The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Commission - 05/09/2022AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, May 9, 2022 - 7:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Carole Mette, William Gooding, Rachel Markos, Robert Taylor, Daniel Grote, Frank Sherwood STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, Community Development Director; Rod Rue, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. MINUTES A. Approval of the Minutes for the April 25, 2022 meeting V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. VARIANCE #2022-01 Location: 6939 Barberry Ln Request for: • To permit the construction of an accessory garage within a front yard setback VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, APRIL 25, 2022 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Frank Sherwood, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Rachel Markos, Carole Mette, William Gooding, Robert Taylor, Dan Grote CITY STAFF: Julie Klima, Community Development Director; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; Rod Rue, City Engineer; Kristin Harley, Recording Secretary I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. SWEARING IN OF NEW COMMISSION MEMBERS A. DANIEL GROTE B. FRANK SHERWOOD III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL All commission members were present. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Taylor moved, seconded by Mette to approve the agenda. MOTION CARRIED 9-0. V. MINUTES MOTION: Farr moved, seconded by Kirk to approve the minutes of February 14, 2022. MOTION CARRIED 6-0 with three abstentions (Sherwood, Grote and Gooding). VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. SUITE LIVING OF EDEN PRAIRIE Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.85 acres PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 25, 2022 Page 2 • Planned Unit Development Amendment with waivers on 2.85 acres • Site Plan Review on 2.85 acres • Preliminary Plat of one parcel into one lot and two outlots on 2.85 acres Jeremy Larson, of Suite Living, presented a PowerPoint and detailed the application. He gave the background on Suite Living, which was an Assisted Living and Memory Care facility with seven communities open throughout the Twin Cities and another six under construction. Larson displayed the site layout, which was divided between assisted living and memory units. The building would have 32 units, 20 of which would be assisted living units and 12 which would be memory care units. The building would be secure, as would the patio area, and the Memory Care facility would have 24-hour supervision. He displayed the rendering and explained the SmartSide and stone material choices. The development incorporated dormers for a more residential look. Trees did have to be removed; trees would also be planted and screening incorporated. He displayed a photograph of the Little Canada development showing the same type of elevation and interior renderings of the units, nursing station, and amenities. Residents would be allowed to bring in their own furniture. He played a video that further explained life in the proposed development. Farr asked if the required move of the underground stormwater chamber had been addressed. Larson replied this was a condition of approval. Mette asked for a sense of the facility’s place along the expense spectrum, and Larson replied this would be a more affordable facility. Due to the high care nature of care, there would not be the amenities provided, such as a workout room or a cinema, that other, more expensive facilities would offer. Larson replied residents stayed in the assisted living facility an average of two to four years, then moved over to the Memory Care. Mette asked if he foresaw transportation issues with emergency or larger vehicles. Larson replied he did not foresee the use of firetrucks or ambulances at this building. Pieper asked if there was neighborhood input, and Larson replied a neighborhood meeting was held, and there were no major concerns. He pointed out there were at least two neighbors present. Taylor asked if there could be more skilled nursing at the facility. Larson replied that was a possibility and could be accommodated if needed, although their facilities did not provide the level of care up to the nursing home care level. Klima presented the staff report. The applicant was proposing to construct a 32- unit assisted living and memory care facility. The parking conformed to the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 25, 2022 Page 3 zoning requirements. The waiver requested additional density on the site of 11.2 units per acre which was in the range of density allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. The landscaping proposed exceeded the City requirements and the tree replacement complied with City Code requirements. Staff recommended approval. Mette asked why the property was not being rezoned. Klima replied the density relationship between the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance was a complicated equation. The current application requested a PUD waiver to allow the density that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This