Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 05/27/2025 (2)Agenda Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting 7 p.m. Tuesday, May 27, 2025 City Center Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ATTENDEES Planning Commission Members: John Kirk, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Robert Taylor, Daniel Grote, Frank Sherwood, Charles Weber, Phou Sivilay, Trisha Duncan City Staff: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner; Carter Schulze, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources MEETING AGENDA I. Call the Meeting to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Approval of Agenda IV. Minutes A. Approval of the minutes for Planning Commission Meeting held on April 28, 2025. V. New Business A. Dell Road MUSA Line Boundary (2025-05) 1. Amendment to Comprehensive Plan adjusting the Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary and updating the land use designations within the MUSA boundary for nine properties along Dell Road and Turnbull Road. VI. Planner’s Report VII. Members’ Reports VIII. Adjournment UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, APRIL 28, 2025 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Frank Sherwood, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Trisha Duncan, Robert Taylor, Dan Grote, Charles Weber; Phou Sivilay CITY STAFF: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner; Sarah Strain, City Planner II; Carter Schulze, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; Kristin Harley, Recording Secretary I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL All commission members were present. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Grote moved, seconded by Kirk to approve the agenda. MOTION CARRIED 9-0. IV. MINUTES MOTION: Taylor moved, seconded by Weber to approve the minutes of February 24, 2025. MOTION CARRIED 9-0. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. AKHTAR/PETERSON VARIANCE (BOA 2025-03) • Request for approval for variance to allow a 100-foot shoreland setback from Mitchelle Lake for an addition to a single-family home where a 150-foot setback is required. Alex Peterson and Nadia Akhtar displayed a PowerPoint and detailed the application. Alex Peterson explained the lot was originally purchased in 1993 by his father-in-law, and the family had believed the variance had already been PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 28, 2025 Page 2 granted. They maintained this understanding while planning an expansion for their growing family but then found out in December 2024 that they actually did not have the setback allowance. Akhtar explained that the neighboring house sat 10 feet from their home, and the shoreline was at an angle relative to the house. They displayed an overview of their request and images from the site. She explained the unique features of the house and the site, which presented challenges to any development following City Code for setback. Akhtar summarized the improvement to the site: 100 trees planted 30 years ago, and a planned native landscape to improve the shoreline. The applicants were happy to comply with the City’s requirements. Alex Peterson explained the main story was in the “basement” and there were no master or main bedroom in this 1950s home without accessing stairs. The addition was needed to care for Akhtar’s special needs brother. This was a reasonable use of the property that would bring it more into character with the rest of the neighborhood. In addition, the well in the front yard, a shared driveway and easements with the neighbors, made this site challenging. The proposed plan would preserve sightlines from the lake and the owners had worked with their neighbors on this application. Akhtar and Peterson displayed the survey results and also photographs of the site, including views from their neighbors looking toward their house. They included a view from the lake and emphasized that from the water only the first story could be seen, which is why building upward would disrupt the view and be more obtrusive. Strain presented the staff report. The applicant was requesting a setback variance to accommodate an addition to the house, which predated all shoreland ordinances. There had been a complicated history with this property. In 1993, three lots on Shamrock Trail went through the subdivision process and variances for setback and lot widths had been requested at that time. This multilayered process resulted in the approval of 105-foot setback of the lot by the Planning Commission and by the City Council, but the Board of Adjustment and Appeals subsequently denied it, resulting in current restrictive language for this property. Staff found the proposed development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and City Ordinances, and the setback was in fact not much larger from today’s current standards. There would be a buffer and plantings which would improve water quality that were consistent with the intent and purpose of the Shoreland Ordinance. The general viewer would not notice the difference in the house setback while on the lake. This proposal would also protect natural resources while allowing residential investment, a goal of the City. The applicants wished to make the house consistent with the character of the rest of the neighborhood; at present, this house sticks out. The setback request was not out of line with other houses that predated and came subsequently to the Shoreland Ordinance. The house was a single-family home and would continue to be used as such. In PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 28, 2025 Page 3 addition, the inlet on Mithcell Lake impacted all houses on Shamrock