Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 01/08/2024ANNOTATED AGENDA TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner RE: Planning Commission Meeting for Monday, January 8, 2024 _______________________________________________________________________________ Monday, January 8, 2024 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Move to approve the agenda. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2023 MOTION: Move to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated December 11, 2023 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Preserve Village Chipotle Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.08 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.08 acres • Site Plan Review on 9.08 acres The applicant is requesting approval to construct a new, free-standing fast-food building with a drive-thru lane at 9605 Anderson Lakes Pkwy. The 9-acre property is located at the intersection of Hennepin Town Road and Anderson Lakes Pkwy, just west of US 169. There are 2 buildings currently on the site approved through previous site plan and PUD reviews. The proposed project will result in a loss of 38 parking stalls. Based on traffic and parking studies, the site can support the loss in parking while accommodating the new fast-food use. The architecture of the new building will compliment the existing 2 buildings on site. MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing. MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval for a PUD Concept Review, PUD District Review and a Site Plan Review all on 9.08 acres as represented in the January 8, 2024 staff report and based on plans listed in the January 8, 2024 staff report ANNOTATED AGENDA January 8, 2024 Page 2 VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT VII. MEMBERS’ REPORT VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Move to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, January 8, 2024 PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Carole Mette, Robert Taylor, Daniel Grote, Frank Sherwood, Charles Weber, Phou Sivilay STAFF MEMBERS: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner; Carter Schulze, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. MINUTES A. Approval of the Planning Commission Meeting minutes dated December 11, 2023. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Preserve Village Chipotle Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.08 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.08 acres • Site Plan Review on 9.08 acres VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2023 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Frank Sherwood, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Carole Mette, Robert Taylor, Dan Grote, Charles Weber; Phou Sivilay CITY STAFF: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner; Carter Schulze, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; Kristin Harley, Recording Secretary I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL Commission members Grote and Sherwood were absent. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Taylor moved, seconded by Weber to approve the agenda. MOTION CARRIED 7-0. IV. MINUTES MOTION: Weber moved, seconded by Kirk to approve the minutes of November 13, 2023. MOTION CARRIED 7-0. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ALDEVRON Request for • Planned Unit Development Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 23 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 23 acres • Site Plan Review on 23 acres PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 11, 2023 Page 2 Lance Monilaws, director of Industrial Project Management for Aldevron, displayed a PowerPoint and detailed the application. He explained Aldevron was a leader in biological science serving scientists around the world with locations in Lincoln, Nebraska; Fargo, North Dakota; and Madison, Wisconsin, supporting cell and gene therapies globally. Jackie Beck, architect, explained the applicant wished to renovate the existing building built in 1982, which had been vacant since 2019, and construct a 96,334 square foot addition to the northwest side of the 345,503 square foot two-story building at 7075 Flying Cloud Drive. The site was currently asphalt covered. The application also called for renovation and recladding of the existing building, with a proposed pedestrian connection from the building to the new adjacent light rail station, and adding new trees and shrubs/grasses/perennials, which would bring the site into compliance with landscaping requirements. Sustainability improvement included providing 7 EV charging stations for 14 vehicles, a solar ready addition, energy efficient fixtures, appliances and equipment, occupancy sensors and daylight harvesting, and low or no VOCs. She displayed renderings of the main entrance (the western elevation), with examples of the materials such as the bronze, orange, and white metal panels, the precast white and black concrete, along with the northwest view showing the roof screening, and the southeast view along the light rail which would be painted to provide interest. The waivers requested were for 669 parking stalls instead of the 748 stalls required, which would accommodate the 420 employees and 15 visitors anticipated on site; the building height in the I-2 Zoning District, asking for a height of 42 feet instead of the maximum height of 40 feet; the request for a 64.1 percent impervious area, less than the existing 64.2 percent but more than the 30 percent impervious area required by City Code; and the building materials. This request was for the north façade to have 57 percent Class I and 43 percent Class II materials (which was the most variance, involving the loading dock area and screening electrical and mechanical equipment), the south façade to have 74 percent Class I and 26 percent Class II materials, the west façade to have the same, and the east façade would be compliant, with 75 percent Class I materials, instead of each façade having 75 percent Class I materials. Mette asked Beck to summarize the main Class I and II materials. Beck replied they were a precast textured concrete exposed aggregate Class I material and curtain wall. Farr observed the existing office building in the southwest corner would be connected to the addition with the courtyard behind being kept. He asked how utilities would be brought in. Beck replied the applicant was working with the building codes department but utilities would be rerouted via the north side of the addition. Farr noted the entry gates came very close to the curb and raised a PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 11, 2023 Page 3 concern about the stacking distance for cars that would not spill out onto the public way. Beck replied there were three curb cuts with security gates that were additional entrances, and this entrance had 40 feet between the curb to the gates, which allowed two vehicles to queue. All employees would have card access for quick entrance. The west entrance would have guest parking. The applicant still needs to work out details, such as an intercom. Farr stated his main concern was the 150 thousand square feet of shell space not included in the traffic study or the parking counts. He found there were over 430 cars required which would result in a parking deck for which there were no accommodations. He requested a proof of parking plan which would address the parking deck, and the square footage. Beck replied the proportions of the shell space would not be the same as the entire project, but would be largely manufacturing. The officing proposed would accommodate a future expansion, as would also the warehouse, and the shell space manufacturing area had a lower per person count. It would be similar to what is going into the addition, perhaps 80- 100 more employees on site. She acknowledged that when the shell space was built out the applicant would have to return to the Planning Commission for approval. Barnhart added he would address this in his staff report. Mette asked where the shell space would be and Beck replied it would be on the lower southeast first and second floors. There would be 150,000 square footage of shell space. Beck added the ceiling height did not meet their requirements after conducting extensive studies for reuse; there were not the same head-height clearances, which would require the second floor and roof to be demolished if it was built today. Different head-height clearances would be used in the future shell design. Barnhart presented the staff report. There were three requests: a PUD concept review, a district review with waivers, and the site plan review, as noted above. There were four waivers requested: impervious surface, building height, building materials, and parking. The proposed site would reduce approximately 1,000 square feet of impervious surface, which was located far from the shoreland in the shoreland district. The requested building height of 42 feet based on length and slope-change of this building would likely be imperceptible. Staff did examine the parking waiver thoroughly, and determined that the shell space was different that typical flex industrial/commercial space; it was not accessible from outside, did not have its own entrance, and was not finished or conditioned. Staff felt comfortable addressing parking issues based on known issues. Other environmental factors, ridesharing, etc. would influence this future condition, and he suggested the commission could handle it in the future and a little differently than other projects. The building materials were also examined by staff. Barnhart stated it was difficult to “morph” a large addition with an existing building to today’s standards PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 11, 2023 Page 4 without destroying the character of the building, so instead staff tried to identify the key components to the design process. After revisions the building articulation met the requirements. The east side exceeded the building materials requirements, the south and west