HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Packet 10.12.2020AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, October 12, 2020 - 7:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS:
John Kirk, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed
Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Carole Mette, William Gooding, Rachel Markos, Lisa Toomey STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Minutes for the September 28, 2020 meeting V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. TILLER CORPORATION PLANT 912 (2019-24)
Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Public to Industrial on 4.49 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural to Industrial on 1.09 acres
• Site Plan Review on 13.21 acres
• Preliminary Plat for approval on 13.21 acres
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
ANNOTATED AGENDA TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
RE: Planning Commission Meeting for Monday, October 12, 2020 _______________________________________________________________________________ MONDAY, October 12, 2020 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A. MOTION: Move to approve the agenda. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 MOTION: Move to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated September 28,
2020.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. TILLER CORPORATION PLANT 912 (2019-24) Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Public to Industrial on 4.49 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural to Industrial on 1.09 acres
• Site Plan Review on 13.21 acres
• Preliminary Plat for approval on 13.21 acres Tiller Corporation owns and operates an asphalt plant and concrete and asphalt recycling operation
at 6401 Industrial Drive. The property is a total of 13.21 acres. Tiller purchased the majority of the
site in 2011. In 2016, Tiller acquired the additional 4.49 acre parcel from Hennepin County. The majority of the property is currently zoned Industrial General (I-Gen). However, the applicant is proposing to rezone the 4.49 acre parcel from Public to Industrial General (I-Gen) and a 1.09 acre parcel from Rural to Industrial General (I-Gen) so that the entire property has the same zoning and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is also proposing a preliminary plat that
combines all five of the parcels into one lot and one outlot. The outlot will include the wetland and wetland buffer and will remain under the ownership of the applicant. Tiller is proposing to update the asphalt plant equipment and pollution control equipment and to relocate the plant and processing/stockpile areas within the site. The project will include stormwater management.
MOTION 1: Move to close the public hearing. MOTION 2: Move to recommend approval for a Zoning District Change from Public to Industrial on 4.49 acres; Zoning District Change from Rural to Industrial on 1.09 acres; Site Plan
ANNOTATED AGENDA October 12, 2020 Page 2
Review on 13.21 acres; and Preliminary Plat on 13.21 acres based on Plans stamp dated October 7, 2020 and the Staff Report dated October 12, 2020. VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORT VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Move to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 7:00 PM—CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Rachel Markos, Carole Mette,
Lisa Toomey, William Gooding
CITY STAFF: Julie Klima, City Planner; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Commission member DeSanctis was absent.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Markos moved, seconded by Mette to approve the agenda. MOTION
CARRIED 8-0.
IV. MINUTES
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by Gooding to approve the minutes of September
14, 2020. MOTION CARRIED 8-0.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT A. CODE AMENDMENT FOR GYMNASTICS Request for:
• Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to gymnasiums Klima presented a PowerPoint and gave the background on this amendment. Prior
to 1982, gymnasiums were not permitted uses in the Industrial Zoning District.
The City received a request to amend the Code to allow gymnasiums in this district. The City Council directed staff to prepare an amendment for review by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission recommended approval of
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 28, 2020
Page 2
the amendment, and the City Council approved an ordinance amendment
permitting gymnasiums in Industrial Zoning Districts. Gymnasiums were allowed to occupy 100 percent of a building’s square footage. Since then, certain issues have arisen: there was no definition of gymnasium, allowing for a broad interpretation. Fitness studios, gymnastics studios, swim schools, dance studios,
martial arts studios, et cetera, had been permitted in the Industrial Zoning
Districts, but their permitted use also in the Commercial Zoning Districts has caused inconsistencies. Also, changes in the uses of industrial buildings are driven by the economy and market trends.
Klima explained this amendment was meant to clean up the Code and allow for
equitable treatment among similar uses by providing a definition and setting use standards. The proposed amendment would allow gymnasium uses up to 50 percent of the total floor area of a building. Staff recommended approval.
