Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 09/22/2025Agenda Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting 7 p.m. Monday, September 22, 2025 City Center Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ATTENDEES Planning Commission Members: John Kirk, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Robert Taylor, Daniel Grote, Frank Sherwood, Charles Weber, Phou Sivilay, Trisha Duncan City Staff: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner; Carter Schulze, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources MEETING AGENDA I. Call the Meeting to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Minutes A. Approval of the minutes for Planning Commission Meeting held on July 28, 2025. V. Public Hearing A. Valley View Hotel Development (2025-07) 1. Guide Plan Change on 59.6 acres 2. Zone Change on 59.6 acres 3. Preliminary Plat on 59.6 acres 4. PUD Concept Review on 6.59 acres 5. PUD District Review w/ Waivers on 6.59 acres 6. Site Plan Review on 6.59 acres B. Roers Eden Prairie Apartments (2025-06) 1. Guide Plan Change on 5.86 acres 2. Zone Change on 5.86 acres 3. PUD Concept Review on 5.86 acres 4. PUD District Review w/ Waivers on 5.86 acres 5. Site Plan Review on 5.86 acres PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA September 22, 2025 Page 2 VI. Planner’s Report VII. Members’ Reports VIII. Adjournment UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, JULY 28, 2025 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Frank Sherwood, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Trisha Duncan, Robert Taylor, Dan Grote, Charles Weber; Phou Sivilay CITY STAFF: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner; Carter Shulze, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Parks and Natural Resources Manager; Kristin Harley, Recording Secretary I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL Commission member Sivilay was absent. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Taylor moved, seconded by Grote to approve the agenda. MOTION CARRIED 8-0. IV. MINUTES MOTION: Duncan moved, seconded by Farr to approve the minutes of July 14, 2025. MOTION CARRIED 8-0. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PRAIRIE VILLAGE PET HOSPITAL ADDITION (2025-08) • Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review on 0.46 acres • Planned Unit Development (PUD) District Review with Waivers on 0.46 acres • Site Plan Review on 0.46 acres Alan Hupp, of Hupp Holdings LLC, presented a PowerPoint and detailed the application. He explained the Prairie Village Pet Hospital had been in place for 40 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2025 Page 2 years and he wished to grow the hospital. He introduced himself as a 30-year resident of Eden Prairie, also a parent, and was involved with the Helping Paws Foster Home. He was also a Twin Cities real estate investor and developer since 2010. The existing pet hospital was 1,995 square feet and built in 1985 at 7815 Terrey Pine Court. The site was purchased in July 2024 by Hupp Holdings IX, LLC. CareVet was the current tenant, which was a national operator with over 200 vet hospitals across 35 states. The Eden Prairie clinic was a top performer but had outgrown its capacity. The applicant was requesting to remodel the current space and construct a 1,114 square foot addition. Hupp wished to reimagine the space, enlarge the surgical treatment area, and make the staff flow more efficient. The client-facing experience would be improved to make this a premier vet clinic. Hupp explained the design would respect the existing land use patterns by complementing existing buildings and surrounding properties, maintaining neighborhood cohesion, and complying with the Comprehensive Plan. The project team was collaborating with departments at City Hall to comply with City Code. Hupp Holdings would privately fund development and extend to CareVet a 10-year lease. The project was requesting two waivers: one for permeability and one for parking setbacks. The development was requesting 52 percent permeability instead of the required 70 percent, or 9,465 square feet instead of the current 12,104 square feet. Hupp added the City of Eden Prairie was working with the DNR to change this permeability requirement in the future. A water garden would be part of the landscaping, and there would be more grass than in the neighboring properties. A setback waiver was needed due to the encroachment of the driveway on the 10- foot setback and three built parking spaces on the 35-foot setback. Farr asked why the proof of parking stalls were in the back instead of the front of the building. Hupp replied this was a good question, but even if in front the project would still need the waiver. He offered to discuss this with his team. Farr noted the existing retaining wall appeared about to fail. Hupp replied it was stable but ideally would be replaced. This would have to be extended at any rate. Farr commending the proposed matching existing materials but recommended the entire roof be replaced at one time in order to match, which was also a good idea with the brick matching. Hupp replied the project would not replace all the brick, but he would take Farr’s advice on the shingles. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2025 Page 3 Barnhart presented the staff report. There were three requests: a PUD concept, PUD with waivers, and the Site Plan. There was no waiver required for the rear setback, and the drive aisle serving did not have to meet that setback. The impervious surface was capped at 30 percent, and the applicant proposed increasing that to 52 percent. The applicant would build a rain garden, whereas there was currently no stormwater management on the property. This design had more green space than the surrounding areas. Staff conditions its recommendation on additional information on the rain garden from the applicant before going before the City Council. The proof of parking was supported by staff. The business need suggested 14 spaces. Staff recommended approval. Taylor asked if the veterinary clinic would remain open during construction and the remodeling. Hupp stated it would be a three-phased project lasting six months, and the clinic would remain open. The new addition would be for surgery. Farr asked if the PUD district was an overlay or if the PUD was being added to this site. Barnhart replied the PUD was being added to allow the waivers. Duncan asked what would have be done otherwise. Barnhart replied there would instead be variances, the standards of which were established by the state, and more challenging than granting waivers. Stormwater management goals would be realized with this development but were not required under a variance. MOTION: Grote moved, seconded by Kirk to close the public hearing. Motion carried 8-0. Duncan asked if the PUD was only being proposed in this proposal, or if there were other additional PUDs in the area. Barnhart replied the proposal was for this property only, although it was likely there were other PUDs in the area. When this property was originally developed, it was approved with variances, which had different standards than in the past. Now, waivers and a PUD were being pursued. Kirk stated he supported the application and was a longtime customer. MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Taylor to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review on 0.46 acres; Planned Unit Development (PUD) District Review with Waivers on 0.46 acres; Site Plan Review on 0.46 acres as recommended by the staff report dated July 28, 2025. Motion carried 8-0. B. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Zoning District Change (2024-09) • Zoning Change from Rural to Parks and Open Space on 4.2 acres Linda Loomis, former administrator of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, stated this District was created in 1960 to act as the local sponsor to assist PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2025 Page 4 the Corps of Engineers in maintenance of the river navigation channel. The material dredged by the Corps of Engineers would be disposed of the District. This was meant to improve water quality and drainage. This proposal was brought to the Watershed by the City of Eden Prairie, as the result of a study on increasing rates of erosion. The site was located at River Mile 19.5, near the intersection of Riverview Road and Mooer Lane, and also known as Study Area Three. Loomis displayed a map and explained there was a City stormwater pond created at the request of the MPCA. She displayed a county plat showing the erosion. She then displayed a historical map showing the bluff line in 1937, 1969, and 2008, showing the results of the erosion. The Watershed District planned to stabilize the bluff with state funds and were going to bid this September. However, to do this the area had to first become public property. The Watershed purchased a parcel to be subdivided, then rezoned to Park and Open Spaces. The Watershed District would own and maintain this property in perpetuity. Loomis followed up with displaying photographs of the eroded bluffs. Loomis added the District was working with homeowners on managing stormwater. She showed a photograph of the stormwater pond, which she explained flooded often, filling in with sediment and creating gullies, which was problematic for the City. She added the District was working with the City on permits and how to manage stormwater. Farr asked how the stabilizing infill would be built up. Loomis replied an access road from Riverview Road would be constructed to access the river. Taylor asked what materials would be used for stabilization, and Loomis replied boulders would be used. These would stabilize the toe of the slope at the curve seen on the map, rather than going completely upslope. This would also prevent the flooding which resulted in the City constantly having to stabilize the pond. Taylor asked if the sediment would be removed from the pond, and Loomis replied she could not say for sure if that would be done. She added in 2014 the City installed bank pins that disappeared in three months. High increases were seen in the Minnesota River due in part to the swing bridge and railroad track at River Mile 14.2 acted like a funnel, backing up water upstream. Therefore, there were significant fluctuations in this area. Farr noted a graphic in the staff report showing how the river trended north. Loomis replied this aggradation was caused by sediment being removed by the faster current to the north on the river than on the south side, causing the south side to fill in. Farr noted this project would keep the north from eroding but not prevent sedimentation on the south and asked if the District was required to maintain a certain river width for navigation. Loomis replied this was not required in this area of the river, as all commercial navigation ended in Savage to the east. Once the river was stabilized the hope was it would come to a new equilibrium. Only recreational boating occurred in this part of the river. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2025 Page 5 Barnhart presented the staff report. This was a simple zoning change, since the applicant needed to own the property for the grant funding, requiring a rezoning. The 4.2 acres parcel would be split from the larger 16-acre piece. Under the current Rural zoning, the minimum lot area is10 acres, but this did not apply to Parks and Open Space. This zoning change was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would be stabilizing and protecting the site from future erosion. There was a pending lot split which would be an administrative approval. Staff recommended approval. MOTION: Sherwood moved, seconded by Weber to close the public hearing. Motion carried 8-0. MOTION: Duncan moved, seconded by Grote to recommend approval of the Zoning Change from Rural to Parks and Open Space on 4.2 acres as recommended by the staff report dated July 28, 2025. Motion carried 8-0. PLANNERS’ REPORT Barnhart announced there would be no August 11, 2025 meeting but did anticipate one for August 25, 2025. Duncan asked for an update on the Dan Foss application. Barnhart replied the City Council approved it, and the Comprehensive Plan Amendment was sent to the Metropolitan Council. Based on the scale of the potential development, Met Council staff could not approve it administratively, so it would go before a Metropolitan Council Subcommittee and then the Full Committee in August. He expected completion by mid-August. MEMBERS’ REPORTS VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Taylor moved, seconded by Kirk to adjourn. Motion carried 8-0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:39 p.m. Planning Commission Staff Report Date: September 22, 2025 Location: 11902 Valley View Road Subject: Valley View Development (Residence Inn/ Restaurant) From: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner Applicant: John Ferrier – CSM Lodging Review period expires: November 29, 2025 ITEM DESCRIPTION The applicant requests approvals necessary to subdivide a 59.6 acre parcel, and construct a 157 unit hotel and an 8,000 sq ft restaurant on approximately 6.59 acres. The balance of the subject property, approximately 53 acres, will be retained as open space as an outlot. REQUESTED ACTIONS • Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Parks and Open Space, Office, and Medium Density Residential to Parks and Open Space and Commercial on 59.6 acres • Zoning Change from Rural to Parks / Open Space and Commercial Regional Service (C- Reg-Ser) on 59.6 acres • Preliminary Plat of 59.6 acres into 2 lots, 1 outlot, and Right of Way. • Planned Unit Development Concept Plan Review on 6.59 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with Waivers on 6.59 acres • Site Plan Review on 6.59 acres BACKGROUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING The proposal includes a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan to reguide the property from residential, parks & open space, and office to parks & open space and commercial uses. The zoning map is also proposed to be amended, aligning the zoning with the intended use and the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment requests to change the zoning from Rural to Parks / Open Space and C-Reg-Service. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Existing Proposed Zoning Map Existing Proposed Medium Density Residential 18.01 Rural 59.6 Parks and Open Space 24.98 46.73 Parks and Open Space 53.01 Office 16.56 Commercial 6.59 Commercial 12.82 Staff Report – Valley View Development September 22, 2025 Page 2 Tree inventories, wetland delineations, and improved mapping allow for a better understanding of the extent of the natural features of the site. This understanding supports a land use amendment that protects these features, while providing for commercial development on the south third of the site. The proposed land use of parks and open space, and commercial is more appropriate given the city’s long term goals for the area. Graphics illustrating these changes are included at the end of this report. SITE PLAN The site plan includes two buildings, a 5 story, 157 unit hotel, and a single story restaurant building. Hotel The hotel building is proposed to be located on the larger lot, and include most of the parking areas, which is located on the south, west, and north sides of the building. An access drive will be located all around the building to support fire requirements. Primary entrance to the hotel will be on the south side of the building, and a circular drive off of the lobby will provide off- loading area for guests. A maintenance accessory building, transformer, and dumpster enclosure are located to the NW corner of the building. These buildings will match the architecture and materials of the principal building. A patio area is proposed adjacent to the lobby area. North of Staff Report – Valley View Development September 22, 2025 Page 3 the hotel is a retaining wall, allowing for a development site while minimizing the impact to the steep slopes and vegetation in the area. Restaurant The restaurant is intended to be a 200 seat, 8500 sq ft “high turnover sit down” restaurant, though the brand has not been identified to date. There is no drive-through proposed. The restaurant also offers a patio on the south side of the building. The restaurant site includes parking in a lot to the north, and additional parking near the main entrance to the west. PRELIMINARY PLAT The preliminary plat subdivides the existing 59.6 acre parcel into 2 buildable lots, an outlot, and 2 small remnants (about 259 sq ft total) for Valley View Road Right of Way. Lot 1 will house the hotel and is 5.27 acres. The restaurant will be located on Lot 2 and will be 1.32 acres. Both lots are sized appropriately, have street frontage, and otherwise comply with applicable zoning and subdivision standards. The outlot will ultimately be owned by the City for preservation purposes. The Development Agreement will include specific details regarding the outlot. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS The purpose of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) as stated in the City Code is to provide for a more creative and efficient approach to the use of land within the City; to allow variety in the types of environment available to people and distribution of overall density of population and intensity of land use where desirable and feasible; and provide for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design. The applicant is requesting the following waivers: A. Building Height – From 40’ to 52-2”. The additional height allows for a reduced building footprint, balancing additional units with minimal impact on the natural features and zero additional impact on views from across the lake. The applicant has provided information that shows the buildings are not visible from across Bryant Lake year round, even with the additional height. Staff Report – Valley View Development September 22, 2025 Page 4 B. Parking Setback – The applicant requests a waiver for the parking setback, since the property line between the restaurant and hotel is located between parking spaces. This waiver supports maximizing the number of parking spaces for the restaurant site. C. Shoreland Setback – From the 200’ Commercial Setback to 100’ from SuperValu Pond. The reduced setbacks are proposed to accommodate the location of the building and the parking. The applicant has proposed a plan that balances the overall parking for the site in order to minimize impact to the shoreland area and regulations. This waiver request is also impacted by existing bluff and wetland setbacks, and a desire to minimize tree removals. The waiver is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of shoreland ordinance and will not undermine the purpose of the setback due to the proposed development conditions that will provide additional protections for the shoreland and water quality. The stormwater management techniques and enhanced landscaping plans will preserve and enhance the quality of public waters. D. Shore Impact Zone – Proposal to remove vegetation from a portion of the Shore Impact Zone along Super Valu Pond, where no vegetative removal is permitted. The shoreland setback requirements, vegetation removal limitations, and impervious cover restrictions around Super Valu pond greatly impacts the buildability of the subject parcel. The site’s grading and clearing plan is intended to balance the protection of sensitive resources including shoreline, wetlands, bluffs and floodplain with development along County State Aid Highway. Areas disturbed will be reseeded with native vegetation. TRAFFIC STUDY/ ACCESS A traffic study was conducted to determine if the surrounding road system can support the new uses on the site, or if modifications will be necessary. Access to the site is proposed along Valley View Road (CSAH 39) at the existing signalized intersection with Market Place Drive and at a modified access point just east of the development where Valley View Road will be reconfigured with a three-quarter access. The three-quarter access allows ingress movements to the site from eastbound and westbound Valley View Road with egress only allowed onto westbound Valley Staff Report – Valley View Development September 22, 2025 Page 5 View Road. The development is expected to generate approximately 154 am peak hour, 171 pm peak hour, and 2,176 daily trips. All trips are new since the site is currently undeveloped. The traffic study analyzed the two intersections referenced above, as well as several other intersections spanning from Valley View Road and Flying Cloud Drive to Valley View Road and Plaza Drive. Turning movement counts were collected and the Level of Service (LOS), which is a measurement of vehicle delay and intersection efficiency, were analyzed for the Build and No- Build conditions forecasted for 2027. All study intersections are expected to operate at a LOS D (lower threshold for overall operating conditions) or better during the weekday am and pm peak hours, and no significant delay or queuing issues were observed. Most intersections will operate at LOS A and B. However, the study did recommend coordination with Hennepin County should occur to revise signal timing to improve side-street performance. Analysis from the study will be shared with the County, and the County is currently working with MnDOT and the City on signal timing optimization for the roadway network within Eden Prairie in 2026-27 that can account for these changes. Construction of the three-quarter access is necessary as the County and City did not support construction of a full access or signalized intersection for safety and traffic operations reasons. The three-quarter access is expected to perform at an overall LOS A during weekday am and pm peak hours. The traffic study concluded that the surrounding roadway network can accommodate the additional traffic from this development and still operate acceptably. Staff also recommends internal wayfinding signage be added to aid in directing patrons to the existing signal using the internal access road. This would help to avoid the exiting right-only vehicles from making a U- turn on Valley View Road as noted in the neighborhood meeting. PARKING Parking for the hotel is based on the number of rooms, and the number of employees on the largest shift. The hotel includes 157 rooms, and the project narrative states that there are 5 employees on the largest shift, requiring 162 parking spaces. The hotel site includes 174 parking spaces. Restaurant parking is based on the number of seats, and the type of restaurant. Since the restaurant type has not yet been determined, the highest ratio of parking is used to determine parking requirements. A type three restaurant, a sit down restaurant that serves liquor, requires 1 space per 2 seats. For a 200 seat restaurant, 100 spaces are required. There are 40 spaces provided for the restaurant lot. The total parking requirement for the two businesses is 262 spaces, and 214 spaces are proposed. City Code includes a provision where the parking requirement can be reduced up to 20% and shared between two or more complimentary uses, provided the applicant can demonstrate that there is no substantial conflict in the peak parking demand and that there is an adequate amount of parking available. The applicant has provided a parking analysis to support the shared parking proposal and staff supports this analysis. Staff Report – Valley View Development September 22, 2025 Page 6 SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS The site plan shows a cross-walk connection between the hotel and the restaurant. There is also a cross-walk connection south of the restaurant to the property line, to proactively provide a connection in the event that a sidewalk or trail is added along the north side of Valley View. There is a trail along the south side of Valley View, and pedestrian access across Valley View is at the signalized intersection. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE AND MATERIALS Hotel The hotel design is driven by the Residence Inn brand requirements and city code. The lower three floors are brick (in two colors) and the upper two floors are a combination of fiber cement panels and stone veneer. All exterior facades meet or exceed the 75/25% class I requirement. Overall, 80% of the facades of the hotel are class I materials of brick, stone, and glass, exceeding the minimum standards. Restaurant Though the final brand for the restaurant has not yet been identified, the restaurant building is designed to be compatible with the general theme and architecture of the hotel. The developer proposes much of the same materials as in the hotel, all sides meet or exceed the minimum 75/25% standards for material, with 3 of the four sides exceeding 79.5% class I materials. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT A phase 1 assessment was completed on October 28, 2024. A phase I environmental assessment reviews a site for potential contamination risks. Because the property is undeveloped, there were no recognized environmental conditions for the site. Staff Report – Valley View Development September 22, 2025 Page 7 WETLAND, SHORELAND, AND BLUFF Wetlands, wetland setbacks, shoreland rules and regulations, and bluffs impact the northern 2/3 of the site which is proposed to be preserved through an outlot to be owned by the City. STEEP SLOPE The parcel contains steep slopes. City Council approval is necessary for development and grading activities within parcels containing steep slopes, and this will be noted in the Development Agreement. ENDANGERED, THREATENED OR SPECIAL CONCERN SPECIES The developer researched potential impacts to endangered, threatened, and special concerned species. This research found the habitat on site carried the potential of endangered or threatened species, though no direct impact was identified. These potential impacts are best mitigated through timing of clearing and grading and other best management practices as suggested by the results. DRAINAGE/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormwater will be managed and treated via underground containment on the north side of the hotel before discharge into Supervalu pond. A watershed district permit will also be required. A maintenance agreement will be required between the city, hotel, and restaurant site; this will be addressed in the Development Agreement. TREE LOSS AND GRADING The site is heavily wooded, and development is proposed for the southern 1/3 of the property. About 11% of the caliper inches on site are being removed, none of them heritage trees. There are 88 caliper inches required to be replaced to satisfy the tree replacement requirement. This will be satisfied as a payment-in-lieu. LANDSCAPING AND TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN Landscaping is based on the size of the buildings. The two buildings require 374 inches of landscaping, which is satisfied by a variety of trees, evergreens, shrubs, and perennials. SUSTAINABILITY The Building Sustainability Standards will apply to the hotel building, and the developer is designing the building to the LEED-Silver standard. The narrative indicates that 2% of the parking (5 spaces), will be EV ready. Other sustainability standards such as solar ready construction, and energy efficient appliances/ fixtures will be utilized. PARK FEES Park dedication will apply to this subdivision, to be paid at the time of building permit. SIGNS Both the hotel building and the restaurant will include wall and free-standing signage. Signage shall comply with the applicable sign regulations. Staff Report – Valley View Development September 22, 2025 Page 8 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING AND RESIDENT INPUT A neighborhood meeting was held on September 11th. The applicant summarized the meeting by saying that approximately 20 residents attended. Much of the discussion focused on traffic flow in and out of the development. Some neighbors expressed concern about vehicles leaving the development by turning right to go west and then doing U-turns to go east. The developer reported that some neighbors liked the idea of a ¾ intersection at the entry and the fact that there is an access easement with the school district to get exiting cars to the full intersection to the east. Additional directional signage indicating how to go east on Valley View through the school district site was recommended. Some neighbors expressed concern about the buildings being visible from adjacent properties. Additional sightline exhibits showing more views from Bryant Lake and the views from the west neighborhoods will be provided. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning District Change, Preliminary Plat, PUD Concept Review, PUD District Review with Waivers, and Site Plan Review for the hotel and restaurant as proposed, subject to the conditions listed below. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This is based on plans stamp dated August 1, 2025 and the following conditions: 1. Prior to release of the final plat, the applicant must: A. Provide a Cross Access, Parking and Utility Easement document over the private driveways, parking areas, and infrastructure located on the Property that provides cross access, shared parking, and utility access between Lots 1 and 2 of the Property. B. Pay trunk sewer and water charges or sign a Special Assessment Agreement. C. Pay connection fees. D. Submit a bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit (“security”) that guarantees completion of all public improvements equivalent to 125% of the cost of the improvements. E. Provide copies of legal documents, either in Association format or private covenant and agreement format to be approved by the City that shall address the following: • Describe the long term private maintenance or replacement agreement for the retaining walls. • Insertion of language in the documents that relinquishes the City of Eden Prairie from maintenance or replacement of the retaining walls. 2. Prior to land alteration permit issuance, the applicant must: A. Obtain permits and approvals from other agencies as needed. B. Comply with all terms and conditions of the Steep Slope Permit. C. Obtain City approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the property. D. Submit construction plans and project specifications for public infrastructure for review and approval by the City Engineer. Staff Report – Valley View Development September 22, 2025 Page 9 E. Submit detailed utility and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. F. Obtain and provide documentation of Watershed District approval. G. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. H. Provide construction grading limits and tree protection plan for review and approval by the City. I. Install erosion control at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by the City. J. Install fencing at the construction grading limits and tree protection areas as shown on the approved plans. K. Submit and receive written approval of an executed landscape agreement. L. Submit a landscaping letter of credit or escrow equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping. M. Provide temporary easements to do work off-site. N. Obtain written approval of a Wrecking Permit for the removal of buildings on the property. O. Make a cash payment for Tree Replacement as provided by City Code. P. Obtain a building permit for retaining wall construction from the City for any retaining walls greater than four feet in height. Q. Submit a land alteration bond, letter of credit, or escrow surety equivalent to 125% of the cost of the land alteration. R. Submit a Wetland Plan for approval by the Water Resources Coordinator. S. Provide proof that the Inspection and Maintenance Agreement for Private Stormwater Facilities has been recorded. 3. Prior to building permit issuance for the property, the applicant must: A. Provide proof that the Cross Access, Parking, and Utility Easement has been recorded. B. Pay the appropriate cash park fees. C. Provide recorded copies of any private covenants and agreements to the City following recording of the final plat. 4. The following waivers are granted through the PUD for the project as indicated in the plans stamp dated August 1, 2025: A. Building Height – From 40’ to 52-2”. B. Parking Setback of zero feet where 10 feet is required. C. Shoreland Setback – From the 200’ Commercial Setback to 100’ from SuperValu Pond. D. Shore Impact Zone – Proposal to remove vegetation from a portion of the Shore Impact Zone along Super Valu Pond, where no vegetative removal is permitted. 5. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, the applicant must: A. Construct the retaining wall(s) in accordance with the terms of the permit and terms and conditions of Exhibit C. B. Complete implementation of the lighting plan in Exhibit B. C. Complete construction of mechanical equipment screening. Staff Report – Valley View Development September 22, 2025 Page 10 D. Install EV charging equipment that is fully operational. E. Complete construction of the trash enclosure. F. Complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan. G. Deed transferring ownership of Outlot A shall be recorded. Memorandum TO: FROM: DATE: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner Mark Kronbeck, PLA, ASLA September 8, 2025 SUBJECT: Guide Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Site Plan Review and Preliminary Plat – Valley View Development, Eden Prairie _____________________________________________________________________________________ CSM Corporation is requesting the Valley View Development be considered for PUD Concept Review, Guide Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Site Plan Review and Preliminary Plat. The proposed redevelopment will consist of a 5-story, 157 room, 26,308 S.F. Residence Inn Hotel. Additionally, we are proposing an adjacent 8,600 S.F. sit down restaurant. The property is owned by UNFI and was part of the previous UNFI / Supervalu corporate campus. The former UNFI office building to the east has been purchased by the Eden Prairie School District 272. Comprehensive Guide Plan Designation The 59.56-acre site has a 2040 Land Use designation of Office and Medium High Density Residential. We are requesting a designation change for the proposed Lot 1 and Lot 2 to Regional Commercial. This would match the classification of the property to the south. Outlot A on the property would also change designation to Park and Open Space District as requested by the city. 1.What impact does the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan change have on the balance of land uses in the City? There is a lack of available land zoned commercial in the city; the sites that are available are either not large enough for our development or have existing buildings that would have to be demolished for our new development, which makes these sites economically infeasible. The existing land uses from the comprehensive guide plan on the site are 16.56 acres designated as office, 18.01 acres designated as medium high density residential, and 24.98 designated as parks and open space. The proposed land uses after the guide plan change would be 6.58 acres designated as commercial and 52.97 acres designated as parks and open space. The portion of our site which we intend to develop is currently guided for office in the Aspire Eden Prairie 2040 Comprehensive Guide Plan. Per a report published by Newmark in the first quarter of 2025, absorption for office space in the Twin Cities Metro area has been negative for 17 of the past 18 quarters. Absorption reached negative 432,847 square feet in the third quarter of 2024 and was negative 220,025 square feet in the final quarter of 2024, so the negative absorption rate for office space continues. This has resulted in an increase of office vacancy (including sublease space) from 22.9% in 3Q24 to 23.8% in 4Q24. The southwest submarket is no different as 4Q24 had negative Page 2 absorption of 125,771 square feet and a 22.7% vacancy rate. Vacancy rates are expected to continue rising through 2028, exceeding 31%. Because of this, we believe the Comprehensive Guide Plan change from office to commercial is warranted for this site. 2.What impact does the Comprehensive Guide Plan change have on surrounding land uses? The Comprehensive Guide Plan to commercial is consistent with the commercial zoning across Valley View Road. The land to the east of the site is guided for public/semi-public, and there is dense vegetation between our proposed commercial site and the existing development to the east that acts to mitigate the impact of the new proposed development regarding noise and views, so the guide plan change has little impact on surrounding land uses 3.What impact does the Comprehensive Guide Plan change have on the site? Our proposed site plan situates the development to have the least impact on the natural features of the site and utilize the existing site access point along Valley View Road. The site was designed to avoid the existing bluffs and bluff impact zones as well as preserve over 85% of the existing trees onsite. The proposed development has been set back from existing wetlands and water bodies, providing a large buffer strip to help protect these important features. In total only 11% of the site is planned to be developed for the two proposed uses, leaving 89% of the site as is and preserved within Out Lot A. 4.What Impact does the Comprehensive Guide plan change have on City services, Such as sewer, water, storm water run-off and roads? The existing guidance of approximately 18 acres of medium high density residential supports “apartments, condominiums, and senior housing developments . . . with densities ranging from 14 to 40 units per acre” per the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan. This would allow for a range of 252 to 720 units along with the associated sewer / water demands under the existing land use. The proposed re-guiding to 6.58 acres commercial for the hotel (157 room units) and 8,545 square foot restaurant (200 seat units for a total of 357 units) would generate an estimated sewer demand on the lower end of the existing 252 to 720 unit medium high density range. Sufficient public infrastructure is available adjacent to the site to handle the proposed sewer and water connections. The above unit comparison is meant to provide a simple, conservative estimate. A more precise estimate per https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/7081.0130/ would yield even further reductions under proposed conditions. The additional parks and open space areas, most of which are located upstream of existing natural water features, provide long-term protection of said features and increased water quality of the area. The proposed development will comply with City and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District rules to reduce stormwater runoff quality and quantity from the existing conditions by means of an underground infiltration system. Please refer to the separate Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Alliant Engineering. 5.Does the proposed land use/ Comprehensive Guide Plan change result in a better use of the land? The Comprehensive Guide Plan change to commercial is a better use of the site. As stated in the above answer to question #1, building new office space is not viable at this time because of the continuing negative absorption and rising vacancy of office space in Eden Prairie and across the Twin Cities metro area. The land use designation of Parks and Open Space is proposed over additional land on the north portion of the site and will preserve the existing large oak woods, treed Page 3 bluffs, and wetland areas. The proposed relocated Residence Inn Hotel and proposed restaurant are consistent with the surrounding land uses and zoning. There is dense vegetation between our proposed commercial site and the existing development to the east that acts to mitigate the impact of the new proposed development in regard to noise and views. A considerable amount of trees and shrubs will be planted to buffer the development from surrounding areas. Zoning Classification Currently, the property is zoned Office, Medium High Density Residential and Parks and Open Space. We are requesting the proposed Lot 1 and Lot 2 be rezone to C-Reg-Ser Regional Service Commercial. The proposed northern Outlot A would remain Parks and Open Space. Proposed Development Overview CSM Corporation is proposing to construct a 5-story, 157 room, 26,308 S.F. Residence Inn Hotel, a 8,600 S.F. restaurant and associated parking. The proposed Residence Inn Hotel will replace an existing Residence Inn Hotel at I-494 and Valley View Road. There is a need to replace the current hotel built in 1984, due to Marriott requirements. The proposed development will retain and create jobs in The City of Eden Prairie, while also increasing the tax base. The hotel and restaurant will share the existing site access from Valley View Road with the school property. CSM Corporation will work with Hennepin County to potentially make this a ¾ intersection. The site has bluff areas and bluff impact zones defined by City Code that the project is avoiding. The project is requesting the following zoning waivers: 1. Building Height – We are requesting to increase the building height from 40’ to 52-2”. 2. Parking Setback - We are requesting a waiver for the parking setback, since the property line between the restaurant and hotel is located in drive lanes and parking areas. 3. Shoreland Setback – We are requesting a waiver from the 200’ Commercial Setback to 100’ from SuperValu Pond. 4. Shore Impact Zone – We are proposing to clear a portion of the Shore Impact Zone along Super Valu Pond. 5. Parking requirements- We are requesting a variance to the parking requirements based on statistical data provided by are other Residence Inns showing that the parking is underutilized even on sell- out nights. See Alliant Engineering’s Parking Generation Study. Sustainable Features CSM will work with the City of Eden Prairie to meet the goals of their Sustainable Building Standards as part of the PUD process. Some of the strategies include the following Sustainable Features Analysis checklist items: - #1 - Participate in the Energy Design Assistance Program - #4 - EV Charging – 2% of parking spaces will accommodate EV charging stations or be built to an EV-ready standard. - #5 - Solar-ready Construction – the building will be built so that it is feasible to add rooftop solar in the future. - #6 – Efficient appliances/fixtures – Tenant buildouts will utilize Energy Star appliances and WaterSense certified fixtures in design. Page 4 - #7 – Low VOC Materials – Tenant buildouts will use low-VOC paints, adhesives, sealants, flooring, and carpet in construction. - #8 – Waste disposal – Tenants will provide recycling service, pairing recycling bins with trash bins and labeling the bins. Summary of Landscaping and Tree Replacement We have strived to preserve as many existing trees as possible as part of the proposed site layout and grading design. Approximately 88% of existing caliper inches on site are to be preserved. Special consideration was taken to preserve as many trees as possible along the Highway right of way and disturbance is to be minimized near the existing steep slope on the west side of the property. Overall, the mature character of the existing trees on site will be preserved and supplemented with new plantings to ensure the long term overstory vegetation on the site. We have integrated sustainable design principles into our landscape design, such as diversity in plant species, disease, and drought resistant native and naturalized plant material, along with the reduction of stormwater run-off through the use of water efficient irrigation. A mix of overstory, evergreen and ornamental trees, shrubs and perennials are designed throughout the site to create a vibrant display of color and foliage. Overstory trees are placed throughout to complement the height of the building. The shrubs and perennials are placed throughout the development adding interest, along with softening the transition from building and parking areas to the adjacent roadways. Plantings have also been used to frame and focus views, while softening the proposed parking areas and screening of the loading areas. Utilities: Stormwater Treatment Requirements: The site is located within Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) Boundaries and will meet the requirements of NMCWD and the City of Eden Prairie consisting of Runoff Rate/Quality Control and Volume Abstraction by means of an underground system. Preliminary borings have indicated a mixture of sands, silty sands, and some clay throughout the site. 2 borings (ST-15 and ST-18) north of the proposed Hotel indicated potential for infiltration. As such, a proposed underground perforated CMP system is proposed to meet volume abstraction with infiltration and attenuate runoff flows northerly towards Bryant Lake. Watermain: The development proposes to connect to the existing 16” watermain in Valley View Road with a 10” wet tap for combined domestic and fire protection services for both buildings and fire hydrants located on site. Sanitary Sewer: Per City As-builts, existing gravity sewer exists south of Valley View Road due south of the site. The development plans to connect to the existing sanitary structure as shown on the plans without the need for a lift station. Shoreland Review Super Valu Pond (27-72P) is adjacent and northeast of the proposed development. Care will be taken to protect the waterbody during construction with a double layer of silt fence, biologs along the slope leading to the pond and a silt curtain at the storm sewer outlet. The Site Plan, C-003.1 depicts the Wetland Delineation, the 100’ Shore Impact Zone and the 200’ Commercial Setback. We are requesting a waiver from the 200’ Commercial Setback to 100’ from SuperValu Pond. Page 5 Bryant Lake (27-67P) is also abutting the property north of the proposed development. Although Bryant Lake is approximately 900’ north of the development. None of the new impervious areas will drain to Bryant Lake. Architecture: Hotel: The architectural design for the hotel is driven by the design guidelines for the Residence Inn brand as published by Marriott International. The prototype has been modified to suit the site conditions and the program goals stipulated by the development team. The exterior utilizes brick, cultured stone and the window and glazing systems as Class I materials. Brick masonry is used as a “base” for the building at the first three stories. Other materials used for the exterior design include stucco, fiber cement panels and trim, standing seam metal at sloped roof conditions and metal fascia and trim at conditions where appropriate. The hotel plan form is a U-shaped configuration with the single-story main entrance structure centered on the south elevation. An exterior patio is located just east of the main entrance and lobby area and provides an exterior space for guests to enjoy. Restaurant: The restaurant design is conceptual in nature at this time. The restaurant uses similar exterior materials and is intended to harmonize and compliment the design for the hotel. The two buildings are in close proximity to each other and connected by an accessible pedestrian sidewalk/crosswalk at grade. The restaurant is a one-story building, simple in massing and scale. An exterior patio for the restaurant is planned at the south side and is articulated and protected with a sloped standing seam metal roof. Care has been taken to screen mechanical equipment through the use of a rooftop screen wall above the kitchen zone and a moderately high parapet wall at the main mass of the dining area. Interior planning and further design development of the restaurant building is pending the selection of a brand and operations team. 8, 5 4 5 S . F . FF E : 8 8 9 . 0 0 RE S T A U R A N T 26 , 3 0 8 S . F . F O O T P R I N T FF E : 8 8 9 . 0 0 HO T E L 15 7 R O O M S PA T I O LO T 2 57 , 2 9 7 S . F . 1. 3 2 A C VA L L E Y V I E W R O A D INTER S T A T E 4 9 4 LO T 1 22 9 , 5 6 9 S . F . 5. 2 7 A C OU T L O T A 2, 3 0 7 , 3 1 7 S . F . 52 . 