Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 12/09/2019 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, December 9, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Charles Weber, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Christopher Villarreal, Carole Mette STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. MINUTES A. Approval of the Minutes for the November 18, 2019 meeting V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL (2019-22) Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 57.4 acres  Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 57.4 acres  Site Plan Review on 57.4 acres  Preliminary Plat to combine multiple parcels into 1 lot on 57.4 acres B. CODE AMENDMENT FOR R1-9.5 SIDE YARD SETBACKS (2019-25) Request for:  Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to side yard setbacks in the R1-9.5 zoning district VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT A. 2020 Workplan VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT ANNOTATED AGENDA TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner RE: Planning Commission Meeting for Monday, December 9, 2019 _______________________________________________________________________________ MONDAY, December 9, 2019 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. MOTION: Move to approve the agenda. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2019 MOTION: Move to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated November 18, 2019. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL (2019-22) Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 57.4 acres  Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 57.4 acres  Site Plan Review on 57.4 acres  Preliminary Plat to combine multiple parcels into 1 lot on 57.4 acres The applicant is requesting approval to remodel and construct several additions at the Central Middle School. The property is located at 8025 School Road behind the School District’s Administrative Services Center. The school district owns 57.4 acres, which includes the Administrative Services Center, the middle school, and outdoor athletic facilities. The applicant is proposing approximately 82,000 square feet of additions and 50,000 square feet of remodeling. The project includes the following additions to the school: theater, gymnasium, cafeteria and classrooms. The project will also include the expansion and reconstruction of the main entrance on the west side of the school. This will be a new secure entrance. In addition, there will be a number of site improvements and changes to the bus drop off area, the parking lot on the west side of the school and the area where parents drop students off. Staff recommends approval with the conditions included in the staff report. MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing. MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval for a Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 57.4 acres; Planned Unit Development Review with waivers on 57.4 acres and ANNOTATED AGENDA December 9, 2019 Page 2 Site Plan Review on 57.4 acres; Preliminary Plat of multiple parcels into one lot on 57.4 acres based on Plans stamped dated November 27, 2019 and the Staff Report dated December 3, 2019. B. CODE AMENDMENT FOR R1-9.5 SIDE YARD SETBACKS (2019-25) Request to:  Amend the City Code Chapter 11 relating to R1-9.5 side yard setbacks. The R1-9.5 zoning district established in 1982 allows for small lot subdivisions. This small lot single family-zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 9,500 square feet and minimum side yard setback requirements utilizing language that effectively requires a minimum one side yard setback of 5’ and total 15’ both sides. The existing language regarding side yard setback is cumbersome and open to interpretation regarding how to apply the setback requirements. The proposed code amendment clarifies City expectations, does not create non-conformities on existing R1-9.5 properties, allows for flexibility, and is consistent with recent Planned Unit Development waiver requests. The goal of the code amendment to R1-9.5 side yard setbacks is to:  Clearly state the minimum side yard setbacks in R1-9.5 district and to be consistent with the chart display of side yard setbacks in the R1-44, R1-22 and R1-13.5 zoning districts chart.  Delete language in Section 11.03, Subdivision 2., A., 8 that can be interpretive in regard to minimum side yard setback being garage side 5’ and house side 10’. MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing. MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval to amend City Code Chapter 11 regarding side yard setbacks in the R1-9.5 zoning district based on the information included in the staff report dated December 4, 2019. VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT A. 2020 WORK PLAN VII. MEMBERS’ REPORT VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Move to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2019 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Charles Weber, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Christopher Villarreal, Carole Mette CITY STAFF: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Parks and Natural Resources Manager; Kristin Harley, Recording Secretary I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL Commission members Weber and Villarreal were absent. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Mette moved, seconded by DeSanctis to approve the agenda. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. IV. MINUTES MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Higgins to approve the minutes of October 14, 2019 as amended on page 4, Number V Item A from “Kirk commented that the design overall” to “Kirk commented that the design overall was good.” MOTION CARRIED 6-0. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS TARGET REMODEL (2019-19) Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.6 acres  Planned Unit Development District Amendment with Waivers on 10.6 acres  Site Plan Review on 10.6 acres PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 18, 2019 Page 2 Ryan Hyllested of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. presented a PowerPoint and explained the application. There is an interior shared wall on the east side of the building. Target proposed to update the signage and facade as a national rebranding effort. The application would revise the concrete masonry units (CMUs) and the percentage of materials previously approved. The red bull’s eye Target signs would be replaced with white bull’s eye signs. The façade, sconce lights, and surfaces would be updated as a “refresh and a modernization.” Hyllested explained the changes to the elevations as the bull’s eye is changed to a white motif. Parking lot islands with plantings at an average of every 20 spaces and a landscape plan was included. Full compliance would require Target to sacrifice parking stalls, so the average was proposed instead. He displayed elevation images before and after the proposed change. A (white bull’s eye) sign would