side were very close, and he found no example of where to logically take away material and add windows or brick. From staff’s perspective the existing and the proposed materials tied together. The north façade which faced the light rail station had been closely examined for visual impact, and it did add landscaping staff recommended. The screening wall as a metal wall was preferred over an extension of the precast panel, which would not be as beneficial an alternative, as metal added texture and variety to the area. Staff recommended approval subject to conditions in the staff report, some of which would be addressed before the City Council meeting. Farr asked for and received clarification of percentages in the north façade nonconforming percentages, which were found mostly in the loading dock, and were included in the calculations. Farr asked Schultz to comment on the lack of stacking distance at the gated entrances, and the fact the traffic report had been conducted only for the day one scenario and not after shell space was occupied. Schultz stated the traffic report indeed looked at the existing condition, then added the 97,000 square footage for the addition, also including the shell space, for the number of trips. There was stacking close to the intersection but the lengthy turn lane plus having staff use all three entrances did not raise a concern for cars waiting for the turn lane. If there was to be an issue it could be brought to their staff to use alternative entrances. This was not a concern as this was not a busy road with the turnoff to the entrance. Mette suggested taking the lowest denominator of parking requirement for the shell space and provide a waiver that included that minimum, and then requiring the applicant to come back to the commission under the development agreement if this was exceeded. Barnhart replied staff did not want to waive the requirement and arbitrarily set it low. He recommended staff examine the true need when the next portion of the project came through rather than being backed into a position that could not be easily corrected. Mette stated she still had concerns, but the other option was a parking ramp, so she was satisfied with the staff recommendation. Mette asked the requirement of parking per 1,000 in City Code, and Barnhart replied the range was based on size at 4.7 per 1,000. The Code had been adjusted in August, 2023. Kirk noted the facility was next to the light rail station, which could provide another mode of transportation into this facility. He stated he agreed with bringing back the shell build to the commission rather than locking in the total parking at this meeting. Farr stated he could not disagree more, having spent his career establishing proof of parking plans. He asked the applicant to establish a parking benchmark, rather PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 11, 2023 Page 5 than have an unknown number of cars with nowhere to go. Either the applicant would warehouse this and request no more parking, or come back with greenspace waivers, or request a parking ramp, which would move a bunch of utilities. Being that there was no mystery to how to other three facilities would be employed, he thought the applicant should show the plan for it. The commission’s charge was to future proof plans like this, rather than to allow for no plan for how the applicant would return before the commission in the future. MOTION: Mette moved, seconded by Kirk to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0. Farr commended the project but objected to the parking waiver. He suggested the commission approve the concept, but delay the district and site plan review. Barnhart urged these be done at the same time, and that the commission members suggest changes instead to the motion. Mette suggested the commission move to recommend approval with the added condition of a proof of parking plan. Discussion followed on whether to require a parking plan or approve the existing motion as proposed. MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Weber to recommend approval for a Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 23 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 23 acres; and a Site Plan Review on 23 acres as represented in the December 11, 2023 staff report and based on plans listed in the December 11, 2023. Motion carried 5-2 (Mette and Farr voting nay). Mette stated she disagreed with the administrative process of allowing the shell space to not count toward the parking waiver, adding ideally she would have preferred to see a proof of parking plan so the future possible parking ramp could be shown as possible. Farr agreed, stated that was his objection as well. Both supported this application otherwise. PLANNERS’ REPORT MEMBERS’ REPORTS VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Taylor to adjourn. Motion carried 8-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:13 p.m. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Strain, Planner II DATE: January 8, 2024 SUBJECT: Preserve Village Chipotle LOCATION: 9605 Anderson Lakes Parkway 120- DAY REVIEW March 12, 2024 PERIOD: REQUEST: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.08 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.08 acres • Site Plan Review on 9.08 acres BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval to construct an approximately 2,300 square foot Chipotle restaurant with a drive thru lane in the northeast portion of the parking lot at 9605 Anderson Lakes Parkway. The property is located at the corner of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Hennepin Town Road and is about 9 acres. The site is currently subject to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and contains a shopping center with a grocery store and a second, detached retail building with a drive-thru lane. Adjacent uses include single family residential to the west and south, parks and open space to the north, and Highway 169 to the east. The property is zoned Community Commercial and is guided for Commercial use in the 2040 Land Use plan. SITE PLAN The proposed restaurant will provide drive thru service with one (1) lane on the east side of the site, facing Hennepin Town Road. Drive thru customers will pick up orders on the north side of the building, facing Anderson Lakes Parkway. This drive thru is a “Chipotlane” and is intended to serve online order pick-ups only. There are no plans to offer onsite ordering from the drive-thru lane. A by-pass lane is provided to allow for drivers to exit the drive-thru lane and provide circulation options for the parking provided south of the restaurant. The restaurant will also have the option to place an order in the store for carry-out or dine-in and feature seating inside and outside for Staff Report – Preserve Village Chipotle Page 2 2 customers. With the parking lot reconfiguration, including the addition of parking lot islands, the percentage of parking lot islands on the site will increase, which means a reduction in impervious surface area. PARKING Fast food restaurants have a parking requirement of one (1) parking stall per every two and a half (2.5) seats at the restaurant. Using this ratio, the Chipotle would require 15 parking stalls. To meet this requirement, 16 parking stalls will be provided south of the restaurant, within the project area. The site currently has a PUD waiver for parking to allow 4.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet of retail for a total requirement of 378 parking stalls. The site currently has 379 parking stalls. The new restaurant will result in a loss of 38 parking stalls, bringing the total number of spaces provided on site to 341. In August 2023, City Council approved an amendment to the parking section of City Code Chapter 11. Included was a provision to allow for shared parking. This provision allows for off-street parking facilities for two (2) or more uses with substantially different hours of operation to be provided in a shared facility. The off-street parking requirements for a development may be reduced up to 20% if the following standards are met: i. Parking spaces are shared between two or more complimentary uses. ii. A shared parking plan must be submitted whenever shared parking is proposed that requires specific analysis on the peaking characteristics of the various and future uses included. iii. The applicant demonstrates that, because of the hours, size, and operation of the respective and future uses, there is no substantial conflict in the peak parking demands of the uses for which shared use of off-street parking facilities is proposed, and there will be an adequate amount of parking available to meet the needs for each use. iv. A shared parking and cross access or similar agreement must be approved by the City Planner and recorded against the applicable properties in the County Registrar of Titles’ or Recorder’s office with proof thereof presented to the City. The City must be party to the Staff Report – Preserve Village Chipotle Page 3 3 agreement and no changes shall be made to the agreement unless all parties agree. To satisfy the above requirements, the applicant has provided the following information: i. Parking on the Jerry’s site is currently shared between four (4) fast food restaurant uses and several retail/services uses, ranging from retail to fitness to health services. Chipotle would be the fifth fast food restaurant on the site. There are two (2) restaurants in the main shopping center and two (2) in the smaller building along Hennepin Town Road, which helps to distribute the lunch and dinner rushes and most in-demand parking spaces close to the restaurants across the sites. Furthermore, two (2) of these restaurants have their peak times in the morning selling coffee (Starbucks) and bagels (Bruegger’s). ii. A parking study was provided to confirm that the loss in stalls could still meet the shopping center’s needs and accommodate a new fast food use. This study provides peaking information and analyses the distribution of parking on the site, meeting this requirement. iii. As part