Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 11/21/2000 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP/FORUM TUESDAY,NOVEMBER 21,2000 5:00- 6:55 PM, CITY CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher,Ronald Case,Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger,Parks &Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety Director Jim Clark,Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram,Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney Roger Pauly and Recorder Lorene McWaters I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER—MAYOR JEAN HARRIS II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. COMMUNITY FORUM SURVEY IV. OTHER BUSINESS V. COUNCIL FORUM A. TERRY PEARSON,EDEN PRAIRIE RESIDENT,REGARDING HARTFORD PLACE DEVELOPMENT VI. ADJOURNMENT MEMORANDUM 0 To: Mayor and Councilmembers MOM From:• Chris Enger, City Manager Date: November 17, 2000 Eden Trairie Subject: Community Forum Survey Attached for your review is the Agenda for the Community Focus Groups sessions held on October 27 and 28. Doug Griffen is preparing an executive summary of the Community Forum Sessions, which he will present at the Council Workshop on December 5. The next phase of the Community Forum/Survey project is development of the Community Survey. The Survey provides us with the opportunity to both clarify and validate the Community Forum results. Our consultant, Wirthland Worldwide, is formatting and preparing this survey instrument. Councilmembers Tyra-Lukens and Butcher have recommended that the Workshop on Tuesday, November 21, be used to discuss the Survey and gain input from Councilmembers and Service Area Directors. Action Required: Please review the Community Focus Group Agenda and identify areas and questions that you feel require additional input. Agenda - City of Eden Prairie--Community Focus Groups on Recreation Services--10/27-28/2000 MASTER/FINAL Introduction --ASL Intro --Facilitator intro/comments --Brief participant intros --Session overview/objectives Identification of What Differentiates Eden Prairie(Topic Commenter) --EBS warm up --What differentiates Eden Prairie Categorization of Eden Prairie Attributes (Categorizer) --Principle themes Survey on Eden Prairie Leisure Services (Survey) --Electronic Survey --Preliminary views from participants,unbiased Perceptions of Eden Prairie in 2020 (Topic Commenter) --EBS question --Identification of key trends Categorization of Eden Prairie Changes for the Year 2020 (Categorizer) --Principle themes Miscellaneous PRESENTATION BY EDEN PRAIRIE --Expected trends --Target demographics Identification of Most Important Eden Prairie Services in the Year 2010 (Topic Commenter) --EBS question --Consider the changes,what services most important in the year 2010 Categorization of Eden Prairie Services in the year 2010 (Categorizer) --Principle themes Prioritization of Eden Prairie Services in 2010 (Vote) --1-10 assessment --Which are the most important to have in place Implications of Providing Services at a High Level(Topic Commenter) --EBS question --What are the implications of being able to provide these services in a quality fashion Categorization of Implications (Categorizer) --Principle themes • Identification of a Current Service that Could be Reduced or Eliminated (Topic Commenter) --EBS PARAGRAPH STYLE --One service that could be reduced/eliminated Current Critical Issues for Eden Prairie(Categorizer) PRESENT TO PARTICIPANTS --Introduce each one at a time for feedback questions Critical Issue#1: Major Center Area/Downtown Park(Topic Commenter) --Series of EBS questions --Approximately 2 minutes each Crititical Issue#2: Flying Cloud Airport Buffer(Topic Commenter) --Series of EBS questions --Approximately 2 minutes each Critical Issue#3: City Developed Recreation Facilities (Topic Commenter) --Series of EBS questions --Approximately 2 minutes each Critical Issue#4: Historical Sites (Topic Commenter) --Series of EBS questions • --Approximately 2 minutes each Participant Response on Why Eden Prairie(Categorizer) REVIEW WITH PARTICIPANTS --Facilitate verbally --Will transfer to EBS VIEWFINDER: Participant Response on Why they Live in Eden Prairie (Topic Commenter) VIEWFINDER TOOL--PARAGRAPH RESPONSE --Transfer notes from participants Final Participant Perception Survey(Survey) --Final activity --Detailed survey --Session•feedback Identification of What Differentiates Eden Prairie (Topic Commenter) 1.If you were describing Eden Prairie to a friend who had never visited here before, how would you describe this community? What are the attributes of Eden Prairie that differentiate it from any other community of its size and help contribute to its overall quality of life? What makes Eden Prairie Eden Prairie? Perceptions of Eden Prairie in 2020 (Topic Commenter) 1. All of us can see what Eden Prairie looks like today,in the year 2000. Imagine for a moment what.Eden Prairie might look like 20 years from now, say in the year 2020. In your view,what are the key trends,lifestyle, and demographic changes that might occur over the next 20 years in Eden Prairie? How will Eden Prairie change? Identification of Most Important Eden Prairie Services in the Year 2010 (Topic Commenter) 1.As you think about the changes you identified as well as the trends and demographic shifts that Eden Prairie has just presented,what do you feel will be the most important leisure services (parks and recreation, open space,historical sites, cultural events, shopping, entertainment, dining, etc.) that Eden Prairie should have in place for its citizens in the year 2010? Implications of Providing.Services at a High Level (Topic Commenter) • 1. Imagine that the City,based on your input and that of other citizens, is able to plan and develop the majority of these services over the next 10 years in a consistent and high quality fashion. What do you feel are the implications of the City being able to do this? What impact might it have for the citizens and the community? Identification of a Current Service that Could be Reduced or Eliminated (Topic Commenter) 1. As you think about the trends that are occurring and what services might need to be in place by 2010,what's ONE CURRENT LEISURE SERVICE that you feel should be reduced or eliminated by Eden Prairie? Why do you feel that way? (Please submit your entire response as a single entry) Current Critical Issues for Eden Prairie (Categorizer) Current Critical Issues for Eden Prairie (Categorizer) 1. CRITICAL ISSUE 1: DEVELOPMENT OF A MAJOR CENTER AREA/ DOWNTOWN PARK--The City has long planned for the development of a 'downtown' area that would be the area in this community that would host regional commercial development(like the Mall), many restaurants,higher density housing, multiple-story office buildings, etc. The 'plan' called for a public open space in this downtown area where large groups of people could gather for community events, entertainment, and daily 'people watching'. Examples of similar parks are Centennial Lakes in Edina,Lake Harriett in Minneapolis, and Rice Park in St. Paul. 2. CRITICAL ISSUE 2: USE OF FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT BUFFER PROPERTY—There has been a great deal of discussion regarding what would be appropriate public use of some of the open space Iand being acquired around Flying Cloud Airport as buffer property. 3. CRITICAL ISSUE 31 CITY DEVELOPED RECREATION FACILITIES--Many cities today are developing large recreation facilities with gymnasiums,indoor water parks, and large fitness facilities. Eden Prairie currently has two privately operated facilities,the Flagship Athletic Club and the Northwest Racquet Club. The issue is whether Eden Prairie should fund and develop its own large recreation facility. 4. CRITICAL ISSUE 4: HISTORIC SITES—The City currently owns three historic homesteads. The City is committed to the preservation of these sites. The issue is the METHOD of restoring and preserving these sites. Critical Issue #1: Major Center Area / Downtown Park (Topic Commenter) 1.What types of programs or activities would you like to see in a major City Center/Downtown Park? 2.What types of community events do you think would be most suitable for a downtown park? 3.How could we make this park unique, special? Crititical Issue #2: Flying Cloud Airport Buffer (Topic Commenter) 1.Would a public golf course be a good use for the property? Why or why not? 2.If a public golf course was built here,what amenities should there be? 3.What other uses other than a golf course should the City consider for this property? Critical Issue #3: City Developed Recreation Facilities (Topic Commenter) 1.What improvements would you Iike to see made to the existing Community Center? 2.What additions, if any, are needed at the Community Center? Critical Issue #4: Historical Sites (Topic Commenter) 1.What type of programs would you like to see at the Cummins-Grill House? 2.How should the Riley Jacques property be utilized (i.e.,house,barn, grounds, etc.)? 3. Should the City own and operate/program all three historic properties? Why or why not? Participant Response on Why Eden Prairie (Categorizer) Attribute 1.Think now about all of the attributes you had previously identified about Eden Prairie and what you feel truly differentiates this community from others. As you think about your experience in living in Eden Prairie,what's the ONE THING that you like the most about Iiving here? Importance 1.Why does that matter to you? Why is that important in your life? Benefit 1.As you think about that one attribute,what's the benefit of that attribute to you/your family? What does it allow you to do? Emotion 1.When you think about the benefit of that attribute,what it allows you to do. How does it affect you emotionally? How does that make you feel? Impact 1.When you think about how it makes you feel,why is that important to you? Why does that matter in your life? VIEWFINDER: Participant Response on Why they Live in Eden Prairie (Topic Commenter) 1. Please transfer now the notes that you have made regarding the SINGLE THING that is most important to you about living in Eden Prairie,why it matters,what the benefit is, how the benefit makes you feel and why that feeling is important to you in your life. (please enter your response as a paragraph and submit as a single entry) Si Survey on Eden Prairie Leisure Services (FINAL) GENERAL PERCEPTIONS 1. In general,how well•do you feel you are informed about the Eden Prairie park • system and facilities? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Well informed [ ] Somewhat informed [ ]Not too well informed - [ ]Not at all informed 2. Overall,.how would you rate the parks and recreation facilities in Eden Prairie? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Excellent . [ ] Good [ ]Fair [ ] Poor USAGE OF RECREATION FACILITIES--For each of.the following Eden Prairie recreation facilities, please indicate whether you have used them in the past 12 months 3. Larger community parks such as Round Lake Park, Staring Lake Park,Riley Lake Park, and Miller Park Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) 4. Smaller neighborhood parks Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) • 5. Outdoor Center Please select the appropriate response • [ ] Yes [ ] No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) 6. Community Center Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) 7. Flying Cloud Ballfields Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) 8. Senior Center Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) 9. Staring Lake Amphitheatre Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) 10. Trails Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) 11. Swimming Beaches at Round Lake or Riley Lake Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) • 12. Hennepin County Swimming Beach at Bryant Lake Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No (please indicate why not in the text box that appears) LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH EDEN PRARIE RECREATION FACILITIES USED IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS--For those facilitities that you have used, please indicate your level of satisfaction 13. Larger community parks such as Round Lake Park,Staring Lake Park,Riley Lake Park, and Miller Park Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14. Smaller neighborhood parks Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15. Outdoor Center Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16. Community Center Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 17. Flying Cloud Ballfields Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction • 1 2 3 4 5 , 6 7 8 9 10 18. Senior Center Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 • 19. Staring Lake Amphitheatre • Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20. Trails Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 21. Swimming Beaches at Round Lake or Riley Lake Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 22. Hennepin County Swimming Beach at Bryant Lake Rate from I to 10, with 10 the highest level of satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 USAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE RECREATION PROGRAMS--For each of the following Eden Prairie recreation programs, please indicate whether you have participated in or attended them in the past 12 months 23. Adaptive Programs&Services Please select the appropriate response [ ]Yes [ ]No • • 24. Adult Athletic Leagues Please select the appropriate response [ ]Yes • [ ]No 25. Youth Athletic Programs Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No 26. Senior Programs and Services Please select the appropriate response [ ]Yes [ ]No 27. Youth Programs Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No 28. Family Programs Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No 29. Arts Programs (examples: Staring Lake Concert Series, Community Theatre, etc.) Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No 30. Community Events (examples: 4th of July Celebration, Oktoberfest, Sunbonnet Day, etc.) Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No 31. Outdoor Education Programs &Trips Please select the appropriate response •[ ] Yes [ ] No • 32. Aquatic Programs • Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No • 33. Skating Programs Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH EDEN PRAIRIE RECREATION PROGRAMS USED IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS--Please indicate your level of satisfaction with any of the programs you indicated you had participated in 34. Adaptive Programs & Services Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 35. Adult Athletic Leagues Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 36. Youth Athletic Programs Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 37. Senior Programs and Services Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 38. Youth Programs Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 39. Family Programs Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 40. Arts Programs (examples: Staring Lake Concert Series,Community Theatre, etc.) Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 41. Community Events (examples: 4th of Juy Celebration, Oktoberfest, SunBonnet Day, etc.) Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 • 42. Outdoor Education Programs & Trips Rate from I to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 43. Aquatic Programs . Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 44. Skating Programs Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SENIOR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES 45. Considering all of the activities offered by the City for Seniors, do feel there are currently sufficient programs and activities for Seniors on our community? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No (Please indicate what specific suggestions you have for Senior programs and activities) TEEN ACTIVITIES IN EDEN PRAIRIE 46. Considering the activities offered by the City, school district, athletoic associations, and faith community, do you think there are sufficient leisure time activities for teens in our community? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes • [ ]No (please indicate what additional leisure time activities you would suggest) HISTORICAL SITES AND ACTIVITIES 47. The City owns five historic sites, and three of them include homes. The City has restored one historic home (The Cummins-Grill House). Each year in September, the City hosts Sunbonnet Day at this site. Have you ever participated in this activity? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No (please indicate why you may not have attended this activity) 48. What other historical programs or activities would you like to see offered in Eden Prairie? Press the space bar to open text box,press the 'F3'key to close text box EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE 49. When the City is completely developed,22% of the land will remain in park or open space, and approximately 30% if the lakes, streams and ponds are added. Please indicate your assessment of the amount of open space that Eden Prairie is planning to maintain: Please select the appropriate response [ . ] Eden Prairie will have too much open space/parks when fully developed [ ] Eden Prairie will have about the right amount of open space/parks when fully developed [ ] Eden Prairie will not have enough open space/parks when fully developed IDENTIFICATION OF FOCUS GROUP SESSION 50. Please indicate the focus group session you are participating in today: Please select the appropropriate response [ ] Session 1 [ ] Session 2 [ ] Session 3 [ ] Session 4 Thanks you for your responses to this survey. Please submit your survey by pressing the 'F3' key, or by requesting assistance from one of the session facilitators. S2 Final Participant Perception Survey (FINAL) EDEN PRAIRIE RECREATIONAL FACILIt'IES 1. Do you think the City should develop its own special use recreation facilities (for example--golf course,performing arts center,water parks,indoor ice rinks) that are currently available in neighboring communities? Please select the appropriate response [ ]No [ ] Yes(please indicate why in text box that appears) 2. Which of the following special use facilities do you feel Eden Prairie should develop on it's own: Please select the appropriate response. You may select more than one facility. • • ( ] Golf course [ ] Performing Arts Center [ ] Water Park [ ] Indoor ice rink [ . ] Other(please specify in text box that appears) 3. Do you personally support the idea of development of special use facilities that don't currently exist through partnerships with other cities to share construction and operational costs? Please select the appropriate response [ ]Yes [ ]No (please indicate why in text box that appears) • EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER • 4. Do you believe there is a need for additional Community Center facilities? • Please select the appropriate response [ . . ]No • [ ] Yes(please identify any additional Community Center facilities in text box that appears) 5. Do you support a private-public partnership to build and operate a Community Center, or would you prefer the use of public funds and user fees? Please select the appropriate response [ ]Prefer a private-public partnership to build and operate a Community Center [ ] Prefer the use of public funds and user fees,no private involvement EDEN PRAIRIE PUBLIC GOLF COURSE • 6. Should the City of Eden Prairie have a public golf course? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No 7. What would your preference be for a public golf course in Eden Prairie? Please select the appropriate response [ ] 9 hole course with a driving range [ ] 18 hole course with a driving range • 8. If the only option for Eden Prairie was to build a 9 hole course and driving range,would you be supportive? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No (please explain why in text box that appears) 9. How much per year in taxes would you be willing to pay for a 9 hole golf course and driving range? Please indicate a whole dollar amount on an annual basis [ ] 10. How much per year in taxes would you be willing to pay for an 18 hole golf course and driving range? Please indicate a whole dollar amount on an annual basis EDEN PRAIRIE HISTORIC HOMES 11. How do you feel the City should preserve and restore the 3 current historic - home sites that it presently has? Please select the appropriate response [ ] With tax dollars [ ] With a private-public partnership [ ] I do not support the City in preserving and restoring the current 3 historic home sites in any way •12. How much per year in taxes would you be willing to pay to restore/preserve the 3 home sites? Please indicate a whole dollar amount on an annual basis [ ] 13. Would you support preservation of any of the 3 current designated historic homes through their SALE to private ownership with restrictions limiting architectural changes? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ]No 14. Would you support preservation of any of the 3 current designated historic homes through their LEASE to private ownership with restrictions limiting architectural changes? . Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No EDEN PRAIRIE CULTURAL AND FINE ARTS 15. Do you think there•are sufficient cultural and fine arts opportunities available at the local and regional level for Eden Prairie? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Yes [ ] No (please explain why you feel this way in text box that appears) COMMUNICATION WITH EDEN PRAIRIE: When communicating with City Staff or Officials on an issue or concern, how likely would you be to use the following communication methods: 16. Direct phone call Please select the appropriate response [ ] Prefer not to use [ ] Might use [ ] Definitely would use 17. Personal meeting Please select the appropriate response [ ] Prefer not to use • [ ] Might use [ ] Definitely would use 18. 24 hour response line Please select the appropriate response [ ] Prefer not to use [ ] Might use [ ] Definitely would use 19. Electronic communication such as email or website response Please select the appropriate response [ ] Prefer not to use [ ] Might use [ ] Definitely would use 20. Council forum, off camera • Please select the appropriate response [ ] Prefer not to use [ ] Might use [ ] Definitely would use 21. Council meeting,on camera Please select the appropriate response [ ] Prefer not to use [ ] Might use [ ] Definitely would use • 22. While the issue or situation might vary,what method of contacting City Staff or Officials would generally be your PREFERRED method? Please select the appropriate response [ ] Direct phone call [ ] Personal meeting [ ] 24 hour response line [ ] Electronic communication such as email or website response [ ] Council forum, off camera [ ] Council meeting, on camera [ ] Other(please specify) SESSION FEEDBACK 23. Did you get a chance to say what you wanted to say? (ability to participate verbally and electronically) Select either Yes or No. Y N 24. What were the most positive aspects or components of today's overall session? What went well? What did you like most? Click in the box to enter text. 25. What was the overall value of the session in terms of better understanding the planning issues facing Eden Prairie and your ability to contribute your views? Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 26. What was the value of the Advanced Strategy Lab electronic brainstorming tool in supporting the session? Rate from 1 to 10, with 10 the highest value. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 27. Do you have any other comments/observations/recommendations about today's session or any aspect of leisure/recreations services or planning for Eden Prairie? Please select the appropriate response [ ]No [ ] Yes (please add comments in text box that appears) PARTICIPANT SESSION IDENTIFICATION . • 28. Please identify the focus group session you are participating in today: Please select the appropriate response [ ] Session 1 [ ] Session 2 [ ] Session.3 [ ] Session 4 • THANK YOU for your participation in todays session and for your feedback comments. Please submit your survey by pressing the 'F3' key or by requesting assistance from one of the session facilitators AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,NOVEMBER 21,2000 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety Director Jim Clark, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney Roger Pauly and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. INTRODUCTION OF STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS AND STUDENT-AT-LARGE REPRESENTATIVES III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS VI. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 7, 2000 VII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERKS LICENSE LIST B. APPROVE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH TKDA FOR WATER UTILITY STORAGE BUILDING C. AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO SIGN MUNICIPAL ABATEMENT INCENTIVE FUND GRANT APPLICATIONS D. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR TH 212/SHADY OAK ROAD HOV SLIP RAMP AND AUTHORIZE FIELD SURVEY AND SOIL EXPLORATION WORK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA November 21,2000 Page 2 E. ADOPT RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 16, 2000, TO CONSIDER ESTABLISHING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING(T11e)DISTRICT F. AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO SIGN "ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NO INTEREST IN CONDEMNATION PROCEEDS FROM PARCEL 92" G. ADOPT RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS AT THE PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL LIQUOR STORE H. ADOPT RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY RELATING TO DATA PRACTICES AND APPOINTING AND DESIGNATING THE DATA PRACTICES COMPLIANCE OFFICIAL VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. SHADY OAK TECHNOLOGY BUILDING ADDITION by Mount Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 2.7 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.7 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 2.7 acres, and Site Plan Review on 2.7 acres. Location: 6875 Shady Oak Road. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment, Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment) B. ENTREVAUX by Pemtom Land Company. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 33.09 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 30.5 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1- 13.5 on 30.5 acres, and Preliminary Plat on 33.09 acres into 41 lots, 3 outlots and road right of way. Location: North of Pioneer Trail, west of Bennett Place. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change, Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment,Resolution for Preliminary Plat) C. LAKE SMETANA PARK AND TRAIL by the City of Eden Prairie. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.0 acres and Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers in the Rural Zoning District on 2.0 acres. Location North side of Smetana Lake. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment, Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment) D. PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM AND ISSUANCE OF MULTI-FANIILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (ROLLING HILLS SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT) (RESOLUTION) IX. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA November 21,2000 Page 3 X. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2 BY AMENDING SECTION 2.26, SUED. 3, RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP ON THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS B. LAKE SMETANA PARK AND TRAIL by the City of Eden Prairie. 2nd Reading of a Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers in the Rural Zoning District on 2.0 acres. Location North side of Smetana Lake. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment) XI. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS XII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS XIII. APPOINTMENTS XIV. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Southwest Suburban Communities Joint Public Training Facility 2. Update on Council Workshops C. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Site Selection for 4th of July Fireworks Display D. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Award Contract for Liquor Store Remodeling(Resolution) 2. Lincoln Parc Multiple Family Housing Project Update E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Award Contract for Pond K Sediment Removal and Disposal Improvements,I.C. 01-5523 (Resolution) F. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA November 21,2000 Page 4 XV. OTHER BUSINESS XVI. ADJOURNMENT VI . UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,NOVEMBER 7,2000 8:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety Director Jim Clark, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney Roger Pauly and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 8:05 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION Mayor Harris said Council Forum is held the first and third Tuesdays of the month from 6:30 — 6:55 p.m. in Heritage Room II. This will be scheduled time following City Council Workshops and immediately preceding regular City Council Meetings. It is important if you wish to visit with the City Council and Service Area Directors at this time that you notify the City Manager's office by noon of the meeting date with your request. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Case added a safety issue on Pioneer Trail,under XIII A.Reports of Councilmembers. MOTION: Butcher moved, seconded by Case, to approve the agenda as published and amended. Motion carried 5-0. V. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD OCTOBER 3,2000 MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to approve the minutes of the City Council Workshop held October 3, 2000, as published. Motion carried 5-0. B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 3,2000 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 2 Thorfinnson made a correction on page 12,paragraph one,which should read "He believed it would be totally appropriate for them to match or come close. . . " Tyra-Lukens made a correction under item 4 on page 18,which should read ". . . County Emergency Medical Service Council." MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher, to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held October 3, 2000, as published and amended. Motion carried 5-0. C. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 30, 2000 MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held October 30, 2000, as published. Motion carried 4-0,with Thorfmnson abstaining due to his absence. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. LARIAT CENTER III by Lariat Companies, Inc. 2nd Reading for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 4 acres and Site Plan Review on 4 acres. Location: 8335 Crystal View Road. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution No. 2000- 174 for Site Plan Review) B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-175 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF LARIAT CENTER C. APPROVE RELEASE OF LAND FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT FOR LOT 3, BLOCK 1, BELL OAKS SECOND ADDITION, S.S.A. 89-06 D. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-176 EXTENDING CONDITIONAL USE AGREEMENT FOR GEOGRAPHICAL DIGITIZED DATA FOR USE MAPPING OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE E. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HTPO, INC., FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR PROPOSED TRAIL ALONG ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY F. AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH OWNERS OF PROPERTY AT 9575 FRANLO ROAD _ G. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-177 TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM THROUGH LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 3 H. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.2000-178 GIVING PRELIMINARY PROJECT APPROVAL TO S & W PLASTICS, LLC, SUBJECT TO A PUBLIC HEARING I. AWARD CONTRACT FOR CSAH 4 BIKE TRAIL,I.C. 99-5496 J. AUTHORIZE SIGNING OF 2000-2001 WINTER USE PERMIT WITH HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARKS FOR THE LRT CORRIDOR WITHIN EDEN PRAIRIE K. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-179 APPROVING THE AMENDED PROJECT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (PMA) BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES, TO EXTEND PROPOSED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE L. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-180 RELATING TO A PROJECT AND CERTAIN REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A GROUND LEASE AND LEASE-PURCHASE AGREEMENT MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher, to approve Items A-L of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. COSTCO by Costco Wholesale Operation. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 17.9 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 17.9 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the C- Reg-Ser Zoning District on 17.9 acres, Site Plan Review on 17.9 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 17.9 acres into one lot. Location: East of Prairie Center Drive between Rolling Hills Rd. & Prairie Lakes Dr. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment, and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Enger said official notice of this public hearing was published in the October 26, 2000,Eden Prairie News and sent to 383 property owners. Bill McHale, Executive Vice President of Ryan Companies, gave the background on this property, which began in 1994 when his company began working with Hartford Companies on a mixed-use development. The 1994 Hartford Place PUD was approved by the City. If the plan for the Costco development is not approved, McHale said Ryan Companies will build Hartford Place. Jackie Frank,Director of Real Estate for Costco Wholesale Operation, said he has been working with City Staff for the past year. Costco warehouses are located in a number of areas of the country but they are just beginning operations in the Midwest. They looked hard for a good location in Eden Prairie. The proposed 3 CITY COUNCIL NIINUTES November 7,2000 Page 4 plan for the site is a 148,000-square-foot retail building with tire store and gasoline service facility. To lessen the impact on surrounding properties, they have placed the warehouse in the area farthest from adjoining residential areas and reduced the scale of the warehouse by creating berms and plantings around the property. The Planning Board had asked if Costco would consider going ahead without the gas-fueling facility in the northwest corner. Frank said senior management was consulted about eliminating that use, which would have several positive results, including the opportunity to increase the number of parking stalls and to increase setbacks to 50 feet along the perimeter. Frank reviewed the issues of the tire store, elevations, lighting, noise, traffic, transition to the neighborhood and land use. Franzen responded that the 1994 Developer's Agreement with Ryan Construction Company states what would be allowed on the property. The architecture and landscaping for the approved plan was based on the mitigation required. Costco has a greater impact on surrounding residential areas due to the larger building, and requires more landscaping , greater setbacks and additional detail on the building. The approved 1994 plan meets City ordinances. The Community Planning Board identified issues before the public hearing. Lighting, noise and traffic issues were brought out by residents of the neighborhood at the public hearing in August. The Planning Board voted 6-0 to recommend denial of the project to the City Council at the September 25, 2000 meeting. The primary reason was that the plan was inconsistent with the approved 1994 plan, which would provide a better transition to the residential neighborhood. Tyra-Lukens said many letters were received from residents expressing concern about the noise the tire center would create. She asked if a tire center would be permitted in the approved Hartford Place development. Franzen replied that would require an amendment to the Developer's Agreement and would have to go through the public hearing process. Butcher asked how Costco would compare to the approved plan in terms of traffic generation. Franzen replied the numbers are very similar, but the important thing is what the numbers reveal; that is, what would have to be done to mitigate the traffic. The traffic analysis in 1994 said a traffic signal would be needed at Prairie Center Drive and Prairie Lakes Drive. The same conclusion was reached in the current traffic analysis. Mayor Harris asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Terry Pearson, 10827 Leaping Deer Lane, spoke on behalf of the four neighborhoods around the proposed development: Weston Woods Townhomes, one- and two-level Hartford Place homes, and the Sanctuary. She was assisted in the presentation by Don Klingel, 10940 Kiawa Drive. There are a total of 240 homes in the four neighborhoods. They have collected 231 petitions indicating opposition to building the Costco warehouse. She said the majority of residents have moved into their homes within the past five years. They understood a strip CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 5 mall was proposed for the site, which is very different from a Costco. If the Costco proposal is denied, the neighbors hope is to work with Bill McHale and City staff to develop something that would provide better a transition to the neighborhood and better services to the neighbors. Ms. Pearson said she would show how the proposed plan is not consistent with the approved plan. The original land use was approved for four retail buildings totaling 165,000 square feet. The largest building authorized is 75,000 square feet. The proposed plan is for a single 148,663-square-foot building including a gasoline fueling facility and a tire center. Approval of the proposed plan would require a change in the PUD and Developer's Agreement. The entrance to the gas fueling facility faces Weston Woods Town Homes. The tire center is not part of the permitted land use for this site and would require a zoning and PUD amendment. Although the amount of noise caused by installing tires does not violate City Code, it impacts the neighbors. The proposed development does not mitigate the impact on the neighboring area. Ms. Pearson and Mr. Klingel have traveled around the country to Costco warehouses and took pictures of the various properties. The pictures showed outdoor storage of shopping carts at one location, and semi-trailers left overnight at a number of locations. At the tire centers door were left open during all hours of operation. Ms. Pearson said these pictures show the difference between how Costco says they do business and how it is actually done. The residents would encourage mixed use of residential and retail on this site. Ms. Pearson asked the Council to vote for what is best for this site, the Eden Prairie market center and residents, and deny the Costco proposal. Tyra-Lukens asked if the neighbors recognize that if the Costco proposal is denied, Ryan Companies can go ahead with the approved Hartford Place plan, and that isn't necessarily going to be a mixed-use development. Ms. Pearson said they considered the original PUD the lesser of two evils. However, they still want to request the opportunity to meet with Bill McHale and discuss possible options. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. Case said he doesn't like the "big-box" concept anywhere, but also is not too happy with the Hartford Place plan. Although Ryan Companies has probably lost patience with the City, he would like to see a third alternative. He realized the impact a Costco business would have on the neighbors and the fact that when they moved in they had different expectations, and therefore he was inclined to deny the project. Butcher said she believed it was essential to review zoning-change requests and PUD changes on a case-by-case basis and to consider how the project would meet the City's needs. After hearing the information from both sides, she said she didn't believe the Costco plan was consistent with the zoning plan and approved Hartford Place plan. It doesn't provide adequate transition to the neighborhood. 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 6 Having one large building on the site has an overpowering impact that cannot be mitigated by architecture. The Hartford plan would provide specialty shops that the community could use. The Community Planning Board has spent many hours reviewing the Costco plan and voted to recommend denying the project. Butcher cautioned the neighbors that the site will be developed. She said she would vote to deny the project. Mayor Harris commended Costco and the residents for working to achieve the mitigation that occurred regarding the landscaping, setbacks, etc. However, the Costco building is still a huge mass for this site and so she didn't consider it the best use of the site. There is an approved 1994 plan for the site, and the developer does not have to come back to the Council in order to implement the plan. She said she was more comfortable with the flexibility of the smaller buildings in the approved plan. That offers the possibility that if for any reason a business should fail it could be replaced with another. Tyra-Lukens said she agrees with the other councilmembers. The problem with Costco is that it's not consistent with the Council's vision for the market center area. Costco has done an exceptional job of trying to make it fit into the site and she respected them for that, but it is an immense building. She would vote to deny the project,but had no doubt the site will develop quickly. Thorfinnson said he had nothing to add. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher, to deny the request for PUD Concept Review, PUD District Review with waivers, Zoning District Amendment and Site Plan. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher, to deny the request for a Preliminary Plat. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to direct staff to prepare findings supporting denial by the City Council,to be adopted later in this meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Pauly said he has worked on some tentative findings, which he could make available to the Council in a short time, if a recess were called. Mayor Harris recessed the meeting at 9:50 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:05 p.m. Pauly said he has prepared findings, conclusions and a decision regarding Costco. The Hartford Plan was included as Exhibit A, the Developer's Agreement as Exhibit B, and this includes all the exhibits entered into the record. He would make this document available to representatives of Costco. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 7 Findings 1. The Land is part of a multi-use PUD known as the 1994 Hartford Place PUD. 2. The 1994 Hartford Place PUD encompasses seven areas of mixed development. Of the seven, four are authorized for single and multiple family housing development, which has now occurred. Area 1, which authorized an office/restaurant building, was later amended to authorize a retail pet warehouse and a mattress store, which have also been completed and constructed. One area (Area 7) had been authorized for commercial use, and later, for multiple family housing and office use, and has not yet been developed. 3. The development of the Land (Area 2) is to occur as authorized and described in the Developer's Agreement. 4. As provided in the Developer's Agreement, the Owner agreed to develop the Land consisting of three lots on which will be placed four buildings for commercial use. 5. The four buildings total 165,000 square feet,ranging from 7,500 square feet to 75,000 square feet in size. 6. The proposed plan is for the construction of one retail building of a size of 148,665 square feet with an attached tire service and free-standing gas fueling facility. 7. Approval of the proposed plan is denied for the following reasons: a. The proposed development of the Land is a material and substantial change from the plan approved for the Land as part of the 1994 Hartford Place PUD. b. The proposed development of the Land is a material and substantial change from the plan required for development of the Land as described in the Developer's Agreement. c. The proposed development is a material and substantial change from the 1994 Hartford Place PUD and the Developer's Agreement because, among other things, it (i) seeks to develop the Land by constructing one massive building containing 148,665 square feet compared to the approved plan providing for the construction of four separate buildings ranging in size from 7,500 to 75,000 square feet and situated in different locations on the Land; and (ii), (a) includes an attached tire service facility with four overhead doors and (b) a free-standing gas fueling facility, neither of which is contemplated in the approved plan. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 8 d. The mass of the single 148,665-square-foot building would result in an unreasonable material and substantial aesthetic visual impairment and obstruction in the area over that of the approved plan. e. The proposed plan would result in an unreasonable deviation from the 1994 Hartford Place PUD and Developer's Agreement, which would substantially impair the expectations of those owners of lands included in the 1994 Hartford Place PUD who developed or purchased lands within the PUD with the expectation that the Land would be developed as approved; i.e., several smaller buildings contrasted with the proposed one massive building. f. The Owner is contractually bound as a consequence of the Developer's Agreement to develop the Land in the manner provided in the Developer's Agreement which is specific as to the number, size and location of the buildings to be constructed. g. The proposed development does not provide an adequate transition to the adjoining residential neighborhoods as required by City Code 11.03, subd. 6,E.5. h. The proposed development does not comply with the following provisions of City Code: i. 5.5 parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of building (City Code 11.03, subd. 3, H, 4, (e)), (5.2 are provided in the proposed development plan.); ii. Parking space width of nine feet(City Code 11.02, subd. 3,H, 3, (d)), (ten feet is provided in the proposed development plan.); iii. Parking space length of 19 feet (City Code 11.03, subd. 3, H, 3, (d)), (20 feet is provided in the proposed development plan.); iv. Parking aisle width of 25 feet (City Code 11.03, subd. 3, H, 3, (d)), (24 feet is provided in the proposed development plan.). i. The proposed development does not mitigate the visual impact of the gas fueling facility on adjoining residential areas including the impact of the canopy lights on homes in the area. j. The tire center with its overhead doors is not aesthetically acceptable as is the brick and glass materials required in the approved plan. Decision The request by Owner for the approvals described above are denied in their entirety. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Thorfinnson,to adopt the findings. Motion carried 5-0. 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 9 B. BLUFFS EAST 17TH ADDITION by Hustad Land Company. Request for Guide Plan Change from Church to Medium Density Residential on 5.78 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.78 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.78 acres,Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 5.78 acres, Site Plan Review on 5.78 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 5.78 acres into 33 lots. Location: South of Pioneer Trail at Franlo Road. (Resolution No. 2000-181 for Guide Plan Change, Resolution No. 2000-182 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change, and Resolution No. 2000-183 for Preliminary Plat) Enger said official notice of this public hearing was published in the October 26, 2000,Eden Prairie News and sent to 231 property owners. Paul Korberg of Hustad companies, said this project is for 32 two-story townhomes located in the southeast corner of Pioneer Trail and Franlo Road. A guide plan change from Church to medium-density residential is requested. • Brian Cluts said he met with the engineering department, which mapped out what right-of-way they require for the intersection, and the plan was modified to accommodate that. Franzen said the Community Planning Board held an informational meeting on June 26, 2000, to review the proposed guide plan change from church to medium density residential and three multiple-family concept plans for the site. The Board determined that multiple-family could be an acceptable use of the property and recommended that the developer pursue either the senior housing plan or the two-story townhouse plan. The Board voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the guide plan change and 32-unit townhouse plan to the City Council at its September 25, 2000 meeting. The Board required that the plan should be revised to provide additional right of way along Franlo Road, eliminate the building setback waiver from Franlo Road, and provide more guest parking on the west side of the project. The plans have been revised according to the Community Planning Board recommendation. Mayor Harris asked if anyone wished to address the Council. No one did. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the public hearing; and adopt Resolution 2000-181 for a Guide Plan Amendment from Church to Medium Density Residential on 5.78 acres; and adopt Resolution 2000- 182 for PUD Concept Review on 5.78 acres; and approve lst Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers and Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 5.78 acres; and adopt Resolution 2000-183 for a Preliminary Plat on 5.78 acres into 33 lots; and direct Staff to prepare a Developer's agreement incorporating Staff and Board recommendations. Motion carried 5-0. C. PRAIRIE LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION by Prairie Lutheran Church. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.98 acres, Planned 9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 10 Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.98 acres, Zoning District Change from R1-13.5 to Public on 1.68 acres,Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 3.3 acres, Site Plan Review on 4.98 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 4.98 acres into 1 lot. Location: 11000 Blossom Road. (Resolution No. 2000-184 for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment, and Resolution No. 2000- 185 for Preliminary Plat) Enger said official notice of this public hearing was published in the October 26, 2000,Eden Prairie News and sent to 77 property owners. David Hennen, Manden Companies, said they are proposing to add to the existing church building on the existing site. The project includes an 18,948 square-foot building addition and parking lot. They are undertaking to improve the landscaping and berming around it to have minimal impact on neighboring properties. Waivers are being asked for front yard parking setback from 50 feet to 29 feet, exterior materials from 75 percent face brick, glass, or natural stone to 25 percent. The church was granted a variance in 1988 for all wood and glass exterior materials since the church was adjacent to single-family homes. They are also seeking a height waiver from 30 feet to 34 feet because the expansion includes a 12-foot by 12-foot gable/peak, which is technically the highest pitched roof and increases the building height to 34 feet. Franzen said the Community Planning Board voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council, including the three waivers, at its September 11, 2000,meeting. Mayor Harris asked if anyone wished to address the Council on this project. Mark Kudla, 11041 Blossom Road, said there were berms in the elevation plans around the parking areas and asked Hennen if they will be built. Hennen answered they had the civil engineer put the berms back in the site plan with new grading. Along the south there will be five-foot berms, and along Blossom Road the existing berms will retain their present height, which is three feet. The existing trees will remain and new trees will be planted. All berms will have coniferous plantings. Kudla asked if there are any details available about the location of the church sign. Hennen replied it would be located at the new driveway entrance, which is to the east of the present entrance. It will be an internally lit monument sign. Kudla said he believed the sign would be too large for the site. There is no traffic on the street except for residents who live in the area, so he thought the sign could be smaller. Hennen said he believed a sign could be designed that is adequate for the area and meets the church's needs. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 11 Case said he assumed the height variance is typical with other churches in the area. Franzen replied it is. Churches have been allowed to exceed the district height limitation in regard to steeples or spires. Case said, with regard to the placement of the driveway, it appears that the headlights from cars exiting the driveway will be pointing toward the houses across the street. He asked if the driveway could be relocated so it is not directly across from the houses. Franzen said they tried to align the church driveway so it would be opposite the driveway across the street. Case asked that Staff look at the placement of the driveway before the second reading. Dietz said headlights could cause a problem. Moving the driveway to the lot line would be a possibility. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to adopt Resolution No. 2000-184 for PUD Concept Review on 4.98 acres; and approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers on 4.98 acres Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.68 acres, and Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 3.3 acres; and adopt Resolution No. 2000- 185 for a Preliminary Plat on 4.98 acres into 1 lot; and direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Staff and Board recommendations. Motion carried 5-0. D. PIRZADEH/SAFINIA REZONING by Nooshin Pirzadeh and Farhad Safinia. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on .51 acres. Location: 9610 Franlo Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change) Enger said official notice of this public hearing was published in the October 26, 2000,Eden Prairie News and sent to 45 property owners. Franzen explained that, considering the simplicity of the project, staff would give the presentation. This is a rezoning of a single-family lot from Rural to R1-13.5 located at 9610 Franlo Road. The owners requested a building addition to the house that could not meet the side yard setbacks for the Rural Zoning District. The Community Planning Board voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council at its October 9, 2000 meeting. Mayor Harris asked if anyone wished to address the rezoning of this property. No one did. MOTION: Butcher moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to approve the 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to R 1-13.5 on .51 acres. Motion carried 5-0. E. ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE 142-UNIT SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT ON BEHALF OF SCF ROLLING HILLS,LLC CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 12 Enger said the developer has requested a continuance until the November 21, 2000 City Council meeting to allow time to complete and submit all the necessary bond documents for staff review. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher, to continue the Public Hearing until the November 21, 2000 City Council meeting. Motion carried 5-0. F. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR APPROVAL OF 2000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (Resolution No. 2000-186) Enger said official notice of this public hearing was published in the October 19, 2000 Eden Prairie News. Al Gray referred to two improvement projects — Lincoln Lane and Forest Hills Road—for which special assessments have been identified, numerous trunk sewer and water assessments, a few connection fees, and some lateral sewer and water assessments included in three old properties that were excluded for five years. There are also a few assessments for grass-cutting and delinquent utility bills to be assessed. Mayor Harris said the Council has received detail on the special assessments.. She asked if anyone wished to speak to the special assessments. John Mallo, 14000 Forest Hill Road, said he has been billed for $834. Forest Hill Road is a cul de sac and he didn't believe he should have to share in the cost of development at the end of the cul de sac when nothing has been added in front of • his property. In 1998 the Council ordered Staff to do a feasibility study on Forest Hill Road. He thought the work could have been done in conjunction with Candace Lane in September 1999. However, the feasibility study was not completed until February 2000. Soil has washed down the street making it muddy. Al Gray combined the work with the Lincoln Lane project, saving money for those residents, rather than combining it with Candace Lane. The residents of Forest Hill Road are being asked to pay an additional nine percent for City services. Gray responded there were significant delays at the beginning of this project. The east end of Forest Hills Road had never been completed. Storm sewer needed to be connected to Forest Hills Road. Therefore, it wasn't possible to do the Candace Lane project with Forest Hills Road. Only one bid was received for the Forest Hills Road project, so it was delayed until 2000 to look for more competitive bids. There was a much more competitive bidding situation in 2000. • The City tried to make an equitable distribution of the cost. The four easterly lots are paying the highest share of the project. • MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher, to close the public hearing, and adopt Resolution No. 2000-186 approving all Special Assessments presented in the fall of 2000. Motion carried 5-0. la CITY COUNCIL M NUTES November 7,2000 Page 13 VI I. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Butcher, Case, Thorfmnson,Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting"aye." IX. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. PIRZADEH/SAFINIA REZONING by Nooshin Pirzadeh and Farhad Safinia. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on .51 acres. Location: 9610 Franlo Road. (2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change) This is a rezoning of a single-family lot from Rural to R1-13.5 located at 9610 Franlo Road. MOTION: Thorfmnson moved, seconded by Case,to approve the 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on .51 acres. Motion carried 5-0. X. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. PETITION SUPPORTING CITY RETAINING OWNERSHIP OF THE SMITH DOUGLAS MORE HOUSE Enger said that the City has received a petition urging the City Council to retain ownership of the Smith Douglas More House and its development as an attraction open to the public. He suggested the Council include the petition along with the results of the Community Forum and Survey in its consideration of the disposition of the Smith Douglas More House. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher, to receive the petition in support of retaining ownership of the Smith Douglas More House; and direct Staff to include petition background information along with the results of the Community Forum/Survey and the recommendations of the Heritage Preservation Commission in the "Adaptive Reuse" Report to the City Council in their consideration of the disposition of the Smith Douglas More House in 2001. Motion carried 5-0. B. REQUEST FOR SUPPORT AND PRESENTATION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FROM FRIENDS OF BIRCH ISLAND WOODS Enger said the City has a request from Friends of Birch Island Woods. Jerry Westerman, representing the Friends of Birch Island Woods, said they are requesting the City Council to direct City Staff to assist in preparing a joint presentation to the County General Government Committee to demonstrate an "overriding public purpose" to the Committee to grant a no-cost conveyance of 13 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 14 Birch Island Woods to Eden Prairie. The group has a power-point presentation plus written material. They are asking for any supplemental material and statistical information the City has that could be used in the presentation. They are also asking that the Council approve having at least one Councihnember and a City Staff person attend the meeting, expected to be held before the General Government Committee on November 28. The group also wants to prepare a contingency plan if a resolution is not reached before the County's December 31 deadline. Mayor Harris said the Friends of Birch Island Woods have done a marvelous job, and the City certainly shares a common goal with them. The City is in active, ongoing discussions with County Staff and County Commissioner Randy Johnson, and the City is optimistic that a resolution can be reached before November 28. She wondered how best to provide limited support. Enger said if the Council wanted to lend some support to this private effort, it would be important for Council to retain control and direction of City Staff and not allow a private group to direct Staff It is necessary to determine how the County would view any alignment with private citizens, in light of the discussions the City is having with Randy Johnson and members of his staff The City's direction has been more of a partnership with the County; i.e., how the City can work with the County to resolve this. It is important to look at what the City's most effective role is in working with the County. Butcher said she agreed with the importance of continuing the negotiations with the County,but wondered if there is some way the City could support the group. Enger said he has been extremely impressed with the work of the Friends of Birth Island Woods. Their request,though subtle, is for solidarity with them. Tyra-Lukens said it seems the County is well aware that a citizens' group is working on this. She said it was not clear how working with them would cause a problem. This would just be a joint presentation and should not cause a problem if parameters are put around it. Mayor Harris said her concern is divergence of strategies. The City is involved in negotiations and trying to get a"win-win" situation, so the City gets what it wants but it is also willing to offer something in the process. She did not want to close any doors. Ms. Westerman said the group's proposed motion deals with a conveyance to the City at no cost or at less than the appraised value and allows for flexibility. She understood negotiations between the City and County are private. The timing of those negotiations is such that if the presentation should be necessary on November 28, it would be because negotiations with the City have not been successful. (9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 15 Enger said, based on conversations the City has had with the County, it would be timely for the Council to request an extension of the deadline from the County. Everything seems to be working together and it is hard to believe the County would feel threatened or disadvantaged by that. If the Council directs, he would request there be an extension. If Councilmembers or City Staff show up and present a different point of view, there could be confusion as to what the City's position is. Mayor Harris wondered what kind of support the group needs. If the City has some information,it could provide whatever data would be useful to them. Tom Casey, attorney for the Friends of Birch Island Woods, said that because this has been going on for such a long time, he believed asking for an extension of the deadline unilaterally would be a mistake. He didn't see any problem with a joint presentation to the County. The reason for the presentation is to demonstrate an "overriding public purpose" for conveying the woods to Eden Prairie at no cost. A unified public effort might be helpful to save the taxpayers' money. He did not believe a joint effort would put them in an adversarial position. Thorfinnson said he was concerned about the joint effort. Going to the County and presenting this "overriding public purpose" to them flies in the face of negotiations and the partnership the City is working on. He suggested Council request an extension of the deadline and offer to give the group assistance in preparing a position. Mayor Harris said she would leave it to the City Manager to decide what help the City Staff can give the Friends of Birch Island Woods. Enger said he would not send a Councilmember and/or City Staff member to go along with the group when they make their presentation. He would have City Staff give them whatever information is available. He would also get a request before the County Board as soon as possible for an extension of the deadline. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher, to receive the request from the Friends of Birch Island Woods; that the City, through the City Manager, assist in giving them information and help in the preparation of their presentation, and that Staff resources be allocated accordingly; and to ask Hennepin County for an extension of the December 31, 2000 deadline of up to six months, to go before the County Board as soon as possible,with a response requested by November 28, 2000. Motion carried 5-0. C. RED ROCK POND PETITION Dietz explained that a petition was received from the neighborhood adjoining Red Rock Pond. They are petitioning the City Council to investigate why the pond area adjacent to their back yards has "dried up." If it cannot be resolved, they request some property tax relief due to the loss of the amenity. It is recommended I5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 16 that Council refer the matter to City Staff for review, with a report and recommendations due back to City Council at the second meeting in January. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to receive the Petition from Red Rock Neighborhood regarding ponding conditions and refer to Staff for further study with a report due back to City Council at the second meeting in January. Mayor Harris referenced the Birch Island water that started to disappear. She asked if there was ever any explanation as to why it disappeared. Lambert said there was a study but nothing was ever proven. Dietz said the contention was that it had to do with the road project. Motion carried 5-0. XI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS XII. APPOINTMENTS A. APPOINTMENT TO PROGRAM BOARD Enger said Susan Oswald has expressed interest in filling the position vacated by Mary Cofer on the Program Board. