HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 04/08/2024AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, April 8, 2024
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS:
John Kirk, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, , Robert Taylor, Daniel Grote, Frank Sherwood, Charles Weber, Phou Sivilay, Trisha Duncan STAFF MEMBERS: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner; Carter Schulze, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Planning Commission Meeting minutes dated March 25, 2024.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Enclave at Manor Rd (2023-14) Request for:
• PUD Concept Review on 6.43 acres
• PUD District Review with waivers on 6.43 acres
• Zoning Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 6.43 acres
• Preliminary Plat to divide one parcel into 17 lots and 1 outlot on 6.43 acres B. Lotus Villas on Anderson Lakes (2024-02) Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Office to Low Density Residential on 5.0 acres
• PUD Concept Plan Review on 5.0 acres
• PUD District Review with waivers on 5.0 acres
• Zoning District Change from Office to R1-9.5 on 5.0 acres
• Preliminary Plat review on 5.0 acres C. Asia Mall Parking Lot Expansion (2024-01) Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.69 acres
• Planned Unit District Amendment with waivers on 4.69 acres
• Site Plan Review on 4.69 acres.
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, MARCH 25, 2024 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER Council Chambers
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Frank Sherwood, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Carole Mette, Robert Taylor, Dan Grote, Charles Weber; Phou Sivilay
CITY STAFF: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner; Carter Schulze, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; Kristin Harley, Recording Secretary
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Commission member Taylor was absent.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Grote moved, seconded by Weber to approve the agenda. MOTION
CARRIED 8-0.
IV. MINUTES
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Sivilay to approve the minutes of February 12,
2023. MOTION CARRIED 8-0
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. EDEN PRAIRIE PUBLIC SCHOOLS - UNFI Request for
• Approval for Guide Plan Changes to Public/Semi-Public and Parks and Open Space on 60.91 acres
• Approval for Zoning Change to Public and Parks and Open Space on 60.91 acres Sherwood recused himself.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 25, 2024
Page 2
Kyle Fisher, Safety Director at Eden Prairie Schools, displayed a PowerPoint and
detailed the application. The application requested a change to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District of approximately 60.91 acres to facilitate the use of the existing office building for educations programming by the Eden Prairie School District. He played a video of the proposed TASSEL program which served
students 18-22 years old. At the end of the summer the program’s lease would not
be renewed in its existing building and the applicant proposed to move this program to the office building in question. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District was involved and had a positive response to the proposal.
Dirk Tedmon, executive director of marketing and communication for Eden
Prairie School District, explained the “Designing Pathways” process and explained the need for a large property to respond to perhaps 200 students’ needs, which included the issues of increasing enrollment and the need to outsource some teaching opportunities. He explained the community outreach done toward
this end.
Kyle Fisher explained the development involved 165,000 square feet on Bryant Lake and stated this was a great opportunity to work with the Watershed District to provide nontraditional learning. The school buildings were almost at capacity
This would have a centralized warehouse area in the lowest level.
Farr asked for and received confirmation the purchase agreement was contingent on District approval. Other uses included environmental learning outdoor spaces, a play area, et cetera, and program were not set in stone but could evolve. There
would also be programs for the community and special events with enough
parking for all. Fisher stated this was like any other program at Eden Prairie Schools. Farr noted enrollment was not dropping in Eden Prairie. He asked if the westernmost driveway off Valley View required a used access agreement. Fisher replied his understanding there was conversation on the use of this as a second
drive. Unfortunately, the design engineer was not able to attend tonight’s meeting.
Farr anticipated questions from the public regarding taxes. Students did not pay tuition so he asked how it was funded. Tedmon replied there was a lease levy purchase for less than a dollar a month, with no major tax impact. A bond referendum was possible in the future. Shawn Hoffman-Graham, community
education, detailed the funding. She was the first connection to events, many of which were fee-based, and the schools would be able to find expanded learning for students, filling the voids and gaps for Eden Prairie citizens. Grote asked if there were any plans to use Bryant Lake. Fisher stated there was no
official plans and did not know in what capacity it would be used. Barnhart presented the staff report. This was a map change in the Comprehensive Plan and land use guidance. This was a unique request; typically, some
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 25, 2024
Page 3
construction is anticipated. Any changes to the exterior or to the landscape would
be subject to city review. There were certain stipulations and conditions on the
use of the lake (docks, moorings, et cetera). There were no lakeside or lake improvements proposed at this time, and any change to that would also have to go through a review process. The proposed use was also in keeping with environmental conditions with no negative impacts. Staff supported the change to
the Comprehensive Plan.
Sivilay asked for Phase I environmental assessment results. Fisher replied one was completed and the only potential concern was an underground 10,000 gallon storage tank. Subsequent tests were not yet back, but at this time no leakage was
indicated.
Farr asked if the traffic would increase as the program evolved and grew. Schultze replied the study’s goal was to document the existing condition, and compare it to the demand, and did not see an increase of traffic even if the program were to
triple. Any major increase would also go through the public review process.
MOTION: Grote moved, seconded by Kirk to close the public hearing. Motion carried 8-0.
Mette spoke in support of the project, not finding traffic a concern. She noted this
would take a tax-generating property off the tax rolls, and she suggested the school district to explore selling off the excess land in order to help put money back on the payroll and raise funds for major renovations.
Kirk seconded Mette’s support and stated he saw no real downsides. The public
processes in the future would allow appropriate input. Sivilay stated his only concern was the recommended mediation in Phase II.
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Weber to recommend approval for Guide
Plan Changes to Public/Semi-Public and Parks and Open Space on 60.91 acres and for Zoning Change to Public and Parks and Open Space on 60.91 acres as represented in the March 25, 2024 staff report. Motion carried 6-0 with Sherwood and Grote abstaining.
B. CODE AMENDMENT – OFFICE USE IN INDUSTRIAL FLEX TECH Request for
• Approval for Guide Plan Changes to Public/Semi-Public and Parks and Open Space on 60.91 acres
• Approval for Zoning Change to Public and Parks and Open Space on 60.91 acres
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 25, 2024
Page 4
Barnhart presented the staff report. This was to incorporate the goals of Aspire
2040 applied to the industrial area known as the Industrial Flex Tech area,
specifically the I-2 and I-5 Zoning Districts. The change would remove the 50 percent cap for office uses in those districts. Over the years there have been a handful of waivers for extensions and this would remove an unnecessary regulation that did not gibe with the Plan’s goals. It would add more employment
and aid to the business community without negative impacts. The commission
might see more parking waivers because office parking was greater than warehousing or manufacturing. . This did not change the I-Gen use distribution where there was still the 50 percent cap; heavier industrial uses being more appropriate in these areas. Staff recommended the change as proposed in the staff
report.
MOTION: Mette moved, seconded by Kirk to close the public hearing. Motion carried 8-0.
Farr stated he could vouch for the demand for this change. Kirk also voiced his
support. Mette agreed; to her it reiterated why the Flex Industrial Zone was created in the first place. MOTION: Farr moved, seconded by Sherwood to recommend approval for the
text amendment to Chapter 11.30 as drafted in the March 25, 2024 staff report. Motion carried 8-0. PLANNERS’ REPORT
MEMBERS’ REPORTS
Pieper announced this was Mette’s last meeting. Mette thanked the commission members and bid them farewell.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Mette moved, seconded by Kirk to adjourn. Motion carried 8-0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:42 p.m.
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Ben Schneider, Planner I
DATE: April 8, 2024
SUBJECT: Enclave at Manor Road
LOCATION: 6591 168th Avenue West
REQUEST: • PUD Concept Plan Review on 6.43 acres
• PUD District Review with waivers on 6.43 acres
• Zoning Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 6.43 acres
• Preliminary Plat to divide one parcel into 17 lots and 1 outlot on 6.43
acres
BACKGROUND
The applicant is
requesting approval to
subdivide the property
into 17 single family
lots at 6591 168th
Avenue West. The
property is located
about a quarter mile
north of Duck Lake, on
the east side of 168th
Avenue West.
The project site
includes one parcel
with a house, barn
structure, and silo (all
vacant). The property
is surrounded by
single-family homes.
The topography is
mostly flat, although the grades begin to slope downward on the northern edge of the site. There are
several trees dispersed throughout the area.
Staff Report – Enclave at Manor Road
April 8, 2024
Page 2
2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING
The subject property is identified as an infill site in the Comprehensive Plan and is guided for
low density residential, which allows up to five (5) units per acre. The proposed development is
2.64 units per acre.
The property is currently zoned Rural. The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to R1-
9.5, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and neighboring homes along South
Manor Road to the east. There are also lots zoned R1-13.5 to the north and south and homes
zoned R1-22 to the west.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
The preliminary plat divides the existing parcel into 17 lots and one (1) outlot for a stormwater
basin. The plat is bisected by right of way for the proposed connection of South Manor Road to 168th
Avenue West. The northern half includes eight (8) lots that are 65 feet wide and Outlot A. These
eight (8) lots would require a waiver from the standard lot width of 70 feet. The southern half
features nine (9) lots ranging from 72 feet to 85 feet in width, meeting the lot width standard.
Staff Report – Enclave at Manor Road
April 8, 2024
Page 3
3
The plat includes a 20-foot drainage and utility easement that runs through lots 1-7 to the north and
an extra five (5) feet of side yard easements for six (6) of the southern lots. The goal of this
configuration of easements and associated stormwater piping is to maximize tree preservation and
tree replacement opportunities.
PLAN ITERATIONS
The initial plans that were submitted to the City showed 20 lots instead of 17 lots, with 10 lots on
each side of South Manor Road. Outlot A and the associated stormwater basin was proposed to abut
the rear yards of six (6) lots, which would have required lot size waivers. Earlier plans also showed a
stormwater sewer line that encompassed most of the southern and western edges of the site. This
resulted in more tree removals and less opportunities for tree replacement. Finally, the stormwater
BMP posed maintenance and aesthetic concerns by staff. The resulting proposal minimizes waivers
and addresses landscaping and tree preservation goals of the city.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS
The purpose of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) as stated in the City Code is to provide for a
more creative and efficient approach to the use of land within the City; to allow variety in the
types of environment available to people and distribution of overall density of population and
intensity of land use where desirable and feasible; and provide for greater creativity and
flexibility in environmental design. The applicant is requesting the following waivers from City
Code:
1. Front Yard Setback along South Manor Road. The request is to have a front yard
setback of 25 feet along South Manor Road. City Code requires 30 feet. This waiver,
applied to all lots, is supported by staff because the reduced setback will help preserve
trees in the rear yards, along the periphery of the site. This will also provide more space
for future rear yard improvements, including decks, sheds, and pools.
2. Front Yard Setback along 168th Avenue West. The applicant is requesting a 20-foot front
yard setback along 168th Avenue West. City Code requires a 30-foot setback on both
sides of a corner lot that face a street. This will only impact Lot 1, Block 2 on the
southwest corner of the plat. This setback is being requested in exchange for the wider
easements that are needed on some of the lots on Block 2. As mentioned previously, this
configuration of easements promotes the most tree preservation and tree replacement
opportunities on the site. The planting plan also includes six (6) coniferous trees to screen
this future home from 168th Avenue West. Staff supports this waiver request.
3. Minimum Lot Width. The applicant is requesting a minimum lot width of 65 feet for lots
1-8 on Block 1. City Code requires a minimum lot width of 70 feet in the R1-9.5 District.
The following are rationale for supporting this waiver:
a. The developer is protecting over 40 significant trees, including one of the two
heritage trees, along the periphery of the site. This will help provide some
immediate screening with mature trees.
b. There are several lots in the adjacent neighborhood to the east with lot widths
Staff Report – Enclave at Manor Road
April 8, 2024
Page 4
4
under 70 feet. The closest nine (9) homes on the south side of the road range from
about 65 feet to 69 feet width. Further down South Manor Road (closer to Duck
Lake Trail) are lots that are closer to 55 feet wide. Overall, this waiver request
does not alter neighborhood character.
c. The lots requesting the width waiver exceed the minimum lot size and lot depth
for the district.
d. The waiver request is for the lots on the same side of the road as Outlot A. The
initial application submittal showed three extra lots in the location of this outlot.
The developer has worked with staff to reduce the number of lots and reconfigure
the plat to better fit the overall neighborhood.
TRAFFIC AND ACCESS
Staff has requested that the developer include the road connection between South Manor Road
and 168th Avenue South. Staff supports this connection for the following reasons:
1. Initial Plans. This connection was anticipated at the time the adjacent neighborhood to
the east was approved in 1983. The staff report stated the following: “The access road off
Duck Lake Trail, as it turns to the west through Phase II, should be extended to the west
property. This will eventually provide a connection the adjoining neighborhood.” The
“access road” refers to South Manor Road and “Phase II” refers to the current
neighborhood adjacent to the east.
2. Comprehensive Plan. This road connection is included as one of the “Anticipated
Roadway Connections” in Aspire 2040.
3. Traffic Study. A full traffic study memo was produced for this project. The analysis is
based off the initial 20 lot proposal, three more than what is now proposed. The memo
concludes that the traffic levels would be acceptable with this new development and the
associated road connection at W 168th/ S Manor Rd, W 168th/ Duck Lake Trail, and S
Manor Rd/ Duck Lake Trail. It is estimated that 20 new homes would generate an
additional 15 trips during the AM peak hour and 19 trips in the PM peak hour.
4. Connectivity. As noted in City Code, cul de sacs should be avoided whenever reasonably
possible. A connection here promotes community, safety, and provides for more efficient
street maintenance, including snow removal.
SIDEWALKS
There are existing sidewalks along 168th Avenue West and on the north side of South Manor Road.
The developer is proposing to continue the South Manor Road sidewalk and connect it to 168th
Avenue West.
TREE LOSS AND REPLACEMENT
The site has 2,723 caliper inches of significant trees, including two heritage trees. A total of 2,068
caliper inches, or about 75 percent, are proposed to be removed. This includes one of the two
heritage trees. The trees that are being preserved are mostly along the periphery of the site, which
Staff Report – Enclave at Manor Road
April 8, 2024
Page 5
5
will assist with screening the development from surrounding neighborhoods.
Based on the removal plans, the developer owes 830 caliper inches of replacement trees. The
planting plan shows 599 inches being added, meaning cash in lieu payment will be needed for the
remaining 231 inches owed, meeting City Code requirements. Trees are planted along the edges of
the site, around the stormwater basin, and in the front and rear yards of each lot.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Based on the slope of the land, all stormwater is proposed to flow to a stormwater filtration basin in
the northwest corner of the development. This basin provides rate control for stormwater discharges
from the site and removes pollutants. The basin would be in an outlot and maintained by the City.
The basin would discharge to an existing trunk storm sewer north of the site, a portion of which is
proposed to be upsized. This portion is within a drainage and utility easement along the western
edges of 6537 168th Ave West and 16460 North Manor Road. The developer has been in
communication with these property owners, as the work would result in a temporary disturbance of
their yards and driveway.
The planting plan shows several new trees that would surround the basin area to provide screening as
well as an access for City maintenance of the basin.
HOUSING PRODUCT
The submittal includes
examples of homes that Brandl
Anderson plans to build in this
development. Their products
feature a variety of rooflines
and all include three-car
garages. In contrast to other
recent infill single-family
projects in the City, the garages
of these homes tend to be more
flush with the rest of the front
home façade. The applicant
estimates that the starting price
point for these homes would be around $700,000.
There is no HOA planned for this development.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
The developer held a neighborhood meeting during the evening of Wednesday, March 27. About 30
people were in attendance. Staff has also received some email comments, which have been included
“The Edgestone”
Staff Report – Enclave at Manor Road
April 8, 2024
Page 6
6
in this packet. Here is a summary of the comments that were shared by the neighbors regarding the
proposed development:
• Road connection. Some residents expressed opposition to the road connection between the
proposed development and South Manor Road to the east due to traffic concerns. Staff
supports this road connection for the reasons cited above in the “Traffic and Access” section.
• Stormwater Ponding. The residents have some aesthetic concerns with the proposed location
of the stormwater basin and request that the ponding be adequately screened. Current plans
do show new trees surrounding the basin. Although, some openings would be necessary to
provide proper maintenance access.
• Sidwalk Maintenance. The neighborhood shared that the portion of the existing sidewalk
that abuts the subject property on 168th Avenue West has not been plowed, at least this past
winter. In general, adjacent property owners are responsible for sidewalk snow removal. If
the site were to be developed as proposed, the responsibility of snow removal of this
sidewalk would be shared by the City (northern half that abuts Outlot A) and the future
owner of Lot 1, Block 2 (southern half).
• Construction Traffic. Residents had general concerns about construction traffic concerning
this development and at High Trail Estates Park, which is west of the project site. The City is
planning to replace the play equipment at the park, but this work is not anticipated to
interfere with other construction traffic.
SUSTAINABILITY STANDARD
Since this is project is a Planned Unit Development, it triggers the City’s new sustainable building
standard that has been in effect since January 1, 2024. For this project, all homes will be required to
install at least one EV-Ready parking space (garage charger) and build a roof that meets Solar-Ready
guidelines.
Brandl Anderson also states in their narrative that each home will have energy star rating appliances,
low VOC materials, and tankless water heaters.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of the following requests:
• PUD Concept Plan Review on 6.43 acres
• PUD District Review with waivers on 6.43 acres
• Zoning Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 6.43 acres
• Preliminary Plat to divide one parcel into 17 lots and 1 outlot on 6.43 acres
This is based on plans submitted on April 4, 2024, staff report dated April 8, 2024, and the following
conditions:
Staff Report – Enclave at Manor Road
April 8, 2024
Page 7
7
1. Prior to release of the Final Plat, the applicant shall
A. Sign special assessment agreement for City trunk sewer and water assessment fees
and connection fees.
B. Pay the proportioned cost of future roadway improvements along 168th Ave.
C. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the
City Engineer and Watershed District.
D. Tender a warranty deed for Outlot A for review and written approval by the City
Engineer. After approval of the warranty deed and filing of the final plat, file the
warranty deed with Hennepin County.
E. Submit a bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit (“security”) that guarantees
completion of all public improvements equivalent to 125% of the cost of the
improvements.
2. Prior to land alteration permit issuance, the applicant shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, wetland, utility, street and erosion control plans
for review and approval by the City Engineer.
B. Pay the fee in lieu for tree replacement.
C. Submit a landscaping letter of credit or escrow surety equivalent to 150% of the cost
of the tree replacement.
D. Obtain and provide documentation of Watershed District approval.
E. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading.
F. Install erosion control at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by
the City.
G. Submit a land alteration bond, letter of credit, or escrow surety equivalent to 125% of
the cost of the land alteration.