was the mechanism and the process the City had utilized for medium and high density for some time. Kirk added the prospective population was equivalent to the density allowed in the zoning district , as this would be one resident per unit and would never increase, so it fit into the current zoning district. Mike Amundson, resident at 9565 Garrison Way, spoke in favor of the development. He did not foresee traffic problems and found the development attractive. He did have a concern as to where the building was located; he proposed it be more centered in the property. MOTION: Markos moved, seconded by Gooding to close the public hearing. Motion carried 9-0. Mette asked if the developer could address the location of the building onsite. Larson replied the engineer was not in attendance but to his understanding the grading of the site drove the building’s location. Kirk stated this was the third proposal seen on this property and to his thinking this seemed to be a good fit. Gooding noted there was a number of existing ash trees that would stay that needed treatment, and he asked staff if this was a requirement. Bourne replied this was a new requirement. For those trees to be counted as having been saved they would have to be treated in the future. Taylor asked if the mature trees at the rear would be kept as a buffer for the neighbors. Larson replied the goal was to cut as few trees as possible. Pieper echoed Kirk’s comments regarding the merits of this project. Klima added to the south of the property there was an open space outlot maintained by an HOA so there would not be backyards abutting this project to the south. MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Markos to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.85 acres; Planned Unit Development Amendment with waivers on 2.85 acres; Site Plan Review on 2.85 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 25, 2022 Page 4 acres; and Preliminary Plat of one parcel into one lot and two outlots on 2.85 acres based on plans stamp dated March 26, 2022 and the staff report dated April 21, 2022. Motion carried 9-0. PLANNERS’ REPORT MEMBERS’ REPORTS VII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Sherwood moved, seconded by Taylor to adjourn. Motion carried 9- 0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:29 p.m. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ben Schneider, Planner I DATE: May 9, 2022 SUBJECT: Variance Request #2022-01 APPLICANT/OWNER: Jake Barker LOCATION: 6939 Barberry Lane 120 DAY REVIEW PERIOD: August 8, 2022 REQUEST: • A variance to construct a detached garage with a 13-foot front yard setback. City Code requires a 30-foot front yard setback in the proposed location of the detached garage. BACKGROUND The subject property, highlighted in the below aerial, is zoned R1-22 and is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for low density residential. The northeast property line borders Duck Lake, which means this lot is also in the Shoreland Overlay District. There is currently a single-family home, initially constructed in 1959, and a detached garage that was added in 1977. As seen below, the garage has access off Barberry Lane. The subject property is a corner lot and thus is subject to 30-foot front yard setbacks from both the Barberry Lane and Peterborg Road right of way lines. The existing detached garage, which is 13 feet from the south property line, is a legal nonconformity because the City Code at the time of construction (1977) would have treated the south property line as a side lot line rather than a front lot line. Staff Report – Variance #2022-01 May 9, 2022 Page 2 The applicant is requesting a 17-foot variance to construct an additional detached garage on the east side of the property. This proposed garage would have access off Peterborg Road and be the same distance from the south property line (13 feet) as the existing detached garage. The City’s shoreland ordinance requires a 100-foot setback from Duck Lake, so building an accessory garage that meets this setback and the 30-foot front yard setback from south would likely not be feasible without the requested variance. Below is a sketch of the proposed structure. In addition to garage space, the property owner is proposing to include a small home office with a bathroom. It should be noted that the variance would still be needed to build the garage if the proposed 18x18 office was removed from the project. The sketch is not to scale, but the applicant understands that this structure would have to meet both the 13-foot front yard setback (if the variance is granted) and the 10-foot side yard setback to the east. Meeting the side yard setback is included as a condition of approval in the drafted final order. This project will also have to satisfy the shoreland requirement of not exceeding 30% impervious surface on the overall property. VARIANCE REQUEST To construct a detached garage with a 13-foot front yard setback. City Code requires a 30-foot front yard setback in the proposed location of the detached garage. EVALUATING VARIANCES AGAINST STATUTORY CRITERIA Variances may be granted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Furthermore, Staff Report – Variance #2022-01 May 9, 2022 Page 3 variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties, as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposed to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed request is not in conflict with the goals and intent of the land use identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The variance aligns with the standards of the Low Density Residential guiding. Granting the variance would not change the residential land use of the property. 