Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council - 05/04/1999
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TUESDAY MAY 4, 1999 5:00 - 6:55 PM, CITY CENTER HERITAGE ROOM II CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Public Safety Services Director Jim Clark, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, Facilities Manager Barb Cross, Fire Chief 1 Spencer Conrad, Fire Chief 2 George Esbenson, City Attorney Roger Pauly and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen OTHER: I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER-MAYOR JEAN HARRIS II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS—OVERVIEW(Molly Koivumaki) IV. FIRE SERVICES—OVERVIEW (Spencer Conrad & George Esbenson) A. RECRUITMENT/RETENTION B. FIRE RESPONSE—FIRE OPERATIONS—FIRE EQUIPMENT C. TRAINING V. FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION UPDATE (Barb Cross) VI. OTHER BUSINESS City Council/Staff Workshop May 4, 1999 Page 2 VII. COUNCIL FORUM-6:30—6:55 PM VIII. ADJOURNMENT Document! AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,MAY 4, 1999 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher- Younghans,Ronald Case,Ross Thorfinnson,Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety Director Jim Clark, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz,Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram,Management Services Director Natalie Swagged, City Attorney Roger Pauly and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. SENIOR AWARENESS WEEK PROCLAMATION IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS V. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,APRIL 20, 1999 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,APRIL 20, 1999 VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. APPROVE BITUMINOUS PAVING BID FOR FIRE STATION#1 C. APPROVE 1999 TOWING SERVICES AGREEMENT D. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR SHADY OAK HOSPITALITY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA May 4, 1999 Page 2 E. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR SETTLERS RIDGE 3'D ADDITION F. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR INDIAN CHIEF ROAD WATERMAIN EXTENSION ,I.C. 99-5492 G. AWARD CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS AT 8010 EDEN ROAD (CITY PROPERTY) H. ADOPT RESOLUTION SETTING A JUNE 15, 1999, PUBLIC HEARING TO ESTABLISH A TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT FOR HOUSING VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. EDEN PRAIRIE MALL THEATERS by General Growth Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 80 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 10 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the Regional Commercial Zoning District on 10 acres and Site Plan Review on 10 acres. Location: Eden Prairie Mall (Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment) B. FARRELL/LAPIC ADDITION by Mike Farrell and Tom Lapic. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.54 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals and Preliminary Plat of 1.54 acres into 3 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: 12563 Sunnybrook Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) C. HALLETT ADDITION by Centex Homes. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 18.84 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 18.84 acres with waivers and Preliminary Plat of 21.09 acres into 32 lots, 3 outlots and road right-of- way. Location: South of Pioneer Trail at Braxton Drive,north of Cedarcrest Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution for Preliminary Plat). D. VACATION 99-03: VACATION OF PART OF THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER LOT 23,BLOCK 3,BLUFFS EAST FIRST ADDITION (Resolution) VIII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS IX. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS X. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS XI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA May 4, 1999 Page 3 A. SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION (Councilmember Nancy Tyra-Lukens) XII. APPOINTMENTS XIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. 1999—2000 PARK DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS a. Round Lake Park Playground and Storage Building Renovation b. Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area Management Plan and Site Plan c. Preserve Park Renovation d. Riley Lake Park Shelter e. Miller Park Shelter f. Flying Cloud Fields Access and Parking Improvements 2. Elimination of Lifeguard Positions 3. Reduction in Mowing of Parkland D. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIV. OTHER BUSINESS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA May 4, 1999 Page 4 A. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION XV. ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar May 4, 1999 SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Sandy Werts Senior Awareness Week Senior Center Proclamation Parks and Recreation Services Requested Action Move to: Proclaim May 6 through May 17, 1999, Senior Awareness Week in Eden Prairie. Synopsis Senior Awareness Week is Eden Prairie's Celebration of Older American's Month which is celebrated nationally in May. This year the activities span 12 days from May 6 through May 17. Numerous activities are being offered by organizations serving seniors in the community. A two page insert featuring the activities available was published in the April 29 issue of the Eden Prairie News. This year's theme is "Seniors in Action." A group of Seniors will be present at the May 4 Council Meeting at 7:00 p.m. to receive the proclamation. Background The first Senior Awareness Week was held in September of 1990. It was moved to May in 1991 to celebrate Older Americans Month. All of the services supporting seniors in Eden Prairie are invited to participate. Attachments: Proclamation 1 Arid PROCLAMATION - City of Eden Prairie Hennepin County,Minnesota WHEREAS, the increasing number of senior citizens in Eden Prairie bring many opportunities and challenges for all components of our City-- families, businesses, and government; and WHEREAS, every segment of our society is influenced by the needs, resources and expertise of our senior citizens; and WHEREAS, our Eden Prairie "Seniors in Action"play a pivotal role in formal and informal education, sharing years of accumulated experience and wisdom which will impact our future; and WHEREAS. the community wishes to celebrate and acknowledge the contributions and accomplishments of the seniors in our community and recognize the organizations that serve older adults; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jean L. Harris, Mayor of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, do hereby proclaim May 6 through May 17, 1999 to be "SENIOR AWARENESS WEEK" In the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on this 4th day of May, 1999. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed the seal of the City of Eden Prairie. Jean L. Harris, Mayor on behalf of Council Members: Ron Case Sherry Butcher Youn•bans Ross Thorfinnson, Jr. Nancy Tyra-Lukens UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Status of Enterprise Funds TUESDAY,APRIL 20, 1999 5:00-6:55 PM, CITY CENTER HERITAGE ROOM II CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher-Younghans,Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson,Jr., and Nancy Tyra- Lukens CITY STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger,Public Safety Services Director Jim Clark,Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development & Financial Services Director Don Uram Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney Ric Rosow and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen OTHER CALL MEETING TO ORDER—MAYOR JEAN HARRIS Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 5:20 p.m. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans,to approve the agenda. Motion carried. III. ENTERPRISE FUNDS, STATUS A. LIQUOR OPERATIONS Uram reviewed the 1998 audited statements of revenues, expenses and retained earnings for the various liquor store operations. He pointed out that sales increased 18 percent from 1997 to 1998 for a total of$6.2 million. Operating expenses were 4.5 percent of this amount, or$486,078. Eden Prairie's sales are the fifth highest in the state. The philosophy for liquor operations is to maximize profits, through quality customer service, competitive prices and complete product selection. Recommendations by the MMBA for improvements include implementing a perpetual inventory system. The Total Register System was selected, at a cost of $20,000; scheduled installation of the system is May 24-26. Another CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP April 20, 1999 Page 2 recommendation is to review merchandising and store presentation. Two ideas came out of this: to reorganize the wine selection at the Den Road location and to implement an open floor plan,which includes wider aisles and more open spaces. Staff recommendations include adjusting staffing levels. The city plans to hire a liquor operations manager to manage the daily operation,prepare the annual liquor budget, and supervise liquor store managers. The city also will hire an inventory control clerk and some part-time employees. Another staff recommendation is to focus on customer service. This includes annual training seminars and establishing a formal customer service policy. Employee training will include personal safety,bad checks, and sales to minors/"carding." Signs are posted in the store stating sales clerks will card anyone under 30. If a clerk sells to a minor, the clerk is the one penalized,not the City. Another staff recommendation is to increase use of technology, through expanding the City's Internet marketing and holding product kiosks. Performance measures included an internal audit at each store,which revealed no material weaknesses, conducting security analyses at the stores, and establishing financial benchmarks such as profitability/efficiency ratios. Future projects include remodeling the Prairie Village store, finding additional store locations, education of managers and their assistants, development of the Wine Club, and a strategy for enterprise marketing. Expanding on these plans for the future,Uram said the City would like to find new store locations in the area of T.H. 169 and County Road 1 and in the northwest corner of the city. Managers and assistants will attend the Academy for Product Management. It is important for managers to know the market and be knowledgeable about the products in the store. Wine Club development is going well. Smaller classes and more wine tasting opportunities are recommended. Uram said the city needs to develop an overall marketing strategy that will be consistent, through advertising and informing people that the liquor stores are operated by the City of Eden Prairie. When one of the good wines was used as a loss leader to bring customers into the store, overall sales increased by five times the normal amount. Once the customers shop around the city's stores they find the prices are not high. B. UTILITY OPERATIONS Dietz explained the need to hire a new plant operator at the water treatment plant. One plant operator had a stroke earlier this year and will be off work for some time. It takes about six months to train a person for this job. Dietz has received permission to hire another plant operator. If the plant operator who had the stroke returns to work, the new operator will become the second shift operator. There will be a reception on May 14 from 4:00-6:00 p.m. at the new water treatment plant,by invitation only,with ceremonial ribbon cutting at 5:00 p.m., which will include several different groups. On May 15 there will be an open house from 1:00-4:00 p.m. to which the public will be invited, and another CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP April 20, 1999 Page 3 ribbon-cutting ceremony at 1:00 p.m. Tours of the plant will be offered and refreshments served. There will be an advertisement in the newspaper and flyers sent to schools to promote the open house. Dietz reported on several emerging issues. He said Hennepin County is expected to adopt a new ordinance in June establishing higher standards for septic systems. There are about 500 existing septic systems in Eden Prairie. Homes built in the last five years are the only ones that will meet the new standards. Inspections by the city would be mandatory if a home is sold, if a homeowner builds an addition to the home or if a septic system is found to be leaking. If the septic systems don't pass inspection, new ones will have to be built. It is expected to cost the City$150 per inspection and an inspector will probably be hired to do this. One alternative to this situation would be for the City to bring sewer and water to every home in Eden Prairie and require homeowners to connect to it, at a cost to them of between$13,000 and$18,000. Case inquired what authority the City has if people choose not to connect to the City's system. Dietz responded that there is a law in place requiring connection within two years but Eden Prairie has not enforced it. At the present time, homeowners are required to pump out their septic system once a year. Dietz said a four- or five-year program should be developed. It will be necessary to initiate special assessment projects to make the system available to homeowners. The Council has authority to adopt resolutions to levy assessments. The City should establish a philosophy on how it wants to proceed. For example, we don't want to make people replace their old septic systems if the City is going to make sewer and water available to their homes in another year. Enger said it will soon be necessary to decide whether the City should pick up the cost of connecting sewer and water and putting in curb and gutter for each new development, and then spread the cost over the whole community. Many communities do this. Another emerging issue is Infiltration and Inflow (I and I) in the sewer system. Some clear water, mostly from sump pumps, is running off into the sanitary sewer system. The City meters how much runoff comes into Eden Prairie from Minnetonka and Chanhassen and also meters what goes out from Eden Prairie; the difference is the amount Eden Prairie pays the MWCC. They have been saying for some time that there is a considerable amount of clear water coming into the sewer system from sump pumps. The City doesn't know exactly what the impact is,but we do know the cost to the City goes up by 30%-40%whenever there is a hard rain. A lot of this is a result of leaking pipes from sump pump systems,but in some areas of the community where there is high ground water,many of the sump pumps are connected to the sanitary sewer system instead of being piped to the outside. It is difficult for the City to gain access to these homes to inspect the sump pumps. Waconia began a program nine or ten years ago of adding a fee to utility bills, and the only way homeowners can have this fee removed is by letting the city inspect the sump pumps in their homes. 3 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP April 20, 1999 Page 4 The priority for handling the above issues is: • Assessable costs for rebuilding streets and establishing the cap on assessments. This will be coming up in the next 30 days. • Inspection of septic systems to meet the new Hennepin County standards. The county is expected to adopt the ordinance early in June, and the City Council will see it in July. • I and I in sewer system will probably be handled next year. IV. OTHER BUSINESS Swaggert reported that staff will be asking to add an additional item to the Consent Calendar,which is approval of the contract for equipment and services that will provide communications cabling necessary to connect the new Fire Station 1 telephone equipment and computer network to the City Center telephone and computer systems. The cost of$34,100 will be part of the overall funding for the fire station. Enger said a tenant in this building has exercised their option to continue renting for five years after January 1, 2000. However, there is another tenant City Staff would prefer to have,which may result in a future sale of the property, so the City will try to negotiate with the current tenant to see if they will leave at the end of this year. V. COUNCIL FORUM—6:30-6:55 PM Enger reported no one had asked to speak to the council. VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans to adjourn the meeting. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,APRIL 20, 1999 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher- Younghans,Ronald Case,Ross Thorfinnson,Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert,Public Safety Director Jim Clark,Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram,Zoning Administrator Jean Johnson,Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert,City Attorney Ric Rosow and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen PRESENTATION OF 1998 HUMAN RIGHTS AWARDS AND YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP AWARD Mayor Harris presented the following awards on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie Human Rights and Diversity Commission and the City Council: Human Rights Award—Business category winner: MTS Systems Corporation. Accepting the award was Charles Cox, Employment Manager. Human Rights Award—Non-profit category winner: ABC Foundation. Accepting the award was Gardner Gay, Executive Director. Human Rights Award—Individual category winner: Bob and Clare Kooiman. Accepting the award was Bob Kooiman. Youth Scholarship Award winner: Diane V. Nguyen, Eden Prairie High School I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilmember Ross Thorfinnson was absent. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 2 III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Enger added Item V. F. APPROVE AWARD OF A CONTRACT TO PARSONS ELECTRIC FOR PROVISION OF COMMUNICATION CABLING FOR THE NEW FIRE STATION. Mayor Harris added,under XII. A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS,Y2K Preparation. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to approve the agenda as published and amended. Motion carried 4-0. IV. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,APRIL 6, 1999 MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Case, to approve as published the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, April 6, 1999. Butcher-Younghans and Harris voted"aye", Tyra-Lukens and Case abstained. Motion carried. V. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. ADOPT RESOLUTION 99-50 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL EQUIPMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR SIGNALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TH 212 STAGE III PROJECT,I.C. 93-5303 C. ADOPT RESOLUTION 99-51 APPROVING COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TH 212-STAGE III IMPROVEMENTS,I.C. 93-5303 D. APPROVE SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE 3-99 AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2 RELATING TO CITY DEPARTMENTS AND ISSUANCE OF CITATIONS AND RESOLUTION 99-52 APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF THE NEW ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2 E. APPROVE CITY CENTER TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADES & ADDITIONS F. APPROVE AWARD OF FIRE STATION COMMUNICATION CABLING CONTRACT MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve Items A-F on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 3 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. CHESTNUT APARTMENTS by BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 9.16 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.16 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the RM-2.5 District on 9.16 acres and Site Plan Review on 9.16 acres. Location: Chestnut Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway (Resolution 99-53 for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment) Enger said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on April 8, 1999, in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to 248 property owners. He asked the proponent of the project to come forward. Linda Fisher, 1500 Norwest Financial Center, representing BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership, said that with her are Sandra Mazur and Ken Belgarde, the owners of the project; James Cooperman of Cooperman&Associates,project architect; and Gene Ernst of Ernst&Associates, the landscape architect. Ms. Fisher said the site is part of the 24-acre Cherrywood Apartment project approved for 272 units in 1974. If the application is approved, the number of units on this site would actually be 63 fewer than originally approved. BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership is a family business. The Chestnut apartments were purchased by BBY about a year ago and are being upgraded and modernized. The proposal is to construct a new 36-unit, 3-story building in the northeast corner of the site, with tuck-under,underground parking and to convert the existing office and recreational building into a three-unit apartment building. Density is consistent with city codes, the building and parking meets setback requirements and the amount of proposed parking meets city codes. Uram stated this project was reviewed at the March 22 Planning Commission meeting. The Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project,with direction to revise the site plan to eliminate congestion near the entrance to the underground garage. This has been done and reviewed by Staff,which found the revisions to be consistent with the directions of the Commission. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval subject to the recommendations of the Staff report. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent must submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District,review the building plans with the Fire Marshal, submit a landscaping bond in accordance with City Code, and provide building material samples and colors for review by the City Planner. Mayor Harris asked if anyone in the audience wished to address the Council. Ken Johnson, a resident in the area of the apartments, said that in addition to the wetland,there is a gully that drains water from the slope and if that is filled it could possibly flood existing properties adjacent to it. He asked if there has been CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 4 an Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the Department of Natural Resources. Uram replied that an EIS would not be required for a project of this size. Regarding runoff, staff will have to take a look at it, in conjunction with the requirement for detailed storm water runoff. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 4-0. Case said he understands the former apartment area currently does not meet NURP standards. He asked Dietz, when revisions are done to a property does this require that the whole property be revised to meet NURP standards. Dietz responded it does not. The City does require that the new addition be run through a NURP pond,but it is difficult to route all of the property. He was not aware a problem existed but will make sure drainage issues are resolved before construction. MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Case,to adopt Resolution 99-53 for PUD Concept Amendment on 9.16 acres; and approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.16 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the RM-2.5 District on 9.16 acres; and direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement to be executed by BBY Chestnut Limited Partnership, incorporating conditions and recommendations of Staff and Council. Motion carried 4-0. B. BEARPATH 10TH ADDITION by Bearpath Limited Partnership. Request for PUD Concept Amendment on 3.3 acres to the overall 420 acre Bearpath PUD, Planned Unit Development District Review on 3.3 acres,Rezoning from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 on 3.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of 3.3 acres into 8 lots. Location: Bearpath Trail. (Resolution 99-54 for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning, and Resolution 99-55 for Preliminary Plat) Enger said the official notice of the Public Hearing was published on April 8, 1999 in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to 46 property owners. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the plans at the March 22, 1999,meeting. The Parks and Recreation Commission did not review this project. He asked the presenter of the proposal to come forward. John Vogelbacher spoke, representing the Bearpath Golf and Country Club and Siena Corporation, the developer of the community. This is a rezoning of existing twin lots. In 1992 this was approved for ten twinhome units on five lots. The proposed plan is eight single-family homes on villa lots, which are detached townhomes. A similar conversion from twin homes to single family was approved in 1996. A neighborhood meeting was held March 18 and a meeting CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 5 was held with the Board of Directors of Bearpath Homeowners Association. This project met with the approval of both of those groups. Uram said this project is recommended for approval, subject to a number of conditions. 1. Prior to release of the final plat, the proponent shall provide a cross access, maintenance and use agreement for review for the shared private drive serving lots 1, 2, and 3, to be recorded with the final plat at Hennepin County. 2. Prior to grading permit, or building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. C. Install erosion control on the property, as well as tree protection fencing at the drip line of all trees to be preserved as part of the development. 3. Prior to each building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed Certificates of Survey for each lot depicting existing and proposed grades, location of all existing trees and trees to be removed, house and driveway locations, and the location of tree protection fencing. B. Pay the Cash Park Fee. 4. The following waivers have been granted through the PUD District review the Property as follows: A. Lot size of less than 13,500 square feet for lot 5. B. All lots do not have a public road frontage. C. Lot width of less than 85 feet for lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. D. Zero lot line setback for the driveway land serving lots 1, 2 and 3. Code requires a minimum of 3 feet. E. Five-foot side yard setback for the garage. Ten-foot side yard setback for the house. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution 99-54 for PUD Concept Amendment on 3.3 acres; and approve ls`Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review on 3.3 acres and Rezoning from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 District on 3.3 acres; and adopt Resolution 99-55 for preliminary plat of 3.3 acres into 8 lots; and direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement to be executed by Bearpath Limited Partnership. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April20, 1999 Page 6 MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to amend the above resolution to add the words, "according to Planning Commission recommendations and Staff report." Motion carried 4-0. C. IMMANUAL LUTHERAN CHURCH by Immanual Lutheran Church. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 6.7 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 6.7 acres with waivers,Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 6.7 acres, and Site Plan review on 6.7 acres. Location: 16515 Luther Way. (Resolution 99-56 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment) Enger said the official notice of the Public Hearing was published on April 8, 1999 in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to 46 property owners. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project at its March 22, 1999, meeting. The Parks and Recreation Commission did not review this project. He asked the proponent of the project to come forward. Gary Johnson, an architect with SMSQ Architects, represented Immanual Lutheran Church. The addition of 14,500 square feet almost doubles the size of the present church facility. Concerns of the neighbors were heard at the Planning Commission meeting in March. The architects have taken the concerns of the neighbors and revised the site plans accordingly. One concern was planting, and they have increased the planting of trees to provide adequate screening from the residential areas near the church. Another concern was water runoff; that is, if catch basins should fill up with debris and flood neighboring property. To respond to this concern,the architects created a swale that will bring water over to a retention pond, and also have created a berm. Butcher-Younghans noted one neighbor had a concern about the outdoor lighting, and asked Mr. Johnson how tall the light posts are. Johnson responded they are 30-foot poles, and there are shields on the lights that keep them from affecting the neighbors. Uram said the project meets city codes and ordinances except for the maximum height of the roof pitch. City code has a maximum height of 30 feet. The skylight on the plan is 35 feet high. However, it is a significant feature of the church and improves the overall design. The church has asked for a waiver from 30 feet to 35 feet. MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Case, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution 99-56 for PUD Concept Review on 6.7 acres; approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review on 6.7 acres with waivers and Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 6.7 acres; and direct Staff to prepare a Developer's CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 7 Agreement to be executed by Immanuel Lutheran Church, following conditions and recommendations of Staff and Planning Commission. Motion carried 4-0. D. INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL,PHASE 3, CLASSROOMS by International School of Minnesota. Request for Site Plan Review and Zoning District Amendment in the Public Zoning District on 56 acres. Location: Crosstown and Beach Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment) Enger reported this Public Hearing was officially published in the April 8, 1999 Eden Prairie News and mailed to 15 property owners. He asked the proponent of the project to come forward. John Harris, President of Harris Architects, represented the International School. The proposed project is a 20,000-square-foot addition to the school, closely following the school's master plan. Uram explained the approved 1987 master plan showed three classroom buildings on this site. The school wants to build two classroom buildings at this time. No concerns were raised at the Planning Commission meeting,but Staff expressed some concern about the location of the NURP pond, which has now been moved on the plan. Staff is satisfied with the location. Tyra-Lukens inquired if the NURP pond will be done prior to construction of Phase 3 to take care of any runoff. Harris responded he didn't know if it would be one of the first things done but will certainly be at the top of the list. It would be completed before the project is finished. Tyra-Lukens requested to make completing the NURP pond prior to construction a Council recommendation. Rosow stated he didn't see anything that requires an Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW). Uram responded that an EAW is not required. Tyra-Lukens asked Uram to clarify whether a zoning district amendment is required on the entire 56-acre parcel when only 39 acres are going to be used in this project,while 17 acres of wetland and woodland are not going to be touched. Uram replied that the project size is 56 acres,but the zoning district amendment, because of those exemptions of wetland and woodland, is 39 acres. The wording of the Council Resolutions should be changed to indicate that the project would be based on 39 acres rather than 56 acres. Case wondered why the Parks and Recreation Commission did not look at this, if the limits are ambiguous with regard to fill and grading. Uram responded that it wasn't necessary because of the consistency of this plan with the previously approved plan. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 8 Mayor Harris inquired if anyone else wished to address the Council regarding this project. Geri Baakkonen, 6251 Beach Road,just west of the International School, said she would be concerned if there were any zoning changes to the wetlands and woodland areas of the property. The advertisement of the Public Hearing in the paper stated two classrooms were involved,which was not a very complete description of the project. Notices were only sent to people within 500 feet of the school. Other neighbors would have been concerned if the zoning changes for the project involved 56 acres rather than 39 acres. Enger said it was pointed out to Staff that the change in zoning was published for the entire property and Staff agrees this should be held to the 39 acres. Mayor Harris asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. David Steen, 6741 Beach Road, said the classrooms at International School are full and the school needs to be expanded,but he also wants the interests of the property owners on Beach Road to be protected. This concern has now been addressed. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, Case seconded, to close the Public Hearing; and approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Public Zoning District on 39 acres; and direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement to be executed by International School of Minnesota, which incorporates Staff and Council recommendations and conditions, including NURP pond completion prior to creation of additional impervious surface; and direct Staff to issue a land alteration permit and footing and foundation permit with the proponents' agreement to proceed at their own risk. Motion carried 4-0. VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion passed on a roll call vote,with Butcher-Younghans, Case, Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting"aye." VIII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IX. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS X. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. REVIEW BOARD OF APPEALS NO. 99-01 Enger reported that this review was continued from the March 16, 1999,meeting. City Staff was directed to look into the issues of hardship, further reasonable uses CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 9 of the property, and sight lines and safety issues on the project. The Staff has done that and he asked three Staff members to give short presentations on each part of it. Johnson said following the March 16 Council meeting Staff reviewed the revised material submitted by the applicant at that meeting. Additional reports have been prepared; an April 14 Supplemental Staff Report and an April 14 Engineering Department memo. These revised reports have been submitted to the Council, in addition to carrying forward all materials from the March 16 meeting, as well as a new letter, dated March 30, from an adjacent landowner. The City Staff review finds the variance request contrary to City code and intention, the lot size situation was created by the previous land owner, variance approval would create an unsafe driveway and road condition, and the property owner is not deprived of other reasonable land uses. Small lots can be used to grow vegetables and flowers for sale, vineyards,bee keeping, or tree farms. Dietz reported that Rod Rue prepared the memorandum dated April 14 addressing the safety and sight distances from the driveway. Revised drawings were submitted on April 19 and have been reviewed, although a written report has not been prepared. He and Rue concluded from this review that the 300-foot sight- distance requirement could be obtained to the left of the driveway,but the sight lines to the right are still about 140 feet. Rosow stated that if the Council decides to uphold the decision of the Board of Appeals he would distribute the attorneys' proposed findings for the Council to act upon. The applicant purchased the parcel knowing it was non-conforming. When the Council directed Staff to go back and review the material further, he looked at the past history of this property and found it was split off as early as March 1969, at which time it was subject to Ordinance No. 8,requiring a minimum of two acres. When the lot was split by the previous owner, a non- conforming parcel was created, which is a self-created hardship. This is a sufficient basis to deny the application for a variance. Rosow said that he did not know this fact at the March 16 meeting,when he said other reasons would have to be found. However,he encouraged the Council to base its decision on all the factors available. Bill Griffith, 1500 Norwest Financial Center,represented applicants Perry and Michelle Ryan. He stated the focus of the discussion should be on whether development of a family home is a reasonable use of this parcel of land. The applicant's intent is to use the property for a single-family home site, served by private sewer and water, consistent with what neighboring landowners have done. Other concerns can be met regarding the sight distances, etc. Griffith disagreed the hardship was created by the applicants,but said it is immaterial. He doesn't believe it is well suited for a truck garden,keeping bees, or other agricultural uses. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 10 Perry M. Ryan,property owner and President of Ryan Engineering, explained the changes made to improve sight distances in the revised drawings. A retaining wall was moved back about 2 feet to the south of the driveway. If the City cleared the brush to the north, the sight distance would be improved to 280 feet. Ryan disagrees with the City that this would require extraordinary maintenance and grading work. Bill Griffith said if this project does not go forward, the above safety improvements will not be made that make the road safer for the public as well as for the homeowner. He asked the City to take a reasonable and practical approach to development of this project and that the Council approve the variance. Mayor Harris inquired if anyone wished to address the Council on this project. Scooter Hill, 10131 Eden Prairie Road, said he was offended by some of the reasons the proponents gave for approving the project. In the winter,this very steep hill is slippery and sight lines have nothing to do with its safety. A number of people in the neighborhood are wondering if this would establish a precedent to let people build on the bluff. He wondered if the City has a plan for this 400-acre area of undeveloped land. Jim Van Winkle, 10129 Eden Prairie Road, addressed the safety of the curve to the north. He agreed that removing the brush would open up the sight distance to the curve. Ralph Nielson, 10100 Eden Prairie Road, said he agrees with Dean Edstrom's position on this matter. Brush should not have to be removed to improve sight lines. Mayor Harris, in response to the speakers, said granting of a variance does not establish a precedent. Each case stands on its own merits. The City Council is in the process of looking at and developing a plan for the whole bluff area. She asked the Councilmembers for their opinions on the variance request. Tyra-Lukens said establishment of a residence on a non-conforming property and setting a precedence which would be contrary to the Rural District area purpose and intent is the main issue for her. Butcher-Younghans said, with all the issues taken together she could not support this variance appeal. She has driven this road and believes it is dangerous. Even with the removal of brush from the roadside, she believes there is a high potential for accidents. She would uphold the Board of Appeals decision. Case said his concern would be development on the bluff. He would uphold the Board of Appeal's denial of the variance request. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 11 Mayor Harris commended Mr. Ryan for the work he has done and issues he has addressed. She also commended the Staff for a much more complete report on the history and issues surrounding development of this parcel. This non-conforming parcel should not be developed at this time. She is concerned about the soils on the bluff and the possibilities of land erosion by providing self-service utilities there. However, safety and sight lines remain the issues that concern her the most. There is a problem in developing another access to this road at the present time. She supports the Board of Appeals decision to deny the variance request. