HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 11/18/2019
AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, November 18, 2019 -7:00 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION John Kirk, Charles Weber, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed
MEMBERS: Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Christopher Villarreal, Carole
Mette
STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer;
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE --ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Minutes for the October 28, 2019 meeting
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. TARGET REMODEL (2019-19)
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.6 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 10.6 acres
Site Plan Review on 10.6 acres
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
ANNOTATED AGENDA
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
RE: Planning Commission Meeting for Monday, November 18, 2019
_______________________________________________________________________________
MONDAY, November 18, 2019 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A. MOTION: Move to approve the agenda.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, OCTOBER 28,
2019
MOTION: Move to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated October 28, 2019.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Target Remodel (2019-19)
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.6 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 10.6 acres
Site Plan Review on 10.6 acres
The applicant is proposing façade updates and site improvements. Portions of the existing
façade will be painted and refurbished, and new signs will be installed on all three exterior
elevations. All existing parking islands will be landscaped, and an existing pedestrian
connection will be improved. No parking stalls will be removed as part of this project.
As part of the PUD amendment, the applicant is seeking waivers for exterior building
materials and signage.
Staff recommends approval.
MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval for a Planned Unit Development Concept
Review on 10.6 acres; Planned Unit Development Amendment with waivers on 10.6 acres
and Site Plan Review on 10.6 acres based on Plans stamped dated November 7, 2019 and
the Staff Report dated November 12, 2019.
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
ANNOTATED AGENDA
November 18, 2019
Page 2
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORT
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Move to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2019 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER
Council Chambers
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Charles Weber, Ann Higgins, Andrew
Pieper, Ed Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Christopher
Villarreal, Carole Mette, Balu Iyer
CITY STAFF: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer;
Matt Bourne, Parks and Natural Resources Manager;
David Lindahl, Economic Development Manager;
Kristin Harley, Recording Secretary
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Commission members Farr and Villarreal were absent.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by Kirk to approve the agenda. MOTION
CARRIED 7-0.
IV. MINUTES
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Iyer to approve the minutes of October 14, 2019.
MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
11000 VIKING DIVE PARKING RAMP (2019-16)
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 16.2 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with Waivers on 16.2
acres
Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 28, 2019
Page 2
Scott Peterson, Vice President of Development for United Properties gave a brief
history of the company and briefly detailed the application. He introduced Marc
Williamson of Edward Farr Architects, who displayed a PowerPoint and
explained the application. The parking stall counts would increase from
approximately 723 to 1,042, from 2.77 per 1,000 square feet to 3.59 per 1,000
square feet. The ramp would be located on the far eastern side of the site. In 2003
there was a Phase II site plan review as a part of the PUD request which at that
time allowed for two parking decks to be constructed in phases and an extension
of the surface parking on the east side. The building would be placed over the
existing surface parking area constructed as part of the Phase II allowance. The
waiver requested fewer parking stalls than required by City zoning. There would
be a future parking deck per the 2003 plan. The parking dimensions were less
than required by the City but greater than recommended by the Urban Land
Institute and by the National Parking Association as published in its book
Dimensions of Parking. The building height at Level C in the center would rise to
26 feet, eventually bringing the perimeter to 26 feet also. The elevator tower, if
constructed in the future, would be 42 feet in height. The exterior materials would
mimic the existing buildings using architectural pre-cast in a buff or cream color
flat cement work, with pre-cast spandrels covered with thin brick to match. The
project included green infrastructure and initiatives, preserving natural vegetation,
including stormwater management, and conserving energy through LED lighting
installation and conversion. The project was being built on an existing parking lot,
minimizing impact on wetland buffers. Permeable surface was being added with
parking islands and landscape around the entry and ends of the building. There
would be a stormwater collection system under the ramp’s structure. He displayed
a mock-up of the proposed parking structure.