Mette asked for and received confirmation that with these changes the Tags
Building would remain a conforming use. Kirk asked for and received confirmation that unless the application pursued a PUD the building would be limited to 50 percent gymnasium use. Kirk stated the logic of the 50 percent limit was to preserve opportunities for manufacturing jobs in the Golden Triangle, and
Klima agreed. With the addition of the LRT line and other changes in the area, a
new mix of uses was arising and there would not be as much acreage for industrial uses. Julia Thompson, co-founder of Tags Gymnastics at 10300 West 70th Street,
stated the business had been in Eden Prairie since 1982 and in this building since
2002. Tags employed 75-100 people. The events of 2020, especially the Covid-19 pandemic and its requirements for masks and social distancing, placed stress on her business serving over 3,500 students. Moving from 100 percent to 50 percent could be challenging. She felt fortunate to meet these guidelines now but worried
about the future and for future owners, especially tenants with uses similar to
hers. Employment was a challenge right now. She urged the commission to show more flexibility in this amendment and thanked them for their flexibility thus far. Kirk asked for and received clarification from both Thompson and Klima that the
rest of the tenants were not gymnasiums, as the one other fitness center exceeded
the 15 percent floor area threshold for retail. Mette asked at what point nonconforming uses such as gymnasiums could be prohibited after a use reverts to industrial. Klima replied the nonconforming
language in the City Code, which mirrored the State’s language, would apply in this case. If the nonconforming use ceased to operate for one year and was not released to another nonconforming business, then the site would require a conforming use. Mette suggested included an explanatory letter in that case.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 28, 2020
Page 3
MOTION: Farr moved, seconded by Kirk to close the public hearing. MOTION CARRIED 8-0. Farr stated this was a mixed-use district but an Industrial Zoned District could include factories and other uses with low density, and he saw a contradiction of
keeping employment high in a traditionally low-density area. He saw more logic
in allowing higher-density technical uses in commercial than in restricting use in an Industrial Zoned District. Also, encouraging fitness, especially indoors in Minnesota, was a good message to send. Ideally, the commission would vote to allow more use of gymnasiums in this zone. Kirk concurred and stated the 50
percent limit was an obstacle for him, too. He asked for data on the results of such
limitations in other communities. He advised against an “artificial” or arbitrary limit. Gooding stated he visited the Golden Triangle and saw a great variety of uses,
ranging from perhaps 10 employees to one hundred, and questioned the focus on
placing limits on gymnasiums. He also asked for more data. Mette warned against the commission getting into a public policy discussion against a land use discussion. She agreed with Gooding, Kirk, and Farr, but stated this kind of question was common in urban planning, even if the stated desired outcome was
not the actual outcome, and the question may go to the policy, which was beyond
the scope of this commission. Kirk replied airing the issue was a healthy discussion. He agreed the commission could only advise on policy. Farr stated the difference between regulating a primary versus a secondary use in
a zoning district. He urged working on the primary use if the strategy was to add
employees. Higgins stated she sensed there was an effort to look at other cities as examples, and asked Klima for examples. Klima replied staff did look at other communities in the region, many of which
used different zoning district terminology. Two communities provided limitations
(Bloomington at 50 percent floor area, and Hopkins at 3,000 square feet). She added the commission could make a recommendation on the percentage. Pieper asked for and received clarification the research did not sufficiently detail to confirm such limitations spurred growth. Mette asked if the limitation was applied
to the Golden Triangle, and Klima replied it applied to all Industrial Zones in
Eden Prairie. Markos noted this could theoretically allow 50 percent gymnasiums in every building, which defeated the purpose of the proposal. Discussion followed on preserving opportunity areas versus encouraging certain jobs. Pieper noted the difficulty of this issue coming up now, during a pandemic. Klima
replied this issue had been on staff’s list to address and after the completion of the Comprehensive Plan process, staff began working on implementing strategies of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff had identified this item as an issue to be addressed and began working on this prior to the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 28, 2020
Page 4
Pieper asked for and received confirmation the commission could make a
recommendation on the definition without adopting the limitation language. Mette asked for and received clarification the commission was being asked to 1) define gymnasiums and 2) recommend a percentage use (or none). Kirk stated the commission was 1) trying to solve a problem it did not know how to solve, and 2)
the way it was being “solved” (the 50 percent limitation) did not have sufficient
data to back it. He questioned putting a building owner through the PUD process with the implementation of the 50 percent limitation. At this time, he supported no limitation change. Mette agreed, and added further changes could be made in the future. Defining this zoning district use definition was also deciding the goal
of this amendment. Kirk replied focusing on primary uses, as Farr had
recommended, was a way forward. Higgins agreed the future was uncertain and no one knew how it would impact zoning in Eden Prairie, therefore the commission could not know the actual outcome of this amendment.
