Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 06/06/2000 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY JUNE 6,2000 7:00 PM,CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: • Mayor Jean Harris, Councihnembers Sherry Butcher, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety Director Jim Clark, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney Roger Pauly and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER • II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS IV. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,MAY 16,2000 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,MAY 16,2000 C. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,MAY 30,2000 V. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. EDEN PRAIRIE MINI-STORAGE EXPANSION by Two S Properties, Inc. 2nd Reading for Site Plan Review on 1 acre. Location: 7921 Eden Prairie Road (Resolution for Site Plan Review) C. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF SETTLERS RIDGE FIFTH ADDITION D. ADOPT RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, GIVING THE PROJECT PRELIMINARY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO A PUBLIC HEARING (MICRO DYNAMICS CORPORATION PROJECT) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6,2000 Page 2 E. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIF1CATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR LINCOLN LANE STREET AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,I.C. 52-196 F. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR FOREST HILLS ROAD STREET AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,I.C. 98-5466 G. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR 2000 STREET STRIPING H. RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ADOPT RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR HIGHVIEW DRIVE/LAKELAND TERRACE AREA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, I.C. 98- 5406 I. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF EMERGENCY PRE-EMPTION (EVP) ON 18 EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNALS THROUGHOUT EDEN PRAIRIE J. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. PW-59-49-98 FOR THE CSAH 1 (PIONEER TRAIL) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FROM HENNEPIN TOWN ROAD TO TH 212 (FLYING CLOUD DRIVE),I.C. 94-5369 K. AUTHORIZE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENT TO FRANCHISE L. AMEND POLICY ON ASSESSMENTS LIMITS FOR HOMESTEAD PROPERTIES M. APPROVE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION TO EXECUTIVE TRAFFIC STUDY AND GOLDEN TRIANGLE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE N. APPROVE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE TRAFFIC STUDY AND GOLDEN TRIANGLE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH THE I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK- PHASE H by Hennepin Parks. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 167.6 acres and Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers within the Rural Zoning District on 167.6 acres. Location: 6800 Rowland Road. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6,2000 Page 3 B. OAK PARKE 2ND ADDITION (Cole Property) by Thompson Land Development. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 11.27 acres of the 162.4 acres of Eden Orchard PUD, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.27 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.99 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.66 acres and Preliminary Plat on 11.27 acres into 31 lots and 4 outlots. Location: 17251 Cedarcrest Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change, and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) C. WELTER'S TRAILHEAD by Ray and Carole Welter, Jr. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.22 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.22 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.22 acres, and Preliminary Plat on 5.22 acres into 4 single-family lots, and 1 outlot. Location: 9630 Crestwood Terrace. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change, and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) D. VACATION 00-04 — VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT IN PART OF BEARPATH SECOND ADDITION(Resolution) E. ORDER IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CEDAR FOREST FIRST ADDITION STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS,I.C. 99-5491 (Resolution) VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VIII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IX. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS X. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. COMMUNITY PROGRAM BOARD RECOMMENDATION ON THIRD RINK TASK FORCE XI. APPOINTMENTS XII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Special Assessement Workshop CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 6,2000 Page 4 C. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Water Quality Proposal for Round Lake D. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. 1999 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR) E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIII. OTHER BUSINESS A. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION XIV. ADJOURNMENT IE. A - UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP/FORUM TUESDAY,MAY 16,2000 5:00-6:55 PM, CITY CENTER HERITAGE ROOM III CITY COUNCIL: Councilmembers Sherry Butcher,Ronald Case and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety Director Jim Clark, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Communications Coordinator Jodi Hogue, IT Coordinator Mike Rutter and Recorder Lorene McWaters I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER—MAYOR JEAN HARRIS Acting Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens called the meeting to order at 5:25 p.m. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. TECHNOLOGY A. TOUCHTONE REGISTRATION IT Coordinator Mike Hutter reported touchtone registration was implemented March 27, 2000, and that 31 percent of Parks &Recreation class registration has been processed via touchtone. Councilmember Nancy Tyra-Lukens asked if this is consistent with other communities that offer touchtone registration. Hutter said it is a little lower than others. City Manager Chris Enger pointed out the lower number may be due in part to difficulties with the phone line when it was first installed. Hutter also pointed out that it is not currently possible to register for swimming or skating lessons via touchtone because the cost for these lessons is different depending on whether or not the registrant is a Community Center member. Hutter stated that the City plans to purchase a program module to handle these types of registrations at some future date. B. UTILITY BILLING Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram stated that of 17,000 utility billing accounts, 1,231 are being paid via ACH(the auto- checking payment option). This accounts for five percent of utility revenues. D. CAD AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT 1 COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 2 Public Safety Director Jim Clark reported that all records have been converted to the new records management system. Clark said CAD (computer-aided dispatch) system administrative training will be complete by June and the full system will be up and running by July. Clark stated that the system allows police officers to run local records while in the street and to write reports from their squad cars. Connection of the system to Hennepin County is pending. The auto locater system automatically assigns squad cars that are closest to incoming calls for faster reponse. Clark reported that the map system is not yet installed. Tyra-Lukens asked what the map system will do. Clark answered that it will provide map overlays. In conjunction with GIS, the system would provide locations of everything down to the fire hydrant level. B. WATER PLANT FIBER CONNECTION Fiber optic installation was completed March 15, 2000, and hardware was installed and tested in late April. The Maintenance Facility switched from T1 to fiber on May 9 and the Water Plant was connect to the network via fiber on May 10. E. PRESENTATION BY COUNCILMEMBER CASE Councilmember Ron Case noted that Eden Prairie is already technologically out in front. He cited the new HR/Logis finance system,touchtone registration for recreation activities,the City's interactive web site, the fiber connections between City buildings, and Time/Warner's new Road Runner high speed internet service. Case said the push toward e-government is being driven by the rapidly expanding internet economy and the growing number of citizens with access to the Web. Case provided an overview of his December trip to the National League of Cities Conference in Los Angeles. Case said he attended all of the technology workshops at the conference and was overwhelmed and impressed by what other government bodies are doing with technology. Case stated he would cover the following topics addressed at the conference workshops: e-service opportunities, e-democracy issues, and e-council options. Case cautioned that if e-connectivity threatens to eliminate the representative process, as some at the conference conjectured,the Council needs to get in front of the movement. Lukens asked what other communities are doing in relation to e-connectivity. Case stated that some communities have conducted town hall meetings that allow individuals to attend in person, call in questions and comments, or participate on- line. Councilmember Sherry Butcher noted that e-connectivity could allow those who can't physically access City Hall to be involved in the government process. Case stated that some cities are acting as internet providers,which allows them to control some of the content disseminated to subscribers. However, Case said he feels the City has skipped beyond this possibility because people can't be forced to subscribe to such a service. a COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 3 Case presented several questions regarding e-democracy for the Council to ponder for future discussion: 1. Are there ways the Council should be taking advantage of the internet's instant response potential? 2. How accessible are/can/should Councilmembers be to the public? As an example of citizen connectivity to government, City Manager Chris Enger spoke about the City's recent experiences with the Boulder Pointe Homeowners Association. Approximately 95 percent of the Association's members are connected to the internet. They have developed a website to distribute information in lieu of a neighborhood newsletter. Enger said the website functions somewhat like a radio station for residents, since they are able to communicate on a much more timely basis. When the Association had concerns about a proposed cell tower in the neighborhood,they used their website to get timely information to the neighborhood and to communicate with City staff quickly. The Association posted an action plan on the website and created a chat room for residents to offer opinions. Enger pointed out that the Association's use of the website speeded up communications by up to two weeks,but also required City staff to drop other work to respond quickly to the issues. Enger also noted that this type of use of the Internet seems to be resulting in new citizen expectations of instant, one-on-one interaction with government staff. Clark stated that he has also met with Steve Borsch of the Boulder Pointe Homeowners Association to discuss ways to use their website to put out neighborhood watch bulletins more quickly and less expensively. Case pointed out that the internet's instant response potential could be used in a town forum format. Butcher stated that she would like the City Attorney's to provide insight into liability issues. She wondered if the entire Council could be held accountable for the comments of one member. Tyra-Lukens stated that the Council and Staff shouldn't be afraid of the new technology. She stated that it is a matter of becoming familiar with its possibilities and limitations. Case stated that almost everyone at the conference he attended had their own e- mail address. He stated that everyone is doing it,"so the answer is not to not do it,but to figure out how to do it." Enger stated that he thought the e-mail issue had been discussed previously and that e-mail addresses could be set up for the council in Groupwise. Case said he didn't believe a conclusion had been reached. Enger further noted that remote access to Groupwise thus far has been"iffy"at best. Case stated that Eden Prairie is behind other cities, and that some provide laptop computers,personal digital assistants, and cell phones to Councilmembers to ensure they are accessible to each other. Case stated that there should be a minimum level of connectedness for Councilmembers, and that he could really use a laptop with which to communicate. Enger noted that City Attorney Ric Rosow has raised liability issues related to providing Councilmembers with laptop computers, since they may also be put to personal use. Enger stated that his cell phone has two lines, one for City business and one for personal use. 3 COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 4 Case asked how much interest the other Councilmembers have in increasing connectivity and how they might use tools such as cell phones. Tyra-Lukens said 80 percent of her personal cell phone use is for City business. Butcher said that having to carry a separate cell phone for City use would be burdensome. Enger brought up the possibility of providing the Council with desktop computers at home and in the Council Chamber. Enger pointed out that laptop computers cost twice as much as desktop models,work more slowly, and do not perform as well. Tyra-Lukens stated that communicating via e-mail allows for more detailed messaging. Public Works Services Director Gene Dietz stated that it can take quite a bit of time to answer even a short e-mail. Enger pointed out that there are pros and cons to increasing the use availability of technology to City Council members. Issues of expense,technical support,remote access, implications to staff level,record management, data practices and open meeting law need to be carefully considered. Regarding e-packets for council meetings,Enger noted that past feedback from Councilmembers has been to use them to augment the City's traditional paper packet. Councilmember Butcher said that a benefit of an e-packet would be to reduce the sheer bulk of the paper packet. She envisions an"e-appendix"that could be electronically distributed. IV. OTHER BUSINESS A. SUMMER WORKSHOP SCHEDULE Enger noted that the first July council meeting would fall on the 4th of July holiday. All present agreed that meeting should be cancelled and does not need to be rescheduled. The July council meeting will be on July 18. The Councilmembers also agreed to hold a follow-up technology workshop on July 18. Councilmembers Case, Tyra-Lukens and Butcher agreed to hold other Council Workshops during the summer on an as-needed basis. V. ADJOURNMENT Acting Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p.m. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,MAY 16,2000 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Parks & Recreation Services Director Bob Lambert, Public Safety Director Jim Clark, Public Works Services Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Management Services Director Natalie Swaggert, City Attorney Roger Pauly and Council Recorder Peggy Rasmussen PRESENTATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD AND YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP AWARDS Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens presented the following awards on behalf of the City Council and the members of the Human Rights and Diversity Citizen Advisory Commission. The 1999 Human Rights Award—Individual Category recipient was Marina M. Kuznetsov. Ms. Kuznetsov, herself an immigrant to the U.S. from Russia, has specialized in assisting Russian immigrants to Eden Prairie with her business,New Land Counseling. There were two recipients of the 2000 Human Rights Youth Scholarship Awards — Maureen Carney and Emily Huck. Maureen Carney and Emily Huck co-created and implemented Project . SERVE,which stands for Students Exchanging Respect,Values &Experiences. I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER In the absence of Mayor Harris, acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Case added Items XII.A.1. and XII.A.2. under Reports of Council Members. Butcher added Item XILA.3., Report on the Human Services Review. Enger added Item V.J., Resolution Authorizing Application for the Livable Communities Demonstration Program. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 2 MOTION: Butcher moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the agenda as published and amended. Motion carried 4-0. IV. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,MAY 2,2000 Butcher made a correction to the last paragraph on page 2. The first sentence should read". . . such as historic houses . . .", and she added a sentence after that one, which read "Butcher stated historic houses owned by the City are different from projects being proposed." MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the minutes of the City Council Workshop held Tuesday, May 2, 2000, as published and amended. Motion carried 4-0. B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,MAY 2,2000 Thorfinnson made a correction on page 4, the third paragraph, which should read ". . . meetings of the Golden Triangle Demonstration Project group . . .". MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher, to approve the minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, May 2, 2000, as published and amended. Motion carried 4-0. V. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-74 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF LIBERTY PLACE C. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-75 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 2000 MILL AND BITUMINOUS OVERLAYS,I.C. 00-5506 D. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-76 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 2000 SEALCOAT,I.C. 00-5505 E. APPROVE THE RELEASE OF LAND FROM THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT FOR REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS F. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-77 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR LANDSCAPING MATERIALS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 3 G. RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-78 SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR CEDAR FOREST STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS H. APPROVE 2000 — 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND FINANCIAL STRATEGIES I. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2000-79 ESTABLISHING POLLING PLACES J. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2000-80 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR THE LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM Butcher questioned Dietz about Item E., approving the release of land from the special assessment agreement. Deitz replied that was a special assessment agreement, put together to pay for demolition of a vacant house. That amount was assessed to the property and now it is appropriate to remove the special assessment. Pauly said the house was unattended, and people could get into it through window openings. Dietz said it had been vandalized, and the City determined it was not feasible to repair it and put it back on the market. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve Items A-J on the Consent Calendar, as amended with the addition of Item J. Motion carried 4-0. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. FOREST HILL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, I.C. 98-5466 (Resolution No. 2000-81) Official notice of this public hearing was published April 27 and May 4, 2000, in the Eden Prairie News and sent to 21 property owners. These property owners received copies of the feasibility report. Dietz said the Council had received the feasibility report about one month ago and set the public hearing for this date. The feasibility study includes the proposed special assessments, but the public hearing on the feasibility report is not to determine the amount to be assessed. The public hearing on the feasibility report is to determine if the project is feasible and if the Council determines that, the City would proceed to order the improvements and order preparation of plans and specifications. At future meetings the Council would be asked to approve the plans and specifications and authorize bids to be received,then awarding the bids, and finally holding a public hearing on the amount of the special assessments. Dietz explained there are two ways a project can be initiated. One is through a valid petition that 35 percent of the property owners have signed and after receiving that petition would require a simple majority of the Council to approve the project. The other way is for the Council to order a feasibility study on its own motion. On this project there was a petition to consider feasibility of putting in a cul de sac. As it was not received on a standard City form, and as some 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 4 conditions were placed upon it, so the City was unsure whether or not it had a valid petition. Dietz said,to be conservative,the Council should assume it would be working on its own motion. Approval would require a four-fifths majority vote by the Council for all the steps along the way. Al Gray,City Engineer, explained the project. It would complete the construction of the east 300 feet of Forest Hill Road and provide a permanent cul-de-sac and neighborhood sidewalk connection to Candice Lane. The sanitary sewer was not deep enough to serve the four westerly lots at the time it was installed and they haven't had access to sanitary sewer or water until development of the property to the east. As part of the 1977 street improvements, it was determined Forest Hill Road would extend up to the temporary cul-de-sac. The City is proposing to extend the road far enough to the east to provide access to the most easterly lots and construct a turnaround that can be built within the existing right-of-way. The cost to enlarge it to a full-size cul-de-sac would require acquisition of very expensive right-of-way. They have included in the project a piece of sidewalk to complete the pedestrian connection between the two neighborhoods on Forest Hill Road and Candice Lane. Because the road ends with a cul-de-sac, it is necessary to extend the storm sewer to the end of it. To answer the question of how the City deals with the project from an assessment perspective, the City determined there were three categories of property that benefit from this project; the neighborhood as a whole, Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4, and Parcel 5. The City proposes to assign a certain cost to the entire neighborhood. Those costs are essentially for the sidewalk connection,the storm sewer extension and permanent cul-de-sac. The total is just short of$20,000, about $935 per unit for each of the 21 lots. .Lot 5 would be paying an additional $2,030 for installation of a concrete curb and gutter and boulevard restoration. Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 would share the total project costs of$54,510 for the street extension, and would be assessed$13,628,plus their neighborhood assessment of$935. Gray said there has been a neighborhood meeting, and after that meeting correspondence was received from John Mallo, one of the property owners. One of the questions was about having a full-size cul-de-sac. The City believes the cost versus benefit of a full cul-de-sac is not feasible. Another question was why charge all the property owners when Candice Lane was built with no assessments for other lots that existed there. The answer is, this was built and designed as a cul-de-sac by the developer, at no city expense, and is different from the Forest Hill Road project in that the cul-de-sac on Candice Lane provides the opportunity to create an additional lot with proper frontage. Another question was why all residents are being charged for the storm sewer at the east end of the road when the westerly lots drain to the west. Gray said it is true that those lots drain to the west. The only reason for extending the storm sewer is because the street is terminating with a cul-de-sac, specifically at the request of the neighborhood. There was previous discussion about why Mr. Jasper, the contractor constructing the cul-de-sac on Candice Lane, was not allowed to construct the cul-de-sac on Forest Hills after constructing the one on Candice Lane, even though he offered to do it. Gray said the answer is that under State statutes, the City has to procure a CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 5 project through competitive bids. There is some concern that because of that, there may be some higher costs. Gray said they couldn't be sure of that. Another question was why wasn't this project built last year. The answer is that the Winstone development didn't proceed until the summer of 1999 and the City waited to begin the feasibility study until that happened and there was a non- competitive bidding market in 1999. The City decided to wait until 2000. A letter from the owner of Parcel 3 has indicated some concern about the assessments proposed and if he could even build on this lot. Gray has discussed this with Mr. Pauly, who believes this will be a site on which a house could be built in the future. The road improvements allow that to happen and, therefore, it is appropriate to include that lot in the assessments. Gray said a rather lengthy letter of objection was just received. It appeared to be a proposal for an assessment agreement. He would like to defer this to the final assessment hearing and he would ask Mr. Pauly discuss it with the property owner between now and the assessment hearing. Case said when lots are developed and a road with curb and gutter is built, that is a quantifiable cost that gets assessed to those lots, which is either included in the cost of the lot or when improvements are made to the road. In this project, the City is looking at each home benefiting by having the sidewalk, cul-de-sac, etc. Why is it these last four lots on the cul-de-sac are not in the same position as other lots in the City that gained curb and gutter, storm sewer, upgraded road, etc. That is, why don't they pay the total cost of $76,000, rather than the whole neighborhood? Dietz replied the $19,600 cap the City has on special assessments includes sewer and water. Parcels 1 and 2 on the south side were provided sewer and water at the expense of the owner, and Parcel 4 received and was assessed for sanitary sewer and water 10 years ago and the owner has paid for it. Parcel 3 would be subject to the connection fee of$12,000 when the home is built. The total cost for that lot will be about $26,000. The $19,600 cap is only for homesteaded properties. In the feasibility study for Cedar Forest Road, the City is proposing the $19,600 cap because those properties are homesteaded. The actual cost is $25,000-$26,000, so the City is subsidizing those properties. Gray added that the assessment policy states that the justification for the cap is recognition that these are properties that have been built with wells and septic systems and have had to invest in those on-site facilities. That doesn't pertain to the last four parcels,however. Butcher had a question about the configuration of the cul-de-sac in terms of emergency vehicle access. Gray replied that those vehicles would certainly have access to the neighborhood. Fire trucks would have some difficulty turning around and may have to back out, but other temporary cul-de-sacs have been in use for years. Ingress and egress to this neighborhood will be about the same as it has been for the past 20 years. Dietz added that police cars can turn around with no problem. For plowing snow in cul-de-sacs, the City is using pickups with 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 6 plows attached. Butcher inquired if emergency vehicles are alerted by the dispatcher that there could be difficulties in these cul-de-sacs. Dietz said the drivers have maps and knowledge of these sorts of situations. Case asked where the $13,628 figure came from for Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4. Cedar Forest Road properties have a street assessment of $14,740. He asked if they shouldn't be the same for Forest Hill properties. Dietz replied when a unit-based assessment is used, the cost is based on the actual cost to build the street. In this case that figure will be divided by four. In the Cedar Forest neighborhood, lots are different sizes and when divided out, it comes to $14,740, based on unit price for square yards of asphalt and per lineal foot for curb and gutter, storm sewer, catch basin, sidewalk, etc. Gray reminded Case the first four parcels also pay the $935 in addition to $13,628. Tyra-Lukens asked if what they were dealing with that day is whether the permanent extension of the road is feasible and not the amount of the assessments for each lot. Dietz replied the Council is dealing with the feasibility of the project, but it is hard to separate the two parts. However, if the Council orders this improvement, that would be the method on which they would propose to assess the properties,but debate about more or less would take place at the special assessment hearing. Tyra-Lukens asked if anyone wished to address the Council on this project. Glenn Bowen, 7025 Mariann Street, had a question for Gene Dietz. He asked if the special utility connection fee is part of this assessment. After the assessment is recorded, would the statement related to the connection fee be recorded as part of the special assessment? Dietz replied the connection fee is collected at the time the building permit is issued and would be a cash payment. It won't be levied as a special assessment unless Bowen requests it. John Mallo, 14000 Forest Hill Road, asked if it would be appropriate at this time to talk about how the improvements are going to be assessed. Dietz replied the decision about final assessment amounts will be at a separate meeting, but Mallo could address the methods used to determine the assessments. Mallo said he wanted to address the history of the development. The first development on Forest Hill Road was Edenvale, in 1973. A cul-de-sac was constructed as part of that development. In 1977 a second cul-de-sac was added to the east end of the street. The City deemed the four lots at the east end were not appropriate for development. They were too low to be connected to sewer and water along with the other lots, and sewer and water could not reach them. A connection was made from Mariann Street. In 1998 Winstone's development was presented to the Council. Residents on Forest Hill Road petitioned the City to terminate the road with a permanent cul-de-sac at the east end of the existing right-of-way. Landowners considered all lots to be part of the same plan. Jasper asked Al Gray if he could construct the cul-de-sac on Forest Hill Road. The construction equipment was on Candice Lane and it would make sense to do it at CITY COUNCIL 1vmvUTES May 16,2000 Page 7 the same time. The cost will be 100 percent higher now because the City did not allow the developer to complete the cul-de-sac. Al Gray was saying the new development was dependent on completion of Forest Hill Road. Sewer and water were not needed on Forest Hill Road. Residents were promised a full cul-de-sac and the proposed cul-de-sac is the same size they currently have. He asked what improvements he is being charged for. When Gray was asked why a full cul-de- sac was not built,he said four lots at the east end were too big to allow that. Mallo said Candice Lane residents were not charged for their cul-de-sac. Residents of Forest Hill Road paid for the temporary cul-de-sac when the houses were purchased, through the higher cost of their lots. He asked why the residents at the west end should be charged for the storm sewer, when the water flows west out of the development, not east into the development. He asked if he and other property owners haven't already paid for a storm sewer. Mallo said this feasibility study has pitted neighbor against neighbor. Al Gray has said he didn't think the four lots at the east end should bear the full cost of the improvement. Why is that the case just on Forest Hill Road and not throughout Eden Prairie? Mallo agreed the whole neighborhood should pay for the sidewalk, however. He noted the total cost of the project is $76,180. Of that, the City proposes to charge 25 percent for administrative and engineering costs. If those were eliminated, it would reduce the cost of the project to $57,000. Tyra-Lukens pointed out that these questions were addressed by Al Gray. She asked if he had anything else to add. Gray said one clarification would be that the offer by the Jasper to build the street was not an offer to build at the developer's expense. It was their contractor building the street and then billing the City for it. In response, Mallo said he talked to Jay Jasper, who told him that he had determined the cost of building the cul-de-sac. Jasper met with Mr. Gray to discuss this and was told it was not possible. Mallo believed there should have been some way that the Candice Lane and Forest Hill cul-de-sac projects could have been done at the same time. Case asked Gray to explain the difference between the Candice Lane and Forest Hill projects. Gray said Candice Lane was done in two pieces by two developers. Gray had thought Candice Lane might continue to the south so Forest Hill could be connected. The City agreed Candice Lane would need a private, full-size cul- de-sac. The cost for Candice Lane stays within this development. In Forest Hill the cost stays within the neighborhood. The question is, should the cost of the cul-de-sac be spread out? The neighborhood said they wanted the street to stay a dead end. We believe some improvements benefit the whole neighborhood and some benefit only part of the neighborhood. Duane Dietrich, 14865 Forest Hill Road, Taurus Properties, said Taurus bought lots from Jasper and built some homes on Forest Hill. One is occupied, as is the one across the road, but they have no paved street. He found it hard to believe that, however this is assessed, the City would allow houses to sit on unpaved 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 8 streets. The street should be completed right away. His other issue was two homeowners living at the bottom of that hill cannot finish their yards. Whenever it rains their yards get inundated with mud. They are quite concerned about this. Cheryl Larson, 14000 Forest Hill Road, said when Councilmember Case asked about the difference in cul-de-sacs between the Candice Lane and Forest Hill projects, the actual difference was nothing. It was originally an open, undeveloped area. Now they are within this constraint of having to be 30 feet • from the edge of the road. Dietz responded that is true. The properties were not developed at one point, but lots were platted. If you were to put a cul-de-sac in the center of that road, it would have been necessary to acquire 20 feet on each side of the right-of-way. So if the City had taken an additional 20 feet of right-of-way on the south,that would have meant homes would have had to be pushed back another 20 feet south. The right-of-way and lots already existed, and the only way to build a full-size, 120- foot cul-de-sac would have been for the City to buy at least two lots. The cost could have been $100,000. The lots had been platted without expecting to put in a full-size cul-de-sac. Patricia Stutts, 14060 Forest Hill Road, said she is a fairly new resident on Forest Hill Road and a new homeowner in Minnesota. She asked why they were being assessed for a road that was already paid for with the purchase of the house. She believed the four houses at the end of the cul-de-sac should pay for it because it wasn't built into the price of their homes. The other issue was on the paving of the cul-de-sac. When Jasper asked about doing the cul-de-sac, Stuffs thought it would have been logical for the City to tell him to submit a bid. The City should have obtained a couple of other bids and had the work done right there and then. Stuffs wondered if that was even considered. Dietz replied in order to do special assessments, the City cannot deviate from Chapter 49 of the state statutes and if it did, it might not be able to sustain the assessments. At the point the person offered to do the work, the City had not approved the plans and specifications and, while it is a small project, there are a prescribed number of days to advertise for bids and it is not possible to do it on short notice. The City has to take sealed bids, and at that point it was not in a position to take them. The amount being proposed for the special assessment of $935, which would be assessed over 20 years and is added to the property taxes. The principal amount stays level, or $46.75 per year. The first year payment would be: principal -$46.75, interest - $74.85, for a total payment of $121.55, • with an 8 percent interest rate on the unpaid balance. The amount per year decreases over the 20-year period. The average payment would be less than$85. Thorfinnson asked what is the cost of storm sewer fees, and Gray replied about $7,000. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 4-0. CITY COUNCIL NIINUTES May 16,2000 Page 9 Butcher said she remembered that the idea of keeping the cul-de-sac in Forest Hill Road was a hard decision for the Council. She also remembered the neighbors were interested in having a cul-de-sac, although Council's policy has been to make as many road connections as possible. After hearing the discussion this night, she believed the neighborhood would benefit from these improvements, both the sidewalk connection and cul-de-sac. The remaining assessments are fair to the one lot and the other four lots, so she supported the resolution ordering the improvements. Case said he understood the $7,000 storm sewer expense is being assessed over all the lots. • Thorfinnson said Mr. Mallo, who seems to be the spokesperson for some of the property owners, wants the City to eliminate administrative costs. However, the City won't to do that. Mr. Mallo agreed they should pay for the sidewalk, but his contention is those at the west end of the road shouldn't have to pay for the storm sewer. Thorfinnson would consider subtracting $7,000 from their assessment and have the four easterly lots pay it. Case said his solution might be to assess the cost of the storm sewer to all 10 lots that drain to the east,that is,those east of the Edenvale addition. Thorfinnson agreed that it might be a better solution. Case said he recalled that when the Council dealt with this issue before, they heard from the neighbors that there would be a loss to them if the City connected the road to Candice Lane. Therefore there must be a gain if the road ends in a permanent cul-de-sac. In trying to get a feel for who benefits from the $7,000 storm sewer, it seems to benefit only the 10 lots that drain to the east. Butcher said she could not separate the water issue from the traffic issue; the benefit of less traffic because of a cul-de-sac. She believed the three neighborhood components Al Gray identified should all be spread out. She believed it was fair to assess $935 per unit for all the houses on Forest Hill Road. Thorfinnson said he believed there was more than $935 in benefits to all the lots along the road. If any changes were made it would be the $7,000 cost of the storm sewer. If Council agrees the project should be done, at a future meeting Council could decide how to divide out the cost. Tyra-Lukens said residents have stated that this is the same thing they already have, but it isn't. The road would be finished, and have a sidewalk, curb and gutter and storm sewer. The improvements clearly benefit all the properties. Case said this improvement would create a permanent cul-de-sac and the road can never be connected to another street. Psychologically, that makes a big difference. I CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 10 Butcher said she was uncomfortable knowing this project is not finished. She recommended getting the project started. MOTION: Butcher moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to adopt Resolution No. 2000-81 ordering improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for Forest Hill Road improvements. Motion carried 4-0. Dietz said he would come back with the plans for Council's approval and to authorize bids. B. EDEN PRAIRIE MINI-STORAGE EXPANSION by Two S Properties, Inc. Request for Site Plan Review on 1 acre. Location: 7921 Eden Prairie Road. Enger said official notice of this public hearing was published May 4, 2000, in the Eden Prairie News and sent to 61 property owners. Todd Jones, Eden Prairie Mini-Storage, said this project is for a 29,800 square foot expansion. The site is located at 7921 Eden Prairie Road. This is the third, and final, phase of their storage center project. All the loading and unloading activities will be by means of a one-way drive inside the building. Access will be through the existing driveway. Access to the lower level will be from Terrey Pine Court. They will continue to use high-end materials of brick and glass. The traffic created by the business is lower than that for other commercial uses. They have established themselves as a good neighbor and a good use for that area. Uram said the Community Planning Board voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project at its April 24, 2000 meeting. This is the last phase of this project and will complete the development adjacent to County Road 4 south of TH 5. They need 50 feet of setback from Terrey Pine Drive. Staff is recommending that the City Council direct Staff to prepare a site plan review and developer's agreement for inclusion on the Consent Calendar at the next City Council meeting. Tyra-Lukens asked if anyone wished to address the Council on this proposal. No one did. Case said he assumed the existing NURP pond is adequate for this expansion. Dietz replied that is correct. When the project was planned, the NURP pond was planned for the entire project. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to close the public hearing; and direct Staff to prepare a Resolution for Site Plan Review; and direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations, for inclusion on the Consent Calendar at the next City Council meeting. Motion carried 4-0. /0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 11 VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Butcher, Case, Thorfinnson and Tyra-Lukens voting"aye". VIII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IX. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS X. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS XI. APPOINTMENTS XII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS l. Councilmember Ron Case's Concern Regarding Building of a Berm Councilmember Case referenced the commercial warehouse area north of Columbine Road at Liberty Place, where the Council directed that a berm be placed as high as possible to keep car headlights out of the townhouses. He asked Staff to check on that, as he did not see evidence this was being done. 2. Councilmember Ron Case's Concern Regarding Spilled Gasoline Case said he was talking to a gas-station owner about nighttime, after- hours pumping of gas through the use of credit cards, and the concern about gasoline spillage. Case was told that each station has its own cut- off, such as 50 gallons. His question to Staff was, do other cities have any ordinance regarding this? Eden Prairie's water supply would be quite vulnerable if there were a major spill. Enger said he and Staff would check into that matter. 3. Councilmember Sherry Butcher's Report on the Human Services Review Committee Butcher said the committee was just formed at the beginning of this year to assess how the City is serving its residents in terms of human service needs. It is composed of one Councilmember (Butcher) and City Staff members in charge of various aspects of human services, including Senior Services, the Adaptive Recreation Program,police from the Public Safety Department, and the Human Rights and Diversity Commission Staff liaison Michael Barone. 1i CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 12 This group reviews proposals that come to the City and makes recommendations in terms of funding. The group provides a great deal of collaborative information. A number of the members serve on other committees and are very aware of what the human service needs are and the providers available. The members have experience working with youth,the immigrant community, crisis management, and emerging needs. Because of this,Butcher believes the group is getting the full picture. Butcher believed it would be helpful if the Council would bring in representatives from agencies that are seeking funding, so the Council can understand the needs there are and what service providers have done and can do. She proposed bringing each of these groups in for a five-minute presentation over the course of the year. Thorfinnson recommended bringing them all in at one time, so the Council can put them in proper perspective and context. Tyra-Lukens suggested having them come to a Council Workshop, but to hold it in the Council Chamber so the public can attend. Butcher said Councilmember Thorfiunson was instrumental in starting up this committee, which replaces the Housing, Transportation and Human Services Board. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Historic Properties Project Status • Enger reported on the Heritage Preservation Commission's review and recommendation to the Council of a plan for use, disposition or preservation of the City's three historic properties. Council asked that the plan be returned by June. The process is ongoing and Bob Lambert said the HPC would need one more meeting to complete its recommendations, which will be presented to the Program Board in June, and the Board's recommendations would be presented to the Council in July. C. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR 1. Approve the Second Amendment to Purchase Agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and H. Dan Wright for the Sale of 7900 Mitchell Road (old police property) to Extend the Closing on the Wingate Hotel Uram said two weeks ago he came with a request for approving the closing date on the Wingate Hotel development. The developers are CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 16,2000 Page 13 having a problem getting the revisions to the development plans and developer's agreement drawn up. Because of that the developer has requested extension of the purchase agreement to the end of June. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher, to approve the second amendment to purchase agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and H. Dan Wright for the sale of 7900 Mitchell Road(old police property) to extend the closing on the Wingate Hotel Parcel to June 30, 2000. Motion carried 4-0. E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DIRECTOR G. REPORT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIII. OTHER BUSINESS A. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens said Council Forum will be held the first and third Tuesdays of the month from 6:30-6:55 p.m. in Heritage Room II. This will be scheduled time following City Council workshops and immediately preceding regular City Council meetings. If you wish to visit with the City Council and Service Area Directors at this time, it is important that you notify the City Manager's office by noon of the meeting date with your request. XIV. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to adjourn the meeting. Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens adjourned the meeting at 8:55 p.m. 13 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,MAY 30,2000 2:30 P.M.,CITY CENTER Prairie Rooms A&B 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Acting Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens; Councilmembers Sherry Butcher and Ronald Case CITY STAFF: City Manager Chris Enger, Community Development and Financial Services Director Don Uram, Council Recorder Lorene McWaters I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER—ACTING MAYOR TYRA-LUKENS Acting Mayor Tyra-Lukens called the meeting to order at 2:40 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Case moved,Butcher seconded, to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried 3-0. IV. 'APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE FOR EDEN PRAIRIE LIONS CLUB SCHOONER DAYS Director of Community Development and Financial Services Don Uram explained that due to oversights on the parts of both City staff and the Lions Club,the application for a temporary liquor license to serve beer at Schooner Days June 2-4 was received after the • deadline. MOTION: Butcher moved to approve the liquor license, Case seconded. Motion carried 3-0. VI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Acting-Mayor Tyra-Lukens at 2:45 p.m. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6,2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREAJDIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Clerk's License Application List ITEM NO.. &Financial Services/ V.A. Gretchen Laven These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Raffle Homeward Bound Inc. (To be held at the Bearpath Golf and Country Club on August 14, 2000.) Temporary Beer Eden Prairie Lions Club Lions Club Corn Feed(08/05/00) Round Lake Park Eden Prairie Lions Club Oktoberfest(10/01/00) Staring Lake Park • June 6,2000 - 1 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 06/06/00 SECTION: Consent Agenda SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Donald R.Uram Eden Prairie Mini-Storage Expansion �•�• Scott A. Kipp Requested Action Move to: • Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review; and • Approve the Developer's Agreement for Eden Prairie Mini Storage Expansion Synopsis This project is for a 29,800 square foot expansion. The site is located at 7921 Eden Prairie Road. Because this project only involves a Site Plan Review, the City Council reviewed the plans at its May 16, 2000 meeting and directed staff to prepare a Resolution for Site Plan Review and the Developer's Agreement for approval at this meeting. Attachments 1. Resolution for Site Plan Review 2. Developer's Agreement EDEN PRAIRIE MINI-STORAGE EXPANSION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,AVIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR EDEN PRAIRIE MINI-STORAGE EXPANSION BY TWO S PROPERTIES,INC. WHEREAS, Two S Properties, Inc., has applied for Site Plan approval for Eden Prairie Mini-Storage Expansion on 1 acre for construction of a 29,800 square foot expansion; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Board reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 24, 2000 meeting and recommended approval of said site plans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Two S Properties, Inc., for the construction of a 29,800 square foot expansion, based on plans dated May 5, 2000, between Two S Properties, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on June 6, 2000. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk a • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT EDEN PRAIRIE MINI STORAGE EXPANSION 2000 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of June 6, 2000, by Two S Properties, Inc. a Minnesota Corporation,hereinafter referred to as"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Developer has applied to City for Site Plan Review on 1 acre,legally described on Exhibit A(the"Property"); NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. for Site Plan Review,Developer shall to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated May 5, 2000,reviewed and approved by the City Council on June 6, 2000, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms,covenants, agreements,and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR CODE VIOLATIONS: In the event of a violation of City Code relating to use of the Land construction thereon or failure to fulfill an obligation imposed upon the Developer pursuant to this Agreement, City need not issue a building or occupancy permit for construction or occupancy on the Land while such a violation is continuing,unless waived by City. The existence of a violation of City Code or the failure to perform or fulfill an obligation required by this Agreement shall be determined solely and conclusively by the City Manager of the City or a designee. 4. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer shall release,defend and indemnify City,its elected and appointed officials,employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants,contractors,subcontractors,suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection,review or approval by City. 5. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance,Developer shall submit to the City Planner,and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior 3 materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. GRADING,DRAINAGE,AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: • A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all wetland, wetland buffer strips, wetland buffer monument locations,water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land alteration permit. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan. Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a land alteration permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features,temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures: All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan. Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the existing and/or proposed sedimentation pond during construction. Developer shall provide preconstruction and post construction surveys for evaluation by City, if requested. 7. IRRIGATION PLAN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 8. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance,the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity,type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150%of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 9. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit,water meters, and standard heating,ventilating, and air-conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening,it is determined by the City Planner,in his or her sole discretion,that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that the City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures. 10. PUBLIC.STREETS: Prior to building permit issuance,Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for new driveway apron and curb modifications for access to Terrey Pine Drive. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, concurrent with building construction and prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. 11. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. These plans shall include details with respect to the height,type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 12. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance,Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 20 feet in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 13. TRASH: Developer agrees that all trash, trash receptacles and recycling bins shall at all times be located inside of the building. • • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6, 2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Public Works Final Plat Approval of Settlers Ridge 5th Addition . C Engineering Services Randy Slick Requested Action Move to: Adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Settlers Ridge 5th Addition Synopsis This proposal is the fifth phase and is a replat of Outlots A, J and K, Settlers Ridge, located south of Pioneer Trail and west of Riley Creek. The plat consists of 31.09 acres to be divided into 37 single family lots, one outlot, and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Background Information The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council May 5, 1998. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on August 4, 1998. Approval of the final plat is subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$1,665.00 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$6,690.60 • Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of$1,404.10 • Satisfaction of bonding requirements for the installation of public improvements • Execution of Special Assessment Agreement for trunk utility improvements and Pioneer Trail Improvements • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement • Provide a list of areas (to the nearest square foot)of all lots, outlots and road right-of- ways certified by surveyor • Dedication of Outlot A to the City Attachments Drawing of final plat - RS:ssa CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF SETTLERS RIDGE 5TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Settlers Ridge 5th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Settlers Ridge 5th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated June 6, 2000. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 6, 2000. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk • cJ / ci a a ?oo Ay... // 3 $ I 'ems o 4.i• CC „„ i �a -,' /, es. 1 C� Cl ---fit---' - 5's' .t •A`/ �°es?.i Z- se -<>1, 1 O O I F) D/ .2' 4.0 \\`. Z xwsmfr.wa 1 1 s E- s M.OY 6ZobpN Ft \ 6Zo00 N `t ot-1 — :�i o L� Sl'6S„ / _ _ _`\ v S7Ytl M.Oi ,� Cd q 1 „ 1 El 64. zoos.. save d,` Q 7 ' [iTIL I Est a 1y.: 0 S. co n: \ N P"' CC O a m o�5 g D�1f�6 • & .io \♦�`r`\ /7a,N t Alb1..5 `. f V lid N`\ \` u\ ( I " `• c- :8R k \. 41) 0 .b) I �\ ` mot/° `% . \ t / ,-- •`V+/n , Vic: `1v"<2,,116 ve.10.4 •; \},• 1 - • /V /) :- -- •fib'"!\:• 4;\ 4 o` �Pa / P \v% ; w ''` 4" a a a a / >I \ >t, C:11 • • • ,. ..' •?/ , / K. iS C /! / \�\, \ of Q i 4r\\\\ As" -Y.� +fin\\ \) ado \ / a to g 1....,..g mamma se rz I �i.a6/ "` O J irkilp I '7JJ minumav .s,a ` 81 8=i E 1 .e. is fj; ,,fift, t. ,II `,:_ i 1 '003. --- N\,ti (± s5 k''" rrd` .fz "' E. slit.ilt la/'I--' - J N ,wq4'-' :,� : c) CO Zi! \ I �a \ �-/ ii `\ \ ' \ ;;" Els. of \•.. \ gh��•l M1).\\`\\ �14//, \\\ � o \ A at / ♦ 1 r • \ ▪ \v// \\` �IL // / / ` `t o~ •d /�P tir• / • \♦ a `s�,`�� \� \/ / ��P�/Pv tea.1 \\\ // �" ry +• r`,8A� q; -�: -;,_- ---;sue c ♦ 9�ui` \ 7i ''a144 ,oa i' a na +�vs 9 0 t \\ °., • i+ _€ - Sa1st ` +//g 1 + ' ~ a Jr dry p S .�, ..-1, 1 • 2. -- nu, 1 ' 44" rt e EJ L rOTM� J / --_ 12 81Y M.LZ,L0o00 N z 3 Qd - Os O : 5 31 " s I. 3 z. 2 2 o II! a _ 1 Boa V 6 i 1 Kv= v 9 € ig`o Q Q 3 5 0,--1 - ''I,' -.g 1 -• E F -e 3 1 '�;1 V o € - o yu E E s •& €a ,s -It---I ss` s I 0 o• b F v 1 S 8'E 33 I s k' • fa 4 O :IA y,. // r 4. �1. •`. h / ��`r ..ego �� :O nse I c Zl;q/L € • / ,,tip t\ //` cier 5 O -_��/ 7 E .0 pi i� ��-�` a a.r,S�est p 5u �If • 0• 3� -.. �//6 ) csy sr•sof 3.a.rr,o N oftl'� �i_7ip,§}yam r+'g 9 '♦ .p s '+.,`,• i/ r'--_ 8 ez'• ,cmi o ,..0 3� '� ♦ ♦ i� 'T// h / feu ^ I ` oara, ( '4\a a ♦y \ x / !1 sl ti I j 'Jl_o•i V J AT 1?'4 w8, � • ' ` d` o-♦♦ °7•c 7 �l^ �/ j:,l al '' o-„ i M1� `'rt %... V`•�adop/ \ h i •\obi 'tea��/ _/1 .8-I 3t •N i�^I 0 w "f, `` v�J CO ; II 'e..;": k o-♦\ ,G-=off v i _' $ _. j F; /� e� ! �j S� ����..��ss� q':�:a �' It., x^ro- 1, 1 ?• I I i C: �' ,. ..p , -\ 0`�i� Win- a by a ,!,,'-•_ n:u.v, 1 °A xc.00-d 1 /. ,� •Y Ir 4:7 \ILI t-i �:1 ct/ „ -tszes•aro•.co-v a. "'i..-o�/ ji \\ N9 N. i / I u 1.--- ''• i�oc a o-v - „' WNW,a.`xal. 1 I • 44 +r♦ 11141 "] �• �, ,��/ ;ill; 1 /+� rl •acsy'o-v - • rrxe-�i._-•ro`'•'/ s ��i c� i h�s�\fie �) �1� 'll to '' Iro.icc-v• a;inT_' M1u + �'�'' q t L--_ I=s I ll arils f g /8 (' I 1 .,`.._3 % --'l. L----men - JI• / i4 . it % ,oy�f��; �:�• �y �' u .00Cr.ovx --1�`r---laid s1DN--•-",• 7 2 ir w 'a ;' �r'� is it r.,..i a:. ti ♦F- S o \ N\•�♦�. tr. A\t I Ix I:a`• al▪ IL in -it 'z \Vi•- st Z3 I a.e:.cc ron ,•HI, 3.».ccro x 1 \ts U. _ IS • 1 w 1- I I. 1 I x d 1 0 b 1„d 13.2 ---J u l --- % mot----- 301.00 r"y• - - v s'8 • 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar 06/01/00 SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Dev. and Financial Resolution relating to a project under the ITEM NO.: Services Municipal Industrial Development Act, giving the Don Uram project preliminary approval subject to a public hearing. Requested Action • Move to adopt: 1. Resolution relating to a project under the Municipal Industrial Development Act, giving the project preliminary approval subject to a public hearing. Synopsis The purpose of this resolution is to give the project preliminary approval subject to a public hearing. The public hearing has not yet been scheduled. Granting preliminary and final approval for the issuance of revenue bonds does not obligate the City to proceed with the project. Background Information Micro Dynamics Corporation has requested that the City issue its revenue bonds in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed$4,500,000 to pay for the costs of financing: 1. Acquisition of land and an existing 50,000 square foot building at 6201 Bury Drive. 2. Renovation of the building. 3. Acquisition and installation of electronics manufacturing equipment. Micro Dynamics currently employees 50 people and is expected that approximately 25 additional people will be employed following the completion of the project. Attachments Resolution RESOLUTION 00- RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT SUBJECT TO HOLDING A PUBLIC BEARING AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH PROJECT (MICRO DYNAMICS CORPORATION) WHEREAS, (a) The purpose of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.165 known as the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act(the"Act")as found and determined by the legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; (b) Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of economically sound industry and commerce are the increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of governmental services required to meet the needs of the increased population and the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment opportunities for such population; (c) The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie(the"City")has received from Micro Dynamics Corporation, a Minnesota corporation(the "Company") a proposal that the City undertake to finance a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of revenue bonds (hereinafter the "Bonds")pursuant to the Act; (d) The City desires to facilitate the selective development of the community, retain and improve the tax base and help to provide the range of services and employment opportunities required by the population; and the Project will assist the City in achieving those objectives. The Project will help to increase assessed valuation of the City and help maintain a positive relationship between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the image and reputation of the community; (e) The Project to be financed by the Bonds is(i)acquisition of land and an existing approximately 50,000 square foot building located at 6201 Bury Drive in Eden Prairie, (ii) renovation of the building and (iii) acquisition and installation of electronics manufacturing equipment. The Company currently employs 50 people and it is expected that approximately 25 additional persons will be employed following completion of the Project; 1173661.2 a (f) The City has been advised by representatives of Company that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced; (g) Prior to final approval of any fmancing the City must hold a public hearing with respect to the Project as required by Section 469.154,Subdivision 4,of the Act and the Internal Revenue Code; and (h) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Proj ect nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Company that the City undertake the Project pursuant to the Act, subject to holding a public hearing with respect to the Project, and to the proposal that the City and the Company enter into a revenue agreement between the City and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay,when due,the principal of and interest on the Bonds in the total principal amount of approximately $4,500,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act and on a tax-exempt or taxable basis, or a combination thereof, to finance the acquisition, renovation and equipping of the Project; and such agreement may also provide for the entire interest of Company in the Project to be mortgaged to the purchaser of the Bonds or a credit enhancement provider;and the City hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its Bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions, subject to holding a public hearing with respect to the Project. 2. On the basis of information available to this Council it appears, and the Council hereby fmds,that the Proj ect constitutes properties,real and personal,used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision 2(a)of Section 469.153 of the Act;that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 469.152; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to Company to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project,if undertaken,will be to encourage the development of economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land,to help prevent chronic unemployment,to help the City retain and improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and employment opportunities required by the population, to help prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State where their services may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City and eventually to increase the tax base of the community. 1173661.2 / 3 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to holding a public hearing,the approval of the Project by the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development("DTED"), and fmal approval by this Council, Company, and the purchaser of the Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project. 4. The City staff is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of a public hearing with respect to the Project in accordance with Section 469.154 Subdivision 4 of the Act. 5. Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the fmancing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by DTED will be paid by Company. 6. Briggs and Morgan,Professional Association,acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project,to consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of the Bonds as to the maturities,interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit such documents to the Council for final approval. . 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Proj ect other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance,legal or equitable,upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof,nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Bonds shall recite in substance that the Bonds including interest thereon,are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 8. In anticipation of the approval by DTED and the issuance of the Bonds to fmance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the Project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Company is hereby authorized to make or to reimburse itself for such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project as Company consider necess ary,including the use of interim,short-term financing,subjectto reimburs ement from the proceeds of the Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. 9. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Company. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds,or issue the Bonds in an amount less than$4,500,000 should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds in the amount of $4,500,000,or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreements as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. 1173661.2 10. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that the City and the Company shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the loan agreement,the Bonds, and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and that the closing of the issuance and sale of the Bonds shall have occurred by no later than December 31, 2000. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are not sold within such time,this resolution shall expire and be of no further effect. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, this 6t1 day of June, 2000. Jean L.Harris,Mayor Attested to by: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk 1173661.2 /5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota,DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office,and that the same is a full,true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to a resolution giving preliminary approval to an industrial development project. WITNESS my hand this day of , 2000. City Clerk 1173661.2 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6, 2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 52-196 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Rodney W. Rue Advertisement for Bids for Lincoln Lane Street Y. E and Storm Sewer Improvements Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids for I.C. 52-196,Lincoln Lane Street and Storm Sewer Improvements. Synopsis These construction plans are consistent with the proposed improvements described in the feasibility study. This project was previously bid in.August, 1999, with the single bid received rejected due to the bid being 36% over the Engineer's estimate. It is recommended that this project be bid again and combined with the recently ordered Forest Hill Road Street and Storm Sewer Improvement Project. This will likely provide more competitive bids for both projects. We anticipate a bid opening on June 29, 2000 with the contract award on July 18, 2000. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,NIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS. WHEREAS,the City Engineer through H.T.P.O., Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: LC. 52-196 Lincoln Lane Street and Storm Sewer Improvements and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. These plans and specifications are proposed to be combined with the Forest Hill Road Street and Storm Sewer Improvements (I.C. 98-5466)for bidding purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m. on June 29, 2000, at City Hall after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, July 18, 2000, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 6, 2000. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL,AGENDA DATE: June 6, 2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: LC. 98-5466 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Rodney.W.Rue Advertisement for Bids for Forest Hills Road V, F 'Street and Storm Sewer Improvements Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids for I.C. 98-5466, Forest Hills Road Street and Storm Sewer Improvements. Synopsis • These construction plans are consistent with the proposed improvements described in the feasibility study. It is recommended that these plans be combined with the Lincoln Lane Street and Storm Sewer Improvement Project. This will likely provide more competitive bids for both projects. We anticipate a bid opening on June 29, 2000 with the contract award on July 18, 2000. • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS. WHEREAS,the City Engineer through H.T.P.O., Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: LC. 98-5466 Forest Hills Road Street and Storm Sewer Improvements and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. These plans and specifications are proposed to be combined with the Lincoln Lane Street and Storm Sewer Improvements(LC. 52-196)for bidding purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m. on June 29, 2000, at City Hall after which time they will • be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, July 18, 2000, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5%(percent)of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 6, 2000. Jean L.Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A.Porta, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6, 2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: LC. 00-5504 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Approve Change Order No. 1 for 2000 Street Mary Krause Striping VG- Requested Action Move to: Approve Change Order No. 1 for I.C. 00-5504, 2000 Street Striping in the amount of$8,321.32 Synopsis Stripe street areas with epoxy paint and remove existing painting. Background • The 2000 Street Striping project, I.C. 00-5504, was awarded by Council on May 8, 2000 to Precision Pavement Marking. In discussions with the contractor, they had just purchased a new piece of equipment that is capable of applying epoxy paint and had approached the City of Eden Prairie to use the machine in test areas. Change Order No. 1 is a result of this and we recommend approval of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of$8,321.32 to Precision Pavement Marking. • CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Date: June 6,2000 Project Name: I.C. 00-5504,2000 Street Striping Contractor: Precision Pavement Marking Engineer: City of Eden Prairie • Nature of Changes: Add two pay items to contract as follows: 1) Epoxy painting. Paint centerline striping in epoxy paint in test areas. Epoxy paint may last 3-5 years and would reduce the number of times painting would be needed on streets as well as reduce overall costs. 49,463 L.F. x$0.14/L.F.= $6,924.82 2) Sand blast existing painting. Removal of existing painting 490 Sq.Ft. x$2.85/Sq.Ft..= $1,396.50 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST +$8,321.32 • • SUMMARY OF CONTRACT CHANGES: ❑ Original Contract Amount $56,960.00 O Net Increase Resulting from Change Order No. 1 +$ 8,321.32 ❑ Current Contract Amount Including Change Order No. 1 $65,281.32 TIM ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED: THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PRECISION PAVEMENT MARKING By By Date Date CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6, 2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: LC. 98-5406 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Receive Feasibility Report and Set Public Alan D. Gray Hearing for Highview Drive/Lakeland Terrace V Area Street and Utility Improvements • Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution setting a public hearing for Highview Drive/Lakeland Terrace Area Street and Utility Improvements (I.C. 98-5406) for 7:00 P.M., June 20, 2000. Synopsis With the assistance of SRF-RCM, the City Engineer has prepared a feasibility study for street and utility improvements serving Highview Drive/Lakeland Terrace and adjoining properties. A public hearing is the next step in the consideration of these improvements. Background Information In response to a petition for street and utility improvements in 1998 from residents of Highview Drive/Lakeland Terrace Area, Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility study. A study has been completed and based on neighborhood meetings and surveys there is substantial support to proceed with improvements based on proposed assessments. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING • WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer, recommending the following improvements to wit: LC.98-5406—Highview Drive/Lakeland Terrace Utility and Street Improvements • NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the June 20, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall, 8080 Mitchell Road. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 6,2000. Jean L.Harris,Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • Kathleen A.Porta,City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6, 2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 98-5472 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Approve Plans and Specifications for Rodney W.Rue Installation of Emergency Vehicle Pre-Emption (EVP) Systems on Eighteen Existing Traffic v'r Signals • Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution approving the plans and specifications for installation of emergency vehicle pre-emption (EVP) on eighteen existing traffic signals throughout Eden Prairie. Synopsis These plans are for the installation of emergency vehicle pre-emption (EVP) systems on various signalized intersections throughout Eden Prairie. This project was selected for MnDOT's Cooperative Agreement program, which provides funding for these types of projects. Our share of the installation costs for this project is estimated at $151,800, plus the engineering costs of approximately $26,400. Our share will be financed by a combination of State Aid and Tax Increment funds. MnDOT will be drafting a cooperative construction agreement which will define the maintenance and financial responsibilities for this project. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EIGHl'EEN EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTON SYSTEMS LC. 98-5472 WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie (through Westwood Professional Services) has prepared final construction plans and special provisions for the installation of eighteen emergency vehicle pre-emption systems on traffic signals at various locations throughout Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that said construction plans and special provisions for State Project No. 8825-27 (City Project 98-5472) are hereby approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 6, 2000. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk CERTIFICATION • I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution adopted by the Council of the City of Eden Prairie at an authorized meeting held on the 6th day of June, 2000, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2000, by Jean L.Harris and Kathleen A. Porta,Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Eden Prairie. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2000. Notary Public CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6,2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5369 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Approve Construction Cooperative Agreement Rodney W.Rue for the CSAH 1 (Pioneer Trail)Project from Hennepin Town Road to TH 212(Flying Cloud Drive) Requested Action Move to: Adopt resolution approving Construction Cooperative Agreement No. PW59- 49-98 for the CSAH 1 construction project from Hennepin Town Road to TH 212 (Flying Cloud Drive). • Synopsis This construction cooperative agreement defines the•financial and maintenance responsibilities for each agency associated with this CSAH 1 construction project. In addition, the agreement defines the responsibilities of the future landscaping plan, which will be a separate project at the completion of the road project. , Background Information - This agreement estimates the total City's share for this construction project at $2,247,384.91 or about 20% of the total project cost. This total includes a share of the construction, engineering, county-supplied equipment and right-of-way costs. We propose to use State Aid and Utility Funds to finance our share. - We hereby recommend approval of Construction Cooperative Agreement No. PW59-49-98 for the CSAH 1 construction project from Hennepin Town Road to TH 212(Flying Cloud Drive). Attachments Hennepin County's Construction Cooperative Agreement No. 59-49-98. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,NIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CSAH 1 (PIONEER TRAIL)FROM HENNEPIN TOWN ROAD TO TH 212(FLYING CLOUD DRIVE) LC. 94-5369 WHEREAS, Hennepin County has prepared construction plans for the construction of CSAH 1 roadway improvements from Hennepin Town Road to TH 212 (Flying Cloud Drive) within the corporate boundaries of the City of Eden Prairie; WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has approved said construction plans; WHEREAS, a Construction Cooperative Agreement has been prepared by Hennepin County which identifies the maintenance and financial obligations for the construction of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that said Construction Cooperative Agreement No. PW59-49-98 for County Project No. 9320 (City Project 94-5369) is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on June 6, 2000. Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A.Porta, City Clerk Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 County Project No.9320 County State Aid Highway No. 1 City of Eden Prairie County of Hennepin CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT,Made and entered into this day of ,2000 by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and . corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota,hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of Eden Prairie,a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the"City". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,The County and the City, along with the Minnesota Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "Mn/DOT",have been negotiating to bring about the improvement of that portion of County State Aid Highway No. (CSAH) 1 (a.k.a.Pioneer Trail)between Trunk Highway 212 and Hennepin Town Road, as shown on the County Engineer's plans for County Project No. 9320, hereinafter referred to as the"Road Project",which improvement contemplates and includes grading, drainage, concrete curb and gutter,bituminous pavement,retaining walls,traffic signals with emergency vehicle preemption(EVP) system, and other related improvements; and WHEREAS,The above described Road Project lies within the corporate limits of the City,and WHEREAS,The County has prepared an Engineer's Estimate of quantities and unit prices for the construction contract work of the above described Road Project in the amount of Nine Million One Hundred Seventy Seven Thousand One Hundred Forty Four Dollars and Five Cents($9,177,144.05). A copy of said estimate is included in Exhibit "A"which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and WHEREAS,The construction costs for said Road Project shall be comprised of federal funds, municipal and county state aid funds,and local funds; and WHEREAS,The City has expressed willingness to participate in the construction cost of said Road Project and the maintenance and operating costs of the traffic signals installed;and WHEREAS,To ensure compatibility with the County's existing network of traffic signal systems the County will furnish the controller, control equipment and control cabinet to be installed as . a part of said Road Project; and • -y 3 WL Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 WHEREAS,The County and the City have also been negotiating to install landscaping along this same portion of CSAH 1 upon completion of said Road Project via a separate project,hereinafter referred to as the"Landscaping Project"; and WHEREAS,The City shall be responsible to develop the plans for said Landscaping Project; and WHEREAS,The County has expressed willingness to participate in the construction costs of said Landscaping Project; and WHEREAS,It is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1992, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1 and Section 471.59. NOW THEREFORE,IT IS HEREBY AGREED: • I Mn/DOT and the County will advertise for bids for the work and construction of the aforesaid Road Project,receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement and Mn/DOT will enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder. The contract will include the plans and specifications prepared by the County, also referenced and identified as S.P. Nos. 27-601-27,and 181-020-22,and approved by Mn/DOT. II The County will administer the contract and inspect the construction of the contract work for said Road Project. The City Engineer of Eden Prairie and his designated representatives shall have the right to make any inspections deemed necessary and shall cooperate with the County Engineer and his staff at their request to the extent necessary,but will have no responsibility for the supervision of the work. The City agrees that the County may make minor changes in the plans or in the character of said contract construction which are reasonably necessary to cause said construction to be in all things performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It is further agreed by the City that the County, through Mn/DOT,may enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the County's Road Project Contractor for the performance of any additional construction or construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans,within the original scope of the Road Project. Said changes may result in an increase or decrease to the City's cost participation estimated herein. The City shall have the right to review any changes to the plans and specifications as they relate to its cost participation. The City Engineer shall have the right to approve any change orders or supplemental agreements prepared by the County that affect the City's share of the construction cost. - - WL Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P.9320 The City further agrees that it will participate in the settlement of any claims from the Contractor that involve project delays attributable to delays in approval by the City for plan or specification changes deemed necessary by the County Engineer or his staff. The amount of participation by the City in any such claims shall be commensurate with the percentage of delay directly attributable to its actions. III The City and at its sole cost and expense,shall develop all the necessary construction plans, specifications and proposal,for the aforedefined Landscaping Project. Said construction documents shall be developed in accordance with the attached"HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS -TRANSPORTATION DIVISION;RECOMMENDED URBAN LANDSCAPE/STREETSCAPE GUIDELINES" (marked Exhibit'B")which by this reference is made a part hereof. Prior to beginning any work,the City shall submit to the County for approval,two (2)complete sets of the final plans and specifications for said Landscaping Project. Upon approval by the County, the City shall also obtain approval of said plans and specifications from the Minnesota Department of Transportation(Mn/DOT)Division of State Aid for Local Transportation. The City shall advertise for bids for the work and construction of said Landscaping Project; shall receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement and enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder. The Contract shall include the plans and specifications prepared by the City or its agents and approved by the County. It is understood that all work to be performed under said Landscaping Project shall be done either in conjunction with or upon completion of the construction activities of the Roadway Project. It is anticipated that the CSAH 1 corridor will be ready for landscaping activities in the Spring of calendar year 2002. • lv The City shall administer the contract and shall perform the required engineering, inspection and testing for the Landscape Project; all in accordance with said approved plans and specifications and the materials sampling and testing requirements of Mn/DOT Division of State Aid for Local Transportation. However,the County Engineer and his staff shall have the right,as work progresses,to make any inspections deemed necessary,but will have no responsibility for supervision of the work. - s WL Agreement No. PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 V In acknowledgment of the aforesaid future Landscaping Project the County has prepared its specifications for the Road Project to allow for changes to the medians on CSAH 1 which may be. necessary to comply with the final design aspects contained in the plans prepared by the City and approved by the County for said Landscaping Project. In addition,the County has also included in the Road Project specifications provisions that allow for the City and a local neighborhood group to be involved in the selection of retaining wall and concrete median walk colors,as well as other aesthetic aspects of both the Road Project and the Landscaping Project. Any revisions that may be required to the Road Project as a result of the aforesaid involvement shall be incorporated into the Road Project in accordance with Article II hereof. It is understood and agreed that the City will participate in the settlement of any claims from the County's Road Project Contractor that involve delays in construction activities attributable to delays in decisions affecting the aforesaid color selections,median treatments, and any other aesthetic aspects to be constructed as part of the Road Project. The amount of participation by the City in any such claims from the County's Road Project Contractor shall be equal to fifty(50)percent of the actual settlement costs of such claims. The City hereby understands that the special provisions for the Road Project specifically require the completion of certain retaining walls,both modular block and cast-in-place,within two months of the start of construction activities on said Road Project. VI The City agrees to grant right of way to the County over those lands owned by the City that are a part of the required right of way for said Road Project. Said right of way shall be granted at no cost to the County. The City,at its sole expense, shall obtain all additional easements,permits, and/or right of way that may be required for the completion of the Landscaping Project on lands not included in the right of way, easements, or permits for the Road Project. • The County or its agents will acquire all additional right of way,permits and/or easements required for the construction of said Road Project. The City shall reimburse the County for fifty(50) percent of the final cost of all additional right of way,permits and/or easements required for the construction of said Road Project,plus all costs incurred by the County in acquiring said right of way, permits and/or easements. The right of way costs incurred as described herein shall include all acquisition costs including, but not limited to, any and all damages occurring to any person or persons,including private utilities,in relocating or removing or adjusting main conduits or other structures located in or upon the land taken -, 6 WL Agreement No. PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 and within the present right of way;or damage in procuring such right of way,whether such damage is caused by the County or the City in the performance of such contract with respect to the improvement of County State Aid Highway No. 1 as shown on the plans for said Road Project. Damages,as used in this section,pertains to acquisition costs allowed by Minnesota Statute Chapter 117 and does not abrogate the meaning of the language set forth in Section XXXII of this Agreement. The County will periodically,as parcels are acquired,prepare and submit to the City itemized invoices showing right of way and acquisition costs incurred by the County. The City's share of said costs shall become due and payable within forty-five(45) days after receipt of said invoice. The estimated right of way expenses described herein are indicated in said Exhibit"A". VII The City shall participate in the construction cost of the contract work for said Road Project as set forth in the Division of Cost Summary in said Exhibit"A". It is understood that the Engineer's Estimate referred to on Page 1 of this Agreement is an estimate of the construction cost for the contract work on said Road Project and that the unit prices set forth in the contract with the successful bidder and the final quantities as measured by the County Engineer and his designated representatives shall govern in computing the total final contract construction cost for apportioning the cost of said Road Project according to the provisions herein. VIII • Included in said Road Project is the construction of colored concrete walk(contract construct pay item"Special Walk"),in the CSAH 1 medians as requested by the City. The City hereby understands and agrees that the County will not participate in the costs for coloring the concrete. The County's cost participation shall be limited to the Contract unit price of standard 75 mm concrete walk. The City hereby agrees to be responsible for the additional costs to construct said Special Walk. IX In addition to the City's proportionate share of the contract construction cost for the Road Project,the City also agrees to pay to the County a sum equal to eighteen percent(18%)of the amount computed as the City's share of the total final contract construction cost for the Road Project. It is understood that said additional payment by the City is its proportionate share of all engineering costs incurred by the County in conjunction with the work performed for said Road Project • -/ wL • Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 • The County will participate in the construction costs of the aforesaid City administered Landscaping Project. The County's participation in said costs shall be limited to no more than $100,000.00 above the amount required by the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance(Ordinance No. 17- 90)for tree replacement and landscaping required as result of the construction of the Road Project. It is estimated that the amount required to satisfy the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance is $300,000.00, therefore the County's total participation in said Landscaping Project is estimated at$400,000.00. It is understood that said total amount of$400,000.00 is an estimate of the County's participation in said Landscaping Project and that the unit prices set forth in the City's contract with the successful bidder and final quantities as measured by the City's contract with the successful bidder and fmal quantities as measured by the City Engineer and his designated representatives shall govern in computing the total fmal County's participation in apportioning the cost of said Landscaping Project according to the limiting provisions herein. It is hereby understood and agreed that said County's share in the construction costs for the Landscaping Project is the County's only participation in said Landscaping Project and that all associated design and construction engineering costs will be borne 100%by the City. The County's share in said Landscape Project construction costs will be directly paid to the City from the County and will not be addressed as credits applied to the City's proportionate share of the costs for the Road Project. • It is further understood and agreed that the County will be funding its proportionate share of the construction costs for said Landscaping Project with County State Aid monies. The County will not be responsible to the City for its proportionate share of said Landscaping Project costs if any action or inaction of the City causes Mn/DOT's State Aid Engineer to determine that the County's portion of the Landscaping Project costs are not eligible for County State Aid funding. XI The County will supply the traffic signal cabinets,controllers and control equipment,including ` the emergency vehicle preemption(EVP)cards,(County Supplied Equipment)for the traffic control signal systems installed as a part of said Road Project. Therefore, in addition to the aforesaid proportionate shares of contract construction and engineering costs the City also agrees to reimburse the County for its respective proportionate share of the costs of the County Supplied Equipment. Said proportionate share of the County Supplied Equipment shall be equal to the City's proportionate share of the contract signal work. An estimate of the City's share of County Supplied Equipment is incorporated into Exhibit"A". It is further agreed that said estimate of the costs of County Supplied Equipment is an estimate and that the actual costs of equipment as determined by the County Engineer shall govern in computing the total final apportionment of cost participation by the City in the County Supplied Equipment. -¢� WL Agreement No. PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 The County will invoice the City separately for said County Supplied Equipment. Payment shall be made to the County by City for the full amount due on said invoice within forty five(45) days of the invoice date. XII Under the terms of Hennepin County Agreement No. PW 64-49-89, dated September 18, 1990, the City shall receive credit for the temporary traffic control signal systems at the intersections of CSAH 1 with Homeward Hills Road and CSAH 1 with Franlo Road. The credit in the amount of Seventy Nine Thousand Dollars and No'Cents ($79,000.00) shall be applied toward the amount of funds to be initially deposited with the County. Upon completion of the Road Project,Agreement No PW 64-49-89,dated September 18, 1990 shall be terminated and superseded by this Agreement. XIII Due to the use of federal funds on this Project, Mn/DOT will be establishing an Agency Account to be used for payment of the contract construction costs for said Road Project. Funds totaling one hundred(100)percent of the estimated Contract amount,based on the bid of the lowest responsible bidder,must be deposited into said Agency Account prior to the award of the construction contract. It is understood by the parties hereto that upon opening and tabulating of the bids Mn/DOT will automatically transfer funds from the County's and the City's respective state aid accounts into said Agency Account. Said transfers will be in amounts equal to one hundred(100)percent of the state aid eligible portion of each party's respective share of the contract construction costs based on the distribution of estimated quantities contained in the Road Project at the time of award and the contract unit prices contained in the lowest responsible bid received. XIV The previous provisions pertain only to those contract construction costs eligible for Federal and State Aid funds;which are under the control of Mn/DOT. Therefore,it is further understood and agreed that upon opening and tabulating the bids the County will invoice the City for(a) one hundred (100)percent of any portion of the City's share of contract construction costs which is either not eligible for Municipal State Aid(MSA)funding or for which the City may choose to fund with means other than MSA and(b) one hundred(100)percent of the estimated City's share in the engineering costs for the Road Project. Said estimated shares shall be based on actual contract unit prices for estimated quantities shown in the plans. The City shall,within forty-five(45) days of said invoice, deposit with the Hennepin County Treasurer,funds totaling the amount of the invoice. In the event the County Engineer or his staff determines the need to amend the construction contract with a supplemental agreement or change order which results in an increase in the contract 9 WL Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 amount,the City hereby agrees to (a)allow the transfer of MSA funds into the Agency Account for• those changes eligible for and for which the City desires to use Municipal State Aid funding,and/or(b) remit within forty-five(45) days of notification by the County of said contract change an amount equal to one hundred(100)percent of the estimated increase in the City's shares for changes not eligible for MSA or for changes for which the City desires to fund with any means other than MSA funds;both as documented in the supplemental agreement or change order,and(c)remit within forty-five(45)days of notification by the County an additional amount equal to eighteen(18)percent of the estimated increase in the City's share to cover additional contract administration costs incurred by the County for the additional work. • Upon the completion and acceptance of the work provided for in the construction contract let by Mn/DOT and the preparation by Mn/DOT of a final estimate computing and determining the amount due the contractor performing the work,the County shall determine and compute the total amount due • the County from the City as set forth hereunder, and based on the actual contract unit prices and the final quantities as measured by the County Engineer and designated representatives. The County shall apply on the payment thereof as much as may be necessary of the aforesaid funds deposited by the City. If the amount found due from the City is less than the amount of the funds deposited by the City,then, and in that event,the balance of said deposited funds shall be returned to the City without interest. If the amount found due from the City exceeds said amount of funds deposited by the City,the City agrees to pay within forty-five (45) days of invoice by the County the difference between said amount found due and said amount of funds deposited. XV All payments to the County must be postmarked by the date due or a late penalty of one (1) percent per month, or fraction thereof, on the unpaid balance will be charged to the City. The City shall pay the amount due as stated on the statement, notwithstanding any dispute of such amount. Should a disputed amount be resolved in favor of the City,the County shall reimburse the disputed amount plus daily interest thereon calculated from the date such disputed amount was received by the County. Daily interest shall be at the rate of one (1%)percent per month on the disputed amount. XVI The County,at its sole cost and expense,has had a Phase I Environmental Assessment conducted for the Road Project. In the event a Phase II Environmental Study is required on any parcel within the City,it is hereby understood and agreed that the City shall reimburse the County for fifty(50)percent of all costs incurred by the County for the completion of a Phase II Environmental Study. The Phase I Environmental Assessment has been completed and it is not anticipated that a Phase II Environmental Study will be necessary. -3/ /0 vv-L Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 XVII After an award by the City to the successful bidder on the Landscaping Project,the City shall invoice the County for ninety five(95)percent of the estimated County share of the contract construction and engineering costs for the Landscaping Project. Said estimated County share shall be based on actual contract unit prices for estimated quantities shown in the plans and shall be subject to the limitations imposed herein. Within forty five(45) days after receipt of said invoice,the County shall deposit with the City, said estimated County share. The remainder of the County's share in the contract construction and engineering costs for the Landscaping Project is to be paid to the City upon the following: (1)completion of the Landscaping Project, (2)final approval by the County,(3)submittal of the City's Final Estimate and(4) submittal of an invoice including the County's final share in the contract construction and engineering costs for the Landscaping Project. Payment is to be made within forty five(45)days of receipt of said invoice and compliance with the above provisions. All payments to the City must be postmarked by the date due or a late penalty of one (1)percent per month,or fraction thereof, on the unpaid balance will be charged to the County. The County shall pay the amount due as stated on the statement,notwithstanding any dispute of such amount. Should a disputed amount be resolved in favor of the County,the City shall reimburse the disputed amount plus daily interest thereon calculated from the date such disputed amount was received by the City. Daily interest shall be at the rate of one(1%)percent per month on the disputed amount. • XVIII The County Engineer will prepare weekly progress reports of the construction activities of said Road Project as provided in the specifications. A copy of these reports will be furnished to the City upon request. The City Engineer will prepare weekly progress reports for the Landscape Project and furnish a copy to the County upon request. XIX All records kept by the City and the County with respect to both the Road Project and the Landscaping Project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto. XX The County reserves the right not to issue any permits for a period of five(5)years after completion of the Road Project for any service cuts in the roadway surfacing of the County Highways included in said Road Project for any installation of underground utilities which would be considered j !1 4ti L Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 as new work; service cuts shall be allowed for the maintenance and repair of any existing underground utilities. XXI It is agreed that the City shall, at its own expense,remove and replace all City owned signs that are within the construction limits of said Projects.