9 7 A C BR Y A N T L A K E SU P E R V A L U PO N D STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L C-003 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T OV E R A L L S I T E P L A N 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Kn o w w h a t ' s b e l o w . Ca l l b e f o r e y o u d i g . R Di a l 8 1 1 SI T E L E G E N D : 8,545 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L C-003.1 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T SI T E P L A N 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 SITE LEGEND: SITE DATA BR Y A N T L A K E SU P E R V A L U PO N D HOTEL 26,308 S.F. RESTAURANT 8,525 S.F. OUTLOT A 2,307,189 S.F. 52.97 AC LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW DEDICATION 130 SF LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC VALLEY VIEW DEDICATION 129 SF SITE LEGEND: DATA: VALLEY VIEW PRELIMINARY PLAT Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L C-001.2 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 HOTELLOBBY MECH.ROOM LOT 2130,000 S.F.2.98 AC 8,600 S.F.FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT VALLEY VIEW ROA D IN T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 12,595,118 S.F.59.58 AC BRYANT LAKE 24,675 S.F. FOOTPRINTFFE: 889.00HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO A PERSPECTIVE VIEW A HOTELLOBBY MECH.ROOM LOT 2130,000 S.F.2.98 AC 8,600 S.F.FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT VALLEY VIEW ROA D IN T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 12,595,118 S.F.59.58 AC BRYANT LAKE 24,675 S.F. FOOTPRINTFFE: 889.00HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO B PERSPECTIVE VIEW B HOTELLOBBY MECH.ROOM LOT 2130,000 S.F.2.98 AC 8,600 S.F.FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT VALLEY VIEW ROA D IN T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 12,595,118 S.F.59.58 AC BRYANT LAKE 24,675 S.F. FOOTPRINTFFE: 889.00HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO C PERSPECTIVE VIEW C HOTELLOBBY MECH.ROOM LOT 2130,000 S.F.2.98 AC 8,600 S.F.FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT VALLEY VIEW ROA D IN T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 12,595,118 S.F.59.58 AC BRYANT LAKE 24,675 S.F. FOOTPRINTFFE: 889.00HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO D PERSPECTIVE VIEW D HO T E L EX I S T I N G O F F I C E S BR Y A N T L A K E RE S T A U R A N T HOTELLOBBY MECH.ROOM LOT 2130,000 S.F.2.98 AC 8,600 S.F.FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT VALLEY VIEW ROA D IN T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 12,595,118 S.F.59.58 AC BRYANT LAKE 24,675 S.F. FOOTPRINTFFE: 889.00HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO E PERSPECTIVE VIEW E PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN ID0.1 ID COVER SHEET 2024-1176 ESG ESG RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP DESIGN DEVELOPMENT No. Description Date RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP 4075 TAMIAMI TRAIL N NAPLES, FL 34103 VALLEY VIEW ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 2024-1238 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FIRE SPRINKLER ROOM ACCESS DOOR WITH SIGNAGE AS APPROVED BY THE AHJ HVAC LOUVER - TYPICALHVAC VENTS - TYPICAL HOTEL BRAND SIGNAGE (ILLUMINATED) LINEN CHUTE VENT BEYOND 10 ' - 4 " LEVEL 1 9' - 4 " CIVIL GRADE = 889.00' 9' - 4 " 9' - 4 " 13 ' - 1 0 " LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 TOP OF PARAPET 52 ' - 2 " 58 ' - 6 " TOP EDGE OF SLOPED ROOF TYPICAL AT GUEST ROOMS HVAC LOUVER AT SIDE WALL BEYOND - TYP. SLOPED ROOF BEYOND HOTEL BRAND SIGNAGE (ILLUMINATED) 10 ' - 4 " LEVEL 1 9' - 4 " CIVIL GRADE = 889.00' 9' - 4 " 9' - 4 " 13 ' - 1 0 " LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 TOP OF PARAPET 52 ' - 2 " 58 ' - 6 " TOP EDGE OF SLOPED ROOF HOTEL BRAND SIGNAGE (ILLUMINATED) REFER TO DRAWING A5 FOR SOUTH ELEVATION INFORMATION BEYOND FIBER CEMENT PANEL SOFFIT - TYPICALFIBER CEMENT PANEL SOFFIT - TYPICAL TYPICAL AT GUEST BATH TYPICAL AT GUEST ROOMS EXTERIOR SCREEN WALL TYPICAL AT GUEST BATH HVAC LOUVER AT SIDE WALL BEYOND - TYP. TYPICAL AT GUEST ROOMS TYPICAL AT STAIR TYPICAL AT STAIR TYPICALTYPICAL HVAC LOUVER CEMENT PLASTER SOFFITS AT LOBBY ROOF AREAS A004 and ADJACENT RESTAURANT SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PUD SUBMISSION 05/12/2025 REVISIONS: No. Description Date Typed or Printed Name License # Date I hereby certify that this plan, specificati report was prepared by me or under my supervision and that I am a duly licensed under the laws of the State of Minnesot Signature I hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulylicensed Architect under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota. Terance A. Gruenhagen 20146 10/13/20236/13/2025 1 RESPONSE TO CITY REVIEW COMMENTS 06/13/25 SIGNAGE AREA = 54 SF AS HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE SIGNAGE AREA = 54 SF AS HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE SIGNAGE AREA = 81 SF AS HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE 21 21 21 21 SIGNAGE AREA = 34 SF21 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN ID0.1 ID COVER SHEET 2024-1176 ESG ESG RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP DESIGN DEVELOPMENT No. Description Date RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP 4075 TAMIAMI TRAIL N NAPLES, FL 34103 VALLEY VIEW ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 2024-1238 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 10 ' - 4 " LEVEL 1 9' - 4 " CIVIL GRADE = 889.00' 9' - 4 " 9' - 4 " 13 ' - 1 0 " LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 TOP OF PARAPET 52 ' - 2 " 10 ' - 4 " LEVEL 1 9' - 4 " CIVIL GRADE 889.00' 9' - 4 " 9' - 4 " 13 ' - 1 0 " LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 TOP OF PARAPET 52 ' - 2 " HVAC LOUVER - TYPICAL HVAC VENTS - TYPICAL HOTEL BRAND SIGNAGE (ILLUMINATED) TYPICAL AT GUEST ROOMS SLOPED ROOF BEYOND LINEN CHUTE VENT BEYOND BEYOND BEYOND BEYOND BEYOND LINE OF WEST ELEVATION BEYOND LINEN CHUTE VENT BEYOND TYPICAL AT GUEST ROOMS HVAC VENTS - TYPICAL TYPICAL AT GUEST ROOMS TYPICAL AT GUEST ROOMS ARCH. PCST. BASE ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST BASE - TYP. A005 and ADJACENT RESTAURANT SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PUD SUBMISSION 05/12/2025 REVISIONS: No. Description Date SIGNAGE AREA = 34 SF21 Typed or Printed Name License # Date I hereby certify that this plan, specificati report was prepared by me or under my supervision and that I am a duly licensed under the laws of the State of Minnesot Signature I hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulylicensed Architect under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota. Terance A. Gruenhagen 20146 10/13/20236/13/2025 1 RESPONSE TO CITY REVIEW COMMENTS 06/13/2521 INTERIOR SPACE - REFER TO FLOOR PLAN 10 ' - 4 " LEVEL 1 9' - 4 " CIVIL GRADE 889.00' 9' - 4 " 9' - 4 " 13 ' - 1 0 " LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 TOP OF PARAPET 52 ' - 2 " 10 ' - 4 " LEVEL 1 9' - 4 " CIVIL GRADE 889.00' 9' - 4 " 9' - 4 " 13 ' - 1 0 " LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 TOP OF PARAPET 52 ' - 2 " 10 ' - 4 " LEVEL 1 9' - 4 " CIVIL GRADE 889.00' 9' - 4 " 9' - 4 " 13 ' - 1 0 " LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 TOP OF PARAPET 52 ' - 2 " 58 ' - 6 " ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST BASE - TYP. HVAC VENT - TYPICAL HOTEL BRAND SIGNAGE (ILLUMINATED) TYPICAL AT GUEST ROOMS TYPICAL HVAC LOUVER TYPICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL SOFFIT - TYPICAL CEMENT PLASTER SOFFIT HVAC LOUVER TYPICAL HVAC VENT - TYPICAL MATERIALS AT THIS ELEVATION ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE INDICATED AT THE LEFT 58 ' - 6 " TYPICAL AT GUEST ROOMS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN ID0.1 ID COVER SHEET 2024-1176 ESG ESG RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP DESIGN DEVELOPMENT No. Description Date RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP 4075 TAMIAMI TRAIL N NAPLES, FL 34103 VALLEY VIEW ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 2024-1238 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA006 and ADJACENT RESTAURANT PUD SUBMISSION 05/12/2025 REVISIONS: No. Description Date 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Typed or Printed Name License # Date I hereby certify that this plan, specificati report was prepared by me or under my supervision and that I am a duly licensed under the laws of the State of Minnesot Signature I hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my directsupervision and that I am a dulylicensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Terance A. Gruenhagen 20146 10/13/20236/13/2025 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN ID0.1 ID COVER SHEET 2024-1176 ESG ESG RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP DESIGN DEVELOPMENT No. Description Date RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP 4075 TAMIAMI TRAIL N NAPLES, FL 34103 VALLEY VIEW ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 2024-1238 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LEVEL 1 CIVIL GRADE = 889.00' LEVEL 1 CIVIL GRADE = 889.00' LEVEL 1 CIVIL GRADE = 889.00' 11 ' - 6 " 20 ' - 3 " 13 ' - 7 " 12 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 3 " TYPICAL HVAC LOUVER CEMENT PLASTER SOFFITS AT LOBBY ROOF AREAS ARCH. PCST. BASE ARCHITECTURALLY EXPOSED STRUCTURAL STEEL (AESS) COLUMNS AND ROOF SUPPORT BEAMS (HSS SHAPES) BEYOND SCALE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS ON THIS PAGE WOOD TRELLIS ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST BASE AESS COLUMN ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST BASE AESS COLUMN A007 and ADJACENT RESTAURANT SUMMARY OF EXTERIOR MATERIAL QUANTITIES (CLASS I %) HOTEL BUILDING RESTAURANT BUILDING CLASS I MATERIAL TOTAL - ALLFACADES COMBINED CLASS I MATERIAL TOTAL - ALL FACADES COMBINED RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP 4075 TAMIAMI TRAIL N NAPLES, FL 34103 VALLEY VIEW ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ARCHITECTURAL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL STEEL (AESS) PUD SUBMISSION 05/12/2025 REVISIONS: No. Description Date Typed or Printed Name License # Date I hereby certify that this plan, specificati report was prepared by me or under my supervision and that I am a duly licensed under the laws of the State of Minnesot Signature I hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulylicensed Architect under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota. Terance A. Gruenhagen 20146 10/13/20236/13/2025 1 RESPONSE TO CITY REVIEW COMMENTS 06/13/2521 Restaurant - ALL FACADES Ref. Elevations on A008 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Total Façade Area in SF 9,387 Class I Materials (SF) Brick & Precast Caps 6,084 Arch. Precast Accent Panels 114 Glazing 1,348 Total Class I Materials 7,546 80.39% Other Materials (SF) Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 128 Sloped Metal Roof 301 Metal Panel Screen Wall 1,000 Metal Fascia and Trim 327 Metal Doors & Frames 49 Wood Columns 36 Awnings 0 Signage/Sign Band 0 Total Other Materials 1,841 19.61% Total All Materials 9,387 100.00% Restaurant - NORTH ELEVATION Ref. Drawing A008 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Restaurant - WEST ELEVATION Ref. Drawing A008 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Restaurant - EAST ELEVATION Ref. Drawing A008 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Restaurant - SOUTH ELEVATION Ref. Drawing A008 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Total Façade Area in SF 2,081 Total Façade Area in SF 2,620 Total Façade Area in SF 2,630 Total Façade Area in SF 2,056 Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF) Brick & Precast Caps 1,480 Brick & Precast Caps 1,708 Brick & Precast Caps 1,724 Brick & Precast Caps 1,172 Arch. Precast Accent Panels 6 Arch. Precast Accent Panels 42 Arch. Precast Accent Panels 42 Arch. Precast Accent Panels 24 Glazing 99 Glazing 404 Glazing 406 Glazing 439 Total Class I Materials 1,585 76.17%Total Class I Materials 2,154 82.21%Total Class I Materials 2,172 82.59%Total Class I Materials 1,635 79.52% Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF) Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 0 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 64 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 64 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 0 Sloped Metal Roof 0 Sloped Metal Roof 0 Sloped Metal Roof 0 Sloped Metal Roof 301 Metal Panel Screen Wall 380 Metal Panel Screen Wall 310 Metal Panel Screen Wall 310 Metal Panel Screen Wall 0 Metal Fascia and Trim 67 Metal Fascia and Trim 82 Metal Fascia and Trim 74 Metal Fascia and Trim 104 Metal Doors & Frames 49 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Wood Columns 0 Wood Columns 10 Wood Columns 10 Wood Columns 16 Awnings 0 Awnings 0 Class I behind Awnings 0 Class I behind Awnings 0 Signage/Sign Band 0 Signage/Sign Band 0 Class I behind Signage/Sign Band 0 Class I behind Signage/Sign Band 0 Class I behind Total Other Materials 496 23.83%Total Other Materials 466 17.79%Total Other Materials 458 17.41%Total Other Materials 421 20.48% Total All Materials 2,081 100.00%Total All Materials 2,620 100.00%Total All Materials 2,630 100.00%Total All Materials 2,056 100.00% 21 CLASS I MATERIAL TOTAL - ALL SOUTH FACADES COMBINED Hotel - WEST ELEVATION Ref. Drawing A004 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Hotel - SOUTH ELEV. (5 story ends) Ref. Drawing A004 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Hotel - EAST ELEVATION Ref. Drawing A005 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Hotel - NORTH ELEVATION Ref. Drawing A005 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Total Façade Area in SF 6,842 Total Façade Area in SF 7,150 Total Façade Area in SF 6,528 Total Façade Area in SF 13,374 Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF) Brick & Precast Caps 2,715 Brick & Precast Caps 3,003 Brick & Precast Caps 2,997 Brick & Precast Caps 5,494 Cultured Stone 2,156 Cultured Stone 1,424 Cultured Stone 1,537 Cultured Stone 2,551 Glazing 1,200 Glazing 1,048 Glazing 1,153 Glazing 3,224 Total Class I Materials 6,071 88.73%Total Class I Materials 5,475 76.57%Total Class I Materials 5,687 87.12%Total Class I Materials 11,269 84.26% Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF) Stucco 331 Stucco 1,378 Stucco 297 Stucco 403 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 265 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 0 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 395 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 1,491 Metal Fascia and Trim 114 Metal Fascia and Trim 221 Metal Fascia and Trim 111 Metal Fascia and Trim 128 HVAC Louvers 38 HVAC Louvers 76 HVAC Louvers 38 HVAC Louvers 0 Metal Doors & Frames 23 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Metal Doors & Frames 83 Total Other Materials 771 11.27%Total Other Materials 1,675 23.43%Total Other Materials 841 12.88%Total Other Materials 2,105 15.74% Total All Materials 6,842 100.00%Total All Materials 7,150 100.00%Total All Materials 6,528 100.00%Total All Materials 13,374 100.00% Hotel - LOBBY - WEST ELEV. Ref. Drawing A007 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Hotel - LOBBY - EAST ELEV. Ref. Drawing A007 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Hotel - LOBBY - SOUTH ELEV. Ref. Drawing A007 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Total Façade Area in SF 879 Total Façade Area in SF 886 Total Façade Area in SF 1,062 Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF) Brick & Precast Caps 273 Brick & Precast Caps 217 Brick & Precast Caps 241 Cultured Stone 124 Cultured Stone 10 Cultured Stone 70 Glazing 50 Glazing 372 Glazing 306 Total Class I Materials 447 50.85%Total Class I Materials 599 67.61%Total Class I Materials 617 58.10% Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF) Stucco 294 Stucco 132 Stucco 215 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 12 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 64 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 88 Metal Fascia and Trim 102 Metal Fascia and Trim 91 Metal Fascia and Trim 115 HVAC Louvers 0 HVAC Louvers 0 HVAC Louvers 27 Metal Doors & Frames 24 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Total Other Materials 432 49.15%Total Other Materials 287 32.39%Total Other Materials 445 41.90% Total All Materials 879 100.00%Total All Materials 886 100.00%Total All Materials 1,062 100.00% 21Hotel - ALL FACADES Ref. All Elevations Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Hotel - ALL SOUTH ELEVATIONS Ref. Drawing A004, A005 & A006 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Total Façade Area in SF 51,096 Total Façade Area in SF 14,208 Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF) Brick & Precast Caps 20,470 Brick & Precast Caps 5,449 Cultured Stone 10,316 Cultured Stone 2,403 Glazing 10,418 Glazing 2,839 Total Class I Materials 41,204 80.64%Total Class I Materials 10,691 75.25% Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF) Stucco 4,810 Stucco 2,269 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 3,489 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 651 Metal Fascia and Trim 1,132 Metal Fascia and Trim 418 HVAC Louvers 331 HVAC Louvers 179 Metal Doors & Frames 130 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Total Other Materials 9,892 19.36%Total Other Materials 3,517 24.75% Total All Materials 51,096 100.00%Total All Materials 14,208 100.00% Hotel - COURTYARD WEST ELEV. Ref. Drawing A006 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Hotel - COURTYD. SOUTH ELEV. Ref. Drawing A006 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Hotel - COURTYARD EAST ELEV. Ref. Drawing A006 Material Areas (SF) Percentage of Façade Total Façade Area in SF 4,043 Total Façade Area in SF 5,996 Total Façade Area in SF 4,336 Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF)Class I Materials (SF) Brick & Precast Caps 1,487 Brick & Precast Caps 2,205 Brick & Precast Caps 1,838 Cultured Stone 752 Cultured Stone 909 Cultured Stone 783 Glazing 750 Glazing 1,485 Glazing 830 Total Class I Materials 2,989 73.93%Total Class I Materials 4,599 76.70%Total Class I Materials 3,451 79.59% Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF)Other Materials (SF) Stucco 627 Stucco 676 Stucco 457 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 299 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 563 Fiber Cement Panels/Siding 312 Metal Fascia and Trim 90 Metal Fascia and Trim 82 Metal Fascia and Trim 78 HVAC Louvers 38 HVAC Louvers 76 HVAC Louvers 38 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Metal Doors & Frames 0 Total Other Materials 1,054 26.07%Total Other Materials 1,397 23.30%Total Other Materials 885 20.41% Total All Materials 4,043 100.00%Total All Materials 5,996 100.00%Total All Materials 4,336 100.00% BAR AND DINING AREA PRIMARY ENTRANCE KITCHEN AREA RESTROOMS SERVICE AREA OUTDOOR PATIO SEATING APPROX. 870 sf if chosen FLOOR AREA IS APPROX. 8,545 sf as shown PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN ID0.1 ID COVER SHEET 2024-1176 ESG ESG RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP DESIGN DEVELOPMENT No. Description Date RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP 4075 TAMIAMI TRAIL N NAPLES, FL 34103 VALLEY VIEW ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 RESTAURANT PLAN & ELEVATIONSA008 and ADJACENT RESTAURANT 2024-11762024-1238 PUD SUBMISSION 05/12/2025 REVISIONS: No. Description Date OCCUPANCY GROUP: A-2 THE RESTAURANT WILL BE FULLY SPRINKLERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE BUILDING CODE. ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT (TABLE 504.3): 60 FEET ACTUAL HEIGHT: 23.2 FEET (O.K.) ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF STORIES (TABLE 504.4): 2 ALLOWABLE AREA : 28,140 SF (SINGLE OCCUPANCY, ONE-STORY BUILDING) ACTUAL AREA: 8,545 SF (O.K.) ALLOWABLE AREA CALCULATIONS Aa = At + (NS x If)  Aa = [24,000 + (6,000 x 0.69)]  Aa = 24,000 + 4,140  Aa = 28,140 SF FRONTAGE INCREASE (If) = [F/P -0.25]W/30, (IBC 506.3) If = [0.75]27.5/30  If = [0.75] 0.917  If = 0.69 F = 375.9 FT. P = 375.9 FT W = 27.5 FT If = [South 86' (100% open) + East 113.8' (100% open) + North 70.3' open) + West 105.8' (100% open) = 375.9’/375.9’ – 0.25)] = 0.75 (100% PRELIMINARY BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE INFORMATION (RESTAURANT) CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B AND FIRE CODE – 2020 EDITION. 21 1 RESPONSE TO CITY REVIEW COMMENTS 06/13/25 ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED W/IN THE SCREEN WALL AREA ISOMETRIC VIEW 2' - 0 " 9' - 4 " 3'-4" 8" ARCH. PRECAST CONCRETE ACCENT (RECESSED 1 INCH FROM THE BRICK PLANE) LIGHT FIXTURE ELEVATION DETAIL 'A' TYPICAL BRICK PIER 3/8" = 1'-0" ROOF ACCESS LADDER (SECURED) PROFILE OF MECH. EQUIPMENT BEHIND THE SCREEN WALL IS ILLUSTRATED WITH A DASHED RED LINE INTERIOR PLANNING IS PENDING SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" DASHED LINE REPRESENTS POSSIBLE PATIO AREA OUTSIDE OF THE ROOF CANOPY (APPROX. 1,575 sf if chosen) PROFILE OF MECH. EQUIPMENT BEHIND THE SCREEN WALL AND/OR PARAPET IS ILLUSTRATED WITH A DASHED RED LINE AWNING NATURAL GREEN TRELLIS FEATURE (OPTION TBD) 23 ' - 2 " 8' - 6 " 16 ' - 0 " ARCH. PRECAST CONCRETE ACCENTS WITHIN BRICK PIERS - TYPICAL - REFER TO ELEVATION DETAIL 'A' PROFILE OF MECH. EQUIPMENT BEHIND THE SCREEN WALL AND/OR PARAPET IS ILLUSTRATED WITH A DASHED RED LINE 16 ' - 0 " 23 ' - 2 " WOOD COLUMNS AT OUTDOOR PATIO (TYPICAL) RAILING AT OUTDOOR PATIO AREA - TYP.LIGHT FIXTURES ACCENT AWNINGS AWNING ROOF ACCESS LADDER (SECURED) RESTAURANT BRAND SIGNAGE (TBD) NATURAL GREEN TRELLIS FEATURE (OPTION TBD) TYPICAL ARCH. PRECAST CONCRETE ACCENTS WITHIN BRICK PIERS - TYPICAL - REFER TO ELEVATION DETAIL 'A' WOOD COLUMNS AT OUTDOOR PATIO (TYPICAL) RESTAURANT BRAND SIGNAGE (TBD) LIGHT FIXTURES 23 ' - 2 " TYP. OF 3 ARCH. PRECAST CONC. ACCENTS WITHIN BRICK PIERS REFER TO ELEV. DETAIL 'A' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" TYP. OF 3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" CAL) TYPICAL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" AWNINGTRELLIS FEATURE (OPTION TBD) REFER TO EAST ELEVATION BELOW - MATERIALS AND FEATURES ARE SIMILAR SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" REFER TO ELEVATIONS BELOW - MATERIALS AND FEATURES ARE SIMILAR Typed or Printed Name License # Date I hereby certify that this plan, specificati report was prepared by me or under my supervision and that I am a duly licensed under the laws of the State of Minnesot Signature I hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my directsupervision and that I am a dulylicensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Terance A. Gruenhagen 20146 10/13/20236/13/2025 AREA - APPROX. 81 SF 70.75 sf AREA - APPROX. 71 SF AREA - APPROX. 71 SF RESTAURANT BRAND SIGNAGE (TBD) SIGNAGE AREA - APPROX. 81 SF 21 21 21 21 21 SEATING CAPACITY ESTIMATED USING OCCUPANT LOAD FACTORS FROM THE STATE BUILDING CODE (REF. MNSBC TABLE 1004.5 FOR APPLICABLE ) INTERIOR RECEPTION (HOST STAND) AND WAITING AREA OPEN DISPLAY KITCHEN AND SERVER PICK-UP AREA KI T C H E N A C C E S S USE 200 FOR ZONING PURPOSES BAR AND BACK BAR AREA POSSIBLE TAKE-OUT PICK-UP AREA OUTDOOR PATIO SEATING BAR AND DINING AREA APPROX. 870 sf if chosen FLOOR AREA IS APPROX. 8,545 sf as shown 21 INTERIOR PLANNING IS PENDING 21 21 21 21 21 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN ID0.1 ID COVER SHEET 2024-1176 ESG ESG RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP DESIGN DEVELOPMENT No. Description Date RESIDENCE INN NAPLES 2024 PIP 4075 TAMIAMI TRAIL N NAPLES, FL 34103 VALLEY VIEW ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 2024-1238 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLANA002 and ADJACENT RESTAURANT0" NORTH SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FOOTPRINT AREA = 26,308 SF #EXIT # EX I T #EX I T # EX I T #EX I T #EXIT #EXIT #EXIT #EXIT #EXIT PUD SUBMISSION 05/12/2025 REVISIONS: No. Description Date 1 RESPONSE TO CITY REVIEW COMMENTS 06/13/25 PRELIMINARY BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE INFORMATION (HOTEL) OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-1 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III-A ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT (TABLE 504.3): 85 FEET ACTUAL HEIGHT: 58.5 FEET (O.K.) ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF STORIES ABOVE GRADE PLANE (TABLE 504.4): 5 (O.K.) ALLOWABLE AREA (SINGLE OCCUPANCY, MULTISTORY BUILDING): 352,240 SF ACTUAL AREA: 111,090 SF (O.K.) ALLOWABLE AREA CALCULATIONS (HOTEL) Aa = [At + (NS x If)] x Sa  Aa = [72,000 + (24,000 x 0.69)] x 4  Aa = 88,560 x 4  Aa = 354,240 SF FRONTAGE INCREASE (If) = [F/P -0.25]W/30, (IBC 506.3) where: F = 778.2 FT. P = 778.2 FT T. W = 27.5 FT (WEIGHTED AVERAGE) If = [0.75]27.5/30  If = [0.75] 0.917  If = 0.69 If = [South 256.3' (100% open) + East 129.8' (100% open) + North 256.3' (100% open) + West 135.8' (100% open) = 778.2’/778.2’ – 0.25)] = 0.75 INDVIDUAL STORIES DO NOT EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE AREA (Aa) AS DETERMINED BY EQUATION 5-2 USING THE VALUE OF Sa = 1. THE HOTEL WILL BE FULLY SPRINKLERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE BUILDING AND FIRE CODE – 2020 EDITION. 21 REFER TO THE ENLARGED PLAN BELOW 21 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM RISER ROOM - DESIGN IS PENDING FROM DELEGATED DESIGN CONTRACTOR. ROOM IS GENERALLY SIZED BASED ON MARRIOTT'S EXPERIENCE NATIONALLY FOR THIS HOTEL BRAND. RISER VALVE ACCESS INTERIOR DOOR MAY NOT BE REQUIRED - TO BE CONFIRMED IN LATER DESIGN PHASE ENLARGED PARTIAL PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 21 Typed or Printed Name License # Date I hereby certify that this plan, specificati report was prepared by me or under my supervision and that I am a duly licensed under the laws of the State of Minnesot Signature I hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulylicensed Architect under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota. Terance A. Gruenhagen 20146 10/13/20236/13/2025 21 8,545 S.F.FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINTFFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO UNFI - SUPER VALU - PROPOSED GUIDING EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 9-2-25 SUPER VALU POND 8,545 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD I N T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC ST-3 ST-5 (NOT DRILLED) ST-2 ST-1 ST-4 (NOT DRILLED) ST-7 ST-6 (NOT DRILLED) ST-8 ST-9 ST-10 ST-12 ST-15 ST-18 ST-20 ST-11 ST-16 ST-13 ST-14 ST-21 ST-22 ST-23 ST-24 ST-19 STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N C-004 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T OV E R A L L P R E L I M I N A R Y G R A D I N G P L A N 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 LEGEND: GRADING NOTES: 8,545 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC ST-10 ST-12 ST-15 ST-18 ST-20 ST-11 ST-16 ST-13 ST-14 ST-21 ST-22 ST-23 ST-24 ST-19 STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N C-004.1 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T PR E L I M I N A R Y G R A D I N G P L A N 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 LEGEND: ST-1 8,545 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD I N T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC SUPER VALU POND STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N C-005 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T BL U F F A N D S T E E P S L O P E S P L A N - O V E R A L L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 DEFINITIONS: LEGEND: 8,545 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N C-005.1 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T BL U F F A N D S T E E P S L O P E S P L A N 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 LEGEND: BRYANT LAKE SUPER VALU POND 8,545 S.F.FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD I N T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC OUTLOT A 2,307,317 S.F. 52.97 AC STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N L-001 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T TR E E P R E S E R V A T I O N P L A N - O V E R A L L 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 L-001.1 L-001.3 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS LEGEND: PLAN NOTE: TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE SURVIVABILITY OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. NO HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED WITHIN THE TREE DRIP LINE AS DESIGNATED ABOVE. ELEVATION 4' ORANGE SNOW FENCE WITH POSTS 8' O.C. AT DRIP LINE OF OUTER MOST BRANCHES DRIP LINE TREE PROTECTION FENCE NO SCALE2 TREE PRESERVATION NOTES: L-001.2 8,545 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC I N T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N L-001.1 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T TR E E P R E S E R V A T I O N P L A N - V I E W A 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 LEGEND: BRYANT LAKE SUPER VALU POND OUTLOT A 2,307,317 S.F. 52.97 AC STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N L-001.2 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T TR E E P R E S E R V A T I O N P L A N - V I E W B 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 LEGEND: STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N L-001.3 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T TR E E P R E S E R V A T I O N P L A N - V I E W C 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 LEGEND: SUPER VALU POND 8,545 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD I N T E R S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N L-003 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T LA N D S C A P E P L A N 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 L-003.1 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS LEGEND 8,545 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD 5.27 AC 6 - HE 3 - RO 5 - FM 2 - JL 5 - HL 2 - FM 3 - RO 2 - JL 1 - CH 1 - CH 1 - JL PATIO2 - CH 1 - JL 1 - FM 1 - FM 1 - CH 1 - CH 1 - JL 1 - RO 1 - HL 1 - HL SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SOD SODSOD SOD SOD SOD 1 - JL 1 - JL 5 - PMD 5 - PPR 5 - BMJ 5 - PMD 5 - PPR 3 - BMJ 8 - LRL 5 - MFG 4 - BMJ 13 - LRL 3 - GLS 9 - AFS 5 - PPR 4 - GLS 3 - PPR 9 - PBC 9 - CLB 6 - MFG 6 - WBP 2 - BMJ 7 - CLB 10 - LRS 3 - GLS 8 - CLB 9 - LGS 9 - PMD 3 - GLS 6 - CLB 6 - PBC 3 - GLS 6 - MFG 11 - CLB 3 - GLS 10 - AFS 6 - FCE 8 - GLS 38 - AWS 12 - NFS 6 - MFG 4 - BMJ 29 - NFS 7 - PMD 7 - LRS 2 - GLS 7 - PMD 2 - GLS 7 - LRS 5 - PPR 3 - BMJ 4 - BMJ 13 - PBC 14 - MAS 1 - TMP 6 - FCE 1 - TH1 - TH 1 - TH 1 - TH 7 - GSH8 - GHC7 - SEH8 - DGS3 - GHC 4 - GOJ 3 - SOS 3 - GOJ 7 - GSH 5 - GLS 4 - GOJ 5 - DBH 1 - TMP 5 - WBP 8 - AFS 1 - SOS 2 - GLS5 - PMD 10 - DGS 5 - PMD 1 - SOS 6 - WBP 5 - PBC 5 - DBH 6 - ELW 5 - DGS 5 - GHC 7 - FCE 5 - GSH 5 - FLH 2 - FLH 5 - SEH 1 - FLH 13 - LRL 7 - MAS 1 - TMP 6 - BBH 11 - BVG 7 - LGS 7 - GHC 3 - WBP 5 - AFS 6 - PMD 5 - BBH 11 - PBC 6 - DNS 7 - BVG 3 - MFG 9 - GHC 3 - SOS 9 - SEH 1 - TMP 6 - SCS 3 - FLH 11 - MAS 3 - WBP 5 - BBH 9 - LGS 10 - GOJ 7 - AFS 5 - BBH 3 - WBP 3 - TMP 3 - GLS 4 - DGS 6 - ELW 7 - GOJ 5 - ELW 6 - DGS 3 - SOS 2 - GLS 4 - GOJ 1 - GLS 8 - GHC 6 - GSH 8 - DGS7 - SEH6 - LRL 3 - GHC 3 - BMJ 12 - CLB 6 - DNS 1 - MKL 5 - GSH 7 - BBH 5 - AFS 10 - FCE 5 - BMJ 10 - LRS 5 - BBH 8 - LGS 1 - MKL 5 - BBH 8 - GGS 3 - MKL 5 - DGS 3 - SEH 5 - DGS 1 - MKL 4 - GOJ 3 - ELW 5 - SEH 5 - ELW 4 - GOJ 1 - MKL 12 - PMD 6 - DNS 1 - MKL 5 - BVG 7 - SCS 3 - MKL 11 - LRS 16 - BAJ 16 - GHC 6 - BVG 4 - DNS 5 - CLB 7 - AFS BOULDERS BOULDERS BOULDERS BOULDERS 3 - BH 1 - FM 9 - LGS 19 - JFG 8 - JFG 9 - JFG 13 - SSG 46 - SSG 3 - BH 2 - RO 3 - FM 5 - TH 8 - SW 3 - BH 2 - FM 3 - RO 1 - HL 2 - HL 2 - CH 1 - HE 1 - CH 1 - CH 3 - BH 3 - HE 3 - BF MULCH MULCH MULCH MULCH MULCH MULCH MULCH STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N L-003.1 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T LA N D S C A P E P L A N - E N L A R G E D 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 LEGEND LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 8,545 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD LOT 1 229,569 S.F. 5.27 AC P1 MH: 25 P1 MH: 25 P1 MH: 25 P2 MH: 25 P2 MH: 25 P2 MH: 25 P2 MH: 25 P3 MH: 25 P3 MH: 2 5 P1 MH: 25 P4 MH: 25 P4 MH: 25 P4 MH: 25 P4 MH: 25 P4 MH: 25 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.8 2.4 2.5 2.1 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.4 2.0 2.6 3.0 3.1 2.8 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.3 2.9 3.1 3.0 2.6 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.6 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.3 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.2 2.6 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.0 2.3 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.0 3.5 3.4 3.3 2.7 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.4 3.1 3.6 3.5 3.2 2.7 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.0 2.4 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.0 3.5 3.4 3.3 2.7 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.3 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.7 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.2 3.1 2.5 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.7 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.7 2.4 1.9 1.5 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.4 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.3 3.1 2.6 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.2 3.0 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 1.2 2.1 3.4 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.9 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 2.9 3.5 2.9 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 2.7 2.7 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.7 2.5 2.8 1.6 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.7 1.0 1.7 2.3 2.8 2.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.2 1.4 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.8 1.9 1.6 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.4 2.1 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.1 2.6 2.6 2.1 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 2.8 3.2 2.6 1.9 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.2 2.2 3.6 3.0 2.0 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.5 3.1 3.3 3.1 2.6 2.0 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.4 3.2 2.7 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.8 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.0 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 2.7 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.8 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.1 2.4 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 2.0 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.5 3.1 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.3 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.6 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 2.3 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.9 2.7 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.9 3.4 3.3 2.8 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.2 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 1.1 2.6 3.6 2.9 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.7 3.9 4.8 4.6 3.6 2.4 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.8 2.4 3.5 4.7 5.0 4.0 2.7 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 2.6 2.9 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.2 3.0 4.0 4.7 4.6 3.6 2.5 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.6 2.4 3.6 4.6 4.7 4.1 2.9 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.9 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.7 3.2 3.3 2.6 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.5 1.7 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 0.2 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 P4 MH: 2 5 STAMP AREA FOR CITY USE CI T Y P L A N N I N G S U B M I T T A L FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N P-001 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T PH O T O M E T R I C P L A N 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 SUPER VALU POND COUNTY RO A D 3 9 (VALLEY V I E W R O A D ) BRYANT LAKE ROUND LAKE GOV'T LOT 3 GOV'T LOT 2 8,545 S.F.FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINTFFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO LOT 2 57,297 S.F. 1.32 AC VALLEY VIEW ROAD PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT EXHIBIT VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND I-494 | EDEN PRAIRIE, MN LEGEND Valley View Development – Parking Generation Study Technical Memorandum PAGE 1 Technical Memorandum To: Jeremy Barnhart 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-949-8529 From: Nick Grage, PE, PTOE, RSP1, Alliant Engineering Shauna McIntire, PE, Alliant Engineering Ella Voorhees, Alliant Engineering Date: 7/29/2025 Subject: Valley View Development – Parking Generation Study 1. Executive Summary Alliant Engineering previously completed a traffic impact analysis for the Valley View Development located north of Valley View Road just east of I-494 on the southwestern portion of the former UNFI SuperValu Corporate site in Eden Prairie, MN. The proposed development consists of a 157-room hotel and 8,545 square foot high turnover sit down restaurant. The main objective of this additional technical memorandum is to determine the anticipated amount of parking generated by the development to compare with City of Eden Prairie off-street parking requirements and the number of spaces provided by the proposed development plan (214 total). The following sections provide the assumptions, analysis, and study conclusions offered for consideration. Parking Study Conclusions Based on conversations with development ownership, which included parking utilization data for comparable hotels, there is a documented history of underutilized parking at comparable extended stay hotels (see Section 2.3) Ownership is confident that the parking provided (214 spaces) will adequately serve the 157-room hotel and 8,545 square foot high turnover sit down restaurant. Leveraging the ITE Parking Generation Manual, parking utilization data for comparable extended stay hotels, and engineering judgment it is our professional traffic engineering opinion that the 214 parking spaces provided by the current site plan are expected to be sufficient during both hotel and restaurant peak hours. Furthermore, the parking data included in this study does not account for hotel patrons utilizing the restaurant (per ownership, they would anticipate that 30 to 40 percent of hotel guests would utilize the restaurant during their stay), nor does it account for the 32 outdoor patio seats which may not be useable for a handful of months each year. Valley View Development – Parking Generation Study Technical Memorandum PAGE 2 2. Parking Generation Analysis Table 1 outlines the City of Eden Prairie off-street parking requirements. The hotel has 157 rooms and 5 employees, and the restaurant has a seating capacity of 200 (168 indoor seats and 32 outdoor patio seats). Based on these values and Section 11.43 of the Eden Prairie Code of Ordinances, 262 parking spaces are required for the combined development. The current layout provides 214 parking spaces, 48 spaces less than code. Table 1. City of Eden Prairie Off-Street Parking Requirements 2.1 MAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND The ITE Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition was utilized to estimate the maximum parking demand expected for the development. The ITE Parking Generation Manual provides an estimated parking demand and hourly parking demand distribution rates based on studies of similar land uses. The weighted average is one approach to estimating parking demands. The estimated maximum parking demand for different days of the week utilizing the weighted average for each land use are summarized in Table 2. The parking demand for weekdays (156), Fridays (194), and Saturdays (178) is below the number of parking spaces provided by the site plan (214) and the number of parking spaces required by the City code (262). Table 2. ITE Parking Generation Estimate – Average Motels, Hotels 1/guest room + 1/employee 157 5 N/A 162 Restaurant Type 3 1/2 seats based on seating capacity N/A N/A 200 100 262 Required Spaces Number of Rooms Number of Employees Seating Capacity Total Land Use Off-Street Parking Space Requiremnts Weekdays 100 56 156 Fridays 100 94 194 Saturdays 102 76 178 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition. Day of the Week 262214 Hotel (157 Rooms)Total Code Required Parking Demand Restaurant (200 Seats) Provided Valley View Development – Parking Generation Study Technical Memorandum PAGE 3 The 85th percentile rate is a second method for estimating parking demands, meaning that 85 percent of similar developments would fall at or below these values. The estimated maximum parking demand for different days of the week utilizing the 85th percentile rate for each land use are summarized in Table 3. The parking demand for weekdays (233), Fridays (295), and Saturdays (266) is above the number of parking spaces provided by the site plan (214) and the number of parking spaces required by the City code (262), except for weekdays which are below the code requirements despite still exceeding the number of parking spaces provided by the site plan. Table 3. ITE Parking Generation Estimate – 85th Percentile 2.2 PEAK HOUR PARKING DEMAND As peak usage for the hotel and restaurant do not overlap, peak parking demands for the restaurant and hotel will not occur simultaneously. To more accurately estimate parking demand values, the parking demand peak hours were considered. Parking demand during peak hours for each respective land use were determined using time-of-day distributions for parking demands from the ITE Parking Generation Manual. The parking demand peak hours of the hotel are from 12:00am – 4:00am (overnight) and the parking demand peak hours of the restaurant are from 1:00pm – 2:00pm and 6:00pm – 8:00pm for weekdays and weekends, respectively. Estimated peak hour parking demands using weighted averages (Table 4) and 85th percentile rates (Table 5) are below. Table 4. Peak Hour ITE Parking Generation Estimate – Average Weekdays 137 96 233 Fridays 137 158 295 Saturdays 154 112 266 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition. Day of the Week 262 214 Hotel (157 Rooms)Total Code Required Parking Demand Restaurant (200 Seats) Provided Hotel Peak 12:00 - 4:00am 100 0 100 Restaurant Peak 1:00 - 2:00pm 65 56 121 Hotel Peak 12:00 - 4:00am 100 0 100 Restaurant Peak 6:00 - 8:00pm 76 94 170 Hotel Peak 12:00 - 4:00am 102 0 102 Restaurant Peak 6:00 - 8:00pm 78 76 154 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition. Day of the Week 262214 Weekdays Fridays Saturdays Parking Demand Code RequiredProvidedHotel (157 Rooms) Restaurant (200 Seats)Total Scenario Time Frame Valley View Development – Parking Generation Study Technical Memorandum PAGE 4 Table 5. Peak Hour ITE Parking Generation Estimate – 85th Percentile After adjusting the parking demand estimates based on the respective peak hour rates, two 85th percentile scenarios still exceed the amount of parking provided (214) during the restaurant peak hours on Fridays (262) and Saturdays (229). However, both would be at or below the number of spaces required by the City code (262). 2.3 COMPARABLE HOTEL PARKING DEMAND To supplement the ITE Parking Generation Manual, parking utilization was analyzed for four comparable sites including two in the Twin Cities (Bloomington and Plymouth), one in Milwaukee (downtown property), and one in Denver / Park Meadows. Parking utilization between January 1st, 2024 and June 26th, 2025 was summarized based on average weekday, average weekend, and average sellout days. Hotel details, including number of rooms and parking spaces, average spaces utilized, and average utilization rates are shown in Table 6 below. Table 6. Residence Inn Parking Utilization Analysis The parking utilization analysis indicates that even across sellout days, when comparable hotels are entirely occupied, parking utilization remains at approximately 30 percent except for Milwaukee which has a limited number of parking spaces to begin with due to the downtown location and notably has similar parking counts despite a higher room count. The analysis would indicate that the weighted average rates from the ITE Parking Generation Manual may be more appropriate for determining parking space requirements for this hotel location than the 85th percentile rates. Hotel 137 0 137 Restaurant 89 96 185 Hotel 137 0 137 Restaurant 104 158 262 Hotel 154 0 154 Restaurant 117 112 229 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition. Day of the Week 262 214 Weekdays Fridays Saturdays Parking Demand Code Required ProvidedHotel (157 Rooms) Restaurant (200 Seats)Total Peak Hour Scenario Utilized Rate Utilized Rate Utilized Rate Bloomington 128 142 32 23%37 26%43 30% Plymouth 119 134 30 22%28 21%41 31% Denver 112 118 22 19%17 14%28 24% Milwaukee 131 50 34 68%36 72%41 82% Source: Residence Inn Parking Utilization Analysis (1/1/2024 - 6/26/2025) Parking Demand Average Weekday Average Weekend Average Sellout Hotel Rooms Parking SpacesLocation Valley View Development – Parking Generation Study Technical Memorandum PAGE 5 3. Summary & Conclusions According to the City of Eden Prairie off-street parking requirements, 262 parking spaces are needed. The current site layout provides 214 parking spaces – a shortage of 48 parking spaces. ■ The parking demand for weekdays, Fridays, and Saturdays utilizing ITE Parking Generation Manual weighted averages under a maximum demand scenario is below the number of parking spaces provided by the site plan (214) and the number of parking spaces required by the City code (262). This would indicate that the provided number of spaces are sufficient. ■ The parking demand for weekdays, Fridays, and Saturdays utilizing ITE Parking Generation Manual 85th percentile rates under a peak hour demand scenario exceeds the amount of parking provided (214) during the restaurant peak hours on Fridays (262) and Saturdays (229). However, both would be at or below the number of spaces required by the City code (262). ● The parking utilization analysis indicates that even across sellout days, when comparable hotels are entirely occupied, parking utilization remains at approximately 30 percent. ● This would indicate that the weighted average rates from the ITE Parking Generation Manual are more appropriate for determining parking space requirements for this hotel location. ■ Based on the parking utilization data, there is a documented history of underutilized parking at comparable extended stay hotels, with the Bloomington and Plymouth sites consisting of suburban Twin Cities properties like Eden Prairie. Based on the ITE Parking Generation Manual, parking utilization data for comparable extended stay hotels, and engineering judgment the 214 parking spaces provided by the current site plan are expected to be sufficient during both hotel and restaurant peak hours. Furthermore, the parking data included in this study does not account for hotel patrons utilizing the restaurant (per ownership, they would anticipate that 30 to 40 percent of hotel guests would utilize the restaurant during their stay), nor does it account for the 32 outdoor patio seats which may not be useable for a handful of months each year. ■ In the unlikely event that overflow parking is needed, one of two options could be considered: ● Lake Ridge Office Park across the street could be approached as the peak parking times for the office land uses would be different than those of the hotel and restaurant. However, pedestrian facilities are not currently available for crossing Valley View Road. ● The school district could also be approached as they use very little of their parking lot. This solution would be a further distance away (approximately 800 feet) but would not require pedestrians to cross Valley View Road. For either option, a shuttle could be considered. Valley View Development – Parking Generation Study Technical Memorandum PAGE A Appendix A: Residence Inn Parking Utilization Analysis Residence Inn Parking Utilization Analysis Version 2 Updated: 06/27/2025 Residence Inn Bloomington Residence Inn Denver/Park Meadows Room Count 128.00                           Room Count 112.00                           Parking Charge Rate 10.00                              Parking Charge Rate 10.00                              Total Parking Spaces Available 142.00                           Total Parking Spaces Available 118.00                           Average Weekend Occupancy 71.2% Average Weekend Occupancy 68.0% Average Weekday Occupancy 72.0% Average Weekday Occupancy 78.0% Highest Average Occupancy Month August | 93.8% Highest Average Occupancy Month July | 93.3% Average Utilization Rate 23.8% Average Utilization Rate 17.4% # of Spaces Utilized 34                                   # of Spaces Utilized 21                                   Average Sellout Utilization Rate 30.1% Average Sellout Utilization Rate 23.9% # of Spaces Utilized 43                                   # of Spaces Utilized 28                                   Average Weekend Utilization Rate 26.3% Average Weekend Utilization Rate 14.1% # of Spaces Utilized 37                                   # of Spaces Utilized 17                                   Average Weekday Utilization Rate 22.8% Average Weekday Utilization Rate 18.7% # of Spaces Utilized 32                                   # of Spaces Utilized 22                                   Average Spaces Unused per Day 108                                 Average Spaces Unused per Day 97                                   Residence Inn Plymouth Residence Inn Milwaukee Room Count 119.00                           Room Count 131.00                           Parking Charge Rate 10.00                              Parking Charge Rate 30.00                              Total Parking Spaces Available 134.00                           Total Parking Spaces Available 50.00                              Average Weekend Occupancy 58.2% Average Weekend Occupancy 59.1% Average Weekday Occupancy 73.4% Average Weekday Occupancy 67.0% Highest Average Occupancy Month August | 85.5% Highest Average Occupancy Month August | 86.4% Average Utilization Rate 21.9% Average Utilization Rate 69.7% # of Spaces Utilized 29                                   # of Spaces Utilized 35                                   Average Sellout Utilization Rate 30.6% Average Sellout Utilization Rate 82.5% # of Spaces Utilized 41                                   # of Spaces Utilized 41                                   Average Weekend Utilization Rate 20.9% Average Weekend Utilization Rate 72.6% # of Spaces Utilized 28                                   # of Spaces Utilized 36                                   Average Weekday Utilization Rate 22.3% Average Weekday Utilization Rate 68.6% # of Spaces Utilized 30                                   # of Spaces Utilized 34                                   Average Spaces Unused per Day 105                                 Average Spaces Unused per Day 15                                   *Data set includes 01/01/2024 ‐ 06/26/2025 Updated by: Z.Miller Source: TM1/SQL 1 of 1 G:\Financial Planning & Analysis\Real Estate ‐ Lodging\Reporting\Monthly\Financial Review\2025\05 May\6. Ad Hoc\ RI Parking Analysis ‐ 06.2025 v2.xlsx Valley View Development – Parking Generation Study Technical Memorandum PAGE B Appendix B: ITE Parking Generation Manual Time-of-Day Distribution 190 Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition Land Use: 310 Hotel Description A hotel is a place of lodging that provides sleeping accommodations and supporting facilities such as a full-service restaurant, concierge service, valet parking, cocktail lounge, meeting rooms, banquet room, and convention facilities. A hotel typically provides a swimming pool or another recreational facility such as a fitness room. Time-of-Day Distribution for Parking Demand The following table presents a time-of-day distribution of parking demand on a weekday (four study sites) and a Saturday (three study sites) in a general urban/suburban setting. Hour Beginning Percent of Peak Parking Demand Weekday Saturday 12:00–4:00 a.m. 100 100 5:00 a.m.