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher, to appoint to the Community Program Board Susan Oswald—her term to expire March 31, 2002. Motion carried 5-0. XIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Report of Councilmember Case re Safety Condition on Pioneer Trail Case said reconfiguring of the lanes on Pioneer Trail was recently completed in front of his house. Since then, when drivers going west come over the hill,they are going into the turn lane to pass other cars. It is illegal to pass in the turn lane and it is also very dangerous, as there doesn't appear to be enough time for drivers to see oncoming traffic coming over the hill. Dietz introduced Randy Newton,the new traffic engineer, and said he will have him look into that issue. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. FAA Preliminary Review of MAC Part 161 Study Regarding Nighttime Restrictions at Flying Cloud Airport /( CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 17 Enger referenced a memo from Scott Kipp regarding the September 27, 2000 letter from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), outlining its preliminary review of the MAC's Part 161 Study for the nighttime operational restrictions proposed at Flying Cloud Airport. From the letter it appears the FAA is probably not in favor of allowing a restriction in nighttime use of the airport. The FAA believes it may be discriminatory to a certain type of aircraft. A future review by the FAA of Ordinance 51 may result in a similar conclusion. Enger said he was working for the City at the time when Ordinance 51 was adopted and MAC said it was not certain it would withstand a legal challenge. The review by the FAA could result in overturning of Ordinance 51. The Flying Cloud Advisory Commission met on November 1 and reviewed the letter and are interested in obtaining the results of conversations that will be held between MAC and the FAA regarding he results of MAC's request for the nighttime ban and the standing of Ordinance 51. The Advisory Commission will consider calling an emergency meeting following those discussions to determine a course of action. The EIS prepared by MAC does not include an alternative if Ordinance 51 was not in place. There could be an impact in terms of the noise level. Staff will be following this closely. City Attorney Ric Rosow was in attendance at the Flying Cloud Advisory Commission meeting and will be attending all meetings held in the immediate future. City Attorneys Rosow and Pauly have been in conversation and reviewing the letter from the FAA for several weeks. Pauly said if Ordinance 51 is challenged successfully and if it cannot be amended;then obviously the present approved EIS would not be adequate and would require revisions. The City would have to examine potential noise from the airport without those constraints. Case said he wanted to underscore that if Ordinance 51 is found to be in non-compliance, the potential is not for just more noise but also for scheduled airline and freight carriers using the airport. The runway would support freight up to 30,000 pounds per wheel, which would basically allow freight carried by smaller-size aircraft and, additionally, the potential for aircraft carrying up to 10 passengers. Enger said it is clear that it would not be in the City's best interest for Ordinance 51 to be overturned. This has been the ordinance that has been effective in keeping some control over the airport for the past number of years. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 18 Mayor Harris said Council would receive the letter from the FAA and will track the process. C. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Round Lake Water Quality Program Update Lambert said on June 6, 2000, the City Council authorized staff to enter into a contract with Greener Pastures Development Corporation to treat Round Lake during the summer of 2000. At that time, Greener Pastures was relatively certain they would be able to obtain a permit within "a few days." The City was notified on August 22 that the experimental treatment of Round Lake and upstream storm water detention basins within the City was approved. By this time, staff determined that it was too late in the season to determine how effective the products were at biologically reducing nutrient levels in the lake and detention ponds. Staff is recommending proceeding with the use of these products in the spring of 2001 and opening the beach for public use during normal times of mid-June until the end of August. Staff recommends transferring the unused operational funds for 2000 to the 2001 budget to fund this project; and further recommends the City request the Watershed District to consider assisting in the funding of this project. MOTION: Butcher moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to authorize staff to enter into a contract with Greener Pastures Development Corporation, Inc. to treat Round Lake and the detention ponds directly serving Round Lake to bring the water quality to a TSI reading of 38 or less by September 1, 2001; and further to petition the Riley/Purgatory Creek/Bluff Watershed District to consider sharing the cost of this pollution-reduction effort and conducting a water quality monitoring before, during, and after treatment in the summer of 2001. Motion carried 5-0. 2. Settler's Ridge Tree Removal&Mitigation Report—Phase II Lambert said there have been additional problems at Settler's Ridge,.with additional tree removal that was illegal and grading that didn't follow the grading plan, causing potential erosion problems. The developer has agreed to mitigate the problems, and this is underway at the present time. 3. Proposed Skate Board Park at Round Lake Park Lambert said at the September 13,2000 meeting,the Community Program Board recommended that the City Council consider development of a skateboard park within the park system, to be funded from cash park fees. On October 18 the Community Planning Board recommended approval of a site within Round Lake Park for the development of a skateboard park. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 19 MOTION: Butcher moved, seconded by Case, to approve development of a skate board park within Round Lake Park to be funded from cash park fees. Tyra-Lukens asked if potential users of the skate board park are going to be included in the planning process. Lambert said they are. Staff will invite interested middle school- and high school-age children to a planning session, tell them about the potential equipment that can be purchased and let them select the components they want to have. Motion carried 5-0. 4. Recommendation for Maintenance of Peony Garden Lambert said earlier this year Council requested Staff to provide bids for maintenance of the peony garden at the Cummins Grill House. City staff contacted four firms to obtain quotes and one firm offered a bid, Gray Gardens Landscape. This firm specializes in flower garden maintenance. Their quote, in the amount of$8,000, details the work that is needed for the next two years to improve the quality and condition of this garden. Staff would anticipate a cost of approximately$2,500 per year to maintain the garden after 2002. Case asked if this information had been reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) and John Gertz. Lambert replied it had not, because the request was received from the Council to come up with a maintenance plan. However, it has been discussed with John Gertz and the Minnesota Historical Society. The Historical Society suggested leaving the garden intact the way it is now because it is considered a historical feature of the site. Case said he believed it should at least be reviewed by the HPC after approval by the Council, so they know what the Council has decided and that it is within the parameters of HPC's expectations. Enger said it would be appropriate for Council to make that direction and to make clear what it wants the HPC to look at. No money is budgeted for maintenance of the garden. The Council has to decide where, when or how this can be funded, and that will be part of the whole budget effort the City and Council will be working on the first part of next year. Staff is suggesting this quote for maintenance should be considered along with other adaptive reuse maintenance requests for the historic sites, at which time the Council will consider whether or not to fund it. In the meantime, it is appropriate for the HPC to review the quote and look at it with the other recommendations it has made for historic properties. Case said it belongs in the budget with other parts of the Adaptive Reuse Plan, and should not be considered separately. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7,2000 Page 20 Enger said Council will decide whether or not all three historic properties can be funded. Council is considering how and if it would fund to that level. One consideration is whether or not to lease or sell the Smith Douglas More House. How much it is leased or sold for will determine whether there would be any other expenses involved with that house and if money could be moved toward maintenance of the other two houses. The maintenance of the peony garden is just $8,000 more that should be considered as part of the renovation and/or maintenance of all historic homes. Mayor Harris said the Chair of the HPC brought the matter of the peony garden to Council's attention. All the historic homes should be considered as a group in the budget. Case said the HPC is responsible for delineated historic properties. The Council is deciding something about one of those properties in isolation, without input from the HPC. Mayor Harris said the HPC is not responsible for the budget; the Council is. She said the peony garden will be looked at along with the costs of maintaining all the other historic properties. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to include the evaluation of the maintenance of the peony garden in the development of a funding plan for the renovation, maintenance and restoration of the historic sites based upon review of the Adaptive Reuse Plan and the City Survey. Motion carried 5-0. D. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIV. OTHER BUSINESS XV. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Thorfinnson moved to adjourn the meeting. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 11:35 p.m. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar November 21,2000 SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Clerk's License Application List &Financial Services/ -Gretchen Laven A , These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Private Kennel Julie Savalas (Dogs) • November 21,2000 - 1 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 21, 2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar • SERVICE AREA/DIVIS N: ITEM DESCRIPTION: LC. 00-5516 ITEM NO.: Public Works Services Supplemental Agreement for Professional Eugene A. Dietz Services with TKDA for Water Utility Storage V I �• Building Requested Action Move to: Approve a Supplemental Agreement for Professional Services with TKDA for the Water Utility Vehicle Storage Building for an estimated combined amount of $22,800 and authorize the Mayor and Manager to execute the document. Synopsis City Council authorized a Professional Services Agreement in July, 2000 for improvements to the north end of the Water Utility Vehicle Storage Building (salvaged end of the former Maintenance Facility). The vision at that time was to merely add a new surface to the north end of the building to cover the repair work done as a result of demolition of the northerly two-thirds of the former Parks/Public Works Maintenance Facility. Due to the prominence of the location in relationship to new TH 212 and the Mitchell Road Bridge, staff recommends that a more sophisticated design be performed. Background Information Due to the prominence of the location of this building and the visual impact that it will have from new TH 212 and especially from the Mitchell Road Bridge, staff is recommending that the level of design detail be increased for the Utility Vehicle Storage Building. City Council will recall that MnDOT purchased the entire building from the City and reconveyed the southerly 10,000 square feet at no cost, but our responsibility was to implement a new architectural exterior on the north end of the building. The original plan called for simply covering the block work and painting the north end of the building. This revised plan will essentially resurface the entire north and west exterior of the building to more closely match the architecture of the Water Treatment Plant. In addition, the roof on the Vehicle Building needs to be replaced. Financial Considerations This amendment to the TKDA Professional Services Agreement would increase the original estimated fee of$12,000 to a total contract amount of $22,800. Payment for these fees would be made from the Utility Enterprise Fund, as would any future cost associated with the actual improvement. Sfaff recommends approval of the Supplemental Agreement as attached. Attachments Supplemental Agreement No. 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 Between CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA and TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED • for ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES RELATED TO THE EXTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WATER UTILITY VEHICLE STORAGE BUILDING This SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 made and entered into this day of ,2000,by and between the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,hereinafter referred to as the OWNER, and TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, a corporation with a regular place of business at 444 Cedar Street,Suite 1500,St.Paul,Minnesota 55101,hereinafter referred to as TKDA, WITNESSETH : WHEREAS,the OWNER previously engaged TKDA to provide Architectural Services in connection with Exterior Architectural Improvements to the Water Utility Vehicle • Storage Building,hereinafter referred to as the Project,which engagement was formalized in a Professional Services Agreement dated July 11,2000,referred to hereinafter as the Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, the OWNER and TKDA,for the consideration hereinafter named, agree to amend the Agreement by and through this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 as hereinafter stated: I. SECTION I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION,replace the entire section with the following: "The Project includes preparation of Construction Documents for Exterior Architectural Improvements to the building. Improvements on the north and west walls of the building consists of application of a brick veneer finish, adding a standing seam metal roof cap, and addition of an Exterior Insulation Finish System(EIFS)accents. The south and east walls will be cleaned and painted. Existing light fixtures will be replaced on the north and west sides. A retaining wall will be added to correct grading problems on the north side. A new roofing membrane system will be installed over the existing insulation,with added insulation only as required to achieve proper drainage. Landscape planting of trees and/or shrubs will be by the OWNER." SA-1--1 a. r IL SECTION II - SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY TKDA,make the following changes: A. Add the following items to Paragraph F: "• Site Plan • Roof Plan • Sections and Details" B. In Paragraph H,change the quantity of documents from six(6)to twenty(20). III. SECTION VI - PERIOD OF SERVICE,change the period of service from 8 weeks to five(5)months. IV. SECTION VII - COMPENSATION,change the total estimated compensation from $12,000 to$22,800. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED By By # 1"1 Richard N. Sobiech,P.E. President By • By • Dean A.John o Director of chitecture SA123 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar November 21,2000 SERVICE ITEM DESCRIPTION: AREA/DIVISION• Municipal Waste Abatement Incentive Fund Grant Public Works Applications for Multi-Family Recycling ITEM NO.: Leslie Stovring Education and for Production of an Educational �( C, Video on Recycling Requested Action Move to: Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign two Municipal Waste Abatement Incentive Fund Grant Applications with Hennepin County.in the combined amount of$33,872. Synopsis • Two Municipal Waste Abatement Incentive Fund Grant Applications have been prepared for submittal to Hennepin County. One is aimed at improved multi-family recycling in Eden Prairie and the second is production of an educational video on recycling. The video will be aimed at children in grades 3 through 7 for use at the Environmental Learning Center. The video will also be used in a"traveling recycling education trunk"which is being proposed under a separate grant application through the City of Plymouth in coordination with other west suburban Cities,including Eden Prairie. Matching funds will be required but are limited to approximately 65 hours of in-kind time spent on the projects by the Environmental Coordinator on both projects and$7,842 or in-kind time spent by Hamline University on the Educational Video. Applications are due November 30,2000. Background In 1999 the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners established a Municipal Waste Abatement . Incentive Fund in the amount of$100,000. The intent of the fund is to increase residential waste abatement rates. The applications must fall into one of the following categories or objectives. • Source Separated Organic Composting Project or Pilot Project • Curbside Recycling Innovation and Efficiency Projects • Improved Multi-Family Recycling Program • Increased Waste Reduction through Promotion of Waste and Toxicity Reduction • Increased Education for Residents in Addition to the City's Normal Program Promotions Two grant applications are being submitted. They include: • Eden Prairie Multi-Family Recycling&Education Initiative Application—The project will consist of hiring an intern to assist the Environmental Coordinator in broadening the City's efforts to increase recycling awareness in the City. The main focus of the work effort will be to collect information on multi-family contacts,current multi-family recycling policies,contamination issues and multi-cultural needs among others. Educational materials would be prepared which would focus on the needs identified. The grant request is for$7,474 with a$852 match by the City for a total project cost of$8,326. • Eden Prairie Recycling Education Video Production and Educational Workshop for Eden Prairie Educators—Hamline University's Center for Global Environmental Education will partner with the I Municipal Waste Abatement Incentive Fund Grant Applications November 21,2000 _ Page 2 of 2 - City for production of a new educational video ("Big Foot")focusing-on our"ecological footprint" and our impact on this footprint through the waste we produce. The video will be used at the Environmental Learning Center as well as for metro-wide distribution in a proposed multi-City "Traveling Recycling Education Trunk"for use in area schools. Harnline will also develop a two- day workshop based on the video for educators. Twenty local Eden Prairie teachers will be able to get one credit of graduate credit for attending and completing the workshop coursework. The grant request is for$26,398 with a$7,842 match by Hamlin University and$994 match by the City for a total project cost of$35,044. All matching funds for the City are staff time, no other out of pocket expenses are proposed. Staff salary for these projects will be taken from recycling funds received through another Hennepin County • Grant process. Attachments • Municipal Waste Abatement Incentive Fund Grant Applications • • • • c.� • Municipal Waste Abatement Incentive Fund Grant Application Form—2000 Application Due—5:00 p.m., Friday,December 1,2000 Mail Signed Copy to: Dan Ruiz Hennepin County Dept. of Environmental Services 417 N. 5th St.,Suite 200 Minneapolis,MN 55401-1309 E-mail Copy(if possible)to: dan.ruiz@co.hennepin.mn.us Applicant Information: • • Municipality: City of Eden Prairie Contact Person: Leslie A. Stowing Title: Environmental Coordinator Address: Engineering Dept., 8080 Mitchell Road City, State,Zip: Eden Prairie,MN 55344—4485 Phone: 952-949-8327 Fax: 952-949-8390 E-Mail: lstovring@ci.eden-prairie.mn.us Grant Request: $7,474 Matching Funds: $852 Total Project Cost: $8,326 Authorizing Signature: The signature of a person who has the authority to enter into a contract with Hennepin County on behalf of the municipality(Mayor, City Manager/Administrator/Clerk). Name(Typed or Printed): Christopher M. Enger,City Manager Signature: ' Title: • Project Title: Eden Prairie Multi-Family Recycling Information&Education Initiative • Project Description: Please provide a brief, one page or less,project description. The project description should address any ' project collaborators, the timeline in which the project will be completed, the expected outcome of the project and the key individuals participating in project activities. • The project will consist of hiring an intern to assist the Environmental Coordinator in broadening the City's efforts to increase recycling awareness in the City. It is anticipated that the project will begin with hiring. the intern in January or February with completion within 6-month period. The expected outcome is increased understanding of what the multi-family housing within the City is doing for recycling as well as reasons why they may not be doing differing recycling activities. A number of residents within these units have called to inquire about the availability of recycling, leading us to believe there may be units which have decreased the number of items which residents can set out for recycling. The outcome will also include targeted educational materials for individual units. This proposal includes some of these materials, including mailing brochures,posters,a web site article on recycling for the City and newsletter articles. • At this time, the City of Eden Prairie has little interaction with the multi-family housing units in town on recycling issues. There is little data and no educational resources from the City that are aimed at our residents within multi-family housing. The City of Eden Prairie proposes to develop a contact database of all the apartment complexes and townhome associations within the City that do communal recycling. This will include collecting information on the estimated number of residents within each complex or association. 3 Once the contact information is gathered, a survey will be developed for each multi-family complex on recycling issues that they feel need to be addressed for their specific complex. We estimate that 50 to 60 apartments and townhome associations will be contacted. This would include gathering information on multi-cultural needs, education needs, contamination problems, among others. The intern would set up direct contact meetings with each apartment manager or association board to ensure that the surveys are completed accurately and fully. This information will be starting point for developing educational tools aimed at representative populations within these areas, specific to Eden Prairie needs and issues. For this project application,we anticipate that two (2) educational brochures and four(4) different high-quality, full color posters would be developed for copying and distribution to the residents and for posting at the apartment complexes. We would develop the posters so that other Cities within the Metropolitan Area could utilize the graphics for production of their own posters. One of the educational brochures will be completed by March 15th for distribution at our Environmental Fair on March 19th. We also anticipate that two (2) articles will be prepared for print in apartment or association newsletters. One article will also be prepared for posting on the City's website on recycling issues in relation to multi-family housing. We will also assess the need for development of additional educational materials for the future, such as development of a recycling bag distribution program. Project Budget: • Provide a detailed budget including expenses for staff,printing, copying, mailing, equipment, materials, etc. If the project cost is over$25,000,you must identify the nature and source of matching funds. The main cost associated with this project will be for the intern and for graphic reproduction of the brochures and posters. The following table outlines the cost estimate for these items. Items in italics are the proposed matching amounts by the City. TASK STAFF HOURS RATE TOTAL Contact Database Development Intern 60 $10 $600 Survey Preparation Intern 30 $10 $300 Survey Preparation Env. Coordinator 10 $28.40 $284 Survey Data Collection/Meetings Intern 120 $10 $1200 Survey Data Analysis/Follow-ups Intern 40 $10 $400 Survey Data Analysis Env. Coordinator 5 $28.40 $142 Brochure/Article/Poster Writing Intern 60 $10 $600 Brochure/Article/Poster Writing Env. Coordinator 15 $28.40 $426 •Web Site Article Preparation Env.Coordinator 10 $28.40 $284 Preparation of Poster Graphics* Graphics Artist 4 poster masters $300/ea "$1200 Poster—Copying* Graphic Artist 6 copies of each $100/ea $2400 Brochure—Copying Copy Center 3000 copies $0.10/ea $300 Distribution of Brochures/Posters Intern 50 $10 $100 TOTAL $8,326 * Costs based on similar posters/educational plaques being prepared for the Environmental Learning Center by a graphic artist. This cost assumes that the Intern and the Environmental Coordinator will prepare the text and the graphic artist will be preparing the graphics and master poster and copies only. City ofEden Prairie Multi Family Recycling Information&Education Initiative Page 2 of 2 Municipal Waste Abatement Incentive Fund Grant Application Form—2000 Application Due—5:00 p.m.,Friday,December 1, 2000 Mail Signed Copy to: Dan Ruiz Hennepin County Dept. of Environmental Services 417 N. 5th St., Suite 200 Minneapolis,MN 55401-1309 • • E-mail Copy(if possible)to: dan.ruiz@co.hennepin.mn.us Applicant Information: Municipality: City of Eden Prairie • Contact Person: Leslie A. Stovring Title: Environmental Coordinator Address: Engineering Dept., 8080 Mitchell Road City, State,Zip: Eden Prairie,MN 55344—4485 Phone: 952-949-8327 Fax: 952-949-8390 E-Mail: lstovringna ci.eden-prairie.mn.us Grant Request:_$26,398 Matching Funds: $8,837 Total Project Cost: $35,044 Authorizing Signature: The signature of a person who has the authority to enter into a contract with Hennepin County on behalf of the municipality (Mayor, City Manager / Administrator / Clerk). • Name(Typed or Printed): Christopher M. Enger • Signature: Title: City Manager Project Title: Eden Prairie"Big Foot"Educational Video Project Project Description: Please provide a brief, one page or less, project description. The project description should address any project collaborators, the timeline in which the project will be completed, the expected outcome of the project and the key individuals participating in project activities. The "Big Foot" video production will be a collaboration between Hamlin University's Center for • Global Environmental Education (CGEE) and the City of Eden Prairie. Key individuals will include John Shepard, CGEE Assistant Director, and Leslie Stovring, Eden Prairie Environmental Coordinator. Students from the Eden Prairie School District will be solicited for the video to give it a greater "kid appeal." It is anticipated that the video will be approximately 5 to 7 minutes in length. We anticipate that the script writing and review will begin in January 2001 with shooting of the video sequences to occur during the summer of 2001. Final editing is projected to be completed by September 2001 with a video premier event to be held in October 2001. The premier event will include invitations for all metro area Recycling Coordinators as well as local educators. The event �.J will be will be held at the City's Environmental Learning Center during after-school hours and a light dinner will be served. Hamline University will also be developing coursework based on the video to give local teachers the opportunity to get one-semester graduate credit. The coursework will be presented during a two-day workshop for 20 educators. The educators would be able to register for one semester graduate credit through Hamline University. It is anticipated that the course will be held in the Fall of 2001. The video will be aimed at grades four through nine. The "Big Foot" video will focus on the average American's "ecological footprint" and how that is related to the resources we consume and the waste that we produce. Currently, Americans need approximately 25 acres to support our current lifestyle,while Canadians need 25% less and Italians need 60% less. With a projected global population of 10 billion for the year 2050, the anticipated footprint available for each individual is only 3 acres. Instruction in areas of resource conservation and waste reduction is becoming critical for the current generation in order to reduce the typical American's footprint to a size more in line with projected future availability. The video will aim to introduce the concept of the ecological footprint and educate Eden Prairie students and citizens about ecological impacts of daily lifestyle choices. Key strategies for reducing consumption,material reuse,and recycling for home and school will be introduced. The video will be shot in a location-generic format so that School Districts outside of Eden Prairie would be able to utilize the video in their classrooms. For example,the video could be used by area Recycling Coordinators for guest speaking engagements at schools. Project Budget: Provide a detailed budget including expenses for staff,printing, copying, mailing, equipment, materials, etc. If the project cost is over $25,000, you must identify the nature and source of matching funds. The following table outlines the cost estimate for this scope of work. Hamline University's Center for Global Environmental Education (CGEE) will be a subcontractor for the City of Eden Prairie. The City intends on handling all billings and payments for the video production and course development. A separate check would not need to be submitted to Hamline University for this project. Matching funds will be split between Hamline University ($7,842) and the City, of Eden Prairie($994). TASK ITEM/STAFF UNITS CST/ CGEE CITY IUD TOTAL Video Pre Production Env.Coordinator 15 hrs $28.40 0 $284 $142 $426 Producer 70 hrs • $35 $1,838 $612 $2,450 Location Scouting 36 hrs. $35 $1,050 $210 $1.260 Research/Scripting 98 hrs $35 $2,573 $857 $3,430 Talent Audition 10 hrs. $35 $268 $92 $360 Video Production Env.Coordinator 20 hrs. $28.40 0 $284 $284 . $568 Producer 80 hrs. $35 $2,100 $700 $2,800 Camera crew(3) 40 hrs. $150 $5,000 $1,000 $6,000 • Student Actors 6 actors $100 0 $600 0 $600 Expenses (mileage, Lump sum $500 $500 0 0 $500 • postage,etc.) Video Post-Production Env. Coordinator 10 hrs. $28.40 0 $142 $142 $284 /Editing Producer ' 36 hrs. $35 $945 0 $315 $1,260 Editing 60 hrs. $100. $5,000 0 $1,000 $6,000 Computer Graphics 20 hrs $75 $1,125 0 $375 $1,500 Sound Studio Lump sum $250 $250 0 0 $250 Music Lump sum $500 $500 .0 0 $500 Video Premier Event Project Manager 5 hrs. $35 0 0 $175 $175 Env.Coordinator 5 hrs. $28.40 0 $142 0 $142 Catering for 40 40 guests $10 0 $400 0 $400 guests Workshop Project Manager 100 hrs. $30 $2,250 $0 $750 $3,000 Development Env.Coordinator 5 hrs. $28.40 0 0 $284 $284 Workshop Delivery Faculty(2) 18 hrs. $35 $473 0 . $157 $630 Env. Coordinator 10 hrs. $28.40 0 $142 $142 $284 1 Graduate Credit for Hamline University 20 $160 $1,600 0 $1,600 $3,200 20 teachers teachers TOTAL $25,472 $1,426 $8,837 $35,044 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 21, 2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 01-5524 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Professional Services Agreement for the Design of Randy Newton the TH 212/Shady Oak Road HOV Slip Ramp -EC ' Requested Action Move to: Approve Professional Services Agreement with SRF Consulting Group, Inc., for the TH 212 / Shady Oak Road High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Slip Ramp and authorize the field survey and soil exploration work to begin immediately. Synopsis The TH 212 / Shady Oak Road HOV Slip Ramp is intended to give significant time savings to HOV's accessing northbound TH 212 from the Golden Triangle Area. In order to meet a self imposed spring 2001 construction deadline the field survey and soil exploration work for the project must be completed prior to significant snow accumulation. This portion of the design work is being requested for authorization in advance of a formal agreement with MnDOT for the entire project. Background Information The City of Eden Prairie is currently participating in a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) demonstration project in the Golden Triangle Area(GTA). Through this project the TH 212/Shady Oak Road HOV Slip Ramp has been identified as an important element in reducing the congestion in the GTA. The slip ramp,by giving a significant time savings to HOV's,will give GTA employees a viable option for dealing with the congestion. Also,by encouraging HOV usage the slip ramp should result in increased vehicle occupancy and decreased congestion. The City is currently pursuing a formal agreement with Mn/DOT for the design and construction of this project. In order to meet a self imposed spring 2001 construction deadline the field survey and soil exploration work for the project must be completed prior to significant snow accumulation. No additional design work will be approved until a signed agreement with Mn/DOT is obtained. Financial Implications • The HOV Slip Ramp is estimated.to cost approximately $500,000 plus $51,450 for design services (approximately $550,000 total). The field survey and soil exploration costs are estimated at.