•Removal and replacement operations shall be coordinated with the construction activities through the County's Project Engineer. XXII Detouring of traffic will be necessary during construction of the Road Project. The detour routes shall be identified in the plans. All guide signs and regulatory signs shall be furnished, installed, maintained and removed by the County's Contractor as part of the contract construction cost. The County will not be responsible for any damage caused by increased traffic on City streets not • marked as the official detour. XXIII As part of said Road Project,the County shall have the"No-Parking"signs installed as represented in the plans and the City, at its expense, shall provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking on those portions of County State Aid Highway No. 1 constructed under this Road Project recognizing the concurrent jurisdiction of the Sheriff of Hennepin County. • Any modification of the above parking restrictions shall not be made without first obtaining a resolution from the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners permitting said modification. XXIV The City agrees that any municipal license required to perform electrical work within the City shall be issued to the Contractor or the County at no cost to the Contractor or the County. Electrical inspection fees shall not be more than those established by the State Board of Electricity in the most recently recorded Electrical Inspection Fee Schedule. XXV . The City shall install, cause the installation of, or perpetuate the existence of an adequate three wire, 120/240 volt, single phase, alternating current electrical power connection to the traffic control signals and integral street lights included in the Road Project at the sole cost and expense of the City. Further,the City shall provide the electrical energy for the operation of the said traffic control signals and integral streetlights at its sole cost and expense. l fr \NL Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 XXVI The City shall not revise by addition or deletion,nor alter or adjust any component,part, sequence,or timing of the aforesaid traffic control signals,however,nothing herein shall prohibit prompt,prudent action by properly constituted authorities in situations where a part of such traffic control signals may be directly involved in an emergency. XXVII Upon completion of this Road Project,the County shall thereafter maintain and repair said traffic control signal systems installed as a part of said Road Project,all at the sole cost and expense of the County. Said maintenance shall include all EVP components. Further,the County, at its expense, shall maintain 110 volt power to the line side of the fuse in the base of the signal poles for the integral street lights. The City, at its expense, shall maintain the fuse,the luminaire and the wire to the load side of the fuse in the base of the signal poles. The EVP Systems provided for herein shall be installed, operated,maintained or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: 1. Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5 and 169.03. The City will provide the County Engineer or his designated representative a list of all such vehicles with emitter units. 2. Malfunctions of EVP Systems shall be reported to the County immediately. 3. In the event said EVP Systems or components are,in the opinion of the County,being misused or the conditions set forth herein are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City of written notice thereof from the County,the County shall remove the EVP Systems. Upon removal of the EVP Systems pursuant to this paragraph,the field wiring,cabinet wiring, detector receivers,infrared detector heads,indicator lamps and all other components shall become the property of the County. 4. All timing of said EVP Systems shall be determined by the County. XXVIII Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof,to the extent authorized by the law,and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The County's and the City's liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The County and the City each warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through an insurance or self-insurance program. - 3 \,ti't_ Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 XXIX It is understood and agreed that upon completion of any and all improvements proposed herein, all street lighting,water distribution system components, sanitary sewer systems, concrete sidewalk, colored concrete median walk,bituminous paths and walks,the westerly box culvert of the two constructed at Nine Mile Creek, and all municipal street construction included in said improvement shall be the property of the City and all maintenance,restoration, repair,replacement or other work or services required thereafter shall be performed by the City at no expense to the County. It is further understood and agreed that upon completion of the Landscaping Project, all landscaping included in said improvement shall not become the property of the County and all maintenance,restoration, repair or replacement required thereafter shall be performed by the City or private citizens at no expense to the County. It is also understood and agreed that the County has included in the plans for said Road Project the construction of a temporary trail between Woodridge Road and Homeward Hills Drive in order to maintain pedestrian access through the Road Project during construction of same. Said temporary trail shall be kept accessible and in good repair during the Road Project construction.by the County's contractor. The City hereby agrees to be responsible for all maintenance, including but not limited to snow removal,during those times when the Road Project construction contract is placed in winter suspension status and the County's Contractor is not present on the construction site. • It is hereby understood that the County requires an operational clear zone behind the face of curb for storage of snow removed from County roadways. The City hereby agrees that the City shall be responsible for the removal of any snow that may be placed on the sidewalks and/or pedestrian/bicycle paths within the operational clear zone, as a result of the County's snow removal operations on CSAH 1 within the limits of said Road Project. This paragraph is not intended to confer a benefit upon any third party and the City's decision to remove snow from the sidewalk and/or paths shall be made by the City in its sole discretion pursuant to its policy on removal of snow and ice from its sidewalks and/or pedestrian/bicycle paths and trails. XXX Upon completion of the Road Project the County shall, at its own cost and expense,retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the easterly box culvert of the two constructed at Nine Mile Creek, all drainage pipe culverts crossing under CSAH 1, and those portions of the roadway storm. sewer drainage system functioning as catch basins and associated lead pipes that are within or between the outermost curblines of the County roadways as well as those within the radius return limits of intersecting municipal streets. All other components of the roadway storm sewer drainage system, constructed as a part of this Road Project including but not limited to all trunk lines,special water quality control drainage structures and all existing or proposed drainage ponds,regardless of their location within County right of way, shall become the property of the City and shall be maintained by the City. Maintenance costs for said City owned drainage facilities shall be shared by the County and the Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 City according to the ratio of contributing drainage area for each respective facility. Future restoration or replacement of said facilities shall be accomplished via mutual agreement by the parties hereto. All questions of maintenance responsibilities that may arise shall be jointly resolved by the City's Director of Public Works and the County's Operations Division Engineer. XX�II • Upon completion of the Road Project the County,at its sole cost and expense,will perform all routine maintenance on all retaining walls constructed as a part of said Road Project. In the event, at any time in the future,that these retaining walls constructed at the right of way lines within said Road Project are rehabilitated and/or replaced the City agrees to participate in fifty(50)percent of the costs of rehabilitation and/or replacement. XXXII The City agrees to defend,indemnify and hold harmless the County,its officials,officers,agents, volunteers and employees,from any liabilities,claims,causes of action,judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses,including,reasonable attorneys' fees,resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the City,its contractors,anyone directly or indirectly employed by them,and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related.to the ownership,maintenance,existence, restoration,repair or replacement of the afore defined City owned improvements constructed as part of said Road Project. The City's liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. The County agrees to defend,indemnify,and hold harmless the City,its officials, officers, agents,volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action,judgments,damages, losses, costs, or expenses,including reasonable attorneys' fees,resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the County,its contractors,anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they maybe liable related to the ownership,maintenance, existence,restoration,repair or replacement of the afore defined County owned improvements constructed as part of said Road Project. The County's liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. XXXIII The City also agrees that any contract let by the City or its agents for the performance of the work on County State Aid Highway No. 1 as provided herein shall include clauses that will: 1)Require the Contractor to defend,indemnify,and hold the County,its officials,officers, agents and employees harmless from any liability,causes of action,judgments,damages,losses, costs or expenses including, without limitation,reasonable attorneys' fees,arising out of or by reason of the acts and/or omissions of the said Contractor,its officers,employees, agents or subcontractors;2)Require the Contractor to be - - i5 WL Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the work provided for in this Agreement; and 3)Require the Contractor to provide and maintain insurance in accordance with the following: 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with Contractual Liability and Explosion, Collapse and Underground Property Damage(XCU)Liability coverages: Limits General Aggregate $1,000,000 Products--Completed Operations Aggregate $1,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Each Occurrence-Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage, $1,000,000 Hennepin County shall be named as an additional insured for the Commercial General Liability coverage with respect to operations covered under this Agreement. 2. Automobile Liability; Combined Single limit each occurrence coverage or the equivalent covering owned,non-owned, and hired automobiles: $1,000,000 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: A. Workers' Compensation Statutory If the Contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverages must apply to Minnesota laws. B. Employer's Liability-Bodily injury by: Accident-Each Accident $100,000 Disease-Policy Limit $500,000 Disease -Each Employee $100,000 • An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above subparagraphs establish minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of the City's Contractor to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with said Project. 1,�- /6 wL Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P.9320 All insurance policies shall be open to inspection by the County and copies of policies shall be submitted to the County upon written request. xV It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the County. Also,any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a . consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. XXXV In order to coordinate the services of the County with the activities of the City so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement,the Hennepin County Engineer or his designated representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and serve as liaison between the County and the City. In order to coordinate the services of the City with the activities of the County so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement,the Eden Prairie Public Works Services Director or his designated representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the City and serve as liaison between the City and the County. XXXVI It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. - 1 I-7 V�'L Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 • CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 Any alterations,variations,modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. XXXVII The provisions of Minnesota Statutes 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. (This space left intentionally blank) • _ _ �g WL Agreement No.PW 59-49-98 CSAH 1; C.P. 9320 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,The parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE (Seal) By: Mayor Date: And: Manager Date: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ATTEST: By: By: Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of its County Board Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: And: Assistant/Deputy/County Administrator By: 71, !�%'o ,�it,� Date: As di. ' ant County Attorney �//!/D And: Date: • �- / Assistant County Administrator, Public Works • and County Engineer • Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: By: Assistant County Attorney Director,Transportation Department Date: Date: -}�- ie \VL 0 2 0 0 00 0 0 0 W Z ' co I CO n`n_o 0 , o is c 0 Z p W O N CON r 0 N N 49. 'd' U = N N r M eh N N 40 • W z 2 o 0 o. a... z W In COO Cowoo T O W W W ' N COn r co o o COH co coE �' ' W z O M •'4' n N O c' O to W— �• LG }� 0 N C) M O C n� N a'• {- N • a. r N N • F• Z W U No co w v} 0 w o W N Z 0 o g 0 cep - ❑ co Q z 0 ti z w ti ~ pNQ o• 0 0 0 >' co CO co cn re n 0 Z �Zcn W ¢ COa0 � 9 0 In o 0 0 o m UZ o CC O 1- Z Z N al ❑t- o = LL Z — UJ yr w w Z 0 0 O n W V O ¢ o Z W p~ W Zp0Z -3H CO wZ w > 0CL � w �� w a OZZz2 ¢ WZ 0 a zQ2a ,�i mw 0= ov( oo �IY ON i- co• o . o e. _ W� oo WO n -1 41 MMr O • C7oiN Q� W X ~ z O 00 I- uiW❑ coO WLii co N r •CO N CD N O Q<L J § OOW GI 0 0< Z + a < c.W U a m ❑ W pQ U X cq� o r W aCCo in al= < ,- o al Z U • U 0 ZQ o 'Al o U o Q" r g a v 0 z ❑-1 if;O U <w COCOQ Q a w m z F- z m 0 en W IN- Fi 0 a: 1- W O ,a a rj w o a co m Ve U U a 0 p�� W -J n m O Om O O N 0 �.Z? W W Z IY Z I 0 0Q J z Z Q Z OJd Qa�.. cn a. (' 0 O. 0 Feli.► 0 0 U 0 0<< Z ma- } Z ..i "Z � Q to El .J re b Fii U WI--� Q WO� Q U OLL W W Z� Z 0 co W W ❑Q 0O {- W Z O I- w ❑ m C9 u. 0 > f � Z ZLLmQ CO U` D= m 2 F- z U) U. 0H WQ co U o d . QU CO= wCU2 cA Fw- 0- g O CD 0 Hennepin County Agreement No. PW 59-49-98 Exhibit"A"; Sheet 1 of 12 20 0 o 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I-i I- I- OOOOOOOriO00OOONtl1STO�p Mr1=0o0000144=IMO0 N Z OOOOON'OCOONriNWIMMN,ZMNMO0111=MOCINp443M00 O • E= O oOOOOM,MM1e1inNMu'IMMMMONION4242M1•\T1 NO:r CO OW 0 + + . • + + • + • . • + + •. a • + + + \Z 0 -Ih E OWNOLC1N C. �•1A•CNNtC N.-IN4MLAM so in a se ~ mW riliJ Let ?!?f UE < N^� ?pi.i 0 NO 0 LA4 0 oQ 00 Oa 0 eo .o= .••10 00 MO MO • A M MO M000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000 h 000000000000000000000000000000000 U 00000000000000000 0=0000000000000 0 en N - .. W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I•- 1=4 = hU 0000LflNOMo0IOCIOso elaOo.pr.,,-10000oocomu11fNo = h= i-11.1 00o0 r•IN ON-INN.•i M 0tt1 tc11e100 MM M O r1 OF ZO0 0000 W ON.iriMM U O =A =4 • • • • + . 0 Wti eoo0 IA !A - 3 ONMVE M r• 0 0 4 4 W = W UU `7 W o h .. +d LI. = N co •1n Wh a=saa 0. ass=s= ' a A M ZUUZO E ZUUUUU O N ,•+Z 1-Z =44=0 N O NNNN=44444 M N Xt=i. f-•10 -1WW-1xEES-.1ZZEZZEZEEZEE-+WWWWWEEEEEZ X E h H OMO O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +aC 0 O a O oa o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41•- \ N• W O 1.•NN0000OOOOOOOOOOOO000a000000oO0o NI- W>. OOOr•IOMoNry•o�Tr-INaNma iriscaM.IMNu1NN0r•4 r..00 h.= OW I-. . 044NN 0004MLAP•P•.4' 01.•10 N CftWW0M..T 0 •h dM 0W. M Nb1MriNM M MsoV• N Mj.iM•• CO N Z ON EI- • + + + to 0. iI Z M>- 1-a M.-i M MN W0II-- o 4 •7Z Wa Z=Z • 1...I W-i v0 Z41- N WZ • NU • W a'W - Z H Z L-I • 1-0 =0. • E h 0 C• a U 0.= • • U.U.U• F- 1-1U 1-4 0= - OON W OW = . 4 _I .1- • 1-n O W 0i0 a= WI-A a tiz ON • • Ma 1-4 ON h W 1-Z• 0 40 . Z -Jai 0 O . W J 4 W A l- •• W Z 1=i• hE• ZO0 Z . • A E > M v= 01- 4 = M ' • a W> ' = c.i- 4 b y va-I 1-1 I- o r•4 W Z CO Z W = M IX h d W M -1..1 E i- >.W W 1-W W U M mu 4•. 0. h 1- A • 4 4 OG hi W W 334= E X 0 0 4 a UX H U W W WC7 •• 00 i-<ZW 4_I Ui . 0 >ZWL►ZJU. a ,-I .0 U M U I- ..= E E N 0 0 411- ..8-.Ahd>4 4 a 4 W U.U. W O ha M. 1- Z . M0 A)-N. WW h vvUh 0.4-1H0. U 0.> WO • W Z 1- O0 o N ha . 0000400 O 1 3400 • 0 4UWW= W . W4 0 W W a W=WW14OW-1 =00W00 W• 00.ZOC1-IW A EOG 4 0. 0 0.)-A 00-1>1•+0.0.Z U1-.0 =C00 >0. O M1-13L. Z WW 4 to W Z=4- E-11-11•iA.14Z4ZWWOA -1O OW.L3. U >Z A O . 1- of 00 i-1I-i70Ea0.-JZWW1-11-I-Z1•rLCD41-I- l- AZ 0. 4w N Z 0 L-• UMOU <U. =LULL -1=>NZMWZZWW aN N 4 = ZW4A OWXE WWW= A1-•10 ==a1OM 4Z>x4.1WCA 1 1-i 0000Z Z4<WWWWWMWAW4000 =}-LU0 U4>ZO • I-E .I• r• E J 1 M1-104 iLa1h1-�LEZ00a.1-3AX4WO4 ==1-AZVL - CI-==oao MO 0 Ni I-- 00 1 . 4W400 1-1-C�c 31/70003C0=00640=000=aUtl3aaa , 1- 1 W I-•i = 1 No-12W=ZZZ • WWWW N P. U a W i 1-1 HWUWWI-IWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW00000 0 N .aCA00= ZZA»»»»»»»»»ZS4444 Z 00.. 0 1-1-1-14141-W W-Io000000 0 0000 0 00000F14i»» qN0o • HWceQ0WWEWWWWWWWWWWWWWEW4.J.+-O:-- 01-1 1O0Li1 LU1444Cd 00 QJ • 0 pi E1.1.•LLUho00.0.aa00W'000.0C0.'000 =WCC'00WWWC•o00101nV)t/ OWN LA 03 y'•Z 1-4 O 0 o 0 .. .. •• 00000oOo.•40M%0NNNWIN�o �Y'.•10oLON01••1.•1I-1oNMLf1 O ri Z = •-LNY•Ntp•i,-i.•Ir/e-i•-11-Ir11•i1••IMNM.C•ONNN,-1Oo00ri,-i►41/11a1LL11f O 0 041 0 000000000000000000r•iOr1•-Ir4uI.4000O00 •• 0 0. W1-IL/1 000000000000000000000000000000000 WM4 , 00000000000000000000000 0.000000 LY - ›.4.. W \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\s.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ W 1'-U U W r•I pi M ri O M.••I N.-i r-I ri ri r1 r-I.•I ri r•1 M M M M ri o.O.0`o.1T M r•l pi.-i,-1+•i A >- 1-I Zaa 000r•I,-IooOO000a000OOO0000a000r-IrrNNNN = M W Z0.Z WE u1LALALAsO•oMululMLAOLAMle1u1u1LALALAu1LALAu1LAulLALALALAu11AIA 0 M 0 CS-IC 1-0 .-1.-I.ie-ir•iriNNM%?..t•tl• • ••tl" •�2'•Q'�'N•T�Y•�'ti!'�'vi.,:r Q•\ • = .-1 0 1-1V71-, N= NMMOW000000000000000O\1•O00000O000o 0 W htnh 000M Orin-Ir-I.drl pi.-ipi.-1•-I.-Ir•I.ie-ir-1.•I\7r•I.-iri.-i Nr•Iri riPr1P W ,-I h 04U NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 4 0 UUi cW O . • 1-1 - N`11hn W • LAOLAomelmo1110LAOLAOLnoMczol!•IOLAoul OLe10LAOi110ri111 I- Z --�"."--- ZCC= =CC 1=1.I,-INNMMW�7u1M,42%0NL+aotoa00+17.001-Ip•iNNMM•VrtMu1u1 N U OOC Na OO0000000oo0000o000orlri Nriri.iririri N.I.Ir•L Mil W a 030 ..J o o a o a a a o a o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 o a o 0 • Hennepin Cbunty Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit °A'I; Sheet 2 of 12 VVL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OII7 0 0 0 0 ' 00000001000000000000000000 l0000000a,.roo 0 N F- 0000004M000moCN0400•000N•00000000000h.CUIo 0 mommNOmo mooN M NO • = 0N CON0. 0VompoCMMNr1l00mCioONN0mcoMcN• 00 CO • • • • • • • • • • • • • a • • • • . • S. • • • • • • • • • • • •.- a \Z m E 0.04014.I40340•ohh•0 4mNNNh001m101mo040m0mc' •O •0 .-1 4 M co4mM .I N4 4 w oo r..i.T.i CNN Lnm Mh.i•0 m '..mCci .0 00 .M .i N m0400O mN N • m4 0 00. o CO H . 0000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0000000000000000000000000000000000000. 0 I- 0000000000000000000000000000 00000000 a V) 0000000000000000000000000000000000000 CO a 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O O M 00 O o O O o M 4 0 0 CO M OC N W 1- .i 1-U 0000.00OhhhOOmcogromu1N.00M.rNmeamo fl0000.1.100 0 Z NH .HOMO No N00 O..IN 101000N mmN'ooulo 0.M o CO .i ZOC N o CO M .i - NMMOO .ih M U 0 00. •. • • a a IOR1 M CO M m m . • 0. CO CO Z ' 0 In v LI = r. CO Eh =sW W o: • _ _ O h 1-.= UU Qa=MMMMMM= OMMMMN NN MM4000N 4 • N HO 2LWJZZZZ33-cEh==E3ZZS}»I-1-HF-..t3ZZZEZWSAUEE W H H L • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 O O o 0 00 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 0 0 CO a n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 O O O 000 00 O o 00 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 o o o o 0 0 O 00 0Qo oo o0000 0=====mOO O O O U1 O 0 1 W)- h..lm..IooN0O00uINNommoom m000000NO'N0N04mhl0LL10 N I-OC 1 I-I- 00 00oNo.O4 mm0000 U.i I1t.1010.0.h OI N.7.t-4-4 i-4,-4.-Ia 0 dH M0m00 •MNNm .0 00. 0NNhu1NIt0 If100 mmm 00 I r., = 1 .T..1-• 1 • • • . • • • • • a • • • • a a a a a • N m MZ 0 mm4m e-I .-+ M N•0 4mm04 I-I.I .00.i VIWW I M N4 m N mMM NIl1 W b1 I- CO 4 W 0' ==E 1 WJ • „ HN OCd' • 24h N ,Z HOGW •• =m +a h0. • E at o• 0.0.0 a LL W U I- IL 4•I PL. 00m W P°= Z X X •~ mFngW- 0 0 1-A O. ~ us a • W . I-< E E A 4 H N P. W~ h h= O W O N 0. W an)• A W W CO • h CO N = 0.0 N m W W OC 4W IA 0 W 4 WW O U4 I- 0 U Ah y A J OOCWI- ).= W 4 Z 2 I-Z =W Z N U .Il.=WX U00 0. 0.40 0 4W 0 • W n NO. 0 I-OHWUvJ UJ0 ,U NH, 7 = Z OC 7= O n WXI-ZOC< CO ^n 4 0J H O H 00 OU ZN7 OCMX 0I-•WU MM 31-- 1- OC M WO I- H In vM NO. 000 OEHWI- by C044 X 0 0 M OU 4 • 1•- W CO dH HavW I- ECXOCW Z4)- 004 a 4 .-I U 0. E0. U - W =CC -10. I-J U XW WMOOC= H.IM O.ZU U CO X H Wm Z 0 OW 0 =0004 mwW=E0.UC ..Ivv Wmw W 0. .-I .O 0 hM W 2 .IN•OC7 Z J ZIL Z0000 ZH H vZOG IX= CO 1-CO H MU LL 0W = OH C01- O#HOC =OCUILLJ02 4WW ma- 0.0 W Z I- 0 LL OJJOA =H 07ce01-000 VL<UH OCI-I- 004 • M - W • 13: W ...1XWWZ H.14402 m= UW0ZOU0C00C1-4 Y. Ww WcWhE ZI- • A E0C 4 A MOWAO 1-mm ZI-U.-, WvA HO UZOm-4 JOCOC aaWE Z0 Z WW 0- 4W} HZ4000C4=4 A J00=0 HOWHW 400 coMOC W U 73 OC 1-JI-0.WW4WUILOC HW»-2HZOCXUI-<C0 }1.-.•ZZ O ON 0. 4W h W HaHa0.0.JOC 0CW W000 ZMW< .4 4 WOOW1-1-]L4 '• 0.0 N 07=77I-U00OI-300• 0<ZZA000AWWZ U. ZUUHZZUV' .TA I 0JCOH44X =040W JWNHWI-d=30fl 1-a WWWON NZ I-Z .I 04HUU7.W=Z4 0 W = EJHWH 40W000JJJ3ZZJ W MM0 m 37VLWUVWIO•IIO•I0006JF-N UI-I-I-Wm3P0�7W04NZla-OWWWUUAx1-XI- I- I WWWF- XA1-I- 444 Z44H0'•Ir1r.}.+ZOCJHZ»1-000 WEWEW .0 h • C(O4ZW44Ql-0CZ0011-- =0 00\M4.7=MMa4-cWhI-W004EWEW .0 N 44400 OC77000WWOCHWW CO• Z0.H ZUUO(U.LLJ 77 _ • . 7770ZYC044W0.0CCWWOWW-IWWWWWWO UE4»U=ZOOJO..1 m0 • JJJJEUMUUJ OOCh-.1 00J3WWWWWF-AWOY=WW=HHA.70V•O A..).-O-.•-• dQaW0»XXWWWW0h44000H4�-}Y•�Y•m00.0MI-I-OWW04040 m4-1 CO• INNOCUZNWWNI-NaC3U4 11-I-F-F-I-POITSNUONN000OCZN N 0 03 • ' CO • • O ''0101000m No moulo0000OCOOr•000M00m0000m00 CO CO .I U.i44.i.d.•i NN04 01 N.7.-m 01K1.i1fW.•t'V••?M.i•o?'0.?,•i.t.7'VYmm Om 00 o O OI110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o m o 0 0o o oeN o o o o o CO . O 00000000000000000000000.i00400o4m000000 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO o: a \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ N. W W pMM.+.•II01NNNNmm.-IamNMM.•IM000O0.V NMMm,-Ih.+. ,Tm N CO )- Eal NNN00000ONOOO.i0oct000mOr.CO.lomo0 000Op m Z M oe WE 000m10100.0•0101a0.010 m0000101m10100m000mm000000mU In 7 M 0 1-0 •41•17I01101t01UII01t0itale-I000.I1.4rINr-0.•Oo00or•r0.•Iu-N,••I.I.i.•IrOrIN N _ H CO HZ 000000000000,•INMM.IN0MM.t.711 .,T0=0001-1HH iHHH .i r- -,---1---M..I-•i..t.-IN NMMMMMMM.7.0•.7.T\7.Y'.7V'•O'..t4 �! -I W ,0 IW ea - INNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N • I- 0 a I • d 0 I . N •W •1 olal0.iU0I0U0UCI000MoI0UOMOUOn.oh000U0IR0UO LOI I-. Z• "'"'wr=0 .0.0h1•"WW0000M .INNMMNV3PMUw•OIICI000010haoo.ieN N 0 U ' HZ 1 ..•.-.H.i4,-C,-I.-I.INNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMMMMM M ` W a J 10 0 0 0 O 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "A'"; Sheet 3 of 12 r 10000000000000000000 0=0 O00=0000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000=00000000 M I. 10.70000000..0000O00000000====MO000===. rri.n0 O • = 1VOpoNOo000NO.oa00000no00•rNLTNOMNOM O=M•rT•OV•?N 00 = Iri•0=Vrin..4NtTOOo V=4:OIt[IP•00 0In'?'ON riN.NNWMOOts1MO�t[1VCM0t1 0 • 0 0 ! • • w w w w • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . a . w • • • . w Z !V OM Nmmt NMV00.7 MMIMMMP•'T COi-i•O.7N.-lMtn It)M•O4ao% O 4 .ICJ tll 0% ••i ,IN 41• M M M \O ! M4 ! - 0 0. ! a i !C 00 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 O 0 0 l000000000000000000000000000000000000000 *000000000000000000000000000000000000000 l0000000000000000O000 000000000000000000 = N •W' 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0In 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 L' M I-U 0I00000111000000%000000000000M00o,0000oltt0.f•O0P0 C mum MMtnO.O N Oin0 0o000 OIOO'NO.PINO oomoo fMNNNrI.-I 2 O =02. 4 MMIVMW ONNMMN.InO•In N 0O'? Nl[t M! o MNMm m r•l M . N O o = r D In .. LI • Z •. 0 ZF- • ==xx ======x== = === • N Wm UUUU UUUUUUUUU U UUU 0 r. F Z n M MN• 4444 444444444 N 4 O 444 M M N N N NN N Ho $ZZZEZWWWWyrZWWWWWWWWW=====W]LZWWW======EZ H K I- L_ 7 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 Qo 0 0 0 O 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 o 0 0 4 Y! M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 41- \ A W} N070000OM1.TN.7NMNMMu1Mr•IrIP.4'Mif1N00•4%0rINOOVMMO.I%0000 ?CLnN F-OG F-i- 4.,TMOM ON rf MInV 0 00M 4M M.7M10 LTin 00 0 ..CH HI. V MM NN 4, M MN.7M0. S F- • • • • 04 N Z 1-4< NIP') N M o W01- 0 4 Wo 4 V I-In z2Z I W-i. H N- =4 Z 41-! N w C=9 I-10.'W - Z H • I-N ZI-00 0 aU 0 Z H U.U.U I- 11-•1UUs.� • 00H W 0aG' 14 n •I-- • W adWA . NN WF-A 0. F-x. MM - F-x I=O • W0 WV U 1-= =W W W as 00 00 0 0 • 4W CO • 4 WW W= I-I 1• 00 OM > Z Z 0 aG 0.0. X A H H M U Z W CLJ H O In O I-'••1 Z0.• 0 Xx 4 0 HJ ad M aG0 F- m 4 O. 4.6 1-fW WM 04X WW.WJ 04 MO. M 00 4 1- -t nZ 43 7 a:P4 0 JJ40a. F- NSH-^•.•••• Q r1 U .0. Z0. U0%71LIF-I- F's' OCtU ..f04 WPC NM1-I04 N <=H U. o X •H Wm 7U1-WW Zi M0 4ZF-0> F-I-0.ZI- UQr+ Y-t 4 M •O U MW ZUvv011.1W.= x >4 ZJ00 00 H W Z hCS4J4 0 1-^410 H- 1-9U O../ »OOOOHWW F-44 0=0G MO CO VF M-t-1d3 W . x F- 0 H -t0-1..1WW 1040.0. C IUW >0. AAWWWN4• •Z).-00.-1dd3 W . ad W 1-JJx==0.0..70aGHH >3W O 4=30Z Ha:44433 In A =ad a A 4JH1m0U44 A0.0. F-F-J >)-F- ZZ0.W ZH} Z<- w= oo Z WW 0. ' >HLLJ 4 -1J J 0.COWHHOW=H4O MU WWOO U >3 4WUHWWWWOOW4= Q4>Z4Ui J44U2-=I-OGCZOOH HWF-I-OZ 0. 4W 0- 0240440.0.0.1LW0.F-0 WW >0000== F- F-AZI•i. ZO.OGI-LL1WZH 0.0 N >104 HFiHt-1 H A AG1Wo WaC=WWWNOH WF�•W44 WaGfKH= .. - _...�_ ,..,., �-.yam •.,..•...a F-E M r CO W WW OG4 x=4r•1F-F-UZF-I-WJH• 0044 4W0ZZ=M ' H O W WWU0UU440.WIst CO 40 0440.0 2=40=MmtUZ00E-H M0 V OGOGi-xaGOGOGcg=OF-O.a WW XOPCWH3Z)-0.X1-4OG U-UOG<ODUHC • • I- I =440 OO F-F-I-J 1-F- F- 41-0..t 0 JU CO CON N U=WJ=Z=Z==== <0U4ZXZQW======Z/Zi4NF-0I- Z=+�Z Z .. ==WW 00 C7t1GOOI- 00. = W'OF-F-=0AAZ Z HO • OGd OW0000440O=G7-J-JNOOOJNOO 00E-U00n22Z Mo 0 AJ- 0. M WOF-Inoln0acaGOOJ)-WW=oMoW .It0InOO4WQZA044INInin0 • 00 4..e�+ • 0040.'V.Y•VF-F-P4 0.=WWHMPMWHPMNPN3000H40==NrONN-r1 • If 0= H O 0 0 It 00i-INNoo00'?000orfNMM•ONPONNOOMU1000P40Moo000O 0 M OM147,40 00''iIN'?'?ONNNN•OO40NVNPO'YrimiHHMMPPMlnVMV• 0 MOOOMNMN000 O M0000 rI 00 NO 00 M NrI rI 0000000000000 - 0 000000000000 MH00000 P40OMOM MO 4 ri0000000000000 00000.0.0.0.0000 0 0 00000000 0 0 00 00 000 0 000000 00 = ♦\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\LU W W MMtt1.TMmMMNNmmNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMMMMO'N00MVHNMmMmtM.-IMri fG 2- `EO o0ooP44PooN'?0 0oo000Oo0o00oo0MNNoCO00OMM Z M = WZ MMMotRlntfLll.OVlf11n.O.O.O0.O.O.OVVVV•O00V0II,Int[11n.OIlninl MMM = M O F-= M1H1.4NMMMMMMNNW.T.7�7'\t�7.1' .7'.? O0VVVMMPMMMM Z M O H Z InInUn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M N N N N N 0 W ''.?''InLntnlnIlnMMMMin,nMMMMlnlnlnlnlnlnlllnMMMMIlnlnlnlnlnlnln W •-I P. NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Q O U . , '• . • H 1 W • OIn OM101n OLEOIn0N..OIOIOLfOIOMLnOIOU0IOMOM10InOIOLEO I- S --- r=c2 MM.7.71nLn.0.OP.NN•N0000%O.00mmNNNMM'.7MMooNN0000000oP N U I HZ MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM .7. .7.7.7•�I•.Y•.Y'.7•..1,Nr l'�7'.Y'.Y•M1MM ISMW 0. 1 -1O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "Ali; Sheet 4 of 12 - I 00000000000000000000000 000 0000 000000 00000000000000000000000000000071000000000 V' F ko NsomN000 •OOCo0o0000m00000000000000000000 Z 0100.4'00.1.7o0000NmmmocumwOoN0000000mMmoo0oo00000 o • = •O.TN.NNI.M•ON-Mmnotnr7Q��n. • oomomr..-Irso0m000m.io.7 0 0 O • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • \Z O E H.4N N.11n000.0rlNlnlnsnlfN •ONM00M?rI rINN,- tnlflul.l M .* n '4 'ONN "'MN N NIn.-I N .O•IVrr.i ...4N • In 4 00. o a • • -I 0000.000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000000000000 000000000000ao0ooa0000000000000000000000 J 000000004100000000000000000oIMM0000oo0000 4 M 00oa00000000000000000m00410ll.mNooaoo0o000 Y_ N W • + • . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . .-I FU q•o0l.L00000r.•MOn00ooutN0I000004..40.-INN.-+oaa00000 Z HH NNMNNMM.ct'Ne-IulI.0If10.-IM 42No000o InMlnlnol M O .•I Z0 rIN4041.•I.•I 00000 N Nri U , 0 O. • • • • • • ton M, waa•NNM .-I • • 00 Z ** • ' 0 0 - U. 2 N. 0 2F =x?-?- O.O.o.da.>•�->-yx xxs M Wm UUM= ZZ2ZE4444Q444_0 UUU O N I-2 N NNN 442E O»»AAAAAAAAAQNN444 N H= ZZEZZ3Z3EZWW44ZZZ22E.J1JJ»>,»»»WZZWWW H X F- 0. • h 0o00000000000000000000004)000000000000000 4 N 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 041000000000000000oo4)nn.NNnoo410o0000000000 , QF \ W>. N.Y'4ImCTOO,Oh..•i0M0M0.-IM4,0ONo00004.0000000000•o.ioO FM F-I- 0Mu1NNul40.4200�'rIrIN.•IIf1O•olft.4•CO 0 00000Ncoo0 No 0 4m N.ON -I.4000 NInMM.7 00000000 In.•I 00 N 2 EF- • • .. .. • • • • • • • • N H H2 NO .-sN .-i.....3-1.•1 NO. I W '-I w 0= M W4Nh 0 4 Wa 2ZZ .o ILL..: H N OG Q ZQN N •0.7 HOCW - SH • 1-0 Eht- • 4 VI 0 MO O 2 H il LLIt.0 h HW ' J U O 4 004 -, •.1-• J W~�17 O. F-Q NW.N•II.0•I FM • N4 F-Z O .r0.•o•or+ ZOO 01-- 2 4a 0 • MOMMJ W W . FJ n3 CO 0. 4W 0 4 EZH OC P. }.0 H .. AI- ZZZZH WOW02>. FOC to ^3 FS =W - ' 000000 >Hf>: N O.OGh^ HOG 3'0 • 4W CO HHHHW 404 NN I1=H= 04 W OW ' OF O Z' Z 00000. 0.WO WMN MMOW 2 CO ...1 OGOG 0..1• H 0 WWWWI/I A 0 0MM - W N ZO W2 4 4 OG4 WM WM F. ' H AAAA. )- Z -IF I O.WU }WW F3 0 H 4 NI MU 4 F- . 2 4000;'W Q> I U2 WHNM.7 =AF- . ZO 0' O F 4 '-I U 0. EIS. OCOGWW0 3WH 0G O >ZW U F42)- HA W W 1-2 O X H WH •WWWWHWWH0 0 Z.2111WW 2WWWW HWHGS \ Z m WM a. .. •O U h0C 1-Fh1-(1/I>OCW 4 W • •N. WW0000 3I.- d =3 on WH o F-0 H 1-IU I-hI•-)-W H0E 0 h0.1 WUU.444< 0ZW00 W I UJOC W 2 F to a»=AZOG4 I- UM= I-hhh Z\oF-•WHEZJ 00 •".• W • OC W 0000v..AOW 000QZZZHw..1000I 00-1001=»w Z W A =CS < A (F00 C301-c3u.H HWvv4•+000G44 COWaWW Z W W 0. Otlo0000t12ZLLIZW0FFI-MHJ QJJ-IJ 00 0 AA OGHd}COCO U >33 441.7 4=044000 AZ000000 44UHat C000>-1-44 0. QW I. W00001HHWHUO-»4CWWZWW WWWW2ZU OC AAZt-• h NN 0.0 N MOCOGOCOCAA0AZO.ZZO.AAH0AA1-1-F-(H HWW0WWWd42 =00 I JO»>WWUWOOWWZ <W0022ZZZN000.0.<0-NN=W000OWW I-Z .-1 4UU00EZZZU0FI--HWW240000000 •OCY•>•00}}HHUZHJH22 HLK 0 3 0 FF 0UQ033UUUUHri4Fh I-0C0G HI-W0 M0 .O IFU1WWWWWUIW.WX44WZZ N fO H 00WJUZ F.F. • N N. <WWWWWWZW40hF-4WWJJJJHHHH0XHWWHWUU0A000.JWW C7 N H0Ca0005 OGZ0U 000 QQQQWwwW=Z '__ =WW< F 4ZE Z • 0000000 UOJ<<OWWF . FI--l- LLILU'0 WO0WO..l..0-WOxl-W HVJ • WZ=Z22Zu1ZJH6.O.JOCOG00004444I-N0.440.4LLLLLt:p =00» • AJ•-0.• • mo0000oN-OW4ZZWHHZZZZ00WWW •0-J-1}.JWW0 0HZ<< 00 4-d 0QUUUU0.-IU0ZHNOG33HHH!-Ihh1-1A.-1$-WWI-!LL.000C01U0HO.6. .•1 OG d N • 0 U 3 O O 0'. In 4Y M0000 WI 0.0.M M.I' 'In.Or-I N M O.i On O.i MN O.-io0000M.IN 0 r• Q.No.r.l.-I.+N.01�Y celoa.-lNNullnlflut.i.+.-I.io..1.O.•IMON000mmM.loo 0 oMo MMoo0o0N000.,1110000000oNNT=410001f1111.oOmoNN . 0 ONNNNO 000000000.•IOoo0000oo.i0o00000.1oo00.4'�Y' O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OC .• OG \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ W W 4,1-1Mr•1.•1MMNMMNNIftMmMMMMM.1.-Ie-I.ImMMMMMMMMMN'. NNN .0 >- Z0 000000000o00rI.10000000o000.0iriri.i.l.i.••I.I00MM00 3 M 0C WE %OMMMM1 1717 O.0.0.O.Otf141.O.OW•O.O.O.O.O•D.a•O.O�D•O•D•O.O•a•D•OInI.0.0 . 0 M 0 hA rI.-1.-I.•1.i -IMMO42'�7�7'N•I•NNNN4MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.2'.�'�'�'�7' Z .i CO HZ NMMNfMMMMMM.7'InIf InLflmmmmtf1•0•0.O•a.O.O.O.O.O•D.0.0.0.O•o•O.O.O.O.O O W In1fl In In In In lnln In In In In Mln In In In In M In M In In In In In In M In Ul In In In In In In In ltl In In W .-4 F N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 4 O U. . IE•I •- W . Inollloln0Woln0LloWotn.-Itn.00If0Inolnoln0WoWoMOMOInOLfIOIn I- =---*1`== .-iNNMM.2'.Y'Inln•O•ONN005Oa•a.O.oO.INMM.Y'•0InO.O.0N•N•000ChUOo . N U HZ IfIfIfllnlnlnlnlnlnlnlnlfllnWtnlnlnln.O.O•D•ll•O.0.0.23.0.0.0.0.0C•0.0.0W•D•DNN W 0. J O O O O o o O o 0 0 o O o O O o o O O O o O O o o O o o O O o O o O o O O o O o EM Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "A"; Sheet 5 of 12 a4 r- ooaoul000a0000coa0000a000000000000aooacoo 0 0 0 0 0 NCT1n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oo O O o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 •1 In F o0000cpome0000000CONOoN'OONC000Ceootnmooul.DOON 4 = inramopl..•oamo�7ul000000woolotneoNmmoo•milno•c�rc0000NOM M 0 • 7 Nr-Ia.M.OsT 0tOY'1 I00C MWOOMM�0N.-1ONNr-.. ¢TOM.iMMMO T 00 0 .. • • • • • • •• • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • a • a \Z 0 = O M OWN .ctnitltnMM.IOON.OM.i.•I.1N' a.wmoM.•ir•t - 0• 40 -1 4 r-Ii4 NMMM.ltnr.Ilu7 r-1.I' •CN 70 .I W n +e .. \O o a In4 2 •0 420. 7 _ . 2 In. -4 O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 -I.. 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 O o o o ofo o o o o 0 o o 0 o o o O O o o o o O o 0 o O O o o o O o o O O o O O 4 N 0000N►+IIlColnln000aooN000000000ooCoiuloColn000 ' W • • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • gm MI FU 1=000o0o.•Iona.No.ao4:20•d.1.0= /423NNInuloo0Nr♦NNOCi.•IOMM Z FIN ino.a.o. to00oiN 'Co 1n in C Or-1 COON O 7 r•1 Z0: , .-1r1.-I 000tn OO oI+1 O.iN •tC 0 0 70• • • • • .. • . • C 000 00 r•i - ..I In .1t•0•�' 1nln a ry r-I.+ F • O n O F e0 Z o M O}G .., U. O = N CD ZF ==2= Nt/IC/m= S = = CD 0. WN UUUU 000U in U U U W • O I- FZ aaaa tNI-INNa )•4• 4 44000NN4 4N F F1 N FIC WWWWZZSZZ=MMONOWZZNN$ZWZZ=WmhdUhG=ZWF==FZZ . F 44. . 0000000000000000000000000000'000000000000 4 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0inin In o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o o o O O O ON o M O O aF \ 00- MMInN4•I04+4-1r•IOO•cOoom0o4-14-IN.-10.•INoNWNa.0.0034-4NWWMOV' FOG FF W 00%0O.-IIfN'N NNr+ a.M.010NN e-INNoa0N •o.-IN ow CD 4N .put.-IoMM M Noo MNo.a M.-tor. C .•IM OO N. = MI- . a • a • • .. • a a 'N N NZ -I 0%Nri NN N.-I1n • Pat NO.W I N 00 r♦ NN WON o 4{.. ' WOI Z=ZZ 1 IU..4 I 1 W4 • ' Z 4 F N 2 I-I OG W - ,Z F0.1 • FN A ZF0 Z 4 •W-II a0 UF-i AW iLU.-1 U M4 . WOW Z ed Zed O:W OON W OG WOG WO WI- W a n F M tl. I-O U.)- F 4 N 0 OG A. Z U.W A ai0 U 4 3 W 1 oG WO _ }lt.. NWOCOW 3 U NW CD WE- 2 a FZ )-..JW 40:0.0-=TZZ 0 = • N Z 1-4 Jo= 0.0. WMWWW JZ 4 ›. 1 N FM 7 00.0... 1 oG I OFFF JN M Ww M CD • 0. =WW=t1.00i ND7 F O CC 4W VI n}. FFOW=OW}}} FO Z CDO a OF • FP.3JF22-IMF-IOCooi NZ W WN Z FZ Z0G 2300SN1-4J}-,I.j0. . FO 4W CD ' I-+02AF144WJ0W JJJ }.WW F Z 4)- U OF J S Z 4000: 40.0.}00.}}444 1-0.0. Z O 0-a N itiJ N O 0.W4r.0.I I 0.I JZZZ F 440 7})- 4 N 4 F CC M WO' F 4-4 4 31 WZW I WWOWCDCD N OFF 1- F NZ N M 00 4 F .'. FOWFOZWFZANlFI O ZZ 0. N U• . t-4J 4 NI U 0. ZO. -F=OGFN,-INFN- 0100 A W W >-=Z4 N 7 LU O 0 X N Wm J0.0w1-40JJNSJW . ZFFF . >FINO: UI Wm UW=0. 0. .-I •O U FOG ZW4-14S3W 23 F.JJJ 0000 444E W F ZWF1 o Fin 1-I HU OJOC 3 }123 A4-4000 UW}} WFF CC 0W 4NIt:A W" Z F UI ..•vvC W I WN=O WW0 ZOO ' ZW O:F ZO. • JMOGW •• W ... OG W OGWZW_WZ.d3FFFJJZ 07Z 4I-Z0)- AJ4Z. A WO: 4 A WW1=Z-=OZNo 1 ZS2 WOJJ WUUW 44o-13UF NZO: 2 W 0. CDCDCDFW-aNNNJNYOOOWWUaa W •O- = C00344 .J1- 0 U ?3 • 444v-4 --I .J JUUUAFt1G2= U ' ?-FFI N.o.-IW...1UJ0000WIL 0. 4W P 000 Z W ZW4 }(WCDCD S 1--4-342 U4=WWZW 0.0 N N00WAWAJAW_331-FFF FHFI W NNW WWWWWOIM1-U.40G 1 WWWCDFI)CI•tiH`) iO AZ00 U. •000 a000G0.0,44OCOCz J0• Nat o ZZZ04Aoa0oo0M000UU 1mm 0 )-)-0).0UZZ} 1---17-•I---1--I}-}FSU4)-W MO .0 FF1-00 WUTANinC0G444Wt-IOI000G20GW2000G XXX OG4U NiYJ F 1• 222W 0 JOG.-144W4=WMN404-44-11-4004==Oa a .VI N. WWWZ ZZZ^Z FFFO 0WwWWQW1-1-OCZZZ==W 4O000G4 N WW === 40O4FdN t0MOZ • WF 0JJJ1Ww •3dWF1- AAAAQQO .Ww NtN • ».a}0OOo00OCJJJZ 0ZZOZJ.i00MWWWWAAW-J(AOZZF AJ..•.0.1..- 444400oCoCoWC77ao WWZW4FIJJ WWWWOO 7I000WW • 10 4J • 0.0.0.0r14.14-44-+4-14-14-INLL.U.1L2W.O1-1-0F000WLL.F000000F=AW0FOG .I W 4 0 • In CDC . 0 o WI.+NMo00o000NN-NM0 P.o.-No000o000.•I.Ir•I COCoON•0o0 0 ,1 CC000C000001nr•IM.-IC.I0OO.i.•I..••1.-1Nrir-1000It1MN.i.i.4Nr-I.1 O N.-I-.I.IW-.I---CO 0000M MM 00000000 N•000000001-1 oo 0 %•I'Inin11•I.4NMM.INM000OON1000000000O0001-4000000MOO OOO`O.t.1.1.1 N N M 00000000000000000000000000000 Z •• W \\`NN\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ • on } =go 000000000000r~-1.N-I.N1Coo...I.*-CC000000000000rp•I.pINMCC E M OG LUZ •20.0000•0•c.0000 inInIn'0'•0♦0.0intotitinln.00IllOMintn•cInCInininM 7 M O F7 i's'.7.2'W0.7.��.7.YVYinn1OulIInOMNWWWWWWMWMWnWlulull[101-I Z .I O NZ .O.142Wk0•40.O•c.00•A•O.O0W 0.0.O'NNNhNNNNNNNNNNNNNN00 D W inlnutlf&lnifMinlninllinlnintnlnulininl0ininintfMulUlinlnininifMMin Mlhinln LI .i F NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN D 4 --I « W •1 otnoOal0Olnoinoinoin0e0olnOlnCinOinCOoOOIOOoIOOo1oM - Z •'•,..1••`•'"SO I .1.i NNMMWWMIn•O.OPN 0o000.00rIr-INNMPnWtrin1410.ONNt0o00.1TOO A U NZ I NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNmmoOO mmtaCOtOtOtO 00t 0002t00000o0a.C. LI I . J I O O O o O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 O 0 11021 Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit 11A11; Sheet 6 of 12 a - • vV\-- 1n 0000a00 000o 00000000000a o 0000000 ae 0000'r0000000a%00000a.r,-+o0 0 0000000 W . . . . • - I . h 000.01�•O Nr10000OOONOOMOo000aNii•lO O a.ON00a00 • O . WO = o001f ONa,MM,CIMSTNM.0 NC.00•pa.•ItOO It) .-4C ROIO Co == O 04M410M4Mr•1MNMNI �► 4N.•1�t0 00�0� N OMMMt01RN OW O aft . w ... .. w w w w w w www w w w w - ♦ w w w w \Z CO —11.. E O.Nri M a•o 04.-1 'O NM O OHO 401r14 M 44 1000.••1 -- NMW OO XX Id= 4 M ri .4 .4MAIM � M N as o o0 00 00 • - ao 00 • A o0 NI 0 0 0 N 00000000000000000000000 O 0000000 00000000000000000000000 0 0000000 1- 00000000000000000000000 0 0000000 U 0000000000001000000010000 O 0000000 4 N .. .. W 0 00 0 M 0 0 00 0 0 0 M OO 0 0 0 C W)' 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . • . . • • . • • • . . • • . . • . . . . • • . • . • . . h r4 Z hU 000.0ri00.OROo0Ma.ota=[1000.1.100 O •Ou100a0IN0 • Z hi, p•.,-i, 000 Nr-1MN •O.i N•O O If1 C.0) O ,•I OJ.In O NI C0}- Za- 000 r•I NMM mt.- in tflmm U O ZA =a www a w • C WN CC= NI .0. M ..13 00.1..1 1A M A hh • 0 Z = C4.i 04.1 . o U) . u IL. A . Z R 0 I-i Zh ass x ==x a% 4 W M =U U U U U U 0 N hZ- A44 N MM M NN MMC)0N 4 MM 444 N N ^1 f•i0 JWWZZ`EZZhZhh-IZZZZZZYXZ W EEEEwww X X4 . ~ a. • I- • EH . 0000000000a00000C000000 o 0000000 • 4 H M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0000000 • 0-1 I .-Ir•4.-00000000000000000001110 M 0•000000 41.. \ -a.. Wy. o000.NNNMO.aoa0Na•NaOO.r•1RVt RM.0 r'i• •aaTa.N,-4OoO h 0: 1n11-I h h 0'C N 00 00 NC.-I o. M a•'O O 0O N r:,N N N.•i'•.-1 In 00 • .O U 41-i ...IN 1fl 4 U N%4" N.-i .4 M 00.-I mar 00 R Z arm Eh w a a a w w N I•I -Z N= N .-I.-1 M•O.-I Na I = 0J)W NI 1.4 RE f = WON. 0 4I— N. IU ===4 �I WJ 'M - N R eC 4 a' • =41- N Z Mp-i V) ..0 A4 1-iWW - xN ZX . hU) =a ' Ehh • 4 U. O Z aN a.la . aaUJ 0fO4 V)W ^ . 0 011--4 W W x • X X W 04 W A N.N-I W W • A P° WI-C 0. hZ 000 A IN WI- W IN h= CO4 4E J 0%00 .-I W W cd . 4W Ah W W U). W 4 Z Z 1...2. Z1Y CO' Z - .s > >L M O a O J O O W 4W Z O NIlhWUv.1 1- U-1U U Nh ? N N I-I= - . X(24 O h•••• 4 U) OJ F- i- I O • ZZ 001.1=hWU MM >-•31- IN N Z Z M ' R a •q 4 1C1 1 1••1 W W N N={- 1-..0 044 X N N 4 N M O0 0.. 0. pp-- h A S 44 xedW =4)- OCl4 4 •.4. 4 4 O UX U U = WM WW}I`} CJQU)U.•CCiU) ..J WMIULI W U� 0 a. ..4 .O N N U 1.4:14 ah44 a4 ' ZM 1-I %.0=0 OCZZUZ 0 1-0 IN IN = NU O)-1N0.0. ZCO.•+OWJ0= 4IW ma O.00'+I-iW • W x OC• 0C O V) h= 0Z>004Ut-i OC OVf4• 1-Il-I as •. I iLI w 4 4 U W W C00(ZNN0004N a wwWWhE Zl-h-.IOCl-. W A EW a a A . 4)- »OhU•.. =W-1 -40CX44WZ ZU4-144a ?0. Z wW U) )-WAOON44 000WHW 4UUAAW WON -10 U ›•3 N A = I-0 ZZ)->L1.WZUhdU 1-ZZ 0 0041LW11.1...4h a 4It) N Z . 0 h41-11-144OG0I-i 4 4 uu..I000hhUar a7 UICah=>0 aVl 0 4 I-I OUNO»4XNNQVW)T,.1-1:4e gUUWSWON. NZW40.rf U.OaCWO Mag N V) = 4 . hUW014HXWWW3000.0W444WWOOX XWWAaW?A•4= ta0 I v h a: 4u.4URi00WWhh 04 Zh000UU h 1-WadhaMOU I- r•i W M O N0-1 A44ri.-iZOC-Is-i===WWW.EO EW=4 aU) 00 U A OC p-1 WWCZ4000atte)H44.4Whh004XWZWh-i Ehhh 0ZWNW =° 4Z C> Z000 Zw = H J40HaWWUE » Z -4OJZZ O NO • O O 0WWEZZZa00000aahlaWC=0CtYI-11-iAs70�t000400n-» A-4-•-O:^••0 O 01••11••IWW40=000 )-)-1-10a0WhhWW0a4UaTUha000AAA 00•I Nd 0. 0 0 O Ealt.WW00044hhatEV14.C(0WIXEN N 0RC0r1.-i444 If1 003 • Z . O N -- - O O A COON 0000OOO.OM 1[t.•IMM0►-iI0 0 111000I[1MIt1 0 . N Z Z .-i‘T•TNN.tr•i.-INIIINTM.-IN7.046r•1 ,-1u4000 0O OW&Na•NM0 a = OM • 0000.I000000000000MN0000 0 .-I000000 - O IL. WNN 0000000o0000o\TOOO,.Mo0000 00 00,-1riCOM a h d a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O 0 a 0 0000000 = - }4-1 OC \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\\\ 1-U0 W mtamMMr•lR 00.-tM " NM rir• • •0'�'M t-ta r•1 N .-1Mri.-INNN rw r•1 a )- N Z0 00000.100000.•i0r•IOO0000.i-ato.t r•I ooN\TOoo 1 Z M aC • Z IL Z WE n ul lfl if A M M M<n itl ltl ul W to•C.O Icl l l ul lfl In•O u1 IL) Ifl ul L lr•O.O.O I = M O 0N0 h0 r•tr•t. Ytulul0O.-100Rr•I.-t.-IN.-i.-Ir1.-+.•IN N r•I.-INN%7v I = r•t . CO NON M= NMM00000.-1ut4TN.T I010000r•1,-a u/ri.1,.1 - Ip1 IL)00000 O W 1.01- 000M.4.4.14.MNMMMN •T •T%TullflulMO 111.1 - h• 040 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N NNNNNNN II- O d mJ3_ 14 0 cola: • I N - ,� N•�1h/) W • O)010)floMoMoulot calasaROQOIOIOI O InC.INt0101f1 • 1 h Z Z04= Z0 .i.4NNOMI Mu1.C.0NNNNN0000%a.00 .i ,-INNNNMM I V) U 000 N a= •O OO.a..a.a.a.iTO.ONC. . a.O.a.RO.0.0.0T0TO0 0 0000000 • 1 W a. UZU -1 0000C0C000000000000O0.-I.I .I .I.i.i.t.i.-p.I amm Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit IIA°; Sheet 7 of 12 • 00000to0000000000000000o to O coo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c O 0 0 e 0 In cd W c c o I•- gOOr•1t11o0p0000000o00Co00000 IL1 I- I- coo Z mi o•w;MNaONNUNN•r000tt1000N%0 IC) • WO Z coo 0 • O 0•riNa3Mm=00sTNP•P•t♦•NN.4243 0ooulN 0 ZX = oNp 00 0 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ OW 0 ♦ 1Z 3 • = o0M1♦..I.700.-4 .-I cor0♦NNN InintfNM •0 JI- = M •0 4 4 N H 0•1-10p,-1 pNp•M c o o M HW < H W 1 • ri r•1,-6r•1 N Xi W= 00- 2 0-• 00 • 00 • 0 00 0 O * .4 o 0 .4 o 0 0 0 O O 00 O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 O p O c 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000000 000 . 000000000000000000010000 000 S 0. 000000000000000000000u1Ln 0• -•• 000 .N4 -0 000a,-1om•a 000000000000CNN N = 1-U - Coo C -+H oulONMmNNNMLn•O'p000000o0 I-= ram o00 7 H CM 1..4N N0000000o (Al-. zX o00 . . . .. . . . . O Z a =a ♦ ♦ ♦ e Da. 0000001n Oo0 J O WH - 000 IL1 a0•NN 00•ar 4 In -1= MNp •♦ O P. O 44 10 Z Z UU • o • .. U. O U. Z ••• . 0 ZI- _= O.AAAAOOO 0 0 T=1- a== . at WH UU ====ZOOC4 W H ZUU o 1-2 44NNNW NNN =====HHHNN I- h-Z =44 H V H= Eww=========ZJJJJJOVIOCZ 4 A H=• JWW U4 • z ~ 6- 0 0 0 p O e o 0 0 o O C e 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 00 O LU. coo* 4 0 0000a000000eCMM0M0ICIL1noo H.I.I MCc0000000000.4•r•H..4 r•INNNOO coo ¢h- 1 L1 . ' . A ILI} ..-C;pOmo...4m tno0�0000000000 A. Wr o00 h-= 1-I- aNM00..-1000.-4NH'0o o0 U dM O 4H ..tMLn•0o01nM '4 h 00 N. Z ZI- ♦ ♦ 44 . HEHN H �H..Z 0• M .-4.4 = Hz . WO. o 4y Wo Wa ZZI-- N •OXCQ OHC 'Z41- N = ' H • HOCLL - =H M 1-O a Iry o 04.0 _ U.U.C I- H U.. • W. 001- W O04C • I•▪ O =~ 400 N WI-C 0 II--2• •100 Z== O W I-= =4 �m = I--I-IW- N S 4W Oft O • • '�a'4 W }•}} 4 .. CLI+-• O ZZH w 000 a I-Z zOi' a W • •OOU ? H = , 4W Z J a' -' HHW 4N JJJh- 0. 0 Oh ? H z O Z 000. WN 444Z H H Z 0..6 i- 0 = H WWO M ZZZ< h I- O M M a= 4 H Z I- . OM )-a'. 0001- OC 4 W H M 00 A. I- .4 O• Z 4 1 r•INM%i• HHHO 4 O. I-• I 40 �i3• 4 ,-I U H Z0. Z ¢ ' SC OCW0m=C• NNNN a H W •Z0. o )C U Wm U 24.J ' W W H W W 1r1 W W W W O U 0C W H . W. • A. .-I -.0 H h-OC 3- XJ4 1-1•-0V1? .0000 C00 JJJW Z H U I-OC• a O I-M. 1- HU Z 0J43 I-I-WOHr-I4444 0000 O• - Z HU Q}• W = IC Cl) 4 =4= ==01== I-I-I-I- MRICOC Z = O • 0 I- • W • 4 W 1- H3 O OC ...v=1=00 IVI 1•-1-I-I-Z 4 U W ' W .42 •• EX WI. M H M •O= 0 Z=ZJ3 W O. . 45 a>.• Z WW ZO WOO od4ZZWH..4 0004a H N }a U o,Z N 4=01-c= 44H0occoC10000J W C. O I-O O. 4W N OH W=H CWHM L WWWW= H Z 0 h- O.N 1• 1•-WOCH=M04 ====1-I-I-h-HI-I-I-WW 4 !Q Z • ZW4 O I-OZUZ=J==WWU ZZZZZ A.A. = H OUOC 1-= N • 044Z=I•-4UUZZZW0O0001-i-I-- }• a' r♦ Z J HHO HOC o =U001-H= oUUUUUHUUUHH 0 a 4 • I-C.A11 m0 : 1 W U.UH01 WWWWU2 0444 •Z . I- co 414.4 I-' rI I-J fQ HHHHH WUUUU OO W W H NOJ .0 .0 0J1•-= E4WWWWZUHHHH=1-I-I-•ZZ 0 U W 0L H O .-L Z40Z=ZHWWWWZ UULL.LL= HH W W _ JAC Z ♦ • Oh= m UUUUU WLL.U.IL.LL.OJJJCA • = HJJ HO • U0-10 oWZZ=Zu1OC4444iJJJAA• )- O o WWW C.Jw0..1-••• WZAIL11L1oa00001•HIYOCXOC =coo r- N O OHH M •OC4'' V• I- ZH4.-I.MO0000N=HHi-ALL.WWWN U O H 0 =WW oO3 • • H . -.. ' 0 0 oo.-t0000lom MOM.-1NM\7or4NMoo o 0 coo 0 N •Or•1.-L•00•2'0N.-Ip.4,.4 NmmmmC.4,.4ptLlM M Z Z r•l N•s3' • O o000000.IM000u10o00N0o000 O = OO oco •• 0 0000000NN000.-10000000000 0 U. WHO 000 O O OOO O O Oo 00000o 0000 O 000 • AI-4 000 04 - IC 11111111111111111111111 3-4-1 = 111 W W MmN.-L.i.tq•r•1.+MMhri.7r•ir•I4r•Ir•I.I.LILIO L-OU W .-I.M O } ZO ONNp4.-I000000000o0o.Ippo0 • >- H =0 000 M M 10 WZ •OtnM>nu1LC1.0MutoILilLtln•0.O.0.•0.0MMu1'n'n OC zLLz WZ -,unto = M o I-= •0.0.0.-ir-I.-L.I.ir•I.1.I.r•11...MMMMMIfInlniflln O OHO H= p4.-1 Z H O Hz 000NNNNMMMMMu1•c•0•oW•0.0•0.0NP'. 0 HOH HZ NMM o W InIAIMUI nLfMOtninlntnl1ILLIC%IfMLfIntnlntnln W MOM 000 W O 4 • N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N 4 =40 N N N • 4 U r : . U • OCU OC • Iz-I - W • Inoul0lnoIoIoILlo.Imomolnoln01n0 N '-3CV1 W • Mom 1- = r=o• •rmulko0S0NN00000.0•o.1.HNN0m0,•CUI•0 Zed= ZO WP•L. 0 U 1 Hz 0000000c000.4HHHH.-I.1.-1.4.1.4.-1 000 H.Z H.-4-4 ® W a I J NNNNNN NNNNNINNNNNNNNNNN 030 NNNN Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "A"; Sheet 8 of 12 000000000000000000aoo o N oo' O OOCO.00OOOCOOO1nG00000 ,0 u1 e: OO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LO F 0.OMWN00000000040000000 - I F 00 2 XrITINM..0000[1oo000CNo00a0o014 00 URA Z 00 0 . O N.41-•O•o IneO.7No%r.oNNNN00 O%NN N EeC C oN O 0 O . • . ► . . . . . . . . . . . . OW O • . N.Z 0 C MNN7 M.iNTOOMM.In-tWM.i P -IW a ;M `CW7 0 ?tXXX MZ M4 0 O000 00 oa o 0000 00 • 00 - CCON o0 001e10.i ' A * ... CC H O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 N OoCoW00000o0001n000000 a.N .... 00 0 W U I- .i FU •Ino0M01000CCCCCC0SSO000o00 .•I = I- ,U 00 2 HH .•.i MN CO O tn000o01. NC0000 F= HH 00 O .i 2W 1nOoNmull•.O0 OOo00 .•I 01- ZOC CO U O =a . . 1. . . . . . .► . • O ' ZA Ca . • O M.IN .i.i . O0O0000 .a O WH Oo • •n '#e0NN 4 My ..Z oN " o I- 0 COZ 44 00 Z } Z • OWGL= 00 I. O N = N v Z N 0 ZF ======= aaaaa 0 0NM EF aS o• WH U0000UU EEEZZ W =4 WH ZU O N HZ M 4444444 0 CC=CC I- Z FZ C4 H N HO EZFF..IWWWWWWWZ` E-I-d-1-1.4 4 i♦OWNN HC -1W 14.4 X X 42, H . I- o 00000000000000000000 EH V ICI. 00 4 N 0000000000000000.4.-•.-IuI.I 4 •OHO 000000000000000000000 0 -7J .I.• QF- \ in . 000800 . 0 . 00 , 90900600 W>. •ON.IN�'.•.iNlnNNN•0O1.u1000o0 • •FF.00..,04. W}} 00 • F2 FF WOM•00. W we.-M 1e14HH 1-4- 0 4H .•I ...-• .4 1..-1 OFUU • QH 00 NN 1-I W2 O.N=2 1-4mm 2 Na I 2 F4 •O}CC 1-.4 W .I H NO .rFE'Z 0= WN4 Co Q{..On WtD' i*AZ WC WW ZZZ I W-7 v OHH Pi ed 24F N Z2 NU1W-Il-I N .0 g244 HWW - SH Zi WIZ •- I-U7 0a0.0. • ZF0 0 00 aX2Z i•• 1L1L� F- H�a . t%fSWW W 00H W OC ' _ W7 I- W se W A NN N.OI,.NI W WFq a 1--Z 0 ultra 00 ol.m 0 > _ 1-4 Z 1- .I ON.d.I .,1 ~ 0 . 0 00 00 4UEZ 0 F-Z 2 OG N .01- 0 Y • . 0 0 CO 2 Cl) . 411 0 MFW0 WW H O OC • OF. > H Z Xa'4 HH IA H 3W 2 OC M m= ..C H NZ I-. X -oWW q a W . • 1-- M CU 4 I- 4 xag a 0aa0.,1-1 .INW) 0. H °t4- .. ,.?'• 4 .I 0 a. Xa ..dWHO 4 44 NH X H 6 0 X WH C)IAEIL H CFFAF-F WWWWW C) E Lei- • a .i .0 Z FOG cc 2 ZOO 1-0 CO U"C7 H CC i...42 co, 1—W 0 HU ^OW-t 4 4CC -444 • F 0 Ht.: O W 0n 2 2 LA >04WW WF F W CANCF-FFF a'.. F •V. .. III • W =a0M1-I-13 W33W 000mM/1U1 4 H LL W C End W A I-N. COCO > >222 a G }a}.. • U >3 OHC ,2WZUFZZ 4 =4441- 000007 00 • OC • F- a 4W H NH 44 > > ZF0OCOCO:iz Z I- am .4 OC4dWZZo 00 ido:HOCF-I-i-t-H 4 M EW o: W040 0 W1f0WWW1LC2ZZZZ OU F-Z a I- W41AILN F.INFF-F 00000( OG " OC -1 . HH Hi 4W3==W 4 444= 000th-I W H O 4 Fu. • Lao. Z 31- OHX (XX0331-1W VI 3 '+. 2 i . 41L 1- W 4.i.12..1 F 4FF..UUUU W W H C NO .N A W0r1'MHW=ZEE ZZEZ4IHHHHed V) U S IX H 0 W >W MME4EMZEEEa'OCILILLLLLC W . JA M • OOCWWC 0: WUIL LL LL LLO E C HMI HN } ZOaaFOCOCCCCCO0FZ d444I- 0: O n . 0W 10-7•-.. •I-- W0>.>.HH40}I3000004OWWWWL O 0 . O OH .0.1 aQ U W41-1-004W=.•.INNN.13U1-t-F1A I- CO 0 o • . EU. M 03 Z . o H ...... 0 o M0000.I.ro.oWsre0NNInIn.-INM•ro o 00 • co O M Hul.ttM.IN%0N 0M%Toco•c.l.i..I.•I.•o kr Z Z .+fit 0 00000o.i0O0.1.4O00ooWOOOON O C ON 00 - O 0000ooHool-I.•O.1.IONo0000 0 Li. WH0 co O O O O O O O O O C O O C O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.H4 O O eC - 0: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ .. }4_l 2 \\ W W 4MOOnrNNNNNNNNMM0O.I,-I,-I.IW4 FUU LL .I.I 0 ). Era 000.I000000000a000Co00 } H • Zrr o0 3 M i WE 1nlnululul•0'0•O•O•0•O.0•0.0.O teI.O.O.O�O'O O: 2:W= W2 lnin C M 0 F-C ♦7.4001.�M1''r'2Th'.•IMMMMM O OHO 1-- .I.1 2 .-I 0 HZ Od.'•'lelo0oo0oCoCoM.0.0•0'0'0 0 HNH MO NM o W .INMMM00000I00u)001nulu'l00 W FV7F • 00 FW- C 4 N N N N N N N N NN N N NN N N N N N N N 4 0 4a NN aZ .0 . . .0 WOO • • H ~ W • ouloulouloulottlotllolfCI101noln0 NSCl/7 W . Mo F Z _ r 0 000O1TOO.I.INNMM�7'rulul•o•ohrOO 2CCZ ZG Oa N U HZ 4.i.I.INNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 000 H.O NN W a J .I.I.I.4.1.4.+.I.I.1.I1-1.4HH.-I.I.i.I.I.I 030 -I H.l ism Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit t1A11; Sheet 9 of 12 • • • ... r.. 20000000000000000000000000a00000 000 0 0 _20000000000000000000000000000000 000 0 0 . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • a 1- a0000000ul00000000Mmooutom0000u'food 0eo 0 0 O • ,A .NmM0• NmiNorsq)0.�NNUlM O~.O•N000.O�rNi OOOr-t O10,:cN. •O.00ON. N v 0 ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 ♦ 4 ♦ 4 ♦ 4 •• 4 4 ♦ ♦ 4 4 4 4 •. ♦ •. 4 ♦ 4 ♦ •• 4 • O Z .i .i.-I N .••I r1 .-+ • .-1,-,N N OO r1 Iil 0 N m m•d'.•I O CO h .O r4.O CO CO NW t.1 a n H N�O-Ivr t�•.TIf1►IN V�.1 .-1 NO o as 0 • . A H • 7 c O c 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 00000000000000000000000000000000 000 0 0 1.