3. Prior to building permit issuance for the lots, the applicant shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Provide recorded copy of the warranty deed for Outlot A to the City following
recording of the final plat.
C. Submit construction plans and project specifications for public infrastructure for
review and approval by the City Engineer.
Enclave at Manor Road
SUBMITTAL FOR:
PUD, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat
Eden Prairie, MN
Revised April 3, 2024
Introduc)on
Brandl Anderson Homes (“Brandl Anderson”) is pleased to be submi ng this applica on. Brandl
Anderson’s mission is to build “Dream Homes for Real Budgets”. Brandl Anderson has been building
award-winning homes since 1993. Locally owned, Brandl Anderson has an office in Burnsville and will
build approximately 100 homes in the Twin Ci es area in 2024.
Team
Brandl Anderson will act as the developer (Enclave at Manor Road, LLC) of the property and builder of
the homes. The primary contact for Brandl Anderson is:
Ma3 Olson, Senior Vice President
221 River Ridge Circle South, Suite 100
Burnsville, MN 55337
The engineer, surveyor, and landscape architect are:
John Bender, James R. Hill, Inc.
2999 West County Road 42, Suite 100
Burnsville, MN 55306
Paul Haugo, Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC
13570 Grove Drive, Suite 278
Maple Grove, MN 55311
Ben Hartberg, Calyx Design Group
475 Cleveland Avenue North, Suite 101A
St. Paul, MN 55104
Property Informa)on
Address
6591 West 168th Avenue
Property Iden)fica)on Number
05-116-22-13-0003
Legal Descrip)on
The South 420.0 feet of the West 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Sec on 5,
Township 116, Range 22 except the West 30.0 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Key Facts
• Exis ng zoning is Rural
• Future guidance is Low Density Residen al
• Proposed zoning is R1-9.5 (PUD)
• Gross area is 6.43 acres
• Proposed number of homes is 17 single family homes
• Gross density is 2.64 units/acre
Project Overview
Brandl Anderson is proposing a single-family home development consis ng of 17 homes and one outlot
on the 6.43-acre site. The proposed development consists of seventeen 50’ x 55’ building pads and the
project will not have a homeowner’s associa on.
The project site is currently guided Low Density Residen al, which allows for a density of up to 5 units
per acre and zoned Rural. The proposed overall site density is 2.64 units per acre which falls within the
guided density.
Along with this applica on we are reques ng a zoning change from Rural to R1-9.5. The following PUD
variances are requested vs standard R1-9.5 zoning.
ITEM R1-9.5 PUD
Minimum Lot Size 9,500 Square Feet 9,500 Square Feet
Minimum Lot Width 70 Feet 65 Feet
Minimum Corner Lot Width 85 Feet 85 Feet
Minimum Lot Depth 100 Feet 100 Feet
Minimum One Side Setback 5 Feet 5 Feet
Minimum Both Sides Setback 15 Feet 15 Feet
Front Yard Setback 30 Feet 25 Feet
Rear Yard Setback 20 Feet 20 Feet
Maximum Building Height 40 Feet 40 Feet
PUD Waivers
Our proposal is a PUD with requested waivers from the straight zoning code language of R1 9.5. The
reason behind proposing a PUD is that the site is an infill site surrounded by exis ng homes to the North,
East and south and road to the west. The development is primarily covered with trees. It’s our goal to
preserve as many as we can but also repopulate the site with younger more sturdy trees. The current
inventory of trees has several trees infested with Emerald Bore Ash that will only spread to other trees.
We intend to take these out and replace them with more sturdy trees. In addi on, there are several
trees that are either ro ng out or past their life and will eventually become a hazard to development
and the surrounding environment. We also intend to take these out and replace them with more high-
quality trees that will have a longer life span. Given the above we are seeking a few lot waivers to
accommodate our landscape plan and the long-term health of the community. They are listed below:
1. Front yard setback from along 168th, we are asking for a setback of 20 feet rather than 30 feet.
This will allow us to replant and preserve as many trees as possible.
2. We are asking for a front yard setback of 25 feet rather than 30 to preserve as many trees as
possible in the back of the lots, specifically on the southern border of the development.
3. We are seeking a lot width of 65 feet rather than 70 feet on the north side of S Manor Rd. This
will allow us to create more affordable lots and homes with the addi on of one addi onal lot.
Site Descrip)on
The 6.43 acre site consists of a house with an a3ached garage, two barns, and a silo. The house is two
stories with a basement and has an approximate footprint of 2,400-square-feet. The southwest barn is
one level with an approximate footprint of 1,750-square feet. The northwest barn is two levels with an
approximate footprint of 836-square feet. The barns and silo do not meet the criteria for local historical
designa on however, pictures will be taken prior to demoli on.
Endangered and Threatened Species
No records of state listed endangered or threatened species are catalogued within a 1-mile radius of the
project area.
The project area falls within the High Poten al Zone for the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee. However, based
on the site condi ons (former pastureland understory lacking in number of na ve pollen/nectar species
and with fairly dense understory cover), the site does not provide suitable foraging, nes ng and/or
overwintering habitat.
Lastly, the are no cri cal habitats at this loca on. Please see full report for details.
Sustainability Standard
Every home we build is tested to Minnesota Green Path and Energy Star Standards. In 2018, our Green
Path Efforts were recognized by House First by awarding us the Green Path Builder of the Year. This
project triggers Eden Prairie’s Sustainable Building Standards.
Our single-family homes in Enclave at Manor Road will include the following sustainable features.
• Dedicated electrical circuit to the garage for electric vehicle charging.
• Electrical conduit installed in the u lity room to the a c for future solar.
• Energy star ra ng appliances.
• Low VOC materials
• Tankless water heaters
Landscaping and Tree Preserva)on
Enclave at Manor Road development has 2,723 caliper inches of significant trees with the removal of
2,068 caliper inches including 40 caliper inches of heritage trees, with 35 heritage inches to remain. The
total replacement of significant trees and heritage trees equals 830 caliper inches. A tree preserva on
plan/landscaping plan will be included in this applica on showing 599 caliper inches of new trees to be
planted leaving a deficit of 231 caliper inches which the developer will pay a cash fee.
Stormwater
Stormwater management will consist of pretreatment via grassed swales, a sump manhole and a
forebay. Primary treatment will be provided by a sand filtra on basin. Addi onally, the northeast
wooded slope will be preserved. The stormwater best management prac ces will provide the rate
control and water quality control required by the City of Eden Prairie and the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek
Watershed District.
Streets/Traffic
The development will connect South Manor Road on the east to 168th Avenue West on the west. The
connec on will also include a sidewalk on the north side of South Manor Road. The December 2023
traffic study done by SSTS, LLC concluded that the proposed development with 20 single family homes
has appropriate access, and the site traffic will not result in poor opera ons or excessive queuing in the
nearby intersec ons.
Architectural Plans
A great home is not defined by square footage, but by whether it fulfills the expecta ons and needs for
each unique family. Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc. has been building homes in Minnesota for over 30
years and understands the defini on of a great home.
We realize that the products and craNsmanship put into our homes are as important as our rela onship
with our clients. Therefore, we never sacrifice quality for price, which ensures that every component
used in the construc on of our client’s home has a proven reputa on for quality.
We at Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc. are proud to have built more than 2,500 homes throughout the
surrounding Twin Ci es suburbs and Wisconsin; however, we are more pleased to admit that we have
just as many sa sfied clients.
At Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc., our homes are built around the way families want to live – with open
floor plans, adaptable spaces, and comfortable rooms. Our exclusive designs take everything into
account – but that doesn’t mean we’re not flexible. Want to move a wall? We can do that. Need to
remove a closet? Sure thing. We work with our customers to build dream homes for real budgets.
Brandl Anderson Homes, Inc. builds more of the extras in every square foot of our custom dream homes,
and the difference also comes through in our numerous home designs that feature larger closets,
spacious living areas, and thoughSul layout configura ons. With new home floor plans including one-
level living villa homes, townhouses, two-story homes and more. Brandl Anderson isn’t out to just build
more homes in Minnesota, we build be3er homes for our community.
Dream Homes for Real Budgets
Brandl Anderson custom homes, where your dreams – and your budget – come to live.
Homes starting in the low $700’s
1. The Arden
a. 2,186 Square Feet
b. 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 2 Stories
d. 48 Feet Wide x 43 Feet Deep
2. The Jayden
a. 2,440 Square Feet
b. 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 2 Stories
d. 48 Feet Wide x 44 Feet Deep
3. The Lauren
a. 2,476 Square Feet
b. 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 2 Stories
d. 48 Feet Wide x 39 Feet Deep
4. The Weston
a. 2,590 Square Feet
b. 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 2 Stories
d. 50 Feet Wide x 46 Feet Deep
5. The Heritage
a. 2,773 Square Feet
b. 5 Bedrooms | 4 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 2 Stories
d. 50 Feet Wide x 50 Feet Deep
6. The Edgestone
a. 3,008 Square Feet
b. 4 Bedrooms | 4 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 2 Stories
d. 50 Feet Wide x 44 Feet Deep
7. The Parker
a. 3,169 Square Feet
b. 4 Bedrooms | 3 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 2 Stories
d. 50 Feet Wide x 44 Feet Deep
8. The Cypress
a. 1,527 Square Feet
b. 2 Bedrooms | 2 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 1 Story
d. 38 Feet Wide x 54 Feet Deep
9. The Spruce
a. 1,656 Square Feet
b. 2 Bedrooms | 2 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 1 Story
d. 50 Feet Wide x 56 Feet Deep
10. The Cedar
a. 1,877 Square Feet
b. 2 Bedrooms plus Flex Room | 2 Bathrooms | 3 Stall Garage
c. 1 Story
d. 40 Feet Wide x 60 Feet Deep
1 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
December 19th, 2023
To: Adam Gadbois, City of Eden Prairie
From: Katie Schmidt, PE
Re: Traffic Study – Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
Per your request, SSTS, LLC has reviewed the traffic impacts associated with development of the
Enclave at Manor Rd single family home residential site in Eden Prairie, MN. The proposed site is
located north of Duck Lake Trail and on the east side of 168th Ave W at S Manor Rd (illustrated on
Figure 1 at the end of this report). The development is planned to include 20 single family homes with
access via S Manor Rd as shown on Figure 2, Concept Site Plan.
This study reviews the No-Build and Build traffic conditions for the year after construction of the site,
year 2026. This memorandum summarizes the findings.
Study Area Intersections
The following study area intersections were defined with input from the city:
· Duck Lake Trail & 168th Av W (side-street stop-controlled)
· Duck Lake Trail & S Manor Rd (side-street stop-controlled)
· 168th Av W & S Manor Rd (side-street stop-controlled)
Roadway Descriptions
The existing conditions of the study area roadways are noted in Table 1. Additionally, Figure 3 shows the
existing lane geometry and traffic control at the study areas intersections.
Table 1. Roadway Description
*AADT Sources: (PM Count) from assuming PM counts are ~10% of ADT
Data Collection & Existing Traffic Volumes
AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at all study area intersections on
Tuesday, November 14th, 2023. The AM peak traffic hour was found to generally occur from 7:45 - 8:45
AM and the PM peak traffic hour was found to occur from 4:00 - 5:00 PM (See Figure 4, Existing Traffic
Volumes).
No-Build Traffic Conditions
The 2026 No-Build traffic volumes were analyzed to establish the baseline for comparison with the Build
traffic volumes. The 2026 No-Build traffic volumes were estimated by applying a 0.5% annual growth
rate to the 2023 existing traffic volumes to “grow” them up to year 2026. This 0.5% annual growth rate
2 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
is conservative as review of historical ADTs on Duck Lake Trail and 168th Av S show a slight decline in
traffic in the past 20 years (from MnDOT’s Traffic Mapping Application). Figure 5 shows the 2026 No-
Build Traffic Volumes with this growth rate applied.
Trip Generation and Distribution
The trip generation for the proposed single family homes use has been estimated based on the
methodology described by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in Trip Generation, 11th
Edition, and ITE’s Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. The ITE land use code coinciding with the
development is Code 210 for Single Family Housing. Table 2 summarizes the trip generation for the
proposed development.
Table 2. Trip Generation Forecast
As shown in Table 2, the site will generate 4 entering and 11 exiting trips during the morning traffic peak
hour, and 12 entering and 7 exiting trips during the afternoon peak hour. The distribution of site traffic
reflects the existing traffic patterns in the area and anticipated travel patterns for residents. Figure 6, Trip
Assignment, depicts the distribution of the estimated site-generated traffic in the study area. The 2026
Build traffic conditions reflect the new traffic added to the 2026 No-Build traffic volumes. Figure 7
illustrates the 2026 Build Traffic Volumes.
Traffic Operations
The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as roadways, traffic signals, roundabouts and
stop-controlled intersections, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical capacity of a
facility to the actual traffic volume on that facility. Various factors affect capacity including travel speed,
roadway geometry, grade, number of travel lanes, and intersection control. The current standards for
evaluating capacity and operating conditions are contained in Highway Capacity Manual1. The
procedures describe operating conditions in terms of driver delay represented as a Level of Service
(LOS). Operations are given letter designations with "A" representing the best operating conditions and
"F" representing the worst. Generally, level of service “D” represents the threshold for acceptable overall
intersection operating conditions during a peak hour. The Chart below summarizes the level of service
and delay criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections.
For side street stop-
controlled intersections
special emphasis is given
to providing an estimate
for the level of service of
the minor approaches.
Traffic operations at an
unsignalized intersection
with side street stop-
control can be described
two ways. First,
consideration is given to
the overall intersection
level of service. This
takes into account the
total number of vehicles
1 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Transportation Research Board, 6th Edition
Trips Generated:
Enter Exit Enter Exit
Single Family Housing Residential 210 20 units 4 11 12 7 189
4 11 12 7
19Totals15 189
PM Peak Weekday
ADT
Land Use Type
Land Use
Code Size AM Peak
3 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is
important to consider the delay on the minor approaches, since the mainline does not have to stop. It is
common for intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience increased levels of delay
and poor level of service on the side streets.
A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular queuing, or the line of
vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can operate with an acceptable Level of
Service, but if queues from the intersection extend back to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to
adjacent land uses, unsafe operating conditions could result. In this report, the Industry Design Standard
95th percentile queue length is used. The 95th Percentile Queue Length refers to that length of vehicle
queue that has only a five-percent probability of occurring during an analysis hour.
This study has utilized the industry current Synchro/SimTraffic software package (11th Edition) to analyze
the No-Build and Build conditions for the AM and PM peak hours. The results for both the 2026 No-
Build and Build conditions are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. 2026 No-Build and Build Operations
1. Overall and worst movement LOS reported from Synchro.
2. 95th percentile queues are a result from an average of 10 SimTraffic simulations.
The results shown in Table 3 indicate that delay, LOS and queueing are all acceptable on an overall
intersection and individual movement basis without and with the Proposed Project. In particular, LOS
remains “A” for all movements in all scenarios and the impacts of site-generated traffic from the
Proposed Project are very minor. Roadway and intersection improvements are not needed to
accommodate the slight increase in traffic.
Conclusion
The proposed Enclave at Manor Rd Residential development with 20 single family homes has appropriate
access, and results from the 2026 Build operational analysis report show acceptable traffic operations and
queuing at study area intersections. Please contact Katie Schmidt at katie@s2traffic.com with any
questions.
Overall LOS & Delay A 0.9 A 1.0 A 1.0 A 1.0
Worst Movement LOS & Delay A 5.2 (SBL)A 5 (SBL)A 5.2 (SBL)A 4.9 (SBL)
95th Percentile Queue
Overall LOS & Delay A 0.9 A 0.7 A 1.2 A 0.7
Worst Movement LOS & Delay A 5.3 (SBL)A 5.6 (SBL)A 5.8 (SBL)A 8.4 (SBT)
95th Percentile Queue
Overall LOS & Delay A 0.5 A 0.4 A 0.6 A 0.6
Worst Movement LOS & Delay A 2.3 (EBR)A 5.7 (EBL)A 3.5 (WBL)A 4.8 (WBL)
95th Percentile Queue
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
168th Av W & S Manor Rd
(Side-Street Stop-Control)
Intersection Criteria 2026 No-Build
Measure of Effectiveness (Delay in Sec and Queue in Ft)
SBLR - 39' SBLR - 34'
Duck Lake Tr & S Manor Rd
(Side-Street Stop-Control)
2026 Build
EBLR - 29' EBLR - 20'
Duck Lake Tr & 168th Av W
(Side-Street Stop-Control)
SBLTR - 48' SBLTR - 38'
SBLR - 43' SBLR - 35'
EBLTR - 26'
SBLTR - 51' SBLTR - 41'
EBLTR - 23'
4 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
5 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
6 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
7 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
8 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
9 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
10 | P a g e Enclave at Manor Rd, Eden Prairie, MN
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call
R
SB-1
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BEING
5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED, ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND
BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS
OTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING RIGHT
OF WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTSARE SHOWN THUS:
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
SB-8
SB-1
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
SB-8
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
SB-8
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
SB-8
SB-1
DRAWN BY
DATE
REVISIONS
PLM
222202
CAD FILE
22SS.GZJ
PROJECT NO.
2200
C2.0
EN
C
L
A
V
E
A
T
M
A
N
O
R
R
O
A
D
ED
E
N
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
FO
R
BR
A
N
D
L
A
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
22
R
I
V
E
R
R
I
D
*
E
C
I
R
C
L
E
S
O
8
T
+
S
8
I
T
E
0
0
B
8
R
N
S
V
I
L
L
E
M
N
2
W
E
S
T
C
.
R
.
2
S
8
I
T
E
0
0
B
8
R
N
S
V
I
L
L
E
M
N
0
P+
O
N
E
2
.
0
.
0
P
K
D
P
S
W
R
Q
#
M
U
K
L
Q
F
.
F
R
P
PL
A
N
N
E
R
S
E
N
*
I
N
E
E
R
S
S
8
R
V
E
Y
O
R
S
ZZ
Z
.
M
U
K
L
Q
F
.
F
R
P
Ja
m
e
s
R
.
H
i
l
l
,
I
n
c
.