2. Harmony with the Purpose and Intent of the Ordinance The applicant is proposing to keep the new garage out of the 100-foot setback from Duck Lake, which aligns with the following objective from Section 11.01 of the City Code: “to safeguard and enhance the appearance of the City, including natural amenities of hills, woods, lakes, and ponds.” The proposed garage also would not further encroach on the south lot line setback compared to the existing garage, which mitigates aesthetic concerns and is thus harmonious with the intent of residential setback regulations. 3. Unique Circumstance The combination of a 100-foot setback from the lake and a 30-foot setback from the south lot line significantly limits the property owner’s ability to have an accessory structure on the east side of the property. This is a unique circumstance not created by the property owner. 4. Alteration of the Essential Neighborhood Character The setback of the proposed garage would be consistent with the setback of the current garage and would not expand on the nonconformity. There are also several other detached garages in the neighborhood. Overall, this variance would not alter the essential neighborhood character. 5. Reasonable Use of Property The use of the property is not proposed to change as part of this application. Accessory garages are a permitted use in residential districts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The granting of this variance is in harmony with intent and general purposes of the ordinance and the nature of the variance requested is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the following request: 1. Approve Variance Final Order #2022-01 subject to plans dated April 30, 2022, based on the information outlined in the Planning Department Staff Report dated May 9, 2022. The Commission may choose from one of the following actions: Staff Report – Variance #2022-01 May 9, 2022 Page 4 1. Approve Final Order #2022-01 as presented. 2. Approve Final Order #2022-01 with modifications. 3. Continue Variance Request #2022-01 for additional information. 4. Deny Final Order #2022-01. 6939 Barberry Lane Variance DISCLAIME R: The City of Eden Prairie does n ot warrant the a ccu racy nor the correctn essof the information contained in this map. It is you r re spo nsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will T he City of Eden Prairie b e liable for an y dama ges,including loss of business, lost profits, business interrup tion , loss of busin ess informatio nor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use o f th is ma p or the informa tion itcontains. Map information is believed to be accura te b ut accuracy is n ot gu aranteed .Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City o f Ede n Pra irie. *Any aerial photography and parcel geometry wa sobtaine d from Henn epin Coun ty a nd allusers are bound by the express written contract betwee n Henn epin Coun ty a nd th e Cityof Eden Prairie. Zoomed O ut Ae ria l F1:4,800Scale: 0 0.10.05Miles Mile s 0 580290FeetFeet VARIANCE #2022-01 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER #2022-01 APPLICANT: Jake Barker ADDRESS: 6939 Barberry Lane OTHER DESCRIPTION: Lot 6, Block 3, Padon Down’s Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota VARIANCE REQUEST: To construct a detached garage with a 13-foot front yard setback. City Code requires a 30-foot front yard setback in the proposed location of the detached garage. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals for the City of Eden Prairie at a regular meeting thereof duly considered the above petition and after hearing and examining all of the evidence presented and the file therein does hereby find and order as follows: 1. All procedural requirements necessary for the review of said variance have been met. (Yes No ). 2. Variance #2022-01 is: _____ granted _____ modified _____ denied 3. Findings and conditions are attached as Exhibit A. 4. This order shall be effective fifteen days after the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals or on May 24, 2022; however, this variance shall expire one year after the date of the approval unless the applicant has commenced the authorized improvements or use or has received an extension of the time period as provided below. The applicant may submit a request for a one-time extension of up to one year from the original expiration date. Said extension shall be requested in writing to the City Planner at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the approval. The requested extension shall be reviewed by the City Planner. If the facts and circumstances under which the original variance was granted have not materially changed, the City Planner may approve the extension. If there has been a material change in circumstance since the granting of the variance, the City Planner shall submit the request for review and consideration by the Board. 