The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 03/02/2021 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP & OPEN PODIUM TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021 CITY CENTER 5:00 – 6:25 PM, HERITAGE ROOMS 6:30 – 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBER CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Ron Case, Council Members Kathy Nelson, Mark Freiberg, PG Narayanan, and Lisa Toomey CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Police Chief Greg Weber, Fire Chief Scott Gerber, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, Administrative Services/HR Director Alecia Rose, Communications Manager Joyce Lorenz, City Attorney Maggie Neuville, and Recorder Katie O’Connor Workshop - Heritage Rooms I and II (5:30) I. PROPOSED CITY CODE AMENDMENTS Open Podium - Council Chamber (6:30) II. OPEN PODIUM A. MARY MARCH – BAKER ROAD B. ROGER SWIGART – BAKER ROAD C. WAYNE ANDERSON – BAKER ROAD D. AL HANSON – BAKER ROAD III. ADJOURNMENT Code Amendment Overview City Council March 2, 2021 Categories of Code Amendments New Zoning Districts: Aspire Implementation Performance Standard Updates: Sign Regulations, Lighting and Parking Code Maintenance: Improve Usability, Provide More Clarity New Zoning Districts Flex Service Zoning District Create Flex Service Zoning District to implement new Aspire Land Use Guiding. Flex Service identified properties located along Martin Drive and Pioneer Trail areas in Aspire Land Use Map. Flex Service to address re-use of existing buildings in a changed marketplace. Flex Service to incentivize location of certain uses not ideally suited for Golden Triangle, Town Center and TOD areas (auto repair, gymnasiums as potential examples). Currently in drafting stage (staff level) then proceed to stakeholder outreach prior to Planning Commission and City Council review. Create zoning district based on Aspire 2040 future land use plan. Mixed Use properties are located at and around EP Center and at either end of Martin Drive. Provide for vertical and horizontal integration of uses; creates more flexibility of permitted uses to reflect market trends; shared amenities and architecture. Currently in drafting stage (staff level) and then will proceed to stakeholder outreach prior to Planning Commission and City Council review. Mixed Use Zoning District Create new Eco-Innovation Zoning District to implement new Aspire Land Use Guiding. The former Flying Cloud Landfill site is guided for Eco-Innovation. Intended to provide opportunities for sustainable and innovative reuse of the landfill site. Ordinance would establish permitted uses and performance standards. Could be applied to other properties as appropriate. Include coordination with MPCA and adopt Land Use Plan for Flying Cloud Landfill. Currently in drafting stage (staff level) and then will proceed to stakeholder outreach prior to Planning Commission and City Council review. Eco –Innovation Zoning District Industrial Flex Tech Properties in the Golden Triangle Area and other I2/I5 properties throughout the City. Revise existing zoning standards for I2 and I5 districts rather than creating a new zoning district. Allows for a streamlined process for rezoning. Distinguish from traditional industrial development to reflect changing market conditions and provide additional flexibility in uses of buildings, property while maintaining EP standards. Currently in drafting stage (staff level) and then will proceed to stakeholder outreach prior to Planning Commission and City Council review. Performance Standard Updates The purpose of the sign code update is not to establish a new sign code, but to revise the existing code to: •Bring into conformance with Supreme Court Ruling on content neutrality; •Update the Code to create sign regulations for all zoning districts, including newly created districts; •Perform housekeeping related updates that would increase usability and provide more clarity without diminishing the integrity of the Code. Sign Code Objectives Objective #1 is to bring the Sign Code into compliance with Federal Ruling on Content Neutrality. The United State Supreme Court issued a decision based upon the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The decision holds that City “Content Based” sign regulations will be reviewed under “strict scrutiny” of which most, if not all, sign codes will rarely be upheld. The current Eden Prairie sign code, which does include content based information, will be reviewed and all references to content based information will be revised. Sign Code Objectives Objective #2 is to create sign code regulations that are specific to all zoning districts, including newly created zoning districts that have been established over the past several years. Objective #3 is to organize/reformat where necessary the code to be user friendly to both internal and external users. Objective #4 is to provide housekeeping updates to reflect clarity. Sign Code Objectives Review surrounding Cities within the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area that have updated their sign code. Review communities nationwide that have updated their sign code to be content neutral. Engage with the local community and business leaders for input. Engage with professional organizations such as American Planning Association (APA) for current information. Tools to accomplish task It is anticipated the project be a multi year project that is completed in phases. Recommended sequence: •Content neutrality; •Sign regulations for zoning districts and new districts to be addressed at time new district is established; and •Housekeeping and formatting Sign Update Timing and Phases Housekeeping amendment to reflect in City Code the requirements that the City has been implementing through policy and Development Agreement requirements. Items to be addressed include: •Downcast, cut-off lighting fixtures •Minimizing light spill onto adjacent properties Lighting Stall and Drive Aisle Dimensions –housekeeping change based on function, sustainability, and recent trends. Multifamily –address parking requirements based on type of MF unit, such as studio units and senior housing. Potential for incentives related to parking for affordable housing. Shopping Centers –address parking requirements based on size of retail centers instead of tenant use. Intent to simplify parking requirements to manage and administer across different tenant uses. Restaurant Patios -provide parking requirements specific to outdoor dining areas. Parking Code Maintenance Group Usable Open Space (GUOS) is defined as land area and facilities specifically designated and developed for group recreational or social activities. The requirement to provide GUOS has been in place since 1969 and applies to multifamily buildings on a per unit metric. Multifamily development styles and layouts have changed over the decades potentially leading to this requirement being outdated. Most of the more recent developments have been on infill sites with less land area to accommodate GUOS resulting in consistent waiver requests. The City’s objective would be to continue to require group usable space, but amend the ordinance to reflect more recent multifamily development patterns. Group Usable Open Space The requirement has been in place since 1969 and applies to the multi-family zoning districts. The requirement results in increasing site area with increased density. The intent is to provide more land area as density increases. Most recent developments have been on infill sites with less land area. Trend is increased density on smaller sites. Most projects require a waiver for gross site area per dwelling unit because the project cannot comply with the requirements. Objective is to reflect the current development patterns. Gross Site Area Per Dwelling Unit In 1982, an ordinance amendment was approved allowing gymnasiums as a permitted use and occupying 100% of building square footage. Gymnasium is not defined and this has allowed for broad interpretation/utilization of the term and the uses that fall within this use. Uses such as fitness studios, gymnastics studios, swim schools, dance studios, martial arts studios, etc. have been permitted in the Industrial Zoning District under the broader category of gymnasium. The same uses have been permitted in the Commercial Zoning Districts under the broad category of retail providing for inconsistencies among similar uses. The intention is to provide a definition for gymnasium which would remove ambiguity and provide for consistency. Initial proposal was to continue to allow for gymnasium uses in the Industrial districts but at reduced level in order to maintain employment opportunity areas. Planning Commission recommended continuing to allow gymnasiums at 100% of building area. Gymnasium Use in The Industrial Zoning District Kennels are a permitted use in the Industrial districts. Provide clarification that treatment of animals is allowed as an accessory use within a kennel. Clarify that parking ramps are required to meet minimum building material standards. Administrative lot combinations limited to a specific number of original parcels. Define public art in order to differentiate from signage. Housekeeping Amendments City Code Revisions 5.60 Kennels •The City will no longer require a private kennel license. People will be limited to no more than 5 dogs or 5 cats or a combination of dogs and cats not totaling more than 5 •Added more detail to Commercial Kennel License application process, including provisions governing suspension and revocation, consistent with other licensing sections •Clarified and added conditions, restrictions, and regulations governing commercial kennel licenses •Condition of premises, inspections, etc. Chapter 8 Parking Regulations •Provides new definition of “commercial vehicle” in the context of where such vehicles may be parked •No parking anywhere in residential districts, unless loading/unloading •No parking on streets in commercial, office, or industrial district for longer than 20 minutes. Previously, could be parked on street unless sign-posted prohibiting such parking •Updated language in unattended vehicle prohibition to provide for remote starters. •Deleted physically handicapped parking provisions, as these are now covered comprehensively by state law. •Added parking prohibitions •Blocking sidewalk, trail, mailbox 9.40 Firearms •Updated definitions and added definitions for “bow fishing” and “firearm” •Redefined permitted discharge area. All of the permitted area is now south of Flying cloud Drive along the MN river. Ordinance now includes a map showing permitted area. •Permits from the City are not required for US Fish and Wildlife land. •Any discharge of firearms on such land is subject to rules, regulations, and permitting requirements of US Fish and Wildlife 9.41 Noise •Added more equipment to list of “Domestic Power Equipment” that cannot be operated outside of 7 am –10 pm •Leaf blower, power trimmer, power saw •Added the following exemptions to hourly noise restrictions: •Fairway and greens mowers and other motorized equipment used to maintain golf courses, parks and other publicly owned property. •City-owned ice rink maintenance equipment •Parking lot sweepers and street sweepers. 9.01 Storage, Deposit and collection of Refuse, Yard Waste, Recyclable Waste and Solid Waste •Single family dwelling: Must be stored in such a manner as to be out of view from the street in front of the premises, or stored within five feet of a dwelling unit or garage, or stored in a garage or other enclosed structure located on the premises. •Does not expressly require screening •Multiple-Family dwellings or commercial properties: Containers must be stored at least 20 feet from property line and must be screened if in the front yard. Must comply with trash enclosure plan if applicable. •The definition of “roll-off container” now includes Bagsters and other dumpster bags. •May not be on site for more than 90 consecutive days, or a total of 120 days in a 12- month period. AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Ron Case, Council Members Kathy Nelson, Mark Freiberg, PG Narayanan, and Lisa Toomey CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, City Attorney Maggie Neuville, and Council Recorder Jan Curielli I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. OPEN PODIUM INVITATION IV. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS A. BAKER ROAD 2021 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND RESTRIPING V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS VI. MINUTES A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021 VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK’S LICENSE LIST B. AWARD CONTRACT TO GARLAND/DBS, INC. FOR FIRE STATION #1 ROOF REPLACEMENT C. AMEND THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT OVER OUTLOT A OF REEDER RIDGE D. APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH BOLTON & MENK FOR WILLOW CREEK ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FEASIBILITY DESIGN E. APPROVE PURCHASE OF CRACK SEALANT MATERIAL FROM MIDSTATES EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA March 2, 2021 Page 2 F. AWARD CONTRACT TO PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. FOR 2021 STREET SWEEPING PROJECT IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS / MEETINGS A. 2021 CDBG FUNDS (Resolution) B. POLICE BODY-WORN CAMERAS X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. FIRST AND SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 2.23, SUBD. 3, RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP RANGE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & DIVERSITY COMMISSION XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS, AND COMMUNICATIONS XIII. APPOINTMENTS A. 2021 COMMISSIONS B. 2021 COMMISSION CHAIRS & VICE CHAIRS C. 2021 BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION XIV. REPORTS A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XV. OTHER BUSINESS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA March 2, 2021 Page 3 XVI. ADJOURNMENT ANNOTATED AGENDA DATE: February 26, 2021 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Rick Getschow, City Manager RE: City Council Meeting for Tuesday, March 2, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBER I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. OPEN PODIUM INVITATION Open Podium is an opportunity for Eden Prairie residents to address the City Council on issues related to Eden Prairie city government before each Council meeting, typically the first and third Tuesday of each month, from 6:30 to 6:55 p.m. in the Council Chamber. If you wish to speak at Open Podium, please contact the City Manager’s Office at 952.949.8412 by noon of the meeting date with your name, phone number, and subject matter. If time permits after scheduled speakers are finished, the Mayor will open the floor to unscheduled speakers. Open Podium is not recorded or televised. If you have questions about Open Podium, please contact the City Manager’s Office. IV. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS A. BAKER ROAD 2021 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AND RESTRIPING Synopsis: Emily Kettell and Chad Ellos, representing Hennepin County, will provide an update on the County’s 2021 cold in-place recycling pavement maintenance and restriping project along Baker Road (County Road 60) from Martin Drive to the bridge under I-494 in Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION: Move to approve the agenda. VI. MINUTES MOTION: Move to approve the following City Council minutes: A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021 ANNOTATED AGENDA March 2, 2021 Page 2 VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Move approval of items A-F on the Consent Calendar. A. CLERK’S LICENSE LIST B. AWARD CONTRACT TO GARLAND/DBS, INC. FOR FIRE STATION #1 ROOF REPLACEMENT C. AMEND THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT OVER OUTLOT A OF REEDER RIDGE D. APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH BOLTON & MENK FOR WILLOW CREEK ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FEASIBILITY DESIGN E. APPROVE PURCHASE OF CRACK SEALANT MATERIAL FROM MIDSTATES EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY F. AWARD CONTRACT TO PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. FOR 2021 STREET SWEEPING PROJECT IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS / MEETINGS A. 2021 CDBG FUNDS (Resolution) Synopsis: Eden Prairie’s 2021 CDBG allocation has not yet been announced by the office of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). However, the Human Services Review Committee used the estimate of $280,000 in grant funding to make their funding recommendations. Once the actual amount is received, the Housing Rehabilitation Program will be increased or decreased accordingly. Federal regulations stipulate that public service funding may not exceed 15 percent of the City’s total allocation ($280,000), plus 15 percent of the previous year’s program income ($130,000). $95,000 in prior year program income will be used for 2021 activities which will bring the total funding amount to $375,000. Any additional program income received will be used to cover expenses generated in an existing CDBG Program or activity. The Human Services Review Committee reviewed the 2021 CDBG proposals and recommended the following activities be funded. ANNOTATED AGENDA March 2, 2021 Page 3 MOTION: Move to adopt the Resolution approving the use of 2021 CDBG funds as recommended by the Eden Prairie Human Services Review Committee. B. POLICE BODY-WORN CAMERAS Synopsis: Minnesota Statute 626.8473 Subd. 2 states “A local law enforcement agency must provide an opportunity for public comment before it purchases or implements a portable recording system. At a minimum, the agency must accept public comments submitted electronically or by mail, and the governing body with jurisdiction over the budget of the law enforcement agency must provide an opportunity for public comment at a regularly scheduled meeting.” Police body-worn cameras fits the definition of a “portable recording system”. As such, in partnership with the Communications Division, the Police Department has already published a draft policy and solicited feedback from the public via the city’s website. The solicitation of feedback from the public produced one response regarding the use of BWC’s when working with other law enforcement agencies. MOTION: Move to hold a public hearing before the implementation of police body-worn cameras. (BWC’s) X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Move approval of Payment of Claims as submitted (Roll Call Vote). XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. FIRST AND SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY Public Service Activities Funding PROP (Housing Support Services) $30,000 PROP (Emergency Vehicle Repair) $15,000 PROP (Child Care) $4,000 HOME (Household & Outside Maintenance for the Elderly) $12,000 Subtotal $61,000 Housing and Administrative Activities Funding Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Loan Program $157,000 Rehab Grants $10,000 Affordable Housing - WHAHLT $80,000 Affordable Housing – First Time Homebuyer $10,000 Fair Housing Initiative $2,000 Program Administration $55,000 Total $375,000 ANNOTATED AGENDA March 2, 2021 Page 4 CODE SECTION 2.23, SUBD. 3, RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP RANGE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & DIVERSITY COMMISSION Synopsis: Currently, the membership of the Human Rights and Diversity Commission is set at five to nine members. Adjusting the Human Rights and Diversity Commission to a range of seven to thirteen members, instead of five to nine members, will provide the City Council with more community engagement and flexibility in making appointments to this Commissions each year. MOTION: Move to approve First and Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending City Code Section 2.23, Subd. 3, relating to the membership range for the Human Rights and Diversity Commission XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS, AND COMMUNICATIONS XIII. APPOINTMENTS A. 2021 COMMISSIONS Synopsis: The City Council hosted Commission interviews on Tuesday, February 23, 2021. All terms will begin on April 1. A required orientation session for new commissioners will be held on Tuesday, March 23. MOTION: Move to: Appoint to the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission Chilkunda Narendranath (community) with a term ending March 31, 2023; and Bob Barker (community) and Michael Lawrence (business rep) with terms ending March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Heritage Preservation Commission Steve Schumacher with a term ending March 31, 2023; and Robert Bowes, George Maxwell, and Paul Thorp with a terms ending March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Human Rights and Diversity Commission Samuel Griffin and Michael Mullins with terms ending March 31, 2023; and Greg Leeper, Sana Elassar, Asad Aliweyd, John Urbanski, and Susan Weaver with terms ending March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission Swati Kumar and Ashley Young with terms ending ANNOTATED AGENDA March 2, 2021 Page 5 March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Planning Commission Ed Farr, Carole Mette, and Robert Taylor with terms ending March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Sustainability Commission Jeff Nobleza with a term ending March 31, 2023; and Emily Eddy, Cindy Hoffmann, and Aaron Poock with terms ending March 31, 2024. B. 2021 COMMISSION CHAIRS & VICE CHAIRS Synopsis: Chairs and Vice Chairs are appointed annually by the City Council following the appointment of members to City Commissions. The City Council hosted Commission interviews on Tuesday, February 23, and determined Chair and Vice Chair assignments for the period of April 1, 2021, through March 31, 2022. MOTION: Move to: Appoint Dan Dorson Chair and Andrew Kleinfehn Vice Chair of the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission Move to: Appoint Pamela Spera Chair and Valerie Ross Vice Chair of the Heritage Preservation Commission Move to: Appoint Gregory Leeper Chair and Shahram Missaghi Vice Chair of the Human Rights and Diversity Commission Move to: Appoint Patrice Erickson Chair and Cecilia Cervantes Vice Chair of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Move to: Appoint Andrew Pieper Chair and Ed Farr Vice Chair of the Planning Commission Move to: Appoint Aaron Poock Chair and Priya Senthilkumar Vice Chair of the Sustainability Commission C. 2021 BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION Synopsis: The proposed members for Council approval are Eden Prairie residents and experienced real estate professionals with extensive knowledge of the Southwest metro area. ANNOTATED AGENDA March 2, 2021 Page 6 Lyndon Moquist of Edina Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro area and manages the Eden Prairie office of Edina Realty. Eileen Canakes of Edina Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro. James Lawver of Bridge Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro. Nate Thompson of Edina Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro. Kristin Rial of Edina Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro. MOTION: Move to appoint to the Board of Appeal and Equalization Lyndon Moquist, Eileen Canakes, James Lawver, Nate Thompson and Kristin Rial for the period of March 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021, or until the Board of Appeal and Equalization completes its work. XIV. REPORTS A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XV. OTHER BUSINESS XVI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Move to adjourn the City Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Proclamations / Presentations DATE March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT / DIVISION Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION Presentation of the Baker Road 2021 Pavement Maintenance and Restriping Project ITEM NO. IV.A. Synopsis Emily Kettell and Chad Ellos, representing Hennepin County, will provide an update on the County’s 2021 cold in-place recycling pavement maintenance and restriping project along Baker Road (County Road 60) from Martin Drive to the bridge under I-494 in Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. Background During the 2021 construction season, Hennepin County plans to complete a three mile cold in-place recycling pavement maintenance and pedestrian ramp improvement project along Baker Road from Martin Drive north into Minnetonka. In conjunction with the pavement improvements, Hennepin County is proposing to restripe the roadway section from 4-lane to 3-lane in an effort to improve corridor safety and comfort for all users while still ensuring vehicle access is efficient and direct. Attachment Hennepin County Memo Hennepin County Public Works 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 612-596-0300 | hennepin.us Memo To: Carter Schulze, City of Eden Prairie From: Emily Kettell, Hennepin County Transportation Planning Chad Ellos, Hennepin County Transportation Planning Date: February 24, 2021 Re: Baker Road pavement preservation and restriping project The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an update to the City of Eden Prairie regarding an upcoming pavement preservation project along Baker Road (County Road 60) between Martin Drive and I-494 in Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. This memorandum details the expected safety benefits for the segment recommended for restriping with the pavement project. Hennepin County is planning pavement preservation work along Baker Road between Martin Drive and I-494 in Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. In coordination with this project, Hennepin County will also be upgrading pedestrian ramps along the corridor to be compliant with current standards. This project provides an opportunity to extend the roadway’s service life and improve corridor safety and comfort for all modes. The recommendations outlined in this memo will help meet the following project goals: • Preserve the existing roadway by upgrading the pavement surface • Improve accessibility for people walking and biking • Improve safety, reliability, and comfort for all transportation users • Reduce crashes along the corridor • Maintain good traffic operations 2 Background This segment of Baker Road is approximately 3 miles long and has a 40 mph posted speed limit. Traffic volumes along the corridor range from 7,100 to 12,500 vehicles per day. North of County Road 62, the roadway provides one vehicle through lane in each direction, bypass lanes, turn lanes and shoulder space. There are no facilities for people walking and biking; however, the Minnesota River Bluffs Regional Trail crosses near the northern terminus of the project limits. South of County Road 62, the roadway is two lanes in each direction, with turn lanes at signalized intersections. There is currently a sidewalk along the west side of the roadway, a multi-use trail along the east side of the roadway and a tunnel under the roadway at Forest Hills Elementary School. The sidewalk and trail are currently located directly behind the curb with no buffer area. People walking and biking must cross at least four lanes of traffic to cross at intersections. Roadway Re-striping Analysis The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) have demonstrated that roadways with less than 20,000 vehicles per day are good candidates for four-to-three lane conversions. Vehicle counts conducted between 2016 and 2018 show that this segment of Baker Road is well under this range. Attachment 2 shows traffic volumes along the corridor. This data was collected in 2019 and is shown in both northbound and southbound directions. Each graph shows hourly traffic volumes. Per FHWA guidance, the orange line shows where hourly vehicle volumes approach the capacity of a three-lane design and the red line indicated where volumes would reach capacity. The data shows that the traffic volumes along Baker Road are well below these thresholds. Therefore, minimal impact in delay is expected for people driving along the corridor. Safety benefits Based on the crash data between the years 2016 and 2019, 22 crashes were reported along the proposed restriping segment between Pinnacle Drive and St. Andrew Drive. • 64% of crashes were rear-end and angle crashes. These types of crashes are expected to be reduced or eliminated with a three-lane section. o Seven rear-end crashes involving a vehicle waiting on Baker Road to turn left onto a side street o Seven angle crashes involving a vehicle on the side street pulling out in front of a vehicle on Baker Road 3 Hennepin County has led several four to three lane conversions across the county providing several safety benefits, including: • Crash Reduction: Three lane roads typically see a 33-50% reduction in crashes compared to four lane undivided roads most notably due to separating left-turning traffic from through traffic and reducing the number of lanes to cross (simplifies gap selection and exposure to conflicting vehicle movements). • Traffic Calming: Narrow lanes typically see a slight reduction in operating speeds and the three-lane configuration provides a more consistent traffic flow making it easier to judge gaps in traffic to perform turning maneuvers. • Enhanced comfort for people walking and biking: Dedicated shoulder space as a buffer between moving vehicles and people walking or biking. Flexible shoulder space can also be utilized by on-road cyclists versus sharing a lane with traffic. Additionally, three lane roadways reduce multiple threat crashes for pedestrians crossing the street. Public engagement On January 15, 2021, Hennepin County mailed postcards to more than 800 residents and businesses within 500 feet of Baker Road or whose only residential access along the corridor is via Baker Road. This provided residents with general information including a project website (www.hennepin.us/baker-road) and an opportunity to share feedback with the project team. Additionally, an email reaching over 4,500 residents in both Eden Prairie and Minnetonka was sent to notify a wider audience about the project. Hennepin County requested feedback by February 16th to provide adequate time to compile comments. Hennepin County staff heard from 125 residents through more than 150 calls, emails and webform submissions related to the project (some residents reached out multiple times). Of the 125 residents, 62 stated their preference to move forward with the project, 56 stated their preference to not move forward with the project, and seven were just seeking additional information about the project. Residents who stated their preference against the striping changes shared concerns about increased congestion, inability to pass slower moving vehicles, difficulty turning on and off Baker Road and the overall need for the changes. For those residents who support the striping changes, the key comments included safer left-turns without fear of being rear-ended, increased comfort and safety on the sidewalk and trail, opportunities to calm traffic speeds and safer access to Baker Road. 4 Proposed recommendations In coordination with the 2021 pavement preservation project and pedestrian ramp upgrades between Martin Drive and I-494, Hennepin County recommends moving forward with the four to three lane conversion between St. Andrew Drive and Pinnacle Drive to improve safety and comfort for all roadway users along the corridor. Attachments Attachment 1 – Baker Road draft striping concept Attachment 2 – Baker Road traffic capacity Attachment 3 – Public feedback 11 FT LANE11 FT LANE8 FT SHOULDER8.5 FT SHOULDERPAVEMENT TO EDGE OF PAVEMENTUSING 38.5 FEET EDGE OFUSING 41 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO FACE OF CURB11 FT LANE11 FT LANE10.5 FT SHOULDER8.5 FT SHOULDER12 FT EXISTING LANE12 FT EXISTING LANE7.5 FT EXISTING SHOULDER5 FT EXISTING SHOULDERUSING 43 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO FACE OF CURB11 FT LANE11 FT LANE10.5 FT SHOULDER10.5 FT SHOULDER124 FEETUSING 36.5 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO FACE OF CURB75 FEET75 FEET30 FEET30:1 TAPER150:1 TAPER50:1 TAPER9 FT8 FT12 FT12 FTSouth Street Feet 100200 N Attachment 1 - Baker Road draft striping concept 11 FT LANE11 FT LANE8 FT SHOULDER8.5 FT SHOULDER12 FT LANE12 FT LANE12+1.5 FT SHOULDER13+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT LANE8.5+1.5 FT SHOULDER10 FT SHOULDER12 FT LANE12 FT LANE15 FT SHOULDER15 FT SHOULDERUSING 42 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52.5 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 54 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBPAVEMENT TO EDGE OF PAVEMENTUSING 38.5 FEET EDGE OF12 FT LANE12 FT LANE15 FT SHOULDER15 FT SHOULDERUSING 54 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB120 FEET135 FEET60 FEET90 FEET30 FEET124 FEET15'EXISTING 30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER74 FEET90:1 TAPER45:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPEREXISTING 150:1 TAPERFeet 100200 N USING 38.5 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT11 FT LANE11 FT LANE3 FT SHOULDER2.5 FT SHOULDER USING 38.5 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE3.5 FT SHOULDER 3 FT SHOULDER USING 39.5 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE5 FT SHOULDER35 FEET9.5 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT LANE3.5 FT SHOULDER3 FT SHOULDERUSING 39.5 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT120 FEET30 FEET30 FEET135 FEETEXISTING 30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER11 FT LANETO EDGE OF PAVEMENTUSING 47.5 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENTCulligan Way 11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER35 FEET60 FEET20 FT25 FT60 FEET25 FT20 FTEXISTING 150:1 TAPERFeet 100200 N CSAH 62 USING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB3.5 + 2 FT SHLDCURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 53 FEET FACE OF11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE11 FT LANE5.5+2 FT8+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE3 FT SHOULDER2.5 FT SHOULDERUSING 38.5 FEET EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT70 FEETEXISTING 10:1 TAPER17.5'9 FT SHOULDER70 FEET140:1 TAPER7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT11 FT11 FT11 FT2 + 2 FT SHLD2 + 2 FT SHLD30:1 TAPER40:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER100:1 TAPER11 FT15'60 FEET10'90 FEET150 FEET5 FT80 FEET9 FT16.5 FT10'100 FEET6+2 FT SHOULDER100:1 TAPER2 FT GUTTER47.5 FEET13.5 FT45 FEET6 FTCURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF10'68 FEET11 FT LANE40:1 TAPER40:1 TAPER40:1 TAPER20 FT6+2 FT SHOULDER20 FTFeet 100200 N 50 FEET90 FEET97.5 FEETEXISTING 15:1 TAPER135 FEETEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANE12 FT MEDIAN12' RIGHT TURN LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANE270 FEET80 FEET38 FEETSaint Johns Woods CSAH 62 Saint Johns Woods USING 51.5 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBSaint Johns Woods 2 FT GUTTER2 FT GUTTER97 FEET35:1 TAPEREXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANE2 FT GUTTE R 2 FT GUTTEREXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANEUSING 64 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 64 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBFeet 100200 N Pi nnacl e Dri ve11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7+2 FT SHOULDER7+2 FT SHOULDERUSING 51 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB11 FT LANE11 FT7+2 FT SHOULDER3 FTUSING 51.5 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB2 FT GUTTER2 FT GUTTER12 FT13.5 FT5+2 FT SHLD11 FT12 FT35:1 TAPER7+2 FT SHLD50 FEETFeet 100200 N 11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDEREdenvale Blvd USING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB11 FT LANE11 FT LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT BIKE LANE7.5+2 FT BIKE LANEUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBPr om ont or y D ri ve50 FEETFeet 100200 N 11 FT TW O WAY LEFT TURN LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDERUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBPromontory Drive Feet 100200 N 11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7+2 FT SHOULDERHolly Road USING 51.5 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBCar di nal Cr eek RoadFeet 100200 N 11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDERSand Ridge RoadUSING 51.5 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7+2 FT SHOULDERUSING 51.5 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBTheresa Place James Place Feet 100200 N 11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDERArbor Glen DriveUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 51.5 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7+2 FT SHOULDERUSING 51.5 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDERUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBCandice Lane Feet 100200 N Roberts Drive11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE7+2 FT SHOULDERUSING 51.5 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDERSaint Andrew Drive Fewnwick Circle Feet 100200 N Saint Andrew Drive 11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER7.5+2 FT SHOULDERUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBSaint Andrew Drive7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE11 FT LANE2 FT GUTTER 11 FT LANE11 FT LT LANE11 FT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT LANE7.5+2 FT SHOULDER11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE13.5 FT25 FT30 FEET15'7.5+2 FT SHOULDERUSING 59 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 52 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB10+2 FT SHOULDERFeet 100200 N Valley View Road Saint Andrew Drive 11 FT LANE11 FT LANE11 FT LANE11 FT LANE11 FT LT LANE11 FT TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE11 FT LANE14.5 FT13.5 FT107 FEET43 FEETEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LEFT TURN LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANEEXISTING 12 FT LANE4+2 FT SHOULDER5:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER30:1 TAPER25 FT52.5 FEET45 FEET212.5 FEET30 FEET2 FT GUTTER2 FT GUTTER2 FT GUTTER 1 FT GUTTER1 FT GUTTER122.5 FEET250 FEET95 FEET32 FEET30 FEET23 FT15'30:1 TAPER100:1 TAPER9.5 FT45:1 TAPER45:1 TAPER7.5 FT5'7.5+2 FT SHOULDER3.5+2 FT SHOULDERUSING 39 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 27 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURBUSING 59 FEET FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB10+2 FT SHOULDER45 FEET25 FEETRAISED MEDIAN5:1 TAPER4+2 FT SHOULDERFeet 100200 N BakerRdValley V ie w R d County R o a d 6 2 Highway 62 Tanage rLnStewartDrFairwayDr EquitableDr TopviewR d P la za Dr GerardDrClear w ate r Dr Rowl andRdWo o d l andDrSaintAnd rew D r Rosem aryRdW 62nd St Ede nvaleBlvd San d RidgeRdCardinalCr e ekRdSc otTerBirch Island Rd Can terburyLnGolfViewDrKi n gs t onDrPinnacle Dr RobertsDr Crown Dr HCRRACorridorArborGle n D r Holly Rd IronwoodCt ValeCtMar tinDr S u n shineDrButterscotchRdBuryDrGor do nDrKaraDrZenithLnHarlanDr PromontoryD rIndustrialDrHowardLnKerr yLnCarlson DrB e a c h Rd $+COUNTY4 $+COUNTY39 $+COUNTY60 $+COUNTY60 $+COUNTY62 $+COUNTY39 ÉÉMINNESOTA62 01212 #"(494 #"(494 #"(494TCW RailroadEDEN PRAIRIE MINNETONKA CSAH 60 (Baker Rd) Traffic Capacity From CSAH 39 to CSAH 62 | Hennepin County Public Works Disclaimer:This map (i) is furnished "AS IS" with no representation as to completenessor accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable forlegal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for anydamage, injury or loss resulting from this map. Publication date: 2/4/2021 Data sources (if applicable): Key ¯0 0.50.25 Miles SB Estimated Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT)NB Estimated Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) NB Peak Hour Percentage (AM, Mid Day, PM) SB Peak Hour Percentage (AM, Mid Day, PM)StreetLight Study Locations Hennepin 5,200 4,850(11%,6%,9%)(7%,6%,12%) 4,750 3,850(9%,6%,11%)(6%,6%,13%) 5,100 3,950(8%,6%,12%)(7%,6%,13%) 5,000 4,050(8%,6%,12%)(7% 6%,13%) Valley Vi e w R d Attachment 2 - CSAH 60 Traffic Capacity From: To:Chad Ellos Cc:Emily Kettell Subject:[External] Baker Road Changes Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 12:11:29 PM Yesterday I learned that you are spear heading the project that seeks to reduce the number of lanes on Baker Road in Eden Prairie from 4 lanes to 3, if my information is incorrect, please tell me who the correct person is or forward this email on. I have been an Eden Prairie Resident for 20 years. I live in the Forest Hills neighborhood immediately off of Baker Road and am directly impacted by any decisions related to this project. As an Eden Prairie resident and tax payer, I am against the lane reduction. Are any of the people on the committee that are making this decision residents of Eden Prairie? It is counter intuitive and insults our intelligence that reducing traffic lanes from 4 to 3 on a busy road will improve safety. It’s hard to imagine how much more traffic we will have if you do a lane reduction and how much more dangerous this road will be. You personally and whoever is on the committee making this decision is knowingly putting me and the other people in the Eden Prairie community that drive this road every day at risk for an accident. We know that this was not being done for safety reasons or our sake. We know 70% of the accidents in the 3-year study used by Hennepin County didn’t take place in the area where the reduction from 4 lanes to 3 lanes is planned. If safety is the main concern of the city planners, plans would first address the area where 70% of accidents occur rather than create an accident issue by reducing 4 lanes to 3 in an area where accidents don’t happen. Eden Prairie is only growing. Lane reduction is counterintuitive. Our area will become a bigger accident zone and harder to make right turns in to neighborhoods if you do the lane reduction. If you are trying to put in biking lanes and make it one lane, you will not solve but exacerbate the issues, causing careless drivers to swerve into bike lanes, which is even worse. There are so many cars using Baker. We are in a pandemic so now is NOT the best time to judge traffic flow. But even in pandemic, there are a lot of cars. Main accident spots on Baker Rd seem to be by the Forest Hills bridge and by the Valley View stop light. So reducing lanes and sudden braking for right turns into neighborhoods makes this even worse. Realistically Bikes are only driven about 4 months a year in Minnesota I’m not sure it makes sense to reduce traffic lanes anywhere in Minnesota to support bikes for 4 months a year. Our weather just doesn’t permit year round riders of other states nor does our population density support it. Also, another accident spot where people get rear-ended is when drivers drive from Baker Rd and are in the far right lane merging onto 62 Eastbound)—Our drivers need Hennepin County to install a huge sign that says, “YOU MAY PROCEED. YOU HAVE YOUR OWN MERGE LANE. KINDLY USE IT. Thank you.” Those who live here know. Those who don’t, slam on brakes because they aren’t clear if they can go or not. The small sign doesn’t work. Cars really get backed up there bc unaware drivers just sit and wait for 62 traffic because they don’t know they can use their own merge lane. This sign will save accidents and lives. I drive this route 10 times a day bc I am driving my kids or going to work Attachment 3 - Public Feedback so I know it well. The people of Eden Prairie expect an open hearing on decisions that impact our community, in particular after we have made our voices clear in the past. We are incredibly disappointed that Hennepin County seeks to slip these decisions by during the covid lockdown. We demand more. The lack of transparency on the part of Hennepin County, the bogus data used in the decision making process is not ok. This proposal was presented years ago and the people of Eden Prairie soundly made their voices heard! Shame on the Hennepin Beauracray for overriding the will of the people. Under the lockdown of covid Hennepin County Beurocrats are trying to shove this change paid for with Tax payer dollars down our throats without representation from the people. This is not what the Minnesota nor the US constitution intended. Thank you for your time. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From: To:Emily Kettell Cc:AllCouncil@edenprairie.org Subject:[External] Baker road design is stupid Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 10:01:52 AM Hey Emily, The reasons for this road design don't make any sense, Claim: A three lane roadway would reduce the chance that a multiple threat crash occurs. A multiple threat crash occurs when a vehicle stops for a person crossing the street, but a second vehicle, who does not see the person crossing, swerves around the stopped car and collides with the person crossing. Reality: There isn't any foot traffic in this area. Therefore, crashes don't occur because of foot traffic and this point is meaningless. It's weird that this is the number one reason when it has no relevance on the topic. Claim: All of the statistics about crash reductions. Reality: There are 33 crashes in 3 years. That is actually a success. We have to expect there to be crashes because of human error and road conditions. 11 crashes a year over 2 miles. If 2,000 people drive that stretch every day, we should expect on average to have 9 accidents a year. So, trying to reduce this by 50% just isn't going to happen. There is no basis in reality for crashes to get that low unless you ban driving. It would make more sense to just give the drivers who have accidents money for repairs directly, than to spend that money to redo the road. Claim: Studies have found that drivers more closely adhere to the posted speed limit, due to a feeling of narrower and closer constraints. A three lane also provides more consistent traffic flow. Reality: This is going to cause more accidents. These studies are from "ideal driving conditions." Minnesota doesn't have ideal driving conditions 6 months a year. Narrow roads in snow and ice will cause more accidents. This should be obvious to anyone that has ever driven in snow. Emily. You need to seriously reconsider this plan because all of the basis for this change are false. You there must arrive at a different conclusion. Thank you. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognizethe sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From: To:Chad Ellos; Emily Kettell Cc:allcouncil@edenprairie.org; editor@eplocalnews.org Subject:[External] Baker Road Lane Reductions Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 2:16:05 PM Chad and Emily, I am writing you this email to again voice my displeasure of your intentions for reducing the number of lanes on Baker Road in Eden Prairie. I strongly ask you to slow this project down until the citizens ofEden Prairie affected by this change have time to voice their opinions and concerns. The reduction proposal is going to cause many more problems than what it is going to solve. Traffic delays in carsentering onto Baker and potentially causing more accidents with frustrated drivers darting into traffic. I’m not aclimate scientist, but I would suspect causing more stopping and starting of traffic (rather than bypassing turningtraffic) and delays in being able to enter onto Baker would also cause more gas emissions than if traffic flowedsmoothly and cars are not idling for longer periods of time trying to turn onto Baker. You have stated it’s all about safety. Whose safety are you focusing on? Auto accidents in the section of theproposed change (from Pinnicle to St. Andrews) are minimal, at best, and I can honestly say I’ve never seen anaccident on this stretch of road for the past 31 years. The proposed changes will most likely cause merging accidentsfrom the four lanes at Pinnicle and St. Andrews to two. So, is it about pedestrian and bicycle safety? The number of accidents for pedestrians and bikes are three. I don’t seean existing safety issue here. I feel you are using “safety” as a smoke screen to add bicycle lanes to Baker Road. Maybe that is why you avoidedanswering my question if bike lanes were going to be added. Emily, your background in transportation planning hasbeen focused on bicycles. Counting bikes in Hennepin County, acting as the Bike Share Planner in the SanFrancisco Bay Area and even your LinkedIn page pictures you on a bicycle. It doesn’t take much to see that this isall about adding bike lanes. I’m sure you’re both well aware that past attempts to reduce auto lanes and adding bikelanes have failed because residents overwhelmingly have been against this very bad idea. It was a bad idea then, it’san even worse idea now. There are three (I’m being generous by including Hwy 101 which is on the border of Eden Prairie and Chanhassen)North-South roads west of 494 in Eden Prairie for traffic between Hwy 62 and highways 5 and 212. Reducing thenumber of lanes on Baker are going to make even more traffic delays. There is a reason why city and countyplanners changed Baker from two lanes to four. They had the foresight of knowing Eden Prairie was growing andneed this main traffic artery. I am copying the Eden Prairie City Council to let them know my feelings and to encourage them to help slow downthis project until all affected parties can weigh in.Thank you for your considerations in honoring my requests. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and knowthe content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Hennepin County seeks to slip these decisions by during the covid lockdown. We demand more. This proposal was presented years ago and the people of Eden Prairie soundly made their voices heard! Shame on the Hennepin Beauracray for overriding the will of the people. Under the lockdown of covid Hennepin County Bearuocrats are trying to shove this change paid for with Tax payer dollars down our throats without representation from the people. This is not what the Minnesota nor the US consitution intended. Thank you for your time. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognizethe sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** will definitely slow response times. With four lanes now it can be challenging to take a left out of our neighborhood. Take a lane away, the problem is compounded and it will make the lives of people that live in this area very difficult. The current notice does not state bicycle lane as the reason for going down to 3 lanes, however our guess is that bicycle activists have been lobbying for this change but not taking into account the disruption that it will bring to residents that use Baker Road. everyday. No, we are not avid hard- core bicyclists who bike in packs on Saturday and Sunday mornings 7-8 months a year. When we do ride a bike, we have wide paths on both sides of Baker that we take to eventually hit a side trail. This proposal is all about bikes and Hennepin County is hiding that from us. Also, many residents that will be affected by this change have not been communicated. This is unacceptable. The key point is the residents living off Baker Road who use this vital access road 365 days a year need a road that is flowing and offers safe and efficient entrance from the neighborhoods it supports. We ask you, Mayor Case and the City Council, to kindly weigh our concerns as the city and the county consider this unappealing change to Baker Road being discussed. Baker Rd used to be 2 lanes back in the day and there is a reason it was changed to 4 lanes. The city of Eden Prairie is growing and going back to the past is a huge mistake. Thank you for noting our opinions and best wishes as you continue to lead the City of Eden Prairie toward being one of America’s most desirable cities to live in. Sincerely, ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Some neighbors have started a change.org to ask Hennepin County to ask for a halt to theplans for a Baker Rd 3 lane reduction that is scheduled to start this spring. For thoseinterested, can you let them know there is a petition at http://chng.it/FQVGtg8Y ? Thank you, ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognizethe sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:19:09 PM Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I’ve seen many comments on social sitesadvocating to oppose this change. I’d just like to comment that I support the change and am happy to see the progress. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:21:03 PM Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Hello. I've lived in Eden Prairie,specifically off of Baker for most of my life. I have also heavily traveled roads like you want to turn Baker into. I strongly oppose turning it into a 3 lane. It works very well with all of thetraffic, as well as being able to turn onto one of 2 lanes to accelerate, versus just 1. Thank you for hearing out the community. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:04:00 PM Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am writing to say I’m opposed to thisproposed project. It was a bad idea 10 years ago when it was withdrawn, and it is still a bad idea today. It smacks of a solution looking for a problem, after reviewing all the material. Ifeel that the process has been very rushed, and not given adequate community notice, unlike last time. A city council meeting isn’t the right place for this info to be conveyed. The feeling Iget is that it’s a political decision shrouded in a 'safety' cloak. It's been denied that it has anything to do with bike lanes, but the entire history of this projects lead person, starting inCA through today is all about bikes, so I take that assertion with a boulder of salt. There doesn’t appear to be any reason that the striping portion of the project has to be so rushed. Ifyou’re so sure that it’s the correct answer for us, then you should meet with us like last time 10 years ago. Otherwise it’s just a done deal, and this is all just window dressing/rubberstamping. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 8:06:48 PM Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please consider adding a sidewalk alongBaker north of 62. We would like to be able to more safely walk to the brewery, but the stretch in front of Adogo is very dangerous for pedestrians. There is no safe place to walk or bike. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 11:40:27 PM Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: As a 20 year resident of Eden Prairiewhose only way out of my neighborhood is Theresa Place & Baker Road, I am strongly against the lane reduction from Hwy 62 to Valley View. First, I do not want to see majortraffic backups in either direction on Baker or at the lights at Hwy 62. The road was widened to 4 lanes in the 1980s to to keep the traffic moving with the left and right turns that arefrequently made into businesses and neighborhoods. I assume that it also helps shorten the wait at the South turn lane/light from Hwy 62 to Baker from getting backed up to 494. Isn't ittrue that of the 109 accidents reported , only 7 occurred in that stretch from Pinnacle to St. Andrews? Over the 2016-2019 test, 7 accidents are not enough evidence to needlessly risk theentire Forest Hills area to endure more traffic back-ups than we do now. Please do not waste money and our entire Spring and Summer on this proposed lane reduction. Thank you. SusanKallsen 13700 Theresa Place From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, February 13, 2021 1:19:30 PM Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Thank you for doing this. Most accidentson that road are caused by people driving in the left lane crashing into the back of cars in the left lane stopped and waiting to turn. I have seen this happen in the afternoon with sun andgood driving conditions, a minivan rear-ended a sedan turning left. People driving in the left lane seem to not notice cars waiting to turn for some reason. I live off a four lane road. Therewas two accidents last year with cars crashing into cars just because they were slowing down from 50 or 40 to 20 mph (why!? why were there stupid accidents like this?? arg), becausethere is no dedicated right turn lane, to turn right off the main road. I imagine cars full-stopped on a road , like Baker, in order to turn left would be more dangerous. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, February 12, 2021 3:48:35 PM Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: We like the proposed change to re-stripeBaker Road as three lanes (one lane each direction, with a center turn lane). 's car was rear-ended a few years ago while paused on Baker Road waiting for oncoming traffic to clearin order to make a left turn onto Cardinal Creek Road. This accident would not have occurred had there been a center turn lane. Subject: Re: [External] Baker Rd 3 Lane Plan Hey Emily, Thanks for the response about not being able to extend the feedback deadline past today, 2/16,and not being able to accommodate an open forum for residents due to deadline and the timeline. I recognize plans are in place to begin but pausing is a worthy consideration. Thankyou for letting me know that you sent a notification to those who live within 500 feet of Baker Rd. Unfortunately, this does not even begin to address how many residents are in the darkabout this Baker Rd change because of how many streets off of Baker Rd are longer than 500 feet. Another flyer needs to go out to all residents in these zip codes so that this isn’t a projectthat is happening without their knowledge. It is detrimental to Hennepin County and the residents to proceed without hearing from the residents in an open forum. March 2 is far away enough that an extra 1.5 hr can be tacked ontothe March 2nd meeting to allow for residential feedback. Otherwise, asking for online feedback from the residents seems like a ruse because you are not considering our feedbackbut rather giving the appearance that you have listened to us. The majority of residents are against this as they were against it in 2011. We do not want nor NEED a 3-Lane Reduction. One neighbor said that she just moved here and what you are trying to do here you did in herold neighborhood. She is upset and said she would have never moved here to Eden Prairie if she knew this was happening to Baker Road too. It upsets me to think this is a pattern. Youneed to listen to the people who live here and the people whose lives will be affected by this change. We know that this is not being done for safety reasons or our sake. We know 70% ofthe accidents in the 3-year study didn’t take place in the part you are making 3 lanes so if safety is your main concern, you would first take care of the 70% of accidents beforeaddressing a residential area where the majority of accidents didn’t happen. We are asking for complete transparency and more information before anything starts in the spring. There is achange.org that the neighbors are starting because it feels like Hennepin County isn’t listening to the residents who live here. Whatever the reason is for the lane reduction, I feel like theresidents do not want this and are being penalized when people who speed should be penalized. We are being punished for other’s mistakes. 1) We ask for a 1.5-hour open forum for residents on March 2nd before your March 2ndmeeting with the city council and that this is publicized on your website and other citywebsites so that all residents are aware of the changes you are hoping to make. There aretwo weeks until March 2 and we are requesting that you add a open forum prior to yourmeeting. 2) We also want an extension until March 1st for residential feedback as you have notprovided adequate time for feedback. Lastly, the website you provided does not honestly portray the safety reasons and pertinent crash data for the portion you are changing into threelanes. We would like that information presented clearly on March 2nd as well. How many accidents in the 3-year study were between Pinnacle Dr and St Andrew Dr? I ask thisspecifically bc the data we have is only from 62 to Martin Drive. I have cc’ed some neighbors and all members of the Eden Prairie City Council to let them know about this correspondence and to ask them to help us add an open forum on March 2nd. Thank you, and my neighbors (My previous email. I have taken out Emily’s response b/c I did not ask for her permission to share it.) Message----- From: Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 1:04 AM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us>Subject: [External] Baker Rd 3 Lane Plan Hi Emily, I noticed that the deadline for feedback regarding the Baker Rd 3 Lane plan is on February 16th. Many residents have not properly notified or informed and are surprised to hear of sucha small feedback window. As we have spoken with the neighbors, many did not receive the informational flyer about this change. We are asking for a month extension for feedback andall the residents to be re-notified by mail with more information about the specific research and information supporting the reason for safety around changing Baker Rd, specificallyaround providing information about the specific accidents that have happened in the proposed area of 3-lane change. Lastly, we are waiting to hear back the specific date in March you willhold the open forum for the residents to hear more information and speak about how this affects our community. If there is no date on the calendar, we request an open forum meetingsoon to discuss this proposed lane change with you and the city council. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, From:Emily Kettell To:" Subject:RE: [External] Baker Rd 3 Lane Plan Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 8:33:00 AM Hi Thanks again for reaching out. We are planning to attend the March 2nd Eden Prairie Council meeting. Unfortunately, we do not have much flexibility with the timing or else we risk delaying the pavement maintenance component of the project. Over the past month, we have sent a mailer to residents who live within 500 ft of Baker Rd and an email message to those subscribed to the county's GovDelivery email system, and have received feedback via phone, email, and our website comment form. The feedback that we've received will be shared with the city staff and council as well. I would direct you to the project website at https://www hennepin.us/baker-road for more information about crash data and the research around the proposed three-lane conversion. Thanks, Emily -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 1:04 AM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Baker Rd 3 Lane Plan Hi Emily, I noticed that the deadline for feedback regarding the Baker Rd 3 Lane plan is on February 16th. Many residents have not properly notified or informed and are surprised to hear of such a small feedback window. As we have spoken with the neighbors, many did not received the informational flyer about this change. We are asking for an month extension for feedback and for all the residents to be re-notified by mail with more information about the specific research and information supporting the reason for safety around changing Baker Rd, specifically around providing information about the specific accidents that have happened in the proposed area of 3-lane change.Lastly, we are waiting to hear back the specific date in March you will hold the open forum for the residents to hear more information and speak into how this affects our community. If there is not date on the calendar, we request an open forum meeting in the near future to discuss this proposed lane change with you and the city council. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: [External] Baker Road Lane Reduction - Eden Prairie Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 8:26:00 AM Hi As I mentioned, I have provided all of the information that I am able to at this time, and would direct you to the Minnesota Department of Vehicle Services for more information. I was out from Friday-Monday, but noticed that you had given me a call as well. I’ll plan to give you a call back today, otherwise, please feel free to reach out with additional questions. Thanks, Emily From: Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 12:58 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: RE: [External] Baker Road Lane Reduction - Eden Prairie HI Emily – Let’s try again. We have not and are not now requesting additional crash details or information that would require access to crash reports. Please provide accident information as in the charts below – except covering only the segment of Baker Road the county is actually proposing to convert to 3 lanes, which is also well defined below. We would appreciate a prompt response. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Emily Kettell Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 11:40 AM To: Subject: RE: [External] Baker Road Lane Reduction - Eden Prairie Hi , Sorry for the delayed response here. It is unusual for us to get these types of detailed requests so one of my colleagues checked with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to confirm if we are able to share any details from the crash reports beyond the materials that we have previously shared. Per state statute 169.09.13, we cannot share the additional crash details that you are requesting as the reports are meant solely for our crash analysis related to this project. Subject: RE: [External] Baker Road Lane Reduction - Eden Prairie Hi Thanks for the follow-up email. While I cannot share the crash reports directly, I am able to share our analysis of the crash severity and crash types along the corridor. The table below also shows crashes where people walking and biking were involved. I plan to share this information as part of a future presentation to the council. Additionally, the project website (https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road) includes some further details about crash characteristics between Valley View Rd and County Road 62. Best, Emily From: Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 5:00 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Baker Road Lane Reduction - Eden Prairie Hello Emily – Thanks for the information you provided by phone on the county’s suggested changes to traffic lanes on Baker road. Due to the lane arrangements and existing infrastructure at Valley View Road (south end) and Rt.62 (north end), the significant part of Baker Road impacted by the restriping would be the roughly 1 ½ mile stretch from St. Andrews Drive (just north of Valley View) and the main entrance to Lifetime Fitness (just south of 62). Please provide a list of accidents for just this stretch of Baker Road for the period of your analysis (2016 – 2019), including the following for each: Date Location on Baker (incl. lane if available – northbound or southbound) Weather conditions, if available Brief description / cause Also, please list any accidents resulting in injury to pedestrians or non-motorized vehicles travelling on the curb-elevated walk/trail running on both sides of Baker – caused by Baker Road traffic. Thank you, Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. From: To:Emily Kettell Cc: Subject:[External] "Repaving" Mitchell Road/Baker Road Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 3:52:07 PM I oppose the change from 4 lanes to two lanes and a center shared turn lane. I have witnessedseveral horrible head on collisions on roads with this design in Atlanta. Most collisions occur because, due to now heavier traffic in two lanes, a car will be sitting waiting to turn, and animpatient driver from opposite direction attempts to use turn lane as passing lane. The result frequently was fatal. As many cars on Baker Road are traveling at 45mph to 55 mph on somesections of the road, it will be fatal here as well. Please, do not do this! In addition, I recall that was previously overwhelming opposition to this in the past. IsHennepin County taking advantage of Covid19 meeting limitations to proceed against the citizens wishes? Again, reconsider this change. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From: To:Emily Kettell Subject:[External] baker road reconstruction Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 11:59:24 AM Hi Emily, I live on Candice lane and wanted to provide some feedback on your proposal. Currently on Baker road between 62 and valley view, there are lots of cars that turn left and right onto side streets. Going from ~45mph to zero takes some distance. The nice thing aboutthe 4 lanes is I can pass someone on the right who is turning left as well as pass someone on the left who is turning right. My concern with the 3 lane approach would be getting stuck behind cars turning right. Willthere be sufficient right turn lanes such that regular traffic can get past them on the left? thanks, ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From: To:Emily Kettell; Vance Blahnik Subject:[External] Baker road redux Date:Thursday, January 21, 2021 9:38:09 AM I received your letter about the proposed changes to Baker, going from 2 lanes in each direction to 1 lane in each direction. I am opposed to this. We have lived at this home for 17 years. We work out of our home and use baker 4-5 times a day. There are many times when trying to get from Pinnacle onto Baker south is almost impossible. I am sure your traffic study shows smaller usage, but at rush hour it is a stupid road. Even with the covid slow down, I have started to go north and use 494S as a simpler solution than trying to navigate Baker. Taking it down to one lane will completely destroy its usefulness. Additionally, there are several new huge apartment building that are just coming on line, along with a light rail hub. You have to expect that Baker traffic will increase. One lane will not be enough. This same plan was proposed by the city of EP the last time the road was overlaid, I think like 7 years ago. It was defeated that time. The planer at that time told me that the only real reason for the proposal was to make the side walks on both side have a larger buffer. Thanks for listening. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From: Subject:[External] Baker road redux Date:Thursday, January 21, 2021 9:38:09 AM I received your letter about the proposed changes to Baker, going from 2 lanes in each direction to 1 lane in each direction. I am opposed to this. We have lived at this home for 17 years. We work out of our home and use baker 4-5 times a day. There are many times when trying to get from Pinnacle onto Baker south is almost impossible. I am sure your traffic study shows smaller usage, but at rush hour it is a stupid road. Even with the covid slow down, I have started to go north and use 494S as a simpler solution than trying to navigate Baker. Taking it down to one lane will completely destroy its usefulness. Additionally, there are several new huge apartment building that are just coming on line, along with a light rail hub. You have to expect that Baker traffic will increase. One lane will not be enough. This same plan was proposed by the city of EP the last time the road was overlaid, I think like 7 years ago. It was defeated that time. The planer at that time told me that the only real reason for the proposal was to make the side walks on both side have a larger buffer. Thanks for listening. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Best, From: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 9:14 AM To: " Subject: RE: Feedback about the Baker Road project Thanks for taking the time to share your comments and concerns. I wanted to take a moment to answer your questions. First, we have implemented a number of three-lane roadways across the county. In our experience, we haven’t heard many issues with emergency vehicles. They’d still have the option to use the center lane if needed. We have more information on the project website, but between 2016 and 2019, our data shows that there have been 109 crashes along the roadway. Fifty-three percent of the crashes were either left-turn or rear-end crashes, which a three-lane roadway would specifically address. We’ve noted a 33-50% decrease in crashes along three-lane roadways as compared to four-lane undivided roadways. This proposal does not include a dedicated bicycle facility; however, the flexible shoulder space could be used by people biking. There are many uses for the shoulder space, including that it will serve as a buffer for people walking along the trail or sidewalk, and can be used as a flexible space for delivery or postal vehicles. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Best, Emily From: noreply@hennepin.us <noreply@hennepin.us> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 7:26 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: Feedback about the Baker Road project Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am writing to express mydisapproval of the proposed changes to Baker Road. I have many reasons for this, outlined below. I live at Baker and Candice Ln, and our house backs up to Baker aroad. I am very familiar with the traffic patterns. - this is a main roadway. Each day, multiple emergency vehicles use this road to get to different emergencies. Bymaking this a 2 lane road, this is going to cause significantly more risk to these vehicles, slowing response time. - I have seen very few accidents on baker in my7 years in Eden Prairie. I read statistics on what a 2 lane road would do, but can you please provide any data on how many accidents occur, and specifically whereon Baker? - during the summer months many bikers use the roadway. Many times you see packs of bikes taking up the outside lane. By eliminating one lane in eachdirection, this is likely to cause many more accidents with bikes, as cars will be closer to cars. Thanks Steve Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From: To:Emily Kettell Subject:[External] Re: Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 9:33:56 AM Hi Emily, Thank you for your response and for providing more information. I just have to tell you, I believe this is going to be a very bad decision based on how the road is used and I sincerely hope you will reconsider this. If you are concerned about accidents, which I believe the data skews and doesn’t take into account where the accidents occur, I would recommend the following. Reduce the speed limit to 35mph. Increase police patrols. I would say, this would be huge. I rarely see police cars running speed traps, and I will tell you, the speed some people drive down the road is quite fast. By increasing patrols, people will slow down and would help in reduction of accidents. I would also tell you, the amount of bike traffic going down the road is quite large. We’re not talking about families biking down a path in the summer, you see large groups taking up the entirety of a lane. I have no doubt, you will see a higher risk of accidents if you reduce each way to 1 lane. I believe there is no increased risk to accidents on Baker Road, particularly between Valley View and 62. I would be curious exactly where those crashes are occurring, because I think they would be concentrated in one or two particular area. It would seem that increased patrols and a reduction in speed would be a more prudent option, but what do I know. I just live here. Best, From: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 9:14 AM Subject: RE: Feedback about the Baker Road project Thanks for taking the time to share your comments and concerns. I wanted to take a moment to answer your questions. First, we have implemented a number of three-lane roadways across the county. In our experience, we haven’t heard many issues with emergency vehicles. They’d still have the option to use the center lane if needed. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 6:49:31 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: This road is heavily used by cyclists.Please consider a bike lane or wide shoulders. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 11:53:40 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I appreciate the safety statistics given,and I like that we are evaluating changes as to whether they improve safety. To facilitate that conversation I would like to see a map showing where along the restriped section of roadwaythose crashes have happened. If I understand correctly, the text on your webpage reads that only 30% of the crashes in the area of concern have happened in the area being restriped. Iwould also like to understand what other restriping projects are being compared to Baker Road. Baker is hilly and curvy, and may not realize the same benefits from a 3-lane restripingas a flat, straight road. I understand that removing the passing lane is viewed as a way to minimize swerve-related accidents, but changing your travel lane well ahead of (for example,overtaking a turning driver) is not the same as swerving, and is an important tool for a defensive driver. Thank you for the opportunity to comment, I eagerly await any additionalinformation. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 11:53:19 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Based on the information available today(1/19/2021) I have several concerns about these proposed changesBaker Road is a very hilly, curvy road, and the proposed restriping does not take into account the safety of drivers whendecelerating downhill to make a right turn, eg. the right turn onto Edenvale. A paint-only plan also does not take into account winter weather, where three-lane lines covered in snow willresult in drivers unsure where the travel lane is inside the larger paved roadway. It sounds like there has also been some negative feedback on the proposed median in Baker just north ofEdenvale, and I would amplify that. I have personally witnessed cars losing traction and sliding down Baker in the winter. With four lanes and no median, this is a situation that cansafely be handled by defensive driving. A concrete median in the middle of the road going down a steep hill would force a crash to happen. Please do not put a concrete median in theroadway. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 7:54:10 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: PLEASE do not reduce Baker Rd tothree lanes. It’s fine the way it is, don’t need bike lanes. Free moving safe vehicle traffic is a priority. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, January 18, 2021 8:03:25 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: This is the second time during the timewe have lived in the neighborhood ( over 20 years) that there have been suggested changes to this road and like the last time, this suggestion would only add a higher level of dangerousdriving situations. It is already hard to turn out onto Baker road from either of the neighborhood exits because of blocked vision and heavy traffic flow. Last time there was aneighborhood meeting at Forest Hills where the city explained and showed the project plan. Many neighbors attended and expressed their concerns and the city did not go forward withthe plan. I am dumbfounded as to why they would bring this up again. It is plain just not safe! It honestly scares me as to what could happen if they went ahead with this project. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 2:20:00 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: We are strongly against this project forBaker Road. As an attorney, CEO and homeowner on Candice Lane, I have reviewed your plans and this project is unnecessary and will be expending costs that are not a good use offunds. This is one of those projects where you want to fix something that is not broken. We are extremely concerned if this is how funds will be spent. We recently moved to Candice Lanefrom Southwest Minneapolis and we are surprised this is a project that Eden Prairie would propose. We will continue to oppose this project in every way we can. Our neighbors are alsoquite concerned as well. Thank you, Annie Betts From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 8:41:32 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: The recommended "improvement" is notan improvement - please do not reduce the lanes down to 2 lanes with a middle turning lane. The traffic flow works well as is it is with 2 lanes of traffic each way. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 7:32:54 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Looks like a great idea. Smoother traffic,fewer speeders, fewer crashes, better atmosphere for walking and biking. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 4:22:58 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Baker road is often used by myself and alot of other cyclists I know, to not only ride recreationally but also to bike commute. I want to make sure a safe path for cyclists is included in this plan, increasing Baker to 3 lanes haseconcerned about my safety as well as that of fellow cyclists From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 5:15:00 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: A three lane configuration would beideal for Baker Road. A safer, speed controlled layout would moderate speeding, while allowing bikers a safer alternative for commuting and recreating. Thank you for consideringthis. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 9:33:56 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please build a bike lane in Bothdirections on baker road. It is a heavily trafficked road for cyclists From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Thursday, February 4, 2021 10:53:49 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: This stretch of roadway should be kept as4 lane as it is now. There are bike trails on either side of the road, there doesn't need to be bike lanes on the road, especially with so few bikers ever using the road in the first place.Reduction in lanes will result in bunched traffic, which will make it increasingly hard to enter the roadway, especially to make a left turn. This same thing was done in Golden Valley onWinnetka Ave, CSAH 156, and in my experience there, it increases the delay in turning left (or right) significantly. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 11:26:37 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: We feel that these improvements/proposed changes will negatively affect our ability to safely pull in and out of our Cardinal Creek entrance onto Mitchell Road. Plus, with buses at Forest Hills needing to ingress andegress out of the school with only one lane to merge into will cause a back up. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 11:21:54 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I live close to Baker road in Eden Prairieand use it daily. I fully support a plan to upgrade the pedestrian cross walks. I especially think it is a good idea to reduce the automotive traffic lanes to 3 lanes and use the additional spacefor bike lanes. Baker road is an important corridor for recreational bike use and the lane reconfiguration would increase the safety of the road. Perhaps more importantly, it is aimportant corridor for bicycle commuters. Adding dedicated bike lanes would increase safety and perhaps encourage additional transportation modes for commuting. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 6:48:02 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I would like to see an on-road bike lane.Baker Rd in Minnetonka has a wide shoulder making it easy to use a bike. However, Baker Rd in Eden Prairie has no on-road option and the sidewalks are not a share option for manypeople riding bikes. I've had too many close calls with dangerous people driving cars along Baker Rd in Eden Prairie. This is a perfect for a 3-lane conversation. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, January 18, 2021 12:14:35 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I wholeheartedly support the move froma 4-lane road to a 3-lane (center turn lane). Left turns are incredibly dangerous on Baker – I make one every day and worry about getting rear-ended. I have had several close calls. Let'sdo it! From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Thursday, February 4, 2021 12:43:15 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I have lived off Baker Road near ForestHlls Elementary for 20 years. Never once during those two decades did I think to myself, "What Baker needs is FEWER lanes." The explanations I have read trying to justify thisdecision-making are patently absurd. 1) There isn't enough bike traffic for this to be relevant. Articles on the topic discuss establishment of "bike lanes" but for which bikers? Many peopledo not bike in the winter months and those that bike year round do NOT make up enough of a population to justify this change. Submitting to the demands of a few bikers (when articlesalso illustrate how many cars utilize this road) makes the opposite of sense. 2) Considering the amount of elderly residents, why would you put a lane where, regardless of direction, peopleare in the same lane driving towards each other? Do you want more accidents? 3) This idea has been proposed numerous times over the years. Cease. Those who actually live off BakerRoad do NOT want this change. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 8:01:08 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: 100% support the 3 lane conversion.Being a part of the Liberty/Agape organizations and having kids attend Forest Hills school a safer Baker road with 3 lanes is the right decision. It is challenging for drivers exiting bothlocations to navigate 4 lanes of fast approaching traffic. Also as a pedestrian, walking on either side of baker feels unsafe being so close to the roadway. 3 Lanes will provide more of abuffer between cars and pedestrians. Also please consider a 35 mph speed limit in the spirit of increased safety. Thank you From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 9:09:15 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Members of Liberty Church, AgapeChristi Academy, Forrest Hills School Principal and families support the 3 lane safer alternative for Baker Road. Thank you for asking for our input. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 4:30:45 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I have mixed feelings on the proposal toreduce Baker Road to a three lane road, with one being a turn lane. Baker Road has a lot of very aggressive, high speed drivers. While I would be worried less about being rear endedwhile turning left into my subdivision, there might be an increase in road rage incidents when the speeders get stuck behind the 35 mph folks. Most definately, though, the turn lane fromBaker north onto 62 east needs to be addressed, as there is a strong divide between the yield/no yield camps. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 3:38:16 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I'm hoping the repavement will takebicyclists in mind. This is heavily used route by cyclists and a dedicated lane would be much appreciated. Thanks From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 10:11:10 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Looking forward to 3 lanes very much.Will improve left turns on and off of Baker. Hope that those in the community who don't understand how much better this will be than the 4 lanes do not raise so much of a fuss thatyou go back on these plans. Already there are complaints on the neighborhood pages. People don't understand how to turn into the middle lane from cross streets and wait for an opening.Also might slow traffic down a bit, as many exceed the 40 speed limit today. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 6:52:02 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I received a mailing stating ImprovementComing Soon regarding Baker Road. How is changing from 4 busy lanes to 2 with a 3rd lane as a turn lane only....an improvement. Who comes up with these ideas to fix something thatdoesn’t need fixing?????? If you are bored and need to spend money, spend it in an area that actually needs fixing. I realize the pandemic has lessened traffic, but before that, it was a waittime to enter or exit Baker Road...traffic was so continuous. So when traffic returns, it will be a nightmare for those of us living off Baker to contend with 2 lanes. I vote a big NO to thisproposed so called improvement!!!! From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 7:09:40 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am all for it! I live on Baker road offcardinal creek road and see this as a huge improvement for safety and efficiency. Thank you!! From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 7:28:08 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Fully support the plan and hope there aresignificant improvements made to make the area feel safer while walking. Traffic is way too fast near Forest Hills From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, January 27, 2021 9:07:18 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Having children who are in the school onBaker Rd, I fully support the transition of Baker Rd being moved to 3 lanes. I live on a curve and it is incredibly dangerous at times to make a left hand turn against speeding traffic.Because of the 4 lanes and the long stretch between stop lights, vehicles feel the entitlement to speed. We also are avid walkers and as a pedestrian, walking along Baker Rd with cars flyingby within reach is frightening. The road absolutely needs a shoulder to allow space between walkers/bikers, and speeding vehicles. Thank you for looking into this for our residents. WhileI'm hearing some feedback from long-time residents who are against this improvement, I believe they may just struggle with "change"...I see no valid reason to not improve the currentunsafe conditions. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 7:56:32 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I frequently ride my bike on Baker Rd,and see others doing the same. I think it would be excellent to have a bike lane to cut down on all those close encounters with cars! Not to mention West Jr High is on Baker and I've seenkids biking it. I made my kids take the long way on the bike trail circling around behind the school but the extra time really made them more averse to riding their bikes to school. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, January 20, 2021 3:32:16 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: The proposed changes are a perfectexample of a solution in search of a problem. There is no need for the proposed change. Certainly no improvement to safety will result and likely a reduction. 32 years traveling thisroadway without witnessing a single traffic incident. There are so many people with needs. Too bad government agencies can't share their money buckets. This money could feed a lot ofpeople. These are the kinds of projects that encourage "drain the swamp" crazies and provide them with examples of government over reach and frivolous spending. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 4:08:38 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please include space for bike lanes. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 3:57:48 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Once again a solution looking for aproblem.. a few years ago there was a proposal to reduce the number of lanes for bike lanes. Was OPPOSED to it then as I am now. It is hard enough to get out of our Cardinal Creekneighborhood during certain times of the day..can’t image waiting for how long it will take with only one lane available to pull into. Please have public hearings because we wouldvocally said NO. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 2:30:29 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Keep the bike lane! I use this weekly inthe riding season April-November for rides with my friends. It’s so nice to have the wide shoulders as a two lane so plenty of room for everyone to be safe From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, February 5, 2021 9:45:55 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: We live on Promontory Drive in EP andutilize the Baker Road cooridor daily, not only in an automobile, but also as pedestrians walking our dog or biking the sidewalks along Baker. We are fully in support of this projectand understand the positive impacts. Speed seems to always be an issue, and with a single stream of vehicles each way, this might help, as well as give some additional space betweenthe lanes and the sidewalks. Also, as a father of new drivers teaching driving, the intersections with 4-lane Baker Road curves and the side streets is always a concern. With speeddifferences, it is sometimes very difficult to judge left turns onto Baker. Please let this project happen! Thank you From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, January 20, 2021 2:38:33 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am a resident on Candice Lane. I amstrongly opposed to this project. This section of Baker Road is not a problem and I am unaware that it is a high-accident road. I believe Baker Road should stay as is, and the moneyfor this project be shifted to another road within the County that is in much-more needed repair. Sincerely, From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 11:06:17 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Needs update. Not sure 3 lane would bepopular if slowed commute From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 11:11:36 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: My husband and I would like to shareour thoughts with you about the plans for Baker Road. We live on Cardinal Creek Road which is connected to Baker. In fact the only way to get out of our development is to use BakerRoad. We are NOT in favor of making this 3 lanes. It would greatly impact our ease of travel and impose undo economic costs on the residence of Eden Prairie. We like the 4 lanes, and infact it was a major factor of us choosing our home. We do not want to be held up every morning and evening trying to get to and from our residents for work or for leisure. