are attached. Existing sanitary sewer and water service stubs available to serve Lot 2 are located north of the northerly lot line in Outlot A. Utilization of these service connections will require open trenching on Outlot A and removal and replacement of portions of the concrete sidewalk, which is located on the east side of Golden Triangle Drive. This sidewalk serves as the public trail connection for pedestrians between the Smetana Lake trail on the south side of the lake, and the eastern City limit. The trail segment from Golden Triangle drive to the east occurs along West 76th Street. The bicycle component of the trail system is located on a bituminous pathway on the west side of Golden Triangle Drive. According to Parks Director Lambert, the Park and Recreation Department have no plans to extend the trail to the east of Golden Triangle Drive along the Nine Mile Creek corridor. Site Plan The proposed building and parking setbacks as listed on the Site Plan require a setback waiver to reduce the structure setback from Nine Mile Creek from 150 feet to 75 feet. The equivalent setback provided in the Normark proposal (1991) was 70 feet for the Creek setback. Because there is no longer any proposed public use within the Creek corridor, such as the trail which was proposed when the Normark plan was developed, the reduced distance currently being proposed between the Creek and parking lot edges should not be a significant issue if sufficient screening of the parking lot areas is provided as viewed from north- bound Golden Triangle Drive. Other Site Data comparisons between the Ancor plan and the proposed plan include: • Base Area Ratio: • Floor Area Ratio: • Impervious Surface Area: • Impervious Surface Percentage: Ancor 12% 31% 80,380 s.f. 49% Oakview 10% 20% 73,200 s.f 45% Based on these figures, a waiver is also required from the current maximum impervious surface area requirement in the Shoreland Ordinance to allow an increase from 30% to 45% impervious surface coverage. Impacts from increased impervious surface coverage are mitigated by the prOVision of NURP pond treatment of runoff prior to discharge into the protected waters. Page 4 Oakview The Site Plan shows proposed sidewalk connections to the public walk along Golden Triangle Drive, and the location of the proposed project sign north of the entry driveway. The proposed sign and setback are consistent with the requirements of the Zoning District and sign regulations. The north property line setback is consistent with the code at 10'. Landscape Plan The landscape concept is based on three design objectives: • Provide a buffer to the building and creek with landscape relief in the parking lot areas. • Use native trees and shrubs in the zone between the parking lot and wetland edge to create an upland buffer zone, which provides diversity of size, color, form and habitat. • Minimize the amount of manicured, formal landscape. Use more formal landscape elements sparingly at the building entrylturnaround and along the south face of the building to accentuate the areas by contrast with the balance of the site area. A wetland edge/upland buffer treatment is proposed along the entire south perimeter adjacent to the parking lot, wetland edge, and pond edge. This buffer combines native wet prairie grasses and native overstory trees, which can thrive in wetland conditions to create diversity of plant material and habitat adjacent to the wetland and open-water pond. Grading Plan The Grading Plan illustrates proposed grades and spot elevations on parking lot and sidewalk surfaces, the finished floor elevations at ground level, top and bottom of wall elevations, proposed contours for landscaped areas, and proposed contours illustrating excavation required for a NURP treatment pond. The proposed treatment pond is designed to preserve the maximum number of the existing willow trees located in the southeast corner of the site while providing for the required pond volume. The pond outlet for the design storm is located in the southwest corner of the pond. A spillway for more intense rainfall events is provided at the southern end of the pond. Detailed drainage, storm sewer, and pond design calculations have been provided to the Engineering Department. Page 5 Oakview The Grading Plan requires an area of wetland fill totaling 7,500 square feet of 0.17 acres. The wetland fill is necessary to provide a slope transition from the parking lot edge elevation to the existing wetland elevation adjacent to the proposed pond. Mitigating for the wetland fill is proposed to be provided through a combination of new wetland area created, and upland buffer area. New wetland totaling 0.22 acre is proposed to the north of the creek, south of the building, and the upland buffer includes the sloped area between the building and creek, and between the parking lot and pond, for an area of approximately one- half acre (600'x35'). The combination provides mitigation in excess of the required 2:1 ratio with 50% new wetland and 50% upland buffer. This concept was approved and permitted for the Ancor proposal by both the Watershed District and the Army Corps of Engineers, for the same area of impact. Further mitigation is provided by sizing the NURP pond to provide treatment of runoff from Lot 1 (the two office-warehouse buildings on the north property line) which is currently discharged to the Creek without treatment. The area between the wetland limit and the parking lot is graded to provide a slope transition which can be planted with a variety of native plant species to create an upland buffer, or edge to help mitigate the proposed wetland impacts. Erosion control measures during site grading and construction will comply with the requirements of the City and Watershed District, including any special requirements based on the steep slopes contained on the project site. Utility Plan Based on the location of sewer and water service stubs in Golden Triangle Drive, extension of sewer and water services across a portion of Outlot A will be required. Connection to these services will also require removal and replacement of portions of the existing sidewalk along Golden Triangle Drive, and may require an easement from the City to the Owner for a portion of the southwest corner of Outlot A. Architectural Floor Plans The architectural floor plans illustrated the general configuration of each of the two levels of the proposed building, including the locations of entries, required exits, stairs, and elevator. The floor plans also illustrate one of the key design features of the building; the south building face is curved to soften the building form, to add interest to the building exterior, and to repeat the landform of the hill behind the building. Page 6 Oakview Architectural Elevations The architectural elevations illustrate exterior building fayade treatments, exterior materials, and building height based on floor-to-floor, parapet, and mechanical height dimensions. The total building height conforms to the maximum building height allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. Exterior building materials include "desert sand" colored face brick, glass and high-quality architectural E.I.F .S. The roof top mechanical equipment will be screened with the exterior wall extending three feet above the roofline. Building exterior materials above the first floor level are: 12,337 Glass & Brick 75% 4.113 E.I.F.S.25% 16,450 s.f. Building Surface Area Traffic All roads are in place serving this development. The Ancor project that was approved discussed the Major Center Area Traffic Study for Eden Prairie Technology Park. This project will have 160 parking stalls which is a reduction of on site parking stalls by 36% from the 250 parking stalls on the Ancor project. This will equate to a 36% reduction in trips from the approved Ancor project. Trash Enclosure The trash enclosure is brick and the elevations are shown. The sidewalk is 10' wide leading from the trash doors to the drive lane. This will be adequate to remove the trash bins. P.U.D. Waivers We are requesting only 2 P.U.D. waivers. *Reduced structure setback from the creek from 150' to 75'. This was approved in 1991 for Normark at 70' with a 55,000 sJ. building. *Impervious surface is from 30% to 45%. The Ancor approval in 1998 was 49% on 50,000 sJ. building. Page 7 Oakview The design team has worked hard to a development in quality, style and size that is compatible with the area buildings. We have proposed a smaller development than the previous plans submitted on this property. Please call when you would like to meet to discuss any revisions to