A. 2 =RQLQJ DQG VHWEDFN
QRWHV
The South 420.00 feet of the West 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 116, Range 22,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the West 30.00 feet thereof.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BEING
5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED, ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND
BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS
OTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING RIGHT
OF WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
ARE SHOWN THUS:
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE
OF THE W1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE1/4
OF SEC. 5, T. 116, R. 22 WHICH IS ASSUMED
TO HAVE A BEARING OF N 88°05'49" W
B. 2 LD\RXW
C. 22 LD\RXW
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
SB-8
llllllllllllll
l
l
l
l
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
l
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
l
l
l
l
l
l
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
l
l
SB-1
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
SB-8
SB-1
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call
R
SB-1
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call
R
BOTANICAL GENUS: QUANTITY MAX. % % OF TOTAL
Abies sp. 25 15% 14%
Juniperus sp. 27 15% 15%
Picea sp. 25 15% 14%
Acer sp. 27 15% 15%
Betula sp. 9 15% 5%
Celtis sp. 6 15% 3%
Gleditsia sp. 8 15% 4%
Ostrya sp. 24 15% 13%
Quercus sp. 10 15% 6%
Tilia sp. 7 15% 4%
Ulmus sp. 13 15% 7%
TOTAL OVERSTORY TREES: 181
Tag Inches Type Significant? Heritage?Remove? Tag Inches Type Significant? Heritage?Remove? Summary Inches
Total Significant Tree Inches Removed 2068
Allowed Removal-None 0
Total Significant Tree Inches Removed for Penalty (A) 2068
Total Significant Tree Inches On-Site (B) 2723
Tree Replacement Constant (C) (C) 0.5
Formula: [(A/B) x C] x A = D
Total Replacement Inches (D) 785.28
Total Heritage Inches to Remain as credit 35
Total Heritage Inches to be Removed 40
Total Significant Replacement Inches Owed 750.28
Total Heritage Replacement Inches Owed (2x Removal)80.00
TOTAL MITIGATION INCHES OWED 830.28
504 24 American Basswood Y N N
505 16 American Basswood Y N N
506 20 Northern Red Oak Y N N
507 20 Northern Red Oak Y N N
508 22 Northern Red Oak Y N Y
509 12 Paper Birch Y N Y
510 23 American Basswood - Multi Trunk Y N Y
511 14 Green Ash N N Y
512 12 American Basswood Y N Y
513 17 American Basswood Y N Y
514 40 American Basswood - Multi Trunk Y N Y
515 12 American Basswood Y N N
516 16 Northern Red Oak Y N N
517 12 Green Ash N N N
518 20 Green Ash N N N
519 20 Black Cherry Y N N
520 14 Black Cherry Y N N
521 18 Black Cherry Y N N
522 12 Black Cherry Y N N
523 13 Black Cherry Y N N
524 18 White Pine Y N N
525 31 Eastern Cottonwood Y N N
526 12 Green Ash N N N
527 18 Black Cherry Y N N
528 10 Blue Spruce Y N N
529 23 Honey Locust Y N Y
530 11 Blue Spruce Y N N
531 9 Blue Spruce Y N N
532 14 Bitternut Hickory Y N N
533 14 Black Cherry Y N Y
534 13 Green Ash N N N
535 14 Green Ash N N Y
536 14 Green Ash N N Y
537 20 Eastern Cottonwood Y N Y
538 14 Sugar Maple Y N Y
539 14 Bitternut Hickory Y N Y
540 15 Northern Catalpa Y N Y
541 12 American Basswood Y N Y
542 14 Amur Maple - Multi Stem Shrub N N Y
543 19 Honey Locust Y N Y
544 12 Green Ash N N Y
545 14 Red Maple Y N Y
546 16 Green Ash N N Y
547 15 Blue Spruce Y N N
548 12 Apple Sp. N N Y
549 13 Black Cherry Y N Y
550 14 Green Ash N N Y
551 12 Green Ash N N Y
552 19 Black Walnut Y N Y
553 16 Black Walnut - Multi Trunk Y N Y
554 28 Bur Oak Y N Y
555 12 Green Ash N N Y
556 27 Bur Oak Y N Y
557 27 American Basswood Y N Y
558 30 American Basswood Y N Y
559 14 Paper Birch Y N Y
560 12 Paper Birch Y N Y
561 12 Paper Birch Y N Y
562 18 Black Walnut Y N Y
563 14 Black Walnut Y N Y
564 26 Black Walnut - Multi Trunk Y N Y
565 16 Black Walnut Y N Y
566 17 Black Walnut Y N Y
567 30 Green Ash - Multi Trunk N N Y
568 30 Green Ash - Multi Trunk N N Y
569 30 American Basswood - Multi Trunk Y N Y
420 20 Northern Red Oak Y N Y
421 22 Northern Red Oak Y N Y
422 48 American Basswood - Multi Trunk Y N Y
423 31 American Basswood Y N Y
424 12 American Basswood Y N Y
425 12 American Basswood Y N Y
426 12 American Basswood Y N Y
427 16 American Basswood Y N Y
428 18 American Basswood Y N Y
429 16 Northern Red Oak Y N N
430 12 Green Ash N N N
431 12 Green Ash N N N
432 12 Green Ash N N N
433 19 Black Walnut Y N N
434 8 Blue Spruce Y N N
435 12 Northern Red Oak Y N N
436 12 Black Cherry Y N N
437 14 Blue Spruce Y N N
438 17 Blue Spruce Y N N
439 20 White Pine Y N N
440 12 Blue Spruce Y N N
441 10 Blue Spruce Y N N
442 14 Sugar Maple Y N N
443 12 Green Ash N N N
444 20 Bitternut Hickory Y N N
445 14 Green Ash N N Y
446 12 Bitternut Hickory Y N Y
447 12 Green Ash N N Y
448 16 Green Ash N N Y
449 12 Black Walnut Y N Y
450 17 Black Walnut Y N Y
451 34 Black Walnut - Multi Trunk Y N Y
452 12 Green Ash N N Y
453 14 Red Maple Y N Y
454 12 Red Maple Y N Y
455 12 Green Ash N N Y
456 12 Blue Spruce Y N Y
457 11 Blue Spruce Y N Y
458 9 Blue Spruce Y N Y
459 11 Blue Spruce Y N Y
460 14 Green Ash N N Y
461 12 Apple sp. N N Y
462 74 American Basswood - Multi Trunk Y N Y
463 20 Black Walnut Y N Y
464 24 Sugar Maple Y N Y
465 12 Paper Birch Y N Y
466 14 Black Walnut Y N Y
467 15 Black Walnut Y N Y
468 27 Black Walnut - Multi Trunk Y N Y
469 14 Black Walnut Y N Y
470 18 Black Walnut Y N Y
471 35 American Basswood - Multi Trunk Y N Y
472 13 American Basswood Y N Y
473 16 American Basswood Y N Y
501 40 Black Walnut - Multi Trunk Y N N
502 17 Bitternut Hickory Y N N
503 35 Northern Red Oak Y Y N
367 12 Black Walnut Y N N
368 26 Black Walnut - Multi Trunk Y N N
369 12 Black Walnut - Multi Trunk Y N Y
370 22 Black Walnut Y N Y
371 22 Eastern Cottonwood Y N Y
372 13 Black Walnut - Multi Trunk Y N Y
373 18 Black Walnut Y N Y
374 14 Black Walnut Y N Y
375 14 Black Walnut Y N Y
376 16 Black Walnut Y N Y
377 18 Black Walnut Y N Y
378 17 Black Walnut Y N Y
379 12 Black Walnut Y N Y
380 21 Black Walnut Y N Y
381 13 Sugar Maple Y N Y
382 13 Sugar Maple Y N Y
383 21 Sugar Maple - Multi Trunk Y N Y
384 28 Eastern Cottonwood Y N Y
385 12 Blue Spruce Y N Y
386 18 Black Walnut Y N Y
387 16 Black Walnut Y N Y
388 16 Black Walnut Y N Y
389 29 Black Walnut Y N Y
390 22 Black Walnut Y N Y
391 37 Black Walnut Y N Y
392 18 Black Walnut Y N Y
393 15 Bitternut Hickory Y N Y
394 15 American Basswood - Multi Trunk Y N Y
395 12 Black Walnut Y N Y
396 15 Black Walnut Y N Y
397 16 American Basswood Y N Y
398 16 Black Walnut Y N Y
399 22 Black Walnut Y N Y
400 13 Black Walnut Y N Y
401 18 Green Ash N N N
402 30 Sugar Maple Y N Y
403 18 Blue Spruce Y N Y
404 12 Blue Spruce Y N Y
405 20 Scots Pine Y N Y
406 16 Black Walnut Y N Y
407 12 Black Walnut Y N Y
408 12 Black Walnut Y N Y
409 12 Black Walnut Y N Y
410 14 Black Walnut Y N Y
411 23 Eastern Cottonwood Y N Y
412 16 Black Walnut Y N Y
413 16 Sugar Maple Y N Y
414 12 Black Walnut Y N Y
415 13 Black Walnut Y N Y
416 14 Black Walnut Y N Y
417 28 American Basswood Y N Y
418 27 American Basswood Y N Y
419 40 American Basswood Y Y Y
Tag Inches Type Significant? Heritage?Remove?
From:ANDI SVENDSEN
To:Benjamin Schneider
Subject:Enclave at Manor Rd project
Date:Tuesday, March 26, 2024 9:47:57 AM
Hello Ben,
I've reviewed the plans online for this development. While I appreciate that Brandl
Anderson would like to leave as many trees as possible, I'm against granting a
variance reducing lot size to 65 feet and setback to 25 feet.
I do not feel that having the ability to add another lot so the development is more
profitable outweighs the impacts of granting their request. The environmental
statement regarding the Rusty Patched Bumble Bees does not take into account theother wildlife such as owls that live in those woods. I did not see the full
environmental impact report online with the other available documents to fully
understand the statement given the summary seems to be a cursory glance at the
vegetation. I also feel that reducing lot size to make high density housing is notappropriate for the location of this development given the surrounding houses and lot
sizes.
Please deny Brandl Anderson's request for lot size variances.
Sincerely, Andi Svendsen
16546 S Manor Rd
Eden Prairie, MN 55346
From:DONALD T HILL
To:Benjamin Schneider
Subject:Enclave at Manor Rd - Question
Date:Friday, March 29, 2024 12:16:59 PM
With the development moving the the water basin to the northwest corner along west
168th Ave. no homes will be next to the area.
Will Eden Prairie being taking care of the maintenance of snow removal on the
sidewalk in the winter and the cutting of the grass in the summer?
This winter even with the lack of snow we still had to walk in the street as nobody took
care of the snow removal.
ThanksDon Hill
16729 Honeysuckle Ln
Eden Prairie, MN 55346
From:Tim and Kay Peters
To:Benjamin Schneider;
Subject:Brandl Anderson Community Meeting from March 27
Date:Saturday, March 30, 2024 9:07:28 AM
Hello Ben,
I see you are the Project Planner for this new development (Enclave at Manor Rd). Please
forward this email to the correct manager/department that can best reply.
As a property owner with a City sidewalk, I'm responsible to clear a path on snowfalls greaterthan 2". There is both a City sidewalk and wheelchair ramp that runs on the west side of this
development. The neighborhood received @6" of snow around Feb 14th, and then greater than2" this past week. Neither time were the City sidewalk or access ramp cleared. This sidewalk
is well traveled by the neighbors. Is the City able to provide some direction to the newproperty owners on this City requirement?
With 17 new homes come the potential of 34 additional cars, plus any extra cars that will now
pass through when South Manor Road opens. High Trails Estate Park on West 168th Ave isadjacent to this development. What ideas is the City considering to ensure our children and
grandchildren can cross the street safely to enjoy this space?
Thanks,Tim Peters
6601 W 168th Ave
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner
DATE: April 8, 2024 SUBJECT: Lotus Villas on Anderson Lake (2024-02)
LOCATION: 10700 Prairie Lakes Drive REQUEST: • Guide Plan Change from Office to Low Density Residential on 5.0
acres
• PUD Concept Plan Review on 5.0 acres
• PUD District Review with waivers on 5.0 acres
• Zoning District Change from Office to R1-9.5 on 5.0 acres
• Preliminary Plat review on 5.0 acres
BACKGROUND The existing 41,000 sq ft office building on site was built in 1982. The property owners propose to redevelop the property with a 19 lot single family residential development with a single, looped private road.
PRODUCT The developer proposes a project that they describe as a villa-style neighborhood. This
single family detached unit will be individually owned, but the yard areas, landscaping, streets, and other features of the project will be managed by a homeowner’s association.
Most of the homes will be a single story plus a
basement. The three interior lots will feature 1 ½ story homes on a slab on grade foundation. Each unit will include 2 stall garages. Homes will be between 2,500 and 3,600 sq ft.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT The property is currently guided Office. The applicant is proposing to re-guide the property to
Low Density Residential (0.1-5.0 units per acre).
This designation allows only single family detached residential. The proposed density is 3.8
Staff Report – Lotus Villas on Anderson Lake
April 8, 2024 Page 2
2
units per acre. Parcels to the north and west are guided Medium Density Residential. Development
to the south is Low Density Residential.
The change in land use is appropriate given the long term viability for the site as office and the surrounding land uses. Low Density Residential is preferred given the surrounding land uses and the lake to the east.
ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE The property is currently zoned office. The applicant is proposing to change the zoning to R1-9.5. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the surrounding land uses, which include single family homes to the south, and twin homes to the north.
SITE PLAN/ PRELIMINARY PLAT The nineteen lots are arranged around a single, looped private street. The private street intersects with Prairie Lakes Drive at two locations. There are no other vehicular connections, and no lot is afforded direct access onto Prairie Lakes Drive. A sidewalk is extended along Prairie Lakes Drive
and will connect to the existing trail near the SW corner of the site, on the west side of Prairie Lakes
Drive. With the goal of preserving the existing slope and vegetation along Prairie lakes Drive, a retaining wall is proposed along the west side of the project area, allowing the pond area to efficiently collect stormwater throughout the site.
PARKING Each unit will have a two stall garage, and parking for two cars in the driveway. While not required for single family developments, up to 20 visitor vehicles can be parked along the curbs of the east/
west streets. The streets are 26 feet wide in these locations.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND WAIVER REQUESTS The Planned Unit Development District is established for 4 main purposes: (1) Encourage a more creative and efficient approach to the use of land in the City;
(2) Allow variety in the types of environment available to the people of the City;
(3) Encourage more efficient allocation and maintenance of privately controlled common open space through the distribution of overall density of population and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible; and, (4) Provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than
is provided under the strict application of the provisions of this chapter while at the
same time preserving the health, safety, order, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare of the City and its inhabitants. The proposal addresses several of these goals with the provision of a single family home
Staff Report – Lotus Villas on Anderson Lake
April 8, 2024 Page 3
3
product with a controlled common open space, and variety in the types of environment in the
city. While there are waivers requested from the R1-9.5 zoning district, it is important to
consider that this district is the most closely suited for the product proposed. The City has not received a number of similar applications to warrant the development of an ordinance to accommodate the product, but will be monitoring the market for that option. The waivers requested include:
Lot area. The lots range in size from 6,826 sq ft to 15,632, with the average 8,654 sq ft.
the requirement of the R1-9.5 district is 9,500 sq ft. All lots but the 4 corner lots require the waiver. Lot width. The widths of each lot vary between 37 feet to 77 feet, with the average 58 feet. The code requires 70 feet of width. Corner lots are required to maintain a width of
at least 90 feet. All lots except for Lot 12, block 2 require the waiver.
Lots on a public street. All lots in a R1 zoning district require frontage on a public street. These lots are proposed on a private street. The intent with the requirement is to avoid flag lot situations, or lots with no access. Private streets are commonly used in managed developments like the proposed.
Front yard setbacks. The developer proposes a front yard setback of 20 feet (25 feet from
the back of curb) for all lots. The zoning code requires a 30 foot setback. Staff supports the reduced setback to bring the homes closer to the street, calming traffic, which preserving at least one car length for driveway parking without extending into the street. Rear yard setback. The three lots backing to the pond show a rear yard setback of
5 feet, less than the required 20 feet. This is in part due to the city’s preference that the
pond be within an outlot. In effect, the rear yards for these lots will appear larger, due to the open space and landscaping around the pond area. Lot coverage. The property is in the shoreland overlay district, where maximum lot coverage of impervious surfaces is 30%. The calculated lot coverage for the entire
project area is 44.7%, which is less that the current 46.7%. The lot coverage for each
individual lot is not known at this stage, but will be greater than 30%. Density. Density of the project is 3.8 units per acre. The maximum density for the R1-9.5 is 3.5 units per acre. The density of the neighborhood to the north is 4 units per acre, and 1.7 units per acre for the neighborhood to the south.
TREE LOSS AND GRADING As the site is currently developed, there are a number of trees that will be removed, including significant trees. There are no heritage trees on site. The size and the number of significant trees
removed requires 235.1 replacement caliper inches. The landscape plan shows 252 caliper inches
planted, exceeding the minimum. This calculation does not include landscaping provided at the foundation of the individual buildings.
Staff Report – Lotus Villas on Anderson Lake
April 8, 2024 Page 4
4
LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
As a single family detached project, there is
no landscaping requirement. Of interest during the development process, however, was the preservation and enhancement of the existing vegetation along the north, west,
and south property lines to maintain the
existing screening in those areas. This is reflected on the landscaping plans. Additionally, as requested by the neighborhood to the north, the developer
proposes a 6 foot tall fence for additional
screening. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS
A sidewalk along the east side of Prairie Lakes Drive will be extended to the south entrance to the
development, where a crossing will be added to connect to the existing trail on the west side of Prairie Lakes Drive. SIGNS
A monument sign is contemplated near the northern access to the site. Any monument sign will
need to conform to City Code. UTILITIES Water and sanitary sewer systems, up to the individual services will be public, maintained by the
city. Utility connections from the service, Storm water and the street will be private, maintained by
the owners or Homeowners association.
SUSTAINABILITY STANDARD
Since this is project is a Planned Unit Development, it triggers the City’s new sustainable building standard that has been in effect since January 1, 2024. For this project, all homes will have at least one EV-Ready parking space (garage charger) and roof trusses that meets Solar-Ready guidelines. Additionally the homes will be built under the MN Green Path program and utilize energy star
appliances.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant has communicated with the neighborhood association to the north, and the 4 abutting residents to the south as plans were developed. The applicant hosted a neighborhood
meeting on March 27th. A summary of that meeting is provided. One resident commented with
concern over the impending noise and dust related to the demolition of the site, and the
Staff Report – Lotus Villas on Anderson Lake
April 8, 2024 Page 5
5
construction of the project. City Code limits construction activities to between the hours of 7 am
and 7 pm, exclusive of Sundays and legal holidays.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of the following requests:
• Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Office to Low Density Residential in 5.0 acres
• PUD Concept Plan Review on 5.0 acres
• PUD District Review with waivers on 5.0 acres
• Zoning Change from Office to R1-9.5 on 5.0 acres
• Preliminary Plat to divide one parcel into 19 lots and 2 outlots on 5.0 acres This is based on plans submitted on March 14, 2024, staff report dated April 8, 2024, and the
following conditions:
1. Prior to release of the Final Plat, the applicant shall: A. Sign special assessment agreement for City trunk sewer and water assessment fees.