Pieper asked for and received clarification on the location of the 26-foot Level C
parking. Mette asked how snow removal would be addressed. Williamson stated
snow would be stockpiled at the southeast corner of the ramp as originally
planned. Mette asked where the Phase 3 office building would fit in. Williamson
replied this was on the original plan from 2003, but there were no current plans to
expand. Iyer asked why the waivers for parking stall and drive aisle dimensions.
Williamson replied the stall dimensions were derived mathematically. The
application asked for 75 degree parking in the main traffic aisles and the City
requirement was 17 feet 10 inches.
DeSanctis asked, since the landscaping would be a mixture of native and
nonnative species, for a description of the nonnative species being introduced.
Williamson introduced Peter Morrell of Sambatec. Morrell stated there would be
a variety: red maple, birch, linden, spruce, Black Hills spruce, crabapples and
thornless Hawthorne trees. DeSanctis asked for the source of power for the LED
lighting. Williamson replied it would be the standard electrical supply. DeSanctis
asked if solar was being considered, and Williamson replied it was not being
considered for this phase since the parking ramp includes expansion opportunity.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 28, 2019
Page 3
Two EV charging stations were included in the application. Future proof of
parking would preclude solar at this time.
Klima gave the planner’s report. The applicant proposed to construct a 69,300
square foot parking ramp at 11000 Viking Drive east of the existing office
buildings. The proposed ramp included 2.5 stories of parking to better meet
parking standards for the Office zoning district. There would be no alterations to
the principal office buildings. The applicant proposed similar exterior materials
for the parking ramp to compliment the office buildings. Trees removed as part of
construction would be replaced at a one-to-one ratio to comply with the existing
landscaping plan. As part of the PUD amendment, the applicant was seeking
waivers for architectural materials, accessory structure height, and parking stall
and aisle dimensions. Staff recommended approval.
Kirk asked if the recommendations based on the Urban Land Institute and the
National Parking Association were typical for development and reliable standards.
Rue replied he was more familiar with City ordinance, though these are national
dimension standards. Staff had raised concerns regarding the parking aisles, drive
aisles, and the parking stalls. The site was also restricted by setback. The 4-foot
drive aisle was of the greatest concern. Higgins noted on page 7 the Traffic
Engineer’s approval of the traffic plan and asked for greater detail on the Traffic
Demand Management Plan for entry and egress. Rue replied a Traffic Demand
Management Plan was typical for larger office uses. It ensured the applicant
would follow through on the suggestions and incentives from various entities for
carpooling, shower facilities for cyclists, lockers, et cetera, to contain congestion.
Iyer reiterated his concern for the parking stall and drive aisle waivers and asked
for a metric from the City. Klima replied a waiver was being requested for aisle
width and staff compared it against the metric required by City Code. The Code’s
metrics utilized a different range, leading to an interpretation that staff ultimately
agreed with. The concern about dimensions was not so far-reaching as to withhold
approval of the waiver, but staff wanted this concern noted in the record. It would
be the responsibility of the property owner to manage traffic circulation. Staff
recommended overall approval with a cautionary note on this concern.
Pieper asked if the City’s perspective would be different with a retail area. Klima
replied there would be more of a concern for retail due to larger parking turnover.
This was private property and would not be spilling out into City’s right-of-way.
Kirk reiterated this last point: there was some concern on some fronts but all
traffic was internal to the applicants’ parking structure and personnel. Pieper
agreed. He asked for and received clarification from Klima the commission was
voting on an approval of up to 42 feet, not just the current height being
constructed in this phase.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 28, 2019
Page 4
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by DeSanctis to close the public hearing.
MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
Mette stated she was familiar with the standards of the Urban Land Institute, and
she recognized it as nationally recognized standard. She stated she hoped the
proposed dimensions were larger than the Minneapolis minimum sizes. They
were larger than the Minneapolis City Code. She had no concern with the drive
aisles or the stall sizes. She commended the developer on the parking ratio, as the
City standard was a bit on the high side in her opinion, whereas the application
was sufficient and matched what she saw in her experience. She also commended
the colors and materials. Kirk thanked Mette for offering her personal expertise
on the parking and stated he too was comfortable with the Class One materials.