5. All Board of Adjustments and Appeals actions are subject to City Council Review. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS N/A = Not Applicable BY:________________________________________________ Planning Commission Chair – Andrew Pieper Date: 05-09-2022 EXHIBIT A – FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS VARIANCE #2022-01 FINDINGS “Practical difficulties” is a legal standard set forth in law that cities must apply when considering applications for variances. It is a three-factor test and applies to all requests for variances. To constitute practical difficulties, all three factors of the test must be satisfied. The three practical difficulties include reasonableness, uniqueness, and maintaining the essential character of the neighborhood. Additionally, the variance must demonstrate harmony with other land use controls. 1. Reasonable use of the property - The first factor is the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner but cannot do so under the rules of the ordinance. The use of the property is not proposed to change as part of this application. The land use is a permitted and reasonable use. The proposed use is consistent and in harmony with the Comprehensive Guide Plan and is a reasonable use of the property. 2. Unique circumstances - The second factor is that the property owner’s situation is due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the property owner. The combination of a 100-foot setback from the lake and a 30-foot setback from the south line significantly limits the property owner’s ability to have an accessory structure on the east side of the property. This is a unique circumstance not created by the property owner. 3. Essential character of neighborhood - The third factor is that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Under this factor, consider whether the resulting structure will be out of scale, out of place, or otherwise inconsistent with the surrounding area. The setback of the proposed garage would be consistent with the setback of the current garage and would not expand on the nonconformity. There are also several other detached garages in the neighborhood. Overall, this variance would not alter the essential neighborhood character. The granting of the variance is in harmony with intent and general purposes of the ordinance and the nature of the variance requested is consistent with the comprehensive guide plan. CONDITIONS: • Subject to the information provided in the Staff Report dated May 9, 2022, and plans dated April 30, 2022. • The accessory garage shall meet the 10-foot side yard setback • Impervious surface on the property shall not exceed 30% • EXHIBIT B – VARIANCE REQUEST #2021-04 Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 2, GOLDEN STRIP SECOND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Jacob Barker 6939 Barberry Lane, Eden Prairie, MN 55346 612-802-2137 jake.dhp@gmail.com April 17, 2022 Attn: City of Eden Prairie Planning Commission I am writing to request a variance to add a secondary detached garage to 6939 Barberry Lane that would require breaching the 30-foot setback of Peterborg Rd. We are unable to meet the 30-foot setback of Peterborg Rd but do meet the 100' setback of Duck Lake to add the building due to the limitations of being a corner lot. The proposed secondary structure would have the same setback as the current garage 13’ from the south lot line; all other setbacks would be to current requirements. Please see the attached proposal and drawings. You will find my contact information above. Please feel free to contact me with follow - up questions. Best Regards, Jacob Barker Proposed 48x30 Garage -30’x30’ w/ one 10-foot overhead door and 15-foot roof height. -18’x18’ with entry door and 13-foot roof height. -1224sf maximum -Maintain 100-foot setback from Duck lake, 10-ft setback from south lot line for Garage, 3’ minimum setback from South lot line for Driveway. -Requesting variance to match setback of current garage 13’ from south lot line for proposed new detached garage. -Garage to be plumbed for sink and toilet. Plumbing to be connected to current home water and sewer. -Driveway to be Concrete and to be designed to not conflict with current power pole and maintain a 3’ minimum set back from south lot line -Windows, doors, siding, paint and hip roof to match current house -Landscaping to be native and restored to minimize run of and minimize impact to Duck Lake -Earthwork not to exceed 100CY -Total impervious surface not to exceed 30% of lot area (Purposed work would bring impervious area to 29% of lot area) -During construction erosion and sediment control will be implemented to minimize adverse impact to Duck Lake 1 PROJECT PROFILE – MAY 9, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION – MAY 9, 2022 1. BOA 2022-01 6939 BARBERRY LN by Jacob Barker (BEN) Location: 6939 Barberry Ln Contact: Jacob Barker, 