this application. We look forward to presenting to the Planning Commission on May 10, 1999. Thank you for your consideration. [Z, Robert J. President CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . DATE: June 1, 1999 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREAlDIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development ITEM NO.: Donald R. Uram Lincoln Parc VI.C. Michael D. Franzen Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Regional Commercial to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 4.83 acres of the 23 acres Market Center Planned Unit Development; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 4.83 acres and Rezoning from Rural to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 4.83 acres into one lot; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Synopsis The project consists of 186 rental apartment units and 20,000 square feet of office/retail on the lowest level of the four-story structure. The developer is requesting waivers including a building height from 40 to 54 feet, Base Area Ratio from .20 to .29, Floor Area Ratio from .40 to 1.17, exterior materials from 75% brick and glass to 60% brick and glass/40% stucco, impervious surface from 30% to 44% in a shoreland area, and density from 17.4 to 38.5 units per acre. Reasons to consider these waivers are listed in the staff report. The project is located at the comer of Eden Road and Singletree Lane adjacent to the water tower. Background Information The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the project with recommendations for a reduction of the structure's length and additional roofline elevation changes at its May 10, 1999, meeting. The Parks and Recreation voted 5-1 to recommend approval ofthe project. Attachments 1. Resolution for Guide Plan Change 2. Resolution for pUD Concept Review 3. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 4. Staff Report dated May 7, 1999 5. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 10, 1999 6. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes dated May 17, 1999 I LINCOLN PARC CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of Lincoln Parc by Hartford Financial Services for a 246,280 square foot, four story building which consists of20,000 sq. ft. of various commercial retail uses on the first level and 186 rental apartment units on the other three levels requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby adopts the amendment of the Plan subject to Metropolitan Council approval as follows: 4.83 acres from Regional Commercial to Community Commercial located at Eden Road and Singletree Lane and Lake Idlewild. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 1st day of June, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. LINCOLN P ARC A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF LINCOLN P ARC FOR HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Conunission did conduct a public hearing on the Lincoln Parc PUD Concept by Hartford Financial Services and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on June 1, 1999; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Lincoln Parc, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally descnbed as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated May 25, 1999. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Conunission dated May 10, 1999. ADO PTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this I st day of June, 1999. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk , ) ') Jean L. Harris, Mayor Exhibit A .. Lincoln Parc Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Idlewild Lake Addition; Tract A, RLS 895; Lot 20, Auditors Subdivision 335; Lot 4, Block 1, Eden Prairie MarketCenter CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. LINCOLN P ARC RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LINCOLN P ARC FOR HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Lincoln Parc dated May 25, 1999, consisting of 4.83 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of June, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen, City Planner Krista R. Flemming, Planner I May 7, 1999 Lincoln Parc Hartford Financial Services Hartford Financial Services Eden Road and Singletree Lane and Lake Idlewild 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Regional Commercial to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.83 acres ofthe 23 acre Market Center Planned Unit Development. 3. Planned Unit Development District Review on 4.83 acres 4. Rezoning from Rural to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres. 5. Site Plan Review on 4.83 acres. 6. Preliminary Plat on 4.83 acres into one lot. '-.:,.. .... :'f ;t • I I . .. , I '\" ~'Aocre K[Q)~~WX~[Q) (,I£RI.&i. PHOtO J~) ........ (7) .. _ ........... _ ... _ ........... _ ............. 'll.S . __ .............. _ ............................. . 1<> ..... ,1' ... I. I __ -r.:. IAGJ. __ L-·.- ..-----~-j!!'1;r_----.. --";0 l ~~ (ZZ) . ?'~ ~ t;; .~ . '- I !~ ) I' ... ·· USl -1 1113. :t • •.•• 1I. " 7 ft·· ~~~X~E ~[Q)~~ I (21) ~ , !lIT , . (~O) .,. • • , (2'3) .. .. 10 ('3) I I I I I I I I I I I I ° I: 10 o o o o 1r-_..;.I0--..l!!Q.I.l_ ;: < : ...... " .,' ... ~4.S1 ---------~ ~, .... ;;- ... :;;;;:.-~: Staff Report -Lincoln Parc May 7,1999 BACKGROUND This project was originally for 7.86 acres to be divided into two separate developments referred to as ''Lincoln Pare North", the 3.15 acres closest to Lake Idlewild, and ''Lincoln Parc South", the 4.83 acres closest to Singletree Lane. The development associated with ''Lincoln Parc North" was recently withdrawn, and has been removed from the plans, but is still shown on the color renderings. ''Lincoln Parc South" is part of the 23 acre, City owned, Market Center Planned Unit Development. Part of the land was sold to Bachmans and Brunswick. The City owns a 5.6 acre site between Bachmans and Brunswick and the 4.83 acres site ofthe proposed Lincoln Parc South. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT The Lincoln Parc South site is currently guided Regional Commercial and zoned Rural. The developer requests a guide plan change to Community Commercial with the corresponding Community Commercial zoning amendment. The Community Commercial guiding will allow the combination of eonnnercial and residential uses. This mixed use will incorporate store front offices and shops with village-style housing that creates a "home town" atmosphere and encourages neighborhood interaction. This use will provide housing in close proximity to office, commercial amenities, and trail systems. Higher density projects are appropriate adjacent to land that is guided regional commercial and office. Residential uses are permitted in the Community Commercial Zoning District through planned unit developments. . SITE PLAN The site plan shows the development of a 246,280 square foot, four-story building. This structure consists of20,000 sq. ft. of various commercial retail uses on the first level, and 186 rental apartment units on the other three levels. The gross density is 38.5 units per acre. There are two levels of underground parking with 390 spaces, and l36 surface level parking spaces. Parking meets City code requirements. The building and parking meet all setback requirements. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS The developer is requesting the following waivers from the City Code. 1. Building height from 40 to 54 feet, Base Area Ratio from .20 to .29, Floor Area Ratio from Staff Report -Lincoln Parc May 7,1999 .40 to 1.17, and density from 17.4 to 38.5 units per acre. These waivers are appropriate since the site is located in an area that was planned for higher intensity development. The area around the Eden Prairie Mall has taller buildings, higher intensity, and higher density. These sites are located near collector roads and highways and not adjacent to low density areas. 2. Exterior materials from 75% brick and glass to 60% brick and glass. The exterior elevations should be revised to meet City Code. The west elevation of the building has two levels ofparlcing with a rock face block exterior. The commercial brick detailing should be continued along this elevation. This helps provide a front door look to the back side of the building. 