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Farr to recommend approval of the code
amendment gymnasium definition change but to add no percentage limit to total floor space area (maintaining the existing allowed 100 percent total floor area). MOTION CARRIED 8-0.
B. CODE AMENDMENT FOR LIGHTING
Request for:
• Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to site lighting
Klima presented a PowerPoint and explained the amendment. This was a
housekeeping amendment to implement design standards currently captured by staff in the Development Agreement, therefore, to require by Code what was currently in practice. The amendment would maintain current requirements and add standards for downcast, shielded, and cut off features and other measures to
reduce glare and light spill onto neighboring properties. Staff recommended
approval. MOTION: Markos moved, seconded by Mette to close the public hearing. MOTION CARRIED 8-0.
Farr advised against being overly restrictive in the lighting code. He commended the addition of “downcast luminaires” and wished to see a three-foot concrete base to the height requirements on pole lights. He was unsure if the recommendation would keep glare from the property lines on parking lots, since
light poles were planted on the green space. He urged some flexibility or “free
zone” where glare was kept from the property line. He asked for more clarification as to the canopy lighting. Kirk suggested the “free zone” be the setback on the other property. Society had
profited from higher efficiency and LEDs, but “efficiency” was not mentioned in
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 28, 2020
Page 5
the amendment, and he asked if this was necessary. Mette agreed it saved money
and was desired by property owners but questioned whether it should go in this amendment or elsewhere. Farr replied most or all new lighting was LED, and new technology could come in the future, so staff’s design guidelines were adequate to address this question. Klima agreed this was addressed by the design guidelines.
Pieper asked for a clarification on requirement b), and Klima explained the three-
foot bumper requirement followed from the requirement all parking lot lighting be installed in an island. Any installed not on an island would require the three-foot base but if given the option, lighting located in islands may increasingly be unlikely to be installed.
Farr noted the units of parking were detailed in number of stalls, which were too far apart for 25-foot light poles. If the City was to require a light on a parking island, require islands. This made sense for, say, Eden Prairie Center but not for all commercial/retail business parking lots. Discussion followed on Farr’s
suggestion that the requirement of all poles being on islands be relaxed.
MOTION: Farr moved, seconded by Toomey to recommend approval of the code amendment based on the staff report dated September 28, 2020 with the following changes: under items a) through g) in the underlighting section, full acceptance of
item a), changing the requirement in item b) to include a 25-foot pole on a
maximum three-foot base, the elimination of item c), retaining item d), changing item e) to add a building setback zone where “adjacent properties” does not apply, retaining item f), and in item g) adding the phrase “except decorative lighting at building entries.” MOTION CARRIED 8-0.
C. CODE AMENDMENT FOR TOWERS AND ANTENNAS Request for:
• Amend City Code Chapter 11 to comply with recent Federal
Communication Commission rulings
Klima presented a PowerPoint and detailed the amendment change. The FCC Act of 1996 established antennas and towers as permitted uses in all cities that may not be discriminated against by zoning districts established in cities. The
Spectrum Act of 2012 established that local governments were required to
approve certain requests to modify existing wireless structures. In June of 2020 the FCC approved a declaratory ruling to further clarify criteria within the Spectrum Act of 2012 related to altering existing wireless structures. The proposed code change would not alter the existing 13 Subdivisions regulating
towers and antennas. Subdivision 14 would be added and provide
acknowledgement of the 2020 FCC declaratory ruling. Staff recommended approval. Pieper asked if what the commission had previously reviewed at Eden Prairie
High School would have still come before the commission after this code
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 28, 2020
Page 6
amendment was adopted, and Klima replied it still would have. It was to build a
new tower, Mette asked for and received clarification Section 14 included items a), b), and c). MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by Mette to close the public hearing.
MOTION CARRIED 8-0.
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Gooding to recommend approval of the code amendment based on the findings in the staff report dated September 23, 2020. MOTION CARRIED 8-0.