612-802-2137, jake.jhp@gmail.com Request for: • To permit the construction of an accessory garage within a front yard setback Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 03/30/22 Date Complete 04/19/22 120 Day Deadline 08/17/22 Initial DRC review 03/31/22 Notice to Paper Date 04/20/22 Resident Notice Date 04/21/22 Meeting Date 05/09/22 Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date N/A 2nd Meeting Date N/A HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION – MAY 16, 2022 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING – MAY 17, 2022 1. SUITE LIVING OF EDEN PRAIRIE (2022-02) by Civil Site Group (BETH) Proposal for a 32-unit assisted living and memory care facility Location: 9360 Hennepin Town Road Contact: Robbie Latta, 952-250-2200, rlatte@civilsitegroup.com Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.85 acres • Planned Unit Development Amendment with waivers on 2.85 acres • Site Plan Review on 2.85 acres • Preliminary Plat of one parcel into one lot and two outlots on 2.85 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 02/14/22 Date Complete 03/26/22 120 Day Deadline 07/23/22 Initial DRC review 02/17/22 Notice to Paper Date 04/06/22 Resident Notice Date 04/07/22 Meeting Date 04/25/22 Notice to Paper Date 04/27/22 Resident Notice Date 04/28/22 1st Meeting Date 05/17/22 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/22 2. 12365 SINGLETREE LN FAÇADE REMODEL (2022-04) by Newton RES LLC (BETH) Proposal for a façade remodel Location: 12365 Singletree Ln Contact: Michael Margulies, 612-205-0521, michaelmargulies7@gmail.com Request for: • Site Plan Minor Amendment on 1.66 acres 2 Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 03/30/22 Date Complete 04/22/22 120 Day Deadline 08/19/22 Initial DRC review 03/31/22 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 Meeting Date 00/00/22 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 1st Meeting Date 00/00/22 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/22 CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – MAY 17, 2022 1. BURGER KING (2021-07) by Cave Enterprises Operations, LLC (SARAH) Proposal to construct a new Burger King quick serve restaurant with double drive thru order lanes Location: 16345 Terrey Pine Drive Contact: John Kayser, 312-829-4000 Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 1.34 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 1.34 acres • Site Plan Review on 1.34 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 04/20/21 Date Complete 05/27/21 120 Day Deadline 07/31/22 Initial DRC review 04/22/21 Notice to Paper Date 06/09/21 Resident Notice Date 06/10/21 Meeting Date 06/28/21 Notice to Paper Date 07/28/21 Resident Notice Date 07/29/21 1st Meeting Date 08/17/21 2nd Meeting Date 05/17/22 2. 6511 ROWLAND RD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (2022-06) by Stone Cottage Construction (BEN) Proposal to amend the development agreement to construct a single-family home Location: 6511 Rowland Dr Contact: Troy Asleson, 14787 Energy Way, 651-261-1633, troy@stonecottage.com Request for: • Development Agreement Amendment on 0.31 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 04/01/22 Date Complete 00/00/22 120 Day Deadline 00/00/22 Initial DRC review 04/07/22 Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date N/A Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date N/A 2nd Meeting Date 05/17/22 PLANNING COMMISSION – MAY 23, 2022 Canceled IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED 1. CODE AMENDMENT FOR BUILDING MATERIALS by City of Eden Prairie (BEN) Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to building materials Contact: Ben Schneider, 952-949-8491 3 Request for: • Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to building materials Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 03/31/20 Date Complete N/A 120 Day Deadline N/A Initial DRC review N/A Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date 00/00/22 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date 00/00/22 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/22 2. EDEN PRAIRIE MULTI-FAMILY (2022-05) by Ryan Companies (BETH) Proposal for a 211-unit multi-family building Location: 11-116-22-32-0004 Contact: MaKinnah Collins, 612-492-4184, makinnah.collins@ryancompanies.com Request for: • Guide Plan Change from Office to Medium High Density Residential on 7.01 acres • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.01 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 7.01 acres • Zoning Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 7.01 acres • Site Plan Review on 7.01 acres • Preliminary Plat on 7.01 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 03/31/22 Date Complete 00/00/22 120 Day Deadline 00/00/22 Initial DRC review 03/31/22 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 Meeting Date 00/00/22 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 1st Meeting Date 00/00/22 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/22 3. TRICAM INDUSTRIES (2022-03) by Plan Force Group (SARAH & BEN) Proposal for an approximately 2,600 square foot addition to an existing industrial building Location: 7677 Equitable