B. Submit a bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit (“security”) that guarantees completion
of all public utility improvements equivalent to 125% of the cost of the improvements.
2. Prior to land alteration permit issuance, the applicant shall:
A. Submit detailed stormwater runoff, wetland, utility, street, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. B. Obtain and provide documentation of Watershed District approval. C. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading.
D. Install erosion control at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by
the City. E. Submit a tree replacement letter of credit or escrow surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the tree replacement. A surety will be required for each phase of tree replacement as shown on the Exhibit B Plans.
F. Submit a land alteration bond, letter of credit, or escrow surety equivalent to 125% of
the cost of the land alteration. G. Provide recorded copies of any Home Owner Association documents or private covenants and agreements. H. Submit construction plans and project specifications for public infrastructure for
review and approval by the city engineer.
3. Prior to building permit issuance for the property, the applicant shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fees.
7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439
(952) 947-3000
MN Builder License # 1220 www.RonClark.com
Monday February 19, 2024 – Updated March 20, 2024 Jeremy Barnhart, AICP City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchel Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Lotus Villas, on Anderson Lake
Ron Clark Construction is proposing a detached Villa Home neighborhood on the existing
5-acre property located at 10700 Prairie Lakes Drive, the site currently is a 40,000 square foot
Office Building/Data Center.
The proposed For-Sale single family detached Villa Home neighborhood would have nineteen
(19) Villa Homes. Each home will have at least a 2-car garage with a minimum of additional
parking for 2 cars in each driveway and approximately 20 guest parking stalls available on the
private street. The project will have private streets owned and maintained by the
Homeowners Association (HOA) with public sewer & water within an easement dedicated to
the city.
The overall goal is to work in balance with the existing natural elements of the site while
adding new housing to create a small neighborhood that aligns with the surrounding
residential areas. The current use of the site clearly does not fit in with the rest of the
surrounding residential areas. The maintenance free, main level living design is in high
demand for existing Eden Prairie residents that are looking for a ‘Lifestyle’ option while still
staying in Eden Prairie near their children and grandchildren. This also, through their existing
homes, grants access to young families aspiring to raise their children within the high-quality
Eden Prairie schools.
The Villas Homes around the exterior of the site will all be single story homes, however the 3
slab-on-grade Villa Homes near the pond will allow for a story and a half design being they
have no lower-level areas. Whether this site is developed with 15, 19 or 25 homes, the overall
lot coverage, street layout and utility design would be very similar. However, by opting for
Villa Homes, you benefit from a streamlined approach with a singular developer, a single
builder, and a unified homeowners association. This ensures that the project's completion and
maintenance align with the approved design.
7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439
(952) 947-3000
MN Builder License # 1220 www.RonClark.com
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change: The current guiding for the site is Office and is
occupied by an approximately 40,000 square foot Office Building/Data Center. We are
requesting a change to Low Density Residential. The change in land use of this small parcel
will have a very minimal effect on the balance of land use within the city. The requested land
use of Low Density Residential is consistent with the surrounding neighborhoods on all sides
of the property. The land use change will result in no increase in city utility and road services
from the current commercial use, with traffic and most other needs being reduced by the new
detached single-family use. We feel very strongly that the single-family land use for the site is
a more appropriate use for the site than the current office building.
Zoning Change: The current zoning for the site is OFC Office and is occupied by an
approximately 40,000 square foot Office Building/Data Center. The proposed zoning would
change the property to R1-9.5 which allows for single family detached structures with the
waivers requested below for this empty nester detached Villa Home style neighborhood. The
density we are requesting is 3.8 units per acre, slightly above the allowed 3.5 units per acre,
which we feel is reasonable as the footprint and overall size of the Villa homes will be less
than what a standard single-family home would be. Also, the proposed street, utility layout,
impervious area and the buildable area of the Villa lots would not be any more than a less
dense traditional single-family design. Our proposal includes the use of the PUD flexibility
which allows us to create our most functional site plan and building layout for the empty
nester detached Villa Home neighborhood.
The project will also increase the tax value for the city significantly, the current assessed
value is $4,370,000 (with the real value about ½ that amount), this new Villa neighborhood
will have a projected value for the 19 homes of over 20 million once completed.
To create this Villa neighborhood, we have the below applications included:
1) Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Low Density Residential
2) Rezoning Application – OFC Office to R1-9.5 Single Family
3) Subdivision Waivers requested
a. Waiver for Coverage of over 30%, but we are less than prior use.
b. Density waiver because of Villa Home style allowing for 3.8 units/acres vs 3.5
units/acre
c. Lot size waiver because of Villa Home style for 6,770 sq ft vs.9,500
d. Lot width waiver because of Villa Home style for 55 feet wide vs. 70 feet wide
e. Side yard setbacks of 7.5 feet on each side of home for a total of 15 feet
between homes
7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439
(952) 947-3000
MN Builder License # 1220 www.RonClark.com
f. Front yard setback of 25 feet minimum from private street to garage face vs 30
feet
g. Rear yard setback on the 3 homes that back up to the pond to be 5 feet vs 20
feet, they will still have open space and ponding behind them
4) Preliminary Plat Application
5) Request release of the prior Developers Agreement on the site with the use change
Preliminary Neighborhood discussions prior to submittal
We met with the HOA Board and a few other homeowners from the Weston Woods
townhome area to the north in early December as we started to plan out the area. Then a week
later we met with a few of the closest neighbors of the single-family area to the south of the
site. Both seem generally supportive of the change to residential zoning and the Villa style
product. A few of the townhome neighbors would like a fence along our shared property line
as their homes look directly across the street at our property. We have focused on both
preserving and enhancing the landscaping between us and the two neighborhoods. In general,
the neighbors were looking for additional information that is included in this submittal before
making a final decision on our new neighborhood, but we think even though change is always
hard, that they agreed the residential use is much better long-term use for the site.
Wetland and Shoreland Area along Anderson Lake
We have submitted to the Nine Mile Watershed District to confirm there are no wetlands on
the site or adjacent to the site that affect the project setbacks or restrictions. The Shoreland
map shows we are not within the Shoreland impact zone for any portion of the site. The
impervious coverage percentages are included on the Site Plan and show a reduction in
impervious from the prior use of about 5% (4,300 sq ft)
Concept plan comments from Staff
We provided an initial concept plan to staff in December to determine if we were on the right
path with the site redesign. We received comments from each department and feel we have
addressed most of those comments or explained the reasons why. One item discussed was
sidewalks within the neighborhood. We are not proposing any internal sidewalks with the
limited traffic of only 19 Villa Homes, this is consistent with the neighborhoods north and
south, that do not have internal sidewalks as well. We will be extending the current sidewalk
along Prairie Lakes Drive along the front of our property. Residents will also be able to walk
across Prairie Lakes Drive and connect to the Center Way trail and which gives access Nesbitt
Preserve Park.
7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439
(952) 947-3000
MN Builder License # 1220 www.RonClark.com
Development Recap:
1) Setbacks
a. The project is requesting the following setback waivers from the standard for
the R1-9.5 Single family district.
b. 7.5-foot side yard setback resulting in a minimum of 15 feet between the Villa
homes.
c. We are providing a 30-foot setback from the adjoining neighborhoods to the
south and north vs the 20-foot standard.
d. On the 3 homes backing up to pond we are requesting a 5-foot rear yard
setback.
2) Stormwater impact
a. See included stormwater report and compliance with both City and Watershed
District requirements.
b. All runoff from the homes will be piped to the stormwater system and into the
pond, only the water landing on the grass in the rear of the homes will continue
to leave the site.
3) Buildable area of site
a. Total Site Area = 5.00 ac
b. Buildable Area of Site = 5.00 ac
c. Density on buildable area = 19 units/5.00 ac = 3.8 units/acre
d. We are requesting a Waiver or Density from 3.5 to 3.8 units/acre.
4) Lighting
a. The site will have street lighting similar to the 2 adjoining neighborhoods.
b. The homes will have soffit or wall sconce exterior lighting on the front of the
garage controlled by a photocell.
5) Parking for visitors
a. All driveways can accommodate two (2) or more cars, plus each Villa Home
has two (2) car garages and are required to not store anything in the garage that
would not allow for them to park 2 cars internally.
b. Additional parking is also available on the private street, this will
accommodate approximately 20 cars.
7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439
(952) 947-3000
MN Builder License # 1220 www.RonClark.com
c. The private Street will be a city standard 26 foot back-to-back, which allows
for parking on one side. Driveways are a minimum of 20 feet wide at the
garage, easily allowing for 2 cars to park in each driveway.
d. The Minimum distance from the private street to the face of garage is 25 feet.
6) Tree Removal and Replacement Plan
a. A Tree Removal and Replacement Plan is provided with our proposal. Our
landscape architect has worked closely with the city staff to form an acceptable
plan that complies with and/or exceeds the minimums of the City Tree
Ordinance.
b. Even though most of the Ash trees we are removing are showing signs of
damage from the emerald ash bore, we are still replacing them as required by
the ordinance.
c. The Ash trees we are saving were treated in 2022 and the HOA will continue
to treat them going forward, if they are later forced to remove the Ash trees,
the HOA will replace them with new trees at that time.
7) Landscaping Plans and Screening
a. A fully designed landscaping plan is provided with our application.
b. We provided an additional 10 feet of rear yard setback to the adjoining
properties along with additional plantings and a 6-foot-high fence to the north
as requested by the neighbors. The area behind the homes even though owned
by the resident will have Buffer Easement placed on that area related to
maintaining required drainage but still allow buffer planting which will make
sure that both are maintained, any dead or damaged trees are replaced, and the
current drainage flow will be maintained properly per the final grading plan. If
at any point these areas are not maintained as required, the city will be allowed
to correct the issue and assess the HOA and/or Homeowner for it. With this
Buffer Easement in place it allows for more plantings to be included in this
area vs. a utility/drainage easement which would not allow for any tree
planting.
c. The 25-foot setback along Prairie Lakes Drive will also have additional shrubs
and trees to maintain and improve the current streetscape.
8) Lot sizes and building footprint coverage
7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439
(952) 947-3000
MN Builder License # 1220 www.RonClark.com
a. See the attached Preliminary Plat showing the individual lot sizes, buildable
area for each lot and proposed building footprint size for each house.
b. We are requesting lot size waiver to 6,770 sq ft from 9,500 and a waiver for lot
width to 55 feet from 70 feet for the Villa Homes.
9) Traffic Memo
a. Included with the submittal is a traffic memo from a traffic engineer, showing
the before and after expected traffic counts. As expected, the residential use is
lower traffic than the prior use, in addition the Villa product being focused on
empty nesters has reduced traffic form traditional single family.
10) Green infrastructure Analysis
a. We have included a recap of the techniques and best management practices we
will use for the development of the site.
11) City’s Inclusionary Housing Policy
a. The project is single family detached and exempt from the City’s Inclusionary
Housing Policy.
12) Sustainable Building Standard/Features
a. All Homes will be built under the MN Green Path Program which is focused
on energy savings and sustainability. This will result in more than a 30%
increase in efficiency in the homes. We will achieve a 50 HERS rating or
below in all homes.
b. We will have an EV-Ready Garage in each home, install per city
specifications, each homeowner will then decide if they want/need a finished
charger system to adapt to the wide variety of charging systems currently on
the market. Termination location will be clearly marked.
c. We utilize many of the Energy Star appliances and Water Sense fixtures
available depending on customer selections.
d. Solar Ready the homes will have trusses designed to allow for the additional
weight of solar panels in the future along with a conduit from the roof to the
Electric panel. We will also provide in the HOA declaration that Solar panels
would be allowed on the roof. We will also make sure that the electrical panel
has open spaces in it to allow for the connection to solar power in the future
7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439
(952) 947-3000
MN Builder License # 1220 www.RonClark.com
Housing and Architecture: The single-family detached Villa Homes will be planned and
designed to fit into the existing neighborhood but also will add a new style of housing not
currently in the neighborhood. We are planning a mix of home designs that range between
2,500 and 3,600 square feet. The home designs will offer two car-plus garages, sunrooms,
porches, and decks with a variety internal floorplans and exterior styles. The overall
Architecture is still in the development stage, we have provided visual examples and if you
look at our current and past projects you will get a sense of the quality of the homes and the
variety of the exterior designs. The 3 homes backing up to the pond will offer a slab-on-grade
design with the potential for a story and a half design element. Many lots will allow for either
a front load or courtyard (side load) garage, this will be decided as each home is built and is
not predetermined.
Homeowners Association (HOA): A Homeowners Association will be planned for the
neighborhood. The Association will maintain each home’s lawn care and snow removal along
with maintaining all common area landscaping and the monument. The Homeowners
Association will be responsible for continuing to actively maintain the rear yard drainage as
shown on the grading plan along with maintaining the buffer planting as approved in those
areas. With the Buffer Easement in place the Homeowners Association, coupled with the
city's monitoring rights, facilitates the inclusion of more trees in the buffer areas between
neighborhoods. This approach surpasses the tree planting that would be permissible if the area
were designated as a drainage easement.
Development Team:
Project Architect – Whitten Associates, Inc. – Tim Whitten and Heather Maanum Project Engineer – Campion Engineering - Marty Campion
Project Surveyor – Westwood – Chris Ambourn Developer and Builder – Ron Clark Construction – Mike Waldo and Landon Wittenberg
1
2
2
3
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
L
A
K
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
TRACT B
5001
5002
5003
5004 5005
5008
5009
5022
5025
510151025103
5104
5105
5116
5117
5118
5124
5130
5137
5139
5164
13
23-026
02/16/2024
RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
N
PO BOX 41486
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441
PHONE: (763)486.3799
EMAIL: MCAMPION@CAMPIONENG.COM
N CAMPION
ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC.
CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ
4
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
LEGEND
1
2
2
3
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
L
A
K
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
TRACT B
5001
5002
5003
5004 5005
5008
5009
5022
5025
5101
5102
5103
5104
5105
5116
5117
5118
5124
5130
5137
5139
5164
PID 1311622340034
Owner FARHANA AHMED
& STEVEN J MCLAIRD
PID 1311622340035
Owner JERALD S JOHNSON TRUSTEE
PID 1311622340036
Owner TODD A MORGAN
PID 1311622230006
Owner CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PID 1311622310035
Owner WEST ON WOODS ON ANDERSON LK
N55°
4
9
'
2
1
"
E
4
2
0
.
4
7
N
2
8
°
0
6
'
4
8
"
W
1
7
3
.
5
2
N
2
1
°
0
9
'
5
8
"
W
3
2
1
.
6
7
3
0
.
0
0
N
3
4
°
3
4
'
2
0
"
W
N52
°
1
8
'
0
3
"
E
4
1
9
.
4
8
L
=
5
8
.
5
8
C
H
=
5
6
.
2
8
C
H
B
=
N
3
7
°
4
1
'
5
4
"
W
R
=
6
0
.
0
0
Δ
=
5
5
°
5
6
'
2
0
"
N
1
7
°
2
8
'
4
3
"
W
2
2
3
.
0
4
L
=
2
7
5
.
0
1
R
=
7
3
0
.
0
0
Δ
=
2
1
°
3
5
'
0
4
"
Found Capped Iron Pipe inscribed License No. 7085
Found Iron Monument
Found Iron Monument
Found Capped Iron Pipe
inscribed License No. 6235
F
o
u
n
d
C
a
p
p
e
d
I
r
o
n
P
i
p
e
i
n
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
Li
c
e
n
s
e
N
o
.
c
a
p
u
n
r
e
a
d
a
b
l
e
Existing Chain Link Fence 0.6 feet
southeasterly of property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 0.7 feet
southeasterly of property line
8
0
.
0
0
f
o
o
t
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
i
g
h
t
o
f
W
a
y
9
.
1
Existing Chain Link Fence on property line
Existing Chain Link
Fence on property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 0.2 feet
southeasterly of property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 3.4 feet
northwesterly of property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 9.1 feet
northwesterly of property line
1
Access
Entrance
B
i
t
u
m
i
n
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
48.0
B-B
16.7
B-B
16.7
B-B
15.1
15.8
1
9
.
2
8
"
W
M
8
"
W
M
8
"
W
M
13
23-026
02/16/2024
RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
N
PO BOX 41486
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441
PHONE: (763)486.3799
EMAIL: MCAMPION@CAMPIONENG.COM
N CAMPION
ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC.
CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ
8
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
“”
” – ”
” – ”
LEGEND
1
2
2
3
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
L
A
K
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
TRACT B
5001
5002
5003
5004
5005
5008
5009
5022
5025
510151025103
5104
5105
5116
5117
5118
5124
5130
5137
5139
5164
13
23-026
02/16/2024
RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
N
PO BOX 41486
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441
PHONE: (763)486.3799
EMAIL: MCAMPION@CAMPIONENG.COM
N CAMPION
ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC.
CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ
5
PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER &
WATERMAIN
”
“
”
“”
LEGEND
5001
5002
5003
5004
5005
5008
5009
5022
5025
5101
5102
5103
5104
5105
5116
5117
5118
5124
5130
5137
5139
5164
Retaining Wall
See CIVIL SET
Retaining Wall
See Civil Set
6' High Opaque Fence
See Civil Set
Monument Sign
See Civil Set
Pond Maintenance Access, Typ.
See Civil Set
Note:
1.See LANDSCAPE set for additional details, notes, and plant list.
2.See CIVIL set for all project general notes, existing conditions, plat, site
plan, sanitary sewer & watermain plan, storm sewer plan, grading plan,
stormwater pollution prevention plan, tree inventory, and related notes &
details. This includes, but is not limited to, site features such as walls and
fences, toposoil spreading, temporary site stabilization, and erosion control.
3.Prior to digging, the Contractor shall contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
at 651.454.0002 or 800.252.1166 for utility locations 48 hours prior to
construction.
4.The Contractor shall verify and coordinate the location of plant material with
site features, utilities, and building features such as doors, windows,
overhangs, walks, drives and patios.
5.The Contractor shall stake the location of trees for review and approval
prior to installation.
6.If a discrepancy exists between the quantity of plants shown on the plant
schedule and the quantity shown on the plan, the plan shall govern.
7.All trees shall be installed in accordance with the Tree Planting Detail,
including all soil amendments and mulch.
8.Final foundation treatment and detailed planting at the building entrances
shall be as agreed upon by the Homeowner and Builder.
9.Contractor shall provide site-wide irrigation design and installation. Irrigation
shall extend into the vegetated areas within the public right-of-way and to
the edge of the pavement/back of curb. Irrigation shall be
fully-programmable and capable of the following:
9.1.alternate date watering
9.2.head to head or drip coverage
9.3.delivering one inch of precipitation per week
9.4.include a rain sensor override.