be added to the south elevation. Hyllested displayed the location of the proposed planted parking islands. DeSanctis asked if this façade would resemble the new Super Target on Rockford Road in Plymouth. Hyllested replied he was not familiar with that store. DeSanctis asked if the sconce lighting would use solar source and when told no, he asked why solar was not considered. Hyllested responded that he thought it would be difficult given the shadowing in the area. It was not typical to use solar to light the exterior of a building. DeSanctis asked if these proposed changes would impact the R-value or the insulation values of the building. Hyllested assured him the changes were merely cosmetic and would not affect these qualities. Hyllested described for DeSanctis the native plants to go into the parking islands. Drip irrigation would be used in these. Mette asked for and received confirmation the red EFIS brick to be installed would go right over the existing façade. Farr asked if the south elevation, which had a tiered wall feature and where a new sign would be mounted, was a shared wall. Hyllested clarified the shared wall was actually the eastern wall, with the Eden Prairie Mall. Farr asked if the landscaping was planned to eventually screen the wall, and Hyllested replied it was; nothing would be removed, but some landscaping would be moved within the site. Farr asked that some shrubs be inserted where the trees were being removed, and Hyllested replied there were some shrubs already, having been planted between the trees. Farr urged Hyllested to continue the aesthetic rhythm of the foliage so it would not become unsightly. Klima gave the staff report. The applicant proposed façade updates and site improvements which would alter portions of the existing façade; it would be painted and refurbished, and new signs would be installed on all three exterior elevations. Since the applicant last went through the review process in 2000, the City has updated some Code requirements. In 2000 a waiver was granted to allow the 59 percentage of Class One materials on the building overall, and now the applicant was asking for 58 percent, a small change but one that required the PUD process. All existing parking islands would be landscaped, and an existing PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 18, 2019 Page 3 pedestrian connection would be improved. No parking stalls would be removed as part of this project; to comply strictly with Code would result in a loss of five stalls. As part of the PUD amendment, the applicant was seeking waivers for exterior building materials and signage. Conversations could be had as a part of future developments on the site to bring the parking lot more in compliance. Staff recommended approval. Mette remarked the definition of a sign and a sign area could become a question when such a recognizable background is changed. She added she did not have an issue with this change. Klima replied some communities did provide that level of specificity in their definitions of signs and signage. Eden Prairie’s ordinance mentioned any visual graphic text area that communicates, or identifies, or advertises but did not get as specific as other communities did. The red EFIS would not constitute signage, based on City regulations and past practices. Farr noted the applicant was changing the color of the entrance aluminum framing and wanted this to be durable and abrasion-resistant, and urged that some technical requirements be given to the applicant to ensure this frame would not peel or deteriorate in time. Klima offered to supply this information. MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Farr to close the public hearing. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. Mette noted this design would look nicer and more modern. Kirk agreed this was a reasonable update very close to the original PUD, and added the parking improvements were welcome. DeSanctis commented this along with neighboring new designs complemented the Mall MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Higgins to recommend approval for a Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.6 acres; Planned Unit Development Amendment with waivers on 10.6 acres and Site Plan Review on 10.6 acres based on Plans stamped dated November 7, 2019 and the staff report dated November 12, 2019. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Farr moved, seconded by Kirk to adjourn. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:23 p.m. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Beth Novak-Krebs, Senior Planner DATE: December 4, 2019 SUBJECT: Central Middle School Building Additions and Remodel LOCATION: 8025 School Road APPLICANT/ OWNER: Eden Prairie School District 120-DAY REVIEW PERIOD: March 11, 2020 REQUEST:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 57.4 acres  Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 57.4 acres  Site Plan Review on 57.4 acres  Preliminary Plat to combine multiple parcels into 1 lot on 57.4 acres BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval to remodel and construct several additions at the Central Middle School. The property is located at 8025 School Road behind the School District’s Administrative Services Center. The school district owns 57.4 acres, which includes the Administrative Services Center, the middle school, and outdoor athletic facilities such as a running track, tennis courts, baseball/softball fields and sand volleyball courts. The applicant is proposing approximately 82,000 square feet of additions and 50,000 square feet of remodeling. Staff Report – Central Middle School Additions and Remodel Page 2 The project will also include the expansion and reconstruction of the main entrance on the west side of the school building. This will be a new secure entrance. It will allow public access to the theater and gymnasium. In addition, there will be a number of site improvements and changes to the bus drop off area, the parking lot on the west side of the school and the area where parents drop students off. GUIDING AND ZONING The property is currently guided Public/Semi-public and is located within several zoning districts. Zoning on the parcels under School District ownership includes Public, Industrial, Rural, and R1-22. The applicant is proposing to rezone the entire site to the Public Zoning District. PRELIMINARY PLAT The School District owns multiple parcels in this location. The proposed preliminary plat combines all of the parcels at this site into one 57.4 acre lot. In 1957, the northwest corner of the site was platted as a single-family residential subdivision. With the expansion and reconstruction of Highway 212 in the mid-1990’s, the single-family homes were demolished. The underlying R1-22 zoning and the Eden School Addition plat still exists. The Eden School Addition plat includes right-of-way and drainage and utility easements that will need to be vacated. In addition, there is right-of-way near the School Road entrance into the site that will need to be vacated. This is proposed to be done as a separate