of the parking study, a list of tenants and hours of operation were provided. One of these restaurants is only open for breakfast and lunch, closing by 2 pm daily. Several businesses in the shopping center have days they are closed, making Wednesdays the only day in the week that all businesses in the shopping center are open for some portion of the day. A few businesses have split hours, meaning they are open in the morning, close for a few hours around the lunch hour, and re-open later in the afternoon. This helps to alleviate potential parking shortages around the lunch hour when all the restaurants are open and busy. Additionally, when the smaller retail building was approved in 2018, a provision was included in the Development Agreement to limit restaurant uses in that building to a certain number of seats. This helps to ensure that uses are varied on the site. The parking study notes that with the construction of Chipotle, the new peak parking demand for the site is expected to “range between 219 and 229 parking spaces (65% to 68% utilized). This is a 108-parking space surplus (32% surplus), which is well beyond the recommended 15% surplus to account for vehicle circulation and the perception of inadequate parking.” iv. This shopping center is all one parcel, meaning a cross access agreement is not needed. Parking arrangements are communicated to tenants in their lease agreements, including, for example, if there are specific areas employees are encouraged to park. Should the property ever subdivide, a shared parking and cross-access agreement would be required as a condition of the subdivision. The applicant has provided information to satisfy the shared parking provision requirements, making Staff Report – Preserve Village Chipotle Page 4 4 the site eligible for a parking reduction of up to 20 percent from City Code requirements. Without the existing PUD waiver, the site would be required to have 410 parking stalls based on the current tenant composition and proposed Chipotle restaurant. A 20 percent reduction from this code requirement would be 82 stalls, allowing a minimum parking requirement of 328 stalls for the site. This number is less than both the current PUD waiver allowing 378 parking stalls and the 341 proposed number of stalls post construction. Therefore, a waiver from the parking is not required. Based on the parking study, staff recommends approval of the proposed parking reduction. Code Required Parking 20% Shared Parking Reduction from Code Requirements PUD Required Parking Parking Proposed 410 328 378 341 BUILDING ARCHITECTURE AND MATERIALS The building materials include two (2) different colors of brick and glass, which are Class I materials. The building will also feature small amounts of EFIS and metal for coping along the top of the building, which are Class II materials. Each façade well exceeds the requirement of providing 75% Class I material. The brick extends high enough to provide rooftop mechanical screening. The building architecture compliments the existing buildings on the site in both material and color, which is part of the criteria for consideration of a PUD review. East Facade of Proposed Building The building achieves façade articulation and visual interest through the bump-out of the pick-up window. Additionally, along the east and north sides of the building along the drive thru lane, bricks will be arranged in a textured pattern with some of the bricks protruding from the wall. This provides visual interest along a prominent corner of the building where windows are not practical due to back-of-house operations. Windows will provide visual interest on the west and south sides of the building, which face internally to the parking lot and the other retail areas. The trash enclosure is separate from the principal structure and should be constructed of the same materials to provide a seamless look between the structures. As part of staff’s recommendation of Staff Report – Preserve Village Chipotle Page 5 5 approval, staff is asking the applicant to provide architectural plans for the trash enclosure prior to the first reading with City Council. LANDSCAPE AND TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN There is an existing landscape plan for this site, approved through prior PUD and site plan approvals. Three (3) existing trees are proposed to be removed to make way for the new building and remove site line barriers along Hennepin Town Road. To maintain consistency with the current landscape plan, all three (3) trees must be replaced on the site with a tree that is at least two and a half (2.5) caliper inches in size. All of the trees marked for removal are small in size and do not meet the City’s definition of a significant tree. Additionally, the new building has a landscaping requirement of eight (8) caliper inches based on the total square footage. The proposed landscape plan exceeds this caliper inch requirement, providing a combination of trees, shrubs, and planting beds. Shrubs and perennials will be planted along the foundation of the building on the north and east sides of the building, along the drive thru. Additional plantings are provided along the exterior of the drive thru lane to provide screening of the drive thru from Hennepin Town Road. Most of the proposed plantings are around the new building and the north side of the site. One (1) tree will be located along the southern property line. This is consistent with the previously approved landscape plan for the site and helps to keep site lines clear along Hennepin Town Road. SIDEWALKS The applicant is proposing to construct a concrete sidewalk to connect the Chipotle restaurant to the existing shopping center. A similar connection was provided between the shopping center and the second detached retail building when it was approved five (5) years ago. The sidewalk will be colored differently from the parking lot pavement to provide visual contrast for both pedestrians and motorists. Staff Report – Preserve Village Chipotle Page 6 6 GRADING AND DRAINAGE The site is relatively flat in its current configuration. Minimal grading will be needed for this proposed building and stormwater infrastructure. Stormwater management will be addressed with an onsite, underground storage tank located in the parking lot south of the proposed building. Stormwater will drain south into the new underground storage tank and to the west into existing stormwater infrastructure. SIGNS All proposed signs will require review and approval through the sign permit process and compliance with Section 11.70. The signage on the exterior elevations is for illustrative purposes only. Based on the information provided, the wall signs on the exterior elevations meet sign code requirements. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT As previously mentioned, the site is subject to a PUD and has waivers for the number of parking stalls, signage, and front yard setbacks for both the structure and parking. With the new shared parking provision in City Code, a waiver for the number of parking stalls is not required to accommodate the proposed Chipotle restaurant and the resulting loss in parking. The proposed project does not require additional waivers. This project requires a PUD concept and district review since there is an existing PUD on the site to be amended, but no additional waivers from code requirements are sought at this time. The Development Agreement will document the shared parking arrangement proposed for the site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the following request: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.08 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.08 acres • Site Plan Review on 9.08 acres This is based on plans dated November 8, 2023 and December 18, 2023, staff report dated January 8, 2024, and the following conditions: 1. Prior to first reading with City Council, the applicant shall: a. Provide architecture plans for the trash enclosure to demonstrate consistency with the proposed building. 2. Prior to land alteration permit issuance, the applicant shall: a. Submit detailed storm water runoff, wetland, utility, street, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. b. Obtain and provide documentation of Watershed District approval. c. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. d. Install erosion control at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by the City. Staff Report – Preserve Village Chipotle Page 7 7 e. Submit a landscaping letter of credit or escrow equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall: a. Secure a Right-Of-Way/Utility Permit from Eden Prairie Public Works for utility work in Hennepin Town Road November 8, 2023 Beth Novak-Krebs Senior Planner City of Eden Prairie Dear Ms. Novak-Krebs, This memo replaces all previous memos regarding this submittal. On behalf of Jerry’s Enterprises, LLC (“Jerry’s”), please accept the attached Site Plan update and PUD amendment application for a new standalone Chipotle Mexican Grill in Eden Prairie. For a summary of the items described below, please refer to Page 4. Jerry’s proposes to construct a new 2,343 SF building to replace a portion of the northeast parking lot at Preserve Village near Highway 169 and Anderson Lakes Parkway. The building will include a drive-thru, bypass lane, sixteen (16) dedicated parking stalls, and an outdoor dining patio. Jerry’s will own the building and lease it to Chipotle. No subdivision is proposed and no other construction work on the property will occur related to this application. The zoning of the parcel is Community Commercial, and the proposed use conforms to zoning and 2040 Comprehensive Plan guidance of Commercial. This property has an existing PUD and Jerry’s respectfully requests a waiver for the number of parking spaces required on the overall site. According to the zoning ordinance this site will require 424 parking stalls after development is complete. A previous PUD approval allowed for 378 stalls. The proposed project would provide 354 total stalls, a reduction of 24 stalls from the current