$8,450 and are included in the design costs. The City of Eden Prairie and Mn/DOT currently have a basis of understanding for the design and construction of the slip ramp. The understanding states that the City will be responsible for the design costs and will apply an additional $50,000 to the construction of the slip ramp. Total cost to the City for this project is approximately $100,000. Mn/DOT will be responsible for the remainder of the construction costs and for the contract administration. City staff is currently pursuing a formal agreement for this project with Mn/DOT. Attachment Professional Services Agreement Pli CONSULTING GROUP , INC . Transportation■Civil•Structural•Environmental■Planning■Traffic■Landscape Architecture■Parking November 6,2000 . Mr.Randy Newman,P.E. Traffic Engineer CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8080 Mitchell Road, Suite 200B Eden Prairie,MN 55344-2230 Dear Mr.Newman: SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE TH 212/SHADY OAK ROAD HOV SLIP RAMP As requested, we are pleased to submit this proposal for Professional Services for design of the TH 212/Shady Oak Road HOV slip ramp. . The project, as we understand it, is to complete the final plans, specification and estimate in order to meet the desired letting date in May of 2001. Mn/DOT and the City of Eden Prairie have agreed to the concept of the slip ramp design. Mn/DOT is in the process of developing a staff-approved layout and project memorandum that will be the basis of our design. Mn/DOT has also delineated the wetland in the project area and will be obtaining all the wetland permits. Specific work tasks that we will complete on this project are as follows: . ■ Design level field surveys • Subsurface soil exploration(GME Consultants,Inc.) . • Preparation of fmal plans,specifications and estimate . -roadway . -ramp meters -lighting - . We propose to be compensated for our work on an hourly basis at the rates set forth in our existing agreement, for out-of-pocket expenses (reproduction, delivery, etc.) at cost, and for mileage not-to-exceed the IRS approved rate for business miles. One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 Telephone (763) 475-0010 ■ Fax (763) 475-2429 • http://www.srfconsulting.com An Equal Opportunity Employer Mr.Randy Newman,P.E. -2- November 6,2000 Based on our current understanding of the project and the work tasks to be completed, we estimate the cost of our services as follows: TASK ESTIMATED COST Field Surveys $ 4,500 Soil Exploration* $ 3,950 Final PS&E(Roadway) $35,000 Final PS&E(Ramp Meters) $ 3,000 Final PS&E(Lighting) $ 5,000 TOTAL $51,450 *GME Consultants,Inc. We will not exceed these figures without your approval. These costs were developed based on receiving the approved layout and project memorandum from Mn/DOT, and do not include any work for the proposed bus turnout, bus shelter or pedestrian underpass. It is also acknowledged that Mn/DOT will administer the construction contract and,provide all construction staking and inspection. The survey and soil exploration tasks must be completed prior to snowfall or the costs will be higher. The attached general conditions are incorporated into the Proposal and Professional Services Agreement. A signed copy of this proposal or separate letter of authorization will serve as notice to proceed. We will begin work immediately thereupon and will complete the project within a mutually agreed upon schedule. Because the work will be based on the preliminary layout and project memorandum being prepared by Mn/DOT, it is not possible to give a firmer schedule at this time. If you have questions or need additional information,please feel free to call. • Sincerely, SRF CONSULTING GROUP,INC. APPROVED: James R.Dvorak,P.E. Vice President Name JRD/bls Title Attachment Date 3 FEB 19 '99 17:06 TO:9-4752429 FROM:CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE T-182 P.02 GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1: PROJECT INFORMATION City andfor representatives of Utility Companies. 1.1 City will provide to Consultant all known information sECI ION 3: SAMPLES regarding existing and proposed conditions of the site or which affects the work to be performed by Consultant. Such 3.1 Consultant may retain at its Ti+Uty selected soil,water,or information shall include, but not be limited to site plans, material samples for a maximum of 30 days after completion of surveys, known hazardous waste or conditions, previous the work and submission of Consultant's report,which samples laboratory analysis results,written reports, soil boring logs shall remain the property of City. Unless otherwise directed by and applicable regulatory site response(Project Information). the City,Consultant may dispose of any samples after 30 days. 1.2 City will immediately transmit to Consultant any 3.2 Disposal of contaminated or hazardous waste samples is the additions,updates,or revisions to the Project Information as responsibility of City. After said 30 days,City will be responsible it becomes available to City,its subcontractors or consultants. to select and arrange for lawftd disposal procedures that include removal of samples from Consultant's custody and transporting 1.3 City will provide an on-site representative to Consultant them to a disposal site. City may request, or if City does not within 24 hours upon request, to aid,define, supervise, or arrange for disposal, Consultant may deliver samples to City, coordinate work or Project Information as requested by freight collect,or arrange for lawful disposal and bill City at cost Consultant. plus 15%. 1.4 Consultant will not be liable for any decision,conclusion, recommendations, judgement or advice based on any SECTION 4: FEE PAYMENT inaccurate information furnished by City, or other subconttactors or consultants engaged by City. 4.1 Consultant will submit invoices to City monthly,and a final invoice upon completion of work. Invoices will show charges SECTION 2: SITE LOCATION,ACCESS,PERMITS, based on the current Consultant Pee Schedule or other documents APPROVALS AND UTILITIES as attached. 2.1 City will indicate to Consultant the property lines of the 4.2 The balance stated on the invoice shall be deemed correct site and assume responsibility for accuracy of markers. unless City notifies Consultant,in writing,of the particular item that is alleged to be incorrect within ten (10) days from the 2.2 City will provide for right-of-way for Consultant invoice date. Consultant will review the alleged incorrect item personnel and equipment necessary to perform the work within ten(10)days and either submit a corrected invoice or a statement indicating the original amount is correct 2.3 City will be solely responsible for applying for and obtaining permits and approvals necessary for Consultant to 4.3 Payment is due upon receipt of invoice(or corrected invoice) perform the work. Consultant will assist City in applying for and is past due thirty-five(35)days from invoice date. On past and obtaining such permits and approvals as needed. It is due accounts,City will pay a finance charge of 1.5%per month understood that City authorizes Consultant to act as agent for on the unpaid balance, or the maximum allowed by law, City for City's responsibilities under tie section including whichever is less,until invoice is fully paid. signing certain forms on City's behalf such as Right-of-Way forms. 4.4 If City fails to pay Consultant within sixty (60) days following invoice date,Consultant may deem the default a breach 2.4 While Consultant will take reasonable precautions to of its agreement,terminate the agreement,and be relieved of any minimize any damage to property,it is understood by City that and all duties un1er the agreement City however,will not be in the normal course of the work some damage may occur. relieved of Pee Payment responsibilities by the default or . The correction of any damage is the responsibility of City or, termination of the agreement at City's direction,the damage may be corrected by Consultant and billed to City at'cost plus 15%; Notwithstanding the 4.5 City will be solely responsible for applying for and obtaining above,Consultant agrees to be responsible for damage caused any applicable compensation fund reimbursements from various by Consultant's negligence. state and federal programs. Consultant may assist City in applying for or meeting notification requirements, however, 2.5 City agrees to render reasonable assistance requested by Consultant makes no representations or guarantees as to what Consultant to enable performance of work without delay or fund reimbursement City may receive. Consultant shall not be interference, and upon request of Consultant, to provide a liable for any reductions from reimbursement programs made for suitable workplace. any reason by state or federal agencies,except as may be caused by Consultant's negligence. 2.6 City will be responsible for locating and identifying all subterranean structures and utilities. Consultant will take 4.6 City may withhold from any final payment due the reasonable precautions to avoid damage or injury to Consultant such amounts as are incurred or expended by the City subterranean structures and utilities identified and located by on account of the termination of the Contract FEB 19 '99 17:07 TO:9-4752429 FROM:CITY OF EDEN PRRIRIE T-182 P.03 Association then existing unless the parties mutually agree SECTION 5: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS otherwise. In the event any person shall commence an action in any court for any claim arising out of or relating tp this 5.1 Consultant will deliver to City certain reports as Agreement or the breach thereof or the Project or construction instruments of the professional work or services performed thereof or any contract for such construction,the party making a pursuant to this Agreement All reports are intended solely for claim in arbitration may dismiss such proceedings (unless the City,and Consultant will not be liable for any interpretations hearing on the claim has commenced)and elect to assert its claim made by others, in such action if such party could have done so but for the provisions of this Paragraph. 5.2 City agrees that all reports and other work furnished to City, or City's agents or representatives,which are not paid SECTION 7: STANDARD OP CARE for,will be returned to Consultant upon demand and will not be used by City for any purpose. 7.1 Because no sampling program can prove the non-existence or non-presence of contaminated conditions or materials 5.3 Unless otherwise agreed, Consultant will retain all throughout the"entire"site or facility,Consultant cannot warrant, pertinent records or reports concerning work and services represent,guarantee,or certify the non-existence or non-presence, performed for a period of at least two(2)years after report is or the extent of existence or presence,of contaminated conditions submitted. During that time the records will be made or materials,and City's obligation under this agreement will not available to City during Consultant's normal business hours. be contingent upon Consultant's delivery of any warranties, City may obtain reproducible copies of all software,manuals, representations,guarantees,or certifications. maps,drawings,logs anti reports at cost,plus 15%,for data and materials not being provided as part of the scope of work 7,2 Consultant's opinions,conclusions,recommendations,and for the project report will be prepared in accordance with the proposal,scope of work, and Limitations of Environmental Assessments and no 5,4 City may use the Consultant report in its entirety and may warranties,representations, guarantees, or certifications will be make copies of the entire report available to others. However, made. Except that Consultant warrants that hardware and City shall not make disclosure to others of any portions or software will perform as represented in proposal and other parts excerpts of a report constituting less than the entire report,or of this agreement to mislead others by omitting certain aspects contained in the report 7.3 Although data obtained from discrete sample locations will be used to infer conditions between sample locations no guarantee 5.5 Consultant will consider Project Information as may be given that the inferred conditions exist because soil, confidential and will not disclose to third parties information surface and groundwater quality conditions between sample that it acquires, uncovers, or generates in the course of locations may vary significantly,and because conditions at the performing the work,except as and to the extent Consultant brae of sample collection may also vary significantly with respect may, in its sole discretion, deem itself required by law to to soil,surfacewater and groundwater quality at any other given disclose. time and for other reasons beyond Consultant's control SECTION 6: DISPUTES 7.4 Consultant will not be responsible or liable for the 6.1 City will pay all reasonable litigation or collection interpretation of its data or report by others. expenses including attorney fees that Consultant incurs in collecting any delinquent amount City owes under this SECTION 8: GENERAL INDEMNIFICATION agreement 8.1 Consultant will indemnify and hold City harmless from and 6.2 If City institutes a suit against Consultant, which is against demands,damages,and expenses caused by Consultant's dismissed,dropped, or for which judgement is rendered for negligent acts and omissions,and breach of contact and those Consultant,City will pay Consultant for all costs of defense, acts,omissions,and breaches of persons for whom Consultant is including attorney fees,expert witness fees and court costs, legally responsible. City will indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses 6,3 If Consultant institutes a suit against City, which is caused by City's negligent acts and omissions, and breach of dismissed,dropped,or for which judgement is rendered for contract and those acts, omissions,and breaches of persons for City, Consultant will pay City for all costs of defense, whom City is legally responsible. including attorney fees,expert witness fees and court costs. SECTION 9: INSURANCE 6.4 At the option of the party asserting the same,all claims, disputes and other matters in question(hereinafter"claim") 9.1 Consultant shall procure and maintain insurance for between the parties to this Agreement, arising out of or protection from claims against it under workers compensation relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof whereby the acts in statutory amounts and public liability/property damage of party or parties asserting the same claims entitlement to not less than S1,000,000 per claim and$3,000,000 in aggregate. damages or payment of less than S25,000.00 in aggregate may be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration 9.2 Consultant shall procure and maintain professional liability 5 FEB 19 '99 17:08 TO:9-4752429 FROM:CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE T-182 P.04 • insurance for protection from claims arising out of (12%)per month or any part of a month to a Subcontractor on any professional services caused by any negligent act, error or undisputed amount not paid on time to the Subcontractor. The omission for which Consultant is legally liable. minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of$100.00 or more is$10.00. for an unpaid balance of less than 9.3 Certificate of insurance will be provided to City upon S100.00,the Consultant shall pay the actual amount due to the request. Subcontractor. SECTION 10: TERMINATION SECTION lit DATA PRACTICES ACT COMPLIANCE 10.1 The agreement between Consultant and City may be terminated by either party upon thirty(30)days written notice. 17.1 The Consultant shall at all times abide by Minn.Stet 13.01 et seq., the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, to the 10.2 If the agreement is terminated prior to completion of the extent the same is applicable to data and documents in the project, Consultant will receive an equitable adjustment of possession of the Consultant. compensation. SECTION 18: ENTIRE AGREEMENT SECTION 11: ASSIGNMENT 18.1 This Agreement contains the entire understanding between 11,1 Neither party may assign duties,rights or interests in the the City and Consultant and supersedes any prior written or oral performance of the work without obtaining the prior written agreements between them respecting the written subject matter. consent of the other party, which consent will not be There are no representations, agreements, arrangements or unreasonably withheld understandings, oral or written between City and Consultant relating to the subject matter of this Agreement which are not SECTION 12: DELAYS Rally expressed herein. 12.1 If Consultant is delayed in performance due to any 18.2 The agreement between Consultant and City may be cause beyond its reasonable control,including but not limited modified only by a written amendment executed by both City and to strikes, riots, fires, acts of God, governmental actions, Consultant. actions of a third pasty,or actions or inactions of City,the time for performance shall be extended by a period of time 18.3 This agreement is governed by the laws of the State of lost by reason of the delay. Consultant will be entitled to Minnesota. payment for its reasonable additional charges,if any,due to the delay. SECTION 13: EXTRA WORK 13.1 Extra work, additional compensation for same, and extension of time for completion shall be covered by written amendment to this agreement prior to proceeding with any extra work or related expenditures. SECTION 14: WITHHOLDING TAXES 14.1 No final payment shall be made to the Consultant until Consultant has provided satisfactory evidence to the City that Consultant and each of its Subcontractors has complied with the provisions of Minn.Stat.290.92 relating to withholding taxes upon wages. A certificate by the Commissioner of Revenue shall satisfy this requirement. SECTION 15: AUDIT 15.1 The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Consultant or other parties relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the . City and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. SECTION 16: PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS 16.1 The Consultant shall pay any Subcontractor within ten (10)days of the Consultant's receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the Subcontractor. The Consultant shall pay interest of one and one-half percent • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 21, SECTION: Consent 2000 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Community Development Call for a Public Hearing to consider &Financial Services: establishing a Tax Increment Financing(TIF) Don Uram District for Rolling Hills Senior Housing David Lindahl Requested Action: • Move to: • Approve Resolution calling for a public hearing January 16, 2001 to consider establishing a Tax Increment Financing(TIF)District. Synopsis: The purpose for establishing the proposed TIF District is to help finance the construction of 15 moderate-cost rental units within the 142 unit Rolling Hills Senior Apartment Project proposal located on Rolling Hills Road and Prairie Center Drive. State law requires that before a public hearing is held to establish a TIF District a resolution must first be passed by the City Council for the hearing. Background: The 142-unit Rolling Hills project received first reading approval by the Council on October 19, 1999, and second reading approval October 3, 2000. The unit breakdown is as follows: • 53 Assisted Living • 14 Alzheimer Care Units • 75 Independent Living Units The developer is requesting to use TIF to subsidize 20% of the Independent Living units(15)to be affordable to seniors with incomes below 50%of the area median income. Details of the TIF plan will be presented to the City Council for their consideration at the January 16, 2001 public hearing. Attachments: Resolution&Exhibit A CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON APPROVAL AN AMENDED PROJECT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (QUALIFIED HOUSING)iti'M M ,'E Zw-' AOff'':r (° BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: 1. Proposed Project Plan and Financing Plan. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota(the "HRA")has prepared, and will present to the City for approval, a amended redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Project Plan(the "Project Plan") for Redevelopment Project Area No. 5 (the"Project Area"), and a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statues, Section 469.002, subdivision 14 (the "Redevelopment Project"). In order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred in connection with the Project Plan and the Redevelopment Project,the HRA has prepared,and will present,to the.City for approval, a tax increment financing plan(the "Financing Plan"),which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, designated as Tax Increment Financing (Qualified Housing)District No. 17 within the Project Area. It has been proposed that the Board of Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council approve the Project Plan and Financing Plan, and that this Council hold a public hearing on the Project Plan and Financing Plan as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.028 and 469.175, subdivision 3. 2. Public Hearing. A public hearing is hereby scheduled to be held on the Amended Project Plan and Financing Plan at 7:00 p.m. on January 16, 2001,in the Council Chambers of the Eden Prairie City Center, 8080 Mitchell Road,Eden Prairie,Minnesota. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing in substantially the form of Exhibit A hereto to be published in the official newspaper of the City not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing, and to provide the information required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 2 to the appropriate governmental bodies. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 21, 2000. ATTEST: Jean L.Harris,Mayor Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 21,2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Acknowledgment of No Interest in Alan D. Gray Condemnation Proceeds from Parcel 92 Requested Action Move to: Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign "Acknowledgment of No Interest in Condemnation Proceeds from Parcel 92" Synopsis The State of Minnesota requests the City of Eden Prairie to acknowledge no interest in funds being paid to 7711 Mitchell Road Partners (BUCA) for condemnation of right-of-way for TH 212 improvements relative to a ten-foot utility easement within the condemned property. The utility easement area is now part of the public right-of-way for Mitchell Road. Background Information The City of Eden Prairie is considered an interested party in the condemnation because of the utility easement over a portion of the condemned property. No utilities existed within the easement. BUCA is replacing the easement along the western boundary of the remaining portion of their property. There is no loss in value to the City of Eden Prairie by the State's condemnation of the property. Attachments Acknowledgment Document 1 TYPE OP CASE: CONDEMNATION STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT • State of Minnesota,by Hubert H. . Humphrey,III, its Attorney General, Court File No. CD-2762 Petitioner, vs.. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NO Robert G. Twiss,Joanne I. Twiss,Northern INTEREST IN CONDEMNATION States Power Company,Taylor Made, Inc., PROCEEDS FROM PARCEL 92 Mike R..rwiss, County of Flennepin,Harty E. Bongard, also known as Harry Edwin Bongard,James E. Ryan,Janet S. Ryan, Ervin C. Goede,Delia A. Goede,Daniel M. Suter and Gail L. Suter, doing business as Suter Electronics, Eaton Corporation;The First American National Bank of St. Cloud, ITT Schadow,Inc., doing business as ITT Cannon Switch Products,Cooperative Power Association,United States of America,National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation,City of Eden Prairie,Northern Healthcare Associates, a Minnesota general partnership,Unknown successors in interest to Northern Life Insurance Company, an expired corporation,ARC West,Inc.,John P. Anderson, Gertrude A.Anderson,Delta Publications, Inc., a dissolved Minnesota corporation,211 West Seeboth Building, L.L.C.,KADA Associates,a general partnership, Canada Life Insurance Company ofNew York,Estes Green,Inc., formerly known as Karp's Inc.,and as CSM-K.ar.'p Acquisition Company,Kay E. Schumacher,Trustee in Voluntary Dissolution of Edenvale,Inc.,formerly Eden Land Corporation, The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, The Equitable Life Mortgage and Realty Investors, a Massachusetts Business Trust, 771 Mitchell Road Partners,BUCA(Eden Prairie), Inc.,Unknown successors in interest to Mid-America Homes of Minnesota,Inc., a dissolved Minnesota corporation,K. E. Schumacher and John K Lassen, Trustees for Eden Land Sales,Inc. Money Purchase Pension Trust,Eaton • MDH Company,Inc.,Gurkipal S. Sikka, Prectie Sikka, Raj Kumar Jain, Salta Jain, also all other persons unknown claiming any right, title,.estate, interest or lien in the . real estate described in the Petition herein, Respondents. • The undersigned, City of Eden Prairie,hereby acknowledges and affirms that • it has no interest in or to any portion of the condemnation proceeds that have been deposited respecting Parcel 92 with the Court,or which may be awarded by the Court-appointed Commissioners or a jury, in these proceedings, and agrees that Respondents 7711 Mitchell . Road Partners and BUCA(Eden Prairie), Inc. shall be immediately entitled to all such condemnation proceeds. Dated: November ,2000 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By Its By Its M I:681565,01 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 21,2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Award Contracts for ITEM NO.: Financial Services Improvements at the Prairie Village Mall Don Uram Liquor Store Vfa- Requested Action • Move to: Move to adopt resolution awarding Contracts for Improvements at the Prairie Village Mall Liquor Store. Synopsis In accordance with the City's Purchasing Policy, Staff is required to advertise in the Eden Prairie News a request for quotes on purchases expected to exceed $5,000. In conjunction with the remodeling of the Prairie Village Mall Liquor Store, Staff recently advertised for the following: 1) Eden Prairie Liquor Store Sign 2)Purchase and Installation of Carpeting 3)Display Shelves A report of the quote results and a recommendation is attached. Attachments Resolution Summary of Quotes CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,NIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTES WHEREAS,pursuant to an advertisement for quotes for the following improvements: Eden Prairie Liquor Store Sign Purchase and Installation of Carpeting Display Shelves WHEREAS, quotes were received, opened and tabulated. Those quotes received are shown on the attached Summary; and WHEREAS, the Financial Services Director recommends awarding Contracts to the following as the lowest responsible bidders: Eden Prairie Liquor Store Sign—Shad Tracy Signs ($5,145.00) Purchase and Installation of Carpeting—Dayton's Commercial Interiors ($16,091.15) Display Shelves—Stan Morgan&Associates($16,822.00) NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into Contracts with the above companies in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amounts listed in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the Financial Services Director. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 21,2000. • Jean L.Harris,Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A.Porta,City Clerk SUMMARY OF QUOTES PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL LIQUOR STORE BIDDER AMOUNT Eden Prairie Liquor Store Sign 1) Shad Tracy Signs $5,145.00 2) Pascual Signs $6,362.00 Purchase and Installation of Carpeting 1) Dayton's Commercial Interiors $16,091.15 2) St.Paul Linoleum and Carpet $16,670.00 Display Shelves 1) Stan Morgan &Associates $16,822.00 2) Lozier $19,850.00 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent November 21,2000 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Management Services Resolution Designating the Responsible Authority Relating to Data Practices and '. Appointing and Designating the Data Practices Compliance Official Requested Action: Move to: Adopt the Resolution designating the responsible authority relating to data practices and appointing and designating the data practices compliance official. Synopsis: Minnesota law requires designation of a responsible authority relating to data practices and appointing and designating the data practices compliance official by December 1, 2000. The attached resolution designates the City Manager as the"responsible authority" and the data practices compliance official. Background: Attachments: Resolution • 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY RELATING TO DATA PRACTICES AND APPOINTING AND DESIGNATING THE DATA PRACTICES COMPLIANCE OFFICIAL. BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The City Manager is hereby designated the "Responsible Authority" as defined in Minn. Stat. § 13.02, Subd. 16 relating to data practices and further is appointed and designated as the "Data Practices Compliance Official"pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13.05, Subd. 13'. ADOPTED by the City Council on ,2000. Jean L. Harris,Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: • Kathleen Porta, Clerk EP\Birch Island Woods\Resolution CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/00 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald R.Uram Shady Oak Technology Building Addition Scott A. Kipp Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 2.7 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 2.7 acres. Synopsis This is a 6,259 square foot building addition to a 26,024 square foot building approved in August 2000, currently under construction. The proposal includes the elimination of the PUD waiver for 75% office use in the I-2 zoning district. • • The Community Planning Board voted 8-0 to recommend approval of the project at its November 13, 2000 meeting. Background Information The City Council approved a 26,024 square foot industrial building for this site and granted a waiver for 75% office use. City Code permits up to 50% office use in the I-2 zoning district. The current proposal is to expand the building by 6,259 square feet for a total building of 32,283 square feet permitted by Code, and to eliminate the PUD waiver for the increased office use. The approval for the smaller building and increase in office use was based on trip generation not exceeding what would be permitted if the site were developed for a 32,283 square foot building meeting the requirements of the I-2 zoning district. The developer has obtained an industrial tenant who will occupy the entire building and not require additional office use beyond 50%permitted by City code. The proposal meets City Code for building coverage, setbacks, and amount of parking. Minor changes in grading will be necessary to accommodate the addition. At this time the proponent is requesting permission to proceed to building permit at their own risk. The City Council will be reviewing an amendment to the Developer's Agreement at its December 5, 2000 meeting. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment 2. Staff Report dated November 9,2000 3. Letter requesting early building permit dated November 8,2000 t SHADY OAK TECHNOLOGY BUILDING ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT OF SHADY OAK TECHNOLOGY BUILDING ADDITION FOR MOUNT PROPERTIES WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS,the Community Planning Board did conduct a public hearing on Shady Oak Technology Building Addition PUD Concept Amendment by Mount Properties and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on November 21, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Shady Oak Technology Building Addition,being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval as outlined in the plans dated November 3, 2000. 3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Community Planning Board dated November 13, 2000. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 21 day of November,2000. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk D_ Exhibit A Shady Oak Technology Building Addition Legal Description: Parcel B That part of Lot 1,Block 2, SHADY OAK INDUSTRIAL PARK lying west of a line drawn at a right angle to the south line of said Lot 1,from a point on said south line distant 340.84 feet west of the southeast corner of said Lot 1. 3 STAFF REPORT TO: Community Planning Board FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: November 9,2000 SUBJECT: Shady Oak Technology Building Addition APPLICANT/ OWNER: Shady Oak Center LLC LOCATION: 6875 Shady Oak Road REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 2.7 acres 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.7 acres 3. Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 2.7 acres 4. Site Plan Review on 2.7 acres to 237,42 a 1.— \I— .:e 1�5 Jarr43e ,tc.25 Cfl 344.25 • 53S - r +f037 a (12) O ' Z \n 1 1 t7) $ A % W I 3 R 1 D� 0 a ,L; >- ^ _ us•09 orE U V • • .• .t 529.49 359 3 2 n 1 Z , i1 - :.• t51 y; 4 - a LEASED AREA 7t.zi 1111 EN d. IMP 4 = N\ ! lSIQ•. 1 J 9 Q 1 Y • ,�a x �= (8) ' IY 1�................. 120) *fir 02 Nyfi�� ' Ac -•_ 66 ?, (2 t2 8� r zrar \ ' a10 - o E. h (17) n' (18) ^ 9 �,C 3 119) 4(0 .�, � • M19.04•Ir• • 0$ -' - -.