process with final plat approval. SITE PLAN The school building is located north of the Administrative Services Center on School Road just north of Scenic Heights Road. Access to the site for student drop off, teachers, staff, and the public is provided by a private street (School Road), which comes off of Scenic Heights Road. The bus drop off area on the east side of the school is accessed from Wallace Road. The student drop off area, the existing parking lot on the west side of the school and the bus drop off area are proposed to be reconfigured to improve the flow of vehicles. The proposal includes a separate 580 foot long parent drop off lane along the drive on the southwest and west side of the school building. The applicant is also proposing to reconstruct the drive around the north side of the school. It will be a two way drive serving as a secondary access/exit for vehicles and will provide opportunities to redistribute vehicular traffic. The following list includes the proposed additions and their locations:  Theater addition – 33,000 square feet plus 3,000 square feet of mechanical room added onto the west side of the building. The performance space will include 700 seats.  Gymnasium addition – 12,000 square feet added onto the existing gymnasium on the south side of the school. The addition will include restrooms, locker rooms, offices and storage space plus a new lobby.  Cafeteria addition –6,000 square feet added onto the east side of the building. The addition will connect the north and south cafeteria. This will allow for the reduction of lunch periods Staff Report – Central Middle School Additions and Remodel Page 3 from 5 to 3.  Classroom addition – 28,000 square feet north of the cafeteria. This addition will include 20 classrooms. The classroom expansion will also include a new music suite adjacent to the performance theater. The running track will be shifted to the north to accommodate the reconfigured drive around the north side of the building. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the existing parking lot on the west side of the school. In order to meet code requirements, the proposed plan includes landscaped islands and pedestrian connections from the parking lot to the front entrance to the school. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE AND MATERIALS The building additions are consistent with the massing and scale of the existing building. The proposed metal panel will contrast with the existing orange brick and proposed dark brick and give the building an updated look. Due to the functional space needs of the theater, the theater Theater Addition Proposed Site Plan Staff Report – Central Middle School Additions and Remodel Page 4 addition is taller than the rest of the building. This highlights it as a special element at the school. Due to the shape of the existing building and the locations of the additions, there is variety in the façade planes, which creates visual interest throughout the length of the building facades. The varying building heights between the existing building and the additions creates rooftop variation along each façade, meeting the City’s expectations with regard to architectural design. The existing building material consists primarily of red-orange brick and glass with some cement panel on the south and east elevations. The additions to the building will be primarily brick, glass and architectural pre-cast panels. The new dark brick is intended to contrast with the red-orange brick of the existing building and break down the long building elevations into smaller scaled elements. The project will also include some silver metallic metal panels that will give the building visual interest as the metal reflects the sun and changes color as the sun sets. Each main entrance will include a splash of red metal to identify the entrance through the use of the Eden Prairie School’s color branding. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS A. Building Height – City Code sets a maximum building height of 30’ in the Public Zoning District. The fly loft in the theater is at 52’ high. This height is needed for the performing arts theater to function properly. Although one of the building masses around the fly loft exceeds 30’ in height (39’ 4”), the applicant has stepped the fly loft back and used various lower building masses around the fly loft to break the perceived scale of the fly loft. The new gymnasium addition is 31’ 4” high. This is 2’ higher than the existing gymnasium. The existing gymnasium is near the southwest corner of the building on the west side and the gymnasium addition will be on the south side of that corner of the building. Both gymnasiums are similar in size, massing and height and help anchor the corner of the building. B. Parking Lot Front Yard Setback – City Code requires parking stalls to meet the front yard setback of 50 feet. Some of the parking stalls in the parking lot on the west side of the building encroach into the setback. This an existing condition and the reconfiguration of the parking stalls will result in the same number of stalls in the setback. C. Façade Articulation – City Code requires façade articulation if a façade exceeds 40 feet in length. The north side of the theater is greater than 40 feet long and lacks building articulation. This façade is at the back of the theater. Although this one portion of the rear façade does not meet the standard, the theater overall is articulated by various materials, colors, and façade planes. The gymnasium addition does not meet the façade articulation standard on the west facade. The applicant intentionally designed the gymnasium to match the massing, scale, and character of the existing gymnasium. The brick colors on the existing and new Staff Report – Central Middle School Additions and Remodel Page 5 gymnasium are contrasting, which adds visual interest. In addition, the gymnasiums are on either side of the new entrance to the new activity center of the school. This new entrance draws attention away from the walls. D. Building Material - City Code requires buildings in the Public Zoning District to include at least three contrasting yet complimentary Class I materials such as glass, brick, and stone with one color variation therein. The Class I materials on each façade of the building including the existing building and additions is proposed to be brick (existing and new), glass, and architectural pre-cast panels. The architectural pre-cast panels are only used on the north and west elevations. This leaves the south and east elevations with only two Class I materials (brick and glass). The use of brick is considered one Class I material. The use of the new brick is intended to complement the existing building material. Although the new brick it is not considered a separate material per the City Code, the applicant is proposing variations in color, façade recesses, curves, height changes and the addition of a metal panel to provide visual interest throughout each of the facades. E. Fence Height – City Code limits fence height to 7’. The applicant