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 11:01:03 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am not happy about the purposed planat all. We have lived in our home a block off of Baker road for more than 30 years and have never had a problem. I think it is a waste of our tax payers money. With all the traffic due toall the apartment that have gone up in the area in the last few years we need to keep two lanes for travel not reduce it to one lane. Turn lanes are not necessary. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 8:53:45 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please keep Baker Road with 4 lanes fortraffic. Being able to pass very slow moving vehicles without any issues is nice and traffic moves well with 2 lanes in both directions. There is sidewalk on both sides of Baker Road,maybe remove one of the sidewalks if widening the road for a dedicated bike lane is wanted but no space to widen. I would think one sidewalk is fine for walkers and have the otherdesigned better for biking. There is also the LRT trail not far away that is much nicer for biking and walking than Baker Road is. Fixing the turn lane from Baker Road to 62 next toLifetime would be a great idea as it backs up in the mornings. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Thursday, January 21, 2021 10:24:40 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: This proposal was initially made someyears ago (10??) and never came to pass. Since that time speeds on Baker between Valley View and 62 have increased considerably. Additionally youths in cars and motorcycles usethis stretch as a race track with the commensurate noise!!. The summer volume of motorcycles, particularly between Roberts Drive and 62 would also indicate that Wild HarleyDavidson visitors (or test ride customers) "maybe" told to make the big circle ride from their premises up to Roberts, up Baker and then 62 to 494 and back to Wildfire Harley. Don't knowfor sure this is the case but there sure is increasing motorcycle traffic and it is always Roberts to Baker and north!! The bottom line is that Baker is getting faster and noisier, and the threelane proposal is long overdue to try to slow this road down again and make it safer. Why not add electronic radar controlled speed indicators as many townships are now doing. Thesepassive devices rally work!! From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Thursday, January 21, 2021 4:33:21 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am not convinced that Baker Road is agood candidate for reduction from 4 lanes to 3 lanes. I have seen this strategy work well on narrow roads (like Portland Avenue, where I used to live) which were very tight and had verylittle room for bicycle traffic. However, Baker south of 62 is much wider, and has sidewalk on one side and a dedicated bike path on the other side of the road. With the large lineup of trafficwaiting to turn into the school in the morning and afternoon, through traffic will be stopped waiting for right-turners going south. There is also a slowdown during rush hour at EdenvaleBoulevard when heading south at rush hour, and the second lane heading south prevents this from impacting all traffic. I'm not familiar with the crash data for other roads that areconsidered for this type of conversion, but if only 33 of the 109 crashes are between Valley View Road and 62, then is this the correct area to be considering for restriping? From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 9:18:56 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am completely against changing thelanes on Baker Road, just like the last time this was brought up many years ago. There will be more rear end collisions when people are turning right. There will be more traffic witheveryone using a single lane. But most of all pulling out of our neighborhood to get onto Baker Road will be even more of a nightmare than it currently is. Please stop looking for waysto waste tax payers money. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 29, 2021 1:13:46 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I live adjacent to the construction project.Please note, the city of Minnetonka is planning on a project that will cut off all traffic on Jorissen between Rowland and Dominick Road. Please coordinate the work. Additionally,there is no need for a three land road here. This section of Baker intersects at Rowland and turns into a residential neighborhood, with speed limits of 35mph. Your 3 lanes would nodoubt increase speeds through the residential area during rush hour, which we strongly oppose. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 9:53:17 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I wholeheartedly disagree with the threelane restructuring idea of Baker Rd. As a resident of Sand Ridge Rd, the traffic this would create would be a major disruption. I also disagree that 'Baker Rd has many accidents'. Theonly accidents I've seen are at the Baker Rd/62 intersection and the occasional slip on black ice over the bridge near Forest Hills. Reducing this huge stretch of Baker Rd would, in myopinion as I drive along it 6+ times every day, would actually increase the number of accidents, cause unnecessary extra traffic build up and increase the number of non residentsthat already use Sand Ridge Rd/Cardinal Creek Rd as a short cut around the Forest Hills school traffic. Speeding and inattentive drivers are already safety issues here - and themajority of offenders do not live in the Cardinal Creek neighborhood. I'm sure this is happening in other neighborhoods as well and this lane restructuring would only make thesituation worse. Thank you for considering. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 11:24:47 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am opposed to this proposed change. Idrive the route often, and have never seen a "multiple threat crash" on this road. I have, however, seen drivers have trouble turning left onto Baker Road and think reducing thenumber of lanes will only increase the problem. If this is to add a bike lane, why not add one along the Minnesota River Bluff LRT Regional Trail down to Valley View Road? I know Iwould rather bike along an LRT route than along Baker Road. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 5:23:29 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Baker Road is one of the best roads inMinnetonka. I only have two comments for your team: 1) Continue to allocate safe space for bike lanes -- Baker Road hooks up to the bike trail, and to Rowland Road; 2) Is there enoughroom for an exit to Hwy 7 heading west? Thank you. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 22, 2021 4:21:43 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: We would appreciate better commuterbicycles infrastructure if it can be worked in. I frequently avoid visiting this area and head up through Hopkins instead because the traffic is so aggressive on Baker. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, January 18, 2021 3:42:05 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I support the new 3 Lane design. Themulti-use design will be safer for cars, walkers and bicyclers. For a residential street, with an elementary school on it, the larger buffer between the sidewalks/trail and traffic is a great idea,too. Currently many neighbors, both adults and children walk to and from the play grounds and sports fields, are only a couple feet away from cars going nearly 50 miles per hours. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, February 1, 2021 3:55:37 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I think it would be a great idea andwould provide good separation for pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles. I have seen many near misses for bicyclists when I pull out from Fairway Drive. Plus, I walk quite often along hereand I don't always feel safe crossing the road when I am walking. I am hoping this will see an increase in raingardens, trees and native landscaping too! From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 11:57:59 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: We need it to be a four lane due to trafficand flow of traffic. It’s often a secondary highway when rush hour is backing up highways. Also the reduction in lames makes it more dangerous to turn and will bottleneck resulting inmore accidents. If there’s a concern for speeding then reduce the speed and the light timing with arrows and yields. Or put speed traps there. Maintenance of the roads is important, butunnecessary changes and more construction is not needed. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Thursday, January 21, 2021 2:36:11 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I very strongly support conducting a 4-3conversion on this section of Baker Rd! I also hope that a southbound on-road bike lane can be included for the extent of the project along the west side of Baker because having additionalnorth-south connectivity to both the existing Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Trail and the proposed Eagle to Bryan Lake regional trail (that will extend to the intersection of Baker Rdand Rowland Rd). A southbound bike lane would provide this connectivity as well as further improve safety for bicyclists by removing bi-directional bike travel on the existing off-roadpath along the east side of Baker. I also hope a northbound bike lane can be added north of 62 to the northern extent of the project since no such lane exists there at this time. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 9:38:59 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please dont do it. This will ruin the flowif this road. Its a great NS alternative to freeway. 3 lane solves crash but creates much larger issues. The turn lane added at 62 to go east doesnt work. Bus stops just north of edenvale. Its15 minute stop to load kids. Delay to high. Try leaving holly road when school buses are there. This option makes these things worse From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 29, 2021 10:09:17 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: It is NOT an improvement. do not punishall drivers for a few bad drivers. the three lanes make Baker NOT adequate . I understand the logic behind three lane but it doesn't fit the way the road is actually used. 1 place I can think ofis trying to exit lifetime fitness parking lot going South`` with proposed 3 lanes you will never get out. road is very nice the way it is. plenty of biking walking and pedestrian optionscurrently on road and more than enough nearby. If pedestrians are the problem put a bridge over for them to cross rather than slowing flow of traffic. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, January 25, 2021 2:29:23 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I'd like to speak against the proposedchange to restripe Baker Road from its current 4 lanes to 1 lane each direction with a left turn lane. Baker Rd between Valley View and Hwy 62 is primarily a residential area, and used byresidents, repair businesses and emergency vehicles, with basically no businesses until you get down to Hwy 62 where Lifetime Fitness is located. This is the area that really needs attention,since this is where I've seen the accidents. Vehicles coming off of 62 onto Baker and then come to a stop, trying to left turn across lanes to get to Lifetime, resulting in rear-end crashes.The only other place I've seen an accident along this stretch of Baker Rd is at Roberts and that's due to slippery conditions caused by ice, which won't change with a reduction down to 1lane, but will more likely now involve additional vehicles. The proposed changes would a major disruption for us residents, backing up traffic, putting us walkers, bicyclists and pets indanger. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 4:08:48 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: l thoroughly support the 3 lane concept,as a vehicle driver and a cyclist that utilizes this roadway. As a cyclist, it is a tight corridor and I am often nervous when I hear cars coming up behind me, even though I am as far right aspossible. I am an experienced cyclist - I can only imagine how those that are not that experienced, or the youth, feel riding thru this area. And as a vehicle driver, I understand thefrustration with coming up on a cyclist and either having to slow down (and if an inattentive driver is behind me, risk a collision) or try to pinch past the cyclist, either getting close to thevehicle in the left lane or getting pretty close to the cyclist. Having experienced a concussion (and spending time in the hospital, off work, and on physical therapy) from getting hit by apassing vehicle (in Mpls), I know full well how bad of an experience this is for the cyclist, and vehicle driver. Thank you for your consideration, and please contact me with any questions. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 9:11:19 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I prefer the lanes stay the same. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 11:41:58 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Also the accidents on Baker Rd between62 and Valley View Rd are usually bc of ice, poor lighting, or the Baker Rd on ramp to 62 by Lifetime. if you are driving from Baker Rd to get on 62 Eastbound)—drivers need Hennepincounty go install a huge sign that says, “YOU MAY PROCEED. YOU HAVE YOUR OWN MERGE LANE. KINDLY USE IT. Thank you.” Who do we talk to about this? They triedwith a small sign but it doesn’t work. Just adding those thoughts. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 6:35:19 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please include dedicated space forcyclists who use this roadway for commuting and recreation. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 11:38:10 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: As someone who uses Baker Roadeveryday constantly and is a resident in this neighborhood, a lane reduction plan is a terrible, terrible idea. It will cause more problems and there are enough problems on Baker Rd. Pleasesomehow get on Nextdoor and listen to the people who love this area and live in this residential area. This is different than how Baker Rd works in other areas. As a taxpayer, I amagainst this lane reduction in my area that is being paid funded by our tax money. Please don’t do this. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 11:11:26 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I oppose any lane reduction in the EdenPrairie corridor of Baker Road. I don't see this a 3 lane road as an improvement, but detriment the environment and quality of life. This is a major throughway, the alternative being 494. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 9:17:28 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: More room for cyclists and pedestrians isappreciated. I'm fine with slower speed limits as well. Thanks for asking From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 8:53:31 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I would highly recommend an additionof a bike lane on both sides of baker road for safer passage of cyclists. It is frequently traveled by cyclists and can prove its need by using the widely used heat maps from strava.com Thanksfor your consideration From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 12:04:55 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Many cyclists use this road. Pleaseinclude a wide bike plan going both directions. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 3:20:59 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am strongly against converting BakerRoad to a 3-lane design. A similar proposal was presented previously and was rejected. I live right off this road and use the stretch of Baker Road between Martin Drive and Hwy 62 on adaily basis. I do not see many accidents on this stretch. A change to three lanes will make use of this stretch much more difficult for residents, and appears to be a project attempting to fixsomething that is not broken. On this area of Baker Road, the only area that needs attention is the Baker Rd/Hwy62 intersection by Lifetime Fitness, since cars coming from Baker andentering Hwy62 simply stop there while there is no Stop sign. That is where cars are rear ended. In my view, the proposed change would bring major disruption for residents betweenValley View and Hwy62. This is a main road for emergency vehicles; it will slow response time and cause traffic for residents since traffic will only flow in a single lane. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 3:58:40 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Hello, could you please consider makingbaker a more bike friendly road? This could be completed by adding a 3-4K’ shoulder, or a bike lane. More people are biking due to the pandemic and the access to bike infrastructure isgood for the environment and local businesses. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 6:25:04 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I LOVE the idea! This section of BakerRoad would benefit from fog lines/bike lanes and a center turn lane that would enable safe turns while keeping traffic moving. A center left turn lane is a safer option than a 4 lane roadas it eliminates sudden lane changes from drivers going around left turners. As well this plan provides for space for much safer bike traffic in this high use biking corridor. I sincerely hopethis plan goes through as it addresses enhanced safety for multi-modal transport. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 4:54:26 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I think the planned improvement wouldcause greater backup on Baker Rd, especially by the school. Twice a day, a line of busses would block that lane, making it difficult for residents along Baker Rd to go in and out of theirdevelopments. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 11:52:54 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: As a driver and a cyclist, I support theupdated 3-lane design on Baker Road between Martin Drive and I-494. Having the 3-lane configuration with striped fog lines to delimit a bicycle lane would be much safer than thecurrent design. This is particularly true in the segment north of CR62, where the current narrow lanes, high posted speed, and lack of fog line/bike lane combine to make this anexceptionally dangerous area for cyclists. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, February 1, 2021 5:20:26 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: There are so many benefits to a 4 to 3conversion on Baker Road! I strongly support the change! Here's why: 1. Bikeable shoulders, and please mark bike lanes, with painted separating buffer strips. There's room! 2. Pedestriansseparated from traffic. Currently the MUP trail on the east side is directly on the curb, so traffic is right up against where pedestrians are. 3. It's far safer for crossing, with only one lanein each direction cars aren't whipping around the ones that stop for ped and bike crossing activity 4. It's calmer. Cars following in a line are going to be more predictable, going at thesame speed, and not leapfrogging back and forth between lanes whenever there is a turning car. 5. Turning cars have their own left turn area. No problem! No blockages! I think theopponents don't understand 4 to 3 conversions. They think there will be a big loss of traffic capacity. Can you gather feedback from other neighborhoods that experienced this to showhow it went? From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 2:55:35 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: We live very close to Baker Road andmy daughter's daycare is at the intersection of Baker Road and Valley View Rd, so we're on this road a lot. I am also an avid cyclist in the neighborhood, including north/south on BakerRoad. I can attest to drivers driving very fast, sometimes putting bikers in a dangerous position. I think a three-lane road design would help slow the speed of drivers and provideenough room for a dedicated bike lane heading in each direction. Eden Prairie has an opportunity to put more focus on becoming a bike-friendly city and this is an "easy" way todemonstrate that commitment to the public. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 8:41:03 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Don't think it is necessary to make anychanges as suggested in the improvements listing. My wife and I are perfectly satisfied with the way the road is. The funds needed to do the improvements can better be used for otherimprovements. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Thursday, January 21, 2021 10:13:01 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: We are strong support for the proposedthree-lane design of Baker Road. As residents of Forest Hills and use the road for many activities including walking and biking. In the past we have spoken to the city regarding trafficand speed issues. We have spoken with and emailed the EP City Council stating our support and the reasons why. *There appears to be a light traffic flow most of the time that does notjustify four lanes. *While biking or walking to local businesses or trails the existing sidewalks and crossings do not provide ample safety due to lack of space. *Our children cannot crossBaker in a safe manner to access the adjacent neighbors to the east unless the tunnel is used. *Police periodically do speed traps, but drivers continue to speed at 50-55mph frequently*There are frequent crashes all along the stretch and this change would reduce those accidents, which we are certain. Thank you for your efforts in making these changes. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, January 18, 2021 11:44:05 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I believe Bake Road should remain 4lanes. Its worked great so far this way!! Makes no sense to change it to 3 lanes. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 11:08:57 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Baker road is a BUSY road! To take itdown to two lanes is ridiculous! Way too much traffic for just two lanes! From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 10:06:08 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please keep cyclists in mind and makethe road bike friendly. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 9:54:51 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: The following statement is taken fromyour explanation of why the change is good. I would say if it stays the same why is it necessary to change anything. Possibly dropping the speed limit and use local lawenforcement to do just that enforce the speed limit would also drop the accident rate and delays. I'm a little confused on how you are going to do this on the north side of 62 where it isonly a 2 lane road at times with little to no shoulder. You really need to be having a dialogue with people on this. Studies have found that traffic delays have often decreased or stayed thesame after a three lane conversion. At major intersections or highway interchanges, the three lane roads are usually supplemented with additional through or turn lanes for traffic capacityreasons. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, January 25, 2021 1:56:42 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: My family just purchased a home in theForest Hills Neighborhood (we are living at ) and I remember how nice the four lane Baker Road was to drive down when we first looked at the Forest Hillsneighborhood that we ultimately bought in. It will become very unsafe if Baker road is changed per your new proposed plan. It will be dangerous for left turns into neighborhoods fortax paying residents who use Baker Road everyday based upon incredible traffic flows during rush hour drive times. ( It is known as an alternate North South route to I494). There are a fewnumber of bicyclists who might benefit for part of the year with your proposal BUT the much larger vehicle group who count on Baker Road 100% of the year will be greatly harmed andinconvenienced if Baker Road is changed per your plan. I question the number of bicyclists who are even tax payers in Eden Prairie or are they merely passing through on their Saturdayand Sunday morning serious bike rides. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:34:10 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: We support reducing the lanes to add aturn lane. We live in a neighborhood hood off of Baker and making a left turn into the neighborhood feels very unsafe with the speed that cars approaching from behind aretraveling. We also have young children crossing the street to attend Forest Hills and having them on the sidewalks with the speed and curves in the road is unnerving. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 23, 2021 12:45:01 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I’m against changing a four lane BakerRoad into a one lane each way and a center turn lane road. The section in Baker Road between Martin Drive and Hwy 62 works just fine the way it is. Changing it into a three lane road willbe a mistake, not an improvement. Please leave it the way it is. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 12:34:05 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please convert to three lanes! Prior to thepandemic, I liked going out to this Lifetime, and this would make accessing it from the south by bike much safer. Thanks From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 7:02:11 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please do NOT reduce the lanes onBaker!!!! From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, January 25, 2021 2:06:54 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please don't fix what isn't broken. Themajor flaw on this new proposal is the project assumes Baker Rd. is the same from Martin Dr. to the bridge under I494. However, between Valley View Rd and Hwy62, Baker Rd is aresidential area with no businesses until Lifetime. The only accidents that happen in this section have been either caused by black ice in the area of Roberts Dr and by Forest HillsSchool and that won’t change by restriping/restructuring Baker Rd. The area that needs attention is the connection between Baker Rd with Hwy62 by Lifetime Fitness. That is thearea that needs to be redone since cars coming from Baker and entering Hwy62 simply stop there while there is no stop sign. That is where cars are rear ended. In my view, the proposedchange would bring major disruption for residents between Valley View and Hwy62. This is a main road for emergency vehicles, it will slow response time and it will cause traffic forresidents since traffic will only flow in a single lane. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 7:00:06 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I bicycle this road frequently. A threelane road with wider shoulders sounds good. I prefer this road for biking over Shady Oak. Shady Oak has a nice trail on the side, but it curves more instead of heading mostly south.Baker also does not have the unpleasant interchange with highway 212 where it runs north. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, February 5, 2021 9:35:04 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I think the change in lanes onMitchell/Baker is brilliant. It’s easy to see how it will reduce and prevent accidents. I support this change and look forward to it. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Monday, January 18, 2021 5:08:47 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please do NOT reduce the lanes. Ibelieve it will slow traffic, increase accidents, and cause problems for people turning onto Baker Road from side streets during busy times. Reducing lanes on this busy road will maketraffic worse, not better. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, February 2, 2021 6:11:34 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Please do not fix what isn’t broken!Baker Road is our way to get anywhere in the city and the only way to get home. It works great and I’ve only ever heard of one accident on this stretch in the nearly 20 years I’ve livedhere. Hardly ever major speeding even. Why would the city waste resources on this project? I am strongly against it. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 12:13:46 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Baker Road has been fine in its currentconfiguration for decades. There has not been significant development along it for decades either. I would recommend spending our tax dollars on areas that truely need updating, likecounty Road 4. Resources are in short supply and I would recommend focusing efforts on projects that are more worthwhile. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 6:37:26 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Baker is already a great road forbicycling but the addition of wider shoulders in the 3 lane design can only make it better. Would love to see it happen: From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Saturday, January 16, 2021 5:10:54 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: This is the worst idea ever. It is going tomake driving here even worse. We have traffic and snow. Bikers do just fine currently. I cycle. I’m fine with it. Finish all your current projects to completion before you think of anythingelse to do. I swear the state/county/DOT has severe ADHD with how they never finish anything without starting a ton of new projects. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 8:37:53 PM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: As a resident by Baker Rd for 15 years, Iam my very concerned with this proposal. It assumes Baker Rd. is the same from Martin Drive to the bridge of I494. Between Valley View Rd and Hwy62, Baker Rd is a residential area.The only accidents that happen in that section are either caused by black ice in the area of Roberts Dr and by Forest Hills School and that won’t change by restriping the road. The areathe needs attention is the connection between Baker Rd with Hwy62 by Lifetime Fitness. That is the area that needs to be redone since cars coming from Baker and entering Hwy62 simplystop there while there is no Stop sign there. That is where cars are rear ended. The proposed change would bring major disruption for residents between Valley View and Hwy62. This is amain road for emergency vehicles, it will slow response time and it will cause traffic for residents. A similar project was proposed couple years ago and it was rejected. Please do nottry to fix what is not broken. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 8:56:34 AM Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I think anything that will promote morebiking/walking and make it safer is a step in the right direction. There are a growing number of people in our community who can’t/don’t drive cars and for them to have access to safeways to get around is important for all of us in the community. From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 9:01:45 PM Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I have lived on Baker Road for 30 yearsand 2 lanes plus a turn lane isn’t Workable . Traffic is bad enough with 4 lanes don’t push on us . From:noreply@hennepin.us To:Emily Kettell Subject:Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Sunday, January 17, 2021 3:45:01 PM Name: Email: Phone number: 9 Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: For 18 years, I have driven Baker Roadin both directions during all times in the daytime and evening hours. Never have I felt we needed a "center turn lane". As busy as it can be on Baker Road, four lanes are very necessary,especially when there is one slow driver. My neighbors and I are "extremely" against the "3- lane plan". It would only create traffic problems. No one is having an unsafe or difficultproblem making left turns that we have ever witnessed. Maybe we need to get signatures on a petition from all our neighbors who are against this unnecessary design that will slow downtraffic and cause unwanted congestion. From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: [External] Baker Rd restriping proposal Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 9:33:00 AM Thank you for your getting in touch to share your comments. We’re currently evaluating the appropriate next steps and will have more information in the next day or so. Please feel free to reach out if you have additional comments or questions. Best, Emily From: Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 6:50 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Baker Rd restriping proposal Emily, I just received a letter with the proposal to restripe Baker Rd which would directly affect me as a resident in the area. The letter talks about a study regarding reduction of crashes. I was wondering if you could provide a history of how many accidents happened in that specific section of Baker Rd in the past few years. I would imagine very few but wanted to get a precise number. I am deeply concerned with the reduction of travel lanes since there is significant traffic on the road and some cars drive extremely slowly (under the speed limit) which would probably cause many cars on just one lane if a very slow one is in front. Also, do you have images showing how the road would look like since it is difficult to picture it. I appreciate your attention. Thank you, ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To:" Subject:RE: [External] Baker Road Lane Reduction Proposal in Eden Prairie Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:19:00 AM Hello Thank you so much for taking the time to share your comments and concerns. I’d like to share the project website, which includes some additional information about the background for this proposal: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road I’d like to reiterate that the driving force behind this proposal is to improve safety for all users of the roadway. We reviewed the crash data along the corridor to help inform the proposed four-to-three lane conversion. Hennepin County has implemented a number of these types of roadways, and our studies have shown that traffic delays have often decreased or stayed the same as a result of the three-lane conversion. While bikes are permitted to use the flexible shoulder space that would be included as part of this restriping, it would not be a dedicated bicycle space. Other uses for the shoulder space may include accommodating turns, delivery and postal vehicles, and creating a buffer between moving traffic for people walking on the sidewalk. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Please also note that we will no longer be attending the Eden Prairie Council meeting tonight as originally scheduled. Best, Emily From: Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 10:11 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Baker Road Lane Reduction Proposal in Eden Prairie Importance: High Dear Ms. Kettell, My family is opposed to the proposed Baker Road lane reduction in Eden Prairie and have lived here for 30 years. The reasons that we are not advocates of it are as follows: 1. There is already a paved path on one side of the road and a sidewalk on the other side so an additional bike lane makes no sense. 2. Traffic can be very heave during rush hours and losing an additional lane would only exacerbate this problem. 3. I have driven on Baker Road almost every day and run on the paved path 3-4 hours a week and rarely see bikes on the road vs. on the paved path since it accommodates bikes and is plowed during the winter. 4. The only accidents that I have seen or heard of on Baker Road have been due to drivers trying to turn left or right or pass cars trying to turn too quickly during heavy traffic and this would only be exacerbated with the lane reduction. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take into account our concerns regarding this proposal. Kind regards, This email contains confidential information so please treat it as confidential. If you received this email in error please permanently delete this message. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: [External] Baker Road proposed project Date:Wednesday, January 20, 2021 8:16:00 AM Hi Thank you for taking the time to reach out and share your comments and concerns about Baker Road. I'd like to reiterate that with every pavement maintenance project, we have the opportunity to evaluate safety and comfort for all roadway users. This proposal is being driven by the an opportunity to improve safety after a careful review of crash data along the corridor. Please note that all of the data used in this analysis only includes pre-COVID numbers. Here is a link to our project website in case you'd like to learn more: https://www hennepin.us/baker-road Please feel free to reach out with any comments or questions. Best, Emily -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 7:06 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Baker Road proposed project Dear Emily, I’m writing with total frustration over this proposed project to make Baker Road a 3 lane, which with one lane designated as turn only, brings it down to 2 lanes versus the the current 4 lanes. Why the need to fix something that doesn’t need fixing; spend that money where it is actually needed. Once covid is more controlled with vaccinations, traffic will return and Baker will be busy again. Before covid, you’d be hard pressed to find someone living off Baker that hasn’t had to wait to either exit onto or off Baker....and that was with 4 lanes. I can only cringe at what a nightmare this so called “improvement “ will create, not to mention more accidents. Bad idea, which I am extremely opposed to. Thank you for your time, Sent from my iPad ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: [External] Baker Road Date:Thursday, January 21, 2021 1:40:00 PM Hi Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. That is correct that we did not move forward with this proposal the last time that it was presented; however, when we complete pavement maintenance projects along a roadway, we see it as an opportunity to evaluate current data to understand if any changes are warranted. In this case, we reviewed crash data along the corridor ahead of our 2021 pavement maintenance project. This data revealed that many of the 109 crashes that occurred from 2016-2019 could be addressed through a three-lane conversion. In regards to the LifeTime driveway, one of the benefits of the three-lane configuration is that when a person driving turns out of a driveway or side street, there are fewer lanes required to cross. We are also proposing some striping modifications near the driveway because our crash data revealed that several crashes occurred there when a vehicle was traveling northbound on Baker Rd and another vehicle, traveling southbound, tried to turn left into the driveway. You can view these proposed changes on the draft layout, available on the project website here: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road. I’d also like to note that there are no changes proposed at signalized intersections and that all data was collected pre-COVID. I’d like to add that this project proposal is being driven by safety and that there will not be a dedicated bicycle facility. With the conversion from four-lanes to three-lanes, the additional space will be used as a flexible shoulder space. While this space may be used by bicycles, it may also be used for delivery and postal vehicles, and to provide a buffer between people walking on the sidewalk or trail and moving vehicles. To answer your question about public involvement, we sent an email and a mailer to residents and businesses along the corridor and anyone is welcome to get in touch via the website comment form or email. I hope this helps answer your questions. Thanks again for taking the time to share your feedback with me. Best, Emily From: Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 12:08 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Cc: Subject: [External] Baker Road Emily Kettell, About a dozen years ago, the Eden Prairie newspaper printed an article about the biking-enthusiast’s celebration of the addition of bike lanes to Baker Road, just prior to the final commitment! That article triggered me to be at the meeting regarding the lane changes. I questioned the committee about their utilization of their simulation- study of the project. As an engineer with many years of experience in mathematical simulation of products and systems, I have also studied and used software for event- driven simulations similar to what was utilized in the city/county studies of Baker Road. Although they never included me to review their study, I believe they realized that the information used in the study was insufficient. Simulation definitely has more bells and whistles than a dozen years ago; however, changing Baker Road is not the same as adding delay-lights on the suburban roads onto 494! The event-driven simulations for these lights may have helped the flow of people outside of the Twin Cities through the suburbs but these simulations need more than enhancements to talk about this unique situation on Baker Road. What has changed since a dozen years ago that leads to this conclusion to reduce the lanes on Baker-Road?! Is there anyone from our neighborhood part of this committee? People that need to turn left onto Baker Road have at least as much say as a biking enthusiast. Have you every left Lifetime (at the corner of Baker Road and 62) and wanted to turn left (from either of its two exits)? It is actually worse than turning left from Promontory Drive. Should we turn right and make a U-turn at the 62-light (or will that be forced to no U-turns) or should we add 10 minutes to our run to the gas-station (etc.) via Edenvale Boulevard? There are no back-roads to utilize to avoid Baker Road. I assume the bike lanes (proposed) are one-way (I cannot imagine they would be 2- way); wouldn’t that defeat the intent of the lanes or is this politically motivated for people going through Eden Prairie (to link to major bike-trails), not for Eden Prairie residents? It would really be dangerous if someone in our neighborhood, who is on a bike (even more-so than in a car), tried to take a left on Baker Road (during a busy time)! I’ve run on the sidewalk of Baker Road for 30 years and I have never had a hassle with someone riding a bike on the wide-sidewalk. It is really misleading for someone to justify the lane changes in the midst of the low- traffic due to the virus! I enjoy riding a bike but not at the risk to myself and others. Utilization of simulation and completing bike paths throughout the region without regard to the people involved would be a huge mistake. The bottom line is that if the lanes are reduced, there will be accidents, not predicted by biased simulations! Thank you for your time, ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Emily, My husband and I would like to share our thoughts with you about the plans forBaker Road. We live on Cardinal Creek Road which is connected to Baker. In fact the onlyway to get out of our development is to use Baker Road. We are NOT in favor of makingthis 3 lanes. It would greatly impact our ease of travel and impose undo economic costs onthe residence of Eden Prairie. We like the 4 lanes, and in fact it was a major factor of uschoosing our home. We do not want to be held up every morning and evening trying to getto and from our residents for work or for leisure. Thank you, Eden Prairie 55346 ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless yourecognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notifythe sender of the transmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message fromyour computer system. From:Caitlin Canfield To:Nick Kim; Colin Cox Cc:Emily Kettell Subject:RE: [External] Concerns about Baker Road three-lane design proposal Date:Thursday, January 21, 2021 4:22:18 PM Thanks Nick – Emily is leading Baker. Best,Caitlin Canfield Communications Specialist612-384-4231caitlin.canfield@hennepin.us From: Transportation <Transportation@hennepin.us> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 4:21 PM To: Caitlin Canfield <Caitlin.Canfield@hennepin.us>; Colin Cox <Colin.Cox@hennepin.us> Subject: FW: [External] Concerns about Baker Road three-lane design proposal Colin and Caitlin, FYI. Wasn’t sure who was supporting communications on this. Nick KimCommunications SpecialistPublic Works Transportation Office: 612-543-4255 | Mobile: 612-384-8448nick.kim@hennepin.us | hennepin.us From: Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 4:17 PM To: Transportation <Transportation@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Concerns about Baker Road three-lane design proposal I am writing regarding the proposal to restripe Baker Road in to a three-lane road. I have been living off Baker Road for over 15 years and I find hard to believe that Hennepin County is once again, considering removing one of the four lanes and turning Baker into a three-lane road. A few years ago, this same desire to eliminate a lane and add a bike lane was proposed but, thankfully, not implemented after several taxpayers, including me, expressed the desire not to do this to Baker Road. Any tax paying resident who lives off Baker Road in Cardinal Creek or Forest Hills knows how busy it can be during drive times and when I494 is backed-up - motorists will use Baker Road as a North-South option. Also, Baker Road has a heavy traffic of emergency vehicles and moving to three lanes will definitely slow response times. With four lanes now it can be challenging to take a left out of our neighborhood. Take a lane away, the problem is compounded and it will make the lives of people that live in this area very difficult. I believe there is no increased risk to accidents on Baker Road, particularly between Valley View and Hwy 62. I would be curious exactly where those crashes are occurring, because I think they would be concentrated in one or two particular areas. If you are concerned about accidents, which I believe the data skews and doesn’t take into account where the accidents occur, I would recommend the following: Reduce the speed limit to 35mph. Increase police patrols. I would say, this would be huge. I rarely see police cars running speed traps, and I will tell you, the speed some people drive down the road is quite fast. By increasing patrols, people will slow down and would help in reduction of accidents. Focus of improving the connection between Baker Road and Hwy 62 by Lifetime Fitness where drivers coming off Baker stop for no reason afraid of incoming traffic and don’t realize there is a lane that continues from Baker. By simply stopping there with no stop sign it increases the risk of accidents (rear end). The current notice does not state bicycle lane as the reason for going down to 3 lanes, however our guess is that bicycle activists have been lobbying for this change but not taking into account the disruption that it will bring to residents that use Baker Road. everyday. No, we are not avid hard-core bicyclists who bike in packs on Saturday and Sunday mornings 7-8 months a year. When we do ride a bike, we have wide paths on both sides of Baker that we take to eventually hit a side trail. The key point is the residents living off Baker Road who use this vital access road 365 days a year need a road that is flowing and offers safe and efficient entrance from the neighborhoods it supports. Thank you for noting our opinions and I hope that the Hennepin County consider this unappealing change to Baker Road being discussed. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To:" Subject:RE: [External] Fwd: Lane Reductions to Baker Road Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:01:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Hi Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns. Please feel free to reach out with any additional comments or questions. Please note that we will not be attending the Eden Prairie Council meeting as originally scheduled today. You may also view additional information here: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road Best, Emily From: Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 3:54 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Fwd: Lane Reductions to Baker Road I am strongly opposed to this change . I have lived on Mariann Drive since 1968. This change is a horrible idea. You tried this some years ago to make a bike lane. That was opposed and stopped. This must not be allowed. Thank you. Begin forwarded message: From: Date: January 17, 2021 at 3:45:47 PM CST To: Subject: Fwd: Lane Reductions to Baker Road What say you about this? I am opposed to this change. Am I missing something? Begin forwarded message: From: Nextdoor Topview and Gordon <reply@rs.email.nextdoor.com> Date: January 17, 2021 at 11:08:16 AM CST To: G Subject: Lane Reductions to Baker Road Reply-To: reply+GM2DGOBXGMZTMX3QOJXWI5LDORUW63S7KBHVGVC7GE3TGOJQG4YDEOA=@reply.nextdoor.com Cardinal Creek/Hills residents, if you haven’t heard yet, Hennepin County is proposing reducing the number of lanes on Baker... View on Nextdoor From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: [External] Lane reduction proposal Date:Monday, January 25, 2021 7:52:00 AM Hi Thank you for the follow-up message. This is helpful feedback as we are using this time to hear from residents about their concerns along the corridor. When we do go to the city council to share our proposal, we will be presenting a summary of the feedback that we've heard via email, phone calls, and the online comment forms. Thanks, Emily -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2021 3:53 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: Re: [External] Lane reduction proposal Hi Emily, Are you sure that it makes it more safe to lane reduce? There is data that supports otherwise. I am not trying to cause trouble I am telling you as someone who lives in the neighborhood this is NOT helpful or going to accomplish what you are hoping for. Roger reached out to you as well I believe? If you lane reduce, you make that single lane now the spot for rear ending as people are turning right (meaning some think a dedicate left turn lane solves an issue—it just creates an alternative issue in the right lane) and you slow single lane traffic to 5/10 mph causing back ups on 62 as lifetime brings a lot of traffic. The lived reality of of how this “improvement” isn’t experienced as an improvement by the people who live here is worth noting we are also paying tax money for something we are against, so taxation without proper representation. I know you are just doing your job so I have nothing against you. But if this is for the people, please listen to the people it affects. Can you convey to the appropriate people that we are speaking up because it matters to us and not because we are trying to be difficult? If speeding is an issue, then please issue more tickets or create a speed trap. That would be great! That solved the speed problem without making the entire community suffer with lane reduction because of law breakers. Punish them not us. Safety makes sense but is lane reduction really the only way? Those who live here care about the people who live here. Those who are passing through at crazy speeds should be caught and fined. Thanks for listening, Sent from my iPhone Please excuse typos. > On Jan 19, 2021, at 7:59 AM, Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> wrote: > > > > Thank you for taking the time to reach out and share your comments and concerns. > > I want to stress that the driving force behind this proposal is safety. We have just added a summary of the crash data to the project website, which you may view here: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road. The website also talks about some of the benefits of four-to-three lane conversions, and our experience across the county shows that vehicle delays are not expected to increase due to the four-to-three lane conversion. > > Through restriping changes, this proposal also would address the area near the Lifetime Fitness Center where people driving northbound merge onto County Road 62. >> Please also note that this proposal would not add a dedicated bicycle space. In fact, the remaining space wouldbecome a flexible shoulder that may be used for bikes, but also as a buffer for people walking along the sidewalk,and delivery vehicles.>> Please let me know if you have any additional questions. We will not be attending tonight's Eden Prairie Councilmeeting as originally scheduled and will post updates on our project website as we have them.>> Best,> Emily>> -----Original Message-----> From: > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 12:04 PM> To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us>> Subject: [External] Lane reduction proposal>>> Hi Emily,>> Today, I learned about the lane reduction proposal from Nextdoor. I hope you are the right person to bring myconcerns before the board that decides. Do any of them live in this neighborhood or have a good sense of the livedreality of these proposed changes? Also if I should contact someone else, can you forward this email to theappropriate person? Thank you.>> As an Eden Prairie resident and tax payer, I am against the lane reduction. For people like me who live in thisexact neighborhood and use Baker Road daily, I cannot imagine how much more difficult and how much moretraffic we will have if you do a lane reduction. Who does this lane reduction help? Why is this people pushed? Ifyou do a lane reduction, it will cause more accidents in our area. A lane reduction plan from 62 to valley view rd onBaker road is not what we need.> More lights, yes.> Less ice. Yes.> Lane reduction. No.>> Eden Prairie is only growing. Lane reduction seems counterintuitive. Our area will definitely become a biggeraccident zone and harder to make left turns in to neighborhoods if you do the lane reduction. If you are trying to putin biking lanes, making it one lane, you will not solve but exacerbate the issues, causing careless drivers to swerveinto biker lanes which is even worse. There are so many cars using Baker. We are in a pandemic so now is NOT thebest time to judge traffic flow. But even in pandemic, there are a lot of cars. The two main accident spots on BakerRd seem to be by the forest hills bridge (where I live) and by the Valley View stop light. Both are due to icy spotsNOT lanes. So reducing lanes and sudden braking for left turns into neighborhoods makes this even worse.>> Also, another accident spot where people get rear-ended is when drivers drive from Baker Rd and are in the farright lane merging onto 62 Eastbound)—Our drivers need Hennepin county to install a huge sign that says, “YOUMAY PROCEED. YOU HAVE YOUR OWN MERGE LANE. KINDLY USE IT. Thank you.” Those who live heknow. Those who don’t, slam on breaks bc they aren’t clear if they can go or not. The small sign doesn’t work. Carsreally get backed up there bc unaware drivers just sit and wait for 62 traffic because they don’t know they can usetheir own merge lane. This sign will save accidents and lives. I drive this route 10 times a day bc I am driving mykids or going to work so I know it well.>>> Thank you for listening,>> > Eden Prairie, MN 55346 > >>>> Sent from my iPhone> Please excuse typos.> ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and knowthe content, do not click links or open attachments.***>>> Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of thetransmission error and then promptly permanently delete this message from your computer system. From:Emily Kettell To:" Subject:RE: [External] Lane reduction proposal Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 7:59:00 AM Thank you for taking the time to reach out and share your comments and concerns. I want to stress that the driving force behind this proposal is safety. We have just added a summary of the crash data to the project website, which you may view here: https://www hennepin.us/baker-road. The website also talks about some of the benefits of four-to-three lane conversions, and our experience across the county shows that vehicle delays are not expected to increase due to the four-to-three lane conversion. Through restriping changes, this proposal also would address the area near the Lifetime Fitness Center where people driving northbound merge onto County Road 62. Please also note that this proposal would not add a dedicated bicycle space. In fact, the remaining space would become a flexible shoulder that may be used for bikes, but also as a buffer for people walking along the sidewalk, and delivery vehicles. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. We will not be attending tonight's Eden Prairie Council meeting as originally scheduled and will post updates on our project website as we have them. Best, Emily -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 12:04 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Lane reduction proposal Hi Emily, Today, I learned about the lane reduction proposal from Nextdoor. I hope you are the right person to bring my concerns before the board that decides. Do any of them live in this neighborhood or have a good sense of the lived reality of these proposed changes? Also if I should contact someone else, can you forward this email to the appropriate person? Thank you. As an Eden Prairie resident and tax payer, I am against the lane reduction. For people like me who live in this exact neighborhood and use Baker Road daily, I cannot imagine how much more difficult and how much more traffic we will have if you do a lane reduction. Who does this lane reduction help? Why is this people pushed? If you do a lane reduction, it will cause more accidents in our area. A lane reduction plan from 62 to valley view rd on Baker road is not what we need. More lights, yes. Less ice. Yes. Lane reduction. No. Eden Prairie is only growing. Lane reduction seems counterintuitive. Our area will definitely become a bigger accident zone and harder to make left turns in to neighborhoods if you do the lane reduction. If you are trying to put in biking lanes, making it one lane, you will not solve but exacerbate the issues, causing careless drivers to swerve into biker lanes which is even worse. There are so many cars using Baker. We are in a pandemic so now is NOT the best time to judge traffic flow. But even in pandemic, there are a lot of cars. The two main accident spots on Baker Rd seem to be by the forest hills bridge (where I live) and by the Valley View stop light. Both are due to icy spots NOT lanes. So reducing lanes and sudden braking for left turns into neighborhoods makes this even worse. Also, another accident spot where people get rear-ended is when drivers drive from Baker Rd and are in the far rightlane merging onto 62 Eastbound)—Our drivers need Hennepin county to install a huge sign that says, “YOU MAYPROCEED. YOU HAVE YOUR OWN MERGE LANE. KINDLY USE IT. Thank you.” Those who live he know.Those who don’t, slam on breaks bc they aren’t clear if they can go or not. The small sign doesn’t work. Cars reallyget backed up there bc unaware drivers just sit and wait for 62 traffic because they don’t know they can use theirown merge lane. This sign will save accidents and lives. I drive this route 10 times a day bc I am driving my kids orgoing to work so I know it well. Thank you for listening, Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Sent from my iPhonePlease excuse typos.***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and knowthe content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To:" Subject:RE: [External] Mitchell/Baker Restriping Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 7:52:00 AM Hi Thanks for taking the time to share your feedback. Please feel free to reach if you have any other questions, or visit the project website for additional information: https://www hennepin.us/baker-road I also wanted to note that we are no longer planning to attend tonight's council meeting. We'll post more information on the website as it is available. Best, Emily -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2021 5:56 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Mitchell/Baker Restriping Emily, This plan is a great idea! I live about halfway between 62 and valley view on baker two blocks south of the forest hills elementary school on the corner of Theresa place and baker. The traffic speeds at 50 and 60 miles per hour way too often and is treated as a mini highway because of the 4 lanes. I am hopeful that there aren’t many complaints as the residents who live on baker will no doubt embrace this change! On the north side of 62, it would be great to have sidewalks on Baker. Thank you! Sent from my iPhone ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From: Subject:RE: [External] Opposition to Changes of Mitchell Rd. and Baker Rd. in Eden Prairie Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:10:00 AM Thank you for taking the time to reach out to share your comments. We’re currently evaluating the appropriate next steps and will have more information to share in the coming day or so. In the meantime, please feel free to reach out with any additional questions, comments, or concerns. Best, Emily From: Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 4:11 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Opposition to Changes of Mitchell Rd. and Baker Rd. in Eden Prairie Emily, I’m writing you to strongly voice my opposition to the proposed changes to Mitchell and Baker Roads in Eden Prairie. I have a number of questions about this proposed change. First, you state a safety reduction from four lanes to three. I’ve lived at my current address for thirty years and I have never, I repeat, never seen any accidents on Baker Rd. In fact, I would suggest reducing the number of lanes is actually going to cause more accidents. It is already very difficult to make a left turn onto Baker Rd. and what this is going to make it even harder to make left turns and cause motorists to “dart out” into a lane, potentially resulting in more accidents. Second, you stated traffic volume and operation studies were made on the subject roads. When were these studies performed? What days? What time of day? What dates? Third, who proposed making this road change? Finally, does the proposed change include addition of a bicycle lane(s)? Thank you for answering my questions. You can be assured I will be attending the city council meeting on January 19th. Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Sent from my iPhone ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To:" Subject:RE: [External] Please please please make Baker 3 lanes Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:02:00 AM Thanks so much for getting in touch to share your comments. We’re currently evaluating the appropriate next steps and will have more information in the coming days. Feel free to reach out with any other comments, questions, or concerns. Best, Emily From: Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 1:22 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Please please please make Baker 3 lanes Hello Ms. Kettell, My name is and I live in the Saint John's Woods townhomes along Baker Road in Eden Prairie. We received notice that Hennepin County is planning to restripe the road from 4 lanes to 3. I cannot support this enough. I wrote the city and county two years ago asking them to consider modifying the road - it's essentially a small highway parallelling 494 right now. It's uncomfortable to walk next to the road and I see cyclists regularly using the road lanes instead of the sidewalks as they are narrow and very uneven. I would hope your team could add a few features to the roadway: First, please go from 4 lanes to 3. According to the city council this was proposed a number of years ago and received bad feedback from the community. I would argue there are likely thousands of people who drive the road every day but hundreds of us who live along it, and we shouldn't let a very minor 1 minute delay take away from traffic and pedestrian safety. Second, can we please add stop signs along the road? Particularly at St. Johns Woods Trail and Edenvale and Cardinal Creek road, Baker bends away form the intersection and reduces the distance down the road a driver can see to enter the roadway. It's almost impossible to cross Baker as a pedestrian right now without running and stop signs would force cars to properly yield to pedestrians. Third, please consider bike lanes in the extra space freed up by the lane reduction. There's a very popular bike trail at 494 that would be wonderful to connect to the other parts of the city. Last, if it's in the budget, it would be nice to do some traffic calming along the route. Reducing lanes will help, but adding other calming measures will reduce speeds without trying to force an artificially-low speed limit on a very straight corridor. Thanks, ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** How does the proposed striping plan take into account school buses? Buses approaching Forest Hills Elementary from the south (ie, on NB Baker) must turn left across the SB lanes. Although they will have a dedicated left turn lane, it seems that reducing the SB lanes to one will make it more difficult for buses to find a large enough gap to turn left. Buses leaving Forest Hills Elementary and turning left from Holly onto NB Baker can today turn into the left lane of NB Baker while oncoming NB traffic takes the right lane. If the NB lanes are reduced to one, it seems that it would be more difficult for a bus to find the appropriate gap to turn left. On the northern end of Baker, children living in the St Johns Woods development are all picked up at a bus stop on SB Baker at Baker and St Johns Woods. This is a very large group of children and takes more than five minutes for them all to load and the bus to move on. If that northernmost section of SB Baker (from 62 to St Johns Woods) is made single lane it reduces the number of cars that can be on that section of road waiting for the bus to finish pickup, pushing the bottleneck back into the intersection of Baker and 62. How is that taken into account? How does the proposed change take into account the left turn lane from 62 west to Baker south? During rush hour in the afternoon, the entire turn lane (which is excellently long, and we appreciate the long left-arrow cycle!) can back up from 62/Baker back under 494. If the number of lanes on SB Baker are reduced, how does this affect the emptying time of that turn lane? And how does that interact with eastbound traffic on 62 that turns right onto southbound Baker? Again, I appreciate the advance notice of this project while there is still time for public comment to be incorporated into the planning. Is there a diagram or map that might help address some of the questions that I have asked? Regards, ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: [External] Re. Proposed Lane Reductions to Baker Road Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 7:50:00 AM Thank you for taking the time to send your feedback. I have noted your concerns, and would just add that this proposal is being driven by a need to improve safety. The project website includes some crash data and other background information in case you’d like to take a look: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road I also wanted to note that we are no longer planning to attend tonight’s council meeting. We’ll be sure to post additional information on the project website. Please let me know if you have any additional comments or concerns. Best, Emily From: Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 6:17 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Re. Proposed Lane Reductions to Baker Road Dear Emily, Please note my strongest objection to the proposal of reducing number of lanes to Baker Road. Contrary to the city's communication, I predict it will cause more accidents with people becoming impatient and darting into traffic to make their turn. Although I am unable to be present in person on Tuesday, January 19th at the EP City Council Meeting at 7:00 PM to voice my concern, please count my vote as a confirm NO to this proposal. Thank you for your kind consideration. EP resident, Topview and Gordon ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: [External] re-striping of Baker Road in Eden Prairie Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:15:00 AM Hello Thank you for taking the time to reach out and share your concerns. I would like to share our project website, which can be viewed here: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road. We have some additional information about the project background which you may find helpful. I’d like to reiterate that the driving factor behind this proposal is to improve safety and reduce crashes. Note that we are not attending the Eden Prairie City Council meeting today as originally scheduled. We will post more updates as information is available. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Best, Emily From: Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 9:35 AM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] re-striping of Baker Road in Eden Prairie Emily, Good morning and Happy New Year to you! Quick note to let you know we are NOT in favor of Baker Road being re-striped. We live in the Cardinal Creek neighborhood that is right next to Baker Road. Any change made to Baker Road would greatly impact us in a negative manner. Re-striping Baker Road is NOT necessary. There are NO crashes on Baker Road. The only crashes occur at the intersection to Crosstown Hwy 62 because of the stupid yield sign. Re-striping would reduce our very busy 4-lane highway to 2 lanes. Who on earth thinks that is a good idea? It’s a terrible idea!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We complained about this a couple of years ago when this was first presented. How did this get brought up again? As for bikers, put them over on the LRT lines where they should be. That’s where we ride our bikes. Do NOT try to fix something that doesn’t need fixing. Thank you for taking the time to read our comments. ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: [External] Restriping to Three-lane road for Baker/Mitchell Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:04:00 AM Thank you for getting in touch via phone and email. We’re currently evaluating the appropriate next steps and will have more information to share in the coming day or so. In the meantime, please feel free to reach out with additional questions, comments, or concerns. Best, Emily From: Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 3:48 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] Restriping to Three-lane road for Baker/Mitchell Hi Emily, My husband and I have been residents at for over 14 years. Can you give any more information on the project? I specifically have a few questions: 1. Will it impact any existing intersections? 2. Will the speed limit decrease off of Baker? 3. Have you thought of closing some intersections so there isn't as many entrances onto Baker? I also left you a voice message. I appreciate any more information you can provide. Thank you! ***CAUTION: This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 9:31:00 AM Thanks for getting in touch to share your feedback. While reducing the posted speed limit is not within the project scope and would need to be a separate initiative, three-lane roadways offer a number of benefits including a more predictable and consistent traffic flow. Additionally, people crossing the street will only need to cross three lanes of moving traffic instead of four. As of now, the proposal includes a median at Baker Rd and Edenvale Blvd, and you can view the draft layout here: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Best, Emily From: noreply@hennepin.us <noreply@hennepin.us> Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2021 9:30 AM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: Feedback about the Baker Road project Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Looks like a good plan to go to threelanes. Are there plans to control speed? Has thought been given to narrowing the road for pedestrian crossing or providing safety islands for pedestrians? From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 9:28:00 AM Thanks for taking the time to submit your feedback for this proposal along Baker Rd. I just wanted to take a moment to answer your questions. The three-lane roadway would include a flexible shoulder space that could be used for delivery/postal vehicles, a buffer between the sidewalk and roadway for people walking, and space for people biking (though not a dedicated facility). Safety is the driving force behind this proposal and we have noted over 100 crashes along the corridor from 2016-2019. You may view additional crash data information on the project website: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road As part of this proposal, we are not proposing to add any additional traffic lights. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Best, Emily From: noreply@hennepin.us <noreply@hennepin.us> Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2021 8:25 AM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: Feedback about the Baker Road project Name: Email: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I strongly object to the changes proposedto Baker Road reducing the number of lanes from 4 to 3. This will create more problems trying to turn onto Baker Road during the rush hours. Here are my questions with the proposedroad changes to Baker Road. Are there bike lanes proposed? When were the studies done? (date range, days and time of day) How many accidents have there been on Baker Road due tohaving 4 lanes? Will there now be a stop light on Baker Road for the busses coming from Forest Hills Elementary to safely turn onto Baker Road after the road is reduced to 3 lanes?Regards, From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 10:00:00 AM Hello While we are not proposing to change the speed limit through this particular project, I will note that three lane roadways provide a safer and more consistent traffic flow. In other projects where we have implemented three lane roadways across the county, we have noticed a decrease in speeding. Feel free to reach out with additional questions or visit our project website for more information: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road Best, Emily From: noreply@hennepin.us <noreply@hennepin.us> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 6:18 AM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: Feedback about the Baker Road project Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: Hello. I’m curious to know if the plannedimprovements will help to control traffic speed. I live in cardinal creek and often walk on baker road - the speed of drivers is always over 40mph. If yes, I’m all for the road changes.! From:Emily Kettell To: Subject:RE: Feedback about the Baker Road project Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 9:51:00 AM Hi Thank you for reaching out to share your comments. We are currently posting additional information on the project website and will use that to communicate updates as information is available. Here is the link to the project website: https://www.hennepin.us/baker-road Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. Best, Emily From: noreply@hennepin.us <noreply@hennepin.us> Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 4:26 PM To: Emily Kettell <Emily.Kettell@hennepin.us> Subject: Feedback about the Baker Road project Name: Email: Phone number: Thoughts on planned improvements for Baker Road: I am definitely in favor of the three laneproposal. The number of times I have nearly been rear-ended turning left into Cardinal Creek Rd on Baker going south is frightening. There was a similar proposal a while back andsomehow through informal channels the city thought our neighborhood, Cardinal Creek, was against 3 lanes and yet we never were included in the process. How will this be communicatedand decided? I am not happy that opposition to the plan is being pushed on Next Door. UNAPPROVED MINUTES CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP & OPEN PODIUM TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021 CITY CENTER 5:00 – 6:25 PM, HERITAGE ROOMS 6:30 – 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBER CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Ron Case, Council Members Kathy Nelson, Mark Freiberg, PG Narayanan, and Lisa Toomey CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Police Chief Greg Weber, Fire Chief Scott Gerber, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, Administrative Services/HR Director Alecia Rose, Communications Manager Joyce Lorenz, City Attorney Maggie Neuville, and Recorder Katie O’Connor Workshop - Heritage Rooms I and II (5:30) I. SOUTHWEST TRANSIT UPDATE Len Simich (5:00-5:30) Case stated residents have expressed many times their appreciation for Southwest Transit’s services. Len Simich, chief executive officer (CEO) of Southwest Transit, stated this will be an update to Council on the organization, operations over the last year, and what the future looks like. Recent discussions have been about a potential merge with Minnesota Valley Transit (MVT). Matt Fyten, chief operating officer (COO) of Southwest Transit, is taking over for Dave Jacobson. Fyten stated 2020 was far from normal. Ridership and farebox revenue was down 78 percent. They took early action and lowered services by 60 percent and reduced staff by 50 percent. They received $2.5 million in federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security, (CARES) Act funding. Early action allowed the agency the opportunity to balance 2020 and 2021 budgets and build operations back once the pandemic is controlled. Case inquired if there will be a difficult time getting bus drivers back. Fyten stated many drivers have been moved to other properties within First Transit and some were furloughed. They are confident they will have drivers ready. Simich added they are a little heavy on having substitute drivers. The drivers are cleaning vehicles and stations in the meantime. The union has allow this reassignment. Fyten presented the highlights and impacts of 2020. They were able to address immediate social distancing, driver barriers, and passenger barriers. They’ve had positive feedback from customers about the steps they have taken. They are the first in transit to install ion air purification system on all their fleet. To their knowledge, there has been no spread of COVID-19 on their buses. Their road call per mile was over one per 50,000 miles, City Council Workshop Minutes February 16, 2020 Page 2 consistently better than the national average. 100 percent of all scheduled trips operated, and chargeable accidents were below one per 100,000 miles. The fund balance stayed above the 25 percent floor set by the Metropolitan Council. For the twelfth year, they received the GFOA award for Financial Excellence. Fyten stated they completed several major projects in 2020. They updated their strategic plan. They updated their asset management plan, completed their 20 year facility assessment, and updated their emergency preparedness plan. They coordinated with Metro Transit to complete a vehicle annunciator project. They expanded their prime service to include Prime MD to book a ride to and from medical facilities. Their garage and office expansion was completed. Throughout 2020 they developed and implemented their COVID response. Simich noted the asset management and emergency preparedness are federal mandates, but they have had these in place for years and many other transit agencies have looked to their model. The vehicle annunciator project should help with the federal requirement to clearly hear each transit stop. Lastly, the garage expansion was done without any bonding or state dollars. A video message was played. Case inquired who the promotional video audience is. Simich responded the video is meant for the public and it is available on their website. The video explains what they have done over the course of the last year. Fyten reviewed what is in store for 2021. They do not expect a flood of people going back to work all at once. They anticipate exploring new markets to service such as suburb-to-suburb services. They will continue to add resources as needed. The last year has provided the opportunity to build back their services smarter. This includes creating more efficient and attractive service schedules, and micro transit capabilities for the first and last mile. Special event services will resume when events take place such as the State Fair, sporting events, and concerts. They will continue to be an innovator of technology such as mobility as a service, looking into electric vehicles, and autonomous vehicles. They are looking to be a leader in autonomous technologies. Simich stated they do not have a big ask this year for legislative priorities. They are trying to draw attention to some of the inequities for resources. What is in place today does not work. The suburban providers are at an unfair disadvantage for funds in comparison to Metro Transit. Suburban providers received about 17 percent of the motor vehicle sales tax (MVST) transit funding allocation. After 2008 there was an increase in funding and suburban providers only received five percent more of the funding. He stated the board welcomes a change. In regards to a potential merge, this would potentially provide more clout. There are a few options in a merge: to fold into another transit company, create an entirely new entity, or share administrative services but retain local control funding and branding. A downside would be likely making some sacrifices. These discussions are on hold until after the legislative session. He asked for the opinions of the Council. City Council Workshop Minutes February 16, 2020 Page 3 Case stated he does not know enough to weigh in on the conversation. He would like to know more about the possible downsides to a merge. Freiberg inquired about the slide regarding funding received and percentages. Simich explained the first chart shows the initial funds distributed by MVST. When additional funds were dispersed, the percentage of funds divided were 95 percent to Metro Transit and five percent to suburban providers. Case inquired how it would be best dispersed. Simich replied the percentage would stay similar to the initial disbursement. Another problem is two of the suburban providers have large reserves and this has been used as a reason to not provide more funding to all suburban providers. Narayanan expressed his thanks for the opportunity to serve on the board. He inquired how many rides they would have in a typical year without COVID-19. Simich responded 1.2 million rides in a year. Toomey inquired when the merger would take place. Simich replied they are not at a place to know a date. The benefit of merging would be the survivability. Case stated he has heard some of the disadvantages but would like to see the benefit and downsides written out. Ideally it would be best to take into consideration which option would give Southwest Transit the longevity to continue to provide services in Eden Prairie. Nelson stated she would like to keep the Southwest Transit leadership, because it is the most innovative and she does not want to lose those benefits. II. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES (5:30-6:30) Case stated if each Council Member could share at least three priorities, he would like to share those during the Council Member report at the meeting upstairs. Nelson stated she would like to begin implementing recommendations from the Housing Task Force (HTF) report. Another big issue is energy efficiency. She would like to install solar and more electric vehicle charging stations at the Community Center as well as other locations like parks. She would like to focus on purchasing more electric vehicles as well. The third priority is to seriously consider implementing the recommendations from the diversity, equity, and inclusion report. The fourth priority is to consider how the City can help support small businesses to keep them open, especially the restaurant industry. The fifth priority would be to consider adding more online opportunities and classes for seniors to stay engaged in the next few months. City Council Workshop Minutes February 16, 2020 Page 4 Case noted these priorities and ideas were helpful and, as anticipated, not necessarily demands for staff. Freiberg stated he would like to continue working on affordable housing and to implement recommendations from the HTF. Another large topic he continues to hear about is hunger in Eden Prairie. This may take efforts coordinating with religious communities and nonprofits. Lastly, he would like to see the City help the business community getting back to a new normal in order to keep businesses healthy. Case stated it would be good to group the like ideas together in a typed document, and to take a deep dive on specific topics and strategies to achieve those goals. Narayanan stated one of his first priorities is to maintain the level of City services we are currently providing. His list is similar to what has been mentioned. His priorities are to implement the HTF recommendations, implement the findings from the race and equity report, and light rail transit (LRT) safety. The LRT priority could be addressed with more public relations efforts. Also, he would like the City to provide assistance to businesses if possible. Toomey stated her top priority is to continue listening and learning. The next priority would be to work with and have regular contact with nonprofits on COVID-19 issues, specifically rental assistance, basic needs, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and business assistance. Sustainability and increasing public awareness of sustainability initiatives is another important priority. As others have mentioned, another top priority is affordable housing and implementing the HTF recommendations. If the City were to set up an affordable housing trust fund, she would like to consider the housing task force members. Also, continued efforts with diversity and inclusion such as Peoplefest!, the Hometown Celebration, and supporting outreach programs. Encouraging participation from diverse populations in Citizens Academy and the City Government Academy. As others have mentioned, reviewing the race and equity report. The police department has worked with other cities on LRT safety and training. Since the LRT timeline has been delayed, potential issues may not need to be addressed unless they become an issue. Case stated it is good to hear priorities from each member. Some of the priorities near to him are the climate initiatives. He would like to continue working towards an electric fleet by 2030. These initiatives are based on the budget, but he would be interested in ways to enhance these initiatives or speed them up. Another priority is to encourage businesses to consider utilizing solar on their flat roofs and if there is a way to help incentive private businesses. Another priority is to implement recommendations on affordable housing. The rental protection piece may be problematic, but there are other pieces that can begin being implemented almost immediately. Hunger, housing, and transportation are all correlated. If there are ways to work with nonprofits to help, he would support it. Another priority is to City Council Workshop Minutes February 16, 2020 Page 5 continue discussing the various sustainability initiatives such as the ban of plastic bags and plastic straws. He is interested in reviewing the findings of the race and equity report and seriously considering the implementation of the recommendations. This may include reviewing hiring practices to represent the community being served. He also agrees with being proactive about LRT safety. The only issue he has begun seeing and hearing about is the sense that Eden Prairie is changing, and a big contributor is LRT. There are large bridges being built to change the appearance of City, and there are seemingly more pan handlers. The City could be more proactive about marketing truth, because sometimes residents may correlate incidents with LRT. Providing statistics to residents in the form of a monthly communique may be helpful. Another priority along the lines of safety is body cameras for police. He continues to receive questions about defunding the police. He would like to continue talking about the needs of the department and whether they could benefit from additional staff, specifically staff who specialize in connecting and following up with residents after an incident. Lastly, he agrees with the need to work with nonprofits on food, housing, and transportation. Narayanan stated in regards to crime alerts, it may be good to also push out positive information about crime statistics. It may be beneficial to provide these positive communications monthly. Getschow noted Staff and Council will receive a snapshot of services, including resident’s sense of safety, in April when we receive the Quality of Life Survey responses. Although the police put positive stories on their blog, they do not catch as much interest as the high interest crime alerts. Staff could do more positive messages. Case added people may know services are great, but it would be beneficial to reinforce these topics and issues with social media blasts and statistics. Narayanan added although the positive stories are on the police department’s blog, it may be helpful to also put those on Facebook or in an email blast. He also agrees with the priorities other Council Members mentioned about sustainability efforts and connecting with nonprofits. He has not heard much about the topic of hunger other than through People Reaching Out to People (PROP), but he would like to learn more about it. Nelson stated residents have stated a safe City is important to them, so it would be good to communicate more of the positive stories and facts on a regular basis. We do have a safe City and good, careful, and compassionate police. Toomey stated when LRT gets closer, it may be beneficial to create a video about safety measures and target seniors for the audience. Also, once COVID-19 subsides, she would like to focus on engagement and outreach with the police department. Case added in previous years they conducted Council meetings at different locations. Maybe they could hold an informal meeting at a different location. Toomey mentioned the idea of coffee with the Council on a Saturday morning at the Community Center. Getschow added it City Council Workshop Minutes February 16, 2020 Page 6 could be more of a town hall type meeting rather than a regular Council meeting. Case likes the idea of coffee with the Council on a Saturday morning. Narayanan inquired if this has been done with the businesses. Case replied this was previously done and organized by the Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce with many businesses. Getschow stated Staff are already working on a few of the priorities mentioned by Council. There are upcoming workshops on Sustainability, race and equity, and the Housing Task Force recommendations. There are a few new topics the Council can vet through a workshop such as assisting businesses and working with non-profits. There is some messaging the City can do around LRT, but a lot of it is going to be closer to a year within it beginning to operate. Staff can plan ahead for this type of messaging. Additionally, there is a program, property assessed clean energy, the City has not used in some time for a commercial property to be assessed over a long period of time with little to no interest for installing solar. Staff can start looking into some of these ideas. There will also be a demand for more engagement after COVID-19 has subsided. Case stated since there are overlapping priorities, he could summarize the priorities as a whole. Anyone who has additional remarks can add their comments. Open Podium - Council Chamber (6:30) II. OPEN PODIUM III. ADJOURNMENT APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Ron Case, Council Members Mark Freiberg, P G Narayanan, Kathy Nelson, and Lisa Toomey CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, Police Chief Greg Weber, Fire Chief Scott Gerber, City Attorney Maggie Neuville, and Council Recorder Jan Curielli I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Case called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. All City Council Members were present. Council Member Nelson attended the meeting virtually. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. OPEN PODIUM INVITATION IV. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS A. BLACK HISTORY MONTH PROCLAMATION Mayor Case read a proclamation proclaiming February 2021 as Black History Month in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and encouraging all citizens to observe this month and honor the history made by Black Americans. B. PROP FOOD SHELF COLLECTION Getschow reported this is the second year the City partnered with PROP to invite customers of the Eden Prairie Liquor stores to contribute $1.00 each time they visited the stores during the month of November. This year a total of $10,587.90 was collected for the PROP food shelf. Mayor Case said the Council Members shared their goals and passions for this coming year at the workshop this evening. Several of the Council Members mentioned helping non-profits address such issues as hunger, housing and transportation. He believed the PROP food shelf collection was a good example of such help. V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 16, 2021 Page 2 Mayor Case added Item XIV.A.1. MOTION: Narayanan moved, seconded by Freiberg, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Freiberg, Narayanan, Nelson, Toomey and Case voting “aye.” VI. MINUTES A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2021 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2021 MOTION: Toomey moved, seconded by Freiberg, to approve the minutes of the Council workshop held Tuesday, February 2, 2021, and the City Council meeting held Tuesday, February 2, 2021, as published. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Freiberg, Narayanan, Nelson, Toomey and Case voting “aye.” VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK’S LICENSE LIST B. TERREY PINE COFFEE (2020-08) by Java Companies. Second Reading of Ordinance 3-2021-PUD-2-2021 for Planned Unit Development with waivers and Zoning changes from Office to HWY Commercial on 0.511 acres, Resolution 2021-20 for Site Plan Review on 0.511 acres (Ordinance No. 3-2021-PUD-2-2021 for PUD District and Zoning Change; Resolution No. 2021-20 for Site Plan Review; Development Agreement) C. MINOR SUBDIVISION- 13905 CHESTNUT DRIVE (2020-07A) by FPA Multifamily, LLC. Resolution for Minor Subdivision on 5.7 acres (Resolution No. 2021-21 for Minor Subdivision) D. APPROVE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE WITH PUREGRACE LLC AT SMITH-DOUGLAS-MORE PROPERTY FOR SMITH COFFEE AND CAFÉ E. APPROVE PURCHASE FROM STRYKER MEDICAL FOR REPLACEMENT OF LUCAS CPR DEVICES F. DECLARE GPS UNIT SURPLUS AND APPROVE PURCHASE OF NEW SURVEY EQUIPMENT G. APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH ADVANCED ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR WELL #17 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 16, 2021 Page 3 H. AWARD CONTRACT TO PUMP AND METER SERVICE, INC. FOR INSTALLATION OF HEAVY TRUCK LIFT I. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH PARROTT CONTRACTING, INC. FOR WATER, SEWER, AND STORMWATER UTILITY REPAIRS J. APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH VALLEY RICH COMPANY, INC. FOR WATER, SEWER, AND STORMWATER UTILITY REPAIRS MOTION: Freiberg moved, seconded by Nelson, to approve Items A-J on the Consent Calendar. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Freiberg, Narayanan, Nelson, Toomey and Case voting “aye.” IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS / MEETINGS Case stated there are no public hearings on tonight’s agenda; however, some development projects are coming through the pipeline for future Council meetings. X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Narayanan moved, seconded by Nelson, to approve the payment of claims as submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Freiberg, Narayanan, Nelson, Toomey, and Case voting “aye.” XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS, AND COMMUNICATIONS XIII. APPOINTMENTS XIV. REPORTS A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS 1. Goals for 2021 – Mayor Case Case explained the Council Members met earlier this evening in a workshop session prior to the regular City Council meeting. Council workshop sessions are open to the public and the press and are informal sessions at which no motions are passed. He reported at tonight’s workshop the Council received an update from a representative of Southwest Transit which indicated Southwest Transit is surviving the pandemic with the help of CARES funding. It is a strong agency moving forward, and they are exploring new opportunities to serve Eden Prairie’s future transportation needs. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 16, 2021 Page 4 Case summarized the discussion that took place at the workshop in which each Council Member shared what they would like to see accomplished this year. • Climate initiatives, such as solar energy and encouraging the switch to an electric fleet; • Housing initiatives, to pursue some of the options presented last year by the Housing Task Force regarding affordable housing; • Sustainability issues, including the State-mandated organic recycling for private residences by 2022; • The systemic racism initiative, including considering the suggestions we expect to receive from the Human Rights and Diversity Commission (HRDC) as they complete their work and report back on how we might address this initiative; • LRT, although the construction of the LRT has been delayed somewhat, we can continue our education initiatives for residents about the effects of the new LRT and how it will affect Southwest Transit; • Public safety, including the use of body cameras for police which is coming soon. Even though our statistics show we are a very safe city and have an amazing Police Department, we can explore needs for our public safety organization, such as additional social services; • Social services, by connecting to our amazing non-profits, we can help to facilitate the social service work done by them. Case believed we have a very strong Council. We work hard to make the City as good as possible so we can be the best city around. Nelson wanted to make sure we include a point regarding what we might do to help small businesses in town. Case observed we have always worked closely with the Chamber and, prior to COVID, were working on some exciting initiatives for entrepreneurs in the City in coordination with the School District. He noted those initiatives have not stopped, and we definitely want to remain very close to our business community. We want to make sure we are doing what we can to help them, especially to ensure our restaurants survive the pandemic. Freiberg thought Mayor Case gave a good summary that pretty much covered all of our discussion at the workshop. Narayanan believed Mayor Case did an excellent job of summarizing the discussions. He wanted to assure everyone we will continue to provide our excellent City services in addition to any work we do on the initiatives expressed by the Council Members. Case agreed and noted the City has a phenomenal group of people working for it. We hear all the time how much residents appreciate our staff. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 16, 2021 Page 5 Getschow reported for the second year Eden Prairie is the only city among the top 50 workplaces in Minnesota as determined by the Star Tribune’s Top Workplace survey of employees around the state. Case commended Mr. Getschow for recruiting the employees who enjoy working here and who voted us among the top 50 workplaces. Toomey agreed with Council Member Freiberg that most everything was covered. She stated she looks forward to working with all of the Council Members and the City staff. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1. Approve Revised Layout for Duck Lake Road Improvements 2. Approve Agreement with Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District for Duck Lake Road Reconstruction Project Getschow explained these are a couple of action items tonight regarding the Duck Lake Road improvements. Ellis reviewed the background of the Duck Lake Road improvement project and noted in September of 2018 the Council was asked for approval of a project layout. Since then, we have been going through the environmental regulation process and are returning tonight with another proposed layout of the project. He gave a PowerPoint presentation showing the project area and the changes in the project design. He explained the changes which incorporate a bridge over the lake. The inclusion of the bridge in the project is a result of numerous meetings with the DNR and the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District to try to minimize the impacts to Duck Lake and to optimize the restoration efforts. The layout plan now includes the bridge to replace the earthen berm, pedestrian facilities on both sides of Duck Lake Road, and a fishing pier on the east side of the bridge, thereby providing recreational opportunities for residents. Ellis believed the revisions are a good decision because of the potential for heavy use by the nearby schools and community members. The City received a petition to have a walking path on both sides of the road. In addition, the new plan reconnects the two parts of Duck Lake and restores the lake bed. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 16, 2021 Page 6 Ellis reviewed the benefits of the new layout. He stated the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District has agreed to participate in the cost up to $1,175,000. Case asked if we get credit for our positive wetland mitigation efforts inasmuch as we are penalized when we fill in wetlands for other projects around the City. Ellis replied we do not. Ellis reviewed the timeline for the project: finalizing the easement acquisition in early 2021; awarding the contract by the summer of 2021; constructing the project in 2021-2022; and with substantial completion by the winter of 2022. Narayanan if there will be enough space between the bridge and the water for a boat to go under the bridge. Ellis replied a kayak might have a challenge going under the bridge, but probably would be able to do that at certain times of the year. Narayanan asked if there will be full access from the sidewalk to the bridge. Ellis replied all ADA requirements will be met for the entire corridor so all people will be able to use the bridge. MOTION: Narayanan moved, seconded by Freiberg, to approve the revised layout dated January 28, 2021 for the Duck Lake Road Improvements, City Project Number I.C. 17-5983. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Freiberg, Narayanan, Nelson, Toomey, and Case voting “aye.” MOTION: Toomey moved, seconded by Nelson, to approve the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District for the Duck Lake Road Reconstruction Project. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Freiberg, Narayanan, Nelson, Toomey, and Case voting “aye.” F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XV. OTHER BUSINESS XVI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Narayanan moved, seconded by Nelson, to adjourn the meeting. Motion was approved on a roll call vote, with Freiberg, Narayanan, Nelson, Toomey and Case voting “aye.” Mayor Case adjourned the meeting at 7:38 pm. - 1 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar DATE: March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Christy Weigel, Police/ Support Unit ITEM DESCRIPTION: Clerk’s License Application List ITEM NO.: VIII.A. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Requested Action Motion: Approve the licenses listed below Amendment to Liquor License – Change from On-Sale 3.2 Beer to On-Sale & Sunday Liquor Pizza Luce IX, Inc DBA: Pizza Luce 11347 Viking Drive 2021 Renewal Licenses Commercial Kennel Hound Dog Pet Hotel, LLC DBA: Hound Dog Pet Hotel CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar DATE March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT / DIVISION Administration Rick Clark, Facilities ITEM DESCRIPTION Fire Station #1 Roof Replacement ITEM NO. VIII.B. Requested Action Move to: Award Contract for Fire Station #1 Roof Replacement to Garland/DBS, Inc. in the amount of $428,755 Synopsis Minnesota Statutes Section 471.345, subdivision 15, permits the City to contract for the purchase of supplies, materials, or equipment without regard to competitive bidding requirements if the purchase is through a cooperative created by a joint powers agreement that purchases items from more than one source on the basis of competitive bids or competitive quotations. The City participates in a cooperative purchasing program called Omnia, which is a service cooperative authorized to establish competitively awarded purchasing contracts on behalf of its participating entities. In 2019, Omnia competitively bid and awarded a contract to Garland/DBS, Inc. for roofing systems, installation, and service with related products and supplies. As a participating entity, the City will use this Omnia contract with Garland/DBS, Inc. for the replacement of the Fire Station #1 Roof. Use of the cooperative purchasing contract enables the City to save time and money for purchases of roofing equipment and installations under price terms already negotiated by Omnia. Background Anticipated as part of the 2021 Capital Improvement Plan, the roof at Fire Station #1 is beyond its life expectancy, failing via multiple leaks that have been getting repaired for the past 7 years, and in need of replacement. The roofing system to be installed is a 50 year longevity expectancy vs. the standard 25 years and provides a warranty period double that of others. A roofing system that is to last twice as long as standard along with material and labor cost increases due to the global pandemic has caused this project to go above initial budgeting of $300,000. Facilities staff met with Garland/DBS as well as other contractors about the roofing system and is confident this roof will provide a savings compared to others via the life expectancy. Attachment Standard City Construction Contract with Garland/DBS, Inc. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar DATE: March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Leslie Stovring Engineering / Water Resources ITEM DESCRIPTION: IC# 18810 Amendment of Conservation Easement Over Outlot A of Reeder Ridge ITEM NO.: VIII.C. Requested Action Move to: Amend the Conservation Easement over Outlot A of Reeder Ridge Synopsis A conservation easement was required for protection of steep slopes surrounding an area set aside for a lookout for use by property owners within Reeder Ridge. However, the builder for the development constructed a portion of the trail and lookout's retaining wall so that they encroach into the conservation easement. This amendment would allow the retaining walls and trail to remain and still provide protection for the steep slopes. Staff recommends approval of the amendment. Background Information The Reeder Ridge Homeowner's Association is requesting to amend the recorded conservation easement as management of the property will pass from the developer, Pulte Homes, to the Association. The encroachment was identified during a field review of the conservation easement boundary in 2017. Now that the Homeowner's Association is in place, they have requested that an amendment to allow the trail and lookout to remain and the easement line to be adjusted to provide an equivalent amount of conservation easement to continue to protect the steep slopes in this area. Staff recommends the following actions: • Approve the amendment of a portion of the conservation easement as proposed. • Convert maintained areas to native landscaping. • Mark the new boundary with permanent conservation easement monuments that meet city standards to inform future owners of the location of the easement. The proposed change to the conservation easement will retain the conservation easement over the steep slopes as originally intended. Attached to this memorandum are diagrams that outline the existing and proposed conservation easement lines. Attachments Letter from the Reeder Ridge HOA requesting the amendment Conservation Easement Overlay Exhibit Conservation Easement Amendment City of Eden Prairie, RE: PID 2911622340010 Please accept this formal request for a conservation easement land swap, as it relates to PID 2911622340010. This conservation land swap is being requested by the Reeder Ridge Home Owners Association. The Association has been made aware that during original site development (by the Pulte Group INC.), Pulte mistakenly constructed and installed a small portion of the REEDER RIDGE paved trail path, fire pit, and landscaping around pit upon defined Conservation Easement. In order to gain compliance with EP City regarding use of this space, the Reeder Ridge Association is requesting a conservation easement land swap. The Association would like to swap 2,504 sq. ft. of existing maintained area located in Outlet A (as described) for 2,504 sq. ft. of existing conservation easement. Thank you, Matt Zarse Vice President – Reeder Ridge HOA (952) 228-8046 ATTACHMENTS: 161718OUTLOT AAREA A AMENDMENT TO CONSERVATION EASEMENT THIS AMENDMENT is made this 2nd day of March, 2021 by and between Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Grantor”), and the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Grantee”). RECITALS: A. Grantor and Grantee are parties to that certain Conservation Easement dated November 26, 2013 filed of record with the Hennepin County Recorder on December 5, 2013 as Document No. A10034396 (the “Original Easement Agreement”). B. As further described on Exhibit B to the Original Easement Agreement, the Easement Area includes the following three separately described areas: Area A (part of Outlot A, Reeder Ridge) Area B (part of Lots 10 through 17, Block 3, Reeder Ridge) Area C (part of Lots 5 through 8, Block 3, Reeder Ridge). C. Grantor and Grantee desire to amend the Original Easement Agreement to adjust only the “Area A” portion of the Easement Area by removing a portion of the property in Area A and adding new property to Area A to provide an equal amount of Easement Area. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. The third “Whereas” clause of the Original Easement Agreement is amended by adding the phrase “and Exhibit C” after “Exhibit B.” 2. Exhibt B to the Original Easement Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the depiction and description of “Area A”. 3. The Easement Agreement is amended by adding a new Exhibit C attached to this Amendment, which provides the new depiction and legal description of Area A. 4. “Area B” and “Area C” as described on Exhibit B to the Easement Agreement remain unchanged and continue to be part of the Easement Area. The Easement Area now includes Area A as described and depicted on Exhibit C and Areas B and C as described and depicted on Exhibit B. 5. As amended herein, the parties reaffirm the terms of the Original Easement Agreement. [Signature Pages and Acknowledgements Follow] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute and deliver this Amendment as of the date stated above. GRANTOR: PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Its: ____________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________________, 2021, by __________________________, the ____________ of Pulte Homes Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public 3732652.5 GRANTEE: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Name: Ronald A. Case Its: Mayor By: Name: Rick Getschow Its: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ______________, 2021, by Ronald A. Case and Rick Getschow, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public This instrument was drafted by: City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 3732652.5 Exhibit C CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar DATE: March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Carter Schulze Public Works / Engineering ITEM DESCRIPTION: #21811 Approve Professional Services Agreement with Bolton & Menk for Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement Feasibility Design ITEM NO.: VIII.D. Requested Action Move to: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Bolton & Menk for the Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement Feasibility Design in the amount of $40,800.00. Synopsis The existing Willow Creek Road bridge is constructed of a concrete slab deck over two metal pipe culverts, which serve as the outlet to Bryant Lake within the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Over the years the traveling surface has widened beyond the concrete deck and the existing metal pipes are showing serious signs of deterioration and corrosion. This bridge needs to be replaced. This feasibility design agreement not only includes bridge design alternatives, but also topographic survey of the potential bridge construction area, water resources impact review and public utilities evaluation, as this neighborhood is not currently served by public sanitary sewer or water main. The final feasibility report will be used to further the design to replace this bridge. Financial Implications The Professional Services Agreement with Bolton & Menk has an estimated cost of $40,800.00. Attachment Professional Services Agreement 2017 06 01 Version 2017 06 01 Agreement for Professional Services This Agreement (“Agreement”) is made on the 2nd day of March, 2021, between the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (hereinafter "City"), whose business address is 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, and Bolton & Menk, Inc., (“Consultant”), a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter "Consultant") whose business address is 12224 Nicollet Avenue, Burnsville, MN 55337. Preliminary Statement The City has adopted a policy regarding the selection and hiring of consultants to provide a variety of professional services for City projects. That policy requires that persons, firms or corporations providing such services enter into written agreements with the City. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions for the provision of professional services by Consultant for Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement Feasibility/Scoping hereinafter referred to as the "Work". The City and Consultant agree as follows: 1. Scope of Work. The Consultant agrees to provide the professional services shown in Exhibit A (Bolton & Menk Proposal letter dated February 10, 2021) in connection with the Work. Exhibit A is intended to be the scope of service for the work of the Consultant. Any general or specific conditions, terms, agreements, consultant or industry proposal, or contract terms attached to or a part of Exhibit A are declined in full and, accordingly, are deleted and shall not be in effect in any manner. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from March 2, 2021 through October 31, 2021 the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional period as they deem appropriate, and upon the terms and conditions as herein stated. 3. Compensation for Services. City agrees to pay the Consultant on an hourly basis plus expenses in a total amount not to exceed $40,800.00 for the services as described in Exhibit A. a. Any changes in the scope of the work which may result in an increase to the compensation due the Consultant shall require prior written approval by an authorized representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay additional compensation for services that do not have prior written authorization. Willow Creek Bridge Replacement Feasibility Page 2 of 10 2017 06 01 b. Special Consultants may be utilized by the Consultant when required by the complex or specialized nature of the Project and when authorized in writing by the City. c. If Consultant is delayed in performance due to any cause beyond its reasonable control, including but not limited to strikes, riots, fires, acts of God, governmental actions, actions of a third party, or actions or inactions of City, the time for performance shall be extended by a period of time lost by reason of the delay. Consultant will be entitled to payment for its reasonable additional charges, if any, due to the delay. 4. City Information. The City agrees to provide the Consultant with the complete information concerning the Scope of the Work and to perform the following services: a. Access to the Area. Depending on the nature of the Work, Consultant may from time to time require access to public and private lands or property. As may be necessary, the City shall obtain access to and make all provisions for the Consultant to enter upon public and private lands or property as required for the Consultant to perform such services necessary to complete the Work. b. Consideration of the Consultant's Work. The City shall give thorough consideration to all reports, sketches, estimates, drawings, and other documents presented by the Consultant, and shall inform the Consultant of all decisions required of City within a reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the Consultant. c. Standards. The City shall furnish the Consultant with a copy of any standard or criteria, including but not limited to, design and construction standards that may be required in the preparation of the Work for the Project. d. City's Representative. A person shall be appointed to act as the City's representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. He or she shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret, and define the City's policy and decisions with respect to the services provided or materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to the work covered by this Agreement. 5. Method of Payment. The Consultant shall submit to the City, on a monthly basis, an itemized invoice for professional services performed under this Agreement. Invoices submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City for: a. Progress Payment. For work reimbursed on an hourly basis, the Consultant shall indicate for each employee, his or her name, job title, the number of hours worked, rate of pay for each employee, a computation of amounts due for each employee, and the total amount due for each project task. Consultant shall verify all statements submitted for payment in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.38 and 471.391. For reimbursable expenses, if provided for in Exhibit A, the Consultant shall provide an itemized listing and such Willow Creek Bridge Replacement Feasibility Page 3 of 10 2017 06 01 documentation as reasonably required by the City. Each invoice shall contain the City’s project number and a progress summary showing the original (or amended) amount of the contract, current billing, past payments and unexpended balance of the contract. b. Suspended Work. If any work performed by the Consultant is suspended in whole or in part by the City, the Consultant shall be paid for any services set forth on Exhibit A performed prior to receipt of written notice from the City of such suspension. c. Payments for Special Consultants. The Consultant shall be reimbursed for the work of special consultants, as described herein, and for other items when authorized in writing by the City. d. Claims. To receive any payment on this Agreement, the invoice or bill must include the following signed and dated statement: “I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid.” 6. Project Manager and Staffing. The Consultant shall designated a Project Manager and notify the City in writing of the identity of the Project Manager before starting work on the Project. The Project Manager shall be assisted by other staff members as necessary to facilitate the completion of the Work in accordance with the terms established herein. Consultant may not remove or replace the Project Manager without the approval of the City. 7. Standard of Care. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in the performance of its services as is ordinarily exercised by members of the profession under similar circumstances in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Consultant shall be liable to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, without limitation, for any injuries, loss, or damages proximately caused by Consultant's breach of this standard of care. Consultant shall put forth reasonable efforts to complete its duties in a timely manner. Consultant shall not be responsible for delays caused by factors beyond its control or that could not be reasonably foreseen at the time of execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible for costs, delays or damages arising from unreasonable delays in the performance of its duties. 8. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven (7) days written notice delivered to the other party at the address written above. Upon termination under this provision, if there is no fault of the Consultant, the Consultant shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the City terminates the Agreement because the Consultant has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Consultant, and the City may retain another consultant to undertake or complete the Work identified herein. Willow Creek Bridge Replacement Feasibility Page 4 of 10 2017 06 01 9. Subcontractor. The Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement except as noted in the Scope of Work, without the express written consent of the City. The Consultant shall pay any subcontractor involved in the performance of this Agreement within ten (10) days of the Consultant's receipt of payment by the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. If the Consultant fails within that time to pay the subcontractor any undisputed amount for which the Consultant has received payment by the City, the Consultant shall pay interest to the subcontractor on the unpaid amount at the rate of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. For an unpaid balance of less than $100, the Consultant shall pay the actual interest penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Consultant shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. 10. Independent Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor engaged by City to perform the services described herein and as such (i) shall employ such persons as it shall deem necessary and appropriate for the performance of its obligations pursuant to this Agreement, who shall be employees, and under the direction, of Consultant and in no respect employees of City, and (ii) shall have no authority to employ persons, or make purchases of equipment on behalf of City, or otherwise bind or obligate City. No statement herein shall be construed so as to find the Consultant an employee of the City. 11. Insurance. a. General Liability. Prior to starting the Work, Consultant shall procure, maintain and pay for such insurance as will protect against claims or loss which may arise out of operations by Consultant or by any subcontractor or by anyone employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. Such insurance shall include, but not be limited to, minimum coverages and limits of liability specified in this Paragraph, or required by law. b. Consultant shall procure and maintain the following minimum insurance coverages and limits of liability for the Work: Worker’s Compensation Statutory Limits Employer’s Liability $500,000 each accident $500,000 disease policy limit $500,000 disease each employee Commercial General $1,000,000 property damage and bodily Liability injury per occurrence $2,000,000 general aggregate $2,000,000 Products – Completed Operations Aggregate $100,000 fire legal liability each occurrence $5,000 medical expense Willow Creek Bridge Replacement Feasibility Page 5 of 10 2017 06 01 Comprehensive Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit each accident (shall include coverage for all owned, hired and non-owed vehicles.) Umbrella or Excess Liability $1,000,000 c. Commercial General Liability. The Commercial General Liability Policy shall be on ISO form CG 00 01 12 07 or CG 00 01 04 13, or the equivalent. Such insurance shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products- completed operations, personal and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract (including the tort liability of another assumed in a business contract). There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability form arising from pollution, explosion, collapse, underground property damage or work performed by subcontractors. d. Professional Liability Insurance. In addition to the coverages listed above, Consultant shall maintain a professional liability insurance policy in the amount of $2,000,000. Said policy need not name the City as an additional insured. It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to pay any retention or deductible for the professional liability insurance. Consultant agrees to maintain the professional liability insurance for a minimum of two (2) years following termination of this Agreement. e. Consultant shall maintain “stop gap” coverage if Consultant obtains Workers’ Compensation coverage from any state fund if Employer’s liability coverage is not available. f. All policies, except the Worker’s Compensation Policy, Automobile Policy, and Professional Liability Policy, shall name the “City of Eden Prairie” as an additional insured including products and completed operations. g. All policies, except the Professional Liability Policy, shall apply on a “per project” basis. h. All General Liability policies, Automobile Liability policies and Umbrella policies shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City. i. All policies, except for the Worker’s Compensation Policy and the Professional Liability Policy, shall be primary and non-contributory. j. All polices, except the Worker’s Compensation Policy, shall insure the defense and indemnity obligations assumed by Consultant under this Agreement. The Professional Liability policy shall insure the defense and indemnity obligations assumed by Consultant under this Agreement except with respect to the liability for Willow Creek Bridge Replacement Feasibility Page 6 of 10 2017 06 01 loss or damage resulting from the negligence or fault of anyone other than the Consultant or others for whom the Consultant is legally liable. k. Consultant agrees to maintain all coverage required herein throughout the term of the Agreement and for a minimum of two (2) years following City’s written acceptance of the Work. l. It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to pay any retention or deductible for the coverages required herein. m. All policies shall contain a provision or endorsement that coverages afforded thereunder shall not be cancelled or non-renewed or restrictive modifications added, without thirty (30) days’ prior notice to the City, except that if the cancellation or non-renewal is due to non-payment, the coverages may not be terminated or non-renewed without ten (10) days’ prior notice to the City. n. Consultant shall maintain in effect all insurance coverages required under this Paragraph at Consultant’s sole expense and with insurance companies licensed to do business in the state in Minnesota and having a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A-, unless specifically accepted by City in writing. o. A copy of the Consultant’s Certificate of Insurance which evidences the compliance with this Paragraph, must be filed with City prior to the start of Consultant’s Work. Upon request a copy of the Consultant’s insurance declaration page, Rider and/or Endorsement, as applicable shall be provided. Such documents evidencing Insurance shall be in a form acceptable to City and shall provide satisfactory evidence that Consultant has complied with all insurance requirements. Renewal certificates shall be provided to City prior to the expiration date of any of the required policies. City will not be obligated, however, to review such Certificate of Insurance, declaration page, Rider, Endorsement or certificates or other evidence of insurance, or to advise Consultant of any deficiencies in such documents and receipt thereof shall not relieve Consultant from, nor be deemed a waiver of, City’s right to enforce the terms of Consultant’s obligations hereunder. City reserves the right to examine any policy provided for under this paragraph. p. Effect of Consultant’s Failure to Provide Insurance. If Consultant fails to provide the specified insurance, then Consultant will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, the City's officials, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability and expense (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses of litigation) to the extent necessary to afford the same protection as would have been provided by the specified insurance. Except to the extent prohibited by law, this indemnity applies regardless of any strict liability or negligence attributable to the City (including sole negligence) and regardless of the extent to which the underlying occurrence (i.e., the event giving rise to a claim which would have been covered by the specified insurance) is attributable to the negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission (including breach of contract) of Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees or delegates. Consultant agrees that Willow Creek Bridge Replacement Feasibility Page 7 of 10 2017 06 01 this indemnity shall be construed and applied in favor of indemnification. Consultant also agrees that if applicable law limits or precludes any aspect of this indemnity, then the indemnity will be considered limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that applicable law. The stated indemnity continues until all applicable statutes of limitation have run. If a claim arises within the scope of the stated indemnity, the City may require Consultant to: i. Furnish and pay for a surety bond, satisfactory to the City, guaranteeing performance of the indemnity obligation; or ii. Furnish a written acceptance of tender of defense and indemnity from Consultant's insurance company. Consultant will take the action required by the City within fifteen (15) days of receiving notice from the City. 12. Indemnification. Consultant will defend and indemnify City, its officers, agents, and employees and hold them harmless from and against all judgments, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including a reasonable amount as and for its attorney’s fees paid, incurred or for which it may be liable resulting from any breach of this Agreement by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, or any negligent or intentional act or omission performed, taken or not performed or taken by Consultant, its agents, contractors and employees, relative to this Agreement. City will indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from and against any loss for injuries or damages arising out of the negligent acts of the City, its officers, agents or employees. 13. Ownership of Documents. All plans, diagrams, analyses, reports and information generated in connection with the performance of the Agreement (“Information”) shall become the property of the City, but Consultant may retain copies of such documents as records of the services provided. The City may use the Information for its purposes and the Consultant also may use the Information for its purposes. Use of the Information for the purposes of the project contemplated by this Agreement (“Project”) does not relieve any liability on the part of the Consultant, but any use of the Information by the City or the Consultant beyond the scope of the Project is without liability to the other, and the party using the Information agrees to defend and indemnify the other from any claims or liability resulting therefrom. 14. Mediation. Each dispute, claim or controversy arising from or related to this agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to initiating arbitration or legal or equitable actions by either party. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the mediation shall be in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association then currently in effect. A request for mediation shall be filed in writing with the American Arbitration Association and the other party. No arbitration or legal or equitable action may be instituted for a period of 90 days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer period of time is provided by agreement of the parties. Cost of mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. Mediation shall be held in Willow Creek Bridge Replacement Feasibility Page 8 of 10 2017 06 01 the City of Eden Prairie unless another location is mutually agreed upon by the parties. The parties shall memorialize any agreement resulting from the mediation in a mediated settlement agreement, which agreement shall be enforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction thereof. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 15. Assignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 16. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing services hereunder, the Consultant shall abide by statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. Any violation of statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the services to be provided shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and entitle the City to immediately terminate this Agreement. 17. Conflicts. No salaried officer or employee of the City and no member of the Council of the City shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement. The violation of this provision renders the Agreement void. 18. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original. 19. Damages. In the event of a breach of this Agreement by the City, Contractor shall not be entitled to recover punitive, special or consequential damages or damages for loss of business. 20. Employees. Contractor agrees not to hire any employee or former employee of City and City agrees not to hire any employee or former employee of Contractor prior to termination of this Agreement and for one (1) year thereafter, without prior written consent of the former employer in each case. 21. Enforcement. The Contractor shall reimburse the City for all costs and expenses, including without limitation, attorneys' fees paid or incurred by the City in connection with the enforcement by the City during the term of this Agreement or thereafter of any of the rights or remedies of the City under this Agreement. 22. Entire Agreement, Construction, Application and Interpretation. This Agreement is in furtherance of the City’s public purpose mission and shall be construed, interpreted, and applied pursuant to and in conformance with the City's public purpose mission. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Contract supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Contract shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. Willow Creek Bridge Replacement Feasibility Page 9 of 10 2017 06 01 23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 24. Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age. The Consultant shall post in places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this non-discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. The Consultant shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. The Consultant further agrees to comply with all aspects of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes 363.01, et. seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 25. Notice. Any notice required or permitted to be given by a party upon the other is given in accordance with this Agreement if it is directed to either party by delivering it personally to an officer of the party, or if mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or if deposited cost paid with a nationally recognized, reputable overnight courier, properly addressed to the address listed on page 1 hereof. Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or the date of mailing or deposit as aforesaid, provided, however, that if notice is given by mail or deposit, that the time for response to any notice by the other party shall commence to run one business day after any such mailing or deposit. A party may change its address for the service of notice by giving written notice of such change to the other party, in any manner above specified, 10 days prior to the effective date of such change. 26. Rights and Remedies. The duties and obligations imposed by this Agreement and the rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to and not a limitation of any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. 27. Services Not Provided For. No claim for services furnished by the Consultant not specifically provided for herein shall be honored by the City. 28. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion hereof is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Agreement. 29. Statutory Provisions. a. Audit Disclosure. The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Consultant or other parties relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the City and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor for a period of six (6) years after the effective date of this Agreement. Willow Creek Bridge Replacement Feasibility Page 10 of 10 2017 06 01 b. Data Practices. Any reports, information, or data in any form given to, or prepared or assembled by the Consultant under this Agreement which the City requests to be kept confidential, shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the City's prior written approval. This Agreement is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practice Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (Data Practices Act). All government data, as defined in the Data Practices Act Section 13.02, Subd 7, which is created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant in performing any of the functions of the City during performance of this Agreement is subject to the requirements of the Data Practice Act and Consultant shall comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity. All subcontracts entered into by Consultant in relation to this Agreement shall contain similar Data Practices Act compliance language. 