—— 6:00 a.m.90 80 7:00 a.m.90 81 8:00 a.m.90 80 9:00 a.m.80 79 10:00 a.m.74 70 11:00 a.m.67 65 12:00 p.m.65 61 1:00 p.m.61 57 2:00 p.m.59 48 3:00 p.m.58 50 4:00 p.m.61 55 5:00 p.m.60 59 6:00 p.m.62 66 7:00 p.m.65 76 8:00 p.m.70 76 9:00 p.m.75 78 10:00 p.m.88 87 11:00 p.m.97 95 670 Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition Land Use: 932 High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant Description A high-turnover (sit-down) restaurant is full-service eating establishment with a typical duration of stay of 60 minutes or less. This type of restaurant is usually moderately priced, frequently belongs to a restaurant chain, and is commonly referred to as casual dining. Generally, these restaurants serve lunch and dinner; they may also be open for breakfast and are sometimes open 24 hours a day. These restaurants typically do not accept reservations. A patron commonly waits to be seated, is served by wait staff, orders from a menu, and pays after the meal. Some facilities offer carry-out for a small proportion of their customers. Some facilities within this land use may also contain a bar area for serving food and alcoholic drinks. Land Use Subcategory Data are separated into two subcategories for this land use: ●Restaurants that serve breakfast ●Restaurants that do not serve breakfast The “serves breakfast” subcategory includes restaurants that serve customers during breakfast, lunch, and dinner; during breakfast and lunch; and during breakfast only. The “does not serve breakfast” subcategory includes restaurants that serve customers during lunch and dinner, during dinner only, and during lunch only. 671 Time-of-Day Distribution for Parking Demand The following table presents a time-of-day distribution of parking demand on a weekday (Monday– Thursday) at restaurants that serve breakfast, lunch, and dinner (10 study sites) and at restaurants that serve only lunch and dinner (25 sites). The following table also presents a time-of-day distribution of parking demand on a Saturday at restaurants that serve breakfast, lunch, and dinner (nine study sites) and at restaurants that serve only lunch and dinner (six sites). Hour Beginning Percent of Monday–Thursday Peak Parking Demand Percent of Saturday Peak Parking Demand Serving Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner Serving Lunch and Dinner Serving Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner Serving Lunch and Dinner 12:00–4:00 a.m. –––– 5:00 a.m.–––– 6:00 a.m.–––– 7:00 a.m.–––– 8:00 a.m.64 –55 – 9:00 a.m.74 –76 – 10:00 a.m.82 –91 – 11:00 a.m.89 28 100 33 12:00 p.m.100 96 97 56 1:00 p.m.86 100 91 69 2:00 p.m.57 51 73 58 3:00 p.m.44 37 51 49 4:00 p.m.39 34 43 63 5:00 p.m.62 56 57 77 6:00 p.m.73 87 66 100 7:00 p.m.95 91 80 100 8:00 p.m.76 73 62 85 9:00 p.m.–––55 10:00 p.m.–––35 11:00 p.m.–––– Land Use Descriptions and Data Plots 0 FINAL DOCUMENT May 23rd, 2025 Prepared By: Nick Grage, PE, PTOE, RSP1 ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. | 733 S Marquette Ave, Suite 700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Traffic Impact Analysis VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT (EDEN PRAIRIE, MN) VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE i Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... i List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................ ii 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Existing Conditions .............................................................................................. 1 2.1 Study Area Intersections .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Roadway / Intersection Characteristics ............................................................................................ 4 2.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis .................................................................................................................. 6 2.3.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis .......................................................................................................... 6 3. Traffic Growth Rates ........................................................................................... 7 3.1 Traffic Growth .......................................................................................................................................... 7 4. Proposed Development ....................................................................................... 9 4.1 Proposed Access ....................................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Trip Generation ...................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2.1 ITE Trip Generation Manual ............................................................................................................ 11 4.2.2 Trip Distribution & Assignment ...................................................................................................... 11 5. Future Traffic Operations .................................................................................. 15 5.1 2027 Traffic Operations Analyses .......................................................................................................... 15 5.2 Additional Three-Quarter Access Analysis ............................................................................................. 16 5.3 Safety Considerations ............................................................................................................................. 17 5.3.1 Historical Crash Data ....................................................................................................................... 17 5.3.2 Driver Behavior ............................................................................................................................... 17 6. Site Plan Review ................................................................................................ 18 7. Conclusions & Recommendations ..................................................................... 19 VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3. 2027 No Build Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................ 8 Figure 4. Proposed Site Plan ................................................................................................................................. 10 Figure 5. Proposed Development Directional Distribution .................................................................................. 12 Figure 6. Added Development Trips ..................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 7. 2027 Build Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................................... 14 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Roadway Characteristics ........................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2. Intersection Characteristics ...................................................................................................................... 4 Table 3. Level of Service Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 6 Table 4. Existing Conditions Intersection Capacity Analysis ................................................................................... 7 Table 5. Trip Generation Estimates ...................................................................................................................... 11 Table 6. 2027 No Build Traffic Operations ............................................................................................................ 15 Table 7. 2027 Build Traffic Operations – RIRO ...................................................................................................... 16 Table 8. 2027 Build Traffic Operations – Three-Quarter ...................................................................................... 16 VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 1 1. Introduction Alliant Engineering has conducted a traffic impact analysis for the Valley View Development located north of Valley View Road just east of I-494 on the southwestern portion of the former UNFI SuperValu Corporate site in Eden Prairie, MN (see Figure 1). The proposed development consists of a 157-room hotel and 8,600 square foot high turnover sit down restaurant. The main objectives of this study are to evaluate existing traffic operations within the study area, identify any potential traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network due to the proposed development trips, and recommend improvements to address issues if necessary. The following provided the assumptions, analysis, and study conclusions / recommendations offered for consideration. 2. Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline for identifying any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes various field observations and research, turning movement counts, and an intersection capacity analysis. 2.1 STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS The following study intersections were identified: • Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive • Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp • Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp • Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle • Valley View Road & Market Place Drive • Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive • Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive The following access was also identified: • Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access o Note: This is an existing right-in / right-out access which, at the time of the study, was not being utilized. Both a right-in / right-out and three-quarter configuration were considered. INTERSTATE 944 INTERSTATE 944 212 Valley View Road Valley Vie w Road Project Location Figure 1 ALLIANT Valley View Development - Traffic Impact Analysis Site Development Proposed VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 3 2.2 DATA COLLECTION 2.2.1 Existing Traffic Volumes To document existing conditions, intersection turning movement counts (TMCs) were collected for the I-494 SB, I-494 NB, and Office Ridge Circle intersections by Alliant Engineering on Wednesday, July 24th, 2024, over the time periods listed below. To provide a conservative estimate of development impacts, historical TMCs prior to the UNFI SuperValu Corporate building being vacated were utilized at the other study intersections. • AM Peak Period: 7:00 – 9:00 a.m. • PM Peak Period: 4:00 – 6:00 p.m. The peak hours were observed to be 7:45 to 8:45 a.m. and 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. Newly collected intersection turning movements counts are included in the Appendix. Recent historical AADTs are 14,500 (2023) at the development access with an ADT of approximately 18,750 calculated from the TMCs. The capacity of a four-lane divided roadway with turn lanes is 32,000 based on guidelines from the Highway Capacity Manual. VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 4 2.2.2 Roadway / Intersection Characteristics In addition to traffic volume data collection, observations were completed to identify roadway / intersection characteristics within the study area (i.e. geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls), which are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. Existing geometry, traffic control, and existing year 2024 peak hour traffic volumes within the study area are shown Figure 2. Table 1. Roadway Characteristics Roadway Cross-Section Speed Limit Functional Classification Valley View Road 4-Lane Divided 45 mph Minor Arterial Table 2. Intersection Characteristics Intersection w/ Valley View Traffic Control Lane Designations by Approach1 NB EB SB WB Topview Road/ Plaza Drive Signal LT / R L / T / T / R LTR L / T / TR I-494 Southbound Ramp Signal - T / T L / L / R T / T I-494 Northbound Ramp Signal - L / T / T - T / T / R Development Access (RIRO) Thru/Stop - - R T / T / R Office Ridge Circle (RIRO) Thru/Stop LR T / TR - L / T / T Market Place Drive Signal L / TR L / T / TR L / L / TR L / T / T / R Bryant Lake Drive Signal - L / T / T / T L / L / R T / TR Flying Cloud Drive Signal L / T / T / R L / T / T / R L / T / R L / T / T / R 1L=Left-Turn, T=Through, R=Right-Turn 2Separate Lanes are Denoted by / Pl a z a Dri v e Valley Vie w Road Drive Market Place 500 SCALE IN FEET DriveBryant Lake Existing Conditions Figure 2Valley View Development - Traffic Impact Analysis ALLIANT Development Valley View LEGEND Lane Configuration Traffic Signal AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) PM Peak Hour: 4:30 - 5:30 PM AM Peak Hour: 7:45 - 8:45 AM 506 (558) 427 (682) 237 (239) 427 (682) 206 (390) 663 (717) 186 (181) 6 (2 2 ) 3 (2 4 ) 634 (716) 29 (1) 627 (1050) 27 (3) 204 (167) 38 (41)548 (832)103 (275) 631 (857) Circle O ffice Rid ge 7 7 (123) 7 (33) 1 8 (31) 156 (186) 450 (632) 58 (103) 36 (36) 373 (397) 14 (32) 9 (15) 2 5 (37) 5 6 (38) 261 (41)35 (45)68 (16) 60 (20)608 (484)345 (299) 410 (641)585 (760)81 (152)22 (157)321 (817)250 (300) 3 2 (73) 0 (1) 1 2 (63) 139 (17) 637 (977) 59 (30) 53 (16) 37 (31) Through / Stop 343 (3 40) 547 (693) 0 (1 ) 528 (721) 5 (1 3 ) 7 (1 0 7 ) VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 6 2.3 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS An existing year 2024 intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations could be compared. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 3. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. The LOS D/E boundary for overall operations is often used as the indicator of congestion in an urban area, with local agencies adopting additional requirement as needed. For side-street stop-controlled intersections, a key measure of operational effectiveness is the side-street LOS. Lengthy delays and poor LOS can occur on side- street approaches even if the overall intersection is functioning well. Table 3. Level of Service Criteria After LOS, the second component of the capacity analysis is a study of vehicular queuing, or the lineup of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can operate with an acceptable LOS, but if queues from the intersection block entrances to turn lanes or adjacent driveways, unsafe operating conditions could result. The 95th percentile queue, or the length of queue with only a five percent probability of being exceeded during an analysis period, is considered the standard for design purposes. 2.3.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis The existing year 2024 intersection capacity analysis was performed for the study intersections during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours as observed by Alliant Engineering as noted previously. Results of the existing year 2024 intersection capacity analysis presented in Table 4 indicate the study intersections currently operate at overall LOS C or better during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours under existing year 2024 traffic volumes. In addition, no significant side-street delay or queuing issues were observed. Detailed operations and queuing analysis results are presented in Appendix. Description Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection A Free Flow: Low volumes and no delays.0 - 10 0 - 10 B Stable Flow: Speeds restricted by travel conditions, minor delays.> 10 - 20 > 10 - 15 C Stable Flow: Speeds and maneuverability closely controlled due to higher volumes.> 20 - 35 > 15 - 25 D Stable Flow: Speeds considerably affected by change in operating conditions. High density traffic restricts maneuverability, volume near capacity.> 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 E Unstable Flow: Low speeds, considerable delay, volume at or slightly over capacity.> 55 - 80 > 35 - 50 F Forced Flow: Very low speeds, volume exceed capacity, long delays with stop and go traffic.> 80 > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 Edition, Transportation Research Board, Exhibits 18-4 & 19-1. Delay per Vehicle (seconds) Level of Service VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 7 Table 4. Existing Conditions Intersection Capacity Analysis 3. Traffic Growth Rates Although the original traffic impact analysis proposal indicated that no background traffic growth would be assumed for the future conditions analysis, delays in the project and multiple iterations to the development plan required modifications to the approach. To ensure the results of the analysis would continue to be valid even with additional delays or slight modifications to development plan an analysis year of 2027 was selected. 3.1 TRAFFIC GROWTH Based on available traffic data, a least squares analysis was completed using MnDOT’s Cumulative ESAL’s worksheet with traffic growth rates demographically adjusted for Hennepin County. The recommended traffic growth rate from MnDOT’s Cumulative ESAL worksheet for Valley View Road is 0.5 percent. This annual growth rate was applied to existing year 2024 traffic volumes to generate forecast year 2027 No Build traffic volumes shown in Figure 3. Completed MnDOT Cumulative ESAL Worksheets can be found in the Appendix. Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive A /C 8.0 /29.5 B /D 13.6 /47.5 Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp A /B 8.7 /18.0 B /C 12.2 /29.1 Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp A /A 1.6 /1.8 A /A 2.6 /2.8 Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle A /B 0.9 /10.6 A /B 1.5 /17.7 Valley View Road & Market Place Drive A /C 3.9 /23.7 B /E 11.5 /58.2 Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive B /C 15.5 /26.9 C /D 25.0 /42.1 Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive C /E 26.9 /63.5 D /E 36.3 /57.1 Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s)LOS Delay (s) Overall Intersection LOS / Worst Approach LOS Overall Intersection Delay / Worst Approach Delay Pl a z a Dri v e Valley Vie w Road Drive Market Place 500 SCALE IN FEET DriveBryant Lake 2027 No Build Traffic Volumes Figure 3Valley View Development - Traffic Impact Analysis ALLIANT Development Valley View LEGEND Lane Configuration Traffic Signal AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) PM Peak Hour: 4:30 - 5:30 PM AM Peak Hour: 7:45 - 8:45 AM 518 (567) 242 (243) 435 (693) 210 (396) 677 (728) 191 (184) 7 (2 3 ) 3 (2 5 ) 647 (727) 30 (1) 638 (1066) 27 (3) 210 (170) 39 (42)557 (845)106 (279) 642 (871) Circle O ffice Rid ge 8 0 (125) 7 (34) 1 8 (32) 160 (189) 458 (642) 59 (105) 36 (37) 380 (403) 14 (33) 9 (15) 2 5 (38) 5 8 (39) 266 (42)35 (46)70 (16) 61 (21)618 (492)351 (304) 418 (651)595 (772)84 (155)22 (160)327 (830)254 (305) 3 2 (74) 0 (1) 1 2 (64) 143 (18) 55 (16) 38 (32) Through / Stop 350 (3 45) 557 (704) 0 (1 ) 540 (733) 5 (1 3 ) 7 (1 0 9 ) 435 (693) 648 (992) 61 (31) VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 9 4. Proposed Development The proposed development is located on a 7.45-acre parcel which is currently undeveloped. The proposed development consists of a 157-room hotel and 8,600 square foot high turnover sit down restaurant. Although a timeline for construction has not been determined, delays in the project and multiple iterations to the development plan led to an assumed 2026 completion for the analysis. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 4, with a larger version included in the Appendix. 4.1 PROPOSED ACCESS Access to the proposed development is available at the following two locations: • Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access o A partial access located approximately 340 feet west of the Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle intersection. This access will serve as the primary access for westbound trips entering and exiting the development site. If this access is a three-quarter access, it would also serve as the primary access for eastbound entering trips. • Valley View Road & Market Place Drive o A full access located approximately 800 feet east of the Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle intersection and one-fifth of a mile east of the Valley View Development Access. This access will serve as the primary access for eastbound trips exiting the development site. If the Valley View Development Access is a right-in / right-out access, Market Place Drive would also serve as the primary access for eastbound entering trips. Additional analysis of the two Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access configurations is included later in the study. This includes a discussion of potential safety concerns, both perceived and realized. Proposed Site Plan Figure 4Valley View Development - Traffic Impact Analysis ALLIANT VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 11 4.2 TRIP GENERATION To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, trip generation estimates were developed for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The trip generation estimates were developed utilizing trip generation rates for similar land uses as documented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. 4.2.1 ITE Trip Generation Manual The ITE Trip Generation Manual was utilized to estimate the trip generation potential for the proposed development. The ITE Trip Generation Manual provides peak hour and daily trip generation rates based on studies of similar land uses. Estimated site generated traffic based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual is detailed in Table 5. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the current development plan is expected to generate approximately 154 a.m. peak hour, 171 p.m. peak hour, and 2,176 daily trips. Based on the methodology described in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, and to provide a conservative estimate of the impact of the current development plan, pass-by trips and multi-used reductions were not applied. Table 5. Trip Generation Estimates 4.2.2 Trip Distribution & Assignment The distribution of site-generated traffic was estimated based on a review of historical traffic volumes, collected traffic counts, expected travel patterns, and engineering judgment. Travel times to / from the major retail areas within Eden Prairie are relatively equal to the west and east, however, regional access to downtown Minneapolis via US 212 East and TH 62 East or downtown St. Paul via I-494 East would primarily come to / from the east on Valley View Road. The estimated proposed development directional distribution is shown in Figure 5. This trip distribution was applied to the respective estimated site-generated traffic volumes to generate added development trips, shown in Figure 6, and forecast year 2027 build traffic volumes presented in Figure 7. Trips In Trips Out Total Trips Trips In Trips Out Total Trips Units 157 40 32 72 47 46 93 1,254 40 32 72 47 46 93 1,254 Gross Floor Area (SF)8,600 45 37 82 47 31 78 922 45 37 82 47 31 78 922 85 69 154 94 77 171 2,176 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. 1: Trips generated for the peak hour of the adjacent roadway network. 2: Multi-use reduction and pass-by trips not applied to provide conservative estimate. Daily Trips Land Use (ITE Code)Units Size AM Peak Hour Trips1 PM Peak Hour Trips1 Proposed Land Uses Hotel (310) Multi-Use Reduction (N/A)2 Not Applied Pass-By Trips (N/A)2 Not Applied Land Use Net Trips High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) Multi-Use Reduction (N/A)2 Not Applied Pass-By Trips (N/A)2 Not Applied Land Use Net Trips Net Development Trips Pl a z a Dri v e Valley Vie w Road Drive Market Place 500 SCALE IN FEET DriveBryant Lake Proposed Development Directional Distribution Figure 5Valley View Development - Traffic Impact Analysis ALLIANT Development Valley View XX% 15%5% 2 0 % 10%1 0 % 20% LEGEND Circle O ffice Rid ge Percentage Trip Distribution Direction Trip Distribution 20% Pl a z a Dri v e Valley Vie w Road Drive Market Place 500 SCALE IN FEET DriveBryant Lake Added Develoopment Trips Figure 6Valley View Development - Traffic Impact Analysis ALLIANT Development Valley View LEGEND Lane Configuration Traffic Signal AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) PM Peak Hour: 4:30 - 5:30 PM AM Peak Hour: 7:45 - 8:45 AM 17 (15) Circle O ffice Rid ge 0 (0) 0 (0) Through / Stop 44 (4 6 )7 (8)7 (8)13 (15)0 (0)0 (0)16 (19) 0 (0)9 (9)0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0)9 (9) 27 (31) 0 (0) 17 (19) 34 (37) 0 (0) 0 (0) 51 (56) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 33 (38) 0 (0 ) 0 (0 ) 51 (56) 0 (0) 0 (0 ) 0 (0 ) 34 (38) 0 (0) 13 (16) 13 (15) 34 (38) 0 (0) 13 (16) 17 (19) 17 (19) 0 (0) 4 (4) 9 (12) 0 (0) 4 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 13 (14) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) VOLUMES RIGHT IN VOLUMES RIGHT OUT VOLUMES LEFT IN V O LU M E S L E F T OU T Pl a z a Dri v e Valley Vie w Road Drive Market Place 500 SCALE IN FEET DriveBryant Lake 2027 Build Traffic Volumes Figure 7Valley View Development - Traffic Impact Analysis ALLIANT Development Valley View LEGEND Lane Configuration Traffic Signal AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (XX) PM Peak Hour: 4:30 - 5:30 PM AM Peak Hour: 7:45 - 8:45 AM 535 (586) 242 (243) 448 (709) 223 (411) 711 (766) 191 (184) 7 (2 3 ) 3 (2 5 ) 681 (765) 30 (1) 723 (1160) 27 (3) 227 (189) 56 (57)584 (876)106 (279) 676 (908) Circle O ffice Rid ge 8 4 (130) 7 (34) 1 8 (32) 164 (193) 467 (654) 59 (105) 36 (37) 393 (417) 14 (33) 9 (15) 2 5 (38) 5 8 (39) 266 (42)35 (46)86 (35) 61 (21)618 (492)360 (313) 425 (659)602 (780)97 (170)22 (160)336 (839)254 (305) 3 2 (74) 0 (1) 1 2 (64) 143 (18) 89 (54) 38 (32) Through / Stop 367 (3 64) 557 (704) 0 (1 ) 540 (733) 5 (1 3 ) 448 (709) 699 (1048) 61 (31) 51 (1 5 5 ) VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 15 5. Future Traffic Operations 5.1 2027 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSES To understand the extent to which the proposed development impacts the study area roadway network, the forecast year 2027 No Build and Build conditions were analyzed. Results of the forecast year 2027 No Build and Build analysis, presented below in Table 6 and Table 7, indicate that all study intersections are expected to operate at overall LOS C or better during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours except for the Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive intersection which operates at LOS D or better. The worst approaches at Valley View Road & Market Place Drive and Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive perform at LOS E in the p.m. peak hour under forecast year 2027 No Build conditions, however these were improved with slight timing changes in the 2027 Build model. Coordination with Hennepin County to revise signal timing would be needed to improve side- street performance. Detailed operations and queuing analyses results are presented in the Appendix. Table 6. 2027 No Build Traffic Operations Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive A /C 8.6 /31.0 B /D 13.2 /46.4 Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp A /B 8.5 /16.9 B /C 12.2 /29.5 Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp A /A 1.7 /1.8 A /A 2.5 /2.6 Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle A /B 1.1 /14.6 A /B 1.4 /14.5 Valley View Road & Market Place Drive A /C 4.7 /28.8 B /E 11.4 /57.9 Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive B /C 15.8 /26.7 C /D 24.9 /40.8 Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive C /D 26.5 /46.0 D /E 36.9 /57.8 PM Peak Hour Overall Intersection LOS / Worst Approach LOS Overall Intersection Delay / Worst Approach Delay Intersection AM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s)LOS Delay (s) VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 16 Table 7. 2027 Build Traffic Operations – RIRO 5.2 ADDITIONAL THREE-QUARTER ACCESS ANALYSIS To understand the impacts of a three-quarter access at the Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access, two alternative forecast year 2027 Build conditions analyses were completed. Results presented in Table 8 indicate the intersection would perform at overall LOS A during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours under a scenario where all eastbound development trips utilize the three-quarter access. Specifically, the eastbound left-turn movement would perform at LOS A during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 8. 2027 Build Traffic Operations – Three-Quarter (Development Only) Results presented in Table 9 indicate the intersection would also perform at overall LOS A during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours under a scenario where all left-turns previously at Market Place Drive in addition to all eastbound development trips utilize the three-quarter access. In this scenario, the eastbound left-turn movement would perform at LOS A during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hours. Table 9. 2027 Build Traffic Operations – Three-Quarter (All Left-Turns) Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive A /C 8.9 /31.4 B /D 12.4 /44.5 Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp A /B 8.8 /17.5 B /C 12.9 /30.8 Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp A /A 1.7 /1.9 A /A 2.3 /2.4 Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access A /A 0.4 /4.0 A /A 0.7 /8.9 Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle A /B 1.2 /14.1 A /B 2.5 /17.5 Valley View Road & Market Place Drive A /C 7.1 /34.1 B /D 17.3 /50.4 Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive B /C 15.5 /25.0 C /D 33.3 /46.0 Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive C /D 26.0 /46.6 D /D 40.1 /53.6 Overall Intersection LOS / Worst Approach LOS Overall Intersection Delay / Worst Approach Delay Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s)LOS Delay (s) Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access A /A 0.6 /3.6 A /A 1.0 /9.3 Overall Intersection LOS / Worst Approach LOS Overall Intersection Delay / Worst Approach Delay Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s)LOS Delay (s) Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access A /A 0.8 /4.0 A /A 1.1 /9.9 Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s)LOS Delay (s) Overall Intersection LOS / Worst Approach LOS Overall Intersection Delay / Worst Approach Delay VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 17 5.3 SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS County staff have expressed concerns with allowing a three-quarter access at the Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access intersection, citing safety, future development, and ongoing discussions regarding the school district’s plans for their property; however, future expansion to the north is unlikely due to several factors. Staff also cite that the majority of left turning movements occurring at Market Place Drive would promote safety and orderly operations given the public investment in the traffic signal at that intersection. 5.3.1 Historical Crash Data The segment of Valley View Road between I-494 and US 212 has two uncontrolled intersections, both 800 feet on either side of Valley View Road & Market Place Drive with one at Office Ridge Circle and a second providing access to a similar business park. Instead of three-quarter accesses both are full access intersections. A review of 10-years of crash data (2015-2024) using MnCMAT2 indicates there have been zero crashes involving these left-turn movements. However, there was one eastbound U-turn crash at the Office Ridge Circle intersection. 5.3.2 Driver Behavior With an opening in the median at Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle, despite the lack of an eastbound left- turn lane at that location, and an existing left-turn lane at Valley View Road & Market Place Drive there are three options for accessing the development site eastbound without a three-quarter access. They are: • U-Turn at Office Ridge Circle – approximately 700 feet of additional travel • U-Turn at Market Place Drive – approximately 2,300 feet of additional travel • Left-Turn at Market Place Drive – approximately 3,000 feet of additional travel Although the first option would be strongly discouraged, there are currently no signs indicating a U-turn is not allowed or a raised median to restrict the movement. Even with sign restrictions, providing a dedicated left-turn lane at the intersection of Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access would be safer than vehicles slowing down in the inside through lane to make a U-turn at Office Ridge Circle. Without a three-quarter access, the safest option of the three would be left-turns at Market Place Drive. However, given the additional travel time to navigate along the internal road, more motorists may opt for making a U-turn at Market Place Drive. VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 18 6. Site Plan Review A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding vehicle ingress / egress and internal circulation. The following should be considered: • The proposed internal roadways and parking layout appear to adequately accommodate typical passenger vehicles. However, truck turning movements should be reviewed to ensure that delivery and garbage truck have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. o Appropriate traffic control and signing should be considered for internal roadways to ensure motorists understand which roadways have the right of way to reduce crash risks. This may be important in the areas surrounding the restaurant where new arrivals to the hotel will be driving in areas where pedestrians may be crossing the road or walking within the parking lot. • There is limited distance between the southern access to the development site from the internal roadway and the intersection with Valley View Road. However, minimal queuing is expected due to the partial access with Valley View Road which will restrict southbound left-turn movements. o Additional signing internal to the development site should be considered for exiting motorists to indicate the right-out nature of the intersection with Valley View Road. • Sidewalk internal to the site is currently shown surrounding the hotel and on the north and west sides of the restaurant. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities are not present along the existing road internal to the UNFI SuperValu Corporate site, nor are they present along the north side of Valley View Road. VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT // Traffic Impact Analysis Alliant No. 4000047-00 PAGE 19 7. Conclusions & Recommendations The following study conclusions / recommendations are offered for consideration: • The proposed development, which consists of a 157-room hotel and 8,600 square foot high turnover sit down restaurant, would be expected to generate approximately 154 a.m. peak hour, 171 p.m. peak hour, and 2,176 daily trips for the current development plan. • Results of existing year 2024, forecast year 2027 No Build, and forecast year 2027 Build intersection capacity analyses indicate that all study intersections are expected to operate at overall LOS D or better during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. o Furthermore, no significant delay or queuing issues were observed that could not be addressed with slight signal timing adjustments primarily at the easternmost signals for US 212. o Coordination with Hennepin County to revise signal timing would be needed to improve side- street performance along the signalized corridor despite Valley View Road accommodating mainline build volumes. • Providing a three-quarter access at the Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access intersection does not present immediate operational issues or safety concerns based on the operational analysis and review of historical crash data of similar intersections along Valley View Road. Under either configuration proper signage should be provided to assist wayfinding. o Based on travel time, distance, and the positioning of the front entrance it would be reasonable to expect some trips to utilize the three-quarter access to reach the school / office building rather than the traffic signal at Market Place Drive. However, modifications to the internal roadways (speed bumps, channelization, signing) could be made to discourage this shortcut. o Two alternative forecast year 2027 Build conditions analyses were completed with both indicating the three-quarter access would perform at overall LOS A during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the eastbound left-turn movement performing at LOS B in the p.m. peak hour of the scenario where all Market Place Drive left-turns divert, otherwise it was LOS A. A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding vehicle ingress / egress, internal circulation, and pedestrian / bicycle connectivity. A summary is provided in Section 6: Site Plan Review. 1 Appendix VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT (EDEN PRAIRIE, MN) TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Intersection:Site Code Date:Ref Pt: Duration: Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes 7:00 --53 --36 89 ------55 --55 ----------0 ------66 --66 --210 -- 7:15 --86 --44 130 ------57 --57 ----------0 ------100 --100 --287 -- 7:30 --65 --53 118 ------77 --77 ----------0 ------122 --122 --317 -- 7:45 --99 --42 141 ------109 --109 ----------0 ------140 --140 --390 -- Hour Total --303 --175 478 ------298 --298 ------------------428 --428 --1204 -- 8:00 --88 --63 151 ------93 --93 ----------0 ------119 --119 --363 -- 8:15 --83 --71 154 ------125 --125 ----------0 ------130 --130 --409 -- 8:30 --73 --61 134 ------95 --95 ----------0 ------117 --117 --346 -- 8:45 --86 --59 145 ------93 --93 ----------0 ------139 --139 --377 -- Hour Total --330 --254 584 ------406 --406 ------------------505 --505 --1495 -- **BREAK**---------------------------------------------------- 16:00 --65 --39 104 ------116 --116 ----------0 ------186 --186 --406 -- 16:15 --92 --40 132 ------130 --130 ----------0 ------162 --162 --424 -- 16:30 --63 --56 119 --1 --141 --142 ----------0 ------154 --154 --415 -- 16:45 --96 --68 164 ------143 --143 ----------0 ------135 --135 --442 -- Hour Total --316 --203 519 --1 --530 --531 ------------------637 --637 --1687 -- 17:00 --97 --46 143 --1 --201 --202 ----------0 ------149 --149 --494 -- 17:15 --84 --69 153 ------197 --197 ----------0 ------119 --119 --469 -- 17:30 --69 --60 129 ------146 --146 ----------0 ------188 --188 --463 -- 17:45 --64 --42 106 ------105 --105 ----------0 --1 --129 --130 --341 -- Hour Total --314 --217 531 --1 --649 --650 --------------1 --585 --586 --1767 -- Grand Total --1263 --849 2112 --2 --1883 --1885 ----------0 --1 --2155 --2156 --6153 -- % of App.0.0%59.8%0.0%40.2%0.1%0.0%99.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%0.0% % of Total 0.0%20.5%0.0%13.8%34.3%--0.0%0.0%30.6%0.0%30.6%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%35.0%0.0%35.0%-- Cars Total --1234 --843 2077 --2 --1854 --1856 ----------0 --1 --2121 --2122 --6055 -- Cars % of Movement 0.0%97.7%0.0%99.3%98.3%--100%0.0%98.5%0.0%98.5%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--100%0.0%98.4%0.0%98.4%--98.4% Trucks Total --29 --6 35 ------29 --29 ----------0 ------34 --34 --98 -- Trucks % of Movement 0.0%2.3%0.0%0.7%1.7%--0.0%0.0%1.5%0.0%1.5%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%1.6%0.0%1.6%--1.6% All Vehicles (Cars & Trucks) Printed ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S Marquette Ave #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 N/A 120 Page No:1 of 50700-0900, 1600-1800 7/24/2024 Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp Int. Ped/ Bike Total Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I-494 Southbound Ramp Valley View Road N/A Valley View Road Int. Veh. Total Intersection:Site Code Date:Ref Pt: Duration: Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes 7:45 --99 --42 141 ------109 --109 ----------0 ------140 --140 --390 -- 8:00 --88 --63 151 ------93 --93 ----------0 ------119 --119 --363 -- 8:15 --83 --71 154 ------125 --125 ----------0 ------130 --130 --409 -- 8:30 --73 --61 134 ------95 --95 ----------0 ------117 --117 --346 -- Hour Total --343 --237 580 ------422 --422 ------------------506 --506 --1508 -- % of App.0.0%59.1%0.0%40.9%0.0%0.0%100%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100%0.0% % of Total 0.0%22.7%0.0%15.7%38.5%--0.0%0.0%28.0%0.0%28.0%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%33.6%0.0%33.6%-- Cars Total --329 --237 566 ------410 --410 ----------0 ------485 --485 --1461 -- Cars % of Movement 0.0%95.9%0.0%100%97.6%--0.0%0.0%97.2%0.0%97.2%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%95.8%0.0%95.8%--96.9% Trucks Total --14 ----14 ------12 --12 ----------0 ------21 --21 --47 -- Trucks % of Movement 0.0%4.1%0.0%0.0%2.4%--0.0%0.0%2.8%0.0%2.8%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%4.2%0.0%4.2%--3.1% Peak Hour Begins At:7:45 Total Vehicles:1508 Truck %:3.1%Va l l e y V i e w R o a d Va l l e y V i e w R o a d I-494 Southbound Ramp N/A 0 343 LeftThruRight 237 0 AM Peak Hour Data 0 Pe d s / Bik e s 0 0 Peds/ Bikes Le f t Th r u 0 42 2 All Vehicles (Cars & Trucks) Printed ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S Marquette Ave #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 N/A 120 Page No:3 of 50700-0900, 1600-1800 7/24/2024 Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp Int. Ped/ Bike Total Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I-494 Southbound Ramp Valley View Road N/A Valley View Road Int. Veh. Total Peds/ Bikes 0 0 Rig h t Pe d s / Bik e s Thru Right 0 0 Le f t 0 Left Th r u Rig h t 0 50 6 Intersection:Site Code Date:Ref Pt: Duration: Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes 16:45 --96 --68 164 ------143 --143 ----------0 ------135 --135 --442 -- 17:00 --97 --46 143 --1 --201 --202 ----------0 ------149 --149 --494 -- 17:15 --84 --69 153 ------197 --197 ----------0 ------119 --119 --469 -- 17:30 --69 --60 129 ------146 --146 ----------0 ------188 --188 --463 -- Hour Total --346 --243 589 --1 --687 --688 ------------------591 --591 --1868 -- % of App.0.0%58.7%0.0%41.3%0.1%0.0%99.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%100%0.0% % of Total 0.0%18.5%0.0%13.0%31.5%--0.1%0.0%36.8%0.0%36.8%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%31.6%0.0%31.6%-- Cars Total --342 --239 581 --1 --684 --685 ----------0 ------588 --588 --1854 -- Cars % of Movement 0.0%98.8%0.0%98.4%98.6%--100%0.0%99.6%0.0%99.6%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%99.5%0.0%99.5%--99.3% Trucks Total --4 --4 8 ------3 --3 ----------0 ------3 --3 --14 -- Trucks % of Movement 0.0%1.2%0.0%1.6%1.4%--0.0%0.0%0.4%0.0%0.4%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%0.5%0.0%0.5%--0.7% Peak Hour Begins At:16:45 Total Vehicles:1868 Truck %:0.7%Va l l e y V i e w R o a d Va l l e y V i e w R o a d N/A All Vehicles (Cars & Trucks) Printed ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S Marquette Ave #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 N/A 120 Page No:5 of 50700-0900, 1600-1800 7/24/2024 Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp Valley View Road Int. Veh. Total Int. Ped/ Bike Total Eastbound 243 0 346 Right Thru Left I-494 Southbound Ramp Valley View Road N/A Peds/ Bikes 0 I-494 Southbound Ramp Southbound Westbound Northbound 0 Rig h t Pe d s / Bik e s 0 PM Peak Hour Data 68 7 Th r u Le f t 0 1 Le f t Th r u 59 1 Pe d s / Bik e s 0 Rig h t 0 0 0 0 Left Thru Right Peds/ Bikes 0 Intersection:Site Code Date:Ref Pt: Duration: Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes 7:00 --------0 ------56 35 91 ----------0 ----24 95 --119 --210 -- 7:15 --------0 ------57 44 101 ----------0 ----37 142 --179 --280 -- 7:30 --------0 ------78 58 136 ----------0 --1 51 142 --194 --330 -- 7:45 --------0 ------111 55 166 ----------0 ----54 180 --234 --400 -- Hour Total ----------------302 192 494 --------------1 166 559 --726 --1220 -- 8:00 --------0 ------95 36 131 ----------0 ----39 170 --209 --340 -- 8:15 --------0 ------126 66 192 ----------0 ----46 172 --218 --410 -- 8:30 --------0 ------95 49 144 ----------0 ----47 139 --186 --330 -- 8:45 --------0 ------94 64 158 ----------0 ----59 169 --228 --386 -- Hour Total ----------------410 215 625 ----------------191 650 --841 --1466 -- **BREAK**---------------------------------------------------- 16:00 --------0 ------116 100 216 ----------0 ----76 176 --252 --468 -- 16:15 --------0 ------132 113 245 ----------0 ----73 177 --250 --495 -- 16:30 --------0 ------143 110 253 ----------0 ----58 163 --221 --474 -- 16:45 --------0 ------142 71 213 ----------0 ----34 187 --221 --434 -- Hour Total ----------------533 394 927 ----------------241 703 --944 --1871 -- 17:00 --------0 ------206 123 329 ----------0 ----48 202 --250 --579 -- 17:15 --------0 ------191 79 270 ----------0 ----41 165 --206 --476 -- 17:30 --------0 ------147 71 218 ----------0 ----71 188 --259 --477 -- 17:45 --------0 ------106 80 186 ----------0 ----55 142 --197 --383 -- Hour Total ----------------650 353 1003 ----------------215 697 --912 --1915 -- Grand Total --------0 ------1895 1154 3049 ----------0 --1 813 2609 --3423 --6472 -- % of App.0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%62.2%37.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%23.8%76.2%0.0% % of Total 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%29.3%17.8%47.1%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%12.6%40.3%0.0%52.9%-- Cars Total --------0 ------1866 1124 2990 ----------0 --1 797 2561 --3359 --6349 -- Cars % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%98.5%97.4%98.1%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--100%98.0%98.2%0.0%98.1%--98.1% Trucks Total --------0 ------29 30 59 ----------0 ----16 48 --64 --123 -- Trucks % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%1.5%2.6%1.9%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%2.0%1.8%0.0%1.9%--1.9% All Vehicles (Cars & Trucks) Printed ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S Marquette Ave #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 N/A 130 Page No:1 of 50700-0900, 1600-1800 7/24/2024 Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp Int. Ped/ Bike Total Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I-494 Northbound Ramp Valley View Road N/A Valley View Road Int. Veh. Total Intersection:Site Code Date:Ref Pt: Duration: Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes 7:30 --------0 ------78 58 136 ----------0 --1 51 142 --194 --330 -- 7:45 --------0 ------111 55 166 ----------0 ----54 180 --234 --400 -- 8:00 --------0 ------95 36 131 ----------0 ----39 170 --209 --340 -- 8:15 --------0 ------126 66 192 ----------0 ----46 172 --218 --410 -- Hour Total ----------------410 215 625 --------------1 190 664 --855 --1480 -- % of App.0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%65.6%34.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.1%22.2%77.7%0.0% % of Total 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%27.7%14.5%42.2%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.1%12.8%44.9%0.0%57.8%-- Cars Total --------0 ------400 209 609 ----------0 --1 182 646 --829 --1438 -- Cars % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%97.6%97.2%97.4%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--100%95.8%97.3%0.0%97.0%--97.2% Trucks Total --------0 ------10 6 16 ----------0 ----8 18 --26 --42 -- Trucks % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%2.4%2.8%2.6%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%4.2%2.7%0.0%3.0%--2.8% Peak Hour Begins At:7:30 Total Vehicles:1480 Truck %:2.8%Va l l e y V i e w R o a d Va l l e y V i e w R o a d I-494 Northbound Ramp N/A 0 0 LeftThruRight 0 0 AM Peak Hour Data 19 1 Pe d s / Bik e s 0 0 Peds/ Bikes Le f t Th r u 0 41 0 All Vehicles (Cars & Trucks) Printed ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S Marquette Ave #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 N/A 130 Page No:3 of 50700-0900, 1600-1800 7/24/2024 Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp Int. Ped/ Bike Total Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound I-494 Northbound Ramp Valley View Road N/A Valley View Road Int. Veh. Total Peds/ Bikes 0 21 5 Rig h t Pe d s / Bik e s Thru Right 0 0 Le f t 0 Left Th r u Rig h t 0 66 4 Intersection:Site Code Date:Ref Pt: Duration: Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes 16:15 --------0 ------132 113 245 ----------0 ----73 177 --250 --495 -- 16:30 --------0 ------143 110 253 ----------0 ----58 163 --221 --474 -- 16:45 --------0 ------142 71 213 ----------0 ----34 187 --221 --434 -- 17:00 --------0 ------206 123 329 ----------0 ----48 202 --250 --579 -- Hour Total ----------------623 417 1040 ----------------213 729 --942 --1982 -- % of App.0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%59.9%40.