10.Landscape materials shall be warranted per the notes on Sheet L-2.
11.All plant material shall be watered and maintained for establishment and
through the warranty period.
12.Contractor shall keep a clean and tidy site.
13.Contractor shall repair, at no cost to owner, any and all damage resulting
from the Contractor's work.
Lawn-Sod
Final Foundation Treatment and Detailed Planting
To be determined with builder and homeowner.
Green Mountain Maple-Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain'
Heritage River Birch-Betula nigra 'Heritage'
Blue Beech-Carpinus Caroliniana
Skyline Honeylocust-Gleditsia tricanthos var. inermis 'Skycole'
Kentucky Coffeetree Decaf-Gymnocladus dioica 'McKBranched'
Existing Tree to Remain
Swamp White Oak-Quercus bicolor
Norway Spruce-Picea abies
Black Hills White Spruce-Picea glauca 'Densata'
L-2
A
Native Stormwater Seed Mix A
LEGEND
White Spruce-Picea glauca
Native Stormwater Seed Mix B
Sample Foundation PlantingL-2
A
2
23-026
02/16/2024
LOTUS VILLAS, ON ANDERSON LAKE
RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
PO BOX 16646
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PHONE: (612)642-1382
EMAIL: sarah@studiogro.com
I hearby certify that this plan, specification, or report has
been prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly licensed Professional Landscape Architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Sarah Sutherland, PLA 45553
2/16/2024
3/7/2024 PER CITY REVIEW DATED 3-6-2024NO. 1
N
L-1L-1
1
2
2
3
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
L
A
K
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
TRACT B
PID 1311622340034
Owner FARHANA AHMED
& STEVEN J MCLAIRD
PID 1311622340035
Owner JERALD S JOHNSON TRUSTEE
PID 1311622340036
Owner TODD A MORGAN
PID 1311622230006
Owner CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PID 1311622310035
Owner WEST ON WOODS ON ANDERSON LK
N55°
4
9
'
2
1
"
E
4
2
0
.
4
7
N
2
8
°
0
6
'
4
8
"
W
1
7
3
.
5
2
N
2
1
°
0
9
'
5
8
"
W
3
2
1
.
6
7
3
0
.
0
0
N
3
4
°
3
4
'
2
0
"
W
N52°
1
8
'
0
3
"
E
4
1
9
.
4
8
L
=
5
8
.
5
8
C
H
=
5
6
.
2
8
C
H
B
=
N
3
7
°
4
1
'
5
4
"
W
R
=
6
0
.
0
0
Δ
=
5
5
°
5
6
'
2
0
"
N
1
7
°
2
8
'
4
3
"
W
2
2
3
.
0
4
L
=
2
7
5
.
0
1
R
=
7
3
0
.
0
0
Δ
=
2
1
°
3
5
'
0
4
"
Found Capped Iron Pipe inscribed License No. 7085
Found Iron Monument
Found Iron Monument
Found Capped Iron Pipe
inscribed License No. 6235
F
o
u
n
d
C
a
p
p
e
d
I
r
o
n
P
i
p
e
i
n
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
N
o
.
c
a
p
u
n
r
e
a
d
a
b
l
e
Existing Chain Link Fence 0.6 feet
southeasterly of property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 0.7 feet
southeasterly of property line
8
0
.
0
0
f
o
o
t
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
i
g
h
t
o
f
W
a
y
9.
1
Existing Chain Link Fence on property line
Existing Chain Link
Fence on property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 0.2 feet
southeasterly of property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 3.4 feet
northwesterly of property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 9.1 feet
northwesterly of property line
1
Access
Entrance
B
i
t
u
m
i
n
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
48.0
B-B
16.7
B-B
16.7
B-B
15.1
15.8
1
9
.
2
8
"
W
M
8
"
W
M
8
"
W
M
13
23-026
02/16/2024
RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
N
PO BOX 41486
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441
PHONE: (763)486.3799
EMAIL: MCAMPION@CAMPIONENG.COM
N CAMPION
ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC.
CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ
3
PRELIMINARY PLAT
LEGEND
1
2
2
3
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
L
A
K
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
TRACT B
5001
5002
5003
5004
5005
5008
5009
5022
5025
510151025103
5104
5105
5116
5117
5118
5124
5130
5137
5139
5164
PID 1311622340034
Owner FARHANA AHMED
& STEVEN J MCLAIRD
PID 1311622340035
Owner JERALD S JOHNSON TRUSTEE
PID 1311622340036
Owner TODD A MORGAN
PID 1311622230006
Owner CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PID 1311622310035
Owner WEST ON WOODS ON ANDERSON LK
N55°
4
9
'
2
1
"
E
4
2
0
.
4
7
N
2
8
°
0
6
'
4
8
"
W
1
7
3
.
5
2
N
2
1
°
0
9
'
5
8
"
W
3
2
1
.
6
7
3
0
.
0
0
N
3
4
°
3
4
'
2
0
"
W
N52°
1
8
'
0
3
"
E
4
1
9
.
4
8
L
=
5
8
.
5
8
C
H
=
5
6
.
2
8
C
H
B
=
N
3
7
°
4
1
'
5
4
"
W
R
=
6
0
.
0
0
Δ
=
5
5
°
5
6
'
2
0
"
N
1
7
°
2
8
'
4
3
"
W
2
2
3
.
0
4
L
=
2
7
5
.
0
1
R
=
7
3
0
.
0
0
Δ
=
2
1
°
3
5
'
0
4
"
Found Capped Iron Pipe inscribed License No. 7085
Found Iron Monument
Found Iron Monument
Found Capped Iron Pipe
inscribed License No. 6235
Fo
u
n
d
C
a
p
p
e
d
I
r
o
n
P
i
p
e
i
n
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
N
o
.
c
a
p
u
n
r
e
a
d
a
b
l
e
Existing Chain Link Fence 0.6 feet
southeasterly of property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 0.7 feet
southeasterly of property line
8
0
.
0
0
f
o
o
t
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
i
g
h
t
o
f
W
a
y
9.
1
Existing Chain Link Fence on property line
Existing Chain Link
Fence on property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 0.2 feet
southeasterly of property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 3.4 feet
northwesterly of property line
Existing Chain Link Fence 9.1 feet
northwesterly of property line
1
Access
Entrance
B
i
t
u
m
i
n
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
48.0
B-B
16.7
B-B
16.7
B-B
15.1
15.8
1
9
.
2
8
"
W
M
8
"
W
M
8
"
W
M
13
23-026
02/16/2024
RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
N
PO BOX 41486
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441
PHONE: (763)486.3799
EMAIL: MCAMPION@CAMPIONENG.COM
N CAMPION
ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC.
CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ
6
PRELIMINARY STORM SEWER PLAN
’
’
DETAIL A
POND CROSS SECTION
Memo
To: Mike Waldo From: Ed Terhaar, PE
Ron Clark Construction
File: 193806865 Date: February 19, 2024
Reference: Trip Generation Information for 10700 Prairie Lakes Drive in Eden Prairie, MN
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
__________________________________ DATE: February 19, 2024
Edward Terhaar
License No. 24441
Purpose and Background
This memorandum presents trip generation information for the existing office use and the proposed residential
use located at 10700 Prairie Lakes Drive in Eden Prairie.
Existing Conditions
The project site currently contains a 40,000 square foot office building with a surface parking lot.
Proposed Development Characteristics
The proposed project consists of constructing 19 new villa dwelling units. Access will be provided at two
locations on Prairie Lakes Drive.
Trip Generation
Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the existing office and the proposed residential were
calculated based on data presented in the eleventh edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Trip Generation for Existing and Proposed Uses
Land Use
(ITE Land Use
Code)
Size
Weekday AM Peak Hour
Weekday PM Peak Hour
Weekday
Daily
In Out Total In Out Total Total
Existing Use
Office (710) 40,000 SF 54 7 61 10 48 58 434
Proposed Use
Single Family
Dwelling Units (210)
19 DU 3 10 13 11 7 18 179
Notes: SF=square feet, DU=dwelling unit
As shown in the table, the proposed use generates 48 fewer trips in the a.m. peak hour, 40 fewer in the p.m.
peak hour, and 255 fewer on a daily basis.
10700 Neighborhood Meeting Summary
3/27/2024
Noted Questions and Concerns from Neighbors:
Mike Waldo did an overall recap of the project, the proposed 19 villas, then change in land use to
low density Single Family from office/commercial and process for approval, etc. Discuss similar
projects we have done in other communities and a little about Ron Clark construction and the fact
we will be the developer and builder which allow for a much more seamless process, if any issues
arise they can always call or email him directly
• Fence & landscape buffer to adjacent properties.
o We have proposed a new 6 foot high fence on the northwest side as requested by a
few of the townhome neighbors, that fence and specification is included in our
submittal and was shown to meeting attendees. To the south we will work
individually with each neighbor to determine the best screening plan, they all have
existing fences and replacement of those fences may do more damage to the
existing planting then just leaving as is.
o Do we have flexibility to work with neighbors regarding tree plantings/landscaping
on both sides of property line? This is something to be discussed with city as we
move forward. We stated we will work with the south neighbors to do plantings, ect.
on our site and maybe a few trees/plants on their property if that provides the best
screening for both properties.
• Construction traffic/timeline
o What is projected timeline for demolition? And start date? Shooting for early June
Demo start and should complete the demo scope in 2 weeks.
o Discussed that building has had a site Phase 1 and Hazardous materials survey
completed and the couple minor items (window caulk, etc.) will be removed prior t
any demo work being started.
o How will possible dust/air pollution be mitigated? When speaking with Demo
vendors, if need be, they will use water to mitigate dust/air pollution.
o What is expected construction traffic? At most this will be 60 or so trucks a day
hauling at certain points throughout the initial demo and grading process.
o Who’s responsible for keeping prairie lakes dr. clean and free of debris? This will be
maintained by street sweeping at least twice a week if not more.
• Home values & property taxes
o How will this affect neighboring home values and property taxes? Overall, this
project will be priced higher than neighboring homes therefore economically
speaking this should increase home values. With that said, property taxes may
increase but not dramatically as this new project should bring in about 25-
30,000,000 of increased tax base.
o What is projected price point of these units? Most likely anywhere from just under a
$1 million to $1.5 million.
o How “custom are these homes” and will all be built from scratch for each
homeowner? We will deliver 3 or so specs/model immediately. Most buyers will go
ahead and customize their fixtures and finishes. For example, kitchen appliances,
flooring, tile, etc. Each villa will not be a full-blown custom home, but we are not the
run of the mill “cookie cutter” builder. Most units will have variances between them
regarding finishes, giving each villa its own unique finish.
Other Noted Questions:
• HOA Structure - Should be similar to Greenway Villas in Golden Valley.
• Why private street? - Cost is on HOA and not the city.
• Water run-off/drainage issues? - There will be no additional run-off into adjacent TH’s &
Homes.
• Communication process- Internally REC will create a neighbor email list and send out
updates. The frequency of this can be increased upon request by the neighbors. Our project
information can be found on the city of EP website. Our other comparable projects can be
found on our Ron Clark website.
Overall, most neighbors were supportive of the change in use of the property to Single Family. As
you can see most of the questions revolved around the process and the potential for noise, dust
and additional traffic during construction. Long term the change will make for a much more
cohesive area with all residential uses.
As previously indicated, we do not object to the proposed development plan. However, given our
proximity to the SAP property we are concerned that the noise pollution, dust and dirt from the
project will be a nuisance that significantly impacts the use and enjoyment of our home.
Ron Clark has indicated they will install a fence along the property line but has not indicated when
the fence will be installed. We requested that the fence be installed prior to the start of demolition.
Ron Clark has indicated that the demolition and infrastructure development will be conducted to
minimize the amount of dirt and dust produced by spraying water as necessary.
We understand that there will be significant noise pollution during all segments of the development
process. It’s our understanding that it’s likely that the decibel level from demolition and
infrastructure development, as well as the reverse beeping from construction equipment during all
phases, will likely exceed the allowable levels specified in the Minnesota Noise Pollution Control
Rules. We would appreciate it if the hours that equipment is operated or there is noise producing
building activity (e.g., framing work) be limited to Monday through Friday, and to cease by 5:00 PM
each day.
Ron Clark has indicated that the grade of the property will not be changed so as to increase water
flow on or under our property. Based on the drawing provided (Site Section 2, prepared by Whitten
Associates, Inc.) it appears that the grade will be higher than it currently is but we really can’t tell.
We request that the City monitor the traffic for speed and safety on Prairie Lakes Drive during all
phases of the construction process. The speed limit on Prairie Lakes Drive was recently increased
to 30 mph which did not make sense to us, especially now with this upcoming project.
Mark & Becky Kuck
10684 Leaping Deer Ln
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
From:City of Eden Prairie
To:Planning
Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Contact Us: Planning and Zoning
Date:Thursday, March 14, 2024 2:37:01 PM
Contact Us: Planning and Zoning
Submission #:3067296
IP Address:15.181.49.124
Submission Date:03/14/2024 2:36
Survey Time:7 minutes, 1 second
You have a new online form submission.
Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login.
Please complete this form to provide comments or ask questions. Planning Division Eden Prairie City Center
8080 Mitchell Road 952-949-8485
Full Name
Mark Kuck
Email
kuckchalet@outlook.com
Full Address
10684 Leaping Deer Ln
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Phone
(612) 578-6185
Message
We understand that Ron Clark Construction has submitted a proposal to develop the SAP site at 10700 Prairie Lakes
Drive. Our home in Weston Woods on Anderson Lakes is adjacent to the SAP site (the building is within 130 feet
from our home). We have sent Mike Waldo our questions in writing as we can't attend the proposed meeting. We
would like to send our comments to the planning commission as well. Can you please let us know who we can send
them to? Thank you, Mark & Becky Kuck
Would you like to be contacted regarding your comments?
Yes
How do you prefer we contact you?
Email
Thank you,
City of Eden Prairie
This is an automated message generated by Granicus. Please do not reply directly to this email.
6
Pictures from our Legacy Oaks Neighborhoods
7
Pictures from our Legacy Oaks Neighborhoods
8
Pictures from our Legacy Oaks Neighborhoods
20
Pictures from our Pike Lake Landing Neighborhood
9
Pictures from Various Model homes
in our Legacy Oaks and Trout Run Preserve
Neighborhoods
Stairs down and Foyer
KitchenDining
Study
Great RoomFront of home
10
Pictures from Various Model homes
in our Legacy Oaks and Trout Run Preserve
Neighborhoods
Lower Level Family Room
Laundry –Mud/Craft RoomOwners Suite Bath
Lower Level Bar & Game area
Owners Suite Bath Owners Suite Bedroom
11
Pictures from Various Model homes
in our Legacy Oaks and Trout Run Preserve Neighborhoods
Office Nook
KitchenDining
Owners Suite Bedroom
Great RoomFront of home
12
Pictures from Various Model homes
in our Legacy Oaks and Trout Run Preserve Neighborhoods
Lower Level Family Room
Laundry –Mud RoomOwners Suite Bath
Lower Level Bar & Game area
Owners Suite Bath Front of home
13
Pictures from Various Model homes
in our Legacy Oaks and Trout Run Preserve Neighborhoods
Lower Level Family Room
Laundry –Mud RoomOwners Suite Bath
Lower Level Bar & Game area
Owners Suite Bath Front of home
Example Villa Floor Plans
15
GV-MANCHESTER
1956 S.F.
MAIN LEVEL
3546 S.F.
1590 S.F.
LOWER LEVEL
TOTAL
UNFIN. MECH
176 S.F.
08/31/2023
1230 GREENWAY PASS
Garage
23'-9"x26'-0"
Front Porch
Foyer
Family Foyer
Bench & Hooks
W D
Primary Bedroom
12'-5"x15'-0"
Dining
12'-5"x12'-10"Great Room
12'-0"x17'-9"
Kitchen
12'-0"x20'-0"
Hall
Primary
Bath
W.I.C.
Clo.
Office Pwdr
Pantry
Deck
27'-0"x13'-0"
Clo.
Built-Ins
Sun Room
12'-0"x14'-0"
Bar
9'-0"x9'-0"
Games
12'-0"x16'-0"
Family Room
13'-5"x16'-5"
Bedroom 2
12'-5"x13'-5"
Hall
Clo.
Bath
Mechanical
Bedroom 3
12'-0"x13'-0"
Flex Room
Ga
s
F
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
Bu
i
l
t
-
I
n
s
Bu
i
l
t
-
I
n
s
Storage
Patio
Screen Porch
13'-0"x14'-8"
Clo.
Ln.
Ledge
Clo.
Ln
.
Bench
Ga
s
F
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
Bu
i
l
t
-
I
n
s
Bu
i
l
t
-
I
n
s
Hall
UP
1
6
R
D
DN
DN
W
IRONWOOD
1688 S.F.
MAIN LEVEL
3088 S.F.
OPT. FLEX ROOM
137 S.F.
1400 S.F.
LOWER LEVEL
TOTAL
UNFIN. MECH
151 S.F.
PatioOpt.
Screened
Porch
Opt.
Sun Room
Deck
143 S.F.
OPT. SUN ROOM
07/12/2022
SEAT
Garage
Family Foyer
W.I.C.
Owner's Bath
Owner's Suite
Hall
Pwdr
Foyer
Kitchen
Dining
Great Room
Deck
Front Porch
Study
Clo.
Optional
Bar
W.I.C
Bedroom 3
Bath
Clo.
Bedroom 2
Hall
Finished
Family Room Games
Opt. Flex Room
Linen
Patio
Mechanical
Ln.
Drop
Zone
Bench
& Hooks
D W
Fireplace
Built-Ins
Built-Ins
Optional
Fireplace
Optional
Built-Ins
Optional
Built-Ins
Storage
3,368 with Porch and Flex
Bufftech ®
Molded and Extruded Textured Fence Products
The Bufftech® Advantage
Two innovative product lines under one great brand
Long-lasting beauty, superior performance and the best protection
you can get – that’s the Bufftech Advantage. Bufftech fence comes
in an array of sophisticated styles, complementary colors and
authentic finishes along with premium features to ensure it will
outlast and outperform the competition. Bufftech also features a
superior warranty including ColorLast® fade protection.
Molded Fence
Bufftech has reinvented fence
manufacturing with its patented
design of rotationally-molded
fence, allowing realistic granite-
stone and deep-grain wood
textures molded from real wood
and stone. Molded fence has
very high impact-resistance
and excellent sound absorption
for quiet and secure outdoor
living spaces and yards. These
extremely durable privacy fences
also offer fade-resistant colors
and steel-reinforced sections.