He added the height was something Eden Prairie would have to live with given its
needs today. Kirk commended the design overall.
MOTION: Weber moved, seconded by Kirk to recommend approval for a
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 16.2 acres; Planned Unit
Development Amendment with waiver on 16.2 acres and Site Plan Review on
16.2 acres based on Plans stamped dated October 11, 2019 and the staff report
dated October 23, 2019. MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
B. HISTORIC YORKVILLE AND BLOOMINGTON ROAD-LOCAL
HERITAGE PRESERVATION DESIGNATION
Klima gave a brief introduction. Staff liaison Lindahl and HPC commission
member Thorp were there to present on the effort to locally designate as portion
of the historic Yorkville and Bloomington Road, and as a part of this process the
City was required to hold a public hearing. The Planning Commission members
were to make a recommendation to the City Council on this proposed local
historic designation.
Thorp displayed the location of the Ox-Cart Trail through Eden Prairie to Fort
Snelling and explained the history and significance of this trail, later a road. He
showed the plat of the town of Hennepin, which had been development by John
McKenzie and a consortium of six investors, and showed where the road appeared
on the plat. He walked the commission members through the trail’s location on
the 1854 government survey and on the 1855 plat map of Eden Prairie. He
explained the 1853 location of the warehouse, blacksmith shop, and tavern and
hotel, and displayed the 1864 plat map. An archeological study commissioned by
Carver County of the Yorkville and Bloomington Road was found by Thorp in an
archives. The residents had asked for an improved road and it was widened.
Yorkville was a settlement north of Chaska which competed with it. Thorp, also a
land surveyor by trade, described how he used this information to trace on a 1999
LIDAR map the trail survey points from 1864. The road extends across Purgatory
Creek. The nomination only encompassed the road within the James A. Brown
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 28, 2019
Page 5
Conservation area. He displayed a 1945 aerial photograph showing the road in an
area that was now densely wooded, and a 2018 aerial showing the road. The intent
of this local designation was to prevent further damage. The area was sandy with
much erosion.
Higgins asked for and received clarification of the location within the
conservation area. Thorp added the area was controlled by the City Parks and
Recreation Department. Pieper asked how designation would benefit the road, and
Thorp replied it would let residents and staff know of its existence, informing
future planning projects, plus then a management plan could be written in
conjunction with the Parks and Recreation Department. There might be no
process needed to otherwise protect the road. DeSanctis asked if the area was
geologically unstable, perhaps making it unsafe for residents to visit. Thorp
replied it was a difficult location to reach, being halfway up the slope with many
downed trees and no available parking. Pieper asked if there had been indigenous
people and lands at the site and Thorp replied there was. Pieper suggested having
conversations with indigenous community members regarding the designation,
since Fort Snelling inspired different reactions from different people. Mette
concurred this might be a good step to take. Mette added this action tonight did
nothing but protect the road, so such a conversation was not required first. Kirk
noted the site was already in the conservation area, an area the City already
controlled, in which case why shouldn’t the commission act? Higgins asked for
and received clarification the commission needed to make a motion.
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by DeSanctis to recommend local
designation of the Yorktown and Bloomington Road. MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
Iyer announced he and his wife would be relocating for the winter months, and would
therefore resign his membership on the commission.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Weber to adjourn. MOTION CARRIED 7-0. The
meeting was adjourned at 7:49 p.m.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Sarah Strain, Planner I
DATE: November 12, 2019
SUBJECT: Target Remodel
LOCATION: 8225 Flying Cloud Drive
REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.6 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 10.6
acres
Site Plan Review on 10.6 acres
120 Day Review
Period:
February 25, 2020
BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting a PUD concept review, PUD District Amendment with waivers, and a
Site Plan review to perform façade updates and site improvements at 8225 Flying Cloud Drive. The
site is approximately 10.6 acres. The site is located adjacent to the Eden Prairie Center near the
intersection of Flying Cloud Drive and Singletree Lane. The site is bordered by commercial uses and
is outlined in the included aerial image.