3. Impervious surface from 30% to 44% in a Shoreland area. The building is within the 1,000 foot shoreland area of Lake Idlewild. The building is 475 feet away from the lake. The shoreland setback is 200 feet. Stonn water does not drain towards the lake, but to a NURP pond on the Bachmans site. TREE LOSS AND GRADING There are a total of838 diameter inches of healthy significant trees on this site. There are a total of 158 inches of oak and cotton wood trees. The remaining 680 inches of significant trees were planted by the original property owner and are too large to transplant. The City Forester calculated the significant tree loss of 502 diameter inches. The required tree replacement is 400 inches. LANDSCAPE PLAN The landscaping requirement is caliper inches based on building size and tree replacement. The caliper inch requirement is 770 inches. The required tree replacement is 400 inches. The plan provides a total of 880 inches. Since this site is part of a PUD, the remaining 290 inches of tree replacement can be located on the 5.6 site owned by the City or along Singletree Lane. Trees on the west side ofthe building must be relocated due to the utility easement and 20 inch water line to the water tower. A mixture of small and large shrubs is acceptable in this location. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS A sidewalk is proposed along Eden Road tying into the existing sidewalk along Singletree Lane. A sidewalk connection will be made from Eden Road that connects with the private courtyard trail system A public easement is needed to the water tower plaza. Staff Report -Lincoln Parc May 7,1999 The existing sidewalk connection from Brunswick to the water tower will be disturbed due to necessary utility construction. This area will need to be restored. Existing landscaping will need to be replaced if it is disturbed. WATER TOWER ACCESS With the construction of the proposed development, a new access is necessary to accommodate maintenance vehicles. The new access is along the north side of the property from Eden Road. This drive isle will be an extension of the drive isle used by residents to enter the underground garage. A cross access agreement and easement between the developer and City is necessary. DRAINAGE The project drains to an existing NURP pond on the Bachmans site. LIGHTING The lighting plan needs to include decorative street lights within the project and along Eden Road to be consistent with the City standards along Singletree Lane. SIGNS The two monument signs located at the entrances need to be placed 20 feet from the right of way. UTILITIES Utilities are available Eden Road and Singletree Lane. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Regional Commercial to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres; Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.83 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.83 acres; Rezoning from Rural to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres; Site Plan Review on 4.83 acres; and Preliminary Plat on 4.83 acres into 1 lot based on plans dated May 6, 1999, this Staff Report, and the following: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Adjust the monument sign placement to a 20 foot setback. B. Eliminate the trees along the western property line and replace them with shrub massing or flowering plant materials. Staff Report -Lincoln Parc May 7,1999 C. Revise the west elevations to show the extension of brick and stucco materials throughout the parking area's exposed wall area, and recalculate the exterior material percentages to meet city code. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall submit detailed stonn water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. 3. Prior to building pennit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Review the building plans with the Fire Marshal. B. Submit a landscaping bond in accordance with City Code. C. Provide building material samples and colors for review by the City Planner. D. Pay the cash park fee. E. Obtain cross access agreements with Brunswick. F. Record public easements with the City of Eden Prairie and Hennepin County for the sidewalk areas and vehicle access to the water tower. 5. The following waivers to the City Code are granted as part of the PUD: • Building height of 54 feet. Code requires 45 feet. • Density at 38.5 units per acre. Code allows up to 17.4 units per acre. • Base Area Ratio of .29. Code allows up to .20. • Floor Area Raito of 1.17. Code allows up to .40 for multiple stories. • Impervious Surface at .44. Code allows a maximum of .30. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Eden Prairie May 10, 1999 Page 5 D. LINCOLN PARK by Hartford Financial Services Bill Griffith, representing Hartford Financial Services, presented the plan with commercial on the first level and apartments above. He explained varying the exterior materials -stucco and brick- and jogging the roofline to break up the mass of the building. He stated ifrequired they would comply with the brick standard of75 per cent. The Commissioners discussed their concern with the massiveness of the building. Robert Bravarius , 87045 Greer Lane, stated he's a new resident to the area and thanked the Commission for their commitment as volunteers. He encouraged the Commission to live within the Guide Plan. He stated concern about the density, traffic, and height of the building. He questioned whether this is the appropriate place for children to be raised. He stated concern about limited green space. He would like to see a building that has less of an impact. The Commissioners generally discussed that this was the appropriate use for this area. They referred to a joint meeting with the City Council where they discussed where higher density was appropriate. The commissioners agreed that the building was tall, massive, and needed more opened space and directed the developer to revise the plans incorporating these comments prior to council review. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Clinton to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5- O. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Lewis to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hartford Financial Services for Guide Plan Change from Regional Commercial to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.83 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 4.83 acres, Zoning Change from Rural to Community Commercial on 4.83 acres, Site Plan Review on 4.83 acres, and Preliminary Plat on 4.83 acres based on plans dated May 7, 1999, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 7, 1999. Motion carried 5-0. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission May 17,1999 Page 3 MOTION: Wilson moved to accept the Oakview Office proposal as recommended in the May 11, 1999 Staff Report. Comeille seconded. The motion was approved 6-0. B. Lincoln Park The proposed development is on 4.83 acres located at Eden Road and Singletree Lane. The land is owned by the city and is a part of the Market Center Planned Unit Development. Jack Brandt of Hartford Financial presented the plan, which includes 186 apartment homes, and 20,000 square feet of commercial, office, and small retail space. The building will be four stories with 2 levels of underground parking. Buildings will be stucco and brick in a traditional style. He said the neighboring retailers support the plan to bring housing to the downtown marketplace. Fox said the land is being zoned from rural to commercial. There will be a significant tree loss of 502 inches, with 406 inches of required mitigation. Mitigation that will not fit on the site will go on the adjacent city- owned sites. Storm water discharge will drain into the existing NURP pond and into Purgatory Creek. Staff is recommending a sidewalk along Eden Road. Discussion: Koenig is concerned about the landscaping plan, and the amount of tree loss. Hilegman said there is "a lot of building for the lot size". She questioned the amount of 40% impervious surface in a Shoreland area. Koenig questioned building so close to Lake Idlewild. Fox said the Shoreland district is within 1,000 feet from the body of water. Stolar noted that the building would be 475 from the lake. Fox said the shoreline setback is 200 feet from the lake, so no variance is needed. Drainage will not go toward the lake, it will go through the NURP pond near Bachman's. Koenig expressed concern about the tree loss and the 290-inch mitigation. Fox said staff is working with the developer to come up with a plan. Hilgeman said that from a natural resources perspective, she doesn't believe this is the best use for this site. She asked "if this is the best we can do on this 4.38 acres". She is concerned about the amount of concrete, the loss of trees, and the proximity to the lake. Fox said the site is guided for Regional Commercial use, and this proposal does meet the guide plan. Koeing asked Brandt about the affordability and the rental range of the apartments. Brandt said the· rental range is about $915 to $1,600 per month, and an affordability component can be added. Jacobson said that the development waivers requested are "way above code". He asked if this was normal, and stated that he thinks these waivers are ''way out of bounds". Stolar asked if the tree mitigation plan was the best that could be done. Cornielle pointed out that the mitigation will be met by planting on city property. MOTION: Comeille moved to approve the Lincoln Park development proposal with the staff recommendations outlined in the May 11, 1999 Staff Report. Wilson seconded. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission May 17, 1999 . Page 4 Discussion: Corneille believes this is a great plan to mix commercial and residential. Stolar said he is philosophically opposed to mitigating tree loss by putting trees off the site, and this sets a precedent for future developments. Fox said the plan calls for planting trees where they wi11last. The motion was approved 5-1 in favor of the proposal. Hilgeman voted against, stating that the amount of tree loss was unacceptable, there was too much impervious surface, and it was too close to the lake. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. TRANSPLANTATION OF APPLE TREES FROM EDEN ORCHARD Hilgeman reported that there are 10 to 20 apple trees that are being donated for transplantation into the meadow area near the Cummins-Grill House. She has been in contact with the Heritage Preservation Committee and the Eden Prairie Historical Society who say there is a historical basis for saving the trees. She said there has been some concern that the commission members are opposed the transplantation idea. Fox said the city position is not to have fruit trees in the city parks, due to their high maintenance and other concerns. The cost to transp lant 10 trees is about $1,000. Stolar suggested that the Heritage Preservation Committee should be put on a future agenda for further discussion. Fox said that he would bring back information to the Commission at the next meeting. A. Cash Park Fees for ADC Telecommunications Development Fox reported checking into the reason why cash park fees were omitted from the staff report regarding the ADC development proposal. Commission members were very concerned why the park fees were not being charged in this case. Fox said because the development is zoned industrial, cash park fees were not appropriate. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. None VIII. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. Report of Manager of Parks and Recreation 1. Round Lake Playground Fox presented several options for providing ADA accessibility to the play area. Option A would have rubberized surfacing for access around the / CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS June 01, 1999 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Community Development and Financial Services Payment of Claims VII. Don Uram ReqJ1ested Action: Move approval of the Payment of Claims as submitted (Roll Call Vote). Checks 75136 to 75662 COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY DIVISION N/A LEGISLATIVE GENERAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMUNITY SERV HUMAN SERV WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS FACILITIES ASSESSING CIVIL DEFENSE POLICE FIRE STREETS/TRAFFIC PARK MAINTENANCE PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY STREET LIGHTING FLEET SERVICES ORGANIZED ATHLETICS COMMUNITY DEV COMMUNITY CENTER YOUTH RECREATION SPECIAL EVENTS ADULT RECREATION RECREATION ADMIN ADAPTIVE REC OAK POINT POOL ARTS PARK FACILITIES PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS CITY CENTER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS PRAIRIE VILLAGE PRAIRIEVIEW CUB FOODS TRUST FUNDS WATER DEPT SEWER DEPT STORM DRAINAGE AGENCY FUNDS EQUIPMENT TOTAL $1.50 $300.00 $24,409.84 $15,939.49 $4,877.17 $262.85 $14,613.66 $13.92 $6,257.25 $1,751. 96 $4.50 $2,752.78 $11,525.77 $3,583.33 $18.84 $4,290.79 $9,346.53 $14,387.49 $18,403.15 $527.18 $1,031.62 $7,684.61 $786.25 $1,886.75 $14,225.93 $2,516.44 $291. 85 $9,838.81 $342.08 $636.50 $444.62 $2,329.49 $410.71 $54,612.77 $175,832.28 $105,138.14 $4,409.92 $50,382.35 $57,225.84 $114,265.51 $39,900.00 $98,359.92 -$6,018.87 $29,109.09 $6,015.36 $83,675.00 $988,600.97* 25-MAY-1999 (11:07) COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 75136 75137 75138 75139 75140 75141 75142 75143 75144 75145 75146 75147 75148 75149 75150 75151 75152 75153 75154 75155 75156 75157 75158 75159 75160 75161 75162 75163 75164 75165 75166 75167 75169 75170 75171 75172 75173 75174 75175 75176 75177 75178 75179 75180 75181 75182 75183 75184 75185 75186 75187 75188 75189 75190 75191 $32.00 $109.12 $22.00 $11. 00 $42.00 $32.00 $30.00 $101.10 $32.00 $13.00 $11.00 $32.00 $60.00 $815.32 $319.50 $22.00 $22.00 $527.18 $50.00 $558.59 $12.00 $26.00 $30.00 $3,000.00 $50.00 $82.90 $618.60 $4,774.80 $2,336.93 $83.25 $329.92 $5,227.07 $92.00 $314.04 $1,490.45 $2,005.33 $1,384.00 $23,688.81 $1,360.47 $15.00 $4,521.20 $119.25 $2,095.17 $8,528.75 $178.28 $316.05 $21.65 $44.00 $5.33 $87.00 $5.33 $1,692.01 $35.00 $29.00 $5.33 VENDOR BRONSTEIN, LEV CORDES, JEFFREY CZECH, KELLY DEGNER, TERRY DENNIS, YVETTE EMERSON, KARIN FASCHING, CLAUDINE FREY, LYNDELL HACKETT, KORINA HOCHRE IN , WAYNE JANNI, BRIAN JOHNSON, BRIAN KIM, JEAN KROEGER, BILL LAMBERT, BOB LAWRENCE, MIKE MARGO, KAY MATEJCEKS MONTGOMERY, FINLEY NORTHLAND GLASS POLYCARPOU, ANDREAS ROSENE, AMY SKAALRUD, LAURA US POSTMASTER WOELFEL, MICHAEL AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO NORTH STAR ICE PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRIBUTING CENTRAIRE INC DAY DISTRIBUTING EAGLE WINE COMPANY GRAPE BEGINNINGS GRIGGS COOPER & CO LAKE REGION VENDING M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC MARK VII PEPSI COLA COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY THORPE DISTRIBUTING WASTE MANAGEMENT -BLAINE WINE COMPANY, THE AAA CREDIT SCREENING SERVICES ABELE, KAREN ADAMS, NANCY ADAMS, SALLY ANDERSON, DEANNA ARCH PAGING BECKER, REBECCA BERGER, SHERIE BHOW, ABHA DESCRIPTION ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG MILEAGE AND PARKING ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG MACHINERY EQUIPMENT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG POSTAGE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES BEER 6/12 BEER 6/12 WINE IMPORTED MISC TAXABLE WINE IMPORTED MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE BEER 6/12 OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES BEER 6/12 WINE IMPORTED WINE DOMESTIC TRANSPORTATION TOBACCO PRODUCTS MISC TAXABLE BEER 6/12 MISC TAXABLE WINE IMPORTED BEER 6/12 WASTE DISPOSAL WINE DOMESTIC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG COMMUNICATIONS SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG 25-MAY-1999 (11 PROGRAM SPRING SKILL DEVELOP TREE DISEASE SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN SPRING SKILL DEVELOP AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 1998 REHAB PROGRAM IN SERVICE TRAINING SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP CAPITAL OUTLAY-PARK SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 1998 REHAB PROGRAM SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP YOUTH TENNIS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP FIRE SPRING SKILL DEVELOP PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 POLICE SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP OAK POINT LESSONS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ADAPTIVE RECREATION OAK POINT LESSONS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 75192 75193 75194 75195 75196 75197 75198 75203 75204 75205 75206 75207 75208 75209 75210 75211 75212 75213 75214 75215 75216 75217 75218 75219 75220 75221 75222 75223 75224 75225 75226 75227 75228 75229 75230 75231 75232 75233 75234 75235 75236 75237 75238 75239 75240 75241 75242 75243 75244 75245 75246 75247 75248 75249 75250 $48.00 $58.00 $32.00 $25.00 $25.00 $5.33 $1,004.44 $5.33 $5.33 $17.75 $15.12 $22.00 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $5.33 $29.00 $5.33 $48.00 $5.33 $27.43 $221.31 $5.33 $5.33 $29.00 $40.00 $5.33 $20.00 $50.00 $5.33 $32.00 $5.33 $29.00 $25.00 $35.00 $5.33 $70.00 $144.61 $51.36 $35.00 $14.50 $34.25 $32.00 $5.33 $5.33 $64.00 $29.00 $5.33 $29.00 $29.00 $18.75 $5.33 $12.00 $12.00 $5.33 VENDOR BICKFORD, TAWNDA BLACKFORD, KATHY CALDWELL, BETH CHEN, MONICA CURIT, JOANN DEMING, GARY DRISKILLS NEW MARKET DUNKLEY, STEVEN DUPONT, SUZY FEDEX FISCHER, TOM GARDNER, JENNIFER GORSKI, SUSAN