approved PUD. The included parking study indicates that 354 stalls is adequate for this site and the expected traffic generated by this project is minimal. Included in this resubmittal is a list of all businesses onsite and their standard operating hours. No business has dedicated parking agreements with Jerry’s and 354 stalls, including 22 ADA stalls, is sufficient for the needs of the current businesses. This resubmittal removes all parking to the east side of the drive-thru lane and slightly reorientates the drive- through lane to provide more visibility along Hennepin Town Road, as discussed in the traffic study. The traffic study recommends a drive-thru lane of 225 feet, which is based on drive-thru lanes where customers order and wait for their food. Chipotle only offers online ordering with dedicated pick-up times; there is no ordering from the drive-thru lane, and it is not expected for there to ever have this option while Chipotle is a tenant. Because of this, Chipotle has determined a queue distance of approximately five cars is sufficient for their needs. We have designed the site for at least six cars as well as a bypass lane so other traffic can maneuver as needed. In addition, in the event a customer arrives before their food is ready, Chipotle offers parking for these customers to wait outside of the pickup lane. There are no dedicated “Mobile Order” pick up spots currently identified. The development area is currently pavement; no wetlands, water bodies, or other environmental features exist. No existing trees qualify as “Heritage Trees” and at build-out more landscaping will be provided than currently exists on site. Stormwater will be managed with underground chambers and drainage will be improved compared to existing conditions. I look forward to discussing the site plan and PUD applications with your staff, the Planning Commission, and City Council. Sincerely, Steve Troskey, AICP Entitlement Manager GENERAL SUMMARY - Proposed 2,343 sq. ft. commercial building - Single user – Chipotle Mexican Grill - Includes underground stormwater detention, underground water quality structures, parking lot reconfiguration, and updated landscape areas CITY GUIDE PLAN FRAMEWORK - No changes to Eden Prairie Guide Plan 2040 - Future Land Use is Commercial - Adjacent land uses: Community Commercial (Jerry’s building) and US 169 ZONING CLASSIFICATION - Community Commercial: no changes proposed. VARIANCES/PUD WAIVERS - Parking spaces required for the entire site. Proposed: 354. Required: 378 (with current PUD). EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES - 9.09 AC parcel used for commercial uses, including retail and restaurant uses. - No change requested for zoning; Chipotle is an acceptable land use per zoning code. SUSTAINABLE COMPONENTS - Use of low VOC materials, recycling bins, and energy-efficient appliances (Energy Star). Site is existing asphalt pavement and this project will add additional green space, improve water quality and detention, and improve appearance of this corner of the site. All additional sustainable features will occur directly with the building itself. PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE - One-phase construction starting in Spring 2024 and complete by fall 2024. DEVELOPMENT METHOD - Developed by Jerry’s Enterprises, leased to Chipotle. Length of lease TBD. SIGNAGE - Chipotle will have building signs and a space on the existing monument sign. All signs will adhere to the existing code. LIGHTING - Site lighting will adhere to existing code. TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY - Minimal impact to the site and Hennepin Town Road. Existing infrastructure sufficient. LEGAL INSTRUMENTS, EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, AND RESTRICTIONS - No change to recorded plat as Jerry’s will own this building. No additional easements needed. - Jerry’s will agree to provide adequate parking for all existing business and provide signage for additional parking if deemed necessary by themselves or the City Engineer. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS - As this site is existing pavement within a commercial district, no EAW, EIS, or other environmental study is required. The Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District performs their own review of stormwater management. 10 10 16 16 13 13 1 3 11 11 11 7 18 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 11 . 0 ' 24.0' A B B B I R4' 12 . 0 ' 9.0' (TYP.)18 . 0 ' A A B B B H L C G G G G D SAWCUT FOR WATERMAIN. REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT IN KIND PER CITY AND COUNTY STANDARDS REMOVE AND REPLACE EXIST. CURB IN KIND PER CITY AND COUNTY STANDARDS SAWCUT FOR BIT. TRAIL. REMOVAL AND REPLACE BIT. TRAIL IN KIND PER CITY AND COUNTY STANDARDS 35' FRONT SETBACK LINE UPGRADE PED. RAMPS PER ADA STANDARDS 5. 0 ' FIELD VERIFY MAXIMUM 2% CROSS SLOPE ALONG PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ROUTE. PROVIDE RESULTS TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLING PAVEMENT MARKINGS. INSTALL 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT SIGN PROPOSED BUILDING 2,343 SF FFE=872.10 EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN 44.8 ' 27 25 . 9 ' R3.0 ' R3.0 ' R3. 0 ' R 5 . 0 ' R 5 . 0 ' R5.0 ' R35 . 0 ' R12 . 0 ' R3. 0 ' R10 . 0 ' R5 . 0 ' R3.0 ' R8. 0 ' R5.0 ' R5 . 0 ' D N START N END D E R 1 0 . 0 ' N 12 10 . 0 ' N B 20.0' 5. 0 ' NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 2 1 : 2 4 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 3 . 0 1 - S I T E . D W G :SI T E P L A N JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 TPK BDB BDB BRADY D. BUSSELMAN 44579 1 11-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH SITE PLAN C3.01 # THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. A.BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) B.B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER C.ACCESSABLE PED RAMP D.CURB CUT FOR DRAINAGE E.FLAT CURB SECTION F.CONCRETE SIDEWALK G.MEET AND MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER H.TRASH LOCATION I.ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING J.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN K.TRANSFORMER L.STOP BAR M.TRAFFIC PATTERNS (TM) NON-STANDARD DECORATIVE CROSSWALK HERRINGBONE PATTERN WITH TP42 BORDER, COLOR WHITE. N.CURB TRANSITION KEY NOTES PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE SAW CUT LINE BOLLARD PARKING STALL COUNT## 1 KEY NOTE CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE SIGN AREA GROSS SITE AREA EXISTING BUILDING AREA PROPOSED BUILDING AREA (CHIPOTLE) TOTAL BUILDING AREA EXISTING BUILDING BREAKDOWN RETAIL RESTAURANT AREA TOTAL RESTAURANT SEATS (STARBUCKS = 36 SEATS) (BODIDDLEY'S = 20 SEATS) (BRUEGGER'S BAGELS = 30 SEATS) (MY BURGER = 20 SEATS) BASE AREA RATIO (BAR) PROPOSED BUILDING BREAKDOWN RESTAURANT AREA (CHIPOTLE) TOTAL RESTAURANT SEATS (CHIPOTLE) NEW OR FULLY RE-CONSTRUCTED IMPERVIOUS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (TOTAL SITE) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (TOTAL SITE) PAVED AREA (TOTAL SITE) ZONING EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING PARKING REQUIREMENTS PARKING REQUIRED (RETAIL 4.5/1,000 SF) PARKING REQUIRED (RESTARAUNT 1/2.5 SEATS) (42 EXISTING PLUS CHIPOTLE 29) TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED ADA STALLS EXISTING ADA STALLS FOR PROPOSED (CHIPOTLE) TOTAL ADA STALLS FOR DEVELOPED SITE TOTAL STALLS EXISTING TOTAL STALLS REMOVED (PROPOSED CHIPOTLE) TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED (PROPOSED CHIPOTLE) TOTAL STALLS FOR DEVELOPED SITE INTERNAL GREEN SPACE AREA WITHIN PARKING REQUIRED 3.50% AREA WITHIN PARKING PROVIDED 4.19% DISTURBED AREA EXISTING ISLANDS REMOVED AREA EXISTING ISLANDS IMPACTED EXISTING AREA PROPOSED AREA DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 396,017 SF 9.09 AC 83,800 SF 2,343 SF 86,143 SF 1.98 AC 78,668 SF 5,132 SF 106 SEATS 0.21 2,343 72 18,358 SF 0.42 AC 289,841 SF 6.65 AC 288,491 SF 6.62 AC 176,768 SF 4.05 AC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL PUD 353 71 424 21 STALLS 1 STALL 22 STALLS 389 STALLS (54 STALLS) 16 STALLS 351 STALLS (6,856 SF) (8,229 SF) 23,840 SF. 833 SF. 248 SF. 361 SF. HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING 1.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 2.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATER DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER IN” CURB. COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR. 4.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 5.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 7.LIGHT STANDARD LOCATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, SITE LIGHTING PLAN IS DESIGN BUILD BY CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM LIGHT STANDARD LOCATION WITH LIGHTING VENDOR. 8.REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DIMENSIONS. 9.ALL GRADIENT ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.00% (1:50). MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE SHALL BE IN 2.00% (1:50). CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR. 10."NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG ALL DRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED BY CITY. 11.