- - -- -- -- - b 25� '16. Zs 255 • 2rL12 '� 'n I r'. ••sue �� 413.01 MO*34.. ■ . Y3- A sI. 1 o� �a 4I u5' 12)2. ID . rJ y� '%' `i'• 410.32 raws-sC• S19.24.1 3 $ �� �J • R 125..027•34.37 • (I.:) • • 9 • s,rz•.rE ®A ••• • •T • • 0P csur •t SI / , ��,R 1lTl 935x 402.25 'Ae • • 1 ®� 04) 2 `R�'d.gLm 13) N Y 1.13 • (9) '79ri. 'y • • • MOD 017G7 141.19 • t57 ®� 2 69TH ST W _ '; •• �J4.14 396.14 339.37 �" MAL•03'3411 �d �[ � 00) � 432 � � p `�j, Tp ?^+ v ( s I2 p4� il 1 14) • lgol , o I a72 so 1 $ �i<' W a, o 01 MK•31.3541 432 ]90.0r aca.o: n0.r9 1 \ 290 344.51 a0 a0 43k2[ S1i'05 037 5 31'35•f 511•05 OS• (21 • 43 S 44 tf4� Staff Report—Shady Oak Technology Building Addition November 9, 2000 BACKGROUND The site is guided Industrial, and zoned I-2. In August 2000, the City Council approved a 26,024 square foot industrial building with a PUD waiver for 75% office use. The building is currently under construction. PUD AND DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT AMENDMENT The plans show the construction of a 6,259 square foot building addition for a total building of 32,283 square feet. The base area ratio/floor area ratio is .275. City code peiuiits up to a .30 base area ratio, and a .50 floor area ratio. The proponent requests that the PUD waiver previously approved for 75% office use in the industrial zoning district be eliminated. This will require an amendment to the Developer's Agreement for the project. The proponent has signed an industrial tenant that will occupy the entire building. The building will meet the standards of the industrial zoning district not to exceed 50% office use. The building and parking meet the setback requirements of the I-2 zoning district. The amount of parking required is 91 spaces. The plan meets this requirement. TRAFFIC The approved PUD waiver for percentage of office use, and size of the building was based on the total trip generation not exceeding what would be peiiuitted for a standard industrial building on the property. The traffic analysis compares trip generation between the approved 26,024 square foot building to the proposed 32,283 square foot building allowed by code. The approved building will generate 242 daily trips, 34 a.m. and 33 p.m. peak hour trips. The proposed building will generate 247 daily trips, 35 a.m. and 34 p.m. peak hour trips. While the proposed building generates five more daily trips, and one more a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip than the approved building, it does not exceed what would be permitted for the site. A Travel Demand Management plan is currently in place for the property. GRADING,DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES The building addition will not impact the approved grading drainage or utilities for the property. 6 Staff Report—Shady Oak Technology Building Addition November 9,2000 ARCHITECTURE The addition will match the current building under construction and consist of 72% face brick and glass, 25%rock face block, and 3%metal. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening is proposed with parapet walls. If the rooftop mechanical equipment is visible after building construction, additional screening will be required to meet City Code. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping has been increased based on the building addition meeting City code and screening requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the following: • Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 2.7 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.7 acres • Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 District on 2.7 acres • Site Plan Review on 2.7 acres This approval is based on plans dated November 3,2000,the Staff Report dated November 10,2000, and the following conditions: 1. Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District and City Engineer. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to review fire code requirements. 2. The waiver from the City code for the percentage of office use in the I-2 zoning district from 50%to 75% is eliminated as part of the Planned Unit Development District Review in the I-2 zoning district. • i —. or u \..................00 °) . . i 1 /ow rYr 1% 1 \ %1 AREA1.1ip24l ME-1•rd15.5' 1 I a I •it 1 1 L. J vr, irr 4. w.r irr , 1 ----ri . . • ,_ Mtrr — — . L . .2 ...... [ O . . . W. 69TH S7 `_- Z tWOriN4 A?POVED PLAN MOUNT PROPERTIES November 8, 2000 Mr. Scott Kipp Senior Planner Community Development City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Expansion of Shady Oak Technology Building Dear Mr. Kipp: Please schedule the first reading with the City Council on November 21 , 2000 and the proposed second reading on December 5, 2000. It is our desire that should the Council approve this amendment to our development on November 21 , 2000, we would obtain our building permit for the addition at that time. We understand that this permit and associated construction would be at our risk if it is prior to the second reading. Enclosed is our signed First Amendment to the Developers Agreement. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, S:•• 1"A"L'-'•••-YV\AAjllk-IA Stephen Michals • 612-941-1383 fax 612-941-1560 7808 Creekridge Circle,Suite 305 Bloomington,Minnesota 55439 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/00 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald R. Uram Entrevaux _Y�J_L_ Scott A.Kipp Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 33.09 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 30.5 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for a Preliminary Plat on 33.09 acres into 41 lots and 3 outlots and road right of way; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Staff and Board recommendations and Council conditions. Synopsis • This is a 41 lot single-family residential development to be zoned R1-13.5 at a density consistent with the area. The Purgatory Creek corridor is included in approximately nine acres of property to be dedicated to the City. PUD waivers for front yard setback and lot frontage are requested for some of the lots, as well as a waiver for two area identification signs at one of the site entrances. The Community Planning Board voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project with the proposed waivers at its October 23, 2000 meeting. In addition, the Board supported the developers' request for a landscaped median at the Olympia Drive entrance. The Staff Report recommended eliminating the landscaped median at Olympia Drive, as well as providing a safety railing along the dam structure in Purgatory Creek. These changes have not been made. Background Information Prior to making application for the project, the developer presented three alternative concept plans for review by City staff. These included multi-family, single-family using a private road and single-family with a public road. The multi-family plan saved more trees than the other options, however the density was not compatible with the adjoining lower density neighborhoods. The single-family plan with the private road was inconsistent with City policy that private road plans should result in less environmental impact. The environmental impact (38.4%tree loss)is the same for the public or private road plan. In addition the private road plan contained 46 lots with numerous lot size and setback waivers. City Council Agenda—Entrevaux November 21,2000 Page 2 The proposal shows 41 single-family lots, with a public road, at a gross density of 1.23 units per acre, and a net density (less Pioneer Trail right of way) of 1.34 units per acre. The Guide Plan permits up to 2.5 units per acre. Welter's Purgatory Acres to the north is 1.7 units per acre and Welter's Brookhaven Farm to the west is 1.83 units per acre. The development will require the following waivers through the PUD. • Front yard setback of 25 feet for Lots 9, 11, and 15,Block 2. Code requires 30 feet. The proposed dedication of the 7.29-acre Purgatory Creek corridor (Outlot B) to the City is a mitigating reason to consider this waiver. • Corner lot frontage of 81 feet for Lot 14,Block 3. Code requires 100 feet. A corner lot typically has two frontages. This lot has three. The lot meets code for two frontages. The lot is 21,423 square feet in size and large enough to build a home meeting setback requirements. • Two area identification signs at a site entrance. Code permits one sign per site entrance. This development has two site entrances. Rather than locating one at the north entrance along Olympia Drive, the proposal is to create a gateway entry at Bennett Place with an area identification sign on each side of Olympia Drive. This has been done in other developments in the City. Purgatory Creek is along the west side of the site and portions of the property are subject to the Shoreland Code. The project meets the requirements of the Shoreland Code. The City Forester has calculated a total of 4,890 diameter inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is 1,879 diameter inches, or 38.4%. Tree replacement is 960 caliper inches. The tree replacement plan meets this requirement. Eden Mill Site (21HE218) is located at the intersection of Pioneer Trail and Purgatory Creek. Two features associated with the site are within the development. Foundation walls of the house/hotel are located in Outlot C. Foundation walls from an early stable with recently . constructed upper level are located in Lot 16, Block 2. The stable building lacks integrity and has been altered. A determination has been made that the stable is not historically significant. The proponent will dedicate Outlot C to the City, and provide a 50-foot conservation easement around the house/hotel foundations over part of Lots 16 and 17, Block 2 for preservation purposes. A proposed entry median is shown on Olympia Drive at Bennett Place. This median is not recommended by staff and should be eliminated for the following reasons: • increased impervious surface • ice and snow removal difficulty • sight distance problems • increased maintenance City Council Agenda—Entrevaux November 21,2000 Page 3 Purgatory Creek contains a dam structure,which is owned by the DNR. As part of the development for the property, staff recommends that the proponent construct a safety railing system along the dam structure. The developer does not want to provide this safety feature. After review by the Community Planning Board the developer revised the plans for portions of the property to show the public sidewalk on private property, and the placement of landscaping and boulders in the right of way. Staff recommends that the landscaping and boulders be removed from the right of way and the sidewalk located entirely within the right of way. These boulevard areas should remain clear for safe pedestrian use and snow storage. These types of site amenities can be accommodated throughout the project within the lots_ adjacent to the right of way. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 3. Staff Report dated October 20, 2000 4. Community Planning Board Minutes dated October 23, 2000 5. Correspondence • ENTREVAUX CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF ENTREVAUX FOR PEMTOM LAND COMPANY WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Board did conduct a public hearing on Entrevaux PUD Concept by Pemtom Land Company and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on November 21, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Entrevaux, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated November 8, 2000. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Community Planning Board dated October 23, 2000. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 21st day of November,2000. Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A.Porta, City Clerk Exhibit A Entrevaux Legal Description: PUD Concept Review and Preliminary Plat Tract A. Registered Land Survey No. 1032, except that part thereof described as follows: All that part of said Tract•A lying Southeasterly of a line hereinafter referred to as Line A drawn at right angles to the center line of Hennepin County Highway 1 as shown on Hennepin County Highway P/at #6 and said Line A'being_Located 886.O:feet from the West line of the Northeast Quarter, Section 26, Township 116, Range 22 as measured bong the centerline of said County Highway 1 and lying Southwesterly of a line drawn at right angles to said line A distant 412 feet Northeasterly of the center line of said County Highway 1 except that part thereof lying Easterly of Purgatory Creek and except that part thereof embraced within the Plat of Welter Purgatory Acres 1ST Addition. • And • •That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range.22 described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Section 26,which corner is marked by Judicial landmark A''; thence West along the North line of said Section 998.25 feet to a point which is marked by judicial landmark "B;.thence South parallel with the East line of said Section 26 a distance of . 1730 feet to a point which is marked by Judicial landmark "Cs; thence West parallel with the North line of said Section, 330.4 feet to a point which is marked by judicial landmark "D; thence South parallel with the East line of sold Section, 234.7 feet to the center line of County Road hip. 14 the point of intersection of said line with the Northerly line of said County Road No. 1 bring marked by judicial landmark 'E; thence South 49° 34'East along the center line of said Road 8.15 feet; thence Southeasterly along the center line of said Road on a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 741.66 feet, a distance of 372 feet to a point 998.25 feet West, measured on a line parallel with the North line of said Section from the East line of said Section 26; thence South parallel with said East line 185.3 feet to a point which is marked by Judicial landmark "Gs; the point of intersection of said last described line with the South line of•said County Road No. 1 being marked by judicial landmark "F"; thence South 73° 13'East 117.4 feet to a point which is'marked by judicial landmark "H; thence North 22° 15' East along the Northwesterly line of Lot 5 in Eden Prairie Acres a distance of 92.2 feet to a point which Is marked by judicial landmark "I; thence North 69° 15'East along the Northerly fine of said Lot 5 a distance of 116.5 feet to a point which is marked by judicial J;• landmark " thence South 81 15'East along the Northerly line of sold Lot 5 a distance of 231.7 feet to a point which is marked by judicial landmark "K' thence North 83° 45' East along the Northerly line of said Lot 5 and said last course extended to a point in the center of the aforesaid County Road No. 1, the point of intersection of said last described line with the South fine of said County Road being marked by judicial landmark al.."; thence South 83° 45'East along the center line of said Road 327.3 feet more or less to a point 10.5 feet Westerly along the center line from the East line of said Section 26; thence Northeasterly in a straight line to the point of beginning, the point of intersection of said line with the northerly line of County Roads No. 1 being marked by judicial landmark "M". • Except that part of the above described property lying Northwesterly, Westerly and Southwesterly of the center line of Purgatory Creek and Northeasterly of the Northeasterly line of County Highway 1 as shown on Hennepin County Highway Plot #6, except that part thereof,embraced within the plat of Olympic Hills Fifth Addition.and except that part thereof embraced within the South 120.00 feet of the North 1529.84 feet of the East 140.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter and Except that part of the above described property embraced within the plat of Welter Purgatory Acres 1st Addition. For the purpose of this description the East line of Section 26 is presumed to be due North and South. ,And Outlot D, Welter Purgatory Acres:1ST'Addition. 5 Exhibit A, continued Entrevaux Legal Description: PUD District Review and Rezoning to R1-13.5 That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26,Township 116, Range 22 and that part of Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1032,files of the Registrar of Titles, both in • Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter;thence North 00 degrees 50 • minutes 32 seconds West,assumed bearing along the east line of said Northeast Quarter,a distance of 338.40 feet to the centerline of County Highway No. 1, as shown on HENNEPIN COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO.6,according to the recorded plat thereof;thence North • 84 degrees 29 minutes 20 seconds West,along said centerline,a distance of 10.50 feet; thence North 00 degrees 34 minutes 55 seconds West,a distance of 28.88 feet to the point • on the northerly right of way of said County Highway No. 1;thence North 84 degrees 32 minutes 08 seconds West,along said northerly right of way, a distance of 1.61 feet;thence North 06 degrees 20 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 13.29 feet;thence North 00 degrees 34 minutes 55 seconds West,a distance of 110.19 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described;thence continuing North 00 degrees 34 minutes 55 seconds West, a distance of 615.22 feet;thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 34 seconds West,a distance of 133.06 feet;thence North 00 degrees 50 minutes 32 seconds West,a distance of 120.01 feet to the point on the south line of Lot 6, Block 4,PURGATORY ACRES • 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 34 seconds West,along said southerly line,a distance of 19.06 feet;thence North 55 degrees 57 minutes 41 seconds West,a distance of 102.42 feet;thence North 79 degrees 27 minutes 03 seconds West,a distance of 140.32 feet; thence North 42 degrees 52 minutes 45 seconds West,a distance of 110.00 feet;thence North 55 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds West, a distance of 128.52 feet;thence North 67 degrees 27 minutes 14 seconds West,a distance of 126.37 feet;thence North 13 degrees • 16 minutes 40 seconds West,a distance of 362.51 feet;thence South 88 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds West,a distance of 87.85 feet;thence South 50 degrees 07 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 214.38 feet;thence North 88 degrees 35 minutes 33 seconds West,a distance of 116.87 feet;thence South 51 degrees 00 minutes 27 seconds West,a distance of 185.71 feet;thence North 35 degrees 08 minutes 38 seconds West,a distance of 20.00 feet more or less to the centerline of Purgatory Creek as platted on WELTERS BROOKHAVEN FARM,according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence southerly and southeasterly along said centerline to the northerly line of Highway Easement as described in Document No.3206747;thence easterly,northeasterly and northerly along said northerly line to the point of beginning and there terminating. TOGETHER WITH: Outlot D,WELTER PURGATORY ACRES 1ST ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ENTREVAUX CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ENTREVAUX FOR PEMTOM LAND COMPANY BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of the Entrevaux for Pemtom Land Company dated November 8,2000 and consisting of 33.09 acres into 41 lots and 3 outlots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 21st day of November, 2000. • Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Community Planning Board FROM: Scott A.Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: October 20, 2000 SUBJECT: Entrevaux APPLICANT/ OWNER: Pemtom Land Company • LOCATION: North of Pioneer Trail,west of Bennett Place REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 33.09 acres • 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 30.5 acres 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 30.5 acres 4. Preliminary Plat on 33.09 acres into 41 lots and 3 outlots. --r - v e�yI- os, •••• IL asAtiL. NAM` IA -, f aw RLI U .'f •�. • riwINIT• t A- • • Y Ali! ,�.` "" do �w J of ., ' ,ti;. tX, to to = Al EIS ; 001 f , ail • 013•1 ' • aa a en M l I: : ! .• s : ` dst 2 tin • 12 . •= n!n�-r�i �tis m, . • ` vs _ @.9Qi . sa3, 1 tiq s u �,� � t303 4 el, u•1 r 3tl a21 ail { : a • t4W + yy4 • t• a-i .:-..f."' du l'A - .. .; inErt-riga t 1 . j' „�. a4± ".�. t7J1t "'tiff, • , . • 1 1;3 . ... tf z: '.. f sax• , . ��-`.t� r ''.fit... �,ta: a tun a, p /trn y . aw iI _ f ' 130f w�� tan v s a» \N\4s4)00 tp 4 mi. th, . for ' 6 . 11► Ji. s= /; f ta11 1j > f V arVitt-: .. i . • ., • 01.10011 As 7 i. h Iry.ey ." k n E. •cliff • ma t .,'Yt1q t4slr _ V �,' f xx. 4,,i .:1.4 • it e El to In ,gt.4.,', at 7 1 15]e�•t d ' if•r r•?' •7w!• r �fi ost. ''4� • ' t3 . '•+ 1543 y• `' Kxs„' t s *1. 13(A • • 51 � • • � •4". 551 {Z ysL LP.+� • �•�` f • :' o J '1 aaayf,sf tl , •SSE _ ..... i11 >. le • w41.... S .- t 60 � '�' i •,j zit/ IY ';� .,4ir. i., „, • 4t• V � 1i21. d • • • r * ' • a I•• t111 't tl33nr f • • - tln Itla $ ' % fa q a � �ILp'S` j4� y • Ma e • , . v. � � Tit 251 • _ . ; la rirs ...4 41 • 0 - 4%2 Sul�,` k qg ' •• aa..ffm, ,s.•: �:: fir[' • O �r� �y� r g . . y 7_ may;f _7 ��i* •.` �r.� + •f . ' • tTi' f k.•� " ••Y�' �` am' fJ' `• _ jir • • • • ." tt • , ....s. ir. ,.. . ..? ..giir. • •1W, �tial '�? °1•ina3u� .1+� • — 7c?•-144P6 .., ! •— • . A NANO .. 't/ 4. w(v 4'WV� • N . a 1 t ir a9: 12W ��1 mII 'ar 114, ��j�` • -rl e: A4 I an if �• <P4k* .�0'' iiitik• A ,.a. �.�_- t ' .y�, , 1. ,/ ,.._, ..• ...Nit i .r. Ivo . *321 a '•1uu kg Uil un 1341% - •-.-•. 11/ .. ff.!. ce . . 1161'A:I .4.. :- -.Jr. fief .-.L • U tm �]: - t2W ...+� t0 y Iitl ag Do an ly, 1 1. GO 2S31.13 1.E5 4(11...... 4'.. 2 23 OD STORii SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARY '• IT Soma. o1STR1CT BOUNDARY AT/ON LE�igi�fA ----------- WATERSHED DISTRICT BOU1nARY 'ATE 1fiNFEPIL INCREMENT BOUNDARY - ILA MAK'of ae.......... • ' Staff Report—Entrevaux October 20,2000 Page 2 BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows this site as Low-Density Residential land use for up to 2.5 units per acre and Open Space along Purgatory Creek. The property is currently zoned Rural. • Surrounding land uses consist of Welter's Purgatory Acres to the north, Olympic Hills 5th Addition to the east, and Prairie Acres to the south, all zoned R1-13.5, and Welter's Brookhaven Farm to the west, zoned RM-6.5. The property is bounded by Purgatory Creek to the west, Bennett Place to the east, and Pioneer Trail to the south. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Part of the approved 1986 Welter's Purgatory Acres project included a future development plan for this property showing 47 single-family lots. The plan was prepared to show how this portion could be developed. The City did not grant a PUD approval for this future plan. The PUD request is to rezone the property from Rural to R1-13.5 and develop 41 single-family lots at a gross density of 1.23 units per acre, and a net density of 1.34 units per acre less Pioneer Trail right of way. The Guide Plan permits up to 2.5 units per acre. Welter's Purgatory Acres is 1.7 units per acre and Welter's Brookhaven Farm is 1.83 units per acre. Lot size varies between 13,555 square feet and 75,500 square feet meeting code, with an average lot size of 19,485 square feet. The development will require the following waivers through the PUD. • Front yard setback of 25 feet for Lots 9, 11, and 15,Block 2. Code requires 30 feet. The proposed dedication of the 7.29-acre Purgatory Creek corridor (Outlot B) to the City is a mitigating reason to consider this waiver. • Corner lot frontage of 81 feet for Lot 14,Block 3. Code requires 100 feet. A corner lot typically has two frontages. This lot has three. The lot meets code for two frontages. The lot is 21,423 square feet in size and large enough to build a home meeting setback requirements. • Two area identification signs at a site entrance. Code permits one sign per site entrance. This development has two site entrances. Rather than locating one at the north entrance along Olympia Drive, the proposal is to create a gateway entry at Bennett Place with a area identification sign on each side of Olympia Drive. This has been done in other developments in the City. The plan shows a Planned Unit Development sign on the west side of Bennett Place in the southeast corner of Lot 25, Block 2 identifying the Olympic Hills PUD. This sign is permitted and will replace a monument sign removed at this location a number of years ago. 1b Staff Report—Entrevaux October 20,2000 Page 3 SHORELAND CODE The property is within 300 feet of Purgatory Creek,which is considered a Shoreland Area according to the Shoreland code. Lots 8 and 9,Block 2 are within 150 feet of the creek and considered abutting lots. These lots meet the requirements of the Shoreland code. Portions of the property also contain Bluff as defined in the Shoreland code. No grading is proposed on the Bluff and all proposed houses meet the required 30-foot setback from the Bluff. GRADING AND TREE LOSS Grading will not impact the Shoreland Bluff, existing wetland, or wetland buffer on the property. A conservation easement is proposed over the wetland on the north side of the site. The City Forester has calculated a total of 4,890 diameter inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is 1,879 diameter inches,or 38.4%. Tree replacement is 960 caliper inches. The tree replacement plan meets this requirement. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer will connect to a line along Pioneer Trail. Water will connect to lines at Olympia Drive and Bennett Place. A NURP pond will be constructed at the southeast corner of the site. Drainage from the roads and majority of the houses will be directed to this pond. A storm sewer will collect roof drainage for Lots 11 through 18, Block 2 rather than being directed down the slope to the creek. HISTORIC SITE Eden Mill Site (21HE218) is located at the intersection of Pioneer Trail and Purgatory Creek. Two features associated with the site are within the development. Foundation walls of the house/hotel are located in Outlot C. Foundation walls from an early stable with recently constructed upper level are located in Lot 16,Block 2. Both archaeological features have been previously recorded as a result of Pioneer Trail reconstruction by Hennepin County. The stable building lacks integrity and has been altered. .A determination has been made that the stable is not historically significant. The house/hotel site retains integrity of location in a relatively undisturbed context and should be preserved as a historic archaeological site. The proponent will dedicate Outlot C to the City, and provide a 50-foot conservation easement around the house/hotel foundations over part of Lots 16 and 17, Block 2 for preservation purposes. �I A 1 Staff Report—Entrevaux October 20,2000 Page 4 ACCESS Access to the property is from Olympia Drive and Bennett Place. Lots 22 through 25, Block 2 will take access from Bennett Place. As part of the Pioneer Trail upgrading, a signal will be installed at the intersection of Bennett Place and Pioneer Trial. A proposed entry median is shown on Olympia Drive at Bennett Place. This median is not recommended and should be removed. PEDESTRIAN SYSTEMS Five-foot wide concrete sidewalks are proposed along the west and south side of Olympia Drive, along the outside portion of Entrevaux Drive, and on the west side of Bennett Place. As part of the County's upgrading plans for Pioneer Trail, bituminous paths will be constructed along both sides of the road. A future City trail is shown on the City's Comprehensive Park and Open Space Plan along Purgatory Creek. The exact location has not been determined. The trail may have to use both sides of the creek and include bridge crossings to provide the best trail location. The City will construct this trail at some future date. Purgatory Creek contains a dam structure, which is owned by the DNR. As part of the development for the property, the proponent should construct a safety railing system along the dam structure. CONCLUSION The development of this site is consistent with the guide plan and compatible with the surrounding area for the following reasons: • The proposed R1-13.5 zoning is similar to developments to the north, east and south • Dedication of land adjacent to Purgatory Creek to the City. After presentation by the proponent and listening to comments from the neighborhood,the Board should discuss the following questions: 1. Is the development consistent with the Guide Plan for Low Density Residential and existing surrounding density? 2. Is the development consistent with the zoning in the area? 3. Are the waivers reasonable?Are there reasons to support the waivers? Staff Report—Entrevaux October 20,2000 Page 5 RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the following request: • • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 33.09 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 30.5 acres • • Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 30.5 acres • Preliminary Plat on 33.09 acres into 41 lots and 3 outlots. This is based on plans dated October 18, 2000, the Staff Report dated October 20, 2000, and the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review,the proponent shall: A. Eliminate the median at Olympia Drive. B. Show a safety railing to be constructed along the dam structure in Outlot B. 2. Prior to final plat approval,the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Submit for review Homeowner's Association documents that address maintenance of entry monument signs,to be recorded with the fmal plat. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Install erosion control on the property, as well as tree protection fencing at the grading limits in the wooded areas for trees to be preserved as part of the development. Said fencing shall be field inspected by the City Forester prior to any grading. C. Submit a Conservation Easement over the wetland and wetland buffer Said easement shall be recorded with the final plat for the property. D. Submit a 50-foot Conservation Easement over that portion of the Eden Mill site within Lots 16 and 17,Block 2 as shown on the plans. E. Dedicate Outlots A,B, and C to the City. • 13 Staff Report—Entrevaux October 20,2000 Page 6 4. Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Provide a tree replacement surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping improvements indicated on the approved plan. B. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for their review and approval. C. Pay the Cash Park Fee. 5. The following waivers have been granted through the PUD District Review for the property: A. Front yard setback of 25 feet for Lots 9, 11, and 15, Block 2. City Code requires 30 feet. • B. Lot frontage on a corner lot of 81 feet for Lot 14, Block 3. City Code requires 100 feet. C. Two area identification signs at the site entrance at Bennett Place. City Code permits one entry monument sign per site access. August 20,2000 Mr.Michael Franzen Community Development City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Dear Mr.Franzen, Subject:Pemom Land proposal for Welters property We are homeowners in the Olympic Bills neighborhood,across the street from the proposed Pemtom Land Company development on the Welter's property. On August 8,2000 I attended a presentation given by Dan Herbst,President of Pemtom development,outlining his proposal to the city of Eden Prairie for.developing the 33 acres of Welter's property east of Purgatory creek. We support the proposed Pemton development,and ask that the Eden Prairie City Council grant Pemton Land development the necessary variances to proceed with the development We would be strongly opposed to any higher density development,as this would create untenable traffic problems through our neighborhood. The Pemtom proposal would provide for the least traffic problems,in addition the proposal turns up to 6 acres of the land over to the city of Eden Prairie for public use. Sincerely, Jim and Linda Seefeldt 9689 Bennett Place Eden Prairie,MN 55347 • • I 9602 Amesbury Lane Eden Prairie, Mn 55347 August 24, 2000 Mr. Michael Franzen Community Development ' City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 • Dear Mr. Franzen: Our single family home is located directly north of the proposed Entrevaux development to be reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 28, 2000. We enthusiastically support this type of development for the property because it will conserve more of the land and trees than other potential site plans and provide over seven acres of public space. Although we would prefer that the property remain in its current natural state, this single family development appears to be a thoughtful application of the highest and best use of the property. We hope you will forward a positive recommendation of this development to the City Council. Sincerely, Yant.6410-/-(- 6vrel(1-61...James and Cynthiah CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/00 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald R. Uram Smetana Lake Improvement Project V C Michael Franzen Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 2.0 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers and Zoning Amendment within the Rural Zoning District on 2.0 acres; and • Approve the Smetana Lake Park and Trail Plan and to petition Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District to initiate the Second Phase of the Smetana Lake Improvement Project. Synopsis This project is a public hearing for review and approval of the Smetana Lake Improvement project,which includes the following: • Completion of a trail around Smetana Lake • Construction of a picnic pavilion and viewing deck • Construction of horseshoe courts and landscaping. • Shoreland setback waivers for the viewing deck and picnic shelter. At the September 25, 2000 meeting, the Community Planning Board voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. Background Information: As part of the Planned Unit Development review, shoreland setback waivers are required. These include a setback from 150 feet to 75 feet for the picnic shelter, and a setback from 150 feet to 80 feet for the viewing deck. Reasons to consider the setback waivers are: • Since the property is a narrow point on the lake, compliance with the 150 foot setback would preclude any structures. • Construction of the picnic shelter and overlook deck results in minimal grading at the top of the slope. • No significant trees will be lost. • Existing trees screen these structures from the lake. In the late 1980's, the City of Eden Prairie petitioned the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District for the Smetana Lake Improvement Project, which included construction of an outlet control structure, a trail around the lake, and development of a park on the north side of Smetana Lake. Due to delays caused by slow development on the north side of the Smetana Lake, the City and the Watershed District agreed to a phasing of this project. The first phase project included construction of the outlet control structure and the trail to Marcella Smetana's home. That project was completed in 1999. The second phase of the project will include all the remaining improvements listed above. The Watershed District generally funds 50% of the recreation improvements for such items as trails, park shelters, etc. The estimated cost for this project is $150,000. Funding the source of this project would be cash park fees for City's match and Nine- Mile Creek Watershed District funds for the balance. On August 28th, staff met with residents of the Real Life complex to obtain their input on development of Smetana Lake Park. Approximately 90 residents met with staff for approximately one and one half-hour to discuss development of the park and trial system around Smetana Lake. Residents suggested that the concept plan include a bocce ball court in the vicinity of the horseshoe courts if there is sufficient room available. Approximately 40% of the residents suggested a small playground area to accommodate grandchildren that are visiting. About 6o% of the residents did not feel it was needed and some felt it would be a distraction. Staff indicated that we would provide a location on the plan that accommodate a possible future playground Some residents felt that it would be nice to develop a shuffleboard court near the park shelter, if possible. There was also discussion regarding the request for additional park benches around the trail to accommodate older people that would like to walk around Smetana Lake. It was also suggested that the City develop a soft surface trail on the dike across Smetana Lake, if possible. Staff indicated that it was not park of the existing project,but staff would evaluate the feasibility of that project in the future. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment 2. Staff Report dated September 22, 2000 3. Bob Lambert Memo dated July 21, 2000 4. Smetana Lake Trail and Picnic Area Concept Plan 5. Minutes of the September 25, 2000 CPB meeting SMETANA LAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,NIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF SMETANA LAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Board did conduct a public hearing on Smetana Lake Improvement Project PUD Concept by the City of Eden Prairie and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on November 21, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Smetana Lake Improvement Project,being in Hennepin County,Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated July 31, 2000. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Community Planning • Board dated September 25, 2000. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 21st day of November,2000. • Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Exhibit A Smetana lake Improvement Project Legal Description: Outlot C,Liberty Place 4 STAFF REPORT • TO: Community Planning Board FROM: Michael D.Franzen, City Planner DATE: September 23, 2000 • SUBJECT: Smetana Lake Park and Trail Plan APPLICANT/ OWNER: City of Eden Prairie LOCATION: North Side of Smetana Lake, south of Smetana Road REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.0 acres 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers within the Rural Zoning District on 2.0 acres 5 I- I OMItt1,0.1NltC✓01I.1'IDI01,2001 0it1M u...I C T - - • ''!/,/ ae� y i a8a 1 c n r - SyiB s,. : I 44 • I °gin74"4 P( 11! ' • J .i, / ` � ' � - \ i�� ' \ is • . h r' ' ''• ( am' � �/ o n, / �'a� AtE`� ; ..,/�/---- J/ f'f•< _ _• �/' I 1 ' ,! 3` !—— r� /�� f.,/ /' CD ' '/ -0 1 n' //'y f �' • .,,•,"7- ...//0 .-------..-----...--. \ 1 I L,'• 1".:... ,,,, ve.,<,..:,,,/,/iy,/,' CD ,t, ,,..;? liki ‘-e-'" . 4----. \.,'. ' N? .• • • • ''.. %.r.:...'/,) ,-.-y'• •• • I • •.' tr . ••• .. . ' •.• •' • �� /a • /� ��� � ,E. t'+•,. ' •••..,. :-:::......i s.,.„..,. _,..0:.,......,........., $ / I <. `'.•. .x,<,:%• /ion /� i.Q'i•:`.. 1 .,.....',::;r:465a r. �. f.•• /dr �` ` ' ` _ "• • • fi:` ii••' �` • , urn // +++; •.r.• '.y :..,•::.:?r:...: : `s, it _ /...: c,;`., 'y` 1i ::� '::: : • ; r'7 ! ,'::ice 1 -- • ...:::.:::::..... ,.,.-5, //7 * -..,• • .... •...''' ,........./ i i .t..."'?•••., ,..".4....: ......7 :-....•,. -...:- • • • ' : g$ / d Qom. - __. O e - ' i. ii sy ..1 -- ,, _ •—"i/i'1 1/;.a,"i-4,-,—..„•,;'; 11Tr1C --2i.— G i I. 4 " a —Ny yh II!!III!Illlil 4 - (/d 1 • I•l:1a % q. y , U 1 : t ta, -'=1 .. 1 g • b �Illl1'illllt{IIII(IIIIIlI!llilllllll!IIIIIIIII _ � L. n { Li f?!l?{{!111111111111111tf1(IN I►IIIII M Ir-c� 1 - 6• J 1 ) Staff Report—Smetana Lake Park and Trail Plan • September 23,2000 REQUESTED ACTION This project is a public hearing for review and approval of the Smetana Lake Improvement project,which includes the following: • Completion of a trail around Smetana Lake • Construction of a picnic pavilion and viewing deck • Construction of horseshoe courts and landscaping. See attached memo dated July 31,2000 from Bob Lambert for a more detailed explanation of the project. BACKGROUND The site is currently guided for Park/Public Open Space and zoned Rural. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT As part of the Planned Unit Development review, the following shoreland setback waivers are required: • Setback from 150 feet to 75 feet for the picnic shelter. • Setback from 150 feet to 80 feet for the viewing deck. Reasons to consider the setback waivers are: • Since the property is a narrow point on the lake, compliance with the 150 foot setback would preclude any structures. • Construction of the picnic shelter and overlook deck results in minimal grading at the top of the slope. • No significant trees will be lost. • Existing trees screen these structures from the lake. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approval of: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.0 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers within the Rural Zoning District on 2.0 • Staff Report—Smetana Lake Park and Trail Plan September 23,2000 acres • Smetana Lake Improvement Project This is based on plans dated July 31, 2000, this Staff Report dated September 23, 2000;and the following: 1. Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Review the building plans with the Fire Marshal. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. 2. Planed Unit Development waivers are granted as follows: • Setback from 150 feet to 75 feet for the picnic shelter. • Setback from 150 feet to 80 feet for the viewing deck MEMORANDUM To: Planning Board j Program Board Parks and Recreation Citizen Advisory Commission From: Bob Lambert,Director Parks and Recreation Services Date: July 31,2000 Subject: Smetana Lake Improvement Project Requested Action Move to: Approve the Smetana Lake Park and trail plan and to petition the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District to initiate the Second Phase of the Smetana Lake Improvement Project to include the following: • Completion of the trail around Smetana Lake • Construction of a picnic pavilion*and viewing deck • Construction of horseshoe courts and landscaping throughout the park Synopsis: In the late 1980's the City of Eden Prairie petitioned the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District for • the Smetana Lake Improvement Project, which included construction of an outlet control structure, a trail around the lake, and development of a park on the north side of Smetana Lake. Due to delays caused by slow development on the north side of Smetana Lake, the City and the Watershed District agreed to a phasing of this project. The first phase project included construction of the outlet control structure and the trail to Marcella Smetana's home. That project was completed in 1999. The second phase of the project will include all of the-remaining improvements listed above.. The.,'Watershed District generally funds 50% of the recreation improvements for items such as trails, park shelters, etc. The estimated cost for this project is $150,000. Funding source for the project would be cash park fees the City's match and Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District funds for the balance. RAL:mdd • H:\I•mhrrt 2000\Smetana Lake Improvement Project Memo • N G R A H A M ASSOCIATES City Planning Landscape Architecture Park Planning&Design • Land Use Planning • Smetana Lake Trail and Picnic Area Concept Plan City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota Project Summary The park and trail project will complete the loop trail around the north shore of Smetana Lake and construct a picnic and recreation area on"The Point'. Smetana Lake has an existing paved trail around the south and east sides of the lake. The trail is well used by area workers and City residents. The new office and residential developments along the north side of the lake are required to install a lakeside trail and boat access. The developer installed paved paths will add approximately 1/4 mile feet of trail along the north shore of the lake. A remaining Y4 mile gap in the loop trail would be in the northwest corner of the lake on city land and on developed office property owned by Jerry Portnoy. The proposed City-Watershed District project would extend the trail around the northwest corner of the lake over city land and Mr. Portnoy's land to complete the loop trail and would develop picnic and passive recreation facilities at the point area. The point area is a wooded point of land that offers excellent views of Smetana Lake and a quiet peaceful setting. The point picnic area will feature a 20' x 44' picnic shelter and a 16' x 32' overlook deck. The shelter and the deck will have views of the lake. The shelter is designed to be a low profile open wood structure with a cedar roof. The overlook would be a wood deck with built-in seating and a durable recycled Trex decking surface. The shelter and overlook would be connected by a paved loop trail around the perimeter of the point. A fishing dock, horseshoe courts,water fountain, security lighting,benches and additional picnic tables are also planned. Access to the point would be from the loop trail and from a small parking lot to be built off of Smetana Lane. The project will improve access to Smetana Lake, complete the loop trail around the lake and add recreation facilities for area residents and local businesses_ The total cost for the project is estimated at approximately$150,000. See attached plans and cost estimate for more detailed information. August 1,2000 /0 2659 Dupont Avenue South Suite 100 Minneapolis,MR 55408 (612)377-2500 talipkeae (612)377-1010 failed: --------________-•-e --, .__ . _ _ _• ---- ..... -- - z^.armor t _ - — -- ii 1 1 s_. _ . __ . , • II 7- —T.. :11 .: ' "- - " ,i i 1:1 "V rn Fan t 3. a. i , aa _ fJ,J ..4+ '�•S "gyp AL I•A, t` if y.i t��J'T .x- + ...3i?L F.. t { .L � { ' . 1- u .,s ` s ' -_,..-,,,,,,,,,...,--,.1.--,,,,- • t � f ,„rL , t � prrYi1r .!a Y mo aw' r.a•1, a M1 rS , 7 .� , ,"S � ! 1u, tr { t ^.,,fi _�` E i ,V L,1•�4� - .t=r t,,A4 -tom` -s4r - - 1 , �°* xc s ,-6 2 , , 2. fr ' - �� ` i' �' SPA ` ,ys.s' !s . , ' fie. >;'y:F '` `�'`,r,- ',-,,,,, r ' ''.,z% `ya�r + , F es r �- ,a ,is i .F1ir;r ,,�• st ter} 2 ,�r� a'i"sr + - ...,•"4 y a ,yM :gyp-e.. .P i > e 3r1 ` /' ' e k N R, tit? + �` g t $ t'b?d WM, L.. ,405i fi v- „,4 �yf!4 ti� <r'44,A ,r i s1 i ". ei Y ,S f.� r�ti ArF. . "� ,j 3� j �.R- 3'•.k.*yM•• •b..a . k�`-1,4 c .:04Awp., �...•>• r'� :4x ry i-krsC" ago j :4,1�r '-n" .rr�^'ta.>�u' viga "s�'ix v Mir' F '` s e ''k S4- ttf c_' S r` v 1 srt 'S %'r'.s.rr t ^a •hw e..«+r .-, #"i �, 3s .'i+» .n7 4 f7`�.`FC 7 r 1 2. i-3 Y L 1.1 \ t t l'E 7 1 �A d � Ras t�} 1 "'Y r�"+� x J 'IAFw 2 � f'E. �� 1 yy 'kS .` k k, ?o" `'4v ecM Sk F'.r A a'^.-1. .! t7 -S ..P,+��''`'r� LFae: t' Y�, .S ••••l••''.}y 4 `h,. !+�`i. V} h .'r 31. ,h..,?,,,,,,'....'-',..1.,, 'ATM j` ;r.,F i x c z.: .A... 4 r` !T�.a, 7.r•.. es.d.'rx f'.'• . "xa t - a-` ,,,,C '„S t?,,t} r'Rr: t .r ,T ri. s .A C 3 x 4y 3• ..�3 •, = as r. ` . "`a } .. xt .s<,,,,,X .>y, 3. a'A•°S•2g.... Y�^.4V,`Px- ;�1" y ;+�.w�0i iT, r'a^'Id :6r i. r;;`;'' u'ay .o wxtk `fiyy- •a*;5}.+:.' 75'� sni-" �. 'SitS` �;.: :,�';'ct"ryE-.-.,-'��.,+. .✓ .k -r t r. 1�i '.`hs.a t^+. t• i s.1 ram' n, t. .i •Ri�as7Tf'"+''�1 t•Y•_ +r.,f•7'.', ,.. ..4. I a v r s ' r r r<s xh ? �i1 � : s 'u� E � 0c r44ar t § ter +tti rk - oy: of s t .v' ,,..�-s V ,.x, „, w e rry �,•S",,,,,,...,,,,,,,,,,,,I,”, 24§i 5 y. ,• c •.,. , 7.,a s"" ixfi r- M p .r rb : a, Yi-'"d !!44. fi 0 's1. 4,,, i S4v::. t 4 c.r 7 • < (•..�`3 ,I,. A t S,e s I 'a. 4. t a,.,r r� •. Ft- P,�'L- W q f a + t-•r€'t yt sr ..:3 is c g'rv,c vv r ��,S• g OY:4'9�+-y '€r591'f �^r.-r4. t .S k'Al-cf• E x L:' {& x� •v h } S tixoilt.,"-4.;i .G"4 '.,+3%.10 ik5 -c"ia ;It 4�r'5ni _'r`'r..A.n Ya< :4 t"1:45 +T{p. z, Y s u5{"� 1 S4.4 t;j, '. r•g"*: 'i '7''•r'X .0 r, •1 A`r. t}4 z :,, - r '4r� 'Y s ` .r < �,.0� ;; `r xlr's'p• . 1— e' 4p. ss',, f i ,f0 `"K -Y xx 'i I °a %if 't r ! a 4 {tti f YA" 'x'?' '•52SS f 4 1 ktl N 1• 0,44.0 f.r' '` a�VI to+ '� i. ' f•r L„,„\. ., a .L : r,, f '4 .11is t ttt' 1 �tH�rlZ., Ft a4`/+ ?•. i ts4r l,.r , }cr k� =fiT' k43> y5 y` a� v_y'r,``�-s'i,'�, �a�,t 7 y t'� t r '�a`^+-. y �"�-. r ra e jM"i .;i n av lbp 1. r `U 3 • `h+..b t.'4j- 4- k`, R ,+$'Li k Apr - {ta. ■ r i I ;mo t.�e'P •, ��±±'a'' ya r--'trr ,x4 se .[ x�„4. Ft 7'� r et'r z t,a igi",, �rr.Si 1 k1ti `. r }+ {1 Ya�,r `'�SS z ya. rs `' F; +GT t"`f,'� t `r�tl .�n 7�. .+ ^ Y'-s- ^: 7�Z5v f !44 5 x{ r�,+ Z '"t r,� +i sye� ate i.,•Y e +:7 'kt a,4' ,t�r .,t k aeE ,+ �. •„ r FL ) , r; 7 .sj [' 7T G 4 r a� K'' i y .^-{ t .•e.r L{+'�3yr,� 1 '�4 L.=•.-.r- .,.,. `a,� y vh �3 G F�' �." 'S �°•--x. ,r' • � yT'�"�''�>., 3 -,, .E t y,.,,.F � E4.,e`:F s c,1,2.' s 4,�`�l 41,°�.s�'�. 2��`•! t `��,.r "Zr .q' 1s r"',..�� °"S'., � 1n ,x "�..Z a } i4+F'`6r�r+ .-'•`.a�,4i&'Y, ' x -, p �...... .: .*rs, t,,,, rN t' 4 t. i r--- r',A LNi ?�.s^: ' 1 + jet .;.•q j G p"7 h?ylrir' 7 g. "�R� t ,a..4rIzr5'!r i rT t.,.r' r S r''' .2 .4 e"tk { r u',.. ✓.'. f...._....._._. .�SAY fi V'{'k ;., 7' k ..Face. . °t p7",3-3 1 U*, YSt'Evsv"a;t'.F'W p1 x� -..7,k%' ` r. TM„ECG d'"0i, 'x'd -} v E3°- ..tr.,,^' r-:-}," id, u a 't •A',� .r' !y '.'�' a.s�*.,.Q h KY F F4.5 .� ' S ' y-10.'"E t r a SSr�,....y r J a.c 4 K r ':.. xa.',' �'k, u'�J.2 a G" l M r`t rY'-r .� t �� --(( n y •Sxa�„wX `t'}�'Y't {{r - s*wr vr� � d s ,Jy !)\ tir i -1 xL '• 6 ktir.l7 C! .,t 1 r p: -sue :t`3'•t i t d r<t- t••F' 11- 1.6. ;;Q i,t. ., V` •.,-} �.._1 � ,�=Cn 7 `_. 4*•"v � 'S Yi'y Y k'c. C,x=� iC na� '�"�cU�e 3-j` ?' A�t`"� ( ,,, k j"'' ,,•S d l e ,.''' jt *:t- ,"'rAAgi tLi .[r 1�1 t- 7 " .Y r'�l� 4 Q• s' a +p..4, .-- .e { tprr: t s g s w4ayMs cy`..4?m, tia ..,.`. •1S sat >-v- ati 'izoi .• .. , .''. 4ti yr rK a3 r �� r. cE jellp• >r#,30•4 ✓. {} ^4c! ft3•e `�.f,iynq� Sx.,-.7: E71"',�•`.4"'ia93S C ,r �d Ae_.c,5,0:\r,'fo:• -!„.%, - � .:..:. 'i.ran )L,i 9 k ^,•inY+ y.•� r�y,1�_�,.3 f,,,i 4. •a it`fs+,a. ¢s' 0 G t 2T7 t 1 t g4 ,1jx t..; ,. Rr -Il.' i .r,gyp;h 1'a<c a A ,.ea; `+ ,� F rr at M,j g `S ,�,r3 5,,� a Y . //,/ ��• �yFE .X •5, •� -0xr a"�" j'ur aZ:''.,,, t }5--. T ti` r o ., t �" .J ys...,, * {�, „ `` i •4 ` 1,- Ht e t t ,'c r ,'pa..1x. Q s"4T x'r 4 3 r ".r`' ' ,,, '',7`,^�`' �`..4.i3f ..., xx 1' ' .3 x . ti5 e,,,,,,5,IrAt'r4? ,..0,1 -i.k,,,.,1„ a., wt . a�•�..Ar4 �3 A,.7av 7 2 F�v ...i -,.,, ' ra^'^y, s yh�iJ',,e a,...,,tg,4, 11t ai•p>,, b <,i ./+Sr4 vF 3 --`4Y 4 ». Lam' i$ S.x.v - y, ft r., ,,ti'y- •� t ks ri u P f'� ...- s I tS:-nr''y`"'`{anp'to ,, d' S .+' ��C'tor,--'•7 Ii .PF `. ".° '� (.�/t. „ • R r 3,,.-#A:a. i -byrr s s ram :. �y sir*piat `'k ti 3tle."...y't. _ ,, )), r p" "�' Fi_j`C, `•, ' v?•4,4:; -�`e' �er..; J I '^u F0z:-`" .. �.h •• �' s 14, ,...-•'"mot �,... "^-••.,,,s",.��,;y• ¢` ,si.: 7-5s1. . �,,�,�.i_:" .; r a rlc : Vf S h� E{ .,g isr z -,;r " !^1 ti1 .''a {{� -. --,'f..•'j7.t .-..^s;' 'e:fir„.„,. -'fit,, h,, .> v ..„: .w#k • r.• / .t s ��'!w^ ri You^•ay ct'`�'�',. ttk:`•g!t v� v-i3,4 {f r.' .' 1;�'s�-%�';'� 't-r;. tl a.f _% l 41 7 t .-.. /if/C•../..•••• ' .,. t G Y l r t t b 4 !Y• . / -•. 1 I )„ rt.4.. '.‘ .S. r,•s' _.,...‘:/e) / 1 -•-..,... 1 9 Jq �• u? _ 'y ,%d i .. IS:) j) •.''',. • Lake Smetana Open Space and Trail Plan =nay ASSOCIATES Overall Trail Plan-West Section 1 1 _ -t- a^""75 '` ray " 1 - '�r ,s... Y i -,,, C t ..,f f• /fj '. - j >� '�° rs- ....c} >�-Y" .}. '� :K — .a^ Q4• a...� �S C, y r, t •'r- -t(?- /' YY} 72: i' .st a.3i +nl 3t .r' .a 5f ,i sx f 1 :�'}1j f 4t G- S' �[. W -t: YS ._-ai.'•�•.` KY .- 1 J ! z : :- _r % xz` T "..+ : -t+-s':it !*� e 'ks'S , it � Z� �i ,,s y. Y `' :. V-,fix.. r1.�;.� }1. et• i f: - r .�y, `' ..yl- '� ',t . . ' ,, .t r sy'_ .i.T-Z, 'S ,� t ,•rt•'`� „ •',i t i 1� ,,•'�.�"t"4-„.Y r ,+ � "` �� S te_ i �.�� � ' ..-, �y i=i .S J> �-.F-. � . t' , �X ,F=-, t ,� ,, ,9: r ' e iY {" rti -c - . 'n.,,- , } t.£" r 4 's.i F. o • �.!i tC7,� 5 11,. y x7'' 6 �r r i� ,�` j4 r �a 1.. .c ' �.1 ,Fr,' 0 • 3`•1 J TJ Y,t`l,. I 3 14--r '.'EY" szi ..� .} 4.': y...<.. v!t. ,'i-,. y e`S' .'s. n X r."� 4 •."�. y yi..f S";S�-.."y ''a n_ ,, h ` n z w y x x z,• r ,, "' s. 1„ ,2 yt eti.-g,_ o • r hr tf .. w . , T t ,. t .� N: t"w,- w-� '� ,J" C rol , r-a„H ,p As 1 -� c rH cry' '�' -.n 'a• w^x •fi�a -tr 1 "_.r z I. `v- u N. t.,.f • r*fir ,, <T,Y xy `�aa•,,, fi"4---,.` kst ,--,,, --i-''y'm� 1 v kr�i-z- '"`'l •g ``o° • s.rY a.sm'�` ��''s4z-i• k r '1+F'� ns C.. }3 4� '�2'` s�i.c. lfi, r !�''�_ ry 4• ,(' �S{� ,,L, mAT,,. Sir', a� t,} x` ,.'.c� yJ�x- ,--c v a 3* -'C,, • 7 �F,�-• ``�,►'• te .a A.i.. z` t, "n,,V 4, �{ , t ...rs a "u aF1 g s !) 1 & F a s- -,P.Vs i p `� g i p,s �" x -- #�c `agr.Y +v �7„+.,i.- > tRI i! 1 .rf t ? y,7,x-`t,2i_. b'zi-, � 0 c tl . 44. F �- tFr 3.:Y • �n r, ,'- ..,P ; i t xis �`° I "`•ztm..' 5 ,� ,�" . .q` F..a. "� 'fT 1. c. o u u g--g:i"^v;-:: �.-t .. y. r -y 3:t..- it y`v^s a ,,d ,ys3f x `e� Y ,2" r'>. al a- h�'R., .,x > '. .f }'F rr S(( ,r.Ft` } ,�J�+�}"• Tr rka SC{af3x� y`i r z 3 S �° e s ,ri^� +'' c- ✓ yr. 'CSa r ^a.- 0' e. F,", t' `' '.filt. f -. •S \ d 44.4t "4c'`442 .�" a�17 z a t£wr2 c J "+ _.t•tx..,Sx ate�r}-t: .�YN.:,, ?` .. a<^r �•.,' 4a1 • • f • x1 C �" ' X ;� Fe 5 ,3 `{-r ;.:'g , .F z.V ' uP ', i„ r t tt " �°k" 3 �-i `a � : `y, .9 . SS yr i',.PAL'.*:f,t,.."4,.:0474.1g.,:.^,,,Oi..1.. .4,1. 7 j ia3-,aw4k +"�i'ck t� "���hhc,,.1�• ie ,�+"xt .I. AI' /ft); \* '.... Fi�l i '�""i„�` aS1Y. �r . a ft / �!f t tt�h tltll ;;lj�tfir�l;il�l{!!iF Y 35�AV 1SSL t) �.,~ 331ff �,,...�:• d � 4 �lilst d# '-flt + r.lst t rvF t 11 111111 r( � ,.. II � l ill r !: • N.T s. t II, ¢ i. !' "h A L 1 i t 11 i 1 I • 1 ' liy,r). • t F • 1} 1 y,... FJ II f 1 ''',/1•</) i fi } Lake Smetana Open Space and Trail Plan Overall Trail Plan-East Section ASSOCIATES 1 _ _Prairie.-- inter Drive _ _ _ I { 1 /3 ct`j -4 4. illie • tr ! 1 -'',....,'„I t ?S.y kt l�aS -' S )r�I � Y F )j ,° . N\.\\ i y• �,y;�tA�!;fs.. Pt<. w'VL.ti 1ys`.F„`/ '%s�l;^Y.,,,,,'�7�* ,,rh c$S,r , ttel yt",r if j r,,;-4,r`y j f 9c !''w,. :A�.t-,S'3'�a c�..-,h r SS.Kiev i /i "r.0 , Y Fr'r.;,-.ta�S t -. "`!a r' '� 'w .. 1• '72Y, rfh �'4. r e.-,i is ; - ,Y' ..a z .e �.zSlb''t-. tb " � < t t .. u•} d wr� s .� y s4.-',• Yit y`"sY.S"�.a .= f5v.-c ,, a !A.✓ . ',..,I',,,,,,,.?i s � t i1.. ''. h i ,rig a r ,y s°:"1-7 i7 .tt @ S r y 1 .w.��it ra C.i P1'. r„kx..y C��.x>3 <.F t`.�, P.t`x 4',..s ! 4�.. ,..-T 'Erg a "x a 4� , ,a, �„�. u x i. f-7 r rr ` Y" :� t :. Fy«r: .rT,.A -_ 4 t , ,,�`<+ f r � � - r F I. A.-.. � .try b.i,.�F' Y - '�K , t r�4u n' t" aM ,,, �i3 P,, -., •,, i a ,, �L''1 .,tJ� f_}t .. Y , , ',- } 4 .E> a t AY he v� t_ a r r§ V.•-•�`�r'.. ,, 9 • -...--`I '}'`•, .-.4,.1.��n s 3y:.2,,,--i�+t4 '" r h4�'.,,,. ,..,-�-h a L•„,• t,.*a,b� �z - %r- 1'e^..A>'+c.S.,. C ,, y:,a� .a.tT�, 44s L:,"tifx E�,...7y� ` a.-�S\ YL14't4 -7.5.Y`'v-4, a�j -' ; .s sh A slY .52, :`,1' .�'r. . y" },P, n ' "4 y'',,t i ? :, 'a^rirFr ti ti -4 r= 't t wr s r 'l" .s. a t 4"'d' !,gy } ''`s'. sy}aiJYt3 t r 'aSr 'M ,et` 1- �''. ftn:'yt5 1, t 2`,'t� `.AS•h7.9„7„`'"tr„T4r$0i"'�• ,7):��S.c t"ce-r'�"x s t S"-, 5� �, ,,s }$ 'fi i;� ':2t, l..0;t Tar x 'y"`,.1, car aZ;,, � i4� . ,44 77.4i x r• h; n C 1.3Y,'..' rcr�s•t , s r> , d Rr.,�`r•-`of w.,, { L Gs'r 11 *,k - 9£ R X y s R z r e£4yS4"5, 2'h ' t a 1 �. t ` w. _.,✓' p sr },4 c ..,, r ror r .suy , "-.c' Xt j t ✓"" .�L*s 1 r 5lt.,LTA si '. s t''r'h r f 1A-y, "a R v x -. - a. T+ d 1�. ',-;' ! & if -s. w t tk n T 4r. S { 2::1).+„;✓"+nc � , z �s s? „nR"` L`{3.' ,2.3-F yd'i i , „'ts.�� S`+*(f F y s 1�7 t 4r y -�� Ea m't"{'.j �,.,.�' . rz7, ‘a ' ,,,-,, ? 1. ,c kt ti• X. F-,.M1 �f . x!&,,,-, r �i F- uh»'S'; ,.w' - 4}r. `o �k 1 T R t :h1 ', 4, ,,a -,-,, �i(,,,,..- Stl,.4 's•1',, . ►- 1,if 0 t`u s `a y; -•;:' '2 7' ,r '1 f. -, h,-,I,F ,-, lr F-• d,t .,, y.„...c "^,,,,ct ',6c- -,,,, 4€ti .$ sr y, f 1<l'7-- }- '',, n' i i s fS, Ty s `R?'r � S rY ,. �. • F .s!E f ,- r 2 f a, G . �r a ` t ` t �rt�Ct°, a � h rr ifs .raw m.. A r 4 Y r- .ck tifa vr• i " a� • t£"�$'�t' k�Yt ,,,,, ,,,, s ., � t.4 3-. ,,� ri` ,. a,,,. �` A - r .. F r - t "^ ., ,,. '+t 'i Ni t ,'} 1.y ` X L 4 F P ! dry . •, 3 3 .G *.. c S°-- •-• -e` li n ,,, ,,t. . . ', .1tCl v0 .Ld -h,'Yu r �'' '1. ^� ," rj, F.t r 1,.....3., \ b 1 ( TG. ' "% Y.. , r RC tl L^ 4.",,, �"Nu 'C • ( rv1G, r µto l K �,..C 5 "f- f 1/ 4 to, i J x .•5 1 ,.t t ,' ' M' c v�-�4� n [ t. xa.,n "i 1 tix 4 } ,t ' 'fvr �,7 w2i'4 ,- : s�jK n*.Y s.yn "-L •x . 1 'Yt+Y � ,F}`�'.y`'.ta'9rT� 3„s y 2r,r, '� >rt a y�,,i y !y , s r7 h r\ F.,k �atr5 hire 3� ,„43,e t--Nr`:-:.5,„.eFi ��r- k'�"-r.: ,F 1..,tickK �'cr. w r,,, 2 2.u', "z c{,,:".' p v,�c xu'F:y ns ff 3 aa. F,-f tt z-1 y'ay '- ^,3 t '"..Z..y.i ti ,� }a ^-t". . t?"' Y ,`,, •t P"�t,�t<4.� < ,,2' A1rya • .1 1..y.`'T 1;4--•F y •�^Y•"r,4.4,, a,y s.'`-5,0} ..Av,,,.V .0 ,r t. w ilSsk .� �i r+£, �i tit �''� s i Sf' J c.&t s-`.a 'f 1 i '+ L k ,� b al ,, , Sti� � r��n-sy-r" tc � Y,-a��`" F �Y ,1 3L u a 4v,.,rift a't 1,d{.it 2t F4 i 1,v',.,tri' S.rr ",. i�.� ,-, ra i L-..r, ,5.�`C 'sus`,,u .,--Y , f>t`sF a'rrr xv�,z{S :It...i�. v'.. r� ,,,,,, t .,".",. r11?k ., aF }�'t v4`.c r„s r ..„, ,,,, } d ,,la", fi r .Y.`C` ., `3 a E r �'2 t "..,'. , a' t ,{r. -n-, rr i }.r s5 R , s y, ,, e--.., fs-7.,,, v2s. j s .a 5t *,,z �.xi -* i,e i • . t-.,i sw ,fii .L. iz f ' J .,i ..x t ` t ' ‘I. A.,,, 7 �r .�ti 433' tea. r T— �trYi`,- .,. s ; ti-- �z'&= h- a 1 J �4wy (.fw'f r ��_,a �or, . 1 cf 1. ..t X- ti in �D 'z, , i ,,s�' , ui a 3!}r'1r,.,r. .,s '7, <r S' i ,rsut Y :fib err i•ti ' ,,,�...T..... �.c f r , t-� ,s ry $ ` � } = •% {' 1 " r ' ,'. u t f/'�,_'.`., 7. w . f .,s, a t ,-* r• Z rr. t `^.may u ? _ i jI F +�,. • J zn Y i x5 1 �- * TJ •1 - 4 !'Fir ✓ � 1 ...... S -. r .. y L i 4. e , I. ,, e..a- 3 jI: s ' 1 42 f t �V ';'''''AT.',.?; t,+ Y r�S t r*' }-i'.wk a ,,.tc ° F 4�. � •;;• 1.' l -C:. �.'+'f+ six ` v F• � . � ��^�Y 3' 4 ' o x � ,T"^�'w a J(/�I , ..-f,s' r yi } -fir a' r:��-- ' rat , a' 1-Y, . v s x{ i'Y t`d l J r 2-f Cyr Y x'\ • ' K' ay' t t i x�� -i Al ' jr F r .,L. t ('. �i z.: rt q- k'• .- 4 + i ". f,:- le/ f / . 4 r , Z u ,,. 21 y t i r ..s. i. Lake Smetana Open Space and Trail Plan ASSOCIATES Proposed Trail Connection 13 - •- .-------. . --* .." 1 I i ' 1----.. ,. .f-— -4'''''`..---..c,_--r:-er---- -•:s..,=47"'i•r--.7--s- -;.;',•17'W ...,: ---- I I i I 177..-,,...1%,L4=t--f's:'--,Z72-4---L.V...;.-'-*I-Ii*-_,1•-&-i7;--;:"--tf-c-;, ' :r.r`,71i--5.,:v- _,;:`,- -:g-.. ., _,. ...,7.7,-,-....f ..- .,,j .......i f i •=',"---•--C, '-`-..-L'"--- '. ---;-.i- •---••-•-•=14",- ..,i,-;:'*"•-•,•N -1':-1.-vr,-7-------:4•-•--."..----z-j---1,7--,...:..4-_,-;*.---,....•--.-Zr. _..-." f --....-,-------,z.4.-g--:---,..0.•-------It-.--4...:-.-----r._.----:---...--t.-1•:,•.,w,,,,,,,,,'".-...-7-' „.•,„--:-._;...--_,...-::-:-...--";7/,---_-...._-,2z-•-•:-1- ' ,e, -__ , -....- -_, ..,,,,,,..-...1...,-;::,-4 .1,-,:,..:7:...,?....r.v.:kt.,,:-.7...-:.....-,-;-:-.--,=,...M.,.. ..x-i-.;. ...,..---_-_,,z.,..7.7----- ------,-..--A-7-'4,7-. c .4.,„ i-.., ,,,----,,,,,f,,..5,___..,-.2,,,c-,,,-,..-_.,.._.5.4------,--„,--:_ft-_-_,.„.... --,.....-..7,-7.....-- .'"...---:. --..f—,.,--4.--,;-_,..."::,-,--v-- 1 , „ ,-----,:4?-3-,F.,....-,71,-;-=!--:-..:-..-ii--4---::--,-,---,-.-_,-f--__N-243r2.4.,-,:.--i--„-2,7 -2-i-:.1,--,5,4-,:i.---1-_-7:-.:,:;_-_-_,--_;:c?..--v-- 1 A „4,,,, ...., A' 1 ,.5 i 1 I -:Z.:rfe":1•5 !".2-0:a',---,X;7:_kAC;-11.'''t;--4.7,Tr.3;,;4-_---;:k:.--- -7,---aV':---1--5,1±4:1!;::::i-:::;•ef:13A'A,•-,-.1:•". // • .. -1 _ -..„ --, tar i/ f I I 27...-..;cr:". ",--,......;-....'Z.i:" -. ...,-,2;...- ---2---•--...-:'A:..-.F.t.,•-"-„Z.....-,,.--7,'57,1,---/ `""'------;-'-;..4..,. 1 --, !1, ..,,i I i . - `;',,-----•147..--tr"--rf.::: , -1.-k,---4-Y--;-..,r:,t••,,,. .--1,'-':!-`.•-1-T.,-;r-z*-•::,..,...-L.:',---1:‘,..1,4, .;•----- ---.,'7 • / ..., ,,.. ,...., , r i ,_:-•-•----.•% --::-----;..*1-.-..5„-,•_--:,..-.....--Z214 ...--4-----7-.-z.7-'..:',i.--"----,--i',-,s-'4,-.4f- -z•-,---,;--,::-,-- -.-r'.-21-,%--- „...--• 1 -., I A I-1 I I --i•-•,-?,'.....tr.-,*-1:-',--kt•-..''-'-..::-.-',1----•_Z‘,re----4,1."--1:F...-.•':-.-_-k-It'.'..:e r.j.n'Z'..57.A.-.-=',4:1, ,, '',.;,-i.-',--', . - / -...„. f 'Tr-4----L.C.--'-....!;"....51---?,....t.-:,;',,,...4,:e_.;.',1....-,,--1,...--4,t.. .-,-...--.--. •''--;;-,-,-,Tc-`,-T• "---",::-/-.7.,-..,Ats, , I 1 1 1 1 1 .---,-;,.-t;f,-,-:--)5'.=---1-_--t_z-Tf---1-7,":=-...."..a.:;',.-e-f=i-;-'.=.‘",:--7-'.1;',------'%:,'-',.. .--•!--.7:4',---;-;''.-7-:=.:-,,,, ...e'" ------:: / 1 "4.- .-...',.. ,, ,,,, ,, ,2tr„.•:+517::,i.1,-,,,-17.177.1.,t-,..^- ,.... 'C',.....---''-2,.-4 ,1',;;f4": ..7.• 7.'--.2'F.1---T'r.....'.W:'',-,- -,,,--4'4,--. ,,,-',.=r.,1 2=4.-`..,, ....._1,7":-.7,1i.' ,..,..e- ,..., ( lid 1 1 -;`2-;::::..- 7',..Y;-1.7._.V:1.-',7 ' 2,..';- '' -..\---,",'.,v-If.4.17,7,7?---,;'-'.-;.-,,,,* • „„...."--- i , --.------- -• --,..-----...--- ,,,-,---,-;-...,.,,...„--.__.--,n1--,-,.-,4• • ' \ \ i ‘ 1 ,-.;:.„.„,r,„?.--,,,,t> ,-,...,..„,-•:‘ •.•-:;,.....-,_-0 ' ......-',;'',7--•,-,71:-.-...",,t . ....T.,....,,P.::.., ._ E t i ,..,,,-,,-.-.,,,,--,.r.,,....-...,..,.:,.---y, ----- .-....,..,.....,....7„,..„---?...r,.- ,,-,,,.. -• i \ ‘ 1. .\ I \ k ,_ ,,-.,, ,,,,,--... ---,,,,,,-,,,,,:.• - - ,- - - -,-,7-,,,..- -..::::._';574,2:,i,--„,.=,..,-,_--..-•w,.'s.,----.. .e-----_-,,-,„_,,,,,,,.,,---,-,-.:....,.. -.---• . , ',:;' ,i-7.,:.=*:..*.'';-`,.:1-•-:.;,:i:.z.`4'-,4,,Fz:='.',"..%,--irf.e.,,..i-„,-- 7/ ,,,--- 7'.... \ \....--- \l'-',4;:-. .g,- '---'.i.f.'''',., ',.ta-;...:.,-...t.;.:7.:,-,:,..;`,' . .„...,,,..•••''''':„.....„.„,....--__:-------.......,,,,s\ ---- k, ------_,,,,,.. ---_ ...,,..o•,--, ,-..,<-;,,,----...A-.-i,.-'3,f7c,--2- \\\\ •.- • ••''',=.1:-5,,:-,.. .,:••'''',74,-;',?-- / --- 1 ,r,,,,D.-:,ii,tYT-41'.;4;,,'e••••,4-'4-,r,ir-je.v.,-. / •-.--\. --- 0 __ 4 t,,,Al-,ZP,,.••,,,t;'1,-,,....,i--:.:''.-''''.--tt.' Ts ii, ...i-06 \\‘k \ - "'.•.-...:•••..:,-,••..; ,-.....„--.,t.,,,e,..,...•,,,,,, i — I - - _••=.•<f-R.,, .""J",..::::,0,,,..7.:1W,-..-4. i --- -, .-..,-,--, .7-1,17..7-+:;• 4.,..1,.,° '\ -.-. .,, -•-1•,...,7,4',"'",<,-..,-'7.,..-_-..7-I;4,,,-,-- ,,-„.7„,....,,7",,,,,-,?,,,,,,,i,,..,..,, ,,,-.• APle a i = ,, ,,,',5•4,-;77,:42 ,:,:!--fr"'.7, , __,„, f ...,, --,,,, ,I•,L..,,,,.-,...,' ,... / Alir 11-. 1111' '''' \ 1 f*let i ----- 1:A14,3",!'641044.'/ -.1"“,,, / /• ..---"" k ‘,.., • 1 i 0._ ,,,,,,,,•,, ; ‘ A 7 r c:, . _ .,,4 , 1 _-- i 77 c-- .,,,,,T-0 "9 / ,' .4 I.1' ;P:::-.,..!•, - sn, , ..e. *41i.._,..: 11 lit • . 1 r / .e, '' ' ,,,,....----- r-,...,.,..<2,,, . . ..‘_....... 'Ai '-.1.).,1 it) V A ' 1 ''' kF / / if A.",:if;f',...-1 (./ ,11 q 07 I ,, j / < /- /11/4/11 ..-.•'';A-je, "N. °I i *)40 i I' I if I I 11 ....1 ,,,r, _,4 r 2 2 03 ,,, ..,.. 21nm 4 1 ifif V\ m•--. / , 1./ / t // ..,1 '-?'• il \\,, 5 2 Xi.,__ ,..., ., .tav, / ,-7":.... . „,- A / „-.gr." iy t). e. ..insi.-1 ..... 4, ,,, N3 2 c3,,,....,'•...N 41c,. - . 1 1 /7 64.g±3=,.\' ' - i ......./ t3-.It,.-,;,'V, 44',. / X i '.A, i.....ri . -,--7 7 A4) ciSd. I i i rztif1,4 .........._ ,,,-- .....„," i .4^ -...."' / ,•••6z-a,, .- g 7 ''' i 11 / , '-",t;1 P.--•t, - / • .... i I'• '' . ...--- .1,•.\,‘,,o,,./ i /.• i 1 • -..,_,... ,...- , t I i ,..•-•-'-' - ,., di • ---- I ai • •-'t. ....b.,cr•," - •"*., 41111. r ,...4„...„•,, .0,N; \.,,I...--,.....4****-*^I . le S .A.,., y 44,i,'::-1/4, 1:-.4:,-10 . R..'-''4 ,,,„..-/,.,,,;9kt&') , , '•.;.;•, .,:n....-:. -'- Vat"' ...i.:1,'1.4.•• t 2e f- X.... ..e,V4"Cr4 --k' 7 r, . },Ck'4[0,fr\ ,..A. a,.'4' I 1\, r• ,...,,, s ' 4 - q ;Fre',VI, ,4. ....,",-. ..,...... is.-0,- 1 ';`^N"\\ -::''' ‘ ......••-,'s , t,-4...a-•'- •1,...4.1.,•' .<17.:C' 4,4'.7' ...-' '''' ..^ r..• i'....."--' ri,J 1 ",,,.,,k1,1•:,1;..1%...•:,4. "k '''' .'''-'1,- "I''': L'.. - A1'>,,,L.,.. 3.'3›,. " i-Th ...'" ( W ..;;;:sn'3'‘ '':04." . ......v .3.:(,-;Yo•••tc,c; f..14, -. ,, :.14„,,,,. .1- .....L rr, 1\...„..... - , i l '^I% 4.'c'?1 .„:!,,:14,4.....t',„•VU...y, .-4, . \-.0:',...-,Z$ ...', '4%,„-1.0 ...A! t• '.1...,,,, • ..):,-'1Th" • g.—"'"'24-r 1..A.-', ."-,,.‘‘51,-5, f'.,'4•; ..."•.".4...41, -'4 / \ )/ -- 4 >f(4) c.7.4t4 ''''' ""' ''''':':*-...,-,....'''''' .:1.'1''' /e, •- 1 " C1.1 al ...... -4,,..... ,... ",•:-,'N'" (*I, .....-' o, - :••••.'.s:','i-,..,, -. ?/1 /1" -•:::.,">„,,,,,.... x•:......N., • -,,••"'"' C.-:.1-4,,,,i --...__„.> ,.e,.,,,,,/ / ) ./.._. ....--- •••.„1 . /I -- ...-••• ' "'Ur --......... ' ,..,-••••••-• '''''' .....,•;----' e r,,,''.F F .., • ' , ‘\ \\ • f.,.......,„ ' Di ,..., ‘-c--- ',......" 1 / 1 ..., '-> / / . ‘\\ .,..'''''''' / ./ \\ 4 \\,‘,...4, ii..., Cr / \•( \\ \\ i, ‘-' 6' -4k--,-..... ___.,- -"*.- ).". / fe. / / \\ \\ :„.„..-,./..-" ...,_, -,... q I Ma US Er. ,Lake Smetana Open Space and Trail Plan wThe Point" Concept Plan ASSOCIATES l Li fs } �" — " ` / Z '/ ''� - 7 .../ CD/1 /6.-'. C),.. '''. / / 7/ X-/1_1/-7., 0 . i / / /-°: l'‘.1111111111,' / / //:://y 1 2/7 / / Aillibbn- ,7',,,, ,.. ilp 1:-_,.* , i w- ,) , iiir /, / ,/,•, 40,,, mod,///,' i. 4,, /. ..,. ) „..._, A...1194- (maiim,...--,, ______-- , 4 00,...„..r y a - . \ J IF „ ... i, N./ ,,,,, , . ,, -) \ , ^`.4, f '� . O `fr- t- I . / = Cf) c. i C) .ti{ xz ,_ IIN ..• ,-..7-- ,.. ,,.., --, ......,,,,,.., — NI = C/3 ,..."*"....,--••tr-A t, _L ''� "- '\ I w..i 1 i A4"'" • i ...'"-'. .1/4'........,.! 'is ri l',..41 t..., , ,..., 1 ,r i „,„ , i ...,,,,, c. • • \\,........„.", -. (f) › 0 i 1 , , x / --1-... \. , I / X-77-,. \ .„ \ 7. —p 7J —0 im--, A....\\N 7J > Z • • • t \ \J, r U ", y .., `' Kati Imo,.. .. ,yy1> > ..„X..,",./ . N. * — Z CV- r). 'k , �,�rj/�,, Y t • '.k ZZ'^•«. 1 '`.i � :tom:'''' • f tY Lake Smetana Open Space and Trail Plan ligmEw Proposed Picnic Shelter ASSOCIATES 15 I- a z , a 7 ti ' w t'YA�fd:ate.-_, Z - i ri ate... M 1 73 ]" n U a7my�,c.i It s1 eH F.,- �� t .414 ,,.fib .I't knSt•A k , '' y..y Vf4,/init==V.,,,,ht2ii:Ft'a.,A4,-08,154:ef: . t •' V.jr .i .....4_ }. 0 Iv, . i = ,,..._..,..,:.,. ,•-:'-! rr..;,-. l! a \� ,0114",f P.II.,1 ., %Ali`` i' -13 • %,.Pr .. ' ta•u,•., ,,.,3> 1 ',,-;ke,'1.1'...',V 4\Si V4.4111(44.7%.%:);%;'.:..'.•4,..$`:e, lit Oss •:a D r4.,41 %'•$• ._ Lake Smetana Open Space and Trail Plan Picnic Shelter Section /� ASSOCIATES • I' ''' I P---'''... ..---. . . f I . ' 1 I : i I , I / I i „..“... -x, P',..) r.s....._.; I I I i / I— '---,„_ I -----7 ti i i , -.•.,.. / i I I i it I _I ---‘,1 '----1 i '----• --„,- i / , f I i i i- . i .e'-‘ .---4.... -,........ 'yi..3.,„ / / ir / / / i . 1 i 17, :),,7--- - , e•y•,. / ',..-,111 .,,^ \ Y.—.1 N / 1 1 „riig i- i / ., i ., f -'• 4 7 i i 1 /1 . / •i•1 f/.1 I.i•7 '/ I1fI11ii ( / I 1 ,,•1•\,,%\.t\.,.\\,,\t*‘'-; \,‘%-\,,.-0‘,e‘,`‘,''As;,.'°.,t..,,.\,\\•,a0;'\\‘,et,\,.‘`%o,\'-;\t;\.m„\1` ,,\•:„\•\k,s.•1,',.\'i.r-`.o'li.1 '\.\‘...:'z\..'.,\.„''..",\'\'y„.'"'',%..','\.*.,.‘,•\,v0.•,r'\r,,.i,,‘,,.,,„..,0,1 1 -,It•1_(:•,..,. ‘\ .,..'..,.,-..V4 _..,. "...- N,1St/ kel /I .1 / 7 I I4 ef 1' \ 1 ..'.7.)••': \,\\ -i-.,f- I • \ k 1 \ i \ \ r— -V I • \ I , \ , fr--,, , .—, .. - -- - \\ ,I -..,. ,...., ...,,., • .„4.,.....4 ,.....;...:,„„. ,i,...- ..; A .\ X ''.1:-. r---, -P..-- ---, >' C '--., i '-.,..,:rr• ' .,..,.t -,, "------4..„,--„,.7,.::-,;47,„. ..1,.. ..,..,..',.,... -,--",:;;iFk---•-.,...::. i ," >.'"\---,-,1/4, is 4..., ••••, . \ \ 1•'''' \1.--''.1-:.-'* /\ • ,-, 1 , ,.. e-....., -,,o...• . \ T... ‹.....„!1•. :t s•-....—,..2 •--' . ,,, i ",..„. \ ; (15) -,„..-.-,...,- ...-.-----4,-- ..k--,,-1--------\--t - \ ..., 'N'".•%. '''''. ( -.''\ _ '. •.,.,-;.,...--,.-..A. ,,,,, i ..,,,, •.,, 3 ., i' ''t.„--.., s r..,„----...--..-,.::::,::---- ...... - ,.,.-J.,,—,,,,,,, ,,--‘,..;„`', \ •'-.., ...,...--",- ~.....- ,.,,' ...`*---.0.-... k'N N. ‘1.,, ..-"'i•.•'-Z..:,';'-if \ "' ' '''''• '"------.0- __ e,....‹.--„%r• "---)N4 -:::.- -- •\1/4.L ;,... ..../ N••,,,,,,„:„.. ,-.• \ • ..'.k....--,,t_ e- .;. :.,..,,.,...„,... -- , -t l'-'7.71"------- ..."%----,- c . \ ... e .\ 0 N. ) -t:::.^-7, -.--..Y. \ -•„,„ , ...,..._ - 4:-...,7.,.,.___ . D-- '``.,„,,.t.s.,,,,_,J•Ni .-"T••••----.. ',-. it....., .'14.,--'4 .! ,... ........„„N A.., %., ' - ',-..„.... •-•-1 ..1 t . '''....,•:...*\ ',,•7.''''' .-i ......i...,:::, ... ./ . t • \•1 .!"••••„„s„.... . ..,•-•.‘' -'''''.---:•!'•4. ".........