The property is currently zoned Commercial-
Regional-Services and is guided for Mixed Use
in the Comprehensive Plan. There are no
proposed land use, zoning, or comprehensive
plan changes as part of this application.
The applicant is proposing façade updates as
part of a nationwide effort to modernize the
appearance of Target stores. Modifications are
being proposed for all four sides of the building.
However, the east side of the building is an
interior entrance to the Eden Prairie Center. As
such, the mall entrance/east elevation is not
considered part of this application review.
There is a PUD for the site approved in 2000.
Staff Report – Target Remodel
November 12, 2019
Page 2
2
This PUD granted waivers for exterior building materials, signage, and parking lot setbacks. The site
also has a Cross Parking and Maintenance Agreement with Eden Prairie Center.
SITE PLAN
The existing façade is comprised of brick, cast stone, glass, concrete masonry units (CMU), and
EFIS. The applicant is proposing to paint existing EFIS on the front façade dark brown and gray.
New red EFIS will be installed over existing EFIS on the front façade to offer a contrasting
background for the new proposed sign, as shown in the image below.
Additionally, the applicant is proposing to install red EFIS on the upper corner of the west
elevation and the exterior screening wall along the south elevation. New white logo signs will be
installed on these EFIS surfaces.
In 2000, when the existing PUD was approved, exterior building standards were generally
applied to the overall exterior as opposed to each elevation as they are for current developments.
Since the existing site plan and PUD address exterior building material requirements as a total
across all elevations, and the existing conditions comply with the 2000 PUD approvals, this
application will also address exterior building material requirements as a total across all
elevations for Target. The three elevations have a total of 59% Class I materials, which was
granted through a PUD waiver in 2000. As discussed below with PUD waivers, the applicant is
proposing to alter the façade to have a total of 58% Class I materials. Across all elevations, there
are three Class I materials/colors utilized in a complimentary manner.
There are currently parking islands throughout the parking lot. Most of the parking islands are
landscaped with solitary trees and rock mulch with some shrubs planted in the storefront parking
islands. Four parking islands are concrete and are not planted. As part of the façade remodel, all
parking islands will be planted. Existing trees will remain, and new shrubs and perennials will be
planted underneath. The new buffer between the concrete sidewalk and the parking area will also
be landscaped. These improvements will increase the pervious coverage on the site and bring the
site into conformance with requirements for landscaped parking islands.
Most parking aisles comply with the current parking lot standards by having a parking island
Staff Report – Target Remodel
November 12, 2019
Page 3
3
approximately every 20 stalls. Staff and the applicant discussed the potential to bring the parking
lot closer into compliance with the city standards by installing additional islands. Due to the
shared parking agreement between Target and the Eden Prairie Center, Target’s parking lot
spaces count toward the 4.5 stalls per 1,000 square foot required of Eden Prairie Center. Eden
Prairie Center is currently at their minimum stall requirement, meaning any decrease in parking
stalls due to parking island installation would bring Eden Prairie Center out of compliance with
their PUD requirements. The applicant is proposing landscaping and pedestrian improvements to
bring the site closer into compliance with City Code while honoring the shared parking
agreement and PUD requirements.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS
The purpose of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) as stated in City Code is to provide for a more
creative and efficient approach to the use of land within the City; to allow variety in the types of
environment available to people and distribution of overall density of population and intensity of land
use where desirable and feasible; and provide for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental
design.
The proposed façade update and site improvements largely complies with City Code and the existing
PUD. As part of the PUD process, the applicant is seeking waivers to City Code requirements as
outlined below.