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD PLANS AS REQUIRED BY PERMITTING AGENCIES. CIVIL 3D MODEL LIMITATIONS SAMBATEK'S DELIVERABLE AND GOVERNING DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE A HARD COPY AND/OR PDF PLAN SHEETS. IF A CIVIL 3D MODEL IS GENERATED IN THE PROCESS OF PREPARING THE PLAN SHEETS, IT IS AS A DESIGN TOOL ONLY AND NOT AS A SEPARATE DELIVERABLE. AT THE OWNER'S REQUEST, WE WILL RELEASE OUR CIVIL 3D MODEL FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S USE. HOWEVER, ITS USE IS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STAKING OF CURB, SIDEWALK, OR OTHER HARD SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS. IF A CIVIL 3D MODEL FOR STAKING HARD SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS IS REQUIRED, WE CAN PROVIDE A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR REFINEMENT AND PREPARATION OF THE CIVIL 3D MODEL. SITE DEVELOPMENT NOTES MTL-1 PT-2 BR-2 MTL-1 PT-1BR-1 BR-1 BR-2 MTL-1 PT-2MTL-1 PT-1 MTL-1 PT-2 BR-2 MTL-1PT-1BR-1 BR-2 MTL-1 PT-1 BR-1 BR-2 MTL-1 PT-2 DATE: SCALE: ST O R E N O . : ISSUE: PRELIM PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" ELEV 12/18/23 AN D E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y ED E N P R A I R I E , M N 5 5 3 4 4 50 0 5 "P R E S E R V E V I L L A G E " 1/4" = 1'-0"ELEV WEST ELEVATION4 1/4" = 1'-0"ELEV NORTH ELEVATION2 1/4" = 1'-0"ELEV EAST ELEVATION3 1/4" = 1'-0"ELEV SOUTH ELEVATION1 NORTH MATERIAL PERCENTAGES: BRICK: 554SF (61%) GLASS: 294SF (34%) EIFS/METAL COPING: 40SF (5%) SOUTH MATERIAL PERCENTAGES: BRICK: 802SF (94%) GLASS: 9SF (2%) EIFS/METAL COPING: 36SF (4%) EAST MATERIAL PERCENTAGES: BRICK: 1048SF (81%) GLASS: 123SF (14%) EIFS/METAL COPING: 77SF (5%) WEST MATERIAL PERCENTAGES: BRICK: 1046SF (69%) GLASS: 367SF (26%) EIFS/METAL COPING: 77SF (5%) EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FINISH MATERIAL COLOR REMARKS PT-1 PAINTED EIFS SIDING PPG #1101-4 "ROCK CLIFFS" TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH BELOW PT-2 PAINTED EIFS SIDING PPG #1001-6 "KNIGHT'S ARMOR"TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH ABOVE BR-1 4" FACE BRICK VENEER 'GOLDEN BLUFF' REFER TO SPEC FOR GROUT COLOR BR-2 4" FACE BRICK VENEER 'AUTUMN SANDS' REFER TO SPEC FOR GROUT COLOR MTL-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING PPG #1001-6 "KNIGHT'S ARMOR" 3' - 8" 3' - 0" SAR SKETCH FOR: *NOTE: DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE "PRESERVE VILLAGE" ANDERSON LAKES PKWY EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 STORE NO.: 5005 12/19/23 FLOOR PLAN 2,388 SF 35 INTERIOR SEATS 16 EXTERIOR SEATS 44" MOPUS ORDERING PATIO DINING UTENSIL DML PASSAGEMAIN ENTRY POS SERVING COOKING COOLER OFFICE KITCHEN 'CHIPOTLANE' PICKUP WINDOW (BY LANDLORD) 3'-6" HM SERVICE DOOR (BY LANDLORD) 9' - 0" x 12' - 0" RESTROOM ROOF ACCESS LADDER (BY LANDLORD) EGRESS ONLY DOOR (BY LANDLORD) WILKUS TO COORDINATE EXTENDING SIDEWALK TO DML LANE WITH CIVIL RESTROOM SEATING MIX: (08) HIGH TABLE -STOOLS (17) LOW TABLE -CHAIRS (03) BANQUETTE SEATS (07) LOW WINDOW -MARSHMALLOW STOOLS TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 6 9 HE N N E P I N T O W N R O A D BLOCK 1 LOT 1 ANDERSON L A K E S P A R K W A Y PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek22 . 0 S ( L M S T E C H ) | BI L L A U C L A I R | 7/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 3 1 0 : 1 4 : 0 0 A M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 2 . 0 1 - E X C N D . D W G :EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.01 # LEGEND BUILDING LINE FOUND MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED ELECTRIC METER LIGHT AIR CONDITIONER GUY ANCHOR HANDICAP STALL UTILITY POLE POST FLARED END SECTION TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER GAS METER OVERHEAD WIRE CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE WOOD FENCE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS BUILDING CANOPY BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE LANDSCAPE SURFACE SIGN EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) STORM SEWER DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE 1.SUBJECT PROPERTIES ADDRESS IS 9605 ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 24-116-22-44-0054. 2.THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 9.091 ACRES OR 396,017 SQUARE FEET. 3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, PER EDEN PRAIRIE ZONING MAP, DATED MARCH 1, 2017. 4.THE BUILDING(S) AND EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS OF THE OUTSIDE WALL AT GROUND LEVEL ARE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. IT MAY NOT BE THE FOUNDATION WALL. Lot 1, Block 1, GARRISON FOREST FIFTH ADDITION, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) 1.THE BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83 (1986 ADJUST). WITH AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 00 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST FOR THE EAST LINE OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 22. 2.FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 11/16/2017. 1.THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88. THE ORIGINATING BENCH MARK IS 2776P, REFERENCED FROM THE MNDOT GEODETIC DATABASE. BENCHMARK #1 Storm Structure Rim- approximately 160 feet SW of southerly access point along the easterly boundary. ELEV.= 872.48 BENCHMARK #2 Storm Structure Rim- approximately 52 feet NW of northerly access point along the easterly boundary. ELEV.= 869.32 DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY BENCHMARKS SURVEY NOTES TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 6 9 HE N N E P I N T O W N R O A D BLOCK 1 LOT 1 ANDERSON L A K E S P A R K W A Y PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek22 . 0 S ( L M S T E C H ) | BI L L A U C L A I R | 7/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 3 1 0 : 1 4 : 0 0 A M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 2 . 0 1 - E X C N D . D W G :EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.01 # LEGEND BUILDING LINE FOUND MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED ELECTRIC METER LIGHT AIR CONDITIONER GUY ANCHOR HANDICAP STALL UTILITY POLE POST FLARED END SECTION TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER GAS METER OVERHEAD WIRE CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE WOOD FENCE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS BUILDING CANOPY BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE LANDSCAPE SURFACE SIGN EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) STORM SEWER DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE 1.SUBJECT PROPERTIES ADDRESS IS 9605 ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 24-116-22-44-0054. 2.THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 9.091 ACRES OR 396,017 SQUARE FEET. 3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, PER EDEN PRAIRIE ZONING MAP, DATED MARCH 1, 2017. 4.THE BUILDING(S) AND EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS OF THE OUTSIDE WALL AT GROUND LEVEL ARE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. IT MAY NOT BE THE FOUNDATION WALL. Lot 1, Block 1, GARRISON FOREST FIFTH ADDITION, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) 1.THE BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83 (1986 ADJUST). WITH AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 00 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST FOR THE EAST LINE OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 22. 2.FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 11/16/2017. 1.THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88. THE ORIGINATING BENCH MARK IS 2776P, REFERENCED FROM THE MNDOT GEODETIC DATABASE. BENCHMARK #1 Storm Structure Rim- approximately 160 feet SW of southerly access point along the easterly boundary. ELEV.= 872.48 BENCHMARK #2 Storm Structure Rim- approximately 52 feet NW of northerly access point along the easterly boundary. ELEV.= 869.32 DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY BENCHMARKS SURVEY NOTES TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 6 9 HE N N E P I N T O W N R O A D BLOCK 1 LOT 1 ANDERSON L A K E S P A R K W A Y PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 7/ 2 4 / 2 0 2 3 1 2 : 3 3 : 3 7 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 2 . 0 1 - E X C N D . D W G :EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023111-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.01 # LEGEND BUILDING LINE FOUND MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED ELECTRIC METER LIGHT AIR CONDITIONER GUY ANCHOR HANDICAP STALL UTILITY POLE POST FLARED END SECTION TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER GAS METER OVERHEAD WIRE CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE WOOD FENCE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS BUILDING CANOPY BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE LANDSCAPE SURFACE SIGN EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) STORM SEWER DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE 1.SUBJECT PROPERTIES ADDRESS IS 9605 ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 24-116-22-44-0054. 2.THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 9.091 ACRES OR 396,017 SQUARE FEET. 3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, PER EDEN PRAIRIE ZONING MAP, DATED MARCH 1, 2017. 4.THE BUILDING(S) AND EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS OF THE OUTSIDE WALL AT GROUND LEVEL ARE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. IT MAY NOT BE THE FOUNDATION WALL. Lot 1, Block 1, GARRISON FOREST FIFTH ADDITION, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) 1.THE BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83 (1986 ADJUST). WITH AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 00 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST FOR THE EAST LINE OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 22. 2.FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 11/16/2017. 1.THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88. THE ORIGINATING BENCH MARK IS 2776P, REFERENCED FROM THE MNDOT GEODETIC DATABASE. BENCHMARK #1 Storm Structure Rim- approximately 160 feet SW of southerly access point along the easterly boundary. ELEV.= 872.48 BENCHMARK #2 Storm Structure Rim- approximately 52 feet NW of northerly access point along the easterly boundary. ELEV.= 869.32 DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY BENCHMARKS SURVEY NOTES TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 6 9 13 10 10 13 13 16 16 13 13 3 11 11 11 14 11 REMOVE/RE-LOCATE EXISTING LIGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN REMOVE "FOR LEASE" SIGN SAWCUT FOR WATERMAIN. REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT IN KIND PER CITY STANDARDS REMOVE AND REPLACE EXIST. CURB IN KIND PER CITY STANDARDS SAWCUT FOR BIT. TRAIL. REMOVAL AND REPLACE BIT. TRAIL IN KIND PER CITY STANDARDS SALVAGE AND REINSTALL EXISTING CASTING AT NEW CATCH BASIN LOCATION REMOVE 5-LF OF EXISTING 15' HDPE NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 4 : 1 7 : 2 7 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 2 . 