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans,based upon the foregoing findings in this document and the conclusions, that the decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments denying Variance#99-01 by Steven and Kimberly Noisi and/or Perry and Michelle Ryan is affirmed, consistent with the verbal amendment to Paragraph 3.A. Motion carried 4-0. XI. APPOINTMENTS XII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS Y2K Preparation Mayor Harris said she has received a number of queries relating to this city's preparedness for Y2K, or lack thereof. The City has been preparing for over a year and is in good condition at this time. The City has provided some preliminary information on its web site; however she suggested a number of other ways to do this. • Staff could schedule periodic reports at Council meetings to provide periodic updates on what is being done. • Ensure the City is getting information into its newsletters. • Illicit the support of the media to address the issues raised by residents. • Put information flyers in with the City's utility bills. • Put up a poster in the City Hall that would list where residents can obtain the information that the city is providing. • In November or December have a town hall meeting to let citizens know everything the City has done and provide information on what they can do to effect a smooth transition. • The League of Minnesota Cities has a whole library of material we can use to provide this information. Case said various governmental agencies are doing their test runs and doing press releases announcing that they are Y2K compliant. Eden Prairie should set a date to put out a press release stating the City is Y2K compliant, and all of the other vendors that serve the City have been certified as compliant. � I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 20, 1999 Page 12 Mayor Harris said the general public wants information that will put their concerns at rest. It should be left to the Staff how best to achieve this. The above are some suggestions. Uram said the amount of work involved in reaching Y2K compliance has been astronomical. Staff can provide general information to the public but it would take too much Staff time to respond with the minute technical details requested by some citizens. He said he would be prepared to make a presentation at a Council meeting in the near future regarding where the City stands on Y2K. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIII. OTHER BUSINESS A. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION Mayor Harris said that the Council Forum will be held the first and third Tuesdays of the month from 6:30-6:55 p.m. in Heritage Room II. This will be scheduled time following City Council Workshops and immediately preceding regular City Council meetings. If you wish to visit with the City Council and Service Area Directors at this time, it is important that you notify the City Manager's office by noon of the meeting date with your request. XIV. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved adjournment. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 8:55 p.m. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: May 4, 1999 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Clerk's License Application List ITEM NO.: &Financial Services/ A. iGretchen Laven These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. CIGARETTE & TOBACCO PRODUCTS Prairie Restaurant Group Dba: Champps Americana CONTRACTOR Advantage Air Inc HHK Construction Jasters& Sons Inc Pepper Construction Co Schwickert Co South Mechanical Contractors Inc Westbrook Development&Const Western Roofing dba: Western Cedar Supply COMMERCIAL LAWN FERTILIZER APPLICATORS Arteka-Landcare USA Davey Tree Expert Company/The Envirolawn Inc Nature's Way Lawn Service Property Upkeep Services Of Mtka Inc TEMPORARY LIQUOR Eden Prairie Lions Club—Schooner Days Round Lake Park& EP Community Center (June 4,5, & 6 - 1999) May 4, 1999 - 1 - EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. V). 13. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Management Services Bituminous Paving Bid for Construction at Fire Station#1. Facility Management Barbara Cross Requested Action Move to approve Bituminous Paving Bid for construction at fire station#1. Synopsis Midwest Asphalt is the low qualified bidder for the paving contract at fire station#1 with the bid of $34,900. The contract will include the preparation and paving of all driveways and parking areas. Background Last fall bids to construct the fire station were prepared, advertised and opened. The City did not receive any bids for paving. In March the paving portion of the construction was again advertised and publicly opened on Thursday, April 15, 1999. Four bids were received with bid prices ranging from $34,900 to $49,785. The work under this contract will begin immediately and is scheduled to be completed in late May. The construction of the fire station should be completed by June 1, 1999, assuming no delays due to bad weather. Financial Considerations The overall project budget for the fire station construction is $2,843,692. This budget included all expenditures and a$100,000 contingency fund. An estimate of$45,000 was projected for the paving contract and the bid of$34,900 came in under budget. These savings will help to counter some of the costs not anticipated in the original estimate ($45,000 for communications and cabling.) To date the contingency fund has $63,000 but there are approximately $53,000 of pending change orders, leaving the balance at $10,000. Attachment CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE STATION NO. 1 BID TABULATIONS OWNER: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 4115/99 AT 2:00 PM CONSTRUCTION MGR.: KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY -MIDWEST DIVISION • ARCHITECT: BOARMAN KROOS PFISTER VOGEL&ASSOCIATES CP-3 DIVISION 1: BITUMINOUS PAVING BIDDER BIDDER BIDDER BIDDER BIDDER Hardrlves Inc. Northwest Asphalt Midwest Asphalt Northwest Bituminous BID SECURITY Yes Yes Yes Yes ADDENDUMS RECD N/A NIA N/A NIA BASE BED $49,785.00 $38,370.00 $34,900.00 $37,000.00 C z , Q Y I d . • • O. rn rn cz Q CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 05/04/99 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Public Safety Services/Police Lieutenant Michael T. Bosacker Approval of 1999 Towing Services Agreement v I Requested Action Move to: Approve the 1999 Agreement for Towing Services between the City of Eden Prairie and Matt's Auto Service. Synopsis This agreement for Towing Services will provide consistency of towing services and costs. Background Information For 38 years, Matt's Auto Service (14521 Excelsior Boulevard, Minnetonka) has been acting as the official towing agency for the City of Eden Prairie, working with the Police Department and the Hennepin County Sheriffs Department prior to the existence of the Eden Prairie Police Department. To date there has never been any kind of formal agreement between the City and Matt's Auto Service regarding services provided or fees charged for those services. Matt's Auto Service provides towing/impoundment services for several other local police departments including Minnetonka, Hopkins, Deephaven, Hennepin County Sheriff, and State Patrol. The proposed agreement is based primarily on the agreement currently approved and used by the City of Minnetonka. The agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. Attachments 1999 Agreement for Towing Services 1 1999 AGREEMENT FOR TOWING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 1999, between the City of Eden Prairie,Eden Prairie City Offices, 8080 Mitchell Road,Eden Prairie,MN 55344- 2230 ("City"), and Matt's Auto Service, Inc., 14521 Excelsior Boulevard, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein,the City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Contractor's Services. The Contractor agrees to provide all services required by the City for towing of vehicles,as that term is defined in Minn. Stat. § 169.01, Subd. 2. These services shall be provided in accordance with the terms of this contract. The Contractor shall furnish the equipment,personnel, supplies, and facilities sufficient to fulfill all the terms of this contract. 2. Personnel. All drivers provided for the towing vehicles shall be checked for driver's license and warrants by the City's Police Department prior to their assignment. Contractor agrees to train all drivers in the proper towing of vehicles containing hazardous materials in accordance with federal and state laws. 3. Storage Facility. The Contractor shall provide storage facility for towed vehicles which shall be fenced and locked in a secure manner. The facility shall have space for no fewer than 150 vehicles and shall be within one mile of the City limits. 4. Operation. No vehicle shall be towed under this contract without specific authorization from an employee or agent of the City. All vehicles shall be towed,not driven(except when authorized)without damage to the vehicles,to the storage facility. Contractor shall maintain and provide a telephone answering service 24 hours a day for the purpose of receiving requests for service pursuant to this contract, and provide and maintain mobile radio service with all towing units. 5. Notification of Owner. Upon the deposit of a towed vehicle in the storage facility, the Contractor shall send, within 72 hours, by certified mail, to the registered owner a notice specifying the date and place of the tow, the year, make, model, and serial number of the vehicle towed,if such information can be reasonably obtained,and the procedure to reclaim the vehicle. A record of this notice shall be retained by the Contractor. 6. Release. No vehicle shall be released without proper proof of ownership. Vehicles ordered held by the Police Department shall not be released without written authorization from said department. Vehicles not kept on a"police hold" shall be released by the Contractor after obtaining proper proof of ownership and proof of current insurance coverage if the vehicle is to be driven out of the impound lot. The Contractor reserves the right to specify the manner of payment for all charges and fees. Contractor agrees to supply personnel and reasonable hours of operation for the A release of vehicles. Minimum hours shall be 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.Monday through Friday; 10:00 a.m.to 1:00 p.m.Saturdays;and 2:00 p.m.to 3:00 p.m.on Sundays and holidays. Contractor agrees to provide emergency service beyond those hours at the request of the police department. 7. Towing and Storage Charges. A 24 hour towing rate schedule for 1999 for the City of Eden Prairie impounded vehicle is: TOWING RATES-POLICE IMPOUNDS Impounded vehicles $68 Trailering impounded vehicles $5 minimum(additional) Accidents $75* Lowboy & Tractor service $75/hour minimum Dollies (Additional) $25 Winching (Additional) $35 small truck $125 big truck* Semi truck tractors and trailers $125 minimum* On-scene additional labor charges $45/hour minimum *additional labor charges may be required depending on the specific equipment or labor needed at the scene. STORAGE RATES-POLICE IMPOUNDS Two wheel motor vehicles,mopeds, $10/day ATV's, and snowmobiles Other vehicles (ex large trucks) $15/day Inside storage $20/day Tractor-trailers, large trucks $25 - $45/day Note: (1) Vehicles not able to be towed by conventional means due to unusual factory or after- market equipment installed will be impounded at the lowbey and tractor service rate plus additional labor charges which the Contractor must justify. Note: (2) Additional labor charges include, but are not limited to, unlocking vehicles, disconnecting transmission linkages or driveshafts, unusual road clean up, snow shoveling, any additional equipment needed, and vehicles located off the main roadways. Labor charges must be justified by the Contractor. All towing or storage charges shall be the responsibility of the vehicle owner,except that(a)public safety vehicles requiring towing within the City of Eden Prairie area shall be towed without charge to the City, (b)vehicles towed and/or stored in error(at the request of the City) shall be returned to the owner at no charge,(c)vehicles towed and stored pursuant to seizure under Minnesota Statutes §§ 609.531 to 609.5318 and §169.1271 will be towed and stored at the following rates: $125 -2- 3 towing and storage for first 45 days; and $150 storage of seized vehicles per month after first 45 days. Payment of these fees for towing and storage of seized vehicles will be deducted from the administrative fees owed by Contractor or paid from revenue from sales of seized vehicles. Vehicles no longer held for seizure may be released to the registered owner as outlined in paragraph 6 above with the payment of any fees related to a seizure with release being governed by Minnesota Statutes §§609.531 to 609.5318 and §609.1217 8. Administrative Fees. The Contractor agrees to pay the City $4.00 for clerical and administrative expenses for each vehicle referenced in an impound towing report filed by the Police Department. These fees shall be paid semi-annually-June 30 and December 31 of each year for the preceding six month period. Vehicles not claimed and destroyed by the Contractor will be exempt from the administrative fee. 9. Records and Reports. Contractor shall prepare a semi-annual report of all vehicles towed, stored, released, and still held, in a form acceptable to the City. This report shall be forwarded to the police department at the same time as payment of the administrative fees referenced in paragraph 8. The report shall include the reasons why, if any, vehicles towed have not been released. All records of services provided by the Contractor pursuant to this agreement shall be available for inspection by the City upon request. 10. Sales and/or Disposal. When the total of all charges for towing, storage, and other charges equals or exceeds the value of the vehicle impounded, the Contractor shall, with the permission of the Chief of Police, sell the vehicle at a sheriffs sale or otherwise dispose of the vehicle by lawful means. The Chief of Police may authorize the lawful sale of other vehicles when so requested by the Contractor after proper notification has been made to the registered owner. The Contractor shall report all transactions of sale or disposal, including the proceeds received, in the quarterly report referenced above in paragraph 9. The Contractor shall keep records and prepare an annual summary report by January 31, 1999, of all losses and profits from the sale or disposal of vehicles towed pursuant to this agreement. 11. Liability. The Contractor shall be responsible for the loss of, or damage to, any vehicle, equipment thereon, and contents due to the fault of the Contractor or his agent, from the time he, or his agent, takes custody of the vehicle, whether that be by signing the receipt for the vehicle or by hooking or hoisting the vehicle. The Contractor shall be responsible for the safe keeping of personal property, within or on the vehicle, as identified on the vehicle impound form. 12. Indemnification. The Contractor shall indemnify,hold harmless and defend the City, its employees and agents from, and against, all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including attorneys'fees,which they may suffer or for which they may be held liable because of bodily injury, including death, or damage to property, including loss of use, as a result of the fault of the Contractor,his employees,agents or subcontractors in the breach or performance of this agreement. 13. Insurance. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain liability insurance for coverage -3- of not less than the following amounts: Hazardous Load As required by fed/state laws Worker's Compensation Statutory Employer's Liability $100,000/$500,000/$100,000 Bodily Injury & $100,000 each occurrence Property Damage Fire & Theft $30,000 each occurrence Garagekeeper Liability $30,000 each occurrence The insurance shall cover all operations under this contract,whether undertaken by himself, subcontractors or anyone employed or retained by them. Coverage for bodily injury and property damage shall be written under comprehensive general and comprehensive automobile liability policy forms,including coverage for all owned,hired and non-owned motor vehicles. The insurance shall also cover the indemnification liability set forth in paragraph 12. The insurance company shall deliver to the City certificates of all required insurance on a form provided by the City,signed by an authorized representative. The representative shall have in effect errors and omissions coverage in limits of not less than$100,000 per occurrence and$300,000 aggregate. 14. Non-Discrimination. The Contractor agrees during the life of this contract not to discriminate against any employee,applicant for employment, or other individual because of race, color, sex, age, creed, national origin, or any other basis prohibited by federal, state or local laws. The Contractor will include a similar provision in all subcontracts entered into for performance of this contract. 15. Subcontractors. The Contractor shall not subcontract all or any portion of this contract without prior written approval of the City,except for assistance in emergency or unforeseen circumstances. All subcontractors shall be bound by, and covered by, all terms of this agreement. 16. Agreement Period. This agreement shall be subject to renewal from year to year,and shall commence on January 1, 1999,and terminate on December 31, 1999. This agreement may also be terminated by either party upon 15 days written notice if the other fails to perform in accordance with the terms of this contract through no fault of the terminating party. 17. Independent Contractor. At all times and for all purposes hereunder,the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. No statement herein shall be construed so as to find the Contractor an employee of the City. 18. Compliance with Laws. In providing services pursuant to this agreement, the Contractor shall abide by all statutes,ordinances,rules and regulations pertaining to the performance of this contract. Any violation shall constitute a material breach of this agreement and entitle the -4- 5 City to terminate this agreement. 19. Audit. The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Contractor or other parties relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the City and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate." 20. Payment to Subcontractors. The Contractor shall pay any Subcontractor within ten (10)days of the Contractor's receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the Subcontractor. The Contractor shall pay interest of one and one-half percent(1%2%)per month or any part of a month to a Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of$100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than$100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual amount due to the Subcontractor." 21. Data Practices Act Compliance. The Contractor shall at all times abide by Minn.Stat. § 13.01 et seq.,the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,to the extent the same is applicable to data and documents in the possession of the Contractor." 22. Final Payment. The City may withhold from any final payment due the Contractor such amounts as are incurred or expended by the City on account of the termination of the Contract." 23. Whole Agreement. This agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties including all prior understanding and agreements, and may not be modified, except in writing, signed by all parties. MATT'S AUTO SERVICE, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By By Its Owner Its Mayor By Its City Manager Dated: Dated: -5- DATE: 05/04/99 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar D, SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Works Final Plat Approval of Shady Oak Hospitality Engineering Randy Slick Requested Action Move to: Adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Shady Oak Hospitality Synopsis This proposal is a replat of Outlot A of Chase Point 2nd addition which is located North of City West Parkway and West of Shady Oak Road. The plat consists of 4.83 acres to be developed into one lot for the construction of a 59,604 square foot hotel. Background Information The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council October 27, 1998. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on December 15, 1998. Approval of the final plat is subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$511.98 • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement • Prior to issuance of the first building permit for the property, Developer shall submit a Conservation Easement for review and approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources • Developer agrees to maintain the existing ingress and egress agreement recorded on the property. • Revision of plat to include drainage and utility easement over the conservation area Attachment Drawing of final plat RS:ssa CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF SHADY OAK HOSPITALITY WHEREAS, the plat of Shady Oak Hospitality has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Shady Oak Hospitality is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated May 4, 1999. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 4, 1999. Jean L. Hams, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, Clerk 1 SHADY OAK HOSP/TAL/TY R.T. DOC. NO. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That SHADY OAK HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,a North Ddoolo limited partnership,owner and H �J'k / r� proprietor of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin.State of Minnesota.to wit: C.BRG=S89 24'0/'E \� / Outlot A,CHASE POINT 2ND ADDITION,according to the recorded plot thereof, IIIIn 4ii =6°405.5" 14 151 • I Has caused the same Io be surveyed and platted as SHADY OAK HOSPITALITY and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public, for puolic �71() "gq'49°E d b• use rare�er,me drainage and angry easements ore mown on said plot. -r•r _ 5 R=868.5/ I n f L 06 '22 29 I I I In witness whereof SHADY OAK HOTEL COMPANY,a North Dakota corporation,a general partner of said SHADY OAK HOSPITALTY LIMITED ff 55' o _ PARTNERSHIP,a North Dakota limited partnership,has caused these presents to be signed by Thomas C.Wald.Secretary,od behalf o sold ° J10�°` / -2 r�E. ——�10 partnership,on this day of , I99— °/5'11 I Ng4 3 / '`oN8 96.26 I \ SHADY OAK HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,a partnership // __ DRAINAGE cT AND unutt ' , SHADY OAK HOTEL COMPANY,o general partner / I I CIS SIGNED: II Thomas C.Wald,Secretary I I STATE OF I COUNTY OF I I I <\ I C The foregoing in trumenl was acknowledged before me ID day of f99_.by Thomas C.Wald,Secretary of s a l J O `� I SHADY OAK HOTEL COMPANY,a North Dakota corporation.a general partner of said SHADE OAK HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,ao�North \ i I I> Dakota limited partnership,on behalf of said partnership. 3 I " I .' I I Notary Public, County, ` b I f, I My Commission Expires p l` o I 0 'j \ I I1L I W I �, I ill I hereby certify that I hove surveyed and plotted the property described on this plat as SHADY OAK HOSPITALITY; that this plot Is a n eat representation of said survey, that all distances are correctly shown on said plot In feel and hundredths of a foot; that al, I I \ monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown on said plat; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated o cC I I said plat; and that there are no wetlands as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.02,Subdivision I or public highways to be CIS designated on said plot. II + r 4-G (, II I I John K.Bames,Land Surveyor \ Minnesota Registration No. 16456 I 0 c) I Ll,j i < I I I STATE OF MINNESOTA \/ V COUNTY OF c) b I \ c� I C I I I The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of , 199_by John K.Barnes.Land -f(I Surveyor. J It I Tf J I I () JIJ I ?r I Notary Public, County, Minnesota 111 My Commission Expires II I � I-, to , e0 I EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA I s Ito V This plat of SHADY OAK HOSPITALITY w approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 199�11 applicable,the written comments and recommendations of the C\ Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer hove been received by the Cityor the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed a DRAINADE AND UTIUtt .\J b� without receipt of such comments and recommendolians,as provided by Minn.Statutes,Section 505.03.Subd.2. N I FASEM f 1 I I DRAINAGE AND unutt-C�4 Ub \� // EASEMENT I o N w CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 1 ��� '1__ oL ----- - \ I BY: Mayer BY: Manager 2DI_.-- p19.00 -- 589°00'00°W /85.,4,(Tl - 581 woo,00 can/ I (Ia TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota /sf r A^[' ° 5,L)�00•, Ill J �' \ 1 hereby certify that taxes payable in 199_and prior years hove been paid for land described on this plat.Dated this ray of I v/7i-1...%L 1`1 0 17 (i) I I I 199_. 1, ?City/T I` Patrick H.O'Connor,Hennepin County Auditor BY: fteputy \) SURVEY SECTION,Hennepin County,Minnesota \ Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,Sec.3638.565(1969),this plot has been approved this day of ISS_ Gary F.Caswell,Hennepin County Surveyor BY: BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED 50 0 50 I00 • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT REGISTRAR OF TITLES,Hennepin County,Minnesota SCALE IN FEET //Suede Land Surveying,LLC. I hereby certify that the within plat of SHADY OAK HOSPITALITY was filed in this office this_day of 199_ of o'clock_.M. Michael H.Cunnif(Registrar of Titles BY: Dept,ly DATE: 05/04/99 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar V) , SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Works Final Plat Approval of Settlers Ridge 3rd Addition Engineering Randy Slick Requested Action Move to: Adopt the resolution approving the fmal plat of Settlers Ridge 3rd Addition Synopsis This proposal is the third phase and is a replat of Outlots C, E and F of Settlers Ridge, located south of Pioneer Trail and west of Riley Creek. The plat consists of 39.8 acres to be divided into 71 single family lots and 18 townhouse units, three outlots, and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Background Information The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council May 5, 1998. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on August 4, 1998. Approval of the final plat is subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$3,827.00 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$8,230.50 • Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of$1,482.25 • Satisfaction of bonding requirements for the installation of public improvements • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement • Execution of Special Assessment Agreement for trunk utility improvements and Pioneer Trail utility improvements • Provide a list of areas (to the nearest square foot) of all lots, outlots, and road right-of-ways certified by surveyor • Revision of plat to include the change of Outlot C to public right-of-way for street purposes • Prior to release of fmal plat, Developer agrees to dedicate to the City Outlots B and D for park purposes • Prior to release of final plat, Developer shall submit a conservation easement on Outlot A Attachment Drawing of final plat CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNFSOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF SETTLERS RIDGE 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Settlers Ridge 3rd Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Settlers Ridge 3rd Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated May 4, 1999. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 4, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, Clerk I _i—/ . ,I<,9t,s�. . 4o'a 2 / a Z� Vrt• •s s / gZ•Lli9 " )r g /tr it9�� • ly Cb RJR 0 =tL = P� rn \v- NI / y \ \s\-1 s a // �,� t = +.,\ a/,' /' -. 1eto 11 ' ' ''r g y n evw 00,875,z h'�`•�dy`�T'8� ,�`' !I-4 / 'n\ $ `e'/ ) (°"`6�11 1 • 8 q *,g` •� r' kdibc = 'Vat 'v / •L i \ 40 fsv ' \ `€\'\\V ,"1.09•re'J9F eaao Q e ') . J'yi9{ ,. %"L\b :' ` c+'°. -+) •_a,'''f �, 8 °�t�.•'e 'F ~.: da fW ni / \ ' �',r' / l\b y sL 'i.+' +N-.....",1 r�� 1 g `I 9,8 M O 4.,•..w�,.1 d, +• � •01 / 4. \\ //'tr t�f -\'� a c•'' 1\41 41.- •N 0L.• ��tY. .4zr ep of-° or /• 59 `•�1.6„ e- r 1 r. `6. \' o: =1..-- +++�1 \ 1.+'��w q'o,zsdr \0 t., 18 it\'. Y 47,�'e 8 = • 11 riag 77 c't \ . r‘'.. VZ• .,r-' M A0 J % --+�-).. `-ur' 1U. I-% •• gp,LS.erl,•'� 8 • \ �.eri --\' "1' L+-.4.M 9o.lse'•"1S i 1. As �I v a y ��' nj CO s`-- - - � ."rn \Y \ • ;' a\g10 %,� S g8 &w d'ot°�+ 'be . �o `-- wa 18 ti. 81 --+� ��;er -�1e ,° ,.t 84 y s.R'; AP ,.r\\ K'Ki+=+�'; \ 1.+++�M,Bo-"OS."N j g T ep.H e'H R,i• y'o.N`'¢ lc, cm 91 ----_ •." 1� \ ,.— * e, Ix ;M,go.L4. a era` ¢ • ri ,w C' +--•�q 1 8\ --+_��++'' '',1\S Otis; •sa � a • * ''',• O M11 \S—Ch ,ems - +�. ��+ -M a9 Lc• " 18 ax.rrr • '� ar #¢d,, 1,.'° 0 KSPL- ---1 cL .21'4:' _ in 1 ` a` —, •Is `- =--M.'''''" CIS .?5 p. -._- IL_----z-_ i 1 = 1 .z2ei- -1 "+ C) y°4 //n _ ,o rol-21 �MRS,-'7 1 T t- +--M jL.K•L'" \w ; -j b / kb •%� V 3�,101 /�\\ room tier''---1% r.\ `` �� 1 IL O 1 "a - — di <� 1 % 7r 1 � T� ",iz:c9d`" 1F1 a\�.At °/ N 14. is 4�r•4`\\\ al ,•c1y�,..,.7no-- / *0 �\ 8 ,\0 1 \\\ \`may le \�ps,.-L/c'\,,'06 Si i �o' N 1 P. • y L 1 %1 / JA= ' O O \\ /,, Ili -_+1-- I L 1S \\\y/ r---T -- k 0 1 / ,./' i y i s O \ /i rsi ~ro 3 �,p 74e7 er ' 1 It' i / 1 • \ a\ / 611/1. Tf• CO ct•• vl 41 eI J A \!� �`st u .It,, It �' =v L M 003I9Y IIIII 12 ? - -�g� /8 1 1le - Z"1• 1 CIO "1 R. G N r ! I —r N ;%. 1 a ! / e I a O - 1 • •i ! ;Ai ;2 — °�7y. 1 NI 412: PS 1 l8 -— I 4., -, at MI $ $ .16 f PIP• 1 OaI+ 1 L .°s°anr r I Ai it;• L "m°snr. ' msn 7 a I 1 I 81 / ? f 8 j V a 18 *1 Ri a {/ 1" lb 1 �8 Iv -NQSN- ---S40M1e.J .v.. w I roses •�We., p,. -�ro•nrr run am __Nw nrl __-_.li "8 . - 1 r \ z 110 • ..-:v,, �i i` � ', 9� \\;v X"Q I i zi I it - \ ' /.6\\\`,•,B \`�$'40.° a ..b. it j q T,:--aT.as7,i 1-< ul I gG.i I♦ \ / '� O • !! .,q \ 244,♦♦♦ ,4,f fl �) \\ o z 9 'w°° i'—'S°'aoi.oo_..� 3'.1�N.4a/i • le I ' c.aaso.,.Y1 ''s\ >•. r !•;•.-h .w» It a,,, 1 ar '- `" Y .ri r•r.! / t ♦♦ °_„gini\..r' �' I: n„ 1 1 yp !a.;.., 3r • gr. !mt.'. A ,(Jr-- —-.a -'1 vs r,'I''sar \\ \ `L`CFI \� f q// ) •\ s + R�N\c' •,, Lip , ".y` dF 6 .yn ♦�♦ a \�^r'-c�aT - 'r 1 1 / N / L k' =�,g.''¢;��'•s.}`i�\cr -';;.-- / �l /^ " \ %I ••_eFtr �_ 41\�. .yF, wmy, e tk / 1 / ` / \\-, / / \\ .'^ f •• ( . 'two \ �e6 ' i i a// - �3 / '�� Qd�i:8i w��.� y • ip / /^\\s v /� �,R.e� " 4 ? ix\ ‘•?,. y ,,,,/,/ ,,, , / 41 pi n_i'..9C.L O �\ \\ , '0// \\y r/ % \\\.^ /�L \�i .b/ • e ' csy, , / ci' 1771 `,`b \% \v..;r • mac♦ \�.. Te\o A$F , . \\ys. i9�d/ ♦�\ IN x7a 4/ \J!ty ° •, \\fr. cam/ •\ v 0.- L1. v y p k'e'1r , a, ° • L. bbr_—r •�reu_'�/'*sZ, Ia, i[ r---T. Y t 0 i g� Iia'D . f 1�s^>- 'O' ri0 C ft H P '1E V I xl: o ff 141 / .� [['� - ._rft---_ ,) `,11'. ;.1.. 4„, , , ili r-10 vi3 q --- L 1 / ' il A$ i- M Lb 400g. yI u� d 4 '0 07 char S, 4 145 ' O 0 DATE: 05/04/99 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar V I, /--, SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 99-5492 Public Works Approval of Plans and Specifications for Indian Chief Road Watermain Engineering Extension Alan D. Gray Requested Action Move to: Approve resolution approving plans and specifications for Indian Chief Road Watermain Extension and authorize the advertisement for bids. Synopsis Watermain is proposed to be extended along Indian Chief Road to provide water service and fire protection to Camp Edenwood. Council previously directed the preparation of plans and specifications for this project April 6, 1999. The plans have been prepared with the assistance of H.T.P.O. Background Information Friendship Ventures entered into a development agreement with the City of Eden Prairie in October, 1998 for the construction of a new dining facility at Camp Edenwood. The existing camp facilities do not have access to the public water supply, except a one-inch water supply line to an existing house on the camp property. Construction of the dining facility precipitates the need for a water supply capable of providing fire protection and domestic use at the site. This plan will provide the desired level of service. It is proposed to complete construction in two phases. Phase I will be comprised of the watermain extension along Indian Chief Road and into the site sufficiently to provide water service to the new dining hall and a fire hydrant at the entrance to the camp site. Phase II will be completed in the fall after the summer camping program is complete. Phase II will consist of the extension of watermain farther into the site with hydrant locations in close proximity of the existing dormitory building. 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNFSOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer through H.T.P.O. has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 99-5492 - Indian Chief Road Watermain Extension and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such'approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 10 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until Thursday, May 20, 1999, 10:00 A.M., at City Hall after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, June 1, 1999, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 4, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: May 4, 1999 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development& Contract for Demolition of Buildings at 8010 Eden Financial Services: Road(City Property) VI.G. Don Uram David Lindahl Requested Action Move to: Approve Contract between the City of Eden Prairie and Ingram Excavating for the demolition of a house, garage, and swimming pool located at 8110 Eden Road. Synopsis Before the City can complete the sale of the Lot 4 Block 1 Market Center Second Addition to Hartford Financial(Jack Brandt), the existing buildings must be removed from the property. Background Information Once the City Council approves the contract with Ingram, the building will be removed within the next two weeks. Attachments Form of Contract with Ingram Inc. 1 FORM OF CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed this day of 19 , by and between City of Eden Prairie hereinafter referred to as the "CITY" , and Ingram Excavating Inc , hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" . WITNESSETH: CITY AND CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter stated, agree as follows : I . CONTRACTOR hereby covenants and agrees to perform and execute all the provisions of the Specifications prepared by The City of Eden Prairie referred to in Paragraph IV, as provided by the CITY for: The Demolition of a house, Garage, and Swimming Pool . CONTRACTOR further agrees to do everything required by this Agreement and the Contract Documents . II . CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept payment in accordance with the prices bid for the lump sum as set forth in the Proposal Form attached hereto which prices conform to those in the accepted CONTRACTOR'S proposal on file in the office of the City Building Official . The aggregate sum of such prices, based on estimated required quantities is estimated to be $ Six Thousand Dollars ($6, 000 . ) III . Payments to CONTRACTOR by City shall be made as provided in the Contractor Documents . IV. The Contract Documents consist of the following component parts : (1) Legal and Procedural Documents A. Advertisement for ,Bids B. Accepted Proposal C. Contract Agreement (2) Special Conditions (3) Detail Specifications (4) Addenda and Supplemental Agreements The Contract Documents are hereby incorporated with this Agreement and are as much a part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. This Agreement and the Contract Documents are the Contract . (V) . CONTRACTOR agrees to fully and satisfactorily complete the work contemplated by this Agreement in accordance with the following schedule : completed by in accordance with the Contract Documents . (VI) . This Agreement shall be executed in 2 copies . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the date first above written. In Presence Of : CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA By Its City Mayor And Its City Manager CONTRACTOR In Presence Of : Ingram Excavating Inc By Title : And Title : CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: May 4, 1999 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development& Calling for a Public Hearing June 15, 1999,to Financial Services: establish a Tax Increment Financing(TIF)District VI.H. Don Uram for Housing David Lindahl Requested Action Move to: Adopt Resolution calling for a public hearing June 15, 1999, to establish a Tax Increment Financing(TIF) District. Synopsis The purpose of establishing the TIF District is to help finance the construction of approximately 55 moderate-cost senior rental apartment units on a site along the south side of T.H. 212 and Fountain Place Road, across from Birdies Sport Park. State law requires that before a public hearing is held to establish a TIF District, a resolution must first be passed by the City Council for the hearing. Background Information A 325-unit senior campus is being planned on a 12-acre site located along the south side of T.H. 212 across from Birdies Sport Park. This proposal would include a variety of housing choices for seniors, including: townhomes, independent living units, assisted living units, dementia units, and special care units. The developer (Silvercrest Properties — Mike Gould) is requesting TIF financing to create about 55 units affordable to seniors with incomes below 50% of the area median, and to help offset high land acquisition costs. Details of the TIF plan will be presented to the City Council/HRA on June 15, 1999. Attachments Resolution Project Area Maps 1 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON APPROVAL AN AMENDED PROJECT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 5 IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING(QUALIFIED HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 15 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: 1. Proposed Project Plan and Financing Plan. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota(the "HRA")has prepared, and will present to the City for approval, a amended redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Project Plan(the "Project Plan") for Redevelopment Project Area No. 5 (the "Project Area"), and a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statues, Section 469.002, subdivision 14 (the "Redevelopment Project"). In order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred in connection with the Project Plan and the Redevelopment Project, the HRA has prepared, and will present, to the City for approval, a tax increment financing plan(the "Financing Plan"), which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, designated as Tax Increment Financing (Qualified Housing) District No. 15 within the Project Area. It has been proposed that the Board of Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council approve the Project Plan and Financing Plan, and that this Council hold a public hearing on the Project Plan and Financing Plan as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.028 and 469.175, subdivision 3. 2. Public Hearing. A public hearing is hereby scheduled to be held on the Amended Project Plan and Financing Plan at 7:00 p.m. on June 15, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Eden Prairie City Center, 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing in substantially the form of Exhibit A hereto to be published in the official newspaper of the City not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing, and to provide the information required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 2 to the appropriate governmental bodies. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 4, 1999. ATTEST: Jean L. Harris, Mayor Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED PROJECT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 5 IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND ON APPROVAL OF A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING(QUALIFIED HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 15 OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie will hold a public hearing on approval of the an Amended Project Plan(the Project Plan) for Redevelopment Project Area No. 5 (the Project Area)and approval of a Tax Increment Financing Plan(the Financing Plan)for Tax Increment Financing(Qualified Housing)District No. 15 (the Financing District)of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Eden Prairie (the HRA) at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 15, 1999, in the City Council Chambers, 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Nfinnesota. The Project Plan and Financing Plan provide for the financing with tax increment revenue generated by the Financing District established by the Financing Plan of certain public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA or the City in connection with carrying out the Project Plan for the Project Area. Accompanying this notice is a map of a portion of the City. The map shows the area encompassed by the Project Area and the Financing District from which tax increment may be collected pursuant to the Financing Plan and the area in which such tax increment may be expended. All who wish to be heard as to the Project Plan and Financing Plan will be given an opportunity to express their views at the time of the public hearing or may file written comments with the Finance Director/Clerk prior to the public hearing. Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk 3 rg . 9 _ i u 3 .r //J QO' t 4, LEY '' � ,, 4.- m vlEw - �,,, a Q Y��, C �% , 0 12 i� m m oRi / ,i , - - ` Lie ccil .. i G yp O,pTgB[E ? ANN�%QR 1 1-.. ,yC' DR {r S e Q!l u. £� .. �y w i ,-N �-] TECHNOLOGY DR. - ^` In\ `• //`` t-J ` s Lake""� .: \ 8tH , ' W 3ewi3d ZS2 .- ' LE NA R \\ 5 d9, 1615 } y C /. a � T116N R'...2W ��/'_ Oj F 3 5+ ■a��^- _ ` •, o \FR a, 7f311, --- .. TECHNOLOGY �� cJ / ti W. Off. `. . 1NG-- EE V/ IS .. W 6.1 k EGJpN W Goa, ~ i�E o ' ---�L CENTER i93{ ii ��O / ' \ Ande; WIN m RAYM p NCT.� c3 G��S��R • a 23� 4 , CD11;;''''" \ K1.gy, ! RAIL �� �G,19 VIA Q� I/ 2 '" �v`� 4j�P��\�gPJNG--IN DR R 1 J tnk�torw 04 A !n / " � �A O z l 'yeR 'pi \9 .', i7 :, il? /; . Rp4 ��,V` _, ` \ CHESTNUT =i• ��E ✓'t( 44 �OG`c DR. G s.\a4. ;r': -" t.- o .N, R j‘ c. [4,��` \ �CRREL j WA' O o j `��• �`- MED 1-' PRAIRIE '`,`. 68.- 67. -'F/f R C 3 l / \ CM ",g� NON CT. \ G4. W HYLI,�``�� a o ce TOWERS LT) LA. , 4� 20 l A • ✓:" I�( '. (�/ �_''.,OR. r v \NO �y j CARMODY� �R•lj,�'OR< • GNO\'1A TP �. "� $� [ �\ M `' / ��&� P N. `�-\V:''� r " 4 1 FF ; ✓py O 3; z RD - 27. cIR. >.�R\ 'jo wesR!_OGE `' • :'- ----i- • C�� z��! S 29 �,o` 3 4RK DR. ., Ib �f \\- 6 f 'i ‘AO,✓�- ,ks , r r ,,, Too Z' xd' v1A 4, a\off wt1 >(��•[4.�a y/,pF1FD EN LA� SO -�CT.�"��po �F���-��u_J ��v �`�f v Q>p111 OCV \ l� I 4i ;' Ji N CfOD p : o �iil v p � RN)} 1 �: [I A ( I •ANDERSON j �12Ao A , NOERSON 0PS yo ��Q�_ Ct �-� `yam OR '/''* --+-i �..�«�f�----,"j--="c- `-..�! 1 / 0 It (•'yc. ��, 1 � �yF 1.441. aiu� �/�U1 ailt 3!'m '` o `goy COGcJ ,4,1 s (/)' 1 \�a�+/ __�-"�` 8S��� �7, Dr ARHEL z WATERFORD Y m i ti,.�,.KE`e _`` �f - W PRESERV 1 BLVD. 1j 1(�- � ? 22 ��, \ a C:'g s,-i CAA CD 1-%fin \,.-�i" �j p a 2� �1 r �tq.1 R Neill )aP ,y :xl Staring \ a'S 9 -1 PRINCETON F AVE. 4.7 ` a L , k e t ,--� La e 1 r r BISHOP CT. p I—`"`3)p jai ."` �. �'N CI. h.� .. HENN. CO. VO=TECH ! 9 �C��D�,�� �. 23 24 a j1 r• / T118N l BROOK <��-� �� 26�25 a I lic \--L____Li z 23 \ - ;-• Go`9" '107 / �.Mo�NT T116W R2ZW o�� 26 �� 6s. .��ck 1, c' a �-- ria' • '\ ' •.crtor Y 4 _ ic-o--R-06 ash \ / } �T -.»2�� �� ,`�\ _ << �jRgJ� �/y IRE 46r�` ,��/�J1� a '^� GER `,til�gY �� �` �� 4 z O U 1 o x I111\• Fr ( 1 ckNpf it _�--Vir TR. r �r� \�� L `�� 25 �RcJ�` 1^�` '^•--.� " ' /4 ��� ���� Kf' EY�` 39.i p i (n` F z l I V I } y RI( ST.)\Pi O27 Qf( t\y v a 4- `\ ,k- Ro. , d,` \/O�RpM� `'LA .!" W •" 1 J\O".CpW DR. /7 / V O �W '��i!�'1..11 A. C. /,I _ _ 9��,t\� 11i� O� = 9 1$7 Y5-Qp�'POINT/" _ u S°74-ii,R..3ac. S 3 GRIST L - BLUEsj. w 9 Z LI m CI) HO � �, let r((�DR. <rY e g &��t,� 7 7—15 (274). . ��'\\ RM-2.5 '� ��� Gp co�oo�Z (20) 50�83 � • ° -StR '• I . / ;o.,c lay.59 ::ie ' is >� t �� ,'/ ,, 3 �•Zu 61 ;CAS TLEMOOR I `•� y� 525.6 ^ $1�3 # tlASri.hi l ! c 9s.t� 4 9•�r •�•x / a e-'� tti i �o in -e I60.31 ...v . 'g\ •p / ^, • --.'\. (1) . •`', (9)�• �,;/� s 'q�� A �,::: � • 6-84,p zs°` `°`' �j¢Opo'��s I •.>c'' f >'t-REG-SE.R .`' '(6) ' /� ,6d�. (19) TI '�i*rR/G'I"�'• ' ,,. ©_87 . A. A r 4is / _,:pl__;;4:1*"- ' ®2e� . s. • \ 11 .5e (20) e`6� ,' � `? �' 1c1 � ' . •� 4 . V" i • a /�' . • �� 55.85 . ,4 90 1.4' Ak . • 44 s. o Aill&14- I o_ Z. cc ' A `� •• $ r-2 ' il *DEN Lq .,- .__.. ., (21) _.__ _,A S f Q// (A) \ r1tn1'01'40'E • s • 4 N a �'`r -A /'� (815), �� ( , /�'r »N _ A POINT 190.8 r , NORTH Ate 452OPjli •r E OF 9x OOR •�/ _ �i:i T_ lJ - C ;4.4/ lierlawinow,, 10 1lt, I I J 10)° 9 w 8 k (23) 8 / Nh (27), (26)- (2•5) (24)' (22) ., s, •y. 3 (2) _b 12 �! _7 !: (21) ,e- 4 ' t (28) ' PORCUPINE Q . ' ti (20 336.51 HI •03 53'E 127. R•IS/, '� ! ' i11.35 C, 186,15 EAST 2712.97 CS 1974 0 eye.,...,.. ctw J- - . 1g',.- ay ^• .,'s _ �gi�pp.. rs�� ry, t $(y +-r tTi ....._l..d.•15�ii�.d .-..°w+..� d.-•.. Test.�£ - .- _. ., �.._. _ .. dR}- .... 1, i O • E-] 1 I ' \. '\ ! di Ei 0PA;,..., „„\ .., ..s.„, ... I 1L)" \ , -s,. ati:1 yI I .01k li i ASS 1 C1 0 �- 1II I io - rvot, \ \1 \ce • \-\s �L I I i IAA._ •\o if7A c70 13 `/ \ m e •,��� \ -7 1 i * . .tit\\ \ El I I V- • nn by \ 1 -„Lil iii 1 _....„,<I,,,,e' * 7 ' 4 \\ \ g \ . ��1 1 s L. . \\ '\ cr) .y 0 i, 1 z ,. t al Pa \ "\ m ; L ° ` --, it \ > ` i ‹.,,,„, 23"Jefg KK LNGZ �._._._.�.�._._._._._.___ri .--•_ I1EI 91 a x S $ o 0 N 3 9 1® B O A R M A N K R O O S f' F I S T F R `- O G E L 6 A S S O C I --- .._ .w d 5t • MI III. MI to 55401 • Fax 612-339-6212 phoa=r612-339-3732 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: Community Development ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Donald R. Uram Michael D. Franzen Eden Prairie Mall Theaters V /[ 4. Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 80 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment in the Regional Commercial Zoning District on 10 acres; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions); and • Direct Staff to issue a land alteration permit and footing and foundation permit to General Growth Properties, Inc. to proceed with construction at their own risk; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission, Staff and Council recommendations. Synopsis General Growth is proposing to relocate the theater(16 screens)to the west side of the mall,with a Borders Bookstore,restaurants and specialty retail. Background Information General Growth is requesting a waiver for exterior materials from 75% face brick and glass to 10%, and a waiver for building height from 40 to 80 feet. Reasons to consider the waiver are are listed in the staff report. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project with waivers for exterior materials and building height. The Parks and Recreation Commission did not review this project. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated April 12, 1999 3. Staff Report dated April 9, 1999 1 EDEN PRAIRIE MALL THEATERS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT OF EDEN PRAIRIE MALL THEATERS FOR GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Amendment of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on Eden Prairie Mall Theaters PUD Concept Amendment by General Growth Properties and considered their request for approval for development and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on May 4, 1999; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Eden Prairie Mall Theaters,being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval as outlined in the plans dated April 27, 1999. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated April 12, 1999. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 4th day of May, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Eden Prairie Mall Theater _ Exhibit A Legal Description Eden Prairie Center Addition Block One, Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6 Eden Prairie Center 8th Addition Block One, Lots 1 and 2 • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Eden Prairie April 12, 1999 Page 2 B. EDEN PRAIRIE MALL THEATRES by General Growth Properties Representatives of General Growth Properties reviewed the minor change to the original plan which moves the theatre from the east side to the west side as Phase I of this project. The architectural design details of the addition and streetscape were reviewed emphasizing the intent to relate the design to the surrounding area as well as the existing building. The Commissioners asked if a major anchor such as Dayton's as earlier discussed would still be a tenant. The proponent indicated they were still working with Dayton's to become a tenant. The proponents were asked if there would be separate entrances to each tenant. The proponent stated the main entrance will be primary but in the case of the bookstore they would have an outside entrance as well as an inside entrance. Commissioner Dorn asked if future phases of this project would show less brick and glass as this phase indicates. He stated concern that the city code requirement of 75 per cent was not being met and hoped that future phases would not continue to show a decrease. The proponent assured the Commission that it was not their intent to propose less brick and glass in future phases of this project. Sample building materials were passed around to the Commissioners. MOTION: Lewis moved, Alexander seconded to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Young, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of General Growth Properties for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 80 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 10 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional District on 10 acres, and Site Plan Review on 10 acres, based on plans dated April 9, 1999 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 9, 1999. Motion carried 6-0. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: April 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Mall Theaters APPLICANT: General Growth Properties, Inc. FEE OWNER: General Growth Properties. Inc. LOCATION: East Side of Eden Prairie Mall REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 80 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 10 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment in the Regional Commercial Zoning District on 10 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 10 acres. 1 -....\\ ...... . c;) ..„b .4 ••• FT. n' n.. ' .• a r �4a (6 = lea., • .� I^ (.i)1 • i re - 1 � i (22) r �', : e:31y r1� e• ti a• I. a ^r.• .a rot '� s : ' s l2tl (I0) r-.�- 4ms *?1 $ •4 :4;•..a , *:.'A • lie -7 ' _ $,` �lEtNA KJ4•tOt7!� � io�/ - f • Yn?• . ,el. •,A .7....4-t-____-__- --_" = -,r4T /rye . � • . ..sn 1 :ra•at twt . 0„ 0' • ..'___ .' .lYh• •_ ' , �,Y'4,( •-4 -..:2 2 + r�a (227� s r *°t) = (16) p^ N 5:. 2 tDti CLE7, ...cg q 5 7. qY i i D`. ''C- �r1V®7 1' ZIm IDoi(t.i, •r L< *� 1 _ ':.au -- :rsr• C i ' eLF 11 s" ••- . In f -"_�-__�--—".i �_ . IN-wag t • a' aft Er (Yi T t ::: vr.r,rs. t.•"h61 1 r t - 1 .\ I)(t2 IDON'`ft lLli�',4 (2e) W aroR,r. )_;naJ ._.r•a'.r[7 1a• .- O I x I a 0 a... - - i.A�- --1. , • 4 'CJ.Yam•' R ZE F , 11ALa aaa... s"a a.«, z ' di 1, ••,� cirri, ��S ar9�• s J� r.n •a tw r t1 ;. '"� �f' eq 1' t,ll I '\" r�,� rS ��-� a�.y• +.+�c ,.rP•r P''a • � t .✓ # " O: :41 y41(is) y ".s�'s;--^ ~-: tu.�6)a•ermt l\0 " I. 1y�'j R ;2�p�(y S .-0.- ,, , Ar' rrP'rt 7]►[.a'a•)K (19•AI Tll *��•:' ra(c } M 46- IC k .014 l' /'� i, A90 ' .na --r;' 9,i • sR (32) -• r.'qr'��, /. '//r.a�a, l �. t-•is- -2 Svc : ' ,.• a. ._2ba :07TCL7EiT Lax - t • :. i 7 r / ` rtit :vu� aw (q1:r ' -- :sc .sr , '' f -y (1) L.� •b� �r � � - �yV41. 0 ..,.".. .., e � ,�./ :""...,, .... f) Y� % %� i -b " 'r4: ` • � �o�' % • ✓ V PUAcJI F• ` � (a) AY' t � 1 ,w (6) CO 2. - �x�L$. 1:440(....,2"'"ir":8X:. ' r �S rs) g � 4 arr• �fa � .. Y c,� . •• / • ag ' �, at. liJi•) IR ' s. cL nlQQ . l � V E � QlJ©N — Say, Gj r• - •* `A s ....al Rfs: y ' t I.•) •�7^ry.• ,L' F.,,, ¢1 i ' •s it ( � �•!T+ t� ..-y _� � T '^ •wror w _.}r..4 �z � al • 1sa . "'- (DI • ��a y c, f \(Ol roattRs•,_a4,ti 3„ ; r ` U" _.- 17y ,.l 444 t as lm ir • ♦ - X awelotri• _. I/ • • i CM ra •. '7� 'l j .' ' t..y• •• I � I '_ _ , ,, '4 '" / r ` ` , EMU PGA I! CL TEP oTN 4017I .n`,t371- • . .,, \�\ a • :,,_t .e„„ 2. .. iicio, 'r.. ./ , 44,.. TIE/ ,, ' T `-1IF S a / C "r an • 1 ;•4C�e I - s* ..91= i 7, O J3'. / mod'r 4. C.w (t\✓r (�n\� ?� 7} . ., Sy .� r Ai ILINDt2 .,-• !, `r1 -?e,,T, • (,s 1 1 b as I • E 7ETT ;, -,,=�,'.1a.,.�a, 3,. r �� 2 c...., ' .0b a-=..__ (5) �'•b-0 (el f ,- n ��2, :::,..,..- HI d , flat d ��14.CfATfj .. -rs r' I .• �,.9 r,, A • _, RD .,r i yY .'fir , n••r.:xy - `V . 5 . t .:. , •r rY -w�rx•7. '+ (n) I� •, .as•'r[.-Y (t09 ' , Op t4 r aw -,} r n .r• .�... -•, ,-7-r t al Q - '.`.iri ::: -..•�,t�Z—z i CENTER d_ - 4 9 4 ♦17.34- n`•r„—'+ l� b w -lS- :::.ar. b t I .a> ' • 9ts. .:.Y-•,a- :..,.[za r:,r..•[ �'''�. p �1� �Ig�-7%,rr=�n}>,C\-1 rawA- ` . .wa•,rt (t2) �, TTTTTT..nn 7 'p/ ,\ ,,\/� L-r- � T ADDA - 7, . (ID6) Jam` Y •). i 1 ro ara•r1 •� 1 yr Iv .e.•.,••••t .a = '' Y r•i•r I3 =1et =r- ". yff�r�a--' y 414 ?or•d , (R1,INCN .i1�a•,. iilSu 11:11 . = ts1t-r:la r• v l20 u. -T. a Y (te7 % L ,P.‘,,,g - • •..7...---4 ...2'.. . ' 1 A lair• 1��i.' 7 . fir -li�1t.:?...' ' (S-^ Lll/ . / �, •�1 2 1 ]\tip ��- 1: (271 Name .11.- i \. • S t s."r.* ',al•..[y '� �\`� \'� IY,/l Ys a)=i^ sl lid it:i • r_ltt)L.'•el •�e r i`•+ !F'' -- (ut 2; i= • ('II ( n'(ii)M(;:)C 171 1 lt.l (,1.73) �'.. , �I _ Lam', • ' `��' \ 6°�, -. 1 ,11 ,MI �901 , v ., 1' --.I;�.;ar (s7 ,3(e) Pvn r :aliic. , '-'Z' > 'd0�7l•-, ' 3 -,, _ •,'w -(9),e a: 4a01 (iI.4,1 ° =61. (99- p i • •a s- -•.•..win-11. �:.tv ++�_ p+i. a MI at.. (_ r 1 1 ,J '77 1.1 (i0I ..r.:ns u Staff Report Eden Prairie Theaters April 9, 1999 BACKGROUND In 1998 the City approved an 18 screen theater on the east side of th e mall. SITE PLAN General Growth is proposing to relocate the theater(16 screens)to the west side of the mall, with a Borders Bookstore, restaurants and specialty retail. The theater is 80,000 square feet. Borders is 28,300 square feet. Restaurant and specialty retail is 42,300 square feet. The building expansion meets setback requirements. The plan meets parking requirements. The parking lot will be striped to direct traffic towards the mall entry. ARCHITECTURE The building addition is 10% brick and glass. This is a waiver from the 75% brick and glass requirement of the City code. Reasons to consider the waiver are: 1. If all exterior walls, existing and proposed, are added together,the amount of brick and glass is 80%. 2. An outdoor pedestrian streetscape is created through the use of smaller tenants with windows, doors and canopies. This will be reinforced by decorative paving, street lights and landscaping similar to Single Tree Lane. (refer to image sketch on first page of the plans) 3. The use of strong vertical elements and entry features help break up the mass of a large building and adds building detail. 4. The use of accents materials are complimentary to the neutral colors of the mall. (Exterior materials will be shown at the meeting) 5. The new mall entry is the prototype for the other main mall entrances. This adds interest and architectural continuity to the mall. 6. The exterior architecture for the addition is the prototype for other additions to the mall. 2 7 Staff Report Eden Prairie Theaters April 9, 1999 The existing mall was granted a waiver from the 40 foot allowed building height to 56 feet.The majority of the building addition is 56 feet tall. The new mall entrance feature is 70 feet tall. The Borders entry feature is 80 feet tall. The taller architectural features are in proportion to the height and scale of the mall and are needed for interest and variety. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is 470 inches. The trees will be planted in the new planting islands in the parking lot,at new entrance features off the main roads into the mall,and in front of the new building addition. UTILITIES Sewer and water service is available on site. Neil Lake is the treatment pond for the mall. FUTURE EXPANSION Sheet two shows the future expansion plans for the mall which is consistent with the master plan approved in 1996. The future plans will include new directional signs and entrance monuments. STAFF RECOMMENDATIQNS The Staff recommends approval of the PUD Concept Amendment on 80 acres,PUD District Review on 10 acres,Zoning District Amendment in the Regional Commercial District 10 acres,and Site Plan Review on 10 acres,based on plans dated April 9, 1999 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 9, 1999 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to building permit issuance the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. C Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. D. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. a Staff Report Eden Prairie Theaters April 9, 1999 E. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 3. PUD waivers are granted for exterior materials and building height from 40 to 80 feet. 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: Community Development ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Donald R. Uram Scott Kipp Farrell/Lapic Addition V I' 13, Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.54 acres; subject to variances approved by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 1.54 acres into 3 single family lots and road right-of-way; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and Council conditions. Synopsis Mr. Farrell and Mr. Lapic are proposing to rezone 1.54 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and plat three single-family lots. The existing twinhome will be converted into a single-family structure to conform to the proposed zoning of the property located at 12563 Sunnybrook Road. Background Information This project was first reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 22, 1999 at which time the request was to maintain the existing structure as a twinhome for rental income. Rezoning the property to single-family would make the structure a "non-permitted" use. The project was continued to allow the proponents to evaluate the ability to convert the structure to single-family use. At the April 12, 1999 Planning Commission, the proponents said the conversion to single-family use was financially possible and requested approval of the project based on that option. Variances for lot frontage and front yard setback are required and were considered reasonable by the Planning Commission based on the low density of the project. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project based on converting the existing structure to a single-family use. The Parks and Recreation Commission did not review this project. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals will be reviewing the project on May 13, 1999. 1 City Council Agenda (5/4/99) Farrell/Lapic Addition Page 2 Attachments 1. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated April 12, 1999 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated February 22, 1999 4. Staff Report dated April 9, 1999 5. Staff Report dated February 19, 1999 2 FARRELL/LAPIC ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FARRELL/LAPIC ADDITION FOR MIKE FARRELL AND TOM LAPIC BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of the Farrell/Lapic Addition for Mike Farrell and Tom Lapic dated April 27, 1999, consisting of 1.54 acres into 3 single family lots and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of May, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 22, 1999 Page 2 B. FARRELL/LAPIC ADDITION Kipp introduced the proponents Mike Farrell and Tom Lapic; and their developer Perry Ryan. Perry Ryan, developer of the site,reviewed the history of the previous request for development. He discussed the difference between this proposal and the previous proposal and the need for the two variances. He also indicated that there would be no tree loss as indicated in the staff report. Sandstad asked if the previous proposal had been given approval of the final plat. Kipp indicated the previous proposal went through first reading only with no recorded plat. Dorn asked about using the neighbor's property for a driveway. Ryan indicated there is an easement, which allows for the driveway to be located on the neighbor's property. Mike Farrell, proponent and resident of the duplex on Sunnybrook Road, informed the Planning Commission of his family history of living in Eden Prairie and indicated they want to continue to live in this community until retirement. He told the Commission that the previous developer had defaulted on their agreement, which caused them considerably monetary expenses as well as vacating the premises. He indicated that this proposal is less dense. He also discussed the contributions that he and Mr. Lapic's family had made to the community by keeping the Purgatory Creek area clean, and respecting the environment needs of the area. He asked the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the variances so that he and his family could continue to reside in this community. Sandstad asked Mr. Farrell if they had considered converting the duplex to a single family home. Farrell indicated they had and that would require complete gutting of the structure at a considerable cost which would prevent them from being able to go through with the proposed development before the Commission. Foote asked if Mr. Farrell and Mr. Lapic owned the property together. Farrell responded they do. Tom Lapic,proponent, 3557 Tara Lane, Woodbury, informed the commission that currently he and his family do not live in the duplex due to a transfer three years ago which required them to move from Eden Prairie. Upon their return they moved to Woodbury. Lapic also discussed the expenses incurred when the previous development fell through and the cost of converting the duplex into a single family home that he estimated at$80,000. This additional loan would prevent them from going ahead with this development. Lapic indicated that he believes this proposal is consistent with the vision of the city's comprehensive plan. Lapic reviewed the improvements that he and Mr. Farrell had made to the creek area such as planting a considerable number of trees. He also indicated that the lot where the duplex stands has wild strawberries thriving under their care—one of the few places in the city. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Eden Prairie April 12, 1999 Page 3 C. FARRELL/LAPIC ADDITION (continued from 2/22/99) Planner Kipp briefly reviewed the proposal. request of General Growth Properties for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment Perry Ryan, Ryan Engineering, presented the option the proponent's request converting the duplex to a single-family structure after the construction of the new single family homes. Mr. Lapic informed the Commission that the conversion will work both physically and financially. Commissioner Sandstad asked if there were any standards for"flag"lots. Planner Kipp stated there are no standards but adequate space is needed for the driveways. Kipp pointed out the special timing requirements for the conversion of the duplex. Commissioner Alexander asked the proponent about improvements to the exterior of the existing structure. Mr. Lapic stated the exterior would be completely updated with new siding and a new roof. MOTION: Clinton moved, Lewis seconded to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Lewis, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Farrell-Lapic for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.54 acres and Preliminary Plat of 1.54 acres into 3 lots, based on plans dated March 15, 1999 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 9, 1999. Motion carried 6-0. • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 22, 1999 Page 3 Kipp reported to the Commission that the staff supports the three-lot subdivision and that it is consistent with the city's Comprehensive Guide Plan. Kipp did indicate that the main issue of concern is maintaining the duplex. Kipp reviewed the history of the duplex and that it was "grandfathered" in as an allowed non-conforming use. With this development proposal, if it were to remain, it would become a"non-permitted"use since its use is multi- family versus single family as proposed for the other lots. Kipp indicated that staff empathizes with the property owners and the proposal benefits the city allowing support of the variances but by allowing the duplex to remain it circumvents the city code. Kipp would recommend removal of the duplex resulting in all three lots being single family. Kipp discussed the tree loss figure in the staff report. The city forester determined the tree loss at 17 per cent. Clinton asked staff why the duplex would become a non-conforming use. Kipp stated that when the new city ordinance was approved, all existing structures were grandfathered in but now that a new development proposal for the area requires action to rezone the area to single family, the use of the property cannot be varied, allowing a multi- family structure to remain. Sandstad asked is there were other areas in the city where single family surrounded a duplex. Kipp indicated that there could have been but if the structures were houses they would have been rezoned to single family. Alexander inquired about the possibility of rezoning only the two new lots and leaving the rural lot in place. Kipp indicated it could be done but would be considered"spot zoning." Alexander asked if the duplex could remain for a period of time until the other homes were built allowing the owners to have time to accumulate the funds for either renovation of the duplex or removal. Kipp indicated this would be a question for the city attorney but it would be considered allowing a non-permitted use. Dorn asked why the first development failed. Kipp stated there were financial issues with another property owner. Dom then indicated he would have a hard time recommending approval of this proposal because of allowing the duplex to remain. Lewis asked in what area would the duplex be allowed. Kipp stated under case law it would create an issue of spot zoning—a density transfer issue. Clinton asked if similar frontage had been previously approved. Kipp indicated yes. Clinton also asked if this development had been reviewed for flooding which previously occurred with the creek. The developer Ryan indicated they reviewed the grading plan and this proposal is situated two and one-half feet above the flood plain. Ryan also indicated at this time his desire to leave the duplex out of the rezoning proposal. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 22, 1999 Page 4 Dorn asked if this development had the same setbacks as the previous proposal. Kipp indicated the setbacks were within a foot or two of the previous proposal. Sandstad stated he would have no problem with the development as proposed for Lots 2 and 3. Alexander asked whether the duplex would meet building code requirements if it were remodeled and used as a single-family use. Kipp stated this option would have to be discussed with the building department. Beth Andrews and Steve Kroiss, MSS Holdings, appeared before the Commission stated they were strongly in favor of the staff recommendations. They believed the replatting would be financially subsidized because of future resale of the property and that renting would not be a problem. Sandstad stated he was a huge fan of gardens and preservation but was not comfortable with this development proposal because of the duplex. He would be in favor of the staff recommendation to remove the duplex. He stated the earlier proposal showed the duplex removed. Lewis stated sympathy to the property owners but the legal issues brought up require the Commission to be consistent. Lewis would be open to either removing or remodeling the duplex to a single-family use. Lewis did not believe it was in the best interest of the city to circumvent the system by allowing the duplex to remain. Dorn indicated his preference to remove the existing structure. Clinton referred to a previous proposal brought before the Commission where they recommended denial and the City Council approved; and this project has still not gone forward. He stated that Eden Prairie may be tough but he believes they are fair in their decisionmaking. He supports the staff recommendation and suggested the property owners look at other options. Alexander stated sympathy to the property owners and was happy to see the northern part of the property preserved but would have to go along with the zoning laws that would require removal of the duplex. Foote stated sympathy to the property owners and appreciate them being good stewards of the land but the Planning Commission's decisions must be fair so he would support the staff recommendation. Dorn asked the property owners if they would like a 30-day continuance to look at their options. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 22, 1999 Page 5 Mr. Farrell and Mr. Lapic requested a 30-day continuance. MOTION: Lewis moved, seconded by Sandstad,to continue the Farrell Lapic Addition request for Zoning District Change with variances and preliminary plat at 12563 Sunnybrook Road to the Planning Commission meeting on March 22, 1999. Motion carried 6-0. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: April 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Farrell/Lapic Addition APPLICANT/ OWNER: Michael Farrell and Thomas Lapic LOCATION: 12563 Sunnybrook Road REQUEST: 1. Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.54 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 1.54 acres into 3 lots and road right of way. -- - --•---- �+/--, , CI,:1 1,03.A iio j ems.i 4 : I.s 1, �- • a , illy 1 -.4... �•�•N-1: g ; Cr Ti ""'4" 4' -"••• , � 4.. - (35) 1 1 / 1 71-3 `� t.�....,yp,� ... ..M ,pp « th I -, 6 • (3) (t) X44.s•:. I (5) S . 1 I 71.I5 1 ;II R I 'i •.41 Or TUC! C k 33)It w. .... , ..., (6) 1 211 71 . ' 1 1 1 ' (No) 1 Po- (2) ti 20'' t },t 1.. .110,.. i g^ 1 tt WI i. yOj .9 ` 07 L Itl 77 :7 �1 ♦ • .3 - .+ 1 !t$ It 9 ww�'j�.�y ~-• 'K A '� ---e ` - S! it X , °} .. « f''o{'ll Z(25)� ^spy �i= � r21 ''T '. ` :, IS 1F a It,r or su...Tiwzx 1104Or __ .i--- ( 10) g X.o �s a. )1 H0 = 4..'" . I .Sivrt .at ... ..-,,a‘ 46A1'A R; ,. '.. 3' I a .'�� 1:r ,�,~ ;:e) (43) . - (�) '` 1 l} I j'i it i .,• 1. ,.. �1 • 7 \ 1 p.3 7T. 1 •f Se 1 _ 1, ai 1 Heat .e..y• , I \ --r- , 7 ,,A-1 .- I + \ { CREEK I I. I• At ... '.3i .;1 '} 4�1 1b1.Oi "'moll : ‘ �� '� �: • (II 5) - tt f j 1 ; (4 5) J: :.ail....- /�1 (64) \` f, �- - (t�} 1 • • ( 12) _ —(48) 4, _ - 1 silt ' '-t~ ' •1' :^, - r \\ .RF �` ' IP - !3 I / ar •� - ..1�'� • .Jr?, •"� ( 1.f} • . . (40) '( ) - .....L .,%1•4 ,(I I) . .,4 f• ya.. $ g:5)a, 'az - A .. 4 7 •� j/ \Z..• \ }�. 4maim 1 ..... r'; . 88,..1.‘ rtz,.:.; •et - c,t,;( IV „., . .. " . •••• he - 4 • :\ tt'''�- '_ (18} tom •. 5 , - ( rti ) (Q).444* ',� ��.'t d...... . ..., • . _.. ait j 5 - 5 4 - ( ) r >i4 1m.04 nos... mmi •V 2� w� . ( 17} y(20)' - �e qr 5 11 r IZ I t27? _ (7) t - --4, (37) (S) (60) , i �� _ - , b) 7_ ( b)y (an _ ( ) r12t1 I'll (51)- (84 (62) Staff Report Farrell/Lapic Addition April 9, 1999 BACKGROUND This project was continued from the February 22, 1999 Planning Commission meeting at the request of the proponent for the opportunity to evaluate options for the development of the property. At issue was the request of the proponent to maintain the existing duplex building with the proposal to rezone the property to single family residential. Zoning the property to R1-13.5 would make the existing duplex a non-permitted use, which cannot be allowed by variance. The two options available to address this issue were to: 1. Convert the existing structure into a single family home and proceed with the development as proposed, or 2. Demolish the existing structure and propose a new single family home meeting City Codes. The proponents did not want to demolish the duplex because they wanted a steady stream of rental income to off-set development costs for the project, and did not believe they could afford the conversion of the structure to a single family use. The proponents have done additional research and now believe they can convert the duplex building into a single family structure, and are requesting that the Planning Commission approve the original proposal, with the existing structure being converted to single family use. PRELIMINARY PLAT The plat shows the subdivision of 1.54 acres into 3 lots at a net density of 2.0 units per acre, consistent with other developments approved along Sunnybrook Road. The minimum lot size is 16,600 sq. ft., with an average lot size of 21,500 sq. ft. This is consistent with surrounding developments. Structure setbacks are met for lots 2 and 3. The proponents are requesting that the existing structure remain on lot 1. The following variances will be required from the Board of Adjustments and Appeals for this project: 1. Lot frontage of 19 feet for lot 2, and 21 feet for lot 3. City Code requires a minimum of 55 feet on a cul-de-sac. 2. Front yard setback of 11.3 feet for the existing home. City Code requires a minimum of 30 feet in the R1-13.5 district. 2 Staff Report Farrell/Lapic Addition April 9, 1999 3. Zero lot line setback for the driveway serving lots 2 and 3. The variances are necessary to address the proponents desire to retain the existing structure as a single family unit. A new driveway is proposed for the existing structure taking access from Cold Stream Lane. The existing driveway to Sunnybrook Road will be removed. Prior to City Council review, the plan should be revised to shift the proposed driveway off of the neighboring property. DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS Converting the structure into a single family home and proceeding with the Development as proposed will: • Require conditions in a recorded Developer's Agreement to address: • Rezoning to single family will not grandfather the existing twinhome use. • No rental of the existing structure until its conversion to single family is complete. • Conversion of the structure to single family will be required within 120 days of occupancy for any new home constructed, and no later than one year from the date of final rezoning action by the City Council. • Leave lot 1 of sufficient size to be considered for a future subdivision. An additional lot would increase the density to 2.59 units per acre,requiring a guide plan change to medium density. Any approval of variances for the project should include a condition that no additional subdivision of the property be permitted. Demolishing the structure and proposing a new single family home meeting City Codes will: (See Attachment) • Remove a non-permitted use in a single family zoning district. • Reconfigure lot lines. • Eliminate the variances, except for lot frontage for lot 3 of 40 feet rather than 21 feet as proposed. Staff supports either option. 3 Staff Report Farrell/Lapic Addition April 9, 1999 SHORELAND ORDINANCE The shoreland area is defined as land within 300 feet of the bank of the channel of Purgatory Creek. Lot 3 is considered an abutting shoreland lot which requires: • Minimum lot size of 13,500 sq. ft. • Minimum structure setback of 100 feet. • Minimum lot width of 120 feet. The lot meets these requirements. No alteration is proposed within the 50 foot shore impact zone. GRADING AND TREE LOSS A small finger of flood plain extends through the property. A total of 210 cu. yds. of fill is proposed within this flood plain area to accommodate the driveway. The amount of fill is consistent with the amount of fill when the site was part of the Villas at Purgatory Creek project. Based on the Watershed District criteria, a total of 525 cu. yds. of fill can be permitted for this project. The existing wetland area will not be impacted by the development. A conservation easement is proposed over the wetland area. There are 139 diameter inches of significant trees on the property. The City Forester has determined tree loss to be 17% or 24 diameter inches. This compares to the average tree loss of 30% for residential projects. Tree replacement is 6 caliper inches. A tree replacement plan for 6 caliper inches will be required. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Sewer and water is available from Cold Stream Lane. The new homes and existing structure will need to be connected to City sewer and water, and the well and septic system abandoned. Drainage will be directed to an existing NURP pond sized to accommodate this development. An 18 inch culvert is provided under the proposed driveway for lot 2 to maintain the existing drainage pattern. An emergency overflow is also provided. 4 j Staff Report Farrell/Lapic Addition April 9, 1999 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.54 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 1.54 acres into 3 single-family lots based on plans dated March 15, 1999, subject to the staff report dated April 7, 1999, and the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council Review, the proponent shall: A. Submit a tree replacement plan for 6 caliper inches of trees. B. Shift the proposed driveway for the existing structure off of the neighboring property. 2. Prior to release of the final plat, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Provide a conservation easement over the Purgatory Creek wetland area. C. Record at Hennepin County, a Developer's Agreement addressing the specifics of the existing structure on the property, including: conversion of the structure to single family use, that rezoning of the land will not permit grandfathering of the use as a twinhome, and that no rental of the structure will be permitted until its conversion to single family is complete. 3. Prior to grading or any construction on the property, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 4. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the cash park fee. B. Submit a tree replacement bond for review. C. Submit a bond for the conversion of the duplex unit to a single family structure. 5 ,` JI Staff Report Farrell/Lapic Addition April 9, 1999 5. The following variances shall be obtained from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for the development: A. Lot frontage of 19 feet for lot 2, and 21 feet for lot 3. City Code requires a minimum of 55 feet on a cul-de-sac. B. Front yard setback of 11.3 feet for the existing home. City Code requires a minimum of 30 feet in the R1-13.5 district. C. Zero lot line setback to parking for the shared driveway serving lots 2 and 3. City Code requires a three foot setback. II. The Planning Commission could recommend approval of a revised plan based on the attachment which removes the existing twinhome, reconfigures lot lines. Staff supports either alternative 6 5 �P- 16 v // • . . :- -..' _ ---.,,is r--- .5 . -sib ,.4,.... ,2:-5y0"... ' ,,,,,.0S,r,5*0 . - -....... 14 '/ i ` \ \ 1 • \ \. � v2( - -. I \ .•••• ---i-' . - - / I , . . 0 it5N. J• \ V 1 I _S:-. \ `.'-'s5 N-\ SI Se IQ. Co.et #t N0041.* J O -------------4P";... .• Iefr . �yVv' `^ ry �95'"0 o / . o ► � \vl o . 1 3O/" I ?> \ 1-- I \ rT �I �, 1 �, \ _ ,_-120a �I o • 1 I `n FROM R SACK - - EEK CL 5' CONSERVATION EASEMENT / ill ram_ . . L95' _ / , \ 110' J N 89'46'46" W 20\00 • • • DEVEL.OPMrr °am 0N�— .WETLAND L'741 S _ lb \ fr-----.... , ATrAc *.IMEN-r N STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: February 19, 1999 SUBJECT: Farrell/Lapic Addition APPLICANT/ OWNER: Michael Farrell and Thomas Lapic LOCATION: 12563 Sunnybrook Road REQUEST: 1. Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.54 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 1.54 acres into 3 lots and road right of way. 17 Q ' T It- -�'u•++•E l i• ... scr4‘ 4- - (35) - i - 1 1 'A • _ ' — , (37) • ' , 1I n•,t 144.C1 A (3) (4) X 44.11.1-..... -.:-..: 1 • �t L ,.:AL., +a Ir.� 1 . ..., 9:1_ .... R : I.it fT T(8)+IACI i 38) / t 73. �' 1 ' i Y .erg, F. li (3G) 1 1 tuR/ St. (2) 213.' , 1 :r. I bay 31 *4.1i g ... 151.u-.j 1 ° z(25)" v-'•13 § r44,�� ,,}` 'i 2 s+ 21 •N.tcl 53 c a s ., j , ,•,2e z.-r 4-", i ! 1. • 19 ',.,•y �y'1ll*: .(21) 5 -.• •4••••• • . Is.. ( 1 t `,. it If, NO . 14, • 1 1 a �• c. , 1 7 _L /j I •�', - L[ (12) •w 0, 4.e •j ,,. , e.e.„ ,r e -, i 1•v.3 v:ie •�' .' , .' I I x 1 1..32 ,' kfit . �� + .. 1 at . 1 CREEK iii81.03 p 322I ,••• 41, ...: • / 1, .3%.0 3.4 Wittrt A t *.w ‘.1 01.7,3)..te:..,'•.7. -•,--741,(.8:5) ,A,,‘ 4e- / "! %(11.3)ri t.. ('4‘5).c.sir4EZ.-.1..' ist:-...(1484„) 4, , 47 -..., • Z. .) �� • �,' `� r . one. r `� ► • , / 43 g as .., '4•Neiz.i (49)#* ..,. % .1,, ( 11) . ,4 . .0. • 55: •••, . 15::: t1.01 d . a -s-r' 'fs'''''' ., 4..7 \t - z% .,, . ,(5:: c -/ kkkel".4:1/4" 1 t•: 4114 (90)..., f ) .,• s' ;.31•.4, . .' .,41.11 g 1,... At tb ' '• ' • : ': •(la)h. el • - 3 $ a _- (53) (52) �_✓' ','cc.,, t 3 + . S = (38) ' is ?I?.Cm 41 G : w� + k(20)- - — S tt 12 t27) N - ` (7) (l7) . ' ' •, (37) (s) _ (60) INA* ts zit. • • = ( 1&)% (21) L 2i. ''' 61 ) 24 �,a.�' die •� : a : (zi) �` \} 10 �. 1.. 4• j � (a3) � o• � g, 1S\ .. 