1. Exterior Building Materials
The existing PUD for the site granted a waiver for exterior building materials to allow a
total of 59.5% Class I materials on the three exterior elevations as opposed to the 75%
required by City Code. The applicant is requesting a waiver to allow a total of 58% Class
I materials on the three exterior elevations. The ratios of Class I to Class II materials are
not proposed to change on the north and west elevations; the applicant is proposing to
swap Class II materials for Class II materials on these two facades. On both the north and
west façades, EFIS will cover or replace existing CMU.
The overall ratio of Class I to Class II materials is decreasing due to proposed changes on
the south elevation. The applicant is proposing to install about 320 square feet of EFIS
over existing brick. The south elevation is partially screened by vegetation, a berm, and
the neighboring store. This proposed change is to match the updates on the other two
façades and provide a space for a new sign.
2. Signage
The site currently has a waiver for sign dimensions, allowing up to 544.5 square feet on the
north elevation and up to 355.5 square feet on the west elevation with no signage on the
south elevation. This allows the same square footage of signage as allowed by City Code but
Staff Report – Target Remodel
November 12, 2019
Page 4
4
distributed on two elevations as opposed to three. City Code currently allows up to 300
square feet of signage per exterior elevation in Commercial zoning districts.
As proposed, the building would have approximately 414 square feet of signage on the north
elevation, 100 square feet of signage on the west elevation, and 36 square feet of signage on
the south elevation. Two elevations meet code requirements, and the north elevation is
reducing its total signage from the waiver in 2000. All proposed signs are smaller than
existing signs. The total proposed signage is less than the 900 square feet of signage
permitted for the site. The proposed waiver would continue to allow a total of 900 square feet
of signage for the building, but signage could be distributed across all three exterior
elevations as opposed to two under the current PUD waiver. Other retail entities throughout
Eden Prairie have similar sign distribution waivers.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
All parking islands will be planted with an assortment of shrubs and perennials, and existing parking
island trees will remain. The proposed plantings meet code requirements for parking islands.
SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS
There is an existing painted crosswalk connecting the
store front to the concrete sidewalk adjacent to the
Mall Ring Road, which connects to concrete
sidewalks along Flying Cloud Drive. The applicant is
proposing to extend the concrete sidewalk into the
site and install a landscape island to provide a buffer
between pedestrians and the parking area. The painted
crosswalk between the store front and the extended
concrete sidewalk will remain.
PARKING
The site currently shares parking with Eden Prairie
Center as part of a Cross Parking and Maintenance Agreement. Eden Prairie Center and its
department stores have a waiver for parking to allow a ratio of 4.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet.
This ratio was used to determine parking requirements for Target in the 2000 PUD, since the site
is attached to the Eden Prairie Center. Since parking stalls in Target’s parking lot count toward
the required parking ratio for Eden Prairie center, no parking stalls are proposed to be removed to
maintain the 4.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet requirement.
LIGHTING
The existing sconce light fixtures at the entrances will be replaced with new sconce light fixtures in
Staff Report – Target Remodel
November 12, 2019
Page 5
5
the same locations. The new sconces will be dimmed by an opaque diffuser and will be directed at
the pedestrian areas around the entrances.
SIGNS
Signs are proposed on all three sides of the building. The sign on the north elevation will be replaced
with a white logo and store name. The existing pharmacy sign will be replaced with a smaller sign.
The sign on the west elevation will be replaced with a white logo. A third white logo is proposed for
the south elevation.
The site currently has a waiver for sign dimensions, allowing up to 544.5 square feet on the north
elevation and up to 355.5 square feet on the west elevation with no signage on the south elevation.
As proposed, the building would have approximately 414 square feet of signage on the north
elevation, 100 square feet of signage on the west elevation, and 36 square feet of signage on the
south elevation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the following request:
PUD Concept Review on 10.6 acres
PUD District Amendment with waivers for 10.6 acres
Site Plan Review on 10.6 acres
This recommendation is based on the plans stamped dated November 7, 2019, staff report dated
November 12, 2019 and the following conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall:
A. Submit a landscape letter of credit or escrow surety equivalent to 150% of the cost
of the approved landscaping.