- 20000000000000000000000000000000 000 0 0 (0 00000000000000000000000000000000 000 0 0 0 N W D O O o 0 0 0 0 OO O O O O O O O O O o OO O O O o 0 O 0 0 0 0 c o o 0 0 0' F 1••1 I-U 7 OOU00001RO0000000IMo0M0mM000M000 000 O O, Z HH mom N0000NMottloCNMol..000i[1MNOmOti vommlIf1 coo O In C rl ZW D •ITUI•Ots.mNNM•?1il•O1.. NV .CM r^l.-f.-INNMW In.ON M •o U O co. 4 4 4 ♦ 4 CO 7 rt Pr - r 1 rl .-1 .i � .4 - i. O CO Z .. U. g • Z a U W H U U U U U U U U U U U U U U o h • F-Z .4a44444 44444 a N HA W$WWWWWWWWWWWWZWZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZ Z Z aX. • • • _.. I- 000000000c0000000000000000000000 000 0 0 4 U) .ao000000ao0000000000000000000000 000 0 0 I .-4o00o0000000000000000000000oo00OO No1r1 .7 N . 41- ` . . I W>.. o0%0N1Wi.-1.•1MNW.iwir-IO,O00MNMOIN•-1.00N•OC..O00 MN.7 .O 1..1 F-a I I-)- •o N.1riNNrl.70O.1CfO1..7.7N MMM p. • 10 _ QM N M r4N.7 .3NN N r4N N a (I 2 F-Q • . M.-1 WNFW- O 4 W� • • < •O 1-0 ZZZ I WJ• H h Z4 Z40 N ..0 • HNW •• SH • 1-0 • ZOO Z aH E . E Z E U.U.0 I- M1W1.• . ..• 4 ? ??? 0 0 o O U A4 , H U) 0 • O. In 0 OOH 'W OC H 0000 CO In •O ri< "7 ♦F- N 004 ri U.CJr• '.-I N WF•ApC LLU CD, - • A O N .Q.1 ..2...10a Z Z Z Z Z Z O a F-Z Z W 4 U;QU ^C7 000 0 0 I-4 . . Z=Z220 M J-I .OAH HHH .H-•1 H I-•Z A - - 00000W U U(3•O.O`D•O•p•O•Q.00WN NNN 0 0' • (0 ♦ OCOCCG IX00Cs. < 000000000CW WWW W W 4t1) 0 0.0.0.0.0.4 n NN000Oo0ooCUA AAA• A A A N 4 4 4 4 4 I W W M M M M M M M M < 1-Z ZOC W ? '- 33. Z'•9W WWW,. W W 4W -• WWWA WW • WWZZZZZZZZ(0.ON CCOCN N OC V)I- • Z AAO.AO.H o ' 0000C0(7C0DC0(OH > 00A. A 0 m-1 O . HHHHHa Cl) • HI-1HHHHHHMWI- I-FF• 1.- 1- OC N1 Z0 H (LaaA.A. Z a WSNNNV)V)V)NVIWO.0 (.10U' U U M AU A 1- ''`>• H ...1 a H •' UWWWWWWWWA > 000 'A 0 • • 4 .I U =O. SE=E =4 U HOCAAAAAA.AA 0-Ce NNCOC OC at WH 0 X U .' :• '• ZZZ Z a . NC O fY Oe000.4 0C 1- I-I-I- 1- 1- I ♦0 I- .ONZ'ZZZZO oA • •0 NWW I NNNNNNNNW00 000 .0 N H 3 WL W ~W0ZA0MMMWWNWWWUWWNNWW-- U O.6.O. O.Q . .aP.I NNM WW0 000 9 0 A ZZ • . 10 )-N44444 H IA Ha0V)V1V)NV)V)V) QQ Q44 Q 4 Z WW WWOCNNNNNa WW WU= =ZZ• Z Z U >3t OWWWWWWa000000 WO.AWUWWWWWWWWC. H HHH H H a 0W F-aaatLaAHILLL)L1.WWa O.0-11. Caaaa0AAO..4...1Q 44% 4 < 0.0 4HHHHHHa I- HaQ-H HHHHHHHHaW NC NW :N N a0.0.4.11.aa AAAAAIA a 1-20.0.0.40.0.0.0. WA AAA Ia A 1-Z N 0 UOCNCOeOeWWW= 000<' 01- • HOC W • WNUUUUUOC4dQ4a41]CHU»aAUUUUUUUUNC l- I-I-I-. .1-_ I- 000 3 • QUOCOCOCCOC A0»00W0Na11.=WWWWNOCCCOC U 000 U U - I- W ' .-t 20000000.00 ZO 0'0 > > N N M CC •. ======Z AZZZZ Z5ZZZZ Z=Z w = O a'C CO AZZZZZZ S=SSSSZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ 1-01-4-1-ci-oi-o Z ♦ Z J 0000000=0 OONNV)U)V)NONON HN• N WIC)IL100001f14<40<0 OtOOOOIf101f1000ciloom 11Z0Z=ZOZ020 AJ•.•-0- w. Hh.hIf10I00NXN00000Cn40000NONmoctul1f'I000OV•000.70.1'•O.3. CO QN..J N ri we t.[)Nmr.II-dF-F-1-,F •O.-F-1�?-•ONOt.M h;M.7.O.ON.+T.-I.•IU UUU U U • • 0 0 0000oo0oICO.3O•oN0oO.00.1.NNNNNUNI11IIIo coo O O O .T .70M00042N.•1.INMM.7•M.7•O'C0WWOONM00WW00•0NNN 401N N N 0 • Om.J.iNMM.70000o000NCNNNr4I NNMMM.T.7.0• 00o M N O ONOOOOOOCOCOCOCOOOCOPOOMM.TO00000000oMM oCM M .7 ooa0,t0%aaa00o0000oar1.i.-1 CNCHaaa.a.t).a.aCo coo O 0 N »- W \\\\%. \\ NNN \\\�.."\\N"NN"\\\ \". ♦ \ W W M M Ul Ul Ift Ill ill Ul N N N N N N r1 N rI P4 r^I rl•-1.I'•1.-1.•i.....ri H r1 M r1 .•1.1.1 .•I rI CO =0 0rlyirlrlMrlr-100000o00r1rlrlrlN.Y'•IY.7'.T'.Y'WW.T'.'t•00 000, O o = M = W= 00UllflsflMIf11f1.0•0.01/40.00MsOUlUlLIlMMMM1f11f1toUlMUlUI.OM Mtllto Ul M O CC) 0 1-0 .-IM.-lrlrirl.-i. MMMm1MMMNNMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM' •O.O.O• V .O Z rI CO H.Z• MOOOOOo00OO.000000000000000000GYOC 000 O O 0 W OMMUlIflUlUlUlUllilIlltillflMlalUlIfllflIflUlU7UlUtIflUlInInUiU)UlMUl MIAIfl M In W ,-I 1- N N NN N N N N NN N N NNN N N N N N NN N N N NNN N N N N N N N N N Q U • •• • i-t-t W • 0olllollloIOUIOIC00000CIO0OIOIIIOtflCUlC0o IOt.l • O It) s • I- ^,�._.r.:•£-ZC aoci NNMM.7.YIllUI•O•ONN0000a.a00r4,- (m M.7\tUl UI.O.O 1•. h In U H.`^r NMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.7.7.7.7.7.1'.7.7.7•?.7 k2'.7.7 .7 .7 W 0. -1 .iri.-1 rt ririri.i.-irlririri rl.i rl ririri rie"l.i ri*-i riri ri.irl .irlri N .i • Mil Hennepin County Agreement Mo. 59-49-98 Exhibit °A°; Sheet 10 of 12 D9' W 1,- . 000000aoo o In I11 0 • 000000000 0 o O I S ' • rI I- COMMM000 IC1 d a. E 0000.0000000 m v' •r o . • O /O N.O.O.O.O N N OO In 1-1 ri 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . a . \Z 00 Z OOOMNMInIM 00 N 'r � 1.4 W In .4 u1 1-i,.II Nrl 4 1-e -4 \0 O . a . ul 004.. O r• l O. Q. • A 4,11. N 40. M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . O O O O O O O O O 1- 0000040coo 0 �•-.. , 000000000 . 4 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC N W . . . . . . . . . I- .•1 !-t.) 000ln00000 Z M•I►•I 000M0=000 . o - zae %Pa.vt. 00000 U 0 =0. a . ... . . . 0 In NM 4OO.NNO 44 -J 4 Z • F O FO• h • IXI- IW z p CCD SF- =22 a.aaa.a. co W Z 0. WM ()LW a ZZZZZ W -f 1.4 O N b~•10 WILIWE » 4 ca I- CIC In 1'•I X .. 4.) C. W ... . I- a. 4 I- ' • ' 0000•0.0.0.O.0 0000M.41-I1.4r 1 <1- \ ' 0M.• NI 0Qi 0?0 00 N Z FII-- N N4.W r.1 I-I H 0 , W 01- O I4- ILI0' M h m4 z 4I- N Z 1-I m W - =10-I i-N .•IN 44 {L U.-i (.) Pq 4 • W W • OOM W OC 0.0. 4 z+1- WC • . - WI-A 0. L--a ' . 00 NN . 'im • 1-z 0 MO 4W ON . AA • • 1--Z • z a~e•. • W W , Ini- 4Z z W.-1 O i-I- • M•4 .-I C=J� . •w 0~. O=COOC.'.►~I�NM.Y 0 XC ' 1-I I-I- re W W W a. •-I ..O . I-0C WOC9000 0 Q 1-� . 1-It..) 004444 ' W J Z • V1 WW .N I-1-i-I- • W .. ::ILI CIC0' Ns 0000000 • A 7. A V H'3 •:• . .4 O0000 O. 4W 44Za.00OCC0 2 CI.0 OCOCW4I-I-I-h►•I 031:141OC22222 • 1-Ice W I-1-4)-I0000 1-4• • OI- W »0�CJ(UUy 1-i CC CDN N OC CC 1--I-IH0W1~C.1~t.L0. z . 'Z NNI-L1ILILILtl.o 1-I0 OC 2202444<I- • 0-t•••••0•••-• o04422aoeW • 00 4-I I- •• C.)000CI+9-'1-I-A ' .. • o03 ••N • • • 0 0 .-INOVI INWI C O N7 00......O o ItM000000N • - o 000000000 000000000 oe m \\\\\\\\♦ 00 }• ZA 00.ci000000 Z M m W Z 1:In II:I.e•0.0.0.0 O M O 1-0 .0.040-4M01M0M 2 rI Co NZ 000.*•1.0.0.0.0.0 • . O W • If If ICI In In in In In its FW- C I- NNNNNNNNN . • S -C .- . M W • 0InCOn0Inoin0 • I- 2'""*4""1"ZO' 000001ITOOr•I.-IN 1101 Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "A"; Sheet 11 of 12 II 1 II I II 1 II • r 00 o On UI O 0 000O o I01 II 011 1-0 O 0.-I ,I Out If1 •C' `0 oC•C•N O O "o • . • • • • • • • • • • • . . O • ZF• NO N Inc in .-I ri If140•040 III yr II Yt 00 hIZ NO N 4301 0 00 a0 omen= CO •0 II \Z CO0 Oa 0n au.' O N N C•.0•s7•'0 00 ry II r♦ 43 ZO • .. • .• • a a • .• • • • • • 0 • pi113 - OZ 00 Yr •00N. '0 N• N•' V0•0'000 00 N II N• Co Y.a um co N•R1 m 'O %o r•10•C•N• co f•• II N• I114 10 00 No. N O•r1r1r1 0 rl II 11•1 00. .. .• • • a .• II • 0 N •O rl rl O% 11 0% . II II 4)4) 4) *4) 41. 4) 4) *4)4)4) 4) 0 II Io 11 01CC3 ~G'.0 - 0r1 N f01or1N II 000 Nr•1 Nri r♦ • NrlrirI II =0 01%, 000 00 0-0000 II - 0O ON or1 r•1 ONI-4 1 II IL. 4C3 4Z S 4CUZZ . II II II N III yr O II II II 1- N in pi ' In U ..J= N If1 00 00 II •QA 0'. 0 1••. to II. • O•.E •tl' *43- N CO II Z F-4 M N to •O oo is a NI O •. a • M II 0 '0 0 r•1 0 0 P.O 0 1-4 II • . .•I N WI .• O II • N 0 0 O 0 rf II F• 4) 0 4) 0. 4) 0 4) 0 0 11 3.• 3.. 3.. ). II -• oe II 0 0 0 0 0 CI 0 0 re OG V II 41- = o 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD ISI II 1.0 1-N). NZ 0 I• W- 0 I- 0 IF 0 FW 0 II0 00 IuO 4 a 4 4 OC II F- 004 ZO 4.3 • CI V C3 0. 110 _ H0.= CCD O O 4 0 00 II • IIJ WNVI I. U. I,13 U. U.Z IL I • II4 ==0 -1 ..4 -1 J .4 II$ . = Z• 4 a a a a II1.1 • Z•¢I-1 0 I- F. F. I- F. III- CI 1.4 4) 0 4) 0 0 0 O. 0 0 II 1.40eZ N I- 1- I- I••• I- II W' _ • =NI=I. =Z 0 0 0 0 • tU CO o 0 CI . WO.4Z" UIo o o o O Z OOP•I C01°' x I-1 • • W o IA d0 O _ . 1111-..I O r1 0 1 §-1 O . F-= • .4 MN I--IA I• ~-000 000 atilt N 4°; a0 ik a" m i-Z0 O CI.0 N•o. 0.1. CO • • NI- C3 HM �N O%0 • 0 ` 00 0O 0. - • . ~ v. ..a 0.4) 4) • M4) • 0 . 0. N 00 ' N . N I•I W N 1 CO • • r♦ N 0.N CO 0 0 Wgg ,I r♦ W 111 N. 00 CI N N r•1 tU •• Z , A. o. ~i a • 1 , . N N , C.I N 0 Oee r•I 0 _ • ' in 0 • o W O o on O 0 4 0 0 0 0 • CI 0 0 0 0 . 00 , IU 00 z • 0 • Z • W O I- Z 4 1•1•I C30 ~• . In '-0 IF M 111! M • M • W 0= r•I ...I r•1 r•1 ' • 0 0 0 o R1D Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "A11; Sheet 12 of 12 31 . • vVL • • HENNEPIN COUNTY • DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION RECOMMENDED URBAN LANDSCAPE/ STREETSCAPE GUIDELINES • • • ansportati n. 0ivision Engineer Revision No, 0 Date 04/03/95 • Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "8 Sheet 1 of 8 \NL APRIL, 1995 • April 3, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Baal INTRODUCTION 1 RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE CRITERIA 1 • Boulevard • 1 • • Crosswalks 2 • Curb 2 • Irrigation 2 • Landscaping/Streetscaping 2 • • • Medians • 3 • Operational Clear Zone 3 • Right'of Way 3 • Sidewalks 4 • Signals, Signing and Other Traffic Control Devices 4 • Snow Storage 4 • Street Lighting 4 • Trees • 5 • Utilities 5 PERMITS 5 FIGURE 1 6 • Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "B"; Sheet 2 of 8 uV April 3, 1995 • HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION • • RECOMMENDED URBAN LANDSCAPE/STREETSCAPE GUIDELINES APRIL, 1995 INTRODUCTION • Hennepin County Department• of Public Works' Transportation Division (Division) has as a delegated function and responsibility to maintain .a system of roadways that provide transportation for residents of the County in a safe, efficient manner. Year around safety requires adequate sight distances and a minimum operational clear zone that can also accommodate .snow storage. The, . Division has prepared this Recommended Urban Landscape/streetscape Guidelines (Guidelines) to more consistently and thoroughly respond to questions about urban landscape/streetscape design practices. All landscape/streetscape plans must be prepared and signed in accordance with the Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture and Interior Design. The City Engineer shall also approve and sign the title or cover sheet for those landscapeJstreetscape plans. The City Engineer must also evaluate sight distances along the project and assure the Division, in a report, that sight distances are adequate. The placement of obstacles or fixed objects, such as structures, trees, etc., within Hennepin County's right of way shall be cause for the Municipality to . assume legal liability and additional maintenance responsibility through a Cooperative Agreement. RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE CRITERIA The following is an alphabetical listing of the Division's recommended guidelines for landscape/streetscape design. The criteria listed is not all inclusive or necessarily complete. Requests for more clarification should be , addressed to the Division Engineer or his/her designee. Figure 1 at the end of this document contains a summarization of the recommended operational clear zone guidelines. • Boulevard The Division prefers a low maintenance boulevard. Snow and ice control methods may prevent the survival of some desired vegetation. The Municipality has the responsibility for mowing and the maintenance of facilities behind the curb. • - Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 - ]/ Exhibit "B"; Sheet 3 of 8 v„,L April 3, 1995 • Crosswalks . Crosswalks shall conform to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) . • The County's standard crosswalk is a block type pattern, painted white, on top of bituminous or concrete pavement. Municipalities have the responsi- bility to maintain pavement crosswalk markings after the initial painting. Non-standard crosswalk surfaces (such as decorative brick, colored aggregate, etc.) shall require prior approval by the Division. • Municipalities shall have the responsibility to install and maintain any crosswalk surface, as well as the abutting material , if the crosswalk • surface is not consistent with the road surface. The municipality shall also indemnify the County for the use of a non-standard crosswalk surface. • Curb • Curb design must conform to Hennepin County's Standard Design and the State Aid manual . Curb and pedestrian ramps must comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) . • Irrigation Water from irrigation systems shall not flow or spray onto the traveled roadway or onto any County owned structures such as traffic signal components and signage. Concrete gutters shall collect excess water from irrigation systems and not allow water to flow across roadways (gutter in). Effects of subgrade saturation shall be addressed when irrigation systems are proposed. Provisions, such as perforated pipe, shall be included for the pickup and disposal of irrigation water. The Division will not allow an open cut for installation or maintenance of irrigation piping within three years of construction, so consideration should be given to installing irrigation piping.within a .sleeve for roadway crossings. Maintenance and repair of the irrigation system is the responsibility of the owner. • Landscaping/Streetscanlnq Roadway geometrics and driver iight distances shall be considered when installing landscape items. A report indicating adequate sight distances have been maintained is required for all access points along the project. The report should consider all elements obstructing a driver's vision such as trees, shrubs, plantings/planters, structures, etc. Any loose landscaping material , such as bark, must have an adequate means of containment that will prevent the material from spilling onto the roadway or sidewalk. The Municipality shall be responsible for maintaining such material , if installed, and for removing the material from the roadway or sidewalk if the material spills onto those surfaces. Loose _landscape rock is not permitted within Hennepin County's right of way because of problems caused during mowing, etc. 35 Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 -/- Exhibit "B"; Sheet 4 of 8 J L • • April 3, 1995 The Municipality or owner has the responsibility to trim all plantings and to maintain visibility. Hennepin County's responsibility for landscape/streetscape restoration, after any County activity, shall be limited to top soil, sod or seed. Restoration of specialty landscape/streetscape items, sidewalks and plantings shall be the responsibility of others. • The Di:vislon prefers traffic control signage to be located behind the sidewalk. Landscape/streetscape should not obstruct the view of signage. Landscape/streetscape should make allowances for placement or future .expansion of utilities within the right of way. Traffic control during maintenance of landscaping shall comply with MMUTCD for traffic control . • Medians The Division can supply typical design standards for raised and depressed medians. Median drainage is a concern of the Division and should be discussed with the Division's Design Section. The Division's guideline does not allow planting trees within the median unless 'there is the minimum operational clear zone for the posted speed limit (see Operational Clear Zone) . Plantings, including raised planting beds, in medians shall not be higher than 3 feet from the bottom of the curb gutter line, however, sight lines must still be checked. Plantings should be kept as far back from the face of curb• as possible to minimize disturbance due to snow plowing (see also Irrigation) . If the Municipality proceeds with placing plantings within Hennepin County right of way, then the Municipality has the responsibility to trim plantings to maintain sight lines. • Ooerational . Clear Zone To facilitate the safe operation and maintenance of a roadway facility, an • - operational clear zone is required. Encroachment into the operational • clear zone causes safety and maintenance concerns. The Division standard provides an operational clear zone of 6 feet from the face of curb where posted speeds are 35 miles per hour (MPH) or less. For speeds greater than 35 MPH to 45 MPH,• the Division standard provides a 10 foot operational clear zone. The required operational clear zone for speeds over 45 MPH shall be analyzed an an individual basis by the Division (see Figure 1) . • Right of Way • Streetscape/landscape items within the County's right of way are reserved for the public and owned by the Municipality. Hennepin County does not allow private enhancements within the County's right of way. 36 Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "B"; Sheet 5 of 8 L • April 3, 1995 • • Sidewalks The Division recommends a sidewalk with a minimum 5 foot width and prefers the sidewalk be placed 6 feet from the face of curb to accommodate snow storage. • • Signals. Signing and Other Traffic Control Devices All traffic control devices must comply with MMUTCD. For urban cross sections, the Division recommends traffic signs be placed at least 6 feet from the face of curb to the edge of sign. Sign placement is preferred behind the sidewalk. The location of utilities should be considered with regard to future sign placement. In areas where- there is • . no sidewalk, clearance to the signage should be at least 6 feet from the curb or edge.o'f shoulder to allow for snow storage and/or future • sidewalk(see Snow Storage) . • Landscape/streetscape should not obstruct the view of signage. Traffic signals shall have the Division's standard type and color. Any other color scheme requires prior review and. approval by the Division and require the Municipality to maintain the paint system at no cost to the Division. Lead based paint shall not be used. Paint must comply with current Mn/DOT specifications. • Snow Staraoe The Division requires minimum operational clear zones for snow storage along the side of the road based on the posted .speed limit. The requirement of an operational clear zone. for snow -storage,aTlows the Division to efficiently clear roads of snow and help maintain the road's traffic carrying capacity. Inadequate snow storage will reduce lane widths, adversely affect traffic handling capacity of the road and prevent trucks from using the partially blocked traffic lane. Roads that are not cleared of snow. along the curb to the storm drain can also cause drainage problems when the snow melts. The Division may require that the Municipality obtain an easement if there is inadequate snow storage available within the right of way as a result of landscape/streetscape structure placement. In areas where landscape/streetscape structures cause inadequate room to store snow off the road, the Municipality will be required to either move or haul away the snow (see Introduction for legal liability and maintenance requirements). • Street Lighting Street lighting must be functional and meet appropriate standards for illumination. Special consideration should he given to eliminating glare and shadows. Questions on lighting should b,: referred to the Division's Design Section. • 3'._ Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 4/Exhibit "B"; Sheet 6 of 8 vo(... , April 3, 1995 • • Trees Trees, in general , can obstruct the view of signs and signals. Prior to the placement of any tree, sight lines should be evaluated that includes consideration for fully mature trees and their canopies. The Division standard does not sanction the planting of trees on County right of way within the operational clear zone (see Operational Clear Zone) . Planting coniferous trees is discouraged within,Hennepin County's right of way. Tree grates in sidewalks or paved areas, unless properly installed and maintained, can be a hazard to pedestrians, people with disabilities, and • snow removal operations, etc. The Municipality assumes all liability for the placement of any tree grates or other obstacles within the County's right of way. • Irrigation, if deemed necessary, should be limited to a trickle type system (see Irrigation) . The Division does not contribute to the replacement of any streetscape/landscape alteration as a result of any highway maintenance, modification or utility work. • Utilities Underground utilities that do not extend above the surface may be placed within•the County's operational clear zone. Above ground utilities, however, should be placed outside the County's operational clear zone. PERMITS The Division's Permit Office shall be informed of all construction or maintenance work within the County's road right of way. Traffic Control and time of work must be approved by the Division prior to beginning any work. (Example: Parking in a traffic lane during rusk hour is not allowed.) • • Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 -A/Exhibit "B"; Sheet 7 of 8 N1 J 1.- a k . • FIGURE 1 - HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION • RECOMMENDED LANDSCAPE / STREETS CAPE GUIDELINES URBAN TYPICAL ROADWAY CROSS SECTION PLACEMENT OF TREES, TRAFFIC LANE MINIMUM UTILITIES, FIXED OBJECTS , ETC. c. 2' GUTTER OPERATIONAL • CLEAR ZONE mm »-�- 'AND SNOW • STORAGE \— RECOMMENDED PLACEMENT OF SIGNS • '1°4 BOULEVARD FACE OF CURB - POSTED SPEED . LIMIT MINIMUM .OPERATIONAL CLEAR ZONE 35 M. P.H. OR LESS 6 FOOT (FROM THE FACE OF CURB) GREATER THAN 35 M.P. H. TO 45 M.P.H. 10 FOOT (FROM THE FACE OF CURB) . GREATER THAN 45 M. P.H. ANALYZED ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS BY THE DIVISION. APRIL i99 5 Hennepin County Agreement No. 59-49-98 Exhibit "B"; Sheet 8 of 8 'N L a CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: DATE: Consent Calendar June 6,2000 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Authorize Publication of the Notice of Intent V. K, Office of the City Manager to Franchise Requested Action: Move to:Authorize publication of the Notice of Intent to Franchise in the Eden Prairie News as required by state law. Synopsis: • The City has received a written request from WideOpenWest("WOW") and Everest Communications ("Everest") for a franchise to construct,operate and maintain a cable communications system in the City. Attached documentation shows the process for the City's consideration of the grant of additional cable television franchises. Attachments: Memorandum from Brian Grogan, dated 30,2000 Timeline for Processing Request for a Cable Television Franchise Notice of Intent to Franchise Request for Proposals Notice of Public Hearing • MOSS &BARNETT A Professional Association MEMORANDUM TO: City Representatives and Staff FROM: Brian Grogan,Moss&Barnett DATE: May 30,2000 RE: Grant of Additional Franchise for a Cable Communications System The City has received a written request from WideOpenWest("WOW")and Everest Communications("Everest")for a franchise to construct,operate and maintain a cable communications system in the City. Pursuant to both requests,we have prepared the attached documentation to process the City's consideration of the grant of additional cable television franchises. To that end,attached hereto please find the following: 1. Timeline for Processing Request for a Cable Television Franchise; 2. Notice of Intent to Franchise,required pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 238.081, subd.2; 3. A Request for Proposals,required pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 238.081, subd.4; and 4. Notice of Public Hearing. The above referenced documents have been prepared to comply with the franchising procedure required under state law. These documents have been carefully reviewed by the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission("Commission"). The Commission has approved and endorsed the documents at its Full Commission meeting on May 24,2000. The documents should be reviewed by City Council and,if acceptable,the City should publish the Notice of Intent to Franchise in the City's official newspaper as required under state law and in accordance with the enclosed timeline. Interested parties may obtain copies of the Request for Proposals and related franchise documentation as described in the Notice and the City should thereafter follow the procedure outlined in the Notice and Request for Proposals which is derived substantially from the procedure outlined under state law. To the extent applications are submitted by entities which possess the requisite legal,technical and financial qualifications,the City will likely be required to grant one or more additional franchises. Federal and state law prohibit a municipality from preventing otherwise qualified entities from providing cable television and/or telecommunications services unless they lack the requisite qualifications or otherwise fail to comply with the franchising procedures. It is important to emphasize that at this time the City is only considering the implementation of the state statutory franchising process. There will be a public hearing before the City Council on this matter later this summer and no entity will be permitted in the City's right-of-way until the City Council considers award of a cable television franchise in the Fall of 2000. Enclosures 338305/1 City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota Timeline for Processing Request for a Cable Television Franchise --subject to change in City's sole discretion-- il r{3a v. �� f s �leC q:j �a BY�(� �"r�r1 © �(31 May 24,2000 Meeting of Southwest Suburban Cable Commission and any other interested parties to review process,law,concerns June 6,2000 City considers publication of Notice of Intent to Franchise June—August Commission begins negotiations regarding franchise terms with prospective applicants. June 15 and 22,2000 City publishes Notice of Intent to Franchise once each week for two (2) successive weeks in local newspaper(Notice also mailed directly to Time Warner,WOW, Everest, Seren and other applicants) July 14,2000 Closing date for submission of Applications(must be at least 20 days from date of first publication) July 14—August 2,2000 Consideration of Franchise Application July 18,2000 City meets to call Public Hearing July 27,2000 • City publishes Notice of Public Hearing- 10 to 14 days before conduct of hearing August 2,2000 Preparation of report by Moss&Barnett regarding qualifications of Applicants August 9, 2000 Southwest Suburban Cable Commission meets to consider Applicant's qualifications and Moss&Barnett report-issue recommendation to Member Cities September 5,2000 City conducts Public Hearing regarding Franchise Applications—considers resolution regarding qualifications. Late September—Early City Council considers award of Franchise to successful applicant(s) -must be at October least 7 days after Public Hearing—no time limit on when action must be taken. October—November Successful applicants accept franchise document and submit required closing documentation-typically within 30 days of grant of franchise 334143/1 3 NOTICE BY THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA OF ITS INTENT TO FRANCHISE A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM Notice is hereby given that it is the intent of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,to consider the grant of an additional franchise(s)for the purpose of constructing a cable communications system to serve the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota. This notice is given in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 238.081. Applications shall be submitted in response to this Notice and to a Request for Proposals and Proposed Franchise Documents available on request in the office of the City Manager,City Hall, 8080-Mitchell Road,Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344,phone: 612-949-8300. A. The deadline for submitting applications is July 14,2000. B. Applications shall be in writing,notarized,in a format consistent with the Request for Proposals, and sealed with ten(10)copies enclosed. Two(2)additional copies of the application must be sent to the attention of Mr. Brian T. Grogan at Moss &Barnett,4800 Norwest Center, 90 South Seventh Street,Minneapolis, MN 55402,who will be providing assistance to the City on this matter. Each application shall include a nonrefundable application fee of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500)in the form of a certified check made payable to the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota. The applications shall be delivered to the attention of the City Manager, 8080 Mitchell Road,Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344,phone: 612-949-8300. Applicants are hereby on notice that any and all costs incurred by the City and the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, of which the City is a member,with respect to the franchise procedure and franchise award which are not covered by the$7,500 application fee shall be recovered from applicant. C. Applicants are requested to be present at a public hearing before the City Council, that is presently scheduled to be held at City Hall,beginning at 7:30 p.m. on September 5,2000. Each applicant will be given time to summarize its application. The City Council may then continue the public hearing to permit further review of the application before a final decision is made to select qualified applicants. D. The Request for Proposals and Proposed Franchise Documents set forth in detail the expectations of the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota and the requirements of the content of the franchise proposal and are made in conformance to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 238.081,subd.4. E. The desired system design and services to be offered are identified in the Proposed Franchise Documents attached to the Request for Proposals and include a system serving the entire City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota with a reasonable line extension policy; flexibility to increase channel capacity;public,educational and governmental access channels supported by the operator;reasonable rates; a mix, level and quality of programs and services comparable to other systems and 334184/1 �[ customer services and maintenance plans to ensure the highest degree of service to the subscriber. The Request for Proposals and Proposed Franchise Documents provide further details of the desired system design and services to be offered. F. The criteria for evaluating the applications and priorities for selection are as follows: 1. The completeness of applications, conformance to Request for Proposal, and Proposed Franchise Documents; 2. The system design; 3. The programs and services offered initially and criteria for adding programs and services; 4. The initial service area and the line extension policy; 5. The time for construction; 6. Customer service policies and system testing; 7. The legal,technical, and financial qualifications of the applicant; and 8. The proposal for community services, including public, educational, and governmental access. H. Applications which meet the above criteria in the opinion of the City Council shall be considered for a franchise. The applicant(s) selected by the City Council will be required to accept the Franchise Documents granted within thirty(30) days after adoption and will also be required to reimburse the City of Eden Prairie for any and all expenses not covered by the application fee, as provided for by Minnesota Statutes Section 238.081, subd. 8. J. Applicants are advised that the City of Eden Prairie is member of a joint powers entity,the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission("Commission")which will provide input and recommendations to the City regarding this process. The Commission consists of the following cities: Edina,Eden Prairie,Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield each of which has previously granted identical franchises to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d/b/a Time Warner. K. All questions concerning this request should be directed to Mr. Chris Enger, City Manager, City Hall, 8080 Mitchell Road,Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 or Mr. Brian T. Grogan,Moss&Barnett,P.A.,4800 Norwest Center, 90 South Seventh Street,Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402-4129,phone(612) 347-0340,the Commission's legal advisor regarding this process. 334184/1 3/5 Date: ,2000 ,City Clerk Publish in: on ,2000 and 2000. Affidavit of Publication required for each publication. 334184/1 i 6 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS OFFICIAL APPLICATION FORM JUKE ,2000 Applicants interested in submitting a proposal for a cable communications franchise shall submit the following information as required by Minnesota Statutes Section 238.081 (subd.4)to the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota on or before July 14,2000. A. Plans for channel capacity,including both the total number of channels capable of being energized in the system and the number of channels to be energized immediately. • B. A statement of the television and radio broadcast signals for which permission to carry will be requested from the Federal Communications Commission. C. A description of the proposed system design and planned operation,including at least the following items: 1. The general area for location of antenna and headend,if known; 2. . The schedule for activating and two-way capacity; 3. The type of automated services to be provided; 4. The number of channels and services to be made available for access cable broadcasting; and 5. The schedule of charges for facilities and staff assistance for access cable broadcasting. D. Terms and conditions under which particular service is to be provided to governmental and educational entities. E. A schedule of proposed rates in relation to the services to be provided and a proposed policy regarding unusual or difficult connection of services. F. A time schedule for construction of the entire system with the time sequence for wiring various portions of the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota. G. A statement indicating the applicant's qualifications and experience in the cable communications field,if any. H. An identification of the municipalities in which the applicant either owns or operates a cable communications system,directly or indirectly,or has outstanding franchises for which no system has been built. I. Plans for financing the proposed system,which must indicate every significant anticipated source of capital and significant limitations or conditions with respect to the availability of the indicated sources of capital. This information shall include the following: 334191/1 1. List and describe all financial resources(committed or otherwise)which the applicant proposes to use in constructing and operating the system. Committed financial resources may include,but are not limited to:bank financing; existing capital reserves; capital calls (or equivalent rights) under definitive governance docume of the applicant; operating surplus to be generated from operating activities; or resources generated through the issuance of debt or equity securities. 2. With respect to each of the sources described in 1 above,provide supporting documentation(such as a commitment letter from a financial institution; copies of definitive governance documents;terms sheet for debt or equity securities...) establishing the total resources available and the amount of resources appropriated for the cable franchise operations,if different from total funds available. 3. To the extent any of the financing sources described in 1 above have limitations or conditions imposed by such financing source on availability, use or other restrictions which could reasonably be expected to adversely affect the availability of such financial resources for use by the applicant, describe in detail: (a) each such limitation or condition; (b)the means the applicant intends to employ in order to satisfy each such limitation or condition; (c) a projection as to when such conditions or limitations will be satisfied(to the extent practical); (d) any contingent sources of capital or financial resources which may be sought in the event such conditions or limitations are not met; and(e)the reasonably foreseeable effect of the • loss of each such source of financing on the applicant's ability to meet its obligations to the City. 4. Provide a detailed budget or other financial forecast which identifies the total capital resources which the applicant projects will be required to construct and operate the cable franchise system in the City for the lesser of five(5)years or until the applicant otherwise projects that the cash deficit from operations will be reduced to zero, including a summary of the material assumptions employed in such forecast or budget. 5. Provide financial statements (balance sheet, statement of operations and statement of cash flow) for each of the two immediately preceding fiscal years,together with the most current set of financial statements for the current fiscal year, all prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles(except as noted). J. A statement of ownership detailing the corporate organization of the applicant,if any,including the names and addresses of officers and directors and the number of shares held by each officer or director, and intercompany relationship,including the parent, subsidiary or affiliated company. K. A notation and explanation of omissions or other variations with respect to the requirements of the proposal. 334191/1 L. Plans for construction and use of right-of-way, as follows: 1. Describe the level of interference landowners will experience with the installation of equipment by the applicant. 2. Describe what steps the applicant is planning to take to mitigate how long the installation of the equipment will take. 3. Describe what steps the applicant is planning to take to inform residents of the equipment installation and any safety concerns or safety measures related thereto. 4. What percent of equipment does the applicant anticipate will be installed above-ground and what percent underground? 5. To what extent does the applicant anticipate the need to detour traffic or close certain roads, sidewalks,or other rights-of-way to accommodate construction or installation of equipment. 6. What steps is the applicant planning to take to minimize destruction of public and/or private property during construction and installation? 7. Will the applicant agree to pay for any and all costs to repair public and/or private property to as good a condition as its was prior to construction and installation? 8. Where does the applicant intend to store its equipment during construction, and what measures will it be taking to keep conditions safe from children, traffic or any other persons who may go near it. 9. What will the applicant do with the equipment during the winter months when construction may be delayed or temporarily discontinued? 10. Does the applicant believe it will be able to collocate its equipment with that of existing cable companies,and what steps has and will the applicant take to determine the feasibility of collocation? 11. Is the applicant committed to collocate its equipment if technically feasible? 12. What steps does the applicant take to secure cable and equipment so there is minimal aesthetic interference? Substantive amendments may not be made to a proposal after a proposal has been submitted to the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota and before the award of a franchise. All proposals must be notarized and must include detailed responses to the above information requests,as well as the information requested in the Notice by the City of Its Intent to Franchise a Cable Communications System,attached hereto as Attachment A. The City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota reserves its rights to request additional information of applicant at any time during this process. 334191/1 9 Applicants are advised that KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest,Inc., d/b/a Time Warner Cable, currently provides cable television service throughout the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, pursuant to Ordinance No. 52-96 which became effective on or about January 1, 1997,and which will expire on or about January 1,2012. Applicant's proposal should identify changes in Ordinance No. 52-96 which applicant requests be adopted and the substantive basis for applicant's request. Applicants are advised that Ordinance No. 52-96 will serve as the basis on which a franchise may be granted to any qualified applicant. Any questions regarding this Request for Proposals or the exhibits attached hereto may be directed to Mr. Chris Enger, City Manager, City Hall, 8080 Mitchell Road,Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 or Mr.Brian T. Grogan,Moss&Barnett,4800 Norwest Center, 90 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis,MN 55402-4129. 334191/1 // /0 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,NIINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota will hold a hearing on September 5,2000 at 7:30 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard,to consider the applications received for a cable franchise. The public hearing will be held at the Eden Prairie City Center, 8080 Mitchell Road,Eden Prairie,Minnesota, Council Chambers. All interested parties are invited to attend and voice their opinions. Written statements may be submitted at or before the public hearing. City Clerk [DATE] 334941/1 { 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6,2000 SECTION: Consent Calendar SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Public Works Service Area Amend Policy on Assessment Limits for V Eugene A.Dietz Homestead Properties Requested Action Move to: Amend assessment limits for homesteaded properties as recommended by City staff. Synopsis Over the past year, City Council has reviewed information regarding the increase of assessment limits (cap) from $15,000 per lot unit to $19,600 for the year 2000. This motion would officially change the assessment limits and provide for an annual adjustment based on inflation. Background Information Based on previous discussions with City Council, it is proposed that Policy(30) be modified to read as follows(changes are underlined): When a local street and utility improvement project abuts a homesteaded single family residential parcel for which additional development is not expected, the maximum amount of the special assessment for street and lateral utilities shall be $19,600 for the year 2000. The exclusion policy would be applicable to these parcels. The City reserves the right to make additional assessments or impose a connection fee against the property if additional development occurs. This maximum amount of assessment will be increased annually in accordance with data published by the"Engineering News Record" Construction Cost Index (CCI). In addition,Policy(28)would be modified as follows(changes are underlined): In situations where homesteaded parcels are adjacent to local improvements and have developable acreages beyond the needs of a single family residential parcel for which the guide plan indicates a higher and better use or additional development is possible, the City shall levy an amount not to exceed the assessment limits provided in Policy (30) of the total assessment and defer the balance with interest until the property is developed. At time of development, the original principal plus accrued interest shall be levied for a five-year period at the original interest rate. The primary modification is to Policy(30), which increases the amount to$19,600 for the year 2000, but would be modified annually based on the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index. Policy(28)deals with additional development potential beyond one unit and needs to be modified to reflect the cap established in Policy(30). Staff recommends Council adopt the motion to modify these two policies. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent DATE: June 6,2000 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Community Development Approve resolutions authorizing the City and &Financial Services: the I-494 Corridor Commission to enter into V. fit. e Don Uram &David Lindahl reimbursement agreements with each other. Requested Action: Move to: 1) Approve the resolution authorizing the I-494 Corridor Commission to execute the Traffic Study and Golden Triangle Reimbursement Agreements with the City of Eden Prairie. 2) Approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Traffic Study and Golden Triangle Reimbursement Agreements with the I-494 Corridor Commission. Synopsis: The Metropolitan Council is providing funding to the I-494 Corridor Commission for the Golden Triangle Area (GTA) TDM Demonstration project in Eden Prairie. The I-494 Corridor Commission has agreed to use some of these funds to reimburse the City for the following costs associated with the GTA project: 1) Pay half the cost of the GTA area traffic study being conducted by SRF Consultants for the City. 2) Pay wages and benefits for a Transportation Management Association(TMA) Director position for one year. 3) Pay for a computer for the TMA position. 4) Provide a$50,000 marketing budget for the TMA position. To enter into contracts for an amount exceeding$5,000, the I-494 Commission needs approval from at least five of the seven member cities. The first motion approves a resolution authorizing the I-494 Commission to enter into the reimbursement agreements with the City of Eden Prairie. The second motion approves the resolution authorizing the City to enter into the agreements with the I-494 Commission. Attachments: Resolutions CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE H KNNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH THE I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter the "City") is a party to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement establishing the I-494 Corridor Commission (hereinafter the "Commission"); WHEREAS, the Commission desire have a Traffic Study performed for the Golden Triangle Area by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (hereinafter "SRF") and further requests that the City enter into a contract, on behalf of the Commission,with SRF to perform the Traffic Study; WHEREAS, the Commission desires to hire and employ an Executive Director for the Golden Triangle Transportation Management Association and further requests the City act as the Commissions agent to hire and administer all administrative duties necessary to employ the Executive Director; WHEREAS, the City has been presented with a Traffic Study Reimbursement Agreement whereby the Commission and the City agree to share equally the costs incurred to perform the Traffic Study; and WHEREAS, the City has been presented with a Golden Triangle Reimbursement Agreement whereby the Commission agrees to reimburse the City for the costs the City incurs in employing an Executive Director. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA THAT: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the Traffic Study Reimbursement Agreement and the Golden Triangle Reimbursement Agreement,both by and between the City of Eden Prairie and the I-494 Corridor Commission, with such changes as are approved by the officers executing the agreements ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of June 2000. By: Its Mayor ATTEST: By: Its Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS BY THE I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City is a party to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement establishing the I-494 Corridor Commission; WHEREAS, Article 6, Paragraph 6.12 authorizes the Commission to enter into contracts deemed necessary by the Commission to carry out its powers and duties, except that all contracts for an amount exceeding$5,000 shall be approved by at least five Parties; WHEREAS, Commission desires to enter into a Traffic Study Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Eden Prairie pertaining to a traffic study for the Eden Prairie Golden Triangle Area, and a Golden Triangle Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Eden Prairie whereby the City would hire on behalf of the Commission an Executive Director for the Golden Triangle Transportation Management Association; and WHEREAS,it is anticipated that both Agreements will exceed$5,000 in cost. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA THAT: The City hereby authorizes the Commission to enter into those certain agreements entitled Traffic Study Reimbursement Agreement and Golden Triangle Reimbursement Agreement both by and between the City of Eden Prairie and the I-494 Corridor Commission. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of June 2000. By: Its Mayor ATTEST: By: Its Clerk 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 06-06-00 SECTION: Public Hearing SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Bryant Lake Park—Phase II Donald R.Uram II. A Krista Flemming Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 167.6 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers within the Rural Zoning District on 167.6 acres. Synopsis Hennepin Parks proposes to add 4 parking lot areas with a total of 85 spaces, 2 restroom facilities, a picnic shelter, and additional paved trails throughout the park consistent with the master concept plan approved in 1993. The project is located West of Rowland Road, north and east of Bryant Lake. The Community Planning Board voted 8-0 to recommend approval of the project with a restroom facility setback waiver from 200 feet to 148 feet at the May 8,2000,meeting. Background • As part of the Planned Unit Development review, Hennepin Parks is requesting a shoreland setback waiver for the restroom facility nearest the lake. The restroom facility setback would be reduced from 200 feet to 148 feet. Hennepin Parks requests this waiver to reduce topographic alterations to the land and eliminate safety concerns associated with crossing a driveway/parking area if the facility were placed on the north side of the parking lot. This setback request is consistent with other setback waivers granted for existing structures currently located along the lake. Prior to project submittal, the City had received concerns from residents in adjacent neighborhoods regarding park users parking on residential streets and walking to the park for disc golf. The City posted temporary"No Parking" signs along Raspberry Hill Road on April 21, 2000, which discouraged some parking, but also caused some parking to shift farther into adjacent neighborhoods. 1 Staff met with Hennepin Parks on May 4, 2000, to discuss the situation and develop an action plan to reduce offsite parking. At the May 8, 2000, Community Planning Board meeting, residents expressed concern about offsite parking. Hennepin Parks presented a plan to educate and encourage onsite parking. The letter dated May 11, 2000, from Hennepin Parks is the action plan to reduce offsite parking. In the letter, Hennepin Parks recommends that if necessary, they believe the City should post "Parking by Permit Only" signs throughout the adjacent neighborhoods. Staff met with Hennepin Parks on May 24,2000,to discuss the action plan. Staff agrees with the action plan with the exception of the "Parking by Permit Only" recommendation. Staff recommends the parking lot proposed closest to the beginning of the disc golf course be constructed as soon as possible. This will provide additional and more convenient parking for disc golf users. City staff will post permanent"No Parking"signs along the east side of Raspberry Hill Road for approximately the first 150 feet, or to the point where Raspberry Hill Road divides into two cul-de-sacs. After the Community Planning Board meeting on May 8, Hennepin Parks distributed parking information and increased monitoring, which has resulted in a decrease in resident calls to the Police Department. Hennepin Parks and Staff will continue with an action plan (see attached letter to the neighborhood representatives)to reduce offsite parking throughout the summer. The City staff and Hennepin Parks will meet again at the end of July to evaluate the situation and determine if additional actions are necessary. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review 2. Ordinance for PUD District Review 3. Community Planning Board Minutes dated May 8,2000 4. Staff Report dated May 5, 2000 5. Memo to Community Planning Board regarding offsite parking issues dated May 5, 2000 6. Letter from Hennepin Parks regarding parking action plan dated May 11, 2000 7. Letter to Residents dated June 1, 2000 BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK-PHASE II CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,NIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK—PHASE II FOR HENNEPIN PARKS WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS,the Community Planning Board did conduct a public hearing on Bryant Lake Regional Park—Phase II PUD Concept by Hennepin Parks and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on June 6, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Bryant Lake Regional Park—Phase II,being in Hennepin County,Minnesota,legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated May 26, 2000. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Community Planning Board dated May 8,2000. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 6th day of June, 2000. Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A.Porta, City Clerk 3 Exhibit A BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK-PHASE II Legal Description: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 116,Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying westerly of the centerline of Rowland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. Also: That part of Government Lot 3, Section 2, Township 116,Range 22,Hennepin County,Minnesota lying southerly and westerly of the centerline of Roland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. Also: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 2, Township 116,Range 22,Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northerly of Registered Land Surveys No. 1421 and 1448. Also: That part of Government Lot 2, Section 2, Township 116, Range 22,Hennepin County, Minnesota except that part lying northeasterly of the centerline of Roland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. Also: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of the centerline of Rowland Road as traveled July 9, 1981 and easterly of the plat of GOLDEN RIDGE HILLS except the following described tract: Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 2, GORLDEN RIDGE HILLS; thence westerly along the north line of said Lot 3 a distance of 150.00 feet; thence northerly, parallel with the east line of said Section 2, a distance of 300.00 feet;thence easterly,parallel with the north line of said Lot 3, a distance of 150.00 feet to the east line of said Section 2;thence southerly along the east line of said Section 2,to the point of beginning. Said tract contains 1.0 acre more or less. Also: The East 8.85 chains of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2,Township 116, Range 22,Hennepin County,Minnesota lying southerly of the centerline of Roland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. Also: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 116,Range 22, Hennepin County,Minnesota lying westerly of the East 8.85 chains of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and southerly of the centerline of Roland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MONDAY,MAY 8,2000 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road BOARD MEMBERS: Ken Brooks,Kenneth E. Clinton, Frantz Corneille, Randy Foote, Vicki Koenig,Kathy Nelson, Susan Stock, Ray Stoelting STAFF MEMBERS: Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural; Mike Franzen, City Planner; Alan Gray, City Engineer; Donald Uram, Community Development/ Financial Services Director PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE-ROLL CALL Chair Corneille called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: by Foote, second by Brooks, to approve the May 8, 2000, agenda. Motion carried, 8-0. III. MINUTES MOTION: by Nelson, second by Koenig,to approve the Minutes of the April 24, 2000 Community Planning Board. Motion carried, 7-0, abstention Brooks. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK—PHASE II by Hennepin Parks for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 167.6 acres and Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers within the Rural Zoning District on 167.6 acres. Location: 6800 Rowland Road. Chair Corneille opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. 5 COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES May 8,2000 Page 2 Karen Bowen, Director of Operations, stated another issue has become apparent as a result of a neighborhood meeting. There has been a lot of interest in the disc golf course, and players are parking outside of the park, in the neighborhoods, to avoid entry fees. There are concerns with loud music, inappropriate language, littering, and speeding. The Eden Prairie Police Department has put out temporary signs prohibiting parking in some neighborhoods, but players are just parking further away. Hennepin Parks staffed about 20 hours over the weekend and passed out flyers, notifying players not to park on residential streets. Eden Prairie PD said there were not a lot of problems over the weekend. Hennepin Parks will consider charging for playing the course if the situation is not remedied. There is a possibility of relocating the Hennepin County southern division of public safety here; there would then be an on site ranger presence. Foote questioned whether the problem was players not wanting to pay the parking fee or the problem was space. Bowen said the fee, not space,was the problem, at $5.00 per day or$25.00 annually Alex Meyer, landscape architect for the project, said Phase I was removal of the entrance road,bringing in a new road, constructing a beach,main parking,maintenance facility, a boat launch with 20 car parking, and a lift station.Phase II involves a$550,000 grant to develop part of the master plan which includes four lots,restrooms, and a picnic shelter on the main hill. They will continue the bike/hike trail loop to Wooddale. This project includes sewer and water to the site. Lighting includes limited downcast shoebox light fixtures. There will be lights at the intersection of the main road. The setback is within 200 feet of the shoreline and requires a variance. The architecture includes a 500 square foot structure with cedar siding, and an 800 square foot structure for the picnic shelter. Nelson asked about the low-level parking lot by the lift station, and the small size of the parking lot close to the picnic shelter. Meyer said it was due to the wetland ordinance and the shoreline buffer zone of 50 feet. Stoelting asked which residential areas the cars are in. Meyer said the problem was mainly in Raspberry Hill Road, directly across from the main entrance to the park. The City now has it signed as tow-away zone;but now cars are parked further up. Stoelting asked if the park entrance was a controlled entry. COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES May 8,2000 Page 3 Meyer said yes; gatehouse attendants collect the fees; they're seasonal. Flemming said the staff recommendation was approval of Phase II as part of the approved master plan. There is one shoreline waiver which is consistent with phase I and the overall concept. The police and Hennepin Parks are working on parking issues. Foote asked if there was a plan to correct the parking issues. Bowen said staff flyers, education,word-of mouth, and rangers were the plan. The next mitigation step would be to charge for disc golf as part of parking. Foote asked whether there would be enforcement of the towaway signs? Bowen said they recommended signs, and possibly parking by permit only for neighbors. Brooks asked whether a traffic count had been completed for the off-street parking problem. Bowen said it was staffed for 20 hours over the weekend; there were 300 cars through the gate,half were for disc golf, and he was not aware of any problems with parking over the weekend. Stoelting asked about the construction of 85 additional parking phases and whether parking had ever been a problem. • Bowen said the pavilion was rented often, if there was a big swimming weekend,the lot may be filled,but it was rare to have overflow. Meyer said the main lot has 212 cars,the overflow has parked in turf lot when necessary. Koenig asked whether the parking would be sufficient with the increased interest in golf. Franzen said staff did not anticipate any problems based upon the plans. Comments from the Public: Barry Carlson of 1551 Raspberry Hill Road said he had lived there for six years.His concern was the impact on neighborhood based on the litter in the COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES May 8, 2000 Page 4 park from frisbee golf, and the streets being clogged. Cherokee and Raspberry should be limited to residential parking. Nelson asked whether he had concerns directly related to phase II of the project. Carlson said he had a problem with the parking and increased traffic. He expressed concern about utilization of dollars; as an example lifeguards are not supplied for the area but$30,000 was delegated for disc golf. Nelson asked whether Carlson had concerns with the bike trails. Carlson said he had no problem with those. They don't bring in automobile traffic. Beth Timm of 11600 Raspberry Hill, said she understood Phase II was going to be an expansion of frisbee golf that is why she was here. Raspberry Hill is a double cul-de sac. There are 24 children under the age of 16, 20 are under age 8. Signs on Raspberry Hill caused traffic to park on Cherokee Trail. There is a lot of litter,broken beer bottles, glass bottles. Kelly Lee,resident of 6677 Cherokee Trail W., for 10 years, said it became worse when temporary signs went in. The parking problem began with frisbee golf. She suggested permit parking only. The problem is now from Shady Oak down Cherokee Trail West. Corneille asked whether parking was being reviewed with phase II. Uram said it was not part of phase II but everyone is aware of the concerns. Nelson asked whether a frisbee golf expansion was being considered? Franzen said it was not at this time. Craig Andrews of 16706 Raspberry Hill,presented a picture of cars parking in front of his property. He would like to hear a timeline for mitigation of traffic and litter issues. Uram said no one is breaking laws. This is a new issue for Hennepin County. He suggested a meeting with Hennepin County,Public Works, and Planning prior to presentation of phase II to the Council June 6th Corneille reviewed the residents' concerns of litter,parking,noise, safety, and overall impact on the neighborhood. COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES May 8,2000 Page 5 Franzen concurred staff could have a roundtable with public works,police, and Hennepin Parks. He suggested Hennepin Parks present a mitigation plan. Brady Roland,resident of Goldridge Drive, asked whether there was a phase III planned. Meyer said Phase II would involve development on the hill and a picnic site. Roland asked whether it would be staffed properly and vegetation would be cared for. Clinton said he supports the Phase II plan. Brooks concurred. Nelson said shoreline setback variances are normally serious issues but a 148-foot setback should be ok. Foote agreed phase II was a good idea. It will encourage youth participation in the park. He would encourage mitigation of the parking situation prior to presentation to the Council. MOTION: by Clinton, seconded by Koenig,to close the public hearing. Motion carried, 8-0. MOTION: by Clinton, seconded by Nelson,to approve the PUD for Phase II of Hennepin Parks Development in Bryant Lake Park with the waiver specified as a shoreline setback of 148 feet for the restroom building; and prior to issuance of building permits Hennepin Parks will present a plan to mitigate the parking problem. Motion carried, 8-0. B. OAK PARK 2ND ADDITION (Cole Property)by Thompson Land Development for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 11.27 acres of the 162.4 acres of Eden Orchard PUD,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.27 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 1.97 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.66 acres, and Preliminary Plat on 11.27 acres into 31 lots and 4 outlots. Location: 17251 Cedar Crest Drive. Chair Corneille opened the Public Hearing at 8:00 p.m. Franzen explained this was a small addition to Eden Orchard PUD with 259 single family units, 118 townhomes, 56 twin homes. This is a replatting to 1 STAFF REPORT TO: Community Planning Board FROM: Krista R. Flemming,Planner I DATE: May 5, 2000 SUBJECT: Bryant Lake Regional Park—Phase II APPLICANT/ OWNER: Hennepin Parks LOCATION: West of Rowland Road,north and east of Bryant Lake REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 167.6 acres 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers within the Rural Zoning District on 167.6 acres l0 BRYANT LAKE PARK • ,• •..,. 0 sort xYr RC �•�' welt-:". 'S1 j.k I Sv. CC.•SCC lit u i jt I...i -,,,t , ,r147111... _ • 1\ ilir- J ) itio SAS r1.+^`r f �-` s'�.- . •• -'Wit.:. \ ; 'WO' ; fit O , L 'IA' ; / { r••,„ cov7. 1 --yi „.....• • \t,it: . i iR' ..1 littlif•-...,,,,..)- 1 7x; _ .-.,ii,l, ..---V: Ai' . . • J. i. 1.; ?l\'' i "4.'.\ xa+u mTr A010•1 44' .-‘,./c.c.•.%,•;....,. ,......„7.0-1,.±.1. ...?,,,::;74/31.. ,/ •k-........ !. ,1 __L_ ._.___. ,..—,,,,,,,,, -1.;,7. ..,.....,,-, ...,„.....---- ..4.' '''\ ...\-----v,ff'4:. :j1 ‘. •n l y4_- 1 `.• COVT e44,• I -r \c'o, ‘‘\` ' 1 7...., V.,A \ ' '— ' IX : ; 4 4 i...,/,'" i tiy. l.T + / 4'w•a.wn. Y0 \ i I A4 . \. . 1 Tom_ 2 1 -� •• \�'\ r r - \ , • Y �! 1 s� y E � -\\\ lit L 3 ?dOiilbd3 N. \ a i-- ii I \ _ 1 iF 1 ° -�'\ ____ _— --.� - rC r_' ate. -.� .�- V` Ya y \ 1 \ I ( .. ..171`.. 22-\, CAW LOT ••y a COYI LOT S , I ; �, 7 lT LOT I COYT tns t f( Staff Report—Bryant Lake Regional Park—Phase II May 5,2000 BACKGROUND The site is currently guided for Park/Public Open Space and zoned Rural. In 1993,the City approved a concept plan for the entire park including the main park entrance, a maintenance building,picnic pavilion/visitor center with parking, a boat rental/changing shelter, a boat ramp with parking and the beach. The City approved detailed plans for Phase I only. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Hennepin Parks proposes to add 4 parking lot areas with a total of 85 spaces,2 restroom facilities, a picnic shelter, and additional paved trails throughout the park. These additions are consistent with the master concept plan approved in 1993. All structures have a residential character with pitched roofs,cedar shake siding and shingles to meet City code in the Rural district and match the architecture of existing buildings. As part of the Planned Unit Development review,Hennepin Parks is requesting shoreland setback waiver for the restroom facility nearest the lake. The restroom facility setback to the lake would be reduced from 200 feet to 148 feet. Hennepin Parks requests this waiver to reduce topographic alterations to the land and eliminate safety concerns associated with crossing a driveway/parking area if the facility were placed on the north side of the parking lot. This setback request is consistent with other setback waivers granted for existing structures currently located along the lake. DRAINAGE Storm water will be treated to NURP standards. UTILITIES Utilities are available onsite through Rowland Road. The placement of the restroom facility will require a lift station to pump wastewater uphill to existing sanitary sewer lines. TREE LOSS/LANDSCAPE PLAN There are 1,350 diameter inches of significant trees throughout the park area. The total tree loss is 62 inches, or 5%. Hennepin Parks completed reforestation projects totaling over 8,900 bare root plants and 250 trees since Phase I in 1993. There are 300 bare root plants scheduled for planting this spring. The required tree replacement is 4 caliper inches, which is satisfied by the reforestation project. Staff Report—Bryant Lake Regional Park—Phase H May 5,2000 TRAIL SYSTEM As approved in 1993 Phase I plan, a 10' bituminous trail connection will be made from the new driveway to the Wooddale Church property at the point where the City currently controls an easement for trail purposes. The trail currently exists,but is not bituminous. A bituminous connection will also be constructed from the existing trail on the north end to the Minnetonka Spur continuing under Hwy. 62 into Minnetonka. LIGHTING Lighting will consist of 20-foot high downcast cutoff shoebox fixtures due to the adjacent residential land use. WETLANDS There are three wetland basins in addition to Bryant Lake. The required wetland buffer strip of 25 feet is maintained with all of the wetlands. One segment of the trail nearest Wooddale Church will encroach into the buffer; however, trails are exempt from this requirement. Hennepin Parks is working with Staff to identify alternatives to avoid encroachment of the wetland or its buffer with any trail segment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approval of: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 167.7 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers within the Rural Zoning District on 167.7 acres This is based on plans dated April 18,2000, this Staff Report dated May 5,2000, and the following: 1. Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Review the building plans with the Fire Marshal. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. 2. Planed Unit Development waivers are granted as follows: • Shoreland setback from 200 feet to 148 feet for the restroom facility closest to the lake. 13 Memo To: Community Planning Board From: Krista Flemming Date: 05/05/00 Re: Bryant Lake Park—Offsite Parking Issues Hennepin Parks held a neighborhood meeting on April 17,2000. Approximately 20 people attended. The primary issue expressed by residents is parking on City streets. Park users are parking on City streets and walking into the park to avoid the park fees. City staff has received complaints about parking on City streets and placed temporary no parking signs on April 21, 2000. The signs reduced parking in the affected area, however, the parking problem moved to another location. Parking is prohibited on Rowland Road . The construction of 85 additional parking spaces with Phase Two may help reduce the number of park users on residential streets, however City staff believes offsite parking will continue, as long as park users are able to avoid paying the parking fee. On May 4, 2000, City staff (Police, Parks, Engineering, and Planning) met with Hennepin Parks staff to discuss the parking problem. A result of this meeting was an agreement by Hennepin Parks to develop an action plan. The plan will be presented at Monday nights meeting. The parking problem is an enforcement issue related to park usage and should be reviewed separate from Phase II of the Master plan for Bryant Lake Park. The Board may wish to recommend that City staff and Hennepin Parks continue to work with area residents on the parking problem. lW HENNEPIN SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 1 County Road 9 Plymouth, Minnesota 55 99 PARKSFAX Telephone(612)559-9000 TDD (612)559-6719 FAX(612)559-3287 �l vre2s k- /iyi6 ii n if f' An Equal Opportunity Employer • May 11, 2000 Mike Franzen,Planner Eden Prairie City Hall 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Dear Mike: I want to follow upon the Eden Prairie Community Planning Board meeting discussion regarding Bryant Lake Regional Park Phase II Development plans--and more specifically--neighborhood concerns regarding the 12-hole Disc Golf Course. To reiterate, the Park District has taken the following actions since becoming aware of residents' concerns at the April 17 neighborhood meeting: • Removed the tee box and green (basket) from hole#7and relocated the Hole #6 basket at the request of a Rowland Road resident. • Significantly increased both Public Safety and Entry Gate staffing--as compared to normal April-May levels--in an attempt to personally speak to Disc Golf Course users and infoini them of the need to follow regulations. • Published three different pieces of information(attached) urging parking within park boundaries and spelling out neighborhood concerns., • Published the same information on the Park District's web page, www.hennepinparks.org, and links to other disc golf pages. • • Made the decision to significantly diminish plans for a Bryant Lake Regional Park Disc Golf Course Grand Opening,planned for June 3. While the event will still be held, it will be much lower key and less widely advertised than originally intended. • Talked personally with several individuals from the disc golf community who assisted in planning and designing the course, to seek their help in speaking with disc golfers at Bryant Lake about neighborhood and Park District concerns. RECYCLED PAPER-Conserving our Resources Contorts SOX total recycled fiber. 10%Post-consumer fiber • Pledged continual coverage of Bryant Lake Park by Public Safety personnel throughout the busy summer months (some of our seasonal Public Safety Officers are students and not available until the end of May). • Begun internal discussions about the possibility of relocating the Southern Division Public Safety(Park Rangers)unit from Hyland Lake Park Reserve to Bryant Lake. This would provide on-going presence of Public Safety personnel, including certified police officers, throughout the year and result in greater scrutiny of all park uses, i.e., underage drinking, dogs off leash,mountain bikes on turf trails, parking without vehicle permits, etc. The major issue, as everyone has acknowledged, is the seeming unwillingness of teen-age disc golf players to pay the daily or annual parking fee, choosing rather to park on residential streets and, understandably, irritating area neighbors. While these young people may be engaging in offensive'behavior, for the most part they are not doing • anything illegal. Therein, lies the problem. Nor is residential street parking anything that Hennepin Parks can remedy, other than through education and communication, as outlined above. • It seems clear that posting city streets with PARKING BY PERMIT ONLY signs, would be the most effective action and one that many of the affected neighbors seemed to endorse. Once accomplished,both City Police and Hennepin Parks Rangers could enforce the regulation and issue citations to violators. We are willing to meet again with Eden Prairie City staff to discuss these or other measures you might suggest. The Planning Board's decision to link its approval of Phase II Development plans to the Disc Golf issue is obviously of concern to us as we would like to move forward with construction as soon as possible. I hope we can discuss both matters in the immediate future to meet the best interests.of the Park District and City. I can be reached at 559-6701. Sincerely, Karen Bowen Director of Park and Trail Operations e: Douglas Bryant, Superintendent Don Davis, Director of Public Safety Tim Marr, Acting Director of Administrative Services HennLpin Parks-Bryan , Lake 12)1SC Golf Course Become a Park Patron Welcome to Bryant Lake Regional Park Disc Golf Course.Park Patrons are important to us and have the satisfaction of knowing they are making an important contribution to parks and trails.In fact,entrance fees account for seventeen percent of annual operating revenues and are critical to the long- term success of recreation areas,trails,and environmental preservation efforts in Hennepin Parks.We hope you enjoy your visit. Paying your way helps to fund your stay! • Please do not park on tesfdental streets. How to Play Disc Golf Stand on tee pad and throw the disc like a frisbee, aiming for the designated basket.Scoring is similar to the game of golf—one point for each throw. -i The person with the lowest score is the winner. Allow three minutes to look for lost discs.Let persons behind you advance if you are playing slower or looking for lost discs. L Rules & Etiquette j • All PDGA(Professional Disc Golf Association) rules apply. " , . � 1 • No littering. • Play the course in the correct numerical order. 1 • Continue playing on one course—either the �. short or long course. • Do not throw disc until other players are out of • Y the way. • Pets are not allowed on course. • For course reservations,call 763/559-6700 SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT HENNEPINPARKS Bryant Lake Regional Park • . .. i 3 { 6400 Rowland Road • Eden Prairie,MN • 952/9414518 www.hennepinparks.org 17-- JayingY our wayhelps to i - fund stay We are glad you had an opportunity to use a Hennepin Parks' facility today. Surveys have shown that the public: • wants to support•parks and trails, in part through taxes; • does not want a reduction in high quality services and facilities; and • wants park visitors to help pay operating costs through user fees. Park Patrons are an important source of funding and have the satisfaction of knowing they are making an important contribution to parks and trails. In-fact, their contributions make up 17% of the annual operating revenue and are critical to the long-term success of the recreation areas, trails, and environmental preservation efforts in Hennepin Parks. We hope you enjoyed your visit. HENNEPIN PARKS • Honor System Pay Boxes are available at park entrances. Dear Disc Golfers: WELCOME TO BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK! We sincerely hope you enjoy your stay and your play. Unfortunately, we also need to make you aware of several serious issues related to our new Disc Golf Course and ASK FOR YOUR HELP AND YOUR COOPERATION. Hennepin Parks is extremely interested in providing a successful disc golf experience; in fact, we have invested some $20,000 to make the facility possible. But we are equally interested in being good neighbors and in recent weeks we have not met that goal. Numerous complaints have been received about parking on residential streets—presumably to avoid paying annual or daily permit fees. There are also concerns about loud music, bad language, litter on area yards and streets, and reckless driving that could endanger the safety of young children. It is expected that Park Patrons PARK WITHIN THE PARK. Annual vehicle permits are $25 for an entire year at each of the District's 14 facilities. Daily parking is $5 and must be placed in the entry drop box when gate staff is not on duty. Please help us and disc golf by respecting other park users. Several fairways interfere with walking paths; use caution before you throw. We take pride in having clean parks; please recycle aluminum, glass and plastic and discard trash and cigarette butts in proper containers. Without this kind of cooperation, the Bryant Disc Golf Course will be in jeopardy. It was developed as a pilot project to determine if the activity is one that fits here and in other Hennepin Parks facilities. We want the "experiment" to succeed and we hope you do too! THANK YOU VERY MUCH. • City of Eden Prairie City Offices 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-4485 ePeden Phone (612) 949-8300 •TDD (612) 949-8399 • Fax (612) 949-8390 prairie w ww.edenprairie.org June 1, 2000 Jo Shaddy,Neighborhood Representative 11896 Dunhill Road Eden Prairie,MN 55344 RE: Bryant Lake Park—Offsite Parking Dear Ms. Shaddy: City staff met with representatives from Hennepin Parks on May 24 to discuss the parking situation associated with Bryant Lake Park. The consensus of the meeting was that efforts put forth by Hennepin Parks to increase awareness of parking and park fees has helped decrease the amount of offsite parking. Although there have been improvements in the situation, the following action plan was established between Hennepin Parks and the City: 1. Hennepin Parks will continue to distribute educational materials and increase the presence of public safety officers to educate park patrons (please see attached letter). 2. Due to the proximity of Raspberry Hill Road to the main park entrance, the City will post permanent "No Parking" signs along the east side of Raspberry Hill Road from Rowland Road to point where Raspberry Hill Road branches into two cul-de-sacs, or approximately the first 150 feet. 3. The Eden Prairie Police Department will continue to monitor the area frequently. 4. The City staff will meet with Hennepin Parks at the end of July to reevaluate the situation. Please contact me if you have questions, or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this plan in further detail. ,K.CulokKeee, Krista R.Flemming Planner Enclosure CC: Gene Dietz,Public Works Service Area Director Bob Lambert,Parks and Recreation Service Area Director Jim Clark,Public Safety Service Area Director Karen Bowen,Hennepin Parks • Recyclable Paper av PLANNING DEPT. On March 31,2000. MAY 2 6 2000 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR CITY OF BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK—PHASE II EDEN PRAIRIE Hennepin Parks is proposing to develop Phase II at Bryant Lake Regional Park located in the City of Eden Prairie. In November, 1986, the Eden Prairie City Council approved the Bryant Lake Regional Park Master Plan. The current development plan closely follows this master plan with several minor modifications due to use pattern or regulation changes. Phase II development includes the construction of an additional park road and four parking lots, two restroom buildings and a picnic shelter. Electrical and water and sewer services will be extended as a part of the development, and bike/hike trail spurs connecting to the City of Eden Prairie on the east end of the park where it abuts the Wooddale Church and on the north end where it connects with the City of Minnetonka trail system that links up with the Southwest Hennepin Regional LRT Trail System will be constructed. The architectural design of the restroom buildings and picnic shelter will recall the original park structures. The, buildings will be clad in panelized cedar shingles and have a heavy weight asphalt shingle roof. Exterior security lighting on the buildings will be downlit and minimal. The restroom buildings are each 570 square feet and the picnic shelter is 864 square feet in size. The lower restroom building is to be located at the Lakeside site and will provide restroom • facilities for trail users and disc golfers as well. Because of the elevation changes, this building will require a lift station for sewage removal. The most striking physical feature of Bryant Lake Regional Park is the steeply rolling hills, some wooded, some grass covered, but all rising up from Bryant Lake. The Lakeside picnic site is one of the few level sites adjacent to the lake and thus a prime site for picnickers. This site sits at the base of a wooded, steep embankment which makes accessibility difficult for the handicapped. In order to make this site accessible, the restroom building and a small parking lot with handicapped parking is required to be located in this area. A variance is being requested for this building and parking lot as they are both located within 200 feet of the shoreline. Without doing substantial grading and retaining wall construction, plus removal'of additional trees, it is impossible to provide the accessible building and parking at this site. In addition, the new wetland ordinance enacted by the City in February,.2000, requires that a 50- foot buffer be provided back from the O.H.W. elevation of 854. This will affect the area currently being mowed for picnickers at this site and Park District staff requests that we work with City staff in delineating this buffer as part of this project development. There are several large trees located at this site that were damaged in recent windstorms and have been scheduled for removal due to potential hazard. The only proposed lighting would be a light standard at the intersection of the existing park road and the proposed road along with lighting in the first parking lot which will serve as parking for trail users, disc golfers and overflow parking for the main beach area. The light standards are 20 feet high and have shoebox style light fixtures to match existing. No additional signage is required as a part of this project. A tree inventory was conducted by the district forestry specialist to determine the number of trees over 12" diameter(4.5' above the ground) located in the park. Twenty-three representative tenth-acre plots distributed throughout the wooded areas of the park were selected and trees over 12 inches were tallied by species and size. Based on the survey, the average density of trees over 12 inches in diameter is 25.2 per acre. Wooded areas cover a total of 50.67 acres at Bryant Lake Regional Park. Since the completion of Phase I development at Bryant Lake, Hennepin Parks has planted two major reforestation projects totaling over 8,900 bare root plants and tree spaded in 250 additional trees. Scheduled for this spring are an additional 300 bare root plants for screening of a portion of the disc golf course from Rowland Road. As a part of this project, additional bare root and tree spaded units will be planted to replace the trees lost due to construction and to soften the edge around the new parking lots. Twenty-four hour traffic counts by the Minnesota Department of Transportation conducted during the summer of 1999 on Rowland Road west of Shady Oak Rd (2584) and just south of where Rowland Road crosses over Crosstown Hwy 62 (1137) were obtained from Eden Prairie staff. In addition, the Research staff at Hennepin Parks during the past two summers did counts of vehicles entering the park each day. The average number of vehicles each day was 160, with weekdays averaging 146 and weekends/holidays 187 with park usage at 367 vehicles. When fully completed, the addition of the two reservation sites will add between 50 to 65 vehicles per day if both sites were reserved. Due to present budget constraints, Hennepin Parks is proposing to construct the road and three parking lots leading down to the Lakeside site, the restroom building and all site utilities except for those going to the Hilltop picnic site and both trail connections. As funding becomes available,the second restroom and picnic shelter would be constructed. Construction for the first part of this proposal would be started immediately upon securing necessary approvals from the city and watershed district and awarding of a contract. The work would then be completed no later than December 31, 2000. Final landscape plantings may have to be completed in the spring of 2001. • RECREATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRAIL LEGEND CONNECTION - Existing Paved Trails a A. --- Existing Turf Trails — Proposed Paved Trails fly 1 ——— Future Paved Trails 11 II — Proposed Park Roads ' Park Roads il9 ' ? Marsh i E'-._.:1 Existing Recreational Areas nix LI 3 Proposed Recreational Areas I1 I ,_,t Park Boundary Irli 1 International lj School l iN Propsurplus 41 'lj / . �� t Creerty l0' \� NORTH l III ll ,', `i �`. i ol, Ifs '_ ; fy� flmnte once /:s..,i 9 I f .�J,l a Boat \ . II d ' •.� t` :r t_/, _, ;1 Launch 1 .,� d; `,. ,1, Visitor Ca a y, i3x.. .- .:. /r I. iLpi is it Bryant Bean 4Il;� vt Lae 'j` `r i /� :=, =.:. s t j ) ,,. -s. s- , ,,.. _ l� , 1 • ti t141111d fit' Or . a i 1 ill. —,_•—tip:.. r, q'. ll ' .a.-...,.,...-.. tl. .-• -tea•.- a3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION • BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK CONTAINS 167.6 ACRES That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying westerly of the centerline of Rowland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. Also: That part of Government Lot 3, Section 2, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly and westerly of the centerline of Rowland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. Also: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 2, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northerly of Registered Land Surveys No. 1421 and 1448. Also: • All of Government Lot 2, Section 2, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota except that part lying northeasterly of centerline of Rowland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. Also: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of the centerline of Rowland Road as traveled July 9, 1981 and easterly of the plat of GOLDEN RIDGE HELLS except the following described tract: Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 2, GOLDEN RIDGE HILLS; thence westerly along the north line of said Lot 3 a distance of 150.00 feet thence northerly, parallel with the east line of said Section 2, a distance of 300.00 feet; thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said Lot 3, a distance of 150.00 feet to the east line of said Section 2; thence southerly along the east line of said Section 2, to the point of beginning. Said tract contains 1.0 acre more or less. . Also: The East 8.85 chains of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2,Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County,Minnesota lying southerly of the centerline of Rowland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. • Also: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 116,Range • 22,Hennepin County,Minnesota lying westerly of the East 8.85 chains of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and southerly of the centerline of Rowland Road as traveled July 9, 1981. brylegaLchb REVISED WETLAND REPORT BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK—PHASE II DEVELOPMENT BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK EDEN PRAIRIE, MN • The wetland areas adjacent to the Bryant Lake Regional Park proposed reserve picnic area improvement and nature trail improvement were initially identified from soils maps, aerial photographs, contour maps, and National Wetland Inventory maps. Site inspections to confirm the location of wetland areas were conducted during the winter and spring of 2000 by Mr. John M. Barten, Hennepin Parks Water Quality Manager and Alex Meyer, Landscape Architect. Mr. Barten is a certified wetland delineator. The attached map shows the location of the wetlands in the project area. The Hennepin County Soil Survey shows that the soils in Bryant Lake Regional Park consist mainly of well drained Kingsley and Salida coarse sandy loam soils,with a large area of Peaty muck soils present on the east side of the site. A series of drainage ditches were constructed through the peat area prior to acquisition of the property by Hennepin Parks. In the early 1990's two nutrient detention basins were constructed in the peat area by the city of Eden Prairie to treat stormwater runoff from a residential area north of Rowland Road. The National Wetland Inventory Map shows a small wetland at the northeast edge of the peat area,near the east property line of Bryant Lake Regional Park. This wetland is adjacent to the existing nature trail. The NWI map classifies this as a seasonally flooded Palustrine emergent wetland(PEMC). Visual inspection of the wetland confirms this designation. The City of Eden Prairie designates this as Wetland 2-44-A. The NWI map also designates the two nutrient detention basins as wetlands. The basins are classified as seasonally flooded Palustrine emergent wetlands, (PEMC). The City of Eden Prairie designates these as Wetland 2-41-B. These basins, as well as the contiguous wetland areas,drain south into Bryant Lake. Although not shown on the NWI map, the City of Eden Prairie also shows a wetland adjacent to where the drainage channel discharges to Bryant Lake. This wetland is designated as 2-41-A, and is considered part of the lake. An existing bridge crosses the channel between the lake and Wetland 2-41-A. The Department of Natural Resources public waters inventory map indicates that only Bryant Lake,67P, is a DNR jurisdictional wetlands. The other on-site basins are WCA • jurisdictional wetlands. Lake shoreline vegetation in the proposed picnic area consists mainly of a 20 to 30 foot wide band of small(4 to 6 inch)green ash and elm trees from the waters edge to the Ordinary High Water elevation. Above the OHW, vegetation consists of mowed turf. The proposed picnic area improvement will avoid any impact to Bryant Lake. No construction activity will occur within 100 feet of the lake OHW. The proposed nature trail improvement will cross a drainage channel which conveys water into Bryant Lake. The channel is located approximately 350 feet northeast of the picnic area. The bottom of the drainage channel is below the OHW elevation of Bryant Lake, and is therefore considered to be part of the lake. A new bridge will be constructed across the channel to avoid any filling below the lake OHW. The bridge abutments will be constructed at elevation 858.00, approximately 3.5 feet above the lake OHW. Wetland 2-41-A will not be impacted by the bridge construction. A wetland delineation will be completed to determine the location of required wetland buffer zones along the trail. Improvement of the nature trail will require filling of approximately 1000 square feet of the seasonally flooded wetland near the east property line of the park. The trail will be moved up-slope, out of the wetland as far as possible, to minimize impacts to the wetland. However, the trail cannot be moved completely out of the wetland without encroaching on the adjacent property. Therefore, avoidance of the wetland impact is not feasible. The attached plan shows the extent of the wetland impacts. The actual wetland edge will be delineated by Hennepin Parks' staff during the spring of 2000, when plant identification becomes possible. The delineated wetland edge will be marked with flags, and also located with a GPS unit with sub-meter accuracy. The GPS locations will be imput into the District GIS system. During construction of the picnic area parking lot and the trail, silt fences will be placed along the lake and wetlands to prevent the movement of sediment into these water • resources. The fences will be maintained by the contractors. Along much of its' length, the nature trail will be adjacent to wetlands, and will not comply with the city wetland buffer ordinance. Because the intent of the trail is to allow the public access to wetlands, City staff has indicated that this trail is exempt from the ordinance. Wetland impacts will be mitigated by extending the affected waterbody to the north. As per the WCA, mitigation will occur at a 2:1 ratio. The exact area to be impacted and mitigated will be determined by onsite delineation in the spring of 2000. Avoidance Complete avoidance of wetland impacts was not possible with this project because the existing trail is located between Wetland 2-44-A, and the east property line of Bryant Lake Regional Park. Moving the trail east out of the wetland will require encroaching on the adjacent private property. Hennepin Parks initially proposed replacing the existing bridge over the drainage channel between Wetland 2-41-A and Bryant Lake with a pipe, to reduce project costs. However, after discussions with DNR, Eden Prairie and Watershed staff, the Park District agreed to construct a new bridge over the channel to avoid wetland impacts in this area. There will be no construction activity near Wetland 2-41-B. Initially Hennepin Parks proposed installing a storm sewer into the wetland to convey runoff water from the upper parking lots into the existing NURP ponds. However,we now propose to construct a detention basin in the uplands 300 feet west of Wetland 2- 41-B, to receive runoff from the parking lots. Discharge from the basin will be allowed to surface flow into the wetland. The basin outlet will be designed to discharge water at predevelopment runoff rates, to reduce erosion potential. Minimization Impacts to Wetland 2-44-A will be minimized by moving the existing trail up- slope, as far as possible,without encroaching on the adjacent property. This will reduce the impact to a maximum of 1000 square feet. Rectify Because the trail will be permanent, this principal does not apply. Reduce Because the trail will be permanent, this principal does not apply. Mitigation Mitigation of the 1,000 square feet of impacted wetland will occur adjacent to Wetland 2-44-A. The high ground north of the wetland will be excavated to an • elevation of approximately 867.0, the same elevation as the impacted wetland. In essence, the wetland will be expanded to the east. Wetland hydrology will be provided by runoff from the east, and from the contiguous wetland to the west. It is anticipated that the created wetland will develop vegetation similar to the impacted wetland, and will therefore, be a similar type. The wetland creation will occur simultaneously with the wetland impacts. A total of approximately 2000 square feet of wetlands will be created to mitigate for the 1000 square feet of impact caused by the construction. Wetland replacement will therefore, occur at a rate greater than 2:1. Ownership of the mitigation site by Hennepin Parks will ensure preservation of the area. The excavation plans for both sites are attached. All wetland areas will be covered with organic soil at the design grade to provide an adequate substrate for the establishment of wetland vegetation. Native vegetation will be seeded above the wetland elevation. The seed mixture will consist of MnDOT Mixture 25B. Monitoring Program Following construction of the replacement wetlands,Hennepin Parks staff will annually monitor the wetland and provide to Eden Prairie an annual report a1 detailing the observations of the inspections. The report will contain the following information: A description of the project location, size, current wetland type, and desired wetland type. A comparison of the as-built specification versus the design specification,(first annual report only), and a rational for significant changes. Hydrology measurements: seasonal water level elevations during the period April through October. A list of the dominant vegetation in the wetland, including common names of plants exceeding 20 percent coverage, and an estimate of coverage. • Color photographs of the project area taken during the period June through August. The photographs will be referenced to the photo-reference points identified on the wetland replacement plan. A list of wildlife species observed in, or adjacent to,the wetland. Regulatory Framework The proposed road and trail construction will occur partially in wetlands regulated by the following Agencies: US ACOE Sec. 404 permit MPCA Sec. 401 certification Eden Prairie WCA permit All necessary permit applications will be submitted pending preliminary approval of the concept plan. �.0 BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK PHASE II DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN The Phase II development in Bryant Lake Regional Park will include construction of four parking lots, a restroom building, a paved trail and paved access roads. The development will occur east of the existing active use area. The project will result in the creation of approximately 1.5 acres of impervious surface. Runoff from the restroom building and lower parking lot will be discharged into an infiltration basin adjacent to Bryant Lake. The attached basin design shows that runoff from ten year storm events and less will be infiltrated by the basin. During rain.events greater than ten year frequency, the basin will be designed to discharge flow at a rate of 1.0 CFS. Historically, the major problem with infiltration basins has been the tendency of the basin infiltration capacity to diminish as fine particles plug the pores in the soil. Hennepin Parks will maintain the infiltration capacity of the basin byremoving accumulated sediment annually, and aerating the basin surface twice annually to prevent sealing of the soils. The Walker Model estimates that construction of the parking lot and restroom building will increase phosphorus loading to Bryant Lake from 1.4 lbs/yr to 2.4 lbs/yr. The infiltration basin nutrient removal efficiency is estimated to be 50%, resulting in a post- development loading rate of 1.2 lbs/yr. There will, therefore,be no increase in phosphorus loading to the lake resulting from the parking lot and building construction. Runoff from the upper parking lots and access road will flow north into the existing nutrient detention basins. These basins were constructed to treat runoff water from Rowland Road and the housing development north of the road. When Hennepin Parks granted an easement to the City to allow construction of the basins in the park, a condition of the easement was to design the basins to accommodate runoff from the Phase II development in Bryant Lake Regional Park. Therefore, the District believes that constructing an additional NURP pond in the park is not necessary. In order to avoid impact to Wetland 2-41-B, runoff from the parking lots will be discharged to a stormwater pond constructed in the upland area located 300 feet west of the wetland. As per the attached TR-55 calculations, the pond will have a capacity of 0.8 acre feet, and a discharge of 4 CFS. This design will allow overland flow of water from the stormwater basin to Wetland 2-41-B without creating an erosion problem. As the TR-55 calculations indicate,the discharge after construction will be significantly less than the current discharge rate for storm events greater than ten year frequency. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 06-06-00 SECTION: Public Hearing SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development Oakparke 2nd Addition Donald R.Uram I Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 11.27 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District • Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.99 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.66 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 11.27 acres into 31 lots and 4 outlots; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Board and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions), and • Direct staff to issue an early land alteration permit to Thompson Land Development proceed with construction at their own risk Synopsis This project is a replat of 20 existing twin home lots in the existing Eden Orchard PUD, and a subdivision of the adjacent Cole property into 10 twinhome lots and 1 single family lot. The project is•located south of Pioneer Trail, east of Dell Road, and west of Cedar Crest Drive. At the May 8, 2000 meeting,the Community Planning Board voted 8—0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. Background Information: The project requires two minor waivers for lot width less than 24 feet. Lot 1,Block 3 is 22.76 feet. Lot 2,Block 2 is 23.30 feet. The lot width waivers are needed in order to create an outlot for the construction of an 8-foot wide bituminous trail which will connect Harrison Drive and Cedar Crest Drive. Conservation easements are proposed for Outlots B and D. 1 Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 3. Community Planning Board Minutes dated May 8,2000 4. Staff Report dated May 5, 1999 5. Letter from Thompson Land Development 05-16-2000 • • oZ OAK PARKE 2ND ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT OF OAK PARKE 2ND ADDITION FOR THOMPSON LAND DEVELOPMENT • WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Board did conduct a public hearing on Oak Parke 2nd Addition PUD Concept Amendment by Thompson Land Development and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on June 6,2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Oak Parke 2nd Addition,being in Hennepin County,Minnesota,legally described as outlined in Exhibit A,is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval as outlined in the plans dated April 19, 2000. 