HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission - 10/14/2019
AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, October 14, 2019 - 7:00 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEMBERS:
John Kirk, Charles Weber, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed
Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Christopher Villarreal, Carole
Mette, Balu Iyer
STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer;
Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Minutes for the September 9, 2019 meeting
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. COSTCO FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION (CONTINUED ITEM) - (2019-12)
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 18.18 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 18.18 acres
Site Plan Review on 18.18 acres
B. NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING ADDITION –
(2019-17)
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.31 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 5.31 acres
Site Plan Review on 5.31 acres
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
ANNOTATED AGENDA
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
RE: Planning Commission Meeting for Monday, October 14, 2019
_______________________________________________________________________________
MONDAY, October 14, 2019 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A. MOTION: Move to approve the agenda.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9,
2019
MOTION: Move to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated September 9, 2019.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. COSTCO FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION (CONTINUED ITEM) - (2019-12)
Request for:
PUD Concept Review on 18.18 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 18.18
acres
Site Plan Review on 18.18 acres
The Costco Fuel Facility Expansion project was initially scheduled for the August 12, 2019
Planning Commission meeting. The applicant requested a continuance to September 9,
2019 in order to address staff concerns regarding internal traffic flow on the east driveway.
The applicant requested a second continuance to October 14, 2019 Planning Commission
meeting.
The applicant is proposing a fuel facility expansion of the canopy and addition of four (4)
new pump dispensers. There will be no alterations to the principal Costco building. The
applicant has addressed the internal traffic flow concern with a revised plan that does not
alter the east driveway and has provided traffic analysis report supporting the new fuel
facility layout.
Staff, therefore, recommends approval of the proposed site plan.
MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval for a PUD Concept Review on 18.18 acres;
ANNOTATED AGENDA
October 14, 2019
Page 2
Planned Unit Development Amendment with waiver on 18.18 acres and Site Plan Review
on 18.18 aces based on Plans stamped dated September 23, 2019 and the Staff Report dated
October 3, 2019.
B. NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING
ADDITION –(2019-17)
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.31 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 5.31 acres
Site Plan Review on 5.31 acres
The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is proposing to construct a 486 square foot
addition onto the northwest corner of the existing building. The property is located at
12800 Gerard Drive just west of Gordon Drive. The proposed building addition includes
three office spaces for existing staff. This project does not include increases to staff or
meetings. The applicant is proposing the same building architecture and materials so the
addition matches the existing building. An existing raingarden in the location of the
addition will be relocated to the north and east sides of the addition.
Staff recommends approval.
MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing.
MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval for a PUD Concept Review on 5.31 acres;
Planned Unit Development Amendment with waiver on 5.31 acres and Site Plan Review on
5.31 aces based on Plans stamped dated September 23, 2019 and the Staff Report dated
October 3, 2019.
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORT
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Move to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER
Council Chambers
8080 Mitchell Road
COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Charles Weber, Ann Higgins, Andrew
Pieper, Ed Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Christopher
Villarreal, Carole Mette, Balu Iyer
CITY STAFF: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer;
Kristin Harley, Recording Secretary
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
Chair Farr called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Commission members Pieper, Kirk, Villarreal, and Mette were absent.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Iyer moved, seconded by Weber to approve the agenda. MOTION
CARRIED 5-0.
IV. MINUTES
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by DeSanctis to approve the minutes of August 26,
2019. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
10197 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD (2019-15)
Request for:
Guide Plan Change from Rural to Low Density Residential on 1.05 acres
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.05 acres
MUSA Boundary Extension on 1.05 acres
Perry Ryan, of 19655 Waterford Place, Excelsior, presented a PowerPoint and
detailed the application. No variances were being sought on this proposal. His
family owned this property since 1998 and wished to develop it as a single-family
home. The driveway to the proposed house had already been constructed in 2013.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 9, 2019
Page 2
Road construction along Eden Prairie Road was done in 2012 and the second
stage began last autumn with tree removal and construction. Main line sewer and
water were being constructed down to Flying Cloud Drive and the utility stubs
had been added to the property; utilities were in place but not hooked up. He
expected completion this fall.