1 'r� �44 :; ;• 14 (3�5� (�) _ (62) 1a Z + i . . im • 10 rTl� - lia (+•) (+o) (E?1 . a 1 2(73) Staff Report Farrell/Lapic Addition February 19, 1999 BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide plan shows this site as low density residential for up to 2.5 units per acre. Surrounding land is guided low density residential and open space. The site is currently zoned Rural. Surrounding land is zoned Rural and R1-13.5. The property was originally part of the Villas at Purgatory Creek single family development which received Council approval, but was not developed. The adjacent development to the east known as Waters Edge at Purgatory Creek was approved last year, but did not include this 1.54 acre site. A legal nonconforming twinhome is located on the site. PRELIMINARY PLAT The plat shows the subdivision of 1.54 acres into 3 lots at a net density of 2.0 units per acre, consistent with other developments approved along Sunnybrook Road. The minimum lot size is 17,300 sq. ft., with an average lot size of 21,500 sq. ft. This is consistent with surrounding developments. Structure setbacks are met for lots 2 and 3. The proponents are requesting that the existing structure remain on lot 1. The following variances will be required from the Board of Adjustments and Appeals for this project: 1. Lot frontage of 19 feet for lot 2, and 21 feet for lot 3. City Code requires a minimum of 55 feet on a cul-de-sac. 2. Front yard setback of 11.3 feet for the existing home. City Code requires a minimum of 30 feet in the R1-13.5 district. The variances for lot frontage and setback are necessary to address the proponents desire to retain the existing twinhome for use as a rental property. Since the property is being rezoned to a single family district, this twinhome will become a non-permitted use. The twinhome was shown to be removed when the Villas at Purgatory Creek was approved. The following options can be considered to address this issue: 1. Convert the existing structure into a single family home and proceed with the development as proposed. This option will: • At the request of the City Attorney, require conditions in a recorded Developer's Agreement to address: 2 1 Staff Report Farrell/Lapic Addition February 19, 1999 • Rezoning to single family will not grandfather the existing twinhome use. • Conversion of the structure to single family will be required prior to occupancy permits for any new home constructed. • Leave lot 1 of sufficient size to be considered for a future subdivision. An additional lot would increase the density to 2.59 units per acre, requiring a guide plan change to medium density. Any approval of variances for the project should include a condition that no additional subdivision of the property be permitted. 2. Demolish the existing structure and propose a new single family home meeting City Codes (see attachment). This option will: • Remove a non-permitted use in a single family zoning district. • Reconfigure lot lines. • Eliminate the variances, except for lot frontage for lot 3 of 40 feet rather than 21 feet as proposed. This may have merit since the lot sizes are consistent with the area and is a reasonable development of the property. Staff recommends option 2. SHORELAND ORDINANCE The shoreland area is defined as land within 300 feet of the bank of the channel of Purgatory Creek. Lot 3 is considered an abutting shoreland lot which requires: • Minimum lot size of 13,500 sq. ft. • Minimum structure setback of 100 feet. • Minimum lot width of 120 feet. The lot meets these requirements except for lot width of 120 feet, which can be achieved with a minor lot line shift and should be made prior to City Council review. No alteration is proposed within the 50 foot shore impact zone. GRADING AND TREE LOSS A small finger of flood plain extends through the property. A total of 210 cu. yds. of fill is proposed within this flood plain area to accommodate the driveway. The amount of fill is 3 Staff Report Farrel fLapic Addition February 19, 1999 consistent with the amount of fill when the site was part of the Villas at Purgatory Creek project. Based on the Watershed District criteria, a total of 525 cu. yds. of fill can be permitted for this project. The existing wetland area will not be impacted by the development. A conservation easement is proposed over the wetland area. There are 139 diameter inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 17% or 24 diameter inches. This compares to the average tree loss of 30% for residential projects. Tree replacement is 6 caliper inches. A tree replacement plan for 6 caliper inches will be required. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Sewer and water is available from Cold Stream Lane. The existing twinhome is connected to sewer and water along Sunnybrook Road. Drainage will be directed to an existing NURP pond sized to accommodate this development. An 18 inch culvert is provided under the proposed driveway for lot 2 to maintain the existing drainage pattern. An emergency overflow is also provided. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS I. The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.54 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 1.54 acres into 3 single-family lots based on plans dated February 8, 1999, subject to the staff report dated February 19, 1999, and the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council Review, the proponent shall revise the plans as follows: A. Show the existing structure being converted to a single family home. B. Shift the lot line between lots 2 and 3 to meet th e shoreland code for 120 foot lot width for lot 3. C. Submit a tree replacement plan for 6 caliper inches of trees. 4 Staff Report Farrell/Lapic Addition February 19, 1999 2. Prior to release of the final plat, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Provide a conservation easement over the Purgatory Creek wetland area. C. Record at Hennepin County the Developer's Agreement addressing the specifics of the existing structure on the property, including conversion to single family use and that rezoning of the land will not permit grandfathering the use of the structure as a twinhome. 3. Prior to grading or any construction on the property, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 4. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the cash park fee. B. Submit a tree replacement bond for review. 5. The following variances shall be obtained from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for the development: A. Lot frontage of 19 feet for lot 2, and 21 feet for lot 3. City Code requires a minimum of 55 feet on a cul-de-sac. B. Front yard setback of 11.3 feet for the existing home. City Code requires a minimum of 30 feet in the R1-13.5 district. II. The Planning Commission could recommend approval of a revised plan based on the attachment and option 2 which removes the existing twinhome, reconfigures lot lines, and minimizes the need for variances. Staff Recommends Alternative II 5 -. . ---1.(. .-- ''. --': . r / ¢%�9�g09�462q'l�O• "' ,ice 1 \ A° # ., -,----. \ \ :\\ �If) . . , 1 `\' 9 ' \ `��. \ i ,• r., • \\ \,\ 1 ' ..•-' \., j Oas \� 1 • . \> ; 1 G - • �zs, ' .8 . .,_.( I \ , . • �s •••..• i I •0 \\ P -0 • . -__ o,......--oh. I F •so - .z. , sso of ♦ G I �a t/ v W o gyp'/* N , 0 _.__ — • 40' — —� / 'C P I r • I ` ` 1 i o , 1 I I I . \ \ - I Ni 1 I �I mI 02o © �3 N 2 - -=IOI i . . 1-2 2r- 00 CREEK CK -- — — I / ) FROM Ci II - 95► . ../ L •• 1� \ 110 J N 89'46'46" W 20 OQ • • - WETLAND L_•, i S &2 .? Soy PL *rki . r----- . CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: Community Development ITEM NO.: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Donald R. Uram Scott Kipp Hallett Addition V II,C Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 18.84 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review on 18.84 acres and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 18.84 acres with waivers; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 21.09 acres into 32 lots, 3 outlots and road right-of-way; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and Council conditions. Synopsis Centex Homes is proposing to rezone 18.84 acres to R1-13.5 and plat 32 single-family lots. Located south of Pioneer Trail at Braxton Drive,north of Cedarcrest Drive. Background Information Waivers will be necessary for one lot without public road frontage, one lot with lot frontage from 85 feet to 40 feet, and for Outlot C less than 10 acres in the Rural District. Reasons to consider the waivers are listed in the staff report. The plans have been revised according to the staff report, except eliminating Outlots A and B. These are remnant parcels that could be acquired for future development with the neighboring property. However there is no guarantee that this would take place, and that reasonable development of the neighboring property can occur without these parcels. Therefore,to avoid the potential for undeveloped remnants, the outlots should be eliminated from the proposal. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project. The Parks and Recreation voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project. 1 City Council Agenda May 4, 1999 Page 2 Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated April 12, 1999 4. Staff Report dated April 9, 1999 5. Supplemental Staff Report to the April 9, 1999, Staff Report by the Senior Planner for Hallett Addition 6. Correspondence 2 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 199 Page 2 V. DEVELOPMENTAL PROPOSALS A. Hallett Addition The proposed project is to develop 21.09 acres of land located south of Pioneer Trail and east of Cedar Forest Road into 32 single-family lots. Dan Blake of Centex Homes was present to discuss the proposal. The developer is in agreement with the staff recommendation, but has an issue with the sidewalks. The staff is recommending sidewalks on the west side of Street A and the north side of Street C. Until the utility work is done for the Cedar Forest subdivision, the city wants the developer to hold money in escrow for the sidewalks. If the sidewalks are not built, the funds would be returned to the developer. Blake doesn't believe the sidewalks are necessary, due to the lack of dominant pedestrian flow. He said if Cedar Forest gets sidewalks, then installing sidewalks in Hallett Addition makes sense, because the sidewalks would connect the two developments. Installing sidewalks later can be difficult, and the wooded nature of the south side allows little flexibility. He said that cost is an issue and that the city has subsidized sidewalks in the past. He agrees with holding money in escrow. Stuart Fox talked about the loss of trees, which amount to a 32% loss of significant trees. Average tree loss in new developments is 30 to 35%. There will be a tree buffer along Pioneer Trail, and each lot will get one tree. There will be a NURP pond for street run-off, which will flow southward into Riley Creek, Fox recommends putting money in escrow for the sidewalks, and the Planning Commission has agreed with this plan. The sidewalk for Street A lines up with Braxton Dr., which lines up with the school crossing on Pioneer Trail. If Cedar Forest sidewalks are not put in, the city does not recommend putting sidewalks here either. Koenig asked if the buffer trees would be mostly coniferous or deciduous. Blank responded there would be more deciduous trees, due to cost, but the coniferous trees would be larger. Hilgeman asked about the amount of caliper inches of trees the developer will need to replace. The additional caliper inches can be made up but installing one or two trees per lot. Jacobson asked if Cedar Forest will need a NUPR pond. Fox said Cedar Forest has catch basins into Riley Creek MOTION: Wilson moved to approve the Hallett Addition project based on the recommendations of the April 9, 1999 Planning Staff Report. Jacobson seconded, with an addition to the motion that would include "the recommendations of the April 14, 1999 staff report." Wilson accepted this addition to his motion. Approved 6-0. Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 1999 3 HALLETT ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF HALLETT ADDITION FOR CENTEX HOMES WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Hallett Addition PUD Concept by Centex Homes and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on May 4, 1999; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Hallett Addition, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated April23, 1999. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated April 12, 1999. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 4th day of May, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk HALLETT ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HALLETT ADDITION FOR CENTEX HOMES BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of the Hallett Addition for Centex Homes dated April 23, 1999, consisting of 21.09 acres into 32 lots, 3 outlots and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of May, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Exhibit A Hallett Addition EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: -- That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 116, Range 22 and tho part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying within the following described boundaries: - 41,4 Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of Section 20, thence on on assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds West along the East line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 1406.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 02 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 307.24. feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point 1; thence South 77 degrees 02 minutes 4 seconds West a distance of 81.93 feet; thence North 4 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 442.64 feet, more or less, to the centerline of County Rood No. 1; thence Southwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the Northerly extension of the East line of Lot 1, Block 6, CEDAR FOREST FIRST ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for said Hennepin County, the actual point of beginning, thence Southerly along said Northerly extension and along the East lines of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, said Block 6 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 4; thence Southeasterly along the Northeasterly lines of Lots 5, 6 and 7, said Block 6 to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 7; thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 7 to the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 8, said Block 6; thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said Lot 8 to the Southeast corner of said lot 8, thence Southeasterly to the Northeasterly corner of Lot 1, Block 5, said CEDAR FOREST FIRST ADDITION; thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said Lot 1, Block 5, to the Southeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 5; thence Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of Lot 2, said Block 5 to the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 2, Block 5; thence Southerly along the East lines of Lots 2 and 3, said Block 5 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 3, Block 5; thence Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of Lot 4, said Block 5 to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 4, Block 5; thence Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of Lots 5 and 6, said Block 5 to the most Easterly corner of said Lot 6, Block 5; thence South 14 degrees 39 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 20.63 feet, more or less, to on intersection with said line drawn parallel with and 15.00 feet Northerly of, as measured at right angles to the following described Line A; thence North 73 degrees 22 minutes 59 seconds East a distance of 128.25 feet; thence Easterly 70.0 feet along a tangential curve concave to the South having a radius of 475.02 feet and a central angle of 8 degrees 26 minutes 26 seconds; thence North 9 degrees 46 minutes 49 seconds West nontongent to the lost described curve a distance of 400.37 feet; thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds West a distance of 1453.87 feet to the intersection with the centerline of County Road No. 1; thence South 76 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds West along said-centerline a distance of 216.73 feet; thence South 76 degrees 50 minutes West a distance of 86.09 feet along said centerline to the actual point of beginning. Line A: Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of Cedarcrest Drive with a line drawn from the most Easterly corner of said Lot 6, Block 5 to the most Northerly corner of Lot 1, Block 4 said CEDAR FOREST FIRST ADDITION, said line having on assumed bearing of South 14 degrees 39 minutes 15 seconds West; thence North 73 degrees 22 minutes 59 seconds East a distance of 137.36 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the right having a radius .of 460.02 feet, delta angle 31 degrees 33 minutes 37 seconds, for a distance of 253.39 feet; thence South 75 degrees 03 minutes 24 seconds East on tangent to said curve a distance of 122.35 feet and there terminating. Together with on easement for ingress and egress, 30 feet in width, over and across part of the North 1/2 of Section 29, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, the centerline of said easement being described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of Cedarcrest Drive with a line, hereinafter referred to as Line 1, drawn from the most Easterly corner of Lot 6, Block 5, CEDAR FOREST FIRST ADDITION to the most Northerly corner of Lot 1, Block 4, said CEDAR FOREST FIRST ADDITION, said line having on assumed bearing of South 14 degrees 39 minutes 15 seconds West; thence North 73 degrees 22 minutes 59 seconds East a distance of 137.36 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 460.02 feet, delta angle 31 degrees 33 minutes 37 seconds, for a distance of 253.39 feet; thence South 75 degrees 03 minutes 24 seconds East on tangent to said curve a distance of 122.35 feet; thence along a tangential distance of 59.33 feet; thence North 84 degrees 02 minutes 02 seconds East on tangent to said curve a distance of 286.94 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 297.03 feet, delta angle of 11 degrees 32 minutes 04 seconds for a distance of 59.80 feet; thence North 72 degrees 29 minutes 58 seconds East on tangent to said curve a distance of 115.15 feet and there terminating; The Northerly and Southerly lines of said easement are lengthened or shortened to their respective intersections with said Line 1. (^ Parcel 1—A:That port of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 116, Range 22 described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 5, Cedar Forest First Addition; thence South 78 degrees 05 minutes East (assumed bearing) along the Easterly extension of the Northerly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 270.00 feet; thence South 38 degrees 27 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 295.55 feet; thence South 85 degrees 19 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 62.0 feet; thence North 27 degrees 40 minutes 32 seconds West a distance of 40.0 feet; thence North 256.81 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2: That port of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 116, Range 22 and that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying within the following described boundaries: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of Section 20, thence on on assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds West along the East line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 1406.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 02 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 307.24 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point 1; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 1488.19 feet, more or less, to on intersection with a line drawn parallel with and 15.00 feet Northerly of, as measured at a right angle to, the following described Line A, said point of intersection being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds West along the last described course to said Point 1; thence South 77 degrees 02 minutes 04 seconds West a 81.93 feet; thence North 4 degrees 0 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 442.64 feet; more or less, to the centerline of County Road No. 1; thence South 76 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds West along said centerline a distance of 217.82 feet; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds West a distance of 1453.87 feet; thence South 9 degrees 46 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 400.37 feet to on intersection with a line drawn parallel with and 15.0 feet Northerly of, as measured at right angles to the following described Line A; thence Easterly along said 15.0 foot parallel line to the actual point of beginning. Line A: Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of Cedarcrest Drive with a line drawn from the most Easterly corner of said Lot 6, Block 5, to the most Northerly corner of Lot 1, Block 4, said CEDAR FOREST FIRST ADDITION, said line having an assumed bearing of South 14 degrees 39 minutes 15 seconds West; thence North 73 degrees.22 minutes 59 seconds East a distance of 137.36 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 460.02 feet; delta angle 31 degrees 33 minutes 37 seconds, for a distance of 253.39 feet; thence South 75 degrees 03 minutes 24 seconds East on tangent to said curve a distance of 122.35 feet and there terminating. Together with an easement for ingress and egress, 30 feet in width, over and across part of the North 1/2 of Section 29, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, the centerline of said easement being described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of Cedarcrest Drive with a line, hereinafter referred to as Line 1, drawn from the most Easterly corner of Lot 6, Block 5, CEDAR FOREST FIRST ADDITION to the most Northerly corner of Lot 1, Block : 4, said CEDAR FOREST FIRST ADDITION, said line having an assumed bearing of South 14 degrees 39 minutes 15 seconds West; thence North 73 degrees 22 minutes 59 seconds East, a distance of 13736' =r feet; thence along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 460.02 feet, delta angle 31 degrees 33 minutes 37 seconds, for a distance of 253.39 feet; thence South 75 degrees 03 minutes 24 seconds East on tangent to said curve a distance of 122.35 feet; thence along a tangential distance of 59.33 feet; thence North 84 degrees 02 minutes 02 seconds East on tangent to said curve a distance of 286.94 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 297.03 feet, delta angle of 11 degrees 32 minutes 04 seconds for a distance of 59.80 feet; thence North 72 degrees 29 minutes 58 seconds East on tangent to said curve a distance of 115.15 feet and there terminating. y 4 The Northerly and Southerly lines of said easement are lengthened or shortened to their respective intersections with said Line 1. Excepting therefrom: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 116, Range 22 descried as follows: Commencing at the South East corner of said South West Quarter of Section 20; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds West, along the East line of said South West Quarter, a distance of 1406.00 feet; thence South 77 degrees 02 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 307.24 feet; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 1045.43 feet to the actual point of beginning of the property to be described; thence continuing South 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 195.00 feet; thence North 77 degrees 01 minutes 48 seconds West a distance of 186.11 feet; thence North 22 degrees 24 minutes'02 seconds West a distance of 123.08 feet; thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds West a distance of 87.41 feet, more or less, to a line bearing North 78 degrees 05 minutes 00 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence South 78 degrees 05 minutes 00 seconds East along said line, a distance of 232.34 feet, more or less, to said point of beginning, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Eden Prairie April 12, 1999 Page 4 D. HALLETT ADDITION Dan Blake, Centex Homes, reviewed the proposal. Commissioner Dorn asked why Outlot C was not being rezoned now instead of waiting. Planner Kipp stated that municipal sewer and water must be available to the property before it can be rezoned to single family residential Diane Dunn, 9381 Cedar Forest Road, appeared asking questions about the access roads and drainage. Jimmy Muniz, 5900 Hansen Road, Edina appeared asking if the property on the south side of the development would be landlocked if Centex does not purchase and redevelop it in the future. He also asked about drainage. Kipp said the property south of the project area would not change by this development proposal. It would remain in its current state. Mr. Blake indicated they were working on easements with the neighbors. Guy Treanor, 17001 Valley Road, appeared in favor of the project stating he is probably one of the most affected because his property is in the middle but he sees minimal affect on his property and others along Cedar Crest Road. Pastor Rod Anderson, 9309 Cedar Forest Road, appeared in support of the plan and would like to see as many trees as possible saved. He would also like to see "Cedar" as part of the name of the development. Robin Ruben, owner of the Cedar Crest Stables, appeared concerned about the drainage pond having standing water that would increase the number of disease carrying mosquitoes and have an adverse affect on her horses. She also stated concern about the easement that was needed and asked if the city would force her to give the developer the easement for the project. Mr. Blake stated that the size of the drainage pond would be approximately one-half acre. He indicated that this was a unique drainage problem and that the city requires them to put in a ponding system rather than have drainage through a heavily wooded area down to the creek. He stated to access the lift station they would need an easement across their pasture. Kipp said an easement could be obtained across the property. Commissioner Sandstad asked if there would be pedestrian ways provided within the development. Cindy Babcock, Riley Creek Ridge, appeared asking if their development could work together with PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES City of Eden Prairie April 12, 1999 Page 5 this development to provide the sanitary sewer and lift station. Planner Kipp stated he would discuss this option with the City Engineer. Commissioner Alexander stated that she does not see the plan complete without easements signed and no pedestrian trails in the plans. She asked if the city could force a property owner to sign an easement. Planner Kipp stated that the city has done this in the past. All cost would be assessed to the developer. The City encourages developers and property owners to work out easements as in this case. Commissioner Sandstad suggested that the Rubens and Centex and staff sit down and discuss and resolve the easement issue. Commissioner Dom suggested that the easement include all necessary connections for future development, which would be advantageous to the property owner when, and if they sell in the future. Foote stated he would like to see the temporary cul-de-sacs be signed that they are temporary. MOTION: Sanstad moved, Lewis seconded to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Lewis, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Centex Homes for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 21.09 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 21.09 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 21.09 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 21.09 acres into 32 lots and three outlots, based on plans dated January 25, 1999; and encouraged all parties to meet and discuss easements; and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 9, 1999. Motion carried 5-1 with Commissioner Alexander voting no until the developer comes forth with more clear drainage and trail plans. I STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: April 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Hallett Addition APPLICANT: Centex Homes FEE OWNER: Bob Hallett Virginia Gunnarson Berg Estates LOCATION: South of Pioneer Trail at Braxton Drive REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 21.09 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 21.09 acres. 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 21.09 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 21.09 acres into 32 lots, 3 outlots and road right of way. 593 Fc. L. (ti) .� .� (�1 �..zls ta S(3i) ' 3 • ' •_ rk ,.,. .,.. MAIM- �► R C (t+),,� ✓-v , 60)_ rt (70) , ow _^....�, . �5 _ s�5(i9)a ei .Q (+o) I "+ s. 1 . • J ey::- (+6)a ' '.3(m '�(26) t t 1 i - y, i .. S3;••.'n(12.)q. •,3(51) _ ' (69) i . '(+ u.: I_ l • , /Z 2 ��yS -. 2) - s AE(�- (12) •_ v — 75) t i �. .,�•:_...a(a5)- 1 - • (7) (b) ) - • (38) 7'"..• _ 1.3 2 'S / (60) _ 4(+2) (5) • -- - -S-- * • • '. (37) - t (r'3) (7+) �:$, : 1. 31 • a ._ (u) 4- -- ,;• 1 W (SI). d \ R.( 4, (67) 3 (a3) •a 1,-�tar.4.-,..• >7, 1`� . _ - ? •..y.as Ez4- _. .rir• v• 1 (66)g v >_ =WM •:,N+_lam• ' -• ?il Q • P - ; • j cen `i y\. '' l :\:11.-11.,: v `— E ,ffi _ 4i}'•41, . yO �t (64) y • "— �•, 1 • SA t s a81 ;,-L:(63)•• " ♦ • •1••• . , ,� vJO � v160 'a>� a3.aa - 621 �• --1 i' • • • r• • (1) v ‘Q) 3. '''.. ...: 5 ' .... .3:..* 4,NO di illipit.... , • P ' I M» • • • .o • .-`sV „.y^•• -. — p ('s) , -*I , 22 • • • : ott , * ' i •t'4 >y - . { j ( ) .. • - 2.. .'/ •,.. -• �.i.4 .- n� ;'."131 (i7) q I 1 • .TS! •t. r. ,� a i „, •ALLTI • • ,' ? �° (3) ' � 'o'� , • '' (2) (1) O (19) • • 4/ ' ,\ • f i •I • J - 4 r , t } ♦ 1 k (23) • .: Illit (3) (6) n ' • • 1" V . `,yT.. y • . • • • +q4 _ Y �•'1� � � e • • i_' • 1'7�.•` •r v. •!Al=-.,�t5l.rE..S,i� ..g•'a • • • - - ! \ .w • .yt tt '?.1 •�a 't„• 4.. (25) • •♦ • - 4. 1 (d) R (7) I.via= g • tnr73+`L^ 1 • • • tW 77 4 , .a ,(,,li . (6) �•'(ip) s k... v.3a►a xc • • • (ZS) .. ..m'. • LP 03. • 4. a c ilz) ......at. 2.2,...,:t.; (,67C%5.4:. .1:4 46* 4.1. 4 f• 4# •4 k1 1 g 4 ••1 . . . ..2 • 7 N.. _:..', - _" (+) 8 'i^y% �2)$r\i.''1 ;'•� 1.}� ,.e• ,40 /� ((CO�(RfST `t :.,6.4,3 F` 7 ' aaL_V • # a(+)'a VI Y�..•' (17) .'.n v • 77 •t'7y r+ � ' 2 n -^-,8 tY (s) a •'Rq 1 !_�.'^ -_, q Alt R i a a1 I .... V (10) ..1, �,. ,t 'v, (7) -I (II) '-S �. <, is •' (26) , i..�� (12) 1 I// P ,e 9 .• y,.9!_�� (23) . S (27) _ +O (t3) ''�•'.'.o ,.a % (5 i •S L (1+) \ 7 (15) � �.J \ N 1 06) 1 .1, ' Staff Report Hallett Addition April 9, 1999 BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows this property as low density residential for up to 2.5 units per acre. The property is currently zoned Rural. Surrounding land use is low density residential, and consists of R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 residential to the north of Pioneer Trail, R1-22 residential to the west, and Rural to south and east. PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposal is to rezone the 21.09 acre site to R1-13.5 and develop 32 single family lots. The density of the project is 1.5 units per acre, consistent with the low density guiding for the property. Lot size ranges between 13,639 sq. ft. and 61,184 sq. ft., with an average lot size of 20,756 sq. ft. Outlot C is proposed to be rezoned with this project. Since future development of the outlot will depend upon the extension of Cedarcrest Drive, which is not part of the proposal, the outlot should remain in the Rural zoning district. Density of the project less the outlot will increase to 1.7 units per acre, still consistent with the guide plan. Lot 7, BIk. 2, and Lots 4 and 5,Blk. 3 do not meet the 85 foot minimum lot frontage, and should be revised to meet City Code. The following waivers will be necessary through the PUD: • Lot 6, BIk. 4 without public road frontage. Code requires frontage on a public street. • Lot 7, Blk. 4 with lot frontage of 40 feet. Code requires a minimum of 85 feet. • Outlot A of 2.25 acres in the Rural zoning district. Code requires a minimum of 10 acres in the Rural zoning district. These waivers may have merit for the following reasons: • An alternative cul-de-sac design(see attached) would result in one more lot, increase grading, and additional tree loss. • The proposal uses an existing driveway alignment resulting in minimal tree loss. • Future development of the outlot will require a public hearing process. Outlots A and B are shown as remnant parcels that could be acquired for future development with the neighboring property. However there is no guarantee that this would take place, and that reasonable development of the neighboring property can occur without these parcels. Therefore, to avoid the potential for undeveloped remnants, the outlots should be eliminated from the proposal. Williams Brothers pipeline traverses the site south of street C. No structures are proposed within the easement area as required by state code. 2 Staff Report Hallett Addition April 9, 1999 ACCESS Access to the property will take place at Pioneer Trail across from Braxton Drive, and will connect to Valley Road to the west. The proponent will be responsible for constructing Valley Road to Cedar Forest Road to City standards. Streets B and C are extended to the easterly property to serve future development of the neighboring site. Temporary cul-de-sacs will be required at the ends of these streets until the neighboring property is developed. TREE LOSS A total of 5,324 diameter inches of significant trees are on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 1,713 diameter inches, or 32%. This is consistent with the average tree loss for residential development. Tree replacement is 729 caliper inches. The tree replacement plan will need to be revised to provide 729 caliper inches of replacement. UTILITIES The site can be served with City water from a connection at Pioneer Trail. Sanitary sewer is proposed to be extended across the easterly property to connect with existing sewer in the Riley Creek Ridge development. A utility easement will be necessary for this connection. Drainage for the development is designed to meet NURP standards. A drainage easement will be required to extend the outlet pipe to Riley Creek. RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approval of the PUD Concept Review on 21.09 acres, PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 21.09 acres with waivers, and Preliminary Plat of 21.09 acres into 32 single-family lots, 3 outlots, and road right of way, based on plans dated January 25, 1999, subject to the staff report dated April 9, 1999, and the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council Review, the proponent shall: A. Revise the request to eliminate rezoning of outlot C. B. Show lot frontage of 85 feet for Lot 7, Blk. 2, and Lots 4 and 5, Blk. 3. C. Provide temporary cul-de-sacs at the easterly ends of streets B and C. IJ 3 Staff Report Hallett Addition April 9, 1999 D. Eliminate outlots A and B. E. Revise the tree replacement plan to show 729 caliper inches of tree replacement. 2. Prior to release of the final plat,the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Obtain easements for utility extensions for sanitary sewer to the east, and storm sewer to Riley Creek. 3. Prior to grading or any construction on the property, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 4. Prior to Building Permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Pay the cash park fee. B. Submit a tree replacement bond for review. 5. The following waivers are approved through the PUD: A. Lot 6, Blk. 4 without public road frontage. Code requires frontage on a public street. B. Lot 7, Blk. 4 with lot frontage of 40 feet. Code requires a minimum of 85 feet. C. Outlot A of 2.25 acres in the Rural district. Code requires a minimum of 10 acres in the Rural zoning district. 14 \ \L ' ' t' S ,` l TX t__� \ • \ \ \a \ 4 �``\#•� .../�•`' ,,,,. _ ., 'sc?...„...._ Lam _ i,.14.4l %% i i ` b ..1 i-.^2K...N.•..••••••••..\w \tt \ \\ \My°.{ qo,. \ '°" ' a 1. \• (ix— 4i -4 ,3,:. \ c.\ ..• . ,.......... , --,7-, ` • • ° \ 1 ...\ ,... , ' ` \ t ; '�\ � ': !\\ • \ \ 7\ yf• te • • /'' > \- .: .f =-! ..r �' . a fin. \ '�,C\t."1: \ i aqa \' ` `a• .fir+ w``�. t ,�, x ` ' ... t.' ,K \( \ \ ` r. .• J o• o • } . % Y.. , ' A^`► (:i s ^t � � I } 1 2 --ham ` :f*t\ / i i • :•; ` � L �, •• t.- .APf• \ : 7a ,y \ 24;J47sf ' \" i f \ \ •`t s,i it dr + ;ZS• 1 - yi : 1,4\.. • co\ X 71., 44 ... :;‘,,:,;.,:,..::: \.., ,.'. 1% ....44:If; '''''-'" qiip. .,,.......1:: ..... ...„::.\:,\\at,Ne ,,: ,.: .. : .,". :. • • `~\• j a\ \ y ' \l,+l i • yw F'3 i t;J" • i „t �t ,�°' } } �• 1 !4 N. !' ha \ •$.. - i•• •••:,• ii; r•• d'' ..':=• 4'1-rw'' tt, , 'if , } i \‘1 xj ! J p:f ?f i' ,... :'c• \ \-.... \•`` • ,,r4 .%.%: .<c , •..'Zi •^'.?fbi il..'}ci'•,.`c r '>cI.• ...,, is f ! 3 - -7fi_'I .. AL+' •+� '4 < �;..; \, ijt i �.. C=�"<r` f! "#. f t7 Y!' 1f : J •,.., i,•7 Js, tr`Vl, ' \ 1 �b :'.',t;;: •, „ ^P'•< ! -'.K i,� .! a��{', f•.' ,Y f...1 -i.,• .ji `> ., • , �4 y s e�l� '`� •s: l -i 1,f t " ! d� '>.'•!..4d f . t /' , • f `, p 21,73` !• i a '`1 ! f '% p�� r. r w •' �• • % l c f rf.X) .,.„-•err ✓;"'.,ry , t. .�. :l . t i r M i $ o = rp t o r. 4: t t ` ,;r,..e .. :i ' 3 i BB ` •e ,•. ' ,,em�ss �• v • . ;" . �yyry - . y �" ."; , !. "^."„"'10 • " . . '� `, t.rc0::,ya.,, f c•• r C. °a%3s�j ,y �t 1 1 !S !/ j�;s: y"' .-- -- n'i ♦. •ii: t `• � / 11 p: \ j\1_ •<•.4 4T, , ` `' f;� 1t�a'r +1 f 1 ?' !1 { -n ••.viJt d• O' • „,. ,, \ .�' t yA•• it.'i ,.• ., V�lg.— w t® :3�� \ 1 ! .1 F: 3fi • a, f'(i: > ... r r ." 0, d !.. )„,,.,.,„ tie .y .\, ,+•' r, , �.i: f J ' ` i-° • , ..i.at Gt>.•i.: �..• t e7 # } L f •.. r�� .•fY► �. j \ t:i�.• \\V.) i ',li ::• t ' s� i j iw+,.t , ` \ to 'r? `� � �'.G"'•' i { ,; ! -x f ?•-", 1,--s .+' ••• •:!? .+ /••.r..'' 1tt i \\\\• . :�-• .. .,; pit. ••••... ....f.. 1' k. i ! :i )., •f - 1 •.�' ::.. .:i'flllti, i S .` .. �t�a�n:' ,kgz j r^ _ 1 f • iiii:F i l 1 t ...•• ::_, :::i0 '�.. .:,. -y ;{4`y 1. ., T � . . Q . _. a;<; r• F,ee 22;1 `S; i r e .:''!7 Jr ;ut f'� s \., `- "`' % ' k \ \ :, }: . ,::i:: •p E '. `.. •�. , }�.. .cam �J ,q.a--. •A\. ..."^~ °^i ? S:;i%�•' f ,\ ' ` ; j i\.+,• �ypyyj .:.-1:• mob.....,.••. .•'!f ,i1 i !: x f : f' • . •,t- •`\ \,� •''1••..•....-..,-' ...._ _ f ° 1,•0 ,. i n 1 I 1 ' •^`. ,.D\ 257 �% :X;; w\.♦,`_ •� !;J�= ..— r;* t .151t "• .. « i Y1 �i �S^ � :.r. y i w//'' —.• .. \caei^., :l Qd_ . ):� j:;. i►�,e66Se i m e J `.w-.A:s,. ri:' ` 7—r--•..-."\I.•..-- y ^:� 14 •7 � 1 \;+ \ CUf .0: .. `-'N4. elt - •s•.c••..._ . \'s> w _t..., �` ' r� Tl ;l _ \ ,, ,'1,,+•• l•-�.�- '•+,..J: 'Val. ` \ .\ t\\ ; \• f. ;..."•f1 I'^" j , t•^, j 1 ,c.,.4.‘f,tr4.. i:As .-k7-4:—..,:_r-:(rixr-4-:. c. ( N, ) lit/r, / .-.., ) .,i t 1. 5 ,.� l.-tf "-)f; \ } •• ci .---.w'. i ^}y xtf �tI"( w.�,,,• :t,�t.�`'•.,'`d. V'�''y1 (f , / Y '•'.` 5 t'•'�" ! .� 't cis (ix; :it1 •„1%tom; , f-'%%/ %. i ; if J1,1.9{X f _ ..•--i--Z• t i! t 3 �t (.' • 1\ .. 1 / , C i ~~' ✓' --, : 3. = .'. ALTERNATE LAYOUT -.R = ' ,,-;-Y„-=.-....