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Markos moved, seconded by Toomey to adjourn. MOTION CARRIED 8-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:36 p.m.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission FROM: Julie Klima, City Planner
DATE: October 12, 2020
SUBJECT: Tiller Corporation Plant 912
LOCATION: 6401 Industrial Drive
APPLICANT: Tiller Corporation
OWNERS: Tiller Corporation
120 DAY REVIEW: December 29, 2020
REQUEST: 1. Rezoning from Rural to General Industrial (I-GEN) on 1.09 acres 2. Rezoning from Public to General Industrial (I-GEN) on 4.49 acres
3. Site Plan Review on 13.21 acres
4. Preliminary Plat of 5 parcels into 1 lot and 1 outlot on 13.21 acres
BACKGROUND
Tiller Corporation owns and operates an
asphalt plant and concrete and asphalt
recycling operation on the subject property.
The property is located at 6401 Industrial
Drive and it is a total of 13.21 acres. Tiller purchased the majority of the site in 2011. In 2016, Tiller acquired the additional 4.49 acre
parcel from Hennepin County. Tiller is
proposing to update the asphalt plant
equipment and pollution control equipment
and to relocate the plant and processing/stockpile areas within the site. These site improvements are intended to
increase safety and efficiencies of the
operation and improve circulation and
stormwater management.
Tiller Corporation Plant 912
October 12, 2020 Page 2
2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
The subject properties are guided in Aspire Eden Prairie 2040 for Industrial development. The
majority of the property is currently zoned Industrial (I-Gen); however, the applicant is requesting
the rezoning of two parcels so the entire property has consistent zoning. The 4.49 acre parcel that Tiller acquired from Hennepin County is currently zoned Public based on its prior ownership. Rezoning of that property from Public to Industrial (I-Gen) is consistent with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan. The 1.09 acre property that is currently zoned Rural is also requested to be
rezoned to Industrial (I-Gen). This rezoning request is also consistent with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan.
PRELIMINARY PLAT The subject area includes 5 parcels. The proponent is requesting to plat all 5 parcels into one lot and
an outlot. The outlot includes the wetland and wetland buffer area along Indian Chief Road and will
remain in the ownership of the proponent. Combining these five properties into a single lot provides
for more efficient use of the site when designing site layout and applying setback requirements from
property lines. Platting of the property also includes the dedication of right of way for Industrial Drive and Edenvale Boulevard for public street improvements, as well as perimeter easements and easements for public utilities.
SITE PLAN
The site currently includes one structure approximately 1,500 square feet in size which is the location of the plant control room, scale operations and quality control testing. The site also includes a 3 sided structure housing storage tanks and some electrical equipment. This 3 sided structure is
proposed to be removed. This structure will be replaced with a 24’ x 44’ building. This new building
will house the plant control room and the quality control testing areas. A 12’ x 14’ two story scale
building will also be constructed to house the scale operations and provide storage area. A 12’ x 24’
shelter for electrical equipment will also be constructed.
All of the proposed buildings meet the required setback and building material standards of City Code. Landscaping requirements for the site are also proposed to meet and exceed Code
requirements.
Tiller Corporation Plant 912
October 12, 2020 Page 3
3
Tiller Corporation Plant 912
October 12, 2020 Page 4
4
DRAINAGE & GRADING
The grading of the curb and gutter line around the southern edge of the cul de sac appears to be
directing runoff to the east. This would put it in conflict with the westerly flow of the runoff from
Industrial Drive. Cul de sac drainage would be improved by directing the drainage around the curb and gutter to the west to the catch basins on the north side of the intersection.
B618 curb on the northern edge of the cul de sac may be difficult to implement due to grading.
Surmountable or drop curb may be preferable.
UTILITIES The applicant is proposing to provide new sanitary and water services along with a hydrant for fire protection for the plant control building. As a result of proposed grading on the site, a portion
of the existing public watermain that runs through the property will need to be reconstructed.
Detailed construction plans (plan and profile) and specifications in conformance with Eden
Prairie standards will be required. The profile, details, and limits of the proposed watermain as
shown will need to be revised. Plans and specifications must address testing of the new watermain.
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
The applicant is providing right of way for the termination of Industrial Drive in a cul-de-sac.
Detailed construction plans and specifications in conformance with Eden Prairie standards will be required. Complete reconstruction of the cul-de-sac is expected. The plans must address driveway access, grading and drainage as noted for Industrial Drive.
A commercial apron must be used for the entrance to the site utilizing Eden Prairie standards in
the City Guide Specifications.