3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Community Planning Board dated May 8,2000. • ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 6th day of June,2000. Jean L.Harris,Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A.Porta, City Clerk 3 Exhibit A Oak Parke 2nd Addition Legal Description: The south 290 feet of the east 752 feet as measured at right angles of the northwest quarter of the • northwest quarter of Section 29,Township 116,Range 22,Hennepin County,Minnesota. and Outlot C, Oak Parke 1st Addition according to the recorded plat thereof,Hennepin County, Minnesota. OAK PARKE 2ND ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • 'HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.2000- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT • OF OAK PARKE 2ND ADDITION FOR THOMPSON LAND DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of the Oak Parke 2nd Addition for Thompson Land Development dated April 19, 2000 and consisting of 11.27 acres into 31 lots and 4 outlots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 6th day of June, 2000. • Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: • Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk • COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES May 8,2000 Page 5 Brady Roland, resident of Goldridge Drive, asked whether there was a phase III planned. Meyer said Phase II would involve development on the hill and a picnic site. Roland asked whether it would be staffed properly and vegetation would be cared for. Clinton said he supports the Phase II plan. Brooks concurred. Nelson said shoreline setback variances are normally serious issues but a 148-foot setback should be ok. Foote agreed phase II was a good idea. Itwill encourage youth participation in the park. He would encourage mitigation of the parking situation prior to presentation to the Council. MOTION: by Clinton, seconded by Koenig, to close the public hearing. Motion carried, 8-0. MOTION: by Clinton, seconded by Nelson,to approve the PUD for Phase II of Hennepin Parks Development in Bryant Lake Park with the waiver specified as a shoreline setback of 148 feet for the restroom building; and prior to issuance of building permits Hennepin Parks will present a plan to mitigate the parking problem. Motion carried, 8-0. B. OAK PARKE 2ND ADDITION (Cole Property)by Thompson Land Development for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 11.27 acres of the 162.4 acres of Eden Orchard PUD,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.27 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 1.97 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.66 acres, and Preliminary Plat on 11.27 acres into 31 lots and 4 outlots. Location: 17251 Cedar Crest Drive. Chair Corneille opened the Public Hearing at 8:00 p.m. Franzen explained'this was a small addition to Eden Orchard PUD with 259 single family units, 118 townhomes, 56 twin homes. This is a replatting to add twin homes and a single family home. Council voted not to extend the road to Cedar Crest Drive, so there will be only a trail and utilities. COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES May 8,2000 Page 6 Lee Johnson of Thompson Land Development presented an overview of the PUD as acted upon a year ago. The area not addressed then was a 40 foot outlot for a trailway connection. The entrance was modified but will not add traffic or units to Cedar Crest Drive. There is a conservation easement;the developer is adding outlots to this.The single family lot is over 1 acre.This platting is consistent with the neighborhood concept, and a good use of land. Nelson questioned the amount of variance from the 24 foot requiement. Johnson said the frontage was 46 feet for both units and a departure of less than two feet. Nelson asked whether the turnaround was large enough for a schoolbus. Johnson said the cul de sac was standard residential design. • Gray said the cul de sac meets residential design radius of 90 feet and busses and emergency vehicles could turn around. Koenig asked about outlot D connecting to the existing outlot, and the easement. Johnson said outlot C would become a right of way for the City, and provide future potential Cedar Crest extension. It is dedicated as a right of way.A separate outlot piece will have utilities and a trailway connection;this will be owned by the association; a separate legal entity. • Franzen said staff recommendation approval, changes should change to list the exact waiver for each lot and Outlots B and D would be part of the conservation easement. A resident of 1719 Cedar Crest said she was next to Outlot D and expressed • concern about extending sewer and water to the existing home. Johnson said as part of the final plat utilities and city service would be extended. MOTION: by Koenig, seconded by Nelson,to close the public hearing. Motion carried 8-0. MOTION: by Stoelting, seconded by Clinton, to recommend to Council approval of the request based on staff recommendations as amended. • Motion carried 8-0. • STAFF REPORT TO: Community Planning Board FROM: Michael D.Franzen, City Planner DATE: May 5,2000 SUBJECT: OakParke 2nd Addition(Cole Property) APPLICANT/ OWNER: Thompson Land Development LOCATION: 17251 Cedarcrest Drive REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 11.27 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 11.27 acres. 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.99 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.66 acres 4. Preliminary Plat of 11.27 acres into 31 lots and 4 outlots. 1 •T , ,,a., ,&, - - as ob - RA, 1!u ' us,I _ 1301)c,\ _ I . a j, ' • 4 ci?7=s ue, F+335t++}'+#' L MO TH' ' . .1'r Q - ,fir"}" Irn ' .., �® �� s �s.. f 441* -.tpd1 ' \ ' ---.-.1Lr� • ulnas• CC V 0 , , .'‘,. 1 7. 1......_.: ..4•'•-r.. 6 . . 2. la .0.1, Et, 4. ..).0 . - :. 4•'' - •sa I s• ram..�..� . � -i'��• , Z: 7 t ill f . e . . ,a • ©1123 . $ 13,E u Z 'tket 7w at,,.. 4 . Ja ao Q .... IW i i t211 {Ti 4 t. VA i `. "0 «'." as :titer' ;j u,. • .bII . o u,..:{::.ti,: j . 4 m 0 111 lit way- R it1 • 'nal ta W • s • .......... ..........)t • :c uu• °b Ml 0 . 1 ; •\ • M ':•°".• Q *�ti Al10EDARCRf� '•y 120) '� mri=. 2 it St CEDARCREST ,N it`■ti -uwa•uir 44. • 2 ul I� '• 'i . -� w fOttirttel. S. ' cfc..• OW,a, • .. Aie• han ,...,.• . 41271 11: t . . • r,• • • 2 7 -, inn .4, S , • 1..4 1) ' o to 9 Staff Report—Oak Park 2nd Addition May 5,2000 DEVELOPMENT REQUEST This project includes the following: • A replat and PUD amendment of 20 existing twinhome lots currently guided medium density residential and zoned RM-6.5,which is part of the Eden Orchard Planned Unit Development, approved in 1998. • Ten additional twinhome lots(5 buildings)guided medium density and zoned rural. A rezoning to RM-6.5 is proposed. • One single-family lot, an existing home, guided low density residential and zoned rural. A rezoning to R1-13.5 is proposed. The 1998 approved Eden Orchard Planned Unit Development plan included 259 single-family homes, 118 townhomes, and 56 twinhomes on 158 acres. - PRELIMINARY PLAT The preliminary plat shows the subdivision of 11.27 acres into 30 twinhome lots and one single- family lot. The minimum lot size requirement for the twinhome lots is 3,000 square feet. All of the lots meet this requirement. The minimum lot width requirement is 24 feet.Proposed lots 1 and 2,Block 3 do - not meet this requirement. The lot width waiver is needed in order to create an outlot for the construction of an 8-foot wide bituminous trail which will connect Harrison Drive and Cedar Crest Drive. The minimum lot size requirement in the R1-13.5 district is 13,500 square feet. The single-family lot meets this requirement. This lot also meets the 85-foot minimum street frontage requirement. Right of way will be dedicated for the extension of Cedar Crest Drive. This will provide access to the land to the north between Cedar Forest and OakParke 2nd Addition. TREE PRESERVATION Tree preservation and replacement is calculated on the gross acres of this project and the Eden Orchard Planned Unit Development. There are 16,462 inches of significant trees. Tree loss is 28% 10 Staff Report—Oak Park 2114 Addition May 5,2000 or 4,639 inches. The required tree replacement is 1,736. UTILITIES The stormwater treatment pond is located in the southeast corner of the site,which will clean water before discharge through a pipe into Riley Creek. TRAILS • Until Cedar Crest Drive;is extended to serve the property to the north,there will be two driveways and a city trail connected to the existing cul de sac. After construction for the extension of utilities, the driveways will have to be relocated in order to provide a 5-foot separation between each driveway and the trail. The City trail will need to be signed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends approval of the following • Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 11.27 acres. • Planned Unit Development District Review on 11.27 acres. • Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.99 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.66 acres. • Preliminary Plat of 11.27 acres into 31 lots and 4 outlots. Approval is based on plans dated April 20,2000, and subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated May 5, 2000, and the following conditions. 1. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall install erosion control and tree protection fencing at the construction limits for review and approval by the City Engineer and City Forester. 2. Prior to any.building permit issuance: • A. The proponent shall pay the cash park fee. 3. The following waivers are approved through the PUD: A. Lot width of 22.76 feet for proposed Lot 1,Block 3 and 23.30 feet for proposed lot 2,Block 3. I I Staff Report—Oak Park 2nd Addition May 5,2000 4. Conservation easements over proposed Outlots B and D • • l2 ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES Minnesota's Enduring Standard of Value May 16,2000 Mr. Michael Franzen City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Re: Eden Orchard PUD Amendment-- Cole Property Dear Mr. Franzen: In conjunction with the PUD amendment to add and rezone the Cole property, we request that the preliminary plat approval and first reading of the rezoning include permission to allow grading of the site. Please advise if you need additional information. Very tru yours, ee W. J son Senior Vice President THOMPSON LAND DEVELOPMENT LWJ/jdh L 8421 Wayzata Boulevard,Suite 300 • Golden Valley,Minnesota 55426 763/544-7333 phone 763/544-9086 fax CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 06/06/00 SECTION: Public Hearings SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: Community Development ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: • Donald R. Uram Scott A.Kipp Welter's Trailhead �C Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 5.22 acres; and • Approve lst Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.22 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 5.22 acres into 4 single family lots, and 1 outlot; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Synopsis This project is for 4 single-family lots located at 9630 Crestwood Terrace. The Community Planning Board voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project to the City Council at its March 27, 2000 meeting. The City Council continued this item at its April 18, 2000 and May 2, 2000 meetings for the developer and City to work out cost sharing for storm sewer installation and erosion restoration. Background Information The property is not currently served by city sewer and water, but will be included in the Crestwood neighborhood Feasibility Study for sewer, water and street improvements, with construction of the improvements anticipated for late 2000. A 2.21 acre outlot will be gifted to the City by the developer. This area will be used for conservation of the Riley Creek corridor. The City will be installing a trail within the outlot along the east side of the property connecting to the trail approved for the Settlers Ridge development across Riley Creek. I City Council Agenda Welter's Trailhead Page 2 The following waivers will be necessary through the PUD: • Lot frontage of 76 feet for Lots 1 and 2. Code requires 85 feet. • Side yard structure setbacks of 5 feet minimum one side/total of 15 feet both sides, for Lots 3 and 4. Code requires 10 feet minimum one side/total of 25 feet both sides. These waivers may have merit for the following reasons: • The plan provides a 20-foot wide outlot along the east side of the property to accommodate the City trail. Without the outlot, all lot frontages would meet Code. • The nearest existing home is approximately 47 feet to the east of the proposed house pads. • 42% of the property is shown as conservation of the Creek corridor. As recommended in the staff report,the proposed storm sewer has been located into an area of active erosion,which will be corrected as part of the development. Cooperation from adjoining property owners may be needed. The Developer and Engineering staff has agreed on a cost sharing solution to address the storm sewer and existing ravine for the project site. The Developer will enter into an assessment agreement to participate in the costs for installing a storm sewer that would extend from the private rear yard storm sewer system to the creek within the ravine and repair of the ravine consisting of side slope repair and filling over the storm sewer. The Developer would be responsible for 50% of those costs,which have been estimated by the Developer's engineer to be $52,850, for a total share of $26,425. The City would contribute the remaining 50%of the costs. The storm sewer and ravine repair is anticipated to be constructed by the City concurrent with the project providing street, storm sewer and utility service to the Crestwood Terrace neighborhood and Welter's Trailhead. Attachments 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat • 3. Planning Board Minutes dated March 27, 2000 4. Staff Report dated March 24, 1999 WELTER'S TRAILHEAD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE H I NNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF WELTER'S TRAILHEAD FOR RAY AND CAROLE WELTER,JR. WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Board did conduct a public hearing on the Welter's Trailhead PUD Concept by Ray and Carole Welter,Jr., and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on June 6, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Welter's Trailhead, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated April 7, 2000. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Community Planning Board dated March 27,2000. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 6th day of June, 2000. • Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Exhibit A Welter's Trailhead Tract D, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1410, according to the registered survey thereof, Hennepin County,Minnesota. WELTER'S TRAILHEAD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2000- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WELTER'S TRAILHEAD FOR RAY AND CAROLE WELTER,JR. BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Welter's Trailhead dated April 7,2000, consisting of 5.22 acres into four lots and one outlot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council off-the 6th day of June, 2000. Jean L.Harris,Mayor . ATTEST: Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk 5 COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES March 27,2000 Page 9 B. WELTER'S TRAILHEAD By Ray and Carole Welter, Jr. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept review on 5.22 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.22 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.22 acres, and Preliminary Plat on 5.22 acres into 4 single-family lots, and 1 outlot. Location: 9630 Crestwood Terrace. Foote said this is a request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review. Dennis Marhula of Westwood Engineering, representing the developer, said the Welters are proposing to subdivide this property into 4 single-family lots. Also proposing to add an outlot which the Welters intend to gift to the City. The City will provide a trail along the east side of the property connecting to the trail approved for the Settlers Ridge development. They have read the Staff report and are in agreement with it. One item came up regarding the storm-sewer drainage. He has discussed that with Al Gray and will work out the issues prior to the City Council meeting. Foote said you are asking for waivers for Lots 3 and 4 for lot frontage and side yard setbacks. For the side yard, these setbacks would be 5 feet minimum on one side,with a total of 15 feet both sides. Stoelting said the surface drainage results in filtration of water over the surface and need for a storm-sewer system. He asked if there are plans for installation of a storm- sewer system. Marhula said yes,they would be installing a storm-sewer system. They will be taking storm water runoff and piping it down to the creek. The storm-sewer system runs down and follows the gully. Currently that gully is eroded and they plan to correct that with the storm-sewer installation. During the construction of the storm- sewer system the gully will be restored. Kipp said the property right now is not served by municipal services. A feasibility study is underway now that would expand services to these properties. The development is dependent on sewer and water being available to the site. The waivers requested for lot frontage and side yard structure setbacks for a few of the lots. Staff recommends approval of the project. Stoelting asked if there is an existing trail. Kipp replied this trail will connect to the trail being built in Settlers Ridge. The City will then construct across the creek and up to Crestwood Terrace. Stoelting asked how the trail would be surfaced. Fox replied Staff is currently looking at a 5-foot wide, hard-surface trail. It may have to go to 8 feet,however. It could be a concrete or asphalt surface. Koenig said the Board appreciates the gift of the property to the City, and being able to put in a trail is an improvement for the City. 6 COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES March 27,2000 Page 10 Foote asked what are the implications to the City of costs resulting from the over- sizing of the storm sewer. Gray replied they expect to work those details out with the proponent. He expects over-sizing costs will be significant, in order for it to serve this property and also to be large enough to handle some future uses. A cost-sharing plan may be worked out, or the City may pass the costs along to future developments that may occur. Foote asked if anyone present wished to address this project. Coleen Cavara, 9617 Crestwood Terrace, said her property is directly across from the development. Her concern was that people wanting to use the trail would park their cars in front of her property. Gray replied that the trail connects neighborhoods together. Most use of the trail would probably be by people like her who live in the neighborhood. Maureen Walker, 9650 Crestwood Terrace, asked who decides where the trail goes. She thought it would be a good idea to go through the wooded area. Fox replied the reason the location was selected is that it fit best with the contours of the land; and also they are trying to set aside the drainage erosion area. Coming along the side hills is the best location. It would be 20 feet easterly of the proposed development. Walker asked if Fox was the one walking the property the previous week. A person from the City told her the trail would be away from the gully area. Fox said he was not and didn't know who it was she talked to. • Walker also asked about side yard setbacks, with a minimum of 5 feet. Foote replied one side can be 5 feet and the other side would have to be 10 feet. Uram said the decision to locate the trail is based on a decision by the Engineering Staff, working with the developer's engineer. Staff would be happy to talk to Ms. Walker about that decision. Grenaire Kauduth, 9601 Crestwood Terrace, wanted clarification about the sewer and water connection. She asked if the connection would be taken to the development • through the orchard or if it would be coming down Crestwood Terrace. Gray replied • that Staff is looking at this end of the neighborhood being able to connect through the existing development with the smaller lots over to the apple orchard. The sewer to Ms. Kauduth's property will be available some time in the future. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Koenig, to close the public hearing. Motion • carried 6-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Koenig, to recommend to the City Council approval of Ray and Carole Welter Jr's request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.22 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.22 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.22 acres, COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD MINUTES March 27,2000 Page 11 and Preliminary Plat on 5.22 acres into 4 single-family lots, based on plans dated March 17,2000, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 24, 2000. Motion carried 6-0. Foote said he also wanted to thank the Welters for the outlot and for not developing the property to the fullest extent. U STAFF REPORT TO: Community Planning Board FROM: Scott A.Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: March 24,2000 SUBJECT: Welter's Trailhead APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Raymond N. and Carole Welter LOCATION: 9630 Crestwood Terrace REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.22 acres 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 5.22 acres 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.22 acres 4. Preliminary Plat on 5.22 acres into four lots, one outlot and road right-of-way • 1 4— , Z III•— —I _ f xx •'K• t�~i S Z IC�I�� Q ` / I t >. 12) (A) • 1 , • • / j A /1 > i a) .t.. ;,.,./.0:4:1 m;` t . r . l4 y �`tv I i 1. a N j 34.4 ..: lY 1 nucr s (W (6) /44e, .4" .442. 1 -?' ` _- Ar . war Mr"__ 7Y�' F swiart TRACT I "rTOUT c ` ) a # , tk� �S a) ( ) d) x" 44 (in line ) r� a tl7l la '''ku4 2: vii,.., �S i , , IL • 1,4 '��1f0) V!(�' *Attdi --#.- S4 - f4i3i . :'i M •• d 4.,.„, .... ' lin - ::' '4 r "V- ♦•• • • • • (20) sar«rrt Tsai 1 a v Q itia fi t,t . • 1• A� Di _ In Dal rs • *. 1' s101' ui' s (2 , .1 . 11,112W ........ SI 44t1 4P5 14.444::. 1 241V, 2... • t , ... ' *1 :LI -.. l' - 11111114 -.....1•71. a-G rl.K 1. 2i147 •• ., t - • i � ��J�jj(���: I 2 tAZI) 401 . OIS, erf4f 'I,° ' /O °°' _�.' Staff Report Welter's Trailhead March 24,2000 BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows this property as low density residential for up to 2.5 units per acre. The property is currently zoned Rural. Surrounding land use is low density residential, with Rural to the north and west,R1-22 to the east and R1-9.5 to the southwest across Riley Creek,which abuts the property. The property is not currently served by city sewer and water, but will be included in the Crestwood neighborhood feasibility study for sewer,water and street improvements,with construction of the improvements anticipated for late 2000. PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposal is to rezone the 5.22 acre site from Rural to R1-13.5, and plat four single-family lots and one outlot. The density of the project is 0.76 units per acre, consistent with the area. Lot size ranges between 19,205 sq. ft. and 37,573 sq. ft.,with an average lot size of 30,315 sq. ft. The minimum lot size required by City Code is 13,500 square feet. The property is located within 300 feet of Riley Creek and is considered a Shoreland Area. None of the lots are within 150 feet of the creek and are not considered abutting lots. A small portion of the property is considered bluff as defined in the Shoreland Code but will not be affected by the development. A 2.21 acre outlot is shown for conservation of the Riley Creek corridor. It is the intent of the developer to gift the outlot to the City. The City will be installing a trail along the east side of the property connecting to the trail approved for the Settlers Ridge development across Riley Creek. Williams Pipeline crosses the northeast corner of the site. All homes are located outside the pipeline easement. The following waivers will be necessary through the PUD: • Lot frontage of 76 feet for Lots 1 and 2. Code requires 85 feet. • Side yard structure setbacks of 5 feet minimum one side/total of 15 feet both sides, for Lots 3 and 4. Code requires 10 feet minimum one side/total of 25 feet both sides. These waivers may have merit for the following reasons: • The plan provides a 20-foot wide outlot along the east side of the property to accommodate the City trail. Without the outlot, all lot frontages would meet Code. • The nearest existing home is approximately 47 feet to the east of the proposed house pads. • 42% of the property is shown for conservation of the Creek corridor. 1/( Staff Report Welter's Trailhead March 24,2000 GRADING AND TREE LOSS Minimal grading will be necessary to establish the walkout house pads, and install utilities. A total of 472 diameter inches of significant trees are on the site. No significant trees will be lost with the four single-family lot development. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer will serve the property as part of the Crestwood neighborhood road and utility improvement currently being reviewed through a feasibility study,with anticipated construction in late 2000. All roof drainage from the proposed houses will be collected in the storm sewer system leading to Riley Creek. The proposed alignment of the storm sewer will result in the loss of significant trees, and does not correct an active erosion problem along the east side of the property. The better solution would be for the proponent to relocate the storm sewer into the area of erosion, and to correct the active erosion problem. This would also save the significant trees. Cooperation from adjoining property owners maybe needed. RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approval of: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.22 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.22 acres • Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.22 acres • Preliminary Plat on 5.22 acres into 4 single-family lots, and 1 outlot This approval is based upon plans dated March 17, 2000, subject to the staff report dated March 24, 2000, and the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review,the proponent shall revise the location of the storm sewer pipe to Riley Creek along the easterly property line in the area of the ravine. 2. Prior to Final plat approval, the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District, including plans for restoration of the active erosion along the east property line. 3. The proponent indicates that Outlot A will be gifted to the City for conservation of the creek corridor. This should take place concurrent with the final plat release for the property. 4. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall install erosion control and tree Staff Report Welter's Trailhead March 24,2000 protection fencing at the construction limits for review and approval by the City Engineer and City Forester. 5. Prior to any building permit issuance: A. City sanitary sewer and water must be extended to serve the property. B. The proponent shall pay the cash park fee. 6. The following waivers are approved through the PUD: A. Lot frontage of 76 feet for Lots 1 and 2. Code requires 85 feet. • B. Side yard structure setbacks of 5 feet minimum one side/total of 15 feet both sides, for Lots 3 and 4. Code requires 10 feet minimum one side/total of 25 feet both sides. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6,2000 SECTION: Public Hearing SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Vacation 00-04 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement in David Olson Part of Bearpath Second Addition . .D , Requested Action Move to: 1. Close the public hearing 2. Adopt the resolution vacating the drainage and utility easements as described in the resolution Synopsis The Property owner has requested this vacation to remove underlying drainage and utility easements from the property to enable the combination of lots. The property received final plat approval by the City Council on May 2, 2000, as Stringer Addition. Replacement easements have been dedicated on the new plat. Attachments Vacation Drawings: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN PART OF BEARPATH SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, The City of Eden Prairie has a certain drainage and utility easements described as follows: All existing drainage and utility easements as delineated within Lots 10 and 11, Block 6, Bearpath Second Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on May 6, 2000 after due notice was given to affected property owners and published in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 6, 2000. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk Mt� 4 -, 0 glf . stAsfer I y ` ti ""00, a' • / s ! 1........,,,.._--,,, ‘ 4 a `5;!..41.Ilk - %f r " • _ 3[s ".r L.�� �e • R •Cf 'i 1•.9•«H fell TO ; , F s i* . p ' 12 : +el ; '• '14 a i 3i. • i 7- � i •�OC�P•4oa qt'hA.f,•r y .. il , i - 0 - `w 0�..•. g4> "� N 1: . .A l''', ... r' • • tA�f• y . ♦ * ® • f r • h C . aQ /,s I P 4 1'� d" • Cg o I e t NT �L uwo. •. • RI • • - Apt: • � SQv I //e ..raux•' • Mfa,M �.::`. . O M Pc.). O •-j f14R.fw Rt P1 O� # 'V L e ~p.4?-s Qo Y s -a 1ems,. . . . �� rSTfb! I `'.NI ..,..,:.. , -,„ ..,, .. sty ' �4si.� D . • ..,..,,,, ,,,..„,._,,. .:.. ,„. ..„,„,.....,, .. .., tv, •.:, -'4 J., "4. 4 p Q 111111; wow • W-__.... 4yta� . — Vie,,• :.rr .s ,. 'I ; b. r .....t ,j,,a,i Vv.,...',.V.ot:,I .:.' . \t1 - lQ 0v r 153H 91LO9Z "0 �1.7 vgems R•• _ i' -7 0_- u, S WT[. v ,y �V ,sd� 1 Ma 12; ! -s •_' B ' o . 0cg• - - a N. a .. 1 Ora ! . - .. ;1.,,..:-: 41,1.'^f. 0 0 ' . _el -1.' 4 - . ,...,...: .....,_ ••••_,...., • . . , . ....,\ .. . ..,, ,...*.:.4. - • •. .. 1 11 w C ~,i�• f assx s3n3•• i. ®CAI -- V:, .. ' , ,..3, 1 ..t. ' - . 1 f, .. , i s' _o , i 1•. ul ,IA 4 •• ••• ..... '.1 ...z...0....q_ _____ :: 222 nLSSWL6)III nof-CA(Ls)Saw -sM-+. Iw•• WWII 1aYaCl C3S MM3 OR1 'I CO l•Cl SIDI d !MS M1"1..1 Its 1t421 W a71C7SL Y N Sga /1 � � wr..w+www11 '0xtxJ.s MO! 2303 ZZ wm k 4n ►n Z7 O^ '3U1 `11IH '1 S2UJE(' L _=.- 101110v Dxn s S o `° w d- w`.,. `.—.."�. ' NOLL iHDS Q Q HDZ..'�S ¢ m U a G 1 T, 0 1 _ 0 F F 0 ;E 2.r s 9z� r•a E 1 z ems " E Kr==C c.CrJ . s 3S� pl p > 'a Eli a 2 - �mz `� I x• id -- 6 rmo 24= 8 d 3^ t0 0 . �95 -E.s q m • • I 'I I I I I I I I I I I • I i I 0... T L.V 12 I I I �`'c I I I I w I. 220.16 N01.56'13'W 1 , —_ r. 1 0 —I ; — : m 1 23 I I � I ir! 3 C3 oW I 1 .�- isI Z F- U 11 I '° () L..J 1 1 ~ �`-J- ^ t- (.110 - b 1 I —s :c a. \ Y +�: I 52203p p0� '��� i1 8 al ill _ \\ a \ 2 S \ m s To 1. 0 \ S0\ (�, 1.N C \ w \ 1,I0 /t \\ \ bej 1 0 y \ \ 1 \ O / \\\ \ \ J \ \ / \ \ / ,cL \ �; \\ •• \ / o ti4 / \ Q i• 4 `i1 \ �� 'a``n / `�cP () `L \ 1 4' \ SCR 4 I Iii di a =z li z i II z I 3�x j- r. x a �1 0 z i s A J u4 .rr $ 3 a1 1 pp L WI Q `114 U 9 i I A IA lit as 3 hi , g 3 < Irst Y � l e11 � p s� � ILI i 1;•a 1 a 51 0 I01 " 5qa A• i ! 1 -11 lC A gu I I ku 1 I YC A 9 fl Fi q �' �' A 6 I y d d I 3 a b g - o • i I I d II I a'� d 7 - A e p d g A A 3' .) a �d� $� 'S' I d Pj 5a a 4 I a ( d�3 ��� q ; 6-' 3 ® � d' » j a I�� a ;HI • F x 1. 9 1 - 3 Ait= 1 ill I ® . I a 3Aa d I= g 1 ; -" - ib ..7 th Mb-1 :"."2..2 ' t i .3 3 C s 3`} a ••A t s - a s a 1' a {„-w �Ba ill?, M �a 4 w. I a I o 3n Z I �� I W�" I -ate W Hsi re I + I•- C0 - A W I— ' 1 C� I �= Wa I I Ic I E] en 220.16 NO1'56.13'W z C] W• po 1 I E 71 I W 3 c�� cj 3 =_md II *7' I.- 1 �N ▪ - I I '— F I 2 I- Z= , 0 I ) F- -0e•t \/ c) \ mo ss ��\ W m� \ • / / \ • . / „� d \\ m —1 / -r, \ 0 ° \ / .' / ''L \ y` .10 \ / k14ry �\{) y 3 3 3 o- y n W a'E -,,\ Cd6- / oQ° c» _ , � _ o �W ta \ / \9 F- J i o 01 o �a.� ion R" =36 >! \./ C] gz L I_.l.---.1 zuo,5, i \{� \ x I I r1W=.g 3.- r. oo--I \ a ism uz V CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6,2000 SECTION: Public Hearing SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 99-5491 ITEM NO.: Engineering Services Order Improvements and Prepare Plans and Alan D. Gray Specifications for Cedar Forest First Addition TEC Street and Utility Improvements Requested Action Move to: 1. Close the public hearing 2. Adopt the resolution Synopsis This project will provide lateral street and utility improvements to approximately 45 residential properties in and adjacent Cedar Forest First Addition as well as utility improvements benefiting approximately 18 land parcels in the area around Cedar Forest First Addition. In developing the study, staff has had two neighborhood meetings and mailed out two surveys to assess property owner opinions. The meetings were attended by approximately 30 people. The primary concern has been cost. Property owners have been aware of the previous $15,000 assessment cap and have expressed a desire to maintain the current amount. Based on the most recent meeting and survey, staff expects substantial neighborhood support for the project. Background Information Details are provided in the Feasibility Study Attachments Feasibility Study CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 16th day of May, 2000, fixed the 6th day of June, 2000, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 99-5491: Cedar Forest First Addition Street and Utility Improvements WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council Hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 6th day of June, 2000, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvements, with the assistance of SEH, consulting engineers. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 6, 2000. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen A. Porta, City Clerk F:IGROUPSIENGINEERlSSA\COUNCIL 20001995491 Cedar Forest Public Hearing.doc My name is Rodney Volk 17141 Cedarcrest Dr Eden Prairie, Mn 55347 We live on Parcel 36 of the proposed Cedar Forest improvement plan. I write to ask your support in obtaining approval for the • proposed street and utility improvements to the Cedar Forest addition. • While a lower assessment would be appreciated, the time is now for the improvements to be made and our addition brought up to thra ctan'1ards of the rest of the city. If any of us on the hat. we e confronted with a well gone dry because the water table lowered and we had to redo our wells or obtain some other source of water, we would certainly be at city hall looking for this improvement to be made as quickly as possible. Now is the time for the improvements. Thank you for your time and support. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Payment of Claims June 6,2000 SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development and Payment of Claims -Dr Financial Services/Don Uram Requested Action Move to: Approve the Payment of Claims as submitted (roll call vote) Synopsis Checks 87211-87837 Wire transfers 000342-000351 Background Information • Attachments COUNCIL CHFCK SUMMARY 01-JUN-2000 (16:17) DIVISION TOTAL N/A $14,670.01 . CONTINGENCY $72.63 LEGISLATIVE $744.22 LEGAL COUNSEL $40,983.80 CUSTOMER SERVICE $23,991.36 BENEFITS $1,723.94 TECHNOLOGY $20,313.43 FINANCE $4,715.00 HUMAN RESOURCES $5,088.81 COMMUNICATIONS $935.02 CITY CLERK $159.75 HUMAN SERV $7,295.50 RISK MANAGEMENT $1,990.08 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION $98,174.41 ENGINEERING $4,209.84 INSPECTIONS $91.42 FACILITIES $43,018.58 CIVIL DEFENSE $50.24 POLICE $28,716.04 FIRE $19,934.87 ANIMAL CONTROL $704.00 PARK ADMIN $610.38 STREETS/TRAFFIC $38,072.59 PARK MAINTENANCE $17,979.57 • PARKS CAPITAL $4,579.50 STREET LIGHTING $51,558.54 FLEET SERVICES $50,691.71 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $14,188.01 COMMUNITY DEV $6,018.11 COMMUNITY CENTER $19,947.53 BEACHES $605.02 HISTORICAL $60.00 YOUTH RECREATION $6,476.96 SPECIAL EVENTS $490.99 ADULT RECREATION $5,126.60 RECREATION ADMIN $1,778.13 ADAPTIVE REC $66.56 OAK POINT POOL $1,803.84 ARTS $525.00 PARK FACILITIES $907.50 PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ $175,956.32 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $575.00 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS $113,194.44 CITY CENTER $4,510.41 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $375.85 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR STORE $104,001.89 PRAIRIEVIEW LIQUOR STORE $140,331.25 DEN ROAD LIQUOR STORE $218,376.02 TRUST FUNDS $74,800.00 WATER DEPT $154,256.04 SEWER DEPT $195,301.79 STORM DRAINAGE $1,461.69 AGENCY FUNDS $6,083.38 EQUIPMENT $60,150.90 $1,788,444.47* COUNCIL CHECK REGISxEt 01-JUN-2000 (16 • CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87211 $105.95 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87212 $1,563.11 BFLLROY CORPORATION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87214 $1,077.10 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 -87215 $4,963.60 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87216 , $2,102.81 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87217 $12,416.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87218 $91.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87219 $14,181.61 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87221 $7,054.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87223 $1,503.69 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87224 $2,920.26 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87225 $393.40 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87226 $133.20 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87227 ' $193.95 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87228 $83.60 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87229 $7,006.57 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87231 $675.97 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING MISC NON-TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87232 $4,300.63 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87233 $8,258.94 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87234 $420.05 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87235 $744.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87236 $227.55 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRIBUTING PRINTING PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87237 $68.92 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87238 $484.00 AUSTRALIAN ESTATES WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87239 $134.00 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87240 $652.85 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87242 $8,422.05 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87243 $219.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87244 $13,987.59 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE- IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 .87247 • $5,026.10 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87248 $276.15 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87249 ' $43.20 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87250 $2,542.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87252 $7,664.29 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87255 $2,263.30 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87256 $363.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE IMPORTED PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87257 $1,803.26 1ST IND. REALTY TRUST ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER WATER DEPT 87258 $79.80 BAHR, JENNIFER CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 87259 $50.00 BLACK, JOHN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 87260 $238.55 FREY, LYNDELL MILEAGE AND PARKING COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 87261 $234.28 GE CAPITAL RENTALS GENERAL 87262 $50.00 GLENDENNING, JILL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL . ICE SHOW 87263 $93.00 GUNDERSON, JEANNETTE LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 87264 $80.00 GUSTAD, MARK M. CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 87265 $25.00 •HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER LICENSES & TAXES GENERAL 87266 $18.00 HOWE-PULLIS, JOAN LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 87267 $1,475.65 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI UNION DUES WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 87268 $30.00 JOHNSON, JOLYNN LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 87269 $14.38 KRESS, CARLA TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 87270 $150.00 LIONS TAP REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES SOFTBALL 87271 $23.25 LOHAN, LESLIE LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 87272 $15.00 MPPOA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE 87273 $4.00 MRS. ARETZ LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 87274 $273.00 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE W/H FD 10 ORG 87275 $150.00 OBERLANDER, CHRISTINE SCHOOLS FIRE 3 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-JUN-2000 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87276 $983.20 ORDWAY MUSIC THEATRE SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 87277 $165.73 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT POSTAGE GENERAL 87278 $54,278.15 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 87279 $50.78 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 87280 $100.00 RAMUNNO, JANE REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 87281 $30.00 SHERWIN, JULIE LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 87282 $75.00 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- ADVERTISING COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 87283 $1,161.00 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 87284 $2,655.89. US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87286 $100.00 WESTERBERG, RICH REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 87287 $100.00 WILLIAMS, JIM REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 87288 $143.55 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRIBUTING MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87289 $1,542.63 POSTMASTER POSTAGE WATER ACCOUNTING 87290 $7.02 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE TELEPHONE POLICE 87291 $4.46 AT&T TELEPHONE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87292 $2,125.23 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 87293 $225.00 HENNEPIN PARKS EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 87294 $46.16 JASMINE Z. KELLER GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 87295 $1,223.62 MINN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 87296 $4,351.15 MINNEGASCO GAS FIRE STATION #5 87298 $45.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFET BIKE REGISTRATIONS FD 10 ORG 87299 $55,416.79 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 87300 $103.28 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10.ORG 87301 $3,019.64 RICHFIELD, CITY OF AUTOS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87302 $1,256.95 WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 87303 $107.77 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87304 $2,429.82 BELLBOY CORPORATION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87306 $838.30 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87307 $1,732.10 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS • 87308 $2,715.99 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87310 $12,128.55 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87311 $1,238.99 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87312 $16,236.04 GRIGGS COOPER & CO BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87315 $14,172,80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS • 87319 $1,435.27 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87320 $1,816.80 'MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87321 $758.51 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87322 $372.42 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87323 $821.74 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87324 $138.14 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87325 $7,453.55 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87328 $518.22 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87329 $3,156.19 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87330 $10,893.15 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87331 $988.60 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87332 $1,590.00 WINE MERCHANTS INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87333 $317.90 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87334 $1,144.37 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC. WASTE DISPOSAL FIRE STATION #3 87335 $85.00 BLAYLOCK PLUMBING CO CASH OVER/SHORT FD 10 ORG 87336 $40.00 BOLD, PAULINE INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 87337 $500.00 CARLSON, PAUL SCHOOLS IN SERVICE TRAINING 87338 $120.00 CODE ADMINISTRATION & INSPECTI REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 87339 $85.00 SLANDER MECHANICAL CASH OVER/SHORT FD 10 ORG 87340 $525.00 ERICKSON, RICHARD OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 87341 $190.86 ESBENSEN, GEORGE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE L4 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-JUN-2000 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87342 $44.00 FIRESIDE CORNER MECHANICAL PERMIT FD 10 ORG 87343 $477.72 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 87344 $196.51 GE CAPITAL RENTALS GENERAL 87345 $10.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEF ASS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE 87346 $342.85 HENNEPIN COUNTY I/T DEPT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT INFORMATION SYSTEM 87347 $168.18 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S ACCT COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 87348 $430.65 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 87349 $2,792.72 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER - AC BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 87350 $100.00 HENNEPIN PARKS EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 87351 $43.23 KLUTE, JOEL MILEAGE AND PARKING ICE ARENA 87352 $105.00 LINDAHL, DAVID SCHOOLS IN SERVICE TRAINING 87353 $757.14 METALS JOINING LAB CO INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87354 $70.83 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 87355 $40.92 MINNCOMM PAGING COMMUNICATIONS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87356 $250.00 MISTY & FRIENDS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 87357 $10.00 NORBLOM PLUMBING CO. CASH OVER/SHORT, FD 10 ORG 87358 $200.00 NORWEST.BANK MN N.A. PAYING AGENT B & I PAYMENTS 87359 . $75.00 OTTERNESS, RON INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 87360 $2,585.86 POSTMASTER POSTAGE GENERAL 87361 $8,333.84 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87363 $2,010.00 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87364 $21.90 STAR TRIBUNE MISC NON-TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87365 $33.05 THORBURN, BERNICE L. ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER WATER DEPT 87366 $3,922.75 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS POLICE 87367 $169.63 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE TELEPHONE SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 87368 $125.00 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMER MISCELLANEOUS IN SERVICE TRAINING 87369 $40.00 M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC MISC NON-TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87370 $46.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH LICENSES & TAXES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 87371 $290.00 STEVE SCHMIT PLUMBING PLUMBING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 87372 $310.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87373 $1,175.43 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, BELLEVUE TELEPHONE HUMAN RESOURCES 87374 $2,206.12 ARCH PAGING COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 87375 $50.70 BACH, BARBARA MILEAGE AND PARKING INSPECTION-ADMIN 87376 $2,895.38 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC DEPOSITS ESCROW 87377 $250.00 CENTRAL REGION IPMA-US CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 87378 $3,590.65 CONVERGENT COMMUNICATIONS SRVC TELEPHONE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87379 $188.00 DAKOTA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT DEPOSITS ESCROW 87380 $60.00 GORDON, LOWELL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 87381 $14.00 HANSON, KATHERINE_ ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 87382 $200.00 HASSELBRING, JANET REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 87383 $3.00 HIRSCH, AMY SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87384 $25.00 .COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MINNESOTA I OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87385 $50.64 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 87386 $32.00 KRYCH, KARRIE LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 87387 $981.08 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC PROTECTIVE CLOTHING WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87388 $175.00 MBC PRESENTATIONS SCHOOLS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87389 $2,772.00 MRPA SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SOFTBALL 87390 $3.00 NIEMANN, NEUSA SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87391 $130.00 OBAR, DREW SPECIAL EVENTS FEES VOLLEYBALL 87392 $94.25 HELLING, LAURIE MILEAGE AND PARKING RECREATION ADMIN 87393 $30.00 PALKERT, BARB LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 87394 $32.00 SCHACHT, LISA LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 87395 $600.71 SCHRAM, SCOTT INSURANCE RISK MANAGEMENT 87396 $1,826.84 SNELL MECHANICAL INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 87397 $4.34 STOCKWELL, MARNIE ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER WATER. DEPT 5 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-JUN-2000 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87398 $200.00 THEOBALD, WILLIAM REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 87399 $24.00 WALKER, MARLEE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 87400 $30.00 WHITMORE, MOLLY LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 87401 $55.00 WOLFE, SUSAN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 87402 $3.00 ZUMI, EDITS SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87403 $78.90 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC. WASTE DISPOSAL FIRE STATION #2 87404 $520.00 BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF KENNEL SERVICE ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 87405 $51.50 CRACAUER, CLIFF AUTOS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87406 $100.00 HASSELBRING, JANET REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 87407 $9,706.00 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC STORMWATER LIFTSTATION 87408 $12,095.23 RELIANT ENERGY RETAIL INC. GAS EPCC MAINTENANCE 87409 $100.00 SORENSEN, ARDYCE REFUNDS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 87410 $100.00 STENSRUD, KIRK REFUNDS• ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 87411 $86.16 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN MTKA GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FIRE STATION #3 87412 $891.90 ALL SAINTS BRANDS DISTRIBUTING MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87413 $156.20 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87414 $823.04 BELLBOY CORPORATION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87415 $498.80 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87416 $6,610.96 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87417 $4,345.20 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87419 $13,316.