„ ���- `: , ;cr,g .V" Public street, plus one lot F :� c�`�- �� A'�� • I -- 'ter of Section 20, Township 116, Rance 22 described escribed Commencing at the South East corner of said South West MEMORANDUM To: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council Through: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks and Recreation Services From: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Date: April 14, 1999 Subject: Supplemental Staff Report to the April 9, 1999 Staff Report by the Senior Planner for Hallett Addition BACKGROUND: This proposed project is on 21.09 acres of land located south of Pioneer Trail and east of Cedar Forest Road. The proposed project is to develop this area into 32 single-family lots and three outlots. NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES: Tree Loss/Landscaping The site has a total of 317 trees defined as significant by city code. These trees total 5,324 diameter inches. The primary tree cover for this site is cedar, cottonwood,oak, and basswood. The trees that would be lost due to construction are 103 trees for a total of 1,713 diameter inches. This is a 32% loss of significant trees. The replacement for this tree loss is 729 caliper inches. The proposed landscaping plan indicates a mixture of oaks, hackberry, maple, ash, and conifer trees, including spruce, Austrian pine, and red cedar would be planted on the site. The proposed landscape plan indicates that one or more streetscape trees would be planted on each lot. In addition, the area along Pioneer Trail would be heavily planted as a landscape buffer. The proposed landscape plan is based on preliminary calculations by the developer; however, it needs to be revised to provide for the 729 caliper inches of trees as calculated by the staff. NURP Pond A NURP pond is proposed at the southerly end of the project. This pond would take runoff from the streets and provide for sedimentation prior to discharge through a pipe into Riley Creek. l � Supplemental Staff Report to Hallett Addition April 14, 1999 Page 2 Prior to development of this NURP pond, it would need to receive the approval of the Watershed District and City Engineering Staff. Sidewalks/Trails: Staff anticipates that with the upgrade of Pioneer Trail that an eight-foot wide bituminous trail would be constructed along the southerly portion of County Road 1. Staff recommends that the berms and landscaping that are proposed for this area by kept back from the right-of-way. This would allow for a future trail with minimal impact. Sidewalk Issues: The staff is recommending the installation of a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk on the west side of Street A and the north side of Street C. However, until the status of utility work (sanitary sewer and water) is known in the Cedar Forest subdivision to the west,the staff is recommending that money be escrowed for these sidewalks. If a sidewalk is not installed along Cedar Forest Road,the funds would be returned to the developer. RECOMMENDATIONS: This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at it April 12, 1999 meeting and was approved on a 5-1 vote. Staff would recommend approval of this project based on the recommendations of the April 9, 1999 Planning Staff Report and the recommendations in this supplemental staff report. A:/Hallett Development/Stuart 1999 Hennepinounkn Equal Opportunity Employer February 11 1999 Scott Kipp City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Proposed Plat—Hallett Property CSAH 1 opposite Braxton Drive Section 20, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 2482 Review and Recommendations Dear Mr. Kipp: Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require county review of proposed plats abutting county roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: • The developer should dedicate the 60 foot half right of way as shown to accommodate any future upgrading of CSAH 1, as well as trails, utilities, signs, snow storage, etc. • The access, opposite Braxton Drive is acceptable. Although the proposed entrance does not meet Hennepin County's recommended spacing guidelines (1/4 mile), it will be permitted since full auxiliary lanes are in place at Braxton Drive. Also, the right of way configuration indicates that the site immediately east of the plat will be served by the new street. No other access to the plat nor to the easterly site (upon its development)will be permitted. • All proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to access, drainage and utility construction,trail development, and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 745-7601 for the appropriate permit forms. • The developer must restore all areas, within the county right of way, disturbed during construction. Please direct any response to Dave Zetterstrom at 745-7643. As a matter of procedure,we request that the City Clerk inform us of the City Council's action on the right of way and access provisions. Sincerely, Thomas D. Jo son, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ:DKZ:jrh cc: Pete Tulkki Dave Swenson Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Recycled Paper Medina,MN 55340-5421 p� (612)745-7500 FAX:(612)478-4000 TDD:(612)852-6760 I O Hallett Property - Eden Prairie, Minnesota Centex Homes January 22, 1999 Request: Centex Homes is requesting rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 21.09 acres and preliminary plat of 21.09 acres into 32 lots and 3 Outlots. Location: The Hallett Property is located south of Pioneer Trail, north of Cedarcrest Drive (private) and east of the Cedar Forest neighborhood. Three unplatted parcels(Gustafson 4.5 acres, Rubin 10.6 acres, and Treanor 1.0 acre) lie between the Hallett Property and Riley Creek Ridge to the east. Riley Creek Ridge is zoned R1-9.5 and Cedar Forest is zoned R1-22 and is without public sewer and water. Guide Plan: The City of Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan designates the Hallett Property as Low Density 0-2.5 unit/acre. The proposed density is 1.7 units/acre, excluding the outlots. Zoning: The proposed zoning of R1-13.5 is an appropriate transition from R1-9.5 to the east and R1-22 to the west. The minimum lot size proposed is 13,639 square feet. The typical lot is 90- 110'wide at the building setback, all lots exceed the 85' minimum. The average lot size is 20,756 square feet. The average lots size for lots adjacent to Cedar Forest is 23,766 square feet. Neighbors: Centex Homes held a neighborhood meeting to discuss this proposal on December 30, 1998. All residents of the Cedar Forest and Riley Creek Ridge neighborhoods, all adjoining property owners, and the developer and builders in Riley Creek Ridge were invited. Approximately 30-40 people attended. Upon review of the proposal, most of the neighbors found the plan reasonable. A few requests were made for provisions for permanent open space and public access to the creek. Many questions regarding City services to Cedar Forest were raised. Waivers: The proposed preliminary plat includes two lots without the required public street frontage. A shared private driveway is proposed to serve these two lots as well as the existing Treanor property. The Treanor property currently does not have public street access and uses a shared private drive without any easement of record. Appropriate access easements will be provided at the time of final plat. The private drive will be generally in the same location and configuration as currently exists. While it is possible to serve this area with a public street, the Williams Bros. gas pipeline crossing the property will present some difficulties. Also, the shared private drive alternative is less disruptive to the site and the existing trees. The two lots proposed to be served by the private drive average 51,521 square feet(1.2 acre). An alternative design with a public street(cul-de-sac) and one additional lot, all meeting the R1-13.5 requirements is shown on the attached sketch. Streets: The proposed Hallett Property plat provides for one street connection to the Cedar Forest neighborhood at the existing Valley Road stub. Two connections are proposed to the east, one of which will ultimately connect to Stirrup Lane in Riley Creek Ridge. The proposed north- south road is aligned with Braxton Drive to the north, across Pioneer Trail. All streets would be standard residential design, 28' back of curb to back of curb with a 50' public right-of-way. Additional right-of-way is proposed along the Gustafson property to allow for flexibility in future development of that parcel. 60' of right-of-way (south of existing centerline)will be dedicated for Pioneer Trail. Sidewalks and Trails: No sidewalks or trails are proposed, with the exception of the existing paved trail along the south side of Pioneer Trail. Utility System: City water is currently available to the property by a stub at Braxton and Pioneer. Future connections through Riley Creek Ridge and Cedar Forest are provided for. City sanitary sewer is available to serve a small portion of the site through a stub across Pioneer Trail approximately 160'west of Braxton. This sewer is not deep enough to serve the entire property, so the proposed sewer connection is to the east across the Ruben property in an alignment consistent with the future street connection to a stub at the end of Stirrup Lane. The area of the proposed crossing is currently open pasture/horse riding ring. The proposed sewer system will include a stub to Cedar Forest, which would be able to service a portion of that neighborhood. Storm drainage will be collected with storm sewer and directed to an existing low area on the south portion of lot 7, block 4. Run-off will then be conveyed to Riley Creek via storm sewer. Drainage and utility easements will be provided for all ponding and pipe areas. Trees: In accordance with the City of Eden Prairie requirements, all significant trees have been surveyed and are identified on the plans. Approximately 30% of the significant trees will be removed with construction. According to the City's tree replacement ordinance, 514 caliper inches of trees are required to be replaced. 533 caliper inches of trees are proposed as shown on the landscape plan. Wetlands: No wetlands exist on the property. This has been confirmed by the City of Eden Prairie and the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District. Park Dedication: No land is proposed for park dedication. Cash park fees will be paid at the time of building permit in lieu of land dedication. Signage: Permanent neighborhood identification signage will be constructed at the intersection of Pioneer Trail and Street A(Braxton extension). Details will be provided to the City in the future. Additional temporary marketing signs will also be utilized along Pioneer Trail. • Schedule: Site development will start in April or May 1999 and be complete in July. Home construction will start in June and total project buildout will likely be Summer of 2000. Future Development: Three outlots are proposed, all would be utilized for future development. Outlots A and B will likely be combined with the Ruben property when it is developed (see concept layout for that property.) Outlot C will likely yield 4 lots at the time that Cedarcrest Drive is constructed between Riley Creek Ridge and Cedar Forest. The property for the Cedarcrest connection is currently privately owned by a third party. The existing sewer to the east is not low enough to serve this area. av DATE: 05/04/99 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Public Hearing 1/g � D SERVICE AREA: rrEM DESCRIPTION: VAC 99-03 Public Works Request to Vacate Part of the Drainage and Utility Easement over Lot 23, Engineering Block 3, Bluffs East First Addition (10021 Kearny Lane) David Olson Requested Action Move to: 1. Close the public hearing 2. Adopt the resolution vacating part of the drainage and utility easement over Lot 23, Block 3, Bluffs East First Addition. Synopsis Approximately 140 square feet of the drainage and utility easement used for storm water storage over a part of this lot have been encroached upon by an addition to the home. The property owner will provide mitigation elsewhere on the property to off-set the storm water storage area compromised by the addition. Attachments Vacation drawings CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. VACATION OF PART OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER LOT 23, BLOCK 3, BLUFFS EAST FIRST ADDITION (VACATION 99-03) WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a certain drainage and utility easement described as follows: That part of Lot 23, Block 3, Bluffs East First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point 60.0 feet Northwesterly of the Southwesterly line of said Lot 23, and 40.0 feet Northeasterly from the Southwesterly line of said Lot 23 (as measured at right angles thereto); thence Southerly parallel with said East line 25.0 feet; thence Easterly to a point 46.0 feet Northwesterly from the Southeasterly line of said Lot 23, said point being 18.0 feet Northeasterly from the Southwest line of said Lot 23; thence Northerly to a point 40.0 feet Northerly of the Southwesterly line of said Lot 23, 10.0 feet Southeasterly from the point of beginning; thence Northwesterly 10.0 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on May 4, 1999 after due notice was given to affected property owners and published in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easement is not necessary and has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easement as above described is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 4, 1999. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk mar14-1►'+r\ rt. l:Arli../r,rtcLLC Land surveyor, Inc. Land Surveyor (612) 941-3031 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Qtr of icat to Of -) uri)ij Survey For Kevin McGuire Book Page File 10021 Kearny Lane E. P. MN. I \o /o. r� _ _ 'IC M J N]�a 72, . _ L, 84-11 Drive Ti. _ _a h �a,. J z3r _��� ;10 ��. ` 'yP /QOZ/ ` \ 4. lIx ` •0 _ -___ ,,1 4 s , , 1 --V, 4, viTh-t, - -45,' / ,:) ' ./' ''. • se •r 'r 7_7u • 9 y Eet rem N OF f�Eg�lE5?'a 7 QaZ,�/ e 7L EAsiN N ��r„e e-nur VA A-cro COr �,.,on • Scale: 1"=30 ' Denotes Iron Mon.Found Chain Link Fences do not follow Lot lines as shown X X I hereby car*that this Is a true and cornet repraaMadon at a sway of the boundrlas of Lot 23 B l k. , B l u f East.st 'F r s t- Add t t•f ri n Harnapin County.trirnaaeta and to* of al visible«w. I .rants.d or"m said lend. Surmadbymaeatat 30th days March . • ,,999 '` " Rev. 4/16/1999 Frank R. Cardarelle State Reg. No. 6508 c:,-05.1 " 3 _AV vi '00 i 0 h 0 ... ,42 ZO'1$ ti v0, .,) 4) (% (m N - 156.86 •�06N'• <��,�i �N°5i51,'W NI°05'30"E7 o NI°0530"E C, AA ': 6+\s. 8 z .k54 + vi_ D otk6 •• -0, �, 108 2a _ �0.36 zz _66.50 O 9 I O O R i o' I , o c,,,' d A r°' �IIw _ Iv• . 9 _ 0 „ 1 D D 1 o m-�, o w -025 25 ��9 7 g o r o r; • W o KEARNY 239.09 iL LONE `\, �°'�r' n 00�0°,3 200N1_I457' 402806' �'I~ (A N1°05'30"E 247.34 �2 ��:- -? b : �, n�D 20 i Ir••b.o I d'3 o6,Q�S 4. ``S 9• U' • W n 00'38 '�--`_ 3.73�_I ol��• --- --- 9 / 2��9�g0o`�.: ..: •o.•U' �N o 4-'S 00 N8o22' 4 100.00 I 83.7I /0 •• .. •\�Sc'j• ,Q: 0 �,C.J10 • 2/3 34 'E-- '. caul rncn Iv-r wv� / N /0 I'--/-"" • . OXO'.% o Cj10-4 o r..I _2/ 58 629.36... , co SOS ;kit a'�o o°/ /!v N ., w 1 rvr/is s Alkw \ O N 574p ` 2 2 wo--1vN y jCO w cower �� �'u' •g n� ~: 40 - E � o u,o ,� v ° Lm,uva a �� `� O�o� �`�� m _ /956O 4;3o165g/•-•�/'N. r �,1Op00 �5 o j 70° ^ �o ' .,!.;?•�a . 66 ' 3o0/96 f _ LA', : N ° .7 N rn - o46 r s 35 IN/3°404/ E -_ �/: o ti • ••1 68 0/94/00•E // 76 6.40. t �u° 0-00 ./k�40 W O_ : '�' w 2 06, t 4jZ&c cp 081.86 165 „ c / 1704pv0 N30j48,E _ c /4p rn 2�q2 E I E ( 157 4 4=9 28 "lP: ' i•4=68.02 _L .3• '•�ti I ---?�: 'w 07O94"E m ° =15°02'39'�I23 74 , N7op 1> N6°12 49'E 4 L=2300 4ti- „ ' = °19'48„ 811: - W f,=4 0320 r 0 ,, z 20 A_3o 701-�� ao ;;•L=68.02 I OD 22jg .2I.0I70.00_ 34.00 . NO°1451E1873 "N 6.0632409 : cn - 7 -w • -.- „ _W a, N3°42'35'E N5°41�45 E N0°I4 51 E 74I m p o w 1• cD 0 �� c,, cn :o -A 01 148.97_ } + cn 1 t o W 410 '°D �1 L=58.01-9 I = :A=4°I9'48" N, 'O 0' 0 • 0l00 ° „�. ,, _ 11 0, , 170.00 _ Z ° a,1 W - I64.00 A=3 2744 :1L=68.02 169_99 0' T-- co ENO 1451E f t 41 , 1 --- _ P. 30 30,E -- - ' I' NO°14 51 E �� colw ;� 0 pN b , O C: Icn NO°I4'S1"E --� • Iul NO°14'511E ;b o' N 10 149_78 0 I N° 0� N; r ;•w0 0� N89°4509'W o' IO 170.00 _�� o o --- ' •`2-'• �+ • -I 0? O I70.00 _ -0' 5-E co I nN0°I451"E L 164.00__ 1 Do0 I ___ �� NO°14'S1 E �1 * 1U 17 o � ' 2 ICA NO°14'51"E :o 0; i0 21_2_03 29��, NO 14 51 E cnl �o ,b - b, to --- 01 " p __Ia° (n co o �o o, 170.00 -,T --- o 'o o' - o -NO°14 51 E j° 164.00 -- to. Z : �_, -170.00 1 10 {,10°14'S1"E -- �n °571 to W - o °DI • I4 NO°14'51"E_ 10 b; n L_ 266.20 �r u NO 14'51' E �I c' • w = lb - o1 '0 170.00 oI rlm --o ___ jcD 16 00 to: o in (0 I70.00 __ 0i h NO°I4'S1"E --� I IV o(71 NO 14'S1"E N tD- -N0°14'51HE- col o 00 4_ o=500.,0: A io 232.12 lo NO°14'51"E ;•:'O W o1 ,o 078 23g52„ .. 1 NO°14'51"E W , o O o ' �' 0 ..2 150•-- :•L=28.I4 It° 164.00_ `O I NO-14 • 51 E_I70_00 1 :•.-�" -- 0=4°i3'46 -- < ,4542E .• 25 25 m 90.00 61.20 v,2\ is7 L 26.„, w co w w`' 6 NO 1451"E -•l z a z ��°,� Q d3°3353 N °kci+ N a;3/°0 , v��so iico � E...„.. N �pI I_ W. - co �cn `�9� �s t0 055 0 0 �_99 /24" � Q ry 164.00 ___ j I ,cn -4 - o I- - \ p�9 63 • ,O ,Og "'"`��• I 4 Ij, S L -' cn. � O •, ° „ -- IP N p i 1 D v'i 2 00 &06'm 4 38°5213r Sp u'". O NO 14 51 E -4 co wi _I 1- o 1 0 �•ii. DI D2-io2,10 L-IpI 7g p3\' O rcn -� b -- o I „ -.IN-it �s46\'`116•- \ �1'17 A=66°38.45" �- 3 6T Q 1 NO°I4 51 E I w o OW-- 1\•1 \ S 4 •SO 164.00. I 90.00 �-. u'u'\ 064 R ' 3`�6` v 030 30 • ' a�� 4p/40�g0�� • ., F RAN LO 383.00 I 7 L I7.03-=,. 92.74 \_ ROAD 318.08 < < NORTH Cl �� P r "L=5666 R=2?0. 3 1141.89 I . ., f-k LI A=11°59'00" : r - i�N -7 a / 4/ AST LINE OF SW 1/4 OF SEC. 25 4 7' p°'/ 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS May 4, 1999 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Community Development and Financial Services Payment of Claims Don Uram Requested Action: Move approval of the Payment of Claims as submitted(Roll Call Vote). Checks 74267 to 74702 1 COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 27-APR-1999 (16:02) DIVISION TOTAL N/A $10.64 LEGISLATIVE $197.00 LEGAL COUNSEL $22,180.39 GENERAL SERVICES $4,840.67 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6,860.81 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $24,431.36 FINANCE $16,380.29 HUMAN RESOURCES $6,980.86 COMMUNITY SERV $1,684.86 HUMAN SERV $11,000.00 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION $115.19 ENGINEERING $6,449.81 INSPECTIONS $12,010.34 FACILITIES $6,727.52 ASSESSING $1,137.16 CIVIL DEFENSE $12.56 POLICE $10,709.59 FIRE $5,728.66 ANIMAL CONTROL $74.50 STREETS/TRAFFIC $8,315.76 PARK MAINTENANCE $31,733.41 PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY $815.10 STREET LIGHTING $377.36 FLEET SERVICES $15,423.15 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $3,498.75 COMMUNITY DEV $466.25 COMMUNITY CENTER $13,268.85 YOUTH RECREATION $432.00 ADULT RECREATION $1,125.10 RECREATION ADMIN $280.61 ADAPTIVE REC $157.50 OAK POINT POOL $21.21 ARTS $471.72 PARK FACILITIES $2,686.00 PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ $91,744.05 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $375.00 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS $247,332.10 CITY CENTER $1,207.56 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $4,413.76 PRAIRIE VILLAGE $42,840.28 PRAIRIEVIEW $48,575.61 CUB FOODS $101,139.63 WATER DEPT $43,922.67 SEWER DEPT $1,279.34 STORM DRAINAGE $1,232.70 AGENCY FUNDS $216.00 EQUIPMENT $92,132.66 $893,016.34* a COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 27-APR-1999 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 74267 $60.00 ASSOC OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNI DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 74268 $7.80 AT&T (KC) TELEPHONE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 74269 $30.00 AVCAM SCHOOLS POLICE 74270 $49.00 CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICE FURNITURE & FIXTURES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74271 $167.19 CONLEY, JOYCE MISCELLANEOUS POLICE 74272 $50.86 FRANZEN, JAMES TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 74273 $21.21 HAINES, SCOTT LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 74274 $47.25 HUYNH, QUOC ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER WATER DEPT 74275 $74.50 KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 74276 $66.50 KLINE, JAMES W SCHOOLS POLICE 74277 $11,941.63 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE LEGAL COUSEL 74278 $20.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 74279 $109.00 MCCARVILLE, SUE SCHOOLS IN SERVICE TRAINING 74280 $5.99 MCGLYNN BAKERIES MISCELLANEOUS POLICE 74281 $150.00 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 74282 $48.00 NEWTEKNIQUES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 74283 $375.00 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. PAYING AGENT 92 STATE AID DEBT 74284 $144.57 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 74285 $240.69 PRODOEHL, JERRY TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 74286 $479.25 PROFILE EVALUTATIONS INC EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 74287 $2,386.75 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY DISABILITY IN EMPLOYERS FD 10 ORG 74288 $2,470.00 UNITED STATE MECHANICAL INC BUILDING COMMUNITY CENTER FILTRATION 74289 $105.00 USPCA REGION 12-B H BADE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 74290 $2,571.81 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74291 $59.60 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74292 $1,890.59 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74294 $792.74 BEST BUY OTHER EQUIPMENT OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74295 $12.73 CONRAD, SPENCER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 74296 $50.37 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 74297 $440.00 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS SCHOOLS FINANCE DEPT 74298 $276.00 LANZI, BOB CLOTHING & UNIFORMS SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 74299 $110.00 MINNESOTA COLLECTION ENTERPRIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE DEPT 74300 $66.00 SCOTT COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT DEPOSITS ESCROW 74301 $20,335.11 ST JOSEPH EQUIPMENT INC MACHINERY EQUIPMENT P/W REVOLVING FUND 74302 $429.73 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL 74303 $1,657.24 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74304 $82.90 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74305 $753.90 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74306 $7,282.45 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74307 $7,669.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74309 $2,348.96 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74310 $4,886.11 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74312 $92.00 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74313 $735.00 ASPEN CARPET CLEANING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74314 $2,229.30 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74315 $275.33 DMX/SOUND PRODUCTS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74316 $806.01 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74317 $12,671.10 GRIGGS COOPER & CO WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74319 $937.21 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74320 $4,420.45 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74321 $1,489.19 MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOD SERVICE TRAVEL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74322 $111.90 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74323 $3,269.09 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74324 $322.97 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74325 $334.50 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- ADVERTISING PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 27-APR-1999 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 74326 $14.60 STAR TRIBUNE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74327 $3,959.65 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74328 $499.76 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74329 $5.00 CANNON, CHRISTINE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74330 $42.00 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY BROCHURE 74331 $2,825.00 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 74332 $40.36 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 74333 $20,746.00 GMAC AND FALLS AUTOMOTIVE AUTOS P/R REVOLVING FD 74334 $20.00 HARRIMAN, KARLA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74335 $10.00 HARRIS, KAREN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74336 $90.00 IKI INSTRUCTOR SERVICE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 74337 $10,238.76 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE LEGAL COUSEL 74338 $10.00 LARSON-MALLO, JOHN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74339 $10.00 LAURENCE, JUDI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74340 $10.00 LHOTKA, TERESA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74341 $560.00 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 74342 $3,179.55 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFET AUTOS P/S REVOLVING FD 74343 $58.00 MUNICIPALS CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 74344 $10.00 PAULSON, DEB ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74345 $10.00 PEPIN, JOHN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74346 $20.00 RODGERS, JOHN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74347 $10.00 STEBLAY, RICHARD ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74348 $5.00 STOLKER, ANNE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74349 $20.00 TREANOR, GARY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74350 $10.00 WINKER, SCOTT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 74351 $92.00 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74352 $72.09 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74353 $664.80 BELLBOY CORPORATION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74354 $2,687.17 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74355 $1,709.92 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74356 $1,027.95 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74357 $151.75 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74358 $58.50 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74359 $847.39 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74360 $466.98 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74361 $178.28 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAINE WASTE DISPOSAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74362 $212.50 AUDIOVISUAL INC CABLE TV COMMUNITY SERVICES 74363 $212.40 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES FITNESS CENTER 74364 $76.44 GRAND CASINO MILLE LACS SCHOOLS POLICE 74365 $31,035.74 HEALTHPARTNERS COBRA COSTS/REV BENEFITS 74366 $1,568.00 JASPER ENGINES & TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74367 $16.04 KROC, REBECCA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 74368 $90.00 M.A.L.E.F.I. SCHOOLS POLICE 74369 $68,814.50 MEDICA CHOICE COBRA COSTS/REV BENEFITS 74370 $1,272.36 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE OTHER EQUIPMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES 74371 $24.72 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC SEWER LIFTSTATION 74372 $200.00 SHOWCORE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNITY SERVICES 74373 $85.00 TEA TIME CATERING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 74374 $182.75 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE POLICE 74375 $6.20 BELLBOY CORPORATION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74376 $2,449.25 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74377 $1,568.55 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74378 $356.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74379 $3,698.56 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74380 $1,199.55 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 Y COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 27-APR-1999 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 74381 $185.71 AT&T TELEPHONE GENERAL 74382 $48.00 BCA CJIS ID UNIT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE DEPT 74383 $8,175.00 EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 74384 $32.60 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE GENERAL 74385 $704.47 GE CAPITAL RENTALS GENERAL 74386 $15.83 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74387 $129.18 HENNEPIN COUNTY WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74388 $72.95 KINKOS INC PRINTING FINANCE DEPT 74389 $20.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK MAINTENANCE 74390 $22,650.03 MINNEGASCO GAS FIRE STATION #5 74393 $130.00 ROAD RAGE SCHOOLS POLICE 74394 $297.14 SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 74395 $314.92 THERMOGAS COMPANY GAS OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 74396 $47.45 WILSON, TAMARA MILEAGE AND PARKING FINANCE DEPT 74397 $3.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74398 $1,098.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74399 $6,622.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74401 $50.94 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74402 $3,191.04 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74403 $5,658.40 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74405 $232.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 74406 $1,729.62 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE TELEPHONE FIRE 74408 $55.64 DUCHSCHERE, KYLE SCHOOLS POLICE 74409 $36.00 DUPONT, BRENT CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 74410 $13.50 GOLD COUNTRY INC SIGNATURE CON CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 74411 $38.96 HELLING, LAURIE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RECREATION ADMIN 74412 $29.85 LEBLANC, ERIC SCHOOLS POLICE 74413 $115.00 MAGC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 74414 $72.87 MINNCOMM PAGING COMMUNICATIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 74415 $45.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AUTOS P/S REVOLVING FD 74416 $100.00 MINNESOTA WEIGHTS AND MEASURES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 74417 $404.72 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74418 $42.44 RADIO SHACK OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 74419 $1,208.49 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE WATER ACCOUNTING 74420 $165.00 WEATHER WATCH INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SNOW & ICE CONTROL 74421 $1,143.30 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74422 $4,568.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74423 $9,141.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74424 $79.65 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74425 $84.35 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74426 $3,585.69 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74427 $6,065.36 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74429 $1,202.50 BROWN, PAUL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 74430 $398.93 CCP INDUSTRIES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74431 $91.50 FEDEX OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE STATION #3 74432 $21.99 GREAT RIVER ENERGY PRINTING POLICE 74433 $111.29 HELLING, LAURIE MILEAGE AND PARKING RECREATION ADMIN 74434 $396.55 HENNEPIN TECHICAL COLLEGE SCHOOLS FIRE 74435 $70.00 LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES TRAINING SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 74436 $50.00 NAPC DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 74437 $150.00 PINE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT DEPOSITS ESCROW 74438 $104.00 STAR TRIBUNE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 74439 $32.55 BANDEMER, LISA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WINTER THEATRE 74440 $20.25 BOSEK, LYLE MILEAGE AND PARKING INSPECTION-ADMIN 74441 $55.19 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 3 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 27-APR-1999 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 74442 $36.60 DON E WILLIAMS CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74443 $4,524.75 ERICKSEN ELLISON AND ASSOCIATE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION 74444 $100.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 74445 $22,350.00 GMAC AND FALLS AUTOMOTIVE AUTOS P/W REVOLVING FUND 74446 $271.25 GRAYBOW COMMUNICATIONS GROUP OTHER EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 74447 $6,377.54 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 74448 $5,482.12 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 74449 $1,475.65 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI UNION DUES WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 74450 $1,286.42 MINN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 74451 $5,436.50 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 74452 $1,155.00 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 74453 $40.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 74454 $261.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LIFE INSURANCE W/H FD 10 ORG 74455 $5,294.23 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74457 $54,863.86 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 74458 $50.78 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 74459 $3,098.23 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE FIRE 74460 $267.00 CENTRAIRE INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74461 $631.50 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74462 $135.00 DMX/SOUND PRODUCTS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74463 $3,824.91 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74464 $8,673.99 GRIGGS COOPER & CO WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74465 $62.90 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74466 $1,222.42 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74467 $4,632.15 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74468 $353.35 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74469 $2,794.52 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74470 $526.98 PROTECTION ONE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74471 $124.05 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74472 $33.58 STAR TRIBUNE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74473 $16,577.60 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74474 $175.00 EINSTEIN BROTHERS BAGELS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COUNCIL 74475 $48.90 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74476 $1,064.71 BELLBOY CORPORATION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74478 $925.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74479 $2,149.50 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74480 $390.70 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74481 $82.50 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74482 $1,104.61 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74483 $79.47 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74484 $900.16 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74485 $185.70 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74486 $621.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74487 $25,477.00 ALBANY FORD AUTOS P/W REVOLVING FUND 74488 $3,471.00 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY PRINTING HUMAN RESOURCES 74489 $1,523.96 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS INSURANCE GENERAL 74490 $100.00 MINNESOTA TECHNOLOGY INC CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 74491 $201.60 MYSTIC HILTON HOTEL SCHOOLS POLICE 74492 $95.00 NSA-TRIAD SCHOOLS POLICE 74493 $202.14 PETTY CASH OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 74494 $37.96 PRENTICE HALL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74495 $243.80 RICHARDSON, JIM OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK FACILITIES 74496 $35.91 WEEDMAN, NICOLE MILEAGE AND PARKING PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 74497 $3,172.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74498 $4,734.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 27-APR-1999 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 74499 $1,284.63 GRIGGS COOPER & CO WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74500 $66.60 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74501 $4,660.55 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74502 $26.00 BART, LORI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 74503 $119.00 TIE COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE GENERAL 74504 $41.40 CULLIGAN WATER WATER SOFTNER OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 74505 $48.36 FABINI, MICHAEL J MILEAGE AND PARKING INSPECTION-ADMIN 74506 $25.51 G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL CLOTHING & UNIFORMS STREET MAINTENANCE 74507 $346.12 JB LAWN LANDSCAPING & SNOWPLOW OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CEMETERY OPERATION 74508 $3,993.57 GCO CARPET OUTLET OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL 1997 REHAB 52045 FOR $50,000 74509 $675.00 ALEXANDRIA FIRE DEPT CONFERENCE FIRE 74510 $100.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 74511 $6,347.54 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 74512 $5,482.12 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 74513 $59.85 KENS MEATS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 74514 $5,536.50 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 74515 $1,185.00 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 74516 $40.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 74517 $69.51 PETERSON, DONALD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BENEFITS 74518 $55,175.04 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 74519 $50.78 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 74520 $4,260.00 RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT RENTAL TREE REMOVAL 74521 $917.46 REAL ESTATE EQUITIES ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER WATER DEPT 74522 $577.00 URAM, DONALD TRAVEL FINANCE DEPT 74523 $4,156.64 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74525 $114.30 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 74526 $128.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 74527 $6,285.40 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 74528 $150.17 AIM ELECTRONICS REPAIR & MANNT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 74529 $1,110.64 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74530 $671.77 AMERICAN PRESSURE INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 74531 $452.00 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI TRAINING SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 74532 $153.37 AQUA ENGINEERING INC LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL STREET MAINTENANCE 74533 $100.00 ARANYOS, STEVEN REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 74534 $183.99 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY IN EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74535 $110.00 AUTOMATED ENTRANCE PRODUCTS IN CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 74536 $66.31 BADGE A MINIT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SENIOR AWARENESS N16 74537 $34.95 BARKER HAMMER ASSOCIATES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 74538 $1,208.00 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74539 $1,153.20 BEACON BALLFIELDS-DIV LODESTAR OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74540 $100.00 BENTLER, STEPHEN REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 74541 $100.00 BERNDT, DAVID REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 74542 $250.38 BLACKBURN MFG CO REPAIR & MANNT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 74543 $73.52 BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE* CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 74544 $1,003.97 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAVEMENT MGMT PROGRAM 74545 $283.18 BRY-AIR INC REPAIR & MANNT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 74546 $2,089.70 BRY-AIR INC REPAIR & MANNT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 74547 $495.00 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM 74548 $832.28 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74549 $296.66 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74550 $1,376.54 COASTAL TRAINING TECHNOLOGIES TRAINING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74551 $1,008.57 COLOR CENTER, THE BLDG REPAIR & MANNT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74552 $85.42 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74553 $90.75 CONTROLLED AIR MECHANICAL PERMIT FD 10 ORG 74554 $258.35 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 7 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 27-APR-1999 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 74555 $1,578.62 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74556 $71.74 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 74557 $99.45 D J'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY INC OTHER EQUIPMENT STREET MAINTENANCE 74558 $240.00 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE 74559 $100.00 DAVIDSON, DUFF REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 74560 $633.14 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74561 $680.71 DELEGARD TOOL CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74562 $7,940.10 DON RIHN TRANSPORT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74563 $270.00 DPC INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74564 $565.23 DYNA SYSTEMS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74565 $2,443.48 EARL F ANDERSEN INC SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNS 74566 $22.00 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMER CONFERENCE COUNCIL 74567 $137.50 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N GYM RENTAL WHEELCHAIR BASKETBALL 74568 $290.00 EDINA, CITY OF CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE 74569 $15,000.00 EIDE HELMEKE PLLP AUDIT & FINANCIAL FINANCE DEPT 74570 $30.35 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE GENERAL 74571 $660.82 FACILITY SYSTEMS INC FURNITURE & FIXTURES FURNITURE ACCOUNT 74572 $19,668.00 FINLEY BROS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74573 $598.31 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC. OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TREE DISEASE 74574 $1,898.36 FOUR WHEEL DRIVE CENTER, THE OTHER EQUIPMENT FIRE 74575 $21.23 FOWLER ELECTRIC INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74576 $556.98 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 74577 $45.00 GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES CONTRACTED COMM MAINT INFORMATION SYSTEM 74578 $630.45 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 74579 $1,788.27 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74582 $197.75 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 74583 $189.20 GRAYBOW COMMUNICATIONS GROUP OTHER EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 74584 $31.95 GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES OF MN IN WASTE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74585 $19,041.32 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPT 74586 $30.00 PRO SOURCE FITNESS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES FITNESS CENTER 74587 $27.50 HEAVENLY HAM OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 74588 $215.00 HENDERSON, JOSH OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES BASKETBALL 74589 $353.19 HENNEPIN COUNTY I/T DEPT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM 74590 $280.