HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 12/02/2002 - Truth in Taxation
TRUTH-IN-TAXATION HEARING APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2002 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Councilmembers Ron Case, David Luse and
Jan Mosman
CITY STAFF: City Manager Scott Neal, Parks & Recreation Director Bob Lambert, Public
Works Director Eugene Dietz, Management and Budget Director Don Uram, City Planner Michael
Franzen, City Attorney Ric Rosow and Council Recorder Theresa Brundage
I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Tyra-Lukens stated the purpose of a Truth-in-Taxation Hearing is for the City to present to
the citizens of Eden Prairie an overview of the City's budget and reasons for tax changes. She said
this is not the time for review of individual tax bills, and those with questions on individual tax
bills may contact Colin Schmidt.
III. PUBLIC HEARING
A. OVERVIEW OF 2003 PROPOSED BUDGET AND TAX LEVY
City Manager Scott Neal said this hearing is an opportunity for citizens to come
forward and speak to City Council and City Staff about budget priorities and City
finances. He said 2003 will be the second year of a two-year budget process, and
although Council has previously reviewed and approved it, state statutes require the
Council to approve it as the official 2003 budget.
Management and Budget Director Don Uram gave an outline of the process and
framework of the City's 2003 budget. He gave a Powerpoint presentation that
included detailed summary and objectives. He said the General Fund Budget totals
$31.6M and is broken up into two components - the property tax levy and debt
service levy. He said the total property tax levy is a 0% increase over 2002. He
said the City property tax, based on median value home of $257,900, is increased
by $463 and includes Hennepin County, the school district, including the recently
passed referendum, the City and other jurisdictions.
Uram said objectives include continuing the Capital Improvements Program,
funding necessary services and staff, comply with levy limits and ensure reasonable
tax impacts. He said levy limits for Pay 2003 limit the City's ability to raise
property taxes to $23,337,073 which is a 3% increase over Pay 2002. He said
factors used in determining calculations of the levy limits include the Implicit Price
TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
December 2, 2002
Page 2
Deflator (0.76%), Household Growth Adjustment (1.6%) and Market Value of New
Commercial/Industrial Construction Adjustment (0.65%).
Uram said in the calculation of levy limits, Staff has noticed a difference household
growth adjustment. He said Staff has calculated household growth at 7% and the
State Department of Revenue calculated it at 1.6%. He said the City is servicing a
larger population than the MET Council and Dept. of Revenue have calculated. He
said the City's population is approximately 58,670.
Mosman asked if the factors used are determined by the State Dept. of Revenue.
Uram said they were.
Luse asked about the impact of the difference in Household Growth Adjustment.
Uram said the State is basing the levy amount on a smaller population than what
Staff believes they are actually serving.
Uram reviewed the Total Property Tax, Property Tax Distribution and the City
Property Tax with a residential increase of 3.63% and apartment and commercial
properties showing a decrease of 17.8% and 11.4% respectively. In General Fund
Revenues, he said Intergovernmental Revenues show an increase of 14% that
includes local government aid that was increased from the State last year for the
city and totals approximately $172,00. He said depending on what happens with
the State budget, this may or may not be received.
Uram said in General Fund Expenditures, the key to the Community
Development/Finance budget included an additional $55,000 for economic
development purposes. He said in an overall operation standpoint, there is an
increase of about 3%. He said new employees for 2003 include two police officers,
a fire inspector and some miscellaneous positions. He noted there is also a tax
abatement of $300,000 in accordance with an agreement between the City and
ADC to help fund intersection improvements at Technology Drive and Mitchell
Road. Uram said the Staff expectation is that the $300,000 prior to the certification
of the final levy, will be reduced based on the final determination of the value of
the ADC building. He said overall, the City's budget from 2002 to 2003 is up 1%.
The median value homeowner pays $73.83 for City services per month.
Case said the debt service reduction is looking better this year and asked if it was
primarily due to a better interest rate or retiring debt. Uram said Staff has refunded
or restructured debt where possible, some of the debt has been called, and some of
the debt has matured. He said Staff is also evaluating additional refunding
opportunities which should save additional monies. Uram said the City's bond
rating is AA1. Uram said the City is ranked among the top 7 communities in the
State for bond rating.
Uram also reviewed Utility Fund Budget and Liquor Fund Objectives and Budget.
In summary, he said the General Fund Budget is $31.6M; Property Tax Levy
includes a General Fund of $23.3M and Debt Service of $2.36M; and Total
Property Tax Levy is $25.66M with a 0% increase over 2002.
TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
December 2, 2002
Page 3
Case asked what types of homes are included in the median value home. Steve
Sinell said townhomes are nearly the same as median value and condos a little less.
Sinell noted that property taxes are a budget driven tax, so if one group of
taxpayers values are up, another will be down. He said commercial properties are
down because values are down, with houses value increasing.
Mosman asked about the 3% increase for residential homes, but median values had
gone up 10%. Sinell said the 3% is after factoring in that the value had changed.
Case noted that the 3% is only the City portion of the tax bill.
Sinell said the typical median family home has a truth-in-taxation notice that would
include all of their property, district, city, county, and with the school referendum,
will be about 16%.
B. PUBLIC COMMENT AND DISCUSSION
There was no public comment.
IV. CLOSE OR CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Mosman, to close the Public Hearing.
Motion carried 4-0.
V. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Luse moved, seconded by Mosman, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried
4-0. Mayor Tyra-Lukens adjourned the meeting at 7:27 p.m.