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87420 $13,539.02 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87422 $22,641.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87426 $2,136.01 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87427 $19,984.86 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR#3 87429 $548.81 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87430 $380.67 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87431 $2,223.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87433 $84.06 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87434 $12,258.05 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87438 $881.16 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87439 $2,830.53 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87441 $38,969.28 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87442 $177.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC TRANSPORTATION PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87443 $292.80 WORLD CLASS WINES INC TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87444 $646.45 PRIOR WINE COMPANY TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87445 $120.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87446 $47.00 ANDERSON, LAVERNE SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROD FEES ADULT PROGRAM 87447 $27.96 AT&T TELEPHONE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 87448 $189.82 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87449 $650.90 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87450 $413.60 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 87451 $13,416.40 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87453 $60.00 HVER FARMS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION 87454 $875.56 HELLERS CARBONIC WEST CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87455 $7.25 KLEVE HEATING CASH OVER/SHORT FD 10 ORG 87456 $35,458.80 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION 87457 $21,358.65 MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSU BLDG RENTAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87459 $2,036.00 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL 87460 $74,052.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DUE TO OTHER GOVNT UNITS SAC AGENCY FUND 87461 $34.70 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS PRINTING POLICE 87462 $7,184.10 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER BLDG SURCHARGES BUILDING SURCHARGE 87463 $23.00 MPCA LICENSES & TAXES SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 87464 $71.25 OLSON, THOR ADULT RESIDENT MEMBERSHIP COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 87465 $230.92 POSTMASTER POSTAGE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 6 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-JUN-2000 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87466 $885.28 PRAIRIE HILL EVANGELICAL FREE DEPOSITS ESCROW 87467 $7,487.65 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87469 $40.00 ROSWEL, DIANNE INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 87470 $9.78 UTING, BRENDA MILEAGE AND PARKING REC.SUPERVISOR 87471 $783.75 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 87472 $3.29 AT&T TELEPHONE HUMAN RESOURCES _ 87473 $5,561.17 CB RICHARD ELLIS UTILITIES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87474 - $17.00 CLEVELAND, BOB ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG PRESCHOOL EVENTS 87475 $325.63 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY SUPPLIES RISK MANAGEMENT 87476 $129.02 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 87477 $105.62 CRACAUER, CLIFF MILEAGE AND PARKING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87478 $325.00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LICENSES & TAXES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 87479 $104.00 DIETZ, EUGENE LICENSES & TAXES IN SERVICE TRAINING 87480 $570.00 EPHS NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87481 $52.30 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE GENERAL 87482 $237.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS RECORDING DOCUMENT FEE ENGINEERING DEPT 87483 $27.20 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE 87484 $219.48 HENNEPIN COUNTY WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE 87485 $166.45 HOME DEPOT/GECF OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 87486 $934.68 ICI DULUX PAINT CTRS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87487 $35.00 KRAUSE, ROBERT FAMILY RESIDENT MEMBERSHIP COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 87488 $29.73 LAMBERT, BOB OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK/REC ADMIN 87489 $490.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS INSURANCE RISK MANAGEMENT 87490 $45.00 MASWCD CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 87491 $33.93 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SR CTR OPERATIONS 87492 $7,184.10 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER BLDG SURCHARGES BUILDING SURCHARGE 87493 $375.00 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. PAYING AGENT 92 STATE AID DEBT 87494 $19.60 QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER POSTAGE GENERAL 87495 $32.00 ROMAN,' NHULANG LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 87496 $40.00 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CENTER INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87497 $12.25 PARAGON CABLE CABLE TV COMMUNITY SERVICES 87498 $365.92 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87499 $5,846.18 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE FIRE 87500 $165.00 WEATHER WATCH INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SNOW & ICE CONTROL 87501 $98.80 ACE ICE COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87502 $37.03 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87503 $4,226.70 BELLBOY CORPORATION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87505 $10,583.77 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87506 $754.41 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87507 $3,890.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87508 $352.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87509 $6,519.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87510 $2,035.63 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87512 $1,900.68 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87513 $2,665.26 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87514 $139.60 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87515 $112.55 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87516 $36.00 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87517 $169.07 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87518 $881.51 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87520 $640.28 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87521 $2,394.93 PRIOR WINE COMPANY WINE.DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87523 $6,822.10 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87524 $484.05 WINE COMPANY, THE TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87525 $138.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 • COUNCIL CHEC REGISTER K 01-JUN-2000 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87526 $171.49 AT&T TELEPHONE GENERAL 87527 $6.00 BLANKENSHIP, JOHN SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87528 $64.00 BOND, LISA LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 87529 $1,850.00 BRANDL ANDERSON HOMES INC. SPECIAL EVENTS FEES PARK ACQUISITION & DEV'P 87530 $82.01 BRUENING, CHARLOTTE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SR CTR OPERATIONS 87531 $75.00 ECKENROD, KARLA OUTDOOR CENTER PARK FACILITIES 87532 $44.00 FIRESIDE CORNER MECHANICAL PERMIT FD 10 ORG 87533 $2,497.24 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 87534 $22.10 JANSEN, TANYA MILEAGE AND PARKING HUMAN RESOURCES 87535 $140.00 JORGENSEN, DORTHY OUTDOOR CENTER PARK FACILITIES . 87536 $92.00 KIRSCH, SUE LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS ' 87537 $60.98 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87538 $187,384.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME WASTE DISPOSAL SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 87539 $9.56 MINNESOTA UC FUND UNEMPLOYMENT COMP BENEFITS 87540 $62.14 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC DOUGLAS/MORE HOUSE 87541 $177.58 PETTY CASH OFFICE SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 87542 $187.57 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING MECHANICAL PERMIT FD 10 ORG 87543 $109.18 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY REPAIR& MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87544 $12,387.38 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87546 $82.00 RAIRAMO, DIXIE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG DAY CAMP 87547 $120.00 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION MISCELLANEOUS IN SERVICE TRAINING 87548 $264.00 SIR, AMY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 87549 $177.00 SNYDER, ROXANNE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 87550 $415.00 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS AWARDS FINANCE DEPT 87551 $45.00 JOHNSON, TARA INSTRUCTOR SERVICE SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 87552 $94,723.38 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC TRAFFIC SIGNALS 87558 $75.00 OTTERNESS, RON INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 87559 $1,249.33 RADCO NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE • 87560 $120.00 SOLEE, LEE INSTRUCTOR SERVICE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87561 $350.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA/MATERIALS M DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87562 $11.65 PARAGON CABLE CABLE TV COMMUNITY SERVICES 87563 $3,000.00 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE GENERAL 87564 $2,961.05 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE FIRE 87565 $5.74 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER , OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 87566 $61.12 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87567 $1,761.64 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC. GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FIRE STATION #1 87568 $176.79 ADDED FLAIR INSTRUCTOR SERVICE PRESCHOOL EVENTS 87569 $1,943.20 ADVERTISING INCENTIVES CLOTHING & UNIFORMS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87570 $75.00 ALAN SHILEPSKY CONSULTING INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87571 $219.02 ALPHA WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTERS POLICE 87572 $258.37 AMERICAN PRESSURE INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87573 $734.75 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI SAFETY SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL . 87574 $1;-021.94 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 87575 $992.02 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY PRINTING PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 87576 $509.60 AQUA CITY PLUMBING AND HEATING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 87577 $434.75 AQUA LOGIC INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES POOL MAINTENANCE 87578 $5,591.26 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87579 $152.30 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY IN NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87580 $251.31 AUTO ELECTRIC SPECIALISTS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87581 $304.50 AUTOMATED ENTRANCE PRODUCTS IN CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 87582 $803.74 BACHMANS CREDIT DEPT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT • EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 87583 $83.95 BADGE A MINIT PRINTING SENIOR AWARENESS N16 87584 $2,683.50 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY DESIGN & CONST BAC TREE PLANTING PROJECT 87585 $168.10 BATTERY STORE INC, THE OPERATING SUPPLIES-G"E.NERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 87586 $1,029.52 BADER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY TIRES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-JUN-2000 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87587 $11,248.60 BEARCOM OTHER EQUIPMENT FIRE 87588 $749.76 BENIEK, BRIAN GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FIRE STATION #2 87589 $150.00 BERNE SCALE EQUIP TESTING & CERTIFICATION WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87590 $48.00 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 87591 $9,194.33 BIFFS INC WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE 87594 $2,036.68 BILL CLARK OIL CO INC LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87595 $320.08 BLR INC TRAINING SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 87596 $255.32 BRIM NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 87597 $61.50 BROADWAY AWARDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 87598 $223.65 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL • TRAFFIC SIGNALS 87599 $1,202.50 BROWN, PAUL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK FACILITIES 87600 $84.10 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES • 87601 $309.92 C&H DISTRIBUTORS INC CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87602 $43.53 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87603 $2,971.13 CEMSTONE ASPHALT OVERLAY STREET MAINTENANCE 87604 $1,060.69 CENTRAIRE INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS MAINTENANCE BUILDING 87605 $645.00 CHAD NESTOR ILLUSTRATION & DES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNITY SERVICES 87606 $969.68 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87608 $36,916.00 CHESLEY TRUCK SALES AUTOS P/W REVOLVING FUND 87609 $101.90 CHIEF SUPPLY CONTRACTED REPAIR &'MAINT POLICE 87610 $660.30 CLAREYS INC EQUIP TESTING & CERTIFICATION SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87611 $163.32 CLARKLIFT OF MINNESOTA INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87612 $117.58 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87613 $50.00 CONVERGENT COMMUNICATIONS SRVC TELEPHONE GENERAL 87614 $5,625.00 CORNERSTONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL COUSEL 87615 $1,856.20 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 87616 $23.87 CROWN MARKING INC OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 87617 . $137.16 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE MISCELLANEOUS POLICE 87618 $105.00 CUT & FILL INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINTENANCE 87619 $14,669.31 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87620 $7,567.45 CY'S UNIFORMS CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 87621 $153.36 D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY CO SAFETY SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87622 $6,534.36 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW AND UBAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES GUIDE PLAN 87623 $363.00 DALCO ROOFING &•SHEET METAL IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE . 87624 $895.06 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 87625 $63.90 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE • LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL ' STREET MAINTENANCE 87626 $1,645.50 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 87627 $279.70 DARTNELL CORPORATION, THE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 87628 $345.59 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87629 $724.44 DECORATIVE DESIGNS INC CONTRACTED BLDG MAINT EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 87630 $5,555.04 DELL MARKETING L.P. COMPUTERS INFORMATION SYSTEM 87631 $2D.00 CODE ADMINISTRATION & INSPECTI LICENSES & TAXES POLICE STATION 87632 $390.00 DESAULNIERS, DAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 87633 $1,276.15 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 87634 $988.75 DNR EMBROIDERY AWARDS VOLLEYBALL 87635 $265.23 DRISKILLS NEW MARKET OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 87636 $805.66 DYNA SYSTEMS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87637 $96.00 EAGLE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 87638 $2,665.14 EARL F ANDERSEN INC SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNS 87639 $81.05 ECOLAB INC CONTRACTED BLDG MAINT SENIOR CENTER 87640 $311.00 EDEN PRAIRIE CLEANERS-REGAL CL CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 87641 $44.22 EDEN PRAIRIE FLORIST OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 87642 $96,261.43 EF JOHNSON CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 87643 $159.75 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ELECTION 87644 $298.50 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE Cl COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-JUN-2000 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87645 $171.75 ELK RIVER LANDFILL WASTE DISPOSAL STREET MAINTENANCE 87646 $1,263.80 ESTEPHANIAN ORIGINALS CLOTHING & UNIFORMS OAK POINT LESSONS 87647 $23,454.96 FACILITY SYSTEMS INC FURNITURE & FIXTURES FURNITURE ACCOUNT 87648 $4,383.00 FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 87649 $398.99 FIBRCOM-MN COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 87650 $777.45 FIELDWORKS INC COMPUTERS POLICE 87651 $1,016.02 FILTRATION SYSTEMS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87652 $275.36 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 87653 $183.20 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC. MISC FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE 87654 $597.61 G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87655 $452.21 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87656 $3,337.32 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE • 87660 $1,406.00 GIGOWSKI, TOM OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 87661 $72.63 GINA MARIAS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL YEAR 2000 87662 $1,9'i8.82 GRAFIX SHOPPE NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87663 $457.95 GREENER PASTURES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87664 $31.95 GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES OF MN IN WASTE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87665 $23,234.90 GROSSMAN CHEVROLET COMPANY INC AUTOS P/S REVOLVING FD 87666 $1,130.97 HACH COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87667 $484.50 HALLOCK CO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87668 $17,663.22 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87669 $5,346.00 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87670 $200.00 HENDERSON, JOSH OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES BASKETBALL 87671 $91.25 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 87672 $143,990.19 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER RIGHT OF WAY & EASEMENTS CSAH4 COUNTY PROJECT 9016 87673 $35.46 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER - AC PRINTING POLICE 87674 $524.13 HERC U LIFT EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87675 .$429.00 HIGLEY, STEVE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 87676 $654.98 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MANUFACTURIN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE ' 87677 $1,211.08 HISCO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 87678 $327.50 HOLMES, TOM OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 87679 $2,080.00 HONEYWELL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87680 $732.99 HORIZONGRAPHICS EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 87681 $177.68 HYDROLOGIC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 87682 $64.11 ICI DULUX PAINT CTRS BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87683 $158.66 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS* OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 87684 $7,912.31 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 87686 $750.86 INGRAHAM & ASSOC BUILDING RILEY LAKE PARK SHELTER (GRANT 87687 $1,013.23 ITS A KEEPER EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES • 87688 $1,705.82 J J KELLER & ASSOCIATES INC . SAFETY SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 87689 $1,414.76 J MARCEL ENTERPRISES CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 87690 $1,902.33 J&R RADIATOR CORP CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE • 87691 $600.00 JABZ! OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES FITNESS CLASSES 87692 $1,658.82 JANEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 87693 $75.00 JENSEN, LYLE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 87694 $527.18 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA IN. CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87695 $184.00 KEN ANDERSEN TRUCKING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 87696 $381.29 KENS MEATS INC MISCELLANEOUS FIRE 87697 $4,300.00 KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE LTD. AUDIT & FINANCIAL FINANCE DEPT 87698 $286.64 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT TRAFFIC SIGNALS 87699 $150.00 KLITZKE, TOM OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 87700 $330.92 KOCH SULFUR PRODUCTS PATCHING ASPHALT STREET MAINTENANCE 87701 $351.50 KURMIS, LAURIE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 87702 $117.44 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 87703 $35.76 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC SAFETY SUPPLIES RISK MANAGEMENT /0 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-JUN-2000 (16 CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87704 $92.50 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87705 $582.77 LAKELAND ENGINEERING EQUIP CO EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87706 $1,607.54 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87708 $1,991.84 LAMETTRYS COLLISION CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87709 $85.74 LANO EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87710 $125.00 LERN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 87711 $213.98 LESCO INC LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL STREET MAINTENANCE 87712 $435.00 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT MAINTENANCE BUILDING 87713 $17,720.88 LOGIS LOGIS SERVICE SEWER ACCOUNT 87714 $258.60 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87715 $155.61 M AMUNDSON TRAINING SUPPLIES OAK POINT LESSONS 87716 $306.36 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87717 $273.00 MAETZOLD, MATTHEW LES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 87718 $50.00 MAGELSSEN, MUFF CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR SR CTR OPERATIONS 87719 $722.70 MARINE RESCUE PRODUCTS INC REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES OAK POINT LESSONS 87720 $51.00 MARKS CERTICARE AMOCO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87721 $2,310.00 MARTIN-MCALLISTER PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM HUMAN RESOURCES 87722 $1,184.28 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTING POLICE 87723 $175.12 MCGLYNN BAKERIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87724 $70.00 MED-COMPASS INC. PERSONNEL TESTING FIRE 87725 $952.00 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87726 $1,388.60 MENARDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINTENANCE 87728 $213.00 METRO PRINTING INC PRINTING PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 87729 $3,381.41 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* RENTALS GENERAL 87730 $425.24 METROPOLITAN FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87731 $1,197.84 MID-NORTHERN ELECTRIC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 87732 $12,606.63 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION OFFICE EQUIPMENT STREET MAINTENANCE 87733 $28.63 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS PRINTING POLICE 87734 $142.80 MINNESOTA CONWAY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 87735 $12,008.38 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT* POSTAGE WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87736 $21.62 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 87737 $4,341.84 MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOD SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL 87739 $140.58 MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 87740 $457.16 MOORE MEDICAL CORP SAFETY SUPPLIES FIRE 87741 $506.50 MQFMT-FACILITY MGMT TECHNOLOGY CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87742 . $90.74 MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 87743 $3,166.23 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87745 $700.19 MUNICILITE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87746 $403.41 NCR CORPORATION REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES CONCESSIONS 87747 $160.00 NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP CLOTHING & UNIFORMS SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 87748 $168.42 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO. OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 87749 $135.78 OHLIN SALES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87750 $2,589.46 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC SMALL TOOLS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87752 $74.55 THE ICE MAN/CO2 SERVICES CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 87753 $229.21 PAPER WAREHOUSE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 87754 $4,392.50 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87755 $493.30 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 87756 $48.96 PETSMART CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 87757 $2,605.55 PICHA GREENHOUSE LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL PARK MAINTENANCE 87758 $19.00 PITNEY BOWES INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES GENERAL 87759 $192.86 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 87760 $53.28 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINTENANCE 87761 $813.59 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING SENIOR AWARENESS N16 87762 $76.99 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC OFFICE EQUIP MAINT WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 87763 $12,485.32 PRECISION PAVEMENT MARKING CONTRACTED STRIPING TRAFFIC SIGNS • if COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01-JUN-2000 (16: CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87764 $28.99 PROGRESSIVE'BUSINESS PUBLICATI DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 87765 $425.00 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87766 $59.59 RADIO SHACK OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 87767 $196.01 RAINBOW FOODS - CHARGES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87768 $1,021.50 RAY, LEE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL . 87769 $283.71 REAL GEM EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 87770 $489.14 REBS MARKETING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER ACCOUNTING 87771 $147.83 RESPOND SYSTEMS* SAFETY SUPPLIES RISK MANAGEMENT 87772 $162.33 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87773 $13,012.40 RMR SERVICES INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER METER READING 87774 $117.45 ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87775 $635.20 ROBICHONS THE IN-LINE SKATE SC INSTRUCTOR SERVICE ' SPRING SKILL DEVELOP • 87776 $1,062.75 S & S WORLDWIDE REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES OAK POINT LESSONS 87777 $3,642.38 SHORT ELLIOT HENDRICKSON'INC DESIGN & CONST CEDAR FOREST UTILITY CONSTRUCT 87778 $1,727,43 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EPCC MAINTENANCE 87779 $797.52 SNAP-ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87780 $579.22 SNELL MECHANICAL INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 87781 $718:88 SPORTS WORLD USA INC REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES. SOFTBALL 87782 $125.63 SPS COMPANIES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87783 $21,486.18 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC DESIGN & CONST CHARLSON CHURCH IMPROVEMENTS 87784 $83.68 ST CROIX RECREATION CO INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE . 87785 $71.87 STAT-MEDICAL INC. SAFETY SUPPLIES RISK MANAGEMENT 87786 $300.00 STORAGE EQUIPMENT INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 87787 $8,961.48 STREICHERS CLOTHING' S. UNIFORMS POLICE 87788 $1,518.32 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87789 $49.89 SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87790 $775.89 SULLIVANS UTILITY SERVICES INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS FIRE STATION #1 87791 $46.09 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG CO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL _ PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87792 $128.48 SUSPENDED AQUATIC MENTOR REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES • OAK POINT LESSONS 87793 $125.00 SWEDLUNDS WASTE DISPOSAL OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 87794 $702.90 TECHNAGRAPHICS - PRINTING SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 87795 $303.60 TEMPEST TECHNOLOGY CORP CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 87796 $60.81 TESSCO OTHER EQUIPMENT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 87797 $330.00 TESSMAN SEED CO' CHEMICALS PARK MAINTENANCE 87798 $12.50 THUNDER COMMUNICATIONS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SENIOR WEB SITE 87799 $326.66 TIERNEY BROS INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87800 $263.59 TIS A GIFT & VICTORIAN GARDENS INSTRUCTOR SERVICE PRESCHOOL EVENTS 87801 $3,816.74 TKDA DESIGN & CONST. EDEN CROSSING ROADS 87802 $12.25 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87803 $1,412.19 TOTAL DISPLAYS ADVERTISING RECREATION ADMIN 87804 $1,900.00 TOTAL REGISTER CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 87805 $581.07 TRANS ALARM INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87806 $118.62 TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 87807 $4,579.50 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO MACHINERY EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY-PARK 87808 $1,096.96 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN MTKA GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FIRE STATION #1 87809 $129.60 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87810 $135.68 TWIN CITY SEED CO LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL PARK MAINTENANCE 87811 $76.50 TWIN CITY TIRE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT . EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87812 $148.44 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING & UNIFORMS FIRE 87813 $50.95 UNION LINE INC CLOTHING & UNIFORMS FIRE 87814 $219.35 UNIQUE CONCEPTS BY LITIN EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 87815 $96.31 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87816 $10,506.55 US FILTER PERRIN PRODUCTS INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87817 $2,219.37 US OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL -. 87819 $1,520.00 VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT /�C COUNCIL CHECK REGISPER 01-JUN-2000 (16: CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 87820 $10,614.96 VESSCO INC MACHINERY EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 87821 $732.78 VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87822 $62.28 W GORDON SMITH COMPANY, THE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 87823 $946.82 W W GRAINGER INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL MARKETCENTER RESERVOIR 87824 $172.41 WARNER OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87825 $217.00 WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES POOL MAINTENANCE 87826 $595.61 WATSON CO INC, THE MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 87827 $603.76 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87828 $1,874.32 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL FLYING CLOUD ATHLETIC FIELDS 87829 $145.52 WOLF CAMERA INC PHOTO SUPPLIES RISK MANAGEMENT 87831 $1,157.25 YALE INCORPORATED CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 87832 $804.75 ZAHN, GERALD OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 87833 $26.65 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY SUPPLIES RILEY LAKE-BEACH 87834 $817.84 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87835 $679.90 ZIEBART TIDYCAR CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87836 $22.84 ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87837 $171.00 ZOELLNER, MARK OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL $1,788,444.47* • • 13 COUNCIL CHECK SU!M12Y 02—STUN-2000 (08:31) DIVISION TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS $0.44 RISK MANAGEMENT $5.62 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION $31.43 ASSESSING $2.63 POLICE —$240.09 FIRE —$126.99 PARK MAINTENANCE $14.65 FLEET SERVICES $950.08 COMMUNITY CENTER $2,990.01 YOUTH RECREATION $19.56 ADAPTIVE REC —$17.54 OAK POINT POOL $160.90 ARTS $10.40 PARK FACILITIES $201.10 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $105,477.50 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS $326,046.98 CITY CENTER $9.36 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR STORE $11,033.57 PRAIRIEVIEW LIQUOR STORE $11,588.67 DEN ROAD LIQUOR STORE $24,878.09 WATER DEPT $5,243.08 SEWER DEPT $23.11 $488,302.56* • sy COUNCIL CHECK REGISrhat 02-JUN-2000 (08 ('WCK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 342 $117,200.15 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A FEDERAL TAXES W/H FD 10 ORG 343 $62,085.85 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A EMPLOYEES SS & MEDICARE FD 10 ORG 344 $62,085.85 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A EMPLOYERS SS & MEDICARE FD 10 ORG 345 $44,172.87 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAXES WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 346 $269.80 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 347 $56,521.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE SALES TAX PAYABLE FD 10 ORG 348 $27,928.08 ORCHARD TRUST CO AS TRUSTEE/CU DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 349 $12,561.46 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 350 $52,700.00 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. PRINCIPAL 92 STATE AID DEBT 351 $52,777.50 FIRST TRUST NATL ASSOC PRINCIPAL B & PAYMENTS $488,302.56* • I3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: DATE: June 6,2000 SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Parks &Recreation Services/ Third Rink Feasibility Study Management Services A. Director of Parks &Recreation x. Services Bob Lambert Director of Management Services Natalie Swaggert Requested Actions: Move to: Thank the Third Rink Task Force for their work and accept their finding that a current need exists for additional ice time of 1,278 hours with sale of up to 1,500 hours being feasible and that between$2 and$3 million additional dollars are needed to make a third sheet of ice feasible. Move to: Accept the finding of the Community Program Board that"based upon information from the Third Rink Task Force Report,there is a present need for additional facilities,but the long term need and the feasibility of constructing and operating a third rink at no cost to the City was not established." MOTION ON COUNCIL POLICY DECISIONS Move to: • Allow the use of park land located at the Community Center site for the purpose of constructing a third rink. • Depart from current City policy and permit naming the Community Center or an ice arena within the Community Center after a corporate sponsor(assuming funding is sufficient to make the project feasible). • Carry the risk of$1 million in debt and $100,000 in annual operating costs against anticipated revenues to support this project. MOTION TO DIRECT CITY STAFF Move to: Direct the City staff to work with the School District to: • Monitor parking at the High School, Community Center, and Round Lake Park for one year based upon all new uses to determine adequacy of parking should a third rink be added at this site. • Determine the general impacts of the proposed third rink on the High School, Community Center and parking facilities and activities. • Obtain School District permission for siting the Third Rink utilizing a part of the High School property. MOTION TO DIRECT THE EDENPRAIRIE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION Move to: Direct the Eden Prairie Hockey Association to demonstrate the financial feasibility of a third rink, at no cost to the City,by obtaining funding commitments necessary to cover the balance of the cost of the facility ($2- $3 million)prior to further City Council Action. 1 Synopsis: The Community Program Board found that "based upon information from the Third Rink Task Force Report, there is a present need for additional facilities, but the long term need and the feasibility of constructing and operating a third rink at no cost to the City was not established." The Program Board cited three additional conditions that require approval by the City Council in order for the project to be feasible. 1. Allow the use of park land located at the Community Center site for the purpose of constructing a third rink. 2. Depart from current City policy and permit naming the Community Center or an ice arena within the Community Center after a corporate sponsor(assuming funding is sufficient to make the project feasible). 3. Agree to carry the risk of$1 million in debt and$100,000 in annual operating costs against anticipated revenues to support this project. Background: The Program Board met on May 23 to review the recommendation of the Third Rink Task Force and the findings of the Parks and Recreation Citizen Advisory Commission regarding the feasibility of a third rink. At that meeting,the Program Board revisited the purpose statement of the Third Rink Task Force,which is as follows: "Evaluate the long-term need for a third indoor ice rink, and if needed, the feasibility of constructing and operating a third rink at no cost to the City." Based on the information presented in the Third Rink Task Force Report, the Program Board does not believe the task force proved a long-term need for a third rink indoor ice rink and feasibility of constructing and operating a third rink at no cost to the City was not proven. The Program Board reiterated the fact that if the existing need for the Hockey Association and Figure Skating Club is 1,200 to 1,500 hours of additional ice time per year,the revenue from that amount of rented ice time would only pay for the operating costs and approximately one-fourth the cost of constructing the facility. The Third Rink Task Force did not present any potential method for financing the approximate$3 million shortfall other than getting donations from advertising and being able to name the facility after a corporate sponsor. Attachments: Third Rink Task Force Charter Statement Memorandum Regarding Third Rink Task Force Report, dated May 1, 2000 Memorandum Regarding Recommendation of Third Rink Task Force, dated March 30, 2000 Third Rink Task Force Report Unapproved Community Program Board Minutes for May 23,2000 a TASK FORCE CHARTER STATEMENT THIRD RINK TASK FORCE—2000 Purpose Statement: Evaluate the long term need for a third indoor ice rink, and if needed, the feasibility of • constructing and operating a third rink at no cost to the City. Roles and Responsibilities: Task Force Responsibilities a. To determine what information is required to make a logical and informed decision on the need for a third indoor rink, and whether or not it is feasible to construct and operate a rink without City funding assistance. b. To review all available data and come to a consensus on a recommendation on the need for a third rink. c. If a third rink is determined to be a long term need for the City, review all available information necessary to determine if constructing and operating a third rink can be achieved, at no cost to the City, for its useful life. d. Evaluate feasibility of a third rink based on additional ice time that would be used by Eden Prairie participants without taking ice time away from the existing rinks at the Eden Prairie Community Center. e. Provide a written recommendation to the Community Program Board no later than June 2000. Staff Responsibilities a. To recommend the process for collecting data and reviewing information necessary to make a decision on the need and feasibility of the project. b. To provide all statistical data required by the committee to make an informed recommendation to the City Council. c. To provide expertise necessary. d. Develop agendas and provide support materials. FAUSBRSWEDABL\msesosoftworaBob IambeR2000\ThitdRmYTaskForeelThudRink.Task Force Statemenb.dx 6n/00 3 Membership: Pat Richard, John Schmelzle, Michael DeVetter, Gary Kraemer, Brian Holcomb, Maggie Asby, Steve Schultz, Dick Brown, Bruce Bowman, Terry Randolph, Allan Callander, Brad Hewitt Chair: Co Chairs—Pat Richard and John Schmelzle Staff Liaison Bob Lambert,Director Parks and Recreation Services Staff Support: Lyndell Frey, Joel Klute, and Laurie Obiazor Duration: February 2000 until June 2000 First Meeting: Tuesday, February 29th, 7:00 p.m., Eden Prairie Community Center, Meeting Room C Recording Secretary: H:\Lambert 2000\Third Rink Task Force Statements F:\USERS MDAB macrosoftwotd\BobLambett2D00\Thad Rink TaskFom\lhad Rink TaskForceStatements_doc6/ll00 2 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council Program Board Parks and Recreation Citizens Advisory Commission From: Third Rink Task Force Date: May 1, 2000 Subject: Third Rink Task Force Report RECOMMENDATION: The Task Force requests the Parks and Recreation Citizen Advisory Commission, The Program Board, and the City Council to review the entire report and to approve the step by step process outlined in the report,that may or may not ultimately result in the construction of a third rink. SYNOPSIS: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the Third Rink Task Force Report and recommendation, as well as a copy of the questions and responses developed by this committee in order to address the Charter Statement developed by the City Council. Included in this report is a copy of the minutes from meetings held in February, March, and April. Also included is a copy of the Charter Statement and the original Hockey Association request for the City Council to consider a third rink The committee had extensive discussion on each of the questions and agreed that there was a need for 1,200-1,500 additional hours of ice time by Eden Prairie teams if those teams were to be offered the same amount of ice time per year as the average for the hockey teams in the west metro area. • The Task Force also agreed that the only way this project would be financially feasible without the use of taxpayer dollars would be to determine relatively accurate cost estimates on the construction and operating costs of the third rink and to provide a relatively conservative • estimate on the projected revenues. Recognizing that there will be a difference between the amount of revenue required to pay for the construction and operation of the facility and the projected revenue from ice rentals, the Task Force suggested that the project is only feasible when the actual cost of the building is "bought down"through grants and donations. BL:mdd H:\Task Force Report to Commission Board Council 5 MEMORANDUM To: Parks and Recreation Citizen Advisory Commission From: Bob Lambert,Director Parks and Recreation Services Date: March 30,2000 Subject: Recommendation of Third Rink Task Force RECOMMENDATION: The Third Rink Task Force in accordance with the City Council goal of constructing a third rink only if the rink can be constructed and operated at no cost to City taxpayers recommends taking the following steps: 1. A major determining factor on the feasibility of the project is the cost of the construction of the facility. In order to obtain more realistic cost estimates, the task force would recommend the City Council either appoint this task force or a separate committee to work with the School District, the City, and an architect to develop more detailed plans and obtain and the necessary soil borings to determine a more accurate estimate of the cost of this facility. The estimated cost for soil borings and architectural and engineering drawings detailed enough to provide relatively accurate cost estimates is $20,000. The steps should be taken as soon as the Hockey Association is able to provide the City with that amount of money. 2. Once the first step is completed, the architect and City staff should then be directed to provide a more detailed cost estimate on operating costs for the third rink as designed. 3. After completing the first two steps, the City would then have a relatively accurate idea of how much money would actually be required to "buy down" the initial cost of the arena in order to make this project feasible. At that point,the City would put the project on hold until that amount of money was raised through grants, gifts, and donations. When the funds are generated the City would authorize proceeding with the project. TASK FORCE PURPOSE STATEMENT: Evaluate the long term need for a third indoor ice rink, and if needed, the feasibility of constructing and operating a third rink at no cost to the City. TASK FORCE RESPONSIBILITIES: A. To determine what information is required to make a logical and informed decision on the need for a third indoor rink, and whether or not it is feasible to construct and operate a third rink without City funding assistance. Recommendation of Third Rink Task Force March 30,2000 Page 2 At the February 29th meeting, the task force met to prepare a list of questions that would gather all the necessary information to make a logical and informed decision on the need for a third rink, and whether or not it is feasible to construct and operate a rink without City funding assistance. The committee developed a total of 55 questions to be answered at the March 28th meeting. A copy of a list of those questions and responses is identified as Attachment No. 1 to this memorandum. B. To Review all available data and come to a consensus on a recommendation on the need for a third rink. At the March 28th meeting, the committee came to a general consensus that there was a need for a approximately 1,278 additional hours of ice time. This included approximately 1,138 hours for the Hockey Association and approximately 140 hours for the Figure Skating Club. The Hockey Association and Figure Skating Club believe those hours would be needed without any substantial additional growth to either of their organizations. The Figure Skating Club believes there may be some additional growth to the Figure Skating Club if the Club is able to secure additional ice time during the winter months. The Hockey Association believes there maybe some additional growth to the Hockey Association if the Hockey Association recruits and encourage girls to join. The School District has indicated the peak population of the school age children will be reached in 2002-2003 school year and decline after that year will be slight each year for several years before leveling. Additional data that confirms the Hockey Association's belief there will be a continued demand for additional ice time is the fact that Eden Prairie Hockey Association participants average 26 hours of ice time per team per year in Eden Prairie; whereas, in these respective communities, Edina Hockey Association numbers average 34 hours of ice time per team per year and Bloomington hockey players average 36.3 hours of ice time per team per year, Chaska averages 54.5 hours per team per year, and Richfield 51.6 hours per team per year. The EPHA demand for 1,138 hours would provide each team with approximately 47 hours of ice time each year that would be purchased in Eden Prairie. Cityfi staff believes the demand for the 1,278 hours is for hours available between October 15t and March 15th. Actually, there are only approximately 920 hours of desirable prime time ice available between October 15th and March 15th; therefore, the Hockey Association and the Figure Skating Club may either continue to buy ice time during those months from other rinks or they would purchase additional hours after March 15th t and before October 15th. The association does believe they would purchase an additional 150 hours during the summer months, although those hours are available today without the construction of a third rink. City staff believe it is likely the City would sell approximately 1,500 hours of ice time on a third rink if that rink were operating eleven months per year;however, staff also believe that a maximum of approximately 920 hours would be sold from October 15th to March Recommendation of Third Rink Task Force March 30,2000 Page 3 15th at $140/hour. Staff believe that the remaining 580 hours would be sold at a discounted rate. The discounted rate in 2000 is $120/hour. C. If a third rink is determined to be a long term need for the City, review all available information necessary to determine if constructing and operating a third rink can be achieved, at no cost to the City, for its useful life. The committee has come to a general consensus that there.is a need for approximately 1,278 hours of additional ice time. As previously stated, only approximately 920 hours is during the prime skating season where the City can charge prime ice rates. Prime ice rates projected in 2001 would be $140/hour. Off-season rates will be $120/hour; however, it is likely that large ice users will be paying less than this amount in order to be competitive with other rinks. Estimated revenue from 1,500 hours ice rental is as follows: • 920 hours x$140 per hour=$128,000. • 580 hours x$120 per hour- $69,600 • • $69,600 +$128,000 =$197,600 total revenue per year ice rental. The estimated cost for construction of a third rink ranges from 3.5 to four million dollars with an annual debt retirement cost of approximately $350,000-$400,000 per year at 20 years. Operating costs are estimated at $80,000, plus $20,000 per year for capital improvements totaling $100,000 per year. The total annual operating revenue necessary to meet construction and operating costs is $450,00-$500,000 per year; therefore, it is estimated the subsidy costs would be approximately $250,000-$300,000 per year unless the construction costs were bought down through donations and/or grants. If the operating costs are approximately $100,000 per year and the revenue is $197,600 per year, the arena would pay for approximately $1,000,000 of construction costs. If the construction costs were 3.5 to four million dollars, the City would have to have cash or firm contracts for donations and grants totaling approximately 2.5 to three million dollars in order for this project to be constructed at no cost to City taxpayers. D. Evaluate feasibility of a third rink based on additional ice time that would be used by Eden Prairie participants without taking ice time away from the existing rinks at the Eden Prairie Community Center. The estimated number of hours sold is above and beyond the ice time that would be sold at the Community Center with the existing two ice rinks. E. Provide a written recommendation to the Community Program Board no later than June 2000. The Program Board will meet on the fourth Tuesday of each month; therefore, the final draft of this report should be prepared for the May 23rd meeting of the Program Board. It Recommendation of Third Rink Task Force March 30,2000 Page 4 must be submitted to the Parks Commission prior to the Program Board. The May meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission is May 1st. SUMMARY OF KEY FACTS FOR PROGRAM BOARD AND COUNCIL TO CONSIDER: Upon reviewing the questions and responses, as well as the attachments to the report, there are some key facts that must be addressed to arrive at a decision regarding the feasibility of a third indoor rink: 1. Annual ice time sold at the Eden Prairie Community Center has decreased each year since 1995. 