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS RECORDING DOCUMENT FEE ENGINEERING DEPT 74591 $527.72 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S ACCO BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 74592 $466.25 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 74593 $770.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER - AC PRINTING POLICE 74594 $931.79 HERC U LIFT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74595 $434.75 HIGLEY, STEVE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 74596 $227.52 HILLYARD REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 74597 $252.57 HOFFERS OF MINNEAPOLIS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 74598 $425.50 HOLMES, JOHN CARTER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 74599 $351.50 HOLMES, TOM OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 74600 $1,787.20 ICBO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL INSPECTION-ADMIN 74601 $40.00 ICEMAN/CO2 SERVICES, THE CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 74602 $290.00 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT INFORMATION SYSTEM 74603 $2,778.03 INGRAHAM & ASSOC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPT 74604 $2,160.50 INTELLUTION COMPUTER MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74605 $880.29 JANEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 74606 $1,137.16 JEANE THORNE INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ASSESSING-ADMIN 74607 $35.20 JUSTUS LUMBER COMPANY BUILDING MATERIALS STREET MAINTENANCE 74608 $80.90 KNOX BUILDING MATERIALS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74609 $231.53 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 74610 $166.28 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC TRAINING SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 74611 $101.77 LAGERQUIST CORP CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT g COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 27-APR-1999 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 74612 $266.60 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 74613 $94.17 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74614 $293.45 LAND'S END CORPORATE SALES CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 74615 $151.77 LANO EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74616 $71.20 LARSON PUBLICATIONS INC EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 74617 $145.00 LERN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 74618 $18,483.57 LOGIS LOGIS SERVICE SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 74619 $11.39 LTD COMMODITIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 74620 $2,511.57 M R SIGN OTHER EQUIPMENT STREET MAINTENANCE 74621 $415.64 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74622 $335.48 MARKHURD OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPT 74623 $17.00 MARKS CERTICARE AMOCO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74624 $1,027.73 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTING POLICE 74625 $103.78 MCGLYNN BAKERIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 74626 $511.75 MCNEILUS STEEL INC NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74627 $150.60 MEDICAL SAFETY SYSTEMS INC WASTE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74628 $293.79 MENARDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINTENANCE 74629 $188.84 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74630 $1,491.00 METALS JOINING LAB CO INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 74631 $704.70 METRO EROSION INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT STORM DRAINAGE 74632 $90.60 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 74633 $30.01 METROPOLITAN FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74634 $869.50 MICHELAN, JOHN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 74635 $4,820.28 MICROAGE COMPUTERS INFORMATION SYSTEM 74636 $828.03 MID-NORTHERN ELECTRIC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS POLICE-CITY CENTER 74637 $127.81 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE 74638 $13.95 MIKE'S SHOE REPAIR INC PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE 74639 $295.00 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 74640 $100.00 MILLER, MARK REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 74641 $9.87 MINN BLUE DIGITAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 74642 $250.00 MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE SCHOOLS POLICE 74643 $48.60 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 74644 $44.40 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 74645 $815.10 MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY MACHINERY EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY-PARK 74646 $449.27 MOORE MEDICAL CORP SAFETY SUPPLIES FIRE 74647 $277.84 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74648 $1,824.38 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 74649 $150.00 NETS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT INFORMATION SYSTEM 74650 $161.61 OHLIN SALES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74651 $55.94 P & H WAREHOUSE SALES INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 74652 $74.80 PAPER DIRECT INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RECREATION ADMIN 74653 $70.20 PAPER WAREHOUSE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SR CTR OPERATIONS 74654 $85.17 PETSMART CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 74655 $30.89 PICAS & POINTS INC PRINTING FINANCE DEPT 74656 $63.58 POKORNY COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES FIRE STATION #3 74657 $320.12 POWER SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74658 $2,030.71 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74659 $75.76 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT PARK MAINTENANCE 74660 $16.90 QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER POSTAGE GENERAL 74661 $255.00 RATEIKE, MARILYN JANE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ART & MUSIC 74662 $298.16 REBS MARKETING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER ACCOUNTING 74663 $817.61 RESPOND SYSTEMS SAFETY SUPPLIES GENERAL 74664 $5,460.88 RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIONEER TRAIL SANITARY SEWER 74665 $311.39 RIGHT WAY ROOFING BUILDING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 74666 $1,232.00 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 7 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 27-APR-1999 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 74667 $21.91 RITZ CAMERA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TREE DISEASE 74668 $129.90 ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74669 $100.00 SAUER, SUSAN ENVIRONMENTALEDUCATION REFUNDS E UCATIO 74670 $171.41 SECOA REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES SUMMER THEATRE 74671 $16.86 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO BLDG REPAIR & MAINT STARING LAKE 74672 $750.00 SJF BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74673 $58.67 SNAP-ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74674 $384.54 SNELL MECHANICAL INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 74675 $534.75 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 74676 $15,966.36 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC DESIGN & CONST TH 212 FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT 74677 $50.00 ST CLOUD TECHNICAL COLLEGE SCHOOLS FIRE 74678 $100.00 STARK, EMMETT REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 74679 $3,825.59 STREICHERS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 74680 $391.04 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74681 $44.52 SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74682 $125.00 SWEDLUNDS WASTE DISPOSAL OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 74683 $190.00 THERMO-DYNE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 74684 $110.57 TIERNEY BROS INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 74685 $7,168.92 TKDA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDEN CROSSING ROADS 74686 $70.41 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74687 $6.80 TRANS UNION CORPORATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 74688 $41,754.80 TRAUT WELLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Wells 13 through 16 74689 $151.08 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74690 $36.44 TWIN CITY TIRE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74691 $178.65 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 74692 $10,919.68 US FILTER/WATERPRO EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER METER REPAIR 74693 $2,288.69 US OFFICE PRODUCTS FURNITURE & FIXTURES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 74694 $7,025.52 VALLEY RICH CO INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 74695 $137.92 VOSS LIGHTING REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 74696 $124.86 WALMART STORES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 74697 $163.64 WARNING LIGHTS OF MINNESOTA SAFETY SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 74698 $166.00 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74699 $1,474.50 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK FACILITIES 74700 $522.81 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE 74701 $4.15 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY SUPPLIES POOL OPERATIONS 74702 $268.01 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $893,016.34* /v CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Reports of Director Parks and Recreation Services SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 1999—2000 Park ITEM NO: Parks and Recreation Development Proposals Robert A. Lambert Director )(J J I ( ' Requested Action Staff requests the Council's review of the six park projects and approve as recommended by staff and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. Synopsis Earlier this year, the City Council authorized staff to obtain plans and specifications for these six park projects in order to determine final design and cost estimates prior to the Council reviewing them and making decisions on which projects would actually be developed in 1999 or 2000. Staff is recommending proceeding with each of the projects as proposed in the Five-Year Park Project Plan. The City has applied for matching grants for the Riley Lake Park Shelter, the Miller Park Shelter and the Preserve Park Renovation. Staff is recommending proceeding with the Riley Lake shelter and the Preserve Park renovation whether or not the City is successful in obtaining grant funds; however, staff is recommending delaying the Miller Park shelter beyond the year 2000 unless the City is successful in obtaining a matching grant on one of those three projects. The Miller Park shelter is the only project that would require significant funding assistance beyond the cost estimate in the Five-Year Park Project Plan. This recommendation conforms with the Management Staff recommendation on the City CIP and allows Flying Cloud Fields to proceed with the most recent cost estimate of 1.1 million dollars. The original staff estimate was $300,000. Miller Park will be delayed by at least one year. Background The following information provides a summary of the projects, the projected year to initiate the projects, the estimated cost as per the Five-Year Park Project Plan, the engineers cost estimate after completing preliminary plans and specifications. City Council Agenda 5/4/99 1999—2000 Park Development Proposals Page 2 Project Year Initiated Project Plan Cost Engineer's Estimate Estimate Round Lake Park Playground 1999 $150,000 $150,000 &Storage Building Renovation Richard T.Anderson Conservation 1999 60,000 60,000-$75,000 Area Management Plan Preserve Park Renovation 1999 450,000 464,000 ($400,000 is budgted from cash park fees and$50,000 from the General Fund) Manufacturer's Rep Estimate Riley Lake Park Shelter 1999 225,000 225,000 Miller Park Shelter 2000 250,000 337,000 Engineer's Estimate Flying Cloud Fields Access and 2000 1,300,000 1,100,000 Parking Improvements The LCMR will make their decisions on the Outdoor Recreation Grant Applications in June. The City may not start any of the projects for which we have applied for grant assistance until receiving word on the grant, as any funds spent prior to approval are not subject to reimbursement. As part of this approval process, residents living adjacent to these projects were notified of the April 19th Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting when those projects were reviewed. Residents were invited to the meeting to provide input or share concerns regarding how the projects might impact their property. A total of six residents attended the meeting. One spoke in support to the Round Lake Park Project. Three spoke in opposition to the Preserve Park renovation, as they were opposed to the hockey rink being moved closer to their homes. Two residents spoke in favor of the Preserve Park Renovation Project. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended approval of each of the projects on a 6-0 vote. BL:Mdd H:\Lambert\May 4 Council Memo CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Reports of Director Parks and Recreation Services SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Round Lake Park ITEM NO: Playground and Storage Building Renovation Robert A. Lambert Director X ill , C. 1, P. Requested Action Move to: Approve the design, cost estimate and funding source for replacing the playground equipment and storage building at Round Lake Park. Synopsis The Five-Year Park Project Plan projects the expenditure of $150,000 for the replacement of the playground equipment located north of the swimming beach at Round Lake Park and the marina storage building. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended approval of Concept A for the playground equipment at an estimated cost of $98,702. The Commission also approved replacement of the storage building as per the attached concept plan at an estimated cost of$45,500. If approved, the project would begin in late August and be completed by the end of the year. Background Information The playground equipment adjacent to the swimming beach at Round Lake Park is one of the most heavily used playgrounds in the system due to its proximity to Round Lake swimming beach. The wood playground equipment is over 15 years old and is worn out. A goal of the ADA program is to provide accessible equipment at all the community parks as soon as possible. This has been accomplished at Staring Lake Park, Miller Park and Riley Lake Park. The play equipment at Round Lake Park is scheduled for replacement in 1999. The consultant presented three concept plans for the playground equipment to the Parks Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. The Commission recommended Concept A due to its high play value and relationship of the ship and lighthouse to the water. The Commission further required that the swings be located west of the trail even if a portion of the trail has to be relocated. The storage building at Round Lake Park is a temporary facility that was moved to Round Lake over 15 years ago. The facility is not large enough to accommodate the marina equipment and boats. The proposed design would not only allow winter storage of that equipment, but would allow a secure storage area during summer months for maintenance equipment that can be used by park attendants for items such as weed whips, hand mowers, equipment for lining and dragging ballfields, as well equipment for weeding flower beds. The design of building is also complimentary to the park shelter and park building. Attachments Report from Ingraham and Associates Concept Plan for the Park Shelter Cost Estimates for All Designs April 19th Minutes Parks,Recreation&Natural Resources Commission H:\Round Lake Renovation/Lambert I N G R A H A M • ASSOCIATES City Planning landscape Architecture Pork Planning&Design Land Use Planning Cost Estimates —Round Lake Park Playground and Marine Building Playground Replacement Playground Alternative Description Estimate Concept A "Light House"play equipment west of path $98,702 Concept B "Beach Slides"play equipment west of path $85,996 Concept C "Tree House", play structures east and west $80,727 of path Marine Building 576 sq. ft. at$65/sq.ft. $37,500 Grading and paving $4,000 Demolition of existing building $4,000 Construction Total $45,500 a 2659 5upont Avenue South Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55408 (612)377-2500 telephone (612)371-1010loaimae • 1 94°RE°14E .4 9"VVILLOW *LOW ROUND LAKE . . •"1( 1.1 011 ) 1144 .-11••• 1. .; Infant loy.orer,'AE.t.\\B ,.."O‘....P._.:.1.t o d t•t-ai r.m,p.i.soe,-i,g.r-.y C e.,ta a.a.7.or...e.,r,aai,m'.,'dA.''a,••,,r.,,t, asipir.:i.iai....r7.I.i•_ 41:114t1.r zr• .. ' .„s.:. ,.... IleR e01‘\''•( BEACH k.,1..B3:C VOLLEYBALL COURT . -C<c-9aS>(Ca.>CC1- I)33s) .. C CL .., i ...,,, ,,,•.t....,. CC ----PPJ,) -.., n 14.1 P VIMIL , r 1 2 4"PIN ' 1 r4M04. Iplilliki: .-. / 3( "SPR -61 2"PIN . -C )'4-1 *AIN .014 4 KA A' ,15"SPR 1 " Cl- [ 14"SPR .,' 1 C - cu 34 wrallia, ,-;i.. " --,,14 PIN , "C3 ' OPP' .1.111W a.. ..... - 0 . 12" APLE V4'11111.1116; X ------- V' --/A13 SPR IN .---------------X CI 009 Pt\ Y.• I...v..5.. em_00 ..,„, 1. op...the NM..Ur.. .... Lima* I 1 I-I X 1E-06 20' 0 10' 20' .---------- P.•• ,,,'''.110-'" Swirl„/0::• CI )( Eprl' --------- ... r"-Thee rod. a Wj - * 3/99 !Arm ortrwat......1 a Ili Sheet 1 -.7-,0 s.o...•s.,..r..•.........r........ 71041 0.0.gimp efto• • • 3/24/99 City of Eden Prairie Round Lake Community Park Play Renovation Preliminary Cost Estimate Plan A Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost SITE GRADING Rough grading SY 2.85 $ - Final grading SY 0.3 $ - Silt fence LF 1.95 $ - Site protection fence LF 1.45 $ - Subtotal for grading $ - • SITE PAVING /SURFACING Curb edging 90 LF 6.5 $ 585.00 Engineered wood fiber- agg. base 210 CY 19.5 $ 4,095.00 Poured-in-place rubber 548 SF 15 $ 8,220.00 $ Subtotal for paving /surfacing $ 12,900.00 WALLS &STRUCTURES Boulders 45 ton 70 $ 3,150.00 Dock seating shelter 12 LF 270 $ 3,240.00 Subtotal for walls& structures $ 6,390.00 PLAY STRUCTURES Toddler play ship 1 EA 20600 $ 20,600.00 Spring toy 3 EA 550 $ 1,650.00 Composite structure 1 EA 32000 $ 32,000.00 Sand table 1 EA 210 $ 210.00 2-bay swingset 1 EA 3200 $ 3,200.00 Compass-free standing 1 EA 420 $ 420.00 Stand-up spinner 1 EA 750 $ 750.00 Subtotal for play structures $ 58,830.00 PLAY STRUCTURES INSTALLATION 22% $ 12,942.60 SITE FURNISHINGS Round Lake Cost Estimates Page 1 y 3/24/99 Benches 2 EA 650 $ 1,300.00 Bike racks 2 EA 275 $ 550.00 Signs(traffic, directional &site LS $ - Subtotal for site furnishings $ 1,850.00 PLANTING Shade tree- 3" cal. 4 EA 260 $ 1,040.00 Mulch 2 CY 25 $ 50.00 Subtotal for planting $ 1,090.00 MISCELLANEOUS $ _ $ - Subtotal for misc. $ - Subtotal $ 94,002.60 5% contingency $ 4,700.13 Design Fees $ - TOTAL $ 98,702.73 Round Lake Cost Estimates Page 2 3 , =%' . il / -- Il n ., , • „,,o, V ii epc, dr�e • J. : Cri CL c / i ^(O 1 i .. .s, ', ,f F C�t�� SNP �,n • 1 r �- f- _`T``- f p�o� U • ✓ / _• s • \ d°° 30 ELM \ r" Iyi -, •. i= �.._ •`-• iiii2 7"ELM -• L '; ,_ m .- J .11:ill' ____________. : ° s�Of°(ae he•d o 1- f _ _� ail ROUiI : E . ConJ c (13 M°<n °•aeC i o 0 cn diropp, ,, - \ \\ I f oge ^- oYEIzr1�sAD Dm� P W VE • o�k e�°rGe 21 "BOX - — _ --- _ E c — .7 i C ►6�% gr�u'S oil a� SotrrH -F L-1146 WALE— W rt w� %' o z 7 i • ►SOFF1 r VCn/T' .xs \ 4" MaT I.Arzu-F 1TEG 1 E Ta a 3_4°'BC zN Fxi s 1PJ& �-dc6' w.v lal...M \ .greump.Mf.d no rlu.frM %%r "\ ua / \ o�..�.0 w ti.iw Floor plan \ \ \ 1 Sketch elevation-no scale .�. E �'99 P f++r w•++*w.s.N+ wja it �` wia �.._" 4/99 " reduced v m IMIEMICErl ASSOCIATES Memorandum To: Bob Lambert and Stu Fox CC: Parks and Natural Resources Commission From: Greg Ingraham,Landscape Architect Date: 04/05/99 Re: Round Lake Park Playground and Marine Building and Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area Management Plan Attached is a draft of the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area Management Plan and concept plans and costs estimates for the Round Lake Park playground and marine building. The RTA Conservation Area Management Plan includes a master plan,recommendations for improvements and management and cost estimates by year and project phase. The Round Lake plans include three playground alternatives and a concept plan for a marine/maintenance building. The cost estimate for the building is: 576 sq ft at$65/sq ft= $37,500 Grading and paving= $4,000 Building demolition= $4,000 Construction Total $45,500 Wendy Anderson and I will be at the April 19th Commission meeting to present both projects. We will also bring graphics to illustrate the three Round Lake playground concepts. Based on staff and Commission input we will prepare plans and specs for the playground. ('all Wendy or me if you have any questions. 1 7 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 199 Page 3 VI. OLD BUSINESS A. 1999 Park Development Proposals 1. Round Lake Park Playground and Storage Building Renovation The plan calls for replacing the existing storage building with a new building, and installing new playground equipment. Greg Ingraham and Wendy Anderson of Ingraham& Associates Landscape Architecture presented three playground options. All three options include a toddler area, a school-age area, and swings, and all have a covered shelter area. Plan A is the "Lighthouse" plan, estimated at $98,802. Plan B is the "Beach Slides Plan", estimated at $85,996. Plan C is the "Tree House" plan estimated at $80,727. The storage building for marina storage would be 24'x24"and would be located near the boat docks. Discussion: Hilgeman asked if trees would be removed to accommodate any of these plans. Lambert said the willows are in bad condition and would be removed for safety reasons. Corneille was concerned about Plans A and C that have the bituminous path separating the toddler play area from the school-age area. Jacobson believes that separating the play areas on by the path raises safety issues and is "asking for trouble". Bikers, roller-bladers and people walking dogs all use this path, which is in route to the boat dock area. Brown agreed with Jacobson on the safety issue, and saw no reason to have a path separate the equipment. Hilgeman wants everything to be on one side of the path, including the swings. Brown asked about the price differences in the three plans. Brown asked if anyone in the audience wanted to comment on the playground plans. Jackie Eisenbright spoke against the play areas being separated by the path. Hilgeman feels there should be at least one ADA accessible swing. Anderson said "the jury is out" on whether the ADA swing is actually accessible. Lambert said that the swings could be eliminated entirely. Ingraham suggested that the path could be moved. Lambert said the volley ball court is coming out, which will provide more space. Also, the site should be looked at to see if the trail could be realigned. Brown wanted to know what the major difference is between plans A and plans C, beside the $13,000. price difference. Lambert said the staff recommends Plan A because it has more play value, and would give 15-20 years of use. Hilgemen prefers Plan A, but with an ADA accessible swing. Jacobson asked if the plans were concept plans only. Lambert said bids would be let on the individual components of the plan that is selected. MOTION: Hilgeman moved to recommend the Plan A concept for the playground equipment, and that the consultants work with the city staff to include swings on the west side of the path, and that the city proceed to bid this project according to the recommendations of the April 7, 1999 staff memo. Corneille seconded the motion. Approved 6-0 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Reports of Director of Parks and Recreation Services SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Richard T. Anderson ITEM NO: Park&Recreation Services Conservation Area Management Plan and Site Robert A. Lambert Director Plan III/. C. I. b. Requested Action Move to: Approve the management plan and site management plan for the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area as outlined in the Site Analysis, Master Plan and Management Recommendations dated March 30, 1999. Synopsis Ingraham and Associates were contracted by the City to prepare a management plan and a site master plan for the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area. The master plan depicts the location of pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular access points, as well as parking lots, trails and picnic areas. The management plan contains a site analysis and recommendations for a phasing and implementation program for eliminating invasive species and restoring the prairie, oak savannah and maple/basswood forest. There is $60,000 budgeted in the Five-Year Park Project Plan for restoration of this site in 1999. The estimated cost for the project recommended by staff in 1999 ranges from$60,000 to $75,000, depending on how much of the work is able to be done in-house. Background Information The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed this proposal at their April 19th meeting and recommended approval of the management plan and the site master plan on 6-0 vote. Staff noted that the management plan projects a relatively short timeline to complete all of the restoration projects that need to be done on this site. The City does not have the funds available, nor is it necessary, to compact the restoration process into such a short time period. Staff anticipates extensive use of the ICWC crews for much of the restoration of this site, as well as use of volunteers and developing Eagle Scout projects for many years to come. Attachments April 7 Memorandum from Bob Lambert Draft Copy of the Site Analysis, Master Plan & Management Recommendations Prepared by Ingraham and Associate Minutes of April 19th Parks, Recreation&Natural Resources Commission H:\Richard T.Anderson Plan\Lambert 1 MEMORANDUM To: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission From: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks and Recreation Services Date: April 7, 1999 Subject: Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area Management Plan Requested Action: Move to approved the following: A. Approve the park management plan subject to annual review of actual phasing and implementation. B. Approve the following projects for the first year of the site management restoration: 1. Mark property boundaries to prevent future clearing, building, or dumping within the Richard T. Anderson Conservation area. • 2. Initiate a biological control program for leafy spurge. 3. Demolish and remove the collapsed barn and the southerly out buildings 4. Repair the roof on the storage building west of the house. 5. Restore the prairie and highly degraded farm fields near Highway 212. D. Approve the master plan for the development of the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area subject to annual review of the phased implementation projects. E. Improve the following projects for completion in 1999: 1. Install a retaining wall along the vehicular driveway access. 2. Pave the upper vehicular driveway and parking area. 3. Create upper trail connection and fencing. 4. Install both upper picnic areas. Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area April 7, 199 Page 2 5. Create and install park entrance signs, trail signs and kiosk. 6. Install three vehicular gates and bollards. 7. Clear existing trails and farm roads. Considerations: The Settler's Ridge Development proposal is under construction along the north boundary of the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area. Prior to actual development of homes immediately adjacent to the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area boundary, it is critical to have completed the access road, parking lot, and trail accesses. Prior to purchasing homes in this vicinity, property owners will then be aware of where public access will be to this conservation area. City staff supports the draft of the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area Management Plan with the exception of the proposed phasing and implementation schedule. The Planner has proposed a rather aggressive schedule that is beyond the fiscal capabilities of the City of Eden Prairie. Although, City staff agrees with the general priorities of those phasing projects, it will take many years to complete all of the projects listed within the management plan. Furthermore, City staff believes that much of this work can be completed through the use of the ICWC program, Eagle Scout projects and other volunteer groups. Staff will develop a volunteer program and projects that can be completed over the next five to ten years. Funding: The Five-Year CIP has budgeted $60,000 of cash park fees to spend in the renovation of the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area in 1999. The projects recommended by staff could cost as much as $75,000 this year; however, much of that work can be done in-house and expenditures may be somewhat less than that amount. The source of funds for all improvements at the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area are cash park fees. 3 __ ,,,,.i..,„,i,,:_ a::::.,.„_•.,:„ is RICHARD T. ANDERSON CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA SITE ANALYSIS, MASTER PLAN AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS March 30, 1999 • PREPARED BY INGRAHAM &ASSOCIATES BARR ENGINEERING tItGirxtrAm 4 ,* ASS 0 E)A T,E S; 2659 DUPONT AVENUE SOUTH SUITE.100 MINNEAPOLIS.MN 55408 (612)377-2500 FAX 377-1010 BARR Engineering I TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS 1 INTRODUCTION Fig.1 Site Analysis Fig.2 Vegetation Communities 2 SITE DESCRIPTION Fig.3 Park Master Plan Fig.4 Proposed Phasing 2.1 History 1 Fig.5 Northerly Entry Drive, Parking&Grading 2.2 Site Analysis 2 Fig.6 Proposed Burn and Restoration Phasing 2.3 Site issues 3 Fig.7 Plant Community End Result Goal 3 PARK MANAGEMENT APPENDIX PLAN A. Recommended Plant Lists 3.1 Strategy and Philosophy 4 3.2 Plan Elements 4 3.3 Master Plan Layout 5 3.4 Vegetation Management 6 3.5 Plant Community Restoration 6 4 PHASING , IMPLEMENTATION AND COST ESTINATES 4.1 Site Management Priorities 7 4.2 Master Plan Implementation 8 4.3 On-going Maintenance Activities 9 1:NGRAi+AM 't ASSOCIATES' 2659 DUPONT AVENUE SOUTH SUITE.100 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55408 (612)377-2500 FAX 377-1010 5 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN ,ss 'Fri 1 - , ...-- k1/2„,,,, K'',' -17 - IINIP IIP-1 ' - r''� Site Analysis,Master Plan and Park Management Recommendations 1. I N ;t * 0 . The Richard T.Anderson (RTA) Conservation Area is 125 acres of city-owned bluff land overlooking the Minnesota River Valley. The property has a mix of forest,prairie, savanna,wetlands, steep slopes and streams that make it an exceptional site for passive recreation (hiking, picnicking, etc.) and nature study. The site is largely undeveloped and represents a rare preserve of"Big Woods" forest,remnant prairie and sweeping views of the Minnesota River. The following analysis and recommendations are put forth in an effort to preserve the unique natural resources and diversity of the site, while planning for the ability of people to enjoy the site and the vistas. 2. Site i :--.-- rii-. ,_ RTA Conservation Area is located in the southeast corner of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, bounded by Highway 212 on the south.,Settler's Ridge-a new single family residential development to the north, an active gravel mine in Chanhassen to the west and existing residential homes to the east. The three parcels that make up the site were acquired by the City of Eden Prairie in 1995, 1997 and 1999 and were designated as a conservation area. The RTA Conservation Area is a unique and diverse landscape consisting of 125 acres of grassland,woodland,wetland, stream bank, and savanna. The terrain consists largely of steep hills divided by valleys and ravines. The valleys and ravines contain either flowing streams or intermittent streams. r i RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Portions of the site were used as crop and pasture land. A farmstead is located along Highway 212 that contains a house and outbuildings and a collapsed barn. An existing unpaved farm road provides access from the farmstead to the top of the bluff and the new Settlers Ridge residential development. Several smaller old roadbeds also are evident on the site. The most unique features of the RTA site are the diverse mix of unique and high quality woodlands, remnant prairies and exceptional vistas of the Minnesota River Valley(see fig. 1). Z1 Nistor�/ Prior to European settlement the RTA Conservation Area consisted of Maple/Basswood forest in the cool, shaded ravine on the west end of the site and transitioned through oak savanna and then dry prairie on the steep south facing hills to the east. Since settlement, a large portion of the RTA Conservation Area has been cropped or grazed. This reduced species diversity and allowed for the encroachment of invasive plant species. It is likely that the higher quality areas, including the Maple/Basswood and the Oak/Ironwood communities,were only slightly impacted by grazing. The RTA Conservation area was acquired by the City in the late 1990's. The acquisition was prompted by a Natural Resources Survey of the Community conducted in 1992,which ranked the RTA site (formerly known as the Peterson Site) as a priority for acquisition. Subsequent approval of a bond referendum in 1994 provided funds to acquire the site. During the development review process for the Settlers Ridge subdivision in 1998, additional land was added to the upper portion of the park and two access points from the subdivision were provided. The westerly access is for a pedestrian trail and the easterly access off of Frontier Place is to provide vehicular access from the north. It is the developer's responsibility to pave these entry points. 2.2 Site Analysis The landscape of RTA Conservation area is unique in part because of the diversity of the plant communities. Within hiking distance, one can traverse through a Maple/Basswood "Big Woods" forest into an Oak Successional Forest, through several small prairie remnants,around a marsh and end up in an Oak/Ironwood forest (see fig.2). The largest plant community on the site is the Maple/Basswood Forest, which dominates the western portion of the land. This significant forest patch is of fairly high quality. The under-story,however,is slightly compromised. East of the Maple/Basswood area is a Successional Oak Forest. It includes many mature Bur Oaks mixed with grassland. The absence of fire since settlement has allowed what was once an oak savanna (a transition community between the 2 7 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN maple/basswood forest and the prairie to the east) to evolve into the current oak forest Many red cedars have invaded this ecotone and the herbaceous ground layer community has dwindled. Continuing eastward, one next encounters a Cedar glade. Once a prairie,this area has been encroached upon by eastern red cedar, a native coniferous tree that thrives on hot,dry sites. Most of the prairies at RTA have been severely degraded due to grazing and the subsequent invasion of Red Cedar. A few relatively high quality prairie remnants still exist on the dry knobs that dot the site. A weed tree community is in the south east and along the southerly edge of the site. The weed tree community is comprised mainly of Chinese Elm. Along the very easterly edge of the conservation area is the Oak/Ironwood Forest Similar to the Maple/Basswood community,this woodland is also of high quality. Interspersed among the grassland area are pockets of prairie remnants that have survived on the site and remained in good condition. It is within these prairie remnants that many spectacular views exist. The site contains many steep ridges and valleys. A stream winds through the western ridges and is fed by four intermittent streams flowing from the northern and upper areas of the land. Several old farm roads share these creek beds,and therefore the beds are relatively open spaces. Another streambed exists in the eastern portion of the site, which also is synonymous with a farm road. Two wetland areas exist along the central spine of the land,one on the northern border,and one near the existing entrance just off of Highway 212. The large stream system flows into this southerly wetland. A great number of prospect points are scattered throughout the site,mainly existing on the upland prairie knolls. The incredible views overlook the river and beyond. Four distinct prairie areas offer just slightly different view points because of differing heights of the knolls,and location of the remnants. One knoll in the south western portion of the site provides a 360 degree panoramic view of the area(see fig. 1). 2.3 Site Issues Due to the rugged topography of the RTA site, several issues have developed over the years,including erosion and sedimentation issues. Parts of the site have slopes greater than 18 percent The site soils are primarily Hayden and Hubbard classifications, which are fine textured and sandy and are susceptible to erosion on steep slope areas. Gullies are forming on these steep upper slopes. Specifically, one gully is located near the pedestrian access to the north,and another is located in the northeastern corner of the site. Along the main farm road, bank undercutting is occurring in the upper reaches. Deposition occurs quite severely below each of these gullies. The erosion is moderate to severe in all the locations identified in Figure 1.Much of that erosion was caused by water runoff from the land to the north. With the development of Settlers Ridge the drainage has been redirected away from the RTA site and a portion of the I � 3 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN easterly erosion area was filled. This will temporarily prevent the gullies from increasing. While the site contains large areas of quality woodlands, there are many areas dominated by invasive plant species, in particular eastern red cedar trees, Siberian elm and buckthorn (see Fig. 2). These are discussed in further detail in the Vegetation Management section of this report The development of Settlers Ridge creates a need to define the park boundary to prevent encroachment and construction activity within the public lands. In addition the vehicular drive and trails should be installed prior to home construction so all new neighbors to RTA know where park access and trails are located. 