WETLANDS
The Developer must provide a wetland plan to include items such as restoration of areas without
vegetation, management of invasive species, and maintenance of the wetlands and wetland
buffers on the property. Full restoration, including planting replacement trees and shrubs or
removing sediment accumulation within the larger wetland, will not be required. However, the
smaller wetland that is designated for use as a stilling basin must be cleaned out when construction and grading are complete.
Tiller Corporation Plant 912
October 12, 2020 Page 5
5
SUSTAINABILITY
The applicant is proposing several sustainability measures as a part of the improvements.
• Energy: Replacing the existing asphalt plant equipment is expected to reduce energy use
by 16 to 22%.
• Landscape: The Landscape Plan includes native plant and pollinator species.
• Waste: Recycling and reuse of concrete and asphalt saves landfill capacity and reduces raw materials used in construction industries.
• Water: Stormwater management will be improved by adding several sedimentation
basins and stormwater management features for collection and on-site treatment of
stormwater runoff. Collection and reuse of stormwater for dust control will be
incorporated into site management. Wetlands and wetland buffers will be placed into an
outlot and protected by a conservation easement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of the following request:
• Rezoning from Rural to I-Gen on 1.09 acres;
• Rezoning from Public to I-Gen on 4.49 acres;
• Site Plan Review on 13.21 acres;
• Preliminary Plat of 5 parcels into 1 lot and 1 outlot on 13.21 acres
This is based on plans stamp dated September 30, 2020 and staff report dated October 12, 2020 and
the following conditions.
Prior to issuance of a land alteration permit, the following items will need to be addressed:
1. Submit detailed storm water runoff, wetland, utility, street and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. Obtain and provide documentation of Watershed District approval.
3. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading.
4. Install erosion control at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by the
City.
5. Submit a land alteration letter of credit, or escrow surety equivalent to 125% of the cost the Land Alteration Activities. 6. Submit plans and specifications for review and approval for the public watermain work.
Prior to release of the Final Plat, the applicant shall:
1. Sign a special assessment agreement for City trunk sewer and water assessment fees.
2. Submit a bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit (“security”) that guarantees completion of all public utility improvements equivalent to 125% of the cost of the improvements.
Tiller Corporation Plant 912
October 12, 2020 Page 6
6
3. Submit a copy of the conservation easement for review and approval to verify that the language meets those established in the Developer's Agreement. Once the Water
Resources Coordinator approves the language in writing, submit evidence that the
conservation easement was recorded with Hennepin County.
4. Submit a financial assurance equivalent to 150% of the cost of the actions required in city
code regarding wetlands and wetland buffers. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items will need to be addressed: 1. Pay the appropriate cash park fees.
2. Submit a landscaping letter of credit, or escrow surety equivalent to 150% of the cost
of the landscaping.
3. The final plat must be released and recorded.
4. Plans and specifications for the public improvements on Industrial Drive must be submitted for review and approval.
The plans shall be revised to address all items identified in the Engineering Memo dated July 23,
2020 at the appropriate times through the review and construction process.
Project SiteProject Site
Edenvale BoulevardIndian RoadCARLSONBIRCH ISLAND INDIAN CHIEFINDUSTRIALPICHALEESBOROUGH¯
Area Location Map: Tiller Corporation Plant 912Address: 6401 Industrial DriveEden Prairie, MN 55346
0 390 780195 Feet
Edenvale Boulevard
Project Site
Text
Project Site
City of Eden Prairie Land Use Guide Plan Map 2010-2040
¯
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialGuidePlan.mxd Map was Updated/Created: April 18, 2008
Guide Plan Map: Tiller Corporation Plant 912Address: 6401 Industrial Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55346
Rural
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Migh Density Residential
High Density Residential
Mixed-Use
Town Center
Transit-Oriented Development
Regional Commercial
Commercial
Office
Industrial Flex Tech
Flex Service
Eco Innovation
Industrial
Airport
Public / Semi-Public
Parks & Open Space
Golf Course
Utility & Railroad
Right-of-Way 530 0 530265 Feet
Date Approved: 10-01-2019
Shoreland Management Classifications
100 - Year Floodplain
Natural Environment WatersRecreational Development WatersGeneral Development Waters (Creeks Only)GD
NERD
Project Site
City of Eden Prairie Zoning Map
In case of discrepency related to a zoning classification on this zoning map, the Ordinanceand attached legal description on file at Eden Prairie City Center will prevail.