Trail and contributed to the restrictiveness of the language. Staff recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. Taylor asked if the Watershed District could impact an approved permit. Strain replied the Watershed District would in that case work within its own permitting process. Barnhart added the District could comment but had no approval power here. He was confident staff had addressed all the issues on which the District would comment, if it were to. Farr asked for and received confirmation the applicants working collaboratively with a contractor and City staff would be responsible for the vegetative buffer and planting plan. Barnhart added the vegetation would include low- to medium-height native species to stabilize the shoreline and provide habitat for birds and pollinators. Chris Bedtke, an Eden Prairie resident who lives across the road from the applicant, commended the applicants as assets to the neighborhood, and spoke in favor of the application. Paul Vogstrom, a contractor for this project, explained the vegetative plan for the property and the applicants’ aims and goals for the property. The runoff would be directed toward the buffer zone to slow it down. The driveway would be built up a bit and a piping and gutter system installed to allow runoff to slowly run into lake via the buffer zone. He offered himself as a resource for any questions. Dave Jackett, of 17800 George Moran Drive, explained he was a 12-year resident, a Michelle Lake Association member, and a neighbor across the street from Akhtar and Peterson. He commended the applicants’ inclusivity and openness in seeking neighbors’ input and stated he was looking forward to the improvements along the shoreline. MOTION: Duncan moved, seconded by Grote to close the public hearing. Motion carried 9-0. Weber commended the shoreline buffer zone improvement, saying this outweighed any small objections to the design that could exist. Kirk agreed. Taylor commended the project, and Farr concurred this would bring the property into agreement with the other properties’ vegetative buffer zones. MOTION: Duncan moved, seconded by Kirk to approve the variance to allow a 100-foot shoreland setback from Mitchelle Lake for an addition to a single-family home with conditions recommended by staff as represented in the April 28, 2025, staff report. Motion carried 9-0. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 28, 2025 Page 4 PLANNERS’ REPORT MEMBERS’ REPORTS VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Taylor moved, seconded by Grote to adjourn. Motion carried 9-0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:42 p.m. Planning Commission Agenda Cover Memo Date: May 27, 2025 Location: Dell Rd/ Turnbull Rd Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment From: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner Applicant: City of Eden Prairie ITEM DESCRIPTION This amendment adjusts the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary for several properties at Dell and Turnbull Roads. The adjustment adopts the Metropolitan Council’s records for the MUSA boundary, correcting an error in mapping. Additionally, the land use designation for the properties is adjusted, shifting the boundary between low density residential and rural to correspond to the MUSA boundary, with low density residential being north of the MUSA boundary line. REQUESTED ACTIONS • Comprehensive Plan Amendment for MUSA boundary line adjustment and from Rural to Low Density Residential on 6 acres over 8 properties BACKGROUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT During the review of a routine sewer extension permit as part of the Dell Road improvement project, it was noted that several of the parcels are not within the MUSA boundary. A property must be within the MUSA boundary to receive sanitary sewer services. The MUSA boundary observed by the City of Eden Prairie differs from that observed by the Metropolitan Council. This discrepancy impacts the 9 parcels illustrated below. Staff report – Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Dell Rd May 27, 2025 Page 2 The maps below show the existing land use (yellow is low density residential, rural is light green) and the existing MUSA boundary (brown line). The proposed MUSA line is shown in orange; this line corresponds to the MUSA boundary observed by and on record with the Met Council. Current MUSA and Land Use Staff report – Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Dell Rd May 27, 2025 Page 3 Proposed MUSA and Land Use This amendment does not support or represent a plan for additional development in the area. Protections for the bluff and other sensitive environmental features remain. This amendment corrects inaccurate information regarding the MUSA boundary, and the land use changes reflect this adjustment. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING AND RESIDENT INPUT Letters were sent to the impacted property owners prior to the public hearing notices. To date no comments or questions have been received. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as presented. \ l=========!i '================f.lyin-9:eloud:Dr.1 edenprairie.org 0 2,000 4,000 Feel � EP MUSA Line -EP MUSA Line Guideplan_Aspire Rural Low Density Residential Parks & Open Space 10020 9989 9993 9995 9997 9998 9999 9991 9980 Current MUSA Line and Guide Plan Land Use edenprairie.org 0 2,000 4,000 Feel c-==----=----===Turnbull Rd-- � Proposed MUSA Adjustment Met Council MUSA Line C> Proposed MUSA Adjustment c:::t Met Council MUSA Line EP MUSA Line Guideplan_Aspire -EP MUSA Line Rural Low Density Residential Parks & Open Space Proposed MUSA Line and Guide Plan Land Use 9980 10020 9989 9993 9995 9997 9998 9999 9991