Ryan read from the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and MUSA Boundary as
listed in the staff report. The R1-44 was defined as a “zoning district [which]
allowed single family detached homes with a minimum lot size of one acre.” Lots
in the area range from 0.5 acres to 1.5 acres. He commended the work of staff on
this project. There would be a 14 percent loss of trees. The house would be
standard, with standard setbacks, most of the grading involved less than a 3:1
slope, with some possibility of retaining walls.
DeSanctis asked Ryan to elaborate on species of trees lost and planned mitigation
of loss. Ryan replied as part of the public improvement project it was mainly oak
trees and replacement needed to have three trees based on their caliper inches. He
planned to have screening up front and he did work with City staff on additional
screening from headlights and car traffic. DeSanctis asked, since there area was
experiencing more frequent heavy rain events, if he anticipated modification in
slope or grading, construction materials or any remedies against mudslide. Ryan
replied he did not .The steep slopes were located outside of the lot and a
tremendous job had been done on stabilizing loads. He would do the same thing
with fiber blanket and mixed seed. There was no excess erosion down to Flying
Cloud on these steeper slopes which exceeded his.
Higgins stated she was curious about the home to be built and asked for a general
outline. Ryan replied it was a typical 50-foot by 50-foot pad like other houses at
the south end of the ridge. It would be a two-story walkout with a three-car
garage, a standard Eden Prairie higher end home.
Klima presented the staff report. The applicant was requesting approval of a
Comprehensive Plan amendment and a MUSA extension and a request to rezone
the property. She noted that 6,000 square feet of the property was already within
the MUSA boundary. The MUSA boundary followed the topographic line when it
was created rather than following property lines. Staff recommended approval
with the following revision: the property be rezoned R1-44 rather than R1-13.5;
the R1-44 district would not allow for any further subdivision; a significant
portion of the property is likely unable to be developed due to geographical
conditions; erosion would be reviewed at time of building permit review.
Farr noted conflicts between the applicant’s narrative versus staff’s, and asked if a
condition to the commission’s motion was required. He wanted to know if a
Wetland Determination Report was required and if the tree replacement was
indeed a 1:1 ratio rather than the applicant’s stated 1.33 requirement. Klima
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 9, 2019
Page 3
replied the 1.33 replacement ratio was a former code requirement. Bourne replied
the replacement would follow the 1:1 ratio. The Environment Resources
Coordinator reviewed plans and would require a WDR (Wetland Determination
Report). Even though this might come back with a negative finding the applicant
must go through the process. Farr asked for and received confirmation the MUSA
line would follow the property lines rather than the topographical line. Klima
explained this was a balance between local and regional policy which allowed
staff to look at specific conditions of each property more than a topographical
analysis would. Farr noted the water and sanitary sewer were already in and asked
if this was a part of the entire utility improvement project in anticipation of other
lots similar to this, and if so, would there be other lots subject to future review.
Rue replied it was fairly typical to put in utility main lateral lines or development
stubs where they are appropriate. For example, the Notermann property was
provided some stubs. It was cheaper to put them in now than later and tear up a
road. All utility work was being done on this project at the City’s expense and
property owners would be assessed a connection service connection fee as set out
in the Code, with the exception of Lion’s Tap, which had an assessment for part
of the lift station and service lines.
Farr noted the plans indicated a road continuing west before turning south to meet
Flying Cloud Road, creating new lots immediately west of this property, and
asked for a summary of how those properties were established and how the utility
lines were protected via easement or right-of-way. Rue replied the property to the
west of the subject property was City-owned and there would be no development.
The parcel between the old and new alignment the City had purchased. The rest of
it to the west was to be preserved. The City followed the existing roadway to
shorten the length of the utility lines and to service Lion’s Tap. A study was done
on how best to serve that area. A new alignment would have added 800 feet, and
there were extra services to new parcels that were rural and undeveloped. There
was some development potential there and this provided service connections.
Farr asked for and received clarification the applicant’s western property line
would abut City property. He noted the lot has been regraded and asked if there
were trees that have been banked and set aside for the lot to make up for the loss
of trees. Rue replied that tree loss in the City’s utility improvement and trees
would be replaced at 30 percent. Plantings were planned along the slopes of Eden
Prairie Road, and three trees would be planted in front of this property. Farr asked
if specific language to address the requested zoning of R1-13.5 was required in
the commission’s recommendation. Klima replied the recommendation as stated
in the annotated agenda would be appropriate as the commission was an advisory
body, and staff would clarify with City Attorney regarding the original request of
an R-1.13.5 zoning prior to City Council review.