GRUBE, JULIE GUERIN, JANE GURALNIK, VALERY HANSON, DIANE HARRIS, ROBERT HART, MARY HAUSCHILDT, STACY HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HENNEPIN COUNTY HOEBELHEINRICH, BOBBI HUFFMAN, JOANNA JANKE, DEDE JOHNSON, CAROL JOHNSON, CLAIRE JOHNSON, TODD JOHNSON, TOM & DEB JONES, BETH KAUL, BELA KININISON, MATTHEW KNISS, ANGIE KORMAN, JAMES KROLAK, MARK KUEBLER, MICHELLE MCNAB, MARYANNE MILES, BRADLEY MONROE, LORI MURPHY, PAM MUSECH, JULIE NORTHERN STATES POWER CO OMDAHL, ERIC OVERTON, BOBBIE PACHAN, KATHY PATTERSON, JOSIE RAY, WENDY REESE, BETH ROMAN, NHULANG ROWE, CINDY RUDIN, TERRY SCHULZ, JAYNE SEXTON, TERESA SHAH, BK SILVERS, LORI DESCRIPTION LESSONS/CLASSES LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG POSTAGE LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG WASTE DISPOSAL WASTE DISPOSAL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG LESSONS/CLASSES SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG LESSONS/CLASSES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT LESSONS/CLASSES SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS LESSONS/CLASSES ELECTRIC ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG LESSONS/CLASSES LESSONS/CLASSES LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG 25-MAY-1999 (11 PROGRAM ICE ARENA OAK POINT LESSONS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP ADAPTIVE RECREATION SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SKI TRIPS/WINTER CAMP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP GENERAL OAK POINT LESSONS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP OAK POINT LESSONS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP ICE ARENA SPRING SKILL DEVELOP PARK MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP OAK POINT LESSONS ADAPTIVE RECREATION SPRING SKILL DEVELOP PRESCHOOL EVENTS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP OAK POINT LESSONS AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND ADAPTIVE RECREATION SPRING SKILL DEVELOP OAK POINT LESSONS POLICE POOL LESSONS ADAPTIVE RECREATION OAK POINT LESSONS MILLER PARK SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP POOL LESSONS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP OAK POINT LESSONS OAK POINT LESSONS POOL LESSONS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP POOL LESSONS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR 75251 75252 75253 75254 75255 75256 75257 75258 75259 75260 75261 75262 75263 75265 75266 75268 75269 75270 75271 75272 75273 75274 75275 75276 75277 75278 75279 75280 75281 75282 75283 75284 75285 75286 75287 75288 75289 75290 75291 75292 75293 75294 75295 75296 75297 75298 75299 75300 75301 75302 75303 75304 75305 75306 75307 $149.33 SOKOUNOVA, IRINA $35.00 STEIGAUF, DAWN $26.00 STOLL, ANN MARIE $39.00 SZCZEPANIAIL, JILL $5.33 VINOKEER, OKSAMA $5.33 WALKER, LORRAINE $5.33 WEBER, JULIE $16.39 WEEDMAN, NICOLE $32.00 WILLEY, JENNIFER $10.66 $5.33 $48.90 $1,167.14 $252.00 $8,507.81 $560.95 $243.35 $3,097.12 $632.04 $43.20 $308.03 $30.65 $10.00 $5.00 $15.00 $75.00 $60.00 $14.00 $20.00 $3.00 $30.00 $65.00 $28.00 $87.99 $225.00 $5.00 $5.00 $75.00 $118.00 $56.00 $240.00 $600.00 $57.80 $6.00 $6.39 $20.00 $50.71 $31. 00 $5.00 $40.00 $187.62 $458.50 $29.24 $15.45 $25.00 WOOD, MARK ZETTEL, BARBARA AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER BELLBOY CORPORATION GRAND PERE WINES INC JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MARK VII MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO THORPE DISTRIBUTING WINE COMPANY, THE B DALTON BOOKSTORE BALON, KEVIN BECKMAN, JUNE BEERY, MARTHA EASTBURN, EMILY GECFS GRAVES, MARIAN HARGROVE, LIBBY HELSMAN, SALLY HIMMELSTEIN, GAIL HOFFHINES, ETHEL JOHNSON, EMILY JUSTUS LUMBER COMPANY KALOGERSON, CHRIS LAN I EWSKI, GLENN LASLEY, MARILYN MAAO CONFERENCES ATTN P KNUTSO MARQUARDT, ESTHER & HAROLD MCCARTHY, ROBERT MEATH-NELSON, WENDY MONROE, MICHAEL NORTHERN STATES POWER CO OLSON, BARBARA PAPER WAREHOUSE PETERS, CONNIE RAINBOW FOODS -CHARGES RICHTER, HELEN SANDNESS, BERNICE SCHULKE, MARY BETH SUPER 8 MOTEL US WEST COMMUNICATIONS W W GRAINGER INC PROEX PHOTO SYSTEMS YOUNGS, MARIA DESCRIPTION ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS LESSONS/CLASSES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES BEER 6/12 WINE IMPORTED MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE BEER 6/12 MISC TAXABLE WINE DOMESTIC WINE DOMESTIC BEER 6/12 WINE DOMESTIC PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SCHOOLS FACILITIES RENTAL SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES CONFERENCE SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ELECTRIC SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES FACILITIES RENTAL SCHOOLS TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT PARTS EMPLOYEE AWARD ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG 25-MAY-1999 (11 PROGRAM SPRING SKILL DEVELOP ADAPTIVE RECREATION OAK POINT LESSONS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP PRESCHOOL EVENTS SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SPRING SKILL DEVELOP LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS HUMAN RESOURCES OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM ADULT PROGRAM OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM POLICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM ADULT PROGRAM ADULT PROGRAM WYNDAM KNOLL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM IN SERVICE TRAINING ADULT PROGRAM ADULT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ROUND LAKE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM HUMAN RESOURCES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM ADULT PROGRAM ADULT PROGRAM OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM POLICE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE HUMAN RESOURCES OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 75308 75309 75310 75311 75312 75313 75314 75315 75316 75317 75318 75319 75320 75321 75322 75323 75324 75325 75326 75327 75328 75331 75332 75333 75334 75335 75336 75337 75338 75339 75340 75341 75342 75343 75344 75345 75347 75348 75349 75352 75353 75354 75355 75356 75357 75358 75359 75360 75361 75362 75363 75364 75365 75366 75367 $1,884.55 $262.54 $2,658.20 $1,721.33 $47.90 $2,386.45 $151.32 $288.00 $109.38 $100.00 $704.47 $96.24 $6,347.54 $31,539.77 $101,974.12 $5,417.79 $1,475.65 $1,270.50 $79.83 $68,720.30 $12,218.70 $5,566.50 $1,185.00 $40.00 $328.68 $55,688.62 $50.78 $1,530.27 $429.73 $9.00 $282.00 $62.90 $8,159.55 $283.10 $1,974.35 $2,525.49 $24.82 $3,739.50 $7,228.66 $344.63 $155.00 $82.15 $262.85 $76.00 $15.00 $736.49 $60.00 $647.52 $136.18 $31.04 $4,333.78 $77.92 $2,536.16 $941.12 $678.00 VENDOR DAY DISTRIBUTING EAGLE WINE COMPANY EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY GRIGGS COOPER & CO QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO THORPE DISTRIBUTING AT&T C&J TRAVEL INC DRISKILLS NEW MARKET FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS GE CAPITAL GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY HEALTHPARTNERS HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI KISSOON CLUGG LINDER & DITTBER LOCKMAN, JIM MEDICA CHOICE MINNEGASCO MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS US POSTMASTER -HOPKINS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS INC GRAPE BEGINNINGS GTE DIRECTORIES JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC STAR TRIBUNE THORPE DISTRIBUTING CORPORATE EXPRESS DISPLAY SALES DNR ENFORCEMENT, FIREARMS SAFE DRISKILLS NEW MARKET MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC MSTMA OLYMPIC HILLS GOLF CLUB RAISANEN, PEGGY SPORTS WORLD USA INC STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC THIELMAN, MARC TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO US POSTMASTER US WEST COMMUNICATIONS DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN ( ·fJ DESCRIPTION BEER 6/12 WINE DOMESTIC BEER 6/12 WINE DOMESTIC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE BEER 6/12 TELEPHONE TRAVEL MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE BOND DEDUCTION RENTALS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES DEFERRED COMP COBRA COSTS/REV LICENSES & TAXES DEFERRED COMP UNION DUES WITHHELD OTHER REVENUE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COBRA COSTS/REV GAS DEFERRED COMP DEFERRED COMP CREDIT UNION OFFICE SUPPLIES PERA WITHHELD PERA WITHHELD POSTAGE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE WINE DOMESTIC ADVERTISING MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE MISC TAXABLE BEER 6/12 WINE IMPORTED MISC TAXABLE BEER 6/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES PRINTING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CONFERENCE DEPOSITS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT MILEAGE AND PARKING BUILDING LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES POSTAGE TELEPHONE BEER 6/12 25-MAY-1999 (11 PROGRAM PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 GENERAL POLICE CONCESSIONS FD 10 ORG GENERAL FITNESS CENTER FD 10 ORG BENEFITS CITY CENTER OPERATING COSTS FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG ICE SHOW BENEFITS FIRE STATION #5 FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG GENERAL FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG WATER ACCOUNTING GENERAL POLICE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS GENERAL FIRE STATION #3 OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM POLICE-CITY CENTER FINANCE DEPT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE IN SERVICE TRAINING ESCROW SPRING SKILL DEVELOP SOFTBALL GENERAL GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES EATON BLDG EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL HOMEWARD HILLS PARK PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 75368 75369 75370 75371 75372 75373 75374 75375 75376 75377 75378 75379 75380 75381 75382 75383 75384 75385 75386 75387 75388 75389 75390 75391 75392 75394 75395 75396 75397 75398 75399 75402 75404 75405 75406 75407 75408 75409 75410 75411 75412 75413 75414 75415 75416 75417 75418 75419 75420 75421 75422 75423 75424 75426 75427 $2,502.35 $7,722.65 $327.95 $3,584.57 $142.02 $910.60 $5,274.46 $152.70 $5,567.01 $150.00 $160.00 $124.38 $193.70 $153.08 $150.00 $150.00 $171.48 $150.00 $150.00 $189.00 $83,524.00 $123.33 $751.75 $48.90 $1,340.00 $239.31 $1,845.05 $4,194.66 $1,127.75 $275.90 $9,392.32 $23,940.35 $1,664.43 $4,662.85 $203.45 $80.70 $7,026.85 $36.50 $2,213.18 $4,746.07 $18,067.22 $673.57 $1,331.45 $347.80 $264.00 $432.00 $6.00 $40.00 $7.93 $9.87 $15,592.50 $1,381.99 $6,224.67 $527.74 $45.99 VENDOR DAY DISTRIBUTING EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY GETTMAN COMPANY JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO NORTH STAR ICE PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO BEST, MIKE CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRE EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE GCO CARPET OUTLET HELLING, LAURIE O'CONNOR, ANNETTE OLSON, PHIL PETTY CASH PIDCOCK, PATRICIA STANDAL, CAROL STEWART-HESTER, RENEE SUPERIOR FORD THOMPSON MEDICAL SPECIALTIES ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRIBUTING AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER BELLBOY CORPORATION CENTRAIRE INC DAY DISTRIBUTING EAGLE WINE COMPANY EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY GETTMAN COMPANY GRIGGS COOPER & CO JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LAKE REGION VENDING MARK VII MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM PEPSI COLA COMPANY PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING PRIOR WINE COMPANY QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO THORPE DISTRIBUTING WINE COMPANY, THE WINE MERCHANTS INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI HOLTZMAN, BONNIE J W PEPPER OF MINNEAPOLIS KROC, REBECCA MENARDS METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME MINN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR NORTHERN STATES POWER CO NSP SPS COMPANIES 7 DESCRIPTION BEER 6/12 BEER 6/12 MISC TAXABLE WINE DOMESTIC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE WINE IMPORTED WINE DOMESTIC TOBACCO PRODUCTS MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES DEPOSITS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL MILEAGE AND PARKING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES AUTOS SAFETY SUPPLIES BEER 6/12 OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES MISC NON-TAXABLE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT BEER 6/12 WINE IMPORTED BEER 6/12 MISC TAXABLE MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE WINE IMPORTED TOBACCO PRODUCTS BEER 6/12 MISC TAXABLE MISC TAXABLE MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE TOBACCO PRODUCTS WINE IMPORTED WINE IMPORTED BEER 6/12 WINE IMPORTED WINE DOMESTIC WINE IMPORTED SPECIAL EVENTS FEES TRAINING SUPPLIES SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL DUE TO OTHER GOVNT UNITS GARNISHMENT WITHHELD ELECTRIC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES 25-MAY-1999 (11 PROGRAM PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 ASSESSING-ADMIN ESCROW FIRE 1998 REHAB PROGRAM RECREATION ADMIN ASSESSING-ADMIN ASSESSING-ADMIN CONSTRUCTION SAMPLE ASSESSING-ADMIN ASSESSING-ADMIN RECREATION ADMIN pis REVOLVING FD FIRE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM WATER UTILITY-GENERAL SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM ART & MUSIC PRESCHOOL EVENTS PARK MAINTENANCE SAC AGENCY FUND FD 10 ORG LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PARK MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT PLANT COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT $39.00 $2,835.07 $46.59 $367.80 $34.57 $255.00 $150.00 $120.00 $461. 90 $433.23 $10.00 $4,587.25 $96.94 $300.00 $45.00 $1,050.00 $3,118.58 $235.00 $356.25 $8.55 $13.92 $928.40 $59.95 $50.50 $25.00 $2,500.00 $28.49 $6.37 $16,632.00 VENDOR TOURVILLE, RUTH US WEST COMMUNICATIONS WERTS, SANDY B & STOOLS BACH, BARBARA BOMA INTERNATIONAL CHRIS KALOGERSON MUSIC CITY ENGINEERS ASSOC OF MINNES CROSS, BARBARA DRISKILLS NEW MARKET FABINI, MICHAEL J GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN HANLON, STEVE HARRIS, JEAN HEBERT, JANENE HELLING, LAURIE HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HOLY SHIRT ITASCA GREENHOUSE INC KEELER, ALESIA KIPP, SCOTT LAMETTRYS COLLISION LOFRANO, TAMMY MAGELSSEN, MUFF MALLAK, TOM MARAVELAS, PAUL MCGLYNN BAKERIES MENARDS METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DESCRIPTION INSTRUCTOR SERVICE TELEPHONE MILEAGE AND PARKING SMALL TOOLS MILEAGE AND PARKING CONFERENCE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS MILEAGE AND PARKING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS OTHER EQUIPMENT PROTECTIVE CLOTHING TRAVEL CONFERENCE SCHOOLS LICENSES & TAXES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES MILEAGE AND PARKING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT SCHOOLS CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR BUILDING MATERIALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE AWARD REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES DUE TO OTHER GOVNT UNITS 75428 75429 75430 75431 75432 75433 75434 75435 75436 75437 75438 75439 75440 75441 75442 75443 75444 75445 75446 75447 75448 75449 75450 75451 75452 75453 75454 75455 75456 75457 75458 75459 75460 75461 75462 75463 75464 75465 75466 75467 75468 75469 75470 75471 75472 75473 75474 75475 75476 75477 75478 75479 75480 75481 75482 $535.00 MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION ALLIA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS $8,798.47 $23.00 $40.00 $1,179.89 $5.81 $75.00 $714.84 $6,491.19 $79.95 $41,913.00 $43.40 $3.10 $4,210.85 $188.91 $3,733.81 $958.50 $238.00 $74.55 $823.75 $40.25 $1,132.72 $605.85 $551.25 $271.00 $378.00 MIRACLE RECREATION OF MINNESOT MPCA MRPA PLYMOUTH, CITY OF PRODOEHL, JERRY SALMELA, DAVID SCHAITBERGER, CHUCK SHAKOPEE VALLEY PRINTING SLEEPING BEAR PRESS SUPERIOR FORD THIES, DOUG BELLBOY CORPORATION JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO NORTH STAR ICE PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC 20TH CENTURY PLASTICS A-1 ROOTMASTER INC AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY AQUA ENGINEERING INC AS LA ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING OFFICE BUILDING LICENSES & TAXES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CONFERENCE CONFERENCE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRINTING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL AUTOS MILEAGE AND PARKING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE MISC TAXABLE MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL FURNITURE & FIXTURES PARK EQUIPMENT TRAINING SUPPLIES PRINTING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SCHOOLS 25-MAY-1999 {11 PROGRAM SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM FIRE REC SUPERVISOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT INSPECTION-ADMIN IN SERVICE TRAINING ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION IN SERVICE TRAINING GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES FIRE INSPECTION-ADMIN CC CAPITAL OUTLAY FIRE COUNCIL IN SERVICE TRAINING IN SERVICE TRAINING CITY CENTER