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%22.6%77.4%0.0% % of Total 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%31.4%21.0%52.5%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%10.7%36.8%0.0%47.5%-- Cars Total --------0 ------619 414 1033 ----------0 ----212 720 --932 --1965 -- Cars % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%99.4%99.3%99.3%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%99.5%98.8%0.0%98.9%--99.1% Trucks Total --------0 ------4 3 7 ----------0 ----1 9 --10 --17 -- Trucks % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.0%0.6%0.7%0.7%--0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%0.5%1.2%0.0%1.1%--0.9% Peak Hour Begins At:16:15 Total Vehicles:1982 Truck %:0.9%Va l l e y V i e w R o a d Va l l e y V i e w R o a d N/A All Vehicles (Cars & Trucks) Printed ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S Marquette Ave #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 N/A 130 Page No:5 of 50700-0900, 1600-1800 7/24/2024 Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp Valley View Road Int. Veh. Total Int. Ped/ Bike Total Eastbound 0 0 0 Right Thru Left I-494 Northbound Ramp Valley View Road N/A Peds/ Bikes 0 I-494 Northbound Ramp Southbound Westbound Northbound 41 7 Rig h t Pe d s / Bik e s 0 PM Peak Hour Data 62 3 Th r u Le f t 21 3 0 Le f t Th r u 72 9 Pe d s / Bik e s 0 Rig h t 0 0 0 0 Left Thru Right Peds/ Bikes 0 Intersection:Site Code Date:Ref Pt: Duration: Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes 7:00 --------0 ----1 92 --93 ----------0 2 ----85 3 88 --181 2 7:15 --------0 ----3 102 --105 ----1 ----1 ------131 3 134 --240 -- 7:30 --------0 ----2 129 --131 --------1 1 1 ----137 4 141 --273 1 7:45 --------0 ----8 161 --169 ----3 --1 4 ------171 6 177 --350 -- Hour Total --------------14 484 --498 ----4 --2 6 3 ----524 16 540 --1044 3 8:00 --------0 ----6 133 --139 ----1 --2 3 ------158 9 167 --309 -- 8:15 --------0 ----6 192 --198 ----2 ----2 2 ----164 8 172 --372 2 8:30 --------0 ----7 138 --145 ----------0 1 ----131 6 137 --282 1 8:45 --------0 ----4 156 --160 --------1 1 ------163 1 164 --325 -- Hour Total --------------23 619 --642 ----3 --3 6 3 ----616 24 640 --1288 3 **BREAK**---------------------------------------------------- 16:00 --------0 ----1 203 --204 ----7 --3 10 ------180 --180 --394 -- 16:15 --------0 ----2 240 --242 ----2 --1 3 ------180 1 181 --426 -- 16:30 --------0 ----1 256 --257 ----3 --6 9 1 ----163 --163 --429 1 16:45 --------0 ------204 --204 ----5 --5 10 2 ----185 --185 --399 2 Hour Total --------------4 903 --907 ----17 --15 32 3 ----708 1 709 --1648 3 17:00 --------0 ----1 318 --319 ----9 --10 19 ------198 --198 --536 -- 17:15 --------0 ----1 272 --273 ----5 --3 8 ------170 1 171 --452 -- 17:30 --------0 ------206 --206 ----4 --3 7 ------190 2 192 --405 -- 17:45 --------0 ------184 --184 ----2 --5 7 ------144 --144 --335 -- Hour Total --------------2 980 --982 ----20 --21 41 ------702 3 705 --1728 -- Grand Total --------0 ----43 2986 --3029 ----44 --41 85 9 ----2550 44 2594 --5708 9 % of App.0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%1.4%98.6%0.0%0.0%51.8%0.0%48.2%0.0%0.0%98.3%1.7% % of Total 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.8%52.3%0.0%53.1%0.0%0.0%0.8%0.0%0.7%1.5%100.0%0.0%0.0%44.7%0.8%45.4%0.0% Cars Total --------0 ----41 2927 --2968 ----44 --39 83 ------2502 44 2546 --5597 -- Cars % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%95.3%98.0%0.0%98.0%--0.0%100%0.0%95.1%97.6%--0.0%0.0%98.1%100%98.1%--98.1% Trucks Total --------0 ----2 59 --61 --------2 2 9 ----48 --48 --111 9 Trucks % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%4.7%2.0%0.0%2.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%4.9%2.4%100.0%0.0%0.0%1.9%0.0%1.9%0.0%1.9% Int. Ped/ Bike Total Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound N/A Valley View Road Office Ridge Circle Valley View Road Int. Veh. Total All Vehicles (Cars & Trucks) Printed ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S Marquette Ave #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 N/A 140 Page No:1 of 50700-0900, 1600-1800 7/24/2024 Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle Intersection:Site Code Date:Ref Pt: Duration: Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes 7:45 --------0 ----8 161 --169 ----3 --1 4 ------171 6 177 --350 -- 8:00 --------0 ----6 133 --139 ----1 --2 3 ------158 9 167 --309 -- 8:15 --------0 ----6 192 --198 ----2 ----2 2 ----164 8 172 --372 2 8:30 --------0 ----7 138 --145 ----------0 1 ----131 6 137 --282 1 Hour Total --------------27 624 --651 ----6 --3 9 3 ----624 29 653 --1313 3 % of App.0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%4.1%95.9%0.0%0.0%66.7%0.0%33.3%0.0%0.0%95.6%4.4% % of Total 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%2.1%47.5%0.0%49.6%0.0%0.0%0.5%0.0%0.2%0.7%100.0%0.0%0.0%47.5%2.2%49.7%0.0% Cars Total --------0 ----26 607 --633 ----6 --2 8 ------600 29 629 --1270 -- Cars % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%96.3%97.3%0.0%97.2%--0.0%100%0.0%66.7%88.9%--0.0%0.0%96.2%100%96.3%--96.7% Trucks Total --------0 ----1 17 --18 --------1 1 3 ----24 --24 --43 3 Trucks % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%3.7%2.7%0.0%2.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%33.3%11.1%100.0%0.0%0.0%3.8%0.0%3.7%0.0%3.3% Peak Hour Begins At:7:45 Total Vehicles:1313 Truck %:3.3% Peds/ Bikes 3 0 Rig h t Pe d s / Bik e s Thru Right 6 0 Le f t 3 Left Th r u Rig h t 29 62 4 Int. Ped/ Bike Total Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound N/A Valley View Road Office Ridge Circle Valley View Road Int. Veh. Total All Vehicles (Cars & Trucks) Printed ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S Marquette Ave #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 N/A 140 Page No:3 of 50700-0900, 1600-1800 7/24/2024 Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle Peds/ Bikes Le f t Th r u 27 62 4 Va l l e y V i e w R o a d Va l l e y V i e w R o a d N/A Office Ridge Circle 0 0 LeftThruRight 0 0 AM Peak Hour Data 0 Pe d s / Bik e s 0 0 Intersection:Site Code Date:Ref Pt: Duration: Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes U-Turn Left Thru Right App. Total Peds/ Bikes 16:30 --------0 ----1 256 --257 ----3 --6 9 1 ----163 --163 --429 1 16:45 --------0 ------204 --204 ----5 --5 10 2 ----185 --185 --399 2 17:00 --------0 ----1 318 --319 ----9 --10 19 ------198 --198 --536 -- 17:15 --------0 ----1 272 --273 ----5 --3 8 ------170 1 171 --452 -- Hour Total --------------3 1050 --1053 ----22 --24 46 3 ----716 1 717 --1816 3 % of App.0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.3%99.7%0.0%0.0%47.8%0.0%52.2%0.0%0.0%99.9%0.1% % of Total 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.2%57.8%0.0%58.0%0.0%0.0%1.2%0.0%1.3%2.5%100.0%0.0%0.0%39.4%0.1%39.5%0.0% Cars Total --------0 ----3 1045 --1048 ----22 --23 45 ------708 1 709 --1802 -- Cars % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%--0.0%100%99.5%0.0%99.5%--0.0%100%0.0%95.8%97.8%--0.0%0.0%98.9%100%98.9%--99.2% Trucks Total --------0 ------5 --5 --------1 1 3 ----8 --8 --14 3 Trucks % of Movement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.5%0.0%0.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%4.2%2.2%100.0%0.0%0.0%1.1%0.0%1.1%0.0%0.8% Peak Hour Begins At:16:30 Total Vehicles:1816 Truck %:0.8% Left Thru Right Peds/ Bikes 3 Pe d s / Bik e s 0 Rig h t 1 22 0 24 Le f t 0 3 Le f t Th r u 71 6 0 Rig h t Pe d s / Bik e s 0 PM Peak Hour Data 10 5 0 Th r u N/A Valley View Road Office Ridge Circle Peds/ Bikes 0 N/A Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Va l l e y V i e w R o a d Va l l e y V i e w R o a d Office Ridge Circle All Vehicles (Cars & Trucks) Printed ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 S Marquette Ave #700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 N/A 140 Page No:5 of 50700-0900, 1600-1800 7/24/2024 Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle Valley View Road Int. Veh. Total Int. Ped/ Bike Total LEAST SQUARES WORKSHEET SEGMENT A1 ROUTE: SP#: DATE :03/05/25 LOCATION: Seq #42974 BASE YEAR:2024 FORECAST YEAR:2044 # of lanes 4 COUNTED YEAR FLOW MAP AADT (SEG A) 1998 17400 850 2000 16100 880 2003 12800 880 2005 13300 1350 2007 12600 1150 2009 12900 1000 2011 12300 1150 2014 14100 1100 2016 15800 1100 2021 12723 1100 2023 11509 1000 LEAST SQUARES BASED FORECASTS: Year AADT Calc ADT Calc 2023 12148 -639 11509 2024 12025 11386 11386.34 2044 9572 8933 9378.14 Statistics AADT R 2 0.29 YEAR AADT YEAR AADT SLOPE -122.66 2023 11510 2023 11510 INTERCEPT 260285 2024 11390 2024 11570 N 11 2044 8930 2044 12720 Raw Least Squares Forecasts County Adjustment Factors were developed to Apply to Projected AADT. They are based on 1992-2007 VMT, Population, Labor Force, Household, and Employment Data. NOTE: Demographically Adjusted Forecasts Valley View Road - West of I-494 Slope Over Base Year -1.08% Slope Over Base Year 0.50% 0.50% COUNTY COUNTY FACTOR HENNEPIN 0.83 LOW GROWTH AREA GROWTH PROFILE 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Historical AADT Least Squares Demographically Adjusted Forecasts LEAST SQUARES WORKSHEET SEGMENT B1 Corresponds :SEGMENT A1 ROUTE: SP#: DATE :03/05/25 LOCATION: Seq #72833 BASE YEAR:2024 FORECAST YEAR:2044 # of lanes 4 COUNTED YEAR FLOW MAP AADT (SEG A) 2002 15300 850 2004 17000 880 2006 14500 880 2008 15100 1350 2010 15000 1150 2012 15700 1000 2014 16400 1150 2016 16700 1100 2018 16900 1100 2022 14072 1100 2023 14456 1000 2019 5600 LEAST SQUARES BASED FORECASTS: Year AADT Calc ADT Calc 2019 13882 -8282 5600 2024 13196 4914 4914.28 2044 10453 2171 2763.68 Statistics AADT R 2 0.10 YEAR AADT YEAR AADT SLOPE -137.14 2019 5600 2019 5600 INTERCEPT 290774 2024 4910 2024 5740 N 12 2044 2170 2044 6300 NOTE: Raw Least Squares Forecasts Demographically Adjusted Forecasts Valley View Road - East of I-494 County Adjustment Factors were developed to Apply to Projected AADT. They are based on 1992-2007 VMT, Population, Labor Force, Household, and Employment Data.COUNTY COUNTY FACTOR HENNEPIN 0.83 LOW GROWTH AREA Slope Over Base Year -2.79% Slope Over Base Year 0.49% GROWTH PROFILE 0.50% 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Historical AADT Least Squares Demographically Adjusted Forecasts LEAST SQUARES WORKSHEET SEGMENT B5 Corresponds :SEGMENT A1 ROUTE: SP#: DATE :03/05/25 LOCATION: Seq #42647 BASE YEAR:2024 FORECAST YEAR:2044 # of lanes 4 COUNTED YEAR FLOW MAP AADT (SEG A) 1998 22700 850 2000 18700 880 2003 16400 880 2005 17400 1350 2007 16000 1150 2009 15500 1000 2011 15400 1150 2014 16300 1100 2016 17000 1100 2018 17400 1100 2023 14211 1000 LEAST SQUARES BASED FORECASTS: Year AADT Calc ADT Calc 2023 14425 -214 14211 2024 14235 14021 14020.82 2044 10431 10217 10907.04 Statistics AADT R 2 0.44 YEAR AADT YEAR AADT SLOPE -190.18 2023 14210 2023 14210 INTERCEPT 399169 2024 14020 2024 14280 N 11 2044 10220 2044 15700 County Adjustment Factors were developed to Apply to Projected AADT. They are based on 1992-2007 VMT, Population, Labor Force, Household, and Employment Data.COUNTY COUNTY FACTOR HENNEPIN 0.83 LOW GROWTH AREA Slope Over Base Year -1.36% Slope Over Base Year 0.50% GROWTH PROFILE 0.50% NOTE: Raw Least Squares Forecasts Demographically Adjusted Forecasts Valley View Road - West of US 212 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Historical AADT Least Squares Demographically Adjusted Forecasts LOT 2 130,700 S.F. 3.00 AC 8,600 S.F. FFE: 889.00 RESTAURANT VALLEY VIE W R O A D S T A T E 4 9 4 LOT 1 2,463,746 S.F. 56.56 AC 26,308 S.F. FOOTPRINT FFE: 889.00 HOTEL 157 ROOMS PATIO FOR RE V I E W O N L Y PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N C-003.2 VA L L E Y V I E W D E V E L O P M E N T PR E L I M I N A R Y S I T E P L A N 733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Suite 700 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 SITE LEGEND: SITE DATA EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 9.6 5.3 3.1 11.0 5.5 4.2 34.0 29.4 4.5 31.8 31.6 12.2 8.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 2.9 Movement LOS A A A B A A C C A C C B A Movement Volume 13 399 35 145 481 63 16 9 80 56 23 10 1330 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 19 54 16 68 51 52 43 43 43 102 102 102 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.0 0.0 1.5 8.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.1 3.8 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A C A A A Movement Volume 0 534 0 0 434 0 0 0 0 339 0 227 1534 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 51 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 137 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 4.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 190 655 0 0 438 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 1483 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 68 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.8 0.5 5.4 0.8 0.0 16.7 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Movement LOS A A A A A A B A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 615 32 27 691 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 1372 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 0 0 37 0 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 8.3 2.5 1.5 5.7 3.8 4.6 34.7 0.0 5.2 41.7 0.0 5.7 3.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.7 Movement LOS A A A A A A C A A D A A A Movement Volume 45 586 35 51 656 141 11 0 27 7 0 7 1566 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 49 74 80 34 45 0 35 44 44 18 26 26 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 200 0 0 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 47.3 8.3 0.0 0.0 8.5 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 9.8 15.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.5 9.1 Movement LOS D A A A A A A A A C A A B Movement Volume 36 546 0 0 658 97 0 0 0 525 0 198 2060 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 80 94 0 0 159 184 0 0 0 223 0 80 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 55.7 29.2 2.7 50.3 23.7 10.9 30.9 22.6 8.1 79.3 42.6 11.3 26.9 Total Delay (hr) 1.2 4.7 0.3 0.3 2.4 0.8 3.0 4.8 0.1 6.3 0.4 0.2 24.5 Movement LOS E C A D C B C C A E D B C Movement Volume 75 576 412 20 359 255 340 740 60 279 36 70 3222 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 108 239 0 49 135 99 302 228 60 380 397 84 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS A Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.8 1.0 Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound ApproachIntersection MOE Eastbound Approach Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 2.7 4.0 BA A A Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 1.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 A A A A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound ApproachIntersection MOE Eastbound Approach 0.0 18.0 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 29.5 A A B C Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Intersection Total Intersection Total 10.6 0.0 A A B Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 2.8 4.0 13.7 23.7 A A B C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 10.7 8.4 0.0 26.9 B A A C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 20.8 19.4 24.3 63.5 C B C E Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Existing Year 2024 Conditions - AM Peak Hour Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 5.3 6.5 11.1 Intersection MOE EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 48.2 10.0 3.6 11.6 9.3 7.4 58.2 53.7 5.1 52.3 49.3 29.8 13.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 1.1 0.0 0.6 1.6 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.1 6.3 Movement LOS D A A B A A E D A D D C B Movement Volume 28 408 36 184 618 97 29 32 117 38 35 14 1636 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 50 84 27 82 117 119 99 99 48 129 129 129 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.9 0.0 1.6 12.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.1 6.2 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A D A A B Movement Volume 0 565 0 0 657 0 0 0 0 338 0 244 1804 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 76 0 0 113 0 0 0 0 194 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 6.2 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.8 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 180 730 0 0 661 413 0 0 0 0 0 0 1984 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 84 0 0 0 32 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.9 1.3 4.9 1.2 0.0 27.4 0.0 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Movement LOS A A A A A A C A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 729 1 2 1054 0 23 0 27 0 0 0 1836 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 0 0 7 0 0 47 0 47 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 84.8 5.8 4.8 11.3 5.7 6.5 65.1 89.6 9.9 63.2 68.8 14.4 11.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.1 1.6 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 2.0 0.0 0.1 6.5 Movement LOS F A A B A A E F A E E B B Movement Volume 13 704 36 30 993 17 62 1 76 111 1 13 2057 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 51 151 162 29 62 0 110 71 71 103 49 49 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 200 0 0 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 84.4 14.4 0.0 0.0 17.1 17.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.3 0.0 11.1 25.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.9 3.4 0.0 0.0 4.1 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.5 20.5 Movement LOS F B A A B B A A A D A B C Movement Volume 39 848 0 0 862 275 0 0 0 734 0 171 2929 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 96 177 0 0 271 298 0 0 0 419 0 77 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 107.7 53.5 3.1 50.9 37.1 13.7 44.7 30.3 5.2 77.8 59.0 12.5 36.3 Total Delay (hr) 4.8 11.6 0.6 2.3 8.6 1.1 3.7 4.1 0.0 0.9 0.7 0.1 38.5 Movement LOS F D A D D B D C A E E B D Movement Volume 157 755 644 158 812 298 299 487 21 39 43 20 3733 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 305 421 0 276 408 335 339 221 31 82 74 23 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 11.8 9.6 22.5 47.5 B A C D Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 4.0 4.4 0.0 29.1 A A A C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 2.3 2.8 0.0 0.0 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.9 1.2 17.7 0.0 A A B A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 7.1 5.9 35.1 58.2 A A D E Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 17.5 17.2 0.0 42.1 B B A D Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 38.1 33.3 35.0 57.1 D C C E Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Existing Year 2024 Conditions - PM Peak Hour EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 11.0 6.1 3.6 11.5 6.0 4.4 31.2 35.4 4.5 33.0 30.1 19.2 8.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 3.3 Movement LOS B A A B A A C D A C C B A Movement Volume 12 442 39 153 484 60 18 8 81 59 24 8 1388 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 19 62 23 75 52 49 40 40 46 113 113 113 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.2 0.0 1.5 8.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.1 3.9 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A C A A A Movement Volume 0 578 0 0 432 0 0 0 0 363 0 241 1614 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 54 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 149 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 4.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 189 713 0 0 438 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 1541 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 71 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.9 0.5 5.1 0.9 0.0 19.9 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Movement LOS A A A A A A B A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 678 32 26 681 0 8 0 5 0 0 0 1430 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 0 0 33 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 10.1 3.4 2.1 5.8 4.5 4.6 33.7 0.0 5.0 39.7 0.0 7.1 4.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 Movement LOS B A A A A A C A A D A A A Movement Volume 56 632 37 60 652 141 10 0 30 10 0 5 1633 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 56 90 91 40 77 0 30 44 44 20 22 22 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 200 0 0 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 49.8 8.9 0.0 0.0 8.5 7.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 9.8 15.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.6 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.6 9.6 Movement LOS D A A A A A A A A C A A B Movement Volume 42 585 0 0 664 101 0 0 0 539 0 211 2142 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 91 99 0 0 162 183 0 0 0 235 0 85 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 55.2 35.5 2.8 47.0 23.4 10.8 34.6 23.7 8.4 57.9 35.6 6.6 26.5 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 6.1 0.3 0.3 2.3 0.8 3.4 4.9 0.1 4.4 0.4 0.1 24.4 Movement LOS E D A D C B C C A E D A C Movement Volume 83 613 421 21 358 266 347 728 59 266 36 71 3269 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 163 301 0 47 129 104 371 245 55 305 59 79 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 6.0 7.1 11.3 31.0 A A Forecast Year 2027 No Build Conditions - AM Peak Hour Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 3.0 3.9 0.0 16.9 A B C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 1.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 A A B Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach A A A A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.9 1.1 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 3.9 4.6 12.2 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 14.6 0.0 A A B A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 11.6 8.4 28.8 A A B C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 24.6 19.0 26.2 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 0.0 26.7 B A A C 46.0 C B C D EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 49.0 9.5 4.1 11.0 9.6 7.2 51.1 44.5 4.8 52.1 49.2 23.9 13.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.5 1.1 0.0 0.6 1.7 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.1 6.4 Movement LOS D A A B A A D D A D D C B Movement Volume 34 414 39 180 643 98 28 35 127 38 36 14 1686 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 62 91 30 83 119 119 89 89 50 119 119 119 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.8 0.0 1.6 12.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.1 6.3 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A D A A B Movement Volume 0 578 0 0 684 0 0 0 0 329 0 240 1831 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 71 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 199 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 6.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.7 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 187 728 0 0 690 389 0 0 0 0 0 0 1994 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 85 0 0 0 26 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.9 0.0 3.1 1.2 0.0 21.6 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Movement LOS A A A A A A C A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 728 1 3 1064 0 22 0 24 0 0 0 1842 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 0 0 8 0 0 42 0 42 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 77.4 5.9 4.4 9.5 5.6 6.1 64.1 150.9 11.1 63.6 0.0 9.8 11.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 1.1 0.0 0.1 1.6 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 2.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 Movement LOS E A A A A A E F B E A A B Movement Volume 17 702 32 29 1001 19 60 1 76 110 0 13 2060 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 72 150 156 26 62 0 111 76 76 107 47 47 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 200 0 0 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 77.9 14.9 0.0 0.0 17.8 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.8 0.0 10.3 24.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.9 3.6 0.0 0.0 4.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.5 20.9 Movement LOS E B A A B B A A A D A B C Movement Volume 38 846 0 0 876 276 0 0 0 741 0 170 2947 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 92 178 0 0 267 299 0 0 0 391 0 72 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 102.2 54.0 3.2 53.0 39.7 13.9 44.2 31.3 5.8 76.2 61.2 11.3 36.9 Total Delay (hr) 4.4 12.1 0.6 2.4 9.4 1.2 3.5 4.5 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.1 40.0 Movement LOS F D A D D B D C A E E B D Movement Volume 148 782 644 160 833 310 285 510 22 41 53 20 3808 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 310 433 0 290 421 351 315 239 30 84 88 23 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 11.8 9.6 18.9 46.4 B A Forecast Year 2027 No Build Conditions - PM Peak Hour Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 3.8 5.0 0.0 29.5 A B D Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 2.4 2.6 0.0 0.0 A A C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach A A A A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.9 1.2 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 7.5 5.7 35.3 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 14.5 0.0 A A B A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 17.6 17.9 57.9 A A D E Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 37.7 35.2 35.1 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 0.0 40.8 B B A D 57.8 D D D E EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 7.5 6.2 3.5 11.8 6.3 4.8 34.9 36.2 4.8 33.3 31.8 17.1 8.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 3.5 Movement LOS A A A B A A C D A C C B A Movement Volume 15 435 39 166 488 60 17 8 86 62 25 9 1410 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 20 65 22 73 58 61 50 50 47 115 115 115 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.5 0.0 1.5 8.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.1 4.0 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A C A A A Movement Volume 0 586 0 0 450 0 0 0 0 376 0 236 1648 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 59 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 158 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 5.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 192 729 0 0 456 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 1611 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 73 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 720 0 0 655 85 0 0 0 0 0 28 1488 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.4 0.1 6.3 1.6 0.0 19.5 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Movement LOS A A A A A A B A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 689 33 25 787 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 1543 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 3 3 36 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 13.0 4.6 2.6 7.9 7.0 5.3 37.1 0.0 5.2 37.4 0.0 7.3 7.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 3.3 Movement LOS B A A A A A D A A D A A A Movement Volume 51 614 44 59 716 148 12 0 29 48 0 6 1727 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 102 104 45 99 43 36 45 45 47 22 22 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 200 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 46.5 8.8 0.0 0.0 9.6 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.3 0.0 10.7 15.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.7 9.7 Movement LOS D A A A A A A A A C A B B Movement Volume 51 592 0 0 706 97 0 0 0 526 0 234 2206 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 89 100 0 0 168 194 0 0 0 216 0 95 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 58.6 28.6 2.8 46.9 25.2 10.6 34.0 24.6 8.1 59.6 36.9 9.3 26.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.6 4.8 0.3 0.3 2.6 0.8 3.4 5.0 0.1 4.4 0.3 0.2 23.8 Movement LOS E C A D C B C C A E D A C Movement Volume 99 600 416 22 370 255 355 718 59 262 33 83 3272 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 127 227 0 58 139 97 344 247 56 318 101 55 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 6.0 7.5 11.7 31.4 A A Forecast Year 2027 Build Conditions - RIRO Access - AM Peak Hour Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 3.3 4.1 0.0 17.5 A B C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 1.9 1.3 0.0 0.0 A A B Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access 0.4 0.3 0.0 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.4 1.7 4.0 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 5.1 6.8 14.5 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 14.1 0.0 A A B A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 11.8 9.4 34.1 A A B C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 21.6 20.2 26.7 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 0.0 25.0 B A A C 46.6 C C C D EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 12.2 9.4 3.0 11.8 8.4 6.7 50.3 50.6 5.1 52.1 46.6 21.7 12.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.6 1.5 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.1 5.9 Movement LOS B A A B A A D D A D D C B Movement Volume 32 417 36 195 638 101 35 34 123 41 37 17 1706 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 34 90 28 99 106 114 100 100 51 138 138 138 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.3 0.0 1.6 12.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.1 6.8 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A D A A B Movement Volume 0 580 0 0 703 0 0 0 0 362 0 229 1874 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 69 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 211 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 7.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 176 772 0 0 705 405 0 0 0 0 0 0 2058 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 94 0 0 0 32 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 771 0 0 1080 100 0 0 0 0 0 34 1985 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.4 0.1 6.3 3.3 0.0 27.5 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Movement LOS A A A A A A C A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 770 2 2 1170 0 20 0 24 0 0 0 1988 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 0 0 11 0 0 47 0 47 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 16.0 7.3 4.8 18.0 16.7 9.4 65.2 55.4 9.1 53.1 36.6 13.9 17.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.1 5.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 10.5 Movement LOS B A A B B A E E A D D B B Movement Volume 18 703 35 29 1057 18 69 1 86 160 0 12 2188 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 155 158 77 318 63 120 72 72 127 81 81 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 200 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 78.1 21.9 0.0 0.0 29.8 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.9 0.0 12.5 33.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 5.4 0.0 0.0 7.7 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.7 28.4 Movement LOS E C A A C C A A A D A B C Movement Volume 61 883 0 0 915 275 0 0 0 704 0 186 3024 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 162 254 0 0 398 415 0 0 0 491 0 96 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 102.5 68.0 3.3 55.7 41.8 11.7 53.7 28.4 8.9 80.8 62.6 14.0 40.1 Total Delay (hr) 5.0 14.7 0.6 2.6 10.0 1.0 4.4 5.4 0.0 1.0 0.9 0.2 45.8 Movement LOS F E A E D B D C A F E B D Movement Volume 170 752 649 163 840 313 297 681 18 42 53 41 4019 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 438 517 0 256 354 294 332 241 28 85 91 37 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 9.1 8.9 21.4 44.5 A A Forecast Year 2027 Build Conditions - RIRO Access - PM Peak Hour Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 4.0 5.3 0.0 30.8 A C D Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 2.4 2.1 0.0 0.0 A A C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access 0.5 0.6 0.0 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.4 3.3 8.9 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 7.4 16.6 34.2 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 17.5 0.0 A A B A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 25.5 30.1 50.4 A B C D Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 45.0 36.4 35.6 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 0.0 46.0 C C A D 53.6 D D D D EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 10.2 6.1 3.4 11.6 6.4 5.0 32.0 26.2 4.9 30.2 32.8 12.1 8.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 3.3 Movement LOS B A A B A A C C A C C B A Movement Volume 15 425 36 157 496 52 17 7 89 58 26 9 1387 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 21 65 22 74 58 62 40 40 48 110 110 110 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.6 0.0 1.5 8.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.1 3.8 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A C A A A Movement Volume 0 569 0 0 435 0 0 0 0 347 0 245 1596 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 58 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 144 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 4.5 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 183 697 0 0 442 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 1547 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 75 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 5.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 35 660 0 0 634 86 0 0 0 0 0 29 1444 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 43 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 29 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 200 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.5 0.1 5.6 1.7 0.0 17.5 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Movement LOS A A A A A A B A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 631 30 22 753 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 1446 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 3 3 32 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 12.8 4.9 4.1 7.9 7.1 5.5 44.7 0.0 5.1 35.7 0.0 5.0 7.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 3.4 Movement LOS B A A A A A D A A D A A A Movement Volume 58 589 36 61 699 151 13 0 33 54 0 7 1701 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 98 97 46 107 0 39 44 44 51 22 22 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 47.4 8.8 0.0 0.0 9.3 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.5 0.0 10.0 15.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.6 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.6 9.5 Movement LOS D A A A A A A A A C A A B Movement Volume 48 592 0 0 702 113 0 0 0 525 0 224 2204 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 84 94 0 0 167 200 0 0 0 214 0 84 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 56.9 28.7 2.7 54.0 26.0 10.8 36.7 24.6 8.4 85.0 47.4 18.3 28.7 Total Delay (hr) 1.5 4.8 0.3 0.3 2.8 0.8 3.7 5.0 0.1 6.5 0.4 0.4 26.6 Movement LOS E C A D C B D C A F D B C Movement Volume 90 594 428 21 381 258 359 718 64 270 33 82 3298 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 121 226 0 52 149 97 395 289 59 395 477 95 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS 67.6 C C C E Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 21.0 20.9 27.5 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 0.0 25.1 B A A C Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 11.7 9.1 32.2 A A B C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 5.5 6.9 16.3 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 13.3 0.0 A A B A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.5 1.8 3.6 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access 0.6 0.4 0.0 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 1.8 1.2 0.0 0.0 A A B Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 3.2 4.3 0.0 16.8 A B C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 6.0 7.5 10.3 29.2 A A Forecast Year 2027 Build Conditions - Three-Quarter Access (Development Only) - AM Peak Hour Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 11.4 8.5 3.1 12.0 8.4 7.4 50.1 50.5 5.4 50.4 50.3 25.3 12.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.6 1.6 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.1 5.8 Movement LOS B A A B A A D D A D D C B Movement Volume 29 409 29 188 660 105 33 35 127 35 36 17 1703 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 34 85 21 107 116 125 105 105 53 122 122 122 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.4 0.0 1.6 12.9 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.1 6.9 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A D A A B Movement Volume 0 569 0 0 711 0 0 0 0 369 0 240 1889 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 79 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 220 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 7.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 Total Delay (hr) 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 173 772 0 0 715 406 0 0 0 0 0 0 2066 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 82 0 0 0 32 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 13.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 1.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 Movement LOS B A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 33 737 0 0 1092 93 0 0 0 0 0 33 1988 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 50 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 32 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 200 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.4 0.0 6.4 3.3 0.0 23.5 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Movement LOS A A A A A A C A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 735 1 2 1167 0 26 0 27 0 0 0 1958 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 0 0 9 0 0 50 0 50 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 14.5 7.9 3.6 19.5 13.4 8.9 69.7 67.2 8.4 53.0 104.5 13.7 15.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 1.6 0.0 0.2 4.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 2.3 0.0 0.1 9.6 Movement LOS B A A B B A E E A D F B B Movement Volume 16 713 33 31 1066 16 58 1 72 156 1 15 2178 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 173 166 64 269 0 109 63 63 123 66 66 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 82.3 25.1 0.0 0.0 27.8 29.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 12.8 36.8 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 6.3 0.0 0.0 7.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.7 31.6 Movement LOS F C A A C C A A A E A B D Movement Volume 55 883 0 0 906 273 0 0 0 728 0 204 3049 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 140 258 0 0 381 412 0 0 0 611 0 106 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 109.4 77.7 3.3 52.3 39.3 9.5 55.8 28.5 10.0 79.1 58.1 12.0 42.0 Total Delay (hr) 5.6 17.0 0.6 2.3 9.3 0.8 4.8 5.4 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.1 47.6 Movement LOS F E A D D A E C A E E B D Movement Volume 181 765 640 152 833 291 309 683 21 39 44 32 3990 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 490 546 0 240 339 276 361 237 32 80 71 30 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS 52.4 D C D D Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 51.3 34.1 36.4 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 0.0 55.9 C C A E Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 28.5 28.2 49.9 A B D D Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 7.9 13.5 36.0 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 15.6 0.0 A A B A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.4 3.3 9.3 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access 1.1 0.7 0.0 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 2.4 2.2 0.0 0.0 A A C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 4.1 5.4 0.0 30.0 A C D Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 8.3 9.0 21.1 45.5 A A Forecast Year 2027 Build Conditions - Three-Quarter Access (Development Only) - PM Peak Hour Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 12.5 6.4 3.1 12.0 6.4 4.8 26.6 37.7 4.3 33.8 31.0 13.1 8.7 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 3.2 Movement LOS B A A B A A C D A C C B A Movement Volume 14 440 36 159 479 62 14 4 80 55 25 10 1378 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 22 65 19 77 60 58 30 30 42 109 109 109 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.1 0.0 1.6 8.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.1 4.0 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A C A A A Movement Volume 0 572 0 0 439 0 0 0 0 362 0 236 1609 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 55 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 151 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 4.5 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 176 719 0 0 444 223 0 0 0 0 0 0 1562 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 69 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 5.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 88 626 0 0 632 58 0 0 0 0 0 29 1433 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 61 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 29 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 200 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.4 0.1 4.0 1.4 0.0 20.6 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Movement LOS A A A A A A C A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 596 29 24 737 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 1395 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 8 8 31 0 0 23 0 23 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 5.0 2.1 7.2 5.5 5.1 41.0 0.0 5.2 36.1 0.0 6.0 6.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.8 Movement LOS A A A A A A D A A D A A A Movement Volume 0 609 38 64 703 146 13 0 29 48 0 5 1655 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 107 111 40 73 0 39 43 43 51 19 19 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 51.9 8.6 0.0 0.0 10.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.9 0.0 10.8 16.0 Total Delay (hr) 0.8 1.4 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.7 10.1 Movement LOS D A A A A A A A A C A B B Movement Volume 57 591 0 0 707 105 0 0 0 539 0 226 2225 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 107 95 0 0 177 205 0 0 0 232 0 97 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 59.2 28.9 2.7 49.8 25.7 11.0 36.4 23.4 8.4 63.6 41.4 9.3 26.3 Total Delay (hr) 1.5 4.9 0.3 0.3 2.6 0.8 3.7 4.9 0.2 4.8 0.4 0.2 24.6 Movement LOS E C A D C B D C A E D A C Movement Volume 90 604 436 21 367 255 365 734 70 266 36 86 3330 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 123 227 0 49 136 94 388 243 67 337 276 54 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS 49.5 C C C D Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 21.2 20.7 26.6 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 0.0 25.7 B A A C Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 12.4 9.8 33.3 A A B C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 4.8 5.6 16.3 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 14.7 0.0 A A B A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.4 1.5 4.0 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access 1.0 0.4 0.0 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 1.8 1.2 0.0 0.0 A A B Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 3.0 4.2 0.0 17.6 A A C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 6.3 7.5 8.8 30.7 A A Forecast Year 2027 Build Conditions - Three-Quarter Access (All Left-Turns) - AM Peak Hour Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 11.0 8.4 3.0 12.4 8.2 6.8 49.8 51.2 5.4 49.7 49.6 28.6 11.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.6 1.5 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.1 5.5 Movement LOS B A A B A A D D A D D C B Movement Volume 31 414 39 183 650 107 30 31 129 33 38 16 1701 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 32 84 25 94 106 107 95 95 55 133 133 133 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 125 0 175 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.3 0.0 1.6 12.5 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.1 6.7 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A D A A B Movement Volume 0 576 0 0 704 0 0 0 0 368 0 237 1885 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 74 0 0 142 0 0 0 0 213 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 7.2 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Movement LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 180 770 0 0 708 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 2058 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 88 0 0 0 32 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 300 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 10.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 1.1 Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 Movement LOS B A A A A A A A A A A A A Movement Volume 50 719 0 0 1082 57 0 0 0 0 0 31 1939 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 50 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 33 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 200 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 0.3 0.0 7.9 3.1 0.0 23.1 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Movement LOS A A A A A A C A A A A A A Movement Volume 0 717 1 2 1122 0 23 0 26 0 0 0 1891 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 0 0 8 0 0 47 0 47 0 0 0 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 0.0 8.0 5.1 16.8 13.1 7.7 62.6 78.8 9.2 53.1 47.0 12.8 15.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.1 3.9 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.0 0.1 9.4 Movement LOS A A A B B A E E A D D B B Movement Volume 0 708 34 28 1063 20 61 2 66 159 1 14 2156 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 0 177 179 34 270 44 110 63 63 127 68 68 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 0 0 0 200 0 200 200 0 0 75 0 0 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 79.8 25.7 0.0 0.0 31.5 34.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.1 0.0 12.5 41.1 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 6.4 0.0 0.0 8.2 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.7 35.8 Movement LOS E C A A C C A A A E A B D Movement Volume 56 875 0 0 922 296 0 0 0 727 0 186 3062 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 178 277 0 0 416 437 0 0 0 793 0 316 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 250 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425 0 1000 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Movement Delay (sec/veh) 112.4 77.2 3.2 56.4 42.4 10.3 53.8 27.3 8.0 76.3 58.1 16.0 42.4 Total Delay (hr) 5.7 16.9 0.6 2.6 10.2 0.9 4.8 5.1 0.1 0.9 0.8 0.2 48.8 Movement LOS F E A E D B D C A E E B D Movement Volume 179 762 643 160 853 312 320 666 23 41 48 35 4042 Movement 95th Queue (ft) 472 545 0 255 358 312 353 231 32 78 77 37 Storage Bay Distance (ft) 325 0 0 200 0 200 550 0 525 300 0 300 Approach Delay (sec/veh) Approach LOS 52.2 D D D D Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive 51.1 36.5 35.3 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 0.0 65.5 C C A E Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive 29.0 32.2 49.8 A B D D Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Market Place Drive 7.9 13.1 35.5 Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach 15.8 0.0 A A B A Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle 0.3 3.1 9.9 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access 1.1 0.8 0.0 A A A A Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp 2.5 2.3 0.0 0.0 A A C Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp 3.9 5.5 0.0 28.8 A B D Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive 8.1 8.9 19.9 45.8 A A Forecast Year 2027 Build Conditions - Three-Quarter Access (All Left-Turns) - PM Peak Hour Intersection MOE Eastbound Approach Westbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach Intersection Total Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive A / C 8.0 / 29.5 B / D 13.6 / 47.5 Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp A / B 8.7 / 18.0 B / C 12.2 / 29.1 Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp A / A 1.6 / 1.8 A / A 2.6 / 2.8 Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle A / B 0.9 / 10.6 A / B 1.5 / 17.7 Valley View Road & Market Place Drive A / C 3.9 / 23.7 B / E 11.5 / 58.2 Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive B / C 15.5 / 26.9 C / D 25.0 / 42.1 Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive C / E 26.9 / 63.5 D / E 36.3 / 57.1 Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive A / C 8.6 / 31.0 B / D 13.2 / 46.4 Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp A / B 8.5 / 16.9 B / C 12.2 / 29.5 Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp A / A 1.7 / 1.8 A / A 2.5 / 2.6 Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle A / B 1.1 / 14.6 A / B 1.4 / 14.5 Valley View Road & Market Place Drive A / C 4.7 / 28.8 B / E 11.4 / 57.9 Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive B / C 15.8 / 26.7 C / D 24.9 / 40.8 Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive C / D 26.5 / 46.0 D / E 36.9 / 57.8 Valley View Road & Topview Road / Plaza Drive A / C 8.9 / 31.4 B / D 12.4 / 44.5 Valley View Road & I-494 Southbound Ramp A / B 8.8 / 17.5 B / C 12.9 / 30.8 Valley View Road & I-494 Northbound Ramp A / A 1.7 / 1.9 A / A 2.3 / 2.4 Valley View Road & Valley View Development Access A / A 0.4 / 4.0 A / A 0.7 / 8.9 Valley View Road & Office Ridge Circle A / B 1.2 / 14.1 A / B 2.5 / 17.5 Valley View Road & Market Place Drive A / C 7.1 / 34.1 B / D 17.3 / 50.4 Valley View Road & Bryant Lake Drive B / C 15.5 / 25.0 C / D 33.3 / 46.0 Valley View Road & Flying Cloud Drive C / D 26.0 / 46.6 D / D 40.1 / 53.6 Overall Intersection LOS / Worst Approach LOS Overall Intersection Delay / Worst Approach Delay Overall Intersection LOS / Worst Approach LOS Overall Intersection Delay / Worst Approach Delay Forecast Year 2027 No Build Conditions Intersection AM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) Valleyview Development - Eden Prairie, MN Traffic Study - Measures of Effectiveness Summary Existing Year 2024 Conditions Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) Overall Intersection LOS / Worst Approach LOS Overall Intersection Delay / Worst Approach Delay Forecast Year 2027 Build Conditions - RIRO Access Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) Planning Commission Staff Report Date: September 22, 2025 Location: 6436 City West Parkway Subject: Roers Eden Prairie Apartments From: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner Applicant: Roers Companies Review period expires: December 20, 2025 ITEM DESCRIPTION Roers is seeking approvals necessary to construct a 195 unit apartment building, replacing an existing 4 story office building. The project includes underground and surface parking, indoor and outdoor residential amenities, landscaping, and stormwater management. REQUESTED ACTIONS • Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Industrial Flex Tech to Medium High Density Residential on 5.86 acres • Zoning District Change from Office to RM-2.5 on 5.86 acres • Planned Unit Development Concept Plan Review on 5.86 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with Waivers on 5.86 acres • Site Plan Review on 5.86 acres BACKGROUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING The project requires the amendment of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, changing the Land Use from Industrial Flex Tech to Medium High Density Residential. Given the proximity of the light rail station, the need for additional housing, and the decline of the office market, staff supports the Comprehensive Plan amendment by removing an underutilized office building and adding a variety of housing options close to a planned light rail station. The zoning district change proposed, from Office to RM-2.5, aligns the zoning with the proposed Comprehensive Plan and the intended use. Existing Proposed Land Use Industrial Flex Tech 5.86 Medium High Residential 5.86 Zoning Office 5.86 RM-2.5 5.86 Staff Report – Roers EP Apartments September 22, 2025 Page 2 SITE PLAN The site is bordered on the east by the light rail, to the north by a protected natural wooded area, apartments to the west, and office buildings to the south. The site plan shows a 5 story, 195 unit residential structure on the east side of the property. Surface parking is located west of the building. Site improvements include an amenity deck above the lower level parking. The amenity deck includes an outdoor pool, grilling, and lounging areas. The plans show a sidewalk around the perimeter of the building, and trail easements along the west and east property lines to facilitate connection to a city trail to be constructed in the future. Vehicular access is via an existing private drive from the south. The site slopes down from the north. Stormwater is collected throughout the site and funneled to proposed underground storm chambers west of the building, in the parking lot. Retaining walls are proposed north of the building to preserve as much of the slope in that area as possible, reducing tree removal and grading in the area, and allowing the building to be set into the grade, reducing the visible mass of the building. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS The purpose of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) as stated in the City Code is to provide for a more creative and efficient approach to the use of land within the City; to allow variety in the types of environment available to people and distribution of overall density of population and intensity of land use where desirable and feasible; and provide for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design. The applicant is requesting the following waivers: • Density – 33.27 units per acre where 17.4 is the maximum per the RM-2.5 zoning district. The density is appropriate for this site and is consistent with the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment. • Front Yard Setback – 24 feet where 35 is required. The front yard is to the east, fronting Highway 212. Minimum front yards are typically established to create open space between the public area and the building. This site fronts on a very wide, high volume corridor which includes Highway 212 and the light rail tracks. These transportation modes establish a very urban feel, where reduced setbacks are common. Staff supports the waiver. • Height – 75 feet in height where 45 feet is permitted. The maximum building height in the RM-2.5 zoning district is 45 feet. The developer proposes 75 feet. The waiver is supported to allow additional housing units within a smaller building footprint preserving more of the wooded areas north of the building. • Parking – In the RM-2.5 zoning district, parking requirements are based on the unit type. All of the units are 1, 2, or 3 bedrooms, so 2 parking spaces are required for each unit, requiring 390 total spaces. The plans show 324 parking spaces, including 207 in the underground garage. The ratio of stalls to units as shown is 1.66. Further discussion on parking can be found in the parking section. Staff Report – Roers EP Apartments September 22, 2025 Page 3 ACCESS AND STREET CONNECTIONS The parcel is tucked back into an office neighborhood, and vehicular access is via two driveways off City West Parkway. The project will connect to existing sidewalks that in turn connect to the trail along City West Parkway. Additionally, the developer provides two easements to allow further connection to a planned city trail through the property to the north which will provide a direct connection to the light rail station. TRAFFIC STUDY A traffic study has been completed. Morning and evening peak hour trips are expected to decrease from the existing office use because residential trips are spread throughout the day while office trips are concentrated during the mornings and evenings. Daily trips are expected to increase slightly from 886 to 908 trips per day. The existing roadway network is expected to accommodate the change in land use without a need for additional improvements. PARKING Parking is provided in both an underground garage and a surface parking lot. The surface lot shows 117 parking spaces, including 4 ADA stalls near the front entrance. The underground garage includes 207 parking spaces, including 6 EV installed spaces, 36 EV ready spaces, and 42 EV capable spaces. The 324 parking spaces provided on site are less than the 390 required. There are 1.66 spaces per unit. To demonstrate that the proposed parking will meet the operational needs of the project, the narrative includes information on how parking will be managed and the expected demographics of their clients. The developer has also provided area examples of their projects to illustrate their experiences. The city has granted waivers from the parking requirements in the past for general occupancy apartment projects as illustrated in the following table: Staff Report – Roers EP Apartments September 22, 2025 Page 4 Other waivers for similar projects have provided 1.7-1.8 spaces per unit. This project proposes 1.66 spaces per unit. To be aligned with previous waivers, if the number of parking stalls remained the same at 324, the number of units would need to be adjusted from 195 to 185 (1.75 stalls/unit). With the proximity to the LRT station, staff also evaluated how the proposed parking would compare to the TOD-R zoning requirements. The number of spaces proposed meets the parking requirements if the project was zoned TOD-R, where the light rail is expected to supplement trips taken within the development. The project is expected to open about the same time the light rail is operational. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE AND MATERIALS The site includes a substantial grade change, with the high point on the north side of the parcel and dropping to the south. The building mirrors this grade change, with the north half of the building being 6 stories (including the underground garage level) while the south half of the building is 5 stories. With the parapets, and the sloping property grade, the perceived height varies from 57 feet on the north side, to 65’5” on the south side. The calculated height, which averages the grade around the building, is 75 feet. The architectural details provide visual variety which break the long facades into visually distinct sections. Additionally, the main entrance column and the bump out features on the west side of the building all incorporate a curved corner attribute, consistent with the neighborhood characteristics of the other office buildings in the area. The building materials are a mix of brick in two colors, glass, and fiber cement, with metal accents. The building materials and distribution meets and exceeds the minimum requirements. Density Units/acre 346 330 1 stall per efficiency unit (38) – Based on 1 stall per efficiency unit approved through a waiver and 2 stalls per unit for other units This includes 24 proof of parking stalls 1.89 stalls for the remaining units 200 Based on 2 stalls per unit 490 Based on 2 stalls per unit 439 1 stall per studio unit (39) Based on 1 stall per studio and 2 stalls per unit for other units 1.8 stalls for the remaining units 116 Based on 2 stalls per unit Roers EP Apartments 195 33.96 390 324 1.66 2 stalls per unit Meets the requirements The Ellie 239 37 404 Trail Pointe Ridge 58 29 116 # of Parking Stalls Required # of Parking Stalls Provided Approved Parking Ratio Paravel 245 49.3 425 1.73 stalls per unit Applewood Point 100 25.8 162 1.62 stalls per unit Martin Blu 192 61.83 Project Name # of Units Staff Report – Roers EP Apartments September 22, 2025 Page 5 USABLE OPEN SPACE Usable open space is required at a ratio of 150 sq ft of usable open space per residential unit, or 29,850 sq ft required. This is being satisfied through a variety of indoor features, including fitness areas, conference and meeting spaces, clubroom, pet spa, and amenity area and patio on the 6th floor. Outdoor features include the pool and fireplace deck, patio and dog run area. These features exceed the minimum code requirements. WETLAND, SHORELAND, AND BLUFF The property is not impacted by any wetlands, bluff, or shoreland characteristics. ENDANGERED, THREATENED OR SPECIAL CONCERN SPECIES No endangered, threatened, or special concern species were identified during a preliminary review of the site. Potential habitat may exist off-site, to the north, owned by another private party. DRAINAGE/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormwater management will be handled onsite, in an underground system below the surface parking lot. TREE LOSS AND GRADING The office building was developed in 1986, so much of the volunteer, natural growth was removed. The proposed apartment building is located mostly within the footprint of the office building, or the developed portions of the site, though there is some encroachment into the hill to the north. There are 39 inches of Heritage trees proposed for removal, in addition to the 358 inches of significant trees removed. Tree replacement is satisfied with on-site plantings. LANDSCAPING The landscaping plan includes a variety of trees, shrubs, grasses, and perennials, with the northern ¼ of the lot remaining untouched. Landscaping is provided in the parking lot, along the foundation of the building, and in the amenity deck area, which is the roof of the underground parking levels. More than 25% of the landscaping is provided by shrubs, grasses, and perennials as permitted by code. INCLUSIONARY HOUSING The project will meet the City’s inclusionary requirements, with 5% of its units at 80% of the Area Medium Income (AMI). The mix of affordable units will be consistent with the mix of units found within the building and detailed in the Development Agreement and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Agreement. SUSTAINABILITY The City’s Sustainable Building Standard will apply to this project. The developers are exploring an all-electric construction option, which satisfies the SBS requirement due to recent amendments by the City Council. If they are unable to make the all-electric construction option Staff Report – Roers EP Apartments September 22, 2025 Page 6 work, they will utilize a Green Building Rating System (LEED or MN Green Communities) and meet the requirements of the Eden Prairie Overlay as well. Final details will be worked out prior to review by the City Council. The project includes EV installed, EV ready, and EV capable parking stalls within the garage area. PARK FEES The property has satisfied park dedication requirements. SIGNS Wall signs are shown on the elevations and will be required to meet code requirements. OTHER AGENCY OR MUNICIPALITY COMMENTS As part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, information on the project was sent to adjacent cities, the DNR, Three Rivers, and area Transportation agencies. No comments requiring modifications were received. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING AND RESIDENT INPUT The developers had a neighborhood meeting on September 4th. No neighbors attended that meeting. Prior to that, the developers met with the adjacent condominium association to introduce the project and identify any concerns. Private agreements to maintain the private drives and add additional landscaping screening off-site were made. While shown on the plans, off site landscaping cannot be counted to satisfy the landscaping requirement and are not part of the project approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the actions necessary to redevelop the subject property to an apartment building as illustrated on plans dated September 11, 2025. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This is based on plans stamp dated September 18, 2025 and the following conditions: 1. Prior to the 1st reading by the City Council, the applicant must: A. Verify the methodology to satisfy the Building Sustainability Standard. B. Locate the additional soil borings on the utility / stormwater plan. C. Satisfy staff comments provided in project review. 2. Prior to release of the final plat, the applicant must: A. Provide Trail Easement documents for review and approval by the City Engineer. B. Pay trunk sewer and water charges or sign a Special Assessment Agreement. C. Pay connection fees. D. Submit a bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit (“security”) that guarantees completion of all public improvements equivalent to 125% of the cost of the improvements. Staff Report – Roers EP Apartments September 22, 2025 Page 7 E. Provide copies of legal documents, either in Association format or private covenant and agreement format to be approved by the City that shall address the following: • Describe the long term private maintenance or replacement agreement for the retaining walls. • Insertion of language in the documents that relinquishes the City of Eden Prairie from maintenance or replacement of the retaining walls. 3. Prior to land alteration permit issuance, the applicant must: A. Obtain permits and approvals from other agencies as needed. B. Obtain City approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the property. C. Submit construction plans and project specifications for public infrastructure for review and approval by the City Engineer. D. Submit detailed utility and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. E. Obtain and provide documentation of Watershed District approval. F. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. G. Provide a plan showing construction grading limits and tree protection for review and approval by the City. H. Install erosion control at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by the City. I. Install fencing at the construction grading limits and tree protection areas as shown on the approved plans. J. Submit and receive written approval of an executed landscape agreement. K. Submit a landscaping letter of credit or escrow equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping. L. Provide temporary easements to do work off-site. M. Obtain written approval of a Wrecking Permit for the removal of buildings on the property. N. Make a cash payment for Tree Replacement as provided by City Code. O. Obtain a building permit for retaining wall construction from the City for any retaining walls greater than four feet in height. P. Submit a land alteration bond, letter of credit, or escrow surety equivalent to 125% of the cost of the land alteration. Q. Provide proof that the Inspection and Maintenance Agreement for Private Stormwater Facilities has been recorded. 4. Prior to building permit issuance for the property, the applicant must: A. Provide proof that the Trail Easement has been recorded. B. Provide recorded copies of any private covenants and agreements to the City following recording of the final plat. 5. The following waivers are granted through the PUD for the project as indicated in the plans stamp dated September 11, 2025. A. Density: 33.27 units per acre where 17.4 units per acre is permitted. Staff Report – Roers EP Apartments September 22, 2025 Page 8 B. Front yard setback: 24 feet from the east property line where 35 feet is required. C. Building Height: 75 feet where 45 feet is the maximum. D. Parking stalls: 324 parking stalls where 390 parking stalls are required. 6. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, the applicant must: A. Construct the retaining wall(s) in accordance with the terms of the permit and terms and conditions of Exhibit C. B. Complete implementation of the lighting plan in Exhibit B. C. Complete construction of mechanical equipment screening. D. Install fully functional EV charging equipment serving at least 5 parking stalls. E. Complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan. F. Install all the features that are intended to meet the Usable Open Space requirement. Project Narrative & Comprehensive Guide Plan Change Responses Project Address: 6436 City W Parkway, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Developer: Roers Project Description Roers proposes the development of a new market-rate multifamily housing project at 6436 City W Parkway in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The project will consist of 195 dwelling units, offering a mix of one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom layouts. The project will feature 326 total parking stalls, including 207 structured stalls and 119 surface stalls. Planned resident amenities include a clubroom, fitness center, landscaped outdoor gathering areas, and rooftop spaces. The project is designed to improve housing options in the district, reduce surface parking, enhance green spaces, and align with evolving urban residential demands. Project Summary This proposal is for a new multifamily residential development requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Planned Unit Development (PUD), and rezoning. City Guide Plan Framework The current land use guidance per the Aspire Eden Prairie 2040 Plan designates the site as Industrial Flex Tech. The proposal seeks to amend this to Medium High Density Residential. Zoning Classification(s) Current Zoning: OFC Office Proposed Zoning: RM2.5 Residential Variances Requested: RM2.5 Density: Maximum allowed 17.4 DU/acre; proposed 33.28 DU/acre Front Yard Setback (from Hwy 212): Required 35'; proposed 24'-0" Height: Maximum allowed 45'; proposed 71'-6” Parking: 398 parking stalls required, proposed 326 parking stalls Based on our existing portfolio and the expertise of our in-house Property Management Group, our proposed parking ratio of 1.67 stalls/unit is adequate to support all tenants and guests onsite. A few comparable projects from our portfolio that are performing well and not burdening their communities with parking issues: - Castillo Commons: 169 units, 267 total stalls, 1.58 stalls/unit parking ratio - located in Fridley, this project has leased to 96% and has not had any parking issues to date. - Risor of St. Louis Park - this is a high end, 55+ community in SLP close to transit with 20% affordability. The project has 170 units and 240 stalls (1.4 ratio) and has been stabilized for 4 months with no parking issues. - Risor of Maple Grove - this is a high end, 55+ development in Maple Grove with 243 parking stalls and 169 units (1.43 ratio). The project has been opened and managed by Roers for 2 years and remained 95%+ occupied. The demographic is active 55+ and the majority of households have more than one resident. There have been no parking issues at the site. Roers will manage the parking by allowing a maximum number of stalls per unit (2), assigning stalls, and controlling pricing. This information is included from the first touchpoint with renters. It is likely that the demographics for the project will include two main cohorts: young professionals (the majority single and some in relationships) and then suburban downsizers (their main home is likely down south, up north, they are retired or close to retirement but want to maintain a connection with friends and family in the area). Both demographics will have one car, but young professionals and workforce housing residents will utilize the LRT upon operations, and it is likely that less than half of the total tenant population will have more than 1 car. Additionally, the property will likely remain 95% (plus or minus) occupied, meaning it is not likely there will be a single time when every single unit will be occupied requiring the parking. The proposed building is tentatively scheduled to complete construction in Winter of 2027. The Metro Green Line Extension (Southwest LRT) is scheduled to begin operations in 2027. The proposed project presents a unique opportunity to create a robust district connection to the already constructed "City West" Station approximately 1/4 miles away. The lease up for a project of this size is expected to take approximately 12 months with target occupancy starting at 30% and moving linearly from there. The site design of the proposed project took great care in designing an accessible and attractively landscaped path from the south site entry point along the south and east side of the site parallel to the train alignment. This path could connect to a Metro Transit path on their right of way curving around the hill and continuing west to the station, providing residents easy access to such transportation. Such a connection would further Eden Prairie's sustainability and carbon reduction goals by reducing car trips and vehicle miles traveled. Existing and Proposed Land Uses Existing: Predominantly OFC Office with nearby RM2.5 Residential and Industrial Proposed: Conversion to Medium High Density Residential Sustainability Components The 6436 City W Parkway Apartments Building will be designed to comply with the City of Eden Prairie Development Review Checklist and Overlay and broader sustainably focused goals. Key sustainability objectives for the site: Our goal as a project is to align with the intent of the required standards within the options available: Complete a Green Building Rating System or install all-electric heating in the project with opportunities for limited allowance to be considered by the Sustainability Coordinator, calculate LCA for estimated building greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, Compare a baseline building to the design building and evaluate opportunities to reduce embodied carbon, meet EV charging requirements for multifamily projects and complete an analysis to investigate cost and feasibility of utilizing heat pump technology in heating, cooling and water heating for the project. The design team shall review and consult the 2024 MN Energy Code, Eden Prairie Development Review Checklist, OPR and BOD for further design information and guidance and complete a Green Building Rating System or all-electric approach. Commissioning of electrical, mechanical and plumbing systems will be performed per the Minnesota Energy Code. Further architectural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing measures are under consideration as the design develops. Landscaping & Tree Replacement See landscape plans and drawings for updates that meet the zoning code requirements. Phasing & Construction Schedule Project by Roers; phasing and schedule details forthcoming. Development Method Roers as developer and owner. Legal Instruments, Easements, & Right of Way Final title clarifications underway regarding a MNDoT-related title commitment exception. Final survey pending. Housing/Land Use Profile Total Gross SF: 308,200 sf Above Grade: 308,200 sf Floor Area Ratio: 1.38 (308,200 sf / 222,704 sf buildable) Signage To comply with City of Eden Prairie zoning code. Lighting See photometric plan. Transportation Capacity & Impacts Traffic study underway (as of 5/13/2025). Phase I Environmental Assessment No Phase I indicated by geotechnical engineer. Environmental Assessment Worksheet/Impact Statement No Environmental Assessment Worksheet/Impact Statement indicated by geotechnical engineer. Shoreland Ordinance/Floodplain The closest body of water is Bryant Lake approximately 1,100 feet to the West of this property. There are no flood plain restrictions according to FEMA Firm Panel 27053C0343F. Airport Zones Not applicable. The property is outside all airspace zones according to the FCM Zoning Ordinance. Disposition of Excess Land Not applicable. Limits of Disturbance Anticipated disturbance area will be approximately 4-Acres of the total 5.61 Acre Property. Cut/fill quantities to be provided once design has progressed further. Stormwater Management Summary The current preliminary stormwater management strategy will be to implement an underground detention system that will meet the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Districts stormwater policy as well as the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the City of Eden Prairie requirements. See Hydrology report and civil engineering drawings. Water & Wetlands According the USGS National Wetlands Inventory Maps, this site has no known wetlands. There are wetlands further to the Northwest of the project site (approximately 450 feet from the property) that are designated as PEM1A and PUBH. Wildlife & Endangered Species This project is a redevelopment of an existing building and parking lot. The intent is to demolish the existing site impervious and replace with new impervious and increased green space that would provide more habitat for the surrounding area. Soils Classification Geotechnical survey for the site is in progress to confirm the existing underlying soil conditions. According to the USDA NRCS Maps, this area looks to be comprised of mostly sandy loam soils and are classified as “well drained.” Borings are planned to assess soils within the extents of the stormwater treatment system and all applicable drawings will be updated to incorporate boring conditions. Existing Structures Refer to existing survey. Steep Slopes Not applicable. Ownership Roers Acquisitions LLC, an affiliate of Roers Companies LLC, is under contract to purchase the property located at 6436 City West Parkway, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The property is currently owned by Duchossois Milestone Real Estate LLC. The legal description, property survey, and related encumbrances have been included in the application materials. The purchase agreement allows for full exploration of the property. There is currently nothing on title that would prevent the proposed use from being constructed and operated. Developer Roers Companies is an experienced Developer, General Contractor and Property Manager. Please see the Roers Brochure document for key individuals and projects that have been completed by the firm. Financing The project will be financed using three different sources. The equity will be raised via Roers Companies’ high net worth syndication platform. This platform has been extremely successful in capitalizing projects very similar to this one. In addition, the project team will leverage its numerous banking relationships to secure a construction loan. Finally, the project would not happen but for the use of TIF financing. If the TIF is approved at the city, the project team will finance the TIF note using a local bank to help pay for construction costs. Housing/Building Use Profile Details reflected in Housing/Land Use Profile section above. Telecommunication Towers Not applicable. Inclusionary Housing Compliance The project has identified criteria number one in the Affordability Plan within the Inclusionary Housing Compliance. The means that the project will create 15 or more units that require approval from the City for the comprehensive plan amendment or receive financial assistance from the city. Because the project is requesting TIF, it is not subject to option A, B or C, but instead will have 20% of its units at 50% AMI with an additional 5% of units restricted to 80% AMI. These restrictions will remain in perpetuity and will be spread through the property evenly. Roers Companies operates an affordable housing portfolio with in house property management and compliance and is very familiar with the administrative process with these units. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change Impact on City’s Balance of Land Uses The proposed change from Industrial Flex Tech to Medium High Density Residential would modestly adjust the area’s land use distribution. While Industrial Flex Tech dominates adjacent properties, integrating a residential parcel introduces housing to an area positioned near public transit, commercial corridors, and job centers—aligning with contemporary urban development trends and housing demands in Eden Prairie. Impact on Surrounding Land Uses The proposed multifamily use generates substantially less noise and traffic than the Industrial Flex Tech use currently permitted. The project’s mid-rise massing and building orientation along the highway mitigate highway noise transmission into the district. It will reduce impervious surface parking, replace it with green spaces, outdoor amenities, and introduce pedestrian circulation options for future connection to regional transit infrastructure with a design that is TOD friendly. Since the previous use of the property was commercial, the traffic impacts would not necessarily increase or decrease and activity/traffic would change from office use being primarily active between 8-5 weekdays and no activity on the weekends, and multifamily being non-active between 8-5 weekdays and high activity on the weekends. This would match the existing traffic patterns of the adjacent properties. Impact on the Site The site has a notable 67-foot elevation change, with a densely wooded northern portion. The proposed development preserves much of the existing hill and vegetation, locating the building footprint to the south and east to minimize impact. Stormwater management will improve upon existing conditions by treating on-site runoff and enhancing green infrastructure. Building design aims to balance cut and fill and nest the structure into the landscape to soften visual impact and minimize shadowing effects on remaining vegetation. Impact on City Services A traffic study is underway to evaluate impacts on roads and intersections. Preliminary designs intend to meet Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and City of Eden Prairie stormwater treatment standards, representing an improvement over current site conditions. The site will reconstruct the new sewer, water and storm sewer infrastructure. New potable and fire services will be extended from the existing municipal watermains. Additional fire hydrants will be provided for improved fire protection. New sanitary sewer services will be installed and will replace the older infrastructure. New storm sewer inlets and pipes will be installed to improve the onsite drainage. Stormwater management will be provided to meet the Nine Mile Creek Watershed, MPCA, and City of Eden Prairie stormwater requirements. The existing interior roads and sidewalks will be removed and replaced with updated pavement to provide the necessary emergency access, private circulation and pedestrian connectivity throughout the site and to the new amenity spaces. Better Use of the Land The proposed project represents a more sustainable, market-responsive, and pedestrian- friendly use of this site compared to its current Industrial Flex Tech designation. It introduces housing stock near emerging transit options, job centers, and existing office and commercial uses while preserving natural features and improved utility infrastructure to replace the older systems, updated storm water infrastructure meeting the more stringent requirements of water quality and runoff rates, improved emergency access, as well as improved pedestrian connectivity thereby warranting the Guide Plan change. NEW BUILDING L1 F.F.E 900.00 L2 F.F.E 912.00 900.00TP 900.00TP 899.85SW 899.35TP 899.80SW 900.00SW 900.00SW 899.95SW 900.00SW 899.25FG 899.40SW 899.20SW 898.70TP 895.35TC 894.85G 890.54TC 890.54G 893.15ME 26. 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 8.0 ' 8.0 ' 8.0 ' R2 2 . 0 ' R5.0' 26 . 0 ' 5.0 ' 899.00SW 898.50TP 890.54ME 890.71ME 892.36ME 899.10SW 898.60TP 898.95TC 898.45G 899.50TC 899.00G 900.25TC 899.75G 900.40TC 899.90G 904.30TC 903.80G 904.55TC 904.55G 903.60TP 900.75TC 900.25G 901.65TC 901.15G 904.75SW 904.25TP 902.50SW 902.00TP 899.80SW 900.10SW 900.25FG 902.95TC 902.45G 899.80SW 899.30TP 891.63ME 891.85ME 890.47ME 891.85ME 889.97ME 891.90SW 892.00SW 891.90SW 892.00SW 892.50FG 891.25SW 890.80SW 890.70SW 891.45SW 891.55SW 891.95FG 892.50FG 892.80SW 891.60SW 892.50FG 912.00SW 912.00SW 911.90SW 911.90SW 911.80SW 911.80SW 923.82ME 918.37ME 910.35SW 910.45SW 911.15FG 911.90FG 911.80FG 911.55SW 911.20SW 911.70SW 911.70SW 905.20FG 921.11ME 903.25FG 903.49ME 902.35TC 901.85G 903.95FG 918.25ME 898.92ME 895.14ME 892.25TC 891.75G 890.10ME RIM 899.70SW 899.60SW 899.05SW 898.55TP 892.35TC 891.85G 897.75SW 897.25TP 891.60ME 891.85ME 894.49ME 892.00TC 891.50G 892.20TC 891.70G 895.55TC 895.05G 892.00TC 891.50G 899.90RIM 899.90RIM 900.00TP 900.00TP 904.45TC 904.45G 911.88ME 909.60FG 911.45SW 911.05SW 910.95SW 911.05SW 911.05SW 910.25SW 910.15SW910.25SW 908.15SW 906.70SW 904.70SW 927.71ME 927.56ME 919.31ME 892.70SW 892.50FG 891.15SW 891.15TC 890.65G ST ST ST S 904.90SW 905.05FG 910.25FG 891.66ME 892.30TC 891.80G 890.96ME 906.80SW 906.90SW 905.42ME 907.40SW 907.50SW 909.99ME 898.30SW 898.30TP 895.45SW 897.85SW 898.30SW 899.10SW 902.60SW 902.75FG 8.0 ' 6. 0 ' 5. 0 ' 5. 0 ' 12. 9 ' 12 . 9 ' 895.60FG ST 27. 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 24. 0 ' 20 . 2 ' 20. 2 ' 27 . 0 ' S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW 26 . 0 ' 895.25TC 894.75G 895.20TC 894.70G 895.22TC 894.72RIM S 894.00FG 894.50FG 889.44ME RIM 890.25SW 890.35SW 890.60FG 893.27ME 14@ 8 . 0 ' 898.60SW 898.10TP 898.70SW 898.45FG 898.85FG 898.00FG 891.85SW 891.75SW 891.70SW 911.30SW 911.40SW 911.30SW 890.70RIM 5.0 ' R 5 . 0 ' R5.0' R 5 . 0 ' 907.00FG 907.60FG 910.65FG 10 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' R5 . 0 ' R5.0 ' R 5 . 0 ' R5.0' R1 0 . 0 ' R10 . 0 ' R 1 0 . 0 ' R10.0' R 1 0 . 0 ' R1 0 . 0 ' R5 0 . 0 ' 22 @ 9 . 0 ' 22@ 9 . 0 ' 16@ 9 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 4.0 ' 4.0 ' 5. 0 ' 18. 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 12@ 9 . 0 ' R 5 . 0 ' 901.25TC 900.75G 898.45TC 897.95G 898.10TC 897.60G 897.40TC 896.90G 894.30TC 893.80RIM 894.40TC 893.90G 894.45TC 893.95G 894.50TC 894.00G 893.35TC 892.85G 896.85TC 896.35G 896.75TC 896.25G 895.95TC 895.45G 895.25TC 894.75G 895.35TC 894.85G 895.55TC 895.05G 895.50TC 895.00RIM 895.55TC 895.05G 895.05TC 894.55G895.05TC 894.55G 895.15TC 894.65G 892.64ME 896.52ME 897.75TP 898.20TP 901.55TC 901.05G 903.40TP 896.30TC 895.80G 896.90TC 896.40G 896.60TC 896.10G 898.30TC 897.80RIM 903.85TP 904.00TP 904.60SW 904.10TP 904.70SW 904.85FG 898.00TP 895.90TP 901.51ME 904.00ME 903.53ME 897.44ME 894.40ME 894.00ME 894.00ME 892.00ME 893.00ME 893.00RIM 890.80TC 890.80G ST ST S S S T ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 891.40RIM ST 895.21ME 892.35SW 891.25SW 890.58ME 891.55SW 891.45SW 891.35ME 891.64ME 8.0 ' 5.0 ' 895.75SW 895.65SW 893.90ME 896.35SW 896.25SW 894.70ME 901.55SW 901.65SW 897.60ME 901.75FG 896.45FG 895.85FG 890.80ME 928.00ME 923.03ME 922.28ME 921.83ME 924.74ME 910.35SW 908.25SW 908.25FG 906.80SW 904.80SW 904.70SW 904.60SW 4. 0 ' W W W S S S 5 . 0 ' 1 0 . 0 ' 5.0' R5.0' R 5 . 0 ' 917.70FG 917.70FG 917.80FG 917.80FG 917.45FG 917.55FG 917.30FG 917.40FG 914.25FG 914.35FG 917.05FG 917.20FG 911.05FG 911.30FG 911.20FG 909.95FG 910.05FG 909.50FG 894.53ME 894.37ME 894.35ME 894.52ME 892.95ME G 893.02ME G ST 925.34ME 917.20FG 917.30FG 894.70RIM 895.95RIM 894.44ME RIM 892.11ME RIM W 8.3 ' 25 . 0 ' 10. 0 ' 900.00SW 900.00SW 899.85SW 899.75SW 899.80SW 899.85FG 899.60SW 899.10TP 899.70SW 899.20TP 899.70SW 899.20TP 899.60SW 899.10TP 899.90SW 899.50SW899.30SW 12 @ 8 . 0 ' 29.5' 14 . 0 ' 8. 0 ' X X X 8.0 ' 901.20FG 900.95SW 900.45TP 900.25SW 900.25TP 900.35SW 901.05SW 900.55SW 900.05TP 900.65SW 900.50FG 900.80FG 899.70TP 900.10TP 899.60SW 899.90SW 892.55SW 892.25SW 892.45SW 892.10SW NEW TRANFORMER PAD ELEV: 892.50 899.78TC 899.78G 899.87TC 899.87G900.00TP 900.00TP 902.50RIM901.90RIM 896.75RIM 896.05RIM S-E V - I S-E V - I S-E V - R S-E V - R ADA - E V - I ADA - E V - I ADA - E V - R ADA - E V - R 894.50RIM 18 . 0 ' 892.95TC 892.45G 893.05SW 899.70SW 6.0 ' 6. 0 ' 6.0 ' 901.65SW 901.75SW 897.84ME 901.85FG ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S 4@ 9 . 0 ' R5. 0 ' 17@ 9 . 0 ' ST 9.0 ' 6. 0 ' C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C SC800 STORMTECH CHAMBERS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM (CITY ID: 01-24-D) DOG RUN BIKE RACKS TRASH STAGING AREA NEW BUILDING L1 F.F.E 900.00 L2 F.F.E 912.00 W W WW S 10 ST W S ST W S-EV - I S-EV - I S-EV - R S-EV - R ADA- E V - I ADA- E V - I ADA - E V - R ADA - E V - R ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S ST SC800 STORMTECH CHAMBERS UNDERGROUNDSTORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM(CITY ID: 01-24-D) BIKE RACKS TRASH STAGING AREA EXISTING BUILDING SOUTH OF PROPERTY (OFFICE BUILDING) EXISTING BUILDING WEST OF PROPERTY (OFFICE BUILDING) EXISTING BUILDING WEST OF PROPERTY (APARTMENTS) ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY (ACCESS EASEMENT) DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS US H I G H W A Y 2 1 2 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y EXISTING BUILDING PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE 503 7TH ST. N , SUITE 200 FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.478.6336 FAX: 701.478.6340 MECHANICAL * ELECTRICAL * CIVIL ENGINEERING S E N W SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 SYMBOL LEGEND: EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE C502 SITE PLAN EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE PLAN NOTES: EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HAND HOLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE ST ST S W W X NEW GATE VALVE NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NEW STORM SEWER INLET NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NEW SIGN NEW FENCE LINE NEW 4" REINFORCED CONCRETE SIDEWALK NEW 7" REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT NEW 4" ASPHALT PAVEMENT NEW THICKENED EDGE REINFORCED CONCRETE SIDEWALK NEW TYPE 1 STANDARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER NEW TYPE 2 STANDARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PUD CONCEPT CHECKLIST: G. PUD CONCEPT AND/OR SITE PLAN REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 1. GROSS FLOOR AREA = 308,200 SF - AMENITY = 7,442 SF - CIRCULATION = 27,669 SF - PARKING = 68,873 SF - SERVICE = 7,833 SF - STORAGE = 9,300 SF - RESIDENTIAL = 187,083 SF 2. BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 76,376 SF 3. BASE AREA RATIO = 76,376 / 255,315 = 0.30 4. FLOOR AREA RATIO = 308,200 / 255,315 = 1.21 5. DENSITY = 195 UNITS / 5.86 ACRES = 33.28 UNITS PER ACRE 6. LOT SIZE = 255,315 SF (5.86 ACRES) 7. AVERAGE LOT SIZE = N/A FOR PRIMELAND 5TH ADDITION PLAT 8. PARKING: - 119 SURFACE PARKING STALLS PROVIDED (INCLUDING: 4 ADA) - 207 STRUCTURED PARKING STALLS PROVIDED (INCLUDING: 4 ADA) - ADA AND COMPACT STALLS ARE 8'x18', ALL OTHERS ARE 9'x18' - 32 COMPACT STALLS PROVIDED (9.82%) 9. DISTURBED AREA = 173,290 SF (3.98 ACRES) 10. SETBACKS - 27' OFF SOUTH PROPERTY LINE - 24' OFF EAST PROPERTY LINE 11. SIDEWALKS SHOWN AROUND PERIMETER OF BUILDING 12. ACCESS TO THE PARCEL IS WITHIN THE ACCESS EASEMENT ON THE SOUTHWEST OF THE PROPERTY. 13. LOCATION OF INTERSECTIONS, MEDIANS AND DRIVEWAYS WITHIN 250' OF PROPERTY ARE SHOWN ON SITE MAP BELOW. 14. PROJECT PHASING = N/A 15. LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES WITHIN 250' OF PROPERTY SHOWN ON SITE MAP BELOW. 16. FLOODPLAIN/WETLAND ZONES = N/A 17. AIRPORT ZONES = N/A 18. BUILDING MATERIALS: SEE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS FOR CALCULATIONS 19. PARKING LOT CALCULATIONS: - PARKING LOT ISLAND AREA = 3,149 SF (7.37%) - TOTAL PARKING LOT AREA = 42,699 SF 20. VARIANCE OR PUD WAIVERS: 1. INCREASE DWELLING DENSITY: -ALLOWED = 17.4 PER ACRE, PROPOSED = 33.28 PER ACRE 2. FRONT YARD SETBACK: ALONG THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY -REQUIRED = 35', PROPOSED = 24' 3. BUILDING HEIGHT: -MAXIMUM = 45', PROPOSED = 71.5' 21. BLUFF AREAS = N/A 22. SEE SECTION G1 23. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES SHOWN AROUND PERIMETER OF BUILDING THROUGH SIDEWALKS AND STRIPED WALKWAYS. 24. ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ARE NEW TO THE SITE. G1. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PUD CONCEPT 1. ADJACENT STREETS WITHIN 250' OF PROPERTY SHOWN ON SITE MAP BELOW. 2. EXISTING STREET NAMES SHOWN ON SITE MAP BELOW. THERE ARE NO PROPOSED STREET NAMES AS A PART OF THE PROJECT. 3. OUTLOT PHASING/DISPOSITION OF OWNERSHIP = N/A 4. NO SIGNAGE PROPOSED FOR PROJECT OUTSIDE OF ADA AND "NO PARKING" SIGNAGE IN PARKING LOT. G2. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN 1. LIGHTING LOCATION = N/A 2. GARBAGE/RECYCLING DUMPSTERS ARE TO BE STORED INSIDE AND BROUGHT OUTSIDE FOR PICKUP. 3. NO MAILBOX CLUSTER PROPOSED FOR THE SITE. 4. PROPOSED STREETS AND DRIVEWAYS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. 5. A 10'x25' LOADING SPOT IS SHOWN NEAR PARKING ENTRY RAMP ON NORTH SIDE OF PARKING LOT. IN ADDITION, THERE IS A DROP OFF ZONE PROPOSED IN FRONT OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING. 6. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. 7. HISTORICAL/CULTURAL RESOURCES = N/A 8. ALL SITE AMENITIES ARE LABELED ON SITE PLAN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SECOND LEVEL AMENITY TERRACE WITHIN BUILDING FOOTPRINT. 9. WETLAND AREAS = N/A 10. IMPERVIOUS AREA BREAKDOWN: - EXISTING = 116,759 SF (2.68 ACRES) (45.73%) - PROPOSED = 141,487 SF (3.25 ACRES) (55.42%) 11. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN INFRASTRUCTURE HAS BEEN SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. 12. UNDERGROUND STORMWATER DETENTION BMP HAS BEEN SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. 13. FIRE TRUCK TURN MOVEMENT IS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT 'A'. FIRE TRUCK TURN MOVEMENT SCALE: 1"=60' EXISTING METRO GREEN LINE WALL MNDOT RESTRICTED ACCESS LINE SITE MAP NOT-TO-SCALE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING STORM SEWER LINE EXISTING WATERMAIN LINE W S ST NEW WATERMAIN LINE NEW SANITARY SEWER LINE NEW STORM SEWER LINE 903.20RIM 896.65FG 903.60SW 919.37ME 904.25TP 899.90G 900.40TC 893.60INV NEW RIM ELEVATION NEW INV ELEVATION NEW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION NEW GUTTER ELEVATION NEW TOP OF CURB ELEVATION NEW FINISH GRADE ELEVATION NEW SIDEWALK ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION ENDANGERED SPECIES: ACCORDING TO THE "NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND RARE SPECIES OF CARVER, HENNEPIN, AND SCOTT COUNTIES, MINNESOTA" MAP, THERE ARE NO ENDANGERED SPECIES OR NATURAL COMMUNITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. BENCHMARKS: BM-1:TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION = 901.05 (NGVD29) BM-2:MNDOT MONUMENT 2773 A, LOCATED IN EDEN PRAIRIE, IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 BRIDGE NUMBER 27545 OVER COUNTY ROAD 61, 1.1 MILES EAST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 494, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 MILE POINT 104.7, 18 FEET SOUTH OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62. ELEVATION = 963.05 (NGVD29) UTILITY CONTACT LIST: COMCAST:800-778-9140 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE STREET:952-949-8533 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WATER:952-949-8530 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS:920-540-7640 CENTURYLINK:800-778-9140 CENTER POINT ENERGY: 608-223-2014 METRO TRANSIT SWLRT:612-237-4763 LEVEL 3 NOW LUMEN: 877-366-8344 MCI:800-624-9675 MNDOT:651-366-5750 XCEL ENERGY:800-848-7558 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PHONE NUMBER: 1-800-252-1166 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL PROPERTY PINS. PROPERTY PINS DESTROYED OR DISTURBED SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL IS ESTABLISHED 4.IF THE LAND BOUNDARY DENOTED ON THE PLANS ENCOMPASSES ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE, A GENERAL PERMIT FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) PERMIT SHALL BE ACQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FROM MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5.ALL GRASSED AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TOPSOILED (6" DEPTH), GRADED, SEEDED, AND HYDRO-MULCHED. 6.ALL CONTRACTOR PARKING AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS MUST BE ON SITE. USE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR PARKING, LOADING/UNLOADING, AND STORAGE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. A. REFER TO GLAZING ELEVATIONS FOR STOREFRONT AND CURTAINWALL ELEVATIONS LVL 01 EL.= 100' - 0" ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" 13'-4 3/4" 2' - 0 " 13 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 2'-0"WOOD OR PREFINISHED METAL TRELLIS EGRESS EL.= 91' - 3" 4" COURSED REVEALS IN FACE BRICK OR ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CORNICE FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE GLASS OR PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL FACE BRICK FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FACE BRICK OR ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST FACE BRICK TO P O F P A R A P E T 69 ' - 9 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 75 ' - 0 3 / 4 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 76 ' - 4 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 66 ' - 0 3 / 4 " FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" 2' - 0 " 13'-4 3/4" COMPOSITE OR VINYL WINDOWS PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY PREFINISHED METAL LOUVER PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WOOD OR PREFINISHED ALUMINUM TRELLIS WITH LED FEATURE LIGHTING WOOD OR PREFINISHED ALUMINUM FINS WITH LED FEATURE LIGHTING COMPOSITE OR VINYL WINDOWS FACE BRICK FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS PREFINISHED METAL COPING GLASS OR PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS PREFINISHED METAL COPING FACE BRICK FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE 4" COURSED REVEALS IN FACE BRICK OR ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CORNICE FACE BRICK OR ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST BE Y O N D TO P O F E L E V A T O R O V E R R U N 59 ' - 5 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 76 ' - 9 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 64 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 56 ' - 0 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 54 ' - 9 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 66 ' - 3 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 64 ' - 1 1 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 66 ' - 5 " WOOD OR PREFINISHED ALUMINUM FINS WITH LED FEATURE LIGHTING LVL 01 EL.