2. Annual ice time purchased by the Hockey Association and Figure Skating Club has increased each year since 1995. 3. The drop off for ice time sales has not occurred during November through February, the time when the Hockey Association, Figure Skating Club, and School District require additional ice time,but has occurred from March 15th through October 15th. Based on this information, it is not prudent to project the sale of a great deal of ice time on a third rink from March to November, nor is it prudent to project the rental rate per hour for this ice time as a consistent figure. 4. Using the matrix that depicts the hours that most likely would be sold, the staff project the sale of approximately 920 hours per year in a third rink from October 15th through March 15th. These are the hours that could be guaranteed to be sold as long as people are still willing to skate until 10:00 p.m. or later and willing to skate full weekend days. 5. Using the ice usage comparison data provided by the EPHA comparing hours of ice time scheduled per team at their home rinks, Eden Prairie averages 26.2 hours of ice time per team per year compared to 34 hours per team per year in Edina and 36.3 hours per team per year in Bloomington, 51.6 hours per team per year at Richfield, 61.5 hours per team per year in St. Louis Park, and 54.5 hours per team per year in Chaska. This information indicates it is likely that Eden Prairie skaters would utilize approximately 1,138 hours of additional ice time at the Community Center if it were available during the prime season, and the EPHA scheduled approximately 47 hours of ice time per team each year. 6. Using the very preliminary cost estimate of the architect of $3.5 to $4 million for construction costs, the annual revenue needed for paying off the debt on approximately four million dollars would be approximately$350,000-$400,000 per year. Recommendation of Third Rink Task Force March 30, 2000 Page 5 7. Using the staff estimate of the total of 920 hours of ice time sales in a third rink from October 15th to March 15th at $140 per hour and 580 hours of ice time sold from March 15th through October 15th at $120 per hour, the average ice rental revenue in a third rink would be approximately$197,600 per year.* 8. Based on the staff estimate of$100,000 per year for operation, maintenance, and capital improvement costs and $350,00-$400,000 per year for debt retirement, the annual revenue needed to pay for all costs without taxpayer assistance would be $450,000- $500,000 per year. 9. The estimated rental fee of $140 per hour could increase each year as operating and maintenance costs increase; however, due to the high number of indoor rinks in the-metro area, and the fact that rinks are now bidding for ice time users during the off-season hours, staff expects the cost per hour of ice time for off-season (March 15th through October 15th) to drop over the next few years as additional rinks are constructed and population of skaters levels off. 10. The School District projects the peak enrollment for the School District to occur in the 2002-2003 school year and levels off after that. Staff anticipates the enrollment in skating programs would follow that projection. Hockey Association representatives believe enrollment for skating programs will maintain their numbers due to a possible • increase in the number of girls interested in hockey programs or figure skating programs if additional ice is available. 11. Other possible revenue sources: A. Advertising in the main rink. (Does not require a third rink to gain this revenue, and philosophy relating to advertising would have to change.) B. Possible renewal of the Mighty Ducks Grant - $250,000 one time grant. C. Contribution from the Hockey Association? D. Possible one time contribution from community businesses ? (Consider naming • the arena after a corporate sponsor.) The revenue generated from a third rink would pay for the operating, maintenance, and capital costs plus debt retirement for one million dollars of construction; therefore, donations and grants would have to total 2.5 to three million dollars in order to make this project feasible if the construction costs total 3.5 to four million dollars. *EPHA estimates 1,156 hours of ice time sales for a third rink from October 15th to March 15th. 16 Recommendation of Third Rink Task Force March 30, 2000 Page 6 RELATED ISSUES: This exercise has emphasized the need to address the philosophical decision of whether or not the City of Eden Prairie should begin negotiating on"deals" for large ice time uses during the off peak months of the year. City staff have been reluctant to negotiate for significant cuts in the summer ice hour rental rate for several reasons: 1. It would be difficult to justify charging a non-resident less for the use of City facilities than we charge our own associations and clubs. 2. City staff believes that beginning to bid against other metro ice arenas for large ice time users is a start down a "slippery slope." Unfortunately, there are some arenas that have begun this practice and the City may be forced to begin negotiating prices in order to remain competitive. As this becomes common practice we will have to predict how much"lower"ice time rentals will be in the future rather than how much"higher." It is becoming obvious that the City will have to set a policy of negotiating on hourly rental rates for large ice rental contracts during the "off season" months of March through October. The EPHA urges the City to negotiate with all potential large ice renters even if the City sells ice to them at lower fees than it charges the EPHA The Hockey Association is encouraging the City to reevaluate the policy on restricting advertising on hockey boards and walls in the Community Center. The EPHA believes the city would generate a significant amount of money from that source of revenue. BL:mdd H:\March 30 Memo to Task Force • ' I UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY PROGRAM BOARD TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2000 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER City Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road BOARD MEMBERS: Chair Munna Yasiri,Vice-Chair Mary Cofer,Harry Davis, Jr., Dick Brown,Kim Teaver,Harry Moran, and Therese Benkowski BOARD STAFF: Chris Enger, City Manager;Natalie Swaggert,Management Liaison; Laurie Obiazor, Staff Liaison; and Carol Pelzel, Recording Secretary SUPPORT STAFF: Lyndell Frey, Community Center Manager; Joel Klute, Ice Arena and Concessions Coordinator; Bob Lambert, Director of Parks and Recreation Services; and Don Uram,Director of Community Development and Financial Services VISITORS: Pat Richard, Co-chair of Third Rink Task Force II. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Yasiri called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Board members present included Munna Yasiri, Therese Benkowski,Mary Cofer,Harry Davis,Jr.,Dick Brown,Kim Teaver and Harry Moran. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Brown moved, seconded by Teaver,to approve the agenda as published. Motion carried, 7-0. III. APPROVAL OF APRIL 25,2000 MINUTES Commissioner Cofer asked that the fifth line of the fourth paragraph on Page 1 be amended to read"Mary Cofer reported that he has been an Eden Prairie resident for six years and previously served on the Senior Issues Task Force and the Housing, Transportation and Social Services Board and is very interested in the City". MOTION: Davis moved, seconded by Cofer,to approve the April 25, 2000,minutes as corrected. The motion carried,5-0-1 with Benkowski abstaining because of absence from that meeting. 1 � Community Program Board May 23,2000 Page 2 IV. OLD BUSINESS A. None V. NEW BUSINESS A. Third Rink Task Force Report 1. Presentation(Co-chair Pat Richard) Bob Lambert,Director ofParks and Recreation,presented the background of the Third Rink Task Force Report and reviewed the history of the request for a third rink. He explained that the Eden Prairie Hockey Association submitted a petition requesting the City Council to consider a feasibility study on a third rink. The City Council authorized City staff to develop a citizen committee consisting of skating enthusiasts and citizens who have no interest in skating. Mr. Lambert introduced Pat Richard who served as co-chair on the Third Rink Task Force and represents the non-skating side of the Task Force. Mr. Richard reviewed with the Board the process the Task Force went through in developing their report. Their charge was to decide if there is a need for a third rink in Eden Prairie and if it was decided that a third rink was necessary what would the alternatives be to fund the third sheet.Mr. Richard explained that the Task Force did decide that there is a need for an additional 1,500 hours of ice time during the months of October to March. However, 1,500 hours does not justify the financial feasibility for another sheet. Mr.Richard further explained that the main users of the ice rink(Hockey Association,Figure Skating Club and High School)would like authorization to spend$20,000 of their own money to do a more detailed study to see what a third sheet of ice would cost and how it could be done to still fit in with the existing facility. Once they determine if it is feasible, they would then determine how much money could be raised by selling ice time. The Task Force also discussed a grant from the Mighty Ducks that requires a matching grant that may be available from the Hockey Association. Mr.Richard pointed out that the biggest issue is going to be whether or not they can get a large private donor for this facility. This evening the Task Force is not asking for permission to move forward with the third ice sheet but permission to move forward to the next step to get a more accurate number as to the amount of money that will be needed to be raised for this additional sheet of ice. They are also requesting permission from the City to allow them to pursue private sponsorship. Chair Yasiri expressed her appreciation to the Third Rink Task Force, City staff and everyone involved in this process for the amount of time and effort that they have put into this report. 13 Community Program Board May 23,2000 Page 3 Mr.Lambert indicated that City staff and the Task Force agree that there are 1,200 to 1,500 hours of ice time that would be bought by the Eden Prairie Association between October and March. This ice time would generate enough money to fund operation costs and$1 million of construction.However, construction costs are estimated at$4 million. This would result in a$3 million shortfall. There is some question as to the total cost and the Hockey Association is willing to put up $20,000 of their own money to hire an engineer and architect to get more detailed information to enable them to pin that number down closer to actual cost. Mr. Lambert stated that they are asking this Board to recommend approval of the process to allow the Hockey Association to spend their money to hire people to work with the School District to see if this facility could be placed partially on the School District's property.This study would enable them to get more detailed plans and specifications as well as soil borings to determine if this facility will work on the proposed site. They are also asking for approval to talk to private businesses to see if they would be willing to donate$1 million to $2 million in return for advertising on this site. The City Council would have to approve the naming of a building or rink after a corporation for advertising purposes. 2. Discussion Commissioner Teaver asked why Eden Prairie has not used corporate sponsorships in the past. Mr. Lambert responded that they have done some sponsorship on a limited basis. They have used advertising on scoreboards on the ballfields. As Parks and Recreation Director, Mr. Lambert said he has resisted such advertising because of the minor amount of money that would be raised in comparison to operational costs. Mr. Lambert said he feels the advertising junks up the parks. Commissioner Davis said he has some concern about private sponsorship at the high school level. The participants are not paid athletes. Also, Commissioner Davis questioned why the City has to give approval for the Hockey Association to spend their own money. Mr. Lambert responded that the Association does not want to go forward unless they have the Parks Commission,Program Board and City Council's agreement that if they get the money they will support this project. Commissioner Davis pointed out that if the Hockey Association feels that strongly committed they should be willing to spend the money to show the feasibility of this project. Commissioner Davis said there is no guarantee that this project will be approved whether they spend the money or not. City Manager Enger explained that the City Council charged the Task Force with looking at this proposal at no cost to the City. The Task Force report requests that the City carry debt on$1 million. The $20,000 feasibility study is more of a side issue. City Manager Enger pointed out that this request is well within this Board's purview to look at other elements of the Task Force recommendation. Community Program Board May 23,2000 Page 4 Commissioner Cofer said he feels that what they are talking about this evening are really the mechanical issues of this project;the building site, soil conditions, parking issues, etc. The report indicates that this third ice sheet will generate enough revenue to pay operating costs of the facility.However,they will still be approximately$3 million short of being able to do this project. Commissioner Cofer pointed out that the Charter Statement prepared by the City Council asks that the Task Force make an evaluation of the long-term need,which this Task Force has established. The Charter also states that if the rink is needed,the feasibility of constructing and operating the third ice sheet should be at no cost to the City.He asked if the Task Force is going to be able to come back to the City Council with options on how the money is going to be raised to fund this project at no cost to the City after spending the$20,000 on the requested study. Mr. Lambert responded that the additional study would allow them to come up with a site plan that both the School District and City Council would approve. They will also be able to contact various organizations in an effort to raise the necessary funds. The School District has responded positively about the process and the concept and has agreed with the need for a third ice rink. Chair Yasiri indicated that the report does show an ice time shortage for the short- term,however, she is not sure she sees a long-term need. With regard to the aging population, Commissioner Yasiri asked if there would be a need five years from now.Mr. Lambert responded that the Hockey Association did quit advertising three years ago for younger students because they did not have the facilities to handle the additional skaters. The Hockey Association believes that with any kind of promotion with girls hockey there would be more girls playing. There is also a high demand for ice team with the ice-skating clubs. Commissioner Benkowski expressed concern as other communities build ice rinks and ice rental becomes more competitive and revenues decline how will operating costs be covered.Mr. Lambert responded that they anticipate rental rates per hour will continue to increase during prime time. Rates are cut during summer months and not during prime time. The additional 1,200 to 1,500 hours they are predicting is during prime time. Commissioner Davis said the Task Force report indicates that prime ice time is October to March and both the Hockey Association and skating clubs are competing for ice the same time. Since figure skating is not competitive, Commissioner Davis asked why they demand the same time as the Hockey Association. Mr. Lambert explained that ice-skating is a year-round sport,however, their big competition is in the winter. Commissioner Moran expressed concern for the amount of traffic that will be generated with this addition.He pointed out that there is already a problem with traffic congestion in this area. One of the proposals eliminates parking spaces. Mr.Lambert stated that one of the proposals adds 60 to 70 spaces while another takes some spaces away. Traffic flow will be an issue addressed under the site-plan review. 15 Community Program Board May 23,2000 Page 5 Chair Yasiri suggested that the Hockey Association add to the value of the program by having practices throughout the year rather than from October to March. This would result in year round use of the facilities. Mr. Lambert explained that reports have shown that youths should be well-rounded athletes and they should play other sports. Also, during the summer months participants want to be outside and not inside the ice arenas. Lyndell Frey, Community Center Manager, addressed the issue of using the ice rink for other activities during the summer. He explained that the rent revenue would result in approximately$5,000 to $10,000 and that would probably not cover the operating costs for an indoor event. Commissioner Brown said he recommended to the Hockey Association that off- season hours be used for young people between the ages of 7 and 13 to learn how to skate. The City could rent the ice not being used at a lesser rate and this would allow the Hockey Association to expand their ice hours during prime time. Commissioner Brown pointed out that one of the greatest growth areas is the figure skaters and they could train their young people to skate on the off-hours. Commissioner Brown said he feels the Hockey Association is not doing everything they can to help solve the problem of shortage of ice time. The City and School District are being asked to give the land for this facility to approximately 170 skaters. Commissioner Brown explained that he is not saying this project cannot be done,however,he wants to see the money and he does not believe it is a sound investment. The Hockey Association did not convince him that they have done everything in their power to help eliminate the problem without the third rink. Commissioner Davis said he has some concern with the long-term use of this facility.He does not feel that Eden Prairie is unique and will have young people to service this debt. Chair Yasiri explained that the Third Rink Task Force's task was to look at how a third rink could be developed without taxpayer or City funding. Chair Yasiri said she feels the Task Force did not totally address the issue of funding this project. Mr. Lambert responded that the Task Force did discuss this and would like an opportunity to try to raise the funds. The hockey and skating people want an opportunity to spend their own money to do a study to determine the feasibility of funding.Also, it would be nice if they could spread the hockey ages and have them participate in the summer. However,they will not be able to change the social trend.Mr. Lambert pointed out that a need has been established for a good part of the year. 16 Community Program Board May 23,2000 Page 6 Don Uram,Director of Community Development and Financial Services, said it was his understanding that this project was to be at no cost to the City.There would be costs if the City were to issue the debt.The City would be responsible for any shortfall in dollars generated by the third rink.Mr.Lambert said they have determined that there is a need for 1,200 to 1,500 hours of ice time. The third rink could be shut down those months when there is not a demand for ice time. There would not be a big risk to the City on the first$1 million of operational costs. This project would not move forward until they have the money.Mr. Lambert asked that the Hockey Association be given the opportunity to conduct a further study and to determine whether or not the necessary funds can be raised. Chair Yasiri said she is somewhat confused because she feels that the request before them this evening was contained in the charter statement of the Task Force. It appears to her that they are asking permission to do what they were originally charged with.Mr. Lambert explained that the report does answer the original question as to whether or not there is a need for a third ice rink. There is a need for an additional 1,200 to 1,500 hours of ice time.Also,the question of feasibility was addressed. With a$3 million gift the project is feasible.To answer the question of whether or not there is a project they must have$3 million of funding. In order to have someone commit to this funding,they need more facts on the project. In order to obtain those facts,they need to go to.Phase II of the process which is what they are requesting this evening. Chair Yasiri said she feels this Board cannot give a • commitment to go ahead with this project until they see that it will be a fiscally sound and sustainable use to meet the long-term needs of the City. She questioned whether or not all of the charges of the Task Force have been met. • Commissioner Brown said the report indicates that they can rent an additional 1,500 hours of ice each year. He stated that he feels this is not a need for a new hockey rink.There is a need for 1,500 hours of ice time. Commissioner Brown said he also questions the location of the proposed rink.He indicated that the Task Force did not justify that a rink is needed for 12 months but did justify that there is a three-month need. Commissioner Cofer explained that he has read the purpose statement of the Task Force to evaluate the long-term need. There is a present need that has been established,however,he questioned the long-term need. Commissioner Cofer said he also has a real concern with the feasibility of constructing and operating the third ice rink at no cost to the City. Commissioner Benkowski said she is concerned about the cost and it has not been proven that there will be no cost to the City. Commissioner Benkowski explained that a traffic problem already exists at this location and this project will only complicate that problem. I `7 Community Program Board May 23,2000 Page 7 Commissioner Moran pointed out that while the Task Force has shown there is a need for additional ice time, a long-term need has not been shown. Commissioner Moran said that asking this Board to approve the expenditure of$20,000 by the Hockey Association does not appear to be within this Board's purview. He feels they have no jurisdiction on how the Hockey Association spends their money. 3. Recommendation for City Council • • MOTION: Brown moved, Cofer seconded,based on the information that this Board received from the Task Force it was not demonstrated that there was a year round need for a third rink and the Board is not convinced of the feasibility of it being built without City funding. Moran offered a friendly amendment to the proposed motion as follows: The Board recognizes,based on information presented from the Third Rink Task Force report,that there is a present need for additional facilities but the long-term need and feasibility of constructing and operating at no cost to the City was not established. Brown moved to accept the friendly amendment with Cofer seconding the amendment.Vote was called on the amended motion with all members voting aye. The motion carried,7-0. VI. REPORTS OF STAFF A. None . VII. FUTURE MEETINGS/EVENTS Ms. Swaggert asked that the Board consider rescheduling their next meeting from June 27, 2000,because she would be out of the office that week. The Board agreed to meet on July 11, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. Commissioner Moran indicated he would not be in attendance at that meeting. The Board will decide at that time whether or not it will be necessary to meet again on July 25,their regularly scheduled meeting. VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Cofer moved,Benkowski seconded,to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried, 7-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. I -6- CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6, 2000 SECTION: Reports of Director Parks and Recreation Services SERVICE AREA/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Water Quality ITEM NO: Parks and Recreation Improvement Proposal for Round Lake Robert A.Lambert Director'Al— C . Requested Action • Motion: Move to authorize staff to enter into a contract with Greener Pastures Development Corporation, Inc. to treat Round Lake, and the detention- ponds directly serving Round Lake, to bring the water quality to a TSI reading of less than 38 by September 1, 2000, and further to petition the Riley-Purgatory-Creek Bluff Watershed District to consider sharing the cost of this pollution reduction effort and conducting the water quality monitoring before, during, and after treatment during the summer of 2000: Synopsis Greener Pastures Development Corporation has developed a relatively new method for reducing pollution in ponds and lakes. The company has developed a product called "Clarify" that contains micro organisms that consume a wide range.of man-made pollutants, including, but not limited to oil, antifreeze, nitrogen, phosphorus, fertilizers, fecal matter from geese, pets and wild animals, cellulose, cotton fibers, sludges, sediment, leaves, grass clippings, and other organic matter. Mark Miles, CEO of Greener Pastures, has committed that with normal water patterns, he believes his product will bring Round Lake from a eutrophic condition to a low mesotrophic condition by the end of the summer. It is his goal that by the first of September the water clarity of Round Lake should be clean enough to see the bottom in 10-12 feet of water. Earlier this year, the City Council authorized staff to use the money originally budgeted for operating the swimming beach at Round Lake to make the necessary investments to provide a swimming curtain and pump fresh water behind that curtain in order to open the swimming beach in 2001. The City's goal was to maintain clean enough water behind the curtain to allow residents to continue using Round Lake while the City and the Watershed District searched for options to clean up Round Lake without the installation of an alum treatment plant in Round Lake. Mr. Miles has indicated that the first year cost to clean Round Lake and the adjacent ponds would be $40,000. The cost to treat Round Lake and those ponds would be $35,000 in 2001 and is estimated to be $24,500 per year after that assuming normal weather patterns. 1 City Council Agenda 6/6/2000 Round Lake Water Quality Improvement Proposal Page 2 Greener Pastures has been successful in treating relatively small ponds the last couple of years; however, staff believes the concept should work on lakes as well as ponds. Staff is recommending the Council request the Watershed District to split the cost of this "experiment" and to monitor water quality to determine if this truly is the answer to,long-term water quality improvement of Eden. Prairie's lakes and ponds. Staff would recommend delaying any investment in a water curtain until determining the results of this proposaL Attachments: Greener Pastures Development Corporation, Inc. Proposal Executive Summary of Barr Engineering Report — Round Lake Use Attainability Analysis BL:mdd H:\Lambert 2000\Memo on Water Quality to Council MAY 25 '00 02:56PM P.1 Greener Pastures Development Corporation, Inc. Mark Miles CEO 809 Berry St,' St. Paul, MN 55114 Telephone 651-646-2900 Fax 651-645-8909 May 24, 2000 Pollution Reduction Proposal for Round Lake • Objective: To increase the levels of beneficial transparent microorganisms that consume the pollutants that have caused severe algae blooms,excess weeds, dead fish,reduces recreational usage and unpleasant odors. Environmental Goals: 1) The Visual Quality Qgal To bring the Carlson Trophic State Indus(TSI)equal to or less than 38 by Sept of 2000,The TSI rating system used as a scale to measure water transparency by measuring the level of Phosphorus,Chlorophyll and Secchi disc transparencies in the body of water. This measuring index is scaled to place a mesotrophic(medium fertility level)lake on the scale between 38 and 50, and high/low fertility lakes(eutrophic and oligotrophic)toward the high and low ends of the TSI • range,respectively. 2) The Envir9mncntal,i)a,mage Reduction Qo a is to achieve this without using copper or aluminum sulfhtes or other chemicals,which may cause harm to fish and/or wildlife while not adversely interrupting the nature food chain. 3) The) ecxeution Goal is to provide water quality that fully supports swimming,sport fishing,and provides high quality visual aesthetics that are void of unbalanced aquatic vegetation. Sincerely • • Mark Miles president MAY 25 '00 02:57FM P.2 Products background; Clarify TM-This microbial product has been approved for use by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for use in all Minnesota lakes where natural or man-made pollutants have caused an undesired effect.CiarlfyTM contains microorganisms that consume a wide range of these pollutants including but not limited to Oil,Antifreeze,Nitrogen,Phosphorous,Fertilizers,Fecal matter from geese,pets,and wild animals.Cellulose, Cotton fibers,Sludge's,Sediment,Leaves, Grass Clippings and other Organic matter. ClarifyTM has been under development for use in recreational bodies of water since 1998.The microorganisms that make up the entire package have been developed over the last 20+years for specific usage in oil spill cleanups,waste water treatment facilities, odor reduction in hog confinement facilities and biological composting of organic material, ClarlfyTM has the ability to replace algae in the food chain while remaining part of the food chain. This is critical so that nature's system is not adversely affected. ClarifyTM comes in a cotton incubation bag that is sunk in strategic locations in and around the body of water. When the water temperature ranges between 70-90 degrees each transparent microorganism will obtain its reproductive peak. Each cell will divide approximately every 20—30 minutes. That makes each cell double in that time period with or without sunlight,as these microorganisms do not require sunlight to survive, Example: 1 cell becomes 2,2 become 4,4 becomes 8. Using this model 1 cell can generate approximately I.7 billion cells within a 12-hour period. Once maximum population has been achieved and the food source depleted they will die and become a natural part of the food chain. Nature's Weed Control for Ponds is derived from food grade soy oils and molasses. This is applied two weeks to one month after the ClarifyTM incubators have been installed. The time differentiation will be based on rainfall,temperatures, and water clarity,which provide us with a visual gauge of success. At this juncture the NWC for Ponds is added directly to the areas where it will come in contact with the foliage, NWC for Ponds will then stimulate the plants cells to photosynthesize at an increased rate. With the absence of sufficient food filamentous algae,chars,milfoil,etc.will starve out within days to a few weeks. NWC for Ponds will not adversely affect non-targeted plants as direct contact is required for control and • accidental over spray will rapidly disperse. Clarifyrm will then consume the dead vegetation prior to be coming a visual or odorous nuisance. Treatment Plan 1) Install one cloth CierlfyTM microbial incubator per 250,000 gallons of water in each of the 9 detention ponds,These detention ponds will serve as ideal microbial breeding areas as the water temperature will be higher than the lake area and the source and level of the pollutants are higher. This will also result in the microbial colonies migrating into the down stream areas and then into Round Lake. 2) Install one cloth ClarifyTM microbial incubator per 125,000 gallons of water. This will consume the excess available nutrients in Round Lake within the shortest time period. 3) Spray NWC for Ponds onto the foliage areas within 50' of the shoreline where a reduction of that species is desired.Placement will be at city discretion. 4) Every 30 days visual monitoring and sample collection of each pond will be used to determine when and where follow-up treatments are needed. The treatments will be performed as needed to maintain the desired environmental goals previously set forth. MAY 25 '00 02:57PM P.3 • Proposed Costs and Duration Project area description and prices for the next 2 years. This will remain in effect until May 1,2001 unless canceled in writing by December 2000. If at anytime during the season the Environmental Goals set forth on page one are not being achieved and GPDC,cannot accomplish those goals with the exception of inclement weather,any agreement between us can be altered or cancelled if necessary. Inclement weather is defined as less than 70-degree temperatures for more than 5 days and/or 4"of rain within a 72-hour period. 11or each of these exceptions additional products may be required to bring the Environmental Goals into the targeted range. 1) ClarifyTM treatment area including detention ponds equals not to exceed 65 surface acres without prior written authorization for the city. 2) NWC for Ponds treatment areas including excess floating aquatic vegetation and 50'from shoreline excess benthic vegetation for Round Lake. Not to exceed 20 surface acres without prior written authorization for the city. Based on a total of not more than 65 surface acres the prices are listed below. Total project cost for 2000$40,000.00 • • Total project cost for 2001 $35,000.00 In the event the surface acres exceed 65 surface acres the cost for each additional acre will$600.00 Future treatment plans for Round Lake And Goose repellant options The detention ponds will remain at the same application rates and prices. The detention ponds will act as large incubators that will assist in the reduction of pollution prior to it getting into the lake,which will then require fewer products and less attention, Once these first two seasons treatments have taken full effect,it is likely that a reduction of 50%in the prices relating to the 35 acres in Round Lake. Based on a cost of$600.00 dollars per acre. The savings in annual treatments should be in the range of$10,500,00 leaving the annual cost of water quality monitoring and treatments to be$24,500.00. I would also suggest that our Goose Repel should be used on the park areas to keep the level of fecal material down to a minimum. This product should be applied once per month for$125.00/Acre in June, July,August,and September. Precautions NWC for ponds: None Known Clarify:None Known Goose Repel: Stay off of treated area for 24 hours or until dry, 5 Executive Summary - Overview This report details the results of a Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) of Round Lake. The UAA is a structured scientific assessment of the chemical, physical, and biological conditions in a water body. The analysis includes diagnosis.of the causes of observed problems and prescription of alternative remedial measures (such as a diagnostic feasibility study)that will result in the attainment of intended beneficial uses of Round Lake. The analysis is based on historical water quality data, the results of an intensive 1996 through 1997 lake and watershed runoff water quality monitoring program, and computer simulations of watershed runoff(given current land use conditions) calibrated to the 1996 through 1997 data set. Water quality goals were set for the lake that correspond to its intended beneficial uses (e.g., swimming and fishing). Management options were then assessed to determine attainment or non attainment of the lake's beneficial uses. • Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District Water Quality Goals The approved Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District Water Management Plan, .1996, articulated five specific goals for Roiin.d Lake. These goals address recreation, water quality, M . aquatic communities, water quantity, and wildlife. Wherever possible, Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) goals for Round Lake have been quantified using a standardized lake rating system termed the Carlson's Trophic State Index(TSI). Thisrating,system considers the lake's total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, and Secchi disc transparency measurements to assign it a water quality index number that reflects its general level of fertility. The resulting index values generally range between 0 and 100, with increasing values indicating more fertile conditions. Total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, and Secchi disc transparency are key water quality parameters upon which TSI statistics are computed,for the following reasons: • • Phosphorus generally controls the growth of algae in lake systems. Of all the substances needed for biological growth,phosphorus is typically the limiting nutrient. • • Chlorophyll a is the main pigment in algae. Therefore, the amount of chlorophyll a in the water indicates the abundance of algae present in the lake. • • 204558 {P • • Secchi disc transparency is a measure of water clarity and is inversely i:elated to the abundance - of algae. Although any one or all three parameters can be used to compute a TSI, water transparency is most often used, since peoples'perceptions of water clarity are most directly related to recreational • use impairment. The TSI rating system is scaled to place a mesotrophic (medium fertility level) • lake on the scale between 40 and 50, and high and low fertility lakes (eutrophic and oligotrophic) • toward the high and low ends of the TSI range, respectively. Characteristics of lakes in different trophic status categories are listed below with their respective TSI ranges: 1. Oligotrophic—[20 5 TSI_<38] clear, low productivity lakes, with total phosphorus concentrations less than or equal to 10 pg/L, chlorophyll a concentrations less than or equal to • • 2 pg/L, and Secchi disc transparencies greater than or equal to 4.6 meters (15 feet). • • 2. Mesotrophic—[38 <TSI 5 50] intermediate productivity lakes, with 10 to 25 pg/L of total phosphorus, 2 to 8 j.ig/L of chlorophyll a, and Secchi disc measurements of 2 to 4.6 meters (6 to 15 feet). 3. Eutrophic—[50 <TSI <_ 62] high productivity lakes relative to a basic natural level, with 25 to • 57 pg/L of phosphorus, 8 to 26 pg/L of chlorophyll a, and Secchi disc measurements of 0.85 to 2 meters (2.7 to 6 feet). ' ' 4. Rypereutrophic—[62 < TSI 5 80] extremely productive lakes which are highly eutrophic, disturbed and unstable (i.e., fluctuating in their water quality on a daily and seasonal scale, producing gases, off-flavor, and toxic substances, experiencing periodic anoxia and fish kills, • etc), with total phosphorus concentrations greater than 57 pg/L, chlorophyll a concentrations greater than 26 pg/L, and Secchi disc measurements less than. 0.8 meters (less than 2.7 feet). The RPBCWD goals for Round Lake include the following: • • • 1. The Recreation Goal is to provide water quality that: (1)fully•supports swimming, applying the "MPCA Use Support Classification for Swimming Relative to Carlson's Trophic State Index by Ecoregion" and, (2) achieves a sport fishery that includes a balance of predator fish(e.g„ • ;; northern pike, bass) and planktivores (e.g., bluegills). This goal is attainable, but only with the implementation of lake and watershed management practices as described in this UAA 204558 T 2. The Water Quality Goal is a trophic state index score that meets or exceeds the necessary level to attain and maintain full support of swimming and fishing: a Trophic State Index(TSIsD) of 53 or lower. This goal is also attainable, but only with the implementation of lake and . watershed management practices discussed in this UAA. 3. The Aquatic Communities Goal is water quality that fully supports fishing, according to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resource (MDNR) "Ecological Use Classification" and achieves a balanced fishery. This goal is attainable, but only with the implementation of lake • and watershed management practices listed berein. • 4. The Water Quantity Goal is to manage surface water runoff from a regional flood, the critical 100-year frequency storm event. Construction of an outlet to Round Lake as part of the Eden Prairie Chain-of-Lakes Basic Water Management Project achieved this goal, now and for the future. 5. The Wildlife Goal for Round Lake is to protect existing,beneficial wildlife uses. The wildlife goal has been achieved, but the current wildlife use of the lake is impeding the achievement of the lake's recreation, water quality, and aquatic community goals. There is substantial use of Round Lake by waterfowl, particularly geese. Water Quality Problem Assessment • An evaluation of 1972 through 1997 Round Lake water quality data was completed to determine • • the extent of Round Lake water quality degradation. Results of this evaluation indicate that historical degradation of Round Lake water quality, and its present poor condition,are related to excessive inputs of runoff-borne phosphorus from its urbanized watershed. Historical Water Quality Trends Trend analyses of 1972 through 1997 data indicate a significant degradation of the lake's water • . quality. The results of regressions analyses indicate that average summer Secchi disc transparency • has declined from 3.2 meters in 1972 to 1.5 meters in 1997 (see Figure EX 1). Over this same time period, epilimnetic(upper 6 feet) total phosphorus and chlorophyll a concentrations also changed (see Figure EX-1): phosphorus increasing to 70 ig/L from 50 pg/L; and chlorophyll a rising to • • 20 lig/L from 13 p1.g/L over the 25-year time period. The results of the trend analysis indicate a continued decline in Round Lake water quality can be expected to occur unless management 204558 ']2'1 ' ROUND LAKE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS—1972 THROUGH 1997 • 120_Average Summer "):-. 4= (June-August) - 'Concentrations ;1.100- Sn + ._ N 80 Trend Line '\ O .� a 60 / Nik 4J 40 a. '" p 20 g, I- 70 75 80 85 • 90 95 ;-••' 4 YEAR 4 -1.e. ROUND LAKE ti ',.t., CHLOROPHYLL a—1972 THROUGH 1997 _Average Summer 35—(June-August) ii.t';_ —Concentrations " ` • 30 tt"-.1 i -,•,h ; 25 Trend Line •.,t4-1-'r;. 20 = • Ti a ;4, ce 15 r�, r• ;1 , O ' 10 '� . 5 d ei !,,, `'`; • 70 75 80 85 90 95 _., -i'• YEAR :'E• j - ROUND LAKE : t i SECCHI DISC- 1972 THROUGH 1997 t',,; •, 0 „Y -r Average Summer —(June-August) -1 —Concentrations 0 \ i w-g Trend Line I co • 'I -5 70 75 80 85 90 95 YEAR k _ Figure EX-1 Round Lake Trend Analysis --1972-1997 Total Phosphorus and.Chlorophyll a Concentrations and Secchi Disc Transparencies i ill . . practices to stop the decline are identified and implemented: A comparison of baseline (1972-1987) and current(1988-1997) data indicates total phosphorus concentrations (means of summer 3. I �, averages)have increased by approximately 50 percent,from baseline to current; corresponding ;r^ chlorophyll a(means of summer averages) concentrations have increased by approximately . i 70 percent;and associated Secchi disc transparencies have decreased by more than 50 percent. •,i ` Current Water Quality s ., , The current water quality of Round Lake is poor, and recreational activities are impaired by el summer algal blooms. The 1997 total phosphorus concentration data indicate the lake was "'--.1eutrophic i.; p (�.e., poor water quality) during early summer and hypereutrophic i.e., very poor water i,,, 4. J quality) during middle and late summer. The 1997 chlorophyll a concentration measurements were in the mesotrophic (i.e., good water quality) category during the early summer,but were in the V`YI eutrophic to hypereutrophic categories during the remaining portion of the summer. The 1997 _, I Secchi disc transparency measurements were in the mesotrophic category during the early summer . -- and were in the eutrophic category during the remainder of the summer. The data indicate that ,':,,,-4,,,, .', ,: 1_ minimal recreational use impairment occurs duringthe earlysummer,but moderate to severe P 44,.' recreational use impairment(primarily swimming) occurs during the remaining portion of the r-1' i summer. `'" i " - — Watershed Runoff Pollution 2. i Round Lake's 444-acre watershed is fully developed and consists primarily of single-family }.,, residential, grassland, and public-sector(i.e., Eden Prairie High School)land uses,plus roads (See ''"`'" Figures EX 2 and EXComputersimulationsof-3). runoff waterqualityindicatethat annual ry'`N�� thePo `;11 total phosphorus load to Round Lake varies from 127 pounds under dry climatic conditions(i.e., . '' : -1 • • 19 inches annual precipitation)to 331 pounds under wet climatic conditions(i.e., 41 inches annual 4}r I"` precipitation; see Figure EX-4). The average phosphorus yield from the Round Lake watershed is 'i. approximately 0.37 lb/ac/yr. Consequently,the average rate of phosphorus loading to the 32-acre lake is 5 pounds of phosphorus per acre of lake per year, which is excessive and causes water quality problems. Round Lake's phosphorus budget for 1997 indicates approximately 58 percent of the lake's annual phosphorus load enters the lake from inflow point RLP(See Figures EX-2 and EX-5). The lake's direct watershed contributes approximately 23 percent of the lake's annual phosphorus load. Atmospheric deposition and the lake's resident geese each comprise approximately 7 percent of the lake's annual load. Detention Basin RLE comprises less than 4 percent and Detention Basins A and C comprise less than 1 percent of the lake's annual phosphorus load. : ; 204558 • _s The water gnnli y benefits and costs of these two alternative combinations are presented in Table 1. Figure.EX-6 compares the minimum and maximum costs of the two.alternatives. The Alternative 1 option in Table EX-1 is recommended to achieve all District goals under all climatic conditions. • Table EX-1 Benefits and Casts of Two Goal Achievement Alternatives • Trophic State Index(TSI)Value Wet Model Average Alternative Year Calibration Year Dry Year Combinations of BMPs Estimated (1983) (1997) (1995) (1988) ;+ +! and Management District (41 inches of (34 inches of (27 inches of (19 inches of Cost Activities Goal precipitation) precipitation) precipitation) precipitation) (Dollars) 11' 1: Fully Meets <53 . 49 47 47 ' 51 $902,100 3r� '`• RPBCWD Water Quality Goals 2: Meets RPBCWD <53 51 51 52 56* $775,100 a'. • _ Goals During All but • the Dry Year ,ru Sri . • ii riff ai • • • 204558 OPTIONS FOR ROUND LAKE BEACH/WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT Option A Option B Option C _Wall Demolition $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Utilities(by City) 1 Y2"water line $644 Outflow structure 1,000 Diffusers 1,000 2"Aeration line extension 500 $3,144 N/A N/A _Site Grading $1,133 $1,133 $1,133 _Site Paving(by City) $360 $360 $360 Planting-Trees,Shrubs,Mulch $5,730 $5,730 $5,730 Walls&Structures • Retaining wall(by City • $11,400 $11,400 $11,400 Water floating curtain 90,000 N/A N/A Floating marker N/A 1,000 1,000 Boulders 4,200 4,200 4,200 Ramp 1,000 1,000 1,000 $106,600 $17,600 $17,600 Site Furnishings Benches,signs,bike racks $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 Vinyl fencing 5,040 5,040 5,040 $8,040 $8,040 $8,040 ::.:.:::::::.�::::.::.:,:::..�::..�::::::...... ............ r,:r r .:....,:::..,::.:, .:;-,: :;.:..�::::::.�;:.:.::..�...i:-::::.:.:::.,:rfff:::::.:::.:::.:::::::r:..::::..:::..r::.:..: •::?.,>••c;{{r:+rci.:,,;.{::s.{::/.�•.r'::{{••":fl{^:Yf::..rr. r f:...... :.:•Y.•:{ :.•n:....: .t•�,v~;:•: ..; :::..............:. , ..:,:-...:..::.;r./N...ri..y:r:f.:-•.�fl,::•:::. •fl:/•f .c r.....:..::::::....::: .• .• •:••:..-rf::•:f::..:•:::;::;i:;• f.;. .n`'r;;'•:•":{ri✓r�.:. ri:f::}l.,cr:;.:�:- ,: ••:•:tv.:+ I r:/.r -,; ::.'r.;3:.l rcir.;,i..' ::xr`.': _ Y@'Ili�ll�. .r',fi.:.,fr"' :.:wc^:{{>�{::{rr`.: .✓.off '��•fi?{{�:{r;:•::�:<:;.::::.:-i� : f .. .�.. '::.f- :::{'l:�ztal::��n .. :.::r.:r.•:•..•...:......r -�.::::....:..:{:.:f. :.....r..i:,:. " "-- ....... $��� '...::.:r::...-.2f a.✓fr.:...:.....r.:..ri.:..:r�..:??rr:r�:r:::fr:;:::::::::.•.•:r..::......:..'Y-.... :::...::.::.:::.i..:.:'.:.:':::::r:.�r:: ::.:�:fr:.>.... .f.:: Water Treatment Cost for 10 Years Clarify($40,0001'yr,$35,000 2nd yr,$24,500/yr N/A $271,00 N/A after) $50,000 N/A N/A Operation costs for aeration system$5,000/yr N/A N/A $766,500 • • Barr Engineering Proposal Alum Treatment N/A N/A 200:000 Alum Plant Operating Cost $50,000 271,000 $966,500 ..:.................r..- v....�.v..-r ••:::v :.-.--... .......-nvv..:iiv"ti:•:4:r:�.ifry;:::Y•:ti+^::v:::.,::�. '::'+f:r...--r-:: - :::4'Y...:::r. : .:f?h x.-.- .. :::/:.8::�v:pi::r:{�ri✓ri':::}--' ------ .... :.::.:• ..... :... , :::::: ?:{{:?iJi':::iir'-:: :n•:i:{f.:ffei::':%:i" •i-!.•rv.::: ?. :/,,... +:fi..,o-:Y{.o•r.:..:;ir {{:{ {':`•4in .!{':•.{{:{•.'•:::{:.+':: f.cf.:i i r.•r:: :::{i +::.t.:+.:.:•:.+: :;?'-,-- -.?f..�•:•:i:0.n.ff...-...f.•..-..- .trr..::.r:::. .-f...i %.:.:ii:+f•:is i,H..n y fi•: :.,�#'�r::':'' l[� :e :.. . SI~�:-::�.. rr,'•:--- ....r::::..F::<,,:,.:::::,�:.�:: r......, .:r. .: ..... �r.�:r ,:.;...:...........................r...:.....-..-.. ......:::::: �::,...::..r. ..:.::,� : . ::.... ,.:.:-�$ � � :rf.<::f:.:: :..:._r;,��00 `'�'•.'.-3�1���•.�; ... Option A Option B Option C Beach Curtain Greener Pastures- Barr Engineering_ Clarify Proposal After 10 Years Relatively clean water in Lake and area NURP ponds Lake cleaned to TSI of less Results the swimming beach area cleaned to TSI of less than 53. Geese kept out of only. Any improvement to than38. Geese kept out of swimming area as much as lake water quality would be swimming area as much as possible. Cost for goose added to this cost. Geese possible. Cost for goose removal in Round Lake kept out of swimming area removal in Round Lake Park and contracting for as much as possible. Cost Park and contracting for dog to harass geese is for goose removal in Round dog to harass geese is additional. Lake Park and contracting additional. • • for dog to harass geese is This annual operating cost additional. *TSI-Carlson Trophic estimate is based on State Index-a rating $20,000/year for ten years. This annual operating cost system to measure water We anticipate this cost is estimated at$5,000/year. transparencies,as well as would increase over time. We anticipate this cost the level of phosphorous would increase over time. and chlorophyll. High - fertility is over 53,medium is 38-53,and low is less than 38. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 6,2000 SECTION: Report of Community Development and Financial Services Director ITEM NO: XII.D. SERVICE AREA: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development 1999 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR) and Financial Services Don Uram-Director Requested Action: Move to: Accept the 1999 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR). Background: Minnesota statutes require that by June 30 of each year, the City prepare a financial report for activities of the previous year. This accounting report will be forwarded to the State by that deadline. Preparation of the report is largely the work of the Finance Department. The report is prepared with review by the independent auditing firm of Kern,DeWenter,Viere,Ltd. Steve Wischmann,Manager in the accounting firm will make a presentation of the financial report. In general,the City's financial conditions and control procedures are sound. Attachment 1. 1999 CAFR 2. Management Letter