Extruded Fence
Bufftech extruded fence is the
undisputed leader in style, color
and texture. Our innovative textures
are molded from real wood to
deliver the most authentic look
available today. Fade-resistant
colors, high-quality accessories,
durable hardware and steel
reinforced rails ensure a long-
lasting installation. Extruded fence
also offers SureStart™ protection,
an exclusive CertainTeed benefit
covering warranted repair and
replacement costs, including labor,
for five years after installation.
On Cover:
Sherwood in Nantucket Gray
Bufftech® Molded Fence
The Bufftech Advantage
starts with details.
Patented Construction
Rotationally-molded
allowing realistic granite-
stone appearance and
dramatic wood texture.
Internal Reinforcement
with galvanized steel to
withstand significant impact
or wind load without
compromising aesthetics.
Sound Barrier
Blocks 98% of direct sound.
Color & Texture
Bufftech fence products set the
standard for the latest innovations in
decorative privacy. From our proprietary
manufacturing process to our vibrant
colors, CertainTeed is the undisputed
leader in color and texture. Our finish
is molded from real wood and stone
to deliver the most authentic look
available today. Plus, Bufftech is virtually
maintenance-free, and never needs
staining or painting.
Allegheny®
Sherwood
Beige Granite Dark Brown Granite
Walnut Brown Nantucket Gray
Brown Granite
Dark Gray Granite
Red Cedar
Dark Gray Oak
Gray Granite
4
Colors throughout this brochure
are simulated.
Consult product color samples
before making final selection.
Performance
Bufftech’s molded fence is made with a
proprietary blend of polyethylene plastic
and is reinforced with galvanized steel.
Our extremely durable fence creates
solid privacy and security without
compromising aesthetics.
With exclusive WindZone™
performance, Bufftech
fence is engineered for use
in high wind and hurricane conditions,
as approved by Miami-Dade County
NOA #22-0616.10*. Recognized as the
most stringent standards in the country,
Miami-Dade test protocols include
dynamic wind load testing up
to 115 mph.
The Bufftech line meets
requirements of the ASTM
and includes styles that
comply with local codes for
swimming pool applications. Check with
your local building code official as local
codes may vary.
Molded panels block 98% of
direct sound, Allegheny has a
(STC) sound transmission class
of 26 and Sherwood has a STC
of 23 to create quiet spaces.
*Miami-Dade County-approved NOA #22-0616.10,
for exceptional performance in high wind conditions.
To comply with WindZone Performance, additional
items are needed for installation. Please reference
our product catalog. Expires 4/4/2028.
Peace of Mind
CertainTeed stands behind the Bufftech
molded fence line with an exceptional
lifetime limited warranty.
Bufftech Sherwood
and Allegheny have
CertainTeed's ColorLast®
fade protection. UV
inhibitors protect against the sun’s
harsh rays to maintain vibrant colors.
Our polymers have been tested
to withstand extreme weather
conditions with little or no fading.
Graffiti resistance makes removing
graffiti easy by using a high-powered
pressure washer.
CertainTeed is actively
pursuing strategies to
reduce our environmental
impact, while increasing
the sustainability of our operations
and products. CertainTeed conducted
a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) that
was submitted to the National Institute
of Standards and Technology (NIST)
and was published in the building
product LCA database, BEES (Building
for Environmental and Economic
Sustainability).
A company you can trust.
For more than 100 years,
homeowners and building
professionals alike have
relied on CertainTeed as a trusted source
of innovative, high-quality building
products. Bufftech® continues this long-
standing tradition with its superior fence
line, proudly made in the U.S.A.
5
STC 26STC 23 STC 21
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner
DATE: April 8, 2024 SUBJECT: Asia Mall Parking lot expansion
LOCATION: 12160 Technology Drive REQUEST: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.69 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 4.69 acres
• Site Plan approval on 4.69 acres
BACKGROUND In 2020, approval was granted for the reuse of the former Gander Mountain to Asia Mall, a two story
retail center with a ground level grocery story and restaurant spaces. Office and additional retail uses also occupy the space. Asia Mall opened in November, 2022. After a short while, it because apparent that the parking did not meet the business need of the property. With the parking lot full, mall patrons were observed
parking at adjacent private properties, and crossing Technology Drive causing safety concerns for both pedestrians and motorists. At the initial opening, in the holiday season and during a winter of heavy snows, a parking issue was identified. Since then, Mall ownership has sought ways to better manage the parking needs. During
periods of high business volume, additional security has been hired to direct traffic; snow will be removed from parking spaces; and the construction of additional parking is proposed. As a longer term solution, the expansion requires land use approvals. SITE PLAN
The proposal is to
replace an existing stormwater pond with surface parking and an underground
stormwater
management system. The additional parking area would add 122 spaces,
primarily east of the
main entrance,
Staff Report – Asia Mall Parking lot expansion
April 8, 2024 Page 2
2
where a right turn lane into the site is also added.
The existing pedestrian pathway of red concrete will be extended east into the new portion of the parking lot for added visibility and safety of pedestrians. The proposal includes additional landscaping and provides for additional parking lot lighting.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS
The following waivers are requested: Front yard (north, and south), side yard setback (west). A waiver has been granted for the existing parking lot to encroach into required front yard on the south. The proposal continues that
encroachment along the south property line providing for consistency in the site design.
Additionally, the proposed parking lot expansions encroach into the west and north required yards. These encroachments are supported because there will not be any further development of these areas and there is significant separation from the property and the large electrical transmission yard to the west, and an on-ramp to Interstate 494 to the north. Given these unique land uses, the goals of minimum setbacks (separation of uses, provision of open space, etc.) are maintained.
Impervious Surface area. This property is within the shoreland overlay district, where the maximum impervious surface area is 30%. The site plan shows 97% impervious surface. Is it difficult to avoid impervious surface waivers in existing commercial/ retail environments. The
shoreland regulations, including the impervious surface area limits, are intended to protect the
natural characteristics of the land, and the quality of the water body. In developed commercial environments, the natural quality is already compromised, so the primary goal shifts to minimizing the impervious surface and water quality. The stormwater management standards protect the water quality. Reducing impervious surface is not practical with the scope of this project due to many factors, including timing.
Staff Report – Asia Mall Parking lot expansion
April 8, 2024 Page 3
3
Parking. The existing and proposed uses of the building requires 445 parking spaces:
Current Proposal
ITE Parking Generation
Square feet Parking
stalls Weekday
peak
Saturday
Peak
Office 4,873 21.9 12 1
Non-grocery retail 5,218 23.5 12 17
Common space 12,560 25.1
Grocery 33,645 151.4 99 122
Type 1 Rest. 5,725 60.0 99 109
Type 2 Rest. 886 8.0 118 118
Type 3 Rest. 11,664 155.0
Parking required 74,571 445 340 367 Total parking provided is 424 spaces. While there is a parking deficit of 21 spaces, the site provides 95% of the code requirements based on the variety of uses. The original approval of Asia Mall granted a waiver to allow 76% of the required spaces, to 294 spaces.
The number of parking spaces provided exceeds the ITE suggested parking requirements for both Weekday and Saturday peaks. Parking islands (size and number). City Code requires one landscaped island per 20 stalls, each
island be 160 sq ft minimum, and the cumulative area of parking islands be equal or greater than 5% of the parking lot area. While overall the total area of parking lot islands exceeds the minimum standard, to meet the standard for the number and size of islands, at least 6 new islands would need to be added, and two proposed islands would need to be enlarged, resulting is 8 less parking spaces. In this situation, waivers are preferred to prevent off-site parking, as street
parking and parking on adjacent private parcels is not possible. TREE REPLACEMENT AND LANDSCAPING 39 trees will be removed to facilitate the parking lot expansion. It is the city’s practice that non-significant trees required of a previous approval be replaced at a ratio of 1:1. Other significant trees
will be replaced subject to the city’s tree replacement ordinance. A combination of planting of trees, shrubbery, and payment in lieu of tree replacement will satisfy these requirements. Upon completion of the project, 43 trees and 65 shrubs will be planted on site. The landscaping plan provided shows new trees and shrubbery along the south property line, east of
the main drive. Staff recommends these trees and shrubs be spaced out along the south property line,
Staff Report – Asia Mall Parking lot expansion
April 8, 2024 Page 4
4
to improve the streetscape interest along the entire frontage, rather than concentrated along a
relatively small section of frontage. This is reasonable given the front yard setback waivers
requested. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS There is currently no sidewalk along the north side of Technology Drive And there are no plans to
add a sidewalk or cross walk in the area. While there is a trail along the south side of Technology
Dr., any future construction of a crosswalk would need to be intentional to avoid introduction of an unsafe situation, or funneling patrons to private property. If one is added in the future, portions of these improvements are the responsibility of the property
owner. The development agreement will speak the property owner’s responsibilities.
DRAINAGE Stormwater will be managed with an underground system under the eastern addition of the parking lot. This system limits the ability to plan trees or other landscaping in the immediate area. The
stormwater management system will conform to applicable regulations. SIGNS No additional signage is proposed, though the existing freestanding sign near the entrance will shift to the east.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the site and the waivers as requested.
January 11, 2024
Eden Prairie Planning Commision
8080 Mitchell Road,
Eden Prairie, MN, 55344
Project: Asia Mall - Parking Expansion
12160 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Site Plan Review Narrative
Dear Chairperson and Committee Members,
On behalf of the property owner Asian Plaza Property LLC, I submit the following
narrative and documents supporting their application to expand the parking lot.
Documents/Exhibits Attached (or previously provided to staff):
Signed Land Development Applications Form
Application Fees for Site Plan Review
Current Title Commitment
Signed/Notarized Deposit Agreement
Exhibit A Updated Traffic Study (previously performed by Alliant Engineering Inc.)
Exhibit B Civil Site Plans (including Existing Conditions, Site, Grading/Drainage, Utility,
Landscape, and Lighting Plans)
Exhibit C Stormwater Report including a Green Infrastructure Review & Soils Report
Exhibit D Phase 1 Environmental Assessment
Exhibit E Shoreland Review
Additional relevant existing information requested per Site Plan Review Application Checklist:
Legal Description Gander Mountain Addition Lot 001 Block 001
Zoning Designation C-REG-SER (Regional Service Commercial)
Executive Summary
The previous Asia Mall site plan review and PUD waiver was approved with a deficit of 92
parking stalls. That approval was based on proposed areas and uses. Now that the facility has
been fully built out, a PUD amendment is necessary as the actual areas and uses differ from the
original proposal. This application proposes the expansion of the existing parking lot with 134
additional parking stalls to meet and exceed the required parking space requirements based on
Asia Mall’s current areas and uses, now that it is fully completed.
Waiver request: For the parking lot expansion to be constructed, the following waivers would
need to be granted:
● Minimum Setbacks (11.03 Subd. 3. H.5.b) - The proposed parking lot is within the
required 10’ setback along the North, West, and Southeast corner.
● Parking Islands (11.03 Subd. 3. G.5.h) - The proposed site layout does not meet the
minimum parking island area requirements.
● Maximum Impervious (11.50 Subd. 13. E) - Proposed impervious surface is 97% which
is greater than the required 30% maximum impervious.
● Screening (11.03 Subd. 3. G.5.q) - The proposed parking lot does not provide full
screening of parked cars from Technology Dr.
Background Information
In 2006 Gander Mountain bought this site and built the existing structure and parking lot. The
city granted a waiver to reduce the parking requirement from 5 to 4.5 spaces per 1,000 gsf of
retail and office space. Asian Plaza Property LLC purchased the property in 2021 and converted
the space to Asia Mall. The facade of the building was replaced and additional square footage
was added to the second level of the building. Asia Mall is a mixed use space with office, retail,
grocery and restaurant space. The converted building required more parking per city code, and
a parker waiver was granted in 2021 due to site limitations. The stormwater pond on the east
side of the site would need to be replaced to accommodate a parking lot expansion.
Asia Mall has been open a year and it has been an incredibly popular destination for the
community. Parking demand has been very high. On busy days the lot will fill up and cars will
park on Technology Dr or at Costco to the west. This high demand has led to traffic congestion
in the area, so the city has required that Asia Mall provide more parking. As a short term
solution, 50 additional parking stalls are being provided at the Asian Plaza Property LLC office
to employees who are then shuttled to Asia Mall.
Project Description:
This project proposes to increase off street parking to the maximum extent practicable. The
existing parking lot would be significantly expanded. The existing pond to the east would be
converted to underground storage. New pavement would then be constructed east out to the
property line. The existing lot would also be pushed out on the west and north closer to the
property line. Additionally, the city would require a right turn lane be added to Technology Dr.
This project would require new pavement, underground stormwater storage, lighting,
landscaping, and an entrance sign.
Parking Requirements
A traffic and parking study was previously performed by Alliant Engineering Inc. in 2021. During
the previous site review a waiver was requested for a shortage of stalls. Since that study, square
footage and restaurant seating has been added which has increased the parking shortage. The
proposed site plan meets the city code requirements, and provides a substantial excess number
of parking stalls for peak traffic demand.
Parking Study
Stall requirements to meet the Eden Prairie code have been updated per actual areas and uses.
UPDATED Eden Prairie Parking Code Requirement
Land Use SF Seats Parking Code Req'd Stalls
Office GLA 4873 4.5/1000 22
Retail GLA 5844 4.5/1000 27
Non-Leasible 12560 NA NA
Grocery 33645 4.5/1000 152
Type 1 Rest. 5725 150 1/2.5 seats 60
Type 2 Rest. 886 24 1/3 seats 8
Type 3 Rest. 11665 310 1/2 seats 155
Total 75198 484 424
Provided Parking Stalls
Underground 77
Surface Parking 217
Surface Parking Expansion 134
Total 428
Provided Parking Stall Excess/ Shortage 4
The proposed site plan would add 134 stalls which provides an excess of 4 stalls per city code.
The previous site plan review had a city code requirement of 386 stalls and there was a 92 stall
shortage. This proposed site plan would provide dramatically more parking.
Traffic Study
The traffic study estimated peak traffic hours for the different businesses on the site (restaurants
are busy at different times than grocery stores etc). The busiest time for the entire site was
estimated. The original Alliant calculations were updated to reflect the current land uses of Asia
Mall. A summary of these calculations can be seen below and full updated calculations can be
found in Exhibit A.
Land Use (ITE Code) Size (SF) Size (Seats)
Stalls per
1,000
SF/Seats
Weekday
[1]
Stalls per
1,000
SF/Seats
Saturday
[1]
Weekday
Peak
Parking
Demand
(Stalls)
Saturday
Peak
Parking
Demand
(Stalls)
Office (710) 4873 2.4 0.3 12 1
Retail (820) 5844 2.0 2.9 12 17
Grocery (850) 33645 2.9 3.6 99 122
Type 1 Rest. (933) [2] 5725 150 0.66 0.73 99 109
Type 2 & 3 Rest. (932) 12550 334 0.35 0.35 118 118
Peak Traffic Demand 317 344
Proposed Total Parking Stalls 428
Parking Excess/ Shortage 111 84
Percent Parking Excess/ Shortage 35% 24%
[1] Source: InsƟtute of TransportaƟon Engineers Parking GeneraƟon Manual, 5th EdiƟon
[2] Source: Due to limited availability, Saturday Peak parking demand esƟmated by mulƟplying weekday
value by a factor of 1.1
The updated traffic study shows the proposed site plan meets peak traffic demand with
significant excess parking. The estimated peak traffic demand from this study is comparable to
what has been seen on site in the last year of operation during peak traffic. The 294 stall parking
lot and the 50 off site employee stalls are occupied and there are more vehicles on site looking
for parking. The proposed site provides enough parking to meet expected traffic demand, and
there should not be a traffic problem in the future.
Summary of Parking Requirements
● Eden Prairie parking code requires 424 off-street parking stalls and the proposed site
offers 428.
● The traffic study estimated parking requirements using data from the Institute of
Transportation Engineer’s Generation Manual, 5th Edition (ITE PGM). The site design
provides enough stalls for peak traffic demand.
● The proposed parking lot meets the requirements in the Eden Prairie City Code.
Therefore, impacts on the surrounding properties and/or roadways are not anticipated.
Asia mall is a unique business. Traffic for the different businesses is varied enough that the
parking lot can handle peak traffic. Also, the multi-use format of the site means that several
people coming to Asia Mall will visit multiple businesses. This was not analyzed in the traffic
study, but it is assumed that this site would see a lower parking demand because of customers
making multiple stops in a single trip. Additionally, employee parking spaces are currently
offered at a separate location and transported via shuttle to the site. The updated traffic study
shows that employees could park on site and the shuttle would not be required after the parking
lot expansion is completed.
Landscaping
The existing site has 78 trees, 11 of which are significant. The proposed project would remove 9
significant trees and 46 non-significant trees. Eden Prairie Municipal Code 11.55 Subd. 4
requires that 24 trees be planted to accommodate this loss.
Tree Replacement
Total Caliper Inches of Significant Removal 136
Total Caliper Inches of Significant Trees 157
Required Caliper Inches 59
Required 2.5" Trees 24
The planting of 24 new trees would meet the city landscaping requirements found in Municipal
Code 11.3 Subd.5. The proposed landscaping plan shows tree locations and the planting
schedule. All proposed trees are naturalized native species according to the University of
Minnesota.
Landscaping Requirement
GFA 76,000
Required Caliper Inches 238
Remaining Dec. Caliper Inches 131
Remaining Con. Height Ft 104
Equivalent Con. Caliper Inches 43
Remaining Shrubs 47
Equivalent Shrub Caliper Inches 24
Proposed Trees Caliper Inches 59
Total Proposed Caliper Inches 257
Construction Schedule
This project would begin as soon as approval is granted by the city and materials can be
procured. It is expected to last approximately 3 to 6 months and would be completed before
winter 2024.
Sustainability
While this project is an addition and not new construction, sustainability was still considered
throughout the design process. The proposed underground stormwater system would improve
water quality leaving the site and lower peak discharge rates. When the building was purchased
two EV chargers were installed. At the time 2 additional chargers were proposed for installation
in 2024. If these are installed then the site would have EV charging at 1% of parking stalls which
is halfway to the city goal of 2%. Also, when the site was purchased a potential solar array was
proposed within 5 years. At this time it is not feasible for this to be installed, but will be
considered again by the original goal of 2026.
Additional Information:
Phase 1 Environmental Assessment
This site has previously undergone an environmental assessment when it was purchased in
2021. The soil had been contaminated but remediation efforts have been taken and the MPCA
has sent closure letters. This alone does not assure that there are no contaminants in the soil.
After reviewing site history the previous contaminants were located on the west side of the site
around the current building. Groundwater in the contaminated area was found to flow to the
west. Proposed excavation for this site would occur on the east side of the site approximately
300’ from the contaminated area. The east side of the site has no history of contaminants.