Drive Contact: Ryan Schroeder, 952-512-9548, ryan.schroeder@planforcegroup.com Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 3.24 acres • Planned Unit Development Amendment on 3.24 acres • Site Plan Review on 3.24 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 02/28/22 Date Complete 00/00/22 120 Day Deadline 00/00/22 Initial DRC review 03/10/22 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 Meeting Date 00/00/22 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 1st Meeting Date 00/00/22 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/22 4. MENARDS PUD AMENDMENT (2021-09) by Menard, Inc. (SARAH) Proposal for a yard gate expansion and addition of an entrance lane Location: 12600 Plaza Drive Contact: Tyler Edwards, 715-876-2143 4 Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 15.72 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 15.72 acres • Site Plan Review on 15.72 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 06/01/21 Date Complete 00/00/22 120 Day Deadline 00/00/22 Initial DRC review 06/03/21 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 Meeting Date 00/00/22 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 1st Meeting Date 00/00/22 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/22 5. PIONEER PRESERVE (2020-09) by Metro Development LLC (SARAH) Proposal to build 8 townhome units Location: Southwest corner of Pioneer Trail and Hennepin Town Road Contact: Melanie Emery, 651-248-8457 Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 3.66 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 3.66 acres • Zoning District Change from Rural to RM on 3.66 acres • Site Plan Review on 3.66 acres • Preliminary Plat of 9 lots on 3.66 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 09/18/20 Date Complete 00/00/22 120 Day Deadline 00/00/22 Initial DRC review 09/24/20 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 Meeting Date 00/00/22 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/22 Resident Notice Date 00/00/22 1st Meeting Date 00/00/22 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/22 6. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23) by SW Metro Transit Commission (JULIE) Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489 Request for: • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres • Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 11.38 acres • Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 00/00/15 Date Complete 00/00/15 120 Day Deadline 00/00/15 Initial DRC review 00/00/15 Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15 Resident Notice Date 11/20/15 Meeting Date 12/07/15 Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15 Resident Notice Date 12/18/15 1st Meeting Date 01/05/16 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20 VARIANCES 5 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 1. ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW - SUNOPTA (2022-01A) by Greiner Construction (BEN) Proposal to add an exterior patio space to office building Location: 7078 Shady Oak Rd Contact: Erin Manning, 612-225-6963; emanning@greinercontruction.com Request for: • Admin Site Plan Review on 6.3 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 01/13/22 Date Complete 01/23/22 120 Day Deadline 05/20/22 Initial DRC review 01/27/22 Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date N/A Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date N/A 2nd Meeting Date N/A TELECOMMUNICATION 1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS (2022-03TM) by SSC on behalf of DISH Wireless (SARAH) Contact: Steve Fester, 612-462-2202, sfester@ssc.us.com Location: 8950 Eden Prairie Road Request for: • Adding antennas to an existing telecommunications tower – Subject to 60-day deadline (COMPLETE) • Enter into a License Agreement with the City of Eden Prairie Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 02/17/22 Date Complete 02/24/22 60 Day Deadline 04/25/22 Initial DRC review 02/24/22 Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date N/A Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date N/A 2nd Meeting Date N/A 2. TELECOMMUNICATIONS (2022-09TM) by Black & Veatch Corporation on behalf of AT & T (SARAH) Contact: Jim Kennedy, 629-993-1057, kennedyj@bv.com Location: 6201 Dell Rd Request for: • Adding antennas to an existing telecommunications tower Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 05/02/22 Date Complete 00/00/22 60 Day Deadline 00/0022 Initial DRC review 05/12/22 Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date N/A Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date N/A 2nd Meeting Date N/A 6 3. TELECOMMUNICATIONS (2022-10TM) by Black & Veatch Corporation on behalf of AT & T (SARAH) Contact: Jim Kennedy, 629-993-1057, kennedyj@bv.com Location: 13708 Holly Rd Request for: • Adding antennas to an existing telecommunications tower Application Info Planning Commission City Council Initial Date Submitted 05/04/22 Date Complete 00/00/22 60 Day Deadline 00/0022 Initial DRC review 05/12/22 Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date N/A Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date N/A 2nd Meeting Date N/A