= 100' - 0" ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" COMPOSITE OR VINYL WINDOWS PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY PREFINISHED METAL LOUVER FACE BRICK OR ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST TO P O F P A R A P E T 64 ' - 2 " 4" COURSED REVEALS IN FACE BRICK OR ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CORNICE FACE BRICK OR ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST TO P O F P A R A P E T 65 ' - 5 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 69 ' - 9 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 55 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 57 ' - 2 1 / 4 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 66 ' - 9 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 66 ' - 1 " BE Y O N D TO P O F E L E V A T O R O V E R R U N 71 ' - 6 " FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS PREFINISHED METAL COPING GLASS OR PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL FACE BRICK FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL PREFINISHED METAL COPING FACE BRICK FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WOOD OR PREFINISHED ALUMINUM ENTRY TRELLIS POURED-IN-PLACE CONCRETE PLANTER PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WOOD OR PREFINISHED ALUMINUM ENTRY TRELLIS ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" PREFINISHED METAL LOUVER WOOD OR PREFINISHED METAL TRELLIS TO P O F E L E V A T O R O V E R R U N 59 ' - 6 " GLASS OR PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL FACE BRICK COMPOSITE OR VINYL WINDOWS TO P O F P A R A P E T 54 ' - 8 " FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE TO P O F P A R A P E T 55 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " TO P O F P A R A P E T 57 ' - 8 " PREFINISHED METAL COPING FACE BRICK FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE PREFINISHED METAL COPING FACE BRICK FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" PREFINISHED METAL LOUVER GLASS OR PREFINISHED METAL BALCONYPREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS FACE BRICK COMPOSITE OR VINYL WINDOWS FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" PREFINISHED METAL LOUVER GLASS OR PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS FACE BRICK COMPOSITE OR VINYL WINDOWS FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE TO P O F P A R A P E T 43 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" PREFINISHED METAL LOUVER GLASS OR PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS FACE BRICK COMPOSITE OR VINYL WINDOWS PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED PROFILE METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH REGLET REVEALS COMPOSITE OR VINYL WINDOWS PREFINISHED METAL LOUVER GLASS OR PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY FACE BRICK EXTERIOR MATERIAL CALCULATIONS METAL MASONRY GLASS FIBER CEMENT AVERAGE COVERAGE (CLASS 1) EAST WEST 75.0% OR 21,029 SF SOUTH NORTH 77.0% OR 12,832 SF 80.0% OR 22,554 SF 75.0% OR 9,649 SF 29.0% 40.0% 31.0% 21.0% 8,131 SF 6,666 SF 8,740 SF 2,702 SF 28.0% 22.0% 25.0% 28.0% 7,851 SF 3,666 SF 7,048 SF 3,602 SF 18.0% 15.0% 24.0% 26.0% 5,047 SF 2,500 SF 6,766 SF 3,345 SF 25.0% 23.0% 20.0% 25.0% 7,010 SF 3,832 SF 5,639 SF 3,217 SF SOUTH EAST NORTHWEST (28,038 SF) (16,664 SF) (28,193 SF) (12,866 SF) PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone: (612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 9/ 1 1 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 2 9 : 2 0 P M A301 250042 9/11/2025 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y RO E R S C O M P A N I E S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N SHEET SPEC ID LIST SPEC ID SPEC SECTION & DESCRIPTION BRK-1 04 2000 - BRICK MTL PNL-20 07 4213 - METAL WALL PANEL, SINGLE THICKNESS, NOT INSULATED SIDING-10 07 4646 - FIBER CEMENT SIDING OR PANELS KEYNOTES - EXTERIOR ELEV. NO NOTE REV. GENERAL NOTES - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A301 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH8D SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A301 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH.8B REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A301 8F EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A301 8C EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST MASONRY DARK IRONSPOT FACE BRICK FIBER CEMENT FIBER CEMENT PANELS WITH REGLET REVEALS - DARK BRONZE METAL PROFILED METAL PANEL - DARK BRONZE GLASS COMPOSITE OR VINYL WINDOWS - DARK BRONZE OR BLACK FRAMES GLASS PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - DARK BRONZE FRAMES METAL PREFINISHED ALUMINUM BALCONY - BLACK W/ ALUM. RAILING W/ GLASS OR METAL MESH METAL PREFIN METAL COPING / FASCIA METAL PREFIN METAL LOUVERS METAL STEEL PLATE HEAD / JAMB RETURNS - PAINTED SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A301 8A EXTERIOR ELEVATION - COURTYARD - SOUTH SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A301 3A EXTERIOR ELEVATION - COURTYARD - NORTH SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A301 7A EXTERIOR ELEVATION - COURTYARD - WEST EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND MASONRY TERRACOTTA IRONSPOT FACE BRICK EXTERIOR MATERIAL CALCULATIONS A. REFER TO GLAZING ELEVATIONS FOR STOREFRONT AND CURTAINWALL ELEVATIONS ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone: (612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 9/ 1 1 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 1 7 : 4 0 P M A303 250042 9/11/2025 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - COURTYARD LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y RO E R S C O M P A N I E S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N SHEET SPEC ID LIST SPEC ID SPEC SECTION & DESCRIPTION KEYNOTES - EXTERIOR ELEV. NO NOTE REV. GENERAL NOTES - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A303 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - COURTYARD - PLAN WEST SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A303 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - COURTYARD - PLAN NORTH SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A303 3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - COURTYARD - PLAN EAST REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone: (612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 9/ 1 1 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 1 7 : 0 7 P M A302 250042 9/11/2025 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y RO E R S C O M P A N I E S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE SE AERIAL SW AERIAL FRONT PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING EAST) REAR PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING WEST) SE PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING NW) SW PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING NE) FRONT PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING SW) SCALE: 6" = 1'-0" A302 ENTRY PERSPECTIVE (LOOKING EAST)8 UP UP A 1 B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Q RS 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 4 G125 _____ 20 0 ' - 8 " PARKING WATER/FIRE RISER LOBBY LEASING MAIL AND PACKAGE STAIR ELEC MECH MECH MECH STAIR CIRC KITCHENETTE/ WORKSPACE LEGEND STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR AMENITY CLUBROOM FITNESS CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE TRASH MEP 2'-2"16'-0"26'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"26'-4"16'-0"2'-2" 18 4 ' - 0 " 5' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 8 " 5' - 4 " 16 7 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 10 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 402'-0" 5' - 4 " 16 7 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 10 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 2' - 2 " 16 ' - 0 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 16 ' - 0 " 2' - 2 " VESTIBULE PET SPA AND BIKE ROOM BATHS MECH TRASH ELEC ELEV SHAFT CONFERENCE STAIR STOR. 29'-10 3/4"18'-7" 16 ' - 8 " 12 ' - 9 1 / 4 " A. FOR TYPICAL BARRIER FREE TOILET ROOM TYPES AND ACCESSORIES REQUIREMENTS AND LOCATIONS SEE DWG G120. B. FOR TYPICAL HOUSEKEEPING CLOSETS ACCESSORIES REQUIREMENTS AND MOUNTING LOCATIONS SEE DWG GXXX. C. ALL PARTITION TYPES ARE "A4" TYPICALLY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. D. COORDINATE PARTITION FIRE RATED REQUIREMENTS AS INDICATED ON REFLECTED CEILING PLANS - DRAWING SERIES A700. E. TYPICALLY INSTALL SOAP DISPENSERS AND PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER AT ALL SINKS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. F. PROVIDE WALL REINFORCEMENT PER DETAIL #X/A-XXX AT WALL-MOUNTED SHELVES AND STORAGE UNITS, MARKER BOARDS, BULLETIN BOARDS, TACK BOARDS, TELEVISIONS AND OTHER CONTRACTOR OR OWNER FURNISHED WALL-MOUNTED ITEMS (REFER TO ACCESSORIES AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE) SEE DWG AX-XXX. G. FOR ALL CARPET TYPE CHANGES BETWEEN ROOMS, TRANSITION SHALL OCCUR AT CENTERLINE OF DOOR PANEL TYPICALLY - U.N.O. SEE DWG AX-XXX. H. COORDINATE DIMENSIONS W/ ASTERISK (IE - *X'-X") W/ EQUIPMENT VENDOR. I. PROVIDE BULLNOSE ON ALL CMU OUTSIDE CORNERS - TYPICAL. J. FOR INTERIOR METAL STUD CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF METAL STUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. K. FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING AND CENTERLINE OF STUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. L. ALL DIMENSIONS INDICATED AS 'CLEAR' ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (GYPSUM, TILE, ETC.). M. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. N. ALL EXTERIOR OPENING DIMENSIONS ARE ROUGH OPENINGS. O. COORDINATE ALL FLOOR OPENING DIMENSIONS AND CLEARANCES FOR DUCTWORK W/ MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR - TYPICAL. P. COORDINATE AND/OR CONFIRM ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCIES WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A201 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 11 PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone: (612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 1 : 5 3 P M A201 250042 9/18/2025 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLANS LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y RO E R S C O M P A N I E S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE N O R T HTRUE NO R T H PL A N KEYNOTES - FLOOR PLAN NO NOTE REV. GENERAL NOTES - FLOOR PLAN UP A 1 1 B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Q RS 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 2 2 4 G125 _____ N O R T HTRUE NO R T H PL A N STOR. UNIT 2C UNIT 2C UNIT 2C UNIT 1C UNIT 2A UNIT 2A UNIT 2A STOR. UNIT 2D UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1A UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 2E UNIT 2E UNIT 2FUNIT 2FUNIT 3DUNIT 2CUNIT 1EUNIT 1EUNIT 1EUNIT 2FUNIT 2D UNIT 3C UNIT 1C UNIT 2EUNIT 2E UNIT 1D UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1E FITNESS CONFERENCE WFH TRASH ELEV LOBBY ELECELEC STAIR STAIR LEGEND STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR AMENITY CLUBROOM FITNESS CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE TRASH MEP GROUP FITNESS UNIT 1B UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C CLUBROOM UNIT 2B ELEC JAN.ELEV 2'-2"16'-0"26'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"26'-4"16'-0"2'-2" 389'-0"11'-4" 6' - 5 3 / 4 " 12 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 4' - 5 3 / 4 " 2' - 2 " 16 ' - 0 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 16 ' - 0 " 2' - 2 " 10 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 38 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 11 8 ' - 3 1 / 2 " GRILLING STATIONS FIRE PIT -FIXED WITH GAS PIPE CONNECTION 3' - 6" HANDRAIL 3' - 6" HANDRAIL KNOX BOX LOCATIONKNOX BOX LOCATION AT GATE IF NEEDED 96 9697979898 STAIR POOL 12'-7 1/4"17'-3 3/4"17'-10"14'-7 1/2" 6' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 8 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 2 " A 1 1 B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Q RS 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 2 2 4 G125 _____ N O R T HTRUE NO R T H PL A N STOR. UNIT 2AUNIT 2AUNIT 1CUNIT 2CUNIT 2CUNIT 2C STOR. UNIT 2FUNIT 2FUNIT 3D STAIR UNIT 2CUNIT 1EUNIT 1EUNIT 1EUNIT 2FUNIT 2D UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1D UNIT 2E UNIT 2E UNIT 1C UNIT 3C UNIT 2D UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1D UNIT 2EUNIT 2E UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1C ELECELECELEC STAIRSTAIR LEGEND STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR AMENITY CLUBROOM FITNESS CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE TRASH MEP UNIT 1B UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 2B UNIT 2B UNIT 2A STOR. UNIT 3E STOR. STOR. ELEV LOBBY JAN.ELEV 2'-2"16'-0"26'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"26'-4"16'-0"2'-2" 40'-6"17'-4"6'-7 1/2"17'-4"8'-2"17'-4"8'-2"17'-4"256'-2 3/4"11'-4" 6' - 5 3 / 4 " 12 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 4' - 5 3 / 4 " 2'- 2 " 16 ' - 0 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 16 ' - 0 " 2' - 2 " 10 ' - 3 " 38 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 10 ' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 11 8 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 96 9697979898 TRASH 12'-7 1/4"17'-3 3/4"17'-10"14'-7 1/2" 6' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 8 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 2 " A. FOR TYPICAL BARRIER FREE TOILET ROOM TYPES AND ACCESSORIES REQUIREMENTS AND LOCATIONS SEE DWG G120. B. FOR TYPICAL HOUSEKEEPING CLOSETS ACCESSORIES REQUIREMENTS AND MOUNTING LOCATIONS SEE DWG GXXX. C. ALL PARTITION TYPES ARE "A4" TYPICALLY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. D. COORDINATE PARTITION FIRE RATED REQUIREMENTS AS INDICATED ON REFLECTED CEILING PLANS - DRAWING SERIES A700. E. TYPICALLY INSTALL SOAP DISPENSERS AND PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER AT ALL SINKS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. F. PROVIDE WALL REINFORCEMENT PER DETAIL #X/A-XXX AT WALL-MOUNTED SHELVES AND STORAGE UNITS, MARKER BOARDS, BULLETIN BOARDS, TACK BOARDS, TELEVISIONS AND OTHER CONTRACTOR OR OWNER FURNISHED WALL-MOUNTED ITEMS (REFER TO ACCESSORIES AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE) SEE DWG AX-XXX. G. FOR ALL CARPET TYPE CHANGES BETWEEN ROOMS, TRANSITION SHALL OCCUR AT CENTERLINE OF DOOR PANEL TYPICALLY - U.N.O. SEE DWG AX-XXX. H. COORDINATE DIMENSIONS W/ ASTERISK (IE - *X'-X") W/ EQUIPMENT VENDOR. I. PROVIDE BULLNOSE ON ALL CMU OUTSIDE CORNERS - TYPICAL. J. FOR INTERIOR METAL STUD CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF METAL STUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. K. FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING AND CENTERLINE OF STUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. L. ALL DIMENSIONS INDICATED AS 'CLEAR' ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (GYPSUM, TILE, ETC.). M. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. N. ALL EXTERIOR OPENING DIMENSIONS ARE ROUGH OPENINGS. O. COORDINATE ALL FLOOR OPENING DIMENSIONS AND CLEARANCES FOR DUCTWORK W/ MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR - TYPICAL. P. COORDINATE AND/OR CONFIRM ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCIES WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone: (612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 1 0 P M A202 250042 9/18/2025 LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLANS LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y RO E R S C O M P A N I E S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A202 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 21 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A202 2 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3 KEYNOTES - FLOOR PLAN NO NOTE REV. GENERAL NOTES - FLOOR PLAN A 1 1 B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Q RS 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 2 2 4 G125 _____ N O R T HTRUE NO R T H PL A N UNIT 2EUNIT 2E UNIT 1D UNIT 1C UNIT 1B ELEC UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 2DUNIT 2FUNIT 2FUNIT 3D UNIT 2AUNIT 2AUNIT 2ASTOR.UNIT 1CUNIT 2CUNIT 2CUNIT 2C ELEC STAIRS UNIT 3E UNIT 2CUNIT 1EUNIT 1EUNIT 1EUNIT 2FUNIT 2D UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1D UNIT 2E UNIT 2E UNIT 1C UNIT 3C JAN.CIRC STAIR STOR.STOR. STAIR STAIR TRASH LEGEND STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR AMENITY CLUBROOM FITNESS CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE TRASH MEP 2'-2"16'-0"26'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"26'-4"16'-0"2'-2" 411'-8" 6' - 5 3 / 4 " 12 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 4' - 5 3 / 4 " 2' - 2 " 16 ' - 0 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 16 ' - 0 " 2' - 2 " 10 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 38 ' - 4 " 10 ' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 11 8 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 5'-9 3/4"55'-4"290'-4"55'-4" STOR. STOR. ELEV LOBBY UNIT 1B UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 2B UNIT 2B 96 9697979898 ELEC. 40'-5 1/4"17'-4"6'-7 1/2"17'-4"8'-2"17'-4"8'-2"17'-4"256'-3 1/2"11'-4" 12'-7 1/4"17'-3 3/4"17'-10"14'-7 1/2" 6' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 8 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 2 " UNIT 1C A A 1 1 B B C C D D E F G H I J K L M N O O Q Q R R S S 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 2 2 4 G125 _____ N O R T HTRUE NO R T H PL A N UNIT 2EUNIT 2E UNIT 1C UNIT 3C UNIT 1D UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 2D UNIT 2C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 2C UNIT 3E STAIRS UNIT 3D UNIT 2F UNIT 2F UNIT 2D UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1E UNIT 1D UNIT 2EUNIT 2E UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1B STOR. UNIT 2AUNIT 2ASTOR.UNIT 1CUNIT 2CUNIT 2CUNIT 2C STOR. ELEC STAIR ELEC STAIR TRASH STAIR CIRC LEGEND STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR AMENITY CLUBROOM FITNESS CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE TRASH MEP 2'-2"16'-0"26'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"26'-4"16'-0"2'-2" 389'-0"11'-4" 411'-8" 2'- 2 " 16 ' - 0 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 16 ' - 0 " 2' - 2 " 37 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 11 ' - 2 1 / 4 " 11 8 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 11 ' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 66 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 5'-5 1/2"55'-4"5'-5 1/2"284'-10 1/2"55'-4" STOR. ELEV LOBBY UNIT 1B UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 2B UNIT 2B JAN. STOR. 96 9697979898 UNIT 2A ELEC A. FOR TYPICAL BARRIER FREE TOILET ROOM TYPES AND ACCESSORIES REQUIREMENTS AND LOCATIONS SEE DWG G120. B. FOR TYPICAL HOUSEKEEPING CLOSETS ACCESSORIES REQUIREMENTS AND MOUNTING LOCATIONS SEE DWG GXXX. C. ALL PARTITION TYPES ARE "A4" TYPICALLY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. D. COORDINATE PARTITION FIRE RATED REQUIREMENTS AS INDICATED ON REFLECTED CEILING PLANS - DRAWING SERIES A700. E. TYPICALLY INSTALL SOAP DISPENSERS AND PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER AT ALL SINKS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. F. PROVIDE WALL REINFORCEMENT PER DETAIL #X/A-XXX AT WALL-MOUNTED SHELVES AND STORAGE UNITS, MARKER BOARDS, BULLETIN BOARDS, TACK BOARDS, TELEVISIONS AND OTHER CONTRACTOR OR OWNER FURNISHED WALL-MOUNTED ITEMS (REFER TO ACCESSORIES AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE) SEE DWG AX-XXX. G. FOR ALL CARPET TYPE CHANGES BETWEEN ROOMS, TRANSITION SHALL OCCUR AT CENTERLINE OF DOOR PANEL TYPICALLY - U.N.O. SEE DWG AX-XXX. H. COORDINATE DIMENSIONS W/ ASTERISK (IE - *X'-X") W/ EQUIPMENT VENDOR. I. PROVIDE BULLNOSE ON ALL CMU OUTSIDE CORNERS - TYPICAL. J. FOR INTERIOR METAL STUD CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF METAL STUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. K. FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING AND CENTERLINE OF STUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. L. ALL DIMENSIONS INDICATED AS 'CLEAR' ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (GYPSUM, TILE, ETC.). M. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. N. ALL EXTERIOR OPENING DIMENSIONS ARE ROUGH OPENINGS. O. COORDINATE ALL FLOOR OPENING DIMENSIONS AND CLEARANCES FOR DUCTWORK W/ MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR - TYPICAL. P. COORDINATE AND/OR CONFIRM ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCIES WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone: (612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 4 : 4 1 P M A203 250042 9/18/2025 LEVEL 4 AND LEVEL 5 FLOOR PLANS LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y RO E R S C O M P A N I E S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A203 1 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 4 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A203 2 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 5 KEYNOTES - FLOOR PLAN NO NOTE REV. GENERAL NOTES - FLOOR PLAN A. FOR TYPICAL BARRIER FREE TOILET ROOM TYPES AND ACCESSORIES REQUIREMENTS AND LOCATIONS SEE DWG G120. B. FOR TYPICAL HOUSEKEEPING CLOSETS ACCESSORIES REQUIREMENTS AND MOUNTING LOCATIONS SEE DWG GXXX. C. ALL PARTITION TYPES ARE "A4" TYPICALLY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. D. COORDINATE PARTITION FIRE RATED REQUIREMENTS AS INDICATED ON REFLECTED CEILING PLANS - DRAWING SERIES A700. E. TYPICALLY INSTALL SOAP DISPENSERS AND PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER AT ALL SINKS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. F. PROVIDE WALL REINFORCEMENT PER DETAIL #X/A-XXX AT WALL-MOUNTED SHELVES AND STORAGE UNITS, MARKER BOARDS, BULLETIN BOARDS, TACK BOARDS, TELEVISIONS AND OTHER CONTRACTOR OR OWNER FURNISHED WALL-MOUNTED ITEMS (REFER TO ACCESSORIES AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE) SEE DWG AX-XXX. G. FOR ALL CARPET TYPE CHANGES BETWEEN ROOMS, TRANSITION SHALL OCCUR AT CENTERLINE OF DOOR PANEL TYPICALLY - U.N.O. SEE DWG AX-XXX. H. COORDINATE DIMENSIONS W/ ASTERISK (IE - *X'-X") W/ EQUIPMENT VENDOR. I. PROVIDE BULLNOSE ON ALL CMU OUTSIDE CORNERS - TYPICAL. J. FOR INTERIOR METAL STUD CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF METAL STUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. K. FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING AND CENTERLINE OF STUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. L. ALL DIMENSIONS INDICATED AS 'CLEAR' ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (GYPSUM, TILE, ETC.). M. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. N. ALL EXTERIOR OPENING DIMENSIONS ARE ROUGH OPENINGS. O. COORDINATE ALL FLOOR OPENING DIMENSIONS AND CLEARANCES FOR DUCTWORK W/ MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR - TYPICAL. P. COORDINATE AND/OR CONFIRM ANY DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCIES WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. A 1 1 B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Q RS 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 2 2 3 G125 _____ 4 G125 _____ N O R T HTRUE NO R T H PL A N UNIT 1D UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 2DUNIT 2CUNIT 2CUNIT 3A UNIT 3E TRASH UNIT 2A UNIT 2A STOR. UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 2E AMENITY PATIO ELEC. STOR. STAIR STAIR 3 2'-2"16'-0"26'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"29'-4"26'-4"16'-0"2'-2" 411'-8" 6' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 8 " 2' - 2 " 16 ' - 0 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 29 ' - 4 " 16 ' - 0 " 2' - 2 " 5'-5 1/2"29'-0 1/2"26'-3 1/2"5'-4" 10 ' - 1 1 " 37 ' - 3 " 11 ' - 4 " 26 ' - 1 " 17 ' - 4 " 8'- 2 " 17 ' - 4 " 8' - 2 " 17 ' - 4 " 23 ' - 9 " 5' - 4 " 18 3 ' - 0 " LEGEND STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR AMENITY CLUBROOM FITNESS CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE TRASH MEP ELEV LOBBY ELEV UNIT 1B UNIT 1B UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 1C UNIT 2B UNIT 2B JAN. UNIT 3B UNIT 2A 96 9697979898 ELEC 12'-7 1/4"17'-3 3/4"17'-10"14'-7 1/2" 6' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 8 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 2 " A 1 1 B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Q RS 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 2 2 4 G125 _____ N O R T HTRUE NO R T H PL A N AIR HANDLING UNIT (4' x 8')AIR HANDLING UNIT (4' x 8') AIR HANDLING UNIT (4' x 8') ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF DRAIN (TYP) DOGHOUSE WITH DRY STANDPIPE AND SHIPS LADDER ACCESS ABOVE STAIR DOGHOUSE WITH DRY STANDPIPE AND SHIPS LADDER ACCESS ABOVE STAIR 96 9697979898 PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone: (612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 1 0 : 0 8 P M A204 250042 9/18/2025 LEVEL 6 FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y RO E R S C O M P A N I E S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N KEYNOTES - FLOOR PLAN NO NOTE REV. GENERAL NOTES - FLOOR PLAN REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A204 1 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 6 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A204 2 LUA - ROOF PLAN ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW SF SF SF SF S SF SF SF SF SF ST ST S S S T ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W S S S SF SF ST W X X X ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S ST 34 33 32 31 30 28 27 29 3536 3837 39 41 40 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 52 50 51 53 54 55 56 5857 63 64 65 66 6762 68 71 7069 61 59 PROPOSED BUILDING DOG RUNPER ENLARGEMENT EXISTING WOODS TO REMAINEXISTING WOODS TO REMAIN EXISTING WOODS TO REMAIN PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS GARAGE ENTRY TURFSOD HW Y 2 1 2 ME T R O G R E E N L I N E WALL PERCIVIL PLANS ROCK MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC 6' WIDE ROCK MULCHPLANTING STRIP ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH PER SPEC IVY, 6' ON CENTERAT BASE OF WALL BIKE BOLLARDSPER DETAIL NATIVE SEED TODISTURBED LIMITS, FIELD VERIFY NATIVE SEED TODISTURBED LIMITS, FIELD VERIFY NATIVE SEED PER SPECIFICATIONS PRO P E R T Y L I N E EASEMENT LINE D&U EASEMENT D& U E A S E M E N T TU R F S O D EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PARKING 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 181716 15 14 PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPE R T Y L I N E LEAVE 2' FROM BACK OF CURB FOR VEHICLE OVERHANG PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E PARKING LOT SCREENING T D& U E A S E M E N T PLANTING TIER BETWEEN WALLSTO RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 18" DEPTHOF PLANTING SOIL. TOP WITH 4" OF WOOD MULCH. TREAT WITH PREEN. PLANTING TIER BETWEEN WALLSTO RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 18" DEPTHOF PLANTING SOIL. TOP WITH 4" OF WOOD MULCH. TREAT WITH PREEN. TU R F S O D ROCK MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS TRASH STAGINGAREA PER CIVIL MAIN ENTRY WOOD MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC BUFFER TREESON NEIGHBORING PAVING & FURNISHINGSBY OTHERS ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC NOTE: TREES PLANTED ABOVE THE RETAINING WALL TO BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 10' BACK FROM WALL. TURF SOD TODISTURBED LIMITS EXISTING SHRUBBED TO REMAIN, REPAIRANY DISTURBANCE TOMATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS ONCE TREEIS INSTALLED BERM PLANT BEDTO 3' TALL IN THE STAIR STAIR EXISTING TURFTO REMAIN EXISTING TURFTO REMAIN WOOD MULCH& EDGER PER SPEC CENTER, FIELD VERIFY EXISTING GRADING IN THE FIELD TO ENSURE THE BERM DOES NOT IMPEDE THE FLOW OF STORMWATER PROPERTY EXISTING PAVED DRIVE LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN: 1. The removal, pruning, and/or planting of trees in the public boulevard requires an approved permit from the City Forester's Office. Any work must be completed by a licensed tree contractor. 2. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 3. Contractor to coordinate any work in the city right-of-way with City Public Works Department. 4. Expose root flare and set at-grade. 5. The contractor is responsible to maintain trees in a plumb position throughout the maintenance period. General Notes: Landscape Legend: New Turf Sod Landscape Edging SITE DATA Zoning: RM-2.5 Building Gross Square Footage: 308,200 sq ft Existing Significant Inches to Remain: 718 LANDSCAPE CALIPER INCHES REQUIREMENT: The minimum number of caliper inches of trees required shall be determined by dividing the total gross square footage of all floors of a building by 320. No more than 80% of trees may be of the minimum size requirement. In the RM-2.5 zoning district, up to 50% of the required landscape caliper inches may be substituted with shrubs, perennials or planting beds if the project has a floor area ratio of 1.0 or greater and the landscaping plan furthers the goals and objectives of the City's Design Guidelines. The request will be evaluated based on meeting five or more of the following criteria: 1.The project includes xeriscaping, raingardens/bioswales, rooftop gardens, public art, native landscapes, pollinator gardens, green roofs, garden plots or similar features to provide variety in meeting landscaping requirements. Native Prairie Perennial Area Proposed: 9,080 sq ft Rooftop Perennial Planting Area Proposed: 620 sq ft At-Grade Foundation Perennial Plant Bed Area Proposed: 2,300 sq ft Total Perennial Area Proposed On-Property: 12,000 sq ft 2.At the entrances to the building, the proposed landscaping activates the space, creates a human scale environment and makes the space inviting. 3.The project provides screening that considers safety, such as screening parking lots to limit views of cars from the right-of-way and adjacent land uses while at the same time allowing surveillance of the parking lot. 4.The project includes landscaping covering more than 75% of the lineal feet of the foundation of the building. 5.The project exceeds the required percentage of the parking lot covered in islands and/or exceeds the parking lot island size requirements. 6.The project utilizes landscaping to define and enhance outdoor spaces such as fire pit areas, outdoor kitchen areas, seating areas, pools, outdoor courts, walking paths, etc. 7.The project utilizes plant material that preserves and conserves resources, reduces waste, and minimizes maintenance. Such plant materials may include those that are drought tolerant, salt tolerant, pollinator friendly, disease resistant, native, low maintenance and shade producing, and those that provide visual interest throughout the year including a variety of periods of blooming, leaf color, bark, and branching structure. Calculation: 308,200 sq ft / 320 = 963 landscape caliper inches required (-) Less 77 Human Planted Tree Inches to Remain as Credit = 886 Total Landscape Inches Owed 471 Landscape Tree Inches Proposed on Property 343 Landscape Shrub*Inches Proposed on Property 72 Perennial** Inches Proposed on Property *6 shrubs = 3 caliper inches ** (Total sq ft of perennial planting beds /500) * 3 = caliper inch equivalent TREE MITIGATION INCH REQUIREMENT: Tree mitigation inches shall be in addition to the landscape requirements. Refer to calculations & inventory chart on Sheet L301 Total Tree Mitigation Inches Owed: 99" Total Tree Mitigation Inches Proposed on Property: 99" ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Species Diversity: Not more than 30% of the required caliper inches shall be composed of one species unless approved by the City. 2. Prohibited Trees: elm (except those bred to be immune to Dutch elm), femal ginkgo, box elder, willow, aspen 3. General Screening: All parking, loading, service, utility, and outdoor storage areas shall be screened from all public roads and adjacent differing land uses. Screening shall consist of any combination of the following: earth mounds, fences, shrubs, compact evergreen trees, or dense deciduous hedge. Hedge material must be at least 3' in height at time of planting. Density and species of planting shall be such to achieve 75% opacity year-round at maturity. 4. No more than 80% of trees may be of the minimum size requirement. 5. Coniferous trees may be considered equivalent to overstory trees by dividing the height of a coniferous tree by 2.4 to determine equivalent caliper inches. 6. Understory trees may make up no more than 20% of the total tree caliper inches required. 7. Size Requirements for Planting: Deciduous Overstory Trees: 2.5" (min) - 5" (max) Deciduous Understory Trees: 1.5" (min) - 5" (max) Coniferous Trees: 6' hgt. (min) - 10' hgt. (max) Shrubs: 5 gal. (min) Perennials: 1 gal. (min) Ground Cover: 4" pot (min) City Landscape Requirements: Native Seed Per Specifications PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L101 LANDSCAPE PLAN Rock Mulch Per Specifications ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW SF SF S ST ST S S ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST W W W S W X X X ST ST ST ST S EDGER PER SPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCHSPECIFICATIONS TURFSOD TURF SOD TURF SOD TURFSOD TURFSOD DOG RUN PER DETAIL & ENALARGEMENT ROCK MULCHSPECIFICATIONS EDGER PERSPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCH SPECIFICATIONS PROPOSED BUILDING MAIN ENTRY GARAGE ENTRY COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE D&U E A S E M E N T EDGER PERSPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCHSPECIFICATIONS TURF SOD TREE FORM HYDRANGEA WALL PERCIVIL PLANS PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E COLUMNAR CONIFEROUS TREE COLUMNAR CONIFEROUS TREE ROCK MULCH & EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH & EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH FROM EDGE OF FENCE TOEDGE OF SIDEWALK TURFSOD PAVI N G P E R C I V I L P L A N S PAV I N G P E R C I V I L P L A N S PAVI N G P E R C I V I L P L A N S LEVEL 2 AMENITY AREA REFER TO PLANTING ENLARGEMENT ON SHEET L103 PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L102 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS: SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY REMARKS BUFFER TREES ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY BR2 Betula nigra River Birch 6` Hgt.B&B 3 Clump Form PD2 Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce 6` Hgt.B&B 6 SI2 Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk`Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 1.5" Cal.B&B 2 DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE AA Acer rubrum 'JFS-KW78'Armstrong Gold® Maple 3" Cal.B&B 22 AS Acer x freemanii `Sienna`Sienna Glen Maple 4" Cal.B&B 3 BJ Betula platyphylla `Jefpark`Parkland Pillar Birch 3" Cal.B&B 23 CP Celtis occidentalis 'JFS-KSU1'Prairie Sentinel® Hackberry 3" Cal.B&B 17 GD Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Draves' TM Street Keeper Honey Locust 4" Cal.B&B 9 QC Quercus Crimson Spire Oak 3" Cal.B&B 13 QA Quercus alba White Oak 3" Cal.B&B 6 Spring Dug QR Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak 3" Cal.B&B 8 Spring Dug EVERGREEN TREES JT Juniperus virginiana 'Taylor'Taylor Eastern Redcedar 8` Ht.B&B 22 Calculated as 3.5" Caliper PD Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce 10` Ht.B&B 12 Calculated as 4" Caliper ORNAMENTAL TREES BR Betula nigra River Birch 10` Ht.B&B 4 Clump Form, Calculated as 4" Caliper MS2 Malus x `Pink Spires`Pink Spires Crab Apple 3" Cal.B&B 20 MS Malus x `Spring Snow`Spring Snow Crab Apple 3" Cal.B&B 9 SI Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk`Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 3" Cal.B&B 9 SHRUBS Cr2 Clethra alnifolia `Ruby Spice`Ruby Spice Clethra 5 gal.Pot 26 Dl Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 5 gal.Pot 106 He Hydrangea macrophylla `Bailmer` TM Endless Summer 5 gal.Pot 40 Hg2 Hydrangea paniculata 'Grandiflora' Tree Form PeeGee Panicle Hydrangea Tree Form 15 gal.Pot 4 Tree Form, 5' Tall at Installation Jf Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`Sea Green Juniper 5 gal.Pot 14 Jw Juniperus horizontalis `Wiltonii`Blue Rug Juniper 5 gal.Pot 104 Rg Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 gal.Pot 249 Ra Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant 5 gal.Pot 61 Sm Syringa meyeri `Palibin`Dwarf Korean Lilac 5 gal.Pot 28 Tt2 Thuja occidentalis `Techny Globe`Techny Globe Arborvitae 5 gal.Pot 46 ANNUALS/PERENNIALS Ep Echinacea purpurea Purple Coneflower 1 gal.Pot 22 Ho Hemerocallis x `Stella de Oro`Stella de Oro Daylily 1 gal.Pot 42 Nw Nepeta x faassenii `Walkers Low`Walkers Low Catmint 1 gal.Pot 34 Pe2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia engelmannii Engelmann Ivy 1 gal.Pot 72 Pe3 Phlox subulata `Emerald Blue`Emerald Blue Creeping Phlox 1 gal.Pot 34 BUFFER PLANTING ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY Ck2 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 79 Sm2 Syringa patula `Miss Kim`Miss Kim Lilac 3 gal.Pot 12 GRASSES Ck Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 167 Ss Schizachyrium scoparium `The Blues`The Blues Little Bluestem 1 gal.Pot 20 ROOFTOP PLANTINGS Am2 Allium x `Millenium`Millenium Ornamental Chive 1 gal.Pot 39 Aw Aster `Woods Purple`Woods Purple Aster 1 gal.Pot 50 Ck3 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 35 Fo Festuca ovina glauca `Elijah Blue`Blue Fescue 1 gal.Pot 35 Sa3 Sedum x `Autumn Joy`Autumn Joy Sedum 1 gal.Pot 25 Sm3 Spiraea x bumalda `Goldmound`Gold Mound Spirea 3 gal.Pot 15 PLANT SCHEDULE 1 L102 FOUNDATION PLANTING ENLARGEMENT SCALE | 1:10 UP IRRIGATED PLANTER PERARCHITECTURAL POOL BY OTHERS PAVING BY OTHERS FURNISHINGS PER ARCHITECTURAL FURNISHINGS PER ARCHITECTURAL BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BALCONYBALCONYBALCONYBALCONY STAIR IRRIGATED PLANTER PERARCHITECTURAL ANNUAL PLANTINGLOCATION ANNUAL PLANTINGLOCATION ANNUAL PLANTINGLOCATION PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L103 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS: 1 L103 LEVEL 2 OUTDOOR AMENITY AREA SCALE | 1:10 1 L103 IRRIGATED PLANTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FREE-DRAINING FILTER FABRIC SEPARATOR LAYER 4" DEPTH DRAIN ROCK LAYER, 1" FIELDSTONES - NO FINES. PLANTING SOIL TO BE PREMIUM GARDEN MIX, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. AVAILABLE THROUGH PLAISTED COMPANIES (WWW. PLAISTEDCOMPANIES.COM) WESTERN RED CEDAR MULCH, 2" DEPTH - HOLD 1" BELOW LIP. PLANTER PER ARCHITECTURAL. INCLUDE 12" POLYSTRYENE INSULATION (VERT) ON ALL INTERIOR SIDES. HOLD BELOW MULCH LINE. FIELD OR FACTORY PUNCH 1" DIAMETER HOLES FOR DRAINAGE (2 MINIMUM) AND IRRIGATION (1). ENSURE WATER CAN ESCAPE THROUGH THE PEDESTAL SYSTEM TO THE ROOF DRAINS. NOTE: Landscape contractor is responsible for installation of planters. This includes putting the planter together, installing soil, mulch, plants etc., and installing internal irrigation insert & PVC vertical drain pipe. Planting contractor to fill the planters with perennials (as noted per plan) at the time of installation. See specifications. IRRIGATION FEED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR IRRIGATION STUB. IRRIGATION FUNNY PIPE TO EMITTERS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL PERENNIALS IN EACH PLANTER AS NOTED PER PLAN AND THE PLANT SCHEDULE. SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY ROOFTOP PLANTINGS Am2 Allium x `Millenium`Millenium Ornamental Chive 1 gal.Pot 39 Aw Aster `Woods Purple`Woods Purple Aster 1 gal.Pot 50 Ck3 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 35 Fo Festuca ovina glauca `Elijah Blue`Blue Fescue 1 gal.Pot 35 Sa3 Sedum x `Autumn Joy`Autumn Joy Sedum 1 gal.Pot 25 Sm3 Spiraea x bumalda `Goldmound`Gold Mound Spirea 3 gal.Pot 15 PLANT SCHEDULE ROOFTOP PLANTING SF 8.0 0 ' TRANSFER BEN C H SYNTHETIC TURFPER DETAILDOG PARKORNAMENTAL DOG PARK OUTCROPPINGS PEN PET WASTE STATIONPER DETAIL DOG PARK OUTCROPPINGS 5' ORNAMENTAL METALPERIMETER FENCE PER DETAIL 36" WIDE GATES, TYP. INCLUDE ADJUSTABLE, SELF-CLOSING HINGES.18" CLEAR FROM THE LATCH ON THE PULL SIDE. 14 . 5 0 ' 60. 0 0 ' 8.0 0 ' 90° HYDRANT 4 3 / 8 " 4 3/8"O.C. TYP. AMERISTAR MONTAGE COMMERCIAL MAJESTIC 3-RAIL OR APPROVED EQUAL, SEE SPECIFICATIONS. GATE, LINE, AND CORNER POSTS PER MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES. GAP BETWEEN PICKETS SHALL BE 3". FINISH: POWDERCOAT BLACK POSTS AT 8' O.C. AS PER MANUFACTURES DIRECTION. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. POST CAPS TO BE PYRAMIDAL, SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS. GATE NOTES: INCLUDE (2) 30" WIDE PEDESTRIAN GATES IN BID. SEE PLAN FOR TRANSFER PEN LOCATION & GATE SWING DIRECTION. OUTSIDE GATE TO HAVE LOCKABLE LATCH WITH RELEASE CABLE OR KNOB ON THE INSIDE. INSIDE GATE IS TO HAVE A CLOSING STRIKE PLATE ONLY. BOTH GATES TO HAVE SELF CLOSING HINGES. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS OF FENCING AND ALL GATE TYPES FOR ARCHITECT REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 8' ON-CENTER 4,000 PSI CONCRETE. CENTER IN A SONOTUBE 4X THE DIAMETER OF THE POST, VERIFY SIZE WITH FENCE MANUFACTURER. 3. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS AND PRODUCT DATA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE CONSIDERED TRUE AND REFLECT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 5OZ, NON-WOVEN, FREE DRAINING. ANGULAR, FREE DRAINING 1/2" - 3/4" DIA. AGGREGATE ROCK, 7" DEPTH, REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR ANY DRAIN TILE IN THIS AREA 2X4 PRESSURE TREATED NAILER BOARD: INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES (AT CORNERS, INSTALL INTERNAL CROSS BRACE) GALVANIZED TACK NAIL 1" DEPTH 14"-3/8" CLEAN LIMESTONE ROCK, FREE DRAINING. SPORTURF EAGLE PUTT 'PL77' FREE-DRAINING SYNTHETIC TURF 9/16" PILE HEIGHT, 30oz PILE WEIGHT. ADD US GREENTECH ENVIROFILL (2.5LBS PER SQ FT). SUBMIT SAMPLES. 9/16" 4" 2" COMPACTED CLASS 5 SETTING BASE / INFILL CONCRETE CURB OR SIDEWALK. SET NAILER BOARD SO TOP OF SYNTHETIC TURF IS LEVEL WITH TOP OF CURB OR SIDEWALK. AFFIX NAILER BOARD TIMBER BELOW GRADE WITH AN EXTERIOR GRADE FASTENER EVERY 24" CONTRACTOR PREPARED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. Install DogiPot Pet Waste Station via direct-bury post inside the proposed dog run area. Include (3) packages of bags. 2. Include all necessary hardware and assembly in pricing. 4. TURF PRICING: CONTACT DUSTIN LOGGINS, SPORTURF PRODUCTS. (706) 508-2526 or dustinloggins@sporturf.com 2 L201 SYNTHETIC TURF DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3 L201 PET WASTE STATION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L201 LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE DETAILS: 1 L201 DOG RUN ENLARGEMENT SCALE | 1:10 4 L201 5'-0" HGT. DOG RUN FENCE DETAIL SEE PLANS WIDTHS MAY VARY 2 L202 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE 1. Tree saucer for individual trees outside of a plant bed to be four inches (4") depth natural single-shred hardwood mulch for trees outside of a plant bed. Install per tree planting detail. Do not place mulch against tree trunk. Remove wire and burlap from top third of root ball before final soil back-fill and mulch. 2. Refer to architectural plans for spot elevations, drainage, site dimensions, survey, tree removal, proposed utilities & erosion control. 3. All plant material shall comply with the latest edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock, American Association of Nurserymen. Unless noted otherwise, deciduous shrubs shall have at least 5 canes at the specified shrub height. Plant material shall be delivered as specified. 4. Plan takes precedence over plant schedule if discrepancies in quantities exist. 5. All proposed plants shall be located and staked as shown. 6. Adjustment in location of proposed plant material may be needed in field. Should an adjustment be required, the client will provide field approval. Significant changes may require city review and approval. 7. The project landscape contractor shall be held responsible for watering and properly handling all plant materials brought on the site both before and after installation. Schedule plant deliveries to coincide with expected installation time within 36 hours. Install plants and sod between April 15 and June 15 or between September 15 and October 30. 8. The landscape contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project site conditions and to plant material growth requirements. 9. If the landscape contractor is concerned or perceives any deficiencies in the plant selections, soil conditions, drainage or any other site condition that might negatively affect plant establishment, survival or guarantee, they must bring these deficiencies to the attention of the landscape architect & client prior to bid submission. Plant bed drainage concerns during plant installation shall be brought to the attention of the Owner and General Contractor immediately. 10. Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that soil and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and around the building site. 11. Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material until time of owner acceptance. Any acts of vandalism or damage which may occur prior to owner acceptance shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with a maintenance program including, but not limited to, pruning, fertilization and disease/pest control. 12. The contractor shall guarantee newly planted material through one calendar year from the date of written owner acceptance. Plants that exhibit more than 20% die-back damage shall be replaced at no additional cost to the owner. The contractor shall also provide adequate tree wrap and deer/rodent protection measures for the plantings during the warranty period. Prune dead wood - use wound paint on trees. 13. This layout plan constitutes our understanding of the landscape requirements listed in the ordinance. Changes and modifications may be requested by the city based on applicant information, public input, council decisions, etc. 14. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits and coordinating inspections as required throughout the work process. 15. Plant size & species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field. 16. Irrigation: The landscape contractor shall provide a quote and furnish an Irrigation Layout Plan for head-to-head coverage of all tree, turf, and shrub planting areas. Use commercial-grade irrigation equipment and provide product cut-sheets and (4) copies of the proposed layout plan to the landscape architect for review and approval. Coordinate irrigation connection point, controller, back-flow and valve locations with the builder & general contractor. Provide tree watering bags for any newly planted trees located outside of the permanent irrigation limits. Contractor is responsible for filling the tree watering bags for 30 days during the maintenance period and shall inform the Owner on refill instructions once the 30 day maintenance period is complete. 17. Unless otherwise noted, all edger shall be professional grade 18" thick black steel edger, Ryerson or Equal. Anchor every 18" on-center (minimum). Submit edger sample for Owner approval. 18. Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the new improvements on and off-site during landscape work activities. Report any damage to the General Contractor immediately. 19. Unless otherwise noted/indicated, plant beds shall receive rock mulch over 3oz spun fabric (free-draining) weed mat. Submit mulch sample for Owner approval. 20. Mulch: unless otherwise noted/indicated, plant beds shall receive 4" depth locally available 3/4" dia. limestone rock mulch, over weed mat. Submit mulch sample for Owner approval. Bryan Rock or Equal. Install rock mulch 1" below back of curbs or walks to prevent spill-over. Do not mound rock mulch. Coordinate finished grade condition with earthwork subcontractor. Do not install weed mat under perennials, with the exception of ornamental grasses. Submit mulch sample for Owner approval 21. All planting, seeding, and sodded areas shall be prepared prior to installation activities with a harley power box rake or equal to provide a firm planting bed free of stones, sticks, construction debris, etc. Unless otherwise noted, fine grading (within 4" of set grade) shall be by the Landscape Contractor, including topsoil. 22. Turf Sodding activity shall conform to all rules and regulations as established by the South Dakota Department of Transportation, for seed bed preparation, installation, maintenance, acceptability, and warranty. 23. The Landscape Contractor shall furnish samples of all landscape materials for approval prior to installation. 24. The Landscape Contractor shall clear and grub the underbrush from within the work limits to remove dead branches, leaves, trash, weeds and foreign materials. 25. The landscape contractor shall contact Gopher State One Call no less than 48 hours before digging for field utility locations. 26. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for the removal of erosion control measures once vegetation has been established to the satisfaction of the municipal staff. This includes silt curtain fencing and sediment logs placed in the landscape. 27. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for visiting the site to become familiar with the conditions prior to bidding and installation. Coordinate with the general contractor on matters such as fine grading, landscaped area conditions, staging areas, irrigation connection to building, etc. 28. See architectural site plan for additional information regarding the project, including sub-surface drainage requirements and performance. 29. Topsoil Requirements: All graded areas of the site that are designated on the plan set for turf sod shall have no less than 6" of imported top soil, areas designated for shrubs, trees, and perennials shall have no less than 12" of imported top soil, meeting MNDOT classifications for planting soil for trees, shrubs, and turf. Slope away from building. 30. Landscape contractor must prove the open sub-grade of all planting areas after their excavation is capable of infiltrating a minimum requirement of 1/4-inch of water per hour prior to installation of plant materials, topsoil, irrigation, weed mat, and mulch. Planting areas not capable of meeting this requirement shall have 4" diameter X 48" depth holes augured every 36" on-center and filled with MNDOT Free-Draining Coarse Filter Aggregate. Re-test sub-grade percolation for compliance to infiltration minimum requirement. 31. Landscape contractor to provide nursery pull list (bill of lading) including plant species and sizes shipped to the site. Additionally, the landscape contractor shall provide nursery stock traceability, proving none of the materials provided contain or are genetic strains of the neonicotinoid family including acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, nithiazine, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam. MULCH, SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES 1 L202 PLANT BED EDGE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE . ... . .... ....... . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. .... . ... . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN WIDTH OF HOLE EXCAVATION SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. 3'' DEPTH WATERING BASIN PLANTING SOIL - PER NOTES. MULCH FINISHED GRADE PLANT ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED PLANTING LOCATIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF REDUCED HOLE WIDTH. 3 L202 TYP. SHRUB PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE MIN. MI N . SEE PLAN PERENNIAL / PLUG PLANT18" MIN. 6" EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN. MULCH PER NOTES. PLANTING SOIL - PER NOTES. CONTRACTOR PREPARED SUBGRADE NOTE: HAND-LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZEDPLANT MATERIALS. 6" 4 L202 TYP. PERENNIAL PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE 1'-6" (MIN.) 4" FACE OF WALL OR BACK OF CURB. EDGER PER LANDSCAPE NOTES 3 OZ. FILTER FABRIC, TURN-UP FINISHED GRADE PITCH SUB-GRADE TO DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS & CURBS. NOTES: SEE PLAN FOR CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION. ROCK MULCH WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLAN. AT EDGES, OVERLAP SEAMS 4". ENSURE 1" OF EDGER IS EXPOSED ABOVE GRADE DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT LEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED; HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN. FIELD STAKE TREES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INSTALL 6" DIA. WHITE PVC TRUNK GUARDS NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1. MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE. SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. 