Iyer asked if the utility stubs had sufficient capacity to connect with extra lots, if
any. Rue replied the service lines would be adequate for a typical single-family
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 9, 2019
Page 4
home and could serve a couple hundred properties. Iyer asked, due to the lay of
the land, if it was safe to build a single family home on the applicant’s property.
Klima replied the staff conditions address this, along with the analysis Ryan and
staff went through to identify an approximate location. A building permit review
would include a land alteration review, erosion control measures, and a slope
analysis. DeSanctis asked for and received confirmation any archeological study
of the property would be the applicant’s responsibility.
MOTION: Weber moved, seconded by Higgins to close the public hearing.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
MOTION: Weber moved, seconded by DeSanctis to recommend approval of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Rural to Low Density Residential on
1.05 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-44 on 1.05 acres, and
MUSA Boundary Extension on 1.05 acres based on plans stamp dated August 23,
2019 and information contained in the staff report dated September 5, 2019.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
B. COSTCO FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION
Request for:
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 18.18
acres
Site Plan Review on 18.18 acres
Klima stated the applicant wished to continue the item to October 14, 2019.
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by DeSanctis to continue the public hearing
to October 14, 2019. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Weber moved, seconded by Higgins to adjourn. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:33 p.m.
SITE
¯
Aerial Map: Costco Fuel Facility ExpansionAddress: 12011 Technology DriveEden Prairie, MN 55344
0 310 620155 Feet
Lake IdlewildSITE
TECHNOLOGY
PRAIRIE CENTER
RAMPUS H IG H W A Y 2 1 2
StreamsPrincipal ArterialA Minor ArterialB Minor ArterialMajor CollectorMinor Collector
City of Eden Prairie Land Use GuidePlan Map 2000-2030
¯
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialGuidePlan.mxd Map was Updated/Created: April 18, 2008
DATE Revised 02-23-06
DATE Approved 03-19-03DATE Revised 01-07-05DATE Revised 11-07-05
DATE Revised 03-23-06DATE Revised 06-23-06
DATE Revised 12-06-06DATE Revised 03-01-07DATE Revised 06-01-07DATE Revised 10-01-07DATE Revised 03-01-08DATE Revised 03-01-09
Guide Plan Map: Costco Fuel Facility ExpansionAddress: 12011 Technology DriveEden Prairie, MN 55344
Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre
Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre
Low Density/Public/Open Space
Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre
Medium Density Residential/Office
High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre
Airport
Office
Office/Industrial
Office/Public/Open Space
Industrial
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
Regional Commercial
Town Center
Park/Open Space
Public/Quasi-Public
Golf Course
Church/ Cemetary
Open Water
Right-Of-Way
CityLimits 380 0 380190 Feet
SITE
TECHNOLOGY
PRAIRIE CENTER
S IN G L E T R E E
RAMP
U S H IG H W A Y 2 1 2PLAZA
TECHNOLOGYCity of Eden Prairie Zoning Map
In case of discrepency related to a zoning classification on this zoning map, the Ordinanceand attached legal description on file at Eden Prairie City Center will prevail.
¯
Shoreland Management Classifications
100 - Year Floodplain
Natural Environment WatersRecreational Development WatersGeneral Development Waters (Creeks Only)GD
NERD
Up dated through approved Ordinances #26-2008Ordinance #33-2001 (BFI Addition) approved, but not shown on this map editionDate: March 1, 2009
0 0.150.075
Miles
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialZoning.mxd Map was Updated/Created: June 11, 2008
Zoning Map: Costco Fuel Facility ExpansionAddress: 12011 Technology DriveEden Prairie, MN 55344
Rural
R1-44 One Family- 44,000 sf. min.
R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min.
R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min.
R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min.
RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A. max.
RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A. max.
Office
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
Highway Commercial
Regional Service Commercial
Regional Commercial
TC-C
TC-R
TC-MU
Industrial Park - 2 Acre Min,
Industrial Park - 5 Acre Min.
General Industrial - 5 Acre Min.