B. Obtain and provide documentation of Watershed District approval.
2. The following waivers have been granted through the PUD District Review for the project as
indicated in the plans stamp dated November 7, 2019.
A. Exterior Building Materials – The existing PUD for the site allows a total of
59.5% of exterior building materials to be Class I. The Waiver allows for a total
of 58% Class I materials to be used for exterior building materials.
B. Signage – The existing PUD allows up to 544.5 square feet of signage on the
north elevation and up to 355.5 square feet of signage on the west elevation with
no signage on the south elevation. The Waiver allows for a total of 900 square feet
of signage to be distributed across the three exterior elevations.
Staff Report – Target Remodel
November 12, 2019
Page 6
6
3. All signage shall require review and approval of a sign permit and shall comply with
Section 11.70 and granted PUD waivers.
¯
Location Map: Target RemodelAddress: 8225 Flying Cloud DriveEden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
0 310 620155 Feet
Singletree Lane
Eden Prairie CenterFlyingCloudDriveW 78th Street
SITE
City of Eden Prairie Land Use Guide Plan Map 2010-2040
¯
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialGuidePlan.mxd Map was Updated/Created: April 18, 2008
Guide Plan Map:Target RemodelAddress: 8225 Flying Cloud DriveEden Prairie, MN 55344
<all other values>
Rural
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Migh Density Residential
High Density Residential
Mixed-Use
Town Center
Transit-Oriented Development
Regional Commercial
Commercial
Office
Industrial Flex Tech
Flex Service
Eco Innovation
Industrial
Airport
Public / Semi-Public
Parks & Open Space
Golf Course
Utility & Railroad
Right-of-Way
Streams
COUNTY HIGHWAY
STATE AID STREET
MUNICIPAL STREET
OTHER
340 0 340170 Feet
SITE
DATE Approved 10-01-19
Singletree Lane FlyingCloudDriveW 78th Street
Eden RoadGlenLane
City of Eden Prairie Zoning Map
In case of discrepency related to a zoning classification on this zoning map, the Ordinanceand attached legal description on file at Eden Prairie City Center will prevail.
¯
Shoreland Management Classifications
100 - Year Floodplain
Natural Environment WatersRecreational Development WatersGeneral Development Waters (Creeks Only)GD
NERD
Up dated through approved Ordinances #26-2008Ordinance #33-2001 (BFI Addition) approved, but not shown on this map editionDate: March 1, 2009
0 400 800200
Feet
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialZoning.mxd Map was Updated/Created: June 11, 2008
Zoning Map - Target Remodel8225 Flying Cloud DriveEden Prairie, MN 55344
Rural
R1-44 One Family- 44,000 sf. min.
R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min.
R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min.
R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min.
RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A. max.
RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A. max.
Office
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
Highway Commercial
Regional Service Commercial
Regional Commercial
TC-C
TC-R
TC-MU
Industrial Park - 2 Acre Min,
Industrial Park - 5 Acre Min.
General Industrial - 5 Acre Min.