OPERATING COSTS AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND TREE DISEASE INSPECTION-ADMIN COMMUNITY SERVICES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FITNESS CLASSES SR CTR OPERATIONS PARK MAINTENANCE 1998 CLG GRANT HUMAN RESOURCES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SAC AGENCY FUND IN SERVICE TRAINING ROUND LK PARK K17 SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND IN SERVICE TRAINING IN SERVICE TRAINING ARTS INITIATIVE FIRE COMMUNITY BROCHURE PARK MAINTENANCE pis REVOLVING FD FIRE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 INSPECTION-ADMIN SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS SR CTR OPERATIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION WATER TREATMENT PLANT HUMAN RESOURCES POLICE • COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 75483 75484 75485 75486 75487 75488 75491 75492 75493 75494 75495 75496 75497 75498 75499 75500 75501 75502 75503 75504 75505 75506 75507 75508 75509 75510 75511 75512 75513 75514 75515 75516 75517 75518 75519 75520 75521 75522 75523 75524 75525 75526 75527 75528 75529 75530 75531 75532 75533 75534 75535 75536 75537 75538 75539 $64.00 $6,199.00 $1,083.82 $272.05 $1,560.88 $5,648.80 $349.56 $162.11 $8.10 $145.41 $79.80 $1,248.78 $59.95 $10.00 $596.79 $1,341.:H $1,658.41 $313.50 $1,362.50 $20,517.88 $300.00 $10.00 $2,427.41 $98.24 $14,110.72 $253.19 $333.14 $1.36 $671. 67 $79.88 $160.00 $172.53 $1,475.00 $69.23 $279.70 $236.43 $431.40 $1,720.00 $33.25 $137.35 $7,522.20 $4,207.27 $727.86 $1,411.95 $175.73 $5,645.00 $380.00 $52.10 $309.65 $72.75 $1,343.50 $1,161. 50 $152.70 $599.49 $45.00 VENDOR BACONS ELECTRIC COMPANY BAKKEN UNDERGROUND BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY BDS LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT BEARPATH GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB BIFFS INC BLACK & VEATCH BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE* BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF BRO-TEX INC BROADWAY AWARDS BRW INC CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS CARLSON AUTOMATIC FIRE PROT CATCO CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SE CEMSTONE CENTRAIRE INC CLAREYS INC CLARKLIFT OF MINNESOTA INC CLEAN SWEEP INC CO-SOURCE CODE ADMINISTRATION & INSPECTI COLOR CENTER, THE CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS CONTINENTAL LIME LTD COPY EQUIPMENT INC CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL INC CY'S UNIFORMS D J'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY INC D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY CO DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE DANCO FOOD AND ENTERTAINMENT DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO DARTNELL CORPORATION, THE DECORATIVE DESIGNS INC DELEGARD TOOL CO DEM CON LANDFILL INC DEPENDABLE INDOOR AIR DISCOUNT STEEL INC DON RIHN TRANSPORT DPC INDUSTRIES INC DYNA SYSTEMS EARL F ANDERSEN INC ECOLAB INC EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N EDINA, CITY OF ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT & SERV EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICE FINLEY BROS INC FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES q DESCRIPTION CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT TIRES CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS CONFERENCE WASTE DISPOSAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT PARTS REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES DEPOSITS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT CASH OVER/SHORT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES CONTRACTED BLDG MAINT CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SWEEPING EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE LICENSES & TAXES BLDG REPAIR & MAINT SAFETY SUPPLIES CHEMICALS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PARTS CLOTHING & UNIFORMS SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT PARTS LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL MECH DEVICE/AMUSEMENT TRAINING SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SMALL TOOLS WASTE DISPOSAL CASH OVER/SHORT BUILDING MATERIALS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES CHEMICALS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK EQUIPMENT CONTRACTED BLDG MAINT CONFERENCE CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT PARTS POSTAGE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MATERIALS CANINE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT 25-MAY-1999 (11 PROGRAM WATER WELL #12 STORM DRAINAGE • EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE STATION #1 IN SERVICE TRAINING PARK MAINTENANCE 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION POLICE-CITY CENTER SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SR CTR OPERATIONS ESCROW WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FD 10 ORG EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE STORM DRAINAGE EATON BLDG SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT PLANT STORM DRAINAGE BENEFITS FIRE STATION #3 WATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT PLANT TRAFFIC SIGNALS POLICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE STREET MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE FD 10 ORG FIRE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT PARK MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE FD 10 ORG COMMUNITY CENTER WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER TREATMENT PLANT SR CTR OPERATIONS FIRE STATION #2 IN SERVICE TRAINING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE FIRE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC STARING LAKE POLICE PARK MAINTENANCE INFORMATION SYSTEM COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 75540 75541 75542 75543 75544 75545 75546 75547 75548 75549 75550 75551 75552 75553 75554 75555 75556 75557 75558 75559 75560 75561 75562 75563 75564 75565 75566 75567 75568 75569 75570 75571 75572 75573 75574 75575 75576 75577 75578 75579 75580 75581 75582 75583 75584 75585 75586 75587 75588 75589 75590 75591 75592 75593 75594 $596.49 $282.72 $441. 00 $276.10 $31. 95 $121.50 $544.20 $466.43 $2,285.53 $240.00 $145.00 $1,878.75 $50.00 $623.03 $180.00 $861.05 $184.87 $805.83 $3,531.34 $53.98 $217.95 $414.00 $662.63 $608.09 $2,656.80 $54.16 $476.60 $100.00 $76.17 $1,011.14 $35.60 $410.52 $11,142.52 $100.00 $144.00 $521.25 $60.00 $9,910.00 $74.40 $186.33 $1,000.00 $1,429.70 $100.00 $150.06 $33.12 $287.50 $92.00 $1,181.19 $374.85 $3,054.01 $4,099.44 $2,914.00 $300.00 $77.38 $500.00 VENDOR GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN GLENROSE FLORAL AND GIFT SHOPS GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC GRAYBOW COMMUNICATIONS GROUP GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES OF MN IN GRINNELL FIRE PROTECTION HACH COMPANY HALLOCK CO INC HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP HCMC-EMS EDUCATION HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MANUFACTURIN HONEYWELL INC ICI DULUX PAINT CTRS OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS INC INGRAHAM & ASSOC INTERNATIONAL SUNPRINTS INC IOMA'S PAYROLL MGRS REPORT IPMA J H LARSON ELECTRICAL COMPANY JANEX INC JEANE THORNE INC JERRY'S FLOOR STORE JIM HATCH SALES CO KEIBLER, TRACY KINKOS INC LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES LARSON PUBLICATIONS INC LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS LELWICA, MICHELLE LINHOFF CORPORATE COLOR LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC LOES OIL COMPANY LOVEGREEN INDUSTRIAL SERVICES M AMUNDSON MAIL BOXES ETC MARTIN-MCALLISTER MASYS CORPORATION MCDONALD, EARL MCNEILUS STEEL INC MEALS ON WHEELS MEDICINE LAKE TOURS MEDTOX METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY METROTECH MICROAGE MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION MINNEAPOLIS BRASS & GLASS DESI MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES & UNI MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOD SERVICE MQFMT-FACILITY MGMT TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE AWARD OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OTHER EQUIPMENT WASTE DISPOSAL FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT PARTS DEPOSITS CHEMICALS SCHOOLS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL LICENSES & TAXES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS BLDG REPAIR & MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT BLDG REPAIR & MAINT IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND AWARDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS REFUNDS