-"•-•,.,.... , i. .„,1 \--..._„/ '''--,,,T.'"*."-'*•,... . 4, N"I----- • - • ......e 1 Lake Smetana Open Space and Trail Plan =EMI Proposed Deck Overlook ASSOCIATES n z 0 a a Alt:':,•��:�';.i��r;. 1�l 1 m i _ ` tf. 4% tit."! r `.0 t— o mil:I:I� act tit ` � ,' ,•�'*S�: ".: , V• o t it '1� ;it,' l .,•�• I'/, "1i :PO Ape ro rt • • ' ' III.. ,T.. 4$r.'.� ; ' ... try• '; •• 0,.4' u mte lao • .,• ,,.. ati � • r ' m • 3 ^ z a Lake Smetana Open Space and Trail Plan EnmsT ASSOCIATES 5°""f E 5 Deck Overlook Section I ' 08/02/2000 City of Eden Prairie Smetana Lake Point Park&Overall Trail Plan Preliminary Cost Estimate Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost DEMOLITION/REMOVALS • Tree removal .250 CaUn. 22 $ 5,500.00 Miscellaneous 1 LS 1500 $ 1,500.00 Clearing&grubbing 1 LS 1000 $ 1,000.00 Subtotal for removals $ 8,000.00 • SITE GRADING Final grading 2000 SY 0.3 $ 600.00 Fill from off-site 200 CY 8.75 $ 1,750.00 Subtotal for grading $ 2,350.00 SITE PAVING/SURFACING Bituminous path(8') 2717 LF 15 $ 40,755.00 Bituminous path(6')• 370 LF 13 $ 4,810.00 Subtotal for paving/surfacing $ 45,565.00 PLANTING Ornamental tree-2 1/2"cal. 5 EA 235 $ 1,175.00 Coniferous tree- 12 EA 300 $ 3,600.00 Sod 312 SY 5 $ 1,560.00 Herbaceous plantings. 40 • EA 6 $ 240.00 Mulch 4.7 CY 8 $ 37.60 Subtotal for planting $ 6,612.60 WALLS&STRUCTURES Fishing pier(DNR Grant) 50 LF 270 $ 13,500.00 Overlook Materials 1 LS 4200 $ 4,200.00 Picnic shelter delivered 1 LS 12,744 $ 12,744.00 Picnic shelter installation 1 LS 3823.2 $ • 3,823.20 Kiosk+signs 1 LS 5000 $ 5,000.00 Swing gate at Smetana Residence 1. LS 700 $ 700.00 Subtotal for walls&structures $ 39,967.20 Smetana Cost Estimate -Page- l� . • 08/02/2000 • SITE FURNISHINGS Benches 4 EA 650 $ 2,600.00 Picnic tables 17 EA 800 $ 13,600.00 Grills 1 EA 220 $ 220.00 Trash receptacles-Alpha 2 EA 1500 $ 3,000.00 Bike racks 1 EA 275 $ 275:00 Horseshoe courts 2 EA 1000 $ 2,000.00 Lighting+electrical connection 1 LS 7,500 $ 7,500.00 Drinking fountains+connection 1 LS 13,500 $ 13,500.00 Subtotal for site fumishings $ 42,695.00 MISCELLANEOUS Permit Fees 1 LS 1000 $ 1,000.00 Subtotal for misc. $ 1,000.00 Subtotal $146,189.80 5%contingency $ 7,309.49 TOTAL $153,499.29 • • • • Smetana Cost Estimate Rage-2- G S B . _ - DEVELOPMENTS SEPTEMBER 22, 2000 COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8080 MITCHELL ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-4485 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I AM A PROPERTY OWNER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SMETANA LAKE AND I HAVE RECEIVED NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE SMETANA LAKE PARK PLAN. UPON CONVERSATIONS WITH STUART FOX, MANAGER OF PARKS AND NATURAL RESOURCES, I AM ADVISED THAT IN ADDITION TO THE PICNIC SHELTER, TRAILS, OVERLOOK, HORSESHOE COURT, AND LANDSCAPING, THAT THE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD WILL BE DISCUSSING THE PERIMETER TRAIL AROUND THE NORTH SIDE OF SMETANA LAKE. I HAVE A NUMBER OF CONCERNS REGARDING THE TRAIL ON MY PROPERTY. MY PROPERTY AS IT CURRENTLY EXISTS IS NESTLED INTO THE TREES OVERLOOKING THE LAKE. IF A TRAIL IS TO BE ESTABLISHED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE LAKE AND RUN THROUGH MY PROPERTY I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT PLACED IN THE BEST LOCATION TO MINIMIZE GRADING, TREE CUTTING AND TOTAL IMPACT ON MY PROPERTY. I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A CONNECTION FROM MY BUILDING TO THE TRAIL. IN ADDITION, I REQUEST THE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD TO CONSIDER TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ISSUES AS THEY RELATE TO THE PROJECT. AS WE ALL KNOW, TRAFFIC IN THE TRIANGLE IS AN ACUTE PROBLEM, AT LEAST FOR THOSE OF US WHO WORK IN THE TRIANGLE, AND TO CREATE AN AMENITY THAT WOULD ATTRACT ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IS QUESTIONABLE. ARE WE NOT BETTER OFF JUST ESTABLISHING THE TRAILWAY SYSTEM WHICH WOULD BE USED BY THE RESIDENTS AND WORKERS IN THE AREA? ADDING ADDITIONAL PARKING JUST INVITES MORE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ISSUES. I THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. VERY LY YOUR , 4G JER'Y PO NOY P/DJ • P.O.Box 4144129 • Eden Prairie,MN 553/141.1429 • 612.9412236 • t 612.942.9567 • jerrn@gsbdev.com �-I COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES SEP'1'hMBER 25,2000 PAGE 3 C. LAKE SMETANA PARK AND TRAIL BY THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.0 acres and Planned Unit Development district Review with waivers in the Rural Zoning District on 2.0 acres. Location North side of Smetana Lake. The public hearing opened at 7:07 p.m. Bob Lambert,Parks and Recreation Service Director, indicated that this is a public hearing for review and approval of the Lake Smetana Improvement project which includes completion of a trail around Smetana Lake (located on the north side of 494), construction of a picnic pavilion and viewing deck, and construction of horseshoe courts and landscaping. Michael Franzen, City Planner, added that this project is part of the Planned Unit Development(PUD)review shoreland setbacks are needed for the picnic shelter and viewing deck. The waivers are reasonable. The property is a narrow point on the lake and compliance with the 150 foot setback would preclude any structures. Construction of the picnic shelter and overlook deck results in minimal grading at the top of the slope.No significant trees will lost. Existing trees screen these structures from the lake. Staff recommends approval. Nancy Arleta, a resident of Real Life Valley View Co-Op, said she wanted to emphasize the need to emphasize green space and significant trees. She said she did not see any trees tagged yet and wanted to know which trees would be preserved. She questioned the use of the kiosk in the plan and how traffic and noise control would be addressed. She suggested bocci ball as a possibility for recreation for the seniors. Lambert said they have not marked trees for removal yet. The kiosk is a sign so that people will know who has the building reserved. He said it would not generate any significant traffic; it would be primarily people already in the area. There is an area designated for horseshoe or bocci ball. Motion by Foote second by Nelson to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7- 0. • The public hearing closed at 7:20 p.m. Foote asked if the funding source was cash park fees collected from Real Life. Lambert said yes,primarily. Motion by Koenig second by Stoelting to recommend approval of the request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.0 acres and Planned Unit Development district Review with waivers within the Rural Zoning District on 2.0 COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES SEP'1'EMBER 25,2000 PAGE 4 acres,based on plans dated July 31,2000 and subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated September 22,2000,to the City Council. Motion carried, 7- 0. • 03 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Public Hearing 11/21/00 SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Dev. And Financial Resolution Authorizing A Proposed Multi-Family ITEM NO.: Services Housing Program and Issuance of Multi-Family Don Uram Housing Revenue Bonds (Rolling Hills Senior _VI If :ID Housing Project) Requested Action Move to: Adopt Resolution Authorizing A Proposed Multi-Family Housing Program and Issuance of Multi-Family Housing Revenue Bonds (Rolling Hills Senior Housing Project). Synopsis This Council has received a proposal that the City issue its revenue bonds to finance a development consisting of a combination of a multifamily housing development and a new health care facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed$24,000,000. The proceeds would be loaned by the City to SCF Rolling Hills,LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company(the "Borrower"), to finance the acquisition of land and the construction and equipping thereon of(i) an approximately 75-unit multifamily rental housing facility designed and intended for occupancy by elderly persons, and(ii) a health care facility consisting of approximately 53 assisted living units and 14 Alzheimer's units. The Project will be located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Rolling Hills Drive and Prairie Center Drive in the City. Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2 of the Act requires that prior to undertaking the financing of the Project, the City must prepare and adopt a housing program after notice and hearing and review given and held as provided therein. The City has prepared a multifamily housing program for the Project, designated as the "Program for Multifamily Housing Development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, Rolling Hills Senior Housing Project" (the "Housing Program"). The Housing Program authorizes the Project and the issuance of revenue bonds by the City in the approximate principal amount of$24,000,000 to finance the costs thereof. Attachments Resolution Housing Finance Program—Rolling Hills Senior Housing Project 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2000- RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROPOSED PROJECT AND REVENUE BONDS UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTERS 462A AND 462C, ON BEHALF OF SCF ROLLING HILLS, LLC; ADOPTING A HOUSING PROGRAM THEREFOR • BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota(the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals and Findings 1.1. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462A and 462C, as amended(the"Housing Programs Act"), to issue its revenue bonds to finance a development consisting of a combination of a multifamily housing development, as defmed by the Housing Programs Act, and a new or existing health care facility, as defmed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.153,which revenue bonds shall be payable solely from revenues of the development or other security pledged therefore. 1.2. SCF Rolling Hills,LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company(the "Borrower"),whose members are Shelter Care Corporation and Ebenezer Society, each a Minnesota nonprofit corporation,has proposed that the City, acting pursuant to the Housing Programs Act, issue its revenue bonds in one or more series (the`Bonds") in an aggregate amount not to exceed$24,000,000, the proceeds of which would be loaned by the City to the Borrower to finance a project(the"Project") consisting of the acquisition of land and the construction and equipping thereon of(i) an approximately 75-unit multifamily rental housing facility designed and intended for occupancy by elderly persons, and(ii) a health care facility consisting of approximately 53 assisted living units and 14 Alzheimer's units, to be owned and operated by the Borrower. The Project will be located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Rolling Hills Drive and Prairie Center Drive in the City. 1.3. Pursuant to the Act,the City is authorized to develop and administer programs of multifamily housing developments under the circumstances and within the limitations set forth in the Act. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.07 provides that such programs for multifamily housing developments may be financed with revenue bonds issued by the City, following adoption of a housing program, after a public hearing, and other proceedings conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Act. 1.4. Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2 of the Act requires that prior to undertaking the financing of the Project,the City must prepare and adopt a housing program after notice and hearing and review given and held as provided therein. The City has prepared a multifamily housing program for the Project, designated as the"Program for Multifamily Housing a Development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C,Rolling Hills Senior Housing Project" (the"Housing Program"). The Housing Program authorizes the Project and the issuance of revenue bonds by the City in the approximate principal amount of$24,000,000 to finance the costs thereof. 1.5. On November 21,2000,this Council held a public hearing(which public hearing was adjourned from the Council meeting of November 7, 2000) on the adoption of the Housing Program after publication of the notice of hearing not less than 15 days prior to the date thereof in a newspaper circulating generally in the City. A copy of the draft Housing Program has been forwarded to the Metropolitan Council(the"Metropolitan Council")for review. The public hearing was duly noticed and held in accordance with the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. All parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to adopt the Program and to undertake and finance the Project and interested persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing. Representatives of the Metropolitan Council did not submit comments on the Program at or prior to the public hearing. Section 2. Adoption of Housing Program. 2.1. Based on the public hearing, such written comments (if any) and such other facts and circumstances as this Council deems relevant,it is hereby found,determined and declared: (a) the Project would assist the preservation of needed housing units in the City; (b) the Housing Program is hereby approved and adopted in the form presently on file with the City; and (c) the issuance by the City of the Bonds under the provisions of the Act and the Program to finance the Project in the maximum aggregate face amount of $24,000,000(the"Bonds")is hereby preliminarily approved. 2.2. A. The Borrower has agreed to pay directly or through the City any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion; and whether or not the Bonds or operative instruments are executed. B. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Borrower. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to in Section 1 hereof, should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds in an amount less than referred to in Section 1 hereof, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreements as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. C. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that the City and the Borrower shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement,the Bonds, and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and that the closing of the issuance and sale of the Bonds shall have occurred by no later than November 21,2001. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are not sold within such time,this resolution shall expire and be of no further effect. D. The Bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable,upon any property of the City, except the revenues specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and each Bond,when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the Bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues and property specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. Passed this 21st day of November, 2000. Jean L. Harris,Mayor Attest: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk 7 PROGRAM FOR A MUL 17NAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,CHAPTER 462C ROLLING HILLS SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT General. The City believes,based upon the data contained in its Housing Plan and the 1990 Census of Population and Housing,that a primary housing need of the City is an increase in housing options available to seniors within the City and surrounding area. To meet the elderly housing needs,the City plans to encourage the development in the City of multifamily housing particularly adapted to the needs of elderly residents. As a secondary benefit,to the extent elderly residents can be relocated into suitable multifamily units, additional single family detached units will become available for sale to families of younger residents. A major method available to the City to facilitate construction of multifamily housing is the issuance of tax-exempt bonds under Minnesota Statutes,Chapter 462C, and Sections 142(d) or 145, as appropriate, of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Target Areas. No specific areas of the City will be targeted for such developments, although development within,or in the vicinity of,the existing nursing homes and elderly housing facilities in the City would be a desirable location for elderly residents. Housing Program to Meet Need. A separate section of this Program contains specific information regarding a development to be undertaken by SCF Rolling Hills,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company(the "Company"),whose members are ShelterCare Corporation,a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, and Ebenezer Society,a Minnesota corporation(the"Corporations"),to develop congregate living units for elderly residents in connection with its existing nursing home and elderly housing facilities. Monitoring Methods. With respect to the specific development hereinafter discussed on behalf of the Company,no special monitoring by the City is necessary. Proceeds of the bonds proposed to be issued to finance the development will be held and disbursed by a trustee bank during construction,and it is believed the oversight exercised by the trustee bank,and any title insurance company assisting the bank with the disbursement of the proceeds,will be adequate to insure the development as presented is in fact carried out. Administrative Capacity of City to Supervise Program. No special administrative work by the City is anticipated in connection with the development proposed to be undertaken by the Company. As noted above,construction disbursements will be handled by the trustee bank for the proposed bonds. After construction,the facility must be operated by the Company in accordance with various operating covenants(relating to such things as maintenance, 5 insurance,licensing,etc.)to be contained in a Loan Agreement to be entered into by the City and the Company,which Loan Agreement will be assigned by the City to the trustee bank as security for the bondholders. All costs incurred by the City in connection with the proposed development will be paid by the Company and the Company will pay an annual administrative fee to cover any ongoing administrative costs to be incurred by the City. No additional staff will be required by the City in carrying out the proposed development. General Description of the Development. The Company proposes to(i)construct and equip a health care facility consisting of approximately 53 assisted living units and 14 Alzheimer units(the"Assisted Living Facility"),and(ii) construct and equip an approximately 75-unit multifamily housing facility designed and intended for occupancy by elderly persons(the"Housing Facility,"together with the Assisted Living Facility,the "Project"). The Company proposes that the City finance the Project by issuing revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed$24,000,000,the revenue bonds to be issued pursuant to the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05,subdivision 7,which permits revenue bonds to be issued to finance developments consisting of a combination of multifamily housing development and a new or existing health care facility,if certain requirements set forth therein are met.It is believed the requirements of said subdivision 7 are met because Assisted Living Facility is a health care facility within the meaning of said subdivision 7,and the Housing Facility is designed and intended to be used for rental occupancy;the Housing Facility is designed and intended to be used primarily by elderly persons. As currently planned,the Housing Facility will consist of 75 one-and two-bedroom living units, varying in size from 753 to 1,060 square feet. Each unit will be a complete living unit with bathroom, living and sleeping areas,and a kitchen. The Housing Facility will also include common areas providing amenities such as a common dining room,a general store,cinema,library/computer room, arts and crafts room, exercise room,community room and day spa,and heated underground parking for its residents. Geographic Area. The Assisted Living Facility and the Housing Facility will be located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Rolling Hills Drive and Prairie Center Drive in the City. It is expected that the Project will draw residents from the City,and also from the surrounding area. Revenue Bond Details. Schedules prepared by Dain Rauscher Incorporated,the proposed bond underwriter,are attached as Exhibit A. The analysis assumes an issue of revenue bonds in the principal amount of$24,000,000, and is based on current interest rate assumptions. It is likely interest rates will change somewhat from those used in preparing Exhibit A. Total Project costs may also change,but the total amount of bonds issued is not expected to exceed$24,000,000. Total bond issuance costs,including underwriters' discount,legal fees,title insurance,mortgage tax,bond printing,are estimated to be approximately $450,000. 6 Meeting Needs of Low and Moderate Income Persons. The Company anticipates that the units in the Housing Facility will rent for approximately$843 to$1,650 per month. Additional services, such as home health care,laundry service, additional meal service, additional housekeeping and grocery delivery,will be available at additional cost. The Company has concluded that the units will be affordable by a significant number of elderly residents of the City and surrounding area on the basis of their current income,and that number will be increased if funds received from the sale of current residences are made available and if tax increment financing assistance is provided. At least 20%of the units in the Housing Facility will be affordable to people with incomes at or below 50%of the area median income. It should be noted that pursuant to Section 462C.05, subdivision 4,no statutory income limits are applicable to the Housing Facility because the Housing Facility is designed for rental primarily to elderly persons. • Bond allocation. Because the Corporations, as sole members of the Company,are both nonprofit corporations exempt from tax under Section 501(c)(3)of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,as amended, it is anticipated that the tax exempt bonds will be issued as"qualified 501(c)(3)bonds"pursuant to Section 145 of the Code. As such,no allocation of bonding authority is required under Section 146 of the Code. E S CERI'lh'ICA E AS TO RESOLUTION I,the undersigned,being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota(the"City"),hereby certify that the attached resolution is a true copy of Resolution No. , entitled: "RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROPOSED PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTERS 462A AND 462C, ON BEHALF OF SCF ROLLING HILLS, LLC;ADOPTING A HOUSING PROGRAM THEREFOR" (the"Resolution"), on file in the original records of the City in my legal custody;that the Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City at a meeting on November 21, 2000, and that the meeting was duly held by the City Council and was attended throughout by a quorum,pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law; and that the Resolution has not as of the date hereof been amended or repealed. WITNESS my hand officially this day of November, 2000. City Clerk 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Payment of Claims November 21,2000 SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development and Payment of Claims Financial Services/Don Uram Requested Action Move to: Approve the Payment of Claims as submitted(roll call vote) Synopsis Checks92768-93212 Background Information Attachments COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 17-NOV-2000 (09:42) DIVISION TOTAL N/A $0.50 LEGISLATIVE $311.09 LEGAL COUNSEL $23,721.26 CUSTOMER SERVICE • $15,996.28 • BENEFITS $14,769.42 TECHNOLOGY $1,704.03 FINANCE $27.06 HUMAN RESOURCES $2,296.87 COMMUNICATIONS $6,574.30 HUMAN SERV $4,420.00 RISK MANAGEMENT $253.07 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION $5,007.26 • ENGINEERING $235.33 INSPECTIONS $20.15 FACILITIES $1,547.03 ASSESSING $99.50 POLICE $17,193.00 FIRE $6,171.52 ANIMAL CONTROL $1,059.07 STREETS/TRAFFIC $1,497.48 PARK MAINTENANCE $28,306.04 FLEET SERVICES $20,209.18 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $600.00 COMMUNITY DEV $1,244.00 COMMUNITY CENTER $6,889.79 HISTORICAL $174.93 YOUTH RECREATION $694.91 SPECIAL EVENTS $123.18 ADULT RECREATION $1,921.96 RECREATION ADMIN $100.75 ADAPTIVE REC $302.26 OAK POINT POOL $164.50 ARTS $42.11 PARK FACILITIES $671.40 PUBLIC IMPROV PROD $558,736.37 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $6,800.00 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS $203,376.15 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM $6,854.25 CITY CENTER $130.48 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $12,373.17 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR STORE $51,389.27 PRAIRIEVIEW LIQUOR STORE $89,320.15 • DEN ROAD LIQUOR STORE $183,539.51 WATER DEPT $147,127.10 SEWER DEPT $6,236.20 STORM DRAINAGE $2,203.27 AGENCY FUNDS $18,506.75 EQUIPMENT $43,215.57 $1,494,157.47* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 17-NOV-2000 (09 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 92768 $3.86 AT&T TELEPHONE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92769 $27.49 AT&T TELEPHONE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 92770 $5.00 BARRADA, AMR ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 92771 $191.62 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO. CASH OVER/SHORT FD 10 ORG 92772 $190.80 DELEGARD TOOL CO SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 92773 $196.51 GE CAPITAL RENTALS GENERAL _ 92774 $29.82 HARMON GLASS COMPANY FURNITURE & FIXTURES SR CTR OPERATIONS 92775 $68.00 KLEMP, AMY LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 92776 $166.50 LAMBERT, BOB DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 92777 $50.00 LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 92778 $38.97 MANN, TRIA MILEAGE AND PARKING SPECIAL EVENTS ADMINISTRATIVE • 92779 $9,576.37 MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSU BLDG RENTAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92780 $600.00 MAX, MICHAEL JON OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES EPAA DINNER 92781 $90.08 MINNEGASCO GAS DOUGLAS/MORE HOUSE 92782 $76.05 MUELLER, CYNTHIA MILEAGE AND PARKING AQUATICS & FITNESS SUPERV 92783 $16.06 STAR TRIBUNE MISC NON-TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92784 $5.00 STIRZL, SALLY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 92785 $97.50 STOVRING, LESLIE MILEAGE AND PARKING ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 92786 $3,000.00 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE GENERAL 92787 $2,593.96 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE GENERAL 92788 $122.65 WESTACOTT, JOEL VIDEO SUPPLIES COMMUNITY SERVICES 92789 $79.62 WRIGHT, IRENE MILEAGE AND PARKING GOLDEN-TRIANGE STUDY 92790 $120.00 APCO INTERNATIONAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 92791 $440.00 BCA/FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATOR SCHOOLS POLICE 92792 $472.76 BLUE LINE CLUB FACILITIES RENTAL ICE ARENA 92793 $26.17 HULTMAN, APRIL LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 92794 $247.32 CUTTING EDGE CLUB FACILITIES RENTAL ICE ARENA 92795 $108.89 EASTBURN, EMILY TRAVEL POLICE 92796 $537.72 EMS EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 92797 $42.40 FEDEX POSTAGE GENERAL 92798 $91.02 GINA MARIAS INC DEPOSITS ESCROW 92799 $39.00 GRAVES, MARIAN SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT PROGRAM 92800 $46.16 JASMINE Z. KELLER GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 92801 $40.00 JUHNKE, THOMAS LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 92802 $32.00 KININISON, MATTHEW LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 92803 $419.93 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 92804 $334.44 LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCE TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 92805 $20.48 LESCO INC LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 92806 $10.00 MAGNUSON, MARVIN SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 92807 $10.00 MAGNUSON, PATRICIA SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 92808 $141,186.45 MEDICA CHOICE COBRA COSTS/REV BENEFITS 92809 $30.00 MEMA ATTN KEN SOUTHORN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 92810 $200.00 METRO CHIEF OFFICERS ASSOC DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE 92811 $25.00 MINNESOTA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS POLICE 92812 $46.00 MPCA LICENSES & TAXES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 92813 $15.00 MPPOA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 92814 $261.00 ' NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE W/H FD 10 ORG 92815 $48.00 NEW TEKNIQUES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 92816 $100.75 HELLING, LAURIE MILEAGE AND PARKING RECREATION ADMIN 92819 $218,889.00 PEMTOM LAND COMPANY, THE LAND & INTEREST IN LAND DEV RICHARD T ANDERSON CONSERV 92820 $180.00 PROTECTION ONE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92821 $56,512.43 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 92822 $50.78 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 92823 $3.00 RUEHLE, JERRY SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 92824 $24.00 SAKALOS, DEBORAH LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 3 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 17-NOV-2000 (09 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 92825 $25.00 SENIOR SAFETY COALITION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 92826 $90.50 SINELL, STEVE MISCELLANEOUS ASSESSING-ADMIN 92827 $40.00 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CENTER INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 92828 $77.03 TROUP, JENNA MILEAGE AND PARKING PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 92829 $2,680.67 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 92830 $469.13 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL 92831 $25.35 VOSBEEK, PETER SCHOOLS POLICE 92832 $1,209.73 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 92833 $958.47 BEST BUY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 92834 $667.36 CEMSTONE WASTE DISPOSAL STORM DRAINAGE 92835 $1,093.04 ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 92836 $246.83 HUMAN SERVICES - EMSOCS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 92837 $130.48 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES POLICE-CITY CENTER 92838 $10,373.17 JAYMES BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES 1999 REHAB 92839 $3,014.73 KMC TELECOM • TELEPHONE GENERAL 92840 $29.49 MCGLYNN BAKERIES MISCELLANEOUS POLICE 92841 $175.00 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 92842 $35.90 PLANNER PADS OFFICE SUPPLIES TREE DISEASE 92843 $104.00 TROUP, JENNA MILEAGE AND PARKING PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 92844 $105.44 ALEX AUDIO & VIDEO SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 92845 $1,075.39 HYDROLOGIC BUILDING MATERIALS MILLER PARK 92846 $140.00 MN DNR DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 92847 $4,776.16 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO OF AME LIFE EMPLOYERS SHARE BENEFITS 92848 $2,818.53 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO DISABILITY IN EMPLOYERS FD 10 ORG 92849 $13.00 RICHFIELD, CITY OF OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 92850 $125.50 ACE ICE COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92851 $741.35 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92852 $147.18 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92853 $1,290.56 BELLBOY CORPORATION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92855 $4,857.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92856 $3,674.77 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92858 $7,141.90 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92859 $256.00 EXTREME BEVERAGE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92860 $1,221.99 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92861 $12,103.81 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92863 $24,420.74 JOHNSON•BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92868 $1,643.60 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92869 $5,804.98 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92871 $353.57 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92872 $258.60 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92873 $2,845.94 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92874 $153.04 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92875 $8,697.82 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92880 $511.20 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92881 $2,475.64 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92883 $13,605.78 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92886 $8,659.82 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92887 $1,454.