30. Waiver. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. Executed as of the day and year first written above. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Mayor City Manager CONSULTANT By: Its: N:\Proposals\Eden Prairie\Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement\FOR REVIEW_Proposal for Willow Creek Bridge Replacement - 0202 2021.docx February 10, 2021 Carter Schulze, PE Assistant City Engineer City of Eden Prairie cschulze@edenprairie.org RE: Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement Proposal for Professional Engineering Services City of Eden Prairie, MN Dear Mr. Schulze, Thank you for allowing Bolton & Menk to prepare this proposal for the City of Eden Prairie for the Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement Project. During our discussion about the project on January 19th, it was determined that a feasibility/scoping phase is needed to help identify overall project needs and design and plan efforts. Following the completion of this feasibility phase a supplemental proposal will be provided with the identified project scope for design and plan preparation. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The existing Willow Creek Road Bridge includes a concrete deck with twin culverts beneath the bridge. The existing roadway has been widened, over time, beyond the width of the concrete bridge deck. The existing corrugated metal pipe culverts under the bridge are exhibiting signs of deterioration, including corrosion. The entire structure: bridge and culverts, need to be replaced. Willow Creek Road, at Bryant Lake Drive, is the only access point for the Willow Creek Road neighborhood (approximately 25 homes), a temporary access route during construction will be necessary as a part of the project. In addition, properties on Willow Creek Road are not served by city public utilities: sanitary sewer or watermain. As a part of this phase, our team will evaluate alignment options to provide sewer and water to the neighborhood to help evaluate possible easement acquisition needs. Partnership and coordination with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, Army Corps of Engineers, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is necessary along with public outreach to the neighborhood. SCOPE OF WORK In accordance with the City’s request, and our meeting on January 19th, Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the following initial scope of work in support of the Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement: Task 1: Project Coordination Bolton & Menk will work in close coordination with the City to develop a project schedule and ensure project deadlines are met. Subtask 1.1: Project Management Upon notice to proceed, we will facilitate a project kick off meeting to clearly define roles and responsibilities, project scope and schedule, and expected deliverables. Project management activities include coordinating with project partners and public engagement efforts with the neighborhood residents. During the feasibility phase, a public informational presentation (narrated power point) will be prepared Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement 02/10/2021 Page: 2 for sharing/posting on the City’s website. A letter, introducing the project and directing residents to the City’s website for the virtual open house, will be prepared for the City to mail to area properties. Feedback will be available through email to the city or our project manager, or we can create an online or to solicit feedback, if desired. Subtask 1.2: City Meetings Bolton & Menk will be available for 2 project update meetings with City staff as a part of the feasibility phase. Bolton & Menk will provide status updates on project development and progress. These meetings will be conducted via phone or Microsoft Teams. Subtask 1.3: Regulatory Agency Coordination This project will require coordination and communication with various regulatory agencies including: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR), and the Army Corp of Engineers. Our team has initiated conversations with NMCWD to obtain their model of this area. Upon receipt of the model, we will move into Task 3 below. Once enough information is known about the hydraulic impacts of the potential bridge replacement and design alternatives are vetted and discussed, Bolton & Menk will facilitate a project meeting with City Staff and regulatory agency/water resources stakeholders. We will maintain constant communication with the project team and share preliminary designs as deliverables are generated. Task 2: Project Survey This task is intended to gather existing topographic, utility, and site feature information. Subtask 2.1 Topographic Survey Bolton & Menk will verify the culvert inverts, pipe sizes and materials. We will also develop topographic survey approximately 150-ft on either side of the bridge, ~20-ft beyond existing right of way, and ~75-ft either side of the existing culverts along the creek. The scope of work for this task includes the following: • Research City & County Information (i.e. plats, half section maps, section corner coordinates, etc.) • Preliminary property corner and plat calculations & preparation of project information for field staff • Submit Gopher State One Call tickets for field markings and maps • Establish horizontal & vertical control based on Hennepin County Coordinate System 1986 Adj. & NGVD 29 • Field locations of existing conditions • Field location of existing utilities, including structure reports (assumes 2-structure reports) • Drafting of existing conditions and utility information • Right-of-way/boundary determination Bolton & Menk will utilize benchmarks provided by the City and/or watershed district near the site based on NGVD 29 datum. An additional line item is included in the estimate, in the event there is not a sufficient number of benchmarks near the project site to utilize and check between. The City will notify property owners of the survey work prior to the start of the project. Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement 02/10/2021 Page: 3 Task 3: Water Resources & Alternative Review Bolton & Menk will utilize NMCWD’s model for this area to review and verify the existing and proposed conditions of the hydraulic modeling. Subtask 3.1 Review and Verify Hydraulic Modeling Willow Creek is a part of Nine Mile Creek and hydraulic modeling and coordination with the NMCWD will be required. Our team reached out to staff at NMCWD and found that the MnDNR holds the current effective floodplain model (FEMA approved) developed by NMCWD. The model was developed assuming TP-40 rainfall depths. NMCWD is currently updating the regional hydraulic model to reflect Atlas 14 rainfall depths with plans to calibrate in 2021. Based on potential timing of the bridge replacement, it may be prudent for the agencies to work together to submit a single Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) to account for any modeling changes and the installation of the new bridge/culvert system. We anticipate utilizing the MnDNR and NMCWD models to establish baseline flow conditions and to assess potential downstream impacts. We understand that the model will be collected in two forms – the current effective FEMA model with TP-40 rainfall depths and distributions, and an update (uncalibrated) Atlas 14 model. Both will be used to compare current and future lake elevations, flow increases, and any adverse impacts. Subtask 3.2 Alternatives Review Utilizing the modeling, our team, in collaboration with City staff, will discuss culvert and bridge options worth evaluating and reviewing further based on the results of the modeling. Following our meeting with the City, will evaluate and review up to three culvert/bridge options to replace the existing Willow Creek Crossing. No additional modifications to the model will be made. The alternatives review will identify permanent and temporary impacts associated with the three options, including temporary impacts necessary to construct a temporary access route during construction. Subtask 3.3 Preliminary Wetland Impact Preliminary figures, utilizing online databases and estimated construction limits, will be developed illustrating approximate wetland impacts with the 3 options. Task 4: Public Utilities Subtask 4.1: Public Utility Feasibility The Willow Creek Road neighborhood is not served by City public utilities. As a part of the feasibility phase our team will evaluate possible layout options to get sanitary sewer and watermain across the creek/bridge to serve the neighborhood in the future. City record drawings of existing facilities in the area will be utilized to help determine connect to existing City utilities. Preliminary permanent and temporary easements needs will be identified, no easement acquisition is included with this phase. Task 5: Feasibility Report Subtask 5.1: Draft Feasibility Report We will prepare and present a draft feasibility report for City review. We anticipate the following report components. • Executive summary • Background and statement need Willow Creek Road Bridge Replacement 02/10/2021 Page: 4 • Description of three options • Hydraulic modeling results • Summary of permitting needs • Construction Access/Staging • Public Utility Feasibility • Estimated costs • Schedule • Recommendations/next steps • Figures Subtask 5.2: Final Feasibility Report Upon review of the draft feasibility report, we will incorporate all City comments. A final feasibility report will be delivered to the City. ESTIMATED FEES Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the above scope of work on an hourly basis for a not to exceed hourly fee of $38,700. These fees for the individual tasks are estimates, a detailed breakdown of tasks, staff hours, and associated fees is available upon request. Task 1 Project Coordination $ 4,800 Task 2 Project Survey $ 9,700 Task 3 Water Resources & Alternatives Review $8,300 Task 4 Public Utilities $ 3,500 Task 5 Feasibility Report $ 12,400 Total Estimated Fee $ 38,700 Task 2 Alt Additional Survey for Benchmarks (if needed) $ 2,100 Bolton & Menk appreciates the opportunity to help you with this challenging project in our continued service to the City of Eden Prairie. We look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions on this proposal please call/email me at 612-756-3427 or sarah.lloyd@bolton-menk.com. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Sarah Lloyd, PE Principal Engineer CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar DATE March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT / DIVISION Scott Riley Public Works – Streets Division ITEM DESCRIPTION Approve Purchase of Crack Sealant Material from Midstates Equipment and Supply for a cost not to exceed $28,000. ITEM NO. VIII.E. Requested Action Move to: Approve Purchase of Crack Sealant Material from Midstates Equipment and Supply for a cost not to exceed $28,000. Synopsis The City of Eden Prairie participates in the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Venture (CPV). This enables the City to purchase materials under the terms of contracts already negotiated by the State of Minnesota. The cost to purchase Nuvo 3405/Elastoflex 63 per State Contract number B-357(5) is $0.581/lb. with costs not to exceed $28,000.00. Funding for this purchase are included in the 2021 Streets Crack Filling budget. Background Natural ground movement and thermal expansion/contraction can cause various forms of pavement cracking. If left untreated, pavement cracks will widen, allowing water to channel and damage the pavement base. A compromised base will quickly lead to pavement deterioration, such as voids, potholes, and raveling. Sealing cracks as part of regular maintenance can drastically slow pavement deterioration and extend service life of pavement. Attachment Midstates Quote CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar DATE: March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Mary Krause Public Works/Engineering ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. #21801 Award Contract for 2021 Street Sweeping to Pearson Brothers, Inc. ITEM NO.: VIII.F. Requested Action Move to: Award contract for 2021 Street Sweeping to Pearson Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $31,950. Synopsis Quotes were received Friday, February 19, 2021 for the 2021 Street Sweeping. Three quotes were received as follows: Pearson Brothers, Inc. $31,950 Allied Blacktop Company $35,622 Reliakor Services, Inc. $49,350 Background Information The schedule for street sweeping in the project specifications indicates a start date of April 5, 2021. This early cleaning of the streets prevents sand and debris that has accumulated from the winter snow removal operations from entering into the City’s wetlands, creeks and lakes. Spring sweeping of the streets takes approximately 5-8 working days. Street sweeping will also take place in the fall to remove leaf debris from the streets. Financial Implications Funding for the street sweeping is from the Storm Water Utility Fund. Staff recommends award to Pearson Brothers, Inc. Attachment Contract CONSTRUCTION SHORT FORM CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed this _____ day of __________ 2021, by and between City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY", and Pearson Brothers, Inc., a Minnesota corportion hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR", WITNESSETH: CITY AND CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter stated, agrees as follows: I. CONTRACTOR hereby covenants and agrees to perform and execute all the provisions of the Plans and Specifications prepared by the Public Works Department referred to in Paragraph IV, as provided by the CITY for: I.C. 21801- 2021 Street Striping Project CONTRACTOR further agrees to do everything required by this Agreement and the Contract Document. II. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to receive and accept payment in accordance with the prices bid for the unit or lump sum items as set forth in the Proposal Form attached hereto which prices conform to those in the accepted CONTRACTOR'S proposal on file in the office of the City Engineer. The aggregate sum of such prices, based on estimated required quantities is estimated to be $31,950.00. III. Payments to CONTRACTOR by City shall be made as provided in the Contract Documents. IV. The Contract Documents consist of the following component parts: (1) Legal and Procedural Documents a. Proposal Form b. Construction Short Form Contract c. Instructions to Contractors, Specifications and Special Conditions The Contract Documents are hereby incorporated with this Agreement and are as much a part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. This Agreement and the Contract Documents are the Contract. V. CONTRACTOR agrees to fully and satisfactorily complete the work contemplated by this Agreement in accordance with the Contract Documents. VI. This Agreement shall be executed in two (2) copies. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the date first above written. In Presence Of: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE __________________________________ By ________________________________ Its City Mayor __________________________________ By_______________________________ Its City Manager CONTRACTOR In Presence Of: ____________________________________ __________________________________ By ________________________________ Its __________________________ __________________________________ _______________________________ Its __________________________ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing DATE: March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Community Development Janet Jeremiah, Director; Jonathan Stanley, Housing and Community Services Manager ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2021 CDBG Funding Recommendations ITEM NO.: IX.A. Requested Action Move to: Adopt Resolution approving the use of 2021 CDBG funds as recommended by the Eden Prairie Human Services Review Committee. Synopsis Eden Prairie’s 2021 CDBG allocation has not yet been announced by the office of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). However, the Human Services Review Committee used the estimate of $280,000 in grant funding to make their funding recommendations. Once the actual amount is received, the Housing Rehabilitation Program will be increased or decreased accordingly. Federal regulations stipulate that public service funding may not exceed 15 percent of the City’s total allocation ($280,000), plus 15 percent of the previous year’s program income ($130,000). $95,000 in prior year program income will be used for 2021 activities which will bring the total funding amount to $375,000. Any additional program income received will be used to cover expenses generated in an existing CDBG Program or activity. The Human Services Review Committee reviewed the 2021 CDBG proposals and recommended the following activities be funded. Public Service Activities Funding PROP (Housing Support Services) $30,000 PROP (Emergency Vehicle Repair) $15,000 PROP (Child Care) $4,000 HOME (Household & Outside Maintenance for the Elderly) $12,000 Subtotal $61,000 Housing and Administrative Activities Funding Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Loan Program $157,000 Rehab Grants $10,000 Affordable Housing - WHAHLT $80,000 Affordable Housing – First Time Homebuyer $10,000 Fair Housing Initiative $2,000 Program Administration $55,000 Total $375,000 Background Information 2021 Allocation Process The discussion of how to distribute the 2021 CDBG funds through the Human Services Review Committee included a complete review of all “Request for Funding” applications and the distribution percentage of funds in 2020. The Committee’s goals were to have the best and highest use of these funds for human services that demonstrated the most direct benefit to the community. Attachments 2021 CDBG Summary of Proposals 2021 Resolution 2021 Action Plan 2021 CDBG Public Service Application Summary Type of Funds Activity Agency 2021 Request 2020 Funding 2021 HSRC Description Clients Served 2020* Projected Clients 2021 Public Service Emergency Housing Assistance PROP $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 Emergency financial assistance for rent/mortgage payments to prevent homelessness. 10 Households $16,000 15 Households Public Service Household Chore & Main. for seniors Senior Comm. Services (HOME) $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 Provide maintenance and chore service to residents 60 and older 19 Households $7,300 38 Households Public Service Vehicle Repair PROP $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Car repair for low-income Eden Prairie families. PROP will administer the program that pays 75% of repair costs up to $1000 per low/mod income resident. 8 Residents $8,000 15 Residents Public Service Childcare Subsidy PROP $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Provide short term child care assistance for residents starting a new job or training program. 1 Youth $1,000 3 Youth TOTAL $61,000 $61,000 $61,000 *Clients served 7/1/2020 through 12/31/2020 Public Service funds available for 2021 = $61,000 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2021 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, as an entitlement community, participates in the Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has developed a proposal for the use of CDBG funds, and held a public hearing on March 2, 2021, to obtain the views of citizens on the proposed use of $280,000 in grant funding plus $95,000 in program income funds for the 2021 Community Development Block Grant Program. Any additional program income received will be used to cover expenses generated in an existing CDBG Program or activity and not just expenses related to the activity generating the income BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie approves the following activities for funding from the Community Development Block Grant program, and authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Manager to execute Subrecipient and Third Party Agreements on behalf of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if there is an increase or decrease in the anticipated funding amount for the 2021 CDBG fiscal year, the Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Loan Program allocation will be increased or decreased accordingly. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute on behalf of the City; the Application for Federal Assistance, Form SF424 submitted with the Action Plan, the HUD Funding/Approval form and all Certifications and other documents required in connection therewith. Public Service Activities Funding Level PROP (Housing Support Services) $30,000 PROP (Emergency Vehicle Repair) $15,000 PROP (Child Care) $4,000 HOME (Household & Outside Maintenance for the Elderly) $12,000 Subtotal $61,000 Housing Activities Funding Level Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Loan Program $157,000 Rehab Grants $10,000 Affordable Housing - WHAHLT $80,000 Affordable Housing – First Time Homebuyer $10,000 Fair Housing Initiative $2,000 Program Administration $55,000 Total $375,000 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of March, 2021. ________________________ Ronald A Case, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Kathleen Porta, City Clerk Annual Action Plan 2021 1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction The City of Eden Prairie became a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement community in 2006. CDBG funds are allocated to the City directly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The City remains a part of the Hennepin County Consortium for purposes of the Five Year Consolidated Plan and HOME funding. The city held its public hearing on March 2, 2021, to determine how to allocate an estimated $280,000 in 2021 CDBG funding. The city’s Human Services Review Committee met on January 22, 2021, to determine their recommendations that were brought to the council during the public hearing for approval. When the city held its public hearing it had not received its 2021 allocation amount from HUD. The city estimated the amount it will receive to be $280,000, with the stipulation that the Housing Rehabilitation Loan program will be increased or decreased accordingly once the actual allocation amount is received. 2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan This could be a restatement of items or a table listed elsewhere in the plan or a reference to another location. It may also contain any essential items from the housing and homeless needs assessment, the housing market analysis or the strategic plan. The City of Eden Prairie will carry out activities that will provide for the preservation of the City's housing stock, provide affordable housing options, provide essential services to seniors, families and individuals and support Fair Housing activities. The city's CDBG allocation will be used for housing rehabilitation, energy improvements, accessibility improvements and emergency repairs for the purpose of maintaining decent affordable housing. The city plans to rehab six low/mod income, owner occupied homes and assist two seniors with emergency grants. If excess program income funds are available, the city may use a portion of these funds to provide rehab grants to non profits who serve low mod income Eden Prairie residents to make needed repairs to their facilities. Annual Action Plan 2021 2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) The City’s CDBG allocation will be used for affordable housing to help provide decent housing, while maintaining affordability and sustainability. CDBG program income funds will be used for a first time home buyer program to assist one low/mod income household purchase their first home. CDBG entitlement funds will be used by the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust to help acquire one single family home, which will then be sold to a low/mod income first time homebuyer. The city supports public service programs that provide assistance to low/moderate income seniors, families, individuals and youth. These funds help provide access to suitable living environments, maintain affordability, availability and accessibility to housing activities. During 2021, it is anticipated that seventy one low/mod income Eden Prairie residents will be assisted through programs offered by PROP and Senior Community Services. The City will utilize CDBG funds to support fair housing activities through the Fair Housing Implementation Council. The city will use excess prior year entitlement funds or program income for administration, public service programs, affordable housing and rehabilitation projects. Any additional program income received will be used to cover expenses generated in an existing CDBG Program or activity and not just expenses related to the activity generating the income. 3. Evaluation of past performance This is an evaluation of past performance that helped lead the grantee to choose its goals or projects. Due to the limited amount of CDBG funds received, the city carefully considers each project to make sure that it will meet as many housing and community development needs as possible. There is particular focus on this with the public service agencies, requiring them to report on past performance and anticipated future performance when applying for funds. The organizations receiving CDBG funding from the City of Eden Prairie typically meet their expected performance goals. These organizations continuously experience high demand for their services and give the city insight into community needs. The city evaluates the organizations receiving CDBG funds through quarterly reports and biennial monitoring visits. By requiring these organizations to submit quarterly reports, the city is able to closely monitor them for timeliness and to make sure they are serving the clientele specified in their funding request. If a grantee is falling behind in their spending or accomplishments, the city works closely with them to come up with solutions. The city feels as though communication is an important tool to make sure the funded programs are successful. The city maintains spreadsheets that track the past performance of funded organizations and uses these spreadsheets when determining funding. The city is able to look back several years to see trends and to determine if a program is serving its purpose. Annual Action Plan 2021 3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process Summary from citizen participation section of plan. The City of Eden Prairie is part of the Hennepin County Consortium, and therefore the City’s Consolidated Plan is part of the Hennepin County Consortium Consolidated Plan. The City follows Hennepin County’s Citizen Participation Plan, which calls for the Hennepin County Consortium Action Plan to be available for public comment 30 days prior to a public hearing before the Hennepin County Board. The Eden Prairie City Council holds their own public hearing before the Hennepin County comment period and allows the public to comment on the proposed activities. Following the Citizen Participation Plan, notice of the public hearing was published on February 11, 2021, in the Sun Sailor more than ten days prior to the council meeting. The City’s Office of Housing & Community Services (OHCS) responds to questions and inquiries about the plan and makes recommendations to the City Council based on feedback. The Human Services Review Committee used the estimated allocation amount of $280,000 along with $95,000 in program income funds to make the funding recommendations to the city council. Once the actual amount is received, the Housing Rehabilitation Program will be increased or decreased accordingly. For the 2021 program year, the public notice was published on February 11, 2021 and public comments were solicited from February 11, 2021 until March 12, 2021. The Eden Prairie city council held a public hearing on March 2, 2021 to approve the city’s 2021 Action plan. No citizens participated in Eden Prairie’s public hearing and no comments were received prior to the meeting. After the city’s public hearing, Hennepin County held a 30 day public comment period for the Consortium’s 2021 Annual Action Plan from April 1, 2021-April 30, 2021. The county’s public hearing was held on April 13, 2021 and no comments were received regarding Eden Prairie’s plan. 5. Summary of public comments This could be a brief narrative summary or reference an attached document from the Citizen Participation section of the Con Plan. No comments have been received by the residents of Eden Prairie. The city does not typically receive public comments on their action plan. Therefore, throughout the year, the city works hard to engage residents in the planning process. The city relies heavily on residents to point out needs they see in the community. As part of the city’s Comprehensive Plan, Aspire Eden Prairie 2040, the City assembled a number of focus groups to address housing, specifically to determine how to meet housing needs going into the future. Due to the pandemic, the majority of the meetings were held virtually. The information gathered will assist in planning for future housing needs, including the development and preservation of affordable housing. The City also convened a 12-member resident Housing Task Force, to be discussed Annual Action Plan 2021 4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) below, which met 16 times over a two-year period, culminating in a presentation of recommendations to the City Council. The city holds quarterly meetings with PROP, the city’s emergency services provider, to discuss resident’s needs/barriers, affordable housing, tenant/landlord issues and homeless prevention. These meetings are very important to the city as a means to understand what the need is in the community and what can be done to address the needs. The city learned that barriers include child care, affordable housing and transportation. The city plans to fund programs that address these barriers in 2021. The city used social media and a city newsletter this year to reach out to first time homebuyers and current homeowners to advertise our First Time Homebuyer and Housing Rehab programs. By using the newsletter, Facebook, email and the city's webpage we were able to educate the public on the programs the city offers. The marketing of these programs through social media increased the number of residents served during 2020. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them Prior to or during the public hearing for the 2021 Action Plan, no comments were received or rejected by the city of Eden Prairie. 7. Summary In summary, the City continues to serve as many low/moderate income residents as possible. The city believes that its citizen participation plan as well as input from public service providers enables it to administer CDBG funds efficiently and to meet the needs of it's residents. The activities to be undertaken during the 2021 fiscal year address the priority needs and local objectives as set forth in the Consolidated Plan. The activities that are part of the 2021 Action Plan are to be completed within 12 months from the time funds are allocated to the City of Eden Prairie. Annual Action Plan 2021 5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b) 1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator EDEN PRAIRIE Community Development Table 1 – Responsible Agencies Narrative Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Annual Action Plan 2021 6 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l) 1. Introduction The City of Eden Prairie has a Development Review Committee comprised of staff from Housing and Community Services, Community Development, Parks and Rec, Police, Fire and Inspections. This committee meets weekly to review proposals for new development and projects. This group works directly with developers, non-profit agencies and other governmental agencies and transit authorities to ensure that all perspectives are considered throughout the review process. The city consults and works closely with the Fair Housing Implementation Council to identify and address fair housing needs throughout the metro area. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(l)). The City uses its CDBG funding, pooled TIF funds and general fund monies to coordinate services with a host of agencies serving households at a variety of low and moderate income levels. The Southwest Rail Light Rail Transit (SWLRT) project has begun and the City is routinely fielding inquiries from developers all of which would include affordable units under the City’s inclusionary housing practice. The City’s investment in the Elevate project, a 222-unit TOD apartment complex, is complete and has 20% affordable units and is near full lease up. Working with the same developer, the new Paravel project will bring an additional 45 affordable units to households at or below 50% of AMI as well as an additional seven inclusionary units affordable at 80% of AMI, with construction to start in 2021. Also new to Eden Prairie is the 58-unitTrail Pointe Ridge, developed by prominent non-profit developer CommonBond, which includes units affordable at 30%, 50%, and 60% AMI, as well several market rate units. The City is also active in working with peer cities along the light rail line, exploring tools for creating or maintaining affordability such as inclusionary housing policies and preserving naturally-occurring affordable housing (NOAH), and continues to refine its own practices surrounding its use of tools such as tax increment financing (TIF) and housing revenue bonds. Using the recently updated comp plan as a starting point, a 12-member Council-appointed Housing Task Force reviewed City tools and practices and presented recommendations to the City Council in October 2020. Every year, the City of Eden Prairie provides grant funding, through CDBG and the General Fund, to community service agencies to provide services to seniors, individuals, children and families. Coordination of the grants takes place within the City’s Office of Housing and Community Services (OHCS). Many of these services are provided on-site to residents living in the three Section 8 project-based housing developments in Eden Prairie. These housing developments are Briarhill, Prairie Meadows and Edendale Retirement Residence. OHCS staff coordinate outreach strategies with the local emergency service provider, PROP, to property managers to ensure they are aware of the programs and Annual Action Plan 2021 7 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) services that are available to the tenants living in their buildings. The city uses general funds to support a YMCA program at Briarhill to increase access to food and community resources as well as educational supports for students during COVID-19. The city is working with Edendale to provide food access as well as providing updates on access to COVID-19 testing, vaccinations and resources. Eden Prairie is collaborating with Onward Eden Prairie to provide housing to youth who are homeless. The program offers supportive housing with supervision and case management to help young people get the education and job skills to lift them out of poverty. OHCS assists residents interested in applying for the wait list for the Housing Choice Voucher program if waiting lists are opened. Assistance is available in English, Spanish and Somali. OHCS staff assists immigrants with employment services and unemployment applications. Finally, the City also works with various public agencies including other cities, Hennepin County, and state agencies. This collaboration allows the City to find out more about what these organizations are seeing in their community and helps the City prepare for future needs. Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness. This coordination is completed by the Minneapolis/Hennepin County Continuum of Care and the Office to End Homelessness. If a resident of Eden Prairie is facing issues of homelessness, the City would first refer to the Coordinated Entry Program through Hennepin County to help assist with the resident's issues. Hennepin County Coordinated Entry works with agencies in the Northwest Metro such as CEAP, PRISM, and the YMCA depending on age of the resident as well as location that could also be used as a referral source. The City of Eden Prairie will work to contact the Continuum of Care staff at Hennepin County to assist with residents of Eden Prairie that are at risk of homelessness or have experienced homelessness. Additionally, the City would contact our partnering agencies such as PROP, Onward Eden Prairie and MoveFWD to assist with potential homelessness depending on the needs of the resident. Members of the Minneapolis/Hennepin County Continuum of Care (CoC) & the Office to End Homelessness (OEH) convene CoC members around specific target populations (Youth Collaborative, Family Services Network, Veteran Committee) and intervention types (Shelter Efficiency Network, The Outreach Group) in order to coordinate and develop new collective strategies to make homelessness rare, brief and non-recurring. The CoC's funding committee evaluates existing and proposed projects for service and reallocates funds to meet emerging needs. All homeless designated housing programs that receive public funding are required to fill all vacancies through referrals from the Coordinated Entry System (CES). This allows for a system-wide assessment and prioritization of people most in need of each housing type. All permanent supportive housing Annual Action Plan 2021 8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) projects prioritize chronically homeless persons and families, with chronicity, length of time homeless, disability status and vulnerability level are all taken into account, alongside client preferences. Our community has very few homeless families that meet the HUD definition of chronic homelessness due to a shelter-all policy for families and access to rapid rehousing and permanent supportive housing through CES. Hennepin CoC has reduced family homelessness overall by 36% over the last five years The youth-specific crisis response system in Hennepin CoC consists of access points (crisis line, website and mobile app), prevention services, street and school outreach (18 FTE), three drop-in centers, 61 Emergency Shelter (ES) beds, 260 Rapid ReHousing (RRH) / Transitional Housing (TH) beds, 30 Host Homes (30) and 269 Permanent Supportive Housing units (PSH). These are spread across providers who receive a combination of federal, state, county and private funds. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction’s area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS Eden Prairie does not receive ESG funds. 2. Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and consultations Annual Action Plan 2021 9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization EDEN PRAIRIE Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government - Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy Non-Homeless Special Needs Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Human Services Review Committee: This committee is comprised of City staff from a variety of departments, including Housing and Community Services, Zoning Enforcement, Police, Administration and Parks and Recreation. This group meets as necessary to work on issues related to housing and community needs. Each year, this committee reviews requests for funding from service providers and makes funding recommendations to the City Council. There are two sources of funding for community services, the City's general fund and CDBG. The recommendations are based on review of written proposals, site visits and other methods to determine the quality of the service and the overall value to the community. The Office of Housing and Community Services meets to determine recommendations for how CDBG funds will be used for housing programs. The recommendations are based on funds available and needs in the community. The city's Housing Rehab Program and First Time Homebuyer Program are popular programs that are funded with CDBG funds. 2 Agency/Group/Organization Senior Community Services (SCS) Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Elderly Persons What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs Annual Action Plan 2021 10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? To determine needs for low/mod income seniors living in Eden Prairie, the city consults with Senior Community Services. Senior Community Services is able to tell city employees what trends they are seeing in the senior community and what the greatest need is. Currently, as the population ages, many seniors are trying to stay in their homes longer. By providing chore services through the HOME program, they are able to help seniors avoid moving out of their homes. Senior Community Services has noticed a trend that the number of residents they are able to serve with CDBG funds has gone down because each senior requires more services and there is not enough funds remaining to meet the needs of additional seniors. They use CDBG funds to leverage other funding to assist more seniors. As the population in Eden Prairie ages, this is a program that is vital to the city as a resource for seniors. 3 Agency/Group/Organization People Reaching out to Other People Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing Services-Children Transportation What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Homeless Needs - Families with children Non-Homeless Special Needs Annual Action Plan 2021 11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? To determine need and anticipated resources for low/mod income families living in Eden Prairie. The city consulted PROP to help with planning the best way to use CDBG funds to prevent homelessness. The city relies on PROP to forward their data to the city so that we are able to prevent homelessness before it becomes a problem. PROP helps the city understand that funding from the city is a high priority in the fight against homelessness. PROP assists Eden Prairie residents who are in danger of becoming homeless and need housing assistance. After consulting with PROP regarding car repair needs in the community, it was determined that there is a large need for car repair assistance in Eden Prairie so low/mod income residents have dependable transportation to work and school. In 2019, PROP implemented a Child Care program that provides short term assistance to residents who are beginning a new job or training program. 4 Agency/Group/Organization WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAND TRUST Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The city consulted with WHAHLT to determine the need for affordable housing and the availability of housing in the city. WHAHLT struggles with finding available properties within Eden Prairie that are affordable. Finding affordable housing in Eden Prairie is a high priority for the city and working with WHAHLT is a way to attain this goal. Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting All agencies listed above were consulted. Annual Action Plan 2021 12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care Hennepin County The Eden Prairie CDBG Action Plan identified homeless prevention activities as important goals. This includes direct homeless prevention housing assistance as well as affordable housing programs. Aspire 2040 City of Eden Prairie Aspire 2040 lays out development of the city for the next 20 years. It also identifies affordable housing efforts within the city, which may be impacted by the city's CDBG efforts. Housing Task Force City of Eden Prairie Using Aspire 2040 and the City's Action Plan as guides, the twelve member, city council appointed, Task Force addressed key goals and strategies including inclusionary housing, affordable housing trust funds, NOAH preservation, tenant protection ordinances, strategies to support seniors, development along transit lines, and a number of other policy and strategic recommendations. Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Council The Eden Prairie CDBG Action Plan has overlap with the Housing Policy Plan. Both plans identify priorities related to maintaining existing affordable housing stock and providing a mix of affordable housing options for households of all life stages and economic means. Table 3 - Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Narrative The City of Eden Prairie coordinates with Hennepin County, and the other entitlement communities that comprise the consortium, in setting the priorities of need, the citizen participation and the fair housing strategic plan for the five year span. The Eden Prairie CDBG program attempts to address the widest range of needs possible despite limited resources. The Action Plan identifies a variety of goals to promote housing affordability, provide suitable and well-maintained housing and accessibility to needed social services. Annual Action Plan 2021 13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-12 Participation - 91.401, 91.105, 91.200(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting The Consortium supports and encourages the participation of citizens, community groups, and other interested agencies in both the development and the evaluation of the Plan's programs and activities. The citizen participation process is designed to encourage all residents, including non-English-speaking and minority populations. Extremely low and low-income persons are encouraged to participate in the process. Attempts are made to include residents of areas where CDBG-funded projects currently exist. The City of Eden Prairie’s citizen participation process includes an RFP process that allows non-profit agencies to apply for CDBG funding. Through this process, the City engages with social service providers, the faith community and school district staff to learn about the needs in the community and how to best allocate pubic service funds in the most effective manner. The city solicited public comments from February 11, 2021 – March 12, 2021. This thirty day comment period was published in the Sun Sailor on February 11, 2021 and the goal was to solicit comments from the public regarding the Annual Action Plan. The plan was available for review upon request and a copy of the plan was available for review at Eden Prairie City Center. No comments were received during the citizen participation process. Any resulting changes to Plan goals would be made in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Consortium's Citizen Participation Plan. The Eden Prairie city council held a public hearing on March 2, 2021 to approve the city’s 2021 Action plan. After the city’s public hearing, Hennepin County held a 30 day public comment period for the Consortium’s 2021 Annual Action Plan from April 1, 2021-April 30, 2021. The public hearing was held on April 13, 2021 and no comments were received regarding Eden Prairie’s plan. The city completed its Housing Task Force to address lifecycle housing, inclusive and affordable housing and other housing options in Eden Prairie. This group is made up of residents, business owners and non profit representatives with city staff acting as a liaison to the group. The Housing Task Force focused on gathering data and formulating a list of recommendations which they presented to the City Council in 2021. The OHCS has Somali and Spanish speaking staff available to allow residents to express the needs of their community in their preferred language. This allows residents to participate personally instead of requiring the use of a translator or family member. The Eden Prairie Human Rights and Diversity Commission (HRDC) is made up of volunteer residents. They serve as an advisory commission to the City Council and give input on items including Bias Incident Response, ADA compliance policy, etc. The commission invites community organizations to present at Annual Action Plan 2021 14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) each meeting. Community groups have used this opportunity to give input about city policy and community needs. The HRDC has undertaken a Race Equity Initiative to focus on building a more inclusive community. This will include internal document review and interviews as well as community listening sessions. Community listening sessions will focus on including a diverse group of residents by using community liaisons to drive wide representation from the cultural groups that live in Eden Prairie. The citizen participation process impacted goal setting by giving Eden Prairie a clear understanding of where the funds would be best allocated to meet the greatest needs in our community. The city plans to continue these focus groups and community meetings in the future in order to get a true sense of the resident’s needs and wants. The city will continue to explore new avenues to provide affordable housing in Eden Prairie Citizen Participation Outreach Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Response attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comments not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 1 Public Meeting Non- targeted/broad community Attendance by three CDBG grantees. Comments made by the three grantees were related to providing information about the organization and thanking the city council for their support. N/A Annual Action Plan 2021 15 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of Response attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comments not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 2 Internet Outreach Non- targeted/broad community N/A No comments received N/A http://www.edenprairie.org/ city- government/departments/co mmunity- development/housing-and- community-services 3 Newspaper Ad Non- targeted/broad community N/A No comments received N/A Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach Annual Action Plan 2021 16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Expected Resources AP-15 Expected Resources - 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction During the 2021 program year, the city estimates receiving an allocation of $280,000 along with $95,000 in program income for a total available amount of $375,000 Anticipated Resources Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG public - federal Acquisition Admin and Planning Economic Development Housing Public Improvements Public Services 280,000 95,000 0 375,000 960,000 During the 2021 program year, the city estimates receiving an allocation of $280,000 along with $95,000 in program income for a total available amount of $375,000 Table 5 - Expected Resources – Priority Table Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied Annual Action Plan 2021 17 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan N/A Discussion Annual Action Plan 2021 18 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Annual Goals and Objectives AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 Homeowner Rehabilitation 2020 2024 Affordable Housing Citywide Preserve/Create Single Family Homeownership CDBG: $157,000 Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 8 Household Housing Unit 2 Direct Homebuyer Assistance 2020 2024 Affordable Housing Citywide Preserve/Create Single Family Homeownership CDBG: $10,000 Homeowner Housing Added: 1 Household Housing Unit 3 Acquisition 2020 2024 Affordable Housing Citywide Preserve/Create Single Family Homeownership CDBG: $80,000 Homeowner Housing Added: 1 Household Housing Unit 4 Rehab Grants 2020 2024 Non-Homeless Special Needs Citywide Rehab Grants CDBG: $10,000 Facade treatment/business building rehabilitation: 1 Business 5 Senior Services 2020 2024 Non-Homeless Special Needs Non-Housing Community Development Senior Public Service Citywide Education, Outreach and Services CDBG: $12,000 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 38 Persons Assisted Annual Action Plan 2021 19 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 6 Public Services 2020 2024 Non-Homeless Special Needs Non-Housing Community Development Citywide Education, Outreach and Services CDBG: $45,000 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 15 Persons Assisted Public service activities for Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 15 Households Assisted 7 Youth Services 2020 2024 Non-Housing Community Development Citywide Education, Outreach and Services CDBG: $4,000 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 3 Persons Assisted 8 Fair Housing 2020 2024 Fair Housing Citywide Fair Housing CDBG: $2,000 Other: 1 Other 9 Administration 2020 2024 Administration Citywide Administration CDBG: $55,000 Other: 1 Other Table 6 – Goals Summary Goal Descriptions Annual Action Plan 2021 20 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 1 Goal Name Homeowner Rehabilitation Goal Description The City of Eden Prairie expects to rehabilitate six owner-occupied homes through the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program. The program is funded using CDBG formula funds and program income. The program provides up to $30,000, depending on availability of funds, for eligible repairs through an interest free, deferred loan, with a phased repayment. The loan is forgiven after 20 years. Applications are accepted year round on a “first come, first served” basis. Applicants qualify based on their household income and the amount of equity in their home. An emergency rehab grant program will also be available for seniors to receive grants up to $5,000 to make emergency repairs to their homes. It is expected that two emergency grants will be made. 2 Goal Name Direct Homebuyer Assistance Goal Description The city assists first time homebuyers through a down payment assistance program. The city expects to provide one First Time Homebuyer loan. Down payment assistance is an interest free deferred loan up to $15,000 that provides 50% of the required down payment, $5000 in closing costs and 10% principle reduction. Loan amount is dependent on availability of program income funds. 3 Goal Name Acquisition Goal Description CDBG funds are used for acquisition of an affordable property by West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) and then sold to a low/mod income eligible buyer. WHAHLT retains ownership of the property on which the home sits, thereby assuring that it will remain an affordable property for a term of 99 years. 4 Goal Name Rehab Grants Goal Description Provide rehabilitation grants to non-profits that serve low/mod income Eden Prairie residents to update their facilities. 5 Goal Name Senior Services Goal Description Assistance to seniors with interior and exterior home maintenance (such as yard work, snow removal, and minor repairs) to help seniors remain in their homes with dignity and safety. During the pandemic, wellness calls, grocery delivery and PPE distribution have been added to the HOME Program services. Annual Action Plan 2021 21 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) 6 Goal Name Public Services Goal Description Provide assistance to households in danger of becoming homeless that need emergency assistance for housing costs (rent/mortgage). Provide emergency transportation assistance through the Emergency Vehicle Repair program. 7 Goal Name Youth Services Goal Description Provide low-income Eden Prairie parents, who may be working or attending school, with child care fee assistance. 8 Goal Name Fair Housing Goal Description Fair Housing activities include education for property managers, staff training, community outreach, and referral to Legal Aid. Funds are provided to Hennepin County for implementation of the Fair Housing activity. 9 Goal Name Administration Goal Description Coordination of the CDBG program for the city of Eden Prairie. Annual Action Plan 2021 22 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-35 Projects - 91.420, 91.220(d) Introduction As determined at the March 2, 2021 public hearing, and adopted by Eden Prairie City Council Resolution No. 2021-, the city of Eden Prairie will undertake activities related to housing rehabilitation, homebuyer assistance, public services, fair housing and program administration. # Project Name 1 Housing Rehabilitation 2 Affordable Housing 3 Family Public Services 4 Senior Services 5 Administration 6 Fair Housing 7 Rehab Grants Table 7 – Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs The City is in contact on a regular basis with a number of nonprofit agencies which coordinate and provide assistance for those who have underserved needs. The City will continue to be in contact with these agencies to learn about the underserved need in the community and how the City can help meet these needs. Despite limited funding, Eden Prairie’s CDBG program is designed to meet a wide range of needs, including services for seniors, youth and families. The city also participates in fair housing activities, housing rehabilitation and affordable housing programs. The city works with public, private, non-profit and private industry partners to accomplish its community development goals using CDBG and other funding sources. In an effort to further the city's efforts in assisting low and moderate income households, the following are additional actions in which the city provides or participates in. The proposed actions the City of Eden Prairie will take to reduce the number of persons below the poverty line are seen in the public services programs the city funds, both with general funds and CDBG funds, which promote self-sufficiency. Funded social services programs such as the vehicle repair program, the emergency housing assistance program, Meals on Wheels, and the HOME program have the common theme of helping people become or remain self sufficient. Helping people become or remain self-sufficient will reduce the likelihood that they will fall below the poverty line. An obstacle to meeting underserved needs the City has encountered has been a lack of affordable housing for potential homebuyers in its First Time Homebuyer Program. Due to the current housing market in the area, the City has encountered a lack of available housing in the price range that is within Annual Action Plan 2021 23 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) reach of young families and individuals who qualify for mortgages in the range of $200,000 to $250,000. This lack of single family homes has become a barrier to first time homebuyers looking to purchase a home in Eden Prairie using the First Time Homebuyer Program. Annual Action Plan 2021 24 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information1 Project Name Housing Rehabilitation Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Homeowner Rehabilitation Needs Addressed Preserve/Create Single Family Homeownership Funding CDBG: $157,000 Description Housing rehabilitation including energy efficiency repairs for low/mod income Eden Prairie homeowners. The rehabilitation loan program provides up to $30,000, depending on availability of funds, for eligible repairs through a interest free, deferred loan that is forgiven after twenty years. These loans are offered in an effort to help maintain the condition of housing and neighborhoods in Eden Prairie. An emergency rehab grant program will also be available for seniors to receive grants up to $5,000 to make emergency repairs which to their homes Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities It is estimated that six low/mod income Eden Prairie families will benefit from the Housing Rehab program and two low/mod income seniors will benefit from the emergency rehab program. Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Housing Rehabilitation 2 Project Name Affordable Housing Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Direct Homebuyer Assistance Acquisition Needs Addressed Preserve/Create Single Family Homeownership Funding CDBG: $90,000 Annual Action Plan 2021 25 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Description Funding for down payment assistance for low/mod income first time home buyers. The Eden Prairie First Time Homebuyer Program offers a zero interest, deferred loan with the city of Eden Prairie holding a second mortgage on the property. The deferred loan helps first time homebuyers offset the cost of purchasing a home by providing assistance with down payment, closing costs, and mortgage principle reduction. Repayment of the loan is required when the home is sold or no longer homesteaded within the first 30 years. After 30 years, the loan becomes due and payable. CDBG funds are used for acquisition of an affordable property by West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) and then sold to a low/mod income eligible buyer. WHAHLT retains ownership of the property on which the home sits, thereby assuring that it will remain an affordable property for a term of 99 years. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities One moderate income household will benefit with first time homebuyer assistance. One moderate income household will benefit with the acquisition of affordable housing. Location Description Citywide Planned Activities First time homebuyer down payment assistance for one low/mod income household WHAHLT - affordable housing acquisition to be sold to one low/mod income first time homebuyer household 3 Project Name Family Public Services Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Education, Outreach and Services Funding CDBG: $49,000 Annual Action Plan 2021 26 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Description The Homeless Prevention program provides one to three months of emergency mortgage and rent payments for low/mod income Eden Prairie families facing a housing crisis. The goal of the program is to prevent homelessness and to stabilize families in their homes and alleviate a financial crisis. The Car Repair program helps low/mod income Eden Prairie residents maintain self sufficiency by assisting with the costs of repairs to their vehicles. The car repair program will pay 75% of eligible safety repairs up to $1000. This enables residents to maintain their transportation and continue working. Provide short term child care assistance for residents starting a new job or job training. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Emergency housing - 15 households Emergency Car Repair - 15 individuals Child Care - 3 families Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Emergency rent/mortgage assistance, emergency car repair assistance and short term child care assistance 4 Project Name Senior Services Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Senior Services Needs Addressed Education, Outreach and Services Funding CDBG: $12,000 Description Senior Community Services helps maintain independence for elders and avoid premature nursing home placement by providing homemaker, maintenance and chore services through their HOME program. Target Date 6/30/2022 Annual Action Plan 2021 27 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 38 low/mod income seniors will receive chore service benefits Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Provide maintenance and chore assistance to seniors 5 Project Name Administration Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Administration Needs Addressed Administration Funding CDBG: $55,000 Description Implement and coordinate the CDBG program. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Coordinate and administer the CDBG program for Eden Prairie 6 Project Name Fair Housing Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Fair Housing Needs Addressed Fair Housing Funding CDBG: $2,000 Annual Action Plan 2021 28 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Description The City is an active member of the Fair Housing Implementation Council (FHIC), a coalition comprised of the counties of Anoka, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey and Washington; the Metro HRA (Metropolitan Council); the Community Development Agencies of Scott and Carver counties; and the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Coon Rapids, Saint Paul and Woodbury. A second coalition, the Fair Housing Advisory Committee (FHAC), was formed to incorporate feedback from the community and a HUD technical services provider to inform and improve the regional Analysis of Impediments. The scope of work includes both informing those most likely to experience discrimination of their fair housing rights, and also connecting them with government decision-makers to address barriers to fair housing. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Low/mod income Eden Prairie residents will benefit from the Fair Housing Implementation Council's (FHIC) work to identify and eliminate barriers to Fair Housing. The FHIC's work includes outreach, education and enforcement activities. This work is not measured in number of people served, but is designed to help as many people as possible experience a better quality of life. Location Description Citywide Planned Activities The city of Eden Prairie will participate in and help to fund fair housing activities through the Fair Housing Implementation Council, which provides support for fair housing activities. Activities include education for property managers, staff training community outreach and referral to Legal Aid. Funds are provided to Dakota County CDA for implementation of the fair housing activity. 7 Project Name Rehab Grants Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Rehab Grants Needs Addressed Rehab Grants Annual Action Plan 2021 29 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide grants to non-profits that serve low/mod Eden Prairie residents for rehabilitation of facilities Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities If excess program income funds are available, the city may use a portion of these funds to provide rehab grants to non-profits who serve low mod income Eden Prairie residents to make needed repairs to their facilities. Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Provide grants to non-profits that serve low/mod income Eden Prairie residents to rehab their facilities. Annual Action Plan 2021 30 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420, 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed All programs will be provided on a city-wide basis and will be directed to low/mod income Eden Prairie residents. Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds Citywide 100 Table 8 - Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Because there are no concentrations of poverty or other significant factors, all programs are available city-wide. Discussion Annual Action Plan 2021 31 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing -91.420, 91.220(j) Introduction The city of Eden Prairie strives to assist residents with affordable housing. They do this through CDBG funded programs including Housing Rehabilitation, First Time Homebuyer and WHAHLT. Public service providers also assist residents with affordable housing through homeless prevention, car repair and maintenance chore services for seniors. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment Eden Prairie uses many strategies to remove barriers to affordable housing. By using the community land trust model, these properties remain affordable for 99 years. The City uses Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and other tools to help incentivize developers to build multi-family developments in Eden Prairie. City policy requires developers who receive public TIF financing to set aside 20% of the units as affordable at the 50% Area Median Income (AMI). The City works with developers to incorporate affordable housing in all new proposed developments and continues studying the development of an inclusionary housing policy that will bring more affordable housing units to Eden Prairie. Eden Prairie, to staff’s knowledge, is the only regional municipality to require its inclusionary units to remain affordable in perpetuity rather than timing out in 15, 20, or 30 years. The City uses CDBG funds in the single family home rehabilitation program to help homeowners keep their properties viable and structurally sound. Without the home rehabilitation program, some of our residents, particularly senior citizens, could not afford to make the repairs which are necessary to stay in their homes. The City of Eden Prairie allocates general funds for social services programs. These programs support people who are currently homeless, facing homelessness or have other special needs. Discussion Eden Prairie will continue to support existing programs that remove barriers to affordable housing as well as participate in regional opportunities to address affordable housing issues. The city will continue its policy of making housing affordable citywide. Annual Action Plan 2021 32 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) AP-85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k) Introduction Despite limited funding, Eden Prairie’s CDBG program is designed to meet a wide range of needs, including services for seniors, youth and families. The city also participates in fair housing activities, housing rehabilitation and affordable housing programs. The city works with public, private, non-profit and private industry partners to accomplish its community development goals using CDBG and other funding sources. In an effort to further the city's efforts in assisting low and moderate income households, the following are additional actions in which the city provides or participates in. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs As described in the Public Housing section, the City of Eden Prairie does not have oversight of and is not involved in the operation of public housing units, and therefore does not have a plan to address public housing improvements and resident initiatives. The proposed actions the City of Eden Prairie will take to reduce the number of persons below the poverty line are seen in the public services programs the city funds, both with general funds and CDBG funds, which promote self-sufficiency. Funded social services programs such as the vehicle repair program, the emergency housing assistance program, Meals on Wheels, and the HOME Progam have the common theme of helping people become or remain self sufficient. Helping people become or remain self-sufficient will reduce the likelihood that they will fall below the poverty line. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing As mentioned, the City, at the Council’s direction, sponsored a Housing Task Force charged with presenting a range of program and policy options to City leadership. Meeting from June, 2019 until October, 2020, the diverse members tackled a range of policy areas and presented its findings to the City Council in late 2020. Representing a wide range of disciplines the Task Force made recommendations on several items, including formalizing an inclusionary policy, creating an affordable housing trust fund, and developing an inventory and strategies for preservation of NOAH properties, and these have been incorporated into the City’s 2021 work plan. The City has already been actively negotiating inclusionary housing into its developments, as mentioned, but formalizing a policy will provide a more streamlined and predictable process for developers. While TIF is a commonly used tool in multifamily developments in the City, we have also built up a substantial reserve of flexible ‘pooled TIF’ dollars and have slated them for use for preserving NOAH properties or for development around one of our four new transit stations to be built in conjunction with expansion of the green line light rail Annual Action Plan 2021 33 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) transit line which terminates in Eden Prairie. To acquire and maintain affordable rental units, the City offers TIF to developers that can demonstrate financial need for their projects, which requires that 20% of units be set aside as affordable for as long as 26 years. The City practices an inclusionary housing model, which requires developers to set aside 5% of units affordable at or below 30% of AMI, 10% affordable at or below 50% of AMI, or 15% affordable at or below 60% of AMI, even if no City financing is involved.. The City also provides conduit financing to owners of multi-family developments who wish to refinance a housing bond. The conduit financing allows the City to require the property owner to accept a specific number of Section 8 Vouchers, or to set aside a certain number of units as affordable. Finally, the City also willingly participates by issuing housing revenue bonds to be paired with 4% low income housing tax credits for new affordable housing development. On the single family side, the City plans to continue to invest CDBG funds in a community land trust called West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT). The land trust model provides homeownership opportunities to people of low to moderate incomes. By using the land trust model, these properties remain affordable for 99 years. The City will use pooled TIF housing funds and CDBG funds for its first-time homebuyer program. This program is structured to allow an interest-free loan with deferred repayment to help low and moderate homebuyers get their start in the community. The City uses CDBG to fund the single-family home rehabilitation program to help homeowners keep their properties viable and structurally sound. This program allows our residents, particularly senior citizens, who could not otherwise afford to do so, make the repairs, which are necessary to remain in their homes. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards Participants in the City’s Housing Rehabilitation Program who reside in a house built prior to 1978 are required to have their home tested for lead-based paint prior to receiving a loan. The lead-based paint testing is completed by Hennepin County. If lead hazards are found, they must be corrected and the home must pass a clearance test before the project is considered complete. If the clearance test does not pass, the corrections and re-testing must continue until the home does pass. This process is completed following HUD regulations and guidelines. If lead is found in the home and children are present, the city will work with the county to help the family apply for county grants in order to address the lead hazards. These grants will provide for temporary housing of the family while the work is being performed as well as paying for a portion of the lead abatement work. Once the home has passed a clearance test, the family will be allowed to move back home. The housing stock in Eden Prairie is newer and there are not many households that participate in the housing rehabilitation program that are built Annual Action Plan 2021 34 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) prior to 1978. Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families The following are actions the City of Eden Prairie is taking to reduce the number of poverty level families  Collaborating with and funding social service agencies in the community that assist low/mod income families achieve self-sufficiency.  Partnering with nonprofits to offer financial management and budgeting classes for the immigrant community, particularly who have accessed financial support in the past.  Employment assistance to immigrants in Eden Prairie in finding jobs, particularly those who have barriers with technology and who have lost jobs due to Covid-19.  Provide assistance to immigrants who have lost jobs due to Covid-19 with completing unemployment applications.  Providing assistance to help poverty level families find affordable housing.  Participate in the Open to Business program to help families start their own small businesses.  Raising the visibility of support services in the community so that families in need can find the help they need to move out of poverty.  Educating the broader population about the needs of poverty level families in the community and holding collaborating events to work together to meet these needs and assist families in becoming self-sufficient Actions planned to develop institutional structure The city of Eden Prairie is already working with many of the public service agencies that serve the community. These agencies receive general fund grants from the city as well as CDBG grants. The two organizations work together as part of a larger, broad-based effort. Since these relationships are working well, there are no planned changes. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies The City of Eden Prairie coordinates a property managers group that meets quarterly to discuss challenges, opportunities and resources available to rental properties. Social services agencies participate in these quarterly meetings. The city’s rental inspection program makes referrals as needed to city housing staff and social services agencies to provide resources to prevent displacement of individuals and families due to deteriorating conditions. The City of Eden Prairie provides grant funding to Senior Community Services for chore services needed by elderly residents which allows the residents to remain safe in their homes. The city supports workshops by tenant advocacy agency HomeLine to Annual Action Plan 2021 35 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) help landlords and tenants both understand the respective responsibilities and to prevent displacement. Discussion Eden Prairie will continue to use its scarce resources to operate programs that maintain the existing housing stock, create new opportunities for low and moderate income households, support existing programs that remove barriers to affordable housing, build long-term affordability into market rate developments, and participate in regional opportunities to address affordable housing issues. The city will continue its broad policy objective of making housing affordable citywide. Annual Action Plan 2021 36 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) Program Specific Requirements AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.420, 91.220(l)(1,2,4) Introduction Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 95,000 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0 5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0 Total Program Income: 95,000 Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities 0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 0.00% Discussion The city will use any excess program income received for additional public services, affordable housing and rehabilitation projects. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing DATE March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT / DIVISION Police Department Chief Greg Weber, Lieutenant Chris Wood ITEM DESCRIPTION Police Body-Worn Cameras ITEM NO. IX.B. Requested Action Move to: Hold a public hearing before the implementation of police body-worn cameras. (BWC’s) Synopsis Minnesota Statute 626.8473 Subd. 2 states “A local law enforcement agency must provide an opportunity for public comment before it purchases or implements a portable recording system. At a minimum, the agency must accept public comments submitted electronically or by mail, and the governing body with jurisdiction over the budget of the law enforcement agency must provide an opportunity for public comment at a regularly scheduled meeting.” Police body-worn cameras fits the definition of a “portable recording system”. As such, in partnership with the Communications Division, the Police Department has already published a draft policy and solicited feedback from the public via the city’s website. The solicitation of feedback from the public produced one response regarding the use of BWC’s when working with other law enforcement agencies. Background Approximately seven years ago, the police department installed video cameras in squad cars. These cameras have shown to be very valuable in gathering and preserving evidence. Furthermore, they have helped in documenting police-citizen encounters, which has helped enhance transparency and accountability. The police department believes that body-worn cameras would greatly expand the reach of this existing technology by extending these same benefits to virtually all police calls for service. Preparing for the implementation of body-worn cameras has included extensive research of viable solutions, planning, educating staff, policy development and budgeting. The police department has discovered that due to the rapid increase in popularity of police body-worn cameras, costs for this technology continues to increase. In preparation for this project, $175,000 has been allocated in the 2022 Capital Improvement Plan. The police department would like to move this purchase to occur in 2021. Attachment Draft Police Department Directive 6.10: Body-Worn Cameras City of Eden Prairie Police Department Directive 6.10: Body-Worn Cameras I. Policy It shall be the policy of the Eden Prairie Police Department to authorize and require the use of department-issued body-worn cameras (BWC) as set forth below, and to administer BWC data as provided by law. II. Procedure A. Use and Documentation 1. Officers may use only department-issued BWCs in the performance of official duties for this agency or when otherwise performing authorized law enforcement services as an employee of this department. 2. Officers who have been issued BWCs shall operate and use them consistent with this policy. Officers shall conduct a function test of their issued BWCs at the beginning of each shift to make sure the devices are operating properly. Officers noting a malfunction during testing or at any other time shall promptly report the malfunction to the officer’s supervisor and shall document the report in writing. Supervisors shall take prompt action to address malfunctions and document the steps taken in writing. 3. Officers should wear their issued BWCs at the location on their body and in the manner specified in training. 4. Officers must document BWC use and non-use as follows: a. Whenever an officer makes a recording, the existence of the recording shall be documented. b. Whenever an officer fails to record an activity that is required to be recorded under this policy, or fails to record for the entire duration of the activity, the officer must document the circumstances and reasons for not recording in an incident report. Supervisors shall review these reports and initiate any corrective action deemed necessary. 5. The department will maintain the following records and documents relating to BWC use, which are classified as public data: a. The total number of BWCs owned or maintained by the agency; b. A daily record of the total number of BWCs actually deployed and used by officers. c. The total amount of recorded BWC data collected and maintained; and d. This policy, together with the Records Retention Schedule. B. General Guidelines for Recording 1.Officers shall activate their BWCs when anticipating that they will investigation, response, or incident is ongoing, officers shall state the reasons for ceasing the recording on camera before deactivating their BWC. If circumstances change, officers shall reactivate their cameras as required by this policy to capture information having evidentiary value. 5.Officers shall not intentionally block the BWC’s audio or visual recording functionality to defeat the purposes of this policy. 6.Notwithstanding any other provision in this policy, officers shall not use their BWCs to record other agency personnel during non-enforcement related activities, such as during pre- and post-shift time in locker rooms, during meal breaks, or during other private conversations, unless recording is authorized as part of an administrative or criminal investigation. be involved in, become involved in, or witness other officers of this agency involved in a pursuit, Terry stop of a motorist or pedestrian, search, seizure, arrest, use of force, adversarial contact, and during other activities likely to yield information having evidentiary value. However, officers need not activate their cameras when it would be unsafe, impossible, or impractical to do so, but such instances of not recording when otherwise required must be documented as specified in the Use and Documentation guidelines in II.A.4.b. 2.Officers have discretion to record or not record general citizen contacts. 3.Officers have no affirmative duty to inform people that a BWC is being operated or that the individuals are being recorded. 4.Once activated, the BWC should continue recording until the conclusion of the incident or encounter, or until it becomes apparent that additional recording is unlikely to capture information having evidentiary value. The officer having charge of a scene shall likewise direct the discontinuance of recording when further recording is unlikely to capture additional information having evidentiary value. If the recording is discontinued while an 7.Officers may mute the audio on their cameras when discussing tactics or strategies for handling a call. C. Special Guidelines for Recording 1. Officers may, in the exercise of sound discretion, determine: a. To use their BWCs to record any police-citizen encounter if there is reason to believe the recording would potentially yield information having evidentiary value, unless such recording is otherwise expressly prohibited. b. To use their BWCs to take recorded statements from persons believed to be victims of and witnesses to crimes, and persons suspected of committing crimes, considering the needs of the investigation and the circumstances pertaining to the victim, witness, or suspect. Digital Audio recording will continue to be the primary method of collecting statements. c. Officers need not record persons being provided medical care unless there is reason to believe the recording would document information d. and will follow the policies and procedures for that agency. Officers assigned to the JTTF will follow the policies and procedures Each officer using a BWC is responsible for transferring or assuring the proper transfer of the data from his or her camera to [specify data storage location] by the end of that officer’s shift. However, if the officer is involved in a shooting, in-custody death, or other law enforcement activity resulting in death or great bodily harm, a supervisor or investigator shall take custody of the officer’s BWC and assume responsibility for transferring the data from it. having evidentiary value. When responding to an apparent mental health crisis or event, BWCs shall be activated as necessary to document any use of force and the basis for it, and any other information having evidentiary value, but need not be activated when doing so would serve only to record symptoms or behaviors believed to be attributable to the mental health issue. Officers should use their BWCs and squad-based audio/video systems to record their transportation and the physical transfer of persons in their custody to hospitals, detox and mental health care facilities, juvenile detention centers, and jails, but otherwise should not record in these facilities unless the officer anticipates witnessing a criminal event or being involved in or witnessing an adversarial encounter or use-of-force incident. e. Officers assigned to the southwest Hennepin Drug Task Force will be supplied with a body camera by the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office f. for that agency. D. Downloading and Labeling Data 1. 2. In accordance with department procedure, officers shall label the BWC data files at the time of capture or transfer to storage. E. Administering Access to BWC Data 1. Data subjects. Under Minnesota law, the following are considered data subjects for purposes of administering access to BWC data: a. Any person or entity whose image or voice is documented in the data. b. The officer who collected the data. c. Any other officer whose voice or image is documented in the data, 2. BWC data is presumptively private. BWC recordings are classified as private data about the data subjects unless there is a specific law that provides differently. As a result: a. b. c. 3. over the “private” classification listed above and the “public” classifications listed below. 4. subject to redaction. Data on any data subject (other than a peace officer) who has not consented to the public release must be redacted [if practicable]. In addition, any data on undercover officers must be Data that documents the final disposition of a disciplinary action against a public employee. However, if another provision of the Data Practices Act classifies data as private or otherwise not public, the data retains that other classification. For instance, data that reveals protected identities under Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subd. 17 (e.g., certain victims, witnesses, and others) should not be released even if it would otherwise fit into one of the public categories listed above. regardless of whether that officer is or can be identified by the recording. BWC data pertaining to people is presumed private, as is BWC data pertaining to businesses or other entities. Some BWC data is classified as confidential (see 3 below). Some BWC data is classified as public (see 4 below). Confidential data. BWC data that is collected or created as part of an active criminal investigation is confidential. This classification takes precedence Public data. The following BWC data is public: a. Data documenting the discharge of a firearm by a peace officer in the course of duty, other than for training or the killing of an animal that is sick, injured, or dangerous. b. Data that documents the use of force by a peace officer that results in substantial bodily harm. c. Data that a data subject requests to be made accessible to the public, redacted. d. 5. Access to BWC data by non-employees. Officers shall refer members of the media or public seeking access to BWC data to the Eden Prairie Police Department Records Unit, who shall process the request in accordance with the MGDPA and other governing laws. In particular: a. An individual shall be provided with access and allowed to review recorded BWC data about him- or herself and other data subjects in the recording, but access shall not be granted: c. Employees seeking access to BWC data for non-business reasons may make a request for it in the same manner as any member of the public. 7. Other authorized disclosures of data. Officers may display portions of BWC footage to witnesses as necessary for purposes of investigation as allowed by Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subd. 15, as may be amended from time to time. Officers should generally limit these displays in order to protect against the incidental disclosure of individual identities that are not public. Protecting i. If the data was collected or created as part of an active investigation. ii. To portions of the data that the agency would otherwise be prohibited by law from disclosing to the person seeking access, such as portions that would reveal identities protected by Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subd. 17. b. Unless the data is part of an active investigation, an individual data subject shall be provided with a copy of the recording upon request, but subject to the following guidelines on redaction: i. Data on other individuals in the recording who do not consent to the release must be redacted. ii. Data that would identify undercover officers must be redacted. iii. Data on other officers who are not undercover, and who are on duty and engaged in the performance of official duties, may not be redacted. 6. Access by peace officers and law enforcement employees. No employee may have access to the department’s BWC data except for legitimate law enforcement or data administration purposes: a. Officers may access and view stored BWC video only when there is a business need for doing so, including the need to defend against an allegation of misconduct or substandard performance. Officers may review video footage of an incident in which they were involved prior to preparing a report, giving a statement, or providing testimony about the incident. b. Agency personnel are prohibited from accessing BWC data for non- business reasons and from sharing the data for non-law enforcement related purposes, including but not limited to uploading BWC data recorded or maintained by this agency to public and social media websites. against incidental disclosure could involve, for instance, showing only a portion of the video, showing only screen shots, muting the audio, or playing the audio but not displaying video. In addition: a. BWC data may be shared with other law enforcement agencies only for legitimate law enforcement purposes that are documented in writing at the time of the disclosure. b. BWC data shall be made available to prosecutors, courts, and other criminal justice entities as provided by law. F. Data Security Safeguards otherwise expressly authorized by the chief or the chief’s designee. time, this agency shall obtain an independent biennial audit of its BWC for the purposes of reviewing or investigating a specific incident that has given rise to a complaint or concern about officer misconduct or performance. Nothing in this policy limits or prohibits the use of BWC data as evidence of misconduct or as a basis for discipline. 