is proposing an 8’ high chain link fence around the running track. This use and the proposed fencing is similar to what is used in public parks where taller fence heights are allowed. F. Parking Lot Islands in the Bus Drop Off Area – City Code requires islands in parking lots to break up large expanses of pavement and provide landscaping in the parking lot. It is not the intent of the ordinance to put islands in areas where busses need room for maneuvering. The proposed plan does not include parking lot islands in the bus drop off area. In this situation, islands would impede efficient drop off and maneuvering for the busses. LANDSCAPING AND TREE REPLACEMENT The project requires 499 caliper inches of landscaping and 52 caliper inches of tree replacement. The Landscape Plan is just short of meeting the landscaping requirements, but with a few small adjustments, the plan will meet City Code requirements. The plan will be revised prior to the City Council 1st reading. The applicant is providing perennials and native grasses in various areas throughout the site to add color, texture and variety throughout the site. The tree replacement meets City Code. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS The pedestrian access to the site from the trail along Wallace Road and Scenic Heights Road will remain. The applicant is proposing to include pedestrian walkways through the parking lot to move pedestrians safely from their vehicles to the main entrance of the building. These pedestrian walkways will be colored concrete so they are clearly visible and distinct from the rest of the Staff Report – Central Middle School Additions and Remodel Page 6 pavement. SHORELAND AND WETLANDS A portion of School Pond is located in the southeast corner of the site. The pond is classified as a Natural Environment Water; therefore; the site is in a Shoreland. The new additions to the building meet the Shoreland setbacks. In addition, there is a wetland around the pond. The wetland has been delineated and the wetland buffer and structure setback have been established. Staff is recommending placement of a Conservation Easement this area. City Code restricts impervious coverage in the Shoreland to 30%. The site as planned has 42.2% impervious coverage. The school currently exceeds 30% impervious coverage. In 1992, a variance was approved allowing 45% impervious coverage on the school site. The proposed project complies with the variance granted in 1992. TRAFFIC AND FUTURE SCENIC HEIGHTS IMPROVEMENTS A traffic study was completed for this project. The focus of the traffic study was around internal operations of the school site as well as the intersection operation at Scenic Heights Rd and School Rd. The existing level of service (LOS) at the intersection is D, which is acceptable. Queues from the AM drop off extend down to Scenic Heights Rd causing queues eastbound and westbound to reach a maximum of 200’. The proposed drop off area will increase from 200’ to 600’. Improved site circulation and additional drop off area is anticipated to resolve the queues on Scenic Heights Rd, however, exiting queues on School Rd is expected to worsen in the AM peak. Promoting the use of the north loop road should improve exiting queue lengths. Improvements to Scenic Heights Road are anticipated to occur at some point in the future and will be initiated by the City of Eden Prairie. The improvements identified in the traffic study listed vehicle and pedestrian modifications at the School Road intersection to improve operations. Participation by the school district in regards to financial contributions are expected. Permanent and temporary easements will likely be necessary for the improvements and should be provided at no cost to the City. LIGHTING The applicant is proposing new lighting on the building additions, lighting along the drive around the north side of the building, in the parking lot and near the bus drop off area. The lighting complies with City Code. DRAINAGE The project includes several stormwater BMP’s including surface and underground infiltration basins. The surface infiltration basins are located northwest of the building and southwest of the existing parking lot. Underground infiltration is proposed under the bus drop off area. SIGNS The building signs proposed with this project will require separate approval through the Sign Permit Staff Report – Central Middle School Additions and Remodel Page 7 process. SUSTAINABLE FEATURES Eden Prairie Schools has an ongoing commitment to sustainability. The project includes a number of sustainable features including the following:  Rooftop solar arrays will be added on the east classroom addition  Vertical sunshades will be installed on the major glass facades at the performing arts lobby and cafeteria  Low E high performance glass will be installed on the south and west facades of the building  All interior lighting will be LED with vacancy controls and daylighting controls to facilitate daylight harvesting  All exterior lighting will be LED  The HVAC system will be controlled by an energy management system for scheduling and control of the system  Native plant species have been incorporated into the landscaping to promote water conservation  The existing asphalt pavement will be recycled on-site and reused as new base material to reduce off-site trucking and gravel mining  An EV charging station is being proposed in the east parking lot BIDDING PROCESS Similar to City projects, as a public entity, the School District is required to solicit bids for the construction of the building additions, remodeling and site improvements. The bidding process may necessitate bid alternates and some changes to the plans. Since the bid opening will occur after City approvals, the School District will coordinate with and inform the City of any proposed alternates so the city can review the changes for general compliance with the spirit and intent of City code and City Council approvals. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of the following request:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 57.4 acres  Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 57.4 acres  Site Plan Review on 57.4 acres  Preliminary Plat to combine multiple parcels into 1 lot on 57.4 acres This is based on plans stamp dated November 27, 2019, and staff report dated December 4, 2019. 1. Prior to the 1st reading by the City Council, the applicant shall:  Revise the Certificate of Survey to include the existing right-of-way within the property adjacent to Scenic Heights Road and School Road.  Revise the Preliminary Plat to clearly show the perimeter drainage and utility easements. Staff Report – Central Middle School Additions and Remodel Page 8  Provide details of the rooftop mechanical screening.  The school has submitted a draft traffic study, which includes city comments, with their application. In addition to addressing the city comments, the study will need the Special Event Conditions, Additional Site Plan Considerations and Recommendations sections completed for approval.  