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92888 $538.75 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92889 $923.34 WINE MERCHANTS INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92890 $105.40 BROWN, JENNIE CONFERENCE COUNCIL 92891 $5,561.17 CB RICHARD ELLIS UTILITIES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92892 $3,000.00 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 92893 $4.00 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES INSURANCE RISK MANAGEMENT 92894 $27.14 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE GENERAL LI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 17-NOV-2000 (09 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 92895 $1,373.85 FANNY HILL DINNER THEATER SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 92896 $149.31 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE 92897 $2,514.15 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 92900 $187.57 GLENROSE FLORAL AND GIFT SHOPS EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 92901 $65.50 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 92902 $165.00 IIMC DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 92903 $85.09 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TREE DISEASE 92904 $275.00 MERSC EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 92905 $450.00 MILE CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 92906 $175.00 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 92907 $175.00 NRPA PUBLICATIONS CENTER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 92908 $17.21 PAPER WAREHOUSE EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 92909 $18.06 PELTIER, TIMOTHY MISC FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE 92910 $170.40 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT VIDEO SUPPLIES POLICE 92911 $139.93 PETTY CASH ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 92912 $1,513.82 SINELL, STEVE TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 92913 $365.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 92914 $183.63 WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE MN WASTE DISPOSAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92915 $320.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL.EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 92916 $2,348.74 ARCH PAGING COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 92917 $29.00 BERNDT, PAM LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 92918 $888.50 C&J TRAVEL INC SCHOOLS POLICE 92919 $150.00 CARDARELLE, DAWN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY 92920 $14.00 CEIPEK, CLEMENS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 92921 $615.69 CUB FOODS EDENPRAIRIE EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 92922 $92.23 DUPONT, BRENT CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 92923 $31.00 EVERS, SCOTT LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 92924 $70.00 GROOM, HEIDI , ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG FALL SKILL DEVELOP 92925 $75.00 IAFCI DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 92926 $141.76 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 92927 $17.50 KROUTH, CHRIS OPEN FEES OAK POINT OPERATIONS 92928 $27.00 LASLEY, CHRISTINE LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 92929 $27.00 MATSUURA, MARY LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 92930 $16.00 MR ROOTER PLUMBING PLUMBING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 92931 $40.00 OBERLANDER, CHRISTINE LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 92932 $998.00 OPERATIONAL TACTICS INC. SCHOOLS POLICE 92933 $489.50 RADISSON AIRPORT HOTEL CONFIRMATION #80205 POLICE 92934 $32.00 REA, AMY LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 92935 $427.10 REBS MARKETING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER ACCOUNTING 92936 $29.00 REINKEN, CYNTHIA LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 92937 $70.00 SHEA, BONNIE LESSONS/CLASSES FITNESS CLASSES 92938 $14.00 STRATTON, ELIZABETH ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 92939 $211.01 SWAGGERT, NATALIE TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 92940 $32.00 THOMPSON, MARGARET ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 92941 $11.65 PARAGON CABLE CABLE TV COMMUNITY SERVICES 92942 $500.00 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE WATER ACCOUNTING 92943 $1,249.42 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE POLICE 92945 $52.64 WRIGHT, IRENE MISCELLANEOUS . GOLDEN TRIANGE STUDY 92946 $134.90 ACE ICE COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92947 $141.82 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92948 $4,042.69 BELLBOY CORPORATION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92951 $84.00 CONNELLY COMPANIES MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92952 $13,607.02 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92954 $3,848.68 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92956 $16,472.66 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 5 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 17-NOV-2000 (09 CHECK NO (CK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 92957 $160.00 EXTREME BEVERAGE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92958 $531.45 GETTMAN COMPANY MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92959 $504.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92960 $20,047.06 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92963 $32,809.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO - WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92968 $4,693.94 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92969 $18,262.58 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92971 $767.36 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92972 $373.40 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92973 $2,396.70 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92974 $1,179.97 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92975 $19,671.59 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92980 $1,235.34 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92981 $6,767.23 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 92984 $11,139.44 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92987 $42,161.97 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 92990 $41.40 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92991 $1,152.12 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92992 $1,844.80 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 92993 $50.00 CONVERGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC. TELEPHONE GENERAL 92994 $194.35 CORDES, JEFFREY MILEAGE AND PARKING TREE DISEASE 92995 $234.28 GE CAPITAL RENTALS GENERAL 92996 $287.43 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FITNESS CENTER 92997 $674.00 JERRY'S FLOOR STORE CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 92998 $50.00 JOHNSON FARMS REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES HERITAGE PRESERVATION 92999 $109.52 KRESS, CARLA MILEAGE AND PARKING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 93000 $60.00 M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC MISC NON-TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 93001 $48.89 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 93002 $2,295.08 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* RENTALS GENERAL 93003 $1,417.12 MINNEGASCO GAS FIRE STATION #5 93006 $372.75 MINNESOTA HORSE & HUNT CLUB RENTALS POLICE 93007 $968.47 NILSSON, BETH INSTRUCTOR SERVICE ICE ARENA 93008 $114.79 THE ICE MAN/CO2 SERVICES CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 93009 $829.22 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 93010 $1,251.96 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE FIRE 93011 $30.50 RICHFIELD PLUMBING BLDG SURCHARGES PLUMBING SURCHARGE 93012 $9.00 SAMS, JOHN MISCELLANEOUS ASSESSING-ADMIN 93013 $10.00 SHOGREN, JEAN SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 93014 $114.53 WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE MN WASTE DISPOSAL LIQUOR STORE eu13 FOODS 93015 $20.00 WATERS, ROBERT SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 93016 $27.06 AAA CREDIT SCREENING SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE DEPT 93017 $43,215.57 ABM EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY COMPA MACHINERY EQUIPMENT P/W REVOLVING FUND 93018 $623.00 AID CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 93019 $71.25 AIRLIFT DOORS INC. REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 93020 $113.00 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI TRAINING SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93021 • $49.00 AQUA CITY PLUMBING AND HEATING CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93022 $228.07 AQUA ENGINEERING INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93023 $2,021.37 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93024 $44.09 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY IN EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93025 $151.58 AUTO ELECTRIC SPECIALISTS EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93026 $165.00 AV SOLUTIONS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 93027 $9,338.50 BACONS ELECTRIC COMPANY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS GENERATORS-WELL 2,9,11,13 93028 $507.97 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93029 $319.50 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 93030 $4,500.96 BIFFS INC WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE 6 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 17-NOV-2000 (09 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 93033 $2,452.89 BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE* OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 93034 $410.00 BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF KENNEL SERVICE ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT •93035 $773.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION DESIGN & CONST LINCOLN LANE PAVING 93036 $238.76 BRO-TEX INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93037 $1,788.00 C.I.D. CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93038 $657.27 CARLSON TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 93039 $2,000.82 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93040 $540.00 CHAD NESTOR ILLUSTRATION & DES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNITY SERVICES 93041 $278.75 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93042 $106.50 CLAREYS INC EQUIP TESTING & CERTIFICATION SEWER LIFTSTATION 93043 $170.05 CLARKLIFT OF MINNESOTA INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93044 $249.07 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY SUPPLIES RISK MANAGEMENT 93045 $5,625.00 CORNERSTONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES s . LEGAL COUSEL 93046 $1,156.69 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 93047 $521.40 COUNTRY WAYS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 93048 $36.58 CROWN MARKING INC • OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 93049 $28.50 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 93050 $970.70 CUSTOM CONVEYOR CORPORATION MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93051 $9,966.72 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93052 $2,573.13 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 93053 $1,704.03 DELL MARKETING L.P. COMPUTERS INFORMATION SYSTEM 93054 $3,793.69 DPC INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93055 $204.40 DRISKILLS NEW MARKET MISCELLANEOUS POLICE 93057 $13,372.80 DRT TRANSPORT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93058 $438.48 DYNA SYSTEMS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93059 $90.52 ECOLAB INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 93060 $177.00 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMER MISCELLANEOUS POLICE 93061 $335.00 EDINA, CITY OF CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE ' 93062 $564.50 EF JOHNSON CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 93063 $840.00 EKLUNDS TREE AND BRUSH DISPOSA WASTE DISPOSAL TREE REMOVAL 93064 $33.55 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS SEWER LIFTSTATION. 93065 $99.31 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 93066 $198.00 EMI REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 93067 $301.11 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS LLC WASTE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93068 $415.35 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC* REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE • 93069 $714.40 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 93070 $1,542.12 FASTSIGNS BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93071 $106.50 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93072 $449.89 THERMOGAS COMPANY MOTOR FUELS ICE ARENA 93073 $398.99 FIBRCOM-MN COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 93074 $333.76 FILTRATION SYSTEMS BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93075 $66.61 FISHER SCIENTIFIC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93076 $224.79 FORCE AMERICA EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93077 $381.60 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES FIRE 93078 $50.00 FRASER, DAMON TRAINING SUPPLIES FIRE 93079 $308.96 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 93080 $114.96 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPA MISC FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE 93081 $215.20 GINA MARIAS INC MISCELLANEOUS FIRE 93082 $39.95 GOVERNING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 93083 $175.00 GREG THAEMERT SEPTIC PUMPING WASTE DISPOSAL OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 93084 $41.00 HACH COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93085 $5,500.00 HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 93086 $50.82 HANCE COMPANIES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93087 $396.70 HARMON AUTOGLASS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93088 $25.00 HARMON INC. REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 17-NOV-2000 (09 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 93089 $8,387.63 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93090 $728.64 HELLERS CARBONIC WEST CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93091 $611.17 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 93092 $1,232.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 93093 $2,790.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER'- AC BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 93094 $60.00 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE SCHOOLS FIRE 93095 $149.46 HOFFERS INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES RED ROCK INTERSECTION 93096 $14,621.00 HONEYWELL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93097 $81.15 HYDROLOGIC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 93098 $275.00 ICE SKATING INSTITUTE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ICE ARENA 93099 $127.00 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS* RENTALS GENERAL 93100 $664.51 INFRATECH REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93101 $5,019.60 INNOVATIVE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY IN LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93102 $199.16 'IOS CAPITAL RENTALS FIRE 93103 $67.98 ITS A KEEPER EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 93104 $210.82• J J KELLER & ASSOCIATES INC SAFETY SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 93105 $516.92 J&H BERGE INC PROTECTIVE CLOTHING WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93106 $22.65 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 93107 $47.98 JANEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 93108 $276.00 KEN ANDERSEN TRUCKING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 93109 $127.96 KOCH SULFUR PRODUCTS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES TRAILS 93110 $805.85 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93111 $18,096.26 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION 93112 $1,017.39 LANO EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT RENTAL WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE. 93113 $10,592.28 LEONARD J KOEHNEN & ASSOC COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT RADIO ANTENNA PROJECT 93114 $124.93 LINHOFF PHOTO & DIGITAL IMAGIN PRINTING HERITAGE PRESERVATION 93115 $3,365.00 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 93116 $88.02 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93117 $997.11 M/A ASSOCIATES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93118 $399.17 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93119 $2,000.00 MARAVELAS, PAUL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES 1999 CLG GRANT 93120 $72.00 MARKS CERTICARE AMOCO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93121 $343.00 MAROTTA, VIC INSTRUCTOR SERVICE FALL SKILL DEVELOP 93122 $59.65 MARS CO SAFETY SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93123 $93.00 MARSHALLS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUNBONNET DAYS 93124 $189.57 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTING POLICE 93125 $57.19 MCGLYNN BAKERIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINTENANCE 93126 $708.85 MENARDS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93127 $188.76 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RACQUETBALL 93128 $673.19 METRO PRINTING INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 93129 $182.81 METROPOLITAN FORD CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93130 $2,430.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL 93131 $478.63 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION GRAVEL TRAILS 93132 $23.95 MIDWEST ENGINE SERVICE & SUPPL EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93133 $491.15 MIDWEST TELETRON INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 93134 $249.00 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 93135 $157,202.41 MINGER CONSTRUCTION INC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS CEDAR FOREST UTILITY CONSTRUCT 93136 $33.25 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS PRINTING POLICE 93137 $39.99 MINNESOTA CONWAY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 93138 $1,539.89 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT* REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93139 $78.22 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 93140 $738.43 MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOD SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 93141 $20.00 MN FALL MAINTENANCE EXPO SCHOOLS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 93142 $25.00 MN LAW ENFORCEMENT BACKGROUND DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 93143 $488.02 MONTGOMERY WATSON DESIGN & CONST LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 7 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 17-NOV-2000 (09 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 93144 $6,800.00 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE BOND ISSUE COSTS $3,390,000 FACILITY BOND-2000 93145 $618.80 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93146 $583.24 MUNICILITE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93147 $104.55 NEW EAGLE COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 93148 $87.53 NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP CLOTHING & UNIFORMS GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 93149 $1,680.47 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO. SMALL TOOLS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93150 $45.67 NORTHSTAR REPO PRODUCTS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 93151 $63.03 OHLIN SALES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 93152 $71.05 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93153 $747.63 OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENTS INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 93154 $97.00 PAGING AND WIRELESS SERVICE CE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 93155 $7.57 PAPER WAREHOUSE EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 93156 $9,737.80 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93157 $48.96 PETSMART CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 93158 $12.78 PLASTIC BAGMART OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93159 $570.00 PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING INC EQUIPMENT RENTAL TRAILS 93160 $19,955.00 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93161 $128.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 93162 $117.15 PRIORITY COURIER EXPERTS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93163 $1,700.00 PRO SOURCE FITNESS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 93164 $21.29 RADIO SHACK OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 93165 $21.08 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93166 $35,993.85 RMR SERVICES INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER METER READING 93167 $97,380.26 S.J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION INC. IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS WM STREET,HIGHVIEW DRIVE & LAK 93168 $112.86 SAFETY-KLEEN EQUIPMENT RENTAL PARK MAINTENANCE 93169 $59.83 SCHARBER & SONS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 93170 $559.99 SE-ME INC PHOTO SUPPLIES POLICE 93171 $4,420.00 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 93172 $426.00 SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TRAILS 93173 $689.53 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO BLDG REPAIR & MAINT PARK MAINTENANCE 93174 $420.00 GOLD COUNTRY INC SIGNATURE CON CLOTHING & UNIFORMS FIRE 93175 $888.27 SNAP-ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93176 $12.75 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS* OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 93177 $416.25 SPORTS WORLD USA INC CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 93178 $44.53 SPS COMPANIES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 93179 $454.60 STREICHERS RESERVE EQUIPMENT POLICE 93180 $387.60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93181 $1,030.00 SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 93182 $41,090.16 TERRANOVA LLC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS WELL 14 93183 $315.67 THYSSEN LAGERQUIST ELEVATOR CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93184 $4,376.12 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC BUILDING MATERIALS ROUND LK PARK K17 93185 $9,495.92 TKDA DESIGN & CONST WELL 14 93186 $91.48 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN MTKA GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER 93187 $236.98 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93188 $9,012.03 TWIN CITY SEED CO CHEMICALS PARK MAINTENANCE 93189 $127.17 TWINCO/ROMAX EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93190 $830.07 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93191 $930.62 UNITED LABORATORIES CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93192 $23.44 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93193 $18,402.77 BRW INC DEPOSITS - ESCROW 93194 $2,405.62 US OFFICE PRODUCTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93195 $9,558.00 VALLEY PAVING INC IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND DEV RICHARD T ANDERSON CONSERV 93196 $9,620.94 VALLEY RICH CO INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 93197 $2,530.41 VERNCO MAINTENANCE INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93198 $520.00 VIDEO SERVICE OF AMERICA VIDEO SUPPLIES POLICE _ 9 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 17-NOV-2000 (09 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 93199 $242.75 VOSS LIGHTING REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 93200 $60.40 VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL • WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93201 $1,900.13 W W GRAINGER INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE • 93202 $74.51 WALMART STORES INC . OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 93203 $132.03 WARNING LITES OF MINNESOTA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNS 93204 $593.77 WATSON CO INC, THE MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 93205 $625.00 WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 93206 $34.13 WEST WELD PROTECTIVE CLOTHING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93207 $239.41 WHEELER LUMBER OPERATIONS BUILDING MATERIALS DEV RICHARD T ANDERSON CONSERV 93208 $5,900.00 WIRTHLIN WORLDWIDE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES COMMUNITY SERVICES 93209 $6,539.94 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE 93210 $172.89 WOLF CAMERA INC PHOTO SUPPLIES POLICE 93211 $167.40 X-ERGON REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 93212 $4,587.68 YALE INCORPORATED OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT $1,494,157.47* / 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: . Ordinances and Resolutions November 21,2000 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Management Services 1st Reading of an Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 2 by Amending Section 2.26, x A Subd. 3,Relating to Membership on the Board of Adjustments and Appeals Requested Action: Move to: Approve the 1st Reading of an Ordinance amending City Code Chapter 2 by Amending Section 2.26, Subd. 3,Relating to Membership on the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Synopsis: An amendment to City Code Chapter 2 is needed to reflect the City's use of minimum/maximum membership levels for City Boards & Commissions. Background: In 1999,the City Council adopted modifications to the City's Advisory Boards and Commissions structure, including a revision that provided for minimum and maximum membership levels. The language change for membership to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals was missed in the revision. Attachments: Ordinance CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. -2000 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2 BY AMENDING SECTION 2.26, SUBD. 3, RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 2.26, Subd. 3, is amended as follows: Subd. 3. "Membership. The Board shall consist of not less than five and not more than seven (as established by the council from time to time) members." Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety,by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 2000, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 2000. Kathleen Porta, City Clerk Jean L. Harris,Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of ,2000. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/00 SECTION: ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development 'p Donald R.Uram Smetana Lake Improvement Project . , D Michael D. Franzen Requested Action Move to: • Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers and Zoning Amendment within the Rural Zoning District on 2.0 acres. Synopsis This is the Smetana Lake Improvement Project. Located on the north side of Smetana Lake. Background Information: No Developer's Agreement is necessary. The Council is requested to take action on the second reading of the ordinance. Attachments 1. Ordinance for Zoning District Change SMETANA LAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO.36-2000-PUD-26-2000 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the Rural Zoning District 36-2000-PUD-26-2000(hereinafter"PUD-26-2000-Rural"). Section 3. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-26-2000-Rural is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-26-2000-Rural is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-26-2000-Rural are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-26-2000-Rural is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 4. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-26-2000-Rural, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 5. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st day of November, 2000, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 21st day of November, 2000. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Jean L. Harris,Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on • EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Smetana Lake Improvement Project Outlot C of Liberty Place SMETANA LAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,NIINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 36-2000-PUD-26-2000 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN LAND WITHIN ONE DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amendment of the zoning of land located at the north side of Smetana Lake within the Rural Zoning District. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 21,2000 SECTION: Reports of Director Parks and Recreation Services SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Site Selection for 4th of ITEM NO: Parks and Recreation July Fireworks Display Tria Mann, Arts & Special \(.( V , C ( . Events Specialist Requested Action Move to: Recommend approval for the relocation of the 4th of July fireworks display from Eden Prairie Center to Round Lake Park for 2001. Synopsis The 4th of July fireworks display has been held at the Eden Prairie Center for the past three years. Because of construction and new development, this location will not be feasible during the summer of 2001. Background Eden Prairie's 4th of July Celebration began in 1984 at Round Lake Park. In 1997, the site was split between Round Lake Park, Staring Lake Park, and Eden Prairie Center. The site was moved in 1997 due to the construction projects at the high school and County Road 4, which caused the loss of half of the existing parking spots at the high school. Since that time, County Road 4 has been improved and additional parking and access have been developed at the high school. Staff would recommend the City Council evaluate this event on a year to year basis with the goal of eventually moving the site to the Eden Prairie's Major Center Area and attempt to involve more of the business community in hosting this event. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 21,2000 SECTION: Report of Financial Services Director SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Award Contract for ITEM NO.: Financial Services Remodeling the Prairie Village Mall Liquor Don Uram Store -` 1 Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution awarding Contract for Remodeling the Prairie Village Mall Liquor Store (detail provided at meeting). Synopsis Sealed bids will be received on Tuesday,November 21, 2000. Staff will make a report of the bid results and a recommendation to the City Council at the Council Meeting. Consideration of the award on November 21, with hand carried reports can accommodate the completion of construction in the slower retail period during the first two weeks of December. Background The renovation of the Prairie Village Mall and the Eden Prairie Liquor Store has been underway for approximately two months. Under the new lease,the owner of the mall was required to make certain improvements to the existing liquor store including a 1000 square foot building expansion and the construction of a new storefront. The owner was also obligated to provide the City with a "vanilla" shell ready for finishing. This contract will complete the store remodel. Attachments To be presented at the Council meeting. I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,NIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS,pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: Eden Prairie Liquor Store Remodeling WHEREAS, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS,the Financial Services Director recommends award of Contract to as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract with in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the'amount of$ in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the Financial Services Director. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 21, 2000. Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk SUMMARY OF BIDS EDEN PRAIRIE LIQUOR STORE REMODEL BIDDER AMOUNT 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 21,2000 SECTION: Report of the Director of Public Works SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 01-5523 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Award Contract for Pond K Sediment Removal Mary Krause and Disposal Improvements \U V Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution awarding Contract for I.C. 01-5523 Pond K Sediment Removal and Disposal Improvements (detail provided at meeting). Synopsis Sealed bids will be received on Thursday, November 16, 2000. A report of bid results and a recommendation will be provided at the Council Meeting, Tuesday, November 21, 2000. Consideration of the award on November 21, with hand carried reports can accommodate the start of construction in weather conditions that are conducive to this type of project. Background Information Storm drainage from the Eden Prairie Mall is directed into Pond K. Development Agreements with the Eden Prairie Mall (General Growth) for construction of the theaters and Von Maur included cash contributions to the City to partially defray the costs of removing the sediment accumulation with Pond K. The removal of sediment will increase the water quality aspects of the pond. The City had agreed to proceed with this project in the year 2000. Attachments To be presented at the Council meeting. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS,pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: I.C. 01-5523—Pond K Sediment Removal and Disposal Improvements Bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS,the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract with in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of$ in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 21, 2000. Jean L.Harris,Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk SUMMARY OF BIDS POND K SEDIMENT REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL IMPROVEMENTS I.C. 01-5523 BIDDER AMOUNT 3