0 2 - D E M O . D W G :DE M O L I T I O N P L A N JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 TPK BDB BDB BRADY D. BUSSELMAN 44579 1 11-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH DEMOLITION PLAN C2.02 # LEGENDDEMOLITION NOTES THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. BUILDING LINE GAS METER HYDRANT LIGHT UNDERGROUND CABLE TV BLOCK RETAINING WALL SPRINKLER HEADSH SPRINKLER VALVESV GUIDE RAIL HANDRAIL REMOVE UTILITY LINE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE GRAVEL DRIVE REMOVE LANDSCAPING REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE REMOVE LIGHT REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE SAW CUT LINE CONCRETE CURB TREE LINE BOLLARD SIGN CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER GAS METER OVERHEAD WIRE WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) STORM SEWER DRAINTILE CONCRETE TREES / SHRUBS 1.DEMOLITION NOTES ARE NOT COMPREHENSIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO OBTAIN A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF THE INTENDED SCOPE OF WORK. 2.THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED ON ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING CONDITIONS. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED UPON ALTA AND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING PREPARED BY SAMBATEK, LLC, DATED 11/16/2017. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITHOUT EXCEPTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE MADE, AT OWN EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 3.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSING IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC., SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 4.CLEARING AND GRUBBING: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. 5.CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UTILITY MAPPING ACCURACY. PRIOR TO START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION FOR ON-SITE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING MINNESOTA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. 6.THE MAPPING LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING, AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. UTILITIES DETERMINED TO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE REMOVED IF UNDER THE BUILDING INCLUDING 10' BEYOND FOUNDATIONS. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES' FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO UTILITY COMPANIES FOR SERVICES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 8.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 9.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC., TO THE BEST PRACTICES. 10.CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES. 11.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED AND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SAW-CUT & PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 13.CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING FEATURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 14.ABANDON OR REMOVE ALL SANITARY, WATER AND STORM SERVICES PER CITY STANDARDS. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH CITY. ALL STREET RESTORATION SHALL BE COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL STANDARDS. 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY A TRAFFIC AND/OR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PLAN PER CITY/COUNTY/STATE STANDARDS TO BE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 13 10 10 16 16 13 13 1 3 11 11 11 PROPOSED BUILDING 2,343 SF FFE=872.10 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 11 / 8 / 2 0 2 3 1 0 : 0 8 : 3 3 A M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 3 . 0 2 - S N O W . D W G :SI T E P L A N JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 TPK BDB BDB BRADY D. BUSSELMAN 44579 1 11-03-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH SNOW STORAGE PLAN # THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE SAW CUT LINE BOLLARD BOUNDARY LINE EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE SIGN SNOW REMOVAL AREA RECOMMENDED SNOW STORAGE AREA SNOW REMOVAL PROCEDURE -WHEN THE DEPTH OF SNOW IN THE PARKING LOT IS BETWEEN 2"- 4" PLOWING SHALL BEGIN. -THE PARKING SURFACE FOR VEHICLES WILL ONLY BE CLEARED AFTER ALL VEHICLES HAVE DEPARTED THE LOT. NOTES: -SNOW STORAGE MAY NOT COVER ANY PARKING SPACE. -SNOW STORAGE AREAS MAY BE CHANGED BASED ON OWNERS PREFERENCE -SNOW STORAGE MAY NOT BE PLACE IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: -ON TOP OF STORM DRAINS -ON LANDSCAPE ISLANDS -IN FRONT OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES -WITHIN SITE SIGHT LINES -UPGRADE FROM ANY SALT STORAGE FACILITIES SNOW REMOVAL PROPOSED BUILDING 2,343 SF FFE=872.10 10 10 16 16 13 13 3 11 11 11 873.01 872.89 872.50 872.41 871.05871.33 870.76 870.32 869.87869.73 GL 869.79 GL 869.89869.94 869.86 GL 869.86 GL 869.74TC/GL 869.71TC/GL 870.49 870.71 870.84870.92 871.06 870.89 870.73 MATCH EXISTING 867.59± 867.80 868.00868.12 871.29 871.22 871.36 871.22 870.87 870.67 GL 870.16 872.63 872.78 872.32 871.88872.10 871.06872.10 872.46 872.24 871.49 871.63 871.42 MATCH EXISTING 872.48± MATCH EXISTING 872.19± MATCH EXISTING 871.64± MATCH EXISTING 871.66± 871.15871.21 875 873 874 872 8 7 0 8 6 9 871 871 86 9 876 871.42 871.68TC871.37GL 871.38GL 871.71TC 871.37GL 871.74TC 871.37GL871.87TC 871.48 871.72 871.97 871.47871.47871.97 871.47 871.20 871.01 870.50 870.75 871.39 871.38871.60GL 872.00TC871.60GL872.10TC 871.92GL 871.92TC 871.83GL871.98TC 871.53GL871.96TC 871.47GL 871.94TC 871.75 871.16 871.13 871.07 869.69TC/GL 869.26 869.63 871.59 871.20 870.72 870.80 - 2 . 1 2 % - 2 . 1 4 % -3 . 2 1 % -2.17% 872.10 871.60 872.10GL872.10TC 871.60 GL 872.10 TC 870.86 TW870.86 BW 870.36 TW868.50 BW 870.26 TW869.16 BW 870.40 TW869.12 BW 868.00 869.81TC/GL 869.50 869.62 868.22 870.36 TC870.29 TC 870.36 TC 870.23 TC 873.51 877 879 878 MAX SLOPE 3:1 869.75869.82 870.79 870.69 870.73 GL 870.63 TC/GL 871.28 871.23 TC 871.17 TC 868.52 TW868.52 BW869.27 TW869.27 BW 869.52 869.94869.71 869.09 TW869.09 BW 869.87 869.73 GL 869.79 GL 869.89869.94 869.86 GL 869.86 GL 869.74TC/GL 869.71TC/GL 867.80 868.00 868.12 86 9 869.69TC/GL 869.26 869.63 870.36 TW 868.50 BW 870.26 TW869.16 BW 870.40 TW869.12 BW 869.81TC/GL 869.50 869.62 868.22 870.36 TC 870.29 TC 870.36 TC 870.23 TC 869.75 869.82 868.52 TW868.52 BW 869.27 TW 869.27 BW 869.52 869.94 869.71 869.09 TW869.09 BW NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 2 : 3 2 : 0 5 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 4 . 0 1 - G R A D . D W G :C- 4 . 0 1 G R A D I N G P L A N JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 TPK BDB BDB BRADY D. BUSSELMAN 44579 1 11-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SOIL BORING999.9 ST # DRAINTILE 902.50 902.50 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.50 OVERFLOW ELEV. CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE 902 CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER BUILDING LINE GRADING PLAN C4.01 # LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SEE INSET A, THIS PAGE INSET A 1"=5' TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 6 9 13 10 10 13 13 16 16 13 13 3 11 11 11 14 11 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 8 : 2 2 : 1 2 A M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 5 . 0 1 - E R O S . D W G :ER O S I O N C O N T R O L P H A S E O N E JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 TPK BDB BDB BRADY D. BUSSELMAN 44579 1 11-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 130 SILT DIKE LINEAR FEET 0 BIO-ROLL LINEAR FEET 145 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-1)UNIT 0 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-2)UNIT 5 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-3)UNIT 0 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. * REFER TO SHEET C5.03 & C5.04 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES BIO-ROLL SILT FENCE SILT DIKE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH CHECK DAM LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICEIP# TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINSB TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPP) TSM TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREATS TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINTILE 902 CONTOUR OVERFLOW ELEV.EOF 902.5 SOIL BORING999.9 ST # RIPRAP CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER EROSION CONTROL PHASE ONE C5.01 # PROPOSED BUILDING 2,343 SF FFE=872.10 TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 6 9 10 10 16 16 13 13 3 11 11 11 875 873 874 872 8 7 0 8 6 9 86 9 876 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP1 IP2 CONTRACTOR SHALL PLUG INLET INTO INFILTRATION SYSTEM IMMEDIATELY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM REACHING SYSTEM. PLUG SHALL ALLOW RUNOFF TO BYPASS SYSTEM DURING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. PLUG SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL DIRECTED BY CITY, WATERSHED OR CIVIL ENGINEER. IP1 IP2 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 8 : 2 2 : 1 2 A M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 5 . 