Public
Golf Course
Water
Right of Way
CityLimitsFlyin gCloudDriveEden Prairie Center
SITE
Singletree Lane
W 78th Street
¯
Aerial Map: Target RemodelAddress: 8225 Flying Cloud DriveEden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
0 200 400100 Feet
Singletree Lane
Eden Prairie CenterFlyingCloudDriveW 78th Street
SITE
1
PROJECT PROFILE – NOVEMBER 18, 2019
PLANNING COMMISSION – NOVEMBER 18, 2019
1. TARGET REMODEL (2019-19) by Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. (SARAH)
Proposal for façade improvement and site improvements
Location: 8225 Flying Cloud Drive
Contact: Ryan Hyllested, 612-568-0698
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.6 acres
Planned Unit Development Amendment with waivers on 10.6 acres
Site Plan Review on 10.6 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/10/19
Date Complete 10/28/19
120 Day Deadline 02/25/20
Initial DRC review 10/17/19
Notice to Paper Date 10/30/19
Resident Notice Date 10/31/19
Meeting Date 11/18/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING – DECEMBER 3, 2019
1. 11000 VIKING DRIVE PARKING RAMP (2019-16) by United Properties Development
(SARAH)
Proposal for a parking structure on top of existing parking lot
Location: 11000 Viking Drive
Contact: Bill Jundt, 952-893-8664
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 16.2 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 16.2 acres
Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/02//19
Date Complete 08/30/19
120 Day Deadline 02/11/20
Initial DRC review 08/08/19
Notice to Paper Date 10/10/19
Resident Notice Date 10/11/19
Meeting Date 10/28/19
Notice to Paper Date 11/14/19
Resident Notice Date 11/15/19
1st Meeting Date 12/03/19
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/19
2
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – DECEMBER 3, 2019
1. 10197 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD (2019-20) by Perry Ryan (JULIE)
Proposal for Guide Plan, Zoning Change and MUSA boundary extension
Location: 10197 Eden Prairie Road
Contact: Perry Ryan, 952-221-3700
Request for:
Guide Plan Change from Rural to Low Density Residential on 1.05 acres
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.05 acres
MUSA Boundary Extension on 1.05 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 07/19/19
Date Complete 07/19/19
120 Day Deadline 01/14/20
Initial DRC review 07/25/19
Notice to Paper Date 08/21/19
Resident Notice Date 08/23/19
Meeting Date 09/09/19
Notice to Paper Date 09/12/19
Resident Notice Date 09/13/19
1st Meeting Date 10/01/19
2nd Meeting Date 12/03/19
2. PARAVEL APARTMENTS (2019-11) by Timberland Partners (JULIE)
Proposal for a 246-unit multi-family community as Phase 2 of the Castle Ridge redevelopment
project
Location: 635 Prairie Center Drive
Contact: Robert Fransen, 952-843-2040
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.962 acres
Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.962 acres
Site Plan Review on 4.962 acres
Preliminary Plat of an outlot into one lot on 4.962 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/20/19
Date Complete 07/22/19
120 Day Deadline 12/04/19
Initial DRC review 05/30/19
Notice to Paper Date 07/24/19
Resident Notice Date 07/26/19
Meeting Date 08/12/19
Notice to Paper Date 08/28/19
Resident Notice Date 08/30/19
1st Meeting Date 09/17/19
2nd Meeting Date 12/03/19
3. COSTCO FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION (2019-12) by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
(STEVE)
Proposal for a fuel facility expansion and site improvements
Location: 12011 Technology Drive
Contact: Julie Anderson, 452-656-7403
3
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 18.18 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 18.18 acres
Site Plan Review on 18.18 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 06/04//19
Date Complete 06/04/19
120 Day Deadline 01/31/20
Initial DRC review 06/06/19
Notice to Paper Date 07/24/19
Resident Notice Date 07/26/19
Meeting Date 08/12/19
Notice to Paper Date 10/23/19
Resident Notice Date 10/25/19
1st Meeting Date 11/12/19
2nd Meeting Date 12/03/19
4. NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT ADDITION (2019-17) by Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District (BETH)
Proposal for an approximate 400 square foot building addition
Location: 12800 Gerard Drive
Contact: Randy Anhorn, 952-835-2078
Request for:
Planned Unit Concept Review on 5.31 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 5.31 acres
Site Plan Review on 5.31 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/30/19
Date Complete 09/13/19
120 Day Deadline 12/19/19
Initial DRC review 09/05/19
Notice to Paper Date 09/26/19
Resident Notice Date 09/27/19
Meeting Date 10/14/19
Notice to Paper Date 10/23/19
Resident Notice Date 10/25/19
1st Meeting Date 11/12/19