4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY). REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL, CUT THE WIRE BASKET IN FOUR PLACES AND FOLD DOWN 8 IN. INTO PLANTING HOLE. PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. NOTE: FOR DIMENSIONS OF PLANTING AREAS SEE PLAN, SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GARDEN BLEND SOIL ( EQUAL MIX OF COMPOST, SAND & SOIL ) PER NOTES. TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAIN THE MULCH WEED-FREE FOR AFTER PLANTING. MULCH RING: 6 FT. DIA. MINIMUM 8FT. DIA. PREFERRED NOTES: ENSURE PLANTING PITS PASS REQUIRED INFILTRATION TEST. MAINTAIN TREES PLUB AND STRAIGHT. INSTALL SUB-SURFACE ROOT BALL STAKES (TOMAHAWK OR EQUAL). DO NOT USE ABOVE-GRADE POSTS AND GUY-WIRES. NOTE: FOR ALL NEW TREES PLANTED PER THIS PROJECT, THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS APPLY: -REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM THE TOP-HALF OF THE ROOT BALL AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE. -REMOVE THE WIRE BASKET DOWN TO THE SECOND HORIZONTAL WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE. -EXPOSE ROOT FLARE AND SET AT GRADE SEE LANDSCAPE NOTE #30. Landscape Notes and Requirements: PLAN VIEW: SIDE ELEVATION:FRONT ELEVATION: ISOMETRIC VIEW: GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL DERO 'BIKE HITCH' BICYCLE BOLLARDS, SURFACE MOUNT. SEE SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS, SPACING, AND QUANTITY. FINISH: POWDERCOAT BLACK QUANTITY: SEE SPECIFICATIONS INSTALLATION HARDWARE: STAINLESS STEEL, TYPICAL 3/8-INCH CONCRETE QUICK-BOLT FASTENERS. EXPOSE NO MORE THAN 1/4-INCH THREADS ABOVE THE BOLT. PAINT BLACK TO MATCH BICYCLE BOLLARD FINISH. FIELD-MARK LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. OBTAIN PERMIT FOR WORK IN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY AS REQUIRED. WWW.DERO.COM | 1-888-337-6729 SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 5 L202 BICYCLE BOLLARD DETAIL PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L202 LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE DETAILS: PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L203 LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE DETAILS: Native Seed Areas noted per plan: (unless otherwise noted on civil plans), shall be: Shooting Star Native Seeds 'Dry Short Prairie Mix', drop seeded into the topsoil layer at 30.0 lbs per acre, plus 10.0 lbs per acre of additional Annual Oats (Avena sativa). Add an additional 1.0 lb per acre of Shooting Star Native Seeds 'Dry Forbs Enhancement Mix'. Submit seed mix for approval. See specifications. Grading and Erosion Control per Civil Plans and Specifications. Note: Per City requirement, D. candida and D. purpurea must be removed from this seed mix and swapped with another forb from the list. NATIVE SEED MIX: NATIVE SEEDING INSTALLATION METHOD: Drop Seeding Onto Tilled Sites This is the "standard" method for seeding on prepared sites such as those on construction projects. a)Site Preparation: The site should be prepared by loosening topsoil to a minimum depth of 3 inches. b)Fertilizer: Use a fertilizer analysis based on a soil test or a general recommendation is a 10-10-10 (NPK) commercial grade analysis at 200 lbs/acre. c)Seed Installation: Seed should be installed with a drop seeder that will accurately meter the types of seed to be planted, keep all seeds uniformly mixed during the seeding and contain drop seed tubes for seed placement (Brillion-type). The drop seeder should be equipped with a cultipacker assembly to ensure seed-to-soil contact. d)Seeding Rates: Rates are specified in the mixture tabulation for the specified mix. e)Packing: If the drop seeder is not equipped with a cultipacker, the site should be cultipacked following the seeding to ensure seed-to-soil contact. f)Mulch: Cover soil with a hydromulch consisting of natural wood fiber or paper fiber, water, and M-Binder at 100 lbs per acre. Note: Heavy equipment is not allowed in the infiltration basins to keep soils from getting compacted. If any compaction occurs due to seeding operations, the soils must be uncompacted. NATIVE SEED REQUIRED MAINTENANCE - 3 YRS: Native Grass and Forb Mixtures (mixtures beginning with the number 3) Year 1 Establishment (spring seeding): 1)Prepare site - Late April - May 2)Seed - May 1 - June 1 Maintenance: 1)Mow (6-8 inches) - every 30 days after planting until September 30. 2)Weed Control - mowing should help control annual weeds. Spot spray thistles, etc. Establishment (fall seeding): 1)Prepare site - Late August - early September 2)Seed - late September to freeze-up Maintenance (following season): 1)Mow (6-8 inches) - once in May, June, and July 2)Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc. Evaluation: 1)Cover crop growing within 2 weeks of planting (except dormant plantings). 2)Seedlings spaced 1-6 inches apart in drill rows. 3)Native grass seedlings may only be 4-6 inches tall. 4)If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow as necessary. Year 2 Maintenance: 1)Mow (6-8 inches) one time between June 1 - August 15 before weeds set seed. 2)Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc. 3)Some sites may not require much maintenance the second year. Evaluation: 1)Cover crop will be gone unless winter wheat was used in a fall planting. 2)Grasses forming clumps 1-6 inches apart in drill rows, but still short. 3)Some flowers should be blooming (black-eyed Susans, bergamot, etc.). 4)If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow site. Year 3 Maintenance: 1)Mow only if necessary. 2)Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc. 3)Sites usually do not require much maintenance the third year. Evaluation: 1)Planting should begin looking like a prairie - tall grasses, flowers, etc. Long-term Maintenance: 1)Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc. 2)Burning (3-5 year rotation) alternate spring and fall if possible. 3)Haying (3-5 year rotation) late summer or early fall. Alternate with burning (may substitute for burning). 4)Burning two years in a row will really "clean up" rough-looking sites. ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW SF SF SF SF S SF SF SF SF SF ST ST S S S T ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W S S S SF SF ST W X X X ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S ST 34 33 32 31 30 28 27 29 3536 3837 39 41 40 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 52 50 51 53 54 55 56 5857 63 64 65 66 6762 68 71 7069 61 59 TREE PROTECTION FENCE,FOLLOW EDGE OF BRUSH LINE FENCE PER DETAIL TREE PROTECTIONFENCE PER DETAIL TREE PROTECTIONFENCE PER DETAIL EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN PR O P E R T Y L I N E PROPOSED BUILDING TREE PROTECTION 75 77 76 74 73 78 79 8091 92 93 94 90 89 88 87 85 86 84 83 81 82 01 02 03 04 0506 2322 24 21 25 20 19 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 181716 15 14 72 60 26 PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPE R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E DISEASED ASHTREES TO BE REMOVED TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: 1. The removal, pruning, and/or planting of trees in the public boulevard requires an approved permit from the City Forester's Office. Any work must be completed by a licensed tree contractor. 2. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 3. Contractor to coordinate any work in the city right-of-way with City Public Works Department. 4. Expose root flare and set at-grade. 5. The contractor is responsible to maintain trees in a plumb position throughout the maintenance period. General Notes: PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L301 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Landscape Symbols Legend: Existing Tree to Remain Existing Tree To be Removed Tree Protection Fence Existing Significant Inches On Site (B):1196 Net Significant Inches On Site to be Removed (A):358 [(A/B) x C] x A = D A = Existing Significant Inches to be Removed B = Existing Significant Inches On Site C = City Tree Replacement Constant (0.5) D = Replacement Inches Required [(358/1196) x 0.5] x 358 = 53 Mitigation Inches Required (+) 78 (2:1 Heritage Inches Removed) (-) 32 Heritage Inches Preserved = 99 Total New Mitigation Inches Owed Note: Refer to Tree Mitigation Data Chart on Sheet L302 Tree Preservation & Mitigation Summary: TREE PRESERVATION NOTES & SCHEDULE: PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L302 TREE PRESERVATION NOTES & SCHEDULE Tree Inventory Table: Existing boundary, location, topographic, and utility information shown on this plan is from a field survey. ·Contractor shall contact the City Forester, prior to demolition or other land disturbance associated with site construction, to verify tree protection measures. ·A city approved permit is required for all boulevard tree work, to be done by a licensed tree company. ·Critical Root Zone: Install high density polyethylene safety fence, 4 ft. high, international orange, at the Drip Line or at the Critical Root Zone whichever is greater, of trees to be preserved per detail, prior to commencement of earthwork activity. Field-staking of the fence location(s) subject to City Forestry Department approval. ·Where silt fence and proposed tree protection fence overlap, place the tree protection fence on the outside of the silt fence, double-staked at the break-point. ·Refer to Tree Protection Detail ·The contractor shall prune the canopy of existing trees to remain where the canopy is in jeopardy of damage due to the new improvements shown. It is recommended that the contractor hire a certified arborist to perform the pruning. Any branches broken during construction shall be immediately trimmed and wounds painted to prevent further damage. ·Perform work in accordance with the laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and orders of public authority having jurisdiction. Secure and pay for permits, governmental fees and licenses necessary for the proper execution of the demolition work. ·Provide protective coverings and enclosures as necessary to prevent damage to existing work that is to remain. Existing work to remain may include items such as trees, shrubs, lawns, sidewalks, drives, curbs, utilities, buildings and/or other structures on or adjacent to the demolition site. Provide temporary fences and barricades as required for the safe and proper execution of the work and the protection of persons and property. ·Remove debris, waste, and rubbish promptly from the site. On-site burial of debris is not permitted. Burn no debris on the site. Salvage material not otherwise indicated to be reused shall become the Contractor's property and is to be removed promptly from the site and disposed of in strict accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, and/or statutes. ·Buildings, features, surfaces, and other descriptive references shown on this drawing are for informational purposes only. Field verify all information relevant to the project prior to proceeding with the work. Visit the site and determine all site conditions and hazards. ·This plan is a guide as to the anticipated amount of disturbance expected due to proposed improvements. The contractor is expected to take all necessary precautions to ensure trees noted to remain are not damaged during construction. Do not store material or drive within the drip line of existing trees to remain. Be aware of overhead branches for clearance of material and equipment. ·This plan is not a guarantee that existing trees will survive during/post construction, but rather a guide to help assure their protection and greatest chances of survival at the surface level. Further protection measures outside this scope could involve ecologists, foresters and arborists. ·Notify the Owner's Representative and Engineer when tree protection fencing is taken down to perform work in conjunction with the new improvements noted in this plan set. The contractor is responsible for re-erecting the tree protection fence immediately after the work is complete, when ever possible ·Trees shown as existing to remain (be preserved) that are damaged / killed as a result of construction activities are subject to replacement per the City of Replacement penalty. Replacement trees are to be paid for at no additional expense to the Owner. General Tree Preservation Notes: 1 L302 EXISTING TREE PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE DRIP LINE NOTE: TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO AIDE IN SURVIVABILITY OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. DO NOT STORE MATERIALS OR DRIVE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE TREE DRIP LINE AS DESIGNATED ABOVE. MAINTAIN THE FENCE INTEGRITY AT ALL TIMES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION. PLANELEVATION 4' FENCE WITH POSTS @ 8' O.C. (MAX.) AT EDGE OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (A RADIUS OF 1-1/2 FEET FOR EVERY 1 INCH OF DBH FOR THE TREE TRUNK OF THE TREE BEING PRESERVED. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATION. SEE NOTE BELOW IF TREE IS SURROUNDED BY PAVING. TREE NOTED TO REMAIN Tree Mitigation Calculations: ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW SF SF SF SF S SF SF SF SF SF ST ST S S S T ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W S S S SF SF ST W X X X ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S ST 34 33 32 31 30 28 27 29 3536 3837 39 41 40 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 52 50 51 53 54 55 56 5857 63 64 65 66 6762 68 71 7069 61 59 PROPOSED BUILDING DOG RUNPER ENLARGEMENT EXISTING WOODS TO REMAINEXISTING WOODS TO REMAIN EXISTING WOODS TO REMAIN PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS GARAGE ENTRY TURFSOD HW Y 2 1 2 ME T R O G R E E N L I N E WALL PERCIVIL PLANS ROCK MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC 6' WIDE ROCK MULCHPLANTING STRIP ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH PER SPEC IVY, 6' ON CENTERAT BASE OF WALL BIKE BOLLARDSPER DETAIL NATIVE SEED TODISTURBED LIMITS, FIELD VERIFY NATIVE SEED TODISTURBED LIMITS, FIELD VERIFY NATIVE SEED PER SPECIFICATIONS PRO P E R T Y L I N E EASEMENT LINE D&U EASEMENT D& U E A S E M E N T TU R F S O D EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PARKING 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 181716 15 14 PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPE R T Y L I N E LEAVE 2' FROM BACK OF CURB FOR VEHICLE OVERHANG PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E PARKING LOT SCREENING T D& U E A S E M E N T PLANTING TIER BETWEEN WALLSTO RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 18" DEPTHOF PLANTING SOIL. TOP WITH 4" OF WOOD MULCH. TREAT WITH PREEN. PLANTING TIER BETWEEN WALLSTO RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 18" DEPTHOF PLANTING SOIL. TOP WITH 4" OF WOOD MULCH. TREAT WITH PREEN. TU R F S O D ROCK MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS TRASH STAGINGAREA PER CIVIL MAIN ENTRY WOOD MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC BUFFER TREESON NEIGHBORING PAVING & FURNISHINGSBY OTHERS ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC NOTE: TREES PLANTED ABOVE THE RETAINING WALL TO BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 10' BACK FROM WALL. TURF SOD TODISTURBED LIMITS EXISTING SHRUBBED TO REMAIN, REPAIRANY DISTURBANCE TOMATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS ONCE TREEIS INSTALLED BERM PLANT BEDTO 3' TALL IN THE STAIR STAIR EXISTING TURFTO REMAIN EXISTING TURFTO REMAIN WOOD MULCH& EDGER PER SPEC CENTER, FIELD VERIFY EXISTING GRADING IN THE FIELD TO ENSURE THE BERM DOES NOT IMPEDE THE FLOW OF STORMWATER PROPERTY EXISTING PAVED DRIVE LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN: 1. The removal, pruning, and/or planting of trees in the public boulevard requires an approved permit from the City Forester's Office. Any work must be completed by a licensed tree contractor. 2. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 3. Contractor to coordinate any work in the city right-of-way with City Public Works Department. 4. Expose root flare and set at-grade. 5. The contractor is responsible to maintain trees in a plumb position throughout the maintenance period. General Notes: Landscape Legend: New Turf Sod Landscape Edging SITE DATA Zoning: RM-2.5 Building Gross Square Footage: 308,200 sq ft Existing Significant Inches to Remain: 718 LANDSCAPE CALIPER INCHES REQUIREMENT: The minimum number of caliper inches of trees required shall be determined by dividing the total gross square footage of all floors of a building by 320. No more than 80% of trees may be of the minimum size requirement. In the RM-2.5 zoning district, up to 50% of the required landscape caliper inches may be substituted with shrubs, perennials or planting beds if the project has a floor area ratio of 1.0 or greater and the landscaping plan furthers the goals and objectives of the City's Design Guidelines. The request will be evaluated based on meeting five or more of the following criteria: 1.The project includes xeriscaping, raingardens/bioswales, rooftop gardens, public art, native landscapes, pollinator gardens, green roofs, garden plots or similar features to provide variety in meeting landscaping requirements. Native Prairie Perennial Area Proposed: 9,080 sq ft Rooftop Perennial Planting Area Proposed: 620 sq ft At-Grade Foundation Perennial Plant Bed Area Proposed: 2,300 sq ft Total Perennial Area Proposed On-Property: 12,000 sq ft 2.At the entrances to the building, the proposed landscaping activates the space, creates a human scale environment and makes the space inviting. 3.The project provides screening that considers safety, such as screening parking lots to limit views of cars from the right-of-way and adjacent land uses while at the same time allowing surveillance of the parking lot. 4.The project includes landscaping covering more than 75% of the lineal feet of the foundation of the building. 5.The project exceeds the required percentage of the parking lot covered in islands and/or exceeds the parking lot island size requirements. 6.The project utilizes landscaping to define and enhance outdoor spaces such as fire pit areas, outdoor kitchen areas, seating areas, pools, outdoor courts, walking paths, etc. 7.The project utilizes plant material that preserves and conserves resources, reduces waste, and minimizes maintenance. Such plant materials may include those that are drought tolerant, salt tolerant, pollinator friendly, disease resistant, native, low maintenance and shade producing, and those that provide visual interest throughout the year including a variety of periods of blooming, leaf color, bark, and branching structure. Calculation: 308,200 sq ft / 320 = 963 landscape caliper inches required (-) Less 77 Human Planted Tree Inches to Remain as Credit = 886 Total Landscape Inches Owed 471 Landscape Tree Inches Proposed on Property 343 Landscape Shrub*Inches Proposed on Property 72 Perennial** Inches Proposed on Property *6 shrubs = 3 caliper inches ** (Total sq ft of perennial planting beds /500) * 3 = caliper inch equivalent TREE MITIGATION INCH REQUIREMENT: Tree mitigation inches shall be in addition to the landscape requirements. Refer to calculations & inventory chart on Sheet L301 Total Tree Mitigation Inches Owed: 99" Total Tree Mitigation Inches Proposed on Property: 99" ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Species Diversity: Not more than 30% of the required caliper inches shall be composed of one species unless approved by the City. 2. Prohibited Trees: elm (except those bred to be immune to Dutch elm), femal ginkgo, box elder, willow, aspen 3. General Screening: All parking, loading, service, utility, and outdoor storage areas shall be screened from all public roads and adjacent differing land uses. Screening shall consist of any combination of the following: earth mounds, fences, shrubs, compact evergreen trees, or dense deciduous hedge. Hedge material must be at least 3' in height at time of planting. Density and species of planting shall be such to achieve 75% opacity year-round at maturity. 4. No more than 80% of trees may be of the minimum size requirement. 5. Coniferous trees may be considered equivalent to overstory trees by dividing the height of a coniferous tree by 2.4 to determine equivalent caliper inches. 6. Understory trees may make up no more than 20% of the total tree caliper inches required. 7. Size Requirements for Planting: Deciduous Overstory Trees: 2.5" (min) - 5" (max) Deciduous Understory Trees: 1.5" (min) - 5" (max) Coniferous Trees: 6' hgt. (min) - 10' hgt. (max) Shrubs: 5 gal. (min) Perennials: 1 gal. (min) Ground Cover: 4" pot (min) City Landscape Requirements: Native Seed Per Specifications PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L101 LANDSCAPE PLAN Rock Mulch Per Specifications ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW SF SF S ST ST S S ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST W W W S W X X X ST ST ST ST S EDGER PER SPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCHSPECIFICATIONS TURFSOD TURF SOD TURF SOD TURFSOD TURFSOD DOG RUN PER DETAIL & ENALARGEMENT ROCK MULCHSPECIFICATIONS EDGER PERSPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCH SPECIFICATIONS PROPOSED BUILDING MAIN ENTRY GARAGE ENTRY COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE D&U E A S E M E N T EDGER PERSPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCHSPECIFICATIONS TURF SOD TREE FORM HYDRANGEA WALL PERCIVIL PLANS PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E COLUMNAR CONIFEROUS TREE COLUMNAR CONIFEROUS TREE ROCK MULCH & EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH & EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH FROM EDGE OF FENCE TOEDGE OF SIDEWALK TURFSOD PAVI N G P E R C I V I L P L A N S PAV I N G P E R C I V I L P L A N S PAVI N G P E R C I V I L P L A N S LEVEL 2 AMENITY AREA REFER TO PLANTING ENLARGEMENT ON SHEET L103 PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L102 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS: SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY REMARKS BUFFER TREES ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY BR2 Betula nigra River Birch 6` Hgt.B&B 3 Clump Form PD2 Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce 6` Hgt.B&B 6 SI2 Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk`Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 1.5" Cal.B&B 2 DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE AA Acer rubrum 'JFS-KW78'Armstrong Gold® Maple 3" Cal.B&B 22 AS Acer x freemanii `Sienna`Sienna Glen Maple 4" Cal.B&B 3 BJ Betula platyphylla `Jefpark`Parkland Pillar Birch 3" Cal.B&B 23 CP Celtis occidentalis 'JFS-KSU1'Prairie Sentinel® Hackberry 3" Cal.B&B 17 GD Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Draves' TM Street Keeper Honey Locust 4" Cal.B&B 9 QC Quercus Crimson Spire Oak 3" Cal.B&B 13 QA Quercus alba White Oak 3" Cal.B&B 6 Spring Dug QR Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak 3" Cal.B&B 8 Spring Dug EVERGREEN TREES JT Juniperus virginiana 'Taylor'Taylor Eastern Redcedar 8` Ht.B&B 22 Calculated as 3.5" Caliper PD Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce 10` Ht.B&B 12 Calculated as 4" Caliper ORNAMENTAL TREES BR Betula nigra River Birch 10` Ht.B&B 4 Clump Form, Calculated as 4" Caliper MS2 Malus x `Pink Spires`Pink Spires Crab Apple 3" Cal.B&B 20 MS Malus x `Spring Snow`Spring Snow Crab Apple 3" Cal.B&B 9 SI Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk`Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 3" Cal.B&B 9 SHRUBS Cr2 Clethra alnifolia `Ruby Spice`Ruby Spice Clethra 5 gal.Pot 26 Dl Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 5 gal.Pot 106 He Hydrangea macrophylla `Bailmer` TM Endless Summer 5 gal.Pot 40 Hg2 Hydrangea paniculata 'Grandiflora' Tree Form PeeGee Panicle Hydrangea Tree Form 15 gal.Pot 4 Tree Form, 5' Tall at Installation Jf Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`Sea Green Juniper 5 gal.Pot 14 Jw Juniperus horizontalis `Wiltonii`Blue Rug Juniper 5 gal.Pot 104 Rg Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 gal.Pot 249 Ra Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant 5 gal.Pot 61 Sm Syringa meyeri `Palibin`Dwarf Korean Lilac 5 gal.Pot 28 Tt2 Thuja occidentalis `Techny Globe`Techny Globe Arborvitae 5 gal.Pot 46 ANNUALS/PERENNIALS Ep Echinacea purpurea Purple Coneflower 1 gal.Pot 22 Ho Hemerocallis x `Stella de Oro`Stella de Oro Daylily 1 gal.Pot 42 Nw Nepeta x faassenii `Walkers Low`Walkers Low Catmint 1 gal.Pot 34 Pe2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia engelmannii Engelmann Ivy 1 gal.Pot 72 Pe3 Phlox subulata `Emerald Blue`Emerald Blue Creeping Phlox 1 gal.Pot 34 BUFFER PLANTING ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY Ck2 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 79 Sm2 Syringa patula `Miss Kim`Miss Kim Lilac 3 gal.Pot 12 GRASSES Ck Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 167 Ss Schizachyrium scoparium `The Blues`The Blues Little Bluestem 1 gal.Pot 20 ROOFTOP PLANTINGS Am2 Allium x `Millenium`Millenium Ornamental Chive 1 gal.Pot 39 Aw Aster `Woods Purple`Woods Purple Aster 1 gal.Pot 50 Ck3 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 35 Fo Festuca ovina glauca `Elijah Blue`Blue Fescue 1 gal.Pot 35 Sa3 Sedum x `Autumn Joy`Autumn Joy Sedum 1 gal.Pot 25 Sm3 Spiraea x bumalda `Goldmound`Gold Mound Spirea 3 gal.Pot 15 PLANT SCHEDULE 1 L102 FOUNDATION PLANTING ENLARGEMENT SCALE | 1:10 NEW BUILDING L1 F.F.E 900.00 L2 F.F.E 912.00 ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW S ST ST S S S T ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W S S S 12. 0 ' 5. 0 ' 12 . 0 ' 5.0 ' ST W X X X ACO K200 TRENCH DRAIN (5 UNITS) OR APPROVED EQUAL RIM 899.90 INV 898.90 15" PVC ST INV 894.45 (COORD. W/ MECH) 64LF-15" SDR35 PVC ST @ 1.0% 48LF-8" SDR35 PVC ST @ 1.0% 15"-8° BEND INV 894.29 10LF-8" SDR35 PVC ST @ 1.0% 8"-45° BEND INV 894.39 56LF-8" SDR35 PVC ST @ 1.0% ACO K200 TRENCH DRAIN W/ CATCH BASIN RIM 899.90 TOP INV 898.82 BTM INV 894.95 15" PVC ST INV 892.05 (COORD. W/ MECH) ST MH #11 FIRST DEFENSE SEPARATOR (3' FDHC BY HYDRO INT. OR APPROVED EQUAL) W/ INLET CASTING & GRATE RIM 890.10 FIELD VERIFY SE INV (15" RCP) SUMP INV 3.71' BELOW PIPE INV TREATMENT FLOW RATE = 0.34 CFS (1.1" RAINFALL EVENT) REMOVE INLET CASTING & REPLACE WITH SOLID COVER RAISE RIM 890.90 ST MH #2 FIRST DEFENSE SEPARATOR (8' FDHC BY HYDRO INT. OR APPROVED EQUAL) W/ INLET CASTING & GRATE RIM 893.80 INV NE 890.80 (15" PVC) INV NW 888.23 (12" PVC) INV SE 888.23 (18" PVC) SUMP 880.83 TREATMENT FLOW RATE = 4.94 CFS (1.1" RAINFALL EVENT) ST MH #8 FIRST DEFENSE SEPARATOR (6' FDHC BY HYDRO INT. OR APPROVED EQUAL) W/ INLET CASTING & GRATE RIM 895.95 INV NW 891.54 (12" PVC) INV SE 891.30 (15" PVC) INV SW 889.88 (12" PVC) INV NE 889.88 (18" PVC) SUMP 883.91 TREATMENT FLOW RATE = 2.92 CFS (1.1" RAINFALL EVENT) ST MH #5 (48") W/ SOLID COVER RIM 901.90 INV NE 893.81 (8" PVC) INV SE 893.81 (15" PVC) INV W 893.81 (15" PVC) 106LF-15" SDR35 PVC ST @ 1.0% 54LF-18" SDR35 PVC ST @ 2.20% ST MH #4 (48") W/ INLET CASTING & GRATE RIM 897.80 INV SE 892.75 (15" PVC) INV SW 892.75 (15" PVC) 127LF-15" SDR35 PVC ST @ 1.54% ST INLET #6 (27") RIM 891.40 INV 888.40 (12" PVC) 34LF-12" SDR35 PVC ST @ 0.50% 43LF-18" SDR35 PVC ST @ 0.53% ST INLET #10 (27") RIM 893.00 INV 890.00 (12" PVC) 47LF-12" SDR35 PVC ST @ 0.25% ST INLET #9 (27") RIM 895.00 INV 892.00 (12" PVC) 46LF-12" SDR35 PVC ST @ 1.0% 75LF-15" SDR35 PVC ST @ 1.0% 41LF-18" SDR35 PVC ST @ 1.0% ST MH #1 (48") W/ SOLID COVER RIM 894.70 INV NW 888.00 (18" PVC) INV SW 888.00 (18" PVC) INV SE 888.00 (18" PVC) ST MH #7 (48") W/ SOLID COVER RIM 896.75 INV SW 889.47 (18" PVC) INV NW 888.00 (18" PVC) INV NE 888.00 (18" PVC) BORING LOCATION #1 (B-1) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 916' SURFACE ELEVATION: 919.16' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION: 880' OBSERVED GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 36' BORING LOCATION #2 (B-2) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 909' SURFACE ELEVATION: 910.97' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #3 (B-3) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 906' SURFACE ELEVATION: 906.32' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #4 (B-4) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 900' SURFACE ELEVATION: 900.34' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #5 (B-5) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 901' SURFACE ELEVATION: 901.18' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION: 874' OBSERVED GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 27' BORING LOCATION #6 (B-6) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 898' SURFACE ELEVATION: 897.38' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #7 (B-7) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 893' SURFACE ELEVATION: 892.84' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #8 (B-8) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 894' SURFACE ELEVATION: 893.40' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION: 876' OBSERVED GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 18' BORING LOCATION #10 (B-10) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 896' SURFACE ELEVATION: 896.10' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #11 (B-11) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 929' SURFACE ELEVATION: 929.20' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #12 (B-12) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 927' SURFACE ELEVATION: 932.64' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING SC800 STORMTECH CHAMBERS OR APPROVED EQUAL WATER TABLE ELEVATION: N/A BOTTOM OF ROCK: 886.50 BOTTOM OF CHAMBER (+18"): 888.00 TOP OF CHAMBER (+33"): 890.75 TOP OF ROCK (+12"): 891.75 TOTAL WATERSHED: 190,675 SF IMPERVIOUS: 128,915 SF (67.61%) WQ REQUIRED: 1.1/12 * 128,915 = 11,817 CF WQ PROVIDED: 15,975 CF (140 SC800 W/ 18" STONE BASE) TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED: 15,975 CF (140 SC800 W/ 18" STONE BASE) BORING LOCATION #9 (B-9) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 894' SURFACE ELEVATION: 894.34' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING 77LF-6" PVC UNDERDRAIN ST MH #12 (30") NYOPLAST BASIN RIM 894.50 INV SE 888.00 (18" PVC) INV S 886.50 (6" PVC) INV SW 886.50 (18" PVC) SC800 STORMTECH CHAMBERS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM (CITY ID: 01-24-D) ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST CONNECT TO EXISTING ST MH INV 885.31 S S 4" INSPECTION PORT (TYP.) PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/11/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE 503 7TH ST. N , SUITE 200 FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.478.6336 FAX: 701.478.6340 MECHANICAL * ELECTRICAL * CIVIL ENGINEERING S E N W SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 SYMBOL LEGEND: EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING STORM SEWER LINE EXISTING WATERMAIN LINE EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE C300 UTILITY PLAN- STORM SEWER EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE PLAN NOTES: EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HAND HOLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE ST ST S W W X NEW GATE VALVE NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NEW STORM SEWER INLET NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NEW SIGN NEW FENCE LINE W S ST NEW WATERMAIN LINE NEW SANITARY SEWER LINE NEW STORM SEWER LINE EXISTING METRO GREEN LINE WALL MNDOT RESTRICTED ACCESS LINE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS: THE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IN RELATION TO HOW EACH GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNIQUE IS UTILIZED OR EXCLUDED FROM THE PROJECT IS LISTED BELOW: i.DISTURBANCE OF NATURAL VEGETATION ACROSS THE SITE IS MINIMIZED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. MUCH OF THE NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE WOODED AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROJECT. MOST OF THIS AREA IS TO BE PRESERVED AND UNTOUCHED AS IT RELATES TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. ii.THE EXISTING SWALE ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY SHOULD BE PRESERVED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. iii.IMPERVIOUS AREA ACROSS THE SITE WAS KEPT TO A MINIMUM AND ONLY PLANNED WHERE REQUIRED. AN EXAMPLE OF THIS IS THE LARGE LANDSCAPING ISLAND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE, AS WELL AS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GREEN SPACE BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND PARKING ROWS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. iv.PERMEABLE PAVEMENTS WERE EXCLUDED FROM THE PROJECT DUE TO THE LONG TERM MAINTENANCE AND ADDITIONAL COSTS THAT THE OWNER IS NOT WILLING TO COVER. v.TREES AND SHRUBS ARE PLANNED TO BE PLANTED ACROSS THE SITE AS WELL AS WITHIN FLOW PATHS AND WILL ALLOW FOR THESE VEGETATED AREAS TO FILTER SHEET FLOW ACROSS THE SITE. vi.THE IMPERVIOUS AREAS ARE GRADED AND ROUTED THROUGH HYDRO-DYNAMIC SEPARATORS THAT WILL PRE-TREAT THE WATER BEFORE IT REACHES THE UNDERGROUND STORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM. vii.A GREEN ROOF WILL NOT BE UTILIZED ON THIS PROJECT. viii.STORMWATER BMPS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE REUSE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE UTILIZED ON THIS PROJECT DUE TO THE SPACE CHALLENGES THE SITE PROVIDES. ix.THERE WILL BE MANY TREES AND SHRUBS PLANTED ACROSS THE SITE, HOWEVER, WE ARE NOT COUNTING ANY OF THEM TOWARDS ADDITIONAL RETENTION OF STORMWATER RUNOFF. x.LARGE EQUIPMENT WILL NOT BE ALLOWED ON SUCH AREAS AFTER INSTALLATION TO AVOID UNNECESSARY SOIL COMPACTION. xi.THE SURFACE PARKING IS HELD AT A MAXIMUM OF 101 STALLS FOR THE SITE. 101 SURFACE PARKING STALLS ARE PROVIDED. THE UNDERGROUND PARKING WAS MINIMIZED. xii.RETAINING WALLS ARE PROVIDED AGAINST THE STEEP SLOPES ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. THE OTHER STEEP SLOPES ON THE SITE ARE ADJACENT TO THE INFILTRATION BASIN WHICH ONLY BORDER OTHER PERVIOUS AREA THAT SHOULD BE UNDISTURBED AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. BORING LOCATION (TERRACON REPORT DATED 6/04/25) KEY NOTE: ALL UTILITIES (STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER AND POTABLE/FIRE WATERMAIN SHOWN ARE PRIVATE UTILITIES. BENCHMARKS: BM-1:TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION = 901.05 (NGVD29) BM-2:MNDOT MONUMENT 2773 A, LOCATED IN EDEN PRAIRIE, IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 BRIDGE NUMBER 27545 OVER COUNTY ROAD 61, 1.1 MILES EAST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 494, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 MILE POINT 104.7, 18 FEET SOUTH OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62. ELEVATION = 963.05 (NGVD29) UTILITY CONTACT LIST: COMCAST:800-778-9140 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE STREET:952-949-8533 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WATER:952-949-8530 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS:920-540-7640 CENTURYLINK:800-778-9140 CENTER POINT ENERGY: 608-223-2014 METRO TRANSIT SWLRT:612-237-4763 LEVEL 3 NOW LUMEN: 877-366-8344 MCI:800-624-9675 MNDOT:651-366-5750 XCEL ENERGY:800-848-7558 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PHONE NUMBER: 1-800-252-1166 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL PROPERTY PINS. PROPERTY PINS DESTROYED OR DISTURBED SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL IS ESTABLISHED 4.IF THE LAND BOUNDARY DENOTED ON THE PLANS ENCOMPASSES ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE, A GENERAL PERMIT FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) PERMIT SHALL BE ACQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FROM MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5.ALL GRASSED AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TOPSOILED (6" DEPTH), GRADED, SEEDED, AND HYDRO-MULCHED. 6.ALL CONTRACTOR PARKING AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS MUST BE ON SITE. USE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR PARKING, LOADING/UNLOADING, AND STORAGE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. NEW BUILDING L1 F.F.E 900.00 L2 F.F.E 912.00 ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW S 12 . 0 ' 12 . 0 ' 5.0 ' 12. 0 ' 5. 0 ' ST ST S S S T ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W S S S 5.0 ' ST W 54LF-8" SDR26 PVC SAN @ 0.52% SAN MH #2 (48") RIM 896.05 INV NW 888.94 (8" PVC) INV NE 888.94 (8" PVC) INV SE 888.94 (8" PVC) 8" PVC SAN INV 889.13 (COORD. W/ MECH) 37LF-8" SCH40 PVC SAN @ 0.52% 234LF-8" SDR26 PVC SAN @ 0.52% SAN MH #3 (48") RIM 902.50 INV NW 890.15 (8" PVC) INV NE 890.15 (8" PVC) 8" PVC SAN INV 890.34 (COORD. W/ MECH) 37LF-8" SCH40 PVC SAN @ 0.52% CONNECT TO EXISTING SAN MH INV SE 888.37 (8" PVC) 8"-22.5° BEND INV 888.65 55LF-8" SDR26 PVC SAN @ 0.52% X X X CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" WM 6"-90° BEND FIELD VERIFY TOP 54LF-6" C900 DR18 PVC WM 6"-22.5° BEND TOP 885.45 6"x6" TEE TOP 886.25 48LF-6" C900 DR18 PVC WM 6"-90° BEND TOP 884.40 NEW FIRE HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX FG ELEV 893.00 TOP 885.00 46LF-6" C900 DR18 PVC WM 6" PVC WM (POTABLE) TOP 892.00 6"x6" TEE 6" GATE VALVE & BOX TOP 890.60 (COORD. W/ MECH) 26LF-6" C900 DR18 PVC WM 6" PVC WM (FIRE) TOP 892.00 6"x6" TEE 6" GATE VALVE & BOX TOP 890.60 (COORD. W/ MECH) 26LF-6" C900 DR18 PVC WM NEW FIRE HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX FG ELEV 901.25 TOP 893.25 46LF-6" C900 DR18 PVC WM 6"x6" TEE TOP 891.00 6"-45° BEND TOP 895.15 6"-45° BEND TOP 895.60 38LF-6" C900 DR18 PVC WM NEW FIRE HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX FG ELEV 905.00 TOP 897.00 31LF-6" C900 DR18 PVC WM 41LF-6" C900 DR18 PVC WM BORING LOCATION #1 (B-1) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 916' SURFACE ELEVATION: 919.16' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION: 880' OBSERVED GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 36' BORING LOCATION #2 (B-2) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 909' SURFACE ELEVATION: 910.97' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #3 (B-3) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 906' SURFACE ELEVATION: 906.32' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #4 (B-4) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 900' SURFACE ELEVATION: 900.34' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #5 (B-5) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 901' SURFACE ELEVATION: 901.18' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION: 874' OBSERVED GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 27' BORING LOCATION #6 (B-6) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 898' SURFACE ELEVATION: 897.38' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #7 (B-7) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 893' SURFACE ELEVATION: 892.84' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #8 (B-8) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 894' SURFACE ELEVATION: 893.40' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION: 876' OBSERVED GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 18' BORING LOCATION #10 (B-10) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 896' SURFACE ELEVATION: 896.10' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #11 (B-11) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 929' SURFACE ELEVATION: 929.20' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #12 (B-12) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 927' SURFACE ELEVATION: 932.64' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #9 (B-9) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 894' SURFACE ELEVATION: 894.34' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/11/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE 503 7TH ST. N , SUITE 200 FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.478.6336 FAX: 701.478.6340 MECHANICAL * ELECTRICAL * CIVIL ENGINEERING S E N W SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 SYMBOL LEGEND: EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING STORM SEWER LINE EXISTING WATERMAIN LINE EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE C301 UTILITY PLAN- WATER & SANITARY SEWER EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE PLAN NOTES: EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HAND HOLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE ST ST S W W X NEW GATE VALVE NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NEW STORM SEWER INLET NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NEW SIGN NEW FENCE LINE W S ST NEW WATERMAIN LINE NEW SANITARY SEWER LINE NEW STORM SEWER LINE EXISTING METRO GREEN LINE WALL MNDOT RESTRICTED ACCESS LINE BORING LOCATION (TERRACON REPORT DATED 6/04/25) KEY NOTE: ALL UTILITIES (STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER AND POTABLE/FIRE WATERMAIN SHOWN ARE PRIVATE UTILITIES. BENCHMARKS: BM-1:TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION = 901.05 (NGVD29) BM-2:MNDOT MONUMENT 2773 A, LOCATED IN EDEN PRAIRIE, IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 BRIDGE NUMBER 27545 OVER COUNTY ROAD 61, 1.1 MILES EAST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 494, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 MILE POINT 104.7, 18 FEET SOUTH OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62. ELEVATION = 963.05 (NGVD29) UTILITY CONTACT LIST: COMCAST:800-778-9140 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE STREET:952-949-8533 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WATER:952-949-8530 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS:920-540-7640 CENTURYLINK:800-778-9140 CENTER POINT ENERGY: 608-223-2014 METRO TRANSIT SWLRT:612-237-4763 LEVEL 3 NOW LUMEN: 877-366-8344 MCI:800-624-9675 MNDOT:651-366-5750 XCEL ENERGY:800-848-7558 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PHONE NUMBER: 1-800-252-1166 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL PROPERTY PINS. PROPERTY PINS DESTROYED OR DISTURBED SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL IS ESTABLISHED 4.IF THE LAND BOUNDARY DENOTED ON THE PLANS ENCOMPASSES ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE, A GENERAL PERMIT FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) PERMIT SHALL BE ACQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FROM MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5.ALL GRASSED AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TOPSOILED (6" DEPTH), GRADED, SEEDED, AND HYDRO-MULCHED. 6.ALL CONTRACTOR PARKING AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS MUST BE ON SITE. USE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR PARKING, LOADING/UNLOADING, AND STORAGE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. NEW BUILDING L1 F.F.E 900.00 L2 F.F.E 912.00 ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW S ST ST S S S T ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W S S S ST W X X X 8" PVC SAN INV 889.41 6" PVC WM TOP 887.41 8" PVC SAN INV 888.87 6" PVC WM TOP 886.87 15" PVC ST INV 893.96 6" PVC WM TOP 891.96 INSTALL 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BETWEEN PIPES 8" PVC ST INV 894.13 6" PVC WM TOP 892.13 INSTALL 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BETWEEN PIPES 15" PVC ST INV 891.56 6" PVC WM TOP 889.56 INSTALL 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BETWEEN PIPES 15" PVC ST INV 894.08 8" PVC SAN TOP 890.76 INSTALL 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BETWEEN PIPES 15" PVC ST INV 891.68 8" PVC SAN TOP 889.67 INSTALL 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BETWEEN PIPES 12" PVC ST INV 889.96 6" PVC WM TOP 887.96 INSTALL 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BETWEEN PIPES 12" PVC ST INV 889.91 8" PVC SAN TOP 889.40 INSTALL 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION BETWEEN PIPES 8" PVC SAN INV 889.78 6" PVC WM TOP 887.78 BORING LOCATION #1 (B-1) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 916' SURFACE ELEVATION: 919.16' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION: 880' OBSERVED GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 36' BORING LOCATION #2 (B-2) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 909' SURFACE ELEVATION: 910.97' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #3 (B-3) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 906' SURFACE ELEVATION: 906.32' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #4 (B-4) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 900' SURFACE ELEVATION: 900.34' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #5 (B-5) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 901' SURFACE ELEVATION: 901.18' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION: 874' OBSERVED GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 27' BORING LOCATION #6 (B-6) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 898' SURFACE ELEVATION: 897.38' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #7 (B-7) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 893' SURFACE ELEVATION: 892.84' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #8 (B-8) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 894' SURFACE ELEVATION: 893.40' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION: 876' OBSERVED GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 18' BORING LOCATION #10 (B-10) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 896' SURFACE ELEVATION: 896.10' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #11 (B-11) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 929' SURFACE ELEVATION: 929.20' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #12 (B-12) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 927' SURFACE ELEVATION: 932.64' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING BORING LOCATION #9 (B-9) APPROX. GROUND ELEVATION: 894' SURFACE ELEVATION: 894.34' GROUNDWATER NOT OBSERVED WHILE DRILLING ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/11/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE 503 7TH ST. N , SUITE 200 FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.478.6336 FAX: 701.478.6340 MECHANICAL * ELECTRICAL * CIVIL ENGINEERING S E N W SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 SYMBOL LEGEND: EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING STORM SEWER LINE EXISTING WATERMAIN LINE EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE C302 UTILITY PLAN- CROSSING SCHEDULE EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE PLAN NOTES: EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HAND HOLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE ST ST S W W X NEW GATE VALVE NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NEW STORM SEWER INLET NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NEW SIGN NEW FENCE LINE W S ST NEW WATERMAIN LINE NEW SANITARY SEWER LINE NEW STORM SEWER LINE EXISTING METRO GREEN LINE WALL MNDOT RESTRICTED ACCESS LINE BORING LOCATION (TERRACON REPORT DATED 6/04/25) KEY NOTE: ALL UTILITIES (STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER AND POTABLE/FIRE WATERMAIN SHOWN ARE PRIVATE UTILITIES. BENCHMARKS: BM-1:TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION = 901.05 (NGVD29) BM-2:MNDOT MONUMENT 2773 A, LOCATED IN EDEN PRAIRIE, IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 BRIDGE NUMBER 27545 OVER COUNTY ROAD 61, 1.1 MILES EAST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 494, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 MILE POINT 104.7, 18 FEET SOUTH OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62. ELEVATION = 963.05 (NGVD29) UTILITY CONTACT LIST: COMCAST:800-778-9140 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE STREET:952-949-8533 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WATER:952-949-8530 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS:920-540-7640 CENTURYLINK:800-778-9140 CENTER POINT ENERGY: 608-223-2014 METRO TRANSIT SWLRT:612-237-4763 LEVEL 3 NOW LUMEN: 877-366-8344 MCI:800-624-9675 MNDOT:651-366-5750 XCEL ENERGY:800-848-7558 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PHONE NUMBER: 1-800-252-1166 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL PROPERTY PINS. PROPERTY PINS DESTROYED OR DISTURBED SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL IS ESTABLISHED 4.IF THE LAND BOUNDARY DENOTED ON THE PLANS ENCOMPASSES ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE, A GENERAL PERMIT FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) PERMIT SHALL BE ACQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FROM MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5.ALL GRASSED AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TOPSOILED (6" DEPTH), GRADED, SEEDED, AND HYDRO-MULCHED. 6.ALL CONTRACTOR PARKING AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS MUST BE ON SITE. USE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR PARKING, LOADING/UNLOADING, AND STORAGE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. NEW BUILDING L1 F.F.E 900.00 L2 F.F.E 912.00 9 0 0 9 0 0 90 2 89 6 89 8 89 4 8 9 2 W W W W WW S 892 892 91 0 90 6 90 8 2.3 9 % 1.9 3 % 4.83 % 7.9 1 % 3.67% 1.5 2 % 1.9 5 % 2 . 0 6 % 5.0 0 % 4.9 8 % 2.3 7 % 3.4 3 % 3.4 3 % 4.9 3 % 1.8 2 % 1.8 2 % 3.7 3 % 1.4 6 % 7.0 5 % 0.6 4 % 4.7 6 % 1.55% 1 . 8 5 % 4.7 7 % 4.14% 0.6 2 % 5.0 4 % 900 910 89 4 896 898 902 904 906 908 8 9 4 8 9 6 8 9 8 900 902 904 9 0 2 9 0 4 ST ST 1.5 5 % 3.6 8 % 3.18% 1 . 8 5 % 2 . 2 8 % 1.9 3 % 3.3 8 % 1.01% 6 . 4 3 % 19. 7 3 % 2.0 4 % 3.0 8 % 1.6 6 % 2.5 9 % 4. 8 5 % 4.90% 4.5 8 % 4.97% 0.8 3 % 4.5 6 % 4.0 4 % 1 . 0 0 % 1.8 8 % 3.77% 4.91% 2. 7 6 % 1.16% 5.04% 2.6 0 % 1.9 9 % 2.9 8 % 3.7 2 % 2.0 0 % 4.2 2 % 8 9 6 8 9 8 900 8 9 4 8 9 6 89 8 902 8 9 2 892 894 8 9 4 3 . 2 9 % 2.0 0 % 2.0 0 % 4.8 4 % 4.8 8 % 4.5 7 % 1.1 6 % 1.1 6 % 1.1 6 % 90 2 90 4 8 9 6 8 9 8 89 2 1.7 2 % 3.1 0 % 3.4 5 % 3.4 6 % W S ST 9 0 4 W X X X 0.6 9 % 2.1 4 % 2.0 0 % 0.5 1 % 1.9 4 % ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/11/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE 503 7TH ST. N , SUITE 200 FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.478.6336 FAX: 701.478.6340 MECHANICAL * ELECTRICAL * CIVIL ENGINEERING S E N W SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 SYMBOL LEGEND: EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE C401 GRADING PLAN - CONTOURS & SLOPES EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE PLAN NOTES: EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HAND HOLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE ST ST S W W X NEW GATE VALVE NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NEW STORM SEWER INLET NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NEW SIGN NEW FENCE LINE EXISTING CONTOUR LINE 902 NEW CONTOUR LINE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 1.0%NEW SLOPE & DIRECTION OF FLOW EXISTING METRO GREEN LINE WALL MNDOT RESTRICTED ACCESS LINE BENCHMARKS: BM-1:TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION = 901.05 (NGVD29) BM-2:MNDOT MONUMENT 2773 A, LOCATED IN EDEN PRAIRIE, IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 BRIDGE NUMBER 27545 OVER COUNTY ROAD 61, 1.1 MILES EAST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 494, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 MILE POINT 104.7, 18 FEET SOUTH OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62. ELEVATION = 963.05 (NGVD29) UTILITY CONTACT LIST: COMCAST:800-778-9140 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE STREET:952-949-8533 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WATER:952-949-8530 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS:920-540-7640 CENTURYLINK:800-778-9140 CENTER POINT ENERGY: 608-223-2014 METRO TRANSIT SWLRT:612-237-4763 LEVEL 3 NOW LUMEN: 877-366-8344 MCI:800-624-9675 MNDOT:651-366-5750 XCEL ENERGY:800-848-7558 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PHONE NUMBER: 1-800-252-1166 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL PROPERTY PINS. PROPERTY PINS DESTROYED OR DISTURBED SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL IS ESTABLISHED 4.IF THE LAND BOUNDARY DENOTED ON THE PLANS ENCOMPASSES ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE, A GENERAL PERMIT FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) PERMIT SHALL BE ACQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FROM MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5.ALL GRASSED AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TOPSOILED (6" DEPTH), GRADED, SEEDED, AND HYDRO-MULCHED. 