0 1 - E R O S . D W G :ER O S I O N C O N T R O L P H A S E T W O JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 TPK BDB BDB BRADY D. BUSSELMAN 44579 1 11-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH EROSION CONTROL PHASE TWO C5.02 # THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. * REFER TO SHEET C5.03 & C5.04 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES (CUMULATIVE) BIO-ROLL SILT FENCE SILT DIKE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH CHECK DAM LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICEIP# TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINSB TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPP) TSM TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREATS TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINTILE 902 CONTOUR OVERFLOW ELEV.EOF 902.5 SOIL BORING999.9 ST # RIPRAP CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER ITEM UNIT QUANTITY (CUMULATIVE) SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 130 SILT DIKE LINEAR FEET 0 BIO-ROLL LINEAR FEET 145 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-1)UNIT 2 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-2)UNIT 5 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-3)UNIT 0 PROPOSED BUILDING 2,343 SF FFE=872.10 TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 6 9 10 10 16 16 13 13 3 11 11 11 35 LF. 6" PVC SAN. SEWER SDR 26 @ 2.00% REPLACE EXIST. CO WITH 48" SAN. MH IE=865.11 WET TAP EXIST. 8" WATERMAIN W/6" GATE VALVE (FIELD VERIFY EXISTING WATERMAIN) 22.5° BEND 6" PVC C-900 WM 6" PVC C - 9 0 0 W M HYD. 6" GV 6"x6" TEE SMH 1 RE=873.15 IE=864.41 REMOVE & REPLACE EX. 7 LF. 12" RCP @ 0.90% INSPECTION PORT INSPECTION PORT 8" SAND LAYER RIP-RAP FROM CURB CUTS TO INLET 4" DRAINTILE IE=861.8 0.5% MINIMUM DRAINTILE SLOPE (TYP) 4" DRAINTILE IE=861.8 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND FILTRATION BASIN HWL:868.16 TOP OF ROCK: 867.23 TOP OF CHAMBERS:866.73 BOTTOM OF CHAMBERS:864.23 BOTTOM OF FILTRATION MEDIA:861.40 BOTTOM OF INFILTRATION SAND:860.73 CONNECT TO EX. CBMH MODIFY TO SOLID CASTING RE=869.26 IE=861.34 (FIELD VERIFY) CBMH 100A INSTALL SALVAGED CURB INLET CASTING RE=867.80 IE=861.39 REPLACE 5 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.9% WITH 5 LF 18" HDPE @ 0.9% MAINTAIN 12' SEPARATION BETWEEN SAND LAYER & EXISTING STRUCTURES MAINTAIN 15' SEPARATION BETWEEN SAND LAYER & LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 17-LF 15" HDPE @ 0.8% 18-LF 24" HDPE @ 0% OCS 101 RE=869.63 IE=861.40 SEE DETAIL, SHEET C9.01 CBMH 102 RE=869.50 IE=864.41 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 2 3 1 : 2 6 : 4 4 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - C 6 . 0 1 - U T I L . D W G :UT I L I T Y P L A N JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 TPK BDB BDB BRADY D. BUSSELMAN 44579 1 11-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH UTILITY PLAN C6.01 # THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINEUNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DRAINTILE SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) STORM SEWER CONCRETE CURB WATERMAIN EASEMENT LINE SEE SHEET C4.02 TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 6 9 10 10 16 16 13 13 1 3 11 11 11 PROPOSED BUILDING 2,343 SF FFE=872.10 875 873 874 872 8 7 0 8 6 9 86 9 876 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 11 / 1 3 / 2 0 2 3 9 : 1 7 : 2 2 A M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - L 0 . 0 1 - T R E E . D W G :TR E E P R E S E R V A T I O N P L A N JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 MJL MJL JRW JOHN R WORKMAN 59119 1 11-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L0.01 # LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED EDEN PRAIRIE TREE PRES. CODE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP NOTE: NO TREES ON SITE QUALIFY AS SIGNIFICANT OR HERITAGE TREES. PER CITY COMMENTS, REMOVED TREES WILL BE REPLACED ON A 1:1 TREE BASIS TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENTIRE LOT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PLANS. Tree DBH Status Condition Maple 6 Preserve Good Maple 8 Remove Good Maple 8 Remove Good Basswood 8 Remove Good Ash 8 Preserve Good PROPOSED BUILDING 2,343 SF FFE=872.10 TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 6 9 10 10 16 16 13 13 1 3 11 11 11 875 873 874 872 8 7 0 8 6 9 86 9 876 CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR BY MATCHING EXISTING GROUND COVER 1 12" RIVER ROCK MULCH HA 5 AC 8 AMH 8 GS 8 AC 5 AB 1 KFG 6 1 HB TRIM LIMBS UP TO 6' FOR VISIBILITY. SNOW STORAGE 1 BL LH 3 1 AB ROCK MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING ISLANDS DW 41 HBGL 7 10 AMH 7 RSH 3 LH 6 GS 7 AMH 4 DW 14 HHR 11 TMT NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 12 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 2 2 : 4 5 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - L 1 . 0 1 - L S C P . D W G :LA N D S C A P E P L A N JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 MJL MJL JRW JOHN R WORKMAN 59119 1 11-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.01 # CALCULATIONS SECTION 11.03 G. 5. B. CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED IS DETERMINED BY BUILDING SF DIVIDED BY 320 ( 2,356SF /320=7.36 INCHES) *NOTE: 6 SHRUBS CAN REPLACE 3 CALIPER INCHES(SECTION 11.03 G.5.C) SECTION 11.03 G. 5. Q. SCREENING OF PARKING AND DRIVE THROUGH (MIN 3' IN HEIGHT AND 75% OPACITY) PARKING ARES (INCLUDING DRIVE AISLES): 15,113 SF PARKING LOT ISLAND LANDSCAPE (5% REQ.) TREE REPLACMENTS LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED EDEN PRAIRIE LANDSCAPE CODE PLANT SCHEDULE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE PROPOSED 9" (1 BL, 2 AB) 78 1,111 SF (7.3%) 3 TREES CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE D S LS RIPRAP REQUIRED 8" - 756 SF 3 TREES SNOW REMOVAL PROCEDURE -WHEN THE DEPTH OF SNOW IN THE PARKING LOT IS BETWEEN 2"- 4" PLOWING SHALL BEGIN. -THE PARKING SURFACE FOR VEHICLES WILL ONLY BE CLEARED AFTER ALL VEHICLES HAVE DEPARTED THE LOT. NOTES: -SNOW STORAGE MAY NOT COVER ANY PARKING SPACE. -SNOW STORAGE AREAS MAY BE CHANGED BASED ON OWNERS PREFERENCE -SNOW STORAGE MAY NOT BE PLACE IS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: -ON TOP OF STORM DRAINS -ON LANDSCAPE ISLANDS -IN FRONT OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES -WITHIN SITE SIGHT LINES -UPGRADE FROM ANY SALT STORAGE FACILITIES SNOW REMOVAL SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 3"Cal.2 HB Celtis occidentalis / Common Hackberry B & B 2.5"Cal 2 BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 3"Cal.1 CONIFERS WP Pinus strobus / White Pine B & B 6`1 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY SHRUBS AMH Aronia melanocarpa `UCONNAM166` / Low Scape Hedger® Black Chokeberry 5 gal 3`25 LH Hydrangea paniculata `Jane` / Little Lime Hydrangea 5 gal 3`6 GL Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low` / Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 gal 7 AC Ribes alpinum / Alpine Currant 5 gal 3`13 DW Salix purpurea `Nana` / Dwarf Arctic Willow 5 gal 8 GS Spiraea japonica `Goldflame` / Spirea 5 gal 3`14 TMT Taxus x media `Tauntonii` / Taunton`s Anglo-Japanese Yew 5 gal 11 HA Thuja occidentalis `Holmstrup` / Holmstrup Cedar 5 gal 5`5 GRASSES KFG Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass 1 gal 6 PERENNIALS HHR Hemerocallis x `Happy Returns` / Happy Returns Daylily 1 gal 14 RSH Hosta x `Regal Splendor` / Plantain Lily 1 gal 7 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT GROUND COVERS TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE SEE L1.02 FOR LOCATION 15 14 BLOCK 1 1 WP NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | AL E A S T U T Z | 12 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 2 2 : 4 5 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 \ C A D \ S H E E T S \ 5 1 6 8 4 - L 1 . 0 1 - L S C P . D W G :LA N D S C A P E N O T E S & D E T A I L S JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. PRESERVE VILLAGE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN51684 05/30/2023 MJL MJL JRW JOHN R WORKMAN 59119 1 11-08-23 TPK BDB BDB REVISED DOCUMENTS PER NEW LAYOUT PREL I M I N A R Y LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND NOTES L1.02 # GENERAL NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE WORK. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AND/OR REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 5.LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. 6.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. 8.THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST. QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 9.THE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES. 10.EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC. WITH 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. 11.LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. PLANTING NOTES: 1.NO PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 2.A GRANULAR PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANT BEDS AT THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED RATE PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION. 3.ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK," ANSI-Z60, LATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 4.OVERSTORY TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE PAVED SURFACES. 5.ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND BURLAPPED AS INDICATED IN THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 6.PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. 7.ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. 8.THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. 9.NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 10.ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE THE STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 11.ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. 12.MULCH: DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK MULCH ON DRAWINGS. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELIVERY ON-SITE FOR APPROVAL. DELIVER MULCH ON DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 3" FOR SHRUB BEDS, TREE RINGS, AND 3" FOR PERENNIAL/GROUND COVER BEDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED. 13.BUILDING MAINTENANCE STRIP: WHERE NO LANDSCAPE PLANTING BEDS EXIST ADJACENT TO A BUILDING FOUNDATION, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP PER PLAN. DECORATIVE ROCK SHALL BE 1 12" DRESSER TRAP ROCK, GREY IN COLOR. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 15.USE ANTI-DESICCANT (WILTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL) ON DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED ANYTIME. APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. ALL EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION DURING WARRANTY PERIOD. 