Public
Golf Course
Water
Right of Way
CityLimits
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Beth Novak-Krebs, Senior Planner
DATE: October 3, 2019
SUBJECT: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Office Addition
APPLICANT/
OWNER: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
LOCATION: 12800 Gerard Drive
120-DAY REVIEW
PERIOD: December 19, 2019
REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.31 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 5.31 acres
Site Plan Review on 5.31 acres
BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 486 square foot building addition onto the
existing office building. The property is located north of Gerard Drive and west of Gordon Drive.
The property is 5.3 acres and includes the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Offices and board
room.
The property is
located in a primarily
residential neighborhood
with the Cardinal Creek
Conservation Area to the
north and west.
The applicant is
proposing the addition
to accommodate the
space needs of the
existing staff. In 2018,
the City amended the
Development
Conservation Area
Project
Site
Staff Report – Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Office Addition
Page 2
2
Agreement to increase the limit of the number of employees using the Property as their office to
five (5) FTE employees, not including student interns and to increase the limit of the number of
Board of Managers evening meetings per year on the Property to twenty (20). The applicant is
not proposing any further increases to the number of employees or meetings with this
application.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING
In 2011, Barbara Kaerwer donated her single family home and property to the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District. The home was converted to offices and meeting space for the Watershed
District’s use. At that time, the property was reguided from Low Density Residential to Parks/Open
Space and Public Quasi Public in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and rezoned from R1-22 to Public.
The Aspire 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the entire property Public/Semi-Public. The building
addition is consistent with the guiding and zoning.
SITE PLAN
The 486 square foot addition is proposed at the
northwest corner of the building. The addition
will include 3 office spaces. The applicant is
proposing a new raingarden to replace the
existing raingarden at the northwest corner of the
building that will be removed with the addition.
The proposed raingarden will be at the north and
east side of the addition. The site also includes a
twenty-six (26) stalls parking lot on the southeast
side of the building. Based on the size of the
building with the addition, City Code requires
twenty-six (26) parking spaces. The existing
parking lot meets the standards. Sixteen (16) of
the parking stalls are paved with permeable
pavers and the remaining stalls are permeable turf
consistent with the approved plan.
Staff Report – Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Office Addition
Page 3
3
BUILDING EXPANSION
The Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions states “Subsequent to the date of the
Declarations any expansion, modification, or replacement of an existing building or structure
shall not substantially alter the character or function of the current residential structure and shall
not exceed the total covered ground area or footprint of the current residential structure by more
than 50%.” The footprint of the original residential structure was 3,826 square feet. A 50%
increase in the original footprint allows 1,913 square feet of expansion. In 2014, the Watershed
District remodeled the building and added approximately 979 square feet and the proposed
addition is 486 square feet for a total expansion to date of 1,465 square feet. This allows the
Watershed District to expand another 448 square feet at some point in the future.
PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS
The applicant is requesting a waiver
from the building material standards
so the building addition can match
the appearance of the current office
portion of the building. City Code
requires each façade to have a
minimum of 75% of the material
consisting of at least three contrasting
yet complimentary Class I materials.
The current building material
includes
primarily
fiber
cement
siding
and trim
(Class II
material),
a small
amount
of metal
coping
(Class II
material)
and some
windows (Class I material). The proposed addition includes the same building materials with
percentages similar to the office portion of the building and is consistent with the residential
Existing north façade and location of proposed addition
Staff Report – Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Office Addition
Page 4
4
character of the adjacent neighborhood.
TREE LOSS AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
Constructing the building addition will not require the removal of any trees. The landscaping
requirement for the building addition is minimal. The applicant is proposing to add canopy trees near
the outdoor classroom north of the addition and add shrubs, perennials, and grasses around the
raingarden. All of this landscaping far exceeds the required landscaping.
SUSTAINABLE FEATURES
The lighting for the addition will include LED energy saving fixtures. The R-value will match the
highly efficient walls of the existing renovated structure. The existing efficient HVAC system
will extend to the addition.
The addition will have a negligible impact on the current stormwater management plan which
exceeds watershed district and city standards.
The Watershed District plans on continuing the use of low mow fescues and native vegetation
throughout the site to reduce the need for irrigating. The results will yield more conservation of
water. Native vegetation will promote a pollinator friendly site and increase biodiversity.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of the following request:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.31 acres
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 5.31 acres
Site Plan Review on 5.31 acres
This is based on plans stamp dated September 23, 2019, and staff report dated October 3, 2019.