PRINTING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING INSURANCE INSURANCE REFUNDS PHOTO SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PARTS WASTE DISPOSAL CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POSTAGE PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM CONTRACTED COMM MAINT REFUNDS OTHER EQUIPMENT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SPECIAL EVENTS FEES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR COMPUTERS PATCHING AS~HALT BLDG REPAIR & MAINT SCHOOLS MISCELLANEOUS LICENSES & TAXES 10 25-MAY-1999 (11 PROGRAM ICE ARENA HUMAN RESOURCES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FD 10 ORG WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER TREATMENT PLANT ESCROW WATER TREATMENT PLANT FIRE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER WATER TREATMENT PLANT INFORMATION SYSTEM WATER TREATMENT PLANT ROUND LK PARK K17 RACQUETBALL HUMAN RESOURCES HUMAN RESOURCES EATON BLDG EPCC MAINTENANCE ASSESSING-ADMIN EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS PARK MAINTENANCE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION SUMMER THEATRE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION WATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT PLANT POOL LESSONS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION STREET MAINTENANCE SENIOR AWARENESS N16 ADULT PROGRAM HUMAN RESOURCES PARK MAINTENANCE WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE INFORMATION SYSTEM STREET MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT PLANT FIRE GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR $715.52 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO $377.25 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION EQUIPMENT PARTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL 75595 75596 75597 75598 75599 75600 75601 75602 75603 75604 75605 75606 75607 75608 75609 75610 75611 75612 75613 75614 75615 75616 75617 75618 75619 75620 75621 75622 75623 75624 75625 75626 75627 75628 75629 75630 75631 75632 75633 75634 75635 75636 75637 75638 75639 75640 75641 75642 75643 75644 75645 75646 75647 75648 75649 $130.00 NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK A DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS $9,775.18 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING $294.89 $916.80 $137.81 $241. 79 $2,058.66 $62.89 $132.00 $225.00 $1,141.76 $72.78 $936.04 $6,081. 72 $176.00 $1,576.82 $431. 33 $63.75 $126.74 $292.82 $201.71 $269.35 $16.38 $30,269.23 $32.70 $240.96 $64.80 $12.88 $2,124.16 $65.09 $4,600.00 $370.17 $4,913.75 $105.00 $1,584.56 $214.58 $531. 80 $100.00 $58.85 $310.08 $27.27 $2,204.00 $29.43 $79.08 $30.00 $250.01 $91.48 $15.00 $136.64 $120.00 $37.19 $1,848.77 $162.94 NEWLINE PUBLISHING NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY OHLIN SALES OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC P & H WAREHOUSE SALES INC PAPER WAREHOUSE PEPSI COLA COMPANY PHYSIO CONTROL CORPORATION PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRECISION PAVEMENT MARKING PRINTERS SERVICE INC PRINTING ESSENTIALS PROFESSIONAL SECURITY ALLIANCE PROTECT MARKETING PSC SUPPLY RADIO SHACK RAINBOW FOODS -CHARGES RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED RITZ CAMERA RMR SERVICES INC ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC SAFETY-KLEEN SALLY DISTRIBUTORS SCHARBER & SONS SECOA SHARPS AWAY SIGNCRAFTERS INC SNAP-ON TOOLS SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIONAL PLANNI SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC ST CROIX RECREATION CO INC STANDARD SPRING STEVENSON, CHARLES STREICHERS SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO SUBURBAN PROPANE SUN NEWSPAPERS TARPS INC THERMOGAS COMPANY THOMPSON PLBG TIERNEY BROS INC TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN MTKA TWIN CITY AREA LABOR MGMT COUN TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO TWIN CITY SCALE CO INC TWIN CITY TIRE UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CHEMICALS COMPUTERS CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EMPLOYEE AWARD MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE • CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRINTING CONTRACTED STRIPING REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL BUILDING MATERIALS TRAINING SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT PARTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT RENTAL REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PARTS REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES TRAINING SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT SMALL TOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING DEPOSITS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT REFUNDS CLOTHING & UNIFORMS EQUIPMENT PARTS MOTOR FUELS EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING SEAL COATING CONTRACTED MOTOR FUELS PLUMBING PERMIT NEW CAR EQUIPMENT GROUNDS MAINTENANCE CONFERENCE LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT CLOTHING & UNIFORMS EQUIPMENT PARTS 25-MAY-1999 (11 PROGRAM EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE IN SERVICE TRAINING HUMAN RESOURCES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE INFORMATION SYSTEM SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE HUMAN RESOURCES CONCESSIONS FIRE EPCC MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE SENIOR AWARENESS N16 TRAFFIC SIGNS ICE ARENA FIRE WATER TREATMENT PLANT HUMAN RESOURCES PARK MAINTENANCE STORM DRAINAGE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TREE DISEASE WATER METER REPAIR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE SR CTR OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUMMER THEATRE HUMAN RESOURCES MARKETCENTER RESERVOIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC HUMAN RESOURCES ESCROW MILLER PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION POLICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE HUMAN RESOURCES STREET MAINTENANCE ICE ARENA FD 10 ORG EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER IN SERVICE TRAINING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 25-MAY-1999 (11: CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 75650 $3,960.02 US FILTER!WATERPRO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL INSPECTION-ADMIN 75651 $278.86 US OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 75652 $25.78 US PREMISE NETWORKING SERVICES COMPUTERS INFORMATION SYSTEM 75653 $113.26 UZ ENGINEERED PRODUCTS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 75654 $1,393.02 VERNCO MAINTENANCE INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 75655 $202.35 VICTORIAN GARDENS CATERING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRESCHOOL EVENTS 75656 $115.76 VOSS LIGHTING REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 75657 $254.67 W W GRAINGER INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 75658 $165.00 WEATHER WATCH INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SNOW & ICE CONTROL 75659 $61. 00 WENZEL PLUMBING PLUMBING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 75660 $169.75 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC -PLYMOUT REPAIR & MAl NT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 75661 $997.15 WORK CONNECTION, THE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 75662 $482.62 X-ERGON CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT $988,600.97* CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 1, 1999 SECTION: Report of Councilmembers SERVICE AREAJDIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: City Council XII.A. Nancy Tyra-Lukens City Manager Management Program Sherry Butcher-Y ounghans Requested Action Receive the report from Councilmembers Nancy Tyra-Lukens and Sherry Butcher-Younghans on the revision to the City Manager Management Program. Synopsis The City Manager Performance Management Program has been revised to reflect the City's Strategic Initiatives and the recently implemented annual merit bonus plan. Attachments Summary Performance Evaluation Summaij Performance'~valu,fltion PREPARED FOR: CHRIS ENGER POSITION: CITY MANAGER DATE: ____________________ _ PERIOD of REVIEW: JANUARY -DECEMBER ·Performance:.0bjective Results Rating Services Finance Strategic Initiative I Strategic Initiative II Strategic Initiative III Strategic Initiative IV StrategicPlan Implementation summary Rating Merit Bonus Performance Score <9.0 9.0-9.9 10.0 and above BGROUPSlCOMMUNIClHRIMANAGERISUMMARYDOC Rev May 26, 1999 Bonus % o 2% 3.5% ;':;'.'!;/'('" ,",'. "." Community Outreach (Community) Council Communications (City Council) Leadership (Staff)