Revise the Geometric Plan West to include the square footage of each parking lot island.  Provide calculations justifying the size of the pretreatment chambers or size appropriately.  Provide a detail showing the design of the pretreatment chambers compared with the other chambers.  Show the locations of manholes or other access for maintenance of the pretreatment chambers and infiltration chambers.  Revise the Utility Plans to clearly show how the stormwater drains into and out of the underground BMP located under the perimeter of the track and how pretreatment is provided for this BMP and access for the inspection and maintenance of this system.  Provide a storm sewer schedule including structure diameter, build height, and casting type.  Revise the Utility Plans by excluding the contours and showing the water service to the Theater Addition.  Revise the Utility Plans to clearly indicate all valves and hydrants and the appropriate pipe and class of material and their locations.  Revise the Utility Plan to address the following comments regarding hydrants: o Add a hydrant near the main entrance on the west side o Move the hydrant on the far west side near the performance area to the other side of the sidewalk closer to the access road o Add a hydrant along the access road on the north side near the classroom addition o Add a hydrant on the south side of the bus drop off loop o Add a remote FDC  Submit a cut/fill analysis.  Revise the Landscape Plans to include landscaping in the island on the north side of the east parking lot.  Revise the Overall Landscape Plan by changing the minimum size of the Royal Frost Birch to 2 ½ caliper inches.  Revise the Overall Landscape Plan to include 13 additional caliper inches. This could be accomplished by increasing the size of some of the trees in the Plant Schedule or adding additional trees to the plan.  It appears that there are some trees in the drainage and utility easement along the west property line. Revise the Landscape Plans by moving the trees out of the easement.  Revise the Overall Landscape Plan by identifying which trees satisfy the Tree Replacement requirement.  Revise the Overall Landscape Plan to say Tree Replacement and Landscaping Staff Report – Central Middle School Additions and Remodel Page 9 Calculation and the calculations that are based on building floor area should be titled Landscape Calculation.  Revise the Surveyor’s Notes on the Preliminary Plat to say that the property is in the Shoreland. 2. The Development Agreement shall address the timing of the installation of the EV charging station and the rooftop solar arrays. 3. Prior to release of the final plat, the applicant shall: A. Obtain City approval to vacate right-of-way and drainage and utility easements on the property. B. Provide a Conservation Easement document for review and approval by the City Engineer. The document shall be filed with the final plat. 4. Prior to land alteration permit issuance, the applicant shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, wetland, utility, street and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. B. Obtain and provide documentation of Watershed District approval. C. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. D. Install erosion control at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by the City. 5. The following waivers are granted through the PUD for the project as indicated in the plans stamp dated November 27, 2019. A. Building Height – City Code sets a maximum building height of 30’ high in the Public Zoning District. The waiver allows the fly loft in the theater at 52”, one of the building masses around the fly loft at 39’ 4” high and the new gymnasium at 31’ 4” high. B. Parking Lot Front Yard Setback – City Code requires parking stalls to meet the front yard setback of 50 feet. The waiver allows maintenance of the same number as the existing parking stalls encroaching into the front setback. C. Façade Articulation – City Code requires façade articulation if a façade exceeds 40 feet in length. The waiver allows the north side of the theater and the west façade of the gymnasium addition to exceed 40 feet without articulation. D. Building Material - City Code requires buildings in the Public Zoning District to include at least three contrasting yet complimentary Class I materials such as glass, brick, and stone with one color variation therein. The waiver allows the south and east elevations to include only two Class I materials (brick and glass). E. Fence Height – City Code limits fence height to 7 feet. The waiver allows an 8 foot high chain link fence around the running track. Staff Report – Central Middle School Additions and Remodel Page 10 F. Parking Lot Islands in the Bus Drop Off Area – City Code requires islands in parking lots to break up large expanses of pavement and provide landscaping in the parking lot. The waiver allows the bus drop off area to be designed without parking lot islands. ¯ Location Map: Central Middle School Building Additions and RemodelAddress: 8025 School RoadEden Prairie, Minnesota 0 380 760190 Feet Middle School Project Site Scenic Heights Rd.Vill a g e Wo o d s Dr. Canyon Rdg.SchoolRd.ViewLn.WallaceRd.W 79th St.FullerRd.TechnologyDr.Highway212 78TH RAMP US HIGHWAY 212WALLACESCENIC HEIGHTS SCHOOL 79TH FULLERTECHNOLOGY N E C H A SUS HIGHWAY 212StreamsPrincipal ArterialA Minor ArterialB Minor ArterialMajor CollectorMinor Collector City of Eden Prairie Land Use GuidePlan Map ¯ DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialGuidePlan.mxd Map was Updated/Created: April 18, 2008 DATE Revised 02-23-06 DATE Approved 03-19-03DATE Revised 01-07-05DATE Revised 11-07-05 DATE Revised 03-23-06DATE Revised 06-23-06 DATE Revised 12-06-06DATE Revised 03-01-07DATE Revised 06-01-07DATE Revised 10-01-07DATE Revised 03-01-08DATE Revised 03-01-09 Guide Plan Map: Central Middle School Building Additions and RemodelAddress: 8025 School RoadEden Prairie, MN 55344 Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre Airport Office Industrial Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial Town Center Park/Open Space Public/Quasi-Public Golf Course Church/ Cemetary Open Water Right-Of-Way CityLimits 480 0 480240 Feet Semi-Public Project Site NE 78TH RAMP US HIGHWAY 212WALLACESCENIC HEIGHTS SCHOOL 79TH FULLERTECHNOLOGY VIEWN E C H A SUS HIGHWAY 212City of Eden Prairie Zoning Map In case of discrepency related to a zoning classification on this zoning map, the Ordinanceand attached legal description on file at Eden Prairie City Center will prevail. ¯ Shoreland Management Classifications 100 - Year Floodplain Natural Environment WatersRecreational Development WatersGeneral Development Waters (Creeks Only)GD NERD Up dated through approved Ordinances #26-2008Ordinance #33-2001 (BFI Addition) approved, but not shown on this map editionDate: March 1, 2009 0 0.20.1 Miles DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialZoning.mxd Map was Updated/Created: June 11, 2008 Zoning Map: Central Middle School Building Additions and RemodelAddress: 8025 School RoadEden Prairie, MN 55344 Rural R1-44 One Family- 44,000 sf. min. R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min. R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min. R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min. RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A. max.RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A. max. Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Highway Commercial Regional Service Commercial Regional Commercial TC-C TC-R TC-MU Industrial Park - 2 Acre Min, Industrial Park - 5 Acre Min.General Industrial - 5 Acre Min. Public Golf Course Water Right of Way Proposing to rezone fromIndustrial to Public Proposing to rezone fromRural to Public Proposing to rezone underlying R1-22 zoning to Public Proposing to rezone fromRural to Public ¯ Aerial Map: Central Middle School Building Additions and RemodelAddress: 8025 School RoadEden Prairie, Minnesota 0 380 760190 Feet Middle School Project Site Vill a g e Wo o d s Dr. Canyon Rdg.SchoolRd.ViewLn.WallaceRd.W 79th St.FullerRd.TechnologyDr.Highway212Scenic Heights Rd. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Steve Durham, Planner II DATE: December 4, 2019 SUBJECT: Code Amendment – Side Yard Setback in the R1-9.5 District BACKGROUND: The R1-9.5 zoning district was established in 1982 to allow for small lot subdivisions. This small lot single family-zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 9,500 square feet and side yard setback requirements utilizing wording that effectively required a minimum one side yard setback of at least 5’ one side and a total 15’ both sides for a double car garage. The language goes on to provide additional and different details in cases where a single car garage is constructed. The intent of the language was to allow for a future second stall garage addition. Very few instances of single car garage construction have occurred since the adoption of the R1-9.5 zoning district. In addition, the existing language is cumbersome and could potentially lead to inconsistencies when applying the setback requirement. Staff is proposing that the language be amended to provide additional clarity and consistency with other zoning districts. DISCUSSION: Currently, City Code provides for detailed and somewhat interpretive language in noting the side yard setback requirements in the R1-9.5 zoning district. Please refer to the table later in this memo for specific language. The cumbersome and potentially interpretive side yard setback wording was formulated to provide for a future garage addition in the scenario of initial single car garage construction. Research indicates there are only two instances in 37 years, since the establishment of R1-9.5 zoning district, where a single car garage was built at initial time of construction. The current wording of Subd. 2, Item 8 creates room for interpretation which side the 5’ setback is assigned to, that is garage side or house side. Depending upon specific home designs, there may have living space behind the garage or living space above the garage. The setback requirement designates minimum setbacks. Therefore, Code amendment will not create non-conforming setbacks in the R1-9.5 Districts. It is anticipated the R1-9.5 subdivision will be used heavily with infill development and for housing to accommodate life cycle housing including first time homebuyers and empty nester housing. Communities of Chanhassen, Woodbury, Lakeville and Maple Grove have zoning districts comparable to R1-9.5 with the minimum side yard setback of 5’ one side total 15’ both sides without any designations which is house side or garage side. The goal of this code amendment to R1-9.5 side yard setbacks is to: Clearly state the minimum side yard setbacks in R1-9.5 district to be consistent with the R1-44, R1-22 and R1-13.5 zoning districts and simplify the R1-9.5 side yard setback wording. 2 Current Code displays the follow chart: Table 1 Section 11.03 Reside ntial District s Minim um Zone Area (Acrea ge/ Sq. Ft.) Minimu m Lot Size Minimum Lot Width-Depth Minimu m Lot Width at Right of Way Line Minimum Yard-Setback Wid th Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. One Side Ft. Both Sides Ft. Rear Ft. Rural 10 Acres 10 Acres 300 300 300 50 50 150 50 R1-44 44,000 44,000 100 150 100 30 15 30 30 R1-22 22,000 22,000 90 125 90 30 15 30 25 R1- 13.5 13,500 13,500 85* 100 85 30 10 25 20 R1-9.5 9,500 9,500 70* 100 70 30 (See Subd. 2 Item 8) 5 (See Subd. 2 Item 8) 15 20 RM- 6.5 13,000 3,000 24 100 24 30 10 20 20 RM- 2.5 25,000 25,000 150 150 150 35 25 50 30 City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.03, Subdivision 2,. A., 8. 8. In the R1-9.5 District, the side yard setback on the garage side, where there is a double garage, is at least 5 feet, for a total of at least 15 feet on both sides, and where there is a single garage, the side yard setback on the garage side is at least 17 feet, for a total of at least 27 feet on both sides. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the following Code amendments as represented in the Planning Commission staff report dated 12-04-19:  Deletion of City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.03, Subdivision 2 A. 8.  Alter Table 1 Section 11.03 in the R1-9.5 district Minimum Yard-Setback to read One Side Ft. 5’ Both sides 15’. PLANNERS REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner DATE: December 5, 2019 RE: 2020 Planning Commission Work Plan BACKGROUND Please find attached a draft copy of the proposed 2020 Planning Commission Work Plan. Historically, the Planning Commission meetings have been largely reflective of the project or land use development applications that have been submitted to the City for review. Due to upcoming significant planning efforts, such as the implementation of the Aspire Comprehensive Plan update, planning staff is suggesting that the Commission identify issues that will provide further education and support for the Commission as these initiatives continue to advance. It is staff’s intention to schedule these items for review as time permits when agendas may be light with development applications or as pertinent topics arise. The topics identified are recommendations based on feedback received from Planning Commission members and potential areas of interest. The work plan is intended to serve as a general guide for Commission discussion. The Commission may wish to revise the work plan to reflect additional or modified topic areas. ACTION REQUESTED Move to approve the 2020 Work Plan as presented or with modifications. 