4. Officers should contact their supervisors to discuss retaining and using BWC H. Data Retention 1. 2. 1. Access to BWC data from city or personally owned and approved devices shall be managed in accordance with established city policy. 2. Officers shall not intentionally edit, alter, or erase any BWC recording unless 3. As required by Minn. Stat. § 13.825, subd. 9, as may be amended from time to program. G. Agency Use of Data 1. Supervisors will randomly review BWC usage by each officer to whom a BWC is issued or available for use, to ensure compliance with this policy 2. In addition, supervisors and other assigned personnel may access BWC data 3. footage for training purposes. Officer objections to preserving or using certain footage for training will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Field training officers may utilize BWC data with trainees for the purpose of providing coaching and feedback on the trainees’ performance. All BWC data shall be retained for a minimum period of 90 days. There are no exceptions for erroneously recorded or non-evidentiary data. Data documenting the discharge of a firearm by a peace officer in the course of duty, other than for training or the killing of an animal that is sick, injured, or dangerous, must be maintained for a minimum period of one year. 3. Certain kinds of BWC data must be retained for six years: a. Data that documents the use of deadly force by a peace officer, or force of a sufficient type or degree to require a use of force report or supervisory review. b. Data documenting circumstances that have given rise to a formal complaint against an officer. 4. Other data having evidentiary value shall be retained for the period specified in the Records Retention Schedule. When a particular recording is subject to multiple retention periods, it shall be maintained for the longest applicable period. 5. Upon written request by a BWC data subject, the agency shall retain a recording pertaining to that subject for an additional time period requested by the subject of up to 180 days. The agency will notify the requestor at the time of the request that the data will then be destroyed unless a new written request is received. 6. The department shall maintain an inventory of BWC recordings having evidentiary value. 7. The department will post this policy, together with a link to its Records Retention Schedule, on its website. I. Compliance Supervisors shall monitor for compliance with this policy. The unauthorized access to or disclosure of BWC data may constitute misconduct and subject individuals to disciplinary action and criminal penalties pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13.09. Police Chief Signature Date Effective date: Directive type: General Order Annual review date: 4-1-21 Section: Administrative Operations Rescinds/Amends: Chapter: Professional Development Authority: Police Chief CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Payment of Claims DATE: March 02, 2021 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Sue Kotchevar, Office of the City Manager/Finance ITEM DESCRIPTION: Payment of Claims ITEM NO.: X. Requested Action Move to: Approve the Payment of Claims as submitted (roll call vote) Synopsis Checks 280415 - 280750 Wire Transfers 1027257 - 1027352 Wire Transfers 8081 - 8108 City of Eden Prairie Council Check Summary 3/2/2021 Division Amount Division Amount Amount 000 General 54,519 601 Prairie Village Liquor 136,604 100 City Manager 14,083 602 Den Road Liquor 229,589 101 Legislative 52,484 603 Prairie View Liquor 144,892 102 Legal Counsel -3,423 605 Den Road Building 1,855 110 City Clerk 92 701 Water Enterprise Fund 614,888 111 Customer Service 3,306 702 Wastewater Enterprise Fund 391,291 112 Human Resources 6 703 Stormwater Enterprise Fund 13,845 114 Benefits & Training 1,481 Total Enterprise Fund 1,532,964 131 Finance 640 132 Housing and Community Services 3,255 316 WAFTA 153 136 Public Safety Communications 650 802 494 Commuter Services 22,702 137 Economic Development -54,519 806 SAC Agency Fund 7,455 150 Park Administration 2,184 807 Benefits Fund 568,864 151 Park Maintenance 10,969 809 Investment Fund 1,358 154 Community Center 3,870 810 Workers Comp Insurance 145,404 158 Senior Center 356 811 Property Insurance 120,666 163 Outdoor Center 913 812 Fleet Internal Service 29,923 168 Arts Center 175 813 IT Internal Service 196,204 180 Police Sworn 29,477 815 Facilites Operating ISF 38,641 184 Fire 557,110 816 Facilites City Center ISF 16,745 186 Inspections 3,192 817 Facilites Comm. Center ISF 36,788 200 Engineering 1,800 Total Internal Svc/Agency Fund 1,184,904 201 Street Maintenance 2,959202Street Lighting 3,079 Report Total 3,741,856 Total General Funds 688,658 301 CDBG 14,392 Total Special Revenue Fund 14,392 435 2008B G.O. Improvement Bonds 116,900 448 2016A GO BONDS - WEST 70TH ST.127,130 Total Debt Service Fund 244,030 309 DWI Forfeiture 11,610 315 Economic Development 55,449 513 CIP Pavement Management 79 522 Improvement Projects 2006 4,266 539 2020 Improvement Projects 5,504 804 100 Year History 2 Total Capital Projects Fund 76,909 City of Eden Prairie Council Check Register by GL 3/2/2021 Check #Amount Supplier / Explanation Account Description Business Unit Comments 8095 545,153 EDEN PRAIRIE FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASSOC Fire Relief Pension Payment Fire EP Fire Relief Assoc contributions8094410,158 US BANK OPERATIONS CENTER Interest Water Enterprise Fund Debt payments 02.01.21 280684 337,628 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MCES User Fee Wasterwater Collection Wastewater svc fee MAR 2020 280541 266,070 LEAGUE MN CITIES INS TRUST Workers Comp Insurance Property Insurance Workers comp/Propert/Casualty premiums 8106 260,033 ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, THE Federal Taxes Withheld Health and Benefits Payroll taxes PR ending 02.12.21 8104 192,957 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION PERA Health and Benefits PERA PR ending 01.29.211027352186,710 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP Improvement Contracts Water Capital Ground storage reservoir/Pump station pymt 16 280570 179,319 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC Software Maintenance IT Operating New World Annual Maint 2021 1027302 165,417 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP Improvement Contracts Water Capital Ground storage reservoir/Pump station pymt 15 8097 91,187 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE Sales Tax Payable Historical Culture 280499 54,519 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC Improvement Contracts General Fixed Asset Account Gr28055750,400 ONEILL ELECTRIC Improvement Contracts Wastewater Capital 280548 48,731 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH Licenses, Taxes, Fees Utility Operations - General 280674 32,284 I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION TREASURER Dues & Subscriptions City Council 280617 31,438 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 8108 27,773 EMPOWER Deferred Compensation Health and Benefits809125,877 FURTHER - AKA SELECT Other Deductions Health and Benefits 280728 24,334 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 8107 21,637 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 State Taxes Withheld Health and Benefits 280590 21,625 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027333 21,426 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Electric General Community Center28062719,155 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS OF MN Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280453 18,876 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027349 17,026 XCEL ENERGY Electric Traffic Signals 8082 16,647 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA Life Insurance EE/ER Health and Benefits 280745 16,026 PRAIRIEVIEW RETAIL LLC Building Rental Prairie View Liquor Store808615,951 WORLDPAY INTEGRATED PAYMENTS Bank and Service Charges Prairie View Liquor Store 280741 14,676 GRI EDEN PRAIRIE, LLC Waste Disposal Prairie Village Liquor Store 280544 11,391 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC Other Contracted Services DWI Forfeiture 280503 11,188 BOLTON & MENK INC Design & Engineering Stormwater Capital 8098 10,703 I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION Wages and Benefits 494 Corridor Commission28074810,588 PROP Deposits Den Road Liquor Store 1027280 10,500 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION Dues & Subscriptions City Council 280735 10,484 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS OF MN Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280672 9,830 GRAYMONT Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment 280462 9,754 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS OF MN Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280716 9,700 DEYOUNG CONSULTING SERVICES Other Contracted Services City Council 280497 9,489 AXON ENTERPRISE INC Training Supplies Police Sworn 280536 9,056 JOHNSON CONTROLS Capital Under $25,000 FF&E - Furn, Fixtures & Equip. 1027351 8,678 BOYER TRUCKS Equipment Repair & Maint Fleet Operating 280448 8,184 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280447 7,993 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280598 7,740 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS OF MN Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280426 7,573 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280608 7,459 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280546 7,380 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Other Revenue SAC Agency Fund 280699 7,377 VERIZON WIRELESS Computers IT Operating 1027348 7,367 WALL TRENDS INC Contract Svcs - General Bldg Ice Arena Maintenance 280616 7,265 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESOTA Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store2804797,222 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280609 6,905 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store Check #Amount Supplier / Explanation Account Description Business Unit Comments 1027287 6,863 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Gas Senior Center 1027343 6,619 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS Supplies - HVAC Prairie Village Liquor Store 280691 6,618 PROP Other Contracted Services CDBG - Public Service 280569 6,600 TREE TRUST Other Contracted Services Tree Removal 1027319 6,535 CUTTING EDGE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INC Contract Svcs - Snow Removal Den Bldg. - CAM2807206,493 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 8090 6,342 FURTHER - AKA SELECT Other Deductions Health and Benefits 280689 6,000 PERFORMANCE ADVANTAGE COMPANY Miscellaneous Fire 8100 5,990 FURTHER - AKA SELECT FSA - Dependent Care Health and Benefits 280452 5,881 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESOTA Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store2804725,372 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280436 5,152 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS OF MN Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280610 5,116 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027334 4,956 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP INC Capital Under $25,000 Water Metering 8081 4,950 FURTHER - AKA SELECT HRA Health and Benefits2805244,874 GRAYMONT Laboratory Chemicals Water Treatment 1027315 4,869 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT Safety Supplies Utility Operations - General 280446 4,724 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280419 4,659 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280721 4,603 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store2804864,597 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS OF MN Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280564 4,528 PROP Other Contracted Services CDBG - Public Service 280701 4,500 WATERSHED PARTNERS Other Contracted Services Stormwater Non-Capital 280623 4,385 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280727 4,328 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESOTA Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store10273384,156 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280679 4,116 JOHNSON CONTROLS Contract Svcs - HVAC Facilities Operating ISF 280573 4,065 VERIZON WIRELESS Data Plans - Police IT Operating 280519 4,062 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY INC Autos Fleet - Police 1027305 4,019 STREICHERS Training Supplies Police Sworn2804783,779 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESOTA Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280418 3,738 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280738 3,714 AE2S LLC Equipment Repair & Maint Water Capital 280629 3,694 WINE MERCHANTS INC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 8084 3,650 US BANK - CREDIT CARD MERCHANT ONLY Bank and Service Charges Finance2806013,546 WINE MERCHANTS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 8093 3,497 CARD CONNECT Bank and Service Charges Community Center Admin 1027345 3,432 STREICHERS Clothing & Uniforms Police Sworn 280417 3,389 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280582 3,351 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280460 3,199 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280554 3,125 MOVEFWD INC Other Contracted Services Housing and Community Service 280545 3,123 METERING & TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS Capital Under $25,000 Water Metering 280742 3,102 HAMMER COMMUNITY SOLAR LLC Electric Facilities Operating ISF 280552 3,094 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Electric Street Lighting 280621 3,090 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280492 3,080 APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC.Capital Under $25,000 Police Sworn 280668 3,061 FIRE SAFETY USA INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280539 3,048 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC.Union Dues Withheld Health and Benefits 280561 3,000 POSTAGE BY PHONE RESERVE ACCOUNT Postage Customer Service 8089 2,864 FURTHER - AKA SELECT FSA - Dependent Care Health and Benefits 1027290 2,864 FILTRATION SYSTEMS Supplies - HVAC General Community Center 280425 2,835 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESOTA Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280470 2,815 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280675 2,805 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS Other Contracted Services Wastewater Accounting Check #Amount Supplier / Explanation Account Description Business Unit Comments 1027328 2,797 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Design & Engineering 2020 Improvement Projects 280732 2,760 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 1027285 2,707 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Design & Engineering 2020 Improvement Projects 280736 2,675 WINE MERCHANTS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 8085 2,584 AMERICAN EXPRESS Bank and Service Charges Inspections-Administration2805952,551 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280522 2,378 FOUNDATION BUSINESS SYSTEMS, LLC Other Contracted Services Stormwater Non-Capital 280683 2,320 METERING & TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS Capital Under $25,000 Water Metering 280743 2,317 HINTERLAND CSG LLC Electric Facilities Operating ISF 280673 2,317 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Board of Prisoner Police Sworn2804832,304 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280704 2,246 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL GROUP Janitor Service Fire 280666 2,184 DSO ARCHITECTURE INC Design & Engineering Planning & Development 280596 2,128 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280560 2,082 PETERSON COUNSELING AND CONSULTING Other Contracted Services Police Sworn2804712,057 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280581 2,037 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEER LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280533 2,035 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 272 Deposits General Fund 1027300 2,012 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY Contract Svcs - Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance 8103 2,012 U.S. BANK - I-494 PURCH. CARD Marketing 494 Corridor Commission2807051,935 ARVIG Fiber Lease Payments IT Operating 280749 1,925 SOBANIA COMMUNITY SOLAR Electric Facilities Operating ISF 280670 1,871 FIRST ARRIVING, LLC Operating Supplies Facilities Staff 1027337 1,808 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Supplies - Plumbing City Center - CAM 280571 1,800 URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK Dues & Subscriptions Sustainable Eden Prairie2804581,758 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280583 1,737 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280680 1,725 LARAMAX CONSTRUCTION LLC Other Contracted Services Rehab 280604 1,655 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280562 1,647 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE Contract Svcs - Snow Removal City Center - CAM2807221,631 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280566 1,610 SSI KEF SLB LLC Electric Water Treatment 280568 1,600 THE ADVENT GROUP Temp 494 Corridor Commission 280697 1,600 THE ADVENT GROUP Deposits 494 Corridor Commission 280733 1,569 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store2806881,567 PERA Wages and Benefits 494 Corridor Commission 280542 1,560 LEAGUE MN CITIES INS TRUST Workers Comp Insurance 494 Corridor Commission 1027327 1,479 VAN PAPER COMPANY Operating Supplies General Community Center 280702 1,418 WM CORPORATE SERVICES INC Waste Disposal Fire Station #1 280614 1,402 HOHENSTEINS INC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280432 1,393 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280563 1,391 PROP Other Contracted Services CDBG - Public Service 280718 1,381 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280750 1,374 YORKTOWN OFFICES Rent 494 Corridor Commission 280482 1,360 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280698 1,358 US BANK Interest Investment Fund 1027297 1,343 METRO SALES INCORPORATED*Deposits 494 Corridor Commission 280558 1,300 OPUS GROUP Deposits General Fund 280444 1,265 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027284 1,253 VAN PAPER COMPANY Cleaning Supplies Fire Station #2 8096 1,247 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE Motor Fuels Fleet Operating 280466 1,239 WINEBOW Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027263 1,237 VINOCOPIA Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280518 1,227 EARL F ANDERSEN INC Signs Traffic Signs 280685 1,213 MINNESOTA AIR INC Supplies - HVAC Park Shelters Check #Amount Supplier / Explanation Account Description Business Unit Comments 280465 1,204 WINE MERCHANTS INC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280514 1,185 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280602 1,146 WINEBOW Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280690 1,140 PRINCETON TEC Protective Clothing Fire 280578 1,111 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store2804881,107 WINE MERCHANTS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280416 1,098 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280543 1,083 MARCO INC Hardware - R&M IT Operating 280450 1,002 HOHENSTEINS INC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027336 991 GRAINGER Small Tools Facilities Staff1027286959CDW GOVERNMENT INC.Computers IT Operating 1027316 949 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORING Landscape Materials/Supp Street Maintenance 1027289 941 FERRELLGAS Gas Riley Lake 280589 937 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESOTA Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027294 930 GRAYBAR Design & Engineering Economic Development Fund1027298921METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS Contract Svcs - HVAC Fire Station #1 280440 911 WINE MERCHANTS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027258 908 VINOCOPIA Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027264 902 BELLBOY CORPORATION Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280667 899 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating1027330885BIFFS INC Waste Disposal Utility Operations - General 1027321 878 FASTENAL COMPANY Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280491 877 AIRGAS USA LLC Supplies - Pool Pool Maintenance 280725 819 HOHENSTEINS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280577 816 TCIC INC Telephone Wastewater Lift Station280468814ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280703 795 AIRGAS USA LLC Supplies - Pool Pool Maintenance 280475 789 HOHENSTEINS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280696 788 TECH ACUMEN INCORPORATED Other Contracted Services Liquor Store Delivery 280525 786 HEALTHPARTNERS OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE Employment Support Test Organizational Services280422782HOHENSTEINS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027299 775 OSI BATTERIES INC Office Supplies Police Sworn 1027292 774 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC Repair & Maint - Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance 1027317 770 CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL INC Software Fleet Operating 280500 760 BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF Other Contracted Services Police Sworn280508751CENTURYLINKInternetIT Operating 280611 735 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280700 689 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC Other Contracted Services Water Distribution 280587 680 HOHENSTEINS INC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280459 673 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTION Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280530 672 HIGHWAY 5 BP Operating Supplies Police Sworn 1027276 667 HAYES, ERIC Operating Supplies Fire 280692 665 SNAP-ON TOOLS Small Tools Fleet Operating 1027326 658 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY Repair & Maint. Supplies Wasterwater Collection 1027318 649 CUSTOM HOSE TECH Equipment Repair & Maint Fleet Operating 280550 640 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSN Dues & Sub-Memberships Fire 1027261 626 WINE COMPANY, THE Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280695 625 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 8105 622 ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, THE Garnishment Withheld Health and Benefits 280538 622 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR LLC Contract Svcs - General Bldg Fire Station #1 1027314 622 BELLBOY CORPORATION Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280540 605 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280489 592 WINEBOW Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280677 590 J H LARSON COMPANY Supplies - Electrical City Center - CAM 280430 581 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store Check #Amount Supplier / Explanation Account Description Business Unit Comments 280526 570 HEINE MASON Clothing & Uniforms Police Sworn 1027293 564 GRAINGER Lab Supplies General Community Center 280737 556 WINEBOW Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280746 550 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP Wages and Benefits 494 Corridor Commission 280420 538 DOMACE VINO Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store280694534STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC Repair & Maint. Supplies Water Treatment 1027282 531 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, LLC Conference/Training Park Maintenance 1027332 518 BOYER TRUCKS Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 1027306 484 XCEL ENERGY Electric Flying Cloud Off Leash Park 280441 480 WINEBOW Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store280669480FIRECOMEquipment Repair & Maint Public Safety Communications 1027310 458 VINOCOPIA Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280613 455 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027323 451 METROPOLITAN FORD Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280708 450 CAREER LIFE ALLIANCE SERVICES Employee Award Organizational Services1027275448FASTENAL COMPANY Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280535 440 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA INC Maintenance Contracts Water Treatment 1027341 438 MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Shelters 280723 416 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 1027291 412 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC Equipment Repair & Maint Utility Operations - General280622410PEQUOD DISTRIBUTION Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280724 406 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280473 404 DOMACE VINO Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280612 392 DOMACE VINO Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027329 390 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC.Waste Disposal Utility Operations - General280740389EDEN PRAIRIE CENTER LLC Building Rental CDBG - Public Service 280630 383 WINEBOW Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280707 383 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC EMS Supplies Fire 1027301 382 REINDERS INC Chemicals Park Maintenance 280606 380 BLACK STACK BREWING INC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store280433379PRYES BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280493 379 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL GROUP Janitor Service Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027311 378 BELLBOY CORPORATION Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027269 374 BELLBOY CORPORATION Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 1027266 374 WINE COMPANY, THE Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store1027268370VINOCOPIALiquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280527 367 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Licenses, Taxes, Fees Garden Room Repairs 280438 360 SUMMER LAKES BEVERAGE LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280619 358 MEGA BEER Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280498 356 BELLADONNA FLORIST & GIFTS Special Event Fees Senior Center Programs 280575 354 WM CORPORATE SERVICES INC Waste Disposal Maintenance Facility 280487 352 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280505 350 BROTHERS FIRE PROTECTION Contract Svcs - Fire/Life/Safe General Community Center 280437 349 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280586 349 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280431 343 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTION Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280739 342 CENTURYLINK Telephone IT Operating 280605 340 BERGMAN LEDGE LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027342 339 METRO SALES INCORPORATED*Equipment Rentals IT Operating 280463 336 STARRY EYED BREWING LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027260 330 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027259 328 BELLBOY CORPORATION Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280464 325 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280676 322 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP Repair & Maint. Supplies Park Maintenance 1027277 316 HYNEK, EVAN Clothing & Uniforms Police Sworn Check #Amount Supplier / Explanation Account Description Business Unit Comments 1027322 312 INTEREUM INC Equipment Repair & Maint Water Treatment 1027308 310 BELLBOY CORPORATION Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280671 309 GALLS LLC Clothing & Uniforms Police Sworn 8087 305 SQUARE Bank and Service Charges Prairie View Liquor Store 280449 301 HEADFLYER BREWING Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store280515300DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY Licenses, Taxes, Fees Utility Operations - General 280726 296 INDEED BREWING COMPANY LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280480 278 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280495 274 ARVIG ENTERPRISES INC Street Permits General Fund 280451 271 INDEED BREWING COMPANY LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store280567271STAPLES ADVANTAGE Office Supplies Customer Service 280506 270 BTR OF MINNESOTA Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 1027303 267 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATORIES Office Supplies Police Sworn 280584 262 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280591 254 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store280579253BLACK STACK BREWING INC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280719 253 BLACK STACK BREWING INC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 1027270 252 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280607 252 BOURGET IMPORTS Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027274 250 EICHMAN NATHAN Canine Supplies Police Sworn280516247DIRECTVCable TV Community Center Admin 280494 245 ARCPOINT LABS OF EDEN PRAIRIE Employment Support Test Organizational Services 280714 245 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT Repair & Maint - Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance 280600 240 UNMAPPED BREWING CO Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027281 239 QUALITY PROPANE Motor Fuels Ice Arena Maintenance280476234INBOUND BREW CO Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280517 234 DODGE OF BURNSVILLE Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280457 229 OMNI BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280618 222 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027324 222 QUALITY PROPANE Motor Fuels Ice Arena Maintenance280502219BOBBY AND STEVE'S AUTO WORLD Miscellaneous DWI Forfeiture 8102 215 VANCO SERVICES Bank and Service Charges Wastewater Accounting 280501 213 BLUEPEARL VETERINARY Canine Supplies Police Sworn 280442 210 56 BREWING LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027304 205 SPRINT Cell Phones 494 Corridor Commission280455201LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280461 199 RED BULL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY INC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027339 199 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC Equipment Testing/Cert.Fire 280687 198 PAPCO INC Janitor Service General Community Center 280730 198 MEGA BEER Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280421 193 HEADFLYER BREWING Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280474 193 HEADFLYER BREWING Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 1027296 193 MENARDS Small Tools Utility Operations - General 1027288 192 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Legal Notices Publishing City Clerk 280510 190 COMCAST Internet IT Operating 280592 184 MEGA BEER Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280628 183 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280521 183 FLYING CLOUD TRANSFER STATION 4553 Waste Disposal Park Maintenance 280585 183 DOMACE VINO Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280477 178 INDEED BREWING COMPANY LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280599 177 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280423 176 INBOUND BREW CO Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280747 175 PROP Other Contracted Services Arts Center 280445 172 BLACK STACK BREWING INC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280555 170 MTUG Dues & Subscriptions Public Safety Communications Check #Amount Supplier / Explanation Account Description Business Unit Comments 280603 170 56 BREWING LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280678 170 J&N TACTICAL Training Supplies Police Sworn 1027278 166 METROPOLITAN FORD Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280594 164 MODIST BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280620 164 MODIST BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store280731164MODIST BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 1027295 162 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY Office Supplies Police Sworn 280626 161 SMALL LOT MN Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280576 160 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Electric Riley Lake 280485 159 SHAKOPEE BREWHALL Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store280481156OMNI BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280706 155 ASPEN MILLS Clothing & Uniforms Fire 280507 153 CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A.Legal WAFTA 280625 151 SAINT CROIX VINEYARDS, INC.Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280588 150 INDEED BREWING COMPANY LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store280520150FERRENTINO, CANDYCE Equipment Repair & Maint Utility Operations - General 280427 148 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280729 148 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280580 145 BOURGET IMPORTS Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027272 144 CARLSTON, BRANDON Clothing & Uniforms Police Sworn280597144PK BLOODY MARY CORP Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027335 136 FILTRATION SYSTEMS Supplies - HVAC City Center - CAM 280504 134 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC EMS Supplies Fire 280428 126 MODIST BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280456 126 MODIST BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store8092125OPTUM HEALTH Other Contracted Services Health and Benefits 1027344 121 SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE CORO Supplies - HVAC City Center - CAM 280484 121 RED BULL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY INC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280454 120 JUST PLAIN WRONG BREWING CO LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 1027309 114 WINE COMPANY, THE Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store1027265106NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280511 103 COMCAST Cable TV Fire 280443 102 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETING Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280469 98 BOURGET IMPORTS Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 1027325 96 SPRAYING SYSTEMS CO Repair & Maint. Supplies Water Treatment102730793VINOCOPIALiquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280439 92 URBAN GROWLER BREWING COMPANY LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280509 90 COMCAST Internet IT Operating 280710 89 CENTURYLINK Telephone IT Operating 280593 87 MINNESOTA ICE SCULPTURES LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027312 87 PARLEY LAKE WINERY Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280693 87 STAPLES ADVANTAGE Office Supplies Utility Operations - General 280713 81 COMCAST Cable TV Fire 280424 80 INDEED BREWING COMPANY LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280711 80 CINTAS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 280715 79 CWKK CRIME DEX Dues & Subscriptions Police Sworn 1027271 79 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Testing CIP Pavement Management 1027346 79 TOWMASTER INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280435 77 SMALL LOT MN Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280565 74 SHRED RIGHT Other Contracted Services City Hall (City Cost) 280624 72 PK BLOODY MARY CORP Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280734 72 PK BLOODY MARY CORP Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280532 71 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP Equipment Repair & Maint Park Maintenance 280467 70 56 BREWING LLC Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 1027279 69 MPX GROUP, THE Printing Fire Check #Amount Supplier / Explanation Account Description Business Unit Comments 280434 69 RED BULL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY INC Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280513 67 CORPORATE TECHNOLOGIES Computers 494 Corridor Commission 280429 66 OMNI BREWING COMPANY Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 1027331 66 BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD EDEN PRAIRIE Equipment Repair & Maint Police Sworn 280490 65 ACE TRAILER SALES Equipment Repair & Maint Fleet Operating102732065EICHMAN NATHAN Clothing & Uniforms Police Sworn 280615 63 INDEED BREWING COMPANY LLC Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 8101 62 MONEY MOVERS INC Other Contracted Services Community Center Admin 1027267 61 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC - ACE ICE Liquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 1027340 58 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC Equipment Repair & Maint Police Sworn808355PAYCHEXPayroll Admin. Fees 494 Corridor Commission 8099 55 PAYCHEX Payroll Admin. Fees 494 Corridor Commission 280512 55 COMCAST Cable TV Fire 1027262 54 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC - ACE ICE Liquor Product Received Den Road Liquor Store 280496 53 ASPEN MILLS Clothing & Uniforms Police Sworn28041553AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETING Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280572 52 UTING, BRENDA Mileage & Parking Park Maintenance 280549 52 MINNESOTA PRINT MANAGEMENT LLC Office Supplies Customer Service 280529 51 HESDORFFER BOYD Operating Supplies Volunteers 280523 50 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL Other Contracted Services Utility Operations - General102731348VINOCOPIALiquor Product Received Prairie View Liquor Store 280537 40 KOCOUREK, JOAN Operating Supplies Police Sworn 1027283 40 SPOK, INC.Cell/Pager Plans IT Operating 280556 39 OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES Other Contracted Services Police Sworn 1027350 38 CRASSAS TRACIE Tuition Reimbursement/School Fitness Classes28054737MINNESOTA AIR INC Supplies - HVAC City Hall (City Cost) 280531 35 IEDITWEB INC Contract Svcs - Garden Rm/Caf.Garden Room Repairs 1027257 33 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC - ACE ICE Liquor Product Received Prairie Village Liquor Store 280528 33 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PUBLIC WORKS Waste Disposal Park Maintenance 280551 27 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS Operating Supplies Police Sworn28068226MAHOTA MICHAEL P&R Refunds Community Center Admin 280717 20 DODGE OF BURNSVILLE Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 280574 20 WASHINGTON COUNTY Licenses, Taxes, Fees Police Sworn 280534 15 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC Repair & Maint. Supplies Water Distribution 8088 12 NCR PAYMENT SOLUTIONS,PA, LLC Bank and Service Charges Liquor Store Delivery28074411KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC Reimburse-legal notices General Fund 1027273 10 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORING Repair & Maint. Supplies Park Maintenance 280559 10 PERA Late Fees / Interest 494 Corridor Commission 280686 10 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Electric Riley Creek Woods 1027347 6 UPS Postage Human Resources 280712 4 COMCAST Other Contracted Services Police Sworn 280709 1 CEF EP COMMUNITY SOLAR LLC Electric Facilities Operating ISF3,741,856 Grand Total CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Ordinances and Resolutions DATE: March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: City Manager ITEM DESCRIPTION: Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 2.23, Subd. 3, Relating to Membership Range for the Human Rights and Diversity Commission ITEM NO.: XI.A. Requested Action Move to: Approve First and second Reading of an Ordinance Amending City Code Section 2.23, Subd. 3, relating to the membership range for the Human Rights and Diversity Commission Synopsis Currently, the membership of the Human Rights and Diversity Commission is set at five to nine members. Adjusting the Human Rights and Diversity Commission to a range of seven to thirteen members, instead of five to nine members, will provide the City Council with more community engagement and flexibility in making appointments to this Commissions each year. Attachment Ordinance CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. __-2021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 2.23, SUBD. 3, RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP RANGE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DIVERSITY COMMISSION; AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Chapter 2, Section 2.23, subdivision 3, subsection A, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: A. The Human Rights and Diversity Commission shall consist of not less than seven (7) and not more than thirteen (13) members. Section 2. City Code Chapter 2, Section 2.23, subdivision 3, is hereby amended by adding the following new subsection D: D. The Citizen Advisory Sustainability Commission shall consist of five (5) to nine (9) members. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation” and Section 2.99 entitled “Violation a Misdemeanor or Petty Misdemeanor” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council for the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of March, 2021, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 2nd day of March, 2021. ____________________________ ______________________________ Kathleen Porta, City Clerk Ronald A. Case, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Sun Sailor on the _____ day of ________, 2021. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Appointments DATE: March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: City Council ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2021 City Commission Appointments ITEM NO.: XIII.A. Requested Action Move to: Appoint to the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission Chilkunda Narendranath (community) with a term ending March 31, 2023; and Bob Barker (community) and Michael Lawrence (business rep) with terms ending March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Heritage Preservation Commission Steve Schumacher with a term ending March 31, 2023; and Robert Bowes, George Maxwell, and Paul Thorp with a terms ending March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Human Rights and Diversity Commission Samuel Griffin and Michael Mullins with terms ending March 31, 2023; and Greg Leeper, Sana Elassar, Asad Aliweyd, John Urbanski, and Susan Weaver with terms ending March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission Swati Kumar and Ashley Young with terms ending March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Planning Commission Ed Farr, Carole Mette, and Robert Taylor with terms ending March 31, 2024. Move to: Appoint to the Sustainability Commission Jeff Nobleza with a term ending March 31, 2023; and Emily Eddy, Cindy Hoffmann, and Aaron Poock with terms ending March 31, 2024. Synopsis The City Council hosted Commission interviews on Tuesday, February 23, 2021. All terms will begin on April 1. A required orientation session for new commissioners will be held on Tuesday, March 23. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Appointments DATE: March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT/ DIVISION: City Council ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2021 Appointments of Chairs and Vice Chairs to City Commissions ITEM NO.: XIII.B. Requested Action Move to: Appoint Dan Dorson Chair and Andrew Kleinfehn Vice Chair of the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission Move to: Appoint Pamela Spera Chair and Valerie Ross Vice Chair of the Heritage Preservation Commission Move to: Appoint Gregory Leeper Chair and Shahram Missaghi Vice Chair of the Human Rights and Diversity Commission Move to: Appoint Patrice Erickson Chair and Cecilia Cervantes Vice Chair of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Move to: Appoint Andrew Pieper Chair and Ed Farr Vice Chair of the Planning Commission Move to: Appoint Aaron Poock Chair and Priya Senthilkumar Vice Chair of the Sustainability Commission Synopsis Chairs and Vice Chairs are appointed annually by the City Council following the appointment of members to City Commissions. The City Council hosted Commission interviews on Tuesday, February 23, and determined Chair and Vice Chair assignments for the period of April 1, 2021, through March 31, 2022. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Appointments DATE: March 2, 2021 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Community Development/ Assessing ITEM DESCRIPTION: Appointments to 2021 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization (LBAE) ITEM NO.: XIII.C. Requested Action Move to: Appoint to the Board of Appeal and Equalization Lyndon Moquist, Eileen Canakes, James Lawver, Nate Thompson and Kristin Rial for the period of March 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021, or until the Board of Appeal and Equalization completes its work. Synopsis The proposed members for Council approval are Eden Prairie residents and experienced real estate professionals with extensive knowledge of the Southwest metro area. Lyndon Moquist of Edina Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro area and manages the Eden Prairie office of Edina Realty. Eileen Canakes of Edina Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro. James Lawver of Bridge Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro. Nate Thompson of Edina Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro. Kristin Rial of Edina Realty is involved in the sale of residential properties in the southwest metro. Background From 1992 through 2020, the City has appointed a special Local Board of Appeal and Equalization (also formerly named the Board of Review). The members are citizen volunteers that are active and knowledgeable, with extensive experience in the real estate market. The members are recruited by the City Manager and City Assessor and appointed annually with confirmation by the City Council. The City pays the members a per diem payment of $50 for all required training sessions and Board meetings. State statute requires the LBAE have a majority (quorum) of the voting members be in attendance for each meeting and at least one member present is required to have completed the LBAE training offered by the Minnesota Dept. of Revenue. Currently, all candidates for appointment have the LBAE certification from the MN Dept. of Revenue.