16.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1 AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1. TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE WHITE TWO-WALLED PLASTIC SHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK FLARE TO THE FIRST BRANCH. 17.ALL DECIDUOUS, PINE, AND LARCH PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE RODENT PROTECTION PER MNDOT 2571.31.2 18.PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS: FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT (4% MIN.) OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL. MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HARDPACK SUBSOIL, STONES, CHEMICALS, NOXIOUS WEEDS, ETC. SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND 10-0-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. IN PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED IN A 6" LAYER AND ROTO-TILLING IT INTO THE TOP 12" OF SOIL AT A 1:1 RATIO.ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED IN AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. 19.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THAT EACH EXCAVATED TREE AND SHRUB PIT WILL PERCOLATE PRIOR TO INSTALLING PLANTING MEDIUM AND PLANTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL THE BOTTOM OF SELECTED HOLES WITH SIX INCHES OF WATER AND CONFIRM THAT THIS WATER WILL PERCOLATE WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. IF THE SOIL AT A GIVEN AREA DOES NOT DRAIN PROPERLY, A PVC DRAIN OR GRAVEL SUMP SHALL BE INSTALLED OR THE PLANTING SHALL BE RELOCATED IF DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 20.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO COMPLETE GROWING SEASONS (APRIL 1 - NOVEMBER 1), UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS. 21.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. 22.SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING AND SEEDING: NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO PLANT IN OFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK. 22.1.POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/1 22.2.DECIDUOUS /B&B: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/1 22.3.EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21-11/1 22.4.EVERGREEN B&B: 4/1 - 5/1; 9/21 - 11/1 22.5.TURF/LAWN SEEDING: 4/1 - 6/1; 7/20 - 9/20 22.6.NATIVE MIX SEEDING: 4/15 - 7/20; 9/20-10/20 23.MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE-SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 24.ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECIFICATIONS. 25.WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. TURF NOTES: TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE MN/DOT 2105 AND 2575 EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW: 1.ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD SHALL ALSO RECEIVE 6" OF TOPSOIL PRIOR TO INSTALLING SOD. TOPSOIL SHALL BE FREE OF TREE ROOTS, STUMPS, BUILDING MATERIAL, AND TRASH, AND SHALL BE FREE OF STONES LARGER THAN 1 12" INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION. 2.WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. 3.SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. 4.TURF ON ALL OTHER AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED BY SEEDING, MULCHING AND FERTILIZING. SEED MIXTURE NO.25-121 WILL BE PLACED AT THE RATE OF 65 POUNDS PER ACRE. 5.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TURF SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 6" TOP SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. FOR SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 6.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE NATIVE SEED, ARE TO RECEIVE PLANTING SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. FOR SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. GENERAL TREE SPECIFICATIONS: 1.ALL STREET AND PARKING LOT TREES SHALL BE LIMBED UP TO THE FOLLOWING HEIGHTS: 1.1.2" CAL. TREES: LOWEST BRANCH 6' HT. 1.2.3" CAL.+ TREES: LOWEST BRANCH 7' HT. 2.TREE CANOPY WIDTH SHALL BE RELATIVE TO HEIGHT/CALIPER OF TREE AND TYPE OF TREE. 2.1.1" CALIPER/6-8' HT: 3-4' WIDTH MIN. 2.2.2" CALIPER/12-14' HT: 4-5' WIDTH MIN. 2.3.3" CALIPER/14-16' HT: 6-7' WIDTH MIN. 3.CANOPY TREES SHALL NOT HAVE CO-DOMINATE LEADERS IN LOWER HALF OF TREE CROWN. 4.ALL TREES SHALL HAVE SYMMETRICAL OR BALANCED BRANCHING ON ALL SIDES OF THE TREE. 5.TREES SHALL NOT BE TIPPED PRUNED. 6.TREES SHALL BE FREE OF PHYSICAL DAMAGE FROM SHIPPING AND HANDLING. DAMAGED TREES SHALL BE REJECTED. 7.SUMMER DUG TREES SHALL HAVE ROOTBALL SIZE INCREASED BY 20% 8.TREES WHICH EXCEED RECOMMENDED CALIPER TO HEIGHT RELATIONSHIP SHALL BE REJECTED. IRRIGATION NOTES: 1.IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL OF SYSTEM LAYOUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2.ALL SOD TO RECEIVE SPRAY OR ROTOR IRRIGATION HEADS WITH MINIMUM DESIGN OF 1" IRRIGATION PER WEEK. 3.ALL PLANT BEDS TO RECEIVE DRIP LINE IRRIGATION , WITH A MINIMUM DESIGN OF .25" IRRIGATION PER WEEK. NOTES PROVIDE & INSTALL RODENT PROTECTION 1/2" HARDWIRE CLOTH, MESH CYLINDER, 8" DIA OR GREATER X 24" HT.. STAKE IN PLACE INSTALL TREE WITH ROOT FLARE VISIBLE AT TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. REMOVE SOIL IN LEVEL MANNER FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL TO EXPOSE 1ST 1/2" OR LARGER MAIN ORDER ROOT IF NEEDED. SET ROOT BALL WITH MAIN ORDER ROOT 1" ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. INSTALL 3" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. PLACE NO MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK REMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL BUILD 4" HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL EDGE CONDITION VARIES PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PREPARED SOIL PLANTING SOIL, REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS, COMPACT TO 85% OF MAX. DRY UNIT WEIGHT ACCORDING TO ASTM D 698 TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT DIG PLANTING PIT 4" TO 6" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 30" RADIUS MULCH RING A1.5 X A MIN. 1 1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL 1/4" = 1'-0" L1.02 P-01 1 INSTALL 3" LAYER OF MULCH, DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACT W/ SHRUB STEM APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE EDGE CONDITION VARIES EDGER, REFER TO PLAN AND SPECIFICATION LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS EXCAVATE PLANT BED MIN. 4" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL HT. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING BED WITH SPADE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE PREPARE SOIL FOR THE ENTIRE BED SEE PLAN12" MIN SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 3/8" = 1'-0" 18 " MI N PLANTING SOIL. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS L1.02 P-02 2 INSTALL 3" LAYER OF MULCH. DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACT WITH PLANT EDGE CONDITION VARIES EDGER, REFER TO PLAN AND SPECIFICATION LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS PLANTING SOIL, REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PLANTING BED WITH SPADE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE PREPARE SOIL FOR THE ENTIRE BED 18 " MI N . 6" REFER TO PLAN NOTE: REFER TO EXTERIOR PLANTING SPECIFICATION PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL 1/2" = 1'-0" L1.02 P-03 3 MULCH/DECORATIVE ROCK PER PLAN AND LANDSCAPE NOTES 316" THICK STEEL EDGER (BLACK) W/ STAKE FINISHED GRADE AND EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN STEEL EDGER 1 1/2" = 1'-0" L1.02 P-06 4 ADDITIONAL REPLACEMENT TREE PLANTING FOR TREE REMOVALS MITIGATION Crown drip line or other limit of Tree Protection area. See tree preservation plan for fence alignment. 4' - 0 " Maintain existing grade with the tree protection fence unless otherwise indicated on the plans. 2" x 6' steel posts or approved equal. 5" thick layer of mulch. Notes: 1- See specifications for additional tree protection requirements. 2- If there is no existing irrigation, see specifications for watering requirements. 3- No pruning shall be performed except by approved arborist. 4- No equipment shall operate inside the protective fencing including during fence installation and removal. 5- See site preparation plan for any modifications with the Tree Protection area. SECTION VIEW KEEP OUT TREE PROTECTION AREA 8.5" x 11" sign laminated in plastic spaced every 50' along the fence. Tree Protection fence: High density polyethylene fencing with 3.5" x 1.5" openings; Color- orange. Steel posts installed at 8' o.c. TREE PRESERVATION DETAIL 1/4" = 1'-0" L1.02 P-04 5 Tenant Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Jerry's Hardware 8 to 8 8 to 6 10 to 5 8 to 8 8 to 8 8 to 8 8 to 8 Preserve Parkway Dental Closed Closed Closed 7:30 to 4 7:30 to 4 7:30 to 4 7:30 to 4 Chiropractic 9 tp 12:30 Closed Closed 9 to 12:30; 3 to 5:30 Closed 9 to 12:30; 3 to 5:30 Closed Barbers 9 to 5 8 to 1 Closed Closed 9 to 5 9 to 5 9 to 5 Eden Tailors 10 to 6 10 to 5 Closed Closed 9 to 5 9 to 5 9 to 5 Givan's Salon and Spa 9 to 5 9 to 4 Closed 9 to 9 9 to 9 9 to 9 9 to 9 Jerry's Foods 6 to 11 pm 6 to 11 pm 6 to 11 pm 6 to 11 pm 6 to 11 pm 6 to 11 pm 6 to 11 pm eXtreme Bodyshaping 5 to 1 6 to 10:30 Closed 5-1; 4-8 5-1; 4-8 5-1; 4-8 5-1; 4-8 Bo Diddley 10 to 8 10 to 8 10 to 8 10 to 8 10 to 8 10 to 8 10 to 8 Memories of Home 10 to 5 10 to 5 Closed 10 to 6 10 to 6 10 to 6 10 to 5 Daisy Nails 10 to 7 9 to 5 10 to 4 10 to 7 10 to 7 10 to 7 10 to 7 Tobacco 9 to 10pm 9 to 10pm 9 to 10pm 9 to 10pm 9 to 10pm 9 to 10pm 9 to 10pm Brugger's 6 to 2 6 to 2 6 to 2 6 to 2 6 to 2 6 to 2 6 to 2 Starbucks 5:30 to 7pm 6 to 7pm Closed 5:30 to 7pm 5:30 to 7pm 5:30 to 7pm 5:30 to 7pm Tide Cleaners 7 to 7 9 to 4 11 to 4 7 to 7 7 to 7 7 to 7 7 to 7 My Burger 11 to 9 11 to 9 11 to 9 11 to 9 11 to 9 11 to 9 11 to 9 Chipotle typically 11 to 10 11 to 10 11 to 10 11 to 10 11 to 10 11 to 10 11 to 10