¯
Ordinance #19-2018 and 20-2018 approved, but not shown on this map editionOrdinance #33-2001 (BFI Addition) approved, but not shown on this map edition
Date: March 1, 2020
0 0.150.075
Miles
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctnessof the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracyof this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages,including loss of business, lost profits, business interruption, loss of business informationor other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information itcontains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed.Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and all other land use information\OfficialMaps\OfficialZoning.mxd Map was Updated/Created: June 11, 2008
Zoning Map: Tiller Corporation Plant 912Address: 6401 Industrial Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55346
RuralR1-44 One Family- 44,000 sf. min.R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min.R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min.R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min.RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A. max.RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A. max.Airport OfficeOfficeNeighborhood CommercialCommunity CommercialHighway CommercialAirport CommercialRegional Service CommercialRegional Commercial
TC-CTC-RTC-MUTOD-ETOD-R Transit Oriented Development - ResidentialTOD-MUIndustrial Park - 2 Acre Min,Industrial Park - 5 Acre Min.General Industrial - 5 Acre Min.PublicParks and Open SpaceGolf CourseWaterRight of Way
Shoreland Management Classifications
100 - Year Floodplain
Natural Environment WatersRecreational Development WatersGeneral Development Waters (Creeks Only)GD
NE
RD
PROJECT SITE
LEESBOROUGHAVE
MANCHESTERLNE D EN VA LE B LV D
TANAGER LNINDIAN CHIEF RDINDUSTRIAL DRCARLSONDR¯
Location Tiller Corporation Plant 912Address: 6401 Industrial Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55346
0 325 650162.5 Feet
1
PROJECT PROFILE – OCTOBER 12, 2020
PLANNING COMMISSION – OCTOBER 12, 2020
1. TILLER CORPORATION PLANT 912 (2019-24) by Tiller Corporation (JULIE)
Proposal to relocate the plant processing and stockpile areas within the site Location: 6401 Industrial Drive
Contact: Michael Caron; 763-425-4191 Request for:
• Zoning District Change from Public to Industrial on 4.49 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural to Industrial on 1.09 acres
• Site Plan Review on 13.21 acres
• Preliminary Plat for approval on 13.21 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 11/08/19
Date Complete 09/01/20
120 Day Deadline 12/29/20
Initial DRC review 11/14/19
Notice to Paper Date 09/23/20
Resident Notice Date 09/24/20
Meeting Date 10/12/20
Notice to Paper Date 09/30/20
Resident Notice Date 10/01/20
1st Meeting Date 10/20/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING – OCTOBER 20, 2020
1. CODE AMENDMENT FOR TOWERS AND ANTENNAS by City of Eden Prairie (STEVE)
Amend City Code Chapter 11 to comply with recent Federal Communication Commission (FCC) rulings Contact: Steve Durham, 952-949-8491 Request for:
• Amend City Code Chapter 11 to comply with recent FCC rulings Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/08/20
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 09/09/20
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 09/28/20
Notice to Paper Date 09/30/20
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 10/20/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – OCTOBER 20, 2020
1. FLYING CLOUD COMMONS (CASTLE RIDGE RETAIL) (2019-21) by Oppidan Investment Company (JULIE) Proposal for retail area as Phase 3 of the Castle Ridge redevelopment project Location: 615-635 Prairie Center Drive Contact: Oppidan Investment Company, 952-294-1259
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.27 acres
2
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 7.27 acres
• Site Plan Review on 5.479 acres
• Preliminary Plat of one outlot into 3 lots and 2 outlots on 7.27 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/14/19 Date Complete 04/20/20 120 Day Deadline 10/31/20
Initial DRC review 10/17/19
Notice to Paper Date 05/05/20 Resident Notice Date 05/06/20 Meeting Date 05/26/20
Notice to Paper Date 07/29/20 Resident Notice Date 07/30/20 1st Meeting Date 08/18/20
2nd Meeting Date 10/20/20
PLANNING COMMISSION – OCTOBER 26, 2020
1. TRAIL POINTE RIDGE PUD AMENDMENT (2020-10) by CB Eden Prairie Limited Partnership (BETH)
Proposal to amend the Planned Unit Development regarding parking Location: 16397 Glory Lane Contact: Cecile Bedor; 651-265-4739 Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Amendment on 2.03 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/05/20 Date Complete 10/05/00
120 Day Deadline 02/01/21
Initial DRC review 10/08/20
Notice to Paper Date 10/07/20 Resident Notice Date 10/08/20
Meeting Date 10/26/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED
1. CROSSTOWN CORE INDUSTRIAL CENTER (2020-11) by Sambatek, Inc. ( ) Proposal to construct a 64,000 square foot speculative industrial building.