Shoreland Review
The existing stormwater pond outlets to Lake Idlewild which is protected shoreland. The
proposed underground system is designed to use the existing outlet structure. Since the
proposed system was designed per RPBCWD rules there should not be any impact on the
shoreland.
Snow and Salt Management Plans
Snow and salt management will not be greatly altered. In the event of a large snowfall, snow
would be hauled off site. This would keep the proposed parking stalls free from snow piles. Salt
is currently not stored on site and will not be stored on site.
Thank you for reviewing this application.
Sincerely,
Lance Elliott, PE
Elliott Design Build
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
2
2
6
6
64
5
6
10
25
6
8
4
EXISTING TRUCK
AREA
3
PARKING CALCULATION
EXISTING UNDERGROUND = 77
EXISTING SURFACE = 217
TOTAL EXISTING = 294
TOTAL ADA STALL PROVIDED =9
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||
EXPAND TO 2'
FROM NORTH
PROPERTY LINE
NEW EXIT
(RIGHT OUT
ONLY)
EXISTING DRIVE
TO REMAIN
AS-ISCHANGE EXITING
TRAFFIC TO
RIGHT-OUT ONLY
EXPAND OUT TO
WEST PROPERTY
LINE TO
ACCOMMODATE
PARALLEL STALLS
RIGHT TURN
LANE PER CITY
REQUIREMENTS
1
APPROX. 3' RETAINING WALL
B612 CURB
B612 CURB
B624 CURB
B612 CURB
RELOCATED LIGHT
-6
10' SEBACK ALONG FRONTPROPOSED SIGN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
PARKING CALCULATION
EXISTING UNDERGROUND = 77
EXISTING SURFACE = 217
TOTAL EXISTING = 294
SURFACE EXPANSION = 122
PROPOSED TOTAL = 425
TOTAL ADA STALLS REQ'D = 9
TOTAL ADA STALL PROVIDED = 9
PROPOSED LIGHT
PROPOSED LIGHT
EXISTING PAVEMENT EDGE
24'
16'
100'
14'
24'
200'
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
5'
13'
19'
24'
24'
24'
-33
38'36'
5'
19'
5'
18'9'
19'9'
9'23'
20'
9'
23'
9'
18'
CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN PATH
MATCH EXISITNG5
6
11
>>
>>
>>
YELLOW CURB
YELLOW CURB
NO LEFT TURN
R3-2
RIGHT TURN LANE MUST TURN RIGHT
R3-7
DO NOT ENTER
R5-1
ARROWS
ARROW
6" WHITE STRIPE
NO PARKING
FIRE LANE SIGN
VALLEY GUTTER
VALLEY GUTTER
NO LEFT TURN
R3-2
CROSSWALK STRIPING
14'
>>
ONE-WAY
R6-1R
INSTALL WOOD
MULCH
LEGEND
EXISTING SITE
PROPOSED SITE
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
DECOMPACT AND SEED
WITH MNDOT 25-131
DECOMPACT AND INSTALL
LANDSCAPE ROCK
PROPERTY LINE
UNDERGROUND STORAGE
EXISTING TREE
Asia Mall. 12160 Technology
Dr., Eden Prairie, MN 55344
E519
GENERAL NOTES:
1.FOLLOW ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS.
2.MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO LAWN DURING DEMOLITION RESTORE WHEN
COMPLETE.
3.PUBLIC STREETS ARE TO BE CLEAN OF DEBRIS AND DIRT ON A DAILY
BASIS.
4.STATE LAW REQUIRES NOTIFICATION OF GOPHER ONE CALL, BUT CAN BE
LOCATED BY A CONTRACT LOCATOR OR OTHER SUITABLE MEANS.
5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITY LINES PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT AND SUPPORT AS NECESSARY ALL
EXISTENCE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES.
7.CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL
REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED
FROM THIS SITE.
PLANTING SCHEDULE
SYMBOL NAME SIZE QTY
BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' 9
IVORY SILK 2.5" 15
JAPANESE TREE LILAC
REJOICE CRABAPPLE 2.5" 15
MATADOR MAPLE 2.5" 4
KARL FORESTER #1 50
GRASS
BLUE STAR JUNIPER #5 15
Feet
1" = 40'
16080040
Tree Removal Calculations
Non-Significant Tree Replacement
Non-Significant Healthy Trees Removed=39
Required Tree=39
Significant Tree Replacement
Caliper Inches of Significant Trees Removed=136"
Caliper Inches of Significant Trees Remaining=21"
Required Tree=24
Proposed Landscaping Plan
Total Required Caliper Inch=157.5"
Proposed Trees=43 (107.5")
Proposed Grasses & Shrubs=65 (6.5")
Total Proposed Caliper Inch=114"
Tree Replacement Fee 43.5" X $125=$5,438
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
EXISTING TRUCK
AREA
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||
865
870
87
5
86
5
87
0
850
850
855
855
860
85
0
85
0
85
5
85
5
86
0
860
865
870
86
0 86
0
86
5
86
0
86
0
865
860
860
850
855
860
865
870
875
880
885
86587087
5
88
0
860
86
5
865
EXPAND TO 2'
FROM NORTH
PROPERTY LINE
NEW EXIT
(RIGHT OUT
ONLY)
EXISTING DRIVE
TO REMAIN
AS-IS
CHANGE EXITING
TRAFFIC TO
RIGHT-OUT ONLY
EXPAND OUT TO
WEST PROPERTY
LINE TO
ACCOMMODATE
PARALLEL STALLS
RIGHT TURN
LANE PER CITY
REQUIREMENTS
B612 CURB
B612 CURB
B624 CURB
B612 CURB
SILT FENCE
CONSTRUCTION
ENTERENCE
TW=860.0
BW=858.5
TW=862.0
BW=861.0
TW=865.0
BW=862.0
TW=861.0
BW=860.0
REDUNDANT SILT FENCE
10' SEBACK ALONG FRONT
TW=861.0
BW=858.5
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF
SILT FENCE
Total Area Disturbed: 46,276 SF
Total New Impervious: 43,699 SF
Asia Mall Impervious: 183,318 SF (87%)
Asia Mall Pervious: 25,624 SF
Turn Lane Impervious: 4,551 SF
GRADING ANALYSIS
CUT=2,500 CY
FILL=4,500 CY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
SF
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
INLET PROTECTION
INLET PROTECTION
>>
>>
>>
UNDERGROUND SYSTEM
UNDERGROUND SYSTEM
UNDERGROUND SYSTEM
VALLEY GUTTER
VALLEY GUTTER
>>
866.56
863.00 859.75
LP 860.93
861.15
861.73
861.57 860.58
859.00
LP
864.00 862.62
862.34
864.03
863.99
862.58
862.45
861.94
859.79
859.32859.34
861.63
873.25
863.03
861.82 860.82
LP
861.86
863.00
863.00
859.5
EOF
861.94 861.47862.17
863.04
864.01
865.49
865.89
859.05
866.46
865.87
867.00
859.03 Asia Mall. 12160 Technology
Dr., Eden Prairie, MN 55344
E519
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1.NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED,
INCLUDING RETNETION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST
EXTEND POSSIBLE. NEW TOPSOIL THAT IS INSTALLED SHALL CONTAIN AT
LEAST 5% ORGANIC CONTENT CONSISTENT WITH RPBCWD TOPSOIL
DEFINITION.
2.ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER
PRACTICES AS SPECIFIEID BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1
(H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION.
3.FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX
INCHES OF TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD AND INCORPORATED
INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENT WHEREVER
TOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED.
4.CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS,
CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER, AND SANITARY WASTE
MUST BE PROPERLY MANAGED.
5.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE
MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION IS
ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS
DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT.
6.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE
REMOVED UPON FINAL STABILIZATION.
7.SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAINING
PERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED
TO ACHIEVE A SOIL COMPACTION TESTING PRESSURE OF LESS THAN 1,400
KILOPASCALS OR 200 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH IN THE UPPER 12 INCHES
OF THE SOIL PROFILE WHILE TAKING CARE TO PROTECT UTILITES, TREE
ROOTS, AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION.
8.ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS
AFTER LAND-DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMORRILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED
ON A PROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS
ELSEWHERE.
9.THE PERMITTE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN, AND REPAIR ALL
DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS
PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND-DISTURBING
ACTIVIITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM
THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS
ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEE WILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER
THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST.
Feet
1" = 40'
16080040
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOURS
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING SPOT
PROPOSED SPOT
SILT FENCE
INLET PROTECTION
SF SF
1025.
0
EAST RETAINING WALL DETAIL
SEE VERSA-LOK FOR FULL DETAILS
862.34
863.47
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||
86
5
870
87
5
86
5
87
0
850
850
855
85
5
860
85
0
85
0
85
5
85
5
86
0
86
0
865
870
860 860 86
5
860
86
0
865
860
860
850
855
860
865
870
875
880
885
865870
87
5
88
0
860
86
5
865
SANITARY BUILDING
CONNECTION
17LF 6' PVC
INV=849.2
8
6
0
860
86
1
861
862
862
863
863864
8
6
2
8
6
3
863
86
4
864
86
0
860
85
9
859
8
6
1
861
8
6
2
865
870
863
86
4
866
867
868
869
871
872
873
850
855
860
865
86
0
86
5 87
0
875
880
885
855
860
865
87
0
875
88
0
885
855
860
85
5
860
8
6
0
865
870
875
865
8
7
0
870
8
7
0
860 86
0861
8
6
1
86
2
86
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
TRENCH DRAIN
RIM=857.90
INV=855.90
SB-3
853.4
SB-2
853.2
SB-1
850.9
SB-4
854.8
853.5SB-5 SB-6
855.0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
17
6
L
F
1
0
"
@
0
.
4
0
%
213LF 10
"
@ 0.39%
217L
F
1
0
"
@ 0.
1
5
%
148LF
1
0
"
@ 0.24%
95
L
F
1
0
"
@ 1
.
0
1
%
203LF
1
0
"
@ 1.
0
4
%
166LF 10"
@ 0.96%
20
0
L
F
1
0
"
@ 0
.
2
5
%
67LF 10"
@ 4.43%
177
L
F
1
0
"
@ 1.
1
2
%
24LF 10"
@ 0.29%
>>
EX. MH 7
RIM=874.32
INV=854.85(W)
INV=854.75(NE)
EX. MH 1
RIM=867.53
INV=840.03(N)
INV=839.93(SW)
EX. MH 6
RIM=869.97
INV=852.78(NE)
INV=852.78(SW)
INV=852.68(N)
EX. MH 8
RIM=869.34
INV=857.94(S)
INV=857.84(E)
EX. MH 5
RIM=864.85
INV=851.72(S)
INV=851.62(NW)
EX. MH 4
RIM=858.18
INV=849.52(SE)
INV=849.42(W)
EX. MH 11
RIM=861.78
INV=854.60(SE)
INV=854.50(W)
ADJUST RIM TO 862.30
EX. MH 9
RIM=863.69
INV=853.23(SE)
INV=853.13(SW)
ADJUST RIM TO 864.15
EX. DROP MH 3
RIM=859.00
INV=847.83(E)
INV=840.70(W)
EX. MH 10
RIM=858.01
INV=853.66(E)
INV=853.56(NW)
ADD ADDITIONAL SECTION
PROPOSED RIM 860.66
EX. MH 2
RIM=848.50
INV=840.63(E)
INV=840.53(S)
>>
CBMH 1003
RIM=859.75
INV=854.31(NE)
SUMP=851.31
6LF 12" HDPE
@ 1.00%
17LF 12" HDPE
@ 1.00%
CB 350
RIM=860.82
INV=856.84(S)
15LF 12" Reinforced Concrete Pipe
@ 1.00%
INSTALL SALVAGED PIPE
4LF 12" HDPE
@ 0.00%
47LF 12" HDPE
@ 1.48%
32LF 12" HDPE
@ 5.59%239LF 12" HDPE
@ 2.94%
14
4
L
F
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@
0
.
4
3
%
36LF 12" HDPE
@ -1.92%
4
6
L
F
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@
1
.
5
2
%
62LF
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@ 0.6
4
%
14LF
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@ 1.
3
0
%
134LF
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@ 1.0
1
%
43
L
F
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@
1
.
0
2
%
49LF 1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@ 0.91
%
68
L
F
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@
5
.
3
8
%
87
L
F
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@
5
.
2
9
%
332
L
F
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@ 0.
6
1
%
47
L
F
1
2
"
R
e
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
d
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
P
i
p
e
@ 0
.
5
3
%
285LF 12" Reinforced Concrete Pipe
@ 2.11%
208LF 24" HDPE
@ 0.19%
12LF 12" HDPE@ 0.42%
48
L
F
1
5
"
R
e
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
d
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
P
i
p
e
@
0
.
5
6
%
185LF 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe
@ 0.54%
11
9
L
F
1
2
"
R
e
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
d
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
P
i
p
e
@
3
.
1
9
%
EX. CB 202
RIM=860.38
INV=856.37(SE)
CBMH 1000
RIM=863.00
INV=854.35(NW)
INV=854.35(SE)
SUMP=851.35
CONSTRUCT OVER
EX. STRUCTURE
CBMH 1002
RIM=862.35
INV=857.40(W)
INV=854.34(E)
SUMP=851.34
CONSTRUCT OVER
EX. STRUCTURE
EX. CBMH 212
RIM=862.35
INV=858.35(W)
INV=858.10(E)
EX. CBMH 213
RIM=0.00
INV=860.15(W)
INV=860.15(E)
EX. CBMH 214
RIM=871.18
INV=867.18(N)
INV=867.18(E)
EX. CB 215
RIM=871.80
INV=867.80(NW)
INV=867.80(S)
INV=867.80(W)
EX. FES 100
RIM=851.88
INV=850.00(E)
EX. STORMCEPTOR 101
RIM=861.00
INV=850.40(SE)
INV=850.40(W)
EX. CBMH 102
RIM=860.94
INV=851.62(E)
INV=855.45(S)
INV=856.95(SW)
INV=850.58(NW)
EX. CB 103
RIM=857.00
INV=852.97(W)
EX. CBMH 105
RIM=866.38
INV=862.50(S)
INV=862.5(N)
INV=862.50(W)
BULKHEAD AND ABANDON NORTH PIPE
CORE WEST PIPE INTO STRUCTURE
REPLACE CASTING
EX. CB 106
RIM=871.11
INV=867.11(N)
REPLACE CASTING
EX. CBMH 104
RIM=862.70
INV=857.40(S)
INV=857.40(NE)
EX. CB 304
RIM=864.75
INV=861.00(S)
EX. CBMH 303
RIM=864.75
INV=860.75(N)
INV=860.75(E)
EX. CBMH 248
RIM=864.45
INV=853.30(E)
INV=853.30(S)
EX. STMH 249
RIM=860.00
INV=853.70(N)
INV=853.70(W)
EX. OCS 250
SEE DETAIL C-5
EX. CBMH 300
RIM=861.00
INV=854.73(W)
INV=854.98(N)
INV=853.52(S)
EX. CBMH 301
RIM=861.00
INV=855.25(E)
INV=855.25(S)
PROP INV=856.69(N)
CORE NORTH PIPE INTO STRUCTURE
ADJUST RIM TO MATCH PAVEMENT
REPLACE CASTING
SALVAGE EXISTING CASTING FOR CB 350
EX. CBMH 302
RIM=861.50
INV=856.25(W)
ADJUST RIM TO 861.4
REPLACE CASTING
EX. STMH 403
RIM=862.00
INV=855.80(S)
INV=855.80(N)
Verify Structure Location
Adjust to Match Gutter
EX. STMH 402
RIM=857.20
INV=852.00(S)
INV=852.00(NW)
ADD ADDITIONAL SECTION
PROPOSED RIM 859.63
EX. STMH 401
RIM=862.50
INV=???
ADJUST RIM TO 862.87
EX. FES 400
INV=???
>>
STMH 2000
RIM=861.92
INV=859.32(S)
INV=858.82(N)
CONSTRUCT OVER EX. PIPE
BULKHEAD AND ABANDON
EX. PIPE TO SOUTH
26
L
F
1
2
"
H
D
P
E
@
5
.
3
8
%
>>
19LF 12" HDPE
@ 0.00%
3LF 12" HDPE
@ 52.18%
CBMH 1001
RIM=859.00
INV=855.50(S)
SUMP=852.50
23LF 12" HDPE
@ 0.00%
>>
20LF 18" HDPE
@ 0.49%
INSTALL SALVAGED PIPE
9LF 18" HDPE
@ 1.00%
INSTALL SALVAGED PIPE
1LF 12" HDPE
@ 0.00%
861.63
873.25
861.86
859.5EOF
861.94 861.47
862.17
863.04
864.01
865.49
865.89
859.05
866.46
865.87
867.00
859.03
BMP-11-34G
BOT=854
HWL=858.97
TOP STONE=859.0
SEE C-5 FOR
DETAILS
BMP-11-34H
BOT=858.5
HWL=862.57
TOP STONE=863.0
SEE C-5A FOR
DETAILS
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
1+00 1+50
48LF 15" Reinforced Concrete Pip
e
EX. CBMH 301
RIM=861.00
INV=855.25(E)
INV=855.25(S)
PROP INV=856.69(N)
CORE INTO STRUCTURE
CB 350
RIM=860.80
INV=856.84(S)
15LF 12"
Reinforced
Concrete Pipe
@ 1.00%
EX. CBMH 300
RIM=861.00
INV=854.73(W)
INV=854.98(N)
INV=853.52(S)
EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
MATCH EXISTING CROWN
Asia Mall. 12160 Technology
Dr., Eden Prairie, MN 55344
E519
LEGEND
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
MANHOLE
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
CATCH BASIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
CATCH BASIN
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING GATE VALVE
EXISTING HYDRANT
UTILITY EASEMENT
>>>
|||
Feet
1" = 40'
16080040
>>>>>>
TURN LANE PROFILE
GENERAL NOTES
1.ALL ELEVATIONS ARE FINISH GRADE.
2.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING TO
ASSURE SCOPE OF WORK IS UNDERSTOOD AND IS TO CONTACT ENGINEER
PRIOR TO BIDDING FOR ANY CLARIFICATION NEEDED. THERE WILL BE NO
ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR ITEMS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN CLARIFIED
PRIOR TO BID SUBMITTAL
3.COORDINATE GAS, ELECTRIC, AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES
CONNECTIONS WITH OWNER.
4.STATE LAW REQUIRES NOTIFICATION OF GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FOR
LOCATION OF UTILITY OWNED LINES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.