2nd Meeting Date 12/03/19
PLANNING COMMISSION – DECEMBER 9, 2019
1. CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITIONS AND REMODEL 2020 (2019-22) by Eden Prairie
Public Schools (BETH)
Proposal for building additions, interior remodeling and site improvements
Location: 8025 School Road
Contact: Jason Mutzenberger, 952-975-7071
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 57.4 acres
Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 57.4 acres
Site Plan Review on 57.4 acres
Preliminary Plat to combine multiple parcels into 1 lot on 57.4 acres
4
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/11/19
Date Complete 11/12/19
120 Day Deadline 03/10/20
Initial DRC review 10/17/19
Notice to Paper Date 11/20/19
Resident Notice Date 11/21/19
Meeting Date 12/09/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED
1. THE OVERLOOK (2019-23) by Gonyea Homes, Inc. (BETH)
Proposal for subdivision consisting of 59 single family lots and 4 outlots
Location: 9955 Spring Road
Contact: Gonyea Homes, Inc; 612-868-5862
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 27.51 acres
Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 27.51 acres
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 27.51 acres
Preliminary Plat of on 27.51 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 11/05/19
Date Complete 00/00/19
120 Day Deadline 00/00/20
Initial DRC review 11/14/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
Meeting Date 00/00/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
2. TILLER CORPORATION PLANT 912 (2019-24) by Tiller Corporation (JULIE)
Proposal to relocate the plant processing and stockpile areas within the site
Location: 6401 Industrial Drive
Contact: Michael Caron; 763-425-4191
Request for:
Guide Plan Change from Public to Industrial on 4.49 acres
Zoning District Change from Public to Industrial on 5.58 acres
Site Plan Review on 13.21 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 11/08/19
Date Complete 00/00/19
120 Day Deadline 00/00/20
Initial DRC review 11/14/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
Meeting Date 00/00/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
5
3. EDEN RIDGE, LLC (2019-20) by Eden Ridge, LCC (BETH)
Proposal for 10 single family lots
Location: 15807 & 15817 Valley View Road
Contact: Ralph M 952-494-3630
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.3 acres
Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.3 acres
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 4.3 acres
Preliminary Plat to divide 2 lots into 10 lots on 4.3 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/11/19
Date Complete 00/00/19
120 Day Deadline 00/00/20
Initial DRC review 10/17/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
Meeting Date 00/00/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
4. FLYING CLOUD COMMONS (CASTLE RIDGE RETAIL) (2019-21) by Oppidan Investment
Company (JULIE)
Proposal for retail area as Phase 3 of the Castle Ridge redevelopment project
Location: 615-635 Prairie Center Drive
Contact: Oppidan Investment Company, 952-294-1259
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.338 acres
Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 7.338 acres
Site Plan Review on 7.338 acres
Preliminary Plat of one outlot into 3 lots and 2 outlots on 7.338 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/14/19
Date Complete 00/00/19
120 Day Deadline 00/00/20
Initial DRC review 10/17/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
Meeting Date 00/00/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
5. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23) by SW Metro Transit Commission
(JULIE)
Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Request for:
Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres
Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on
11.38 acres
Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres
6
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 00/00/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15
Resident Notice Date 12/18/15
1st Meeting Date 01/05/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/00
6. HUELER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (2019-18) by Greg &
Kelli Hueler (JULIE)
Proposal for amendment to the Development Agreement to relocate driveway location
Location: 12300 Riverview Drive
Contact: Greg & Kelli Hueler, 612-221-4172
Request for:
Development Agreement Amendment 4.45 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/03//19
Date Complete 10/07/19
120 Day Deadline 02/03/20
Initial DRC review 09/05/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
Meeting Date 00/00/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
1st Meeting Date 00/00/19
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/19
VARIANCES
TELECOMMUNICATION