2020 Planning Commission Work Plan The Planning Commission typically meets the second and fourth Mondays of the month. The annual schedule is set annually in December. The City Staff Liaison to the Planning Commission is Julie Klima, City Planner. Charter Statement To provide for an open process and a balanced review of development proposals and land use requests, both private and public, with regard to the City’s Strategic Plan, Comprehensive Guide Plan, and City land use. Roles and Responsibilities A. To review and recommend revisions to the Comprehensive Guide Plan as prescribed by law. B. To conduct public hearings as may be required to gather information necessary for the drafting of recommendations to the Council concerning requirements of law and as defined in Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code. C. To provide an opinion on whether specific proposed developments conform to the principles and requirements for the Comprehensive Guide Plan and the City Code provisions. D. To make recommendations to the Heritage Preservation Commission with respect to the relationship of proposed Heritage Preservation designations to the comprehensive plan of the City, to provide its opinion to the Heritage Preservation Commission as to the effect of proposed designations upon the surrounding neighborhood and any other planning consideration which may be relevant to the proposed designation, and to give its recommendation of approval, rejection or modification of the proposed designation to the Council. E. To review and recommend on additions to or modifications of park and trail and leisure uses of land. F. To achieve balanced growth by utilizing the Strategic Plan and Comprehensive Guide Plan to review land development while respecting the natural environment and private property rights. G. To perform other duties which may be lawfully assigned to it. Membership Seven to Nine members: Five representatives with experience in the areas of Heritage Preservation, Transportation, Environment, Housing, Leisure Services and two to four at-large members representing a spectrum of interests including Architecture, Land Development, Real Estate, Public Safety, Economic Growth and Landscape Architecture. Term Lengths/Dates Typically three-year terms, with exceptions as determined by the City Council. Terms start on April 1, terms end on March 31. Chair and Vice Chair Annually appointed by the City Council 2020 Goals and Work Plan 1st Quarter (January – March 2019) o Planning Commission Training Curriculum o Code Amendments to update zoning ordinance and/or to implement Aspire (ongoing) o Aspire implementation strategies 2nd Quarter (April – June 2019) o Planning Commission Training Curriculum o Code Amendments to update zoning ordinance and/or to implement Aspire (ongoing) 3rd Quarter (July – September 2019) o Code Amendments to update zoning ordinance and/or to implement Aspire (ongoing) 4th Quarter (October – December 2019) o Code Amendments to update zoning ordinance and/or to implement Aspire (ongoing) o 2021 Work Plan The topics identified in the work plan are intended to be reflective of city led initiatives or topic areas that the Commission seeks additional information on to support its roles and responsibilities. These timelines are intended to serve as a general guide and may be adjusted depending upon time availability and priorities. These topics may be added to agendas as allowed by statutory review of project and land use applications. Time Commitment The time commitment per meeting may vary depending upon the number and complexity of agenda items scheduled. Planning Commission members are expected to review all staff reports and plan materials provided with the agenda packets prior to the scheduled meeting. Planning Commission members are encouraged to contact planning staff prior to the meeting with any additional comments or questions. 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE The meeting dates are the 2nd & 4th Monday’s of each month with the exception of May 25 – due to the Memorial Day Holiday and December with only one meeting on the 14th – which is a regularly scheduled meeting date. January 13 January 27 February 10 February 24 March 9 March 23 April 13 April 27 May 11 May 26 (Tuesday) June 8 June 22 July 13 July 27 August 10 August 24 September 14 September 28 October 12 October 26 November 9 November 23 December 14 (only meeting in December) 1 PROJECT PROFILE – DECEMBER 9, 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION – DECEMBER 9, 2019 1. CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITIONS AND REMODEL 2020 (2019-22) by Eden Prairie Public Schools (BETH) Proposal for building additions, interior remodeling and site improvements Location: 8025 School Road Contact: Jason Mutzenberger, 952-975-7071 Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 57.4 acres  Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 57.4 acres  Site Plan Review on 57.4 acres  Preliminary Plat to combine multiple parcels into 1 lot on 57.4 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 10/11/19 Date Complete 11/12/19 120 Day Deadline 03/10/20 Initial DRC review 10/17/19 Notice to Paper Date 11/20/19 Resident Notice Date 11/21/19 Meeting Date 12/09/19 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 1st Meeting Date 00/00/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20 2. CODE AMENDMENT FOR R1-9.5 SIDE YARD SETBACKS (2019-25) by City of Eden Prairie (STEVE) Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to R1-9.5 zoning district Contact: Steve Durham, 952-949-8491 Request:  Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to side yard setbacks in the R1-9.5 zoning district Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 11/18/19 Date Complete N/A 120 Day Deadline N/A Initial DRC review N/A Notice to Paper Date 11/20/19 Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date 12/09/19 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date 00/00/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING – JANUARY 7, 2019 1. TARGET REMODEL (2019-19) by Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. (SARAH) Proposal for façade improvement and site improvements Location: 8225 Flying Cloud Drive Contact: Ryan Hyllested, 612-568-0698 2 Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.6 acres  Planned Unit Development Amendment with waivers on 10.6 acres  Site Plan Review on 10.6 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 10/10/19 Date Complete 10/28/19 120 Day Deadline 02/25/20 Initial DRC review 10/17/19 Notice to Paper Date 10/30/19 Resident Notice Date 10/31/19 Meeting Date 11/18/19 Notice to Paper Date 12/17/19 Resident Notice Date 12/18/19 1st Meeting Date 01/07/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20 CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – JANUARY 7, 2019 1. COSTCO FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION (2019-12) by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (STEVE) Proposal for a fuel facility expansion and site improvements Location: 12011 Technology Drive Contact: Julie Anderson, 452-656-7403 Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 18.18 acres  Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 18.18 acres  Site Plan Review on 18.18 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 06/04//19 Date Complete 06/04/19 120 Day Deadline 01/31/20 Initial DRC review 06/06/19 Notice to Paper Date 07/24/19 Resident Notice Date 07/26/19 Meeting Date 08/12/19 Notice to Paper Date 10/23/19 Resident Notice Date 10/25/19 1st Meeting Date 11/12/19 2nd Meeting Date 01/07/20 2. 