3. Park Management Nal The park management plan includes two distinct but interrelated components,the park master plan and the natural resources management and preservation plan. 3.1 Strategy and Preservation Philosophy The goal for the RTA Conservation Area master plan is to bring people into the Conservation Area to enjoy the beauty of the site and the vistas while enhancing the quality of the plant communities and preserving natural resources.At RTA,visitors will begin to gain a greater understanding for the stewardship that is needed to maintain the natural resources and also observe natural features and processes. The native plant communities in Richard T.Anderson Conservation Area represent a quickly vanishing natural resource within Minnesota. Only 0.3% of the original undisturbed prairie remains within the state,and maple-basswood forests have been reduced to small, isolated fragments. The prairie and maple- basswood forest remnants at RTA. are some of the last holdouts of these plant communities and are a resource well worth preserving. Present and future generations are afforded the opportunity to enjoy this natural resource and experience a fascinating aspect of our natural history when unique areas like this are preserved. The purchase of RTA by the City of Eden Prairie was the first step in the site's preservation,now these plant communities must be protected from the invasion of exotic plant species and managed for the long term. 3.2 Plan Elements In order to protect the fragile nature of the site,only passive recreational elements were considered for the plan including trails, benches, picnic tables and satellite restrooms, parking and driveway for access and signs/kiosks for information and interpretation. The signs and kiosks will display general information including maps of the trails and general rules of the park. The kiosks will educate by explaining the conservation and 4 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN management tools being utilized on the site, describing the history of the site or adjacent lands,or demonstrating appropriate use of the site. 3.3 Master Plan Layout The Master Plan (fig 3) is based on providing access to the site without disrupting natural resource features. There will be two driveways and parking lots to provide public access to the park. The primary access point will be off of Highway 212 at the existing farmstead. A parking lot and trailhead kiosk will be constructed for casual visitor and school group use. Satellite toilets will be provided at the trailhead for the use of visitors. The non-permanent restrooms will be carefully placed and screened to prevent the structures from being visually obtrusive. Landscape plantings should be installed between the new parking lot and Highway 212 to help buffer the park from the highway. Vehicular access from the north will arrive via Frontier Place. A portion of the farm road will be paved to provide access to a new eight-car parking lot to be located at the upper portion of the site. Most of the trails are proposed to follow existing old farm roads along the stream banks and along the valley areas. The existing farm road routes were chosen to minimize disruption and for cost efficiency. Linkages are to be created by connecting these road trails in order to provide several loop trail options. The trails generally follow routes that are not difficult to traverse. In the few areas where the topography is too steep for a direct trail,a switch back is planned. The existing central farm road is to be paved to provide maintenance access to the site and as a bike/walk trail. Gates at the upper and lower ends of the road will prevent unwanted vehicle access while allowing access for maintenance vehicles and walkers/bikers. The roadway will be fine-graded and paved in a sensitive manner in order to minimize any erosion and to allow for the most appropriate method to deal with stormwater runoff. Due to existing erosion issues,a retaining wall will need to be installed on the upland side of the road for approximately 130 linear feet. The wall will be a maximum height of eight feet,will be built in two four-foot high walls, and will retain the soil with an average slope of 3 to 1. The existing farmhouse is proposed to be used as a caretakers quarters to help provide security for the park. It is recommended that city maintenance staff lives in the house and act as a caretaker. This arrangement has worked well for other municipalities. Picnic tables are to be located near the main parking farmstead parking lot, near the upper parking lot and at the southwestern overlook. Educational kiosks and interpretive signs are to be used to display trail maps and information about site environmental features and management activities. The site contains a collapsed barn and two small out buildings located near the barn that are structurally unsound. These should be demolished and the debris removed. A trout stream and pond are located on private property just east of the RTA Conservation Area. Due to the presence of the stream, the scenic beauty of the area 5 10 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN and the educational and recreational potential of the land efforts should be made to add the stream and pond area to the Conservation Area. 3A Vegetatlon Management Exotic species invasion has been described as a slow-motion explosion on the landscape. Wave after wave of invasive plant species has moved into the area and new invasive species threaten. More plant communities are destroyed in the United States each year due to exotic species invasion than are destroyed by development and agricultural expansion. The preservation of RTA Conservation Area should now move to the control of invasive plant species. Besides preserving native plant habitat,the control of invasive species will aid in the preservation of native soils. The deep, fibrous roots of native species and the layer of thatch that builds with it, function to hold the site's steep soils in place. As invasive species displace native plants,they eliminate this tight soil cover leaving it susceptible to erosion. The steep, sandy slopes of RTA will be protected through the control of invasive plant species and the nurturing of native plant species. Past grazing and grading activities on the site have disturbed the site and have allowed invasive species to easily become established. Such disturbance opens the soil cover, creating a seedbed for invasive plant establishment. Soil disturbance must be avoided as much as possible in the future. Invasive species in the conservation area include: Common buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica,Tartarian honeysuckle Lonicera tartarica, Eastern red cedar JunOerus viTinica(although native, it is invasive on the prairie remnants),Siberian elm Ulmus pumila,Leafy spurge Euphorbia esula and Smooth brome Bromus inermis. 3.5 Plant Community Restoration Although the plant communities of R. T. Anderson Conservation Area are compromised,the plant community structure,particularly the forests,is in good shape. Low diversity currently exists in the forest under-story and in the prairies. Restoration of the site will involve two primary activities: 1) the eradication of invasive species and 2) the reintroduction of local ecotype species. Priorities for invasive species control are listed below. As areas are cleared of invasive species, some existing native species will begin to reproduce and thrive. Not all areas (in particular the savanna) will require active planting. However,to achieve rich species diversity,seed and live plants should be implemented where invasives are eliminated. Appendix A contains recommended species lists from local high-quality plant communities. These species should be reintroduced in the longterm process of plant community restoration at RTA Conservation Area. 6 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Process The process of native plant community restoration should begin simultaneously on two fronts. First, within the maple/basswood forest honeysuckle and buckthorn should be eradicated. Because the presence of these species is not great,this should be able to be accomplished within the first two years of the process. Secondly,prescribed burns and invasive tree removal should commence to regenerate the prairie remnants on site. Yearly fires and cutting should occur in concentric rings emanating from the three prairie remnants identified in figure 6. By continued cutting and expansion of burning,the three remnants can eventually join into one expansive prairie. As areas are cleared of invasive species, native prairie seedlings (see appendix A for a species list) should be reintroduced as a seed source for further reproduction. Depending upon budget resources,this prairie expansion could take up to twelve years. For a detailed description of restoration phasing,see the Site Management Priorities section below. All three of the prairie remnants should not be burned during the same season. Stagger the prescribed burning of each remnant to prevent the destruction of indigenous insects and wildlife. Eventually the prairie will be burned in sections, on a two to three year rotation. 41 Site Management Priorities and Cost Estimates Exhibit 6 illustrates the proposed phasing of plant restoration. First Year: • Control erosion within the three large scarps existing along the upper terrace and along the main road cut through the site.Estimated cost$20,000—$100,000 • Mark property boundaries to prevent future clearing,building or dumping within. R.T.Anderson Conservation Area. Estimated cost:$2,000 • Burn the high quality prairie remnants to prevent further loss of native species. Estimated cost$2,500 • Initiate a biological control program for leafy spurge. Estimated cost$1,500 • Watch for new invasive species such as wild garlic that will likely move onto the site. Estimated cost$400 • Demolish and remove the collapsed barn and the two southerly out buildings. Estimated cost$5,000 • Restore prairie in the highly degraded farm fields near Hwy. 212 (3.5 acres). Estimated cost$3,000/acre Year One Estimate: $42,000-$122,000 T i � • RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Second Year: • Initiate common buckthorn eradication program. Little buckthorn presently exists on the site. Now is the time to eradicate what does exist before it reproduces and becomes costly to control (40 acres). Estimated cost v$300/acre • Initiate control eastern red cedar. Red cedars have encroached onto most of the prairie remnants (40 acres). Although native to the area,it is effectively displacing prairie species. It can easily be cut and removed from site (or burned on site). This is a great volunteer activity because it is not dangerous and because the results are tangible and immediate.Estimated cost;500/acre Year Two Estimate: ;26,000 Third Year: • Initiate eradication of the Siberian elm on site (11 acres). Estimated cost:;800/acre • Initiate elimination of the smooth brome and replace it with prairie species (17 acres);a long term approach to restoring prairie on site. Estimated cost;4,500/acre Year Three Estimate: ;85,300 4.2 Master Plan Implementation and Cost Estimates Figure 4 illustrates the proposed phases for implementation of the master plan. Phase One: • Pave upper vehicular driveway and parking area. $38,000 Drive estimated cost 860 linearfeetat135/Lf. Parking estimated cost Eight spaces at$750/pace • Install retaining walls along vehicular roadway. $10,500 Estimated cost$10,500/Ls. • Create upper trail connections and fencing $7,200 Estimated cost 2,400 linear feet at$2-6/Lf. • Install both upper picnic areas $3,000 Estimated cost:1500/ea. • Create and install park entrance signs, trailhead signs and kiosk. $4,000 Estimated cost$4000/Ls. • Install three vehicular gates and bollards. $4,250 Estimated cost$4,250/Ls • Clear existing trails/farm roads. $2,000 Estimated cost$500/ea.. Phase One Total $70,000 a 13 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Phase Two: • Create lower and western trails $12,600 Estimated costa 4,200 linearfeet at ,$2-4/Lf. • Provide two bridges across stream beds $10,000 Estimated cost$100/Lf. • Add reinforcement to existing streambed trail if necessary due to high water level during flood season. $3,000 Estimated cost$4-12/41 • Pave trail along existing farm road to provide bicycle route and maintenance access. $16,500 Estimated cost:1,250 linear feet at$10-16/Lf. • Create and pave lower vehicular/bus entrance and parking area. $44,000 Drive and curb estimated cost 580 linearfeetat$50/Lf Parking estimated cost 20.paces at$750/,mace • Plant proposed screen vegetation along Highway 212 using recommended plant community species. $12,000 Estimated cost$300/ea. • Create lower picnic area. $3,000 Estimated cost:$1500/ea. • Create and install additional trail signs,kiosks where needed. $2,000 Estimated cost$2000/Ls. • Create ridge prospect point picnic/seating area. $5,000 Estimated cost$5000/Ls • • Construct portable toilet screen near lower parking area. $2,000 Estimated cost:$2000/Ls. Phase Two Total $110,000 Future Phases: • Acquire trout stream and pond area to the east.Possible dedication by owner. (portion of Brown property). • Create trail connection to future trout stream/pond area. $2,400 Estimated cost:600 linearfeet at$2-6/Lf. • If warranted,provide open shelter for school/picnic groups. $50,000 Estimated cost:$65/sf. 9 it( R T A CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN 4.3 On-Going Maintenance Tasks • The steep slopes of the site will continually be susceptible to erosion. This must be monitored and repaired as soon as an erosion problem begins to prevent exorbitant costs of gully repair. Estimated cost:$5,000/year • Control deer populations. This site provides ideal deer habitat. However, because of the lack of predators,deer populations are too high and excessive grazing is destroying the habitat. Plant species have been and will continue to be extirpated from the site if deer populations persist at their current numbers. Control of deer populations will be critical in restoring vegetative diversity to the site. Estimated cost:1500/year • Eradication of invasive species on-site will be an on-going effort. Because of the extent of invasion it will be most economical to phase control programs. Mechanical and chemical removal of these species will be necessary. Biologic control may become a viable option in the future. Managers should keep abreast to new invasive species control techniques. Buckthorn and Tartarian honeysuckle: These species will always be a threat to the forests on-site (40 acres). Once existing stands are eliminated,pulling or spraying will be necessary each year to control new invasions. Estimated cost$'300/acre Siberian elm and Red cedar. Once these species are eradicated,fire will keep them from establishing in the prairie. Inspect the forest-prairie border for the establishment of these plants;eliminate as necessary (34 acres). Estimated cost$'800/acre Leay(y spurge and Smooth brome. These aggressive herbaceous species will be extremely difficult to eradicate on-site. The goal should be to control them to the greatest extent possible and protect high quality prairies from their invasion (17 acres). Herbicides will be necessary to eliminate smooth brome and an aggressive planting program must follow the eradication of these species to prevent their reestablishment. Biological control of leafy spurge can keep it in check. Estimated cost:y$4,500/acre New invasive species such as wild garlic may invade the site. Annual inspections should identify invasion and initiate quick eradication. Estimated cost:I300/year 10 15 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN • As species are removed,extirpated species should be reintroduced to restore plant species diversity (17 acres). Estimated costa$3,000/year • Prairie remnants should be burned approximately every three years. A burning rotation program should be implemented to avoid burning the entire site each year. This will keep costs reasonable and provide refuge for animal and insect populations. Estimated cost$2,500/year • Inspect property boundaries for neighbor encroachment and dumping. Educating neighbors on the value and sensitivity of the preserve will be a good investment. Explore the possibility of forming a"Friends of the Park"group. Estimated costa 1200/year • Inspect trails on a regular basis to clear fallen tree and limbs and mow as needed. Estimated cost:13,000/year • On-going utility and maintenance costs for the caretaker's quarters. Estimated cost$3,500/year 11 / ( RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix A: Reference Plant Lists The following plant lists are botanic surveys from local high quality native plant communities of the types that exist in Richard T.Anderson Conservation Area. These lists should be used as templates when selecting plant species for reintroduction on to the site. The lists are not exhaustive,however,additional species likely existed in RTA prior to European settlement. TABLE 1 MITTELSTED TRACT—MINNESOTA VALLEY WILDLIFE REFUGE PRAIRIE SPECIES LIST Achilles millefollum Common Yarrow Allium stellatum Wild Onion Ambrosia artemisiifolia Common Ragweed Amorpha canescens Leadplant Amorpha fruticosa False Indigo Bush Andropogon gerardii Big Bluestem Andropogon scoparium Little Bluestem Anemone patens Pasqueflower Antennaria plantaginifolia _ Pussytoes Artemisia ludoviciana White Sage Astragalus crassicarpus Ground Plum Besseya builli Kitten-tail Bouteloua curtipendula Side-Oats Gramma Bouteloua hirsute Hairy Gramma Grass Buchloe dactyloldes Buffalo-grass Campanula rotundifolia Harebell Carex sprengelil Chrysopsis villosa Golden Aster Cirsium sp. Hill's Thistle Conyza canadensis Horseweed Dales purpurea Purple Prairie-clover Delphinium virescens Prairie Larkspur Elymus sp. Wild Rye Equisetum hyemale Common Scouring Rush Erigeron philadelphicus Common Fleabane Geum triflorum Prairie Smoke Helenium autumnal() Sneezeweed Lespedeza capitate Bush-clover Lithospemum incisum Narrow-Lvd. Puccoon Monarda media Wild Bergamot Oenothera biennis _ Evening Primrose Oxalis violacreae Violet Wood-sorrel Panicum virgatum Switch Grass Penstemon grandiflorus Large Flowered Beardtongue Plantago patagonica Woolly Plantain Senecio plattensis Prairie Ragwort Seneco sp. Groundsel Sisyrinchium mucronatum Erect Blue Eyed Grass Sorghastrum nutans Indian Grass Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry Verbena hastata Common Vervain Verbena stricta Hoary Vervain 12 / 7 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE 2 RILEY CREEK WOODLAND SPECIES LIST Trees Acer saccharum _Sugar maple Carya cordiformis Bittemut hickory Fraxinus pensylvanica Green ash Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen Prunus serontina Black cherry Prunus virginiana Chokecherry Quercus borealis Red oak Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak Tilia americana Basswood Ulmus americana American elm Ulmus rubra Slippery elm Shrubs Ribes americanum Black current R ibes cynosbati Prickly gooseberry Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry Xanthoxylum americanum Prickly ash Herbaceous Amphicarpa canadensis Hog peanut Anemone riparla Thimbleweed Aquilegia canadensis Wild columbine Aster cordifolius Heartleaf aster Carex pensylanica Sun sedge Erigeron spp. Fleabane Galium concinnum Bedstraw Geranium maculatum Wild geranium Helianthus strumosus complex Sunflower Hydrophyllum virginianum Virginia waterleaf Hystrix patula Bottlebrush grass Lathrus venosus Wild pea Phryma leptostachya Lopseed Ranunculus abortivus Kidneyleaf buttercup Sanguinaria canadensis Bloodroot Sanicula marilandica Black snakeroot Smilacena racemosa False Solomon's seal Smilax herbacea Greenbrier Solidago flexicaulis Zig-zag gpoldenrod Thalictrum dasycaipum Tall meadow-rue Thalictrum dioicum Early meadow-rue Veronicastrum virginicum Culver's root Viola pubescens Violet Zizia aurae Golden alexanders 13 RTA CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Table 3 MITTELSTED TRACT—MINNESOTA VALLEY WILDLIFE REFUGE Maple/Basswood Forest Species List Acer saccharum Sugar Maple Asanrm canadense Wild Ginger Carpinus caroliniana Blue beech Carya cordiformis Bittemut Hickory Hydrophyllum virginlanum Virginia Waterleaf Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper Sanguinana canadensis Bloodroot Tilia americana Basswood Ulmus americana American Elm 14 I / Q� / v -,• �,.s sr 'Do'Do •t OVERLAND TRAIL -. al' c 7 \�9. sr / Fl,r, 1 i { o \ i r,�< /; I SETTLER'S ROOE il i J! ,=.' 7 \ j SUBDIVISION /L`y �/ d' ai SSC `�i��rc �fr Adcess Pont - - /__ 7, / - ` % /`.\ _qG�' - :ez $ doet za t \ .'fm' •nNeeded - - % Bounds . . , ...= . 1/2-1 - .'. r ‘4••--,. ;1 :. ; .;:c: d' Gravel 1 s ; nas s IdP N ( • jillt. .• . is = 7 3 ! 17•= - U. , e "_j Road-Noi - _ - a LU 10 -4 • • es Farmstead, . i er in --- 4-8 moy- c.i i �'I N%'•," Y 2. Existing Trees a g u.m W c _ Prairie Area o 00 0 � ��` � Wetland/Pond v co n �� — Stream , � --- Intermittent Stream Existing Trails/Old Farm Roads EPRTAI2.98 A Q Prospect Point/Views _ ' " 3130199 M Erosion .,.. ��—�-r—, Note:See Plant Communities Sheet for vegetation Information B Steep Slopes+18% Figure 1 • •r+ / / ;/ , iJ a' 1 \ „, s ' �. \" /j I ''• \ _ 8 -:_,:, . , , , : - , , , ..\ . T \ ' III , _, ' `,� g Q OC r� • i ^�� i0"- • ilt i 1 O• , y • N .I .__ , , :, _it ; , ,,,.._ i: ::,,__ i ,,, , , ____ ‘,,,,„ ,, _ , _..... • ` `i '\ 1I m •� • - ��,7., s ® �•_ I \.r__._ / --y Sg t -o - 13 r S c g -a X rn a I ` -am m a o m y 3 3 03 o 5• \ --- I�i D -Imp a m N 111 VV CO y' m .� yr 0 S� „� «'. �i g tMGRA,kUM 1 City of Eden Prairie Parks&Recreation Richard T.Anderson ?(st 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie MN Conservation Area 2659 Dupont Aye.s. M���avor�s MN 55aoe `w phone:612-949-8442 fax:949-8390 Concept Master Plan pho s,zren2sao 3n-,o,o� :ice e, ai \ - - ,, / St • / 411 ,'/ /.' z, ( 1 /7-1...._) / , AII /' —. 1 li o •R \\• z \1I�' .' --- / $ $ \\ 1 Nam - / - ‘ . ` 3 i#111' 'II( , ---...,„.........,----,,.,. Illirl%111- 411111 Lov oil i.''-- ...1. l , 000/ , .43 . 4\1.5; \ \ tes ,ii '-'---'--- ,7, \:.-# * i ,) s• • • s i _ • [� i In i • . . - 5 • �/ •• o 0 • • •►' • . .3 .a I 1 I N i 1 O ® * { tD I f--- _ 1-Al sl \9 1 -nvvm `� =_ cngv m mo C y CO to N (D C. al-- U 0) Q' _ m m m 5 M 3 % S) vim, o Om3 nc E. ----- r��►� • . \ Jp moi i n in m 3 o 0 G j 3 0 CD CO City of Eden Prairie Parks&Recreation Richard T.Anderson 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie MN Conservation Area .41. 3 d i� 2659 Dupont Ave.S. Minneapolis MN 55408 phone:612 949 8442 fax:949-8390 Master Plan Phasing phone:612/377-2500 tax:377-1010 e-mail:ingrahan6pm.net d- - -�— i \ ` a a E \,\ ' _______' -- - is ►. c 1 i Gat • /� ign j 5 Entry Drive a m u ,�' �� ct ' \ / % by Developer 20'wide i �; 0 t / N 0,1 / 0 C co 00 ipir . . CI 'P. m s c w !� NORTH �, i3 v Csf.3 I 1 1 • o0 50' 0 Entry Drive 845 Linear.Feet ..,� ` ` ► 2a2'Wide Bituminous S rface Retaining (sheet drain to outside -dge) f _ 1 c Wall - _ - System 730I.f.max.4' i fY ; 39 I.f.max.4' ) _ (/) t a = a W O N New Unpaved ; Trail '� a 12'Paved Sign " -a Bike/Hike Tr-. Gate, &Mainte - ce '. �i - - 'etaining` ; e PRTA12.98 Drive '- , wall1. 1 € - 5'3099 Fgure 5 ,= \ /I • ' ' / . 4 • 1 \IF-0 1 ) - ,4-t ._ )111 ) ___..------ i 0 — li„. .,--- )_1 _ r 13 5—�• C o. 03 m • /4'''''‘‘,. m m coCD 111 x -o m cc r j / Fcll'Ip y O toftliiiilfr i13. ' (D 1n T z Cityof Eden Prairie Parks&Recreation Richard T. Anderson 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie MN Conservation Area rn `� 2659 Dupont Ave.S. Minneapolis MN 55408 phone:612-949-8442 fax:949-8390 Proposed Bum&Restoration Phasing phone 012/377-25001ax 377-1010 e-mea:kigahan4mr.net at-, \ \\\\ \- , • (-. .- ' -.7,-.-;.:'7 7 T.,7.,:..-.-....---,.,:,.,,..,,:,-,• \‘ \ ... ...,...,..`..- . •••.,.. •,.,.., .., \ \ • ' N , ..„. .... . . ,\, \ '''''''''',.:,,..',.,'',.,1'',.,'•:::.s''‘' \ .s\s s \\ \\' \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\'\:\\:\‘‘N\‘'\ \\:7‘:\'':' ------\-7. \ •\ •, ,,\ N:, \ \\\ , , . ,\ ... , ' \\\:, \ •\ .'..• \.',,,,\ -,`,, \., \• •.`• ' '', • -— ' .', \\ '\\ \ • \ ,;•.,\,.. ...` \ .,\k. \ • ‘;' ,X-,, \,. \\ • \ \ \ .„. .. ,• \\ .-N''‘N \\ ' \N\\. v s ' \ ' \ - . 1 1> -\''''''''• ' • ‘\ • \ \ \\ . ‘..N\ \\\ \\,, \:- .-•\, \\\ \ ‘.;\ . ,;,\ \ --.„ .''''',.• .• ':, - ' \ - •\‘ '\ '‘\ \ \'\\.,\''''''', , •\,,\\ \\\\ \'-''N ‘‘, „ \:, - ----,•_. , ' ' —. ' ''' \`‘. \ \\\ \,•'` • • '-'-'-• :-::''''''''•.;.. '\-\\\\ '' \\, \ \ * \'' ,,, \ \'''' • .‘‘‘‘‘:::', \ \‘‘‘,.\'\--.,' \‘\\\\,,\ '----_, R . -• ...-,:._•.-±':,,,,,,,..,,,:,:.:..,\ ,\\.;,, ,:-.,,, ,\s \ \ \ \ ',... N\ ;‘,..,-;,- ..\,,N \\.\\„, \ •,,,,,,,;;;;::*....\ \;.,\:-. .--, .._,, •., :,..'..-:.f.\\N \N\,.‘, •., :.,,,....,.\\ \ . .‘ \ \ \ ,‘,\\ \ ,\\,s \, `,t,‘\ ,,‘,\\,-;\\ • -• '..-- -: ' \\ ',.-„, x.,,,\,•\ .".:.- 7:',',:,s • ".;\.\\ \.\\,‘--\\ \N \\\ \\\\ -.„..',''..\\\Ns.,,,,'N' N.,,.., ''' , . .',.,.,:i:::;....,, ..\\,\ \‘`..,\AV:::::', ....i',!.SW, \\.‘,„\'''k., , : \••‘::‘,.:2, .,,,,;,i....,,:‘,.,..,;„',,',',;::.',.','..,C'..\\,..,?,'":,',,,:rrk:\‘'X \ '-'-. -.--... '. . \'.'....',.:',':'•:': \X.\\k\2....;'''''L:'.::1,`'''A‘i:';'..', :<,;',:,',. ,'',':.•,'.4''s'....'...:'D'.:..'...,%', .'.'.:'"?. :‘:;1.':::.;',4.:4.'''.i.:..--''';'''.''''' ''' '''':: \.k\' '0\\ ' .''' -.... \.,:,.'>,',.''' ..,-,.1.':•V'',:n:::,*.'',,•:::.....',f.;'- .''.‘,''...?-..;'?..-.:'::'s--_!':,-.i'.'",.'.i:;::‘,..:`'.--;.'''-::::.:.'..j,: ki:.:''. .. :•:. ‘. \\ ''' .' ''''.':. ''''' ....::;').':::';.'''.:':::. ,.\''ITS::,'.`:',..,'; :''.....';'.'. .-.:.''''':' ''',.:''':.:':' :.... t--• -_;::::::::-.-5 ::::SgZUs' '` ,\ \ -..., ''''' ''''':''''' ''' 'ril‘::':.':.6''''''''i''''''''...4:'‘:'''.:. ::.;:F.'::''': 4.';...` ,::':... ....''''',t:21ii.:4:;-1-'1;lf .:!;:j:;: t.:.0::9,77;•KqA \, \\\ ''', , . .. `.... ,<..,... „ ,...,`. .-',. :..-,,-....,..'.., .,..,........,,,,..-,.. ' ---- ::'Y-.:.'.:', :::-'ig', , ...... .-• . .:::'..::.;':VigN" '•-•-''-:_, .4)• -------- . . . --.. -.... ..-..,.....,,, .. `.., :‘, 1':'...''.::‘7,1i-.'-::...'-•'.'''' ' ''-. 7-- '-' - .- 0 I i!'•:!,;-. ..,:1, - ---- g „,,. ..,.... N..,_:,.,...... ,... I --------, -.'"•--y:/----- D K ;CI lei 2 E, E. . --, /•-., . .„ „gb• 0 co * = — 0 . 0 0 § 31 . -.„1.,...-..',:x:,.,.,-.,.•r.,. .,,.,••,,,-..-,,,,,-,-,-,§::::,:--- \e.._,.'. __ .-.•,,,,,,,,.-.,....::- .--.,,,„„•. ,_.,.:.i..:=:,.,.,-.f..--;.,--:=, -,,,..-A,w.,,...„,i:i 2 zi3 .-.-. = . zt '‘. ,:.::::',:.:"..,:•.1.41 -4. ,„-,-,-..,:,::-.:::: :,...„,.:::::: :„,..., ,.,,,,-.,.,:„„, ,,,,A,..:;.._,:„„, ,..,..; \ n City of Eden Prairie Parks&Recreation Plant Communities c Richardonsen Conservation t ionA Andersonrea 377-1010 e-madIngraham@minel phone:612/377-2500 fax PreEuropean 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie MN FD. .. X. phone:612-949-8442 fax:949-8390 '''''42:9:::::::::: M;inreapolis MN 55408 End Result Goal for Restoration Plan Q 5 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 199 Page 4 2. Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area Management Plan Ingraham and Associates and Barr Engineering developed a park management plan for this area. Greg Ingraham presented the plan, which would be implemented in phases over a period of time. The Settler's Ridge development along the north boundary is under construction, and road access and parking for the park will have to be completed within the development's time frame. The park would be designed for low impact use and to enhance the community and preserve it's natural resources. The present farm road would be paved, and would require retaining walls. Fred Rozumalski of Barr Engineering spoke on how native plant communities would be restored. He talked about the types of vegetation found in the areas of savannah, prairie, and woods. Invasive species would be removed. Prairie areas would need to be protected from predatory species through periodic burning. Koenig asked if there was a plan to control the deer population. Fox said no deer reduction plan is included, but there may be hunting in some areas. Hilgeman asked about volunteer help in the park. Lambert said that groups such as the Boy Scouts and the High School Ecology Club are likely volunteers. Brown asked about present erosion control. Lambert said only $60,000 is budgeted for the restoration and development in 1999. This amount would not include erosion control. MOTION: Wilson moved to accept the park management plan of the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area, and to approve the master plan as recommended by staff in the memo dated April 7, 1999. Hilgeman seconded. Approved 6-0. 3. Preserve Park Renovation The plan for renovating Nesbitt Preserve Park includes replacing playground equipment, construction of a park shelter, and relocation of the skating facilities. Lambert explained the background of the park, which was built in 1978, and the need to replace the hockey rink, warming house, and playground equipment for safety reasons. There are springs in the pond, which make the free skating rink usable for only about five weeks during the winter season. The staff recommends moving the lighted hockey rink and the free skating rink to the large level area in the northwest part of the park. The new playground equipment would be located where the hockey rink is now located. The rinks would have lights on until 9:00 pm on weeknights, and 10:00 pm on weekends. Trees and shrubs will be planted to screen the rink. Sewer and water will be stubbed in for future restrooms. Brown opened discussion to the audience. Martha Johnson of Northmark Dr. said that she and her neighbors along Northmark objected to the obtrusive nature of the hockey rink lighting. She thinks the rink should be kept below the hill. a c� CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Reports of Director Parks and Recreation Services SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Preserve Park ITEM NO: Renovation Robert A. Lambert Director x i r i.c. Requested Action Move to: Approve the preliminary plans for the renovation of Preserve Park and authorization to complete plans and specifications for this project. Synopsis The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the concept plan and to complete plans and specifications for this project in order to be able to proceed as soon as the city becomes aware of the grant application status for this project. The neighborhoods surrounding Preserve Park were notified of the April 19 meeting. Five residents spoke to the Commission regarding concerns for renovation of Preserve Park. Three were opposed to moving the hockey rink from its existing location. Two spoke in favor of the revised plan. Fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in the general fund for replacement of the playground equipment and $400,000 is budgeted in the Five-Year Park Project Plan for replacing the building, skating facilities, and expanding the parking. The City has applied for a $200,000 Outdoor Recreation Grant. The results of that application should be known around July 1, 1999. Due to the condition of these facilities, it is imperative that the facilities be replaced with or without the grant. Because of the late notice on the grant status, this project cannot be started until July; thus, it is likely that we will lose the 1999-2000 skating season. Background Information The playground equipment at Preserve Park is the highest priority playground for replacement based on current safety guidelines. The City's Building Inspector has been recommending removal of the park shelter for several years due to the poor condition of this building. The pond that is used for free skating contains springs that results in a poor skating season and poor quality ice most of the time. The hockey boards are at the end of their life cycle and need to be replaced. City staff are recommending relocation of the skating facilities and the park shelter to the north City Council Agenda 5/4/99 Preserve Park Renovation Page 2 side of the access road and expanding the west parking lot to an additional 30 cars. The existing playground would be removed and new playground equipment would be located in the vicinity of the existing hockey rink. The existing playground equipment is located within the foul ball zone of the northern most baseball field. The revised plan would allow expanded skating facilities at this site in the future, if needed, and would put the skating facilities in a location that could be maintained for better ice conditions and at the same elevation as the warming house. Residents along Northmark Drive oppose moving the hockey rink closer to their homes. Residents along Deer Path and Black Maple Drive support moving the hockey rink further from their homes. The City staff have assured residents along Northmark Drive that they would be able to help locate trees within the landscape plan to help screen the rink from their homes. The staff have requested the architect to utilize the same park shelter plan as was constructed at Miller Park without the overhang and sky light. This building will be used as a ice skating warming house and may be used as a tournament headquarters if the athletic associations continue to utilize this park for that purpose. Staff does not anticipate any demand for park shelter use at this site. A sun shelter will be incorporated in the playground design similar to the facility at Pheasant Woods Park. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended bidding installation of restrooms as a deduct alternate, but agreed that the installation of restrooms at this time was not critical. Attachments: March 19 Memorandum from Del Erickson Development Plan April 19 Minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Meeting. H:Lambert\Renovation Preserve Pak C1.3/L7/17» 1 .11 1.11 LJ`iJJ4JJ uN •••...LI• ' DELANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55426 612-544-8370 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 19, 1999 TO: Robert Lambert-Fax No: 949-8390 FROM: Del Erickson RE: Nesbitt Park Rink Shelter& Site Improvements Commission No_ 9901 Based on our meeting of last week and review of concept site design,we have prepared a cost estimate as follows: Schematic Design as attached with masonry walls,asphalt shingle roof, skate tile,plumbing,heating, site lighting and rink lighting,using existing standard poles). Cost Estimate Base Bid: 1. General Conditions(Single General Contract): $ 33,000 2. General Construction Building: 155,000 (building with unfinished toilet rooms only w/mechanical&electrical) 3. Site Work: 170,000 (grading,paving,drainage,utilities,turf and site restoration per attached breakdown) 4. Rink Lighting(six poles reuse existing): 6,000 5. Parking Lot Lighting(three poles): 6.000 Construction Cost Estimate: $370,000 Contingency(10%/15%): a8,000 Total Construction Budget Estimate $408,000 A/E Fees: 35,000 Survcy & Tcsling: 6.000 Alternate (Finish Toilets): )5,000 (IRANI) I t YTAI. PROJECT: $464,000 Items (NI(') by Owner: PklYgrotind I gtiipnicnt: ;50,000 I lorkev I' iuL Boards and Screen $7.5_000 r Westwood Professional Services,Inc. W 7599 Anagram Drive • March 12, 1999 Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Phone:612-937-5150 Fax:612-937-5822 Toll Free:1-888-937-5150 . NESBITT PARK IMPROVEMENTS Email:wps@westwoodps.com Eden Prairie,Minnesota . Preliminary Cost Estimate Assumptions: No grading of swales or ballfields • No budget for signage or additional curb/pavement striping. 1. Hockey Rink and Freeskating Area - Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost "Blue Topping"Survey Services Lump Sum 1 800.00 800.00 Fine Grading Hours 20 100.00 2,000.00 Restoration Seeding Acre 1.8 1,600.00 2,880.00 Subtotal $5,680.00 2. Shelter/Toilet Building Utilities Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 1 '/2"Copper Water Line L.F. 300 12.00 3,600.00 4"PVC Sewer Line L.F. 500 10.00 5,000.00 Connect to Existing Manhole Lump Sum 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 Subtotal $9,600.00 Additional Costs: Special connections at the building? Hydrant placement? 3. Access Drive,New Curb,New Walkway Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Clean Lump Sum 1 100.00 100.00 Crack Sealing S.Y. 1,200 2.00 2,400.00 Leveling TON 50 35.00 1,750.00 1 'A"Bituminous Overlay S.Y. 1,200 5.00 6,000.00 1"Bituminous Wear S.Y. 1,200 4.00 4,800.00 Score and Break Pavement L.F. 500 2.00 1,000.00 New B612 Curb L.F. 500 10.00 5,000.00 Pave New 10' Wide Bit.Trail S.Y. 500 15.00 10,500.00 $31,550.00 Sod Restoration S.Y. 400 2.50 1,000.00 Subtotal $32,550.00 Li Designing the Future Today...since 1972 4. East Parking Lot-30 spaces Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Clean Lump Sum 1 100.00 100.00 Crack Sealing S.Y. 1,700 2.00 3,400.00 1 'h"Bituminous Overlay S.Y. 1,700 5.00 8,500.00 1"Bituminous Wear S.Y. 1,700 4.00 6,800.00 New B612 Curb(Island& L.F. 250 10.00 2,500.00 End of Lot) Restoration: Sod and Seed S.Y. 400 2.50 1,000.00 Painting and Striping Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 Precast Curb/Wheel Stops Each 18 100.00 1,800.00 C.B./M.H. Lump Sum 1 900.00 900.00 Pipe - 12"R.C.P. L.F. 220 20.00 4,400.00 Subtatol $30,900.00 5. Expanded Upper Lot-90 Spaces . Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Clean Lump Sum 1 300.00 300.00 Crack Sealing Lump Sum 1 4,200.00 4,200.00 1 'A"Bituminous Overlay S.Y. 2,100 5.00 10,500.00 1"Bituminous Wear S.Y. 2,100 4.00 8,400.00 • 8"Class 5 1,200 5.00 6,000.00 2"Bituminous Base 1,200 7.00 8,900.00 1 %"Bituminous Wear S.Y. 1,200 6.00 7,200.00 New Curb L.F. 240 10.00 2,400.00 New 10' Wide Bit. Walkway L.F. 220 15.00 3,300.00 Sod Restoration S.Y. 400 2.50 1,000.00 Painting and Striping Lump Sum 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 C.B./M.H. Lump Sum 1 900.00 900.00 Pipe- 12"R.C.P. L.F. 200 20.00 4,000.00 Subtotal $59,100.00 6. Access to Play Equipment Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 10' Wide Bituminous Trail S.Y. 290 15.00 4,350.00 Restoration Lump Sum 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 Subtotal $5,350.00 _ Page 2 7. Play Pit Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost • Grading Lump Sum 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 PVC Drain Pipe Sock L.F. 500 5.00 2,500.00 Geotextile Fabric YDS 1,200 3.00 3,600.00 Sand C.Y. 800 6.00 4,800.00 Concrete Edger 420 10.00 4,200.00 10"Wide Bituminous Walkway S.Y. 333 15.00 4,995.00 Culvert- 18"C.S.Pipe L.F. 30 30.00 900.00 Subtotal $21,995.00 8. Miscellaneous Site Work Item Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Tree Removals Demolition 10 200.00 2,000.00 Overall Misc. Site Restoration Lump Sum 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 Sod/Seed Subtotal $5,000.00 SUMMARY 1. Hockey Rink and Freeskating Area 5,680.00 2. Shelter/Toilet Building Utilities 9,600.00 3. Access Drive New Curb New Walkway 32,550.00 4. East Parking Lot 30 Spaces 30,900.00 • 5. Expanded Upper Lot 90 Spaces 59,100.00 6. Access to Play Equipment 5,350.00 7. Play Pit 21,995.00 8. Miscellaneous Site Work 5,000.00 Subtotal $170,175.00 15%Contingency 23,525.00 Total $195,700.00 • Construction Staking $2,000.00 Field Topography $1,500.00 Page 3 Z R e d I I <--- $ RR ;i3 c t • \:/4 c IIai C\\ N i_ M` _.� - . C 0 I I / \ • 4vi . " _ g. . hi: Z a W i \ 0 0 1 ..) 1 IP 4, -11 /1---7\\ till ,. 6:E.10. • \ I,' 5i. / ___L I ;1 ) 1 , -ta j id )/ . z.; , -_ . 1 . ) ,...-7: , 1........10000001-•, . at r. ma _ I:- / - III 1111 1 : / ..........."'" .......1 ►l i ill fli of 1 7 3iii Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 199 Page 4 2. Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area Management Plan Ingraham and Associates and Barr Engineering developed a park management plan for this area. Greg Ingraham presented the plan, which would be implemented in phases over a period of time. The Settler's Ridge development along the north boundary is under construction, and road access and parking for the park will have to be completed within the development's time frame. The park would be designed for low impact use and to enhance the community and preserve it's natural resources. The present farm road would be paved, and would require retaining walls. Fred Rozumalski of Barr Engineering spoke on how native plant communities would be restored. He talked about the types of vegetation found in the areas of savannah, prairie, and woods. Invasive species would be removed. Prairie areas would need to be protected from predatory species through periodic burning. Koenig asked if there was a plan to control the deer population. Fox said no deer reduction plan is included, but there may be hunting in some areas. Hilgeman asked about volunteer help in the park. Lambert said that groups such as the Boy Scouts and the High School Ecology Club are likely volunteers. Brown asked about present erosion control. Lambert said only $60,000 is budgeted for the restoration and development in 1999. This amount would not include erosion control. MOTION: Wilson moved to accept the park management plan of the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area, and to approve the master plan as recommended by staff in the memo dated April 7, 1999. Hilgeman seconded. Approved 6-0. 3. Preserve Park Renovation The plan for renovating Nesbitt Preserve Park includes replacing playground equipment, construction of a park shelter, and relocation of the skating facilities. Lambert explained the background of the park, which was built in 1978, and the need to replace the hockey rink, warming house, and playground equipment for safety reasons. There are springs in the pond, which make the free skating rink usable for only about five weeks during the winter season. The staff recommends moving the lighted hockey rink and the free skating rink to the large level area in the northwest part of the park. The new playground equipment would be located where the hockey rink is now located. The rinks would have lights on until 9:00 pm on weeknights, and 10:00 pm on weekends. Trees and shrubs will be planted to screen the rink. Sewer and water will be stubbed in for future restrooms. Brown opened discussion to the audience. Martha Johnson of Northmark Dr. said that she and her neighbors along Northmark objected to the obtrusive nature of the hockey rink lighting. She thinks the rink should be kept below the hill. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 199 Page 5 Mary Beth Bachmann of Northmark Dr. also objected to the lighting, and believes having the lights so close will affect the property value of her home. She has concerns about locating the playground so close to the pond. She also said the trees and plantings on the berm are nearly all gone, with only five trees left, and is concerned about the lack of maintenance in the park. Another Northmark resident questioned how much the hockey rink will be used, and doubted the need for two skating areas. She believes the park has been poorly maintained, and that the rink should stay where it is now She was concerned about the playground being next to the swampy area, and suggested that the skating rinks be moved to where the soccer field is now. Lambert responded by saying the pond has not been a problem for 20 years and he doesn't anticipate it becoming a problem with the new design. There is a need for a family skating area. One option would be to rebuild the hockey rink in the area where it is now and move the skating area to the west of the hockey rink, but this would require retaining walls and would be very costly. Hilgeman suggested putting the skating rinks where the soccer field is now, and vice versa. Lambert said many different concepts were looked at, due to the poor soil in the area below the hill, the plan presented is the best one Jackie Eisenstadt spoke in behalf of some of the-southeast neighbors, and she supports the program. She would like to see the park better staffed and maintained, and requested that the playground equipment be in colors that blend with the landscape, rather than bright colors. Jim Beckman of Northmark Dr. suggested that with such few days of good outdoor skating, the city could save money by eliminating the rinks altogether. Another resident suggested moving the rink to Eden.School, where it may be more accessible for the kids. Lambert said what little space is left at the school is too marshy. This skating facility will be the only ones available in southeast EP, so it is important to keep the Preserve Park rinks open. There was discussion on how the new structures and the new hockey rink walls would look. Lambert said the boards would be kept painted, and the structures would be tan with forest green trim. The city will landscape around the rink, and will work with the Northmark Dr. area residents to place trees where they help screen the rinks from the houses. Everyone whose property abuts the park will be notified to help work out the landscape screening. Jacobson asked about the status of the grant application. Staff said that if given, the grant would come in about July. However, the plans would proceed whether the grant comes in or not., with construction to start in the spring of 2000 or this fall if we are willing to lose a skating season due to construction MOTION: Corneille moved to approve the preliminary plans for the renovation of Preserve Park as specified in the staff memo dated April 6, 1999. Jacobson seconded. Approved 6-0. 4. Riley Lake Park Shelter CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Reports of Director Parks and Recreation Services SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Riley Lake Park Shelter ITEM NO: Robert A. Lambert Director x//I, C. I. d Requested Action Move to: Approve the preliminary plan for the construction of a park shelter at Riley Lake Park and to develop plans and specifications required for obtaining bids on this project. Synopsis Previously, the City Council had authorized staff to obtain preliminary plans and cost estimates for an open sided park shelter at Riley Lake Park. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed the preliminary plan and cost estimates at the April 19 meeting and recommended approval on a 6-0 vote. The Five-Year Park Project Plan projects a $225,000 expenditure for this project in 1999. The estimated cost, if this particular design is approved, would be approximately $225,000, which includes the preparation of a concrete plaza ,and a walkway to the parking lot and playground area. The City applied for a matching Outdoor Recreation Grant earlier this year for this project. The LCMR will make their decision on this grant application in June. The City will not start this project until they receive word on the grant, as any funds spent prior to approval are not subject to reimbursement. If the City is successful in obtaining the grant, the project will cost approximately $112,500. Background Information An open sided park shelter is proposed to be constructed in Riley Lake Park west of the parking lot near the new playground equipment. City staff are proposing to construct a 54 foot diameter, eight sided, open park shelter similar to the polygon shelter referred to as G0054. Staff are recommending an open sided park shelter, rather than an enclosed facility for the following reasons: 1. The major demand use for park shelters within this community is for company picnics, family reunions, or other large group get togethers during the months of May through early October. City Council Agenda 5/4/99 Riley Lake Park Shelter Page 2 2. There are no plans for skating facilities in Riley Lake Park; therefore, an enclosed heated facility is not required. 3. The open sided facility provides more building and less maintenance costs for the investment. 4. Although, there will be water provided at the site, there is no sanitary sewer within close proximity to the site; therefore, portable toilets will continue to require a screened site adjacent to the parking lot. The GOC design is proposed with white columns, white trim, and a red roof. This design is similar to the park shelters that were often found in town squares in the early part of the century, and the design and colors will compliment the colors of the Riley/Jacques historical homestead located in the northeast corner of this park. Attachments: January 28 Letter from Brenda Wenner Preliminary Drawings Minutes from Parks, Recreation Commission Dated April 19, 1999 BL:mdd H:\Lambert\Riley Lake Park Shelter Item 12 ,.. y Miracle Recreation of Minnesota$ Inc. ��� Park and Playground Equipment MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT COMPANY EASTERN MINNESOTA January 28, 1999 Jay Webber 1442 Brooke Court Mr.Bob Lambert Hastings,MN 55033-3266 Eden Prairie Park&Recreation (651)438-3630 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Fax(651)438-3939 1800)677-5153 Dear Mr.Lambert: EMAILmiracle@minn.net Thank you for the opportunity to give to you a preliminary proposal on Riley Lake Park Brenda Wenner Shelter. If there are any changes to the layout,we will at that time review the pricing. 1442 Brooke Court 1 - GOC 54 T $78,495.00 Hastings,MN 55033-3266 - with prime painted frame (651)438-3630 - with tongue&groove roof deck Fax(651)438-3939 - with Cannel ornamentation (800)677-5153 - with 40 PSF snow load EMAIL:miracle@minn.net - with electrical access - with T34 cupola Bob Klein Add Powdercoat Paint system $ 19,000.00 MN State PE Stamp $ 650.00 1303 Lincoln Lane Sub Total $ 98,145.00 Hastings,MN 55033-1067 6.5%MN State Taxes $ 6,379.43 (651)437-4525 Delivery to Eden Prairie,MN $ 1,150.00 Fax(651)437-2616 Total Delivered Cost $105,674.43 Options: Add Standard Asphalt Shingle Package $ 2,580.00 WESTERN MINNESOTA Add Std..Polirib Metal Roofing $ 11,070.00 Dave Leper (These prices do not include any site preparation,foundation or foundation design, unloading, storage, and installation of materials). 215 East Oak Street Redwood Falls,MN Exclusions: All other construction to the building will be the responsibility of the Owner. 56283-1144 (507)637-5159 - This quote is good for 60 days after issue date. Miracle Recreation of MN,Inc.will Fax(507)637-8673 require 25%deposit prior to fabrication. Please feel free to call at anytime at(651)438-3630 (800)576-1425 or(800)677-5153,if you have any questions or would like to meet with me. Sinc ly, Minnesota's Exclusive a-(21121e/e j Representative for: Brenda Wenner •Miracle Recreation Park Sales Associate &Playground Equipment •Poligon Shelters& Gazebos •Goalsetter Basketball Goals •Leisure Lite Outdoor 1 Furniture ul /7 j/i p . i • r /'da , 9� - it,- ME ' = t _ ', i•-• MN ',/.; r ■ O 0 CD o C W NJ J dce ' 4444 a I d)4 H.....71 .... NM 0 _II 0� Z c) In W NM WI U o Ov m , \ NM elms Nom • \` m L Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 199 Page 6 4. Riley Lake Park Shelter The Riley Lake Shelter is a 54' diameter structure proposed to be built west of the parking lot near the playground. Cost is projected at $225,000. Staff has applied for a matching grant, which would reduce the cost to $112,500. If granted, construction would begin in the fall of 1999 or the spring of 2000. MOTION: Koenig moved to approve the preliminary plans for construction of a shelter at Miller Park as recommended in the staff memo dated April 7, 1999. Hilgeman seconded. Approved 6-0. 4. Miller Park Shelter An open sided 80' diameter park shelter is proposed to built east of the playground in Miller Park. Cost is projected at $337,000. Staff has applied for a matching grant, which would reduce the cost to approximately$168,000. The plans could be altered to include restrooms, a stage, and a hot plate area. Bids would be let in July 1999 subject to the grant being given. If the grant is not awarded, the project would not go forward. However, Lambert said the city would continue to apply for a grant. MOTION: Hilgeman moved to approve preliminary plans for construction of a park shelter at Miller Park, per recommendations of the staff memo dated April 7, 1999, and subject to receipt of a grant. Koenig seconded. Approved 6-0. 5. Flying Cloud Fields Access and Parking Improvements The City is proposing to improve road access and parking at Flying Cloud Ballfields. Laurie Johnson, the consultant on this project, presented the plan which includes a loop drive that goes around the ballfields, and parking expansion to 700 cars. The plan calls for paving entrances to the trails, with rock driveways. An alternative would be to pave all driving surfaces. Cost of the project with limited paving is $800,000, and increases to approximately $1,000,000 if all roads and parking lots are paved. Lambert recommended proceeding with the permits, to obtain all approvals to allow construction in 2000. The Miller Park and shelter will not be built unless this grant is obtained. Improving the road access here is of high priority to the city. Due to the fact that the city does not own the land, which is owned by Flying Cloud Airport, there is the question of putting funds into the additional paving. The city has a 90-day lease with the airport, but investing in the park is a safe bet, according to Lambert. MOTION: Jacobson moved to approve the plans and funding for improvements to the access and parking facilities at Flying Cloud Fields, as recommended by staff in the memo dated April 6, 1999. Seconded by Corneille. Approved 6-0. The Commission further recommended the Council consider the feasibility of funding this project with a referendum at the general election in the year 2000. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Reports of Director of Parks and Natural Resources SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Miller Park Shelter ITEM NO: Parks and Recreation Services Robert A. Lambert Director VII, C. I. ,e. Requested Action Move to: Approve the preliminary plan for the construction of a park shelter at Miller Park and to develop plans and specifications required for obtaining bids as per the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. Synopsis Earlier this year, the City Council authorized staff to obtain preliminary plans and cost estimates for an open sided park shelter at Miller Park. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed the preliminary plan and cost estimates at the April 19th meeting and recommended approval on a 6-0 vote to approve the 80 foot diameter facility, but to add restrooms and a stage area within the structure. The Five Year Park Project Plan projects a $250,000 expenditure for this project in 2000. The estimated cost, if this particular design is approved with the additional restrooms and stage, would be close to $400,000. The City applied for a matching Outdoor Recreation Grant earlier this year for this project. The LCMR will make the decision on the grant application in June. The City will not start this project until they receive word on the grant, as any funds spent prior to approval are not subject to reimbursement. If the City is successful in obtaining the grant the costs will be reduced by approximately $112,000. The City staff and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission do not recommend proceeding with this project unless a grant is secured. Background Information An open sided park shelter is proposed to be constructed in Miller Park east of the playground site in the open area in the woods north of the parking lot. City staff are proposing to construct an eighty- foot diameter twelve sided, open park shelter similar to the polygon shelter referred to as PAV 80. The materials and color of the shingles, etc. would be similar to the warming house constructed within Miller Park (tan rock-face block with a forest green shingle and dark green metal trim.) Staff are recommending an open sided shelter, rather than an enclosed facility for the following reasons: City Council Agenda 5/4/99 Miller Park Shelter Page 2 1. The major demand for park shelters within this community is for company picnics, family reunions, or other large get togethers during the months of May through early October. 2. There are no large open sided facilities that would accommodate groups over 200 people within the community. 3. The only park in the City that could accommodate the parking needs for this large a facility is Miller Park. 4. Miller Park is the host site for many large softball, baseball, and soccer tournaments. These tournaments generate large numbers of people that want to stay in the park throughout the day and may require a shelter in case rain or inclement weather. The pavilion series design from Polygon Architecture is the model staff recommends for the preparation of plans and specifications. Staff is further recommending an extended concrete plaza surrounding the facility to accommodate grills and picnic tables that can also be set up outside of the shelter. This facility can also be used for concerts, special events, and other public uses. Staff would recommend proceeding with completing plans and specifications for this project whether or not the City is successful in obtaining the grant this year. If the City is not successful in obtaining the grant, staff would recommend putting this project on hold and reapplying next year. BL:mdd Attachments: Miller Park Concept Plan Depicting Location of The Shelter Photo of Polygon 12 Sided Pavilion Minutes from Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Dated April 19, 1999 r \ Residential - .>" _youth softball complex 4 fields(200'lighted! • future picnic shelter plaza ••• t launch 6 parking future shelter r picnic area 0 \ landscaped berm ��/ tong cage youth baseball complex 3 fields(2501 'c park) (60 tarsi ,,,A, parking 1340 cars(_ /y ,� t7 Mitchall lake _1 '' ,, / future shelter r��+ a flpke Pack entry from Co.k4 44 k lk NI I 11 lif ..�'3!� 'r: �� _me �^r�� wiN' ttp �. fit ' n'4 .o.,4741 S." 3�"ifli. ,y [6}sr �p .• •` G :, � ,�/ .°. i1/4),u 4.. .5— (R tie sj �, �� fin '( r,:6` ``{� { rr w` '!I tit >e,�;;•r; �, .,it��4 ).4.41 .� N 1 / 1, u • �•��bLy'� Jj i( ►/Iiive' ♦ ( o'Q �d k c rr�`A..- �1,t r.,l-� S:s�. �'m r VA d�! . I'TRPJ®� ,t � r�` %:, •. waking trails " 1"'" I . �,�- / si • . �r•. :-:. i . '. p� tsat rap xY>KooMa playstructue o• !�t�i�7'� ,i !. I. ,:: .we . I+ "'• �'Ay i5.s© ',," c} Anise lake view pia ,. r m� '4 + 4 1•, r � r•..c4'k: b r.w. ri La —"• • 41r ,F'.1 ve i1 :``tzty „ r� � .•. 1 �6 fir,; ^' ,. _� r � , � -� fishing pier /�;. `�- � t � � "1P o ' IFri��'ir 4As +acuis�•/t �``, �%. • $t �� �. —dr c lu JP g �q ru •%. t ,_ pie- ._ :— �- i 1 11 �c f l i 17�i Visp 7 11� i� ,}.(� :.' i c 7 CK• _4' o o- ....... ,a.•r• . ,.,.,(.4....._,..... • • • p 'le-�'rtejct •i �—.. �Y'F.� future shelter /i. . GI .�"' 1,�/�'�} .�"' +1+ 1° �,� ( , x v, 0 0 rnH dV/ / Inp(B5 cars) ?: ,_L_A',‘,C •0;-'"-'Z;rribt4Ve*.. fail ))1rIgfli 1 (6'' --: , b ,a. :) 44/ yO a ,- ,- • ' _„# zwgi----*.w.ik, •ro its 0.47, , • ,-.' *1„ T" i // � r ( r { 1 JAG• e00•baseball held(I{ghtedl / l � � F 1 ,'L. aRy / t ..`Tj I�IW regional tree // CIF J — I 1 t iim \ .0. r •'^"'`I'/ / v4' Future Interstate Highway 212 • basketball ____�— .youth soccer/football conptea 5 Heeds 13 lighted) _ONR protected wetland t° N parking(23 eats) Mute shelter southern park entry etaa ' a possisle road cornnectscn • mg(400 cars) C'v ply 5. 7C 0 50 100 200 300 400 45 C N Miller Park Concept Plan d Ia, a. City of Eden Prairie 110 acres 1 ---•• 'r"....:- _. 0 c) • . , . , . .• .. . .. .-. .,, : :- -- -- --4k Ai- . -:, ... ..,_. -. .. .,..• 4,rifitectzete PAVILION . • •-•, -----:-.•-‘-: --,--- - -----__-:.• . ,SERIES •4 -0 • ---e....-..- - 1441' '' - .--"ire..7.'i''' -_ ' •• • .._ . .,:„..... 7..,••.,„.,,, ,'-.' ..t.:',,',,r:_. ,. ------ - ---- _ . _ . ,....„• - .._ . , ,---. . .:-.1---7' ---- ---- •• - ._.._, ... •••.‘-•(PAV) . ----„,-,,,,,,,,, ,,,,--- _ .. . t. .. „..„,,...4...h.,-. . ..„..., •-`,..-,- .,1-';,•.":"."."*• -".. •- ,_. • Twelve -..o...."-,..:-.:,'''.'--'--•-'.-7•',.'-' '-'•.:'''':'':-'.:••-‘•-', -'Ar''-•*:"..- . •',. i;Pitri:Ft s' ._.. ,, _______ •,: , _. . ,.._, sided -' - - - - - - ' - ..--"rir'r-t. - - ,. . . ..., . . . , Milt ' , • .-,-.; --:'.... -'_'—*•:'... ,.. • 'Vigr''' pavilion -.:.;.---,, - ...- ,:.;----....------, .• :-...- - •'- -..!'..:., ' .'-'-...--41g,.,,,;,..-;;-/',i'.,--\.....:.,,.„.• ' __ - '. ai. 'i:7', .--....77'._11c7..--' --" .,-:...-. .. _ 'tie:A - • Single or ..;,./::,,, double ":.7.4..'"` .-,-..7,1..-:-.:--..:,.:..--;- ::'• -; .--.------ : . -:'.„,...-if.c,f-:, -...(Y:::-.7--1--7•11-...._':-..::-',7-::.\'!.-- --- -2443,%-': '' - !.?..."4.11/H:'"11- 1--.'it"..---.:-'..---,-.--,''-'--'-'- , '':--''':*;'. ...1, 1 •00000,0, ..'.i.,',-:' -,-,-;:. .. _ •,,,,,....-,.....,,,-,,-,...... . , tier roof .--,,,,,,..:/•-,-- --.-,... - '-.•:'0-:F.' ' ---------=----'---.'.----- . ...... . • PAV8OCL .Ce-!?!•-""i'" '.--:` ' -: i.i_..,-.1-':',1.--4. -2=-7.. . -. .-.,:.-.. ••- -,-----•,----.-_-.. .::::::.,-. . --;t::-"---•'-.,:•,•.,.,;z4-',,,- : -'''4'1, , --'•'•:-,--:"..-:'-.------,"'":'-':_'.-ajl-:.°:. ._. ... -.... fk- ---...f.;„--;,-;.r ..--.-.,:,--,,, .••-_.--"-- • :• .-,_:.-.-.-.,„-,----,.,-•_----.,----,:---..-.-4:%.„..-__. ...... - ..-.'..-,,,,..- ..,,i' standard -?,,i,:-.-:•;;;A,:;:",‘61 .'. .;,.- ' ::::',:''1',,_.'''' ....-:-.' '''-': ',.--'---.;-;-7.-•;..-7--:•••-•4•-•:17• 4'..*•::•"•4.5:•''''4;.• ::'•.-- -•:' i ''''''•••-••--•,'...t: 1-'4 •-"Ittiet,„ - '')'•‘ .;.3,•'•••.., i. -,..1,.. .1.1x,----1:4&::---Ai7...„----".. 1:•7•-•-•:1-r:-.. ,-1,'-i,---,:-:',,----.'...--_-'•_-7-V-..:; -...;7-;`,•:-4,11k;i4 .-..,....-. .` ''-,•t,...'1 s; 1_:,-.;--;-- si. with 6' -,-..-,...-‘.,--;-- r......,,..-.... .''... ;•,-_-_,-.--, ...„,,,..--;;_iv..,..,--- --...--,:.....-„..7.-,-.---',..-.:;:-,i:,-i,:-:-,:f.,-i-,..-!....---,f..-....-,...:.-,-,..---7-.-.--,-.,_:;-... ,. 4„--- - --,,,,-,--r-,, • , ,\ - - ,.:4!'--4.::'.-:;4,4 ....77' ."-. -,.-;.-.„.' - 4' : :'...-.-..ici',:.-.:4-:f- ..-;:----,----,,,,--.:•••=--?.----i-,---"--';. --,2-'-.:4-4---..it5----`-t"".-_,-,,,„: Pv" ... A.,• .:•,,,,...."1:. cupola --.:"' '-'•'- -''''," ' -'''''',.;-..,;";*t f'-`...'.. ..--;7:'-,,,*:,..-,,i---'-f4."--.".-2;t:;,'..-,-,--;--'-'-'---'1:-:':'--,-,-,---',:',..-`4,.' . ..'-'s"--. .'-'7:,--,.:-I.:',-._if.. ';,t1.'"..,..,....!.... •,..::::11.1. "''''',;:-.4'..:1',4-;i•(7.,:._:,3:--;,--:--_-.7..Y-----.4--f,---,'f7-'-.f.-----,r1-_-_,:__:2:-..:::•"-2.- .",;-5,7-,.:-C:X.,Ag:'-- -?•-i -T-'—' . • PAV44CL 1,4 ... r. I . .;'54 5 4CL, & •:...--• .. ';•• ‘.. °1-..e:L-:•-i;''••••••11-;'••;','... .;".-.'"••••••--•4.±..77.--:,.-;:f .-...'---..L -..,1•,,,•.:',•:-.7;---7••: - ‘R-•',...V: 4.,.- _ ___ ___,...,,,. .0.:_:,1" ..--• ,:;',-.---..-- ,_-_ -_-------- . - --2- . _ ..1:"; . ',"-••;'•'. . - ' if. ... .-••,,..- -- ..•.. . : . • '.1 ,th h . , -,- : ,• -. - 60CL are -•:-..:-.. '...--• .4. ' ,, 1 ,.., ... .__ ,,,,. ., , _.- „ - _-. ,. . 1 -.... -r ., ,. _standard , -,,i--••,-c-",:-- -- - '''':-.P1'''''' l'' • • • with 4 , .,„ ,.......... , e . . .,.. .!;:-'.,,7;,•i? a•. • - • : I .' s •+- cupola - - _ • '-'' - * . CUSTOM PAV 80C.L T A •4 P • 1 1 foot ori - - . .„..... -,--• 4....,.,;---,,- .--..,--- • ‘ . . . •-- .., ; • , -iroP• - •---,,44.-,-r ,.% ..., . •KENTUCKY KINGDOM,LOUISVILLE,KENTUCKY clearance -i ...,-----t--m=r-----,‘---,--- -• - • Optional :.-.; ... - ,,,- , -...• - • . . ' . . ._ . . . ..,. . . . . . . _ .„.. , .. . . ornaments -..:::-..: ...• ,.•• -- '4 ... '. . :.. available --.......-,,•,-.-..-.--- ..-.- - • - . - . , .. . . . • . .,• .,_ . ... . . . (p.9) • - • ,- . .. ..- • •, . - -- -„. •-- ,..-:--:. ' -Asp,• , -,--,- A At . --'-..,-.X1-. '.4-.:- -'---• - . -- - "'•:..... ,,,,, . , ' . , , •'.-4t*VVO,T:rg,34,.." ...6115 iiM77,0jet EU ";71.72,74 iz"....7-..•,•.: : I.:,, ....--- . . • '' ': ' ' .''',•-'2:-.-i*tti.,,,:,- - . — ,, '4' '''''''4'T 4•-, --'--. ,--...'42.-..,..:.,,,t-' ',F• Po,-;v.,..,-...:4,..,,,":,-„,,,,...,,,,!, "--.."---.:'-'."---:-.,17.''...f-'1',7`4-.' -_,..1.4,--.,,--i:, 1. ..--:...,..,..4,,,,,,,,...3.--,. i'',- ;:..7 ,,,i'4,..'.i,'''-;1';:;'4''''.',.:•,.-„t''''' 1 F.,',7,2,7;;,-..,1 ',-i?,3 ''.11,,;; 71...- . I 1' . . _ 1. .. ... __ __ _ .. -- ......•..... ,!*-.4 to, 1,.-t,-..::,4. Ri L-....,,..........:.,,,,,,;,.,-,..f.,! tt--....-...-....t•.---...-....., r.r. ,..=,—,.---;--,-v....-• 1 =sumo C -'2;1;•WI';''',;;:;'-'::.,.7;.," '';;"••::Y.",,,f,!, ..--:•:%:..4•'•-•...,i-:.-_ ., .., -- •-.-,..f.• -y •-,,,, .,, - :. • . . -.. •-..-2 ..,,--..;_,:,,,,:::."....-:,,,, ;:t•••-,-::.. '.-.•-r.,- -' A . ,_----............•......_.... ,_., --_-.-•:,.z :,- • - • - ' . ' . - ': 45 tR•i,",:..t.:.'.-Z-',---;:,_,71:,::j.',fl`-`2.-AP#4,;,,T`A, 3"'":7'''y'''',"'''''''''''-':.:74.-"'''' '''-(''''''.:L''' -:- ' '* - ''' ' '.-' - . ' ' -''''''.'-';''.7..'' ''' '''''''':'- - . 1 1 1-1 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 199 Page 6 The Riley Lake Shelter is a 54' diameter structure proposed to be built west of the parking lot near the playground. Cost is projected at $225,000. Staff has applied for a matching grant, which would reduce the cost to $112,500. If granted, construction would begin in the fall of 1999 or the spring of 2000. MOTION: Koenig moved to approve the preliminary plans for construction of a shelter at Miller Park as recommended in the staff memo dated April 7, 1999. Hilgeman seconded. Approved 6-0. 4. Miller Park Shelter An open sided 80' diameter park shelter is proposed to built east of the playground in Miller Park. Cost is projected at $337,000. Staff has applied for a matching grant, which would reduce the cost to approximately$168,000. The plans could be altered to include restrooms, a stage, and a hot plate area. Bids would be let in July 1999 subject to the grant being given. If the grant is not awarded, the project would not go forward. However, Lambert said the city would continue to apply for a grant. MOTION: Hilgeman moved to approve preliminary plans for construction of a park shelter at Miller Park, per recommendations of the staff memo dated April 7, 1999, and subject to receipt of a grant. Koenig seconded. Approved 6-0. 5. Flying Cloud Fields Access and Parking Improvements The City is proposing to improve road access and parking at Flying Cloud Ballfields. Laurie Johnson, the consultant on this project, presented the plan which includes a loop drive that goes around the ballfields, and parking expansion to 700 cars. The plan calls for paving entrances to the trails, with rock driveways. An alternative would be to pave all driving surfaces. Cost of the project with limited paving is $800,000, and increases to approximately $1,000,000 if all roads and parking lots are paved. Lambert recommended proceeding with the permits, to obtain all approvals to allow construction in 2000. The Miller Park and shelter will not be built unless this grant is obtained. Improving the road access here is of high priority to the city. Due to the fact that the city does not own the land, which is owned by Flying Cloud Airport, there is the question of putting funds into the additional paving. The city has a 90-day lease with the airport, but investing in the park is a safe bet, according to Lambert. MOTION: Jacobson moved to approve the plans and funding for improvements to the access and parking facilities at Flying Cloud Fields, as recommended by staff in the memo dated April 6, 1999. Seconded by Corneille. Approved 6-0. The Commission further recommended the Council consider the feasibility of funding this project with a referendum at the general election in the year 2000. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Reports of Director of Parks and Natural Resources SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Flying Cloud Fields ITEM NO: Parks and Recreation Access and Parking Improvements Robert A. Lambert Director xIl/. C.. ), r. Requested Action Move to: Approve the following: a. Plans and specifications for improvements to the access and parking facilities at Flying Cloud Fields. b. Authorization to obtain the necessary permits from Metropolitan Airports Commission and Hennepin County Department of Transportation. c. Funding these improvements from either of the following options: • Cash park fees and making the necessary adjustments to the Five-Year Park Project Plan to fund this project in the year 2000, or • From a park bond referendum submitted for a vote in the November election in the year 2000 for a 2001 project (recommendation from the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission). (Management staff recommends funding this project with cash park fees.) d. Obtain bids for the project in the fall of 1999 with the goal of completing this project as early as possible in the year 2000. Synopsis The revised Five-Year Project Plan depicts an expenditure of 1.3 million dollars in the year 2000 toward this project. The original general estimate ranged from $300,000 to one million dollars. The actual cost estimate based upon plans and specifications is approximately 1.1 million dollars. The improvement would realign the eastern most access road with La Rivier Court. There would be two-way traffic in and out the fields at both locations and all of the parking would be around the perimeter of the ballfields, rather than the interior. Parking would be expanded from 450 cars to nearly 700 cars to accommodate the actual use of those fields. 1 City Council Agenda 5/4/99 Flying Cloud Fields Access and Parking Improvements Page 2 Due to the high use of this facility and the fact that the peak use occurs during the evening rush hours, park and recreation staff believe this project is the highest priority park project. Funding Funding sources could be the use of cash park fees as per the 1999-2003 Five Year Project Plan that is attached. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission suggested the City Council consider adding a bond referendum question to the general election in November of the year 2000 for construction in the spring of 2001; however, during the recent Capital Improvement Workshop, staff and the City Council agreed that all major improvement projects within the City should be evaluated and prioritized prior to selecting any particular issue for a future referendum. Attachments Preliminary Engineers Estimate April 19, 1999 Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission 1999-2003 Five Year Project Plan BL:mdd H:\Lambed\Flying Cloud Fields Council Memo a 1999.2003y Estimated Revenue for Five Year Park Project Plan .............._....---....,J,»,>,...,:»:».....,a.•_o_:...,::.:»•r.,,:.�,:ass;f•,;:�.:<.�.:::�«<.; :- .:.<.:•._..._:..�,.�,:�1;�;z�>..,.'.......s.�..<.•' .��sss:<<<is'>`i'><-'s.' 'u:� ..r.ra, Fund Balance Beginning of Year $2,047,450.00 $ 2,312,750.00 $ 1,677,350.00 $ 1,610,350.00 $ 1,271,350.00 $ 691,350.00 Cash Park Fees-Fund 30 $ 900,800.00 $ 700,000.00 $ 750,000.00 $ 750,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 SoftballNolleyball Fees-Improvements $ 30,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Bob Referendum $ 4,500.00 $ 72,700.00 $ 1,300,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Revenue Bonds $ - $ - $ 2,000,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Tax Increment Financing $ - $ 200,000.00 $ 800,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - Federal&State Park&Recreation Grants $ 25,000.00 $ 317,200.00 $ 450,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Other Grants,Funding Assistance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000.00 General Fund/ADA* $ - $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Other(donations,etc.)Soccer Association Hockey Association,etc. $ 33,900.00 $ - $ 250,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Interest Accrual-Fund 31 $ 106,450.00 $ 110,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 25,000.00 General Fund(capital outlay,etc.) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Estimated Total Revenue 31,481,000 $ 3,777,650.00 $ 7,377,350.00 $ 2,675,350.00 $ 1,846,350.00 $ 1,641,350.00 Estimated Total Expenses $ 835,350.00, $ 2,100,300.00 $ 5,767,000.00 ; $ 1,404,000.00 _$ 1,155,000.00 $ 1,300,000.00 1999-2003 Flve Year Park Project Plan ;A q48 .............:.. Y 2002 Cit Other Funds 1998 1999 2000 2001 2003 Richard T.Anderson Conservation Area $ 1,056,900.00 $ 317,200.00 $ 179,800.00 $ 804,300.00 $ 170,000.00 $ 220,000.00 Cedar Forest land in lieu Smetana Lake land in lieu Riley Lake :/. Subtotal i. . ���ca .�,... . 31lT�eA.#!� C 1f#$.81fi�8��; srax�,:,S;, :; # � 4 1 �5'T Community Center $ 37,500.00 $ 394,200.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 2,800,000.00 Round Lake Park $ 512,000.00 $ 171,000.00 $ 92,000.00 $ 29,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 200,000.00 Staring Lake Park $ 236,800.00 $ 91,800.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 85,000.00 Riley Lake Park $ 252,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 225,000.00 Miter Park $ 1,005,800.00 $ 5,800.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,030.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 Purgatory Creek Recreation Area $ 1,250,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 800,000.00 $ 250,000.00 Birch Island Park $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 Preserve Park $ 400.000,00 .$ 400,000.00 Prairie View Park $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 = Pheasant Woods Park $ 12,000.00 _ Edenbrook Conservation Area $ 105,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Richard T.Anderson Conservation Area $ 136,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Rice Marsh Lake Park $ 95,400.00 $ 95,400.00 Miller Spring $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 _ Cedar Forest Park $ 600.000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 150,000.00 Crestwood Park $ 700,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 350,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Forest Hills Park $ 200,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 200,000.00 Smetana Lake Park $ 140,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.03 Flying Cloud Fields $ 1,322,650.00 $ 37,000.00 $ 39,650.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 1,300,000.00 �-. _ _ .c.. : G;. :.::... A.. �- �µ Cam! c� Mr. dtffiti{Ri # OO a1 t ' Je4 rtW t$0.90 4 w!:: -R�..:.. '1''t: .VY.:': :."*.-0 . 3, it ,: a :.4.:•" ,;,ix ' 5�'s� To 1"iiltill!!'I!kHoi -_ .: ,,: - - . Rice Marsh Lake Park $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Lower Purgatory Creek Future Hidden Ponds $ 25.000.00 $ 25,000.00 Prairie Bluff Conservation Area $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Indian Road Bike Trail $::: 40,000.00 $ 360,000.00 $ 500,000.00 . .:...:: is r'^ra' Grand Total $ 8,525,250.00 F$ 781,700.00 I$ 635,350.00 $ 2,100,300.00 f$ 5,767,000.00 $ 1,404,000.00 I$ 1,155,000,00 I$ 1,300,000.00 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 199 Page 6 The Riley Lake Shelter is a 54' diameter structure proposed to be built west of the parking lot near the playground. Cost is projected at $225,000. Staff has applied for a matching grant, which would reduce the cost to $112,500. If granted, construction would begin in the fall of 1999 or the spring of 2000. MOTION: Koenig moved to approve the preliminary plans for construction of a shelter at Miller Park as recommended in the staff memo dated April 7, 1999. Hilgeman seconded. Approved 6-0. 4. Miller Park Shelter An open sided 80' diameter park shelter is proposed to built east of the playground in Miller Park. Cost is projected at $337,000. Staff has applied for a matching grant, which would reduce the cost to approximately $168,000. The plans could be altered to include restrooms, a stage, and a hot plate area. Bids would be let in July 1999 subject to the grant being given. If the grant is not awarded, the project would not go forward. However, Lambert said the city would continue to apply for a grant. MOTION: Hilgeman moved to approve preliminary plans for construction of a park shelter at Miller Park, per recommendations of the staff memo dated April 7, 1999, and subject to receipt of a grant. Koenig seconded. Approved 6-0. 5. Flying Cloud Fields Access and Parking Improvements The City is proposing to improve road access and parking at Flying Cloud Ballfields. Laurie Johnson, the consultant on this project, presented the plan which includes a loop drive that goes around the ballfields, and parking expansion to 700 cars. The plan calls for paving entrances to the trails, with rock driveways. An alternative would be to pave all driving surfaces. Cost of the project with limited paving is $800,000, and increases to approximately $1,000,000 if all roads and parking lots are paved. Lambert recommended proceeding with the permits, to obtain all approvals to allow construction in 2000. The Miller Park and shelter will not be built unless this grant is obtained. Improving the road access here is of high priority to the city. Due to the fact that the city does not own the land, which is owned by Flying Cloud Airport, there is the question of putting funds into the additional paving. The city has a 90-day lease with the airport, but investing in the park is a safe bet, according to Lambert. MOTION: Jacobson moved to approve the plans and funding for improvements to the access and parking facilities at Flying Cloud Fields, as recommended by staff in the memo dated April 6, 1999. Seconded by Corneille. Approved 6-0. The Commission further recommended the Council consider the feasibility of funding this project with a referendum at the general election in the year 2000. 5- CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Reports of Director Parks and Recreation Services SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Elimination of ITEM NO: Parks and Recreation Lifeguards During Adult Lap Swim Robert A. Lambert Director /i/I C Requested Action Move to: Approve the elimination of lifeguards during specified lap swim hours, which will be designated "adult lap swimming." Designate adult lap swim be defined as swimmers 18 and older, and post the proper signage as indicated in the public swimming pool rules per the State Health Code. Synopsis The availability of qualified, certified lifeguard staff has significantly decreased as the need for a growing work force continues to increase. Residents demand and deserve services of fitness/lap swim, especially in the early morning before normal business hours. Finding available staff to cover these hours has become increasingly more difficult. Denying residents services due to the lack of available staff does not seem reasonable when other options currently in use at other facilities would also work at the Community Center. Staff reviewed this proposed action with representatives of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. They have indicated they are getting many similar requests from other cities and have advised the city to post the proper signage "No Lifeguard on Duty" in the proper locations in the pool. Background Attached to this memo is an April 1, 1999 memorandum from Cynthia Mueller, Aquatic and Fitness Coordinator, that provides more detail regarding this recommendation. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended approval of eliminating lifeguards during adult lap swim on a 6-0 vote. Attachments April 1, 1999 Memorandum from Cynthia Mueller, Aquatics & Fitness Coordinator Minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission of April 19, 1999 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes April 19, 199 Page 7 VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Unnecessary Mowing The City recommends that unnecessary mowing be eliminated in city parks. This would pertain to berms, hillsides, and other grassy areas not used for picnics and park activities. Lambert said the city can better spend their maintenance dollars elsewhere. The city would start not to mow certain areas in Miller, Riley Lake, and Round Lake Parks. There was some discussion on how the public and homeowners adjacent to these areas would respond. The plan would be tried and monitored for one year. MOTION: Hilgeman moved that the staff be authorized to eliminate unnecessary mowing in the parks as recommended in the March 25, 1999, staff memo. Koenig seconded. Approved 6-0. B. Recommendation to Eliminate Lifeguard During Lap Swim The staff is recommending eliminating lifeguards during the early a.m. hours for adult lap swim time, from 5:30 am to 8:30 am. It is increasingly difficult to find staff to work during these hours, The plan would result in savings of about $16,000. Lyndell Frey was present to explain the proposed changes, which include changing the signage around the pool to "no lifeguard"warning signs. The only option to this recommendation would be to shut down the pool during these hours. Brown was concerned about the city's liability in this situation. Frey said the city will need to go through the proper channels in regard to risk management. MOTION: Wilson moved to eliminate lifeguards during adult lap swim time according to the staff recommendations in memo dated April 1, 1999. Koenig seconded. Approved 6-0. VI. REPORTS OF THE COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. Reports of Director of Parks and Recreation Services 1. Osprey Nesting Project Lambert reported ospreys are attempting to nest in the light standards at Miller Park. Minnesota Valley Electric Co. donated three 40-foot poles which were erected to provide alternative nesting sites for the birds. Volunteers will monitor these nesting sites. 2. Ice Area Survey City Staff completed a market survey to determine ice time demand in the metro area, especially the areas surrounding Eden Prairie. Lambert said E.P. demographics are similar to Edina. Edina has generated about $192,000 in CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/4/99 SECTION: Reports Director Parks and Recreation Services SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Reduction in Mowing ITEM NO: Parks and Recreation of Parkland I 3 Robert A. Lambert Director Requested Action Move to: Approve the recommendation from the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and City staff to reduce the amount of mowing in city parks in 1999 as per the May 24, 1999 memorandum. Synopsis Staff is recommending to initiate a trial program in 1999 to reduce the amount of mowing in such areas as berms, hillsides, and other large grassy areas that have been mowed for aesthetic purposes only. Staff is recommending five specific areas for this cutback in mowing to monitor how well this cutback is received by park users and neighbors. The sites staff is recommending to eliminate in the mowing program in 1999 include the following: 1. Large berm that screens the Weston Bay neighborhood from Miller park. 2. The large berm on the south side of parking lot for the baseball field in Miller Park. 3. The large grassy area on the west side of Round Lake Park. 4. Around the pond on the west side of Round Lake Park. 5. Along the west side of the entry to Riley Lake Park. Background The Environmental Waste Management Commission is recommending an ordinance that would allow residents and businesses to plant and manage native grasses that would be allowed to go beyond the 12 inch maximum described by City Ordinance. The purpose of this proposed ordinance is to allow a variety of landscape types that do not require high amounts of irrigation City Council Agenda 5/4/99 Reduction in Mowing of Parkland Page 2 and may offer cover to a wide variety of wildlife. Staff believes the City should provide an example by reducing unnecessary mowing, watering, and maintenance. As the park system continues to grow to accommodate the City growth, the demand for services grows beyond the increased revenues. Staff believes there are some services such as mowing unnecessary grassland that can be reduced that may also provide other benefits such as less erosion, less maintenance, less water, and more cover for a variety of wildlife. • If the City Council approves of this cutback in mowing, the staff would notify any property owners who abut the land that has been mowed and explain the rationale for cutting back on the mowing of those areas. Staff would recommend monitoring the feedback the City receives from the community regarding this maintenance decision and providing a report in the spring of the year 2000 regarding continuing the practice. BL:mdd H:\Lambert\Unnessary Mowing Memo