PRIVATE UTILITY LINES WILL NOT BE LOCATED BY A CONTRACT LOCATOR OR
OTHER SUITABLE MEANS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION ALL
UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
5.WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR CONNECTION TO PUBLIC UTILITIES
MUST BE COORDINATED WITH THE EDEN PRAIRIE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM 48-HOUR NOTICE
PRIOR TO BEING PERFORMED.
UTILITY NOTES
1.CONTRACT TO VERIFY EXISTING INVERTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
2.ALL SITE UTILITY MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION METHOSTO MEET STATE AND
CITY REQUIREMENTS.
3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
4.ANY VARIATIONS FROM THIS PLAN FOUND ON SITE TO BE REPORTED TO
PROJECT ENGINEER.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>>>
INV=854.25INV=853.75
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
17LF 12" HDPE
@ 1.00%
6LF 12" HDPE
@ 1.00%4LF 12" HDPE
@ 0.00%
INV=854.43
23LF 12" HDPE
@ 0.00%
>>
>>
>>
INV=854.25
9LF 18" HDPE
@ 1.00%
INV=854.25
20LF 18" HDPE
@ 0.49%
INV=855.33
1LF 12" HDPE
@ 0.00%
INV=854.25
INV=854.25
INV=854.43
CBMH 1000
RIM=863.00
INV=854.35(NW)
INV=854.35(SE)
SUMP=851.35
CBMH 1002
RIM=862.35
INV=857.40(W)
INV=854.34(E)
SUMP=851.34
EX. OCS 250
RIM=860.00
INV=853.75(NW)
INV=853.75(S)
INV=851.75(NW)
SUMP=851.75
MODIFY PER DETAIL
CBMH 1003
RIM=859.75
INV=854.31(NE)
SUMP=851.31
CBMH 1001
RIM=859.00
INV=855.50(S)
SUMP=852.50
Asia Mall. 12160 Technology
Dr., Eden Prairie, MN 55344
E519
Feet
1" = 20'
8040020
GRAVEL LAYER EXTENDS 1'
BEYOND CMP
APPROX. 18,700 SF
6" Ø Orifice
INV = 853.75
INSTALL SALVAGED GRATE
WEIR WALL
SEE DETAIL
48" MH
NWL = 853.75
INV = 851.75
12" RCP
INV = 853.75
12" HDPE
12" RCP
REMOVE EXISTING PIPE
BULKHEAD STRUCTURE
CORE INTO STRUCTURE
INSTALL SALVAGED PIPE
RIM = 860.0
RIM = 856.5
EXISTING OUTLET CONTROL
STRUCTURE 250
NOT TO SCALE
EXISTING WEIR
WALL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
ADD NEW CONCRETE SECTIONS
REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING GRATE
6'X12' STORM
FILTER VAULT
B
A
PIPE CROSSING SCHEDULE
A*EX 12" RCP
TOP
853.97 PROP 12"
HDPE BOT
854.23
B*EX 10" SDR
35 TOP
854.90 PROP 12"
HDPE BOT
855.40
CONTECH STORM FILTER DESIGN
NOT TO SCALE
SEE CONTECH PLAN FOR DETAILS
INLET=854.25'
OUTLET=853.75'
857.00'
10 X 27" STORMFILTER CARTRIDGES
WITH PHOSPHOSORB MEDIA
FILTRATION BAY
OUTLET BAYINLET BAY
TRANSFER
HOLE
COVER
FRAME AND COVER
AND ACCESS HATCH
CAST FLUSH IN TOP
STEP (TYP)
HIGH FLOW
BYPASS WEIR
FILTRATION BAY FLOORINLET BAY FLOOR TRANSFER HOLE TO
FILTRATION BAY
ELEVATION
SECTION B-B
INV = 856.0
GENERAL NOTES
1.ALL INLET STRUCTURES TO THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM TO HAVE 3' SUMPS
2.TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE, MINIMIZE POTENTIAL INVASIVE SPECIES
(EG. ZEBRA MUSSELS, EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL, ETC.) TRANSFER WHEN
WORKING IN EXISTING POND SUBWATERSHED.
*INSULATE CROSSINGS PER CITY DETAIL
HIGH FLOW
BYPASS WEIR
IN SITU
NOT TO SCALE
SEE CONTECH PLAN FOR DETAILS
48" CMP SECTION
859.00'
854.00'
858.00'
858.98' HWL
48" PERFORATED
CMP
PAVEMENT (PER
ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS)
CMP TO SIT
DIRECTLY ON
SUBGRADE
STONE
BACKFILL
SUBBASE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
PARKING CALCULATION
EXISTING UNDERGROUND = 77
EXISTING SURFACE = 217
TOTAL EXISTING = 294
TOTAL ADA STALL PROVIDED =9
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||
865
870
87
5
86
5
87
0
850
850
855
855
860
85
0
85
0
85
5
85
5
86
0
860
865
870
86
0 86
0
86
5
86
0
86
0
865
860
860
850
855
860
865
870
875
880
885
86587087
5
88
0
860
86
5
865
20
'
S
T
O
R
M
S
E
W
E
R
E
A
S
M
E
N
T
(
P
E
R
D
O
C
N
O
.
4
6
5
3
7
7
)
2
0
'
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
S
E
W
E
R
E
A
S
M
E
N
T
(
P
E
R
D
O
C
N
O
.
4
2
5
0
0
4
0
)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
3635
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
2
1
11
12
13
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44 45 46 47 48
49 60
61
64
62
50
51
59
52
63
58
57
53
54
5556
65
666768
69
70
7172
7374
75
76
77
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
SB-3
853.4
SB-2
853.2
SB-1
850.9
SB-4
854.8
853.5
SB-5 SB-6
855.0
N0
0
°
0
6
'
3
2
"
E
37
9
.
2
7
S83° 10' 12"E
230.57
S6
2
°
3
0
'
3
6
"
E
39
0
.
1
0
L=384.23,Δ=20°45'36"R=1054.94
N89° 04' 05"E
745.79 L =189.74
Δ=5°5 5'2 9"
R=18 34.86
N0
6
°
4
3
'
4
8
"
E
35
.
1
7
10.0'
17.5'
10.0'
20.0'
20.0'
20.0'
20.0'
20.0'
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E E
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
MANHOLE
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
CATCH BASIN
EXISTING STORM SEWER
MANHOLE
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING GATE VALVE
EXISTING HYDRANT
UTILITY EASMENT
SOIL SAMPLE
EXISTING TREE
Asia Mall. 12160 Technology
Dr., Eden Prairie, MN 55344
E519
Feet
1" = 40'
16080040
PROPERTY LINE
EASEMENT
FENCE
BURIED ELECTRIC
OVERHEAD LINES
||||
EXISTING
FENCE
ALONG
PROPERTY
LINE
EXISTING
TREES
EXISTING
TRANSMISSION
TOWER
EXISTING
TRANFORMERS
STA
T
E
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
N
O
.
5
TECHNOLOGY DR
Tree Size (in dbh)Common Name Scientific Name Notes
Save Non
Significant
Tree (in)
Save
Significant
Tree (in)
Remove Non
Significant
Tree (in)
Remove
Significant
Tree (in)
1 8 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 8
2 9 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 9
3 6 Crabapple Malus sp.6
4 5 Crabapple Malus sp.5
5 6 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 6
6 6 Crabapple Malus sp.6
7 5 Crabapple Malus sp.5
8 6 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 6
9 4 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 4
10 5 Crabapple Malus sp.5
11 6 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 6
12 6 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 6
13 7 Crabapple Malus sp.7
14 9 Crabapple Malus sp.9
15 7 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 7
16 7 Crabapple Malus sp.7
17 10 Crabapple Malus sp.10
18 8 Crabapple Malus sp.8
19 7 Crabapple Malus sp.7
20 6 Crabapple Malus sp.6
21 7 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 7
22 8 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 8
23 7 Crabapple Malus sp.UNHEALTHY 7
24 7 Crabapple Malus sp.7
25 5 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 5
26 7 Crabapple Malus sp.UNHEALTHY 7
27 7 Crabapple Malus sp.7
28 7 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 7
29 6 Crabapple Malus sp.UNHEALTHY 6
30 6 Norway Maple Acer platanoides UNHEALTHY 6
31 6 Norway Maple Acer platanoides UNHEALTHY 6
32 6 Norway Maple Acer platanoides UNHEALTHY 6
33 5 Crabapple Malus sp.UNHEALTHY 5
34 4 Crabapple Malus sp.4
35 7 Crabapple Malus sp.7
36 6 Crabapple Malus sp.6
37 6 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 6
38 6 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 6
39 14
Cottonless
Cottonwood
Populus
deltoides 14
40 8 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 8
41 14
Cottonless
Cottonwood
Populus
deltoides 14
42 9 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 9
43 14
Cottonless
Cottonwood
Populus
deltoides 14
44 26
Clump Redmond
Linden Tilia americana 26
45 7 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 7
46 9 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 9
47 16
Clump Redmond
Linden Tilia americana 16
48 15
Clump Redmond
Linden Tilia americana 15
49 11
Clump Redmond
Linden Tilia americana 11
50 11 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 11
51 10 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 10
52 12 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 12
53 5 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 5
54 10 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 10
55 8 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 8
56 6 Prairie Cascade
Salix 'Prairie
Cascade'6
57 11 Redmond Linden Tilia americana 11
58 13 Redmond Linden Tilia americana 13
59 10 Redmond Linden Tilia americana 10
60 22
Clump Prairie
Cascade
Salix 'Prairie
Cascade'
Willow not
signifiicant 22
61 9
Clump Redmond
Linden Tilia americana 9
62 11 Prairie Cascade
Salix 'Prairie
Cascade'11
63 12 Redmond Linden Tilia americana 12
64 11 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 11
65 6 White Spruce Picea glauca 6
66 9 White Spruce Picea glauca 9
67 10 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 10
68 6 White Spruce Picea glauca 6
69 6 White Spruce Picea glauca 6
70 10 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 10
71 12
Japanese Tree
Lilac Syringa reticulata 12
72 9 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 9
73 6 Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata 6
74 9 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 9
75 5 White Spruce Picea glauca 5
76 7 White Spruce Picea glauca 7
77 10 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 10
78 7 Norway Maple Acer platanoides 7
10' D&U EASEMENT ALONG
FRONT AND SIDE
17.5' D&U EASEMENT
ALONG REAR
PROPERTY LINE
25' WETLAND BUFFER
SETBACK
60' WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND
PERIMETER
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
E E
OH OH
ANNOTATED AGENDA
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner
RE: Planning Commission Meeting for Monday, April 8, 2024 _______________________________________________________________________________ MONDAY, APRIL 8, 2024 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Move to approve the agenda. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, MARCH 25, 2024 MOTION: Move to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated March 25, 2024 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Enclave at Manor Rd. (2023-14) Request for:
• PUD Concept Review on 6.43 acres
• PUD District Review with waivers on 6.43 acres
• Zoning Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 6.43 acres
• Preliminary Plat to divide one parcel into 17 lots and 1 outlot on 6.43
acres The applicant is requesting a PUD Concept Review, PUD District review with waivers, Zoning Change and Preliminary Plat review, all on 6.43 acres. The project would subdivide one lot to create
17 new lots for single family homes. The site is located about a quarter mile north of Duck Lake and
is surrounded by existing single-family homes. The property is identified as an infill site in the Comprehensive Plan, and the proposed density of 2.6 units per acre is consistent with the low density guiding, which allows up to 5 units per acre. The plans also show a road connection with the existing neighborhood to the east, as anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. Waivers are being requested for
front yard setback and lot width. The front yard setback waivers would promote more tree
preservation/replacement and the lot width waiver is consistent with other lots in the neighborhood. MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval for PUD Concept Review, PUD District Review with
waivers, Zoning Change and Preliminary Plat all on 6.43 acres as represented in the April 8, 2024 staff report.
ANNOTATED AGENDA April 8, 2024
Page 2 B. Lotus Villas on Anderson Lakes (2024-02)
Request for:
• Guide Plan Change from Office to Low Density Residential on 5.0 acres
• PUD Concept Plan Review on 5.0 acres
• PUD District Review with waivers on 5.0 acres
• Zoning District Change from Office to R1-9.5 on 5.0 acres
• Preliminary Plat review on 5.0 acres The applicant is requesting for Guide Plan Change, PUD Concept Review, PUD District review with waivers, Zoning Change and Preliminary Plat review, all on 5 acres. The project redevelops
an existing office building into a 19 lot single family development, in a villas concept. The
applicant describes a villa as a ‘detached’ townhome, with individual ownership of the unit, nut common maintenance of grounds, streets, and driveways. MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval for Guide Plan Change, PUD Concept Plan Review, PUD District Review with waivers, Zoning District Change and Preliminary Plat all on 5.0 acres as represented in the April 8, 2024 staff report.
C. Asia Mall Parking lot Expansion (2024-01) Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.69 acres
• Planned Unit District Amendment with waivers on 4.69 acres
• Site Plan Review on 4.69 acres. The applicant is requesting approvals to expand the parking lot at Asia Mall. This expansion will
add 122 parking spaces, but require several waivers from setbacks, lot coverage, and parking lot islands. MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing. MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval for Planned Unit Development Concept review, PUD District review with waivers, and Site Plan Review on 4.69 acres as represented in the April 8, 2024 staff report. VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT VII. MEMBERS’ REPORT VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Move to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting.
THE ENCLAVE AT MANOR ROAD
Brandl Anderson Homes has been building award-winning homes since 1993.
We are local builder.
We are a builder who respects the environment within our homes which are built to Green Path standards.
Minnesota’s Green Path is the leading energy efficiency and green building program for the residential
construction industry in Minnesota.
Neighborhood
Exceptions
Setbacks adjusted to save more of the trees
Self-Imposed Redundancy Rules
Elevation – No duplicates to the left, the right, and directly across the street
Color – No duplicates to the left, the right, and directly across the street
Community Commitment
Helping with sizing pipe off site per city guidelines
Traffic Study completed
Local company contact
The Enclave at Manor Road
Neighborhood
The Enclave at Manor Road
Landscape
Plan
The Enclave at Manor Road
Landscape
Plan
The Enclave at Manor Road
Time Frame
June 2024 – Start Development work
August 2024 – Sales Start
April 2026 – Complete our last home
The Enclave at Manor Road
Product
Homes will Range in size from 2400-4165 sq. ft.
Pricing will start in Low 700’s.
The Enclave at Manor Road Included Features Stone Accents (Per Plan)
Increased roof pitches for visual appeal LP Smartside Siding on Fronts
LP Trim Around Windows on All Four Sides
Garage Doors with Windows Enhanced Landscaping Package
Electric Vehicle Ready Solar Ready
The Enclave at Manor Road
Thank you!
1
Detached Villa example from Legacy Oaks in
Minnetonka
Lotus Villas - 10700 Prairie Lakes Drive
- Planning Commission Meeting April 8, 2024
Existing Area map with surrounding land uses
2
Area map with proposed site plan and surrounding land uses
3
Existing Office Building - Data Center Site Survey
4
5
Lotus Villas on Anderson Lake - Site plan
6
Lotus Villas on Anderson Lake - Site plan
7
Lotus Villas on Anderson Lake – Preliminary Plat
8
Lotus Villa on Anderson Lake – Grading Plan
9
Lotus Villa on Anderson Lake – Landscape Plan
10
Requests - Proposed PUD – Preliminary Plat
• Guide Plan Change from Office to Low Density Residential on 5.0
acres
• PUD Concept Plan Review on 5.0 acres
• PUD District Review with waivers on 5.0 acres
• Zoning District Change from Office to R1-9.5 on 5.0 acres
• Preliminary Plat review on 5.0 acres
Why is does the change on Zoning make sense:
•More Compatible with the surrounding uses then Office!
•Increase in Tax value – Villa homes provide a 4-5 times increase in tax
base with limited demand on schools and services
•Gives current Eden Prairie residents a new maintenance free, main
level living design which is in high demand.
•Provides Parents and Grandparents of existing Eden Prairie residents
a place to live closer to family
•This also, through their existing homes, grants access to young
families aspiring to raise their children within the high-quality
Eden Prairie schools.
11
Lotus Villas – Site Plan showing Cross-section locations
12
Lotus Villas to Single Family area - Cross-section
13
Lotus Villas to Westin Woods Townhomes area - Cross-section
14
Pictures from our Legacy Oaks Neighborhoods
15
Pictures from our Legacy Oaks Neighborhoods
16
Pictures from our Legacy Oaks Neighborhoods
17
Pictures from our Legacy Oaks Neighborhoods
18
Pictures from our Legacy Oaks Neighborhoods
19
Pictures from Various Model homes
in our Legacy Oaks and Trout Run Preserve Neighborhoods
Lower Level Family Room
Laundry – Mud/Craft RoomOwners Suite Bath
Lower Level Bar & Game area
Owners Suite Bath Owners Suite Bedroom
20
Pictures from Various Model homes
in our Legacy Oaks and Trout Run Preserve Neighborhoods
Office Nook
KitchenDining
Owners Suite Bedroom
Great RoomFront of home
21
Pictures from Various Model homes
in our Legacy Oaks and Trout Run Preserve Neighborhoods
Lower Level Family Room
Laundry – Mud RoomOwners Suite Bath
Lower Level Bar & Game area
Owners Suite Bath Front of home
Example Villa Floor Plans
22
Example Villa Floor Plans
23
Example Villa Floor Plans
24
Example Villa Floor Plans
25
Asia Mall Parking
Expansion
4/8/2024
Planned Unit Development 4.69 AC
Required Waivers
-Setbacks
-Impervious Surface Area
-Parking
-Islands
Landscaping & Tree Replacement
Stormwater Improvements
4/8/2024
2
Existing Conditions
4/8/2024
3
Waivers
4/8/2024
4
•Setbacks – 10’ Front & 2’ Side and Rear
•Impervious surface –87% Proposed (30% Max)
•Parking Stall – 20 Stall Deficit
•Parking Islands – 1.5% Island Area Proposed Shortage (3.5% Provided/5.0% Required)
Parking Calculations
4/8/2024
5
Eden Prairie Parking Code
Land Use Square Ft Stalls
Office 4,873 21.9
Retail 5,218 23.5
Common Area 12,560 25.1
Grocery 33,645 151.4
Type 1 Rest.5,725 60
Type 2 Rest.886 8
Type 3 Rest 11,664 155
Required Stalls 445
Proposed Stalls 425
ITE Parking Generation
Land Use Weekday Saturday
Office 12 1
Retail 12 17
Common Area
Grocery 99 122
Type 1 Rest.99 109
Type 2 Rest.118 118
Type 3 Rest
Peak Parking 340 367
Expected Parking at Peak
Time 317 344
Summary
Thank you for your consideration. Approval of these waivers and the construction of the parking
expansion would provide a long-term solution for traffic and public safety.
4/8/2024
8