11000 VIKING DRIVE PARKING RAMP (2019-16) by United Properties Development (SARAH) Proposal for a parking structure on top of existing parking lot Location: 11000 Viking Drive Contact: Bill Jundt, 952-893-8664 Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 16.2 acres  Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 16.2 acres  Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres 3 Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 08/02//19 Date Complete 08/30/19 120 Day Deadline 02/11/20 Initial DRC review 08/08/19 Notice to Paper Date 10/10/19 Resident Notice Date 10/11/19 Meeting Date 10/28/19 Notice to Paper Date 11/14/19 Resident Notice Date 11/15/19 1st Meeting Date 12/03/19 2nd Meeting Date 01/07/19 PLANNING COMMISSION – JANUARY 13, 2019 CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – JANUARY 21, 2019 1. 10197 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD (2019-20) by Perry Ryan (JULIE) Proposal for Guide Plan, Zoning Change and MUSA boundary extension Location: 10197 Eden Prairie Road Contact: Perry Ryan, 952-221-3700 Request for:  Guide Plan Change from Rural to Low Density Residential on 1.05 acres  Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.05 acres  MUSA Boundary Extension on 1.05 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 07/19/19 Date Complete 07/19/19 120 Day Deadline 02/13/20 Initial DRC review 07/25/19 Notice to Paper Date 08/21/19 Resident Notice Date 08/23/19 Meeting Date 09/09/19 Notice to Paper Date 09/12/19 Resident Notice Date 09/13/19 1st Meeting Date 10/01/19 2nd Meeting Date 01/21/20 IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED 1. GOLDEN TRIANGLE- INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT (2019-26) by Opus Development Company LLC (SARAH AND BETH) Proposal for a 130,000 square foot industrial building Location: No address assigned, PID 12-116-22-13-0013 Contact: Kit Bennett, 952-656-4546 Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.258 acres  Planned Unit Development District Review on 10.258 acres  Zoning District Change from Rural to Industrial on 10.258 acres  Site Plan Review on 10.258 acres  Preliminary Plat of 1 lot on 10.258 acres 4 Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 11/27/19 Date Complete 00/00/19 120 Day Deadline 00/00/20 Initial DRC review 12/05/19 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 Meeting Date 00/00/20 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 1st Meeting Date 00/00/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20 2. THE OVERLOOK (2019-23) by Gonyea Homes, Inc. (BETH) Proposal for subdivision consisting of 59 single family lots and 4 outlots Location: 9955 Spring Road Contact: Gonyea Homes, Inc; 612-868-5862 Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 27.51 acres  Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 27.51 acres  Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 27.51 acres  Preliminary Plat of 3 parcels into 59 lots and 4 outlots on 27.51 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 11/08/19 Date Complete 00/00/19 120 Day Deadline 00/00/20 Initial DRC review 11/14/19 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 Meeting Date 00/00/20 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 1st Meeting Date 00/00/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20 3. TILLER CORPORATION PLANT 912 (2019-24) by Tiller Corporation (JULIE) Proposal to relocate the plant processing and stockpile areas within the site Location: 6401 Industrial Drive Contact: Michael Caron; 763-425-4191 Request for:  Guide Plan Change from Public to Industrial on 4.49 acres  Zoning District Change from Public to Industrial on 5.58 acres  Site Plan Review on 13.21 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 11/08/19 Date Complete 00/00/19 120 Day Deadline 00/00/20 Initial DRC review 11/14/19 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 Meeting Date 00/00/20 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 1st Meeting Date 00/00/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20 4. EDEN RIDGE, LLC (2019-20) by Eden Ridge, LCC (BETH) Proposal for 10 single family lots Location: 15807 & 15817 Valley View Road Contact: Ralph M 952-494-3630 5 Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.3 acres  Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.3 acres  Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 4.3 acres  Preliminary Plat to divide 2 lots into 10 lots on 4.3 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 10/11/19 Date Complete 00/00/19 120 Day Deadline 00/00/20 Initial DRC review 10/17/19 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 Meeting Date 00/00/20 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 1st Meeting Date 00/00/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20 5. FLYING CLOUD COMMONS (CASTLE RIDGE RETAIL) (2019-21) by Oppidan Investment Company (JULIE) Proposal for retail area as Phase 3 of the Castle Ridge redevelopment project Location: 615-635 Prairie Center Drive Contact: Oppidan Investment Company, 952-294-1259 Request for:  Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.338 acres  Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 7.338 acres  Site Plan Review on 7.338 acres  Preliminary Plat of one outlot into 3 lots and 2 outlots on 7.338 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 10/14/19 Date Complete 00/00/19 120 Day Deadline 00/00/20 Initial DRC review 10/17/19 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 Meeting Date 00/00/20 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 1st Meeting Date 00/00/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20 6. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23) by SW Metro Transit Commission (JULIE) Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489 Request for:  Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres  Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 11.38 acres  Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 00/00/15 Date Complete 00/00/15 120 Day Deadline 00/00/15 Initial DRC review 00/00/15 Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15 Resident Notice Date 11/20/15 Meeting Date 12/07/15 Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15 Resident Notice Date 12/18/15 1st Meeting Date 01/05/16 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/00 6 7. HUELER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (2019-18) by Greg & Kelli Hueler (JULIE) Proposal for amendment to the Development Agreement to relocate driveway location Location: 12300 Riverview Drive Contact: Greg & Kelli Hueler, 612-221-4172 Request for:  Development Agreement Amendment 4.45 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 09/03//19 Date Complete 10/07/19 120 Day Deadline 02/03/20 Initial DRC review 09/05/19 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19 Resident Notice Date 00/00/19 Meeting Date 00/00/19 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19 Resident Notice Date 00/00/19 1st Meeting Date 00/00/19 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/19 VARIANCES TELECOMMUNICATION