6.ALL CONTRACTOR PARKING AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS MUST BE ON SITE. USE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR PARKING, LOADING/UNLOADING, AND STORAGE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. NEW BUILDING L1 F.F.E 900.00 L2 F.F.E 912.00 SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DOG RUN DETAILS 26. 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 8.0 ' 8.0 ' 8.0 ' R2 2 . 0 ' R5.0' 26 . 0 ' 5.0 ' NEW ACCESSIBLE SIGN NEW "NO PARKING" SIGN INSTALL 8LF DROP CURB SECTION W/ 6' FLARES & 8LF ADA DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL INSTALL NEW CONCRETE STAIRS W/ HANDRAIL 12" TREADS W/ 6" RISERS TOP STAIR: 906.80 BTM STAIR: 904.80 INSTALL NEW CONCRETE STAIRS W/ HANDRAIL 12" TREADS W/ 6" RISERS TOP STAIR: 910.15 BTM STAIR: 908.15 8.0 ' INSTALL 8LF DROP CURB SECTION W/ 1' FLARE & 8LF ADA DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL 6. 0 ' NEW STEPPED RETAINING WALLS (REFER TO C400 FOR ELEVATIONS) 5. 0 ' 5. 0 ' 12. 9 ' 12 . 9 ' 27. 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 24. 0 ' 20 . 2 ' 20. 2 ' 27 . 0 ' W W W W WW INSTALL 2LF DROP CURB SECTION W/ 3' FLARES 26 . 0 ' S 14@ 8 . 0 ' NEW ACCESSIBLE SIGN 5.0 ' R 5 . 0 ' R5.0' R 5 . 0 ' KEY NOTES: 1.ALL GATE VALVES LOCATED WITHIN NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT SHALL HAVE A 3'x3'x6' REINFORCED CONCRETE COLLAR. 2.ALL SANITARY AND STORM MANHOLE CASTING LOCATED WITHIN NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT SHALL HAVE A 6'x6'x6" REINFORCED CONCRETE COLLAR. INSTALL EXPANSION/SILICONE AT BUILDING (TYP.) (SEE DETAIL 7/C601) JOINTING SCHEDULE 5' SIDEWALK: 5'x5' PATTERN 6' SIDEWALK: 6'x6' PATTERN 8' SIDEWALK:4'x4' PATTERN 10' SIDEWALK: 5'x5' PATTERN 12' SIDEWALK:6'x6' PATTERN L:W RATIO NOT TO EXCEED 1.25:1 JOINTING NOTE: EXPANSION JOINT IS TO BE INSTALLED EVERY 100 LF FOR 8' METRO PATH. SEE ARCH/STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AT RAMP NEW RETAINING WALL (REFER TO C400 FOR ELEVATIONS) 10 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' R5 . 0 ' R5.0 ' R 5 . 0 ' R5.0' R1 0 . 0 ' R10 . 0 ' R 1 0 . 0 ' R10.0' R 1 0 . 0 ' R1 0 . 0 ' R5 0 . 0 ' 22 @ 9 . 0 ' 22@ 9 . 0 ' 16@ 9 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 4.0 ' 4.0 ' NEW TRANFORMER PADDROP CURB LAST 3' 5. 0 ' 18. 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 12@ 9 . 0 ' R 5 . 0 ' ST 8.0 ' INSTALL 5LF ADA DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL 5.0 ' 4. 0 ' W S 5 . 0 ' 1 0 . 0 ' 5.0' R5.0' R 5 . 0 ' ST W 8.3 ' 25 . 0 ' 10. 0 ' 10'x25' LOADING STALL SEE ARCH/STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AT RAMP 12 @ 8 . 0 ' 29.5' 14 . 0 ' 8. 0 ' X X X 8.0 ' NEW ACCESSIBLE SIGN NEW "NO PARKING" SIGN NEW ACCESSIBLE SIGN INSTALL 8LF DROP CURB SECTION W/ 6' FLARES & 8LF ADA DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL INSTALL 14LF DROP CURB SECTION W/ 3' FLARES S-E V - I S-E V - I S-E V - R S-E V - R ADA - E V - I ADA - E V - I ADA - E V - R ADA - E V - R 18 . 0 ' 6.0 ' 6. 0 ' 6.0 ' ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S 4@ 9 . 0 ' R5. 0 ' 17@ 9 . 0 ' ST 9.0 ' 6. 0 ' C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C NEW BUILDING L1 F.F.E 900.00 L2 F.F.E 912.00 W W WW S W S W S-E V - I S-E V - I S-E V - R S-E V - R ADA - E V - I ADA - E V - I ADA - E V - R ADA - E V - R ST ST ST ST ST ST S S ST PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE 503 7TH ST. N , SUITE 200 FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.478.6336 FAX: 701.478.6340 MECHANICAL * ELECTRICAL * CIVIL ENGINEERING S E N W SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 SYMBOL LEGEND: EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE C500 PAVING PLAN EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE PLAN NOTES: EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HAND HOLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE ST ST S W W X NEW GATE VALVE NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NEW STORM SEWER INLET NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NEW SIGN NEW FENCE LINE NEW 4" REINFORCED CONCRETE SIDEWALK NEW 7" REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT NEW 4" ASPHALT PAVEMENT NEW THICKENED EDGE REINFORCED CONCRETE SIDEWALK NEW TYPE 1 STANDARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER NEW TYPE 2 STANDARD CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SITE NOTES: LOT SIZE: 255,315 SF (5.86 ACRES) PARKING: - 119 SURFACE PARKING STALLS PROVIDED (INCLUDING: 4 ADA) - 207 STRUCTURED PARKING STALLS PROVIDED (INCLUDING: 4 ADA) PARKING RATIO: - 326 TOTAL SURFACE AND STRUCTURED PARKING/195 DWELLING UNITS: 1.67 ADDITIONAL PARKING NOTES: - ALL PARKING ARE 9'x18' OTHER THAN TWO 8'x18' ADA STALLS - 32 COMPACT STALLS PROPOSED (8 STRUCTURED, 24 SURFACE) (9.82%) - TOTAL PARKING LOT AREA = 42,647 SF - PARKING LOT ISLAND AREA = 1,840 SF (4.31%) BUILDING SETBACKS: - 27' OFF SOUTH PROPERTY LINE - 24' OFF EAST PROPERTY LINE FIRE TRUCK TURN MOVEMENT SCALE: 1"=30' EXISTING METRO GREEN LINE WALL MNDOT RESTRICTED ACCESS LINE BENCHMARKS: BM-1:TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION = 901.05 (NGVD29) BM-2:MNDOT MONUMENT 2773 A, LOCATED IN EDEN PRAIRIE, IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 BRIDGE NUMBER 27545 OVER COUNTY ROAD 61, 1.1 MILES EAST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 494, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 MILE POINT 104.7, 18 FEET SOUTH OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62. ELEVATION = 963.05 (NGVD29) UTILITY CONTACT LIST: COMCAST:800-778-9140 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE STREET:952-949-8533 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WATER:952-949-8530 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS:920-540-7640 CENTURYLINK:800-778-9140 CENTER POINT ENERGY: 608-223-2014 METRO TRANSIT SWLRT:612-237-4763 LEVEL 3 NOW LUMEN: 877-366-8344 MCI:800-624-9675 MNDOT:651-366-5750 XCEL ENERGY:800-848-7558 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PHONE NUMBER: 1-800-252-1166 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL PROPERTY PINS. PROPERTY PINS DESTROYED OR DISTURBED SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL IS ESTABLISHED 4.IF THE LAND BOUNDARY DENOTED ON THE PLANS ENCOMPASSES ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE, A GENERAL PERMIT FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) PERMIT SHALL BE ACQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FROM MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5.ALL GRASSED AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TOPSOILED (6" DEPTH), GRADED, SEEDED, AND HYDRO-MULCHED. 6.ALL CONTRACTOR PARKING AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS MUST BE ON SITE. USE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR PARKING, LOADING/UNLOADING, AND STORAGE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. NEW BUILDING L1 F.F.E 900.00 L2 F.F.E 912.00 W W W W WW S LANDSCAPED AREA SALT STORAGE AREA (INSIDE FRONT ENTRANCE OUT OF THE WAY OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS) LANDSCAPED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA SALT STORAGE AREA (INSIDE L1 ENTRANCE AWAY FROM DRIVE AISLES) 10 ST ST W S ST W X X X LANDSCAPED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA UNDERGROUND STORMWATER CHAMBERS S-E V - I S-E V - I S-E V - R S-E V - R ADA - E V - I ADA - E V - I ADA - E V - R ADA - E V - R ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/11/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE 503 7TH ST. N , SUITE 200 FARGO, ND 58102 PHONE: 701.478.6336 FAX: 701.478.6340 MECHANICAL * ELECTRICAL * CIVIL ENGINEERING S E N W SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 20100 40 SYMBOL LEGEND: EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE C501 SALT & SNOW MANAGEMENT PLAN EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE PLAN NOTES: EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HAND HOLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE ST ST S W W X NEW GATE VALVE NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NEW STORM SEWER INLET NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NEW SIGN NEW FENCE LINE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AREA PROPOSED SALT STORAGE AREA SNOW & SALT MANAGEMENT NOTES: SNOW MANAGEMENT - TOTAL SNOW STORAGE AREA = 0 SF - AREAS THAT SNOW MUST NOT BE STORED: 1. ON TOP OF A STORM DRAIN OR STORMWATER CATCH BASIN 2. IN PARKING STALLS REQUIRED TO MEET THE MINIMUM ZONING REQUIREMENT 3. IN OR ON LANDSCAPED AREAS OR ISLANDS 4. WITHIN SIT ACCESS SITE LINES - ANY SNOW THAT DOES NOT FIT WITHIN DESIGNATED STORAGE AREAS MUST BE HAULED OFF SITE TO AN APPROPRIATE STORAGE FACILITY. SALT MANAGEMENT -SALT STORAGE AREAS ARE ALL SHOWN AT INDOOR LOCATIONS ON IMPERVIOUS PAVEMENT TO AVOID ADVERSE AFFECTS OF RAIN, SNOW, WIND, AND MELT WATER. -ALL SALT MUST BE KEPT OUT OF DRIVE AISLES AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS TO REDUCE EXPOSURE WHILE IN STORAGE. -IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ANY WINTER MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES GO THROUGH SMART SALTING TRAINING TO IMPROVE OPERATOR EFFECTIVENESS AND REDUCE CHLORIDE POLLUTION. EXISTING METRO GREEN LINE WALL MNDOT RESTRICTED ACCESS LINE UNDERGROUND STORMWATER CHAMBERS KEY NOTES: 1.SNOW MUST NOT BE STORED ON ANY STORMWATER BMP'S OR CATCH BASINS, LANDSCAPED AREAS, AND PARKING STALLS COUNTED TOWARDS SITE-WIDE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. 2.ANY AND ALL SNOW WILL NEED TO BE HAULED OFF SITE TO AN APPROPRIATE STORAGE FACILITY. 3.SALT STORAGE MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF ANY DRIVING AISLES TO AVOID ANY UNWANTED DISPERSION OF SALT. 4.SALT MUST BE MOVED TO STORAGE/MAINTENANCE CLOSET AFTER WINTER SEASON. SALT STORAGE AREAS MUST BE SWEPT AND CLEANED AFTER SALT IS MOVED. 5.SMART SALT TRAINING IS RECOMMENDED FOR ALL WINTER MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES. BENCHMARKS: BM-1:TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATION = 901.05 (NGVD29) BM-2:MNDOT MONUMENT 2773 A, LOCATED IN EDEN PRAIRIE, IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 BRIDGE NUMBER 27545 OVER COUNTY ROAD 61, 1.1 MILES EAST ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 494, AT TRUNK HIGHWAY 62 MILE POINT 104.7, 18 FEET SOUTH OF WESTBOUND TRUNK HIGHWAY 62. ELEVATION = 963.05 (NGVD29) UTILITY CONTACT LIST: COMCAST:800-778-9140 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE STREET:952-949-8533 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WATER:952-949-8530 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS:920-540-7640 CENTURYLINK:800-778-9140 CENTER POINT ENERGY: 608-223-2014 METRO TRANSIT SWLRT:612-237-4763 LEVEL 3 NOW LUMEN: 877-366-8344 MCI:800-624-9675 MNDOT:651-366-5750 XCEL ENERGY:800-848-7558 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PHONE NUMBER: 1-800-252-1166 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL PROPERTY PINS. PROPERTY PINS DESTROYED OR DISTURBED SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL IS ESTABLISHED 4.IF THE LAND BOUNDARY DENOTED ON THE PLANS ENCOMPASSES ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE, A GENERAL PERMIT FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) PERMIT SHALL BE ACQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER FROM MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5.ALL GRASSED AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TOPSOILED (6" DEPTH), GRADED, SEEDED, AND HYDRO-MULCHED. 6.ALL CONTRACTOR PARKING AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS MUST BE ON SITE. USE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR PARKING, LOADING/UNLOADING, AND STORAGE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. UP UP LVL 01 EL.= 100' - 0" ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" 6' - 0" DRIVE LANE SW SIDEWALK 15 0' - 0 " 2 0 0 ' - 0 " 2 5 0 ' - 0 " 78 ' - 0 " LVL 01 EL.= 100' - 0" ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" 2 G125 _____1 G125 _____ SW GRASSBOULEVARD RETAINING WALLS SIDEWALK 2 5 0 ' - 0 " 200' - 0" 150' - 0" 78 ' - 0 " LVL 01 EL.= 100' - 0" ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" SIDEWALKPARKINGSWGRASS 150' - 0" 20 0 ' - 0 " 2 5 0 ' - 0 " 78 ' - 0 " EGRESS STAIR WITH STANDPIPE 200' HOSE PULL MAXIMUM PER 905.4.6 STANDPIPES AT ROOF IF NEEDED EGRESS STAIR WITH STANDPIPE 200' HOSE PULL MAXIMUM PER 905.4.6 STANDPIPES AT ROOF IF NEEDED 250' - 0" 20 0' - 0"1 5 0 ' - 0 " Hose Coverage 150', 200', and 250' radius shown from center of each fire truck elevated water discharge point. HYDRANT SEE CIVIL HYDRANT SEE CIVIL EXISTING DRIVE LANE (NOT ON PROPOSED PROPERTY HYDRANT SEE CIVIL EGRESS STAIR WITH STANDPIPE 200' HOSE PULL MAXIMUM PER 905.4.6 STANDPIPES AT ROOF WATER/FIRE RISER ROOM AT L1 FDC AT FRONT DOOR FIRE COMMAND CENTER AT L1 MAIN ENTRY VESTIBULE TO INCLUDE KNOX BOX Fire Protection Systems (Chapter 9) Group “R”(903.2.7): An approved sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings with a group “R” fire area. Group “S-2”Enclosed Parking Garage (903.2.9): An approved automatic sprinkler system required in enclosed parking garages. Group A-3 Community Room (903.2.1.3): An approved automatic sprinkler system required. Other areas where automatic sprinkler systems are required: (903.2.10.1.3, 903.2.10.2 and 903.2.10.3) Stories and basements without openings Trash Chutes Buildings over 55’in height (above lowest level of fire department vehicle access-applies). As required by IFC 903.2.13. Installation Requirements: In accordance with NFPA 13 (903.3) Standpipe Systems: Class I standpipes required per 905.3.1 Exception 1. Comply with Local requirements-including main landing location in lieu of intermediate Fire Alarm and Detection Systems: Required as per IBC and NFPA 72 (907) “R-2”Occupancy (907.2.9): Multi-family residential occupancies. 907.2.10 -Single-and multiple-station smoke alarms. Listed single-and multiple-station smoke alarms shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this code and the household fire-warning equipment provisions of NFPA 72 GALVANIZED STEEL STAIR ACCESS TO L2 AMENITY TERRACE KNOX BOX AT TOP OF STAIRS IF NEEDED TURNING RADII FOR ILLUSTRATION SEE CIVIL EGRESS STAIR WITH STANDPIPE 200' HOSE PULL MAXIMUM PER 905.4.6 STANDPIPES AT ROOF 6 0 0 ' - 0 " 600' - 0" GALVANIZED STEEL STAIR ACCESS TO L2 AMENITY TERRACE KNOX BOX AT TOP OF STAIRS IF NEEDED HYDRANT SEE CIVIL 26'-0" STAIR EGRESS STAIR EGRESS FIREPIT -FIXED WITH GAS PIPE CONNECTION DECORATIVE BALLAST (UNOCCUPIED) BAR GRILL SAUNA DECORATIVE BALLAST (UNOCCUPIED) UNIT TERRACES UNIT TERRACES UNIT TERRACES UNIT TERRACES UNIT TERRACES POOL SNOW STORAGE AREA SEE CIVIL GUARDRAIL AT ROOFTOP EDGE; TYP. EMERGENCY FIRE ACCESS TO OUTDOOR AMENITIES 5' WIDE CLEARANCE HALLWAY 36" OPENING WIDTH DOOR HYDRANT SEE CIVIL 2 HR FIREWALL CONTINUOUS FROM L2 3HR RATED FLOOR TO ROOF WITH DOUBLE ACTING DOOR EACH LEVEL STAIR EGRESS LVL 01 EL.= 100' - 0" ROOF EL.= 164' - 6" LVL 02 EL.= 112' - 0" LVL 03 EL.= 122' - 6" LVL 04 EL.= 133' - 0" LVL 05 EL.= 143' - 6" LVL 06 EL.= 154' - 0" 6' - 0" DRIVE LANE PARKING SIDEWALK 150' - 0" 2 0 0 ' - 0 " 2 5 0 ' - 0 " 78 ' - 0 " 4 G125 _____ PARKING WATER/FIRE RISER LOBBY LEASING MAIL AND PACKAGE STAIR ELEC MECH MECHMECH STAIR CIRC LEGEND STUDIO ALCOVE 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR AMENITY CLUBROOM FITNESS CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE TRASH MEP VESTIBULE MECH TRASH ELEC ELEV SHAFT CONFERENCE STAIR WATER/FIRE RISER ROOM AT L1 STAIR EGRESS STAIR EGRESS EV CHARGING SHUTOFF SOLAR ARRAY SHUTOFF OPEN TRELLIS ABOVE L1 ENTRANCE STAIR EGRESS OPEN TRELLIS ABOVE L1 ENTRANCE BATHS KITCHENETTE/ WORKSPACE PET SPA AND BIKE ROOM SCALE: 1" = 80'-0" G125 FIRE SERVICE6 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" G125 GRADING SECTION 22 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" G125 GRADING SECTION 11 SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" G125 GRADING SECTION 33 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" G125 GRADING SECTION 44 SCALE: 1" = 80'-0" G125 FIRE SERVICE - HOSE COVERAGE5 PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone: (612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 9/ 1 1 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 3 8 : 1 6 P M G125 250042 9/11/2025 FIRE SAFETY DIAGRAMS LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y RO E R S C O M P A N I E S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA: BUILDING CODE: IBC 2018 WITH MINNESOTA AMENDMENTS RISK CATEGORY II - TYPICAL DESIGN LIVE LOADS: PUBLIC 100 PSF EGRESS STAIRS 100 PSF RESIDENTIAL 40 PSF DESIGN SNOW LOADS: GROUND 50 PSF FLAT ROOFS 35 PSF WIND LOADS: 109 MPH (ULTIMATE) EXPOSURE B LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION CRITERIA: TYPICAL FLOORS SPAN / 480 EXTERIOR WALLS 3/8" MAX OCCUPANCY : PRIMARILY R-2 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY) S-2 (PARKING GARAGE) CONSTRUCTION TYPE : IA (FLOOR 1) IIIB (FLOORS 2-6) SPRINKLER : NFPA13 LOCAL ZONING : RM2.5 PERCENTAGE OF TYPE-A UNITS (2% OF TOTAL) : .02 x 199 = 4 UNITS CODE SUMMARY PARKING STALLS - STRUCTURED Type Comments Count Stalls/Unit STRUCTURED 193 96.98% STRUCTURED - ADA 4 2.01% STRUCTURED - COMPACT 8 4.02% 205 103.02% TOTAL STALLS: 205 103.02% AMENITY - DEPARTMENT Area Department Area LVL 01 AMENITY 2,223 SF LVL 02 AMENITY 3,946 SF LVL 06 AMENITY 796 SF 6,965 SF EV PARKING STALLS - COUNTS EV STALL TYPE Count Stalls/Unit EV INSTALLED (EV-1) - PARKING LOT 6 3.02% EV INSTALLED (EV-I) 5 2.51% EV INSTALLED ADA (EV-1 - ADA) - PARKING LOT 6 3.02% EV INSTALLED ADA (EV-I - ADA) 1 0.5% 18 9.05% EV READY (EV-R) 34 17.09% EV READY ADA (EV-R ADA) 1 0.5% EV READY COMPACT (EV-R) 1 0.5% 36 18.09% EV CAPABLE (EV-C) 39 19.6% EV CAPABLE COMPACT (EV-C) 1 0.5% 40 20.1% TOTAL STALLS: 94 47.24% SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" G125 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 17 GROSS AREA Area Department Area LVL 01 AMENITY 2,223 SF CIRCULATION 1,880 SF PARKING 68,873 SF SERVICE 2,016 SF STORAGE 735 SF 75,727 SF LVL 02 AMENITY 3,946 SF CIRCULATION 5,767 SF RESI 39,004 SF SERVICE 981 SF STORAGE 908 SF 50,606 SF LVL 03 CIRCULATION 5,618 SF RESI 41,552 SF SERVICE 971 SF STORAGE 2,465 SF 50,606 SF LVL 04 CIRCULATION 5,618 SF RESI 41,552 SF SERVICE 971 SF STORAGE 2,465 SF 50,606 SF LVL 05 CIRCULATION 5,618 SF RESI 41,552 SF SERVICE 971 SF STORAGE 2,465 SF 50,606 SF LVL 06 AMENITY 796 SF CIRCULATION 3,509 SF RESI 24,109 SF SERVICE 731 SF STORAGE 903 SF 30,049 SF 308,200 SF ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW SF SF SF SF S SF SF SF SF SF ST ST S S S T ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W S S S SF SF ST W X X X ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S ST 34 33 32 31 30 28 27 29 3536 3837 39 41 40 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 52 50 51 53 54 55 56 5857 63 64 65 66 6762 68 71 7069 61 59 PROPOSED BUILDING DOG RUNPER ENLARGEMENT EXISTING WOODS TO REMAINEXISTING WOODS TO REMAIN EXISTING WOODS TO REMAIN PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS GARAGE ENTRY TURFSOD HW Y 2 1 2 ME T R O G R E E N L I N E WALL PERCIVIL PLANS ROCK MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC 6' WIDE ROCK MULCHPLANTING STRIP ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH PER SPEC IVY, 6' ON CENTERAT BASE OF WALL BIKE BOLLARDSPER DETAIL NATIVE SEED TODISTURBED LIMITS, FIELD VERIFY NATIVE SEED TODISTURBED LIMITS, FIELD VERIFY NATIVE SEED PER SPECIFICATIONS PRO P E R T Y L I N E EASEMENT LINE D&U EASEMENT D& U E A S E M E N T TU R F S O D EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PARKING 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 181716 15 14 PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPE R T Y L I N E LEAVE 2' FROM BACK OF CURB FOR VEHICLE OVERHANG PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E PARKING LOT SCREENING T D& U E A S E M E N T PLANTING TIER BETWEEN WALLSTO RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 18" DEPTHOF PLANTING SOIL. TOP WITH 4" OF WOOD MULCH. TREAT WITH PREEN. PLANTING TIER BETWEEN WALLSTO RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 18" DEPTHOF PLANTING SOIL. TOP WITH 4" OF WOOD MULCH. TREAT WITH PREEN. TU R F S O D ROCK MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS TRASH STAGINGAREA PER CIVIL MAIN ENTRY WOOD MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC BUFFER TREESON NEIGHBORING PAVING & FURNISHINGSBY OTHERS ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER SPEC NOTE: TREES PLANTED ABOVE THE RETAINING WALL TO BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 10' BACK FROM WALL. TURF SOD TODISTURBED LIMITS EXISTING SHRUBBED TO REMAIN, REPAIRANY DISTURBANCE TOMATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS ONCE TREEIS INSTALLED BERM PLANT BEDTO 3' TALL IN THE STAIR STAIR EXISTING TURFTO REMAIN EXISTING TURFTO REMAIN WOOD MULCH& EDGER PER SPEC CENTER, FIELD VERIFY EXISTING GRADING IN THE FIELD TO ENSURE THE BERM DOES NOT IMPEDE THE FLOW OF STORMWATER PROPERTY EXISTING PAVED DRIVE LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN: 1. The removal, pruning, and/or planting of trees in the public boulevard requires an approved permit from the City Forester's Office. Any work must be completed by a licensed tree contractor. 2. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 3. Contractor to coordinate any work in the city right-of-way with City Public Works Department. 4. Expose root flare and set at-grade. 5. The contractor is responsible to maintain trees in a plumb position throughout the maintenance period. General Notes: Landscape Legend: New Turf Sod Landscape Edging SITE DATA Zoning: RM-2.5 Building Gross Square Footage: 308,200 sq ft Existing Significant Inches to Remain: 718 LANDSCAPE CALIPER INCHES REQUIREMENT: The minimum number of caliper inches of trees required shall be determined by dividing the total gross square footage of all floors of a building by 320. No more than 80% of trees may be of the minimum size requirement. In the RM-2.5 zoning district, up to 50% of the required landscape caliper inches may be substituted with shrubs, perennials or planting beds if the project has a floor area ratio of 1.0 or greater and the landscaping plan furthers the goals and objectives of the City's Design Guidelines. The request will be evaluated based on meeting five or more of the following criteria: 1.The project includes xeriscaping, raingardens/bioswales, rooftop gardens, public art, native landscapes, pollinator gardens, green roofs, garden plots or similar features to provide variety in meeting landscaping requirements. Native Prairie Perennial Area Proposed: 9,080 sq ft Rooftop Perennial Planting Area Proposed: 620 sq ft At-Grade Foundation Perennial Plant Bed Area Proposed: 2,300 sq ft Total Perennial Area Proposed On-Property: 12,000 sq ft 2.At the entrances to the building, the proposed landscaping activates the space, creates a human scale environment and makes the space inviting. 3.The project provides screening that considers safety, such as screening parking lots to limit views of cars from the right-of-way and adjacent land uses while at the same time allowing surveillance of the parking lot. 4.The project includes landscaping covering more than 75% of the lineal feet of the foundation of the building. 5.The project exceeds the required percentage of the parking lot covered in islands and/or exceeds the parking lot island size requirements. 6.The project utilizes landscaping to define and enhance outdoor spaces such as fire pit areas, outdoor kitchen areas, seating areas, pools, outdoor courts, walking paths, etc. 7.The project utilizes plant material that preserves and conserves resources, reduces waste, and minimizes maintenance. Such plant materials may include those that are drought tolerant, salt tolerant, pollinator friendly, disease resistant, native, low maintenance and shade producing, and those that provide visual interest throughout the year including a variety of periods of blooming, leaf color, bark, and branching structure. Calculation: 308,200 sq ft / 320 = 963 landscape caliper inches required (-) Less 77 Human Planted Tree Inches to Remain as Credit = 886 Total Landscape Inches Owed 471 Landscape Tree Inches Proposed on Property 343 Landscape Shrub*Inches Proposed on Property 72 Perennial** Inches Proposed on Property *6 shrubs = 3 caliper inches ** (Total sq ft of perennial planting beds /500) * 3 = caliper inch equivalent TREE MITIGATION INCH REQUIREMENT: Tree mitigation inches shall be in addition to the landscape requirements. Refer to calculations & inventory chart on Sheet L301 Total Tree Mitigation Inches Owed: 99" Total Tree Mitigation Inches Proposed on Property: 99" ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Species Diversity: Not more than 30% of the required caliper inches shall be composed of one species unless approved by the City. 2. Prohibited Trees: elm (except those bred to be immune to Dutch elm), femal ginkgo, box elder, willow, aspen 3. General Screening: All parking, loading, service, utility, and outdoor storage areas shall be screened from all public roads and adjacent differing land uses. Screening shall consist of any combination of the following: earth mounds, fences, shrubs, compact evergreen trees, or dense deciduous hedge. Hedge material must be at least 3' in height at time of planting. Density and species of planting shall be such to achieve 75% opacity year-round at maturity. 4. No more than 80% of trees may be of the minimum size requirement. 5. Coniferous trees may be considered equivalent to overstory trees by dividing the height of a coniferous tree by 2.4 to determine equivalent caliper inches. 6. Understory trees may make up no more than 20% of the total tree caliper inches required. 7. Size Requirements for Planting: Deciduous Overstory Trees: 2.5" (min) - 5" (max) Deciduous Understory Trees: 1.5" (min) - 5" (max) Coniferous Trees: 6' hgt. (min) - 10' hgt. (max) Shrubs: 5 gal. (min) Perennials: 1 gal. (min) Ground Cover: 4" pot (min) City Landscape Requirements: Native Seed Per Specifications PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L101 LANDSCAPE PLAN Rock Mulch Per Specifications ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW SF SF S ST ST S S ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST W W W S W X X X ST ST ST ST S EDGER PER SPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCHSPECIFICATIONS TURFSOD TURF SOD TURF SOD TURFSOD TURFSOD DOG RUN PER DETAIL & ENALARGEMENT ROCK MULCHSPECIFICATIONS EDGER PERSPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCH SPECIFICATIONS PROPOSED BUILDING MAIN ENTRY GARAGE ENTRY COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE COLUMNAR OVERSTORY TREE D&U E A S E M E N T EDGER PERSPECIFICATIONS ROCK MULCHSPECIFICATIONS TURF SOD TREE FORM HYDRANGEA WALL PERCIVIL PLANS PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E COLUMNAR CONIFEROUS TREE COLUMNAR CONIFEROUS TREE ROCK MULCH & EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH & EDGER PER SPEC ROCK MULCH FROM EDGE OF FENCE TOEDGE OF SIDEWALK TURFSOD PAVI N G P E R C I V I L P L A N S PAV I N G P E R C I V I L P L A N S PAVI N G P E R C I V I L P L A N S LEVEL 2 AMENITY AREA REFER TO PLANTING ENLARGEMENT ON SHEET L103 PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L102 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS: SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY REMARKS BUFFER TREES ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY BR2 Betula nigra River Birch 6` Hgt.B&B 3 Clump Form PD2 Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce 6` Hgt.B&B 6 SI2 Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk`Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 1.5" Cal.B&B 2 DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE AA Acer rubrum 'JFS-KW78'Armstrong Gold® Maple 3" Cal.B&B 22 AS Acer x freemanii `Sienna`Sienna Glen Maple 4" Cal.B&B 3 BJ Betula platyphylla `Jefpark`Parkland Pillar Birch 3" Cal.B&B 23 CP Celtis occidentalis 'JFS-KSU1'Prairie Sentinel® Hackberry 3" Cal.B&B 17 GD Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Draves' TM Street Keeper Honey Locust 4" Cal.B&B 9 QC Quercus Crimson Spire Oak 3" Cal.B&B 13 QA Quercus alba White Oak 3" Cal.B&B 6 Spring Dug QR Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak 3" Cal.B&B 8 Spring Dug EVERGREEN TREES JT Juniperus virginiana 'Taylor'Taylor Eastern Redcedar 8` Ht.B&B 22 Calculated as 3.5" Caliper PD Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce 10` Ht.B&B 12 Calculated as 4" Caliper ORNAMENTAL TREES BR Betula nigra River Birch 10` Ht.B&B 4 Clump Form, Calculated as 4" Caliper MS2 Malus x `Pink Spires`Pink Spires Crab Apple 3" Cal.B&B 20 MS Malus x `Spring Snow`Spring Snow Crab Apple 3" Cal.B&B 9 SI Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk`Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 3" Cal.B&B 9 SHRUBS Cr2 Clethra alnifolia `Ruby Spice`Ruby Spice Clethra 5 gal.Pot 26 Dl Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 5 gal.Pot 106 He Hydrangea macrophylla `Bailmer` TM Endless Summer 5 gal.Pot 40 Hg2 Hydrangea paniculata 'Grandiflora' Tree Form PeeGee Panicle Hydrangea Tree Form 15 gal.Pot 4 Tree Form, 5' Tall at Installation Jf Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`Sea Green Juniper 5 gal.Pot 14 Jw Juniperus horizontalis `Wiltonii`Blue Rug Juniper 5 gal.Pot 104 Rg Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 gal.Pot 249 Ra Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant 5 gal.Pot 61 Sm Syringa meyeri `Palibin`Dwarf Korean Lilac 5 gal.Pot 28 Tt2 Thuja occidentalis `Techny Globe`Techny Globe Arborvitae 5 gal.Pot 46 ANNUALS/PERENNIALS Ep Echinacea purpurea Purple Coneflower 1 gal.Pot 22 Ho Hemerocallis x `Stella de Oro`Stella de Oro Daylily 1 gal.Pot 42 Nw Nepeta x faassenii `Walkers Low`Walkers Low Catmint 1 gal.Pot 34 Pe2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia engelmannii Engelmann Ivy 1 gal.Pot 72 Pe3 Phlox subulata `Emerald Blue`Emerald Blue Creeping Phlox 1 gal.Pot 34 BUFFER PLANTING ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY Ck2 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 79 Sm2 Syringa patula `Miss Kim`Miss Kim Lilac 3 gal.Pot 12 GRASSES Ck Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 167 Ss Schizachyrium scoparium `The Blues`The Blues Little Bluestem 1 gal.Pot 20 ROOFTOP PLANTINGS Am2 Allium x `Millenium`Millenium Ornamental Chive 1 gal.Pot 39 Aw Aster `Woods Purple`Woods Purple Aster 1 gal.Pot 50 Ck3 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 35 Fo Festuca ovina glauca `Elijah Blue`Blue Fescue 1 gal.Pot 35 Sa3 Sedum x `Autumn Joy`Autumn Joy Sedum 1 gal.Pot 25 Sm3 Spiraea x bumalda `Goldmound`Gold Mound Spirea 3 gal.Pot 15 PLANT SCHEDULE 1 L102 FOUNDATION PLANTING ENLARGEMENT SCALE | 1:10 UP IRRIGATED PLANTER PERARCHITECTURAL POOL BY OTHERS PAVING BY OTHERS FURNISHINGS PER ARCHITECTURAL FURNISHINGS PER ARCHITECTURAL BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BA L C O N Y BALCONYBALCONYBALCONYBALCONY STAIR IRRIGATED PLANTER PERARCHITECTURAL ANNUAL PLANTINGLOCATION ANNUAL PLANTINGLOCATION ANNUAL PLANTINGLOCATION PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L103 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS: 1 L103 LEVEL 2 OUTDOOR AMENITY AREA SCALE | 1:10 1 L103 IRRIGATED PLANTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FREE-DRAINING FILTER FABRIC SEPARATOR LAYER 4" DEPTH DRAIN ROCK LAYER, 1" FIELDSTONES - NO FINES. PLANTING SOIL TO BE PREMIUM GARDEN MIX, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. AVAILABLE THROUGH PLAISTED COMPANIES (WWW. PLAISTEDCOMPANIES.COM) WESTERN RED CEDAR MULCH, 2" DEPTH - HOLD 1" BELOW LIP. PLANTER PER ARCHITECTURAL. INCLUDE 12" POLYSTRYENE INSULATION (VERT) ON ALL INTERIOR SIDES. HOLD BELOW MULCH LINE. FIELD OR FACTORY PUNCH 1" DIAMETER HOLES FOR DRAINAGE (2 MINIMUM) AND IRRIGATION (1). ENSURE WATER CAN ESCAPE THROUGH THE PEDESTAL SYSTEM TO THE ROOF DRAINS. NOTE: Landscape contractor is responsible for installation of planters. This includes putting the planter together, installing soil, mulch, plants etc., and installing internal irrigation insert & PVC vertical drain pipe. Planting contractor to fill the planters with perennials (as noted per plan) at the time of installation. See specifications. IRRIGATION FEED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR IRRIGATION STUB. IRRIGATION FUNNY PIPE TO EMITTERS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL PERENNIALS IN EACH PLANTER AS NOTED PER PLAN AND THE PLANT SCHEDULE. SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY ROOFTOP PLANTINGS Am2 Allium x `Millenium`Millenium Ornamental Chive 1 gal.Pot 39 Aw Aster `Woods Purple`Woods Purple Aster 1 gal.Pot 50 Ck3 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 35 Fo Festuca ovina glauca `Elijah Blue`Blue Fescue 1 gal.Pot 35 Sa3 Sedum x `Autumn Joy`Autumn Joy Sedum 1 gal.Pot 25 Sm3 Spiraea x bumalda `Goldmound`Gold Mound Spirea 3 gal.Pot 15 PLANT SCHEDULE ROOFTOP PLANTING ST ST ST S ST S S S S S S S S S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW SF SF SF SF S SF SF SF SF SF ST ST S S S T ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 10 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W S S S SF SF ST W X X X ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S S ST 34 33 32 31 30 28 27 29 3536 3837 39 41 40 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 52 50 51 53 54 55 56 5857 63 64 65 66 6762 68 71 7069 61 59 TREE PROTECTION FENCE,FOLLOW EDGE OF BRUSH LINE FENCE PER DETAIL TREE PROTECTIONFENCE PER DETAIL TREE PROTECTIONFENCE PER DETAIL EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN PR O P E R T Y L I N E PROPOSED BUILDING TREE PROTECTION 75 77 76 74 73 78 79 8091 92 93 94 90 89 88 87 85 86 84 83 81 82 01 02 03 04 0506 2322 24 21 25 20 19 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 181716 15 14 72 60 26 PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPE R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E DISEASED ASHTREES TO BE REMOVED TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: 1. The removal, pruning, and/or planting of trees in the public boulevard requires an approved permit from the City Forester's Office. Any work must be completed by a licensed tree contractor. 2. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 3. Contractor to coordinate any work in the city right-of-way with City Public Works Department. 4. Expose root flare and set at-grade. 5. The contractor is responsible to maintain trees in a plumb position throughout the maintenance period. General Notes: PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L301 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Landscape Symbols Legend: Existing Tree to Remain Existing Tree To be Removed Tree Protection Fence Existing Significant Inches On Site (B):1196 Net Significant Inches On Site to be Removed (A):358 [(A/B) x C] x A = D A = Existing Significant Inches to be Removed B = Existing Significant Inches On Site C = City Tree Replacement Constant (0.5) D = Replacement Inches Required [(358/1196) x 0.5] x 358 = 53 Mitigation Inches Required (+) 78 (2:1 Heritage Inches Removed) (-) 32 Heritage Inches Preserved = 99 Total New Mitigation Inches Owed Note: Refer to Tree Mitigation Data Chart on Sheet L302 Tree Preservation & Mitigation Summary: TREE PRESERVATION NOTES & SCHEDULE: PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/18/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L302 TREE PRESERVATION NOTES & SCHEDULE Tree Inventory Table: Existing boundary, location, topographic, and utility information shown on this plan is from a field survey. ·Contractor shall contact the City Forester, prior to demolition or other land disturbance associated with site construction, to verify tree protection measures. ·A city approved permit is required for all boulevard tree work, to be done by a licensed tree company. ·Critical Root Zone: Install high density polyethylene safety fence, 4 ft. high, international orange, at the Drip Line or at the Critical Root Zone whichever is greater, of trees to be preserved per detail, prior to commencement of earthwork activity. Field-staking of the fence location(s) subject to City Forestry Department approval. ·Where silt fence and proposed tree protection fence overlap, place the tree protection fence on the outside of the silt fence, double-staked at the break-point. ·Refer to Tree Protection Detail ·The contractor shall prune the canopy of existing trees to remain where the canopy is in jeopardy of damage due to the new improvements shown. It is recommended that the contractor hire a certified arborist to perform the pruning. Any branches broken during construction shall be immediately trimmed and wounds painted to prevent further damage. ·Perform work in accordance with the laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and orders of public authority having jurisdiction. Secure and pay for permits, governmental fees and licenses necessary for the proper execution of the demolition work. ·Provide protective coverings and enclosures as necessary to prevent damage to existing work that is to remain. Existing work to remain may include items such as trees, shrubs, lawns, sidewalks, drives, curbs, utilities, buildings and/or other structures on or adjacent to the demolition site. Provide temporary fences and barricades as required for the safe and proper execution of the work and the protection of persons and property. ·Remove debris, waste, and rubbish promptly from the site. On-site burial of debris is not permitted. Burn no debris on the site. Salvage material not otherwise indicated to be reused shall become the Contractor's property and is to be removed promptly from the site and disposed of in strict accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, and/or statutes. ·Buildings, features, surfaces, and other descriptive references shown on this drawing are for informational purposes only. Field verify all information relevant to the project prior to proceeding with the work. Visit the site and determine all site conditions and hazards. ·This plan is a guide as to the anticipated amount of disturbance expected due to proposed improvements. The contractor is expected to take all necessary precautions to ensure trees noted to remain are not damaged during construction. Do not store material or drive within the drip line of existing trees to remain. Be aware of overhead branches for clearance of material and equipment. ·This plan is not a guarantee that existing trees will survive during/post construction, but rather a guide to help assure their protection and greatest chances of survival at the surface level. Further protection measures outside this scope could involve ecologists, foresters and arborists. ·Notify the Owner's Representative and Engineer when tree protection fencing is taken down to perform work in conjunction with the new improvements noted in this plan set. The contractor is responsible for re-erecting the tree protection fence immediately after the work is complete, when ever possible ·Trees shown as existing to remain (be preserved) that are damaged / killed as a result of construction activities are subject to replacement per the City of Replacement penalty. Replacement trees are to be paid for at no additional expense to the Owner. General Tree Preservation Notes: 1 L302 EXISTING TREE PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE DRIP LINE NOTE: TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO AIDE IN SURVIVABILITY OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. DO NOT STORE MATERIALS OR DRIVE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE TREE DRIP LINE AS DESIGNATED ABOVE. MAINTAIN THE FENCE INTEGRITY AT ALL TIMES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION. PLANELEVATION 4' FENCE WITH POSTS @ 8' O.C. (MAX.) AT EDGE OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (A RADIUS OF 1-1/2 FEET FOR EVERY 1 INCH OF DBH FOR THE TREE TRUNK OF THE TREE BEING PRESERVED. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATION. SEE NOTE BELOW IF TREE IS SURROUNDED BY PAVING. TREE NOTED TO REMAIN Tree Mitigation Calculations: TREE PRESERVATION NOTES & SCHEDULE: PROJECT DATE SHEET PHASE 12345678 12345678 A B C D E F www.jlgarchitects.com 710 South 2nd Street, 8th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 phone:(612) 746-4260 PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 0 2 : 2 6 A M 250042 09/11/2025 LAND USE APPLICATION copyright © 2025 64 3 6 C I T Y W P A R K W A Y JL G A R C H I T E C T S ED E N P R A I R I E , M N REVISION SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION DATE DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture Planning 475 N. Cleveland Avenue | Suite 101A Saint Paul, MN 55104 651.788.9018 | calyxdesigngroup.com L302 TREE PRESERVATION NOTES & SCHEDULE Tree Inventory Table: Existing boundary, location, topographic, and utility information shown on this plan is from a field survey. ·Contractor shall contact the City Forester, prior to demolition or other land disturbance associated with site construction, to verify tree protection measures. ·A city approved permit is required for all boulevard tree work, to be done by a licensed tree company. ·Critical Root Zone: Install high density polyethylene safety fence, 4 ft. high, international orange, at the Drip Line or at the Critical Root Zone whichever is greater, of trees to be preserved per detail, prior to commencement of earthwork activity. Field-staking of the fence location(s) subject to City Forestry Department approval. ·Where silt fence and proposed tree protection fence overlap, place the tree protection fence on the outside of the silt fence, double-staked at the break-point. ·Refer to Tree Protection Detail ·The contractor shall prune the canopy of existing trees to remain where the canopy is in jeopardy of damage due to the new improvements shown. It is recommended that the contractor hire a certified arborist to perform the pruning. Any branches broken during construction shall be immediately trimmed and wounds painted to prevent further damage. ·Perform work in accordance with the laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and orders of public authority having jurisdiction. Secure and pay for permits, governmental fees and licenses necessary for the proper execution of the demolition work. ·Provide protective coverings and enclosures as necessary to prevent damage to existing work that is to remain. Existing work to remain may include items such as trees, shrubs, lawns, sidewalks, drives, curbs, utilities, buildings and/or other structures on or adjacent to the demolition site. Provide temporary fences and barricades as required for the safe and proper execution of the work and the protection of persons and property. ·Remove debris, waste, and rubbish promptly from the site. On-site burial of debris is not permitted. Burn no debris on the site. Salvage material not otherwise indicated to be reused shall become the Contractor's property and is to be removed promptly from the site and disposed of in strict accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, and/or statutes. ·Buildings, features, surfaces, and other descriptive references shown on this drawing are for informational purposes only. Field verify all information relevant to the project prior to proceeding with the work. Visit the site and determine all site conditions and hazards. ·This plan is a guide as to the anticipated amount of disturbance expected due to proposed improvements. The contractor is expected to take all necessary precautions to ensure trees noted to remain are not damaged during construction. Do not store material or drive within the drip line of existing trees to remain. Be aware of overhead branches for clearance of material and equipment. ·This plan is not a guarantee that existing trees will survive during/post construction, but rather a guide to help assure their protection and greatest chances of survival at the surface level. Further protection measures outside this scope could involve ecologists, foresters and arborists. ·Notify the Owner's Representative and Engineer when tree protection fencing is taken down to perform work in conjunction with the new improvements noted in this plan set. The contractor is responsible for re-erecting the tree protection fence immediately after the work is complete, when ever possible ·Trees shown as existing to remain (be preserved) that are damaged / killed as a result of construction activities are subject to replacement per the City of Replacement penalty. Replacement trees are to be paid for at no additional expense to the Owner. General Tree Preservation Notes: 1 L302 EXISTING TREE PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE DRIP LINE NOTE: TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO AIDE IN SURVIVABILITY OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. DO NOT STORE MATERIALS OR DRIVE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE TREE DRIP LINE AS DESIGNATED ABOVE. MAINTAIN THE FENCE INTEGRITY AT ALL TIMES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION. PLANELEVATION 4' FENCE WITH POSTS @ 8' O.C. (MAX.) AT EDGE OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (A RADIUS OF 1-1/2 FEET FOR EVERY 1 INCH OF DBH FOR THE TREE TRUNK OF THE TREE BEING PRESERVED. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATION. SEE NOTE BELOW IF TREE IS SURROUNDED BY PAVING. TREE NOTED TO REMAIN Tree Mitigation Calculations: MEMORANDUM www.sr fconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer SRF Project No. 19057 To: Adam Gadbois, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Eden Prairie From: Brent Clark, PE, Project Manager Payton Gehloff, Engineer I Date: June 30, 2025 Subject: 6436 City West Parkway Trip Generation Review; Eden Prairie, Minnesota Introduction As requested, SRF Consulting Group has completed a trip generation review for the proposed 6436 City West Parkway residential development in the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The proposed development is located in the northeast quadrant of the City West Parkway and Shady Oak Road intersection. The existing site is currently an office building with a gross floor area of 81,705 sf. The proposed development, shown in Figure 1, will feature 5 floors with 200 dwelling units, ranging from studios to 3-bedroom apartments. Therefore, the main objectives of this review are to estimate the number of trips generated by the proposed development and quantify any potential impacts to the adjacent transportation network, if any. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and study findings offered for consideration. Trip Generation Review To understand potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, trip generation estimates for the proposed land use were developed for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and on a daily basis. The estimate, shown in Table 1, was developed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. Upon completion, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 74 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 78 during the p.m. peak hour, and 908 daily trips. Comparing the proposed development with the existing land use indicates that the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 50 fewer a.m. trips, 40 fewer p.m. trips, and 22 additional daily trips. While an overall reduction in peak hour trips is expected, travel patterns are expected to be reversed, where more vehicles are expected to be leaving in the a.m. and arriving in the p.m. It should be noted that the existing ADT along City West Parkway is around 2,500 vehicles per day (vpd), whereas the capacity of a four-lane divided roadway ranges from 18,000 to 22,000 vpd. Therefore, based on this level of trip generation, the adjacent roadway network can support the proposed development, and no capacity improvements are expected to be needed. 02519057 June 2025 Site Generated Trips 6436 City West Parkway Trip Generation Review City of Eden Prairie Figure 1 Cit y W es t P k w y Villa g e P l NORTHNo r t h XX [XX] (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Site Trips - P.M. Peak Hour Site Trips - Daily Site Trips LEGEND Cit y W es t P a r k w a y Village Pl 17 [9] (136) 20 [10] (159) ( 0 ) [ 0 ] 0 (1 5 9 ) [ 1 7 ] 6 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] 0 (1 5 9 ) [ 1 7 ] 6 Cit y W es t P a r k w a y Village Pl 0 [0] (0) 20 [11] (159)20 [ 1 0 ] ( 1 5 9 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 5 [ 1 4 ] ( 1 3 6 ) Adam Gadbois, PE, Assistant City Engineer June 30, 2025 City of Eden Prairie Page 3 of 3 Table 1 Trip Generation Comparison Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Trips Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Trips Daily Trips In Out In Out General Office Building (710) 81,705 sf 109 15 20 98 886 Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) 200 DU 17 57 48 30 908 Change in Trips: -92 +42 +28 -68 +22 Although no traffic issues are expected, it’s worth noting that the redevelopment site is located in the back corner of the business park and is accessible via multiple private roadways. Given the redevelopment is residential, most residents will likely be familiar with the site and their preferred route. However, visitors, delivery vehicles, and moving trucks may not be. Therefore, to assist unfamiliar users, consider providing wayfinding signage at the preferred access location along City West Parkway, as well as internal wayfinding along the private roadways. The northern access point is likely the most direct and convenient route to the site and currently features signage from the former office building, which could be replaced with updated signage for the new development.