1. The following waiver has been granted through the PUD District Review for the project as
indicated in the plans stamp dated September 23, 2019.
A. In the Public Zoning District, each façade is required to have a minimum of 75%
material consisting of at least three contrasting yet complimentary Class I
materials. The Waiver allows the use of primarily Class II materials (fiber cement
siding and trim, and metal coping) on the addition to match the existing material
on the office portion of the building.
¯
Location Map: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Office AdditionAddress:12800 Gerard DriveEden Prairie, Minnesota
0 230 460115 Feet
Project Site
Location of ProposedAddition
GERARDDRIVE
G OR D O N D R I VE
TOPVI
EWRO
A
D
D ONLEALN.SLEEPYHOLL
OWLNGERARDDRIVE
¯
Aerial Map: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Office AdditionAddress:12800 Gerard DriveEden Prairie, Minnesota
0 170 34085 Feet
Project Site
GERARDDRIVE
G OR D O N D RIVE
D ONLEALN.SLEEPYHOLL
OWLNTOPVIEWROADLocation of ProposedAddition
GERARD
I
NTERSTATE 494TOPVIEWGORDONBEEHIVEEDGEBROOK DONLEASLEEPY HOLLOWI
NTERSTATE 494GORDONStreamsPrincipal ArterialA Minor ArterialB Minor ArterialMajor CollectorMinor Collector
City of Eden Prairie Land Use GuidePlan Map
¯
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialGuidePlan.mxd Map was Updated/Created: April 18, 2008
DATE Revised 02-23-06
DATE Approved 03-19-03DATE Revised 01-07-05DATE Revised 11-07-05
DATE Revised 03-23-06DATE Revised 06-23-06
DATE Revised 12-06-06DATE Revised 03-01-07DATE Revised 06-01-07DATE Revised 10-01-07DATE Revised 03-01-08DATE Revised 03-01-09
Guide Plan Map: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Office AdditionAddress: 12800 Gerard DriveEden Prairie, MN 55344
Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre
Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre
Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre
High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre
Airport
Office
Industrial
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
Regional Commercial
Town Center
Park/Open Space
Public/Quasi-Public
Golf Course
Church/ Cemetary
Open Water
Right-Of-Way
CityLimits 350 0 350175 Feet
GERARD
PROJECT SITE
Semi-Public
GERARD
TOPVIEW
I
NTERSTATE 494ROBERTS GORDONBEEHIVE DONLEASLEEPY HOLLOWI
NTERSTATE 494GORDONCity of Eden Prairie Zoning Map
In case of discrepency related to a zoning classification on this zoning map, the Ordinanceand attached legal description on file at Eden Prairie City Center will prevail.
¯
Shoreland Management Classifications
100 - Year Floodplain
Natural Environment WatersRecreational Development WatersGeneral Development Waters (Creeks Only)GD
NERD
Up dated through approved Ordinances #26-2008Ordinance #33-2001 (BFI Addition) approved, but not shown on this map editionDate: March 1, 2009
0 0.150.075
Miles
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialZoning.mxd Map was Updated/Created: June 11, 2008
Zoning Map: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Office AdditionAddress: 12800 Gerard DriveEden Prairie, MN 55344
Rural
R1-44 One Family- 44,000 sf. min.
R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min.
R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min.
R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min.
RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A. max.RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A. max.
Office
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
Highway Commercial
Regional Service Commercial
Regional Commercial
TC-C
TC-R
TC-MU
Industrial Park - 2 Acre Min,
Industrial Park - 5 Acre Min.General Industrial - 5 Acre Min.
Public
Golf Course
Water
Right of Way
CityLimits
Project Site
1
PROJECT PROFILE – OCTOBER 7, 2019
PLANNING COMMISSION – OCTOBER 14, 2019
1. COSTCO FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION (2019-12) by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.
(STEVE)
(CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING) Proposal for a fuel facility expansion and site improvements.
Location: 12011 Technology Drive.