Location: 10250 Crosstown Circle and 6534 Flying Cloud Drive Contact: Erik Miller; 763-259-6687
Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.0 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.0 acres
• Zoning Change from OFC, RURAL and C-HWY to Industrial on 5.0 acres
• Site Plan Review on 5.0 acres
• Preliminary Plat of 2 parcels into 1 Lot on 5.0 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 10/05/20
Date Complete 00/00/00
120 Day Deadline 00/00/20
Initial DRC review 10/08/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
Meeting Date 00/00/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
2. PIONEER PRESERVE (2020-09) by Metro Development LLC (SARAH)
3
Proposal to build 8 townhome units Location: 9955 Pioneer Trail Contact: Melanie Emery, 651-248-8457 Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 3.66 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 3.66 acres
• Zoning District Change from Rural to RM on 3.66 acres
• Site Plan Review on 3.66 acres
• Preliminary Plat of 9 lots on 3.66 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/18/20 Date Complete 00/00/20
120 Day Deadline 00/00/20
Initial DRC review 09/24/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
Meeting Date 00/0020
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
3. TERREY PINE COFFEE (2020-08) by Java Companies (BETH) Proposal to build a drive thru coffee shop with walk- up window and patio seating Location: 16315 Terrey Pine Dr Contact: Mark Krogh, 612-384-9646 Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 0.511 acres
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 0.511 acres
• Zoning Change from Office to Commercial on 0.511 acres
• Site Plan Review on 0.511 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/16/20
Date Complete 00/00/20
120 Day Deadline 00/00/20
Initial DRC review 09/24/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
Meeting Date 00/0020
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
4. CODE AMENDMENT FOR LIGHTING by City of Eden Prairie (SARAH) Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to site lighting Contact: Sarah Strain, 952-949-8413
Request for:
• Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to site lighting Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/08/20
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 09/09/20
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 09/28/20
Notice to Paper Date 09/30/20
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
5. CODE AMENDMENT FOR GYMNASIUMS by City of Eden Prairie (BETH)
Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to gymnasiums Contact: Beth Novak- Krebs, 952-949-8490
4
Request for:
• Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to gymnasiums Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/08/20
Date Complete N/A
120 Day Deadline N/A
Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 09/09/20
Resident Notice Date N/A
Meeting Date 09/28/20
Notice to Paper Date 09/30/20
Resident Notice Date N/A
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
6. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23) by SW Metro Transit Commission (JULIE)
Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489 Request for:
• Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres
• Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 11.38 acres
• Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 00/00/15 Date Complete 00/00/15
120 Day Deadline 00/00/15
Initial DRC review 00/00/15
Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15 Resident Notice Date 11/20/15
Meeting Date 12/07/15
Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15 Resident Notice Date 12/18/15
1st Meeting Date 01/05/16
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
VARIANCES
1. BOA 2020-03 18704 Melrose Chase by Glen Steeves (SARAH) Proposal to exceed 30% impervious surface coverage to construct a swimming pool
Location: 18704 Melrose Chase Contact: Glen Steeves, 603-440-8544
Request for:
• Variance from Shoreland Code to allow impervious surface coverage to exceed the City Code requirement of 30% Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/29/20
Date Complete 00/00/20
120 Day Deadline 00/00/20
Initial DRC review 10/08/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
Meeting Date 00/00/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20
Resident Notice Date 00/00/20
1st Meeting Date 00/00/20
2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
TELECOMMUNICATION
1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS #2020-010TM by T-Mobile (c/o- Buell Consulting) (SARAH) Location: 7500 Flying Cloud Drive Contact: Eddie Buell; 612-716-0929 or ebuell@buellconsulting.com
5
Request for:
• To remove 6 existing antenna and replace with 3 new antenna along with multiple other antenna equipment upgrades.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council
Date Submitted 09/16/20 Date Complete 00/00/00 60 Day Deadline 11/16/20
Initial DRC review 09/17/20
Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date N/A
Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date N/A
2nd Meeting Date N/A