Contact: Julie Anderson, 452-656-7403
Request for:
Planned Unit Development District Amendment with waivers on 18.18 acres
Site Plan Review on 18.18 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 06/04//19
Date Complete 06/04/19
120 Day Deadline 01/31/20
Initial DRC review 06/06/19
Notice to Paper Date 07/24/19
Resident Notice Date 07/26/19
Meeting Date 08/12/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
1st Meeting Date 00/00/19
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/19
2. NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT ADDITION (2019-17) by Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District (BETH)
Proposal for an approximate 400 square foot building addition
Location: 12800 Gerard Drive
Contact: Randy Anhorn, 952-835-2078
Request for:
Planned Unit Development District Amendment on 5.31 acres
Site Plan Review on 5.31 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/30//19
Date Complete 00/00/19
120 Day Deadline 00/00/19
Initial DRC review 09/05/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
Meeting Date 00/00/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
1st Meeting Date 00/00/19
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/19
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING – OCTOBER 15, 2019
2
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – OCTOBER 15, 2019
1. MILLER PROPERTY/HIGHLAND OAKS (2019-13) by Wooddale Builders (JULIE)
Proposal for 17 detached single-family homes
Location: 7120 Gerard Dr.
Contact: Steve Schwieters, 952-345-0543
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.73 acres
Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 9.73 acres
Zoning District Change from R1-13.5 to R1-9.5 on 9.73 acres
Preliminary Plat of one lot into seventeen lots and one outlot on 9.73 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 06/07/19
Date Complete 07/08/19
120 Day Deadline 11/04/19
Initial DRC review 06/13/19
Notice to Paper Date 07/24/19
Resident Notice Date 07/26/19
Meeting Date 08/12/19
Notice to Paper Date 08/14/19
Resident Notice Date 08/16/19
1st Meeting Date 09/03/19
2nd Meeting Date 10/01/19
2. PARAVEL APARTMENTS (2019-11) by Timberland Partners (JULIE)
Proposal for a 246-unit multi-family community as Phase 2 of the Castle Ridge redevelopment project.
Location: 635 Prairie Center Dr.
Contact: Robert Fransen, 952-843-2040
Request for:
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.962 acres
Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 4.962 acres
Site Plan Review on 4.962 acres
Preliminary Plat of an outlot into one lot on 4.962 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 05/20/19
Date Complete 07/22/19
120 Day Deadline 11/18/19
Initial DRC review 05/30/19
Notice to Paper Date 07/24/19
Resident Notice Date 07/26/19
Meeting Date 08/12/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
1st Meeting Date 09/17/19
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/19
PLANNING COMMISSION – OCTOBER 28, 2019
1. 11000 VIKING DRIVE PARKING RAMP (2019-14) by United Properties Development
(SARAH)
Proposal for a parking structure on top of existing parking lot
3
Location: 11000 Viking Drive
Contact: Bill Jundt, 952-893-8664
Request for:
Planned Unit Development District Amendment on 16.2 acres
Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 08/02//19
Date Complete 00/00/19
120 Day Deadline 00/00/19
Initial DRC review 08/08/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
Meeting Date 10/28/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
1st Meeting Date 00/00/19
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/19
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – NOVEMBER 12, 2019
1. 10197 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD (2019-20) by Perry Ryan (JULIE)
Proposal for Guide Plan, Zoning Change and MUSA boundary extension
Location: 10197 Eden Prairie Road
Contact: Perry Ryan, 952-221-3700
Request for:
Guide Plan Change from Rural to Low Density Residential on 1.05 acres
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.05 acres
MUSA Boundary Extension on 1.05 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 07/19/19
Date Complete 07/19/19
120 Day Deadline 11/15/19
Initial DRC review 07/25/19
Notice to Paper Date 08/21/19
Resident Notice Date 08/23//19
Meeting Date 09/09/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
1st Meeting Date 10/01/19
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/19
IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED
1. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23) by SW Metro Transit Commission (JULIE)
Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station
Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Request for:
Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres
Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on
11.38 acres
Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres
4
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 00/00/15
Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15
Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15
Resident Notice Date 12/18/15
1st Meeting Date 01/05/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/00
2. HUELER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (2019-18) by Greg &
Kelli Hueler (JULIE)
Proposal for amendment to the Development Agreement to relocate driveway location
Location: 12300 Riverview Drive
Contact: Greg & Kelli Hueler, 612-221-4172
Request for:
Development Agreement Amendment 4.45 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/03//19
Date Complete 00/00/19
120 Day Deadline 00/00/19
Initial DRC review 09/05/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
Meeting Date 00/00/19
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/19
Resident Notice Date 00/00/19
1st Meeting Date 00/00/19
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/19
VARIANCES
TELECOMMUNICATION